Graduate Portfolio 2020 by jfraz31

Volume I

Graduate Works Portfolio

Jacob Frazier

JacobFrazier Graduate Portfolio 

Jacob Frazier

Architectural Designer I am actively seeking a position at an architecture firm that focuses on sustainability and regenerative design methods. Learning to create space that takes into account the immediate environment, human experience, and the planetâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s well-being is what I am passionate about in architecture. Utilizing my knowledge in Revit, Rhino, SketchUp, the Adobe Suite and UnReal Engine 4, I hope to accomplish this goal of embracing regenerative design in architecture.

Contact Phone c636.751.8182

Experience January 2019 - Present St. Louis, MO

Address 917 Laramie Street Apt. #6 Manhattan, KS 66502

Architectural Designer Responsible for design, construction documents, and renderings of broadcast studios, breweries, and workplace environments.

Email jfrazier3147@outlook.com Website jfraziermarch.myportfolio.com

V Three Studios

April 2017 - August 2018 January 2020 - Present Manhattan, KS

May 2014 - August 2017 St. Louis, MO Manhattan, KS

Anderson Knight Architects Architectural Designer Primarily involved in documentation and design of residential projects in the local area of Manhattan, KS.

Starbucks Shift Supervisor

Led baristas and coordinated the creation of a new position aimed at reducing waste and promoting quality.

References

Education

Dr. Peter Magyar

Summer 2016 - Spring 2020

Kansas State University

Manhattan, KS

M.Arch Graduate Student

RIBA, Distinguished Professor of Architecture

Wendy Ornelas

Distinguished Professor, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture Richard Upjohn Fellow, American Institute of Architects

Kurt Kurns

AIA, NCARB, V Three Studios Principal Contact Info Available upon Request

May 2015 St. Louis, MO

Fort Zumwalt East High School Magna Cum Laude

K-State Education Opportunities Summer Accelerated Studio 2016 Summer Accelerated Studio 2018 Fall Italian Studies Program Fall 2018 Eight Month Academic Internship Spring 2019 - Fall 2019

Awards and Recognitions APDesign Photo Competition 2019 | Misc. Category First Prize Dennis Law Complete Works Documentation & Chief Book Editor Fall 2019 Studio Book Editor Smart Cities Design Competition | Top 5 Finalist | Spring 2017 | NYC Design Competition Manko Design Competition Finalist | 2018 APDesign Digital Fabrication | Vice President APDesign Plot Club | Technician

TODAY TOMORROW

II Jacob Frazier

Reimagine life. Revive the planet.

Expand the natural; Condense the synthetic.

G ive back control. The environment is not ours to reign, it is their’s.

Civilization and nature must synergize; ‘the natural’ needs revival.

The defibrilatorsWillare out. IT’S TIME. we get up, or stay lying down?

Follow reason, meaning, and empathy. Create with one, simple restriction: compassion. The world needs to be revived.

Say no to Convention, to Materialistic, to Unambitious.

ARCHITECTURE CAN BE MORE. IT NEEDS TO BE MORE.

Change is necessary; NOT FOR US, but for them. For it. For the world.

Or merely covering up our mistakes with innovation?

CAN'T YOU SEE IT? Are we asking the correct questions?

Would you pour gasoline on a fire to put it out? This is what we are doing.

Decline through progression Be different, Be flashy, Be novel

ARCHITECTURE VS.

Personal Manifesto III

Parsonsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Animal Care Center Fourth-Year Project Manko Competition Finalist Parsons, Kansas

PEJARI Chair Patent Pending Mentorship with Professor Ongoing Project

Design Experience Anderson Knight Architects Broadcast Facilities Workplace Brewery/Restaurant

Design Experience V Three Studios Broadcast Facilities Workplace Brewery/Restaurant

IV Jacob Frazier

Council Grove Public Library Third-Year Project Net Zero Energy Council Grove, Kansas

Regenerative Cultivation Center Thesis Project Regenerative Design Northeast Kansas City, Missouri Ongoing Project

Photography & Personal Works Travel Photography Drawing Artwork

Photography & Personal Works Personal Manifesto Resume

Table of Contents

Parson's Animal Care Center The Parsonsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Animal Care Center, or PACC, was a project done during my fourth year of schooling. We had eight weeks to produce a full construction set and design of the center for a community and county in need of a new facility. Our client owned an existing animal hospital adjacent to the ten acre site and our projects were intended to be used for precedents of a much-needed animal shelter to house abandoned or stray animals for the entire Labette County. I was incredibly fortunate to have the opportunity to present this project as a finalist in the annual APDesign 2018 Manko Competition. 10 40 20

01 Jacob Frazier

Schematic Design Iteration

Immediately this project took the form of the barn archetype commonly seen on the local Kansas prairies. In schematic design, I focused my efforts on creating opportunities to immerse yourself and the housed animals in the exterior environment. Framing views of the prairie grasses and creating interior courtyards to play with potential adoptees, this scheme was ultimately reworked due to the physical disconnection of the two primary barns and difficulty to circulate back-and-forth for employees.

Precedent Forms

Gambrel Barn Archetype Simple in form and one of the most common barns, the gambrel barn maximizes usable space.

Diagrams

03 Jacob Frazier

Shed Archetype The simplest of all enclosed, rural structures: the shed. Four posts and a single sloped roof. Extremely functional and versatile.

Final Forms

Raised Monitor Barn I The final form for the community room was a raised monitor barn for its ability to bring daylight into the center of the space.

Raised Monitor Barn II The raised monitor barn was also used in the kennels of the PACC. It allowed the kennels to be scaled more for animals on the periphery, while the center could offer a double-height space for visitation and human-centered use.

Cabana Shed The cabana shed type bridged the two â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;monitor barnsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; for kennels on the west side of the site. In this space, mechanical units were hidden from sight in the ceiling/roof and below became the staff areas and break room.

Parson's Animal Care Center 04

20 21 22 20

20 21 20

1 4 2

16 15 14 13

12 11 10

9 8

PACC | Parsonsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Anima

05 Jacob Frazier

1. Community Center 2. Men’s Restroom 3. Women’s Restroom 4. Janitor Lobby & Reception 15. Community Center Administration 26. Men’s Restroom Community 37. Cat Women’s Restroom Intake PensCloset 48. Mechanical Examination 59. Lobby & Reception Dog Isolation 610.Administration CatCommunity Isolation 711.Cat Isolation 812.Intake PensSupport Surgeon Prep 913.Examination Animal Prep 1014.Dog Isolation Operation 1115.Cat IsolationRoom Staff Break Room 1216.Isolation Support Staff Locker 1317.Surgeon Prep & Restroom Food Prep 1418.Animal Prep Mechanical & Storage 1519.Operation Room Kennels 1620.Staff Break Room Adoption 1721.Staff LockerSuites & Restroom Grooming 1822.Food Preparation

Floor Pla

19 20 21 22

Mechanical & Storage Kennels Adoption Suites Grooming

PACC Design The final design of the Parson’s Animal Care Center held strong precedence on the natural prairie and the power that the natural environment plays in the lives of us and animals alike. It’s important to note that the program was centered on a community event space– meaning that this site should be opened up to the community as an asset and a park. The entire site could be utilized by local residents to walk their pets, or simply enjoy the natural environment. Additionally, an interior courtyard allows the center itself to be surrounded and integrated with nature, while adding privacy a buffer from adjacent industrial buildings and the busy main street to the south. At the core of this building is nature, but an element that was just as important was the rural qualities of the region. This building needed to be grounded in the region it was set within and take into account the behaviors of a rural community. The simple instinct was following the barn archetype. This form was functional and practical as it is something that has many styles and a lot of room for innovation. Think Faye Jones and his regionalistic architecture in Northern Arkansas. Beautiful, innovative, and practical with its wood stud construction. In addition to formal moves was behavior. In rural communities, often farmers or residents circulate outside from one building to another. As this isn’t ideal in most scenarios, circulation paths were primarily placed in the exterior courtyard to accommodate these habits, but provide partial shelter with a roof overhang.

Community Space

Kennels

Courtyard ‘Bridge’

al Care Center Site Section Perspective

Parson's Animal Care Center 06

20 10 5

Community Room Floor Plan

Community Room Section

07 Jacob Frazier

Community Room Wall Section

Parson's Animal Care Center 08

1/2

Clerestory Material Detail

Exterior Rendering at Kennels

09 Jacob Frazier

Exterior Rendering at Kennels

Dog Kennels Plan

Dog Kennels Section

Parson's Animal Care Center 10

11 Jacob Frazier

Reception & Isolation Section

South Complex Elevation

North Complex Elevation

Parson's Animal Care Center 12

PEJARI Chair Many times in my time at K-State I have been extremely lucky to have found myself in positions of opportunity. Probably the biggest, and most significant, opportunity I received was a partnership with my professor Dr. Peter Magyar, RIBA. Following a design studio with him, the PEJARI chair was born from a sketch done by him in the 1980â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s. Never had I imagined that I would build a prototype chair in my time at K-State, and I definitely never expected to have a patent pending on a design before being out of school. This project is has been a true honor to be a part of and to continue to be a part of.

13 Jacob Frazier

15 Jacob Frazier

PEJARI Process The process involved in this project began with a series of sketches done by Dr. Peter Magyar, RIBA. Shortly after being a part of his design studio, he gave me a booklet of furniture sketches as a gift. Over the following summer I modeled them in Rhinoceros 5 and rendered them into the image depicted on the left. Never have I seen a manâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s eyes light up as much as I did when I showed it to Peter. This kickstarted a process of refining their form through a back-and-forth collaboration of sketches (done by Peter and shown below) and digital modelling and 3d printing. After much time and development, we moved to full-scale prototyping of glue-laminated plywood members. Upon sitting on the first prototype, it was time to go back to the drawing board. The original chair was proportioned similarly to the Womb Chair, but because of its tectonic structure, it was difficult to rest both arms on the armrests. The final prototype was made months later and resembled the proportions of a dining chair, yet had the comfort of a lounge chair with the angled back and flexible materiality of the plywood. At this stage, the PEJARI Chair (named after the final prototype was produced and based on the first names of those involved in its creation: PEter, JAcob, and RIchard) has been patent pending for a year and a half. Current efforts involve trying to get a manufacturer to produce the flat-packed, self-locking chair.

PEJARI Chair 16

16 cm

PEJARI SECTION ARM TYPEELEVATION 2L PEJARI FRONT

3 cm

1 cm

7 cm

2 cm

cm 5 cm R 7 R cm 7

57.5 cm

7° 7 cm

60.5 cm

57.5 cm

7°

7 cm 2 cm

7°

7c 7 cm 7 cm

1 cm

2 cm

7 cm

1 cm

PEJARI PERPENDIC

6 10

7 cm

cm R

cm 5

2 cm

1 cm

BACK LE R

7°

5 PEJARI FRONT ELEVATION ARM TYPE 2 L FRONT LEG cm L BACK SUPPORT L PEJARI PEJARI FRONT SECTION ELEVATION ARM TYPE 1.1 R PEJARI PERPENDICULAR7° TO FRONT

PEJARI PERPENDICULARARM TO FRONT TYP BA 7° PEJARI PEJARI PERPENDICULAR ELEVATION TO FR ARM TYPE 1.2 R FRONT

9 7 cm

7 cm

7 cm 2 cm

2 cm

39 cm

7 cm

2 cm

7 R

PEJARI SECTION ARM TYPE 1.1 L FRONT LEG L

PLAN ARMPEJARI TYPE 1.1 L VIEW

7 cm

2 cm

7°

60.5 cm

7 cm

cm 77cm

7 cm

1 cm

16 cm

57.5 cm

7 cm

PEJARI FRONT ELEVATION

1 cm

16 cm

PEJARI PLAN VIEW 90°

PEJARI SECTION

7 cm

1 cm

12 6

1 cm

11° 7°

11°

7 cm

10 cm

2 cm

P 3 cm.

7 cm

7° 11

1 cm

7 cm 7 cm 7 cm 7 cm 7 cm cm 3 cm 3 cm 1

7 cm

2 cm TY 3 cm

5 cm

7 cm

7 cm P.

7 cm

2 cm TY

11° 5

1 cm

5c m R

7 cm

90 5BACK LEG ° cm

7 cm

39 cm

7°

3 cm

3 cm 7 cm cm 7 cm 8° 3 cm 1 10

7 cm

7°5 cm

39 cm

5°

11 4

10 cm

7 cm

39 cm

7 cm

16 cm

2 cm TY

90 °

7 cm

8° 10

7 cm

ARM TYPE 1.2 L

7°

7 cm 39 cm

7 cm

3 cm

1 cm

7 cm

°8

1 cm

3 cm

1 cm

7 cm

90 °

5 cm 7°

R 5c m R 1

1 cm

3 cm

BACK LEG L

ARM TYPE 1.2 L 5 cm 8° 10 11°

1 cm

39 cm

7 cm

2 cm TY

5 cm 10 cm

81 9BACK 0° LEG cm

7 cm

5 cm

10 cm

18 cm

5 cm10

7 cm

FRO

10 cm

R 42

90 °

18 cm

8° 10

5 cm5 cm

10 cm

18 cm

10 cm

10 cm 10 cm

33 cm 7 cm

7 cm

5 cm

5c m

5 cm

7 cm

57.5 cm

R 42

3 cm

ARM TYPE 2 L PEJARI FRONT ELEVATION

7 cm

5c m

1 cm

3 cm

33 cm

5 cm 5 cm

7 cm

1 cm

R 42

3 cm

7 cm

5 cm

7 cm

2 cm

33 cm 7 cm

ARM TYPE 1.1 L

PEJARI SECTION

10 cm

1 cm

3 cm

7 cm

m 40 c

7 cm

18 cm

7 cm

7 cm cm 5 cm 7 1 cm 3 cm 3 cm

3 cm cm R 42

7 cm

33 cm

7 cm

2 cm

7 cm

57.5 cm

7 cm

35 cm

33 cm 7 cm

1 cm

NE 1.2 LBACK LEG L

E2L

3 FRONT ELEVATION PEJARI

ARM TYPE 1.2 L

BACK BACK LEG R LEG L

ARM TYPE 1.1 L

1 cm

7°

1 cm

3 cm

7 cm

1 cm

7 cm

m 40 c

PEJARI PLAN VIEW

6 8

106

8 6

FRONT LEG L

ARM TYPE 2 L ARM TYPE 1.2 R

BACK LEG R

FRONT LEG L

BACK LEG R FRONT ARM LEG TYPE L ARM TYPE 1.1 R 1.1L L BACK SUPPORT

8 PEJARI PERPENDICULAR TO FRONT

BACK LEG R

ARM TYPE 1.2 L

ARM TYPE 2 L

BACK LEG R

ARM TYPE 1.1 R

BACK SUPPORT L

BACK LEG R

ARM TYPE 1.2 R

ARM4 TYPE FRONT 1.1SUPPORT R LEG ARM TYPE 1.2 R 9LCENTER BACK 5

ARM TYPE

BACK SUPPORT CENTER ARM TYPE 1.1R R BACK SUPPORT

ARM TYPE 2 R

ARM TYPE 1.2 R

ARM TYPE 1.1 R

ARM TYPE 1.2 R

BACK SUPPORT L

7 5

10 ARM TYPE 2 R

BACK SUPPORT CENTER

BACK BACK SUPPORT SUPPORT L BACK SUPPORT R CENTER

17 Jacob Frazier

BACK SUPPORT CENTER

7 11

ARM TYPE 2 R BACK SUPPORT R

BACKLEG SUPPORT R CENTER FRONT RBACK SUPPORT

ARM TYPE 2 R

BACK SUPPORT R

12 11 1311

FRONT LEG R

ARM T

FRONT LEG R

FRONT LEGBACK R SUPPORT R 7

BACK SU FRONT LE

ARM TYPE 2 R

7 10 11

FRON

7 cm

m 40 c

5 cm cm

2 cm

7 cm

7°

33 cm 7 cm

7 cm

5 cm

10 cm

18 cm

10 cm

R 42

57.5 cm

90 °

8° 10 9

7 cm

7°

7 cm

7 cm 2 cm

2 cm

7°

1 cm

11°

1 cm

3 cm

3 cm 39 cm

2 cm TY

1 cm

7°

PEJARI SECTION

PEJARI FRONT ELEVATION

PEJARI PERPENDICULAR TO FRONT

12 7 9

5 3

FRONT LEG L

ARM TYPE 1.1 R

BACK LEG R

ARM TYPE 1.2 R

8 13 2

ARM TYPE 2 R

FRONT LEG R

4 6 5

BACK SUPPORT CENTER

BACK SUPPORT R

PEJARI Chair 18

60.5 cm

5c m

5 cm

INTRODUCING THE NEXT ICON OF FURNITURE:

THE

PEter magyar | JAcob frazier | RIchard thompson

CHAIR A flatpack-delivered, self-locking chair system. It can be made of different materials with the appropriate manufacturing processes â&#x20AC;&#x201D; the result is always the same: a stackable, beautiful piece of furniture, which will adorn any private or community space. A child can assemble it in minutes, without any tools or glues. Forward inquiries to KSU Institute of Commercialization, Kent Glasscock, President, kentglas@ksu.edu. (Patent pending)

19 Jacob Frazier

PEJARI Chair 20

Design Experience | V Three Studios Directly after my study abroad experience in Italy I had the opportunity to go on an eight month, academic internship with V Three Studios in St. Louis, Missouri. The firm primarily specializes in broadcast facilities, breweries, and workplaces–however–there is no limit to what project may come along and the challenge of designing enriching environments for anything. During my time at V Three, I jumped back and forth on projects of all scales, but truly learned the importance of acoustics in the designed environment. Ever since, I’ve been very fortunate to have stayed on the design team from school as was given the opportunity to work remotely from school. Please note: all images and drawings are property of V Three Studios and they have given me permission to use them here.

21 Jacob Frazier

Broadcast

Brewery | Restaurant

Workplace

Broadcast Studios

Broadcast Studio

San Francisco, CA

Broadcast Studio

Los Angeles, CA

Radio Facility Graphic Map

23 Jacob Frazier

Broadcast Facility Diagram Underlay

Los Angeles, CA

ADJACENT WALLPROVIDE FRT BLOCKING WINDOW SILL AS IT OCCURS, CONTINUE 3/4" MDF TO SILL

11 3/4"

LOOSE CUSHIONS SEE FINISH SCHEDULE 3/4" MDF PLYWOOD SHEATHING 2" x 4" FRT WOOD BLOCKING, TYP

3' - 1 1/8"

1' - 5"

WD LAMINATE - SEE FINISH SCHEDULE

1' - 2"

1' - 4"

2" x 4" FRT WOOD FRAMING @ 16" O.C.

TOE KICK - SEE FINISH SCHEDULE

8/29/2019 4:21:12 PM

1' - 10"

Broadcast Facility Bench Detail

Broadcast Facility

1/4" = 1'-0"

05.01 26.02

WB1 4 A604

WOOD CAP

4' - 0"

WB1

AP2

AW-3

AP2 3' - 0"

1 ELEV_INT_126_NORTH

AW-1

1/4" = 1'-0"

PT4 ALL SURFACES ABOVE T/O SOFFIT

PT1

5 ELEV_INT_127_SOUTH

AP3

A406

A604

2 BBBBBBB

A406

11' - 0" B/O HARD LID

San Francisco, CA

TC1

2' - 8"

PT1

AP3

4' - 0"

1' - 10"

Thirsty Planet Tasting Room

Austin, TX

PT1

PT4

EXISTING CONCRETE DECK

9' - 0"

20 GA. 1 1/2" HAT CHANNELS @ 12" O.C.

B/O SOFFIT 11' - 0"

13' - 0"

11' - 11"

1/4" = 1'-0"

16 GA. 1 1/2" COLD ROLLED CHANNEL @ ISOLATORS 20 GA. 1 1/2" HAT CHANNELS @ 12" O.C.

362S137-33 BRACE @ 48" O.C.

LED LIGHT

F.R.T. 2x4 BLOCKING AND GYPSUM LIP @ SOFFIT PERIMETER

3/4"

2" DIA. PIPE KEE-KLAMP GRID SYSTEM (SEE RCP FOR LAYOUT) SECURE TO DECK w/PIPE FLANGE AND TAPCON ANCHORS

3/4"

PT1

SOFFIT FRAMING: 3 5/8" LT. GA. MTL. FRAMING @ 16" O.C.

PROVIDE BLOCKING AT SOFFIT FRAMING FOR PIPE GRID

WOOD CAP

PT1

PAINTED WOOD FASCIA

F.R.T. 2x4 BLOCKING AT SOFFIT PERIMETER

3' - 6"

Studio Ceiling Detail

WCG1

(1) LAYER 5/8" PLYWOOD & (1) LAYER 5/8" GYP. BD. ON 3 5/8" MTL STUD w/ STAGGERED JOINTS

3/4"

CONT. ACOUSTICAL SEALANT @ EA. LAYER OF GYP. BD., TYP.

09.05

05.01 26.02

AW-1

1 1/2"

Design Experience | V Three Studios 24 A

PT4 ALL SURFACES

1/2

CONT. ACOUSTIC SEALANT @ EA. LAYER GYP. BD.

3-#10 S.M.S. TYP FROM BRACE TO VERTICAL SOFFIT STUD U.O.N.

WB1

9' - 0"

Plano, TX

2" TECTUM PANEL

(1) LAYER 5/8" GYP. BD. AND (1) LAYER 5/8" PLYWOOD w/ STAGGERED JOINTS

CONT. TRACK BETWEEN BRACE, SEE STRUCTURAL FOR TRACK & STUD CONNECTION, TYP.

PT4

A604

2 BBBBBBB

AW-1 6' - 0"

2" THICK MINERAL FIBER 2.5 LBS/CU.FT. MIN. DENSITY SOUND BATT INSULATION

5 1/2"

TC1

11.09

AP3

WB1

1/4" =

9 ELEV

A406

Learfield IMG 3' - 0"

2 ELEV_INT_126_WEST

11.09

6' - 0"

10' - 6"

B/O SOFFIT

B/O HARD LID

SIMPSON 'MSJC10.25' w/ 3/8" BOLTS INTO COLD ROLLED STEEL OR METAL STUD BACKER AT CEILING SUSPENSION SYSTEM ABOVE

B/O HARD LID

B/O SOFFIT

11' - 0"

PT7

B/O HARD LID

A406

1' - 6"

AP2

9' - 0"

AND CABLE TRAY

KINETICS SPRING ISOLATOR, SEE RCP FOR LAYOUT; EXPANSION ANCHOR INTO DECK

OPEN TO CORRIDOR 117

PT3

PT8

A002

2 BBBBBBB

AP2

9' - 0" B/O 9WOOD CLG SYST.

27.02

2" 1' - 10"

4' - 0"

PT4 ALL SURFACES ABOVE T/O SOFFIT

2' - 8"

EXIST DECK

05.01 26.02

WB1

1/4" = 1'-0"

6 ELEV_INT_127_WEST

A406

Studio Interior B/O Elevation HARD LID

3" = 1' - 0"

Workplace

Lutheran Hour Ministries

Marketing Axonometric

Workplace Scope of Work Diagram

25 Jacob Frazier

Plano, TX

Broadcast Facility

St. Louis, MO

San Francisco, CA

Learfield IMG

New York City, NY

Learfield IMG

Atlanta, GA

Learfield IMG

Jefferson City, MO

Learfield IMG

Plano, TX

Brewery | Restaurant

St. Louis, MO

Takashima Records | Photo

St. Louis, MO

Thirsty Planet Tasting Room

Takashima Records | Rendering

Austin, TX

Takashima Records | Photo

St. Louis, MO #3 BARS @ 1'-0" OC #4 BARS @ 8" CENTERED IN SLAB

CAST-IN-PLACE LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE

B.1

T.O. EXISTING STRUCTURE 19' - 0"

4 A503

2' - 4 3/4"

EXISTING CONCRETE DECK KINETICS ICC 210 OR EQUAL SPRING ISOLATOR HANGER @ 4' - 0" O.C. EA. WAY: HANG FROM ALL THREADS & AND EXPANSION ANCHOR FROM DECK

Sim

4"X4" STEEL ANGLE

COLD ROLLED CHANNEL HAT CHANNELS @ 16" O.C.

CONTAINER TOP 7' - 11 1/4"

(2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. w/ STAGGERED JOINTS EXIST SPRINKLER MAIN

3 5/8" STUD SUPPORT STRUCTURE

6x2x1/4" HSS WELD TO CONT. 5x3x1/4" HSS POST

2 1/2" SOFFIT FRAMING w/ 5/8" GYP FINISH

UNISTRUT FRAME CONTAINER CORRUGATION (BEYOND)

MINERAL FIBER 2.5 LBS/CU.FT. MIN. DENSITY SOUND BATT INSULATION

PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQ'D

4"X4" STEEL ANGLE @ CONTAINER PERIMETER

5x3x1/4" HSS POST, BEYOND

4' - 0" RECESSED LED, TBD 6' - 0"

TRIM PIECE, TBD CONTAINER CLOUD, SEE RCP

LED LIGHTING STRIP BACKLIGHTING

SOUND BATT INSULATION

TRANSLUCENT ACRYLIC PANEL, TBD

ACOUSTIC TILE CEILING SYSTEM, ACT 1

Ceiling Detail at Shipping Container 3 A503

WD1 FINISHED 2x12 CASEWORK w/ VERTICAL MEMBERS SET @ 4'-0" O.C.

Sim CONTAINER CORRUGATION

PIN 3 5/8" SLIP TRACK TO T.O. CONTAINER

LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE 1 5/8" UNISTRUT FRAME

OFOI WOOD CASEWORK PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQ'D

DJ Booth Clg. Detail

SOUND BATT INSULATION

CONTAINER TOP 7' - 11 1/4"

SEE PARTITION TYPES FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS/FINISHES

SOUND BATT INSULATION CEILING CLOUD, SEE RCP 4' - 0"

RECESSED LED, TBD

Ceiling Detail at Shipping Container

Design Experience | V Three Studios 26

Design Experience | Anderson Knight Architects After my second year of architectural education I had the opportunity to intern full-time in the summer for Anderson Knight Architects in Manhattan, Kansas. Little did I know that the opportunity to work with them would extend beyond the summer and into the school semester. During my time with them, I have been primarily involved in carrying out the documentation and design of high-end residential homes with the occasional smalltown commercial project. Please note: all images and drawings are property of Anderson Knight and they have given me permission to use them here.

27 Jacob Frazier

G2.03

Code Compliance Plan 2nd, 3rd & 4th Floors

17-208 09.01.2017

REVISIONS: 1 09.11.2017

JOB NO: DATE:

12B Lofts 1122 Bluemont Ave. DW

Unit 204,304,404 1257 SF

REF.

Unit 203,303,403 1253 SF

Unit 205,305,405 1158 SF

CLASS 1 MANUAL WET STANDPIPE

EXIT LIGHT

EMERGENCY LIGHT REMOTE HEAD

EMERGENCY LIGHT

EXIT LIGHT / EMERGENCY LIGHT

FIRE EXTINGUSHER

2 HOUR FIRE BARRIER W/ 90 MINUTE RATED SELF-CLOSING DOORS

1 HOUR FIRE PARTITION

F.E.

1/2 HOUR FIRE PARTITION W/ 20 MIN. SELF CLOSING DOORS

2 HOUR SHAFT W/ 90 MINUTE SELF CLOSING DOORS

NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS, EXIT PATH

FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

REF.

0 0" 0"

LEGEND:

REQUIRED EXIT OCCUPANT LOAD REQUIRED EXIT WIDTH EXIT WIDTH PROVIDED

39 7.8" 36"

F.E.

ISSUE RECORD: For Construction

Manhattan, KS 66502 -9

REF.

1' 6' - 5" 12' 10"

F.E.

" -6

Unit 206,306,406 1172 SF

1/2"

" -6

- 0"

- 5"

26'

" -6

PLANTER S P ROVID ED BY OWNER , VER IFY I RRI GA TION R EQ's.

7' - 0" 67' - 5 1/ 8" +/-

43' 3" 8' - 5 1 /8 " +/-

" -6

0" 2' - 0 1 /8 " +/-

18' - 0"

4' - 2"

2' - 3"

2' - 0"

4' - 0"

1' - 0"

18' - 0"

4' - 0"

1' - 0"

4' - 0"

2' - 0"

4' - 3"

4' - 9"

18' - 0" 4' - 9"

4' - 3"

2' - 0"

4' - 0"

1' - 0"

4' - 0"

5' - 0" 1' - 0"

4' - 0"

2' - 0"

14'

D 7'

- 0" 6' - 5"

42' 7"

12' 10"

4-0x7-6

- 5"

2 A7.00

1040 SF 17'

6 A7.00

D OU BLE 2x6 STU D WALL

-9

4-0x7-6

-- -

1 1"

4-0x7-6

1 1"

1/2"

4-0x7-6

BU ILT-IN S

1' - 0"

-9 3/16

D OU BLE 2x6 STU D WALL

" +/

Library

BU ILT-IN S

13' -0"

1 1/2"

REF.

Garage 120

2' - 6 1/ 2"

10' - 2"

11"

3' - 3 1/ 2"

24 EQ. R .

4' - 1 0"

Hall way 105

3 A7.01

11' - 9 1/ 2"

8' - 8"

4' - 6"

5' - 0"

5' -6"

Sim

2-6x 8-0 (FI XED) 2-6x 2-0 (TRANS OM)

F.E.

2 A7.02

2-0x5-0

6-0x8-0 (1-6 TRA NSOM)

3 ' - 1 1 /2 "

2-6x 8-0 (FI XED) 2-6x 2-0 (TRANS- OM)

-- -

3-0x 2-0 (FI XED) 3-0x 6-0 (FI XED) 3-0x 2-0 (TRANS OM)

6' - 0"

7' -4"

10' -0"

COVE RED UPPER TERRACE

-- -

7' - 2"

9' - 7 1/ 2"

12' - 0"

24' - 0"

7' - 2 1/ 2"

9' - 0"

9' - 0" 18' - 0"

5' - 0"

10 1/ 4"

2" STONE COPING CAP, TYP.

REF.

Unit 208,308,408 1426 SF

75' - 2 1/ 4"

Unit 201,301,401 912 SF

3-0x 2-0 (FI XED) 3-0x 6-0 (FI XED) 3-0x 2-0 (TRANS OM)

6' - 0"

2-0x5-0

3' -0"

4' -2"

2-8x 2-0 (FI XED) 2-8x 6-0 (FI XED) 2-8x 2-0 (TR ANS OM)

258 SF

UP UP

40 8" 36"

F.E.

2nd, 3rd & 4th Floor Code Plan 1/8" = 1'-0" 1

G2.03

REF.

Unit 200,300,400 911 SF Unit 209,309,409 1195 SF

F.E.

Unit 210,310,410 1626 SF

10"x10" TIMBER POST

PLAN NORTH

REF.

6' - 1 0" 15' - 4"

PR OV IDE SOAP/ SHA MPOO WALL NI CH ES, VER IFY LOC ATION S PR IOR TO FRA MING WITH INTER IOR D ESIGNE R.

SH ADE D AREA IN DI CATES A 3" R ECES S I N TH E FLOOR TO ALLOW FOR ZERO-ENTR Y (CU RBLESS ) SH OWER.

Master Sui te 108

6' - 3 1/ 2"

Unit 202,302,402 910 SF

5 1 /2 "

107 42 SF

1' -8"

2-0x2-0

5 ' - 5 1 /2 "

Master Closet

4' - 4 1/ 2"

B.I.

6-0x 8-0 (w /AR CH ED TOP TRAN SOM)

3-0x 2-0 (FI XED) 3-0x 6-0 (FI XED) 3-0x 2-0 (TR ANS OM)

2-8x 2-0 (FI XED) 2-8x 6-0 (FI XED) 2-8x 2-0 (TR ANS OM)

3-0x 2-0 (FI XED) 3-0x 6-0 (FI XED) 3-0x 2-0 (TRANS OM)

2' - 2 1/ 2"

6-0x 8-0 (w /AR CH ED TOP TRAN SOM)

2-8x 2-0 (FI XED) 2-8x 6-0 (FI XED) 2-8x 2-0 (TR ANS OM)

111 101 SF

1 0 ' - 5 1 /2 "

3-0x 8-0 3-0x 2-0 (TR ANS OM)

2-8x 2-0 (FI XED) 2-8x 6-0 (FI XED) 2-8x 2-0 (TR ANS OM)

18' -0" 5 ' - 1 1 /2 "

Breakfast

5 ' - 5 1 /2 "

7' - 8"

R EF. WA TE R LINE THI S WALL

1 2 ' - 1 0 1 /2 "

D OWN SPOUT, TIE TO U NDE RGROU ND D RAIN TI LE, D RAI N TO D AYLIGHT.

10 1/ 4"

REF.

5' -2"

3' - 6"

3 ' - 9 1 /2 "

9' - 7 1/ 2"

1' - 8"

2' -6"

9' - 0"

4' - 4"

4' -4"

355 SF

7' - 4"

2' - 2 1/ 2"

2 ' - 6 1 /2 "

112 268 SF 2' - 4 1/ 2"

4' - 7"

3-0x8-0

5-0X8-0 (ARC HED TOP)

Master Bath

4' - 4 1/ 2"

2 ' - 1 1 1 /2 "

Great Room 109

Ki tchen

2-0x2-0

5' -2"

8" MIN . E LEV . P IT

106 158 SF

7 ' - 3 1 /2 "

1 0 ' - 10 "

1 8 ' - 10 "

14'

2 A7.02 2-0x2-0

2-0x2-0

4' -0" MRL D RU M 1 00 Ib. E LE VE TTE 4 2x54

29 SF

3' - 3"

7' -0"

B.I.

32' - 9"

36 SF

3-0x8-0

5' - 6" 6' -10"

6' - 5"

Powder Room 114

3' -6"

2' - 9 1/ 2"

2x6

6' -1"

6 ' - 0 1 /2 "

3' -10"

Masonry Fireplace Insert : Mason-Lit e MFP 49 B-Vent Gas Fire Kit w/ 2 additional risers, Chimney Fan and Mechanical D amper Approx. Weight : 3000 lbs

113 53 SF

1' - 10 1/ 2" 3' - 10 1/ 2"

13' -0"

-0

9" 4 ' - 1 0 1 /2 "

1 0 ' - 9 1 /2 "

3 -0x8

IN C LIN AT OR C O MPA NY O F AME RI CA

115 62 SF

PANTRY Laundry

Unit 207,307,407 1177 SF

4 ' - 1 1 /2 " 7 ' - 8 1 /2 "

6-0x15-8 (ARC HED TOP)

11 1/ 2"

3' - 0"

3 -0x8-

" -0

REF.

1' - 11 1/ 2"

Stair 104

155 SF

1' - 7"

-0

REF.

3 -0x8

1 1/2"

0" -1

24'

3' - 0"

2 ' - 5 1 /2 "

2' -6"

1' - 3"

2' - 1"

1 1 ' - 6 1 /2 "

3' - 1 1/ 2"

3' - 0"

5' -9"

5' -8"

113 SF

119 92 SF

5 ' - 2 1 /2 "

Foyer 101

Hal l

12' - 4"

2' - 1"

4 1/ 2"

17' 6'

3' - 0"

6x80

2' - 1 1/ 2"

102 13 SF

3 -0x8-

Art Nic he

5' - 6"

1' - 11 1/ 2"

Closet

6-0x 9-0 (ARC HED TOP

11"

4' - 8"

-- x8 -0

0" -1

3-0

57' 4'

-- -

4 ' - 3 1 /2 "

2-0x2-0

1/2"

- 10

- 6"

-6

5 ' - 2 1 /2 "

- 6"

2 A7.03

122 13 SF 4'

17' - 0"

121 176 SF

Closet

117 26 SF

1 1 ' - 0 1 /2 "

103 204 SF STONE ENTR Y A RC HWAY

Dining Room

17' - 1"

Closet

Private Residence I Manhattan, KS

Side Yard Perspective

Front Exterior Rendering

5 East Elevation

29 Jacob Frazier

VERIFY SILL TRIM w/ INTERIOR DESIGNER

HONED COTTONWOOD LIMESTONE WINDOW SILL 1/2" GYP. BD.

3/8" BACKER ROD & SEALANT

1' - 2"

EIFS BAND @ PERIM. OF HOUSE 2"

1 1/8" PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR 2

T.O Foundation 2 -4 1/8"

First Floor 0"

DRIP 1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING 10"

DOUBLE 2x10 SILL PLATE, REF. STRUCT.

Side Yard Construction Progress

1' - 7 1/2"

6 2

10 1/2"

HONED COTTONWOOD LIMESTONE ARCH, REF. ELEVATION

3/8" BACKER ROD & SEALANT

2" 2"

3/8" BACKER ROD & SEALANT

Window Sill Detail

1' - 6"

BLOCKING AS REQ'D, TYP.

VERIFY TRIM w/ INT. DESIGNER, TYP.

6 6 2 2

2 2

6 6

4 1' - 0"

Front Exterior Photo

Plan Detail

ICE & WATER SHIELD UNDERLAYMENT

CLAY TILE ROOF 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING

8 1/8"

6" DIA. HALF ROUND COPPER GUTTER

T.O. Plate 2 12' - 1 1/8"

8 2x6 STAINED CEDAR 2x10 STAINED CEDAR

1x6 T&G SOFFIT

Roof Fascia Detail

Backyard Exterior Photo

Design Experience | Anderson Knight Architects 30

Private Residence II Manhattan, KS

Overall House Perspective

Exterior Rendering

Roof Detail

31 Jacob Frazier

Wall Section

Deck Column Foundation Detail

12b Lofts

Manhattan, KS

Roof Parapet Detail

12b Lofts Rendering

Apartment Section

Roof Parapet Detail

Enlarged Plan

12b Lofts Photo

Design Experience | Anderson Knight Architects 32

Council Grove Library The Council Grove Library was a project done in my fall semester of third year. In this project I aimed to capture the historic feeling of the small townâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s main street, while striving to achieve net zero energy. The biggest challenge in this project was not sacrificing design for the required engineering of systems. This project certainly paved a path towards my passion of regenerative designâ&#x20AC;&#x201C;creating a building that adds value to a location and the human experience in space.

33 Jacob Frazier

EXTERIOR BALCONY

CHILDREN'S AREA

GAME ROOM

VESTIBULE

ADULT STACKS TEEN/ADULT STACKS

MAKER'S SPACE

EGRESS

ENTRY

STORAGE

STORAGE FEATURED STACKS & ATRIUM

TELECOM PUBLIC MEETING

STU

WORK ROOM/OFFICE

VESTIBULE

NO OKS

TELECOM

CUSTODIAL

REST ROOM

CRAFT/CLASSROOM

TECHNOLOGY CENTER

EGRESS GROUP LEARNING

GROUP LEARNING

Early Experiential/Conceptual Drawing

Process Drawings

Much of this project existed in sketch form, allowing me to move quickly and precisely from one scheme to another rather than getting bogged down by the technical aspects of the computer.

35 Jacob Frazier

Building Section

Core/Service Atrium Book Stacks Study Area Public

Programmatic Diagram

Rendering in Atrium Reading Space

Rendering on Second Floor Overlooking Atrium

Council Grove Library 36

South Elevation Rendering

Interior Rendering

37 Jacob Frazier

North Elevation Rendering

L3 Book Stacks Reading Nooks Study Area Rooftop Terrace

L2 Book Stacks Study Areas Meeting Rooms Maker’s Space Classroom

L1 Public Meeting Help Desk Media Lab Children’s Room

Basement + Site

Section Perspective

Library Exploded Axon

Council Grove Library 38

Thesis | Regenerative Cultivation Center The food we eat, the clothing we wear, and the items we use everyday are often made from materials produced by the land. In many places agriculture is vital for families to not only provide themselves with food, but also clothing or items such as baskets or furniture. In this right, the farmer is an artisan and they sell their knowledge, culture, and/or traditions. This is the premise behind the Regenerative Cultivation Centerâ&#x20AC;&#x201C;using agriculture as a catalyst for a culturally diverse community.

39 Jacob Frazier

T ru

Hispanic Caucasian

K an sas

Kansas City

Other

african American

pla

Truman pl

Kansas

ity

Truman plaza

man plaza Tru

Cit

K an sa

K an sa s

Trum an

Kansas City

aza n pl ma

For the entirety of our fall semester, we researched the communities of the Northeast and built a program from scratch that would offer a positive impact on the area. After identifying a site and refining our program, we moved into analysis of the immediate context and why this site offered the best location for our proposed program. In the following pages you will find a portion of this research.

it sC

Kansas City

Research & Site Analysis

Cit

NORTHEAST KANSAS CITY DEMOGRAPHICS

K an s a sC

Ci t y

TRUMAN PLAZA DEMOGRAPHICS:

Existing Site Conditions Sketch

Poverty | 34%, vs. Citywide 17% NORTHEAST KANSAS CITY DEMOGRAPHICS

K an sa

Truman plaza

Kansas City

T ru

Health: Other Ranked 71st out of 115 in overall health (115 being worst) All 5 truman plaza communities ranked “High need” (5/5) Hispanic 494.6 out of 500 combined health index between 5 communities Caucasian

Kansas

Truman pl Ci t y

ity

Cit

Ka n s as C NEKC Demographic Charts

REFINE

african American

K a n sas

Kansas City Population Density

12 Jacob Frazier

an plaza

m Tru

Cit

Education: ages 16-19 not in school | 30% Of those not in school | 80% unemployed College attendence | 28% vs. 58% citywide Residents over 25 without GED/Diploma | 40% vs. 14% citywide

*Graphic courtesy from NEXTRail KC

K an sa s

T r u m an

aza n pl ma

it sC

pla

Kansas City

Household Income | $27,055 vs. $44,466 citywide Unemployment | 14.6% vs. 8.5% Citywide

*Based on 2017 census data

TRUMAN PLAZA DEMOGRAPHICS:

KS MO

Poverty | 34%, vs. Citywide 17% Household Income | $27,055 vs. $44,466 citywide Unemployment | 14.6% vs. 8.5% Citywide Education: ages 16-19 not in school | 30% Of those not in school | 80% unemployed College attendence | 28% vs. 58% citywide NEKC Residents over 25 without GED/Diploma | 40% vs. 14% citywide Health: Ranked 71st out of 115 in overall health (115 being worst) All 5 truman plaza communities ranked “High need” (5/5) 494.6 out of 500 combined health index between 5 communities

Hispanic

REFINE Asian

Black White Kansas City Diversity Map

41 Jacob Frazier

12 Jacob Frazier

Vacant Grass Lots Parks Asphalt Integrate Site into the Neighborhood

Asphalt Lot vs. Public Parks & Grass Lots

Stream Pollution Road/Rail/Industry NEKC Land-Locked in Pollution

Potential Businesses to Distribute Food to in the NEKC Area

Thesis | Regenerative Cultivation Center 42

Buildings in use Remediated Buildings Unknown Conditions Brownfield Ground Contamination

Brownfield Site Existing Conditions

Research Conclusion The communities of Northeast Kansas City are stressed and impoverished when it comes to financial income and overall nourishment. They are, however, incredibly wealthy in their cultural diversity and heritage. This wealth is both the largest asset and the largest challenge moving forward. The challenge is overcoming the tribalism that exists and breaking down language barriers associated with the 121 countries of origin, but this diversity becomes an asset when considering the amount of knowledge and experience contained within such a small area.

Brownfield Site Existing Conditions

43 Jacob Frazier

Thesis | Regenerative Cultivation Center 44

Regenerative Cultivation Center Schematic Design

Hardesty Federal Complex (HFC) Masterplan

The chosen site, located in the neighborhood of Lykins in Northeast Kansas City, is a twenty acre parcel of land that was previously known as the Hardesty Federal Complex. This area is deemed a brownfield and needs to be remediated to heal the surrounding community. Moving into schematic design, I have decided to tackle a masterplan of the entire site with the Regenerative Cultivation Center being ‘ground zero’ of the site remediation.

RCC Schematic Design In this iteration of design, urban agriculture– aquaponics and vertical farming–will become the foundation for reviving the contaminated Hardesty Federal Complex. Residents will be invited to take part in learning how to farm and utilize the crops to craft goods or food. These functions will require the building to house a flexible space for farming and hosting demonstrations. Additionally, large spaces devoted to crop cultivation will be necessary to provide enough materials for the hosting of events. For example, cooking workshops will require an open, commercial kitchen and plenty of food, while a basketweaving workshop would require the same space without ovens or stovetops.

RCC Site Location Focus

HFC Masterplan | First Iteration

HFC Masterplan Schematic West Elevation

HFC Masterplan Schematic Section A

45 Jacob Frazier

RCC Design Focus Above shows a simple parti of what this center hopes to achieve. A focus on shared experience, connection to crop cultivation, and the gaining of skills such as cooking will be the focus of this center.

Thesis | Regenerative Cultivation Center 46

Final Schematic Design

47 Jacob Frazier

Thesis | Regenerative Cultivation Center 48

Photography & Personal Works Over the years I have been fortunate to have the opportunity to follow many of my passions of photography, drawing and travel outside of my studies in architecture. In this final section you will find some of my favorite works and many of the beautiful places I have had the opportunity to visit.

49 Jacob Frazier

Ambiguity is Design

Architectural Drawing Theory | Final Drawing

51 Jacob Frazier

Church Sketch | Orvieto, Italy Sketch | Orvieto, Italy

Photography & Personal Works 52

53 Jacob Frazier

Colosseo Di Notte

2019 APDesign Photo Competition First Prize | Other

Photography & Personal Works 54

Mask For The Common Man

55 Jacob Frazier

Photography & Personal Works 56

57 Jacob Frazier

Photography & Personal Works 58

59 Jacob Frazier

Photography & Personal Works 60

61 Jacob Frazier

Photography & Personal Works 62

Thank you Thank you for taking the time going through this culmination of my work. It is an honor to be considered for a position at your firm and I look forward to soaking up your knowledge, experience, and insights in the design profession. I can assure you that what I lack in knowledge, I will certainly make up in my eagerness to learn and expand myself as a professional. No challenge exists that I am not willing to take on and I eagerly await the opportunity to have this statement tested. All the best,