The CourtYard

Page 1

STUDIO JAM

JULIETTE FOURNIER + MAYA ROSEN


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Lake | Flato

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CHAPTER 1

2

INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION CHAPTER 3

11 17

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 5

25

THE PROJECT! CHAPTER 6

54

IN REFLECTION

Adie Hailat

Emily Lounds

Adam Martin

Rashmi Pradhan

Casey Nelson

Kelly Ferris

Allison Peitz

Mason Bechtold Kenzie Pelletier

Silke Frank

Garrett Novak

Ellie O’ Connor

STUDIO WHITE

55

APPENDICES

56

Cal Poly Faculty

Jamie Intervalo

Stacey White

Matthew Porreca

Barry Williams

Matthew Winter

Alex Hirsig

WRNS

Jermaine Washington Emily Jones

Brian Osborne

Kelly Shaw

Jeff Ponitz

Rachel Kao

Andrew Goodwin

Tomas Stankiewicz

Mark Cabrina

Outside Reviewers Jessica Goswick

BIBLIOGRAPHY

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

Emily Chung

Krista Scheib

SITE UNDERSTANDING CHAPTER 4

Ryan Yaden

LPA

4

Cal Poly Students

Jessica Napier Lauren Mosley Ashley Shoals

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


1

2

INTRODUCTION In the two-quarter studio, the goal is to create a more in-depth building design, which considers a multitude of factors in the design process. Consideration of structure, site context, mechanical systems, energy consumption, programmatic function, formal drivers, material properties, and material assemblies are all drivers to the spatial development of the design. In the initial phases, group work helped in compiling research about the clients, immigrant populations being served, campus planning, potential sites, and questions to answer. The two-quarter allowed for individual exploration of program and form at the first phases of design, before combining forces with another colleague in the studio for further development.

DESIGN PROCESS + PROJECT PHASES

MAYA ROSEN

JULIETTE FOURNIER

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

The start of the design process began initial group research. We researched mass migration and its causes which provided a general understanding of who will be entering the campus. Campus planning research pinpoints the needs of students and how they interact with the communities that surround them. Further research raises questions of how we might combine the needs of the students with those of the people they serve. This research fed into what kind of site would most benefit the two groups based on accessibility, surrounding communities, climate and natural resources, and existing infrastructure. With the selection of Barrio Logan, further site research and a site visit provided a better understanding of the existing context, and which parts of the site might be best suited for the campus. Campus and site development were done as a class, to establish the redevelopment of roads and pedestrian walkways, as well as general location of buildings. Simultaneously, design development started for individual buildings, starting to develop established programs needed. A “moonshot” program was also chosen based on what was deemed most necessary to enhance the campus. Massing, test-fits, and program development lead up to mid review and firm reviews, to start introducing intentions and initial ideas. Post-reviews, the project moved from individual to group work, to take comments from mid review and revisit the conceptual massing and program. In the second half of the two-quarter, a more in-depth dive into the building code provided a solid basis to adjust/ account for mechanical systems, plumbing, structure, and other more technical aspects and re-affirm goals. In the final weeks, more attention was directed towards façade design, material choice, and walls/floor assemblies. JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


3

4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Currently located in downtown San Diego, California Western School of Law is seeking to expand its campus to provide a higher quality of education. As a part of its curriculum, there is an emphasis on hands-on education through clinics that serve under-represented clients in the areas of criminal, immigration, trademark, legal aid, and internet law. With the largest clinic being focused on immigration law, understanding who they are serving was crucial to better understanding the campus and building design. From research on mass migration, five issues that were researched in depth included: crime and violence, environmental degradation, poverty and economic opportunity and immunity and elite indifference. Taking examples of other law campuses provided an outline of how to approach design Cal Western’s new law campus. Positive attributes included: strong community and safety, highly pedestrian, human-scaled, accessible from multiple modes of transportation/ commercial areas, a mixture of shared/private spaces, and additional resources to support students. Its proximity to downtown San Diego and public transit benefits both students and populations being served. Regarding its climate, the weather stays within the comfort zone throughout much of the year and is an ideal location for using solar energy and internal heat gain. The site is at the threshold between downtown San Diego and the more residential Barrio Logan community, providing an opportunity for the campus to bridge the two together. In reshaping the site, the campus only occupies the two empty lots, leaving much of the existing infrastructure untouched. The main campus locates itself with National Ave., 16th St., and Commercial St, populated by five main building and a central plant. In designing the campus collectively, the goal was to respond to environmental and cultural context, implement transitional spaces, introduce biophilic design, and encourage community interaction. Much of the master plan takes direct influence from the goals of the Barrio Logan Master Plan. As a part of the campus, the CourtYard serves as Cal Western’s recreation and bilingual daycare. The recreation center is a crucial amenity to student’s health and well-being. Furthermore, it provides an opportunity for interaction between students and the community in a non-formal setting. Alongside the rec is a bilingual daycare, providing services to both students and the Barrio Logan community. Primarily, these two spaces are designed to encourage a care-free and playful environment, as a place to escape the stressful environment of law school. JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

CHAPTER 2 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


5

6

CAL WESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW (CAL WESTERN/CWSL)

HIGHER EDUCATION

California Western School of Law, founded in 1924, is currently located in downtown San Diego and is the city’s oldest law school.

Every place of higher education has multiple physical and environmental characteristics which make it successful. Finding those

They currently occupy three buildings on Cedar Street on the northern end of downtown near the I5 freeway. While there are

common trends in campuses across the country was the first step towards designing a new campus for Cal Western School of Law.

currently 670 law students with a planned expansion to accommodate 1,000 students. They are an independent, not-for-profit

Looking at law schools of diverse sizes and locations and consolidated our findings to create a strong starting framework to begin

school that offers four-degree pathways. The school is committed to providing a rigorous education to a diverse student body

master planning. We were able to narrow down the characteristics of an ideal campus to the following: Community & Safety

through an emphasis on experiential learning with simulations and community clinics that serve underserved clients in the areas of criminal, immigration, trademark, legal aid, and internet law.

Integrating the campus with the surrounding community through open design and community-based activities that

In their new location, the California Western School of Law hopes to reflect their school motto through the campus experience.

interact with the general population.

Rethinking the physical presence of the overall campus location can act as a catalyst in better serving the immigrants’ justice,

Providing transparency on the ground floors to maintain “eyes” on the street.

protection, and upliftment to aim towards a brighter future. The approach to better serving the at-risk communities requires

Integrating access to emergency response stations that alert authorities of criminal activity along the campus circulation

interventions integrating legal education practices and a sense of empathy towards human immigration and civil rights. The Cal

routes to provide security.

Western School of Law plays a crucial role in serving the evolving communities of San Diego and provides a high quality education

Supplying adequate even lighting throughout campus, including those to academic functions and campus housing.

to shape future lawyers.

Organization

Aiming to represent the state’s diverse society, California Western Law School trains ethical, compassionate, and competent future

Increasing building density (while maintaining a human scale to provide spaces for students as well as the community.

lawyers and hopes to aid the underserved populations. With 41% of the 2021 student population being ethnic minorities and

Highlighting clear and consistent indicators of where important programs are located and how to access them

59% women, Cal Western encourages those who face larger battles and aim to better the world around them. Cal Western offers

Creating a clear pedestrian circulation route using consistent visual language and scale to provide a connection between all

scholarships and grants to students ranging in socioeconomic status, opening the doors to lower-income applicants. To foster

spaces

and encourage diversity the site is in Barrio Logan, San Diego, a neighborhood whose community faces challenges that students

Providing universal access to make areas easy to traverse for people of all physical types

could offer legal advice on. Cal Western prepares its students to focus on immigration law and criminal justice by placing them in

Accessibility & Transportation

clinics located near the school to obtain practical work experience while working towards their degrees. Locating the campus in a

Easy access for walkways to create a safe space away from traffic or clear spatial integration of pedestrian walkways within

community of those who lack legal aid provides students a greater opportunity for creating change. Cal Western offers its students

traffic routes.

many class courses, clinical programs, and community law interventions that encourage students to give back to their surrounding

Integrate bike routes throughout campus that tie into the community bike circulation system

community.

Design for varied transit strategies for commuters to/from campus including bus stops and shared car services. Resources Include spaces for informal learning such as spaces to study or for student support services in a single location. Provide spaces that can be shared/accessed by the broader community that act as multipurpose spaces for students and community members to both enjoy and be able to use as recreational spaces as well. Have resources for education that include financial aid, career advisors, access to studying with professionals, and disability resources. Provide resources that help support student success even in the non-academic side, for example such as a childcare center.

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


7

8

LEGAL EDUCATION The educational requirements to practice law in the State of California consist of several processes with varying academic

Second and Third Year Curriculum:

standards to be met. While the California Bar Examination is the ultimate milestone to obtaining licensure to be an attorney, the

The upperclassman curriculum includes two important milestones which are the STEPPS program and the Clinical Externship

traditional educational requirements entail obtaining a JD (Juris Doctor) degree from law schools registered by the State Bar

Program. STEPPS includes a client-attorney simulation set up to practice law earlier in the educational years. Some other courses

(California-accredited) or approved by the American Bar Association (ABA). The JD takes three years to complete, which follows

include

the pre-legal education of College Level Equivalency Program Examinations or at least two years of college in any given major.

- Constitutional Law I

The most typical undergraduate majors choosing this path in California obtain a four-year bachelor’s degree in English, Business,

- Criminal Procedure I

or Political Science. This does not limit other majors to take up the JD program as an academic path to achieving licensure as an

- Evidence

attorney. The state bar of California summarizes the following legal education options for eligibility to obtaining licensure

- Legal Scholarship Training Seminar

Three or four years of study at a law school accredited by the American Bar Association (ABA)

- STEPPS

Four years of study at a State Bar-registered, fixed-facility law school

- Torts II

Four years of study with a minimum of 864 hours of preparation at a registered unaccredited distance-learning or correspondence law school

CSWL also focuses on clinics and assistance programs to provide opportunities for externships and simulation-based learning. The

Four years of study under the supervision of a state judge or attorney

pro-bono programs excel in bridging the gap between the academic world and real-time problems. Trial law is another essential

A combination of these programs

part of the program to practice communication and real-time delivery of arguments. Some of the Clinical Programs include

The academic process requires a guided approach with mentorship; from graduate school all the way to becoming a practicing

- Access to Law Initiative

attorney. CWSL offers a variety of courses to cover ground on theoretical knowledge and practical application. Some of the

- Competitive Advocacy Program

traditional courses are offered based on the year’s curriculum. These are split into three years

- California Innocence Project - Pro Bono and Public Service Honors Program

First Year curriculum: Foundational year with special emphasis on legal analysis, research, and writing to explore opportunities. The academic year is

The ethos of legal practice can be found in academic initiatives that are taken up by the law school to shape lawyers that are

split into trimesters, some of the courses include

rigorous workers and empathetic citizens, through the experience of obtaining a law degree at Cal Western School of Law.

- Civil Procedure

Experiential Learning programs such as law clinics, paralegal services, advocacy programs, community law projects etc. Aid in

- Contracts

enhancing the legal education aspects that mostly pertain to minimum formal education requirements.

- Legal procedures - Torts

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


9

10

MASS MIGRATION + UNDERLYING CAUSES Environmental Disasters

6M

5M

800

4M 600

Environmental Disasters Data from "Climate Knowledge Portal." The World Bank, (2021).

Data from "Refugee Data Finder." The UN Refugee Agency, (2020).

1400 45 1200

40

35

1000

30 800 25 600

Homicide Rates Per 100,000

1000

Population Displacement 2015-2020

7M

Homicide Rate Data from "Citizen Security in Latin America." Igarape Institute, (2018).

20

3M

This includes comparisons of crime in different Central and South American countries, specifically homicide rate and rate

400

of asylum seekers (per 100,000) in the countries listed. While not definitive, in general countries with higher homicide rates

200

15

400 2M

United States

Chile

Argentina

Panama

Paraguay

Uruguay

Brazil

Bolivia

Peru

Dominican Republic

Colombia

Costa Rica

Belize

Guyana

Mexico

Ecuador

Nicaragua

Honduras

Venezuela

0 Guatemala

Chile

0

Argentina

Panama

Paraguay

Uruguay

Brazil

Bolivia

Peru

Attention to the mass effects of natural disasters on populations, and the number of people displaced by environmental

Dominican Republic

Colombia

Costa Rica

Belize

Guyana

Mexico

Ecuador

Nicaragua

Honduras

Environmental Degradation

5

0M Guatemala

0

El Salvador

also see more asylum seekers moving to the US.

10 200

1M

Venezuela

Crime and Violence

Rate Of Asylum Seekers Per 100,000

environment.

1200

Data from "Refugee Data Finder." The UN Refugee Agency, (2020).

Asylum Seeking Population

50

Asylum Seeking Population

8M

55

1600

Wildfire

9M 1400

Measure Names Homicide Rates Per 1..

60

Rate Of Asylum Seek..

Storm

1600

students would ultimately be working with. Research focused on five primary immigration related issues: crime and violence,

1800

Flood

10M

issues, the following research was completed to gain an understanding of the San Diego community and those clients whom the

understanding of why large populations are moving into the US and what needs to be done to create a desirable, welcoming

Country Environmental Disaster- .. Earthquake

1800

Rate Of Asylum Seekers Per 100,000

social justice and give the students an opportunity to interact with real clients. Given the school’s focus on immigration-related

environmental degradation, poverty and economic opportunity and immunity and elite indifference. Each gave us a basic

Asylum Seekers vs. Homicide Rates Country

El Salvador

One of the primary areas that students dedicate time to on this campus is the experiential learning clinics that address issues of

disasters is another indicator of which countries experience the most mass migration. Categorizing the worst natural

800 10 600

8 6

400

Data from "Infant Mortality Rate from 2009 to 2019 (in deaths per 1,000 live births)" Statista, (2021).

0.8

Asylum Seeking Population

0.7

Data from "Refugee Data Finder." The UN Refugee Agency, (2020).

1400

1200

Poverty Rate 0.6

1000

0.5

800

Poverty Rate

Infant Mortality Rate

12

Data from "Poverty Headcount Ration at National Poverty Lines." The World Bank, (2020).

0.4

600

0.3

400

0.2

200

0.1

0

0.0

4 200

United States

Chile

Argentina

Paraguay

Bolivia

Uruguay

Brazil

Dominican Republic

Peru

Costa Rica

Belize

Guyana

Mexico

Ecuador

Nicaragua

Venezuela

Honduras

Guatemala

Argentina

United States

Chile

Paraguay

Uruguay

Brazil

Bolivia

Peru

Dominican Republic

Colombia

Guyana

Belize

Mexico

0 Ecuador

0

El Salvador

2

Costa Rica

The identified causes do a good job of describing some of the reasons people are seeking asylum in the US, however there

14

1000

Nicaragua

Comprehensive Findings

Infant Mortality Rate

16

Honduras

trend was inconclusive. Some countries with fewer asylum seekers still saw very high infant mortality rates.

1200

Venezuela

Studying the rates of infant mortality was used as a metric to compare the number of asylum seekers in a country, but the

18

Guatemala

Impunity and Elite Indifference

Data from "Refugee Data Finder." The UN Refugee Agency, (2020).

1400

Rate Of Asylum Seek..

1600

Asylum Seeking Population

20

Rate Of Asylum Seekers Per 100,000

rates.

22

Poverty Rate

0.9

Rate Of Asylum Seek..

Rate Of Asylum Seekers Per 100,000

1600

Measure Names

1800

Infant Mortality Rate

24

Poverty and Economic Opportunity

similar among the countries studied, but countries with the highest rates of asylum seekers also tend to have higher poverty

Measure Names

1800

displacement from natural disasters.

economic opportunity among countries and asylum seekers can be seen with some countries but not all. Poverty rates are

Country

Country

Colombia

evidence that many of the countries with the most asylum seekers in the US have also experienced high population

Poverty rates have been shown to be very high among the countries studied. Some correlation between poverty/the lack of

Asylum Seekers vs. Poverty Rate

Asylum Seekers vs. Infant Mortality Rate

El Salvador

disaster in the country hints that natural disasters play a large role in the displacement of large populations. There is

is one outlier that sticks out in multiple databases. Brazil features similar numbers to the countries with the most asylum seekers but sends very few people to the US. With a GDP ($1,434.08 Billion) nearly 33% higher than the next closest country in Central and South America, (Mexico, $1,076.16 Billion), Brazil remains appealing to people despite the ongoing issues. JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


11

12

CONTEXTUAL UNDERSTANDING Population With the site sitting at the threshold between Barrio Logan and Downtown San Diego, the law school campus would serve to bridge the two communities together. On the south-eastern part of the site sits Barrio Logan, a more residential community. To the north of the site is Downtown San Diego, a much more dense, urban environment. The total population of Logan Heights, also known as Barrio Logan, is 58,408, with around a 5% population increase annually. The community makes up about 4% of San Diego’s total population of 1.4 million people. Community Context The initial neighborhood of Barrio Logan grew due to the development of a US Naval Base in 1898 in San Diego. Later, the creation of a major commercial seaport and the railroads also provided a housing boom in the area. This brought many diverse groups to the area, including African-Americans, Japanese-Americans, Filipino-Americans, and Italian-Americans. However, the spirit of the community today, known as the “Logan Heights Experience” (aka The Heights, Logan, La Logan, Barrio Logan, etc.) is due to the migration of the Mexican families which began around 1900. They came from all parts of Mexico, including Baja California, Sonora, Chihuahua, Sinaloa, Durango, Michoacan, Zacatecas, etc. The population growth of Mexican families would continue up to the 1950s. In 1956, the placement of Interstate 5 and the deliberate changes in zoning patterns (from primarily residential to mixed-

CHAPTER 3 SITE UNDERSTANDING

use industrial) devastated Logan Heights by removing economic viability and decreasing property values. The highly controversial Coronado Bridge created a strong physical separation in the community. In both aspects, Logan Heights residents felt uninformed and unable to voice objections or opinions on the expansion of San Diego, and to this day, families still feel a great sense of loss. However, in the late 1960s, the residents of Logan Heights came together to oppose the construction of a sub-station under the San-Diego-Coronado Bay Bridge. Through incredible will and commitment, the land was turned over to the community and later became Chicano Park. The community’s tenacity, spirit, and determination to preserve Barrio Logan as a vibrant, culturally rich, and united community continues and can be seen today in their Barrio Logan Community Plan. Demographic Distribution San Diego has a distinctive cultural identity from Hispanic populations. Historically, the area became prominent from industrial jobs, and there was a significant increase in San Diego’s Mexican population due to the 1910 Mexican Revolution. Alongside the prevalent Hispanic and Latino population, 42% of San Diego’s residents are white, 16% are Asian residents, and Black or African American residents make up 5% of the population. The median age is around 26.8 years. Overall, the culturally vibrant community consists mostly of local families that need a catalyst to revitalize the sense of physical connection that drives socio-economic and employment growth. Poverty In Logan Heights, the annual median income varies with an average income of $52,944. The total median income lies below the

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


13

14

average at $40,310, primarily belonging to demographics under 25 and over 65. The total working population of Logan Heights consists of 51,093 people, 73.9% of which are above the poverty level with an additional 22.9% below the poverty level. The average Barrio Logan household lives on an annual income 45% less than the rest of San Diego. Air Quality San Diego is currently ranked as having the seventh worst ozone pollution in the country. With a median AQI, or Air Quality Index, of 64, this city reports only 73 days of good air quality throughout the year while the remaining 292 days record air quality that is moderate or unhealthy for sensitive groups. Water Availability The availability of water in Logan Heights is limited due to its lack of precipitation and large population. Annually, it receives approximately 12 inches of rain per year, mostly seeing clear and sunny days. Logan Heights also experiences an average humidity of 69% per year with the most humid month being July and the driest being January. Given its context in southern California, Logan Heights and the rest of San Diego rely on imported water from northern California or the Colorado River through the 242-mile-long Colorado River Aqueduct. Still, Logan Heights and San Diego produce 10% of their own drinking water through the desalination of ocean water. Land Use Barrio Logan is organized in a manner that prioritizes its residential and commercial communities. In the Barrio Logan Community Plan, the commercial and residential zones are the heart of the community and are framed by major streets and key sightlines. The development of these zones is driven by multi-family development but is restricted by the large, industrialized zones. Near the waterfront, the land is reserved for heavy industrial and military development, primarily the San Diego Naval Base. The industrial and military development of the land has forced awkward circumstances on the existing community as some residents find themselves living next door to a boat-building yard. This shows a relative disregard for the existing community present before the industrial development. Additionally, the proximity of the Naval Base has sparked development that further imposes on the Barrio Logan Community such as a need for naval lodging. Barrio Logan has been forced to adapt and integrate these waterfront industrial conditions. Transportation The site is located adjacent to the I-5 and the Coronado Bridge, making it a hub for vehicle transportation. Through the site, there are two modes of public transportation that circulate. Trolleys and buses run alongside cyclist lanes. There are anticipated road improvements to enhance mobility and connectivity in the community such as the Draft Mobility Element that is meant to make walking, biking, and public transit more attractive in the city, including Barrio Logan. The Draft Mobility Element will work alongside the developing land use of the community to create a more vibrant and accessible neighborhood through the growth of the community’s interconnections. JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

Transportation The site is located adjacent to the I-5 and the Coronado Bridge, making it a hub for vehicle transportation. Through the site, there are two modes of public transportation that circulate. Trolleys and buses run alongside cyclist lanes. There are anticipated road improvements to enhance mobility and connectivity in the community such as the Draft Mobility Element that is meant to make walking, biking, and public transit more attractive in the city, including Barrio Logan. The Draft Mobility Element will work alongside the developing land use of the community to create a more vibrant and accessible neighborhood through the growth of the community’s interconnections. Resource Availability Logan Heights benefits from coastal air, and its proximity to the Pacific Ocean. The coastal winds can easily be utilized in passive design strategies for individual buildings as well as energy generation for the city. Offshore wind and hydroelectric farms have great potential in powering the city but have received pushback from the city power suppliers like San Diego Gas & Electric Company. Gas and electricity are provided by the San Diego Gas & Electric Company. SDG&E has substantial investment in the Barrio Logan community. One of the utility’s major power stations in the San Diego region is in Barrio Logan. This station is identified as the Silvergate substation, located west of Harbor Drive at Sampson Street. JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


15

ECOSYSTEM UNDERSTANDING

16 70

70

60

80

80

110

120

130

140

90 60

100

Soil Soil is primarily composed of marine and non-marine, poorly consolidated, fine- and-medium-grained, pale brown sandstone.

50

This means that the soil conditions of the site are weak and need more than just a slab foundation to support the building. Likely, 40

the building will require piles for additional support. A site in California also means that earthquakes are an important factor to 110

consider. Barrio Logan and Downtown San Diego are near the Rose Canyon fault, making it an earthquake and liquefaction-prone area. However, it is a buildable zone.

110

Vegetation Due to the intense development and urbanization of the area, no native plants are present in this area. There is little to no

100

90

landscaping existing on or around the site. Barrio Logan’s coastal proximity means that there are plans to preserve the marine vegetation (algae and marine grasses) for the preservation of marine wildlife. Despite the lack of rainwater, the coastal climate can support succulents, such as artichoke agave and the Mexican fencepost cactus. Various wildflowers can also thrive here, such as

80

EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY 40

50

60

70

the Arroyo Lupine, the Goodding’s Verbena, the Bush Anemone, as well as Texas Sundrops. The Chaste tree and Phoenix Mesquite are among trees that San Diego’s climate supports. In the right conditions, San Diego can be quite lush as is seen in Fern Canyon in the San Diego Zoo and Balboa Park. Wildlife Again, due to intense development of Barrio Logan, much of the wildlife has been pushed back to canyons that are more inland. Among these include coyotes, deer, and other mammals. Birdlife is most prominent there, with 430 bird species in San Diego County. Six miles south of the community is a habitat for rare and endangered bird species. The biggest factor that contributed to the decrease in biodiversity (especially in north and central San Diego) is growing infrastructure and dumping of waste. Most prominent are oil spills and ship waste. This has highly impacted marine wildlife of the area, which includes dolphins, otters, and sea lions. Topography The site is effectively flat and continues this way to the bay to the west and south. The elevation increases well beyond the site boundary to the north and east. Balboa Park is built on top of a hill while it spreads out into the many canyons that stretch from it. Climate San Diego has a diurnal swing of about 35 degrees Fahrenheit with a mean temperature of about 65-70 degrees. This puts San Diego in the comfort zone for a major portion of the year: June to November. Summer months see a slight increase to about 75 degrees, but the temperature remains unwavering for much of the year. Its climate makes it ideal for certain design strategies including internal heat gain and solar direct gain. Sun shading is necessary for higher sun angles during the summer months. San Diego’s wind is cold and primarily comes from the northwest. JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


17

18

HOW MIGHT WE GOALS Community - How might we reflect global context within local design? - Globally, how might we respond to humanitarian issues such as immigration and mass incarceration through quantitative research and qualitative application? Locally, how might we design as “a part” of the community rather than “apart” from it, both visually and spatially? Additionally, how might we create a strong campus environment and identity while still welcoming those in need? Clients

How might we design to promote student physical and mental well-being through the organization and development of spaces for both student and community interaction? Service How might we emphasize the architect’s and law student’s responsibility to serve through building design? Site How might we utilize unique site conditions as well as environmental factors to create a safe and accessible place for

campus plan | arch353 christian gibson | gaby guevara | kenzie pelletier | maya rosen tr

station ain

ars

epartmen ed

fir

t

maintena

c

campus navigation

IT servi

s ce

CHAPTER 4 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

learning?

e nc

transportation

pol i

nt

er deliv ies

gro c

departme ce

es eri

AC C E S S I B I L I T Y

wellness services su

acy arm

g

couns

doctors

g elin

ym

rt g ppo ro

s up

ph

LO C AT I O N + PROXIMITY having campus close to resources makes it easier for students to use the university. students should not struggle to have access to food or supplies while at school. incorporating transportation into campus allows students to explore the environment around them.

the idea of proximity + accesibilty as shown here from Stanford University, allows students relative access to the city’s wellness services encouraging students to receive support in areas they may need to be successful in their academic and personal lives

the idea of central heart as shown here from University of Oregon, creates a central place for students to meet up and feel connected to their campus and peers. the central heart has food, classes, study space and outside area for students to use

having an accessible campus makes it welcoming to students, professors and guests. we want a campus to be a place for all people t o u s e a n d b e n e fi t from.

library

travel access

infrastructure

advisors

mni alu educational

resources

walk ab ili

ty

central heart

public recreational facilities

es caf

O R G A N I Z AT I O N OF S PAC E S

C R E AT I N G A COMMUNITY

collaboration hubs

foster connections

professional

stud

labs

e

m

t

bate

en

de

governm

ock t rial

nt

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

qu

orientation programs

iet zone

h

creative

pr

ofesso

organizations mni alu

24 hour

din

ce spa

the organization of the campus' facilities can be taken into account to facilitate better circulation. a central hub can connect d i ff e r e n t e d u c a t i o n a l a r e a s throughout the campus. placing amenities in these areas can encourage full use of the campus as well as s o c i a l i z i n g b e t w e e n d i ff e r e n t disciplines.

personal

professional

tec

lin

r

t

cen

s

ke

having spaces that students can both study and relax encourages them to stay on campus. spaces for students to study with peers also creates a stronger community among students.

ca

reer fa i

s and clin s

er

ic

r

business connections s

gree n

safety

s

the idea of a collaboration c e nte r, s h ow n h e r e f r o m Tr i n i t y University in San Antonio, allows students to study, work, and brainstorm in a productive and unique environment.

private

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


19

20

CAMPUS PLANNING BEST PRACTICES Upon analysis and review of other universities, it was concluded that important qualities that exist for a campus plan to be successful must be reflected. Our project seeks to prioritize the experiences of the law students and Latin American immigrants who will predominantly be utilizing these campus spaces. On the other hand, we also wish to create a transitional experience from the public to private through landscaping features that introduces biophilic design. Furthermore, the qualities and characteristics of a campus plan that are of greatest interest to our project include: (1) responding to environmental and cultural context, (2) implementing transitional spaces, (3) introducing biophilic design, and (4) designing with continuity to encourage community. The best practices we have outlined for our site and project include: Biophilic Design Implementation of vegetation – including deciduous trees and shrubs with an emphasis on those that provide food Landscape design that seeks to engage communities Landscape and vegetation that encourages health and wellbeing of project’s users Thresholds Transitions within the campus in order to encourage interaction between the interior and exterior environments Distinctions between spaces Dynamic buffers within a space to elevate the user’s experience. Sense of Community Create central nodes or quads that allow for various student or regional communities to cross paths and engage with one another Provide buffer zones for students to study or rest between classes. Provide landscape features whilst implementing seating that enables people to sit and engage in conversations Environment and Cultural Context Understand the environmental capacities of a site while implementing design strategies to address site conditions Understand the cultural context of where a project resides and how to contribute in a respectful way Encourage community engagement with local communities

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


21

CAMPUS COMPARISONS

22

Duke University School of Law

A Nolli map is a figure ground drawing that aided in developing our campus plan. These plan drawings help to distinguish private, semiprivate, and public places from each other and clearly differentiate space from mass using black and white to represent the area being studied. We used several Nolli maps to help inform the flow of spaces on our campus and identify the ideal qualities of a law school campus. Some of the specific campus functional elements we would like to emulate were determined to be on these nine campuses:

Students are expected to live off-campus, while the law school features many sheltered outdoor spaces for students to relax and study. Its clinic wing is designed as a separate law office that fosters trust between law students and clients because it offers a space to meet confidentially. Notre Dame Law School This campus creates community through large library reading areas as well as “living rooms” for student and teacher interaction. It utilizes large grassy lawns for social spaces and provides housing for graduate students and their families on campus.

Georgetown Law School This school was chosen for its centralization and walkability in the Washington D.C. area. The campus provides its students with living facilities (such as childcare, a fitness center, and housing for 300 students) to support students’ educational excellence. This is in addition to the classrooms, clinic spaces, and an expensive library. The proximity to national buildings and public transportation also encourages immersion into the extracurricular activities that D.C. has

New York University Law School The school is a unique campus as it is a series of buildings nestled in the city itself and centered around Washington Square Park. It is well integrated into the city and fosters experiences in which school and city life intertwine. Stanford Law School

to offer.

The central location of the university primarily gives students access to the mental health services. There are several green spaces available in the form of

Harvard Law School The campus is comprised of mostly historic buildings with lots of green open space between buildings. The WWC is the hub for all student life which holds

courtyards for studying and gathering. Its circulation system is also robust as the campus is broken up into four buildings with separate educational functions linked together with shared courtyards.

common spaces, classrooms, clinics, and dining facilities.

Lewis and Clark Law

Fordham Law School The school’s proximity to the urban setting, along with its inclusion of greenery and distance to Central Park provides easy access to city activities and nearby law firms. While located in a large, bustling context, the silver LEED certified campus itself contains a smaller plaza within to create a threshold between the

The ample green spaces on the 20-acre campus function as “living rooms” to encourage community and gathering and are used as outdoor classrooms on occasion. The school is further surrounded by the forests of the state park, giving students access to nature as they make their way through the intensive law curriculum.

campus and the city.

University of Oregon Law School The buildings on this campus create pockets of public space that are more sheltered than the general public realm and are oriented towards a shared

1

2

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

3

courtyard with other buildings.

4

5

6

7

8

9

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


23

24

COMMUNITY CONNECTIVITY

CAMPUS RESILIENCY

While the term community most frequently refers to a group of people or a tangible location, the abstract definition spans

Resiliency refers to a site’s ability to weather adverse conditions (both immediate disasters and long-term stresses) while

beyond physical reach. When compiling the campus master plan, reflecting the conceptual community surrounding our site was

maintaining a high level of functionality and safety for all its residents. In our era, a primary test of resiliency is a site’s response to

imperative to the proposal’s success. With a site located in Logan Heights, our master plan was faced with the challenge of being

the challenges posed by climate change. As a coastal site in a drought and fire-stricken state, our campus will be particularly at-

a point of transition to the more urbanized Gas Lamp district as well as the lower density community of Barrio Logan. The campus

risk. The central concerns include sea-level rise and flooding, increasing temperatures, and decreasing precipitation. Although in

serves as a major threshold between Downtown and the future developments planned for Barrio Logan. The project is based on a

the most catastrophic climate scenarios our site may simply become uninhabitable, we have pursued resiliency strategies that will

series of transition zones that require attention; by focusing on scale, density, and circulation, we were able to propose a seamless

ensure its functionality under many circumstances. Some primary strategies are outlined as follows:

shift that melds two communities into one.

Addressing Sea-Level Rise and Flooding:

The Scale

- Our buildings avoid placing primary or essential functions in below-grade spaces, so that flooding events do not damage or

With the Barrio Logan and Downtown in mind, buildings were designed following the idea that the campus alludes to the

inhibit campus activity in the long-run.

infrastructure around it. The master plan gradually shifts from five story structures in the southwest corner of the site to a larger

- Implementation of bioretention swales

scale of up to nine story structures on the northeastern side of the site.

Addressing Increasing Temperatures:

The Density

- Reducing urban heat island effect with extensive site vegetation, cool roofs, and rooftop gardens.

Similar to the transition in scale, density plays an important role in designing the campus master plan. The lack of accessible

- Increasing tree canopy on street edge and internal campus quad to give community greater access to shade in extreme heat.

public realm was a primary concern in the initial design phase. The proposed campus plan allows for the street condition to adhere

Addressing Decreasing Precipitation:

to its surrounding context while the site itself remains inviting for members of the surrounding communities to experience and

- Use of building-level water capture and reuse of graywater to reduce strain on municipal water systems.

inhabit.

- Extensive native-plant landscaping to reduce campus irrigation needs.

The Circulation

Addressing Unreliability of Energy Access:

The selected campus site provides a bridge between varying existing hardscapes, with a goal of maintaining and enhancing the

- Reducing energy needs (and thus reliance on potentially spotty energy grids) by taking advantage of appropriate building-scale

overall ground plane moving forward. Following the requirements defined in the Barrio Logan plan, all major thoroughfares will consist of sidewalks ranging between ten and fourteen feet accompanied by planting strips and class I and class II bike lanes.

and site-specific passive strategies. - Site design with awareness of solar access to increase natural daylighting in each building. - Extensive on-site solar generation to reduce loads on city grid and provide an independent energy source. Many of the measures described here are very physical and architectural. While these may help preserve life and increase physical comfort, the campus also takes measures to address social and communal resiliency. By providing spaces for justice-oriented law education and pro-bono practice, as well as non-academic programs (such as markets, greenhouses, daycares, and more), the campus works towards lifting the community and putting the neighbors in a better situation to recover following a disaster. The conjunction of architectural and social interventions embodied in our campus to support making Barrio Logan more resilient in the face of the challenges to come.

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


25

THE PROJECT | THE COURTYARD

26

CHAPTER 5 THE PROJECT!

PROJECT PURPOSE The CourtYard provides essential wellness support services for the community of Barrio Logan and the students of Cal Western School of Law. The building is designed to create a safe and mentally freeing space, in contrast to the stressful environment of law school. To support all aspects of community, student, faculty, and staff life, the bilingual daycare provides caring and supportive services to allow parents to focus on their work while feeling reassured that their children are being cared for. Proximity to a primarily Hispanic community influenced the decision to make the daycare bilingual, bridging the cultures between children and their families.

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


27

28

PROJECT PROGRAM The CourtYard bridges two potentially conflicting programs: a gym and a bilingual daycare. The gym can be used by all students and members of the community, as can the daycare. Both programs require a level of privacy, especially in the daycare, so perforations and bubble windows provide a visual and acoustic connection. Students can enter the recreation center and wave down at friends climbing the rock wall while on their way to the rooftop pool. Community members can peer down into the basketball court on their walk to the transit center or they can stop at the cafe on their way to work. Parents feel a sense of relief knowing they are leaving their children in a safe and protected space.

PERFORMANCE GOALS + ACCOMPLISHMENTS Since the building will use large amounts of energy to cool and heat spaces, the goal was to help offset the energy use with some energy generation from the building itself and other parts of the campus. The goal is to reach below an EUI of 27 kBtu/ft^2-yr to reach an 80% reduction. To address the energy and water needs, the roof is populated with solar panels to take advantage of the favorable weather conditions to help with on-site energy production. Gym equipment also helps generate energy, enough to offset the heat of the machines and reduce energy needed for cooling the gym. Operable windows and outdoor circulation throughout the building provide natural ventilation into the gym and daycare spaces, again helping to reduce energy consumption. The building reached an EUI of 24 kBtu/ft^2-yr with the help of on-site energy production. To help offset energy use, the campus will incorporate other energy generation methods. Other contributing factors to reducing energy was passive strategies such as overhangs, minimizing WWR on the south and western facades. Wastewater from rain can reach the ground floor through drainage systems, reaching the greenery below. Form

FORMAL DRIVERS Scale of the building was heavily influenced by the site’s immediate context. Since the building is located closest to Barrio Logan,

which is planned to have primarily five-story buildings, the height of the CourtYard matches this, so as to not feel imposing on the community. Its programmatic organization is also heavily influenced by the site. Most of the recreation center is oriented towards the campus side and Commercial Street. Meanwhile, the daycare is oriented more towards the community side, along the side anticipated to have less vehicular and transit traffic. The elevated outdoor daycare space provides an auditory connection to the less vehicular street. Placing the rock-climbing wall and basketball court adjacent to the busier street provides a visual connection into those activity-heavy spaces. To make the most of San Diego’s climate, the outdoor pool is located to the south, on the rooftop of the building. Playful aspects in the daycare introduce themselves in the recreation center to create a more playful and relaxing space. JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


29

30

STRUCTURAL Due to the long spans and structural needs of the building, the building is supported by a steel and concrete structure. Gravity loads are supported by tube steel columns encased in concrete for fireproofing, as well as concrete bearing walls. Steel columns are spaced between 25-30’ spans, connected by steel wide-flange beams and girders. In spaces with longer spans, such as the basketball court and rock-climbing wall, steel trusses support the spaces above. To support the heavy loads of the rooftop pool, the floor below allows room for the necessary structural supports. Concrete shear walls and moment frames provide lateral support.

1/4"=1'-0" 0'

1

2

4

8

ACTIVATE CAMPUS SIDE

PROVIDE PROTECTED OUTDOOR PLAYSPACE FOR KIDS

ACTIVATE ROOFTOP OUTDOOR SPACE

N

NNW

NNE

NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW

S HIERARCHY OF HEIGHTS ON ACTIVE STREET

EXTRUDE BUBBLE WALL

EGRESS STAIR RESTROOMS ELEVATOR CORE

SSE

SUN PATH

DAYCARE GYM VISUAL AND AUDITORY INTERSECTION

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


31

32

FLOOR PLANS The separate programs of day care and gym play a pivotal role in the layout of the plans. Ensuring child safety while also having connections between the program drove the design process. Allowing passersby to peer into the rock climbing wall and the basketball court brings the community into and onto the campus while also creating a safe space for students 1 A109

UP

UP DN

A 30' - 0"

A

1

B 32' - 0"

32' - 0" UP

UP

B

A108

DN

C 25' - 0"

DN

25' - 0"

C UP

UP

D

D

1

E

25' - 0"

25' - 0"

A116

E 22' - 0"

22' - 0"

UP

F

17' - 0"

1

30' - 0"

2

30' - 0"

3

F

32' - 0"

4

BASEMENT JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

17' - 0"

5

1

FIRST FLOOR

30' - 0"

2

30' - 0"

3

32' - 0"

4

28' - 0"

5

6

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


33

34

UP DN

UP DN

A

B

UP

B

DN DN

A

UP

UP

C

UP

C

DN

DN

D

D

E

UP

E

UP DN

DN

F

F

1

2

3

4

5

SECOND FLOOR JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

6

1

THIRD FLOOR

2

3

4

5

6

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


35

36

UP

DN

DN UP

DN

A

B

B

30' - 0"

A

32' - 0"

DN

DN

UP

C

C

D

D

E

E

25' - 0"

25' - 0"

DN

22' - 0"

UP DN

DN

F

F

17' - 0"

1

30' - 0"

2

30' - 0"

3

32' - 0"

4

28' - 0"

5

FOURTH FLOOR JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

6

1

FIFTH FLOOR

2

3

4

5

6

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


1 A108

37

5 1

38

A119 A116

5

KEY NOTES 1 | RETAINING WALL

4

3

CONCRETE FRICTION PILES 3’ CONCRETE FOUNDATION 1’ CONCRETE RETAINING WALL RIGID INSULATION WATER RESISTANT BARRIER AIR BARRIER PAINTED TYP. GYPSUM BOARD

3 | DAY CARE FLOOR WOOD FLOORING CONCRETE SLAB ON METAL DECK RIGID INSULATION (EXTERIOR) AIR BARRIER STEEL BEAM RADIANT HEAT COMPOUND CEILING ACOUSTIC CLOUD RECESSED LIGHT

2

5 | ROOF CONNECTION CHILLED CEILING METAL FASCIA STEEL BEAMS CONCRETE CAST IN PLACE ON METAL DECK RIGID ROOF INSULATION SINGLE-PLY ROOF MEMBRANE ROOF DRAINS PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS

1 A109

1

1 A116

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

7 | BUBBLE WINDOW ALUMINIUNM TUBE EXTENDED FOR SOLAR SHADING TOWARDS SOUTH OPERABLE WINDOW TIED TO BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM GLAZING

KEY NOTES

SUMMER SUN 81o

8

2 | OPERABLE WINDOW FLASHING AIR CAVITY OPERABLE IGU CERAMIC FRIT STEEL TRUSS @6’ O.C. STEEL GIRDER

WINTER SUN 24o

7

4 | GFRC WALL PANELS 6” x 24” GFRC CLADDING HAT CHANNEL FLASHING CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION WATER RESISTANT BARRIER COLD FORM STEEL FRAMING PAINT TYP. GYPSUM BOARD

3

6 | GYM FLOOR CARPETED FLOORING FLOOR PAD CONCRETE OVER STEEL DECK STEEL BEAM DUCT SPACE FOR AIR BASED MECHANICAL SYSTEM ACOUSTIC CEILING

6 1

4

A109

1

8 | POOL DRAIN PAVERS POOL TILED POOL FLOOR W GUNITE FINISH WATERPROOFING AND DRAINAGE LAYER DRAIN @ POOL DRAIN @ WATERPROOFING LINER DRAINAGE PIPE TO WATER FILTRATION SYSTEM

1 A116

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


39

EXTERIOR VIEW OF THE COURTYARD FROM NATIONAL AVE

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

EXTERIOR VIEW OF OUTSIDE CHILD PLAY AREA

40

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


41

INTERTIOR VIEW OF BASKETBALL COURT

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

INTERIOR VIEW OF 0-2 PLAY AREA

42

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


43

INTERTIOR VIEW OF BUBBLE WALL PLAY AREA

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

EXTERIOR VIEW OF ROOF LOUNGE AND POOL

44

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


45

46

SITE PLAN

N

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


47

SITE SECTION

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

48

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


49

SE-NW SECTION

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

50

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


51

PHYSICAL MODEL

52

1/4”=1-0”

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


53

54

IN REFLECTION Going through the process of a two-quarter studio confronted me with new design challenges and new aspects to consider in the building process. Faced with a sensitive and diverse client base, which requires sensitivity in the design of the building and the campus as a whole. At the start of the quarter, the goal was to understand and address the client’s requirements through understanding and empathetic design. This philosophy has not changed since the start of the quarter and was a factor we considered throughout the design process. From the start of the quarter, the intention was to create a welcoming environment for students, children and the surrounding community. With more time, receiving more opinions from actual community members who would frequent the space (such as students, immigrant populations, etc) would have been helpful to better accomplishing the initial intention we had. An building’s design can has a profound impact on its surroundings and users, in a positive or negative way. In approaching how to design for these clients, we first researched these individual communites, especially immigrant populations, to try to understand why they may be coming to the US. Simultaneously, we did research to understand what entails a successful college campus. However, hard data only does so much to inform what the desires of a group actually are. Multiple reviews and outside opinions were incredibly valuable to helping offset our own biases and sparking new ways to bring our intentions across. Looking back, it would’ve been incredibly helpful to start with a precedent that wasn’t necessarily a building, but more informed by forms around the site. One aspect of studio that helps me significantly with concept development is abstraction of an idea or intention, and usually physical models are the most beneficial. Focusing on a specific aspect at the start of spring was extremely beneficial in understanding our project and intentions from an exterior perspective. This would have been something I would’ve wanted to do earlier in the quarter for idea generation, since building precedents were not helpful yet at this phase of the project. Ideally, I would want to balance the more creative design phase initially with a more practical approach later. It was challenging to design iteratively without having a form to start with. Student reviews from upper years was something that I hadn’t thought about trying, but something that was incredibly beneficial in the long run. It felt like they could be more honest and were more willing to provide more concrete suggestions, which significantly impacted the way we approached our project and its goals later in the double-quarter. Definetely, our biggest challenge as we approached the project was the programmatic breakdown and connection between the two programs. I am glad that we followed through with the challenge, since it helped us explore and understand the best way to approach it. One frustration we had was the suggestion to look at precedents since we couldn’t find any. Rather than accepting the defeat that these programs are simply incompatible, it helped us explore other ways to connect programs without a physical connection.

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


55

BIBLIOGRAPHY

“A Database of Sustainable Design Principles, Strategies, Tools and Resources at Your Fingertips.” 2030 Palette, 2030palette.org www.cwsl.edu “Zero Tool.” Zero Too, zerotool.org “Zero Code.” Zero Code, zero-code.org “The City of San Diego.” sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/planning/community/profiles/pdf/cp/cpblfull.pdf “10 Best Landscaping Plants for the San Diego Climate.” EcoMinded Solutions, 2022. ecomindedsolutions.com/blog/san-diegoplanting-guide Climate Consultant Insight ArchDaily wrnsstudio.com lpadesignstudios.com/projects “Refugee Data Finder.” The UN Refugee Agency (2020). “Climate Knowledge Portal.” The World Bank (2021). “Citizen Security in Latin America.” Igarape Institute (2018). “Poverty Headcount Ration at National Poverty Lines.” The World Bank (2020). “Infant Mortality Rate from 2009 to 2019 (in deaths per 1000 live births)” Statistica (2021).

JULIETTE FOURNIER | MAYA ROSEN | STUDIO WHITE | ARCH-352/353 | WINTER/SPRING 2022


JOHN OLVER DESIGN BUILDING UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST LEERS WEINZAPFEL ASSOCIATES

PAIGE DZENGELEWSKI, JULIETTE FOURNIER, LILIANA HUNT, MAYA ROSEN STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


01 - STORY LEERS WEINZAPFEL ASSOCIATES Leers Weinzapfel Associates is an award winning architecture firm that is driven by making wonderful architecture for the public realm, while maintaining a collaborative and diverse work environment. Each project focuses on four main points: the human experience, being grounded in context, devotion to the art of building, and a project-specific process. Designs also come together from multiple disciplines within the field to create each of their projects, resulting in highly sustainable projects. These projects tend to be LEED Gold Certified university halls and labs located in the New England region. The buildings themselves usually show structure and utilize cross laminated timber. Additionally, their buildings are naturally lit, bright on both the interior and exterior, and aesthetically pleasing. The John Olver Design Building is the perfect example of what their design goals and ideas encompass.

PROJECT DESIGN TEAM UMass Project Manager: Burt Ewart UMBA Project Manager: Hill International, Inc. Designer / Architect: Leers Weinzapfel Associates Environmental Design Consultants & Engineers: Atelier Ten Southwest Exterior Perspective Construction Manager Suffolk Construction Accessibility: Kessler McGuiness & Associates Acoustics & Audiovisual: Acentech; Code Consultant: Howe Engineers Cost Estimating: Faithful and Gould Engineer - Civil: Nitsch Engineering; Engineer - Geotechnical: GZA Geoenvironmental, Inc. Engineer - MEPFP: BVH Integrated Service, P.C. Engineer - Site/Hazmat: Weston and Sampson Engineer - Site Utilities: BVH Integrated Service, P.C. Engineer - Structural Design: Equilibrium Consulting Inc Engineer - Structural of Record: Simpson Gumpetz & Heger General Contractor: Suffolk Construction Hardware: Campbell-McCabe Landscape Architect: STIMSON Specifications: Steven McHugh Sustainable Design & Lighting: Atelier Ten Wood Shop / Digital Fabrication Consulting: Radlab DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

PROJECT BACKGROUND The John W. Olver Design Building was built for the University of Massachusetts in Amherst as a setting that would merge previously separated Architecture, Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning, and Building & Construction Technology programs into one facility for collaboration and joint learning. In addition to a public rooftop courtyard (which features plants native to the Northeast) the designers use a vertical slatted structure which was inspired by Amherst’s historical traditional wooden tobacco barn structures. The building is surrounded with drought tolerant landscaping which requires little maintenance. The John W. Olver Design Building is located between the arts campus and the science campus, bridging the two campuses together. Its programmatic elements include administrative offices, workshops, classrooms, studios, a cafe, lab space, a gallery, and a central atrium. The building utilizes crosslaminated timber in its structural system which greatly reduces its carbon footprint. The 87,573 sq ft. project began construction in March of 2015 and was completed in January of 2017, costing UMASS $52 million.

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


02 - SITE: REGIONAL RESOURCES

­

CONTEXT The John W. Olver Design Building was built for the University of Massachusetts in Amherst as a setting that would The John W. Olver Design Building is located on a college campus within a larger suburban setting. Consequently, large noise disturbances are minimal. Its location within the campus itself holds an important role, connecting the arts campus and science campus on each of its four sides. The main entrance aligns with the primary pedestrian and vehicular path of the area.

DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


Climatic Responses

Wind Speed (mph) City: Chicopee Falls West Country: USA Source: TMY3 Period: 1/1 to 12/31 between 0 and 23 @1 Calm for 8.73% of the time = 765 hours Each closed polyline shows frequency 0f 0.6%= 50 hours

Dry Bulb Temperature (ºF) City: Chicopee Falls West Country: USA Source: TMY3

Time [hr] City: Chicopee Falls West Country: USA Source: TMY3

­

­

­

SITE STUDY

CLIMATE

There are two main entry points on the east and west faces of the structure. This project eases the transition threshold between public and private through the use of open outdoor space on both of these sides of the exterior. The integrated vegetation and pathways welcome those coming from sidewalks and streets to the building itself. The landscaping stays low-maintenance by using largely drought-tolerant and native species. A light material with a high SRI is used for the roof as well as the hardscape to avoid making this area extremely hot. A large public atrium leads into more private studios and offices, as well as a public rooftop garden on the top floor.

Amherst has a temperate climate with warm summers and cold winters. The climate consists of high temperatures in the summer months and heavy rainfall and snowfall in the winter months. Set in the New England climate, the John W. Olver Design Building reacts to conditions with a series of climate specific influences. Radiant floor, wall panels, and ceiling provide heat in colder temperatures, while operable windows lower energy usage when temperatures are more mild. A high performance envelope keeps harsh weather out, while shaded glazing lowers solar heat gain alongside skylights with daylight dimming controls to minimize energy usage for cooling demands. The primary wind comes from the south-western direction, which impacts the orientation of the building as well.

DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


 ABOUT YOUR BUILDING

03 - SKIN

 RESULTS

Building Name

Mission District

Country

United States

City | State/Prov.

Amherst

Postal Code

01003

Degree Days

Target EUI is 34 based on a 80% reduction

 *

*

BASELINE 166 EUI 100 Zero Score

 * Massachusetts

TARGET 34 EUI 20 Zero Score

*

HDD 6807

* CDD 514

* 100

New construction

80

60

40

0

20

-20

Existing Building BUILDING SUMMARY

 BUILDING USE DETAILS

LOCATION

Amherst, MA

01003

USES

College / University

87,500 sq.ft (100.0%)

In order to provide you with an appropriate comparison for your building, we need to know how spaces in this building will be used. If your building has multiple uses, add them below.  Commercial Add Another Use

Selected Use Type(s):

College / University

BASELINE

TARGET

YOUR BUILDING

EUI % Reduction from Baseline

0%

80%

N/A

Zero Score

100

20

N/A

Site EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr)

166

34

N/A

Source EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr)

263

53

N/A

Total GHG Emissions (metric tons CO₂e/yr)

931

187

N/A

RESULTS

Residential

imperial

metric

print 

DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


04 - STRUCTURE

MASS TIMBER CONSTRUCTION In order to create an environmentally friendly and aesthetically successful building, the Design Building makes use of a mass timber structural system. Currently, the building is the most advanced, contemporary mass timber building in the country, with the largest timber frame structure in the Northeast. Glulam timber posts and beams are aligned in a grid system, with a cross laminated timber roof decking. A glulam-steel zipper truss allows for a 40’ atrium span and a rooftop garden sitting above. With a second story cantilever, steel beams with wood cladding provide the necessary support. Cross laminated timber shear walls serve the structure and house support spaces for the building. The structure is exposed and reveals the large wooden members that are supporting the building. There is steel lateral cross bracing at the ends of the building to support the building for wind and earthquakes. A concrete foundation and composite concrete CLT floor structure helps with radial floor heating to heat the building.

DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


05 - CIRCULATION

EGRESS

Entry takes place on the east and west facades of the building, with an experiential stair connecting the first and second floor along the atrium. Private programmatic functions are situated on the perimeter, resulting in a radial circulation pattern on the floors. Vertical circulation in the form of elevators and stairwells stay stagnant, which adds more predictability to the otherwise variable circulation network. Exit access is available in the form of two enclosed stairwells on opposing sides of the building, allowing for easy access to the main exits. One of the staircases also opens directly to the outside of the building on the east face. The elevator is located near one egress set of stairs for practicality. DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


06 - MASSING MODEL

07 - SYSTEMS: WATER WATER WAYS All of the restrooms are located on top of each other so vertical plumbing is in the same area. Specific measures have been implemented to reduce indoor potable water consumption. These include low-flow lavatory fixtures such as sensor-activated toilets, urinals, and lavatory faucets. Water stations are located throughout the building to encourage students, faculty and visitors to use reusable water bottles rather than single-use plastic.

DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


08 - SYSTEMS: LIGHT + AIR

ANNUAL SUNLIGHT EXPOSURE (ASE)

SPACIAL DAYLIGHT AUTONOMY (SDA)

EAST

NORTH

SOUTHWEST

SOUTH

sDA + ASE According to this analysis, the Spatial Daylight Autonomy is 56% while the Annual Sun Exposure is 28%. Particularly, the south-western and western facades bring significant daylight into the space, with the help of large windows and light streaming in from the skylights and windows on the rooftop garden. Most spaces are relatively well daylit, particularly studio spaces and office spaces. Overall, the EUI of this building is 39.98 kBtu/sq.ft/yr. Knowing that the building is LEED Gold Certified, but that the analysis indicates a failing ASE value, it’s clear there are faults in the analysis due to some key elements that are not accounted for. For instance, the west and southwestern facades use high performance glazing called “smart glass” which is intended to address shading. Interior walls were not accounted for either. These both significantly decrease the ASE value. DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

WEST

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


09 - SYSTEMS: MECHANICAL

PASSIVE SYSTEM Operable windows with glazing, dynamic glass along the south and western facades, and fritted glass on the windows to the atrium all address solar heat gain and daylight control within the building while still allowing outdoor views. Other methods include radiant slab heating to increase temperatures indoors, an open atrium for natural ventilation, and an outdoor rooftop garden.

ACTIVE SYSTEM The HVAC systems are separated into the air side and hydronic side, then further divided into four groups. Each zone addresses different programs that require different levels of ventilation. Air Handling Unit (AHU) 1 serves the studios and classrooms. AHU 2 serves the south wing faculty and administrative offices. AHU 3 serves the atrium and central core. AHU 4 serves the wood lab and shop, along with the fabrication lab. All groups utilize a forced air system, while AHU 2 also uses the hydronic system. Energy consumption reductions are implemented in all units. All rooms have an occupant and sensor controlled thermostat system that makes adjustments to temperature, humidity, and percentage of fresh air. These systems work within the geometric areas of the building created by the programs and remain concealed in the floor. Designated vertical locations are located throughout the building for the elements, while horizontal distribution is located between floors. DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

1 2

3

4

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


10 - SYSTEMS: MECHANICAL

GLULAM COLUMNS

ROOFTOP SKYLIGHT

ZIPPER TRUSS HIGH PERFORMANCE WITH GLAZING AND EXTERIOR SHADES

GLULAM BEAMS

COPPER ANODIZED ALUMINUM WRAPPER

RADIANT FLOOR HEATING AHU- STUDIOS AND CLASSROOMS HVAC PIPES AIR DIFFUSER

AHU- WOOD SHOP AHU- OFFICE AND ADMINISTRATION

N

SECTION FACING EAST 1/16"= 1'-0"

0'

DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

5'

10'

20'

40'

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


WORKS CITED

REFLECTION

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Leers Weinzapfel Architects. “John W. Olver Design Building.” Leers Weinzapfel Architects. 2017. https://www.lwa-architects.com/project/integrated-design-building/ Project Information, Architect Information (Story) Sketches, Drawings, Models, Renders Rendano, Ryan. “Campus: Olver, John W. Design Building.” University of Massachussetts, Amherst. https://www.umass.edu/cp/olver-john-w-design-building Regional Resources Skin and Space Structure Passive Design Strategies Facilities and Campus Services. “John W. Olver Design Building: Building User Manual.” University of Massachussetts, Amherst. https://www.umass.edu/cp/sites/default/files/John%20ODB_Building%20User%20Manual.pdf HVAC Systems Passive and Active Design Strategies AIA. “John W. Olver Design Building.” AIA. https://www.aia.org/showcases/6280256-john-w-olver-design-building Project Information (Story) Regional Resources Department of Environmental Conservation. “The John W. Olver Design Building at UMass Amherst.” BCT UMass Amherst. https://bct. eco.umass.edu/about-us/the-design-building-at-umass-amherst/ Plans, Sections, Diagrams

IMAGE CITATIONS

“John W. Olver Design Building.” Leers Weinzapfel Architects. 2017. https://www.lwa-architects.com/project/integrated-design-building/ Cover image, section drawing overlay, structure, circulation, mechanical “John W. Olver Design Building.” Nordic Structures. https://www.nordic.ca/en/projects/structures/umass-design-building Story “People.” Leers Weinzapfel Architects. 2021. https://www.lwa-architects.com/people/ Leers Weinzapfel Associates Vecerka, Albert. “University of Massachussetts, John W. Olver Design Building.” SGH. 2017. https://www.sgh.com/project/university-of-massachusetts-john-w-olver-design-building/ Project Background, Structure “University of Massachussetts Amherst, John W. Olver Design Building.” Society for College and University Planning. https://www.scup.org/award-winner/university-of-massachusetts-amherst-john-olver-design-building/ Project Background Atelier ten. “Campus: Olver, John W. Design Building.” University of Massachussetts, Amherst. https://www.umass.edu/cp/olver-john-w-design-building Skin Doan, Ngoc. “SOLARBAN glasses enhance sustainable design of award-winning John W. Olver Design Building.” PRISM Pub, Sustainability in the Built Environment, 22 Jan. 2021. https://prismpub.com/solarban-glasses-enhance-sustainable-design-of-awardwinning-john-w-olver-design-building/ Reflection

DZENGELEWSKI, FOURNIER, HUNT, ROSEN

Our first interaction with the John W Olver Design Building occurred this past spring. From the architect’s lecture on the project, the piece that stood out the most about the building was the zipper truss. It was a technology that we had never encountered, as well as the selling point of the building. As we dove into the project, the rooftop garden peaked our interest. It emphasized the complexity of the truss structure underneath to hold heavy loads while allowing for an open atrium space below. Further research resulted in greater appreciation for the smaller elements implemented within the building. Simple decisions have profound effects that make it environmentally and aesthetically efficient. Programs on the perimeter helps daylight the more used spaces while a central circulation seamlessly bridges all of the programs together. A separation of smaller private spaces from larger public spaces reflects the systems used. It was notable how all of the systems pieced together and did not collide when creating our diagrams. One caveat to our analysis was a cove tool inaccuracy. We did not include interior walls which would raise the EUI. However, we were amazed by the building’s LEED gold certification despite a few walls of glass. This confirmed how the building was intentionally placed on its site, amplifying the user experience. In conclusion, our group was both pleasantly surprised and inspired by the John W Olver Design Building. We hope to take the thinking process, methods, and resources from this design and apply it towards future studio projects.

STUDIO PONITZ | ARCH-341 | FALL 2021


Ask, Understand, Act

Juliette Fournier Studio White Winter 2022 1.4.2022

As architects, it’s vital to create designs guided by an understanding of the community/ client it serves. Above all else, respect, consent, and listening are requirements towards creating successful civic architecture. Beyond the scope of the specific community, the architect must also take responsibility for any climate and technical implications that come with their proposal. Arguably, a critical mistake architects must avoid is overstepping boundaries. This point is especially emphasized in “Designing Like You Give a Damn- About What Exactly?” where Nikki Linsell criticizes architects for thinking “they are the ones with the appropriate knowledge and expertise,” but only from their own biases (Linsell 614). Under every circumstance, its likely the client understands their needs better than the architect. In certain areas, people of the area will have better awareness of local building customs and culture than an outsider. Architects must be willing to learn from the community they are serving, not simply impose their ideas thinking they have the superior knowledge. While the architect should absolutely provide suggestions and use their knowledge, it’s vital to not only ensure the client understands those implications. Consent is also necessary in multiple aspects of the process, particularly in the design process. Lack of consent runs the risk of becoming “the new imperialism,” as Linsell calls it, but also of making something unusable (610). Clients and communities must have active involvement in the process at the risk of designing a structure that someone will never use. Linsell provides an example of brick homes that were “left uninhabited” by the local population, designed completely differently from the local construction (616). Beyond simply being a waste of resources, if architects truly want to provide their services, the important decisions must come from the client (what will make it feel like a home and what is important to consider/include in this case). As students, its sometimes feels like “letting a building evolve out of the culture and place” cheating; we want to invent something new, complex, or go wilder and crazier (Rural Studio 2). Unlike in the Rural Studio, it’s not common to work one-on-one with a client in school, and we learn to make assumptions based on our personal experiences. Therefore, the organization of the education system itself enforces the reliance on our biases, not necessarily seeking whether they are actually valid. The organization of Rural Studio forces students to actually work with clients, in this case people who are often not actually treated as clients. A student mentioned learning to “know and respect… and empathize” from working in the studio (3). Fundamentally, our role as architects requires a fundamental respect and understanding of the clients and their needs. Realistically, it’s impossible to ignore our biases and prior knowledge of our own culture, which either beneficial or detrimental. Working effectively and successfully for architects is benefited by experiencing it ourselves. One solution is to just “’stay home’” or “work with what you know.” This approach of “design localism” doesn’t feel like a viable philosophy architects should aspire to (Linsell 616). It feels a bit too extreme to say that one’s lack of experience with other cultures means they shouldn’t help them. Rather, an architect must experience and understand the people they are working for. As a solution, architects could immerse themselves in the culture a few weeks/ months, work with a local architect, and most importantly, DO THEIR RESEARCH. Having a better sense of how the clients experience their day-to-day lives creates an architect that has a much better understanding of their clients needs. Understand before taking action. Action becomes problematic when “help” wasn’t deemed necessary or helpful by the people it’s intended to aid.


Juliette Fournier Studio White Winter 2022 1.4.2022

On the other hand, even in staying “local,” mutual empathy and respect are not an option, but a necessity. It may be easier than having to learn the quirks and customs of a whole new culture, thus it likely makes the process easier. Rural Studio does exactly that, focusing on members of the surrounding community, but even then, they do not IMPOSE their ideas onto the client. Working and listening with the client ensures they get what they want and makes them feel more involved in the whole process. Listening is one of those skills also crucial to successful architecture. Linsell brings up the “yes problem,” where a culture is happy to get something for free, even if they don’t really need it. Rather than suggesting what a place may need, asking questions should be the first step. Again, it comes down to avoiding assumptions. Particularly when working with other cultures, our needs may (and likely do) differ. It’s also important to ask yourself, did they even ask? One of the major problems with western civilization is that we assume our living style is superior. Thus, we assume that what we “need” is needed by all surrounding societies. As a general rule, if they didn’t ask, don’t interfere. Historically, it seems to cause more harm than good.

Addressing climate becomes a point where the architect should have hearsay. The documentary “Climate Refugees” also mentions the significant gap between what the “law provides and what the world needs” (Climate Refugees). Architects take part in this too, especially with the construction industry playing such a large role in carbon emissions. Sustainable design is one area that an architect’s role should overrule the client. Realistically, the issue of climate change surpasses a single client’s opinion. “Climate Refugees” emphasized we have to “try to avoid the problem” rather than having to fix it later, but it’s too late for that. Even Rule 2.401 in the AIA Handbook is too lenient. It’s phrasing, “members shall make a reasonable effort to inform their clients of potential environmental impacts,” gives too much liberty for the client to disagree (2020 Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct 3). If cost-wise the price is similar, it should be the default. Conversely, architects should still have the willingness to listen to the client, for their culture may provide a solution that is as efficient or can be incorporated. It is the architect’s responsibility to ensure that what they are building has a minimal carbon footprint but still meets the requirements of the client. We clearly have the knowledge of how to apply local materials/ recycled materials to create successful structures, as illustrated by the Rural Studio. They make use of “donated, salvaged, and recycled materials. It helps bring the costs down significantly (Rural Studio 9). Architects play a role that essentially requires care towards the needs of their client. No successful architect creates something purely from their own thoughts and ideas. Civic architecture, any architecture, requires an architect that above all respects the needs of their client and addresses the larger impact of their work. Regardless, climate change remains the one factor that is non-negotiable.


Works Cited

Juliette Fournier Studio White Winter 2022 1.4.2022

Oppenheimer Dean, Andrea, and Timothy Hursley. “Rural Studio: Samuel Mockbee and the Architecture of Decency.” January 2002. Linsell, Nikki. “Designing Like You Give a Damn- About What Exactly? Exploring the Ethics of ‘Humanitarian’ Architecture.” Proceedings, UIA2014 DURBAN Architecture OTHERWERE, 2014. General Council. “2020 Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,” AIA, December 10, 2020. content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/2020_Code_of_Ethics.pdf Nash, Micheal P. “Climate Refugees.” 2010. tubitv.com/movies/463799/climate-refugees


Cuidado Wellness Complex Juliette Fournier | ARCH 352 | Studio White Programs: Gym, Health and Wellness Center, Childcare, Dining

In consideration of the larger community and campus overall, this building serves as a service to both students and the surrounding community. Its programmatic allocations create a building that will be actively used throughout the day and are catered to the wellness of the community it serves. Including a bilingual childcare provides connection to the existing predominantly Hispanic population of the area. Incorporating the gym and wellness center nearby enables easy access to both the student body, but a seperation from their study spaces as well. A cafe and lounge area creates a place of connection between students and beyond the campus. Its name “cuidado” means care, in that the complex takes care of the population it serves. Experience Student Perspective Law student Jamie has been experiencing insomnia and severe exhaustion recently, but can’t figure out the cause. He decides to head to the health center to meet with one of the on-campus doctors. The entrance looks welcoming, surrounded by trees, and its entry is filled with light and plants. His patient room is fully private, with a clearstory window to let some natural light in. When the doctor tells him exercise may be a helpful de-stresser and to pick up some sleep medication, Jamie quickly stops by the pharmacy in the health center, before walking into the adjacent gym. He decides to go swimming at the pool, and makes his way up through the peaceful gym to step outside onto the roof. Natalia, a single mother of two toddlers, wants to ensure her kids learn and speak Spanish, so she speaks to them in Spanish at home. So learning about the new bilingual daycare the law schools new campus seemed like the perfect option for a more stable childcare. She walks past the cafe, noting the wonderful smell of coffee, and makes her way up through the lively corridor and into the more private childcare. As she tours the childcare, she hears laughter from the kids playing outside, contrasted by the children painting in the colorful playspace. She’s happy to know her kids are in a safe space just steps away from her classes.


OVERALL MASSING

MASSING IN CONTEXT (FROM SOUTH)

NORTH

EAST

SOUTH

WEST

NORTH

EAST

SOUTH

WEST

MASSING BY PROGRAM


INTERIOR VIGNETTE PLAYFUL, PEACEFUL, PRIVATE, RELAXING, COLORFUL


MATERIAL EXPLORATION



Space SpaceNeeds Needs Bilingual 0-60-6 BilingualDay DayCare Carefor forages ages Classrooms Classrooms Playground Playground Play Playspace/ space/Recreation Recreation Under Under2s2s Bilingual Children's Library

Bilingual Children's Library

Café/ Dining Café/ Dining Seating Seating Kitchen

Kitchen

Recreation and wellness RecreationMain and wellness Gym Main Gym Studio Studio wellbeing center Nutrition/ Nutrition/court wellbeing center Basketball Pool Basketball court Lounge/Work Space Pool

Lounge/Work Space

Health and Wellness Health andEntrance/ WellnessLobby/ Seating Doctor's Office Entrance/ Lobby/ Seating Patient Rooms Doctor's Office Women and Children's Health Center Patient Rooms Pharmacy Women and Children's Health Center Gender-Affirming services Pharmacy Reproductive health services Gender-Affirming Supporting Facilitiesservices

No. No. 5 1 2 2 1

ASF ASF Total Total Sq Ft Sq Ft 12000 120002000020000 5 600 600 3000 3000 1 20002000 2000 2000 2 10001000 2000 2000 2 15001500 3000 3000 2000 2000 1 2000 2000 Bilingual D 12000

Total

2 1

2500 5000 2 10002500 1000 5000 1 Dinin1000 6000 1000 Café/

Total

1 4 1 1 1 1

12000

6000

12000 12000 1 1200 12000 480012000 4 15001200 1500 4800 1 47501500 4750 1500 1 45924750 4592 4750 1 40004592 4000 4592 Recreation 1 400031642 4000

Total

31642

1 2000 2000 10 1 1502000 1500 2000 10 100 1000 10 150 1500 1 1000 1000 10 100 1000 1 400 400 1 1000 1000 1 1000 1000 1 400 400 1 1000 1000 1 1 21001000 2100 1000 Reproductive health services 1 and100010000 1000 Health Supporting Facilities 2100 2100 Subtotal (ASF) 59642 1 Total 10000 40000 sq ft allocated to additional support spaces Subtotal (ASF) 59642 Total (GSF) 99403.33

40000 sq ft allocated to additional support spaces Total (GSF) 99403.33

Housing Instructional

Rashmi Izzy Christian Juliette Mason


UP

UP

Patient Room 73 Pharmacy

96 SF

57

Equipment Rental

400 SF

Doctor's Office

63

72

1496 SF

155 SF DN

Radiology 61

Lab 58

432 SF

776 SF UP

Restroom 65 400 SF

Restroom 64 403 SF

Basketball Court 62 5141 SF Kitchen 1 435 SF

Dining/ Cafe 52 2455 SF

Sleep Room 71 799 SF

Admin 70 612 SF

Under 2

Staff Room

66

69

2302 SF

478 SF

Room 68 267 SF

First Floor Plan Juliette Fournier | Studio Stacey | Winter 2022 1/8" 1'-0"

0'

10'

20'

40'

Room 67 267 SF

80'


Office 87 115 SF

Patient Room 88

Patient Room

UP

87 SF Patient Room

86 106 SF

89 87 SF

Patient Room 85 Patient Room

87 SF

84

Nutrition and Wellbeing

Staff Room

87 SF

48

UP

90

490 SF

256 SF Patient Room 83 87 SF

DN

Patient Room 82 87 SF

Locker Room 80 728 SF

Locker Room 79 637 SF

UP

lounge 81 1989 SF

Dining 92 Kitchen 91 435 SF

UP

Chidren's Library 78 910 SF

Playspace 74 2428 SF

Restroom 77 265 SF

Second Floor Plan Juliette Fournier | Studio Stacey | Winter 2022 1/8" 1'-0"

0'

10'

20'

40'

Restroom 76 265 SF

80'

1412 SF


Doctor's Office 96 133 SF

Patient Room 97 86 SF

Doctor's Office

Patient Room

95

Room

86 SF

Doctor's Office

115

99

134 SF

134 SF

Gender-Affirming Services

Room

Room

116

114

134 SF

140 SF

DN

DN

98

176 SF

Doctor's Office

55

100

723 SF

Room

134 SF

117 134 SF UP

DN

Weights 118 1509 SF

Lounge 130 1408 SF

Women and Children's Health Services 53 825 SF

UP

Library 93 2320 SF

Third Floor Plan Juliette Fournier | Studio Stacey | Winter 2022 1/8" 1'-0"

0'

10'

20'

40'

80'

UP


Free Weights 101 Not Enclosed

DN

UP

Bikes 102 2208 SF

Office UP

111 244 SF Office 112 230 SF Office 113 224 SF

UP

Fourth Floor Plan Juliette Fournier | Studio Stacey | Winter 2022 1/8" 1'-0"

0'

10'

20'

40'

80'


Bike Studio 123 832 SF

Studio 124 751 SF

DN

Studio 125 893 SF

Lounge 119 977 SF Locker 126 339 SF Locker 120 339 SF

Rooftop Pool 14 3388 SF

Playground 129 3057 SF

DN

Fifth Floor Plan Juliette Fournier | Studio Stacey | Winter 2022 1/8" 1'-0"

0'

10'

20'

40'

80'


PRECEDENTS

Woxsen University- Designhaaus Solutions

Gallery of Belloit College Powerhouse- Studio Gang

Hyderabad, India

Beloit, Wisconsin, USA

Open Central space that branches into seperate programs. well lit Lounge Space has complete transparency to other programs: connections between rooms even if they are more private

Strong and dynamic circulation Combines multiple programs and creates connectivity between them through verticality and transparency to programs below

Maria Montessori Mazatlán School- EPArquitectos, Estudio Macias Peredo

The WELL- Hornberger and Worstell

Interesting private circulation, provides a more peaceful mood Precedent for a daycare

Precedent to observe connection of wellness complex, recreation center, and additional student services Use of two seperate entrance for both programs Blend of private and public spaces Main program in the center/ most visible and branches off

Mezatlan, Mexico

San Jose State University, San Jose, California



Maya Rosen mayarosen7@gmail.com

juliettefournierca@gmail.com

(510) 926-0503

San Luis Obispo, CA

Oakland, CA

Seeking to expand my knowledge of architecture and get real world experience in my chosen field.

EDUCATION

California Polytechnic State University | San Luis Obispo, CA Bachelor of Architecture | College of Architecture and Environmental Design · Graduation Year: 2024 · 7 quarters of design studio · GPA: 3.3

WORK EXPERIENCE

2019-present

Intern, Amato Architecture | Emeryville, CA · Assisted with drawings on AutoCad · Measured sites · Organized sample collection and coordinated updates for materials.

Summer 2021

Event Support, Marine Applied Research and Explanation | Pt. Richmond, CA · Sold raffle tickets · Welcomed guests at fundraising events for non-profit · Provide occasional office support

2015 - 2020

Assistant, Flooring Alternatives | Berkeley, CA · Helped clients with decision making; · Provided expertise on flooring materials · Ordered and organized stock · Created invoiced and handled billing

2018 - 2019

LEADERSHIP

· American Institute of Architecture Student Member · Freedom by Design · Architecture club that designs projects to serve the community · Collaborates with architecture students to generate designs · Mentor to first years helping orient them to college

2020 - present

· College of Architecture and Environmental Design Ambassador · Organization that gives tours of the CAED to prospective students · Plan college related events

2021 - present

SKILLS · · · · · ·

Adobe Indesign, Photoshop, Illustrator AutoCAD Rhino Revit Microsoft Excel Model Making

JULIETTE FOURNIER (909)-809-9255

Orange County, CA/ San Luis Obispo County, CA

EDUCATION

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Bachelor of Architecture Minor: Architectural Engineering Third Year, Global Citizens: Studio Stacey White

DESIGN TOOLS

Rhino Adobe Illustrator Adobe Photoshop Adobe InDesign Microsoft Office Grasshopper- Ladybug, Lunchbox Cove Tool/ Zero Tool Enscape Revit AutoCAD

Graduation Date: May 2024 G.P.A: 3.85 Dean’s Honor List

SKILLS

Model Making Digital Fabrication/Laser Printing Drafting Site Analysis Structures Photography Climate Analysis Teamwork Organization French Fluency- Reading, Writing, Speaking

LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE

NOMAS (National Organization of Minority Architecture Students) Outreach Team Lead - Restructured NOMAS lecture series and planned the Cal Poly NOMAS Dialogue with Cal Poly faculty and students -Relay information to the team, president, and the head advisor during bi-monthly meeting -Lead and assign responsibilities to the Outreach Team -Research, initiate contact, and correspond with professionals and students to communicate details about upcoming events AIAS Freedom by Design -Collaborate with other students to design a music garden for Cal Poly’s Preschool Learning Lab -Compile research about the impact of music on child development to inform the design

September 2020- Present 4 hrs/ week

September 2020- 2021 2 hrs/ week

VOLUNTEERING

Habitat for Humanity OC -Gain experience in customer service through ReStore -Contribute to construction process, working with a team to finalize home in Fullerton - Work with mechanic to prepare materials and fix power tools for building sites

WORK EXPERIENCE

June 2021-August 2021

Blaze Pizza Team Member June 2021-September 2021 -Ensure clear and effective communication with team members, management, and customers 30 hr/week -Take initiative to learn tasks and reproduce results quickly and accurately -Maintain high quality customer service in a fast-paced work environment


GO TEAM!

Ask, Understand, Act

Juliette Fournier Studio White Winter 2022 1.4.2022

As architects, it’s vital to create designs guided by an understanding of the community/ client it serves. Above all else, respect, consent, and listening are requirements towards creating successful civic architecture. Beyond the scope of the specific community, the architect must also take responsibility for any climate and technical implications that come with their proposal. Arguably, a critical mistake architects must avoid is overstepping boundaries. This point is especially emphasized in “Designing Like You Give a Damn- About What Exactly?” where Nikki Linsell criticizes architects for thinking “they are the ones with the appropriate knowledge and expertise,” but only from their own biases (Linsell 614). Under every circumstance, its likely the client understands their needs better than the architect. In certain areas, people of the area will have better awareness of local building customs and culture than an outsider. Architects must be willing to learn from the community they are serving, not simply impose their ideas thinking they have the superior knowledge. While the architect should absolutely provide suggestions and use their knowledge, it’s vital to ensure the client understands those implications. Consent is also necessary in multiple aspects of the process, particularly in the design process. Lack of consent runs the risk of becoming “the new imperialism,” as Linsell calls it, but also of making something unusable (610). Clients and communities must have active involvement in the process at the risk of designing a structure that someone will never use. Linsell provides an example of brick homes that were “left uninhabited” by the local population, designed completely differently from the local construction (616). Beyond simply being a waste of resources, if architects truly want to provide their services, the important decisions must come from the client (what will make it feel like a home and what is important to consider/include in this case). As students, its sometimes feels like “letting a building evolve out of the culture and place” cheating; we want to invent something new, complex, or go wilder and crazier (Rural Studio 2). Unlike in the Rural Studio, it’s not common to work one-on-one with a client in school, and we learn to make assumptions based on our personal experiences. Therefore, the organization of the education system itself enforces the reliance on our biases, not necessarily seeking whether they are actually valid. The organization of Rural Studio forces students to actually work with clients, in this case people who are often not actually treated as clients. A student mentioned learning to “know and respect… and empathize” from working in the studio (3). Fundamentally, our role as architects requires a fundamental respect and understanding of the clients and their needs. Realistically, it’s impossible to ignore our biases and prior knowledge of our own culture, which can be either beneficial or detrimental. Working effectively and successfully for architects is benefited by experiencing it ourselves. One solution is to just “’stay home’” or “work with what you know.” This approach of “design localism” doesn’t feel like a viable philosophy architects should aspire to (Linsell 616). It feels a bit too extreme to say that one’s lack of experience with other cultures means they shouldn’t help them. Rather, an architect must experience and understand the people they are working for. As a solution, architects could immerse themselves in the culture a few weeks/ months, work with a local architect, and most importantly, DO THEIR RESEARCH. Having a better sense of how the clients experience their day-to-day lives creates an architect that has a much better understanding of their clients needs. Understand before acting. Action becomes problematic when “help” wasn’t deemed necessary or helpful by the people it’s intended to aid.


Juliette Fournier Studio White Winter 2022 1.4.2022

On the other hand, even in staying “local,” mutual empathy and respect are not an option, but a necessity. It may be easier than having to learn the quirks and customs of a whole new culture, thus it likely makes the process easier. Rural Studio does exactly that, focusing on members of the surrounding community, but even then, they do not IMPOSE their ideas onto the client. Working and listening with the client ensures they get what they want and makes them feel more involved in the whole process. Listening is one of those skills also crucial to successful architecture. Linsell brings up the “yes problem,” where a culture is happy to get something for free, even if they don’t really need it. Rather than suggesting what a place may need, asking questions should be the first step. Again, it comes down to avoiding assumptions. Particularly when working with other cultures, our needs may (and likely do) differ. It’s also important to ask yourself, did they even ask? One of the major problems with western civilization is that we assume our living style is superior. Thus, we assume that what we “need” is needed by all surrounding societies. As a general rule, if they didn’t ask, don’t interfere. Historically, it seems to cause more harm than good.

Addressing climate becomes a point where the architect should have hearsay. The documentary “Climate Refugees” also mentions the significant gap between what the “law provides and what the world needs” (Climate Refugees). Architects take part in this too, especially with the construction industry playing such a large role in carbon emissions. Sustainable design is one area that an architect’s role should overrule the client. Realistically, the issue of climate change surpasses a single client’s opinion. “Climate Refugees” emphasized we have to “try to avoid the problem” rather than having to fix it later, but it’s too late for that. Even Rule 2.401 in the AIA Handbook is too lenient. It’s phrasing, “members shall make a reasonable effort to inform their clients of potential environmental impacts,” gives too much liberty for the client to disagree (2020 Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct 3). If cost-wise the price is similar, it should be the default. Conversely, architects should still have the willingness to listen to the client, for their culture may provide a solution that is as efficient or can be incorporated. It is the architect’s responsibility to ensure that what they are building has a minimal carbon footprint but still meets the requirements of the client. We clearly have the knowledge of how to apply local materials/ recycled materials to create successful structures, as illustrated by the Rural Studio. They make use of “donated, salvaged, and recycled materials. It helps bring the costs down significantly (Rural Studio 9). Architects play a role that essentially requires care towards the needs of their client. No successful architect creates something purely from their own thoughts and ideas. Civic architecture, any architecture, requires an architect that above all respects the needs of their client and addresses the larger impact of their work. Regardless, climate change remains the one factor that is non-negotiable. Looking back, my thinking still stands. Over the course of six weeks, the biggest challenge has been how to implement what I know about the community into the actual formal design of the building. My understanding of the surrounding context, of the upcoming plans for the city, and of the immediate community that is being served is solid. However, to create a form that doesn’t feel out of place and that accounts for the surrounding context is the next step. It takes more than the contextual understanding of a place to formulate a successful design. I think that a driving concept and general consensus of what the building is trying to achieve may be the next step to help the architect create something that works. One comment during our review was to integrate the existing culture of our

Juliette Fournier Studio White Winter 2022 1.4.2022

surroundings into the building. This requires a more abstract view of what truly matters to the client. In a way, this is a way of showing that one isn’t just listening, but echoing to confirm that the understanding is there.

Works Cited Oppenheimer Dean, Andrea, and Timothy Hursley. “Rural Studio: Samuel Mockbee and the Architecture of Decency.” January 2002. Linsell, Nikki. “Designing Like You Give a Damn- About What Exactly? Exploring the Ethics of ‘Humanitarian’ Architecture.” Proceedings, UIA2014 DURBAN Architecture OTHERWERE, 2014. General Council. “2020 Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,” AIA, December 10, 2020. content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/2020_Code_of_Ethics.pdf Nash, Micheal P. “Climate Refugees.” 2010. tubitv.com/movies/463799/climate-refugees


Maya Rosen

Environment, states “Members shall consider with their clients the environmental effects of their

Professor Stacey White

project decisions” as the only rule of conduct for architects to follow for the environment. Yes, all

ARCH - 352

environments are different and therefore need different standards for design but I believe that

4 January 2022

the preservation of the environment should be a larger part of our architecture community’s Morals or Money: The Architectural Dilemma

Code of Ethics and not be simplified into one vague and general line.

As children, we are taught to treat people with kindness, but as we get older, our motives often shift from communal benefits to personal gain. In architecture school and training we are

There are many topics that all architecture students in the United States are taught, such

taught the rules and codes to create safe and habitable spaces for people to thrive in, and

as building codes, architectural history, and design skills, but some architectural professors have

creating a pleasant space for people to live, work or use benefits the productivity and moods of

special training and knowledge that give students insight on how to design sustainably. Cal Poly

the occupants. But not all architects and architecture students are taught how to design in an

gives architecture students the tools to know how to design environmentally, but once we

environmentally conscious way or for the larger community at hand. The building industry has

graduate there is no requirement to surpass the existing codes in place for design and

always had a large influx of money running through it, which leads to many people working in

construction to improve such designs environmentally. I think that environmental design

the industry being motivated almost solely by profit. I want to work on a project because I liked

education should be incorporated into all architecture programs to improve the future of the

the idea and goal and because I was motivated to do it for the clients, community, or site. I hope

industry and to educate all future architects on the importance and details of how to do so. Even

to one day to leave a positive impact on the built environment, but I want it to be an impact I am

the environmental building requirements that are currently set are not extreme enough for a

proud of because of the people that it served rather than the money I earned from it. The people

long-lasting healthy climate.

in the architectural industry mostly focus their time and energy on projects that will benefit them financially rather than focusing on how their projects can benefit the communities they work

Auburn University’s Rural Studio plays a unique role in Hale County through its acts of

with. Although Cal Poly Architecture Students are taught to design both beautifully and

building infrastructure for the area for extremely low prices. The community struggles financially

environmentally, there are many issues within the building process that hold our industry back

and infrastructurally, and Rural Studio comes in to better the community by allowing architecture

from benefitting the underserved.

students to design and build community buildings at a low cost. The architecture students are given the opportunity to help the community, which is an amazing opportunity and business

As members of the architect community, we are held to a standard of ethics, both

venture, but it might be the only time they do something to help the underserved in their careers.

socially and legally. The Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct guides architects in their way

Not necessarily because they don't want to, but because they simply don’t have to. Today, I had

of business and design but should be more explicit in its way of supporting the community to

my first Construction Management class, Introduction to Construction Management, which

make a greater ethical change to the industry as a whole. Canon VI, Obligation to the

focuses on a topic of which I have been interested in learning more about since my time at Cal


Poly started. It was the first day, the day on which the important information about the course is

After working on our project for a quarter, I am still in agreement with everything I wrote

delivered, when exams are, the grading policy, office hours, but this class was 50 minutes long

before starting. One aspect of our project that I think is very important, is the people we are

and the professor talked about making money four separate times. I knew that Construction

surviving, our clients, and who our clients are serving, the underserved. The people our spaces

Managers made more money than Architects, and the few students in that major were very

are designed for are usually forgotten. My view on the construction industry has only gotten

excited about their future money making careers, but I was mind blown by the fact that the

stronger in its stance about profit-driven people. As I move forward, I want to ensure that I am

professor had to make a point of how much money they made by building massive commercial

thinking about the environment I am designing in, the environment I’m designing for, and how

buildings for fortune 500 companies while so many people in low-income communities go

my project will impace the environment both spacially and sustainably.

unserved. The reason people choose between helping those struggling and those who are thriving is the money. Comparatively, it is similarly difficult to build a high-end apartment building versus a low-income housing unit, but there are so many more high-end apartment buildings already, or in the process of being, built because construction companies will get more in return financially for their services. It is disappointing, yet not surprising that most construction companies want to make money more than they want to help their community. I think many people have their priorities twisted; I want to be fulfilled by what I design and create outside of the financial benefits of the project.

As a student who still has a lot to learn and a whole life ahead of them in a career after graduation, I am excited to change the way our generation is looking at our industry. I hope that I am able to make a little bit of a difference in communities near and far without being tempted by greed and wealth. As architects, we spend our careers helping people and doing what they want, and I think it is important we help those who cannot ask for it, which is why I want to focus my career on designing for the environment and for the people who cannot afford to ask for help.


Project Description

Goals for the Quarter + Schedule

As students spend most of their time learning and helping the community, it is our opportunity to support them through their challenging work. We aim to create a refuge from the stressful environment of law school. Adding a gym allows them to relieve physical stress and clear their minds. A daycare offers a safe space for children to stay while students focalize themselves on their work. For immigrants and the falsely accused, having free family support enables their energy and attention to be completely focused without additional stresses and distractions. And having students’ and faculties’ minds free of childcare allows students to focus their attention on their clients’ needs. Additional student support spaces bridges these spaces together, promoting interaction between the campus community and the population of Barrio Logan. We plan to continue with our moonshots, incorporating the gym portion of Juliette’s program with Maya’s study/public space. Outdoor circulation and patios are features we want to incorporate, along with a large ARC Hto 352: C itizethe n Arccommunity hite c t central space bring together. We want to incorporate screens/ light filters as a way to Na m e Yo u r Pro je c t divide spaces visually to enable privacy between programs without fully blocking out the auditory connector.

1. Think more abstractly in the first phase to develop stronger concept 2. Incorporate tech knowledge more intently 3. Skills to master: Revit, 3D Printing, Passive Strategies, Enscape/TwinMotion 4. Have more check-ins with Stacey to get walk through progress 5. Balance between aesthetic and function 6. Compromise and work collaboratively (strong communication) 7. Grid consistency and cohesive design language 8. Incorporate site context and culture to the design

Sp a c e Ne e d s

SCHEDULE TIME Sunday 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 9:00 AM 9:30 AM 10:00 AM 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:30 AM 12:00 PM 12:30 PM 1:00 PM 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 2:30 PM 3:00 PM 3:30 PM 4:00 PM 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 5:30 PM 6:00 PM 6:30 PM 7:00 PM 7:30 PM 8:00 PM 8:30 PM 9:00 PM 9:30 PM 10:00 PM

Monday

M M M M M M M M M M

Tuesday M M M M M M

Wednesday

M M

M M M M M M M M M M

M M M M

DAILY START TIME

TIME INTERVAL

START DATE

Thursday M M M M M M

Friday

Saturday

M M

M M M M M M M M M M

M M M M

Potential Meeting Times: Wednesday 10-12, 5-6; Tuesday, Thursday 11-12,1-2; Saturday 12-2PM

Not Free Sometimes Free

No .

Se a ts

ASF p e r

Lib ra ry Use r Sp a c e s

In d ivid u a l Stu d y Red= Not free O p e n (Live ly) Stu d y Orange = Sometimes Free Pub lic Sp a c e Asse m b ly Se rvic e De sks C a fé / Ma rke t Se a tin g Kitc h e n Asse m b ly / Lo u n g e Mo o nsho t Da yc a re (50 kid s? ) C la ssro o m Pla yg ro u n d (o u td o o r) (se p a ra te sp a c e In sid e p la ysp a c e (o p e n 24/ 7) 0-2 p la y a re a Bilin g u a l Lib ra ry Kitc h e n (fo r sn a c ks) Din in g Are a O ffic e (fo r w o rke rs) G ym We ig h t Ma c h in e s Fre e We ig h ts Bike s a n d Tre d m ills O p e n G ym Stu d io s C h a n g in g / lo c ke r ro o m s Ba ske tb a ll C o u rt Po o l Sta ff Sp a c e O ffic e s Sh a re d C a te rin g Bre a kro o m / Kitc h e n Sto ra g e Sha re d Re so urc e s Me d iu m C o n fe re n c e ro o m Sm a ll C o n fe re n c e Ro o m

To ta l ASF 22,500

1 1

570 800

2500 20000

2,500 20,000

1 6 1 1 1

200 2 1 120 0

4000 120 2000 1800 400

13,420 4,000 720 2,000 1,800 400

1

3

4500

4,500 12,100

5 1 2 1 1 2 1 5

6

500 2000 2000 1000 750 300 500 150

2,500 2,000 4,000 1,000 750 600 500 750 26,050 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,800 3,000 4,750 4,500 5,740

1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1

1 1

10

3000 3000 3000 3000 600 1000 4750 4500

23 3 10

1 0 0

80 300 300

1,840 900 3,000 1,250

2 5

12 6

250 150

500 750

TO TAL

81,060

No te s


SHIBORI OFFICE PROJECT LOCATION: GANDHINAGAR, INDIA ARCHITECT: THE GRID ARCHITECTS MANUFACTURERS: HRS ALUGLAZE PVT. LTD, HABIBI CARPENTERS INTERIOR FLEX WORK AREA

INTERIOR CIRCULATION

EXTERIOR FACADE

EXTERIOR CIRCULATION

Located in India and its warm climate The cicle pattern from by the screen outside the windows, creates a powerful and playful impact on the space it illuminates. The larger cut-outs are on the bottom while the smaller ones are higher to allow for more controlled sunlighting. In addition to the circles, the vibrant red color on the walls creates a eye-catching backdrop to the surrounding programs. The curtain wall with its screen breaks the boundary of interior and exterior and brings them together.

SITE PLAN

SOURCES: https://www.archdaily.com/962502/shibori-office-the-grid-architects


FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ON VIRGINIA

PROJECT LOCATION: MCKINNEY, TEXAS CONTRACTOR: ROGER O’BRIEN CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT: MASS DESIGN GROUP STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: LA FUESS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC MEP ENGINEER + INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE: SMITHGROUP This family health center is providing medical services to children, families, and individuals, regardless of their ability to pay. This building blends in with the residential neighborhood it is located near. The building is made up of 2 wings with a central “breezeway” with a common roof. MASS Design, broke the building up into “human scale” areas which makes the building more approachable to visitors. In addition to clinical spaces there are also community spaces and exam rooms within the building. Community spaces help reduce stress of a medical building and exam rooms allow patients to speak directly, and privately, with their doctor.

SITE PLAN

FIRST FLOOR

INTERIOR WAITING AREA

INTERIOR CLASSROOM

EXTERIOR ENTERANCE

EXTERIOR PLAZA

5

15

25

SECOND FLOOR

5

15

25

SOURCES: https://www.archdaily.com/957138/not-ready-family-health-center-on-virginia-mass-design-group?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab


WOXSEN UNIVERSITY PROJECT LOCATION: HYDERABAD, INDIA ARCHITECT: DESIGNHAAUS SOLUTIONS LEAD ARCHITECTS: RAJEEV KUMAR SHARMA, GOURAV DAS, ARVIND KUMAR MANUFACTURERS: AUTODESK, DAIKIN, KOHLER, KAJARIA YEAR:2021 On Woxsen University’s campus, this building comprises the library, which makes up 50000 sq. ft. The design made use of double-height spaces to create the illusion of every space being one level and to maintain visibility. This also allowed for increased ventilation and light within the space. Planters along the exterior help to accomodate glare, maintain a cooler environment, and create a natural screen. It makes use of an open-plan concept to accomodate a coffee shop, reading nooks, and social flex space within.


UNILEAO GYM AND SCHOOL PROJECT LOCATION: LAGOA SECA, BRAZIL ARCHITECT: LINS ARQUITETOS ASSOCIADOS LEAD ARCHITECTS: CINTIA LINS, GEORGE LINS MANUFACTURERS: BENDERMIX, COPER VIDROS, ISOESTE, OLARIA CEMONTE YEAR:2018 Due to the hot and dry, this university gym has and East-West orientation which makes it highly succeptible to overheating. The plan is simply five intersecting circles containing different sports activities. To address the hot climate, the facades are three layers: the first is a ceramic tile light filter to allow light, creating a dynamic interior. The second layer shelters an interior garden to increase cooling inside. The final layer is clear glass pivoting frams that allow for mechanical cooling if necessary. Use of thermo acoustic tiles oon the roof help against excessive heat.


TABLE OF CONTENTS 1_Story: Written Description of Final Project 2_Final Presentation or Poster 3_Final Project Images Juliette Fournier fournier@calpoly.edu In Collaboration with Maya Rosen mrosen09@calpoly.edu ARCH 352-05, Studio White Winter 2022

4_Integrated Site + Building Section Drawing 5_Site + Structure + Skin + Space + Circulation 6_Systems Integration Report 7_Design Process 8_Precedents 9_Written Reflection


1_STORY: WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF FINAL PROJECT What makes this project meaningful, interesting, relevant, powerful, and inspiring? What is the central guiding concept that drives your decision-making process for this project?

The Crib Project Location: Barrio Logan, California Program: Gym and Daycare (part of broader Law School Campus) Gross Square Footage: 100000 GSF Written description here (recommended 150 words or less) Through designign our recreational center, we hope to provide support services to students and the community. We aim to create a safe and mentally freeing space for both children and adults. We ask ourselves how might we create an environment that is both welcoming to the public and safe for the student population and children? Our goal is to bridge the student body through a leisure space. We also hope to incorporate playfulness into the design to deter from the stresses of law school.

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

2 Winter 2022


2_FINAL PRESENTATION

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

No.

Seats

ASF per

Total ASF

Notes

1 1 1 1

1 120 0 3

2000 1050 550 7900

9,500 2,000 1,050 550 7,900 13,953

6

600 3650 3030 1020 1050 545 780 483 150

PROJECT STATEMENT

TEST FITS

Through designing our recreational center we hope to provide support services to students and the community. We aim to create a safe and mentally freeing space for children and adults. We are asking ourselves how might we create an environment that is welcoming to the public that also creates a safe place for the student population and children? Our goal is to be a bridge between the student body and the surrounding community through a leisure space. We hope our space benefits the campus and the community around it.

EXPERIENTIAL NARRATIVE

CLASSROOM

BILINGUAL LIBRARY

ROOFTOP POOL

KIDS PLAY AREA

As we serve the students, community and their children, we want all to feel welcome and safe in our space. Regarding the students, we want students to have an escape from the stress of classes and their daily lives. Students will enter the space and look down to the rock wall and wave at a friend mid climb. Community members will walk passed the basketball court seeing their neighbors play a 2 on 2 game with students. Children will walk into a bright and playful space filled with laughter from the rooms above. Parents feel a sense of relief as they know they are leaving their children in a safe and protected space.

GYM MACHINE ROOM

LOUNGE

ARCH 352: Citizen Architect Gym and Daycare

PARTI DIAGRAM

Space Needs

ACTIVATE CAMPUS SIDE

PROVIDE PROTECTED OUTDOOR PLAYSPACE FOR KIDS

ACTIVATE ROOFTOP OUTDOOR SPACE

N

NNW

NNE

NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW

HIERARCHY OF HEIGHTS ON ACTIVE STREET

RESTROOM STACK

SUMMER SUN

section 2

EGRESS STAIRS VENTILATION SHAFT

ROOF TOP POOL SPACE pool absorbs heat before it enters the building

WINTER SUN MECHANICAL SYSTEM

air system required due to high demand for air circulation

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

steel structure because of the space required for air based mechanical system and due to the climate

SHADED PLAY SPACE

OPERABLE WINDOW

outside daycare space protected from summer sun

opens upward to allow for heat to escape

OPERABLE WINDOW opens upward to allow for heat to escape

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM trusses to span across basketball court and over rock wall

OPERABLE WINDOW opens upward to allow for heat to escape

AIRFLOW

as air flows from northwest towards the other side of the building the air warms the foliage cools the wind as it enters the building

GENERAL MASSING WITH OUTDOOR ROOFTOP POOL

EGRESS STAIR RESTROOMS ELEVATOR CORE

S

SSE

MASS WITH GLAZING AND SCREENS

Public Space Café/Market Seating Kitchen Assembly / Lounge Moonshot Daycare (50 kids?) Classroom Playground (outdoor) (separate space f Inside playspace (open 24/7) 0-2 play area Bilingual Library Kitchen (for snacks) Dining Area Drop o zone O ce (for workers) Gym Weight Machines Free Weights Bikes and Treadmills Rock Climbing Wall Open Gym Studios Changing/locker rooms Basketball Court Pool (outdoor) Rental Equipment Pool lounge space

4 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1

1 1

10

1600 3000 3700 2300 1850 1200 670 5950 3890 830 4680 SUB TOTAL

2,400 3,650 3,030 1,020 1,050 1,090 780 483 450 35,280 1,600 3,000 3,700 2,300 1,850 4,800 2,680 5,950 3,890 830 4,680 58,733

3 Winter 2022


3_FINAL PROJECT IMAGES

Juliette Fournier

OUTDOOR RENDER FROM SOUTH SIDE ALONG S 16 ST PROJECT STATEMENT

TEST FITS

Through designing our recreational center we hope to provide support services to students and the community. We aim to create a safe and mentally freeing space for children and adults. We are asking ourselves how might we create an environment that is welcoming to the public that also creates a safe place for the student population and children? Our goal is to be a bridge between the student body and the surrounding community through a leisure space. We hope our space benefits the campus and the community around it.

EXPERIENTIAL NARRATIVE

CLASSROOM

ROOFTOP POOL

BILINGUAL LIBRARY

KIDS PLAY AREA

GYM MACHINE ROOM

As we serve the students, community and their children, we want all to feel welcome and safe in our space. Regarding the students, we want students to have an escape from the stress of classes and their daily lives. Students will enter the space and look down to the rock wall and wave at a friend mid climb. Community members will walk passed the basketball court seeing their neighbors play a 2 on 2 game with students. Children will walk into a bright and playful space filled with laughter from the rooms above. Parents feel a sense of relief as they know they are leaving their children in a safe and protected space.

LOUNGE

INITIAL PROGRAM STORY

Studio Stacey White

4 Winter 2022


3_FINAL PROJECT IMAGES (CONT’D)

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

5 Winter 2022

INTERIOR RENDER OF ROCKWALL, VIEWABLE FROM NATIONAL AVE

MASSING DIAGRAM BASED ON PROGRAM AND ORIENTATION


3_FINAL PROJECT IMAGES (CONT’D)

FLOOR PLANS WITH PROGRAMMATIC FUNCTIONS YELLOW= DAYCARE BLUE= GYM PURPLE= EGRESS

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

6 Winter 2022


3_FINAL PROJECT IMAGES (CONT’D)

PROGRESS WORK FROM MAYA AND JULIETTE FROM PREVIOUS INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENTS

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

7 Winter 2022


4_INTEGRATED SITE + BUILDING SECTION DRAWING

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

8 Winter 2022


4_INTEGRATED SITE + BUILDING SECTION DRAWING

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

RESTROOM STACK

SUMMER SUN

section 2

EGRESS STAIRS VENTILATION SHAFT

ROOF TOP POOL SPACE pool absorbs heat before it enters the building

WINTER SUN MECHANICAL SYSTEM

air system required due to high demand for air circulation

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

steel structure because of the space required for air based mechanical system and due to the climate

SHADED PLAY SPACE

OPERABLE WINDOW

outside daycare space protected from summer sun

opens upward to allow for heat to escape

OPERABLE WINDOW opens upward to allow for heat to escape

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM trusses to span across basketball court and over rock wall

OPERABLE WINDOW opens upward to allow for heat to escape

AIRFLOW

as air flows from northwest towards the other side of the building the air warms the foliage cools the wind as it enters the building

9 Winter 2022


5_DESIGN FOR SITE How does the project respond to this specific climate, and available resources, and why? How does the project respond to this specific community and cultural context, and why? How does the project respond to the ground and adjacent buildings, and why?

Juliette Fournier

10 Winter 2022

Studio Stacey White

Write a brief summary of SITE here. Our site creates the threshold between Barrio Logan and Downtown San Diego. As a result, our law campus bridges the two together. Regarding the climate, San Diego has a warm marine climate, warmest in the summer months, with little fluxuation in temperature throughout the year. Its wind is predominantly from the NW direction. The weather is condusive to certain passive strategies including: sun shading of windows, internal heat gain, natural cooling ventilation, and solar direct gain. Due to the dual bordering communities, our site isn’t technically part of either its neighbors. That being said, community was considered in the design. In response to the bordering Barrio Logan community, our project incorporates a bilingual daycare (due to the predominantly Hispanic community). The building is 5 stories tall to match those that will appear in the future. Furthermore, programmatic functions were considered based on proximity to large roads, versus the Barrio Logan community, versus the campus. CONSIDERING SITE CONTEXT FOR MASSING PARTI DIAGRAM

ACTIVATE CAMPUS SIDE

PROVIDE PROTECTED OUTDOOR PLAYSPACE FOR KIDS

ACTIVATE ROOFTOP OUTDOOR SPACE

N

NNW

NNE

NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW

HIERARCHY OF HEIGHTS ON ACTIVE STREET

CONSIDERATION OF CONTEXT PRIOR TO DESIGNING

GENERAL MASSING WITH OUTDOOR ROOFTOP POOL

EGRESS STAIR RESTROOMS ELEVATOR CORE

S

SSE

MASS WITH GLAZING AND SCREENS


5_DESIGN FOR STRUCTURE

Juliette Fournier

What is the primary structural material and system (steel frame, mass, timber, etc.) and why? What is the basic configuration of the structural system in plan and section, and why? What special spaces might require a long span structural system, and why?

11 Winter 2022

Studio Stacey White

Our structural system requires large spans across a basketball court, pool and rock climbing wall, with one that cannot have columns interrupting the space. Thus, we decided a steel structural system would be most appropriate. The marine climate of San Diego also warrants the structure to need some protectant coat to minimize corrosion from the moist, salty marine air. Concrete will coat exposed steel, particularly on the lower ceilings.

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

83

$ 32’ - 0”

52&. &/,0%,1* $5($ %(/2: %$6.(7%$// &2857 $5($ %(/2:

%

83

& '1

' 83

83

3/$< $5($

'$<&$5( /2%%< .,7&+(1

(

%5($. 5220

25’ - 0”

'1 2)),&(

83

19’ - 0 1/2”

STEEL TRUSS

a truss is required to span across the basketball court and the rock climbing wall

STEEL COLUMN

using steel structural system allows us to use the space between the structural members and the dropped ceiling for fire protection to place the air-based mechanical system

Sample image caption

/HYHO

2)),&(

30’ - 0”

2)),&(

)

22’- 0 1/2”

6LWH 3ODQ -$0 $UFKLWHFWV _ -XOLHWWH )RXUQLHU _ 0D\D 5RVHQ _ 6WXGLR :KLWH _ $5&+ _ :LQWHU


5_DESIGN FOR SKIN What is the desired relationship between interior and exterior environments, and why? What is the basic material pallette for the building exterior, and why? What is the basic skin configuration and mass-to-glass ratio for each building face orientation, and why?

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

12 Winter 2022

Write a brief summary of SKIN here. While skin has been a brief consideration, multiple aspects of the facade integrate our concept of playfulness. A perforated bubble facade/ screen is one skin aspect we’ve started to play with to address strong daylighting from the south and to create a dynamic pattern within playspaces and activity spaces. Exterior environments are intended to be calm and natural with use of plants and a rooftop pool. Materials that are weather-resistant are most important, so wood is not an option. However, materials like brick, steel, or materials native to San Diego have been considered. Each building face has a varying mass-glass ratio. North-east has the most glass, due to little direct light entering and overheating spaces. The south-east has the second greatest amount to still allow light into spaces. However a perforated screen will be incorporated. To the south-west and north-west, fewer windows are present to avoid overheating. Some are inset to still allow light to enter spaces but to allow for adequate shading. SOLAR RESPONSE

N

NNW

NNE NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW SSE

S SUMMER SUN

WINTER SUN

N

DAYLIGHT STRATEGIES

INSET WINDOW

by insetting the windows, it allows for indirect light without the heat from entering the space

WINDOW WITH PARTITION

the window allows light into the space over the partition and on the sides, but the wall blocks the heat from entering the main part of the room

PERFORATED SCREEN

the screen filters the light and heat and slows the enterance into the building

GREENERY

the tree’s leaves and branches slow the heat from entering the building on the south facing facade

MASS VS GLASS

PERFORATED BUBBLE FACADE FOR FILTERING LIGHT NOTE: GENERIC MATERIAL FOR BUILDING NOT DETERMINED YET


5_DESIGN FOR SPACE

Juliette Fournier

How are spaces organized and sized in relation to their program, each other, and circulation, and why? How are spaces designed to harness and control daylight, and why? How have you allocated space for services such as restrooms, mechanical rooms, and storage, and why?

Studio Stacey White

13 Winter 2022

Write a brief summary of SPACE here. Three programs require a massive amount of space and coordination: the pool, the basketball court, and the rock wall. These three programs largely dictated the layout of spaces. Both the basketball court and rockwall submerge and create double or triple height spaces. The pool’s location is most ideal for southern sun and privacy, resulting in placing it on the roof. The daycare and gym both require high levels of privacy and security, posing a challenge to organizing them under one building. The daycare was placed most south while the gym recedes closer to the north. Restrooms, elevators and storage have been accounted for, largely concentrated to the NW portion of the building, since its recieves less light. Their locations also were dependent on the leftover space after the pool and larger programs were placed. PROGRAMMATIC FUNCTIONS PARTI DIAGRAM

NA TIO N ACTIVATE CAMPUS SIDE

PROVIDE PROTECTED OUTDOOR PLAYSPACE FOR KIDS

ACTIVATE ROOFTOP OUTDOOR SPACE

N

NNW

AL

AV E.

NNE

NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW

HIERARCHY OF HEIGHTS ON ACTIVE STREET

GENERAL MASSING WITH OUTDOOR ROOFTOP POOL

EGRESS STAIR RESTROOMS ELEVATOR CORE

S

S1

SSE

MASS WITH GLAZING AND SCREENS

N

= GYM

ARCH 352: Citizen Architect Gym and Daycare Space Needs

air brought throught the building via shaft from basement to roof

CENTRAL MECHANICAL PLANT

located off site elsewhere on the campus we have a central plant that services all buildings on the campus

ADDITIONAL SERVICES

T. HS

= CHILDCARE

HVAC SYSTEM

AIR VENTILATION SHAFT

6T

Public Space Café/Market Seating Kitchen Assembly / Lounge Moonshot Daycare (50 kids?) Classroom Playground (outdoor) (separate space f Inside playspace (open 24/7) 0-2 play area Bilingual Library Kitchen (for snacks) Dining Area Drop o zone O ce (for workers) Gym Weight Machines Free Weights Bikes and Treadmills Rock Climbing Wall Open Gym Studios Changing/locker rooms Basketball Court Pool (outdoor) Rental Equipment Pool lounge space

No.

Seats

ASF per

Total ASF

1 1 1 1

1 120 0 3

2000 1050 550 7900

9,500 2,000 1,050 550 7,900 13,953

4 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3

6

600 3650 3030 1020 1050 545 780 483 150

1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1

1 1

10

1600 3000 3700 2300 1850 1200 670 5950 3890 830 4680 SUB TOTAL

2,400 3,650 3,030 1,020 1,050 1,090 780 483 450 35,280 1,600 3,000 3,700 2,300 1,850 4,800 2,680 5,950 3,890 830 4,680 58,733

Notes


5_DESIGN FOR CIRCULATION What is the experience of approaching from the edge of the site and entering the building, and why? How do vertical and horizontal circulation worth together to create a network of movement, and why? What method(s) of conveyance is used to move air, heat, water, and waste through the building, and why?

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

14 Winter 2022

Write a brief summary of CIRCULATION here. In designing, the primary entrance was placed close to the core of the campus so as to illustrate make it accessible to students. However, people passing from the street side can look into the basketball court and rockclimbing wall, as a way to bring the public in. The daycare entrance is seperate from the gym entrance to create ease and privacy for dropping off kids. As one circulates the gym, it is primarily open with views onto the rock wall from several floors. The top two floors are primarily intended for outdoor circulation, which two outdoor egress stairs lead straight up to. Currently, the circulation requires a bit more improvement to connect the spaces a bit better, especially in the gym. Most of the systems that move air, heat, water, etc are tucked away to make them the least visible part of the building.

PARTI DIAGRAM

ACTIVATE CAMPUS SIDE

PROVIDE PROTECTED OUTDOOR PLAYSPACE FOR KIDS

ACTIVATE ROOFTOP OUTDOOR SPACE

N

NNW

NNE

NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW

HIERARCHY OF HEIGHTS ON ACTIVE STREET

GENERAL MASSING WITH OUTDOOR ROOFTOP POOL

EGRESS STAIR RESTROOMS ELEVATOR CORE

S

SSE

MASS WITH GLAZING AND SCREENS

CIRCULATION AND FLOW OF ELEMENTS HILIGHTED

FIRST FLOOR PLAN TO ILLUSTRATE ENTRANCES TO EACH SPACE


6_SYSTEMS INTEGRATION REPORT

Juliette Fournier

SYSTEMS INTEGRATION REPORT

Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In observing the successful typologies from Labs 2 and 3, we found that an L-shaped and U-shaped typology yielded the most successful EUIs. Therefore, as we considered our massing, out floors started to be shaped through a similar typology. Double height spaces are used within our building to allow light to penetrate into the building, particularly on the first two floors. In considering energy, we incorporated some outdoor occupancy and outdoor circulation spaces to minimize energy used within these spaces. Windows are concentrated on the east and north facade, and perforated screens will cover our large south and west-facing windows. Greenery on every floor also provides additional shading and cooling. Our structural system requires large spans across a basketball court, pool and rock climbing wall, with one that cannot have columns interrupting the space. Thus, we decided a steel structural system would be most appropriate. The marine climate of San Diego also warrants the structure to need some protectant coat to minimize corrosion from the moist, salty marine air. Concrete will coat exposed steel, particularly on the lower ceilings. In approaching our project, we were faced with the advantage of an angled site at about 40 degrees, which provides ideal basis for addressing the issue of daylight control and heat control. Ventilation was addressed with use of outdoor spaces present on every floor, as well as operable windows scattered along the facade. Ideally, we would likely add more operable windows along the NW facade where wind is most prominent as we continue the project. Our rooftop pool will likely also serve as a cooling mechanism for the building. Lab 4 also made us think that incorporating the pool’s moving water as a light filter would create a dynamic effect on spaces below it. Bubble screens are another factor of our building that will creating a dynamic interior lighting condition. Based on Lab 1, natural ventilation and sun shading help most with cooling the building. While our building currently lacks louvers, we started to inset floor and windows so that the floors above create some sun shading for the building. Heat gain shouldn’t be an issue for the gym portion of the building, which accumulates heat from body heat quickly. By contrast, the daycare will require some passive heat gain (especially over summer), which influenced its placement towards the southern side of the building. Our pool provides additional cooling through the absorption of some heat, keeping the building cooler below. Due to our programmatic functions, the building system will require an air-based system. However, we will have to allocate the space for it in Spring. Likely, its placement will be near our core by the gym, since this space will require the active system the most. A central plant was another consideration for our studio, which would reduce the need to allocate as much square footage within the building itself. In spring, we are building towards a lower EUI with the help of solar panels on the roof and as shading for the rooftop pool. Colored glass/ apertures are another area of play we wanted to potentially incorporate to support our goal of a playful space.

Studio Stacey White

15 Winter 2022


S SUMMER SUN

6_SYSTEMS INTEGRATION REPORT (CONT’D)

WINTER SUN

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

16 Winter 2022

2. INTEGRATED DIAGRAMS PARTI DIAGRAM

ACTIVATE CAMPUS SIDE

N

DAYLIGHT STRATEGIES

PROVIDE PROTECTED OUTDOOR PLAYSPACE FOR KIDS

ACTIVATE ROOFTOP OUTDOOR SPACE

N

NNW

NNE

NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW

HIERARCHY OF HEIGHTS ON ACTIVE STREET

EGRESS STAIR RESTROOMS ELEVATOR CORE

GENERAL MASSING WITH OUTDOOR ROOFTOP POOL

SSE

S

MASS WITH GLAZING AND SCREENS

Form Generation based on programmatic functions, orientation, and maximizing outdoor spaces. Rooftop pool oriented south, along with outdoor playspace. For future, may experiment with more playful form

SOLAR RESPONSE

N

NNW

NNE

INSET WINDOW

by insetting the windows, it allows for indirect light without the heat from entering the space

NW NE WNW ENE

W E WINDOW WITH PARTITION WSW ESE SW SE

the window allows light into the space over the partition and on the sides, but the wall blocks the heat from entering the main part of the room

PERFORATED SCREEN

the screen filters the light and heat and slows the enterance into the building

GREENERY

the tree’s leaves and branches slow the heat from entering the building on the south facing facade

SSW SSE

S SUMMER SUN

WINTER SUN

Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen

Floor plates create overhangs to prevent summer sun from entering spaces. The pool serves as a cooling method on the southern-most part of the building. Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen

DAYLIGHT STRATEGIES

N


6_SYSTEMS INTEGRATION REPORT (CONT’D) HVAC SYSTEM

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

17 Winter 2022

3. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PERFORMANCE MODEL AND EUI ANALYSIS N

AIR VENTILATION SHAFT

air brought throught the building via shaft from basement to roof

EUI: 22 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103204 (103.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Third Iteration with 2 prongs and adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

CENTRAL MECHANICAL PLANT

EUI: 21 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted WWR

EUI: 20 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100706 (100.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 75:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong, adjusted WWR, increase finger width, and reduced number of floors

Based on our EUI target, we were able to achieve an ideal EUI for our building. Using Insight360, our EUI started out at 54 kBtu/ft^2/yr. However, adjusting some of the settings, we were able get a more accurate picture of our EUI: 17.8. This falls under our target EUI of 27 which means our building is performing well. Based on Lab 3, we followed through with less floors (about 5-6 stories) and varied floor to floor heights. Due to our programmatic need, the ceilings are required to be higher, which will increase floor to floor height compared to what was predicted in Lab 3. Lab’s 2 and 3 concluded that L and U typologies are most effective for EUI, which we don’t quite implement in our building. This may help reduce our EUI even more. Our model assumes 60-100% PV coverage on the roof, which helped to significantly reduce our EUI. At the highest PV coverage of 90-100%, we were able to reduce our EUI even further to 10.9. The largest energy consumer by far is the HVAC system. Since our system is a VAV system, its impact keeps our EUI higher than if we used a water-based system. Operating schedule also played a large factor, since a place like a rec center usually stays open 7 days a week for 12-18 hours. Thus the building is in use longer, requiring more energyy to stay running. Especially with a gym, our energy use may be higher than predicted due to the high need for constant ventilation within the building.

located off site elsewhere on the campus we have a central plant that services all buildings on the campus

In designing, we assumed a central mechanical plant would provide all energy to our building. However, we have yet to account for an AHU unit. Distribution ducts and pipes will impact the FF height, which we accounted for in the elevation of our ceilings. 3 traction elevators are centrally placed at the core of the building

NATURAL VENTILATION STRATEGIES EXTERIOR EGRESS STAIRS outdoor stairs don’t prevent the wind from entering the building, air can still flow through them

N

NORTHWEST WIND

the wind blows from the northwest and enters the builidng where we have lots of patios and openings to let air flow into the building

Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen

Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen


Juliette Fournier

4. STRUCTURAL GRID/ ORGANIZATION The structure of our building will likely be steel construction to address the long spans necessary for the basketball court and rock wall. Below the pool will also require strong structural support, not just immediately below it, but following down to the foundation. Maya and I started to lay out our structural grid with an approximate 20-30’ span. Currently, our grid is not completely even between each bay. Our A-E grid is split into two, with half the building using a 32’ span, and the other half a 25’ span. The 1-6 grid is a 30’ span for most, except the two edges. This results an approximately a 24” girder, or 18” beam which will have to be considered as part of the ceiling. A protection will have to be accounted for as well for fire safety. We will have to address the variations in span in ARCE 316 next quarter as our building continues to evolve structurally. We will also have to consider methods of spanning the larger spaces. Currently, a truss structure over the basketball court and playground feels the most feasible. In ARCE 316, we also will want to address how to support the pool’s massive load and plumbing, while potentially maintaining some transparency for interesting daylighting qualities below.

STEEL TRUSS

a truss is required to span across the basketball court and the rock climbing wall

STEEL COLUMN

using steel structural system allows us to use the space between the structural members and the dropped ceiling for fire protection to place the air-based mechanical system

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

83

$ 32’ - 0”

52&. &/,0%,1* $5($ %(/2: %$6.(7%$// &2857 $5($ %(/2:

%

83

& '1

' 83

83

3/$< $5($

'$<&$5( /2%%< .,7&+(1

(

%5($. 5220

25’ - 0”

'1 2)),&(

83

19’ - 0 1/2”

2)),&(

30’ - 0”

2)),&(

)

22’- 0 1/2”

Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen

6LWH 3ODQ -$0 $UFKLWHFWV _ -XOLHWWH )RXUQLHU _ 0D\D 5RVHQ _ 6WXGLR :KLWH _ $5&+ _ :LQWHU

Studio Stacey White

18 Winter 2022


7_DESIGN PROCESS (CONT’D) lA

ca

de

Studio Stacey White

19 Winter 2022

my

Vi e

tte

Juliette Fournier

The planning layout of Viettel Academy allows open green circulations as well as natural flow of air through the humid tropical site and provide cover from the intense overhead sun Source: https://archello.com/news/vtn-architects -designs-educational-oasis-with-microcli mate-in-mind

Columbia University Iconic central quad provides a strong campus identity within the larger city. Source: https://news.columbia.edu/sites/defaul t/files/styles/cu_crop/public/content/Ne ws-Images/campus_morningside_aeri al_from_southwest_angle.jpg?itok=Kv 54DDIw

Georgetown University has multiple transporation means all-around the campus available such as bus stations, plenty of pedestrian ways and bike paths Source: https://www.wellsandassociat es.com/case-studies/georgeto wn-university/

Poverty and Economic Opportunity

GDP per 100,000 Population vs Poverty RRate GDP vs perUnemployment 100,000 Populat ionRate vs Unemployment at e vs Pover t y R at e Unemployment Rate

6000M

0.0470

United States

0.2030

5500M Greenland

5000M

4500M

Canada

GDP per 100,000 Population

4000M

3500M

3000M

Bahamas

2500M

2000M

1500M

Uruguay

Venezuela Barbados

Chile

Costa Rica

Panama Argentina

1000M

Guyana

Grenada

Dominican Republic

Brazil

Paraguay

Peru

500M

Ecuador

Jamaica

St Vincent Colombia and the Grenadines

Mexico Dominica

Suriname

Belize

El Salvador

Bolivia

Guatemala Honduras Haiti

Nicaragua

0M 0.00 0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

0.75

0.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

Pover t y R at e Pover t y R at e vs .GDP per 100,000 Populat ion. Color s hows Unemployment R at e. S ize s hows s um of M ean Year ly Income. The mar ks ar e labeled by Count r y. A higher GDP per 100,000 people is us ed as a meas ur e of a count r y' s wealt h and s t andar d of living f or each of it s people. As illus t r at ed in t he char t , s ome count r ies have r elat ively high GDP per 100,000, but t heir pover t y r at e and unemployment r at e are s ignifi cant ly high. This may indicat e dis pr opor t ionat e dis t r ibut ion of wealt h. It may als o point t o t he high infl ux of immigr at ion int o t he Unit ed S t at es f or bet t er economic oppor t unit y. *Unemployment of Gr eenland not f ound. Pover t y r at e of B er muda and Cuba not f ound. Sources: “Poverty Headcount Ratio at National Poverty Lines”, The World Bank 2020. “Unemployment, % of Total Labor Force,” The World Bank 2020. “GDP per capita (current US $),” World Bank 2020.

Holly Dufek, Juliette Fournier, Noelani Maylad, Kenzie Pelletier ARCH 352-05, Studio White, Winter 2022

INITIAL RESEARCH INTO CLIENT, PLANNING METHODS, AND CORE BELIEFS


7_DESIGN PROCESS (CONT’D)

UNDERSTANDING THE SITE FROM MULTIPLE FACTORS

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

20 Winter 2022


7_DESIGN PROCESS INTERIOR VIGNETTE

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

21 Winter 2022

PLAYFUL, PEACEFUL, PRIVATE, RELAXING, COLORFUL

Cuidado Wellness Complex Juliette Fournier | ARCH 352 | Studio White Programs: Gym, Health and Wellness Center, Childcare, Dining

In consideration of the larger community and campus overall, this building serves as a service to both students and the surrounding community. Its programmatic allocations create a building that will be actively used throughout the day and are catered to the wellness of the community it serves. Including a bilingual childcare provides connection to the existing predominantly Hispanic population of the area. Incorporating the gym and wellness center nearby enables easy access to both the student body, but a seperation from their study spaces as well. A cafe and lounge area creates a place of connection between students and beyond the campus. Its name “cuidado” means care, in that the complex takes care of the population it serves. Experience Student Perspective Law student Jamie has been experiencing insomnia and severe exhaustion recently, but can’t figure out the cause. He decides to head to the health center to meet with one of the on-campus doctors. The entrance looks welcoming, surrounded by trees, and its entry is filled with light and plants. His patient room is fully private, with a clearstory window to let some natural light in. When the doctor tells him exercise may be a helpful de-stresser and to pick up some sleep medication, Jamie quickly stops by the pharmacy in the health center, before walking into the adjacent gym. He decides to go swimming at the pool, and makes his way up through the peaceful gym to step outside onto the roof. Natalia, a single mother of two toddlers, wants to ensure her kids learn and speak Spanish, so she speaks to them in Spanish at home. So learning about the new bilingual daycare the law schools new campus seemed like the perfect option for a more stable childcare. She walks past the cafe, noting the wonderful smell of coffee, and makes her way up through the lively corridor and into the more private childcare. As she tours the childcare, she hears laughter from the kids playing outside, contrasted by the children painting in the colorful playspace. She’s happy to know her kids are in a safe space just steps away from her classes.

Master Site Plan 1/128"=1'-0" = Gym, Health and Wellness, Childcare = Instructional, Clinics, Market, Visitor Housing = Library, Spiritual Center = Housing, Mental Health

0 10 20

40

80

160

N

INITIAL MASTER PLAN WITH GROUP OVERALL MASSING

MASSING IN CONTEXT (FROM SOUTH)

MASSING IN CONTEXT (FROM SOUTH)

NORTH

SOUTH

EAST

WEST

PROGRAMMATIC ALLOCATIONS MIDREVIEW PROGRESS

NORTH

EAST

MASSING IN CONTEXT (FROM SOUTH)

NORTH

EAST

Space Needs No. Bilingual Day Care for ages 0-6 Classrooms with learning stati Playground Dining/ Eating Play space/ Recreation Under 2s Kitchen/ Food Prep Staff room Office Bilingual Children's Library Admin/ front desk

5 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 1

Café/ Dining Seating Kitchen

12000 600 2000 1250 1000 1250 100 225 125 1500 750 Total

2 1

1750 1250

Recreation and wellness Main Gym Studio Bike studio Locker rooms Nutrition/ wellbeing center Offices Basketball court Pool (swimming) Lounge/Work Space Rental Equipment Room

3500 1250 4750

1 3 1 2 1 6 1 1 1 1

9000 1000 1250 1000 1500 120 4750 4592 4000 1500

9000 3000 1250 2000 1500 720 4750 4592 4000 1500 32312

2000 150 100 1000 700 400 225 400 1000 1000

2000 1500 1000 1000 700 400 450 400 1000 1000

Health and Wellness Entrance/ Lobby/ Seating Doctor's Office Patient Rooms Women and Children's Health Lab Radiology Break Room/ Staff Room Pharmacy Gender-Affirming services Reproductive health services

ASF

1 10 10 1 1 1 2 1 1 1

Total

Total

Total Subtotal (ASF) 60312 40000 sq ft allocated to additional support spaces Total (GSF) 100520

Total Sq Ft 20000 3000 2000 1250 2000 2500 200 225 375 1500 750 13800

9450


7_DESIGN PROCESS (CONT’D)

EXPERIENTIAL SECTION

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

22 Winter 2022


7_DESIGN PROCESS (CONT’D)

MAYA’S PROCESS WORK

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

23 Winter 2022


DATE

y

7_DESIGN PROCESS (CONT’D)

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

24 Winter 2022

Project Description As students spend most of their time learning and helping the community, it is our opportunity to support them through their challenging work. We aim to create a refuge from the stressful environment of law school. Adding a gym allows them to relieve physical stress and clear their minds. A daycare offers a safe space for children to stay while students focalize themselves on their work. For immigrants and the falsely accused, having free family support enables their energy and attention to be completely focused without additional stresses and distractions. And having students’ and faculties’ minds free of childcare allows students to focus their attention on their clients’ needs. Additional student support spaces bridges these spaces together, promoting interaction between the campus community and the population of Barrio Logan. We plan to continue with our moonshots, incorporating the gym portion of Juliette’s program with Maya’s study/public space. Outdoor circulation and patios are features we want to incorporate, along with a large ARC Hto 352: C itizethe n Arccommunity hite c t central space bring together. We want to incorporate screens/ light filters as a way to Na m e Yo u r Pro je c t divide spaces visually to enable privacy between programs without fully blocking out the auditory connector. Sp a c e Ne e d s

No .

Se a ts

ASF p e r

Lib ra ry Use r Sp a c e s In d ivid u a l Stu d y Red= Not free O p e n (Live ly) Stu d y Orange = Sometimes Free Pub lic Sp a c e Asse m b ly Se rvic e De sks C a fé / Ma rke t Se a tin g Kitc h e n Asse m b ly / Lo u n g e Mo o nsho t Da yc a re (50 kid s? ) C la ssro o m Pla yg ro u n d (o u td o o r) (se p a ra te sp a c e In sid e p la ysp a c e (o p e n 24/ 7) 0-2 p la y a re a Bilin g u a l Lib ra ry Kitc h e n (fo r sn a c ks) Din in g Are a O ffic e (fo r w o rke rs) G ym We ig h t Ma c h in e s Fre e We ig h ts Bike s a n d Tre d m ills O p e n G ym Stu d io s C h a n g in g / lo c ke r ro o m s Ba ske tb a ll C o u rt Po o l Sta ff Sp a c e O ffic e s Sh a re d C a te rin g Bre a kro o m / Kitc h e n Sto ra g e Sha re d Re so urc e s Me d iu m C o n fe re n c e ro o m Sm a ll C o n fe re n c e Ro o m

1| 1

To ta l ASF

No te s

22,500 1 1

570 800

2500 20000

2,500 20,000

1 6 1 1 1

200 2 1 120 0

4000 120 2000 1800 400

13,420 4,000 720 2,000 1,800 400

1

3

4500

4,500 12,100

5 1 2 1 1 2 1 5

6

500 2000 2000 1000 750 300 500 150

2,500 2,000 4,000 1,000 750 600 500 750 26,050 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,800 3,000 4,750 4,500 5,740

1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1

1 1

10

3000 3000 3000 3000 600 1000 4750 4500

23 3 10

1 0 0

80 300 300

1,840 900 3,000 1,250

2 5

12 6

250 150

500 750

TO TAL

81,060

Ja n ua ry 2018

NEW DESIGN STEPS AND REDLINING INITIAL PLANS IN MIRO


8_PRECEDENTS

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

25 Winter 2022

FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ON VIRGINIA

PROJECT LOCATION: MCKINNEY, TEXAS CONTRACTOR: ROGER O’BRIEN CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT: MASS DESIGN GROUP STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: LA FUESS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC MEP ENGINEER + INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE: SMITHGROUP This family health center is providing medical services to children, families, and individuals, regardless of their ability to pay. This building blends in with the residential neighborhood it is located near. The building is made up of 2 wings with a central “breezeway” with a common roof. MASS Design, broke the building up into “human scale” areas which makes the building more approachable to visitors. In addition to clinical spaces there are also community spaces and exam rooms within the building. Community spaces help reduce stress of a medical building and exam rooms allow patients to speak directly, and privately, with their doctor.

SITE PLAN

FIRST FLOOR

INTERIOR WAITING AREA

INTERIOR CLASSROOM

EXTERIOR ENTERANCE

EXTERIOR PLAZA

5

15

25

SECOND FLOOR

5

15

25

SOURCES: https://www.archdaily.com/957138/not-ready-family-health-center-on-virginia-mass-design-group?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab

WOXSEN UNIVERSITY

UNILEAO GYM AND SCHOOL

PROJECT LOCATION: HYDERABAD, INDIA ARCHITECT: DESIGNHAAUS SOLUTIONS LEAD ARCHITECTS: RAJEEV KUMAR SHARMA, GOURAV DAS, ARVIND KUMAR MANUFACTURERS: AUTODESK, DAIKIN, KOHLER, KAJARIA YEAR:2021

PROJECT LOCATION: LAGOA SECA, BRAZIL ARCHITECT: LINS ARQUITETOS ASSOCIADOS LEAD ARCHITECTS: CINTIA LINS, GEORGE LINS MANUFACTURERS: BENDERMIX, COPER VIDROS, ISOESTE, OLARIA CEMONTE YEAR:2018

On Woxsen University’s campus, this building comprises the library, which makes up 50000 sq. ft. The design made use of double-height spaces to create the illusion of every space being one level and to maintain visibility. This also allowed for increased ventilation and light within the space. Planters along the exterior help to accomodate glare, maintain a cooler environment, and create a natural screen. It makes use of an open-plan concept to accomodate a coffee shop, reading nooks, and social flex space within.

Due to the hot and dry, this university gym has and East-West orientation which makes it highly succeptible to overheating. The plan is simply five intersecting circles containing different sports activities. To address the hot climate, the facades are three layers: the first is a ceramic tile light filter to allow light, creating a dynamic interior. The second layer shelters an interior garden to increase cooling inside. The final layer is clear glass pivoting frams that allow for mechanical cooling if necessary. Use of thermo acoustic tiles oon the roof help against excessive heat.


9_WRITTEN REFLECTION-JULIETTE How would you describe your studio’s project brief, in your own words? How did your instructor design and organize the studio to aid your development of this work over ther quarter?

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

26 Winter 2022

Our studio revolves around the design of a law school for 1000 students. These students have to tackle challenging issues of mass incarceration and immigration, on top of a law school curriculum. Furthermore, our site borders two areas of San Diego, an area that has a dense homeless population. In approaching how to design for these clients, we first researched these individual communites, especially immigrant populations, to try to understand why they may be coming to the US. Simultaneously, we did research to understand what entails a successful college campus. Our studio has required teamwork throughout to start compiling a master plan and data. We had the chance to create two iterations of a building before teaming up to better understand which parts of the project to highly consider. Reflect on the state of your design project at the midpoint of the Two Quarter Studio, drawing upon the feedback you received in reviews, discussions with your studio instructor, and your own evaluation of your work. What do you feel are the project’s current strengths and weaknesses?

Currently, the programs and placement are strong and rational. However, what lacks in our current project is the playfulness aspect that we wanted to emphasize. While we have a perforated facade, I think we need to push the idea of perforation/ playfulness into our form to create the desired atmosphere. We started to use circles and curves to bring in that playfulness, but I think we need to push it to the next level. I think circulation may be another important factor to change moving forward. What are some questions you need to answer, or decisions you need to make in order to move your project forward in Spring?

How can we relate back to the Barrio Logan community? How can we mesh two programs that each require a level of privacy/ are somewhat incompatable? How might perforation help to inform what spaces do?

Did ARCH 307 lectures and/or labs influence your thinking or approach in your design studio project this quarter? If so, how?

The labs and lectureres highly influenced my approach this quarter. Specifically, we took the daylighting lab seriously since we want to create playful lighting effects within the daycare and gym spaces. Therefore, we are thinking of using the pool as an interesting lighting source, or playing with perforated screens. Color may be another factor we will incorporate moving forward too. We were also conscious of the structural system later in our project, the elevator and egress placement, as well as the form that maximizes daylighting. Did the ARCH 307 Integrated Section influence your thinking or approach in your design studio project this quarter? If so, how?

Somewhat. I think we could have used it more to create connections between certain spaces, but much of our design still started in plan to ensure our programs could fit within the allocated square footage. It may be a helpful tool next quarter, particularly for thinking of spaces more vertically. Did Common Hour presentations and pin-ups influence your design studio project this quarter, or contribute to your education more broadly? If so, how? Do you have any suggestions for improving Common Hour in the Spring, or in future years?

The pinups were definetely helpful for inspirational and designing this quarter. It’s nice to see what other studios are doing, and to understang what there projects are from a section. It would be helpful for common hour to show how professors each approach


9_WRITTEN REFLECTION (CONT’D)

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

27 Winter 2022

a design challenge. I know certain studios approach it from a more technical standpoint, while others think more from an abstract standpoint. Sharing a glimpse of the professors approach may be useful to get ideas.

Were there other outside influences that informed your design studio project this quarter? This could be other courses you were taking this quarter, previous courses, the Hearst Lecture Series, or things outside of school such as art, current events, personal experiences, etc..

My other coursework was helpful as I was implementing structure this quarter, particularly ARCE 315. ARCH 461 will be extremely helpful to creating the perforated facade we want, and this is something I am excited to implement more moving forward. It may help us with structure of more curved objects as well.


9_WRITTEN REFLECTION-MAYA How would you describe your studio’s project brief, in your own words? How did your instructor design and organize the studio to aid your development of this work over the quarter?

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

28 Winter 2022

For Winter and Spring quarter we are asked to design a building for a law school campus. This building should benefit the students and the community as a whole. The campus should bridge the space between Downtown and Barrio Logan in San Diego. We started by designing individual buildings with mostly student related program in addition to a “moonshot” which is a program that benefits everyone in the community. After creating the preliminary design for that building, we heard feedback on our projects before we joined forces with another student. Over the last 3 weeks, Juliette and I designed a building by combining aspects from her building’s program with aspects from my building. Reflect on the state of your design project at the midpoint of the Two Quarter Studio, drawing upon the feedback you received in reviews, discussions with your studio instructor, and your own evaluation of your work. What do you feel are the project’s current strengths and weaknesses?

At the start of the project I really struggled to feel connection to the project and program, but after pairing with Juliette I felt that my designing was more purposeful and I was able to connect to it. An aspect of our project that needs some readjusting would be our circulation. We had a lot of large program blocks that we needed to fit within the space, and we made the circulation fit around it. This is not necessarily a large problem, but could be more seamless. The layout of our program is well fit into the site to showcase the rock climbing wall and basketball court to the public. What are some questions you need to answer, or decisions you need to make in order to move your project forward in Spring?

Checking in with Stacey for more direct feedback based on our design and combine that with feedback from our reviews last week would be beneficial to our design process. Moving forward, questions about the performance of perforated screens and how to continue to lower our EUI are questions we are still wondering about. Did ARCH 307 lectures and/or labs influence your thinking or approach in your design studio project this quarter? If so, how?

From Lab 1 we learned the best passive strategies to implement in our building like shading and louvers. We plan on adding louvers next quarter. From Lab 2 and 3 we got our massing form. We learned that L-shaped buildings were effective in lowering EUI and therefore implemented an L-shaped building with lots of outdoor space to being ventilation into the building. From Lab 4 we implemented perforated screens and greenery to change the way light enters the building. By filtering the light we are able to have more glass along the south facing facade without the direct sun and heat entering the space. Did the ARCH 307 Integrated Section influence your thinking or approach in your design studio project this quarter? If so, how?

When making the integrated section, I realized ways I could increase cross ventilation by adding operational windows. In addition to more windows, the rooftop pool also acts as a level of insulation which simultaneously slows heat from entering the building and cools it down. Did Common Hour presentations and pin-ups influence your design studio project this quarter, or contribute to your education more broadly? If so, how? Do you have any suggestions for improving Common Hour in the Spring, or in future years?

Common Hour presentations were not particularly helpful in my opinion. I think implementing more tutorials (maybe in rendering or representation) would be helpful. I enjoyed hearing my peers feedback on my work, but would be more effective if it were in person rather than over zoom or miro.


9_WRITTEN REFLECTION

Juliette Fournier

Studio Stacey White

29 Winter 2022

Were there other outside influences that informed your design studio project this quarter? This could be other courses you were taking this quarter, previous courses, the Hearst Lecture Series, or things outside of school such as art, current events, personal experiences, etc..

I struggled at the beginning of the quarter to connect with the site because I was unable to see it in person which negatively impacted my designs for it. But once I got a partner, I was able to connect more. This quarter, I looked at more precedents than I usually do and was able to draw inspiration from them.


SYSTEMS INTEGRATION REPORT

Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In observing the successful typologies from Labs 2 and 3, we found that an L-shaped and U-shaped typology yielded the most successful EUIs. Therefore, as we considered our massing, out floors started to be shaped through a similar typology. Double height spaces are used within our building to allow light to penetrate into the building, particularly on the first two floors. In considering energy, we incorporated some outdoor occupancy and outdoor circulation spaces to minimize energy used within these spaces. Windows are concentrated on the east and north facade, and perforated screens will cover our large south and west-facing windows. Greenery on every floor also provides additional shading and cooling. Our structural system requires large spans across a basketball court, pool and rock climbing wall, with one that cannot have columns interrupting the space. Thus, we decided a steel structural system would be most appropriate. The marine climate of San Diego also warrants the structure to need some protectant coat to minimize corrosion from the moist, salty marine air. Concrete will coat exposed steel, particularly on the lower ceilings. In approaching our project, we were faced with the advantage of an angled site at about 40 degrees, which provides ideal basis for addressing the issue of daylight control and heat control. Ventilation was addressed with use of outdoor spaces present on every floor, as well as operable windows scattered along the facade. Ideally, we would likely add more operable windows along the NW facade where wind is most prominent as we continue the project. Our rooftop pool will likely also serve as a cooling mechanism for the building. Lab 4 also made us think that incorporating the pool’s moving water as a light filter would create a dynamic effect on spaces below it. Bubble screens are another factor of our building that will creating a dynamic interior lighting condition. Based on Lab 1, natural ventilation and sun shading help most with cooling the building. While our building currently lacks louvers, we started to inset floor and windows so that the floors above create some sun shading for the building. Heat gain shouldn’t be an issue for the gym portion of the building, which accumulates heat from body heat quickly. By contrast, the daycare will require some passive heat gain (especially over summer), which influenced its placement towards the southern side of the building. Our pool provides additional cooling through the absorption of some heat, keeping the building cooler below. Due to our programmatic functions, the building system will require an air-based system. However, we will have to allocate the space for it in Spring. Likely, its placement will be near our core by the gym, since this space will require the active system the most. A central plant was another consideration for our studio, which would reduce the need to allocate as much square footage within the building itself. In spring, we are building towards a lower EUI with the help of solar panels on the roof and as shading for the rooftop pool. Colored glass/ apertures are another area of play we wanted to potentially incorporate to support our goal of a playful space.


2. INTEGRATED DIAGRAMS PARTI DIAGRAM

ACTIVATE CAMPUS SIDE

PROVIDE PROTECTED OUTDOOR PLAYSPACE FOR KIDS

ACTIVATE ROOFTOP OUTDOOR SPACE

N

NNW

NNE

NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW

HIERARCHY OF HEIGHTS ON ACTIVE STREET

EGRESS STAIR RESTROOMS ELEVATOR CORE

GENERAL MASSING WITH OUTDOOR ROOFTOP POOL

SSE

S

MASS WITH GLAZING AND SCREENS

Form Generation based on programmatic functions, orientation, and maximizing outdoor spaces. Rooftop pool oriented south, along with outdoor playspace. For future, may experiment with more playful form

SOLAR RESPONSE

N

NNW

NNE NW NE WNW ENE

W E WSW ESE SW SE SSW

S

SSE

SUMMER SUN

WINTER SUN

Floor plates create overhangs to prevent summer sun from entering spaces. The pool serves as a cooling method on the southern-most part of the building. Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen


WINTER SUN

N

DAYLIGHT STRATEGIES

INSET WINDOW

by insetting the windows, it allows for indirect light without the heat from entering the space

WINDOW WITH PARTITION

the window allows light into the space over the partition and on the sides, but the wall blocks the heat from entering the main part of the room

PERFORATED SCREEN

the screen filters the light and heat and slows the enterance into the building

GREENERY

the tree’s leaves and branches slow the heat from entering the building on the south facing facade

Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen


HVAC SYSTEM

N

AIR VENTILATION SHAFT

air brought throught the building via shaft from basement to roof

CENTRAL MECHANICAL PLANT

located off site elsewhere on the campus we have a central plant that services all buildings on the campus

In designing, we assumed a central mechanical plant would provide all energy to our building. However, we have yet to account for an AHU unit. Distribution ducts and pipes will impact the FF height, which we accounted for in the elevation of our ceilings. 3 traction elevators are centrally placed at the core of the building

NATURAL VENTILATION STRATEGIES EXTERIOR EGRESS STAIRS outdoor stairs don’t prevent the wind from entering the building, air can still flow through them

N

NORTHWEST WIND

the wind blows from the northwest and enters the builidng where we have lots of patios and openings to let air flow into the building

Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen


3. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PERFORMANCE MODEL AND EUI ANALYSIS

UI: 21 kBtu/ft2/yr tal S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F.) of Stories: 7 F. Height: 12 WR: 0.291 V Ratio: 65:1000 ird Iteration with 1 prong d adjusted WWR

EUI: 20 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100706 (100.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 75:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong, adjusted WWR, increase finger width, and reduced number of floors

Based on our EUI target, we were able to achieve an ideal EUI for our building. Using Insight360, our EUI started out at 54 kBtu/ft^2/yr. However, adjusting some of the settings, we were able get a more accurate picture of our EUI: 17.8. This falls under our target EUI of 27 which means our building is performing well. Based on Lab 3, we followed through with less floors (about 5-6 stories) and varied floor to floor heights. Due to our programmatic need, the ceilings are required to be higher, which will increase floor to floor height compared to what was predicted in Lab 3. Lab’s 2 and 3 concluded that L and U typologies are most effective for EUI, which we don’t quite implement in our building. This may help reduce our EUI even more. Our model assumes 60-100% PV coverage on the roof, which helped to significantly reduce our EUI. At the highest PV coverage of 90-100%, we were able to reduce our EUI even further to 10.9. The largest energy consumer by far is the HVAC system. Since our system is a VAV system, its impact keeps our EUI higher than if we used a water-based system. Operating schedule also played a large factor, since a place like a rec center usually stays open 7 days a week for 12-18 hours. Thus the building is in use longer, requiring more energyy to stay running. Especially with a gym, our energy use may be higher than predicted due to the high need for constant ventilation within the building.

Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen


4. STRUCTURAL GRID/ ORGANIZATION The structure of our building will likely be steel construction to address the long spans necessary for the basketball court and rock wall. Below the pool will also require strong structural support, not just immediately below it, but following down to the foundation. Maya and I started to lay out our structural grid with an approximate 20-30’ span. Currently, our grid is not completely even between each bay. Our A-E grid is split into two, with half the building using a 32’ span, and the other half a 25’ span. The 1-6 grid is a 30’ span for most, except the two edges. This results an approximately a 24” girder, or 18” beam which will have to be considered as part of the ceiling. A protection will have to be accounted for as well for fire safety. We will have to address the variations in span in ARCE 316 next quarter as our building continues to evolve structurally. We will also have to consider methods of spanning the larger spaces. Currently, a truss structure over the basketball court and playground feels the most feasible. In ARCE 316, we also will want to address how to support the pool’s massive load and plumbing, while potentially maintaining some transparency for interesting daylighting qualities below.

STEEL TRUSS

a truss is required to span across the basketball court and the rock climbing wall

STEEL COLUMN

using steel structural system allows us to use the space between the structural members and the dropped ceiling for fire protection to place the air-based mechanical system

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

83

$ 32’ - 0”

52&. &/,0%,1* $5($ %(/2: %$6.(7%$// &2857 $5($ %(/2:

%

83

& '1

' 83

83

3/$< $5($

'$<&$5( /2%%< .,7&+(1

(

%5($. 5220

25’ - 0”

'1 2)),&(

83

19’ - 0 1/2”

2)),&(

30’ - 0”

2)),&(

)

22’- 0 1/2”

Systems Integration Report | Juliette Fournier | ARCH 307-05 | Studio White | Winter 2022 In Collaboration with Maya Rosen

6LWH 3ODQ -$0 $UFKLWHFWV _ -XOLHWWH )RXUQLHU _ 0D\D 5RVHQ _ 6WXGLR :KLWH _ $5&+ _ :LQWHU


Baseline and EUI Target  ABOUT YOUR BUILDING Building Name

United States

City | State/Prov.

Chula Vista

Postal Code Degree Days

*

HDD

BASELINE 132 EUI 100 Zero Score

 *

California

1744

*

CDD

625

Number of Stories

TARGET 27 EUI 20 Zero Score

* 100

Prescriptive

Performance

 *

7

80

60

40

20

-20

kBtu/ft²-yr

MBtu/yr

43.2

4,319.6

Estimated Building Source Energy Consumption Total Renewable Energy Required

43.2

On-Site PV Generation Potential Remaining Off-Site Procured Renewable Energy

768.5

35.5

3,551.1

187

Estimated Area for Collectors (ft²)

Existing Building

OFFICE BUILDING SUMMARY 91915

USES

College / University

100,000 sq.ft (100.0%)

RESULTS

Residential

Add Another Use

Selected Use Type(s): 

College / University

BASELINE

TARGET

*

100000

ESTIMATED BUILDING ENERGY IMPACTS

YOUR BUILDING

End Uses

80%

N/A

PV SYSTEM

Zero Score

100

20

N/A

13450.5

Site EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr)

Estimated Area for Collectors

132

27

N/A

Module Type

Standard

Source EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr)

263

53

N/A

Losses (%)

10

Total GHG Emissions (metric tons CO₂e/yr)

870

174

N/A

Array Type

Fixed - Open Rack

Set Default Values *

Fans 25

Interior Plug Lo Service

20

Other

delete sq.ft

Heating Cooling

30

Default Values estimate on-site building PV system potential. Uncheck Use Default Values to enter custom inputs. If your building has multiple PV systems, add them below. 

0%

 *  *

15

*

Renewable

10

metric

print 

On site

 *

Tilt (Degrees)

10

*

Azimuth (Degrees)

180

*

Inverter Efficiency (%)

96

*

5

0 End Uses

COLLEGE / UNIVERSITY

delete *

100000

Gross Floor Area

sq.ft

GENERATE RESULTS

Estimated Site EUI: 33.01 kBtu/ft²-yr Estimated Site Energy Consumption: 3,301.20 MBtu/yr

Zero Score

End Use

Subtotal

Percent

(kBtu/ft²-yr)

Enter your target expressed as either a percent reduction from baseline EUI, or as a Zero Score. A baseline represents a typical modern building. 

80

Renewable Energy

Building Energy Impacts and End Uses are based on code compliant prototype buildings modeled by NORESCO in their Impact Analysis. Actual building energy consumption will vary from modeled results.

 Add another PV System

 *

 ENERGY REDUCTION TARGET

Percent Reduction

Site

35

 ON-SITE PV SYSTEMS

EUI % Reduction from Baseline

imperial

13,450

Metric:

Chula Vista, CA

In order to provide you with an appropriate comparison for your building, we need to know how spaces in this building will be used. If your building has multiple uses, add them below.  Commercial

Gross Floor Area (sq.ft)

LOCATION

kBtu/ft²-yr

 BUILDING USE DETAILS

delete

4,319.6

7.7

On-Site PV System

Office

RENEWABLE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS

Rated Capacity (kW)

New construction

Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 307-05 | Winter 2022

Energy Consumption & Generation

 *

Selected Use Type(s):

0

*

6

Add Another Use

*

91915 

Climate Zone

 *

Climate Data

 RESULTS

Code Pathway:

Target EUI is 27 based on a 80% reduction

Chula Vista Law School 1

Country

 ABOUT YOUR BUILDING

 RESULTS

*

Heating

1.45

4.39%

Cooling

3.39

10.27%

Interior Lighting

4.21

12.77%

Plug Loads

15.49

Dry Bulb Temperature- Chula Vista’s trends to being within the comfort zoned throughout the year. The highest temperatures happening during late summer and early fall, and the coolest occuring during the winter months. Both heating and cooling strategies must be accounted for to create a comfortable environment during these extremes.

Wind Rose and Sun Path Chart

46.91%

Service Hot Water

1.84

5.58%

Fans

5.64

17.10%

0.60 0.08 0.30

1.82% 0.25% 0.91%

33.01

100.00%

Other Exterior Light Heat Rejection Pumps

Are you using the Zero Tool to meet 2030 Challenge Targets?

Total

Psychrometric Chart and Design Strategies

Sun Shading- Use of horizontal overhangs and vertical louvers to reduce overheating, as well as vegetation and recessed glazed openings.

Internal Heat Gain- A high R-value in the insulation as we as maximizing sun exposure. Keep the envelope of the building to a minimum to Credit: Classroom Prototype, Eleena reduce heat loss. Jamil Architects, 2030 Palette.

Credit: Stockebrand Residence, Richard Rush, 2030 Palette.

Passive Solar Direct Gain High Mass- Using thermal mass to absorb and store heat that is then released at night. Use of masonry that is exposed to solar energy. Credit: Rocky Mountain Institute, Tim Griffith, 2030 Palette.

Natural Ventilation- Provide adequate cross ventilation and stack ventilation to allow proper airflow in and out. Credit: British High Commission, Richard Murphy Architects, 2030 Palette.

Wind directions year-round are prominently coming from the west, likely due to the proximity to the ocean. Due to the lack of surrounding building of this site, wind direction will impact orientation to maximize cross ventilation. According to the sunpath chart, high noon and early afternoon during the summer months will require the most shading to reduce overheating. Maximizing sun from the East or during the winter months would allow some necessary heat gain to attain a comfortable temperature.

EUI, CLIMATE, AND DESIGN STRATEGIES

CHULA VISTA


Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 307-05 | Winter 2022

Team Matrix- Phoenix, AZ and San Diego, CA Juliette Fournier, Mason Bechtold Studio White

Gross Sq. Ft: 100,000 sq ft Target EUI:BUILDING 20 ABOUT YOUR

 RESULTS

 RESULTS

Country *

BASELINE 132 EUI 100 Zero Score

BASELINE

City * | State/Prov.98 EUI Chula Vista

*

100 Zero Score

Degree Days

HDD

100

80

New construction

1744

*

TARGET 20 EUI 20 Zero Score

*

60

 *

California

91915 

CDD 40

625 20

*0

-20

USES

TARGET 27 EUI 20 Zero Score 100

80

60

40

0

20

Phoenix, AZ

85013

Office

100,000 sq.ft (100.0%)

BASELINE

Commercial Residential EUI % Reduction from Baseline Add Another  Use Zero Score

0%

TARGET

BUILDING

80%

N/A

 100

20

N/A

Site EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr) Selected Use Type(s):

98

20

N/A

EUI  College /Source University

247

(kBtu/ft²/yr)

Total GHG Emissions (metric tons CO₂e/yr)

imperial SUMMARY

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104727 S.F. (104.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 56:1000 First iteration with central atrium and adjusted WWR

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103739 S.F. (103.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 77:1000 First iteration with adjusted WWR and less floors, and central courtyard

EUI: 36 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104437 S.F. (104.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.666 S:V Ratio: 53:1000 Second iteration Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 33 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104437 S.F. (104.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 53:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

EUI: 33 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100296 S.F. (100.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 2 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 99:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR wider floor area and less floors

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104437 S.F. (104.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 16 WWR: 0.218 S:V Ratio: 47:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR and higher floor to ceiling heights

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102285 S.F. (102.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 16 WWR: 0.218 S:V Ratio: 46:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR central atrium

EUI: 33 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 101150 S.F. (101.1% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 64:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR and less floors with atrium

EUI: 28 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 105691 (105.6% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 S:V Ratio: 85:1000 WWR: 0.666 Third Iteration with 3 prongs Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 27 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103082 (103% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.666 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Third Iteration with 2 prongs Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 27 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104270 (104.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.666 S:V Ratio: 77:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 22 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103204 (103.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Third Iteration with 2 prongs and adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

EUI: 21 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted WWR

EUI: 20 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100706 (100.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 75:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong, adjusted WWR, increase finger width, and reduced number of floors

-20

BUILDING SUMMARY LOCATION

Chula Vista, CA

91915

USES

College / University

100,000 sq.ft (100.0%)

or ng In order to provide you with an appropriate comparison for your will be used. If m building, we need to know how spaces in this building YOUR your building has multiple uses, add them below.  RESULTS

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 105000 S.F. (105% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 16 WWR: 0.218 S:V Ratio: 51:1000 First iteration higher floor heights and adjusted WWR

Existing Building

BUILDING SUMMARY LOCATION USE DETAILS  BUILDING

EUI: 33 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 101963 S.F. (101.9% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 2 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 101:1000 First iteration wider spread with less floors and adjusted WWR

 *

United States

Postal Code *

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 105000 S.F. (105% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 57:1000 First iteration with adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

Target EUI is 27 based on a 80% reduction

Target EUI Vista is 20Law based on a 80% Chula School 1 reduction

Building Name

EUI: 38 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 105000 S.F. (105% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.666 S:V Ratio: 57:1000 First iteration Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

1,237

metric

50

248

N/A 

N/A

print 

INDIVIDUAL MATRIX

BASELINE

TARGET

YOUR BUILDING

EUI % Reduction from Baseline

0%

80%

N/A

Zero Score

100

20

N/A

Site EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr)

132

27

100,000 N/A

Source EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr)

263

53

N/A

Total GHG Emissions (metric tons CO₂e/yr)

870

174

N/A

RESULTS

imperial

metric

MASON BECHTOLD

ARCH 30701/ STACEY WHITE SAN DIEGO, CA SF TARGET EUI = 27

print 

My approach was more based around using on shape and manipulating/ isolating individual factors (such as changing the F.F. Height, WWR ratio, or adding a courtyard. On the other hand, my team member took a different 2 5 ÿ we used approach, manipulating the building form/ using a larger variety to explore different typologies. Since different sites, the EUI calculations of mine will likely be more extreme, so certain aspects like a courtyard or 8 5 ÿ9'/ÿ ÿ2.ÿ! ÿ ÿÿ: ;ÿ # open hole only worsened the EUI. Meanwhile, a site like San Diego seems more allowing of this typology. Mason also found a way to significantly reduce the EUI the most by adding multiple stories with relatively low <=>?@AB? CDEÿ9'/ CFFÿG ÿ # WWR and a more rectangular shape. He experimented with the floor height and number of stories for some H=IJ?H EKÿ9'/ EFÿG ÿ # iterations I also experimented with, achieving slightly differing results. Number of heights seemed 0to impact EUI F M2 : 7 L 2 slightly, with a smaller building footprint increasing the EUI slightly. Regardless, we both found WWR plays the <NA@OABJÿ>NQQ=IR most signficant role. A higher ratio seems to correlate to a higher EUI. Next steps would be to see how switching the location we designed for might inform changes in our original typographies. RSNI <NA@OABJ ;

:;

BT=

SUMMARY


Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 307-05 | Winter 2022

Individual Matrix- Phoenix, AZ

EUI: 38 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 105000 S.F. (105% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.666 S:V Ratio: 57:1000 First iteration Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 105000 S.F. (105% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 57:1000 First iteration with adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

EUI: 33 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 101963 S.F. (101.9% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 2 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 101:1000 First iteration wider spread with less floors and adjusted WWR

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 105000 S.F. (105% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 16 WWR: 0.218 S:V Ratio: 51:1000 First iteration higher floor heights and adjusted WWR

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104727 S.F. (104.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 56:1000 First iteration with central atrium and adjusted WWR

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103739 S.F. (103.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 77:1000 First iteration with adjusted WWR and less floors, and central courtyard

EUI: 36 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104437 S.F. (104.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.666 S:V Ratio: 53:1000 Second iteration Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 33 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104437 S.F. (104.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 53:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

EUI: 33 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100296 S.F. (100.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 2 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 99:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR wider floor area and less floors

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104437 S.F. (104.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 16 WWR: 0.218 S:V Ratio: 47:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR and higher floor to ceiling heights

EUI: 34 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102285 S.F. (102.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 16 WWR: 0.218 S:V Ratio: 46:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR central atrium

EUI: 33 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 101150 S.F. (101.1% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 64:1000 Second iteration with adjusted WWR and less floors with atrium

EUI: 28 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 105691 (105.6% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 S:V Ratio: 85:1000 WWR: 0.666 Third Iteration with 3 prongs Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 27 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103082 (103% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.666 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Third Iteration with 2 prongs Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 27 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 104270 (104.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.666 S:V Ratio: 77:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong Window sill: 2' Window height: 10'

EUI: 22 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103204 (103.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Third Iteration with 2 prongs and adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

EUI: 21 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted WWR

EUI: 20 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100706 (100.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 75:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong, adjusted WWR, increase finger width, and reduced number of floors

In approaching this iteration process, I started with three variations to build off of in order to see how initial shape might impact the EUI. I built off of each shape, seeing how individual changes affected the EUI. The first two iterations went through a similar process, where I first lowered the WWR, which had the largest positive impact on all of the shapes. The adjusted WWR was kept for the rest of the iterations, which then followed increasing the footprint of the building, and reducing the number of floors. This I found had very little to no impact for the most part. Reverting back to the original shape, I increased the floor heights, which had more of a negative impact on the building. I then tried adding an atrium or courtyard to the building, with no positive impact on the building. The final iteration was done using the alphabet script, which created a much more efficient shape to begin with. Experimenting with different amounts of prongs, the U and L-shapes were the most efficient. Continuing with these two, the WWR was decreased, making a significant impact on both shapes. Thickening the prongs of the L-shape provided the most efficient shape with the lowest EUI. S:V ratio seemed to have little impact/ no noticeable correlation to EUI.


Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 307-05 | Winter 2022

Individual Studies- Phoenix, AZ Study 1

STUDY SUMMARY This typology (along with all the alphabet typology interestingly had a signficantly lower EUI than the other typology. When trying the previous typology with a courtyard, the EUI would signficantly increase, but this study, which creates something similar had a significantly lower EUI. The 12’ FF height provided the lowest EUI, along with a significantly small WWR. Largely, this was intended to illustrate how the shape of the building and WWR can impact EUI. That being said, lighting would likely be a huge issue since daylight accesses only 1.5-2.5 of the depth of the building. While the EUI is low, the building would require electrical systems for lighting.

EUI: 22 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103204 (103.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Third Iteration with 2 prongs and adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5'

EUI: 22 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103204 (103.2% of Target S.F) # of stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 73:1000 An iteration with 2 prongs, and a low WWR and floor to floor height.

EUI: 21 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted WWR


Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 307-05 | Winter 2022

Study 2

STUDY SUMMARY

Again the alphabet typology proved most sucessful. What differentiates this from the previous typology is the number of arms, decreasing the S.V ratio. It is possible this reduced the EUI. The thickness of the arms was increased as well, which also may have impacts the EUI, by decreasing how much of the building is exposed to sun. Once again, lighting would likely be an issue due to such a low WWR.

EUI: 21 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong

EUI: 21 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F) # of stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 An iteration with 1 prong and a low WWR and floor to floor height.

EUI: 20 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100706 (100.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 75:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong,


Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 307-05 | Winter 2022

Study 3

STUDY SUMMARY

EUI: 20 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100706 EUI: 20 kBtu/ft2/yr (100.7% of Target S.F.) Total S.F.: 100706 (100.7% of Target S.F) # of Stories: 4 # of stories: 4 F.F.12 Height: 12 F.F. Height: WWR: 0.291 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 75:1000 S:VwithRatio: 75:1000 An iteration 1 prong, and a low WWR and floor to floor height. The finger widths were thickened from the previous study. Third Iteration with 1 prong, adjusted WWR, increase finger width,

As an iteration of the previous study, this one observes changing the number of floors and arrangement of the square footage along the building footprint as a result. Reducing the number of floors increased the S.V. Ratio but did end up decreasing the EUI. This led me to the conclusion that S.V. Ratio doesn’t necessarily cause EUI changes. However, it was a decrease from the 1st study, which means that S.V. Ratio may have to fall within a certain range? Regardless, reducing floors did decrease the EUI slightly, attaining the target EUI of 20.


Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 307-05 | Winter 2022


INDIVIDUAL MATRIX

Team Matrix- Barrio Logan, CA Juliette Fournier, Mason Bechtold Studio White

MASON BECHTOLD

ARCH 30701/ STACEY WHITE

Gross Sq. Ft: 100,000 sq ft Target EUI: 20

 RESULTS

EUI: 22 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103204 (103.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Third Iteration with 2 prongs and adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

Target EUI is 20 based on a 80% reduction

 * BASELINE 98 EUI 100 Zero Score

 *

SAN DIEGO, CA 100,000 SF EUI: 21 kBtu/ft2/yr TARGET Total S.F.: 102435 EUI = 27 (102.4% of Target S.F.)

# of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 7'

EUI: 20 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 100706 (100.7% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.291 S:V Ratio: 75:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong, adjusted WWR, increase finger width, and reduced number of floors

EUI: 24 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.375 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted WWR Window sill: 6' Window height: 10.5'

EUI: 24 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 101286 (101.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.375 S:V Ratio: 75:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted WWR Window sill: 6' Window height: 10.5'

TARGET 20 EUI 20 Zero Score

*

100

80

60

40

0

20

-20

BUILDING SUMMARY LOCATION

Phoenix, AZ

85013

USES

Office

100,000 sq.ft (100.0%)

EUI: 27 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103204 (103.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.708 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Iteration with 2 prongs and adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 12'

2 5 ÿ

8

or ng BASELINE

TARGET

YOUR BUILDING

EUI % Reduction from Baseline

0%

80%

N/A

Zero Score

100

20

N/A

Site EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr)

98

20

N/A

Source EUI (kBtu/ft²/yr)

247

50

N/A

1,237

248

N/A

RESULTS

Total GHG Emissions (metric tons CO₂e/yr)

print 

5 ÿ9'/ÿ ÿ2.ÿ! ÿ ÿÿ: ;ÿ #

<=>?@AB? CDEÿ9'/ CFFÿG ÿ # 0

EUI: 24 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 103204 (103.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 12 WWR: 0.416 S:V Ratio: 82:1000 Iteration with 2 prongs and adjusted WWR Window sill: 3.5' Window height: 10'

Juliette Fournier

:

7

L

2

H=IJ?H EKÿ9'/ EFÿG ÿ #

<NA@OABJÿ>NQQ=IR

EUI: 23 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 102435 (102.4% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 7 F.F. Height: 16 WWR: 0.281 S:V Ratio: 59:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted F.F height Window sill: 6' Window height: 10.5'

; 0 052

:; 2 2.

F

M2

EUI: 23 kBtu/ft2/yr Total S.F.: 101286 (101.2% of Target S.F.) # of Stories: 4 F.F. Height: 16 WWR: 0.281 S:V Ratio: 65:1000 Third Iteration with 1 prong and adjusted WWR Window sill: 6' Window height: 10.5'

RSNI <NA@OABJ BT= BT= BT=

SUMMARY

Mason Bechtold Through this study I decided to look at buildings with different shapes and some with different ratios b 63 1* U1% 7 on what was changeable in the grasshopper document. I noticed a significant difference in the change SUMMARY 2 7 5 V 5 BT = 63 1* U1% 7 ratio as compared to me changing the geometry of the building. In terms of floor to floor heights I did :. 0.L BT= significant change in EUI but one of the changes happened to increase my EUI when I increased the flo 6 #ÿ ÿ$WX 1% 7 In addressing developments to the matrix, three of the best performing studies with EUI were iterated to experiment with and floorThe heights. first are focused WWR, which had a by 4’ for WWR my fifth study. threeThe I chose from on myincreasing most signifithe cant studies in categories such as sh 0 ÿY direct positive correlation with increasing the EUI. Another consideration in the other studies was changing the FFH, actually decreased the EUI when the windows were up higher. Mason iterations show a change in ratios within certain typologies. imperial

metric

similar correlation, which illustrates that the WWR impacts the EUI. He also found that adding an atrium but increasing the number of floors did not impact the EUI negatively. Iterations also played on trying multiple spans, some that would either require breaking up the structure more, or need a thicker structural material to span a longer span.


Daylight Analysis- Barrio Logan, CA Studio White

Gross Sq. Ft: 100,000 sq ft Target EUI: 20

SUMMARY In approaching the daylight study, I chose to study and iterate the progress of my studio project to work through potential building forms and where to place glazing around the building. Its made me realize the thicker part of the building may have too deep a span, and may need more divisions to allow enough light to enter through to the center of the building. The glazing on the northern portion of the building brought more light in than expected, but also allowed for significantly higher WWR that the southern, south--western, and south-eastern part of the building. The 70’ width of the north-eastern part, along with the entire southern portion of the building is very well daylit. For the space that are less well lit, particularly at the north would be ideal for the basketball court and potentially the weights room, which require either minimal light, or very few windows. Spaces with the most social spaces (such as the dining, lounge, and childcare) should have a high sDA. Increasing span of windows but with a low WWR increases the daylight entering the space, but will likely increase the EUI. It’s important to note that no interior walls were added to this model, which would also significantly impact the sDA.


Structural Bay- Barrio Logan, CA Studio White

SUMMARY Due to potentially large spans that will be present within my building, a steel structure seemed ideal to experiment with. This structural system has a thick depth, which will mean either the structure needs to be broken down to shorter spans (for smaller members) or the FFH will need to be increased. The ceiling must also account for additional mechanical systems and some form of fire-proof coating (such as spray applied or Gypsum board). The organization of the gride is fairly condusive to the current form acquired and modified from studio. For larger spaces, larger members will likely be needed to account for the need for a wide empty space. Some spaces may allow for further division, reducing the need for such deep members.

32’ span

30’ span

STRUCTURAL STEEL BEAMS AND GIRDERS

This chart is for steel wideflange beams, composite beams, and girders. For average and light loads, read toward the right in the indicated areas. For heavy loads, read toward the left. Beams or girders acting as part of a rigid frame for lateral stability may be deeper than indicated by this chart. Standard depths of shapes come in 2-in. (50-mm) increments up to 18 in. (450 mm) deep, and in 3-in. (75mm) increments for larger sizes.

FIRE-RESISTANCE RATINGS FOR STEEL BEAMS AND GIRDERS Steel beams and girders may be used in both Combustible and Noncombustible Construction. Fire-resistance ratings of as high as 4 hours are achievable with applied fireproofing or an appropriately fire-resistive ceiling. Some building codes also allow reduced fire protection or exposed steel for roof structures that are 15 to 25 ft (4.6 to 7.6 m) or more above the floor.

Widths of beams and girders range from approximately onethird to one-half the depth of the member. Heavy sections used for heavy loads or to conserve depth may be wider. Depths of up to 36 in. (914 mm) are available as standard rolled sections. Deeper beams capable of longer spans may be shop-fabricated.

105


Lab 4: Daylight Modeling-Exploring Place, Time and Mood

Location: San Diego, CA Latitude: 32.7 degrees

Juliette Fournier | ARCH 342 | Studio White | Winter 2022

Mood: Pensive

Oblique

SUMMER 9AM

SUMMER 12PM

SUMMER 3PM


Location: San Diego, CA Latitude: 32.7 degrees

Mood: Curious

Oblique

FALL/SPRING 9AM

FALL/SPRING 12PM

FALL/SPRING 3PM

WINTER 9AM

WINTER 12PM

WINTER 3PM

SUMMER 9AM

SUMMER 12PM

SUMMER 3PM


Location: San Diego, CA Latitude: 32.7 degrees

Mood: Playful

Oblique

FALL/SPRING 9AM

FALL/SPRING 12PM

FALL/SPRING 3PM

WINTER 9AM

WINTER 12PM

WINTER 3PM

SUMMER 9AM

SUMMER 12PM

SUMMER 3PM


Mood Mapping

FALL/SPRING 9AM

FALL/SPRING 12PM

Initial Idea was curious, but the red may been a bit harsh to be interpreted as playful. It’s interesting that the variety of answers did differ, showing that each person interprets a space differently. Incorporating more colors/ lighter colors may have helped to make the intent more clear.

FALL/SPRING 3PM

Reflection In your studies, by what methods have you made the intanglible (daylight; mood) tangible (through space, aperture and material manipulation)? In my studies, I made use of color, light filters, and various aperture placement to create the mood and manipulate how daylight affects the space. For instance, I used cooler tones for a peaceful environment and warmer tones to create a more vibrant mood. The light filters created more dynamic pattern on the floors and walls, creating a more playful mood within the space. The aperture placement also impacted which portion of the space was most impacted by the light. Placing it to the east created a more dynamic impact in the morning than in the afternoon. However, placing it to the north created less variation in the light changes. Largely, the brightness increased or decreased but the movement of actual light was less apparent. This is also likely since the first iteration diffused the light rather than simply filtering it. What is your intention for applying lessons learned here to inform an appropriate space in your current studio project (space and aperture manipulation, daylight, material, and in particular, the sectional development of your design project)? Be specific.

WINTER 9AM

WINTER 12PM

WINTER 3PM

Use of dynamic lighting would be great in the children’s center of the project, particularly in the play space. Otherwise, we were considering using light filters for both creating a peaceful environment, and to avoid such a solid seperation between programs. This way, a space that needs a bit more privacy on the visual side can still have a connection to a larger space through the sound. Many of the programs within our project (a gym and childcare) require a certain level of privacy, but could use sound as an attractor to the project. For instance, the children’s playground could be adjacent to the street, which would allow people to hear without seeing directly into it. Making use of filters would still allow light to enter these spaces dynamically. We also want to include a rooftop pool which could create some interesting lighting if manipulated correctly.


PROJECT 1: MATERIAL SPECIFICATION MATERIAL CASE STUDIES: PERFORATED ALUMINIUM MESH JULIETTE FOURNIER | ARCH 352- 05 | STUDIO WHITE | SPRING 2022 MOSCONE CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION MATERIAL APPLICATION The Convention Center makes use of transparency and translucent materials to bring natural light in and reveal activity within the building. The material is self-reinforcing and stagggerd on the facade. The EnFold Facade Walllscreen, developed by Bok Modern, can be used on exteriors and interiors. it does not require secondary supporting members. Its intention was to minimize on-site labor through an easy application.

COLOR AND TEXTURE

The material used on the Convention center is a white/gray material with a smooth finish. However, the manufacturing website/ product indicates that more options are available to customize the color and change the texture a bit. This particular building cleverly used a two-layered facade to give the illusion of a textured facade.

DETAILS

In this example, the material was able to be hung from a single row of structure at the roof and pinne out from the building with lateral supports only.

CUSTOMIZATION

An additional diamond patterning behind the 3 foot screening system creates a 3D illusion on the facade. The perforation pattern is versatile and customizable per building facade due to precise laser cutting. It can by finished in Kynar, powder coat, anodized aluminum, or a rusted surface. They also create guardrails. Architect: Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP Mark Cavagnero Associates Architects

Sources: “Moscone Convention Center Expansion,” Bok Modern. bokmodern.com “Moscone Center-Wallscreens | BOK Modern” Arch Daily. www. archdaily.com “Why EnFold Facade?” EnFold Facade. enfoldfacade.com


PROJECT 1: MATERIAL SPECIFICATION MATERIAL CASE STUDIES: PERFORATED ALUMINIUM MESH JULIETTE FOURNIER | ARCH 352- 05 | STUDIO WHITE | SPRING 2022 Northampton International Academy MATERIAL APPLICATION

The Proteus PC material (perforated panels) serve to partially conceal the monolithic brutalist architecture that it incases. The material is 2mm in thickness and is an excellent material against corrosion. They are hung from an aluminum panel carrying system and the ancillary components are anchored to a cantilever steel frame from the underlying masonry structure.

COLOR AND TEXTURE

The reflective surface aims to reflect the surface of the surrounding city to make the tall building feel less imposing. The color is a silver aluminum, highly reflective texture (mirrorlike).

DETAILS

The perforation sizes in the center of the facade are larger to maximize light entering into the center of the buildings, while reducing solar glare. Perforations are reliant on the programmatic functions spread throughout the building.

CUSTOMIZATION

The aluminum material is perforated or solid and come in multiple different tones. This maunfacturer includes an attachment system that can be applied to any type of structure. It can also provide some acoustical barrier, according to the manufacturer. Architect: Architecture Initiative

Sources: “Northampton International Academy,” Proteus Engineering Facade Technology . proteusfacades.com “Proteus SC,” Proteus Engineering Facade Technology . proteusfacades.com


PROJECT 1: MATERIAL SPECIFICATION MATERIAL CASE STUDIES: PERFORATED ALUMINIUM MESH JULIETTE FOURNIER | ARCH 352- 05 | STUDIO WHITE | SPRING 2022 MOSCONE CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION MATERIAL APPLICATION

This perforated aluminum cladding can be used both indoors and outdoors on the building. These are made of 20% recycled material. It has a 60 year lifespan.

COLOR AND TEXTURE

The finish on this specific aluminum panels is a rusting finish to give the more old, matte appearance. The material is fairly smooth, though not continuous from top to bottom.

DETAILS

These panels are highly fire resistant. They resist UV Degradation & Corrosion, Resists Chemical Exposure, Color Resists Fading, Chalking, or Loss of Gloss. Furthermore, they are highly sustainable, with a LEED approved and Red List free rating.

CUSTOMIZATION

The finish of these panels can differ, providing a different appearance to the panels. Furthermore, there are size variations to accomodate different facades, as well as varying thicknesses. Acoustic customizations can be included as well. Perforations are also customizable. Davis Partnership

Sources: “Perforated Wall Panels,” ArchDaily. www.archdaily.com “Perforated Wall Panels,” Pure+Free Form. purefreeform.com “Union Denver,” Pure+Free Form. purefreeform.com


PROJECT 1: MATERIAL SPECIFICATION

4'-0"

GRAPHIC DIMENSIONAL CONSTRAINTS

14'-0" 13’-0”

HORIZONTAL CONFIGURATION

MODULE MOSCONE CONVENTIONTION CENTER EXTENSION

Specs

Max Height: depends on thickness 1/8”= 10’ 3/16”= 13’ Thickness: 1/8”, 3/16, 1/4” Width: 4’ Bolts: @24” OC

2060 FOLSOM AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLEX, SF

VERTICAL CONFIGURATION


TO QUICKLY ADJUST LINEWEIGHTS/LINETYPES. S-Cols (.13) A-Pn01-Hidden (.13) A-Pn01 (.13) A-Pn02 (.18) A-Pn03 (.25)

PROJECT 1: MATERIAL SPECIFICATION A-Pn04 (.5) A-Pn05 (.7)

T/ SLAB 0'-0"

2'-3

3 4"

DETAILED WALL SECTION AND ELEVATION: PERFORATED ALUMINIUM PANELS LEADER EXAMPLE

JULIETTE FOURNIER | ARCH 352- 05 | STUDIO WHITE | SPRING 2022 CL

6"

CL

CL

X’-X”

3'-0"

T/ Slab 28'-0"

T/ Slab 28'-0"

PANEL SUPPORT SYSTEM

18" AT 1/2" = 1'-0"

13’-0” 14'-0"

STEEL BEAM

48" x 168" x 1/8" max PERFORATED ANODIZED ALUMINUM PANEL DOUBLE-GLAZED IGU, MONOLITHIC EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR GLASS 1 12 " AIR CAVITY

T/ Slab 14'-0"

T/ Slab 14'-0"

0 6" 1'

2'

4'

3 58 "

PERFORATED WALL SECTION SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0” JULIETTE FOURNIER STUDIO WHITE 4/18/2022

ROCK CLIMBING ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0” JULIETTE FOURNIER STUDIO WHITE 4/18/2022

ELEVATION


PROJECT 1: MATERIAL SPECIFICATION CSI SPECIFICATION SUMMARY CSI DIvision: 074213 SUMMARY

After some intensive research, the chosen manufacturer for this material is BOK Modern, due to their wide variety of patterns and finishes. Other manufacturers considered were Proteus Engineered Facade Technology and Pure+FreeForm. However, their options were more limited in customizations and material finishes.

RELATED MATERIALS

Other materials that can be used for this type of wall include stainless steel, cold-rolled steel, Corten steel, or aluminium. For instalation, other materials are necessary: metal framin, thermal insulation, weather barriers, jooint sealants, metal furring, gypsum board, and rough carpentry.

CHOICES AND QUESTIONS

C20 PATTERN, 53.36% OPEN

I was unsure who is in charge of which parts in the document. Who is in charge of building the mock-up and samples? Some decisions include: 1. Orientation: NE and NW facades of the building 2. Material: Aluminium (3/16” or 1/4” for larger span) 3. Panel Width: 4’ x 13’ Finishes: 1. Anodized Aluminium, Light Bronze 2. Fluoropolymer Coating needed to withstand salt spray more 3. Pattern: C20 highly perforated Is there a way to make the steel more mat rather than shiny? Where are the catalogues for the finishes? Is there a way to attach paneling to the glass? Only masonry and studs are mentioned. Otherwise, the glass may not be able to be continuous.

ALUMINUM WITH BRONZE COATING



Arch 342: Spring 2022 ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 3.3

Cabrinha | Stannard

Lab 1: Integrated Wall Self-Assessment PLEASE NOTE: The following grading rubric is supplied for you to use as a check-off list. You must fill out this self-assessment (be honest) and include with your PDF.

90

JULIETTE FOURNIER

self-assessment score total

Name

10

Craft and Layout (10 pts)

Appropriate range of lineweights, elements cut through graphically stand out / elements beyond recede in elevation with lighter lineweights. Section, Elevation and Plan are all precisely aligned using structural column lines to coordinate across plan, section, and elevation. Column lines are indicated with a centerline and column bubble. Elevation targets coordinate across elevation and wall section, and are correctly labeled (see example). Student Name, Studio and Discussion instructor Names, and Date are clearly indicated. This self-assessment scoring sheet is completed and submitted with drawings.

27 19

Primary Structure (30 pts total)

Structural System (concrete / steel / timber) is clearly identifiable. Floor deck is accurate with appropriate thickness of topping slab. Slab edge is clearly identified. Structure cut through is identified graphically (poché, darker lineweight) Framing beyond is indicated with lighter lineweights.

Envelope (20 pts)

Envelope has appropriate (believable) thickness, and Varies in thickness as appropriate to material variation, (curtain wall versus barrier wall). Large areas of glazing are clearly identified (curtain wall) and distinquished from punched openings.

9

Red Line Test (10 pts)

Continuous thick red line from start of exterior wall at foundation, up wall and over roof is clearly indicated.

18

Passive Response: Solar Control and Ventilation (20 pts)

Summer and Winter Sun Angles are indicated. Solar Control strategies are evident in massing, plane of glazing, and/or shading devices. Natural ventilation is evident through operable windows and is expressed in drawings through arrows or other graphic indication (legible but can be very light).

7

Active Response: HVAC (10 pts)

HVAC is identified in interstitial space (ceiling, raised floor, or in-floor radiant systems). Radiant systems should be indicated in slab with dashed line, and indicated with a note. If radiant systems are used, fresh air intake/supply must be indicated.


1

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS

A108

B

1

4

3

RIGID ROOF MEMBRANE

DAMP- PROOFING

Level 5 Ceiling 80' - 0"

RIGID INSULATION FASCIA

Level 5 Ceiling 80' - 0"

8' - 0"

A109

A

OPERABLE WINDOW

Level 5 64' - 0"

Level 5 64' - 0"

Level 4 Ceiling 60' - 0"

Level 4 Ceiling 60' - 0"

6' - 0"

OPERABLE WINDOW

CONCRETE ENCASED W12X16 BEAMS

Level 4 48' - 0"

HYDRONIC-BASED MECHANICAL SYSTEM

Level 4 48' - 0"

DROP CEILING

Level 3 ceiling 44' - 0"

1/2" GYPSUM BOARD

Level 3 ceiling 44' - 0"

6" C.F STEEL FRAMING WRB

CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION

Level 3 32' - 0"

2' - 9"

Level 3 32' - 0"

Level 2 Ceiing 28' - 0"

Level 2 Ceiing 28' - 0"

6' - 0"

6" x 2' GFRC PANEL CLADDING

STEEL GIRDER ACOUSTIC CEILING PANEL

Level 2 16' - 0"

Level 2 16' - 0"

62' STEEL TRUSS @ 6' O.C. OPERABLE WINDOW

Level 1 ceiling 12' - 0"

Level 1 ceiling 12' - 0"

5' - 9"

FIXED GLAZED IGU WITH CERAMIC FRIT

HAT CHANNELS 1" AIR CAVITY FLASHING 1' CONCRETE RETAINING WALL

Level 1 0' - 0"

3" RIGID INSULATION

Basement Ceiling -4' - 0"

NE ELEVATION 1/2”=1’0”

Level 1 0' - 0"

AIR BARRIER

Basement Ceiling -4' - 0"

PAINTED TYP. GYPSUM BOARD

LAMINATED WOOD FLOOR 5

FLOOR PAD WRB

A119

RIGID INSULATION 1

3' CONCRETE FOUNDATION

Basement -15' - 0"

A109 DN UP

A

CONCRETE PILES

Gardens CLIMBING WALL BELOW

Outdoor Child's Dining

B

1 A108

Outdoor Playground DN

UP

C

DN

D

DN

E

UP DN

Cafe and Dining 2nd Floor JAM Architects | Juliette Fournier | Maya Rosen | Studio White | ARCH 353 | Spring 2022 1/16" 1'-0"

0

2ND FLOOR PLAN 1

5

F

10

20

30

NE SECTION 1/2”=1’-0” 2

3

4

5

6

Basement -15' - 0"



Arch 342: Spring 2021 ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 3.3

Cabrinha | Stannard

Lab 2: Self-Assessment Each student must develop their own integrated wall focus area. Team projects should coordinate different sections to develop different aspects of their project.

90

JULIETTE FOURNIER

self-assessment score total

Name

10

Craft and Layout (10 pts)

Appropriate range of lineweights, elements cut through graphically stand out / elements beyond recede in elevation with lighter lineweights. Color / rendering is used to convey material experience. Wall Section and Elevation are precisely aligned using structural column lines to coordinate across section and elevation. Column lines are indicated with a centerline and column bubble. Elevation targets coordinate across elevation and wall section, and are correctly labeled. Student Name, Studio and Activity instructor Names, and Date are clearly indicated.

15

Floor Assemblies (15 pts)

Floor assembly graphically describes and conveys through notation the entire floor assembly including walkable surface through primary structure and through to ceiling or exposed structure.

13

Wall Assemblies (15 pts)

Typical wall assembly graphically describes and conveys through notation entire wall assembly including exterior cladding, each material layer as described in lectures, back-up wall and interior finish. Wall is accurately drawn and connected to primary structure. Openings in wall are accurately conveyed / detailed. Vertical string of dimensions from lower floor target elevation to upper floor target elevation, along with dimensions to rough openings of windows / openings. Continuous insulation is clear (thermal break is identifiable). Continuous Red Line from foundation up wall and over roof to represent continuous WRB.

18

Elevation: Material Experience (20 pts total)

Elevation is drawn to scale with accurate linework that corresponds to the wall section (pull lines from wall section to elevation, visa versa). Lineweight is used to convey sense of depth in the façade. Material and color is expressed in elevation, Depth is conveyed through layers of material and transparency. Depth is conveyed through shade and shadow. Primary structure is accurately conveyed where visible through cladding and or glazing.

9

Passive Env. Response: Solar Control and Ventilation (10 pts)

Sun angles and solar control are clearly evident in the wall section. Passive ventilation strategies are clearly indicated with operable windows etc. Where these passive responses are not appropriate for this project, notation with alternate solutions appropriate for this project should be clearly indicated (for example, in the case of passive heating with thermal mass strategy, direct solar gain would be appropriate. In a climate where natural ventilation is not as effective, other means of ventilation should be evident.)

9

Active Environmental Response: HVAC (10 pts)

Ductwork and/or other HVAC strategies are indicated as appropriate in the wall section. Radiant systems should be indicated in slab and indicated with a note. For radiant systems, fresh air intake must be addressed.

18

3d Axon / Model (20 pts)

Clearly expresses the exterior envelope as a layered assembly connected back to primary structural system. Layers of exterior envelope are identified with notes.


Lab 3- Electric Lighting Design and Section Integration Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 342-10 | Spring 2022 Iteration 1:

SMALL BILINGUAL LIBRARY Average Maintained Footecandles (for classroom/ Target footcandle level): 40 FT Tasks for space: reading, resting, listening, drawing, writing Width: 43’ Length: 45’ Ceiling height: 14’ Workplane height: 2’ Selected luminaire: Indy-S2X4BLPR-3140U-WH3 Actual illuminance (FT): 38 Quantity: 27 LPD: 0.49 W/ft^2 Integration: Recessed Troffer Sensor: Passive Infrared

Iteration 2:

SMALL BILINGUAL LIBRARY Average Maintained Footecandles (for classroom/ Target footcandle level): 40 FT Tasks for space: reading, resting, listening, drawing, writing Width: 43’ Length: 45’ Ceiling height: 14’ Workplane height: 2’ Selected luminaire: Lithonia Lighting-GRD ID1300LMF 20/80 120 80 30K Actual illuminance (FT): 42 Quantity: 27 LPD: 0.56 W/ft^2 Integration: Suspended luminaire (1’ down) Sensor: Passive Infrared


8' - 0"

Lab 3- Electric Lighting Design and Section Integration Juliette Fournier | Studio White | ARCH 342-10 | Spring 2022

Partial Section for Library Lighting

OPERABLE WINDOW

6' - 0"

Iteration 3:

OPERABLE WINDOW

CONCRETE ENCASED W12X16 BEAMS HYDRONIC-BASED MECHANICAL SYSTEM DROP CEILING PENDANT LIGHT 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD 6" C.F STEEL FRAMING WRB

CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION

6' - 0"

6" x 2' GFRC PANEL CLADDING

STEEL GIRDER ACOUSTIC CEILING PANEL

REFLECTION 62' STEEL TRUSS @ 6' O.C. After analyzing each iteration, a combination of the last two iterations best matches the design goals. The secOPERABLE WINDOW ond iteration type of lighting is not strong enough, thus 27 fixtures is not as cost efficient. However, the lower illuminance of 42 FT better acommodates the needs of the space. It would pass code, since the would be beFIXEDLPD GLAZED IGU WITH FRIT low .8 W/ft^2 (it would be .56 W/ft^2). The reduced number of fixtures will be more aestheticCERAMIC and more efficient. Iteration 3 performed the least well, due to the highest LPD and highest illuminance. NeitherHATthe illuminance nor CHANNELS the LPD need to be this high for the program’s needs. Considering lighting power actual makes the lighting performance in the space more efficient. I think the biggest challenge with this space is that direct is usually 1" AIRlighting CAVITY more fitting for reading/ makes the space more cozy. Therefore, it might be more strategic to place lamps in FLASHING addition to overhead lighting, and reduce the overhead lighting. Another challenge is accounting for the age gap 1' CONCRETE RETAINING WALL occupyuying the space. A variety of ages, from toddlers to the elderly, may be using the space, so the footcandle should lean towards the higher side. 5' - 9"

SMALL BILINGUAL LIBRARY Average Maintained Footecandles (for classroom/ Target footcandle level): 40 FT Allowed LPD for Reading area and Stacks area: 0.8 and 1.1 Width: 43’ Length: 45’ Ceiling height: 14’ Workplane height: 2’ Selected luminaire: Peerless Lighting- VNU4 SQ CCV 80CRI 27K I3500LM 8600LM Actual illuminance (FT): 56 Quantity: 12 LPD: 0.75 W/ft^2 Integration: Suspended luminaire Sensor: Passive Infrared

3" RIGID INSULATION AIR BARRIER PAINTED TYP. GYPSUM BOARD


Spts

JIA.lie~ M'-'-f"oilf

Your Name:

7

Partner's Name: Studio Professor's Name:

~ ---ir,..rA.. t-!a:. . . .J.'=

Project Name: _}½.J.....:...::{.::....._(u@c.!!....(

Nqji O(Y,d Aw· lv\l. S 1btti S-c-)

Project Address:

~on lOpts

Sketch:

]),~'° J CA

draw your main structure, isometric view

C, -s-+o ~re__~

\'

ARCE 316



4. (10-points) Studio Project Live Loads. Sketch your floor plan here and label the areas (corridors, residential, commercial, storage, classroom, garage, etc.). For multi-story structures, sketch one floor level. Next to or below each label, write the live load from Chapter 4 of the ASCE 7.

.... I

,.,.

C), ;,.fe> l "

u.~ 1)1t)i1t

v i

__J

..

-

_

I

-

I

1 ·,\.u.)

}Gfcheh

,I

f3)

' J.. ,. ,

©

lij I /I I I

'

~"'

r)\ f"ll

-

t°' -

-

Q l,A.~ 0 I

7 l 11

... .

e .__ 1.11111

I

o~\-~

I

~~").

1.,JeJf. -t'

I

rc.t4-~ -

I

I I 11

+-Stv--ir -;- e, <,'-t- ::. ,f oo ~

01/1 '1n +

+

r

=

0

('Jj r--.

1W

fSt

oO f 1i

:: Lt o

C1 jr"' -:-- ,too

P~t

M

-

;vLlJ

-


1

UP

A109

DN UP

30' - 0"

A

YOGA STUDIO

OUTDOOR YOGA

YOGA STUDIO

1 DN

B

32' - 0"

A108

DANCE STUDIO

DN

UP

C 25' - 0"

BIKE STUDIO

D

National Ave & 16th St, San Diego, CA 92113

A119

The CourtYard

Due to the structural needs of the building, the building is supported by a steel and concrete structure. Gravity loads are supported by circular steel columns encased in concrete, as well as concrete bearing walls. For aesthetic purposes, the structure is only exposed in the rock wall and basketball court. Steel columns are spaced between 25-30’ spans, connected by steel wide-flange beams and girders. In spaces with longer spans, such as the basketball court and rock-climbing wall, steel trusses support the live and dead loads from above. To support the heavy dead loads of the rooftop pool, the floor below allows room for the necessary structural supports.

5

25' - 0"

MECHANICAL ROOM

80’

POOL STRUCTURE

UP

E

16’

22' - 0"

OUTDOOR LOUNGE

DN

Gym space that is both interior and exterior. This floor provides the structural supports for the rooftop pool above.

F

17' - 0"

1

30' - 0"

2

30' - 0"

3

32' - 0"

4

Juliette Fournier Maya Rosen

28' - 0"

5

Friction piles due to the poor soil conditions

6

White, 05 Napier, 02

5 3/64”=1’-0”


National Ave & 16th St, San Diego, CA 92113

The CourtYard Concrete-encased steel HSS16X0.625 Steel

Juliette Fournier Maya Rosen

W24x55 Concrete slab on steel decking

White, 05 Napier, 02

5 3/64”=1’-0”


National Ave & 16th St, San Diego, CA 92113

The CourtYard

In deciding the lateral system, the main factor stemmed from which walls require less openings and run continuously through the building. The areas with the elevator and stairs provide the most opportunity for lateral support. For aesthetic purposes, some of the lateral force-resisting systems are more open since they are partially outdoors.

80’ 16’

Gym space that is both interior and exterior. This floor provides the structural supports for the rooftop pool above.

Friction piles due to the poor soil conditions

Juliette Fournier Maya Rosen White, 05 Napier, 02

4 3/64”=1’-0”


National Ave & 16th St, San Diego, CA 92113

The CourtYard concrete shear walls and moment frames

Juliette Fournier Maya Rosen concrete over metal deck rigid

White, 05 Napier, 02

4 3/64”=1’-0”


White, 05 Napier, 02

5 3/64”=1’-0”

National Ave & 16th St, San Diego, CA 92113

The CourtYard This is largely an outdoor deck for the pool, so not all the structure extends to this floor. The main areas with structural need do extend from the bottom floor

Juliette Fournier Maya Rosen


National Ave & 16th St, San Diego, CA 92113

The CourtYard concrete shear walls and moment frames

Juliette Fournier Maya Rosen concrete over metal deck rigid

White, 05 Napier, 02

5 3/64”=1’-0”


ARCE 316 Building Envelope System

Juliette Fournier

Student Name__________________________________

Maya Rosen Student Name__________________________________ Studio Professor’s Name_________________________ Napier One submission per studio project Sketch: • Draw or drop a screen snip here of your wall section. Include at least two levels; no need for the whole section. 5 pts • Show the structural elements. Highlight them or use a text leader to indicate structural elements, including the connection of the envelope to the main structure. 10 pts 1

PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS

A108

A

RIGID ROOF MEMBRANE

DAMP- PROOFING RIGID INSULATION Level 5 Ceiling 80' - 0"

8' - 0"

FASCIA

OPERABLE WINDOW

Level 5 64' - 0"

Level 4 Ceiling 60' - 0"

6' - 0"

OPERABLE WINDOW

CONCRETE ENCASED W24x55 BEAMS HYDRONIC-BASED MECHANICAL SYSTEM

Level 4 48' - 0"

DROP CEILING PENDANT LIGHT

Level 3 ceiling 44' - 0"

1/2" GYPSUM BOARD 6" C.F STEEL FRAMING WRB

CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION Level 3 32' - 0"

Level 2 Ceiing 28' - 0"

6' - 0"

6" x 2' GFRC PANEL CLADDING

STEEL GIRDER ACOUSTIC CEILING PANEL Level 2 16' - 0"

62' STEEL TRUSS @ 6' O.C. OPERABLE WINDOW Level 1 ceiling 12' - 0"

FIXED GLAZED IGU WITH CERAMIC FRIT

5' - 9"

B

HAT CHANNELS 1" AIR CAVITY FLASHING 1' CONCRETE RETAINING WALL

Level 1 0' - 0"

3" RIGID INSULATION AIR BARRIER

Basement Ceiling -4' - 0"

PAINTED TYP. GYPSUM BOARD

LAMINATED WOOD FLOOR FLOOR PAD WRB RIGID INSULATION 3' CONCRETE FOUNDATION

CONCRETE PILES

Basement -18' - 0"


Describe the structural elements of the envelope system. Five sentences, min. 10 pts

In order to connect the GFRC envelope to the structure of a building, a curtain wall system was used. Steel stud frames are used behind the envelope to help hold up the wall and connect it back to the primary structure. Fasteners are used to help hold the envelope to the interior wall. There is room for other elements required in the wall, such as continuous insulation. Windows and curtain walls are present in many walls, held together by mullion connections.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.