作品集 林昊天 johnlinlht@gmail.com +86-18588462536
林昊天 地址：深圳市罗湖区东门北路2044号鸿业苑鸿龙阁6B 电邮: johnlinlht@gmail.com 手机: +86-18588462536
教育背景
2007.9-2012.7
2010.11
华南理工大学建筑学学士，广东广州
“长城脚下”建筑艺术博览园全国大学生设计竞赛银奖
建筑学院建筑系
中国建筑学会和北京探戈坞旅游开发有限公司联合举办
2012.9-2014.6
代尔夫特理工大学（Technische Universiteit Delft）理学硕士，荷兰代尔夫特
2010.12
建筑学院城市系（Urbanism）
“纬纶杯”营造大赛——窥视材料三等奖
实习经验
2010.12
2011.4-5
彭氏奖学金三等奖
华南理工大学建筑设计研究院，广东广州
•
2011.9
湖南株洲职教城核心区城市设计：资料收集，分析图绘制，概念设计
2011.7-9
利海奖学金二等奖
道格玛建筑工作室（DOGMA），广东广州
•
贵阳东部新城概念城市设计：分析图绘制
2011.12
•
贵州毕节卫校初步设计：建筑设计，CAD绘制
彭氏奖学金二等奖
校园活动
资格认证
2007.9-2009.4
2014.7至今
华南理工大学建筑学院团委学生会学术部干事
荷兰注册规划师（Stedenbouwkundigen）
•
协助举办展览，讲座，比赛
荷兰注册建筑师协会（Bureau Architectenregister），注册号：2.140701.001
•
负责和其他学校对应学生会部门的联络工作
获奖情况 2008.9 华南理工大学奖学金
目录
P1
> 科技馆设计 2009.3-2009.5 本科三年级课程设计
P7
> 图文信息中心设计 2012.2-2012.6 本科毕业设计
P13
> 鹿特丹北区城市设计 2012.11-2013.1 研究生课程设计
P19
>单位小区的演变：单位小区城市更新的另一种选择 Evolving Danwei Housing: An alternative way to develop former public housing in Shenzhen, China 2013.9-2014.6 研究生毕业论文
科技馆设计
简介 由于学生人数持续增加，学生与教师的活动空间显得捉襟见 肘，这栋科技馆便是为此而建。本建筑被定义为校园综合体，
类型：个人
同时容纳五大功能：教学，会议，实验室，展览和图书馆。这
地点：中国广州，华南理工大学
一校园综合体不仅是教学的空间，也为学生和教室提供了休闲
日期：2009.3-2009.5，三年级课程设计
的场所。鉴于岭南地区炎热潮湿的气候，半室外空间会成为本
指导老师：李哲扬， lizhy@scut.edu.cn
设计的关注点。
1
B: 1930s
A: 1930s
F: 1930s
H: 1930s
D: 1980s
E: 1980s
G A F
B
Site
H
C
E
混合
D
共存
G: 1990s
C: 1990s
丰富的历史文脉和混杂的环境 华南理工大学的校园的建设可以追溯到20世纪三十年代民国时期的国立中山大学。当时建造了大量仿中 国传统样式的建筑。新中国成立后，为了满足教学和研究的需求同时节省资源，新建建筑多为样式单调 的功能主义建筑。到了八十年代，这些建筑大多被更富有岭南特色的新建筑所替代。科技馆的场地恰恰 位于这些风格各不相同的建筑中间，所以本设计必须考虑到如何和不同建筑风格对话。
华南理工大学校园
2
知识之森 如何与混杂的建筑风格和谐共存？假如我们把建筑设想为一个容器，那么森林就是一个非常适合的 参考对象。成千上万的生物在森林中生存，无数的事件在树上，地表和地下同时发生。作为一个容 器，森林能够容纳自然界中的一切。大学是人类社会最高精神文化荟萃与传播的场所，是创造知识 的场所，是教师与学生面对面交流的空间。因此，本设计希望建造一个“知识之森”，能容纳风格 各异的人事物，学生和教师都能在其中找到学习、研究、休憩、交流的空间，从而促进各种想法的 诞生。
森林
森林里的空间
空间类型
容纳的活动
建筑空间
通过
架空
遮挡阳光
遮挡 运动 连廊
部分穿越
限定和围合
集会
矮墙
躺 阳台
不同高度，不同的景观
高差 桥
3
坐
连廊
架空层 实验室
图书馆
教室
会议
展览 教室入口 主入口
会议入口
森林中的体验 中庭是本设计的核心空间。中庭的设计提供了各种关于森林的体验，例如在树冠上步行，在树荫 下散步或穿越灌木丛，而这些恰恰是在城市空间中所欠缺的体验。尽管这一建筑并不是真正的森 桥
林，但这些设计能唤起常年居住于城市中的人们对自然的思念。 4
Section AA
19.500
15.600
12.300
lab
gallery
8.700
classroom
5.100
lobby
12.300
classroom
8.700
lab
15.900
classroom
5.100
classroom
Âą0.000
Âą0.000
meeting room
6
2
2
2
2
1 gallery 2 meeting room 3 classroom 4 library 5 lecture hall 6 lobby 7 office 8 lab 9 studio 10 equipment room 11 storage
2
6
2
2
1
3
3
3
3
5
4
2
7 6 6
5
Site Plan
0
10
30
70m
Ground Floor Plan
0
1
5
15
7
35m
7
7
Second Floor Plan
4
11
Section BB
library
5.100
gallery
±0.000
3
3
3
8
8
Third Floor Plan
上
下
9
9
meeting room
±0.000
10
9
3
3
3
11
8
5.100
lecture hall
8
Fourth Floor Plan
9
9
3
3
3
3
3
9
Fifth Floor Plan
6
图文信息中心设计 类型：规划部分集体完成，单体设计个人完成 地点：中国温州 日期：2012.2-2012.6，毕业设计 指导老师：寿劲秋、林旭文、遇大兴
7
规划部分：总平面图 一、项目概况 温州肯恩大学拟建于温州瓯海区丽岙镇丽仙片中心组团高教基地 内，校区总用地面积约1059.4亩；地上建筑总面积约305288m2 。 二、规划概念 现代校园，中美交融 把握基础教育发展趋势，顺应教育内涵变化。注重中美教育文化的 融合，由传统的教师对学生的单项灌输向以学生为主体，以人的 发展和素质培养为中心的开放式教育转化，规划营造多层次交流空 间，通过课堂内外交流环境的潜移默化，促使学生全面素质的提 高。 山水校园，人文圣殿 以生态环保意识为指导，人与自然共存。充分利用现有自然基地条 件，营造高雅、有文化氛围、有活力的校园环境。以规划、景观、 建筑三位一体的整体化校园设计为目标，从整个校园生态环境到单 体建筑内部，营造多层次的园林空间，立足于提高修养，陶冶情 操，起到“环境育人”的作用。 前庭后院，特色书院 以规划、景观、建筑三位一体的整体化校园设计为目标，在校园建 设上延续中国传统书院空间文脉与山水温州地域特点的同时，以典 雅建筑造型与新材料和新技术来表达中美校园文化的有机融合，力 求体现独特的校园风貌。
8
单体设计部分：图文信息中心总平面图
N B-4
B-1 图文信息中心（6层） B-2 公共教学楼（2-5层）
B-4
B-3 公共教学楼（2-5层） B-4 学院教学楼（2-5层） B-5 学生活动中心（2-3层）
B-4 B-1
B-2
B-5
0
B-3 9
10
30
70m
仪式性与标志性
前庭后院
架空层
采光
在基座上放置一方形体量，以突出图文
在方形体量中挖出一庭院，同时底层裙
为了不打断沿湖岸的游览路线，将二层
顶层靠近庭院部分设置了屋顶花园，采
信息中心的重要性，同时迎合校前中心
楼北侧切割出不规则平面，从而营造一
架空，人可自由穿行其中。不仅可以丰
用退台式设计，希望将日光直接引入
广场的严整风格。
个与前广场风格相反、观感上更为自由
富游览体验，也制造了一个环境怡人的
北侧底层，改善自习室、架空层的光
灵动的后院。
活动空间。
环境。
最终造型
10
11
人工湖北岸低点透视
鸟瞰
东南低点透视
二层观景活动平台
内部空间概念
交流空间
传统图书馆为了检索图书的方便和空间使用的高效，通常将大量书架整齐划一地布置在房间一侧，
图书馆各层平面分为两部分：阅览空间和交流空间。阅览空间靠外侧设置，保证充足的采光；交流空间靠
阅览座位也极为整齐地布置在余下区域，严肃和拥挤形成了我们对图书馆的固定印象。作为一所新
中心庭院布置，使用者可享受到较好的景色。两部分相对独立，减少相互间的干扰。交流空间相对阅览空
时代的大学图书馆，它应该更富趣味性，能够提升学生的学习意愿。甚至这座图书馆不只是学习的
间布置比较自由，有圆桌，有条凳，可允许学生进行集体学习与小声交流。这里也是学生学习疲劳之后休
空间，更是学生课余消磨时间的场所。对于图书馆的使用方式，通常可分为两种：漫游式的与检索
息的场所。
式的。本方案通过构建两种使用方法来增进图书馆内部空间的趣味性。当然，实际使用时读者不一 定只遵循单一模式，更多情况下是两种情况混合的。 主要交通核
节点及其景观视线
次要交通核
路径
路径
湖景
湖景 屋顶花园
六层
六层
湖景 湖景
屋顶花园 湖景
五层
五层
四层
四层
湖景 湖景
庭院
通高
前广场 湖景 湖景 庭院 湖景 庭院 起点
三层
三层 通向二层检索大厅
漫游式
检索式
每层的书架与阅览以组团布置，组团间间以空
通过两个主要垂直交通核和三个次要交通核串联各
地、阳台等开放空间，形成一个个富有节奏的“
层，每层通过单一路径串联书库，保证检索图书的
节点”，每个“节点”都可看到不同的景观，吸
效率。
引读者在书海中漫游。
12
中心城市 鹿特丹是荷兰的第二大城市，并且与其他荷兰的重要 城市有密切的交通、经济、文化和商业联系。因此， 她是荷兰城市网络中的重要中心城市。 鹿特丹北区 本研究区域毗邻市中心，可达性高，能方便地从这里 到达工作场所或娱乐区域，同时拥有完善的公共交通 系统和自行车道。鹿特丹北区是适合工作和居住的场 所，因为本区域能为居民的日常生活提供充足的选 择。
场地范围 Amsterdam
鹿特丹北区城市设计
The Hague Delft
Rotterdam GERMANY Breda
类型：前期分析集体完成，策略及设计部分个人完成 地点：荷兰鹿特丹 日期：2012.11-2013.1 指导老师：Wouter Oostendorp 13
Utrecht
BELGIUM
鹿特丹区位
FRANCE
问题与潜力 对于研究区域的分析分为两大部分：空间分析及人口现
Good accessibility
状。通过研究本社区的优势、劣势、机遇与威胁，从而
A lot of specialized (work)shops
得出改造策略。
Green space along
Multiple functions
the Hofbogen
空间分析
Viaduct
交通方面，路网密集，但是公共交通覆盖不平衡。商 业、居住、办公各种功能齐备，生活便利。这里租金相 对便宜，吸引不少手工艺者及艺术家进驻，一条特色商
Close to city centre
业街正在形成。但是，本区建筑密度较高，开放空间分
Poor public transport
布不平衡，居住环境的质量差别较大。住宅户型与实际 需求不匹配，造成部分地段房屋空置率偏高。某些区域
Unactive public space
的宜居性（Liveability）相对较差，成为阻碍居民移入
Vacancy High density
的因素。另外，本区域内有一条废弃的高架铁路贯穿南 北，具有改造的潜力。
优势与劣势：现状
人口现状 本区域年轻人口多，且以单身为主。非荷兰裔移
Cheap housing
民集中，低收入人士多，有导致社会隔离（Social segregation）的可能性。大量居民居住在出租屋中， 房屋自有率偏低，而房屋自有率与公共空间的维护相
Singles
关。另外，南部犯罪率偏高，影响本区的形象，降低居 民移入的意欲。 Livability
存在的问题 尽管这个社区拥有不少优点和特色，但假如不采取任何 措施，未来也有可能成为一个宜居性差、低收入人群集 Low income recipients
中、治安恶劣的问题社区。
Small housing Age 25-45
Immigrants
Safety
1990
1994
机遇与威胁：未来的可能性
1998
2002
2006
2010
2012
2014
2018
14
Strategy
Aim
策略 为了防止本社区成为问题区域，我们需 要整合其本身所拥有的优势和潜力，改
Improve livability
善其劣势并消除威胁。因此，本设计提 出了四项改善策略：统一的开放空间系 统，特色作坊区、新住宅项目以及改善 公交系统。
The viaduct
Nearby green space
Close to city centre, good accessibility
Multiple functions, cafe & shops for visitors
开放空间系统：通过将废弃的高架铁路
Park system
Re-activate public space
Close link between each green space. Place for inhabitants and vistors. Good accessibility. Combination with the neighbourhood.
改造为一线性公园，连接各个孤立的开 放空间以及住宅。这个系统将会成为居 er
old
p rg Be
民以及来访者的活动空间。
Vacancy for new (work)shops
特色作坊区：利用高架铁路下的空间建
Ag
nie
设作坊，吸引年轻艺术家、手工业者，
se
bu
ur
t
从而强化本社区的特色，增强就业机 会，促进社区的经济活力。
Higher income Location of specialized shops/studio
The viaduct and nearby public space
Young single as workforce and customers
Close to city centre, good accessibility
新住宅项目：新住宅项目应遵循以下原
Workshop zone Medium and low-end oriented. Generate jobs for the young and low income recepient. Good accessibility
则。拆除质量低下的住宅；改造质量 p rg
Be
尚可的住宅，并使其满足居民的居住需
old
求；改造应结合开放空间的设计。
er
Better environment quality under highdensity situation
改善公交系统：通过调整线路改善可达
Ag
nie
se
bu
ur
t
性差的地段。 High density
Livability
Increasing number of young need more housing
Combining housing and green space to improve spatial quality
New housing
Improve livability
Well connected to the park system. Better living environment. Small and cheap housing.
er
old
p rg
Be
Convenient public transport Ag
nie
se
bu
ur
t
Vacancy Area without convenient public transport
15
Vacant housing and shops, partly result from poor public transport
Green space with bus or tram stops
Rising number of young people. Some of them have to commute to workplace.
New bus or tram stops Combined with park system. Good accessibility.
节点设计
Legend
由于高架铁路贯穿整个区域，所以高架铁
Programmatic zone
路将成为设计的核心。位于高架铁路沿线 的这六个节点各不相同，因而对其余需要
East-west connection
改造的地点有示范作用。
Neighbourhood park
Green space on the ground New bus line
50
0m
500m walking distance
Park system
New bus stop Building to be transformed Crossing
Workshop zone
Workshop zone
New housing
Boulevard
New housing
New bus or tram stops
Mini mall station Hofplein
Vision 16
主要节点：作坊区
“梯田” 广场
高架桥公园
广场 17
“梯田”
高架桥公园
总平面 N
0
8m
Roof garden
Gallery
Courtyard
Office, Workshop
Workshop
Courtyard
剖面
概念：城市梯田 功能
在山区，农民为了更有效地耕 作，他们发明了梯田。在现代的
Housing Workshop, shop, office Gallery
城市景观中，密集的建筑成为了 人工的“山丘”。高层建筑充分 利用了宝贵的城市空间，却同时
平台
梯田
住宅与作坊
开放空间
打断了人与地面的联系。“城市 梯田”可以扭转这种局面。错落 的建筑体量组成的“梯田”，既 可提供充足的公共空间，也可连 接各个高度上的空间。“梯田” 下的空间可以作为作坊、办公或 商店，从而空间得到了充分利 用。“城市梯田”这一概念构建 空间结构
了高密度与人对自然的向往的平 衡。
Platform Terrace
城市梯田：多层次多功能 18
单位小区的演变：单位小区城市更新的另一种选择 Evolving Danwei Housing: An alternative way to develop former public housing in Shenzhen, China 类型：个人 日期：2013.9-2014.6，硕士毕业论文 指导老师：dr. Qu Lei, dr. ir. Machiel van Dorst, Dr. Yawei Chen Land-based development model decreases housing affordability The project focuses on danwei housing, a kind of characteristic former public housing in Chinese cities. Danwei housing has relatively low rent or price and good location and provides affordable option for migrants who want to settle in cities. To improve competiveness of the city, on-going urban renewal and infrastructure construction is upgrading inner city. As the socio-spatial conditions degrade, danwei housing has also become a hot spot for redevelopment. Land-based development brings great economic success but the cost is high housing price and housing affordability of disadvantaged group. Therefore, the project raises the research question: what kind of urban renewal strategies that can enhance housing affordability for disadvantaged groups and improve sociospatial conditions of danwei housing neighbourhoods in Shenzhen as well as contribute to economic prosperity?
Enhance affordability through spatial planning and institutional design By conceptualising housing affordability in Chinese context, the project argues that affordable housing contributes to economic prosperity by accommodating low income group, one of the main contributors of Shenzhen economy. Affordable housing guarantees the accommodation for the migrants and thus ensures the supply of labour. So, housing affordability has positive effect on economy indirectly. Another part of the question is concerned with how to enhance housing affordability. First of all, a decent living condition is one of the central issues of housing affordability. Though high quality of living environment may increase price, emphasis on residents’ urgent need can limit the rise of price generated from environmental improvement. Besides the disadvantaged group, affordable housing is concerned with the others. Homogeneity in a neighbourhood may harm disadvantaged group’s opportunity of self-enhancement. As a result, the improvement of living condition should be based on different groups’ demand. In China, low-income group pays more attention to work and work-related issue while middle and mid-low income group has higher expectation on good life quality. Second, institution facilitate disadvantaged group to obtain decent housing. There has formed a consensus that partnership between public and private sectors is necessary to solve housing problem. A successful partnership should not only create incentives for private sector but also maintain government’s social commitment. Housing affordability
• What is housing affordability • Affordable housing and social issue • The ethics of affordable housing • Measure of housing affordability • What increases housing price (rent)
Living environment • A decent living condition is the central issues. • Convenient public service, infrastructure and spatial planning contribute to affordability. • Prevent homogeneity in neighbourhood. • High quality of living environment may increase price. Improvement should be based on their need.
X Tenant (migrant)
New development
Land price
Prevent homogeneity Need of each income group District scale
X
￥
Infrastructure
Neighbourhood scale
￥ Land
￥
￥
Current land-based development model
19
Public space concerning safety; walking environment; functions and facilities.
Land Owner
Government
Connection between work and housing; public transport; accessibility; walking environment.
Housing scale
Developer
Housing typology; single room for low-skilled workers and young professions; apartment for family.
Theoretical framework
Institutional aspect • The provision of affordable housing can be operated by multiple actors. • Necessary to have an organization for participation and management of the community.
Public private partnership Incentives for private sectors · Funding · Design flexibility · Simplification of regulatory procedure Social commitment ·Transparency in the partnerships · Encouraging social participation · Financial aid for certain social groups
Interpret socio-spatial and institutional condition of danwei housing Contexts where danwei housing neighbourhoods are located vary. Several criteria, which include centrality, accessibility, convenience of public facilities and accessibility of open space, help to interpret the relation between contexts and residents’ demands. When we analyse a particular danwei housing neighbourhood, these criteria position it and form the foundation for spatial intervention.
Centres
Unbalanced distribution of metro station
Lack of small communal open space
Two types of spatial structure
Two types of road structure
Preser ved green space as potential place for recreation
Centrality
Accessibility of transport
Accessibility of open space
Lack of public facilities in industrial and warehouse zones
Convenience of public facilities
The contexts of Danwei housing 20
Despite the difference of contexts, danwei housing has similar spatial design because of the influence of Clarence Perry’s neighbourhood unit. The design principles of danwei housing neighbourhood reflect the concept of neighbourhood unit and respond to Chinese reality. The design seemed quite desirable in the past. However, as the social condition changes and economic grows, it has turned outdated and can no longer satisfy the new demand.
Secondary street
Dayuan General conslusion • Three-level spatial structure Context specific conclusion • Boundary condition variation • Passing in neighbourhood
Main street
Housing
Dayuan (Courtyard)
• •
Define privacy levels according to existing function and passing Encourage small scale concentration
Rezoning community
Secondary street
Connection General conclusion • Dead-end road • Lack of space for commerce Context specific conclusion • Division of car and pedestrian • Disconnection
Institutional condition has great impact on danwei housing. Housing reform starting from 1980s radically changed the public housing policy which had lasted since the foundation of socialist China. Over-marketization of housing stock threatens the interest of those who are unable to get decent housing in free market. The management of danwei housing is driven by a top-down governance structure. It cannot effectively satisfy residents’ need and represent their interest.
• •
Strengthen main streets Restrict passing in neighbourhood units
•
Integrate public space and functions, connections Create enclosed neighbourhood unit through public space design Clarify ownership
Connecting home and work Morphology General conclusion • Homogenized public space • Shortage in Parking • Privatization of public space • The elderly and children as main users Context specific conclusion • Lack of public facilities
Building typology General conclusion • Deterioration • Lack of housing typology diversity • Unorganized transformation • Diversity on ground floor • Diversity of resident
• •
Defining public space
• •
Diversify housing typology for different income groups Diversify function
Diversifying building and housing typology
District government
Sub-district office
Work unit Property management
Resident community
?
?
Private
• •
Institutional aspect • Over-marketized housing stock • Ineffective top-down governance • Ambiguous ownership
Private
?
Establish housing association Encourage communal participation
Strengthening public intervention and communal organization
?
The analysis of sptial layout of danwei housing and institutional conditions
21
General strategies for renewing danwei housing neighbourhood
A new renewal model The degrading socio-spatial conditions of danwei housing in Shenzhen result in profit-oriented redevelopment which do harm to housing affordability. The project proposes several strategies to replace the current redevelopment model with a new one that emphasises affordability as well as liveability. Based on the strategies, a new transformation model is proposed. Housing association is established to guarantee affordability as the goal of renewal. Clarification of ownership and responsibility can reduce conflict and keep the quality of neighbourhood environment after completion. Community participation reflects residents’ demand into the plan so that the renewal can really benefit the residents. The spatial renewal plan is based on contexts and strategy. The spatial transformation consists of two clues: difference and sameness. On urban scale, the diverse contexts of danwei housing lead to different spatial structures for renewal. On human scale, the design of public space and housing typology inherits such difference. The reason is that contexts provide some qualities which people demand for. The principles to transform neighbourhoods are the same because the design of danwei housing follows the same concept.
Before renewal
Ownership of public space
Ownership of housing Ownership (Before transaction)
Institution
Communal organization
Housing association Propose
Ambiguos ownership
Individual owner
Housing association
Resident’s participation Transaction
Discussion and communication
Sell to housing association
Clarification and transaction of ownership
Renewal of neighbourhood
Relocation of housing
Renewal plan
Maintain Ownership (After transaction)
Government
Renewal
Street Housing associsation
After renewal
Public space in neighbourhood
Maintainence
Housing association Transformation model
Individual owner
Housing association
Owner-occupied
Rental housing
Private rental
Housing for sale
Social rental
Communal organization Clarification and transaction of ownership
22
Integration of scales facilitates affordability Danwei housing neighbourhoods are shaped by the homogeneous spatial layout. It is a disadvantage and advantage as well. The advantage is that the homogeneity provides enormous potential for upgrade, compared to the prevailing private housing which has strong identity and cannot be transformed with an adaptive model. Instead of replacing danwei housing with the typical private housing, transformation can keep the neighbourhood adaptive. The disadvantage is the contradiction with the diverse contexts. The project aims at an adaptive model that improves affordability and maintains certain level of liveability. To be specific, the model diversifies the homogeneous spatial layout of neighbourhood. The design of neighbourhood has to cooperate with contexts and reflect the demands. Therefore, there is internal link between scales: urban scale (contexts), neighbourhood scale and human scale (demand). Affordability, as an inextricable term, is concerned with both housing and nonhousing issues, which embody on various scales. Only when scales are considered coherently can affordability be achieved as a quality of housing.
Housing typology public space design
Spatial structure
Context
23
Affordability
Danwei housing after transformation 24