PORTFOLIO
Jørund Bjørlykke
TABLE OF CONTENT CV
:
p.4-5
MIXING AXIS, DIPLOMA PROJECT
:
p.8-21
GJENNOMSIKTEN
:
p.22-25
DOUBLE HOME URBANISM
:
p.26-31
WRAPPED LIVING
:
p.32-35
PRODUCT DESIGN
:
p.36-37
OTHER EXPERIENCES
:
p.38-39
CURRICULUM VITAE NAME
:
Jørund Bjørlykke
DATE OF BIRTH
: 20.05.1983
NATIONALITY
: Norwegian
LANGUAGE SKILS
:
Norwegian, English, (Spanish)
ADRESS
:
Hans Hauges gt, 5034 Bergen
MAIL/PHONE
:
jbjorlykke@gmail.com / 90925967
Personal
:
I am a positive and active person who likes challenges. I get inspired when working as part of a team, particularly the spirit of performing someting valuable together. I am trusting and have a large work-capacity. Growing up on an island on the west coast of Norway taught me to be independent and to take initiative.
2008-2013
:
Master of architecure / Bergen School of Architecture, Norway
Fall 2012
:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain (exchange program)
2004-2007
:
Bachelor Interior architecture / Bergen Academy of Art and Design, Norway
Spring 2006
:
Camberwell College of Arts, London, England (exchange program)
Education
4
Experience 2013
:
Design of cottage, Stord, Norway
Summer 2011
:
Construction of grind-bygg, Voss, Norway
2010
:
Assistant at the art project “Papirprosjektet” by Jørund Fjøsne
Spring 2008 Summer 2009-2012
:
Apprentice, Stord Glass og Byggteknikk, Stord, Norway
Fall 2007
:
Language course, Salamanca, Spain
2003-2004
:
Military service, Missile torpedo boat, Norway
2002-2003
:
Internship at Jørund Fjøsne Design, Fitjar, Norway
2013
:
Exhibition of Diploma project, Bergen, Stord, Norway
2011
:
Creator of the seminar “Verdiskaping”, Stord, Norway
2007
:
Exhibiter at Stockholm Furniture Fair, Stockholm
2006
:
Exhibiter at 100% design, London
2005-2006
:
Creator of the music festival “Størjevikfestivalen”, Stord, Norway
Technical skils
:
Rhinoceros, Archicad, Illustrator, Photoshop, Indesign
Interests
:
People, art, culture, hiking, food, skiing, travelling, entertainment
Exhibitions/events
5
6
PROJECTS
7
MIXING AXIS
SUNNHORDLAND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH PARK Each of the thirty largest cities in Norway emerged as a consequence of maritime infrastructure. However, as the use of automobiles has expanded, and with it the road network, it has replaced many of the functions that were provided exclusively by the sea. This diploma proposes an industrial knowledge hub as a strategy to develop the area between a historic city core and a suburban shopping area. The site of investigation is on the Island of Stord, an island located in the region of Sunnhordland, on the West coast of Norway The historic centre of Leirvik is being challenged by a rapidly developing shopping area along the costal highway E39 at Heiane. Instead of development merging the two cores, a constant growth is taking place outwards, generating an ever greater distance between the evolving center at Heiane and Leirvik. The industry at Stord has proven highly resilient in adapting to global competition, yet once again they have begun losing contracts and are being forced to reconsider how they can be competitive in the future. We propose to expand the role of the existing industry through the creation of the Sunnhordland Offshore Research Cluster, situated between Leirvik´s historic city core and Heiane´s highway shopping core. Year:2013 Course: Diploma project Duration: 6 mounths Students: Nils Eivind Horneland/Jørund Bjørlykke Tutors: Thomas Wiesner/Espen Folgerø
Opposit page:Area of investigation at Stord
8
9
SITUATION
1940 Production of herring oil
1960 Production of oil tankers
1980 Production of oil rigs
Development of industry at Stord
Bergen
Trondheim
Stord Bergen Stord
Stavanger
Stavanger Maritime infrastructure Car based infrastructure
10
2013 (proposal) Offshore research park -test pool for scale models
Developmpent today
Proposed development (densification between cores)
Developmpent today
E-39
Coastal highway
Heiane
Vabakken
Suburban shopping area based on the coastal highway E-39
Obsolete area consisting of sheds
Leirvik
Historic core based on the maritime infrastructure
Industry
Cornerstone of the society/economy at Stord
Proposed location of Sunnhordland Offshore Research Park Location of existing industry at Stord 11
SITE AND INTENTIONS Agri culture Agri culture
Dwelling
Retail area Retail area
Sport & Schools
Regulation plan today
Sport & Schools
Forest
Forest
Photo: Bjørn Ă˜strem
Proposed regulation plan
Today the site consists of shed structures facillitating the space required retailing
During opening hours the area is active
During closed hours the area is not active
Sport
Dwelling
INTENSITY
Office
05:00
04:00
03:00
02:00
01:00
24:00
23:00
22:00
21:00
19:00
18:00
20:00
16:00
15:00
17:00
14:00
11:00
13:00
12:00
09:00
10:00
08:00
07:00
06:00
Inspired by the low cost sheds used in retail areas, the architecture explores the potential of this typology. By mixing different programs the project aims to keep a higher intesity during the whole day.
12 Photo:Klara Sofie Ludvigsen
The simple structure of a shed allows for a flexible use and different climatic zones. By using elements from this standarized way of building the project proposes to play with the surface material of the shed and introduces smaller climated boxes inside the shed depending on it´s function.
BOX IN BOX
ORGANIZATION OF SPACE
Playing with the suface materials (skins)
Dwelling
First skin: open Second skin: sealed
Facilitating for different uses
Office
First skin: sealedSecond skin: open
School
Combination
Dwelling
(more private)
Office
(more public)
School
(combination)
13
THE LOGIC OF THE BUILDING Sunnhordland Offshore park consists of two different axis. The Urban Axis is pointing towards Heiane (retail area) and Leirvik (the old city centre). The green axis is stretching from the school and sport area to the recreational area on the other side of the coastal highway E-39.
FRAME WORK
The core element of the intervention is a big test pool in which the two axis are crossing over. By placing the Research Park in between the two centres we intend to start a densification process. Better facilities for walking and bicycling would improve the accessibility between the two centres. In close future we believe these two will grow as one. The Urban Axis contains offices, an engineer school, dwellings and pathways. The Green axis is planned as a park. It contains green houses, pathways and parks.
SCHOOL
Retail area
Test Pool Public Sports/Schools
Forest Green axis Urban
N
DWELLINGS
Historical Centre
N
OFFICES
POOL & PARKING
14 Photo:Klara Sofie Ludvigsen
ADM, CANTINA & AUDITORIUM
Towards Stavanger
v
s
ard
Tow
ric
to his
re
co
E-39
Towards Bergen
GREEN HOUSES & PARKS
15
SECTION GREEN AXIS
Photo:Klara Sofie Ludvigsen
Land책sen Existing network of pathways in the forest used for recreation
16
Photo:Klara Sofie Ludvigsen
Green houses Green houses along the Axis for people living in the Urban Axis
Gardens Common gardens for people living in the Urban Axis
E-39 Using the Green Axis to reconnect the the two sides disrupted by the road
Parking Underground parking serving the research park and surrounding programs
Photo:Klara Sofie Ludvigsen Photo:Klara Sofie Ludvigsen
Forest
Elevator Elevator going for the underground parking straight to the main public areas
Common volumes Common restaurants and meeting rooms for people working and living in the research park
The staircase The staircase as one of the main public areas
The framework A constructive element to cope with the span of the testpool acting as an industrial landscape
The pool Test pool for offshore installations in scale
Sports Schools
Road Local road
17
Current page: Public space in front of water mirror Opposit page: The constructive framework as a architecural landscape
18
MIXING AXIS
SUNNHORDLAND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH PARK
19
Photo:Tor Resser
From the presentation for the citizens of Stord
20
Doing the diploma made me aware of the responsibility of an architect.The neglected areas of suburban Norway contributes to shape peoples mind, and we see our diploma as an important response to this phenomenon. It was important for us to exhibit the diploma in our home town Stord. For the citizens of Stord this is not just a school project, but a serious statement in the discussion about their future city plan.
21
GJENNOMSIKTEN PAVILLION FOR THEATER
“Gjennomsikten” was a comissioned work for Grenland friteater located along the river of Porsgrunn. The pavillion is functioning as a stage for a family show being performed outdoor, but also as a new public space for the citizens. Porsgrunn and the neighbour city Skien is about to grow together, this project is situated between the two cities as a symbol of a joint cultural commitment. The design gives various room for performance and is offering a new viewpoint towards the two cities from the roof terrace. Year: 2013 Design and construction: Anna Andrea Aniksdal Vik, Sindre Wam, Jørund Bjørlykke
22
23
Photo from the press conference
24
Being humble and bold at the same time was extremely important in order to get people enthusiastic. Doing the design and actually constructing it made me aware the difference between theory and practice, it is important to cope with this in a constructive way.
25
Double home urbanism
Private utopias, collective landscape The double home urbanism project was a pure research course investigating the extensive development of single family houses and additional cabins in Norway. Ownership of two homes in this manner is known as double home urbanism. The final and common product of the studio is a book which is currently in progress to be published. The chapter I was working on in collaboration with a fellow student is looking into how we preserve and discuss sustainability in relation to the phenomena of the double home urbanism. By going into themes like energy use, time use and land use we try to compare different perspectives. The research shows how the private utopia plays out in broader context and how it effects fields like economy, ecology and socio-geography. Year: Fall 2012 Course: Double Home Urbanism Duration: 6 months Students: Sindre Wam/Jørund Bjørlykke Tutors: Deane Simpson
26
Energy consumption
Energy consumption SFH share
Consumption Euro Consumption
Slovenia
Hungary
Norway
Switzerland
Netherlands
Spain
70%
69%
63%
25%
16%
15%
Energy consumption Norway General overview Other
Culture/leisure
Transport
House
Food/drinks
2009
2009
1973 1958
Income
Development
2009
Grønn byggallianse
Bellona Grønn hverdag
Greenpeace Natur og ungdom
Norges kulturvernforbund
Norges miljøvernforbund
NORWAY
WORLD
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
“The focus on the energy debate has lowered the energy consumption in the single family home, but forces supplying this dream evens out the positive effect.”
1958
1974-76
1983-85
1992-94
2002-04
665kr
1732kr
5528kr
9331kr
14882kr
18048kr
N/a
1156kr
4552kr
8303kr
12604kr
15043kr
N/a
499kr
785kr
784kr
993kr
17.400
9.100
56.500
47.100
34.700
22.800
10.500
6.800
33.000
29.500
22.800
15.900
916kr
13.200
7.000
37.000
32.800
23.900
17.800
2005 2009
an energy perspective - be called sustain-
family home is actually decreasing, while
able. Owning two dwellings is by definition a form of overconsumption. This is further
relatively the opposite is happening at the “hytte”. Also, calculations show that the
in. At the same time, Norway also has a
reflected in the Norwegian debate around
CO2 emissions travelling back and forth to
high level of consumption. If every nation were to consume as much as Norwegians
sustainability where the focus among others politicians, scientists and architects is
the hytte, consumes more energy than the daily average commuting per person.
we would need 2,4 earths. Logically the
highly concentrated around consumption
double home urbanism phenomenon correlates well with high consumption.
of energy in buildings and transport. What is found during this research is that
This double home urbanism cannot - from
the energy consumption within the single
6
6.2
9.4
10.8
193 m2
200 m2
206 m2
62.7 m2
68.3 m2
88 m2
2009
7.9
5
-5%
-17%
8.9 -5%
5.7
10.3
6.5
-8%
-5%
-24%
Anual energy hytte Anual energy SFH
Transportation
Change
1987
2005
1990
1997
2003
2009
100
120
145
175
100
101
103
105
og Greenpeace ungdom 1998
2000
Bellona 2004
2002
Idehus
Hus 1
Backer Bolig
Horten Hus
Blankenborg
Overhalla Hus
9 121 t
13 231t
4 851t
3 552t
Development
25518kr 41379kr
Other
11 662t
11 445t
2006
2008
2010 Rygehus
Massive Wood
Nydal Bygg
Svalehus
PEAB Bolig
Stolt Bolig
Tyrolerhus
Stensland/Byberg
Urbanhus
Jærbygg
Østlaft Bygg
Setskog Hus
1974-76
1983-85
1992-94
2002-04
2007-09
2554kr
8098kr
10640kr
25014kr
31055kr
Car
2012
“National patterns of single family home and hytte habitation leads to mass consumption” Another important finding in the research has been the social implications of the val-
square kilometre, which leads to the fact that only two percent of the nation is built land. Although this is a small amount it is interesting that eight percent of this con-
These calculations only show the national scale and will of course vary within the different counties, but it indicates that the lib-
has been mechanized and made more efficient, which has consequences for the cultural landscape and the bio diversity, which is the main focus of the debate around land
portant to remember the implied infrastructure one is obligated to develop by law. The infrastructure has severe consequences, as many species will not live closer than 5
eral housing market in Norway will lead to a social and geographical division of people.
use. Also, around the most urbanised ar-
km from technical installations.
584kr
480kr
454kr
306kr
399kr
167kr
4.7kg CO2
25.1kg
28.9kg
44.9kg
50.6kg
71.4kg
Fish (kg)
Potato (kr)
Potato (kg)
Other 2007 1987
1987
38 771kr
40 184kr
2007-09 35.8
29.1%
Average km
215
14.9km
107 %
1 490t
2002-04
1992-94
1983-85
1974-76
1958
30%
Cloths and shoes
33.8%
20866kr
16817kr
12939kr
9151kr
4841kr
1448kr
23300kr
20763kr
16767kr
9459kr
4875kr
922kr
24712kr
22047kr
17281kr
8892kr
3716kr
666kr
Furiture and househod items
65 041kr
CO2
Other items and services
570.22 kg CO2
Travels hytte/SFH
8 349t
34 000-52 754
19 000-29 999
30 000-33 999
7 000-18 999
180km
897.12 kg CO2
2 863-6 999
Source:Eurostat
Source:Statistics Norway, Vestlandsforsking
Density
Source:Statistics Norway
Agricultural land use
Ecological impact
Population
Slovenia
Norway
Hungary
Switzerland
Nederlands
Spain
Agriculture land 1995
70%
69%
63%
25%
16%
15%
98
106
13
184
404
80
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2001
2010
Amount of farms 1949
1959
220.000
1969
1979
1989
160.000
125.000
100.000
60.000
2005
200.000
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
10 693
11 606
13 119
14 157
15 153
19 860
15 875
2010
2011
12 907
10 985
2009
1900
Amount of new agricultural land
1940
1998
Wilderness more than 5km away from tecnical interventions
Sesonal corridors/grazing area for reindeer disturbed by hytte development
Roads (km) 2009 38.281
196.245
93.509
70.048
128.651
Amount of rezoned agricultural land
151.525
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
17 963
14 137
15 442
16 442
15 164
Land 20.273
93.030
385.186
41.290
41.526
504.782
Flåm
Rezoned agricultural land
Norway
Offi
Open land 39%
21%
Roads
Wetland 5%
ces
Dwellings
40 %
Bare rock 7%
Ice 6% 3%
37%
Other settlements
Freshwater
Agriculture
3% 8%
Cabins 5% Infras
Hol
tructu
re 18%
Finse
Oth
ers
Forrest Agricultural buildings
Rezoned according to building regulations
Rezoned according to Rezonedregulations agricultural land 2011 agriculture
8%
Parks Industry
Built land 2%
25%
23 %
11%
Housing settlements
Gree
Pu
blic
n str
18%
uc
ob
jec
8% Hytte settlements
tur es
tiv es
Geilo
8%
5%
10km
age prices in Oslo. This also account for the lowest income groups if they want to buy a single family home in Akershus.
has effects on the bio diversity. The settlements occupy land that was once open land to ensure bio diversity, but it also im-
26.5kg
0km
ue of land where single family homes are located. The research actually shows that no profession has high enough income to buy a single family home based on aver-
During the research it is clear that the development of hytte settlements in particular
24.3kg
5km
into single family home settlements, while one chooses to preserve the enormous recreational area north of Oslo called Marka.
The growth of hytte settlements also correlates with the decreasing amount of farms in Norway. The total amount of agriculture land has not declined, but the agriculture
sists of “hytter”.
Average annual trips
28
Fiskarhedan
eas as Oslo one sees that the agricultural land around the city is being transformed
19.9kg
Euro
Ferdighus Norge
Norway is one of the countries in Europe with lowest density- only 13 inhabitants per
19.4kg
Commuting
162 % 40184kr 65041kr
+ 400 %
Blink Hus
15.9kg
41 379kr
66 308kr -2 %
162 %
Euro
Nordbohus
IEC Hus
25 518kr
39 404kr
2007
Car purchase
- 27 %
270 %
Carbon dioxide
Øster Hus
Hetlandhus
Duplo Element
18.4kg
17%
Transport
45 %
38771kr 66308kr
LANDUSE
1996Natur
Fjogstad Hus
Light fuel
Change
171 %
Household
SHARE URBAN DWELLERS + 33%
Sagabo
46kg CO2
106 583
1987 2005
Population
Älvsbyhus
305kr
2007
1987
Relative energy use
2009
1994
30.5kg
769kr
Food
Household, light, fuel
Consumption Norway
SFH share
Wax Hus
922kr
45.4kg
Fish (kr)
2010
1987
8.5
Land use
Øklandhus
1958
2902kr
46.1kg
1438kr
2007
8.3
European landuse
Jadarhus
1974-76
5577kr
46.9kg
1894kr
Size hytte
2005
Landuse
Follohus
1983-85
6657kr
45.8kg
2037kr
Beef/beefproducts (kg)
2000
1980
Emission
Source:Statistics Norway,
1992
1992-94
79331kr
49.9kg
2950kr
808.38kg CO2
Size
Size SFH
Source: Statistics Norway
SINGLE FAMILY HOME PRICE INDEX NORWAY
2002-04
9202kr
Beef/beefproducts (kr)
Petrolium
39404kr 106 583kr
According to the Human Development
2007-09
Electricity
Consumption
Food
Index made by the UN, Norway is rated as the best country in the world to live
2007-09
LSum light & fuel
ENERGY
Framtidens byer Future built Zero
Framtiden i våre hender
Area of conflict between reindeer and development of hytte
Density Density
400-499
200-299
300-399
100-199
Hytte resort
0-99
Reindeer
Square km
Source:Statistics Norway
Source:Statistics Norway, Eurostat
Source:Statistics Norway, Vestlandsforsking
Consumption of time
Value of land
Time
Debate
Road
5km
Train
Ski trails
Power lines
Areas 1500 masl
Source:Norsk institutt for naturforskning
European timeuse
Leisure,social and associative life
International timeuse Slovenia Loan potential
SFH combinations
Salary
Spain
Norway
Profession Mining Electricity and gas supplies
5.665 619.000
High_High
Information and communication
High
69%
63%
15%
631 min
616 min
668 min
346 min
346 min
291 min
229 min
184 min
197 min
197 min
201 min
193 min
1970
1980
1990
2000
10h 28m
10h 15m
10h 04m
9.58t
10.12t
5h 1m
6h 02m
6h 11m
6h 24m
6h 15m
Finance and insurance Academic services
4.860 High_Medio
Industry Transport 483.000
Real estate services
Medio
4.510
Teaching Public administration
High_Low
TIME
4.100
Agriculture, fishing Water and waste handling
Medio_Medio
Building and construction Merchandising
3.630
421. 000 Low
Medio_Low
Accomodation Business and service Health and social services Culture
3.230 M2 price single family home 1993
Other Low_Low
M2 price single family home 2012
Social interaction
Watching TV
1970
Oslo
Oslo
Oslo
Oslo
Oslo
Oslo
5.665
4.860
4.510
4.100
3.630
3.230
1980
1990
Bellona
2000
2010
Akershus
All dwellings 2012
Single family homes 2012
All dwellings 2012 Counties
Akershus
Oslo
Population C o u n t473 ies 1993 Population 2012 1000 people
613
Oslo424
473
1993
1000 people
Hordaland
416 Akershus
424
556
2012
613
490
556
Nord Norge
Rogaland
Hordaland 465
Nord 346 Norge
416
Trøndelag
Rogaland 381
465
469
443
490
Agder
469
Østfold
245Trøndelag
346
430
238
381
285
443
High_Medium
High_High
Single family homes 2012 Møre og Romsdal
Buskerud
Agder 225
Østfold239
245
278
430
238
265
Vestfold
285
278
Oppland
Hedmark
200 Buskerud
Møre og 182 Romsdal
Vestfold 187
225
239
200
256
236
265
187
256
192
236
Counties
Telemark
Oppland 163
Hedmark
182
187
SFH Telemark
187
Oslo
m2 prices
Hordaland
Rogaland
Vestfold
Buskerud
Agder
Nord Norge
Trøndelag
Østfold
Low_Low
Møre og Romsdal
Telemark
Oppland
Hedmark
7 400
5 900
4 500
4 500
4 500
5 900
4 500
4 500
4 600
4 000
4 600
3 900
4 100
4 500
40 900
25 300
24 400
22 400
18 900
18 400
18 300
17 500
16400
16 400
15 700
14 800
13 800
12 600
2012
M2 price
192
Akershus
Medium_Low
Medio_Medio
1993
163
170
High_Low
170
Employment
Density
SFH 2012
2012 337 Employment 1000 people
291
256
234
235
215
136
136
135
130
117
92
90
8
Percent
86
50
61, 4
50, 4
60,5
61,5
68,8
55
68
58
66, 7
69,9
76
75,9
2012 1000 people
Single family home
337
26
111
291
111
256
234
154
112
235
108
215
85
136
70
136
71
135
76
130
60
68
117
69
92
90
86
55
SFH
Single family home
All buildings
1000 buildings
301
SFH
26
111 220
221
111
154
226
183
112 196
108 124
85 120
70 116
71 115
76 100
88
60 92
68
69
55
78
All buildings
Nr 1 (4 counties)
1000 buildings
Nr 2 (4 counties)
220
221 Nr 1 (2 counties)
226
183
196
124
120
116
115
100
Nr 2 (4 counties)
Nr 2 (4 counties)
Nr 3 (5 counties) Nr 4 (1 counties)
301 Nr 1 (2 counties)
88 92 Nr 1 (4 counties) Nr 2 (4 counties)
78
Nr 1 (2 counties)
Nr 1 (2 counties)
Nr 2 (4 counties)
Nr 2 (4 counties)
Nr 3 (4 counties)
Nr 3 (4 counties)
Nr 3 (5 counties)
Nr 3 (4 counties)
Nr 3 (4 counties)
Nr 4 (4 counties)
Nr 4 (4 counties)
Nr 4 (1 counties)
Nr 4 (4 counties)
Nr 4 (4 counties)
Source:Statistics Norway
Source:Statistics Norway
Norwegian timeuse
“Norwegians increasing leisure time is consumed in front of the television and computer and through merchandising and entertainment, altering the domestic space to become an arena in the consumer society.” ing one to participate simultaneously in the
holding the central position and is the ob-
(pseudo-) pastorality of the suburb and in the teeming, information-rich social world
ject social activities are gathered around. What the spatial consequences are when
ist. Therefore, the most relevant categories within this selection are the ones one use at leisure - or household activities. Com-
made possible by concentration and central markets.” This implies that improved access to new channels and better broad-
web TV on e.g. smart phones are further improving is still to be seen. The phenomenon of the hytte has from a
pared to other countries that hold a high proportion of single family homes, Norwegians have most time to perform leisure ac-
band that has occurred in Norway actually supports double home urbanism. And further, as the hytte is becoming more urban
sustainable point of view been heavily critiqued due to its consumption of energy. However, if one looks at it from a health
tivities but the lowest to perform household activities. The increased time Norwegians have to
than many single family home settlements this should be seen in close connection to the rising time use of media.
and time perspective it is actually a phenomenon, which is positive. In a world where most people is experiencing a time/
perform leisure is mainly used in front of the TV or the computer. According to architectural theorist Sanford Kwinter, “The
The increasing time spent in front of the television and computer has also had architectural impacts. Before the advent of
space compression and the level of stress increases, the hytte offers qualities one can not find in the primary dwelling, largely
television... replaced the real multispectral information fluxes of the true city with remotely constituted synthetic “feeds”, allow-
television, the fireplace was claimed by architects to have the central position in the dwelling, now we see that the television is
due to the feeling of escaping the daily life.
+ 21 %
- 21 % 4.09t
3h 39m
3h31m
3h 18m
3h 25m
3.38t
3h 29m
3h 37m
3h 47m
3h 36m
-1%
Employment
Source: Koolhaas, R & Kwinter et al, S (2001) Mutations, ACTAR. p. 508
Household
Personal care
Leisure, social and associative life
Leisure
6:00-5:30h
5:00-4:30h
5:30-5:00h
4:30 -4:00h
Source:Statistics Norway, Eurostat
Correlations
Norwegian timeuse
2010
-2%
The time one is using in double urbanism is the time one is not at work, but specific statistics sorted by typology does not ex-
Detailed timeuse Norway
Correlations Development of leisure time Norway
People
1990
2000
2010
1.59h
2.0h
1.45h
1.19h
2010
2000
1990
1980
1.24h
1.25h
1.34h
1.57h
Social interaction
Norwegian population
Housework
0.30h
0.20h
Cooking
0.13h 0.33h
0.35h
0.34h
0.40h
0.01h
0.02h
0.02h
0.05h
0.00h
0.01h
0.02h
0.03h
0.27h
0.30h
0.21h
0.16h
0.27h
0.32h
0.33
0.25h
1990
2000
2010
6,02
6,11
6,27
6,15
Hrs/Min
Hrs/Min
Hrs/Min
Hrs/Min
Leisure
Leisure
Leisure
Leisure
1990
1997
753.000
971.000
2004 1.670.000
2011 2.825.000
Production of food
4.213.000
3.800.000
Sum SFH + Cabin
Maximum loan per average income
Cabin price
Payed vacation Cabin development
percent
1990
1997
2004
2011
243.000
353.000
807.000
1.388.000
Cabin size
Average use of internet
Visiting friends
Conversations
Use
25
Visiting family 0.26h
1980
million
Price double home urbanism
Single family home price
4,4 1980
Ecological impact
People
1,2
1919
1947
1964
2000
1 week vacation
3 week vacation
4 week vacation
5 week vacation
1980
1990
2000
2010
1990
1997
2004
2011
242.695
315.463
347.726
398.884
67 m2
70 m2
80 m2
110 m2
Clothes/shoes
million
Flåm
Internet users average day
Leisure
Electronic medias
2010 2.03h
0.05h
0.02h
1.16h
1.24h
1.48h
1.51h
1980
1980
2010
0.24h
0.25h
0.27h
0.29h
0.08h
0.09h
0.08h
0.10h
0.08h
0.08h
0.06h
0.07h
22% 2.45
50% 38%
12% 18%
Television
Garden and plot
6,5
Hol Finse
day
Geilo
Average searches
Media
CO2 House
20%
Search
CO2
CO2
7,7
0,007
54
Recotds/video 0.03h
0.07h
0.07h
0.10h
0.41h
0.36h
0.48h
0.48h
5.34h
4.42h
2.59h
2.45h
0.04h
0.03h
0.03h
0.03h
0.37h
0.33h
0.45h
0.37h
million
Searches average day
kg
CO2 per search
tonnes
Tonnes CO2 per day
1990
tonnes
Tonnes CO2 per year
Babysitting 0.08h
0.25h
0.13h
0.15h
0.12h
0.01h
0.01h
0.02h
0.03h
Coversation with children
0.13h
0.13h
0.15h
0.12h
Travels related to housework
0.13h
Games/playing 0.03h
0.03h
0.09h
0.12h
0.06h
0.03h
0.02h
0.01h
0.26h
0.32h
0.34h
0.33h
Handcrafting
Firstly, we spend more time at the “hytte” while the amount and sizes are increasing a lot. This logically have ecological implica-
tions since we are urbanising more land, but what is not so obvious is that with an average Norwegian salary you do not have the possibility to access the double home urbanism market- you are dependent upon fortune or access via your family. Next, the time Norwegians spend in the car to travel to the “hytte” or commute implies that the space of the car is becoming more domesticated. More utilities like DVD players and TVs further enhance this, and within the double home urbanism the car is
1990
2000
2010
1h 24 min
1h 48 min
1h 51 min
Internet
1990
N/a
2000
2010
28”
26”
40”
Broadband subscriptions Social interaction within household
1980
1990
2000
2010
N/a
N/a
8 min
25 min
2003
2006
2009
2012
603.511
1.123.950
1.516.831
1.700.268
Car as a third home
“The domestic space of the single family home, the car and the hytte has become an integrated and exploited space in the consumer society.” Through the three previous parts it is clear that Norway has a high level of energy consumption per capita, that Norway is a sparsely populated land and that Norwegians have more time disposable to spend in their homes or at the “hytte”. Naturally, there are correlations between the different types of consumption.
1980 1h 16 min
Internet
Care work
Internett
Source:Statistics Norway
Avergage size television
Gear
Other leisures
Travels related to leisure
Spatial consequence
Television
19 710
0km
2h
0.10h
Radio
Search
5km
1.41
0.12h
Maintenance
10km
1.31h
Household
Transportation Related to spare time
most likely becoming a form of third home. Lastly, what is not that obvious is that the increasing use of Internet actually has a serious environmental affect as shown is the table above. The utility doesn’t consume much resources in close connection to the users, but the amount of energy one needs to cool the servers at other locations in the world are causing large CO2 emissions.
1980 26 min
1990 32 min
2000 34 min
33 min
2000 19 min
22 min
2010
Transportation
Car density
(including commuting)
Related to household 1980 10 min
1990 13 min
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
54 min
1h 05 min
1h 15 min
1h 18 min
(Car per capita)
1980
1990
2000
2010
0,30
0,37
0,43
0,54
Source:Statistics Norway, Elektronikkbransjen, Flickr
27
665kr 665kr
1732kr 1732kr
5528kr 5528kr
9331kr 9331kr
14882kr 14882kr
18048kr 18048kr
N/a N/a
1156kr 1156kr
4552kr 4552kr
8303kr 8303kr
12604kr 12604kr
15043kr 15043kr
N/a N/a
499kr 499kr
785kr 785kr
784kr 784kr
993kr 993kr
916kr 916kr
1980 1980
2000 2000
2010 2010
193 193 m2 m2
200 200 m2 m2
206 m2 m2 206
62.7 62.7 m2 m2
68.3 68.3 m2 m2
88 m2 m2 88
Electricity Electricity
Petrolium Petrolium
Size Size
Size Size SFH SFH
Size Size hytte hytte
Household, light, light, fuel fuel Household, 2007 2007
1987 1987
Relative Relative energy energy use use Anual Anual energy energy hytte hytte Anual Anual energy energy SFH SFH
1990 1990
1997 1997
2003 2003
2009 2009
100 100
120 120
145 145
175 175
100 100
101 101
103 103
105 105
Light Light fuel fuel
17% 17% 39 39 404kr 404kr
106 106 583 583
Loan potential
Development Development 1974-76 1974-76
Salary 2007 2007
2007-09 2007-09
Electricity and gas supplies 1987
1987
619.000
High_High
Information and communication
High
Car Car
Car Car purchase purchase
Profession Mining
5.665
2002-04 2002-04
1992-94 1992-94
1983-85 1983-85
Transport Transport
SFH combinations
Finance and insurance Academic services
29.1% 29.1%
4.860 2554kr 2554kr
All dwellings 2012
Average Average annual annual trips trips
Average Average km km
Oslo
215 215
14.9km 14.9km
High_Medio
Transport
66 308kr
Real estate services
Medio
4.510
Teaching Public administration
High_Low
“The focus on the energy debate has lowered the energy consumption in the single family home, but forces supplying this dream evens out the positive effect.” 4.100
Akershus
Travels Travels hytte/SFH hytte/SFH Population 473
570.22 570.22 kg kg CO2 CO2 Hordaland Nord Norge
424
416 180km 180km
28 28
Rogaland
Trøndelag
346
381
465 897.12 897.12 kg kg CO2 CO2
3.630
Agriculture, fishing
Agder
Møre og Romsdal
Medio_Medio Østfold Buskerud
Vestfold
Merchandising
245
238 Medio_Low
225
239
421. 000 200 Low
556
Accomodation 182 187 Business and service
163
Culture
3.230
2012 M2 price single family home 2012 490
Water and waste handling Oppland Hedmark Telemark Building and construction
Health and social services
1993
M2 price single family home 1993 1000 people 613
38 38 771kr 771kr
Industry
66 483.000 308kr
Single family homes 2012
CO2 CO2
Commuting Commuting Counties
31055kr 31055kr
25014kr 25014kr
10640kr 10640kr
8098kr 8098kr
Other Low_Low
469
443
430
285
278
265
256
236
187
192
170
“TheEmployment liberal housing market in Norway will lead to a social and geographical division of people.” All dwellings 2012
Single family homes 2012
2012
1000 people
Counties
337
Oslo
Population Single family home
1993 SFH 2012 All buildings High_High 1000 people 1000 buildings
Counties Employment 2012 SFH m2 prices 1000 people 1993
291
256
Akershus
473 Oslo 26
424 111
234
Hordaland
Nord Norge
416 111
465 154
Oslo
235
Rogaland
346 Oslo 112
215
136
136
135
130
117
92
90
86
Møre og Romsdal
Vestfold
Oppland
Hedmark
Telemark
239 76
200 60
187 69
163 55
Trøndelag
Agder
Østfold
Buskerud
381 108
245 85 Oslo
238 70
225 71
Oslo
182 68 Oslo
Akershus 5.665
613 301
4.860 High_Medium 556 220
490 221
Oslo
Akershus
Rogaland
7 400
5 900
4 500
337
4.510 High_Low 469 226
291
Hordaland
4 500 256
4.100 443 183
Vestfold
Buskerud
4 500
5 900
234
235
Medio_Medio 430 196
Agder
4 500 215
285 124
3.630 278 120
Medium_Low 265 116
Trøndelag
Nord Norge
Østfold
4 500
4 600
4 000
136
136
135
256 115 Møre og Romsdal
Low_Low 236 100
3 900 117
192 92
Oppland
Telemark
4 600 130
3.230 187 88
Hedmark
4 100 92
170 78
4 500 90
86
2012
M2 price
Single family home
28
Density
40 900 26
25 300
24 400
111
22 400 111
18 300
17 500
154
18 900
18 400 112
108
85
16400 70
16 400 71
76
15 700
60
14 800 68
13 800
22660,5
61,5 183
68,8 196
55124
68 120
58 116
66, 7 115
100 69,9
88
12 600 69
55
92
75,9 78
SFH SFH
All buildings 2012 1000Percent buildings
8 301
50 220
61, 4
221
50, 4
76
Flåm
Hol Finse
1900
1940
1998
Reindeer
10km
Hytte resort
5km
Geilo
Sesonal corridors/grazing area for reindeer disturbed by hytte
0km
Wilderness more than 5km away from tecnical interventions
Road
5km
Train
Ski trails
Power lines
Areas 1500 masl
“The settlements occupy land that was once open land to ensure bio diversity, but it is also important to remember the implied infrastructure is obligated to develop by law.”
“Norwegians increasing leisure time is consumed in front of the television and computer - and through merchandising and entertainment, altering the domestic space to become an arena in the consumer society.”
Social interaction
1970
Watching TV
1980
1990
Bellona
2000
2010
29
30
Doing this kind of research made me understand architecture and the consequences in an entirely new way. Rather than trying to prove preconceptions it became crucial to balance the argument in order to open up the understanding of the subject. Working with graphics to explain and make the argument understandable was extremly challenging, it was all about 1mm.
31
WRAPPED LIVING
HOSTEL IN HARAJUKU, TOKYO The semester at ETSAM was called “the world around in 80 days” where we were to work fictionally on many different places. This smal project is from the site in Tokyo. Harajuku is an area in Tokyo famous for the way young people dress, resulting in it being called Harajuku style. Many prominent designers and fashion ideas have sprung from Harajuku and incorporated themselves into other fashions throughout the world. This project is trying to translate the atmosphere on the site into an architectural response inspired by the harajuku style. The building can be considered as a human body wrapped with textile, the façade will change as the climatic needs change. The concept of using textile is also manifested in the way hammocks are used instead of beds, this will also reduce the required amount of space. Year: Fall 2011 Course: “the world around in 80 days” Duration: 1 month Students: Jørund Bjørlykke
Situation plan
Private
Public
1. Translate the atmosphere of the street into the the building 32
2. New entrance/relation towards the forest behind
3. Keep the gound level public
Textile (90%reflection of light) Steel beam
Textile curtain (insulation) Sliding door Steel pillar Concrete Wire 30mm Wooden wall
1:50
Section of building
Section of context
33
The courtyard at ETSAM
34
I would say the biggest learning outcome was not in the study, but rather the understanding of another culture through new friendships, food, music, landscape and language. A culture so including! Understanding the position of the architect in Spain made me intrigued to know more about construction details, but also aware of and appreciate the more free approach in Norway.
35
PRODUCT DESIGN
“Bend it” Padded dining chair, twist and adjustable height.
“U” Laminated shelf in oak 36
“Lift” Pnumatic floor/chair system
“Summertime” Folding stool of laminated birch.
“Drope” System of lamps for floor and ceiling 37
OTHER EXPERIENCES EVENTS 2
1
Creator of Størjevik festivalen 05/06
1
2
Assistant on the art project “Papirprosjektet”
3
4
3
5
6
Responsable for spatial concept of the music festival Øyo 09
5
4
7
Participant on the architecural triennale “Man made”
6
Assistant on comissioned event in Drammen theater
7
Creator of the seminar “verdiskaping”
6
Design and drawing of cottage, Bømlo
ARCHITECTURE/DESIGN 1
3
4
2
1
38
5
6
Drawings and consulting on cottage, Jotunheimen
2
Drawings and consulting on house, Stord
3
Design and production of trofè for the Norwegian championship of underwater rugby
4
Drawings and consulting on cottage, Bølmo
5 Design and drawing of extention on cottage, Stord
PRACTICAL WORK 2
1
4
5
3
Assitant on the grind-bygg production of boathouse,
1
2
Assistant on the grind-bygg production of cottage, Voss
3
Assistant on the construction work, Stord
4
Assistant on the construction work, Stord
5
Assistant on the design and production of meeting room table, Husnes
INTERESTS 2
1
3
5
4
1
Windsurfing/sailing
2
Drawing and painting
3
Sculpturing
4
Fishing
5
Skiing and hiking
39
40
Jørund Bjørlykke jbjorlykke@gmail.com 0047 90925967
41