INTERFACE MOVEMENT+ INTERACTIVITY
SYSTEM CRAFT+ TECHNOLOGY
INFRASTRUCTURE URBANISM+ CULTURE
JACOB DUGOPOLSKI Professional Portfolio February 2010
chair component/room small building large building city blocks urban design 1 2 TYPE
3 4 5 6+ no. of people involved
1 2 SCALE
3 4 5 6+ size category of project
1 2 LENGTH
3 4 5 6+ no. of months
1
c:0 m:15 y:100 k:15
INTERFACE MOVEMENT+ INTERACTIVITY
PERCOLATE PROLIFERATE
02 03 04 05
DUALITY+ DISTRACTION
06 07 08 09
2
c:0 m:40 y:100 k:10
SYSTEM CRAFT+ TECHNOLOGY
URBAN CATALOGING
10
THICK THIN
12
11
13 14 15
ADAPTIVE PREFAB
16 17 18 19
RE CONFIGURE
20 21 22 23 24 25
3
c:50 m:25 y:100 k:0
INFRASTRUCTURE
URBANISM+ CULTURE
EXPOSING PROCESS
26 27 28 29 30 31
ISEEE
32
MORSE+STILES
34
33 35
TEMPORAL TYPOLOGY
36 37 38 39
er Riv st
PERCOLATE PROLIFERATE
Ea
Broadw ay
Ve rn o
n
Bl vd
84th Street 83rd Street
kayaks fro m the East Riv er
1 (individual studio project) 150,000 sf (landscape-building) 3 COURSE Arch 501a, Arch Design I Project 1: Skins and Skulls INSTRUCTOR Ben Pell SITE Socrates Sculpture Park, Long Island City, NY PROGRAM boathouse, educational space, offices, community meeting space, bicycle rental
CIRCULAT ION
EVENT
BATHRM SEATING
PREP
RENTAL
STORAGE
REPAIR
OFFICE
STORAGE
PROGRAM B
REAKDOW N
OPEN HOUSE EXHIBIT 09.2008 RETROSPECTA 05.2009
people fro m park, riverfront path
1 INTERFACE
Making use of the visual and experiential effects of the moiré pattern, this project uses shifted programmatic grids to filter and connect Socrates Sculpture Park, the Long Island City Boathouse, and the greater Long Island City community. Maintaining the outer path following the edge of the East River and creating an urban street edge along Vernon Boulevard, the intervention connects both edges through a network of paths around the overlaps of three misaligned striations. These overlaps are composed according to external influences and become pavilions or enclosed spaces which at the speed of movement across the site create moirés intensified according to a catalog of speeds.
FLOA VIEW TIN [-8’] ING
plan catalog PARALLEL TO GRAIN
OPEN
CLOSED
PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN
OPEN
VARIES
6"
moire pattern
12"
9"
typical solid wall width blending width
bike storage
18"
kayak storage large wall width
24"
movie screen building entrance
VARIES
PROGRAM (varies)
VARIES
CLOSED
APPROX 6'
4'0"
LG PASSAGE SM PATH LG DOOR
SM DOOR
1'0"
FILTERED WALL SOLID WALL
section catalog
THICK
THIN moiré wall
20'0"
moiré wall
moiré wall
moiré wall
8'0"
1'-4" 4'0"
DISPLAY WALL: 24" flat display front, back combined with cafe
POSTING: 12"
SEATING: 12"
SCREENING: 12"
CHANNEL: 12"
interlocking pieces, tilting towards viewer
separation of paths, program zone filters
sporadic seating around the park
BIKE RACK: 9" alternating cuts up and down
18" KAYAKS: sloped rack with protective higher strip
AREA (ABOVE): 12" SEATING larger seating plateaus SEATING AREA (BELOW): 12"
CAFE: 12"
simple storage and counter area locked storage adjacent
EVENT: 12"
simple enclosure with varying profiles furniture formed through system, allowing for light entrance correlated
depressed group seating areas
thin water element connection to water
elevation catalog
OPEN
SEATING: 12"
random placement in cafe and relaxation zones
CLOSED
KAYAKS: 18"
sloped rack with protective higher strip
BIKE RACK: 9" alternating cuts up and down
MOIRE WALLS
vertical or near vertical walls visual effect along pathways
POSTING WALLS
near entrances and key points for park and community postings
WINDOW OPENINGS in solid program walls allowing for specific light entry
DISPLAY WALL
r
bicycles fro m North Ver non
Rd
community acc from Vernon ess Rd
SITE FLOW S/
PROGRAM ZONES
DISTRIBU TION
bicycles fro m South Ver non Rd
people fro m park, secondary entrance
EAST RIVER [-8’]
G VIEWIN RM PLATFO
[WATER -2’]
SEASO
NAL K AYAK RAC
KS
SEATING AR EA KAYAK REPA IR/ NATURE CE NTER
CAFE
BATH ROO
M
LONG
NG C L G TE ASSRO O RRA CE A M/ BOV E
SEATING AR EA
STEP PE
SEAS ONA STO RAG L E
ATIN G STAG E
[- 4’]
[0’] / CAF E
AYAK RAC
CAFE/P
HOTO
KS
SEATING AR EA
KAYAK
BAC K SUP STAGE/ POR T
[WATE R -2’]
DISP L AND AY SCR E THE OPEN A EN ATER IR
OFFIC
POSTIN G WA LL
BIKE RACK/RENTAL
[- 4’] [0’]
CITY
BIKE R OFF ENTAL ICE
SEATING AR EA
[WAT ER -2 ’]
[WATER -2 ’]
[SEAT ING -2 ’]
INFO
COM MEE MUNITY TING
EVEN SPAC T E
BIKE RACK/RENTAL
RENTA L
[SEAT ING -2 ’]
[WATER -2 ’]
D SE
INDO VIEW OR SEA TING ING
TERM K
DES
K
E
4 5
top view of interlocking systems
section A: slow path
section B: fast path
view of corridor, entry posting wall and bike rack
DUALITY+ DISTRACTION 1 (individual studio project) 150,000 sf (building) 4 wks (11-12.2008)
6 7
COURSE Arch 501a, Arch Design I Project 3: BAM West INSTRUCTOR Ben Pell SITE Brooklyn Bridge Park, Brooklyn, NY PROGRAM extension of BAM’s (Brooklyn Academy of Music’s) current facilities offering theaters, office space, public amenities Emphasizing the myriad of performance types that BAM supports and is trying to grow, the proposal works on the line of intersection between these venues, offering combinations of viewing experiences and an engagement with a larger set of culture while offering a connections to the neighborhood and Manhattan skyline. Adapting the warehouse typology of the DUMBO neighborhood (Down under the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridge overpasses) and framing venues within the existing Tobacco Warehouse Building, these are shifted within the modified grid and tied together in access by an upper street. The public access the building from either end and pass on the seam of performance venues finding different widths of this street that offer food, businesses, and social areas along the length. Ticket holders can proceed up to prefunction areas on the roof terrace for each venue or down to the performance space. They also have the option of sitting in the center zone focused on one performance or on the seam between both offering new combinations of visual and audial experiences. warehouse/theater push toward skyline backdrop
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE
CINEMA
connection to exterior seating
AUD
connection to street, visual link through exterior display
urban street+branches
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE DANCE THEATER backdrop on entrance
move back to ease compression, hide visual enhance audio
theater shifts+stages
+75'
DANCE THEATER
+15' +0'
5' WING: BAR/VIE
DN
A-L
+32.5'
20' RANT: RESTAU
CIRCULATION/ RESTAURANT
DN
DN
CINEMA SCREENING/ PREFUNCTION
DN
REHEARSAL ROOM/ FLY LOFT PREFUNCTION
20%
+32'-6"
KITCHEN
VIEWLIGHT +32'-6"
FLY LOFT roof access
100 0%
+35'
+35' roof access
UP
+35'
BAM OFFICES
20%
M
+35'
VIEWLIGHT 100 0%
roof access +30'
roof access
FLY LOFT
roof access
DN
+35'
REHEARSAL ROOM/ PREFUNCTION
+35'
20%
UPPER GALLERY
UP
FLY LOFT 20% roof access
+32'-6"
+30'
BAM OFFICES
DN
A-L
LEVEL 3: ROOFSCAPE
1/16” = 1’-0”
100 100
100 0%
100 0%
A-L
DN
CLASSROOM/ +20' STUDIO 3
UP
25% 25%
UP
25% 25% +24'-6"
UP
DN
-5' DN
UP
+20'
UP
FLY LOFT UP
+20'
+0'
BATHROOM
BATHROOM
+20'
FE: CA
R: 5' BA
100 0%
50% 0%
KITCHEN
100 0%%%
SERVING/ BAR
UP
+10'
+20'
+22.5' ' : 25 LERY GAL
75% 75% A/V SUPPORT
+0'
' 10
50% 0%
+20' BATHROOM
BATHROOM
SERVING/ BAR
DN
+20'
UP
UP
+20' DN
25% 25%
FLY LOFT
DN
FLY LOFT
50% 50%
R: 5' BA
+20'
5'
FE: CA
G: WIN VIE BAR/
DN
M
50% 50%
100 0%
DN
A/V SUPPORT
75% 75%
' 10
BAM OFFICES
+20'
+24'-6" +20'
BAM OFFICES
DN
open to below
UP
UP
DN
25% 25%
+0'
LEVEL 2: URBAN STREET 1/16” = 1’-0”
A-L
OUTDOOR GALLERY
OUTDOOR SEATING
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE
+0'
-5'
DN
CLASSROOM/ STUDIO 2+10'
UP
A-L
+12'-6"
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE
DN
UP
UP
DN
+12'-6"
+10'
PROJECTION BOOTH
-5'
-3'
DANCE/ MUSIC
-5'
ENTRANCE 2 UP
M
TICKETING
+10'
RETAIL
OUTDOOR CAFE
COAT CHECK
+2'-6"
AUD
+0'
DANCE/ MUSIC -3'
LOADING
CINEMA
+0' UP
+0'
-5'
UP
UP
COAT CHECK
2
UP
+0'
CROSS PATH 3
1
OUTDOOR CAFE
TICKETING
+12'-6" DN
CROSS PATH 4
CROSS PATH 2
+0'
CROSS PATH 1
E46 ZON
1
ENTRANCE 1
A-L
LEVEL 1: ENTRY/SEATING 1/16” = 1’-0”
1
0
1
BR
O
+0'
O
KL YN BR
flat, open
viewing, performance
ID
G
E
6 +2'-6"
2
flat, playground
-2'-6"
beach extension
2 +0'
4
6 +0'
5 +2'-6"
+2'-6" +10'
+0' 1 +0'
+0"
+0' 0' 1 +0
+2'-6"
-2 --2'-6 2 6" -2'-6"
+2'-6"
+2'-6"
-2'-6" -2' 2'--6"
viewing, performance 5 1
1 1
2
+5' +
3
3
2
flat, open
r+50'
-5'
2 -5'
+2'-6"
r+45'
r+45'
+0'
r+40'
+0'
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
CONCRETE GRASS LOOSE GRAVEL BOULDERS WOOD SLAT WOODCHIPS COR-TEN STEEL
ZONE 2 115'
r+45'
+35'
r+50'
ZONE 3 150'
+35'
r+40'
r+45'
+2'-6"
r+45' r+60'
r+45'
r+45'
r+45'
r+60' r+50'
CROSS PATH
1
CROSS PATH 4
CROSS PATH CROSS PATH
1
3 2
1
N
ZONE 1 90'
b1
OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE
N
CINEMA SCREENING/ PREFUNCTION
LEVEL 3 +35' RESTAURANT WEST
TO URBAN STREET
100 0%
VIEW OF LOWER MANHATTAN
TO CINEMA
TO CINEMA
LEVEL 2 +20'
+12'-6"
LEVEL 1 +0'
TOP OF TOWERS +60'
A
B
S
C
S
D
S
E
S
N
TO STREET
F
N
8 CINEMA SCREENING/ PREFUNCTION
9
100 0%
100 0%
LEVEL 3 +35' 100 0%
PARK ENTRY LOBBY
URBAN STREET WEST END
TO PRE
TO PRE
PROJECTION BOOTH
TO LOWER GALLERY
50% 0%
50% 0%
50% 0%
LEVEL 2 +20'
TO UPPER GALLERY
VIEW / SKYLIGHT
100 0%
TO LOWER GALLERY
OUTDOOR CAFE
TO PRE
TO OUTDOOR PERF
OPEN WALL TO OUTDOOR PERFORMANCE AREA
LOADING/ STORAGE
LEVEL 1 +0' LEVEL 0 -5'
PARK ENTRANCE PROJECTION BOOTH
e1
S UPPER GALLERY
100 0%
TO URBAN STREET
LEVEL 3 +35'
LOWER GALLERY TO URBAN STREET
TO URBAN STREET
+22'-6'
LEVEL 2 +20' TO OUTDOOR PERF
CINEMA CROSS PATH 4
LOADING
LEVEL 1 +0'
-3'
j1
DANCE/ MUSIC
N 100 0%
REHEARSAL ROOM/ PREFUNCTION
-5'
TO URBAN STREET
TO THEATER
TO THEATER
75% 75%
G
H
N
TO PRE
I
TO PRE
S
J
K
N
N
L
N
CIRCULATION/ RESTAURANT
VIEW / SKYLIGHT
TO URBAN STREET
CLASSROOM/ STUDIO 3
TO PRE
TO PRE
50% 0%
CLASSROOM/ STUDIO 2 TO AUD
TO AUD
CLASSROOM/ STUDIO 1 TO PRE
TO OUTDOOR PERF TO PRE
TO PRE
h1
TO PRE
75% 75% S
REHEARSAL ROOM/ PREFUNCTION
100 0%
LEVEL 3 +35'
TO URBAN STREET
LEVEL 2 +20' TO THEATER
AUD
TO THEATER
-5' +0' LEVEL 1 +0'
DANCE/ MUSIC -3'
DUMBO ENTRANCE
URBAN CATALOGING 1 (individual studio project) 150,000 sf (landscape-building) 3 wks (10.2008) COURSE Independent Study, 745b Extended Site Project for compilation work INSTRUCTOR Pedro Azara, ESTAB (Barcelona) Liza Fior, muf architects (London, Yale seminar) SITE Various public spaces in Barcelona The political shift of Spain in the mid-1970s resulted in a commitment of the new administration to encourage and affirm the reconstruction and harmonization of the city’s public space. It was a key moment that freed designers of the urban realm to engage with the culture 10 and society in a new, open way. This project analyzed 11 a series of fourteen contemporary public spaces in Barcelona through creating a catalog of details of how the edges between the architecture and urban realm were treated ultimately deciphering the cultural effects toward a construction of context. Within the last thirty years there have been four general attitudes which are largely distinguished by the city’s hosting of the 1992 Summer Olympics. Prior to the Olympics spaces were framed by creating a variation of
2 Sant Andreu: Clot Park
Daniel Freixes, Vicente Miranda 1982-1986 3.3km, 41min
the edge conditions and voiding the center, allowing for clear open spaces. For the event and in rebranding the city were complex programmed facilities. The following development was large scale and sensitively shaped new micro-cities and contextual redevelopment. The most contemporary interventions are of a new variety, complex and layered, struggling to find the same vitality as their predecessors. By experiencing and absorbing the journey to every one of these spaces, I have created a combined analysis and experiential postings on my blog under the heading contemporary place (www.jdugo.com/blog). In response to the static judgments portrayed on other sites, I look to provide this information and experiences in an open context to develop and understand how these contemporary spaces evolve.
4 Sant Martí: Olympic Village Housing-Beachfront Apartment Blocks: Elías Torres, José Antonio Martínex Lapeña Weather Center: Alvaro Siza Viera 1989-1992 3.4km, 40min
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
10 Ciutat Vella: MACBA/CCCB MACBA: Richard Meier + Partners, CCCB:Helio Piñón, Alber Viaplana 1990-1995 0.7km, 7min
14 Besos Mar: Fórum 2004 Esplanade José Martínez Lapeña, Elías Torres 2000-2004 5.3km, 65min
2 SYSTEM
THICK THIN 1 (individual studio project) 300 sf (building) 2 wks (01.2009)
CHARACTERISTICS 69M
41F
male
female
Widower retired archivist lifelong g bibliophile p and collector obsessive compulsive (mild) visuallyy impared p and sensitive to high contrast light
COURSE Arch 502b, Arch Design II Project 1: Cohabitation INSTRUCTOR Peter de Bretteville SITE n/a PROGRAM two apartment units fit into specified volume
Divorced former dancer maintains web-based practive in yoga instruction
In an elevated cube of space opening only to above and below two users cohabit, negotiating sectionally and addressing the main structure in opposite ways. The overall duality is a lightening of structure as the elevation increases from 12” concrete to 1 ½” honeycomb plastic sheeting, while the steel structure grows from four points in a single line at the foundation to the full width of the cube at the top. Both users ascend toward the North to the first level and pass along the Northern edge, entering their apartments at the far corner. This triangular space is determined by the maximum sun angle setting the 72 degree structure to provide only indirect light to the high-contrast light sensitive user with the lower apartment.
fastidious p promotes and maintains “healthy lifestyle”
POLARITIES 69M small grain indeterminate blurred wrapping reflected depth quantity extended + age THICK SPACE
41F large grain determinate clear core direct thinness quality compressed - age THIN SPACE
The 69 year old widower/bibliophile engages the structure in his apartment, hanging the floor panels as well as the shelving which lines and shapes the space to the comfortable human reach, even containing his bed. The 49 year old divorced yoga instructor climbs further toward the south and sunlight up to her main space stacked above in the center, wrapping and concealing the structure. On the south edge both uses mix sectionally, bathrooms notching in the center and utilizing opposite spaces of respite with a terrace opening up and cave-like study below.
21 JUN 1 Y2 MA
0
R2
AP AR
M 20
FE B2 0
JAN 2 DEC 1 21
N
N
stacked
interlocked
shared
bathroom+ kitchen water (filtered)
adjacent water channeled to irrigate garden below
sun angles + structure
program adjacencies
water collection
14 15
desk
desk
PLASTIC
20' TERRACE
plywood stringer
STUDIO
18' STUDIO
BATHROOM
BATHROOM
bed (61M)
SHARED COORIDOR
concrete stringer
LIBRARY
STUDY 7' STUDY
PRIMARY SUPPORT FROM BELOW
10' LIBRARY
outdoor garden/ vertical
PRECAST
steel stringer
CONCRETE
GROUND ZONE
outdoor reading nook
2'-8" STAIR LANDING
PRIMARY SUPPORT FROM ABOVE
timber stringer
PLYWOOD
14' LANDING
TIMBERS
BUILDING ZONE
bed (49F)
ADAPTIVE PREFAB 1 (individual studio project) 50,000 sf (building) 3 wks (02.2009) COURSE Arch 502b, Arch Design II INSTRUCTOR Peter de Bretteville SITE 8-10 West Street, New Haven, CT PROGRAM ten units of affordable housing and communal areas YALE STUDENT EXHIBITION 05.2009 RETROSPECTA 05.2009 In relation to the constantly changing family size of the immigrants entering the neighborhood and church, this assemblage of units needed to address flexibility and community integration as its core. Through a similar operation of stacking and shifting the main living spaces along the south facade as well as interlocking the utility functions on the north, the units formed a network easily adaptable for hundreds of combinations. Working the assembly at both the urban and unit scale bringing unique intersection into the site and connecting across lots to the sponsoring church. 16 17
P5 P4
P1 P2
P3
E8
+40
E7
U2 dn +36
units/sta
irs morp
hology
+36
D6
A
dn
vertica 12 stacl entry system ked un betwee its n
D5
+32
dn
+28
up +28
U1 +28
E8
E7
+28
B
dn
up
A
COMMON
A
300 sf
informal/ living room
+24
section betwee al shift for gre n units, a possibleter adaptabil ity subdivis ions
patio 150 sf
C4
+24
C3
+24
B
B
+24
+20
up
U1
dn
+20
up
+20 U2
+20
+20
D4
C
compa stairs, bcting plan th ro ecome internaugh staggere d l to unit s
D3
+20
+16 +16
E6
E5
+16 +16
B
+16 up +12
dn
-4
+12
A
dn
U1
+12
bridge
up
+12 U1 +12
+8
F4
COMMUNITY MEETING / DINING open
F3
C2
450 sf
C1
+12
B
D
optimiz variableing per flat g rou unit size s on eitnd condition her end
A +12
+12
U1
common internal space, /views +8
+8
+8
shapin captureg massing to addr sunlight toward ess street, back of site common street fr space, ontage
D2
D1
+8
+8 dn +4
U2
up
dn
+4
up +4
node
+4
E4
optimiz spaces, ing per site, add carving passag ing common e throu gh
E3
+4 to church
P1
B
E
-4
up STUDY
A
-4
up
-4
-2
100 sf
-4
LOBBY
(bridge)
100 sf
-4
+4 +0
P2
-8 MECH
-4
F1
+12
+0
+8
A
-4
LAUN
F2
+0
ramp dn
bike rack
-4 +3.25
P4
P3
+0
P5
ADMIN/INFORMAL GATHERING 450 sf
up +2.0
B
church laundry connection, room, circulat ion
+4
-4 up
+1.0
+0
+0
solor ho panel, t water heate no doorSouth elevatio r n if to terra ce
18
47x
19
S1
internal with fra stair assem additio me attachembly nal unit en above ts for and be
low
F3A/B/C
division point: 180 door
RELAX
WORK
F1A
7x
division point: 180 door
F1A F1B
F1A/B
U1/U2 division point: 90 door
ZONE 2: 4" WOOD
ZONE 1: 8" CONC
entry/e storagexit unit divisio stair up , bed slot, n, South to North entry/e storagexit unit divisio , stair up bed slot, n, North to South
F1B
F1A
ZONE 2: 4" WOOD
S1/S2
ZONE 3: 2" WOOD
0-12x
+8
F1A
F1A
F1A
F1B
F1B
F1B
F1A
F1A
F2A
F2A F2B
6x
(up)
F1B
S1/S2
F3A
4x
bath
ZONE 3: 2" WOOD
(up)
12-0x
+4
F3B
2x
translucent wall (nanogel)
kitchen/ 4 struc bathroom as access tural bays wid sembly from th e, ree units possible kitchen/ 3 struc bathroom as tu access ral bays wid sembly from tw e, o units possible
F2A/B TERRACE (+0)
SLEEP
st
U2
5x
kit
U1
dark floor surface as infill and absorber
possible division point
r
5x
-4
solar hot water heater on non-operable stair unit
3x
+0
(dn)
F3C
mid-uni storage t division, open be, workspace tween ha , lves mid-uni storage t division, closed , workspace , betwee n halves
entry/e 7.5 o ro xit unit divisio stair up tation, storagen South to , North entry/e 7.5 o ro xit unit divisio stair up tation, storagen North to , South entry/e no rota xit unit divisio no stair,tion, storage n glass be , hind
F2A
F2A
F2A
F2A
F2A
F2A
F2A
F2A
F2A
F2A
F2A
F3A
F3A
F3B
F3A
F3B
F3A
F3C F3B F3C F3A
F3A
F3B
20 21
RE CONFIGURE 10 (group project) 2,000 sf (building) 2 mo (03-04.2009) COURSE Arch 503b, Arch Design III Project 5: Building Project Competition Phase INSTRUCTOR Alan Organschi, Coordinator Adam Hopfner, Building Project Director SITE 10 King Place, New Haven, CT PROGRAM two family house - accessible ground floor unit with three bedrooms, rentable tenant unit with one bedroom PROJECT MANAGER (1 OF 2) 02-09.2009 WINNING BUILDING PROJECT TEAM 04.2009 BUILDING PROJECT INTERN 06-08.2009 In our proposal, we developed a coupling mechanism that allows for dynamic cohabitation between the owner and the tenant. The tenant is treated as part of the utility of the house, along with the mechanical systems of the house. The two main construction systems are the SIP panels for the exterior envelope and conventional balloon framing for the inside structure. The SIP panels make up a neutral and systematic enclosure that is efficient in terms of thermal performance, construction labor management, and sequence/ease of assembly. The internal armature is a result of both the needs of the owner and the tenant, shaping spaces as a result of the clustering of program. In this framework, plug-in furniture allows for labor to be distributed across the team of interns for greater detailing through the span of construction. The shell or container system is more static and systematic; it responds to the local context and allows for the house to participate in the local condition or urban fabric. The internal system of construction on the other hand is active, made of multiple layers, adaptable and flexible per site condition and needs of the occupant. Both systems are replicable and have possibilities beyond this site while also interacting on the human scale to sponsor dynamic cohabitation. 4 3
5
6
2
1 2 3 4 5 6
owner porch bedroom window bath skylight kitchen skylight living room window tenant balcony
1
CONSTRUCTION SITE
SITEWORK
excavation, foundation, slab
millwork/casework revision
millwork/casework design millwork & casework testing and fabrication - YSOA shop
SIPs order placed
10
17
24
sills, beam, 1st floor deck and framing
landscape formwork pouring begins for ramp
2nd floor deck
2nd floor framing
31
ridge, SIPs
7
JUNE
14
insulation, windows, stair, exterior drs
metal roofing, exterior cladding
waterproofing
MEP
sheetrock
sitework remainder (decks & porches, walls, etc)
1
A
2
6 5
B
6
3
7
8
7
C
4
9 22 23
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
section A
section B
CASEWORK/MILLWORK DRAWINGS DUE
SIPS SHOP DRAWINGS DUE
SIPs revision
3
SIPS PANELS ARRIVE
design documentation
MAY
CD SET DUE
DESIGN PRODUCTION SUPPLY CHAIN & OFF-SITE FABRICATION
owner porch kitchen eating living room master bedroom bathroom bedroom washer/dryer owner back porch
section C
millwork and casework fabrication begins 21 (Breakfast Woodworks Inc.)
JULY
5
12
CASEWORK/MILLWORK READY TO INSTALL
28
TERM ENDS INTERNS CONTINUE
RE-ORGANIZATION INTO 3 TEAMS INTERIOR TEAM 1 doors
tiling
SITEWORK TEAM walls
26
AUG 2
painting
millwork/casework installation
kitchen
INTERIOR TEAM 2 flooring
19
9
punch list (all teams)
interior detail fencing, paving, lawn
storage
Final MEP
tenant living room/eating/kitchen
1
2
4
3
5
6 1 2 3 4 5 6
bedroom bathroom eating kitchen living tenant balcony
owner living room/eating/kitchen
king street elevation
building project 2008
16
23
24 25
cedar siding pattern (personal design) N5a
13 '-8 9/ 16 "
S4a
N4a
" 16 5/ '-2 20
S6a S7a
S3
20 '-2 5/ 16 "
N6a N3a
N7 F.C. @ SECOND FLR = +20'-11"
S2
N2a 8'-8 1/4" RO WINDOW
28'-0"
TOP OF EXT. WALL = +18'-3-3/4"
S1a
E5
E7
E6a
E8
E9
E10a
N1
E11
FACTORY INSTALLED WIRE CHASE ATTIC
N3b
N 5'-6 1/2" RO
S5 " 16 5/ '-2 20
6'-55 8"
2ND FLOOR WIRECHASE
16'-0"
E1
E2
E4
E3a 4'-11 5/8" RO
9'-13 8"
20'-3 7/8"
4'-0" RO
E3b
4'-0" RO
E6b
F.F. @ FIRST FLR = +1'-9" 6 1/2"
32'-0" 33'-1"
SIP shop drawings (coordinator)
6 1/2"
COLUMN BEYOND (3) 2x6
COLUMN BEYOND (3) 2x6
44'-0"
E10b
N4b 16'-0" 16'-6 1/2"
10'-2"
S8
8'-0" RO WINDOW
S7b
16'-7 1/2"
S6b
4'-0" RO
4'-0" RO
8'-0" RO
5'-7 3/4"
N6b
BEAM NOTCH
F.F. @ SECOND FLR = +11'-11"
S4b
8'-0" RO WINDOW
N5b
T.O. 2ND FLOOR
4'-11 5/8" RO
S1b
9'-9 1/4" RO
16'-7 1/2"
18'-2 1/8"
N2b
FACTORY INSTALLED CONTINUOUS WIRE CHASE
6 1/2"
16'-0" 16'-6 1/2"
FACTORY INSTALLED WIRE CHASE
33'-1"
FACTORY IN WIRE CHAS
METROPOLIS MAGAZINE BLOG POST, WEEK 11: A TAXONOMY OF DECISIONS ... To me, the most interesting parts of the Yale Vlock Building Project are the interpersonal dynamics and the group process of determination. As one of two project managers, my role is to be a peer-organizing element and a conduit to Adam, our project coordinator. Conflict is inevitable when the varying passions and perspectives of 49 classmates intersect. Keeping a hand on the pulse of the class is essential to maintaining a positive and cohesive flow forward. ... Collaboration in this context isn’t cut-and-dry. An evolving part of the Building Project course is learning about team dynamics and project delivery. In my mind, this is crucial and a much under-engaged part of architecture: how the many parts of the process work together to achieve the best possible result. Compared to the typical scenario, the building project throws 90 percent out the window, because we all have to agree on what that window is—type, size, exterior color, and interior finish (and then agree on how to install it correctly). ... Since the beginning of the project, people have been asking me, What makes your house unique? I struggle to answer them in one sentence, because it is both the concept and the people—and both are constantly evolving. It is the SIPs, the interior/exterior “Jimmy” concept, and the site responses from solar to programmatic organization. But more importantly it is the people and the process; that is what really makes this house unique. Decades of team training and group analysis could not solve the intricacies of this dynamic, but that is the fun of it. Collaborative design is an uneven process of decision making and discovery.
N8 44'-0"
W2
W3
W4
W5
W7
W6a
W8
W9a
W10a
W11
2ND FLOOR FACTORY INSTALLED WIRE CHASE
8'-0" RO WINDOW
4'-0" RO
BEAM BEYOND
COLUMN BEYOND
7'-8 1/2" RO WINDOW
6 1/2"
7'-8 1/2" RO WINDOW
NSTALLED SE
W6b
W9b FACTORY INSTALLED WIRE CHASE
12'-0"
32'-0" 44'-0"
W10b
15'-11 9/16"
6'-5 1/2"
W1
INFRASTRUCTURE
3
EXPOSING PROCESS
LSF SF
LIBRARY S STORAGE FACILITY Y
DELIVERY 00:07 8 miles
1 (individual studio project) 150,000 sf (building) 4 mo (09-12.2009)
RETURN 00:07
COURSE Arch 1021a, Arch Design III Project: Exquisite Archive INSTRUCTOR Joel Sanders SITE Corner of Trumbull Street and Hillhouse Ave, New Haven, CT PROGRAM extension of Bieneke Library’s current facility, vault, archivist process spaces, offices, reading room, group meeting, classrooms, theater My main idea is to express the circulation and processing of visual materials, exposed through circulation routes that allow visitors to selectively navigate through these normally off-limit zones. The proposal also incorporates a connection to the Farmington canal greenway, facilitating a connection to temple street and sponsoring a new bike path to the center of the green. In massing, I used two rows of compact storage modules and a central access path stacking these to the six stories to continue the urban edge. Inserting a loading dock along the back edge to sponsor a processing/admin bar to frame a front lawn and respecting the suburban scale. The entry sequence for the public first involves the underground digital interface, a basement level connection with digital display screening the digital storage modules behind. The tunnel and street level paths parallel the processing facilities to the right and converge at the lobby, lodged in plain view of the loading dock. From this point, event and researcher paths break encountering a myriad of connections to the material of the archive and between users.
PEOPLE
HILLHOUSE STREET looking north away from campus
FARMINGTON CANAL PATH looking toward Hamden
STREET PARKING
IN
TO W
HIT
NE
YG
REE
N
2
FROM
I-91
TO
HA
MD
EN
LINK
OUT
TO
WA TE
R
TO
E EK EN BI
TO GREEN
TRUCK completes service drive loop staying off of Hillhouse Ave
CAR reading room as beacon from I-91 Trumbull Street off ramp, campus gateway
BIKE pathway connection through sponsors bike lane connection into the heart of the New Haven Green
PEDESTRIAN Farmington Canal Greenway bike and walking levels, pedestrian corner shortcut to Whitney Square Green
SECTION A1
SECTION A2
1. DIGITAL GALLERY 2. UNDERGROUND BIKE PATH CONNECTION 3. ENTRY FROM GRADE 4. LOBBY / FRONT DESK 5. THEATER / PROJECTION 6. CLASSROOMS 7. GALLERY 8. GROUP COLLABORATION 9. OPEN GREEN ROOF
1. START OF RESEARCHER LOOP 2. UNDERGROUND BIKE PATH CONNECTION 3. RECIEVING / LOADING DOCK (2/2) 4. SHIPPING / LOADING DOCK (1/2) 5. WAITING CAFE 6. VAULT
+75
6 +63
8
6 +51
6
9
+39
7 +27
5 6
6
MATERIALS M I +15 +12
1 3
4
3
+3 +0
2
5
4
-12 -15
5 6 -27
COLLABORATION
CIRCULATION
RESEARCH
ARCHIVING
OPEN GALLERY SECURE GALLERY
PHYSICAL STORAGE
ADMINISTRATION
ARCHIVING
READING ROOM
RESEARCH
CLASSROOMS
CIRCULATION
MATERIALS
PEOPLE DIGITAL STORAGE
RECIEVING LOADING DELIVERY PROCESSING PROCESSING
PREFUNCTION
THEATER
massing study models, post-midterm
28 29
bike path, from Temple Street
view over intersection of Temple Street and Hillhouse Ave
service drive, mid-block
6 1
UP
level 4 detail UP
1 2 3 4 5 6
2
vault individual research reading room archivist area researcher area group collaboration
5
4
UP
DN
UP
DN
3
2
DN
2
4
section B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4
6
8
prefunction ramp to prefunction theater vault secondary circulation reading/archivist station behind main circulation path digital research room individual pods
9
7
30 31 5
6
4
4
2
4
3 4
1
ISEEE 7 (work team) 650,000 sf (building) 4 mo (11-02.2007) FIRM KieranTimberlake Associates LLP PROJECT PRINCIPAL James Timberlake SITE University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada PROGRAM Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment, and Economy, LEED Platinum proposed building with wet and dry lab space, classrooms, offices, campus links PERSONAL ROLE study of massing and contextual strategy, imaging and production of various site proposals, help with physical model and coordination of detail model METROPOLIS MAGAZINE 08-09.2007, ISEEE rendering created personally on p111 A major competition win for the firm, this massive building required a rigorous study involving the program, site, and sustainability. The floor area of four standard big box stores, the building has potential to redefine the University of Calgary campus. The main design concept was to use the building as landscape in shaping new interdisciplinary connections and a strong campus grain. I was an integral part of shaping the contextual strategy and building massing working directly with James Timberlake to create massing proposals, reshaping, refining, and re-rendering in a continuous iterative process. The site that I studied had two main proposals, the early version bridging across 32nd Avenue toward the research campus, and a later version defining a new edge along the road and connections into campus.
programmatic mixing
4
3
1
5 6 7
2 8 9 10
11
University of Calgary campus with summer solstice shadows and site numbers
32 33
massing progression for bridge scheme
(personal role in imaging for all, led site 3-4-5 design)
site 1
site 3-4-5
site 11
site 7-9
site 4 bridge scheme across 32nd Avenue (personal role in design and imaging)
MORSE+ STILES 7 (work team) 200,000 sf (building) 9 mo (08-10.2006+06-11.2007) FIRM KieranTimberlake Associates LLP PROJECT PRINCIPAL Stephen Kieran SITE Yale University, Morse and Stiles Colleges designed by Eero Saarinen, New Haven, CT PROGRAM complete renovation of 180,000 sf and underground addition of 20,000 sf including a new auditorium and social/recreational spaces. PERSONAL ROLE focus on entrance lobbies and stairs down to addition, help with design and detailing of underground addition, physical model, presentation images
existing building
One of the last works designed by Eero Saarinen and completed in 1962, these two residential colleges have a rich history and architectural prominence. Built in the style of pre-Gothic Tuscan towers, the rubble masonry and lack of right angles form an amazing shell but with time the inside has worn and become outdated. Program for the renovation includes an expanded servery, new kitchen, and a considerable amount of additional social and recreational space, now housed in the dark concrete quarters of the basement. As part of this intervention we sought to re-define the identity of the colleges especially in relation to each other. This was achieved in part through establishing a material language for layering new texture and linking to the addition. Part of the challenge was working a new cohesive flow into a very rigid existing structure. For the subterranean addition, we established battered walls and edge skylights within structural boxes aligned to the curving geometry of the two colleges.
view of lower court from central passage stairs to addition on Morse side (personal role - design and detailing)
34 35
underground addition model (personal role - coordination and creation)
TEMPORAL TYPOLOGY 1 (individual studio project) 15 blocks (urban design) 4 mo (01-04.2006)
Bran
ch:
Edu
cati
on
COURSE Arch 442, Arch Design IV (4th/Final studio) INSTRUCTOR John Comazzi SITE Dequindre Cut, Detroit, MI PROGRAM headquarters, nursery, and education space for the Greening of Detroit, public space for recreation areas, paths, relaxation DIMENSIONS 20 02.2007 Univ of Michigan student-run yearly book of top final semester studio projects
Bran
ch:
Gre
enh
ous
e/M
aint
ena
The Dequindre Cut is an abandoned rail line that was constructed below street level, becoming overgrown and derelict since its last train run in 1960. Running from the Eastern Market to the Detroit River, this one mile stretch is a neglected but vital space to the City of Detroit and has the potential to initiate and merge with a larger system of greenways. This project addresses how architecture can engage and compose the temporal; how it can become a scape in itself, an experiential progression that links the city and the cut. It addresses the blurring distinction between nature and artifice, especially how human and artificial cycles interact, converge, and conflate natural cycles for a better understanding of the other. Working in a cross-grain motion to connect the current figures and voids, the project became a projective urbanism. It is a context sensitive yet flexible typology that can continue beyond the limits of the site, accommodating the growth and needs of the Greening of Detroit. Three main building/bridges and three land transformations were defined. This typology mixes and changes size to fit the context, growing and reshaping with time, developing and integrating across, along, and around.
Bran
ch:
Aba
Proj e
ct M
ndo
ned
ana
nce
Brid
ger/
Leas a
ge/A
ble
butm
ent
existing longitudinal path
Nur
sery
/Pro
duct
ive L and
scap
e
36 37
Rec r
eat
existing cross path
ion
/Le
isur
e La
nds
cap
e
.
.
#URRENT
#URRENT 'REENING
#ONNECT
0ROJECTED #ONNECTIONS
9RS
0HASE
9RS
0HASE
9RS
0HASE
9RS
0HASE
&UTURE 5NIT /FFICE ,OCATION 3TAFF 3PACE !DMINISTRATION /FFICES )NTERNS 3TORAGE 3TAFF 3PACE &UNDRAIDING /FFICES 'ENERAL 3TORAGE
7HITE &IR .ORWAY -APLE 3AUCER -AGNOLIA
APPLES PEARS WATERMELON
PEACHES RASBERRIES STRAWBERRIES CHERRIES
CONCERTS PERFORMANCE PUBLIC SPACE
SWIMMING VOLLEYBALL ROCK CLIMBING
PEACHES RASBERRIES STRAWBERRIES CHERRIES
TENNIS BASKETBALL RACQUETBALL
BEANS PUMPKINS SQUASH TOMATOES
HERBS GREENS BROCCOLI CABBAGE PEAS
PICNIC PLAYGROUND
HERBS GREENS BROCCOLI CABBAGE PEAS
"RANCHES
FT X FT "RONZE FT YR YR TRANS v BALL
FT X FT 9ELLOW &ALL FT YR YR TRANS v BALL #ORKY "ARK
,INDEN
-ONTHLY
FT X FT /RANGE FT YR YR TRANS v BALL
FT X FT 9ELLOW &ALL FT YR YR TRANS v BALL 2ED &RUIT
2ED /AK
FT X FT %VERGREEN FT YR YR TRANS v BALL
!MUR #ORK 4REE ,OMBARDY 0OPLAR
h.ATURALv SCRUB LEFT TO WILD GROWTH OF TREES
#RAB !PPLE
FT X FT 3TRONG 9ELLOW FT YR YR TRANS v BALL FT X FT 2ED &ALL FT YR YR TRANS v BALL FT X FT 0ALE 9ELLOW FT YR YR TRANS v BALL
APPLES PEARS WATERMELON
5NALTERED
SOCCER FOOTBALL FIELD HOCKEY
#ORE
,IBRARY 2EADING 2ESEARCH !REA $AY #ARE ADJACENT PLAY AREA
9EARLY
2ECEPTION ,ARGE -EETING #AFE 'IFT 3HOP
&ULLY $EVELOPED
7INTER 3OLSTICE
&ALL %QUINOX
3UMMER 3OLSTICE
3PRING %QUINOX
$AILY ,EAVES
WATCHING
WATCHING
RELAXING GARDENING
RELAXING GARDENING
EDUCATION CORE EVENTS RECREATION DISK GOLF
EDUCATION
WALKING INTERIOR SERVICE RUNNING
RECREATION
WATCHING RELAXING
RELAXING
RELAXING GARDENING
RELAXING
EDUCATION
RECREATION
RECREATION
WATCHING RELAXING
RELAXING GARDENING
RELAXING 2'-71/4" 2'-213/16"
1'-101/2" 1'-913/16"
WATCHING WATCHING RELAXING
EDUCATION RECREATION
RELAXING GARDENING
"ENCHES ALONG PATH VIEWS FROM DECENT .ICHES ALONG PATH FOR PERSONAL AREAS
RELAXING
4OP OF BRIDGE ABUTMENTS MIXED IN WITH PATH MATERIAL TREATMENT .ODE BUILDING SPACES INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR
EDUCATION RECREATION
%VENT SPACES PERFORMANCES LARGE MEETING AREA
CORE EVENTS CORE EVENTS RECREATION
,ARGE DEDICATED EXPANSIONS ALONG PATH
RECREATION
.INE STATIONS PLACED THROUGHOUT CONTINUOUS $IRT 7OOD SLOWER PATH
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
0ARKING AND SLOW MOVING SWITCHING ZONES
SERVICE
&ASTER PATH CONCRETE WITH LESS BENDS 7INTER USE QUICK PASSAGE THROUGH
CROSS COUNTRY SKIING CYCLING VEHICLE INFORMATION
#ONCRETE PATH THE LENGTH
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
VEHICLE
3LOWED AT CERTAIN POINTS TO CREATE BETTER RECOGNITION
0’-0” EDUCATION
SLOW experiencing, learning winding path
WOOD tactile primary system, railings and rainscreen
FAST direct access down service, maintenance
METAL hard and sleek surface structure, bracing
MIXED ces ess ramp access to offices quick path to nursery
CONCRETE primary building wrap walls, stairs, ramps
-25’-0”
0’-0” GREENHOUSE/SUPPORT
-25’-0”
0’-0” PROJECT BRANCH
top perspective of one bridge combination, physical model
38 39
-25’-0”
0’-0” branch pair from St. Aubin Road, top of abutment
-12’-6” mid-level view, greenhouse branch
JACOB DUGOPOLSKI
371 Crown Street New Haven, CT 06511 jacob.dugopolski@yale.edu www.jdugo.com