1.
JAEHYUN LEE
phone: email: portfolio: website:
703.314.5799 jayden.jhlee@gmail.com http://issuu.com/jayden.jhlee http://cargocollective.com/jaydenjhlee
GSAPP: COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CONTENTS University Infrastructure 01 Critic: Laurie Hawkinson, Christian Uhl, Jonathan Cole and James Graham Spring 2012 GSAPP Headquarter 02 Critic: Amale Andraos Fall 2011 New Fun Palace 03 Critic: Urtzi Grau and Cristina Governa Summer 2011 Imagine the Ultra-Real 04 Critic: Kevin Cimini & Chris Hoxie Fall 2011 Digital Craft 05 Critic: Josh Uhl& David Fano Summer 2011
UNIVERSITY INFRASTRUCTURE Phoenix, Arizona The new university infrastructure in the city of Tempe, AZ suggests a new direction for the university in the near future based on various current university models. The university’s new infrastructure will package an education institution with not only academic research facilities that support students and scholar’s needs, but also provide support for various needs of the next generation of entrepreneurs. In the new university, the graduate school with state of the art research facilities and business incubators will bind together within a single site to maximize a synergy effect created by proximity. The new university infrastructure will also include unique moments in various locations where different program circulation will take place, guided into shuffling spaces in order to increase chances for encounters and interactions. Due to solar radiation in the local environment, most occupiers of the new university will seek shaded areas for their open-air interaction activities. Since the new university is located in the city of Tempe, AZ the environment naturally inherits the greater Phoenix metropolitan area where a vehicle oriented culture condition takes place. Therefore, calibrating the right density within the infrastructure will play a critical role to create micro urban conditions for the new university’s campus ground under Phoenix’s macro urban condition. As the university will grow in the future there is also the possibility for future expansion of the university’s grid into a greater infrastructure system.
OVERALL VIEW
WEST
SKYSONG
DOWNTOWN
SKY HARBOR TEMPE
RESEARCH PARK CAMPUS LIGHT RAIL INTERCAMPUS SHUTTLE 10 mi 5 mi
SITE: ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
FLEXIBLE DISPLAY CENTER
POLYTECHNIC
SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2000ft 1000ft
N
AIRPORT & ADJACENT BLDG
PUBLIC ACCESS
Terminal 3 Terminal 2
Terminal 4
TERMINALS
Cloverleaf Interchange
inexpensive method takes up considerable area of land
Stack Interchange
Full Y Interchange
moderate cost and land
Trumpet Interchange
expensive method free of weaving
userful for highways as well as toll roads
Cloverstack Interchange
Diamond Interchange
cheaper than stack interchange takes up considerable area of land
Non-Freeway inexpensive method prone to congestion and accidents HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE STUDY
PHOENIX URBAN FABRIC STUDY
MODEL STUDY
MODEL STUDY
PROGRAM MASS STUDY
PUBLIC SPACE & DIVISION AMONG PRIVATE & PUBLIC SPACE
STREET GRID & PARKING ON GROUND FLOOR
BREAKERS: ALLOWING CIRCULATION SHUFFLING
EDUCATION RESEARCH INCUBATOR
PROGRAM DIAGRAM
PHYSICAL MODEL
PLAN +8”
N
PLAN +32” N
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
CROSS SECTION
GSAPP HEADQUARTER Manhattanville, New York The architectural education experienced huge shift in modes of operation in last few decades. Works produced in architecture school is now largely computer generated and digital fabricated; as students find architecture blogs and websites more convenient way of researching than going to library, what would be the future of architecture school? One thing for certain is that architecture school must offer a new spatial quality to new generation of students. During the research phase of the project, I surveyed large number of students to see what they think about architecture building in Columbia University. The most striking yet expected feedback was that large number of students work their project, research, and paper outside of studio. Virtually, any space could be sufficiently turn into studio with minimum tool. New GSAPP headquarter does not have designated studio space, rather studio is everywhere. Studio space is distributed to other programs in architecture school such as fabrication lab, lecture hall, classroom, library and such. Students will choose their working space according to their needs, preference and interest. This new arrangement will offer a number of advantages over convention method of dividing students by each studio, year and program.
45
stud io?
YES
40 35
25 20 15
to 1
1t o
ho
2h
ou
ur
NO
Do yo
r
w Ho 18
stu
de
tu
nt s
fro
m
M
Ar ch
s nt
de
m
AA
3
fro m M ch Ar 2
rom rch MA 1
Urba t men
velop n De
Real Estate
Where do you spend for break time?
f nts
s from
Right outside Avery Hall
de
nies)
Main Campus
stu
Cafe (Brow
dent
1 student from
7 stu
pus
fro
de
tu
14
oke
nts
D
2s
I do Sm Off-Cam
Lib rar Stu y de nt Ot Lo he un r ge fac Ca i li t fe i es Ou td oo Or r ..
in
in
7s
sin Ev ery g da y( co Ig mm oo uti ut ng Tw ) ice I go aW ou tO e e nce k I go aW out eek Tw ice aM o I go nth out I go Onc out ea less Mo than nth Onc eaM I don onth I Pre ’t Sm fer n oke ot to answ er
m
AAD
3 rch MA
2 rch MA 1 rch MA n sig De an te Urb sta al E Re
0m
ur ho
ou
3
sH
30
to 3
to
15
pu
5 people
2
Ca m
um
10
Ho me
ostl yw ork/ stud y in
30
arti 49 P eN
n th
o nts
cipa
nce vinie Incon e r tim -Ove er Turn h it ann w hM Issue e e wit Pric Issu h t i ew es Issu r uc eso n of R k tio c a ic La un m ue om iss hC No e wit e urc Issu So ide s s e t Ou tim n5 es a im th 5t re o o es M 4t tim o3 t 2 ce On
t of igh r fir
obe Oc t
No
Un
st
b? La n
Ne ve Fa r br ic at io
ck
? De skt op
e us
or
a la
top
ow n
lap sho
Do
not
off er a uld
pto
p
pto p La
mb ia
esk top
lapt op na
ad off er
Co lu
Ow
r?
ling
de mo
ste
me
t se en urr
uld
g
nc
el i
od
al m
YES
l sica phy
ho
in ht
c ysi ph
ith
ia s
r
ne
on
es w Issu YES
mb
n
bl
an
yo u
ta
lig
rk wo
NO
NO
prefer?
Digital Modeling
workshop
Physical Modeling
Which do you
Drafting
separate
All of them
Prefer to have
acious
More sp
Co lu
lit
ra tio
sc
ith
do
u
ua
pi
of
sw
te n
ns
fo r
La
ue Iss
you
of
tI
co m
Do
Ho w
Ai rQ
No
Iss
ec
ha
desk
w
?
dio
u yo
o kd
e we
sa
r ou
yh an
m 0
0 -1
r ou
h
11
5h
(1.
0
-2
rs ou
) ay
urs
r(2
21
- 30
ay)
ad
urs
o (4 h
ur
ho
31
40
Stu
en
sp
ad
o .5 h
u ho
n di
ay)
ad
rs a
ou (6 h
r
hou
ys lwa
st a
o Alm
SURVEY TEMPLATE
t Studio
s abou
Pro Cons &
l Inspirationa Convenience Great atmosphere Sociability
To use Digital Equipment
To use Library
To be in Ca
mpus
Issue w
ith HVA C system
inadeq
uate st
Noise
udio sp
Crow ded
inad
Insa
Lac
ko
equ
nita
fm
ry
ate sp
ace
icro wa ve Ina deq uat Ina e de Pin La qu -Up ck ate spa of Sto pri ce oa r a va ge cc c spa y es st ce oB ue sw alc on ith y Pr ty int er
na
air
)
day
ls
for P hysic a
ace
l Mo
dell
ing
pa
ce
SURVEY DIAGRAM
On the saturday night of October, I surveyed almost all Columbia Architecture students working in studio to see how they feel about Avery Hall. The respondent of this survey are including graduate architecture student from 1st to 3rd year, Urban Design and Real Estate Development program.
PROGRAM ELEMENT
Auditorium
Cafe
Exhibition
Office
PROGRAM BREAK DOWN
150,000SF
150,000SF
147,00
+?
27,000
Circulation Cafe
Circulation & etc
15,000 Library
100,000SF
Research/Labs
+3,000
Auditorium
Library
10,000
+4,500 Auditorium
Shops
Research/Labs
20,000
65,000SF
Office Exhibition
Cafe Circulation
Office Exhibition
+6,000 Classroom
Jury
50,000SF
+2,500 Shop
Pin-up
Pin-up
27,000 Library
Auditorium Shop 7,000
UD/Planning
Office Exhibition 4,000 Pin-up/Classrooms
Landscape
11,000 Studio
Architecture
50,000 Studio
Generic model
MArch 3 MArch 2 MArch 1 Urban Development Real Estate
Avery Hall
+39,000 Studio
Urban D
Expan
All program space of GSAPP headquarter starts out with generic volume study
Library
Shops
Pin-up
Research/Labs
Classroom
147,000SF
00SF
MArch 3 MArch 2 MArch 1 Development Real Estate
nsion
30,000 Circulation 2,500Cafe
35,000 Library
15,000 Auditorium
visiting office attending lecture series close to reviews
Research/Labs
work in more open environment
16,000
research in computer lab
17,500
Shop
9,000
Office Exhibition
research in library
Classroom
work involved with fabrication
10,000 Pin-up
Customization
“Nomadic�
deskcrits
Studio V - Amale Andraos Fall11
pin up
Studio III - Housing ProJect Fall11
review
Studio V- Konyk & Prudon Fall08 AAD - Kate Orff Summer11
workshop
Urban Development Fall11 Studio VI. BUNGE + HOANG Spring11
site visit
Independence Day
lecture
Week 7
Week 6
Week 5
Week 4
Week 3
Week 2
Week 1
The diagram indicates students physical proximity to STUDIO space and how it fluctuate over the course of semester
M Arch 3 Classroom
700 level
600 level
M Arch 3 + UD +RE
500 level
M Arch 1
M Arch 3
M Arch 2
Pin Up
Classroom
Offices
400 level
Research/Lab
Library
200 level
Fab Lab
Library
Auditorium
Library
Cafe
100 level
Fab Lab
300 level
Current Model
new “Nomadic” Model
Existing Model
Concept ‘Nomadic’
Week 14 Thanksgiving 2008
Week 13 Thanksgiving 2011
Week 12
Week 11
Week 10 Election Day
Week 9
Week 8
CURRICULUM STUDY OF 6 STUDIOS IN GSSAP
SHOP
LIBRARY
CLASSROOM
OFFICE
LAB
PIN-UP
AUDITORIUM
EXHIBITION
CAFE
MASSING STUDY
Second phase of the project was investigating the possibilities of iterations of elements from the first phase.
RY
RA
LIB
RY
RA
AS
LA
B
LA
IUM
R
ITO
D AU
B
ION
IT
HIB
EX
CL
AS
B
LA
LIB
CL
SR
OO
SR
M
RY
RA
LIB
OO
M
E
NG
U LO
D AU
OP
LIB
M
RIU
ITO
SH
SH
OP
RA
RY
LIB
RA
RY
LIB
RA
RY LIB
LIB
RA
RY
OM
RO
SS
A CL OU GA TDO RD OR EN
C
LA
CL
AS
SR
CL
AS
OF
M
SR
OO
FIC
E
OF
PIN
OO
OM
O
R SS
-UP
RA LIB RY RA RY
M
-UP
PIN
FIC
E
OF
FIC
AU D
ITO
E
RIU
M
SECTIONAL STUDY
UNROLLED PERSPECTIVE
FACADE
1. 2.
2.
3.
PLAN +36’
PLAN +67’ 6”
4.
7. 5.
6.
PLAN +120’
1. AUDITORIUM 2. PIN-UP 3. RESEARCH/LABS 4. CLASSROOM 5. LIBRARY 6. SHOP 7. OFFICE
PHYSICAL MODEL
PERSPECTIVE SECTION
+ 135’ roof
+ 125’ lounge
+ 114’ library 4
+ 102’ library 3
+ 91’ library/shop 2
+ 74’ library/shop 1
+ 59’ classroom 2
+ 44’ classroom 1
+ 31’ auditorium
exhibition/cafe
NEW FUN PALACE Manhattanville, New York
in current context. New site which I choose is Time Square in New York City. During 1980s, as part of a long-term development plan Time Square was filled with commercial buildings and neon lit signs. As it became more tourist-friendly attractions and upscale establishments, Time Square is now place where New Yorkers no longer visit. The new “Fun Palace” in Time Square will perform as an outdoor theatre and culture center. By using existing dense commercial signs as backdrops, visitors would use Time Square for dancing, music, drama and fireworks
Cedric Price imagined a new theatre where everyone is an actor, director and spectator at same time. The idea was to build a ‘laboratory of fun’ with facilities for dancing, music, drama and fireworks. Central to Price’s practice was the belief that through the correct use of new technology the public could have unprecedented control over their environment, resulting in a building which could be responsive to visitors’ needs and the many activities intended to take place there. Using an unenclosed steel structure, fully serviced by travelling gantry cranes the building comprised a ‘kit of parts’: prefabricated walls, platforms, floors, stairs, and ceiling modules which could be moved and assembled by the cranes. Virtually every part of the structure was variable. The only fixed element within the Fun Palace was to be the structural grid of steel lattice columns and beams. All other programmatic elements – hanging theatres, activity spaces, cinema screens and speakers – were to be movable or composed of prefabricated modular units that could be quickly assembled and taken apart as needed. The goal of studio was to reinterpret and redeploy of “Fun Palace”
WEST
WEST
EAST
EAST
WEST West 48th St
West 47th St
West 46th St
West 45th St
West 44th St
West 43rd St
BILLBOARDS IN TIME SQUARE
EAST
W 42nd
W 43rd S
W 44th S
W 45th S
W 46th S
W 47th S
GIFTS NYC
SAMSUNG PONTIAC
WICKED
TKTS
GRAND OPENING
DOUBLE TREE GUEST SUITES SOUTCH PACIFIC
WAMU
WEST SIDE STORY
VIVIENNETAM
ROXY
W 47th St TEXT
NINJA ASSASIN
DANCE FLICK
CNN AVENUE Q AUGUST AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS
INFORMATION CENTER
CHICAGO
HEIGHTS
MAXELL VORNADO
VIRGIN RETAIL
BOX OFFICE
KODAK
PLANET HOLLYWOOD
SOUTHPOLE
BERTELSMANN BUILDING
LG
MARQUIS
MARRIOT
UFC
HEIGHTS
ELVIS
MTV
STARBUCKS
POP PEPSI COKE
ELEMENTS LIVE SUNDAY
MTV STORE
VIRGIN MOVILE
TOYS R US
BILLABONG
MOVIE AWARDS
FOOT LOCKER
THE LION KING
STOMP
RED BOX
SWATCH
MILLENNIUM HOTESL
BANK OF AMERICA
BROADWAY
MAMMA MIADIGITAL
HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL
BILLY ELLIOT
GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
THE LION KING
THE BODY SHOP
McDONALD’S
W 46th St PLANET HOLLYWOOD
HP TOUCH THE FUTURE NOW
FRIDAYS
HOTEL
BILLY ELLIOT
NOKIA THEATRE
HAIR
SBARRO TAU’S STEAK
W 48th St
ROCK OF AGES
JERSEY BOYS
PRUDENTIAZL
PHANTON
COCA COLA
MARQUIS
CORONA
HSBC
CHINA BLOOMINGDALE’S
W 45th St
W 44th St
WRIGLEY’S TIPTOP
EYEWITNESS NEWS
JVC 4TH AND LONG ABC
LEVIS
GMC
SEPHORA
BUBBA GUMP SHRIMP CO. RAG
TIME RICOH
CHASE
YAHOO
BUDWEISER’S
PANASONIC
PATISSERIE
HARD ROCK
YONKERS
AT & T
WALGREEN
I LOVE NY
NASDAQ
W 43rd St
DUANE READE
MARKETSITE FAST
IZOD ESPN ZONE
NASDAQ W 42nd St
BROADWAY
7th Ave
BILLBOARDS (AS OCTOBER 2011) & LOCATION OF MUSICAL THEATER
HEARTLAND
ESPN GUMMY
W 48th St
W 47th St
W 46th St
W 45th St
W 44th St
W 43rd St
W 42nd St
BROADWAY
7th Ave
BILLBOARDS STRUCTURE
re d theat
Enclose
REIMAGINING “THE FUN PALACE”
ser vic e
open a udito
rium
tow e
r
pole
restaurant
bar
mi
basement
Catalog of Fun Palace
searchlight
observatory tower
fence
TV & Radio tower
tent
gantry crane
panel
steel
helicopter pad
large screen
15’x15’ structure
stairs
small screen
news panel
open cinema
workshop
rally platform
moving catwalk
sewage puri�ication plants
open plaza
revolving door
musical instruments
elevator
curtain
proje
p
loa
s
icrophone
camera
cable
beams
machine
restroom
storage
plumbing
15’x15’ �loor
lighting
ramp
stage
ecting screen
sphere
escalator
partition
screen
ading dock
speakers
exhibition area
enclosed theatre
bolts and nuts
seating
promenade
tower crane
columns
OVERVIEW
W
ST rd 46
,B T-A er-
pp
5-U
W4
T-A erow
6-L
W4
e
an -Cr 6-T
T erpp
6-U
W4
T-B erow
6-L
ST
W4
th
47
ay dw
W
th
48
ST
oa Br
W4
W
E AV
7th
use ho are ty W li e aci lac g F op pa n i N FU Train rksh Wo
W
nd
42
ST
B,
C
, T-A erpp 2-U W4
ST rd 43
, r-A we To erow T-L dS
2n
W4
W
B,
C
ST
, T-A erow
th 44
3-L W4
e an -Cr 3-T W4
W
B,
C
T erpp 3-U W4
e an -Cr 4-T W4
W
4-L
ST
W4
th 45
T erow
,B T-A erpp 4-U W4
5-L W4
,B T-A erow
s
ed
cu r i c
siz y l mi fa
VE RT ICA
LL
LY OR IEN TE D
OP
ER
A
HOW TO BUILD A THEATER “THEATER MANUAL BASED ON IKEA”
FAMILJ STORLEK CIRKUS
Fun Palace
2
1
3
5
4
7
8
6
9
10
IMAGINE THE ULTRA-REAL Aurora by Mark di Suvero “course objective� The architectural rendering-be it photo-realistic, analytic, or abstract-captures the energy of an idea about space and the forces that act within it. The challenge of this course is to convey that dynamism-whether it is the movement of a set of bodies, a change in lighting and material qualities, or any other dynamic quality of architecture with a set of static images. My specific intention was to generate an image of a place which embodies motion. A specific transition gate between the water and the ground.
PRECEDENT STUDY
HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE RENDERING
SYNTHETIC RENDERING
DIGITAL CRAFT FOA: World Trade Center Proposal
RENDERED IMAGE
PHYSICAL MODEL
3D ANIMATION