09028878 Boulmer Lifeboat Station - Proposed Scheme

Page 1

Student Number: 09028878 Jonathan Scott Davey

BOULMER LIFEBOAT STATION Virtual Project Module: BE1341

FINAL DESIGN

This section takes an in depth look into the proposed scheme, including final design ideas, plans, elevations, sectional elevations and architectural illustrations showcasing the final proposed design.


CONTENT 01

PROPOSED ELEVATIONS

In this section we take a look at the proposed elevations of the scheme. These are architectural illistrative elevations which showcase the material considerations.

02

EXTERNAL VIEWS

In this section we take a look at the external views of the proposed scheme. These images are rendered in Revit, with photoshop to insert people, grass and trees.

03

INTERNAL VIEWS

In this section we take a look at the views from within the building. These images highlight the space created in the building and how the shapes and materials compliment the natural surrounding.

2


04

REVIT PLANS, ELEVATIONS & TECHNICAL DETAILS

In this section we take a look at floor plans and elevations that were created in Revit. Also included are the technical construction details for the proposed scheme.

05

DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT

This section looks at materials and desiign choices and why those choices were made. It also highlights certain special features and aspects of the proposal.

06

INSPIRATION

This section looks at what inspired the proposed scheme. From material choices to design characteristics.

07

LEARNING OUTCOME

This section looks at my learning outcomes and what I have taken from the project.

3


PROPOSED PLANS & ELEVATIONS & DETAILS

Student Number: 09028878 Jonathan Scott Davey

4


IF IN ANY DOUBT PLEASE ASK THE DESIGNER FOR CLARIFICATION DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWINGS. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE THE COPYRIGHT FOR THESE DRAWINGS REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF CHA. THEY MUST NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT CHA's PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT

Soffit of new common rafters to receive sandwiched multifoil insulation, between battens and counterbattens as shown, with min 20mm air gap either side.

Proposed 150mm x 50mm C24 common rafters at 400mm c/c

Celotex GA4100 between rafters with min 50mm air flow between sarking.

Soffit of new common rafters to receive sandwiched multifoil insulation, between battens and counterbattens as shown, with min 20mm air gap either side.

New slate roof covering with min 75mm head laps, suitably fuiixed to tanalised timber battens over breathable sarking membrane such as Tyvec supro.

Connect rafters to wall plates using proprietary galvanised steel rafter brackets, nail or screw fixed.

Celotex GA4100 between rafters with min 50mm air flow between sarking.

New slate roof covering with min 75mm head laps, suitably fuiixed to tanalised timber battens over breathable sarking membrane such as Tyvec supro.

Connect rafters to wall plates using proprietary galvanised steel rafter brackets, nail or screw fixed.

Tilting fillet a UV resisting cloak to eaves

Galvanised steel tie down straps screw fixed twice to wall plate and plug and screw fixed at least 5 times to masonry wall. Straps at max 1.8m c/c.

Proposed window (typical) Timber window sills glue fixed Insulation and plasterboard returned across reveal and into rear of window/door frame

Tilting fillet a UV resisting cloak to eaves

Galvanised steel tie down straps screw fixed twice to wall plate and plug and screw fixed at least 5 times to masonry wall. Straps at max 1.8m c/c.

12.5mm thick plasterboard, screw fixed to stud partition and ceiling/roof structure, joints scrim taped and finished with a lightweight gypsum plaster finish.

12.5mm thick plasterboard, screw fixed to stud partition, joints scrim taped and finished with a lightweight gypsum plaster finish.

12.5mm thick plasterboard, screw fixed to stud partition and ceiling/roof structure, joints scrim taped and finished with a lightweight gypsum plaster finish.

New cast look black plaster guttering to the clients specification, with brackets at 600mm c/c to prevent damaged from snow loading.

Minimum 25mm air flow void between wall and stud framing.

Minimum 25mm air flow void between wall and stud framing.

25mm thick Celotex PA4025 to the internal face of the stud framing.

25mm thick Celotex PA4025 to the internal face of the stud framing.

Vapour barrier between insulation and stud framing

New cast look black plaster guttering to the clients specification, with brackets at 600mm c/c to prevent damaged from snow loading.

75mm thick Celotex PL4000 installed between the stud framing.

EXTERNAL STONE WALL

75mm x 50mm regularised stud, or metal framing with vertical members at max 600mm c/c and verticals at max 900mm centres, all screw fixed.

75mm x 50mm regularised stud, or metal framing with vertical members at max 600mm c/c and verticals at max 900mm centres, all screw fixed.

Breathable membrane (Tyvec or equal approved) staplled to the outer face of the stud framing.

Breathable membrane (Tyvec or equal approved) staplled to the outer face of the stud framing.

Eaves - Exist. Wall - Proposed Wing Extension 1 : 10

5

Silicone sealed

Metal top hat section stud framing screw or adhesive fixed

Stone sill if applicable

25mm thick Celotex PA4025 to the internal face of the stud framing. Vapour barrier between insulation and stud framing

Remove sill and rebed with a damp proof membrane on lime sand mortar.

EXTERNAL STONE WALL

100mm thick Celotex PL4000 installed between the stud framing. Breathable membrane stapled to the outer face of the stud framing.

Vapour barrier between insulation and stud framing

75mm thick Celotex PL4000 installed between the stud framing.

2

Proposed 150mm x 50mm C24 common rafters at 400mm c/c

EXTERNAL STONE WALL

75mm x 50mm regularised stud, or metal framing with vertical members at max 600mm c/c and verticals at max 900mm centres, all screw fixed. Minimum 25mm air flow void between wall and stud framing.

Proposed Wing Eaves Detail

9

1 : 10

Window Sill Detail - Proposed Wing Extension 1 : 10

12.5mm thick plasterboard, screw fixed to stud partition, joints scrim taped and finished with a lightweight gypsum plaster finish. 25mm thick Celotex PA4025 to the internal face of the stud framing.

Minimum 25mm air flow void between wall and stud framing.

Vapour barrier between insulation and stud framing

12.5mm thick plasterboard, screw fixed to stud partition, joints scrim taped and finished with a lightweight gypsum plaster finish.

75mm thick Celotex PL4000 installed between the stud framing. 75mm x 50mm regularised stud, or metal framing with vertical members at max 600mm c/c and verticals at max 900mm centres, all screw fixed.

25mm thick Celotex PA4025 to the internal face of the stud framing.

EXTERNAL STONE WALL

75mm thick Celotex PL4000 installed between the stud framing.

Skirting board to the clients specification.

Breathable membrane (Tyvec or equal approved) staplled to the outer face of the stud framing.

Min 75mm sand cement screed finish with fibrous reinforcement.

Insulation and plasterboard returned across reveal and into rear of window/door frame

Vapour barriers to floor and wall to be lapped Breathable membrane and DPM to be lapped WBP plywood kicker screw fixed to stud partition as edge former for floor makeup.

Vapour barrier. Min 120mm thick Celotex (FF4075 or GA4075) under floor insulation. Breathable membrane such as Tyvec C30 concrete floor slab - min 100mm thick with a wood float finish. 2000 gauge visqueen membrane.

Where external ground level is equal to or less than internal finished floor height

Well compacted dolomite hardcore - min 150mm thick.

Existing Ext. Wall To G Floor Detail Proposed Wing Extension 1 : 10

Battens and counterbattens to create min 20mm air gap either side of YBS

Proposed 150mm x 50mm C24 treated regularised common rafters

Roof End Section - Typical 1 : 10

Window / Door Reveal - Proposed Wing Extension 1 : 10 No.

Revision Description

Date

By

REVISION SCHEDULE

Minimum 25mm air flow void between wall and stud framing. 12.5mm thick plasterboard, screw fixed to stud partition, joints scrim taped and finished with a lightweight gypsum plaster finish.

Ensure a nominal gap (10mm min) is acheived between steel and flooring to allow for shrinkage of floor joists.

Insulated plaster reveal as detailed elsewhere

Vapour barrier between insulation and stud framing 75mm thick Celotex PL4000 installed between the stud framing.

Proposed first floor construction as detailed elsewhere

EXTERNAL STONE WALL

75mm x 50mm regularised stud, or metal framing with vertical members at max 600mm c/c and verticals at max 900mm centres, all screw fixed. Breathable membrane (Tyvec or equal approved) staplled to the outer face of the stud framing.

Foil backed plasterboard ceiling, scrim taped and skim finished

Insulation and plasterboard returned across reveal and into rear of window/door frame Contractor designed tanking system fixed to the inner frace of the stone opening, prior to the insertion of the new window/door. A cementitious or plastic membrane system may be considered. The characteristics of this installation are to prevent damp and water from reaching the partition/dry lining system from the external stone wall, and directing any such moisture to the outer frace above the window/door frame.

Mezzanine Floor Beam Arrangements 1 : 10

Low level access threshold to external doorways, with maximum upstand of 15mm

Replace existing lintels with 150mm x 100mm pre cast pre stressed concrete lintels with 150mm end bearings.

PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ELSEWHERE

Stone head/lintel

Boulmer

      

Boulmer Life Boat Station

             

Boulmer Life Boat Station

    

Proposed Construction Details

Window / Door Head - Proposed New Openings In Existing Main Building 1 : 10

Proposed stone sill Nominal expansion joint to perimeter of the floor slab

Scot reveal, if applicable Level base in preparation for insulated screed over using mortar.

Proposed window/door

EXTERNAL STONE WALL

1 7

     

Proposed external door and frame

25mm thick Celotex PA4025 to the internal face of the stud framing. Flooring, screw fixed to joists

Ensure a nominal gap (10mm min) is acheived between steel and plasterboard ceiling to allow for shrinkage of floor joists.

YBS superquilt or eual approved Proposed window/door

6

8

Proposed 203 x 133 x 30 universal beam at intermediate support locations concealed within first floor structure

Scot reveal, if applicable

Contractor designed tanking system fixed to the inner frace of the stone opening, prior to the insertion of the new window/door. A cementitious or plastic membrane system may be considered. The characteristics of this installation are to prevent damp and water from reaching the partition/dry lining system from the external stone wall, and directing any such moisture to the outer frace above the window/door frame.

Nominal expansion joint to perimeter of the floor slab

Well compacted sand blinding.

4

Remove and relay slate roof covering. Allow to replace all damaged/perished slate with reclaimed to match. Fix to new tanalised slater battens onto breathable membrane such as Tyvec Supro or equal approved.

EXTERNAL STONE WALL

75mm x 50mm regularised stud, or metal framing with vertical members at max 600mm c/c and verticals at max 900mm centres, all screw fixed.

Minimum 25mm air flow void between wall and stud framing.

3

Celotex GA4100 between rafters with min 50mm air flow between sarking.

Vapour barrier between insulation and stud framing

Breathable membrane (Tyvec or equal approved) staplled to the outer face of the stud framing.

       

              

Door Threshold - Proposed Wing Extension 1 : 10



1 : 10 

Prelim



25/04/2016 18:11:36 

A109

                                  

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BUILDING SURVEYORS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS BUILDING CONSULTANTS

                                  

Designer



Author





Checker 

BOUL/01 A1

5


ELEVATIONS - ILLUSTRATED

Front Elevation - As you can see from the front elevation, the main building has become a focale point of the building, providing a view platform from the mezzanine floor level. The mezzanine floor has a double door set out onto the viewing platform. The trusses are also exposed on the viewing platform, again adding to the characted of the building and its aesthetic appeal. East Elevation - You can see from the side elevation how the proposed wing extension, hugs the main building to form an L shape around the existing main building. This provides the most efficiant internal layout possible and make the most from the limited space on site. West Elevation - The west elevation really shows how the below ground level classrooms and study areas are possible. Light is provided at ground level for the below ground classrooms which is a key feature when in the study areas. The access points for these areas are from the external stair cases down into a passage, which allow entry into the class rooms.

PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION

6


PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION

PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 7


EXTERNAL VIEWS

ARCHITECTURAL ILLUSTRATION - FRONT VIEW FROM ROAD

Student Number: 090288788 Jonathan Scott Davey

8


The image to the left shows the view from the rear of the passage way, looking back towards the front of the building. The purpose of this view is to show how the platform acts as a viewing area to the sea. The floor covering will be external vinyl which will be coloured to match the sea and the sky, creating an ‘infinity’ like platform. In this imagge youcan see the contrasting building materials of the natural stone of the main building with the contrastic blue/grey render of the new L shaped wing.

The image to the right looks back to the point of view of the image above. This shows the glazing into the study areas and toilets, and down to the corner of te L shaped walk way.

9


10


FRONT ELEVATION VIEWS

The image to the right shows how the building will look on an approach or how it will be views from the road. The shapes and angles of the building area in keeping with the local area and environment. With the use of locallly sourced materials, along with new, modern weather protective materials, it will be a land mark within the village, and will hopefully inspire local developments in years to come.

11


The image to the right shows the grandure of the main hall and how affective the mezzanine floor has been in creating a viewing platform out onto the sea.

The image above shows the viewing platform from the external space provided by the mezanine floor. You can see the exposed truss’s from this view, which is a key feature and character of the building.

The images both left and right show how the mezanine floor will look as a viewing platform. The area could be used as a seating area or a communal area.

12


INTERNAL VIEWS

WING EXTENSION INTERNAL

WING EXTENSION INTERNAL LOOKING EAST ONTO THE SEA Student Number: 09028878 Jonathan Scott Davey

13


ILLUSTRATIVE SECTION

The image to the right is a illistrational section, showing the differing levels within the proposed scheme. he four main level comprise of the following: •

Main Ground Floor Level

New Mezzanine Floor

Wing Extension Base Level

Wing Extension First Floor Level

The multiple floors offer great characteristics to the scheme, while also offering the most efficiant of floor layouts.

14


The wing L shaped extension will feature large glazed unit to the front of each room which will create and maximise light into the rooms. The wing extension will feature exposed beams, in keeping with the original main buildings feature and character.

15


Communal Area 73 m²

Mezzanine Floor 25 m²

Viewing Platform 17 m²

1                ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BUILDING SURVEYORS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS BUILDING CONSULTANTS 



1 : 100

A102

                                  

2

1 : 100

IF IN ANY DOUBT PLEASE ASK THE DESIGNER FOR CLARIFICATION DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWINGS. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE CHECKED ON SITE THE COPYRIGHT FOR THESE DRAWINGS REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF CHA. THEY MUST NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT CHA's PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT      

Boulmer

             

Boulmer Life Boat Station

      

Boulmer Life Boat Station

         

Proposed GF & FF Main Building

                                  

25/04/2016 17:15:47



       

Main Building PR GFL

Designer





BOUL/01

Prelim



Author



Checker 

A3

REVIT PLANS, ELEVATIONS & TECHNICAL DETAILS Student Number: 09028878 Jonathan Scott Davey 16

Main Building PR FFL 1 : 100

REVISION SCHEDULE No.

Date

Revision Description

By


The plans above show the proposed wing extension. Wing PR Base Level shows the level below ground. This level will be accessed externally around the perimeter of the building via staircases that span from the ground floor to the lower ground level. Wing PR FFL shows the first floor level of the wing extension. This floor will have an additional three teaching/research spaces, male and female WC’s and additional store areas for the research/teaching areas.

17


PROPOSED FRONT & REAR ELEVATIONS

18


PROPOSED EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS

19


DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT MATERIALS Materials for the prposed scheme will need to be chosen to compliment the surrounding landscapes and environments. Consideration will also be needed for the materials durability and ability to withstand the roughest weather conditions from the prevailing sea. Stone The stone that will be used for ammendments to the original main building will be to match the existing. The stone will be locally sourced, and hopefully reclaimed stone, to be weathered the same as the existing stone. Because the proposed scheme is retaining as much of the main building as possible, it will reduce the costs with the need for constructing a complete new building. One option could be to re-use and retain the stone from the demolition of the existing extensions to the building. This will create a seemless look to the building and hopefully the new alterations to the main building will be relatively unoticed.

Student Number: 09028878 Jonathan Scott Davey

20


Lime Mortar Repointing with a waterproofing addative Damp issues with stone buildings are very common, especially in a area such as Boulmer with the harsh weather conditions. The main reason period building were made of such a thickness is that it was harder for moisture to pass, most likely the water would evaporate before it reached the internal surface. Lime mortars allow the transmission of moisture, which compared to cement based mortars, which trap the moisture, damaging the walls in differeing weather conditions such as freezing the moisture in the walls, creating expanding gaps. As the building gets older, crack appear in the building. Therefore it is essential that the building, both proposed and existing is repointed with a lime mortar with a waterproofing addative to assist the damp proofing and weather protection. The repointing will also allow the new alterations to match the existing structures. Render The proposed wing extension will be rendered to produce an aethetically pleasing yet robust fascade. The proposed render will be a two-part flexible waterproofing material made specifically for the protection and waterproofing of structures. The render can be applied to rendered concrete and masonry and is resistant to sea water, sulphated water and de-icing salt as well as reducing the carbonation of concrete. The colour of the render will be a medium blue colour, similar of that in the photo on the right, which also uses the same rendering system. This colour will compliment the natural surrounding environment, and will match that of the sky, therefore camoflauging the building so it sits perfectly within the landscape.

Glazing The use of glazing will be maximised to reflect the environment and the surrounding areas, again helping blend the proposed development with the surround areas. The glazing will form part of the proposed buildings thermal value by using thermal ‘Low E’ glazing. Low-e coatings have been developed to minimize the amount of ultraviolet and infrared light that can pass through glass without compromising the amount of visible light that is transmitted. Solar heat gain, which is short-wave energy, can pass through into the room but indoor heating cannot escape to the outside as it is long-wave energy. The coating effectively reflects the room’s radiated heat back in, whilst allowing heat and light from the sun to enter through.

21


MEZZANINE FLOOR

CONSERVATION VELUX ROOF LIGHTS

The main building that is to be retained will benefit from the proposed addition of a

The main body of the building will benefit hugely from Velux roof lights. They will provide

mezzanine floor. This will not only create more floor space but will create a specticle

both additional light, as well as ventilation as they will be electronically operated, pro-

within the room. The views from both the ground floor and the mezzanine floor will be

viding additional ventilation and air through the building during the summer months.

dramatic.

The conservation Velux lights will provide a more traditional roof light in keeping with

Looking up from the ground floor you will be able to seen both glazing units on the front

the surrounding area and the existing building itself.

fascade, as well as the exposed trusses. The mezzanine floor will provide a great viewing point, not only to the floor below, but through the glazed wall and out into the sea. The mezzanine floor can be used as an observation area or a study area. The mezzanine floor will be constructed using joists fixing into the existing masonry wall on joist hangers, the mezzanine deck will be topped with a tounge and groove floor boarding with a vinyl finish on top. Beneath the mezzanine floor will be sheet rock. The mezzanine will be thermally and acoustically insullated with rigid foam board and cavity insulation.

22


LEVEL BELOW GROUND With the site of Boulmer Life Boat station being reletively limited, one way I thought to maximise the area was to propose a floor below ground. As you can see from the sectional visual below, the below ground level features a thin strip of glazing units at roof height, which, is actually only on ground level externally. This creates a void that is relatively hidden yet maximises floor space. This area can be utilised for teaching area as with the windows being at wall height, there is maximum wall space to work with, with displays, teaching boards and equiptment. From an external perspective, you can only see the main building, and the wing extension, when a first glance only looks like one level. This maximises the attractiveness to the local planning authority as it has minimal effect on the local environment and community. The below ground level almost halves the external elevation height. The below ground level is accessed externally to the side and rear elevations, as shown on the proposed plans.

23


INSPIRATION In this section I will show examples of inspiration for the proposed development. Inspiration is an important insight into material choices and also design possibilities. Inspirational images can induce a certain thought of design. Inspiration can be taken from the smallest thing and turned into something brilliant.

Student Number: 09028878 Jonathan Scott Davey

24


25


26


27


LEARNING OUTCOME

My learning outcomes have been plentiful. From learning about the restrictions that a site can have upon a proposal is very important. Another learning outcome would be how much of a detrimental effect weather can have upon a building over time, this shows that weather conditions within a certain area need to be a very important part of the design process. Weather conditional can determine many factors within a building, from materials used to the construction and alterations made to the existing building to make the building more robust to handle the weather conditions for years to come and preserve the original building as much as possible. Other learning outcomes have been my learning experience on Revit. I had a OK knowledge of Revit, but by usiing Revit more for floor plans, sections and elevations, it has confirmed to me how much more I need to use the programme over CAD. I have learnt and researched a lot into architectural illustration and presentation, and I will take these skills into my day job as an Architectural Technologist.

JONATHAN SCOTT DAVEY

09028878


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.