data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b48a3/b48a3c2b9097392457a7d42c4275e2924ea0454a" alt=""
10 minute read
3.9 Tidal cycles as an explanation for Dansgaard–Oeschger triggering mechanism
ice core, unaffected by CO2 levels being constant until 115 ka and then falling by one third of the glacialinterglacial difference in the last 4 kyr (Fig. 2.18). It is hard to argue for an important role by CO2 on glacial terminations without evidence, when it clearly doesn't have one at glacial inceptions.
We know from ice core measurements that glacial termination I (the closest to us, starting at 18 ka) involved a change in CO2 atmospheric concentrations from 190 to 265 ppm, an increase of 75 ppm. Concurrently the temperature increased globally by an estimated 4–6 °C (Schneider von Deimling et al. 2006; Annan & Hargreaves 2013; Tierney et al. 2020). CO2 role has been estimated at causing directly 30% of the warming, and indirectly through forcing interactions another 20% (Gregoire et al. 2015), so between half and one third of the warming (or about 2–3 °C) is attributed to the CO2 increase.
A simple calculation tells us that the rise from 190 to 265 ppm is 48% of a doubling. This is true because we are dealing with a logarithmic scale, (ln(265)–ln(190))/(ln (190(2)–ln(190))=0.48. So 48% of a doubling is estimated to have produced c. 2–3 °C of warming between 18–10 ka. The rise from preindustrial to current levels of CO2 (280 to 415 ppm, or 135 ppm) constitutes 57% of a doubling. That is (ln(415)–ln(280))/(ln(280(2)–ln(280))=0.57, so it should be similar in terms of warming effect. Yet, even if CO2 is responsible for 100% of modern warming, as the IPCC claims (see Chap. 9), why has it produced only about 0.8 °C increase (HadCRUT4 1850–2020)? Something is not right. If our knowledge of past CO2 levels is correct, and the hypothesis that CO2 was responsible for one third to half of the warming at glacial termination is correct, at 18 ka CO2 was two to three times more potent than now. If anthropogenic CO2 is not responsible for all the warming observed since 1850, as it appears probable, then the situation is much worse. There is no way to reconcile the disparity that was already noticed by the late Marcel Leroux (2005). So we must accept, based on current data, that CO2 had a very minor role during the glacial cycle, responsible for, at most, one sixth of the warming at terminations, and therefore conclude that CO2 is not an important climate factor during the Plio–Pleistocene glacial–interglacial transitions.
A more pessimistic view is to consider that the recent CO2 increase entails more than 1 °C of committed warming not yet manifested, implying an equilibrium climate sensitivity of 4 or more. There is no evidence to support this belief. In fact, there is ample evidence against it: • The continued removal of anthropogenic CO2 via increasingly robust carbon sinks. The more we produce, the more is removed from the atmosphere. An increasing removal rate works against a hypothesized high warming commitment from current CO2 levels. • The lack of evidence for a climate sensitivity of 4 or more. Most experimentally deduced values for equilibrium climate sensitivity are between 1.5 and 2.5 (see
Sect. 9.5), half of the rate required for the claimed role of CO2 in deglaciation. • The lack of a significant increase in the rate of warming during the last century. If we had actually increased the committed warming significantly, the rate of warming should have increased proportionally, but that is not what has been observed (see Sect. 12.7).
• A great amount of committed warming should make periods of decades with little or no warming increasingly unlikely. Again this goes against observations.
The only reasonable way to reconcile the disparity in CO2 increases and temperature increases between glacial termination I and Modern Global Warming is to conclude that CO2 had a minor role in glacial termination. Further, it is reasonable to expect it will have a minor role in the next glacial inception.
2.12 Conclusions
2a. Obliquity is the main factor driving the glacial–interglacial cycle. Precession, eccentricity and 65°N summer insolation play a secondary role. The glacial cycle is the result of the interplay between two cycles operating simultaneously, the 41-kyr obliquity cycle and the global ice-volume 100-kyr cycle related to eccentricity. 2b. The Mid-to-Late Pleistocene pacing of interglacial periods is the consequence of the Earth being in a very cold state that prevents almost half of obliquity oscillations from successfully emerging from glacial conditions. The rate for the past million years has been 72.7 kyr/interglacial, or 1.8 obliquity oscillations between interglacials. This can be generally described as one interglacial every two obliquity oscillations except when close to the 405 kyr eccentricity peaks, when interglacials take place at every obliquity oscillation. 2c. Glacial terminations require, in addition to rising obliquity, the existence of very strong feedback factors recruited at very high global ice-volume levels. Increasing northern summer insolation once obliquity is rising is a positive factor, and if high enough during eccentricity peaks, it can drive the termination process on its own. 2d. The Mid-Pleistocene Transition was likely provoked by the continuous cooling of the planet causing too much accumulation of extrapolar ice. This change introduced the counter-intuitive requirement for large ice sheets build up to trigger an interglacial, starting the 100-kyr global ice-volume cycle and causing obliquity-driven interglacial generation to skip one oscillation unless high eccentricity removes the ice volume requirement. 2e. The most convincing hypothesis on the effect of obliquity is through changes to the summer latitudinal insolation gradient, that affects the latitudinal temperature gradient controlling energy and moisture transport to the poles. 2f. CO2 can only produce a minor effect in glacial terminations since its measured change in concentration (roughly a third of a doubling, which represents half of the warming effect of a doubling) is too small to account for any important contribution to the large observed temperature changes.
References
Annan JD & Hargreaves JC (2013) A new global reconstruction of temperature changes at the Last Glacial Maximum. Climate of the Past 9 (1) 367–376 Bereiter B, Eggleston S, Schmitt J et al (2015) Revision of the
EPICA Dome C CO2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present. Geophysical Research Letters 42 (2) 542–549 Berger A (1978) Long-term variations of daily insolation and
Quaternary climatic changes. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 35 (12) 2362–2367 Bosmans JHC, Hilgen FJ, Tuenter E & Lourens LJ (2015)
Obliquity forcing of low-latitude climate. Climate of the Past 11 (10) 1335–1346 Bryson WM (2003) A short history of nearly everything. Broadway Books. New York Davis BA & Brewer S (2009) Orbital forcing and role of the latitudinal insolation/temperature gradient. Climate dynamics 32 (2–3) 143–165 Donders T, Van Helmond NA, Verreussel R et al (2018) Land-sea coupling of early Pleistocene glacial cycles in the southern
North Sea exhibit dominant Northern Hemisphere forcing.
Climate of the Past 14 (3) 397–411 Drysdale RN, Hellstrom JC, Zanchetta G et al (2009) Evidence for obliquity forcing of glacial termination II. Science 325 (5947) 1527–1531 Gallup CD, Cheng H, Taylor FW and Edwards RL (2002) Direct determination of the timing of sea level change during Termination II. Science 295 (5553) 310–313 Gildor H & Tziperman E (2000) Sea ice as the glacial cycles climate switch. Paleoceanography 15 605–615 Gregoire LJ, Valdes PJ and Payne AJ (2015) The relative contribution of orbital forcing and greenhouse gases to the North
American deglaciation. Geophysical Research Letters 42 (22) 9970–9979 Hays JD, Imbrie JN & Shackleton J (1976) Variations in the
Earth's Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages. Science 194 1121–1132 Huybers P (2006) Early Pleistocene glacial cycles and the integrated summer insolation forcing. Science 313 (5786) 508–511 Huybers PJ (2009) Pleistocene glacial variability as a chaotic response to obliquity forcing. Climate of the Past 5 481–488 Huybers P & Langmuir C (2009) Feedback between deglaciation, volcanism, and atmospheric CO2. Earth and Planetary Science
Letters 286 (3–4) 479–491 Huybers P & Wunsch C (2005) Obliquity pacing of the late Pleistocene glacial terminations. Nature 434 491–494 Imbrie J, Berger A, Boyle EA et al (1993) On the structure and origin of major glaciation cycles 2. The 100,000‐year cycle.
Paleoceanography 8 (6) 699–735 Jouzel J, Masson–Delmotte V, Cattani O et al (2007) Orbital and millennial Antarctic climate variability over the past 800,000 years. Science 317 (5839) 793–796 Kent DV, Olsen PE, Rasmussen C et al (2018) Empirical evidence for stability of the 405-kiloyear Jupiter–Venus eccentricity cycle over hundreds of millions of years. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (24) 6153–6158 Kukla G & Gavin J (2004) Milankovitch climate reinforcements.
Global and Planetary Change 40 (1–2) 27–48 Kutzbach JE (1981) Monsoon climate of the early Holocene:
Climate experiment with the earth's orbital parameters for 9000 years ago. Science 214 (4516) 59–61 Landwehr JM, Coplen TB, Ludwig KR et al (1997) Data from
Devils Hole Core DH–11. US Geological Survey Open File
Report 97–792 http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/ofr97-792/ Accessed 13 Jun 2022 Laskar J, Robutel P, Joutel F et al (2004) A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth. Astronomy & Astrophysics 428 (1) 261–285 Lawrence KT, Liu Z, & Herbert TD (2006) Evolution of the
Eastern Tropical Pacific Through Plio–Pleistocene Glaciation.
Science 312 79–83 Leroux M (2005) Global warming-myth or reality?: The erring ways of climatology. Springer, Berlin Lisiecki LE (2010) Links between eccentricity forcing and the 100,000-year glacial cycle. Nature Geoscience 3 (5) 349–352 Lisiecki LE & Raymo ME (2005) A Pliocene‐Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic !18O records. Paleoceanography 20 1 Liu Z, Cleaveland LC & Herbert TD (2008) Early onset and origin of 100-kyr cycles in Pleistocene tropical SST records.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 265 (3–4) 703–715 Lorius C, Jouzel J, Ritz C et al (1985) A 150,000-year climatic record from Antarctic ice. Nature 316 (6029) 591–596 Ludwig KR, Simmons KR, Szabo BJ et al (1992) Massspectrometric 230Th–234U–238U dating of the Devils Hole calcite vein. Science 258 (5080) 284–287 Maclennan J, Jull M, McKenzie D et al (2002) The link between volcanism and deglaciation in Iceland. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 3 (11) 1–25 Maslin MA & Ridgwell AJ (2005) Mid-Pleistocene revolution and the 'eccentricity myth'. In: Head MJ and Gibbard PL (eds)
Early-Middle Pleistocene transitions: The land-ocean evidence. Geological Society, London. Special Publications 247 19–34 Masson–Delmotte V, Jouzel J, Landais A et al (2005) GRIP deuterium excess reveals rapid and orbital-scale changes in
Greenland moisture origin. Science 309 (5731) 118–121 Mearns E & Milne A (2016) The Shrinking Glacier Conundrum.
The Alpine Journal 120 195–207 Moseley GE, Edwards RL, Wendt KA et al (2016) Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing. Science 351 (6269) 165–168 Muller RA & MacDonald GJ (1997) Spectrum of 100-kyr glacial cycle: Orbital inclination, not eccentricity. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 94 (16) 8329–8334 Murphy JJ (1869) On the nature and cause of the glacial climate.
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 25 (1–2) 350–356 Nie J (2018) The Plio–Pleistocene 405-kyr climate cycles. Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology 510 26–30 Paillard D (1998) The timing of Pleistocene glaciations from a simple multiple-state climate model. Nature 391 378–381 Paillard D, Labeyrie L & Yiou P (1996) Macintosh program performs time‐series analysis. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 77 (39) 379–379 Pollard BS & Baez JC (2013) Milankovitch cycles and the
Earth's climate. Climate Science Seminar at California State
University. Northridge, April 26. https://math.ucr.edu/home/ba ez/glacial/glacial.pdf Accessed 29 Jun 2022 Puetz SJ, Prokoph A & Borchardt G (2016) Evaluating alternatives to the Milankovitch theory. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 170 158–165 Rial JA, Oh J & Reischmann E (2013) Synchronization of the climate system to eccentricity forcing and the 100,000-year problem. Nature Geoscience 6(4) 289–293 Ridgwell AJ, Watson AJ & Raymo ME (1999) Is the spectral signature of the 100 kyr glacial cycle consistent with a Milankovitch origin? Paleoceanography 14 (4) 437–440 Schneider von Deimling T, Ganopolski A, Held H & Rahmstorf
S (2006) How cold was the last glacial maximum? Geophysical Research Letters 33 (14) L14709 Scotese CR (2016) Some thoughts on global climate change: The transition from icehouse to hothouse. In: Scotese CR (author)
The Earth History: The evolution of the Earth System. PA-
LEOMAP Project, Evanston, IL, https://www.researchgate.net /publication/275277369_Some_Thoughts_on_Global_Climate _Change_The_Transition_for_Icehouse_to_Hothouse_Conditi ons Accessed 18 Oct 2018