JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
ACADEMIA-PROFESSIONAL EXAMPLES
CONTENTS ACADEMIC WORK 5. REFLECTION 6. ARCH 2 STUDIO 17. ARCH 3 STUDIO 22. ARCH 4 STUDIO PROFESSIONAL WORK 52. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 54. REVIT MODELING
ACADEMIC
ACADEMIC WORK
REFLECTION
The first time I was aware of the term architecture, I must’ve been around three years of age. An aunt of mines which I never got to meet due to her passing before I was born, past away during the final stages of her thesis work due to health complications. I seen the pain such event brought to my family, and how the unfulfilled hopes, promises and expectations scarred the members of my family. I happened to stumble across some of her work during my childhood, and it was obvious that her talent was inmensed. Her detailed linework in her drawings was the first definition of grace and hard work for me as far back as I can remember. By the time I was four years of age I knew what I wanted to be and that was to be an Architect. My father was good at hand drawing and I always practiced hand drawing as a child; Building blocks were my favorite toy at the time, but the first time I seen the swing of a door on a set of construction drawings I just knew what it was. I cannot explain how or what made me know what it was but I just knew. I did not picked up a sport or a video game as a favorite past time during my childhood, not knowing that probably was due to the limited financial means that were available to my parents but drawing and reading were and still my favorite thing to do. My mother was very hesitant on me choosing to be an architect, I found it odd at the time but then again the family member that past away was her sister, and me not having the perspective of a mother seeing her first child pick up the same trade that her deceased sibling chose, I was at odds with her not supporting my ideas at first. Now at my age I can fully understand her concerns at the time... When I first came into the doors of the BAC, I thought I had defined my artistic design language as an architect. thought with the years I had under my belt of hand drawing were enough for me to push my believes on others. I had the perception (at the time) that I was a polished, refined and in some ways, which now thinking back on that time it was plainly wrong by me, I assumed that I knew everything that has to do with architecture. At times I had the audacity to dismiss the work of others in a moments notice if it did not appealed to me from first sight. Of course all these thoughts derived from the notion that form was the focal point of structures, completely ignoring function, purpose, concept, program and execution. All these terms were unknown to me of course, but with lack of perspective and knowledge I couldn’t see that far..... Arrogance can be a friendly enemy to the mind. Eventually I managed to get practice working in the field as a apprentice under contractors, architects, surveyors, electricians and carpenters which allow me to realize almost every single day that I did not knew much and made me realize how wrong I was during the times of my early stages of schooling. During these times I wanted to give up. I realize the talent I thought I had was sub-par and my work ethic was mediocre at best. However those memories of my childhood managed to make me refocus on the goal of becoming the architect I promised to myself that I would become. After all this time I have realize that being an architect is much more than a pretty drawing of a home or structure. It is really defined by the person that practice architecture, for me is has become the answer to the problem within space. JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
DESIGN STATEMENT The main goal for this project was to re- design the Boston Food Distribution Center located in Chelsea, MA. with a focus on resilient architecture. The studio had to take into consideration the sea level rise expectancy in the area as well as the function of the building. This building is of high importance to the infrastructure of the metropolitan area of Boston. We as a Studio focused on the idea on how to keep the distribution center running during weather precipitation and sea level rising expectansy 90 years from the time of execution. I was in charge of designing the food distribution center, with a Net-zero energy approach. We had to do background research of the site due to the fact that the area is a hub of commerce which at the time was going under major construction and redevelopment. At the time this was the most complexed project I’ve been involved as a student at the BAC.
INSTRUCTORS Arlen Stawasz Tyler Hinckley
ARCH 2
HISTORY EVERETT The area of Everett Massachusetts, use to be part of the Charlestown Grant in 1629 and was normally called the Mystic side or south Malden. The main transpiration that was used to bring people to Boston, was the Penny Ferry which began in 1640. The ferry in use until 1790, when the Malden bridge was put over the Mystic river. The ferry served everyone north of Everett on the Mystic River, and the bridge stopped that only having an 8-foot clearance. The man economic base for Everett was fish, and agriculture. Other business that were getting started were shoemaking and brickmaking, however agricultural pursuits stayed dominant. In the year 1848, Everett started the twenty-one-year struggle of trying to separate from Charlestown. By 1870 their independence was achieved and the population grew to 2,152. This was the start of Everett making its mark in the area, industries grew, fast boosting the economy, with the agriculture being the main motivation of the society. The Chemical Works was built in 1868, where the new Wynn casino is being built. The area was taken over by different chemical throughout the years. Mystic Generating Power Plant was built 194. In the beginning the power plant was using eight units, pushing out 1,968
Chelsea Square - http://energytariffexperts.com/blog/2013/4/28/power-plant-of-the-week-mystic-generating-station
CHELSEA Historic map of Everett and Chelsea - http://www.historicmapworks.com/Map/US/53794/
megawatts of power which can power 322,752 homes, and now producing 50% of Boston’s energy By 1945 Everett had its name on the map, the population was at its peak, 48,242 people. The community of Everett was third on manufacturing in the Greater Boston Area, behind Cambridge and Somerville. They are also second in the area in wages paid, this was the final peak for Everett. Since this time Everett has been working well from an industrial stand point, but has lost his social identity. Boston’s Orange Line use to have a stop in the beginning of Everett, that was taken out in 1975.
Everett Square - http://www.nobomagazine.com/2012/01/15/a-brief-history-of-the-city-of-everett/
4 | RESEARCH
The area of Chelsea used to be known as Winnisimmet, good spring nearby, to a Massachusetts tribe. Samuel Maverick settled in the area 1624 and considered Chelsea to be the first permanent settlement by Boston Harbor. The city was then sold to Richard Bellingham ten years later but wasn’t given the name Chelsea until 1739. In the 1840’s Chelsea became a power house in wooden ship construction, and as years went into the industrial age so did Chelsea’s industries. They shifted to manufacturing rubber and elastic goods. In the spring of 1908, almost half of the city of Chelsea was destroyed, only the first fire of two that would devastate the city.
This horrific fire left over half the population of Chelsea homeless, making many of the residents leaving and never coming back even after all the repairs. This gave room for crowded immigrants in Boston to move in. In 1919 Chelsea hit its peak population of 52,662 people..After WWII the city went on a decline, losing 38 percent of the population. The Route 1 North Expressway was built in the 1950’s, cutting the city in half abandoned historic homes, industrial buildings, salt piles, and gas and tank storage. 1973 was the year of the second fire, burning eight-teen blocks. Chelsea started being called the “rag shop district
ESO Everett - http://www.aukevisser.nl/inter-2/id318.htm
RESILIENT FOOD STUDIO | 5
SITE DIAGRAM
Existing program Boston’s food distribution
A VERY DENSE AND CONGESTED INDUSTRIAL HUB
Energi GDF / Distrigas Residential area Oil and LNG storage area Mystic Generating Station
n
Commercial area
an dj un ct io
be
ac
th
ad
wa y
lyn
bro
my s
de xt
er
de
tic
nd
lik es
m
st
t
st
st
st
6 | RESEARCH
in Tob
mystic river
bri
dg
e
Ma lde
nb ridg
e
OL NE D M W ON WY SA NN NT CA O S SIN ITE O
gr
or
ha
RESILIENT FOOD STUDIO | 7
SOCIAL
Everett
POPULATION INEQUALITIES Everett and Chelsea have a wide spread of ethnicities. Everett does have a 62.8% white community, with some Hispanic, Asian, African American and Indian American culture thrown in. Even though Everett is predominantly white, their neighbor’s Chelsea has a 61.1% Hispanic community. These two cities are very diverse and they need something to bring that together and embrace it.
EVERETT 42,935
In the beginning of Everett’s settlement, the 1700’s, the population was around 100-200 people. The population started growing more when Everett was White trying toHispanic gain Chelsea African American Asian their independence. By the 1800’s the population was around 800 people. Once Everett achieved their Year Chelsea Everettthat same independence their population hit 2,152 year. As the1700 city started industrializing people of 112 the 108 Everett started 1725migrating to Boston. 205However, 151with the CHELSEA big companies residents came 1750moving to the city 472 325 back 37,084 for all the new jobs reaching 37,718 1775 525by 1915.356 1800 849 402 Chelsea was1825 settled on 1624, in the 642 first two 812hundred years the population barely made it over one thousand 1850 6,701 1,356 people. In the 1890’s the “great wave” of Jewish, Russian 1875 18,547 2,200 White theHispanic African American Asian and Eastern European immigrants started flooding 1900 34,072 24,336 city. By the 1930’s the population had grew to almost 1925 After the first great 43,184fire the 40,120 46,000 people. population 1950 dropped, but still hit its peak 38,912 of 56,66245,982 people was 1975 The population 30,625 42,485hit after reached in 1919. took another 2000 38% from 1940-1980. 35,080 38,037 WWII, decreasing 2025 41,892 47,155
BLACK - 14.3% HISPANIC - 21.1% WHITE - 62.8% ASIAN - 4.8% AMERICAN INDIAN - 0.4%
Indian American
Two or more
BLACK - 8.5% HISPANIC - 62.1% WHITE - 47.8% ASIAN - 3.1% AMERICAN INDIAN - 1.1% Property Value Map - http://ss2.climatecentral.org/#12/42.3137/-71.0789?show=satellite&projections=0-RCP85-SLR&level=5&unit=feet&pois=hide
Indian American
Two or more
ChartLEVELS Title GROWTH INCOME 50,000 50,000
AVERAGE INCOME OF GREATER BOSTON AREA EVERETT
CHELSEA
$53,833
$48,752
45,000 45,000
$66,986
SOMERVILLE
40,000 40,000 35,000 35,000
30,000 30,000
$69,160
BOSTON
25,000 25,000 20,000 20,000
MEDFORD
$77,865
15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000
MALDEN
5,000 5,000 00 1650 1650
6 | RESEARCH
1700 1700
1750 1750
18001800
18501850
Chelsea
Everett
The diversity and enriched culture of these two cities may be high but their median income levels are on the low side when compare to the places around them. The places that are in the higher end of this is Boston, Somerville and Medford, they are averaging over $60,000 in income over the city, with Malden coming in a littler under $60,000 yearly. Even though Everett and Chelsea are on the lower part of the scale in this category, The Wynn casino, coming in 2019, with be providing a lot of jobs for its construction and even more long term jobs for the community.
$55,523
1900 1900 1950 1950 2000 2000 20502050
RESILIENT FOOD STUDIO | 7
ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE VULNERABILITIES The industrial park in the lower part of Everett includes different companies that are vital to the Metropolitan area. The New England Produce Center, which produces more than 40% of the Greater Boston Area, is on the edge of Chelsea and Everett. This produce terminal has 128 bays, and around 400 people working there. The terminal has 300-500 trucks coming through daily. The NEPC is more just the middle man for grocery stores and bodegas they are a public produce provider, anyone can walk into the center and purchase the variety of food they have. If Boston does not receive their share of truck loads in three days, Boston will go into a state of emergency. Distrigas is the top importer of Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) into the U.S. This LNG terminal, in Everett, is essential to New England energy needs, producing nearly 20% of New England’s natural gas supply. It is the longest operating LNG terminal and an essential part of the regions energy supply mix. Going through 100 million cubic
feet/day with trucking capacity and millions of Vaporization capacity. cessary back pressure on the pipeline system. Mystics Generating Power Plant is also in this park. It’s another company important to Greater Boston’s power supply, providing more than 30% of power. These two company’s area also an important part of the US pipelines, the Distigas terminal proves the necessary back pressure on the pipeline system. There are six different pipelines going through lower Chelsea and Everett. There is the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, Algonguin Gas Pipeline, National Grid, Mystic Station, and local distribution. The Tennessee line also known as Kinder Morgan’s Pipeline, runs approximately 11,800-mile interstate pipeline. It transfers natural gas from the Gulf of Mexico up to north eastern section of the United States, including Boston and New York, pushing out 750 PPIG. The Algonguin gas transmission is a 1,100-mile system, delivering natural gas into New England. Similar to the other line it goes all the way down
DISTRIGAS PIPELINES
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE
Distrigas Oil Storage -http://www.powermag.com/everett-lng-terminal-at-the-crossroads/
Mystic Power - http://energytariffexperts.com/blog/2013/4/28/power-plant-of-the-week-mysticgenerating-station
to the Gulf of Mexico, but lays along the northeastern coast line. National grid pipeline is not nearly as long as the others, it distributes to the National Grid stations around New England. Mystic Generating Station has its own personal gas pipeline; it solely runs on gas from the LNG terminal right down the road. The station takes most of the gas out of the six different pipelines, taking 30-40%, pushing approximately 750 PPIG. The boil off or local distribution line uses the least of the lines, only using 1-2%, pushing out a petite 22 PPIG. Finally, we have the liquid delivery, this is not a pipeline but is transporting 1 million gallons/day via trucks. Still using more of a percentage than the local distribution.
ALGONGUIN GAS PIPELINE NATIONAL GRID MYSTIC STATION LOCAL DISTRIBUTION LIQUID DELIVERY
NEPC - Photo taken by Anthony Pietroforte
8 | RESEARCH
https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2015/04/24/c-tough-decisions-about-energy//story.html
RESILIENT FOOD STUDIO | 9
ENVIRONMENTAL CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITIES
INCREASES INTENSITY OF STORME
.
Hurricane .
The world we live in is not in the best of shape right now, even if we can go green in everything the damage has been done. The damages we have been starting to see are sea-level rise, increase in precipitation, heat waves and increase in the intensity of storms. Since 1958 to 2010 there was a seventypercent increase of precipitation. This statistic was for the United States, but the Northeast region of the US has had a faster increase of precipitation over the whole country.
22FT FT SLR SLR
33FT FT SLR SLR
4 FTSLR SLR 4FT
5 FT SLR
6 FT SLR
7 FT SLR 7FT SLR
8 FT SLR
9 FT SLR
Flooding
INCREASE IN TEMPERATURES CAUSING MORE PERCIPITATION The rising of the temperatures means that ocean will be evaporating more after than normal, causing more the air to hold more water. Which will create heavier precipitation events. This is makes all the problems become even worse. From 1985 to 220011 there was a 0.16 F increase per decade, increasing 10% or five inches per decade.
1 FT SLR
Increased Percipitation
Rising Temperatures
Sea level rise is expected to be 5 feet by 2070 beyond current level.
http://surgingseas.climatecentral.org/#12/42.3136/-71.079
10FT SLR 10 FT SLR
10 | RESEARCH
RESILIENT FOOD STUDIO | 11
ENVIRONMENTAL
12 | RESEARCH
RESILIENT FOOD STUDIO | 13
NZFDCB
PLAN AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT
NET ZERO FOOD DISTRIBUTION CENTER Food production and distribution are a major problem accross the world. Although there is enough food in the world for every human being on Earth (statistically), Not everyone has the means to have food at their disposal. Waste of food itself is also an issue that further deteriorates the problem that is food. But what if there’s a place with proximity to a major city in the U.S. which major focal point is emphazising the problem and tackles solutions by educating and improving the “food experience” for consumers, disribuotrs and simultaneously it serves as a future precendent for a net zero energy and waste commercial building.....
SITE
BUSINESS LAYOUT
I propose a zero net/zero waste and net-zero water, food distribution center, which main strategy is to educate the local community on where their food comes from, how it’s processed and disposed, but also focuses on displaying the beast of food consumption at a global and national and local level, while practicing a common food distribution business model in conjunction with a public limited market place.
SITE RELATION TO OTHERS
PHAZING PLAN
NET ZERO KEY PLAN AND STRATEGY LOADS
EFFICIENCY
RENEWABLES
OPTIMIZING
A/C HEAT LIGHTING MACHINERY
GEO THERMAL HEAT COLD EXCHANGE ENERGY RECOVERY
SOLAR RAIN WATER
WATER CONSUMPTION WATER USE WASTE REMOVAL AND RECYCLING
ROA D
SITE ACCESS
SUSTAINABLE STRATEGY
PROPOSAL INTENT AND STATEMENT ALL STRATEGIES ON SITE, MAIN FOCUS IS TO PRESERVE WATER, ENERGY AND COST OF WASTE REMOVAL AND PROCESSING. THE ARCHITECTURE IN THE SITE REFLECTS THE FUNCTIONS WITHIN THE BUILDING AS WEL THE STRATEGIES TACKLED BY THE DESIGN ON THE EXTERIOR AND LOCATION OF MASSING. ALL SYSTEMS IN THE BUILDING ARE INCONJUNCTION WITH THE RESILIENT INTENT.
ZERO NET ENERGY, WATER AND WASTE STRATEGY KEY MAP
COMMERCIAL VEHICULAR PATH
PUBLIC VEHICULAR PATH
RAIN GARDEN
COMPOST AND WASTE ZONES
SECTION A.2 WATER CANAL PRISMATIC LENS SKYLIGHT
TRAILER TRUCK TURNING RADIUS
ROOF PIVOT POINT AND UPPER WATER CANAL
SECTION A.1
SOLAR PANEL
DETAIL SECTION AND SYSTEM STRATEGY CLEAR STORY WINDOW
R40 WALL INSULATION
R60 INSULATED ROOF
GEO THERMAL WATER COOLING PIPES
R50 WALL INSULATION
SHROUD [TRUCK ENTRANCE]
GEO-THERMAL SYSTEM WATER PIPE (DOWN 200’ INTO THE GROUND)
DETAIL SECTION
RAIN WATER COLLECTING TANKS
WATER CANAL
RESILIENT CHELSEA STUDIO
HIERARCHY MAPPING ACTIVITY IDIOM
SECTION A.1
1. SHIPPING AND RECEIVING PATHWAYS
3. VISUAL CAPABILITY OF COMMERCIAL AREA AMONGST
ALONG THE BUILDINGS
THE EDUCATIONAL/COMMERCIAL TYING BELT.
5. COMPOST AND WASTE ZONES SERVE AS RAIN WATER FILTERING SYSTEM AREAS GUIDED BY THE SHAPE OF ROOF
COMPOST/WASTE AREA ELEVATION
SECTION A.2
2. DLH- SERIES BAR JOIST STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS FOR FRAMING OF
4. A “FARM FIELD” OF SOLAR PANELS AND SKYLIGHTS WILL BE
THE PITCH FLAT ROOF. (15’ OF DISTANCE FROM ONE ANOTHER.
FEATURED IN THE ROOF OF THE PRODUCTION BAYS
RESILIENT CHELSEA STUDIO
RENDERINGS
PERSPECTIVE VIEW FROM PUBLIC SPACE LOOKING OVER COMMERCIAL PATHWAY
NZFDC
COMPOST WASTE AREA BAY
SHIPPING/RECEIVING COMMERCIAL ALLEY
RESILIENT CHELSEA STUDIO
DESIGN STATEMENT The main goal for this project was to design a contemplation center in the Al Wathba Wetland Reserve in Abu Dhabi. The main focus was to desing a place that will have a minimum impact on the site since the land is dedicated to the research and contemplation of flamingos. The site for construction was limited and the use of space required to have am area fully dedicated to education, contemplation and research combined with a small cafe area. This was the one semester that had to be cut down short due to COVID. for the first few weeks of the sememster we were able to meet with the instructor in person, then we migrated to remote access via online. The challenge was interesting but since the basis were covered by the instructor during the first weeks, the execution was succesful by the studio. My approach was to use all possible spaces to cover all areas of the structure, by using the roof of the building as the contemplation space.
INSTRUCTOR Natalie Adams
ARCH 3
AL WATHBA WETLAND RESERVE
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
X D S 1 0 0 0 SPRING 2020
LOCATION
ABU DHABI AL-WATHBA WETLAND RESERVE UAE @24.2642771,54.595784
Site Location
N 0mi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SITE SITE LOCATION WITHIN PROJECT SITE
SITE
AL WATHBA WETLAND RESERVE
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE NORTH OF THE AL WATHBA WETLAND RESERVE. THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE SITE CONSIST OF A RICH POPULATION OF FAUNA, WITH A HIGH CONCENTRATION OF FLAMINGOS AND A VAST RANGE OF INSECTS. THE WEATHER IS DRY AND ALL FACILITIES ARE TO BE LOCATED WITHIN ONE ROOF.
9
11
12
X D S 1 0 0 0 SPRING 2020
N
N
EN TRY
EN TRY
SITE PLAN CONTEXT PARKING AREA TRU TH
TRU
OR
EN
TRAINING ROOM
OR
EN
TOILETS / DISPLAY AREA
TH
INFO CENTER
PARKING AREA
RESTAURANT / CAFE
W
CONTEMPLATION AREA
PARKING AREA
W
E
E
FOOT TRAFFIC WITHIN PROPOSED BLDG. FOOT TRAFFIC ABOVE PROPOSED BLDG.
THROUGH BUILD ING
TOILETS/DISPLAY AREA & INFO. CENTER
NS- SECTION
SMALL CAFE AREA/ TRAINING ROOM FOOT TRAFFIC THROUGH TERRACE
TERRACE
EW - SECTION
FOOT TRAFFIC
EW - SECTION
NS- SECTION
CONTEMPLATION/ FAUNA INTERACTION AREA
S
S CONCEPT DIAGRAM
LEVEL 1
THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT CONSISTED ON HAVING ALL TRAFFIC TO BE EASILY ACCESSIBLE WHETHER BY FOOT OR VEHICULAR. ALTHOUGH I DEPARTED FROM THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT, MOST OF THE ORIGINAL IDEAS ARE IN PLACE.
LEVEL ONE HAS MOST OF THE REQUIRED FACILITIES IN THIS LEVEL. PARKING AREA IS CAPABLE OF HOLDING UP TO FIFTEEN CARS.
NORTH ELEVATION
LEVEL TWO IS COMPOSED BY THE TERRACE. THIS AREA ALLOWS USERS TO INTERACT WITH THE BUILDING AND FAUNA SIMULTANEOUSLY.
SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
LEVEL 2/ TERRACE
X D S 1 0 0 0 SPRING 2020
HIERACHY MAPPING
N
IRRIGATION POINT
ACTIVITY IDIOM, MATERIAL SELECTION
HIGH LINE NYC (PRECEDENT )
NS - SECTION
W
E
ENTRY TIER
TIER 1 S TIER 2
VIEWS THROUGHOUT SITE
SITE
(TIER SYSTEM)
3. VISUAL CAPABILITY BY MULLION 1. CONCRETE SLAB STAIRWAYS FOR FAUNA
SYSTEM BEING IN PLACE. 4. GLASS GUARDRAIL SYSTEM FOR ELEVATED
INTERACTION AREA
AREAS IN TERRACE OF BUILDING
5. WHITE FACADE INTENDED FOR THE BUILDING. MOST LIKELY BRICK OR STONE-WORK METHODS.
2. CURVED CURTAIN WALL FOR FACADE THROUGHOUT MOST OF THE BUILDING FEATURES
DETAIL SECTION AND SYSTEM STRATEGY LEVEL 2 @ 16’ ABOVE GORUND LEVEL 1
12
FRONT OF BUILDING
EW - SECTION
SECTIONS INDICATING PROPOSED MATERIRALS AND ACTIVITY IDIOM
RENDER
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
BAR/RESTAURANT AREA
X D S 1 0 0 0 SPRING 2020
DESIGN STATEMENT The main goal for this project was to design a recreational center in the city of Cambridge MA. the site is located in an area familiar to plenty of the BAC student body. My approach was mainly focused on the fitness aspect for the user. Since one of the main problems during the quarantine period of COVID was getting exercise, I injected my personal struggles into the project. I proposed to have a climbing wall that serves as the focal point of the building within the structure, which gives the users a way to interact with the building vertically depending on your climbing skill level. Not only climbers get to experience this but with the help of contemplation windows within the climbing area, allows climbers and users of other spaces to interact with each other without pausing their respective forms of use. Research of materials, techtonics, methods of egrees and Hvac was essential to the design process of the studio. This was by far the most challenging Studio for me. The instructor was very helpful giving instructions during thr COVID period.
INSTRUCTOR Amy VanLauwe
ARCH 4
ARCHITECTURAL STUDIO 4
CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY AND RECREATIONAL CENTER BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE ARC1004 AMY VANLAUWE
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
SITE
CAMBRIDGE ME
MO
SITE
LD
SS
SF
VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FOOT TRAFFIC
AC
IEL
RIV
E
DR
HU
D E
BOSTON
MA
IER
LD
SE
TTS
TUR
NP
IKE
BOSTON UNIV. BRIDG
SO
RIA
SITE LOCATION: Open field in Magazine Beach Park in Cambridge, MA. The site has plenty of views of the city of Boston across the Charles River. It is a site that has a vast volume of foot traffic during the warm days of the year.
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
PROCESS - PRECEDENTS AND ANALYSIS PRECEDENT
PRECEDENT IS LOCATED IN BOURDAUX FRANCE. A FORMER GARAGE CONVERTED INTO A COMMUNITY CENTER
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
PROCESS - SITE DIAGRAM & ANALYSIS SITE INTRO
SITE
NOLLI PLAN SKETCH
SITE INTRO SITE BIKE PATHS
SECTION SKETCH POINTS OF ENTRY THRU SITE (EXISTING) SHAPE EXPLORATION “VOID VS SOLID”
SKETCHES SHOWING SITE ENTRY AND POSSIBLE SCHEMATIC TECTONICS
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
PROCESS - CONCEPT CONCEPT MODELS
“PLAYFUL”
”WAYFINDING”
“SHAPE”
“UNEXPECTED”
“MODERN”
INITIAL MODELS PLAYED WITH THE IDEA OF FORM AND POSSIBILITIES OF CIRCULATION
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
PROCESS - CONCEPT PROGRAMMING
Area distribution within the building was essential during the planning process. Bubble diagrams were used to plan the circulation plan throughout the floors of the structure.
BUBBLE DIAGRAMS
FIRST FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
PROGRAMMING OF SPACES THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING WITH A VERTICAL APPROACH
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
PROCESS - CONCEPT STRATEGY & RESEARCH PASSIVE STRATEGY
PASSIVE HOUSE WINDOW DETAIL
RESEARCH MATERIALS
Level 5 59' - 0"
2 mm
2.5 mm
1/8" 3/8"
1-1/2" GRIDWORX STEEL FASTENER 16" OC GRIDWORX INTERMEDIATE ANCHOR
SOLAR PANELS
2.5 mm
Z-CHANNEL W/G90 COATING @ 16" O.C. (GAUGED BY ENGINEERING)
HIGH GRADE SHEATHING OVER METAL STUDS @16" O.C.
Level 4 47' - 0"
ACOUSTIC PANEL CEILING
WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE AT FACE OF SHEATHING (BY OTHERS)
3 85" MLT STUD
Level 3 35' - 0"
WEEP HOLES @ 16" O.C. LOW MODULUS SILICONE APPLIED CONTINUOUSLY INTO FORK SLOT
5 8"
GYPSUM BOARD
DROP CEILING
LOW MODULUS SILICONE APPLIED CONTINUOUSLY INTO SLOTS
INSULATION
AUDITORIUM SEATING/STEPS
ST GEORGE CENTER AT GENEVA
EFCO WINDOW TYPE
Level 2 15' - 0"
EXT
DETAIL
WALL AT WINDOW DETAIL
INT 2 1/4" 3/8"
FRAME DIMENSION
A7.0
5/8"
WEEP HOLES
ROUGH OPENING
D.L.O.
3" = 1' - 0"
1/4"
WOOD SILL
FLASHING
GAP TO VENT
HW 6
Level 1 0' - 0"
7
WALL AT WINDOW DETAIL SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS
1
BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
HIGH GRADE SHEATHING OVER METAL STUDS @16" O.C.
ACOUSTIC PANEL CEILING
Structural insulated panels provide building panels for the walls, floors, and roofs of homes and light commercial buildings. Other names for SIPs include foam-core panels, structural foam panels, stress-skin panels, and sandwich panels. Manufacturing of SIPs occurs under controlled conditions in a factory. Four- and eight-inch thick rigid foam panels, placed between two stiff sheathing materials form the SIPs. Products used to make the foam include either expanded polystyrene (EPS), extruded polystyrene (XPS), polyurethane (PUR) or polyisocyanurate (PIR). Manufacturer's pressure laminates the EPS and XPS foam and sheathing together. WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE AT FACE OF SHEATHING (BY OTHERS)
3 58" MLT STUD
WEEP HOLES @ 16" O.C.
5 8"
GYPSUM BOARD
LOW MODULUS SILICONE APPLIED CONTINUOUSLY INTO FORK SLOT
LOW MODULUS SILICONE APPLIED CONTINUOUSLY INTO SLOTS
EFCO WINDOW TYPE
EXT
2 1/4"
FRAME DIMENSION
3/8"
ROUGH OPENING
D.L.O.
INT
1/4"
5/8"
WEEP HOLES
WOOD SILL
FLASHING
GAP TO VENT
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
Manufacturers inject and cure (under high pressure) the liquid PUR and PIR foam. Producers of SIPs commonly use 7⁄16-inchWINDOW thick oriented DETAIL strand boards (OSB) for the sheathing boards. Other sheathing 2 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" materials include plywood, gypsum sheathing, sheet metal, fiber-cement siding, magnesium-oxide board, fiberglass mat, and composite structural siding panels. SIP construction produces straight walls with higher levels of insulation, airtightness, and strength compared to woodframe construction. However, the numerous problems with SIP construction can diminish the quality of the wall system and ultimately cost both the contractor and building owner time and money.
RESEARCH MATERIALS
CLIMBING WALL POSSIBILITIES
ST GEORGE CENTER AT GENEVA AT NIGHT
RESEARCH MATERIALS Corten Steel (sometimes known as weathered steel) is a group of steel alloys that are often used in outdoor construction. CORTEN STEEL was designed to eliminate the need for painting and if left outside, exposed to the elements, they will develop a rusted appearance in just a few months. In the 1930’s, U.S. STEEL DEVELOPED a commodity that they named Corten steel. The product was originally designed to help build railroad coal wagons. The success of the coal wagons led to it being a prominent material for outdoor art projects during the 1960’s. In America, you can still find some early examples of the delicacy of Corten Steel structures OR-TEN refers to corrosion resistance and tensile strength. USS sold its discrete plate business to International Steel group; USS still sells branded material in strip-mill plate and sheet forms. Weathering steels, such as ASTM A847, A588, A242, A606 and COR-TEN exhibit superior corrosion resistance over regular carbon steel as a result of the development of a protective oxide film on the metals surface which slows down future corrosion.
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
PROCESS - STUDY MODELS & STRATEGY JEHIEL E. ROSARIO ARC 1004 FALL 20'
12 STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANEL
1/4
CONTEMPLATION AREA
COMMUNITY SPACE
CORTEN STEEL PANEL
FIXED WINDOW TYP.
AUDITORIUM AREA
MTL. HEADER
COMMERCE AREA EXTERIOR ELEVATION
BUILDING SECTION
THE MAIN FOCAL POINT WITHIN THE STRUCTURE. HOW DOES A CLIMBING WALL IS BUILT AND HOW TO BUILD IT.
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
BUILDING OCCUPANCY Jehiel Rosario Occupancies: A-3 – Gathering Spaces A-4 – Indoor Sporting Events A-2 – Intended for food and/or drink consumption A-1 – Production and viewing of arts. Group S – Place where items are stored Group B – Place where services are provided Building Height: Building Stories: 4 Building Height: 65 feet Allowable Height: 85 feet Construction Type: Type II Construction – Non-combustible/limited combustible Type II-B – Most common type of Fire resistance. Allowable Stories Above Grade: Group A-3: Three stories above Grade Group S: Three stories above Grade *Max Egress Distance 250 feet.
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
FLOOR PLANS
FLOOR PLANS
FLOOR PLANS PROGRAM 3
4 6
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
2
5
11
ENTRANCE ELEVATOR/FREIGHT EGRESS STAIRWAY KAYAK STORAGE BATHROOM CLIMBING WALL
6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
2
LOUNGE CAFE AREA ADMIN OFFICE LOCKER ROOM LOBBY/INFORMATION DESK KAYAK RENTAL DESK
3
4 6
PROGRAM 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
2
5
9 7
11
8
ENTRANCE ELEVATOR/FREIGHT EGRESS STAIRWAY KAYAK STORAGE BATHROOM CLIMBING WALL 8
9
AUDITORIUM STORAGE ELEVATOR STORAGE STAIRWAY
6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
BATHROOM WALL CLIMBING AREA LOBBY STAIRWAY UTILITY CLOSET
LOUNGE CAFE AREA ADMIN OFFICE LOCKER ROOM LOBBY/INFORMATION DESK KAYAK RENTAL DESK
SECOND LEVEL PLAN
N
FLOOR PLANS
6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
1
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
10
10
FIRST LEVEL PLAN
N
3
5 6
7
10
1
PROGRAM
4
FLOOR PLANS 0
20 FT.
0
1
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
20 FT.
FALLJEHIEL 2020E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
PROGRAM
4 2 3
5
7
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
RESTAURANT STORAGE ELEVATOR STORAGE STAIRWAY STAIRWAY 8
9
9
6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
PROGRAM
4 2
UTILITY CLOSET CLASSROOM CLASSROOM COLD STORAGE WALL CLIMBING AREA
5
8
3
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
GYM STORAGE ELEVATOR STORAGE STAIRWAY
6. 7. 8. 9.
STAIRWAY UTILITY CLOSET WALL CLIMBING AREA BOULDERING WALL
1
11
1 10
FIRST LEVEL PLAN
N
9
8
6
6
7
7
0
N
THIRD LEVEL PLAN
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO 0
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
20 FT.
20 FT.
FOURTH LEVEL PLAN
N 0
FALLJEHIEL 2020E. ROSARIO
20 FT.
FALL 2020 FALL 2020
BUILDING SECTIONS
TRANSVERSE SECTION JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
BUILDING SECTIONS
LONGITUDINAL SECTION JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
BUILDING SECTIONS
VOID
WHOLE
WALL CLIMBING PLAYS A MAJOR ROLE WITHIN THE STRUCTURE. THE PURPOSE IS TO HAVE THE USERS INTERACT WITH THE STRUCTURE AS A WHOLE. USE THE BUILDING AS A PLAYING GROUND.
TRANSVERSE SECTION JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
BUILDING SECTIONS
FOOT TRAFFIC PROGRAM WITHIN THE STRUCTURE.
SECTION PERSPECTIVE JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSN
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
N
N
N
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
N
N
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
N
NORTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS N
2020 JEHIEL E.FALL ROSARIO JEHIEL E.FALL ROSARIO 2020
SOUTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION
N
FALL 2020 FALL 2020
NORTH ELEVATION JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
WEST ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION
JEHIEL E.FALL ROSARIO 2020 JEHIEL E.FALL ROSARIO 2020
WEST ELEVATION
FALL 2020
FALL 2020 FALL 2020
SUN STUDIES AND MATERIAL
Views of surroundings of the site were discussed and were focal point as well.
SUN STUDIES AND MATERIAL
SUMMER SOLSTICE
SUMMER SOLSTICE
WINTER SOLSTICE
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
ELEVATIONS
WINTER SOLSTICE
ELEVATIONS
ELEVATIONS
ELEVATIONS
SIGNANGE CAN BE CHANGE ACCORDING TO THE EVENT
VIEW FROM SOUTH ORIENTATION
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION THE STRUCTURE HAS A WALL DEDICATED TO ADVERTISEMENT OF EVENTS THAT MAY TAKE PLACE WITHIN.
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
FALL 2020
STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS The framing and structural elements were essential for the building. Since the climbing wall is the focal element, framing had to be addressed from the early stages of the project.
STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
FIRST LEVEL FRAMING PLAN
SECOND LEVEL FRAMING PLAN
N
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
FIRST LEVEL FRAMING PLAN
SECOND LEVEL FRAMING PLAN
N
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO N
THIRD LEVEL FRAMING PLAN
FOURTH LEVEL FRAMING PLAN
FALL 2020
CRITICAL WALL DETAIL
DETAIL 1 WALL
LEVEL 5 64’ - 0”
LEVEL 4 52’ - 0”
DETAIL 2 SLOPED WALL
LEVEL 3 40’ - 0”
LEVEL 2 20’ - 0”
DETAIL 3 CORTEN PANEL CONNECTION LEVEL 1 5’ - 0”
DETAIL BREAKDOWN JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
CRITICAL WALL DETAIL METAL CAP ROOF MEMBRANE PROTECTION BOARD OSB SHEATING
VAPOR BARRIER
FLASHING
LEVEL 5 64’ - 0”
BG JOIST GIRDER
LEVEL 4 52’ - 0”
SELF-SEALING TAPE APPLIED CONTINUOUSLY OVER METAL STUD
BG JOIST GIRDER
6" INSULATION
LEVEL 3 40’ - 0”
3" GRIDWORX STEEL FASTENER 16" OC
5/8" PLYWD SHEATING DBL. 2X6 WD LEDGER COMMERCIALLY MOLDED HAND HOLDS ATTACHED TO SIDING
Z-CHANNEL W/G90 COATING @ 16" O.C.
SLOPED FIXED SINGLE PANE WINDOW
SLOPED CLIMBING WALL PEA GRAVEL W/ FILTER
2.5" RIGID INSULATION CORTEN STEEL PANEL
FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT COMMERCIALLY MOLDED HAND HOLDS ATTACHED TO SIDING
STEEL BEAM SUPPORT
SLOPED CLIMBING WALL
RAILING GLASS PANEL - BOTTOM FILL SLOPED CLIMBING WALL
LEVEL 2 20’ - 0”
AIR & VAPOR BARRIER COMMERCIALLY MOLDED HAND HOLDS ATTACHED TO SIDING PEA GRAVEL W/ FILTER FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT
ACOUSTIC PANEL CEILING
LEVEL 1 5’ - 0”
DETAIL 1 JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
DETAIL 2
DETAIL 3 FALL 2020
EGRESS PLANS
92’
68’
62’
62’ 35’ 76’
42’
FIRST LEVEL PLAN
SECOND LEVEL PLAN
LEGEND
N EGRESS
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
DIRECTION OF EGRESS
START POINT
FALL 2020
EGRESS PLANS
80’
62’
78’
THIRD LEVEL PLAN
FOURTH LEVEL PLAN
LEGEND
N EGRESS
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
DIRECTION OF EGRESS
START POINT
FALL 2020
EGRESS PLANS
STAIRWAY STACK
ELEVATOR SHAFT
MEANS OF EGREESS THROUGHOUT BUILDING. STAIRWAY VS ELEVATOR.
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
HVAC PLANS
FIRST LEVEL PLAN
SECOND LEVEL PLAN
SUPPLY DUCT RETURN DUCT VAV BOX DIFFUSERS
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
HVAC PLANS
THIRD LEVEL PLAN
FOURTH LEVEL PLAN
SUPPLY DUCT RETURN DUCT VAV BOX DIFFUSERS
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
HVAC PLANS
SUPPLY DUCT RETURN DUCT VAV BOX DIFFUSERS
HVAC 3D PLAN STACK JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
RENDERINGS
OVERALL VIEW OF STRUCTURE
VIEW STRUCTURE AS YOU APPROACH FROM MEMORIAL DRIVE
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
RENDERINGS
VIEW OF OPENINGS AT UPPER LEVELS OF CLIMBING WALL AREA I VIEW OF OPENINGS AT UPPER LEVELS OF CLIMBING WALL AREA II
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
RENDERINGS
VIEW OF CLIMBING WALL FROM SECOND LEVEL INTO LOBBY
VIEW OF OVERALL CLIMBING WALL
JEHIEL E. ROSARIO
FALL 2020
STATEMENT These projects are some examples of my work in the architectural and surveying field throughout the years. some range from small scale residential work, to large mixed-use commercial, and infrastructural work as well.
PRACTICE WORK
CAD DRAWINGS DRAWINGS & CONSTRUCTION SETS
CAD DRAWINGS DRAWINGS & CONSTRUCTION SETS
REVIT
SOUTH STATION BOSTON, MA
MODELING & SURVEYING
OVERALL VIEW
SECTIONAL ELEVATION
BIRD’S EYE
REVIT
SOUTH STATION BOSTON, MA
MODELING & SURVEYING
EYE ELEVATION VIEW VIEW FROM PLATFORMS
REVIT MODEL & POINT CLOUD DATA
VIEW FROM TRAIN TRACKS