Link: https://edberry.com/blog/climate-physics/agw-hypothesis/climate-alarmistsuse-junk-science-to-promote-their-agenda/ Please see link above for original document, embedded hotlinks and comments. Sign up for free climate emails. Go to link above. Average one email per week. How to find truth. “Ishi looked upon us as sophisticated children – smart, but not wise. We knew many things, and much that was false. He knew nature, which is always true.”
In my front yard. The Swan Mountains are behind me. Glacier National Park is to your left. Edwin X Berry, PhD, Physics ed@edberry.com Climate Physics LLC 439 Grand Dr #147 Bigfork, MT 59911 USA AMS Certified Consulting Meteorologist Expertise: Physics, Climate Physics, Numerical Models, Philosophy of Science.
Greta Thunberg snarls at you for using fossil fuels. Bill Gates, George Soros, and others pay to manage and promote Greta because she inspires the brainwashed younger generation to accept junk science. She is reminiscent of the Joe Camel advertising that caused a large increase in youth smoking.
1
Climate alarmists use junk science to promote their agenda Ed Berry November 11, 2019 “Trump pulls out of the UN Paris Climate Agreement” vs “More than 11,000 scientists from around the world declare a ‘climate emergency’” In a moment, I will to show you a simple proof that President Trump is a better climate scientist than all 11,000 climate science imposters who claim we have a “climate emergency.” Those 11,000 so-called “scientists” don’t know a freaking thing about climate science. If they were MD’s, they would be to using leaches to suck your blood. Today, they are opportunists who suck your money and your freedom. They are guilty of climate malpractice. There are not 11,000 real climate scientists on the planet. So, who are these people? The public believes “climate change protesters” are climate experts. They believe those who “care about the environment” are climate experts. They believe Greta is a climate expert. Universities train students to be ecologists, environmentalists, climate activists, and socialists. These students graduate thinking they are climate experts. Governors appoint them to climate expert panels. The government gives them money. Congress, state legislatures, lawyers, and the media think these graduates are climate experts. Thus, they get the headlines. But they are not climate experts.
2
Climate change is a subject of physics. Climate change is about determining cause and effect. It takes physics, not feelings, to determine cause and effect. Without physics, there is no climate science. But who wants to study physics? It’s much easier to be a climate alarmist. Besides, that’s where the money is. Here’s some basic science truth to help you decide who to believe about climate change. First, no one can prove a theory is true. Climate alarmists have a theory. Their theory is that human carbon emissions cause global warming, global warming causes climate change, and climate change causes bad stuff to happen. Then they claim the bad stuff PROVES human carbon causes climate change. Isn’t that what you read in the news every day? In logic, their argument is called the “argument of ignorance” or “affirming the consequent.” Aristotle explained their illogic 2300 years ago. Here is a parallel version of this illogic that you will readily understand: If Bill Gates owns Fort Knox, then Bill Gates is rich. Bill Gates is rich. So, Bill Gates owns Fort Knox. The point is events do not prove their cause. Claims that bad stuff happens does not prove we caused it. Get it? So, how does science work? Glad you asked. Science works by proving theories false. Having 11,000 claims that a theory is true is meaningless. One scientist who gives you valid evidence that their theory is not true, wins the science debate. Scientific truth is not decided by votes. No amount of evidence can prove a theory is true. Yet, the promotion of that logical fallacy is at the basis of the claims that we are causing climate change and all the bad stuff that it makes happen. Did you learn that in school? I just finished writing another scientific paper. It proves human emissions do not cause climate change. All 11,000 who claim otherwise are wrong. My focus on this paper kept me from writing to you every week as I like to do. Now, my preprint is finished, and I am free again to write to you again. Why should you believe me versus all those who tell you we are causing climate change? 3
In high school, I scored a perfect 800 on the SAT exam while finishing in half the allotted time. I was accepted by Caltech, MIT, and Reed. I choose Caltech. Linus Pauling was among the fantastic teachers who taught me science and logic. After graduating from Caltech, Dartmouth College gave me a teaching fellowship in physics. Then, the University of Nevada in Reno gave me a research fellowship in physics. My PhD mentors included William T. Scott and Friedwart Winterberg. Winterberg was known as the best student of Heisenberg, who was a Nobel Laureate in physics. Thirty years later, Winterberg said I was his best student. My theoretical PhD thesis was a significant breakthrough in climate physics that still gets many citations every year. Other scientists have explained my thesis work in their textbooks. There was more to Caltech than science and engineering. It was the honor system. That meant we had to be honest. No one stole anything at Caltech. No one cheated on exams. All without policing. I bring that system to you. I will tell you the truth about climate science. Climate science today Until about the 1980’s climate science was science. Now, climate “science” is climate politics and feelings. Most people don’t know the difference between real science and fake science. The climate alarmists have a political agenda, a ton of money, and an absence of science. Climate politics wants you to believe the climate lie that our carbon emissions cause climate change. If you believe the lie, you will vote for a globalist government. Climate politics rejects climate truth because truth stops them from achieving their political agenda. The climate activists want power. They want to control you. They want America to decline in power. They want a one-world government to run the world and America. I don’t want that to happen. But it will take a lot more people than me to stop it. If you don’t want that to happen, then you must help bring climate truth to your country. Therefore, I am planning to organize a climate action group composed of people who wish to help bring climate truth to America. We need to get major media attention. We need to bring our message to President Trump and the Republican Party because they are the only people who will support climate truth. I will tell you more about this in my next letter. A simple way to know the climate alarmists are lying. I know, their lips are moving. But here is something much more specific. Here is the UN IPCC Figure 6.1 that claims to represent the carbon cycle.
4
UN IPCC Figure 6.1. Natural and human carbon cycles data. This figure proves all climate alarmist claims are invalid.
This figure extracts the IPCC data for the human carbon cycle from Figure 6.1. This figure shows the IPCC human carbon cycle is fake science. Because it is fake, all IPCC’s claims that human carbon emissions cause climate change are invalid. 5
Let’s see if I can explain this to you. This figure represents the four carbon reservoirs: Land, Atmosphere, Surface Ocean, and Deep Ocean. All human carbon begins in the atmosphere. Then human carbon flows to the other reservoirs. You can think of these four reservoirs as water buckets of different sizes with tubes connecting them. You fill only the atmosphere bucket and let the water flow to the other buckets. Here are 3 blatant scientific errors in IPCC’s human carbon cycle: Problem 1: The Surface Ocean level is zero, but the Deep Ocean level is 155. Carbon can’t get to the Deep Ocean without first adding carbon to the Surface Ocean, and it can’t get there when the flow is zero. Problem 2: The land level is negative at -30. That is impossible. That is like having a glass filled with negative water. Problem 3: IPCC’s natural carbon cycle (shown only in IPCC Fig. 6.1) has the atmosphere level at 1.5%. But IPCC’s human carbon (shown here) has the atmosphere level at 65.7%. This difference proves IPCC treats human carbon differently than it treats natural carbon. This violates physics because nature will treat human and natural carbon the same. IPCC has stacked the deck in its invalid attempt to prove human carbon emissions cause climate change. But we have now caught them with their diapers down. In summary, these 3 errors alone bring down the whole IPCC argument that human carbon emissions cause climate change. The 11,000 so-called “scientists” and all climate alarmists – who claim we have a “climate emergency” – promote junk science. Here is a review of the “11,000 scientists” by Ezra Levant: They are NOT climate scientists. Sign up for Ezra Levant’s news on https://premium.rebelnews.com/browse
6