Jaehyun Lee-GSAPP 2012

Page 1

1.


JAEHYUN LEE

phone: email: portfolio: website:

703.314.5799 jayden.jhlee@gmail.com http://issuu.com/jayden.jhlee http://cargocollective.com/jaydenjhlee


GSAPP: COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CONTENTS University Infrastructure 01 Critic: Laurie Hawkinson, Christian Uhl, Jonathan Cole and James Graham Spring 2012 GSAPP Headquarter 02 Critic: Amale Andraos Fall 2011 New Fun Palace 03 Critic: Urtzi Grau and Cristina Governa Summer 2011 Imagine the Ultra-Real 04 Critic: Kevin Cimini & Chris Hoxie Fall 2011 Digital Craft 05 Critic: Josh Uhl& David Fano Summer 2011


UNIVERSITY INFRASTRUCTURE Phoenix, Arizona The new university infrastructure in the city of Tempe, AZ suggests a new direction for the university in the near future based on various current university models. The university’s new infrastructure will package an education institution with not only academic research facilities that support students and scholar’s needs, but also provide support for various needs of the next generation of entrepreneurs. In the new university, the graduate school with state of the art research facilities and business incubators will bind together within a single site to maximize a synergy effect created by proximity. The new university infrastructure will also include unique moments in various locations where different program circulation will take place, guided into shuffling spaces in order to increase chances for encounters and interactions. Due to solar radiation in the local environment, most occupiers of the new university will seek shaded areas for their open-air interaction activities. Since the new university is located in the city of Tempe, AZ the environment naturally inherits the greater Phoenix metropolitan area where a vehicle oriented culture condition takes place. Therefore, calibrating the right density within the infrastructure will play a critical role to create micro urban conditions for the new university’s campus ground under Phoenix’s macro urban condition. As the university will grow in the future there is also the possibility for future expansion of the university’s grid into a greater infrastructure system.


OVERALL VIEW


WEST

SKYSONG

DOWNTOWN

SKY HARBOR TEMPE

RESEARCH PARK CAMPUS LIGHT RAIL INTERCAMPUS SHUTTLE 10 mi 5 mi


SITE: ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS

FLEXIBLE DISPLAY CENTER

POLYTECHNIC


SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

2000ft 1000ft

N

AIRPORT & ADJACENT BLDG


PUBLIC ACCESS

Terminal 3 Terminal 2

Terminal 4

TERMINALS


Cloverleaf Interchange

inexpensive method takes up considerable area of land

Stack Interchange

Full Y Interchange

moderate cost and land

Trumpet Interchange

expensive method free of weaving

userful for highways as well as toll roads

Cloverstack Interchange

Diamond Interchange

cheaper than stack interchange takes up considerable area of land

Non-Freeway inexpensive method prone to congestion and accidents HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE STUDY


PHOENIX URBAN FABRIC STUDY


MODEL STUDY


MODEL STUDY


PROGRAM MASS STUDY


PUBLIC SPACE & DIVISION AMONG PRIVATE & PUBLIC SPACE

STREET GRID & PARKING ON GROUND FLOOR

BREAKERS: ALLOWING CIRCULATION SHUFFLING

EDUCATION RESEARCH INCUBATOR

PROGRAM DIAGRAM


PHYSICAL MODEL



PLAN +8”

N



PLAN +32” N








LONGITUDINAL SECTION



CROSS SECTION


GSAPP HEADQUARTER Manhattanville, New York The architectural education experienced huge shift in modes of operation in last few decades. Works produced in architecture school is now largely computer generated and digital fabricated; as students find architecture blogs and websites more convenient way of researching than going to library, what would be the future of architecture school? One thing for certain is that architecture school must offer a new spatial quality to new generation of students. During the research phase of the project, I surveyed large number of students to see what they think about architecture building in Columbia University. The most striking yet expected feedback was that large number of students work their project, research, and paper outside of studio. Virtually, any space could be sufficiently turn into studio with minimum tool. New GSAPP headquarter does not have designated studio space, rather studio is everywhere. Studio space is distributed to other programs in architecture school such as fabrication lab, lecture hall, classroom, library and such. Students will choose their working space according to their needs, preference and interest. This new arrangement will offer a number of advantages over convention method of dividing students by each studio, year and program.



45

stud io?

YES

40 35

25 20 15

to 1

1t o

ho

2h

ou

ur

NO

Do yo

r

w Ho 18

stu

de

tu

nt s

fro

m

M

Ar ch

s nt

de

m

AA

3

fro m M ch Ar 2

rom rch MA 1

Urba t men

velop n De

Real Estate

Where do you spend for break time?

f nts

s from

Right outside Avery Hall

de

nies)

Main Campus

stu

Cafe (Brow

dent

1 student from

7 stu

pus

fro

de

tu

14

oke

nts

D

2s

I do Sm Off-Cam

Lib rar Stu y de nt Ot Lo he un r ge fac Ca i li t fe i es Ou td oo Or r ..

in

in

7s

sin Ev ery g da y( co Ig mm oo uti ut ng Tw ) ice I go aW ou tO e e nce k I go aW out eek Tw ice aM o I go nth out I go Onc out ea less Mo than nth Onc eaM I don onth I Pre ’t Sm fer n oke ot to answ er

m

AAD

3 rch MA

2 rch MA 1 rch MA n sig De an te Urb sta al E Re

0m

ur ho

ou

3

sH

30

to 3

to

15

pu

5 people

2

Ca m

um

10

Ho me

ostl yw ork/ stud y in

30

arti 49 P eN

n th

o nts

cipa

nce vinie Incon e r tim -Ove er Turn h it ann w hM Issue e e wit Pric Issu h t i ew es Issu r uc eso n of R k tio c a ic La un m ue om iss hC No e wit e urc Issu So ide s s e t Ou tim n5 es a im th 5t re o o es M 4t tim o3 t 2 ce On

t of igh r fir

obe Oc t

No

Un

st

b? La n

Ne ve Fa r br ic at io

ck

? De skt op

e us

or

a la

top

ow n

lap sho

Do

not

off er a uld

pto

p

pto p La

mb ia

esk top

lapt op na

ad off er

Co lu

Ow

r?

ling

de mo

ste

me

t se en urr

uld

g

nc

el i

od

al m

YES

l sica phy

ho

in ht

c ysi ph

ith

ia s

r

ne

on

es w Issu YES

mb

n

bl

an

yo u

ta

lig

rk wo

NO

NO

prefer?

Digital Modeling

workshop

Physical Modeling

Which do you

Drafting

separate

All of them

Prefer to have

acious

More sp

Co lu

lit

ra tio

sc

ith

do

u

ua

pi

of

sw

te n

ns

fo r

La

ue Iss

you

of

tI

co m

Do

Ho w

Ai rQ

No

Iss

ec

ha

desk


w

?

dio

u yo

o kd

e we

sa

r ou

yh an

m 0

0 -1

r ou

h

11

5h

(1.

0

-2

rs ou

) ay

urs

r(2

21

- 30

ay)

ad

urs

o (4 h

ur

ho

31

40

Stu

en

sp

ad

o .5 h

u ho

n di

ay)

ad

rs a

ou (6 h

r

hou

ys lwa

st a

o Alm

SURVEY TEMPLATE

t Studio

s abou

Pro Cons &

l Inspirationa Convenience Great atmosphere Sociability

To use Digital Equipment

To use Library

To be in Ca

mpus

Issue w

ith HVA C system

inadeq

uate st

Noise

udio sp

Crow ded

inad

Insa

Lac

ko

equ

nita

fm

ry

ate sp

ace

icro wa ve Ina deq uat Ina e de Pin La qu -Up ck ate spa of Sto pri ce oa r a va ge cc c spa y es st ce oB ue sw alc on ith y Pr ty int er

na

air

)

day

ls

for P hysic a

ace

l Mo

dell

ing

pa

ce

SURVEY DIAGRAM

On the saturday night of October, I surveyed almost all Columbia Architecture students working in studio to see how they feel about Avery Hall. The respondent of this survey are including graduate architecture student from 1st to 3rd year, Urban Design and Real Estate Development program.


PROGRAM ELEMENT

Auditorium

Cafe

Exhibition

Office

PROGRAM BREAK DOWN

150,000SF

150,000SF

147,00

+?

27,000

Circulation Cafe

Circulation & etc

15,000 Library

100,000SF

Research/Labs

+3,000

Auditorium

Library

10,000

+4,500 Auditorium

Shops

Research/Labs

20,000

65,000SF

Office Exhibition

Cafe Circulation

Office Exhibition

+6,000 Classroom

Jury

50,000SF

+2,500 Shop

Pin-up

Pin-up

27,000 Library

Auditorium Shop 7,000

UD/Planning

Office Exhibition 4,000 Pin-up/Classrooms

Landscape

11,000 Studio

Architecture

50,000 Studio

Generic model

MArch 3 MArch 2 MArch 1 Urban Development Real Estate

Avery Hall

+39,000 Studio

Urban D

Expan


All program space of GSAPP headquarter starts out with generic volume study

Library

Shops

Pin-up

Research/Labs

Classroom

147,000SF

00SF

MArch 3 MArch 2 MArch 1 Development Real Estate

nsion

30,000 Circulation 2,500Cafe

35,000 Library

15,000 Auditorium

visiting office attending lecture series close to reviews

Research/Labs

work in more open environment

16,000

research in computer lab

17,500

Shop

9,000

Office Exhibition

research in library

Classroom

work involved with fabrication

10,000 Pin-up

Customization

“Nomadic�


deskcrits

Studio V - Amale Andraos Fall11

pin up

Studio III - Housing ProJect Fall11

review

Studio V- Konyk & Prudon Fall08 AAD - Kate Orff Summer11

workshop

Urban Development Fall11 Studio VI. BUNGE + HOANG Spring11

site visit

Independence Day

lecture

Week 7

Week 6

Week 5

Week 4

Week 3

Week 2

Week 1

The diagram indicates students physical proximity to STUDIO space and how it fluctuate over the course of semester


M Arch 3 Classroom

700 level

600 level

M Arch 3 + UD +RE

500 level

M Arch 1

M Arch 3

M Arch 2

Pin Up

Classroom

Offices

400 level

Research/Lab

Library

200 level

Fab Lab

Library

Auditorium

Library

Cafe

100 level

Fab Lab

300 level

Current Model

new “Nomadic” Model

Existing Model

Concept ‘Nomadic’

Week 14 Thanksgiving 2008

Week 13 Thanksgiving 2011

Week 12

Week 11

Week 10 Election Day

Week 9

Week 8

CURRICULUM STUDY OF 6 STUDIOS IN GSSAP


SHOP

LIBRARY

CLASSROOM

OFFICE

LAB

PIN-UP

AUDITORIUM

EXHIBITION

CAFE


MASSING STUDY

Second phase of the project was investigating the possibilities of iterations of elements from the first phase.


RY

RA

LIB

RY

RA

AS

LA

B

LA

IUM

R

ITO

D AU

B

ION

IT

HIB

EX

CL

AS

B

LA

LIB

CL

SR

OO

SR

M

RY

RA

LIB

OO

M

E

NG

U LO


D AU

OP

LIB

M

RIU

ITO

SH

SH

OP

RA

RY

LIB

RA

RY

LIB

RA

RY LIB

LIB

RA

RY

OM

RO

SS

A CL OU GA TDO RD OR EN

C

LA

CL

AS

SR

CL

AS

OF

M

SR

OO

FIC

E

OF

PIN

OO

OM

O

R SS

-UP

RA LIB RY RA RY

M

-UP

PIN

FIC

E

OF

FIC

AU D

ITO

E

RIU

M

SECTIONAL STUDY



UNROLLED PERSPECTIVE



FACADE


1. 2.

2.

3.

PLAN +36’

PLAN +67’ 6”

4.


7. 5.

6.

PLAN +120’

1. AUDITORIUM 2. PIN-UP 3. RESEARCH/LABS 4. CLASSROOM 5. LIBRARY 6. SHOP 7. OFFICE



PHYSICAL MODEL




PERSPECTIVE SECTION

+ 135’ roof

+ 125’ lounge

+ 114’ library 4

+ 102’ library 3

+ 91’ library/shop 2

+ 74’ library/shop 1

+ 59’ classroom 2

+ 44’ classroom 1

+ 31’ auditorium

exhibition/cafe













 







 














NEW FUN PALACE Manhattanville, New York



in current context. New site which I choose is Time Square in New York City. During 1980s, as part of a long-term development plan Time Square was filled with commercial buildings and neon lit signs. As it became more tourist-friendly attractions and upscale establishments, Time Square is now place where New Yorkers no longer visit. The new “Fun Palace” in Time Square will perform as an outdoor theatre and culture center. By using existing dense commercial signs as backdrops, visitors would use Time Square for dancing, music, drama and fireworks





Cedric Price imagined a new theatre where everyone is an actor, director and spectator at same time. The idea was to build a ‘laboratory of fun’ with facilities for dancing, music, drama and fireworks. Central to Price’s practice was the belief that through the correct use of new technology the public could have unprecedented control over their environment, resulting in a building which could be responsive to visitors’ needs and the many activities intended to take place there. Using an unenclosed steel structure, fully serviced by travelling gantry cranes the building comprised a ‘kit of parts’: prefabricated walls, platforms, floors, stairs, and ceiling modules which could be moved and assembled by the cranes. Virtually every part of the structure was variable. The only fixed element within the Fun Palace was to be the structural grid of steel lattice columns and beams. All other programmatic elements – hanging theatres, activity spaces, cinema screens and speakers – were to be movable or composed of prefabricated modular units that could be quickly assembled and taken apart as needed. The goal of studio was to reinterpret and redeploy of “Fun Palace”







 















 






WEST

WEST

EAST

EAST

WEST West 48th St

West 47th St

West 46th St

West 45th St

West 44th St

West 43rd St

BILLBOARDS IN TIME SQUARE

EAST

W 42nd

W 43rd S

W 44th S

W 45th S

W 46th S

W 47th S


GIFTS NYC

SAMSUNG PONTIAC

WICKED

TKTS

GRAND OPENING

DOUBLE TREE GUEST SUITES SOUTCH PACIFIC

WAMU

WEST SIDE STORY

VIVIENNETAM

ROXY

W 47th St TEXT

NINJA ASSASIN

DANCE FLICK

CNN AVENUE Q AUGUST AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS

INFORMATION CENTER

CHICAGO

HEIGHTS

MAXELL VORNADO

VIRGIN RETAIL

BOX OFFICE

KODAK

PLANET HOLLYWOOD

SOUTHPOLE

BERTELSMANN BUILDING

LG

MARQUIS

MARRIOT

UFC

HEIGHTS

ELVIS

MTV

STARBUCKS

POP PEPSI COKE

ELEMENTS LIVE SUNDAY

MTV STORE

VIRGIN MOVILE

TOYS R US

BILLABONG

MOVIE AWARDS

FOOT LOCKER

THE LION KING

STOMP

RED BOX

SWATCH

MILLENNIUM HOTESL

BANK OF AMERICA

BROADWAY

MAMMA MIADIGITAL

HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL

BILLY ELLIOT

GOOD HOUSEKEEPING

THE LION KING

THE BODY SHOP

McDONALD’S

W 46th St PLANET HOLLYWOOD

HP TOUCH THE FUTURE NOW

FRIDAYS

HOTEL

BILLY ELLIOT

NOKIA THEATRE

HAIR

SBARRO TAU’S STEAK

W 48th St

ROCK OF AGES

JERSEY BOYS

PRUDENTIAZL

PHANTON

COCA COLA

MARQUIS

CORONA

HSBC

CHINA BLOOMINGDALE’S

W 45th St

W 44th St

WRIGLEY’S TIPTOP

EYEWITNESS NEWS

JVC 4TH AND LONG ABC

LEVIS

GMC

SEPHORA

BUBBA GUMP SHRIMP CO. RAG

TIME RICOH

CHASE

YAHOO

BUDWEISER’S

PANASONIC

PATISSERIE

HARD ROCK

YONKERS

AT & T

WALGREEN

I LOVE NY

NASDAQ

W 43rd St

DUANE READE

MARKETSITE FAST

IZOD ESPN ZONE

NASDAQ W 42nd St

BROADWAY

7th Ave

BILLBOARDS (AS OCTOBER 2011) & LOCATION OF MUSICAL THEATER

HEARTLAND

ESPN GUMMY

W 48th St

W 47th St

W 46th St

W 45th St

W 44th St

W 43rd St

W 42nd St

BROADWAY

7th Ave

BILLBOARDS STRUCTURE


re d theat

Enclose

REIMAGINING “THE FUN PALACE”


ser vic e

open a udito

rium

tow e

r


pole

restaurant

bar

mi

basement

Catalog of Fun Palace

searchlight

observatory tower

fence

TV & Radio tower

tent

gantry crane

panel

steel

helicopter pad

large screen

15’x15’ structure

stairs

small screen

news panel

open cinema

workshop

rally platform

moving catwalk

sewage puri�ication plants

open plaza

revolving door

musical instruments

elevator

curtain

proje

p

loa

s


icrophone

camera

cable

beams

machine

restroom

storage

plumbing

15’x15’ �loor

lighting

ramp

stage

ecting screen

sphere

escalator

partition

screen

ading dock

speakers

exhibition area

enclosed theatre

bolts and nuts

seating

promenade

tower crane

columns


OVERVIEW

W

ST rd 46

,B T-A er-

pp

5-U

W4

T-A erow

6-L

W4

e

an -Cr 6-T

T erpp

6-U

W4

T-B erow

6-L

ST

W4

th

47

ay dw

W

th

48

ST

oa Br

W4

W

E AV

7th


use ho are ty W li e aci lac g F op pa n i N FU Train rksh Wo

W

nd

42

ST

B,

C

, T-A erpp 2-U W4

ST rd 43

, r-A we To erow T-L dS

2n

W4

W

B,

C

ST

, T-A erow

th 44

3-L W4

e an -Cr 3-T W4

W

B,

C

T erpp 3-U W4

e an -Cr 4-T W4

W

4-L

ST

W4

th 45

T erow

,B T-A erpp 4-U W4

5-L W4

,B T-A erow






s

ed

cu r i c

siz y l mi fa

VE RT ICA

LL

LY OR IEN TE D

OP

ER

A



HOW TO BUILD A THEATER “THEATER MANUAL BASED ON IKEA”

FAMILJ STORLEK CIRKUS

Fun Palace









2































































1




3

5

4

7

8

6

9

10


IMAGINE THE ULTRA-REAL Aurora by Mark di Suvero “course objective� The architectural rendering-be it photo-realistic, analytic, or abstract-captures the energy of an idea about space and the forces that act within it. The challenge of this course is to convey that dynamism-whether it is the movement of a set of bodies, a change in lighting and material qualities, or any other dynamic quality of architecture with a set of static images. My specific intention was to generate an image of a place which embodies motion. A specific transition gate between the water and the ground.



PRECEDENT STUDY


HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE RENDERING

SYNTHETIC RENDERING


DIGITAL CRAFT FOA: World Trade Center Proposal

RENDERED IMAGE


PHYSICAL MODEL



3D ANIMATION



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.