jason boyd ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO
Traveling the world has always been a fundamental part of my life, and as a third culture kid born and raised in Saudi Arabia, I was blessed with many opportunities to experience different cultures, people, and the world in which they live. As a result, I became aware of the built environment at a young age. I formed a natural interest in exploring architecture and how buildings are put together, with each one grounded in its own history and sense of place. These are the thoughts that have always intrigued me during my journey to becoming an architect, and it is through these experiences that I am always reminded of the undeniable value architecture has in shaping our daily lives.
Model Shop | RVA | NYC | 2016
The relationships I have formed over the years, including those at Clemson University (SC), Rafael Vinoly Architects (NYC), and Gensler (NJ), have instilled a passion for architecture and design that will only expand. They have molded me into the person I am today and are reflected in the dedication I have for craftsmanship, quality, innovation, and collaboration inherent in the architectural process. I firmly believe our profession is a continuous evolution of self-exploration while maintaining a social consciousness to improve the world in which we live. This ethos defines the spirit that motivates me as I navigate my way, not only through the profession of architecture, but life. Now, I am on a new path, looking to grow further as an individual and as a professional, where I can utilize my skills and experiences effectively and form new relationships and knowledge.
Jason R. Boyd
academic work CLEMSON UNIVERSITY | M. ARCH 2017
High Speed Train Station CLEMSON | SOUTH CAROLINA
A strong sense of place fashions a link between the past and the present. A genuine awareness of location and place can lead us to rethink mobility, at both the community scale and the regional scale. Through architecture, we can begin this dialogue to rethink the borders and dimensions of a place to help establish a new and sustainable model. If we look at the history of the railroad in America, it has been the single most influencing factor in the settlement patterns in this country. At first, Clemson was just a pit-stop along the Southern Crescent, the picturesque train line that connects New York City to New Orleans, but by 1889 Clemson became the site for the largest land donated state university in the US. The Clemson train station located on the Northeast corner of US-123 and SC-133 has been the site of significant moments in history for this community. It’s where soldiers reunited with America upon their return to the University after WWI. It’s where the community gathered to say goodbye to Franklin Delano Roosevelt as his memorial train rolled through town. The train station is the one binding place in the history of Clemson that has been timeless in its presence yet might be the most forgotten today. Looking into the future, the America2050 plan puts Clemson in the heart of the Piedmont Atlantic mega region. Population growth in this region will need to be accommodated. With trends heading toward more connected communities, it is vital that Clemson begins to truly embrace the social, economical, and environmental qualities of a sustainable community, and in the process, create moments that enhance the fabric of our community and its potential as we move forward. In my proposal for a new high speed train station I ask: how can architecture weave the borders and dimensions of a place in order to support a more engaged and dynamic community? In this case, a successful intervention is one that captures the energy of a place and its inhabitants while encouraging movement across barriers and into the community.
elevated site
elevated track
SC-133
existing station
US-123 + SC-133
The current Amtrak station is hidden and under utilized, therefore, the need to transition from a small caretaker sized station to a medium sized one is crucial. By leveraging our sense of place we can use this moment to re-invision the way we engage each other and the community through architecture. SITE PROS: - Elevated site with great views - Site at the corner of two major roads - Space for expansion - Proximity to different zones - Potential for community engagement
US-123
SITE CONS: - Rail road creates barrier across site - Steep terrain limits approach to station - Limited site porosity, hidden station - Poor pedestrian movement - Congested vehicular flow - Limited transit connections
SC-1
33
site
existing station
US-123
PREMISE HOW CAN ARCHITECTURE WEAVE THE BORDERS AND DIMENSIONS OF A PLACE TO SUPPORT A MORE DYNAMIC AND ENGAGED COMMUNITY?
1. HIGH SPEED TRAIN STATION 2. TRAIN PLATFORM 3. BUS PARKING 4. PLAZA 5. NEW TRAFFIC CIRCLE 6. EXISTING AMTRAK STATION
2 1 4
3 5
6
By developing a physical modeling system congruent with the action of weaving, instructions for making the physical model become visual. An intricate system of openings and notches offers visual cues for how to build the model. Sliding ribs into their appropriate locations emerges as an intuitive process and selfsustaining one, as the need for glue is eliminated.
e nt ra
nc
e
3
2
1 1. WEFT - Level 1 2. WEFT - Level 2 3. WARP - Slabs + Entrance
ENTRANCE
The inspiration for the overall design and construction of the station came from the weft and warp of weaving. The primary load bearing walls are the weft and act as a guide for the ribs. These ribs are the warp that help to construct the secondary structure of horizontal slabs and the tertiary elements like the entrance stairs and seating.
WARP
WEFT
light
form
site
public library
NEW CANAAN, CT
south
east
north
west
sections
N
site plan
structure
rowing center CLEMSON, SC
36
O
0
vi e
ws
pavilion
NEW CANAAN, CT
facade
AMSTERDAM
My design process was to examine shadow and light through a multilayered facade. I strategized a grid of varying proportions and materials that allowed light to spill through the facade. A “shadow wall� captures the intricate projections.
T
FANT STREE
T
MAIN STREE
AVE MURRAY
WHITNER
STREET
T
STREE MARKET
site
T
RIVER STREE
ACTIVATION: A PROPOSAL FOR AN URBAN HIGH SCHOOL | ANDERSON, SC
Jason Boyd + Daniel Taylor
With our proposal for a new high school in downtown Anderson, SC, our goal is to establish an active learning environment for the students on a multitude of levels. One that promotes collaboration and learning through doing. ACTIVATING:
1. The community 2. The students
3. The building
>>> ACTIVATING THE COMMUNITY
ite
gs
in ist
ex
>>> BUILDING FORM: 1. embrace the urban context 2.bring the community into our site
RIVER ST
SOUTH ELEVATION | 1” = 25’
MAIN ST
N
SITE PLAN | 1” = 25’
>>> ACTIVATING THE STUDENTS
auditorium
vertical connections
AVE RAY
circulation
MUR
IN
MA
ST
ER RIV
neighborhoods
ST 2 1 3 4
>>> PROGRAM:
1. collaborative neighborhoods 2. overlapping spaces 3. encourage movement, conversations, visible connections
view
1
view 2
SECTION 1 | 1” = 25’
>>> JUNIOR NEIGHBORHOOD
VIEW 1: AUDITORIUM
>>> FRESHMAN NEIGHBORHOOD
VIEW 2: GYMNASIUM
EAST BUILDING GYM
ROOF EAST BUILDING
LEVEL 3
+54’
+42’
+28’
LEVEL 2
+14’
STREET
0’
E1 | NORTH ELEVATION
>>> EAST BUILDING PROGRAM: STREET LEVEL LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 woodshop gym vocational neighborhood locker rooms pavilion classrooms/labs weight room
E2 | WEST ELEVATION
>>> FLOOR PLANS
>>> SECTIONS
WEST BUILDING
EAST BUILDING
E1
LEVEL 3 +32’
WEST BUILDING
ROOF +46’
LONGEST TRAVEL DISTANCE 150'
W1
LEVEL 2 +18’
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
STREET 0’
DN
PLAZA -10’
SECTION 2 | 1” = 25’
GYM +54’
E2
EAST BUILDING
W2
W3
ROOF +42’
OPEN TO BELOW
LEVEL 3 +28’
OPEN TO BELOW
LEVEL 2 +14’
STREET 0’
SECTION 3 | 1” = 25’ LEVEL 3 | 1” = 25’ DETAIL A
DETAIL B
A
B
UP
DN
C OPEN TO BELOW
D
E F
G H
I
UP
SECTION 4 | 1” = 25’
J
K
DN
OPEN TO BELOW
L
2 LEVEL 2 | 1” = 25’
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1
15
3 4 W1
DN
E1
OPEN TO BELOW
>>> ELEVATIONS
DN
W2
W3
E2
OPEN TO BELOW
UP
UP
W2 | EAST ELEVATION STREET LEVEL | 1” = 25’
UP
UP
AIR HANDLERS
ELECTRICAL
CHILLERS AND BOILERS
AIR HANDLERS
PLAZA LEVEL | 1” = 25’
W3 | WEST ELEVATION
>>> ACTIVATING THE BUILDING 1. express an honest industrial feel 2. reflect the city’s historical ties to textiles and manufacturing 3. utilize modest construction methods with exposed steel and concrete 4. provide solar shading with exterior panels and metal grate
5. activate the facade with user operated “gizmos” 6. allow students to become an active participant in how the building performs and adapts 7. have the architecture itself become a mechanism for learning
3 2 5 Roof (TYP): Roof membrane 3 layers of insulation, staggered joints 4” Concrete slab 3” Metal decking
4 1 2% slope (1/4” per 1’)
8
4 1 A157
7
6 1 A153
3
2
1
9
1. Ventilated facade panels 2. Hangers 3. Adjust. screw 4. Vertical “T” frame 5. Bracket 6. Insulation w/ fluid applied barrier 7. Fiberglass reinforced precast concrete 8. Anchor 9. Steel window frame 10. Steel window mullion w/ thermal break 11. Double glazed low-E glass 12. Window flashing
12
10
11 9
1. Steel window mullions 2. Steel louver 3. Steel plate connection 4. Bar grate panels
Exterior Solar Shading Panels A157 | 1-1\2” = 1’-0”
Facade + Framed Window Header A153 | Ventilated 1-1\2” = 1’-0”
9
1 A158
11
1 A154
1
10 Floor (TYP): 1.5” Topping slab 4” Concrete slab 3” Metal decking
2
12
13 9
3 2 A158
8 7
7 6
3 A158
4 6
5
4
3
2
1. Metal stud framing 2. 5/8” gypsum 3. 3/4” plywood 4. 1/4” birch finish 5. Soffit lighting 6. Birch trim 7. Firestop 8. Anchor 9. Steel window frame 10. Steel mullion w/ thermal break 11. Double glazed low-E glass 12. Window flashing 13. Neoprene layer
1
5
8
1 A155
1nterior Soffit + Framed Window Sill A154 | 1-1\2” = 1’-0” 1 2
1 A156
1. Steel window mullions 2. Steel louver 3. Steel plate connection 4. Bar grate panels 5. Ventilated facade panel system 6. Flashing 7. Neoprene layer 8. Curtain wall support framing
Wall Glazing System A158 | Curtain 1-1\2” = 1’-0”
6 1
1. Metal stud framing 2. 5/8” gypsum 3. 3/4” plywood 4. 1/4” birch finish 5. Profile w/ air inlet 6. 8” can light
A155 | 1-1\2” = 1’-0”
Exterior soffit
1
2
3
4
2
5
1 A159
2 A156
5
3
1
2 A159
1 2
3 4 1. Steel mullion w/ thermal break 2. Neoprene layer 3. Base plate + anchor bolts 4. Anchors 5. Exteiror soffit
Curtain Window + Column Base A156 | 1-1\2” = 1’-0”
4
West Building: South Wing SECTION A | 3\4” = 1’-0” 1. Steel window mullions 2. Steel louver 3. Ventilated facade panels 4. Reinforced isolated footing
SECTION B |
DETAIL A
West Building: North Wing 3\4” = 1’-0”
DETAIL B
Curtain Wall + Isolated Footing A159 | 1-1\2” = 1’-0”
>>> BUILDING ENVELOPE
VENTILATED FACADE PANEL SYSTEM: 1. allows air circulation in the ventilation cavity 2. convective properties reduce interior thermal loads 3. acts as solar shading, absorbs/reflects incident energy 4. protection from water 5. panels allow for material compatibility 6. no visible components, concealed back anchors/hangers
a g
f
e
d
b
c
layer 1: building components
layer 2: ventilated facade system c. panels f. steel window frames + mullions d. framing g. precast concrete backing wall e. insulation
layer 3: solar shading a. operable panels b. steel grate
>>> TECHNICAL RESOLUTION
STRUCTURE
HVAC SYSTEM MECHANICAL Boyd + Taylor Cooling Towers
Supporting beams (W14” x 7”) TYP.
e level 3
e
Vertical chases
Auditorium Roof Girders (W24” x 12”)
d d
level 2
Columns (W14” x 10”) TYP.
c c
Branch supply/return (5’ x 1.5’)
Auditorium Floor Girders (W36” x 12”)
Cross bracing, gusset plates for cantilevers (TYP.)
b
street level
Mechanical Room - fan room (north wing) - fresh air/exhaust louvers
b
Shear Cores (12” reinforced concrete)
plaza level
a a
a. b. c. d. e.
Isolated footings and building pad Shear cores: 12” reinforced concrete walls Primary load bearing structure: Columns (W14” x 10”) Girders (W16” x 7”) Auditorium structure: Roof girders (24” x 12”) Floor girders (36” x 12”) Mid-span beams (W24” x 12”) Supporting beams: Joists (W14” x 7”)
a. b. c. d. e.
Ground Level (isolated footings, shear cores) Level 1 (auditorium stage, lower seating, floor girders) Level 2 (auditorium circulation, upper seating, floor girders) Level 3 (auditorium roof girders) Roof
MULTI-ZONE VARIABLE AIR VOLUME (VAV) SYSTEM provides a constant supply air temperature dampers vary air flow rate for each thermal zone VAV boxes connect to a direct digital control system that actuates the dampers ADVANTAGES: more precise temperature control, reduced compressor wear, lower energy consumption by system fans, less fan noise, and additional passive dehumidification
Mechanical Room - boilers/chillers - fan room (south wing) - fresh air/exhaust louvers
professional work RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS | 2010-2016
432 Park Ave | New York, NY Scale: 3/64” = 1’-0”
Wood Framing
Sheathing
Fabricating a full scale mock-up allowed the team to grasp interior spatial conditions, proportions, and structure. Construction of a wood framing system had to be diagrammed then tolerance for material sheathing had to be calculated. This was a continuous process of interpreting and understanding relevant architectural drawings.
60th floor - Looking North
Rockefeller University | New York, NY Scale: 3/64” = 1’-0”
Site + Context Study
Understanding how the scheme related to the urban context and interacted with FDR Drive was paramount. A master plan model was developed which required many sites visits, photos, and measurements..
NYU Theater | Abut Dhabi, U.A.E. Scale: 1cm = 0.5m
Section Study
The construction process for any physical model must include a strategy that will successfully display the intended design and maintain structural integrity. The complexity of the acoustical paneling challenged design applications and digital and physical fabrication techniques.
Gubei Tower | Shanghai, China Scale: 1cm = 3m
Facade Study
The decision to have a model with a metallic finish and be illuminate presented a unique challenge that required exploring different material finishes and fabrication methods. We decided to utilize an acid etching process for the thin stainless steel facade while a frosted plexi core housed LEDs. The team further examined the facade by producing various combinations of mullion thicknesses and geometric densities.
Massing Study
Beach House | Malibu, CA Scale: 1/8” = 1’ - 0”
curriculum vitae JASON R BOYD | JUNIOR DESIGNER
140 W. 69th St, Apt 95B New York, NY 10023 jrboyd1@gmail.com www.issuu.com/jrboyd1
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE Junior Designer with a record of success in academics, architectural design, and construction administration and coordination. An intuitive and creative problem solver with the ability to drive the architectural process in a passionate, dynamic, and technical method. Design – Solid background in exploring design methods while understanding project scope and direction. Equally strong in 3D modeling software and physical model building. Passion for challenging design applications emphasized by a hands-on approach. Documentation – Proficient in reading construction documents and architectural drawings. Experienced with the submittal process, document archiving, document control, specifications, RFI’s. Administration – Excellent organizational and analytical skills. Able to multi-task and prioritize various duties in a fast paced and collaborative environment. Coordination – Well versed in coordinating with various consultants, project and construction team members, and clients. Participated in on-site project meetings and coordination efforts. Collaboration – Experienced in constructive dialogues in a group atmosphere. Can successfully contribute to the creative process and bring innovative design capabilities to the team. Communication – Strong interpersonal skills with the ability to develop productive relationships with colleagues, clients, consultants, and staff of all levels. Persuasive communicator with well-developed presentation skills. Software – Rhino, Revit, AutoCAD, Photoshop, InDesign, Illustrator, Microsoft Office Skills – professional model maker, laser cutting, 3D printing, wood working, CNC routing Leisure – NYC Clemson Club, Zog Sports, World Travel
EXPERIENCE RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS - New York, NY
GENSLER - Morristown, NJ
(July 2010 – July 2015, Summer 2016)
(Mar 2008 - Dec 2008, laid off)
Position: Architectural Designer, Professional Model Maker
Position: Job Captain
Maintained an integral position within the firm to develop physical models, mock-ups, and furniture designs through all phases of the architectural process.
Projects: H.B. Wilson, Dudley Elementary Schools Client: New Jersey School Development Authority Location: Camden, NJ Cost: ≈$23 million (each) Area: ≈90,000 sf (each)
Contributed as a member of the in-house Computational Research + Design team in an effort to optimize work flow across multiple disciplines and relevant software. Thoughtfully collaborated with staff of all levels to grow a holistic approach to design, refine problem solving logic, and develop strategic planning skills. Successfully brought conceptual ideas into focus through an iterative process and hands-on approach. Researched technology trends and their application within the architecture field. Analyzed drawings and digital files for compliance for 3D printing, laser cutting. Reinforced my dedication to craft, quality, innovation, and collaboration.
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY - Clemson, SC (August 2015 - May 2017)
Position: Graduate Assistant Supervised the Materials Lab/Wood Shop and Digital Design Shop. Trained students in wood shop safety and machine use. Advised students on optimizing fabrication techniques. (wood work, 3d print, laser cut, CNC) Maintained machinery, tools, and a clean workshop Helped students with project design and development. Collaborated on projects for the Clemson SOA
Assisted in construction administration and architectural duties for two large scale elementary schools. Reviewed construction documents, submittals, RFI’s, and sketches with the Project Architect, MEP, Structural, and Design consultants. Maintained a detailed electronic submittal log in Excel and produced updated status reports. Provided submittal information, coordination, and progress reports at on-site project meetings. Coordinated calls and emails from various consultants, project team members, and clients. Maintained and organized an extensive filing system of data sheets, construction documents, and architectural drawings. Initiated research of submitted product data for specification compliance. Assisted with construction observation and inspection.
EDUCATION Clemson University School of Architecture (2015-2017) M ARCH (gpa: 3.9), AIA Henry Adams Medal Finalist Clemson University School of Architecture (2003-2007) BA ARCH (Minor: Business Admin) Universitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain (Fall 2005) Study Abroad, Barcelona Architecture Center Emory University (2002-2003) University Transfer