with no lack of epistemic virtue , we often epistemically warrant existential actionability (put simply, prudently determine a choice to be a 'live' option) with normative justifications that include neither probabilistic information (because it is unavailable or weak) nor "justified true belief" (because it is indeterminable or problematical) and this can be the case even when, especially when, we're being forced to make what are incredibly vital choices (such as those regarding our concerns regarding ultimacies) ... all of this is to recognize, then, that we often proceed in the light of faith what are some of those other normative justifications? browse this site to learn more about a pragmatic semiotic realism