Design Portfolio
JUSTIN WHITE
Justin White
1
[Education]
[Experience]
College of Design, University of Kentucky
College of Design, University of Kentucky
Masters of Architecture, January 2015- December 2016 (Expected)
Bachelors of Architecture with honors, Cum Laude August 2011 - May 2015
Western Kentucky University
Studies in psychology August 2010 - May 2011
Education Abroad, France & Italy May - June 2014 Observation and synthesis of historical architecture.
UK / Center For Applied Energy Research
Amazon
Student Web & Graphic Designer January-May 2015 Collaborated in developing an interactive website for Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant ongoing cleanup operation and historical significance to the region as part of graduate studies.
Picker May - August 2015 Worked independently with hand held devices in a fast pace environment to meet quotas and customer needs. Wal-Mart
Associate May - August 2013 Collaborated with others on a team to meet demands for customers. Worked for the Lawn and Garden Department.
[Skills & Knowledge]
3D modeling, 2D drawing, rendering and visualizations (Autocad, Rhino, Vray Render, Maxwell Render, Sketchup) Adobe products (Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Muse) web design (CSS, Wordpress, HTML) physical modeling & Digital fabrication (CNC, laser cutter, 3D Printing)
[Awards & Honors]
First Year Outstanding Student Award Second Year Design Studio Certificate of Excellence Third Year Design Studio Certificate of Excellence Excellence in Second Year Graduate Studio Award
UK/CoD End of the Year Show 2014-2016 Deans List 2011-2015 Eagle Scout
[Community Service]
Western Kentucky University M.A.S.T.E.R Plan
Otter Creek Park
Provide landscaping work at a women refuge shelter.
Trail construction and landscape work.
Boy Scouts of America Architecture Merit Badge
AIAS: Mentor Program
Taught scouts about architecture and how to draw plans and sections.
Guided Children through design exercises and provided information about becoming an architect.
[Affiliations]
American Institute of Architecture Students
Member 2012- Present Secretary 2013-2014
Christian Student Fellowship Southland Christian Church
[References] 2
Upon Request
Table of Contents [At Montgomery]
[INFILL: Home & Studio]
Anne Filson Studio 2015 pg. 4-9 Team Members: Justin White Addison Mullins Katie Halsey
Mark O’Bryan Studio 2012 pg. 28-30
[Berlin University Residences] Micheal Jacobs Studio 2016 pg. 10-15
[Inventors Cooperative] Kyle Miller Studio 2012 pg. 16-20
[PAVILION/Light+Shadow] Chris Manzo Studio 2013 pg. 21
[Lexington Visitor Center]
[Monastero Del Santo Regno] Mark O’Bryan Summer Abroad 2014 pg. 31-35
[Hang / Micro-bathhouse] Akari Takebayashi Studio 2014 pg. 36
[South Brother Thermal Baths] Akari Takebayashi Studio 2014 pg. 37-43
[Forest Retreat] Mark O’Bryan Studio 2012 pg. 44
Chris Manzo Studio 2013 pg. 22-27
3
at
Montgomery
at Montgomery is a multi family urban housing and retail development in the Portland neighborhood of Louisville Kentucky. This project is designed to bring new young families and students into the Portland area as well as providing much needed food services to the current residents. The site located on the corner of Montgomery and N27th Street is directly across from the Portland community center and park as well as walking access to the Louisville river walk. The site is also close to the Portland Christian School and a small shopping area on Portland Ave.
Demand for Local Food
Louisville Metro
Current Market Residental
Potential
$258 Million
$100,000,000
Possible Sites for Future Farms Current Market $214,000,000
Commercial
Source: Seed Capital Kentucky, January 2013
Program Relationships
LEARNING KITCHEN
MARKET
FARMS PLATE
4
19 total acres 116 prime areas
more than .5 acres less than .5 acres
LOFTS
Potential
$353 Million
1) ACQUISITION Land cost Title cost
$ $
320390 2000
Misc Cost/ appraisals Escrow Cost
$ $
2000 1000
$325,390
TOTAL SITE ACQUISITION
2) CONSULTANTS Architect Interiors
PERCENT CONSTRUCTION $ PER FOOT OF CONSTRUCTION
11.00% $2.50
$ $
$707,802.81 $95,967.50
Structural Landscape
0.80% 0.20%
$ $
$51,476.57 $12,869.14
electrical mechanical civil
0.20% 0.30% 0.50%
$ $ $
$12,869.14 $19,303.71 $32,172.86
soil engineer acoustical
0.20% 0.20%
$ $
$12,869.14 $12,869.14
$0.13 0.50%
$ $
$4,990.31 $32,172.86
0.50%
$
$32,172.86
32872
$25
$
$821,800
1500 38387
$25 $115
$ $
$37,500 $4,414,505
38387
$15 10%
$ $
$575,805 $584,961
legal/historical real estate taxes developer fee entitlement fee
0.40% 1.50% 4.00% 1.30%
$ $ $ $
$25,738.28 $96,518.57 $257,382.84 $83,649.42
coc insurance
0.30%
$
$19,303.71
e&o insurance cgi insurance blue lines/model fund control/accounting
0.50% 1.10% 0.20% 0.30%
$ $ $ $
$32,172.86 $70,780.28 $12,869.14 $19,303.71
$958,200.01
TOTAL CONSULTANTS
3) PERMITS AND FEES Building Permit Fees Civil entitlement permit
$69,336.02
TOTAL PERMITS
4) CONSTRUCTION
Gross area
Site work other Shell Construction Interiors contingency
10% of subtotal
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
$6,434,571
5) DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
TOTAL FROM LINES 1-5
8%/12months
annual payment (8%)(2Years)
0.67%
$
8.00%
$
16.00%
$
fees for construction loan
2.00%
$
loan broker fee
LEARNING KITCHEN
1.00%
$
$56,314.95 $672,417.27 $1,344,834.54 $168,104.32 $84,052.16
gross area
number of units
cost/ft
monthly
1000
14
$1.25
$17,500.00
850 1550 2300 2300 6787
1 2 1 1 1
$1.25 $1.25 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00
$1,062.50 $3,875.00 $6,900.00 $6,900.00 $20,361.00
TOTAL GROSS REVENUE
$ $ $ $
8) VACANCY vacancy rate Total net revenue
$210,000.00 $12,750.00 $ $ $ $
$4,527.88
8.00%
$
$
% of gross revenue per month by tenant by tenant
3.00% $200
$ $ $ $
$1,562.12 $200 0 0
$ $ $ $
$18,745.42 $2,400 0 0
utilities water and sewer
per unit/year per unit/year per unit/year
$600 $170 $200
$ $ $
$3,000 $850 $1,000
$ $ $
$36,000 $10,200 $12,000
repair and maintenance maintenance reserve insurance real estate taxes
appraised value (constr)
1.25%
TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES
annual
$
6702.678125
$
$
$13,314.80
$
TOTAL NET REVENUE EXPENSES
$465,069.88
monthly
annual
20%
1,365,859
80%
5,463,438
loan amount
total number of payments payment per period $
th
1
at
6 ADDITIONAL FARM CONSTRUCTION LOFTS
18 months
15 months
Montgomery
n mo
$6,829,297.02
lines 1,3,4
down payment bank loan
annual interest life of loan (yrs) number of payments/yr
N TRUCTIO
ONS
BEGIN C
$80,432.14
$159,777.56
$38,755.82
10) MORTGAGE
6 months
$624,847.44
monthly
3 months
PREDESIGN-SITEWORK
$54,334.56
$52,070.62
9) ANNUAL EXPENSES management manager
ADDITIONAL FARM ACQUISITION
3 months
$679,182.00
MARKET
8 months
FARMS
$46,500.00 $82,800.00 $82,800.00 $244,332.00
$56,598.50
5
7 months
7 months
annual
residential a residential b residential c cooking school restaurant Grocery
required money
PLATE
$1,596,991.01
TOTAL INTEREST LOAN
7) PROJECT REVENUE
Total Lot Area: 1.7437 Total Value: $315,140
$8,405,215.85
6) INTEREST AND LOAN
total payment
616 N 27th St. Lot Area: 0.049 Acre Assessed Value: $940 2719 Portland Ave Lot Aera: 0.53010 Assessed Value: $64,200 2715 Portland Ave Lot Aera: 0.09560 Assessed Value: $27,250
$617,718.82
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
monthly payment
632 N 27th St. Lot Area: 0.075 Acre Assessed Value: $42,820 630 N 27th St. Lot Area: 0.077 Acre Assessed Value: $41,830 628 N 27th St. Lot Area: 0.1018 Acre Assessed Value: $2,500 622 N 27th St. Lot Area: 0.105 Acre Assessed Value: $41,780 618 N 27th St. Lot Area: 0.052 Acre Assessed Value: $2,500
2716 Montgomery Lot Aera: 0.16020 Assessed Value: $62,280 2714 Montgomery Lot Area: 0.12 Acre Assessed Value: $27,510 2712 Montgomery Lot Area: 0.18 Acre Assessed Value: $1,530 2708 Montgomery Lot Area: 0.15 Acre Assessed Value: $2500 620 N 27th St. Lot Area: 0.048 Acre Assessed Value: $2,500
Proforma
$
$
$5,463,437.62 5.00% 30 12 360 -$29,328.91
-$351,946.97
total cost of loan
TOTAL NET PROFIT
$
$9,426.91 LTV:
$
$113,122.91 75.68%
5
MARKET
LOFTS
APARTMENTS - 17 high quality lofts - 2 story apartments - starting at $1,100 per month
6
GROCERY STORE FARMERS MARKET - 6,000 sq. ft. - focus on fresh produce - a partnership with Kentucky Proud and Healthy in a Hurry
PLATE KITCHEN
LEARNING KITCHEN - 2,343 sq. ft. - 6 learning stations - provides disconnected youth with workforce and life skills training to become employed and
FARM
URBAN FARM - seasonal crops - used to teach people how to farm - sold at the weekend farmers market - a partnership with Louisville Grows
RESTAURANT - 2,295 sq. ft. - locally sourced foods - rotating seasonal menu - staffed by graduates of the learning kitchen program
B
D
Portland Park
Portland Community C Center
Access to Riverwalk
Montgomery Street
A
N. 28th Street
N. 27th Street
A
Tyler Avenue
Ground Floor Plans
Portland Avenue
25’
B
D
C
50’
100’
7
D
D
C
C
Down
UP Down
Down Down
UP
Down
A
Down
UP
A
Down
A
A
Down
UP Down
Down Down
UP
Down
UP Down
Down Down
UP
Down
UP Down
Down Down
UP
Down
down
Down Down
Down
Down
Down
down
UP
Down Down
Down
Down
Down
UP
UP Down
UP
UP
UP
Down UP
UP
UP
UP
Down
Down
Down
Down Down
Down
UP
Down
Down
D
C
P
26-BJ-45
C
Second Floor
Third Floor 10’
Down
D
20’
40’
20’
10’
05 01
Section A
P
Section C
8
26-BJ-45
05 01
40’
1 Unit Flexible Spaces 2 Bedroom 2 Bath 2 Story - Split Levels 1500 SQ Feet
14 Units Flexible Spaces 1 Bedroom 1 Bath 2 Story - Split Levels 1000 SQ Feet
P
26-BJ-45
1 Unit Large Sliding Dividers 1 Bedroom 1 Bath 850 SQ Feet ADA
1 Unit 2 Bedroom 2 Bath 2 Story 1500 SQ Feet
05 01
Section B
Section D C Section
9
Berlin University Residences
Apartments
Student Dorms
Hostels
10
Ko p
en
ic ke r
St r.
Str ala
All
ee
Ob er ba
um
br uc ke
uer
Sc
hle
sis
ch
e
St r.
Sp
Maximum volume and context height
Ri
ve r
La
nd we h
rC
an
al
Cu vr ys tra B
e
ree
hle
St r.
La
nd
we h
rC
an
al
Cu vr ys tra B
Gorlitzer Park
e
Ta bo rs t
ra Be
sis ch e
us en uf er
hle
Sc
Sc
Street wall & courtyard alignment
Carve of courtyard spaces
Ground plane manipulates massing
11 11
6 7
8
2
5
5
1
4
3
Floor 1 1. Hall 2. Study Area 3. Bar 4. Offices 5. Storage 6. Gameroom 7. Gym 8. Pool / Waterzone
12
Floor 2
Floor 3
Floor 4
Floor 5
Floor 6
Floor 7
Roof Plan
13
14
1 A Student Dorm
1 A Student Dorm
1 B Student Dorm
1 C Student Dorm
3 A Hostel
3 B Hostel
2 A Apartment
2 B Apartment
2 C Apartment
15
Inventors Cooperative
16
This project was about designing an aggregated architectural construct to develop a complex that dealt with form, landscape, program, interior spaces, and structure. Investigating organizational relationships between forms and program created an overall strategy, which ties the project together and gives the user a unique experience. This project began with aggregated volumes that were sliced and shifted on various axis. This aggregation study was the main driver for the formal expression of this Inventors Cooperative and gave the opportunity to explore different variations of shapes that connect together into a cohesive complex. This arrangement of volumes are assigned specific program as well as how it interacts with the landscape environment. The site for the cooperative is on the shore near Fontana Dam in western North Carolina. The solution of the isolation was to create a dock that transported users to and from the complex. Rather than users hike in since an access drive was impossible. Overall the project is trying to create a series of relationships between different functions of the Inventors Cooperative. The idea for the program was to have dwellings in which scientists, engineers, and inventors alike can live and work in a unique collective environment to develop new products and technologies. Many facilities including a library, computer facilities, lounges, labs, are the main spaces that the community would work for their studies and research.
A
B
0
20
40
60
80
Aggregation Study
17
PROGRAM OVERVIEW Spaces Accessible to the Public -Public Entry Vestibule -Lab/Research Space -Library Complex -Presentation Space -Lounge & Cafe -Toilets -Outdoor Garden/Public Space*
150 Sq Ft 2500 Sq Ft 800 Sq Ft 300 Sq Ft 450 Sq Ft 200 Sq Ft
Total:
4,550 Sq Ft
Private Spaces for Visitors -Private Dwelling (1-Bedroom) -Private Dwelling (2-Bedroom) Total: Total Floor Area:
18
Two Bedroom Dwelling Units
Presentation Space
Labs
Entry Vestibule
Lounge
6,000 Sq Ft 4x1600 Sq Ft 6x400 Sq Ft 2400 Sq Ft 12,400 Sq Ft 16,950 Sq Ft
One Bedroom Dwelling Units
Library & Document Storage
UP
DOWN
DOWN
DOWN
BEDROOM
LIVING/KITCHEN
BATHROOM
LIVING/KITCHEN
BEDROOM
DINING BEDROOM
13’
Plan & Section A Bedroom Units A: SECTION: Two
Plan & Section B
19
ROUND COLUMN. STEEL. HOLLOW. STEEL BRACKET. BOLTED. 1” THICK. ZINC PANEL. FURRING CHANNEL. TIED.
ALUMINUM CONNECTOR. WITH RUBBER SEALER.
INSULATION GYPSUM BOARD.
.
STEEL BRACKET. BOLTED. GYPSUM BOARD ALUMINUM BASE STEEL TRACK EXPANSION JOINT
1” THICK. ZINC PANEL. ALUMINIUM FLASHING. 1’ FOUNDATION WALL. FLY ASH CONCRETE.
Vegetative Roofing
RUBBER MEMBRANE
Aluminum Flashing Vegetative Roof Steel Truss
4” CONCRETE SLAB
Steel Beam Zinc Panels Aluminum Trim Steel Beam Steel Truss
The complex uses a steel post and beam construction. The reasoning for this is steel, a highly durable material, takes more loads and has a longer span width unlike heavy timber construction. In addition it is lighter so less foundation work is needed to accommodate loads. Steel is less likely to be wasted in the construction process as well. With these benefits this system connectors are bolted for faster construction time and all material is pre-made to the specifications of the measured spaces and heights before introduced to the site.
20
Glass
Gypsum Board Zinc Cladding
Steel Nogging Steel Brackets Insulation
Concrete Foundation
1’ Concrete Footer
You see a cube in the distance. Slices of darkness embrace the cube. A screen barely visible on the exterior is a perforated gem on the interior. You enter and see a processional wrapping the screen. Moving upward reveals an expression of light and shadow; The slices once dark are now glowing. Arriving to the point of transition, reluctant at first, walks out, suspended in the light. The light becomes mystical.
PAVILION/Light+Shadow
21
Lexington Visitor Center
22
The design problem was to create a new visitor center in downtown Lexington, Ky. The site has
an old building on the parcel and took up Wren Court, an access alley for parking. The solution was to strip the building down to the bearing walls and re-purpose it to fit the needs of the structure of the new building. The concept was to have two masses that were connected by an atrium space, which also was the center for circulation. Wren Court was transformed into a pocket park, which also provided an extra entranceway for the atrium space. The structure of the main two masses was pour concrete construction, and load bearing brick walls with steel reinforcement. The atrium space was housed by a steel, aluminum, and glass caged frame that protected the circulation but also allowed light come into the space. There are various programs within the building that were required. The visitor center itself, a gift shop, an auditorium, office spaces, Legacy Trail office, a print makers co-op and gallery space. In addition, other programs such as a coffee shop, a sculpture garden, and bike rentals were included to make it more of a hub for Lexington citizens as well as those who are visiting the city. As a visitor, you would come through the Main Street entrance, be greeted at the desk then can optionally go to the second floor to the auditorium for a screening of Lexington and Bluegrass history. Afterward the visitor can be directed to the gift shop or go to gallery spaces on the top floor. In addition, visitors can sign up to rent bikes to ride on the Legacy trail which goes from downtown to the Horse park
23
Structure & Circulation Diagram
Program Diagram
ART GALLERY EXTERIOR SCULPTURE GARDEN
PRINTMAKER’S CO-OP
BATHROOMS VISiTOR CENTER OFFICES
LEGACY TRAIL OFFICE
AUDITORIUM COFFEE SHOP
BIKE RENTALS
EXTERIOR SEATING AREA VISTOR CENTER & GIFTSHOP
24
Ground Floor Plan Ground Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan Second Floor PlanT
Third Floor Plan hird Floor PlanF
Fourth Floor Plan ourth Floor PlanR
Roof Plan ooftop Plan
25
ECTION A 26
SCALE: 1’ : 1/8”
27
INFILL: Home & Studio The design problem was to create a Home & Studio for two architects that may or may not have a family. The location of this project was a nonfictional infill plot between a modern building and an ornate facade row of townhomes. This design intent was to create an environment where the inhabitants can have all work related functions on the street level and the mezzanine. Then have a private, modern home, on the next two floors. The facade of the Home & Studio expresses barring walls just like the two buildings it shares with and uses brick and concrete to blend into the streetscape. The entranceway has large windows to allow pedestrians look in and see selected works in the gallery space. The use of natural light was very important to this project. In the early stages of design, there was a need to have light come into the center of the building. This could not be solved by pure open glass facade on each side of the infill. The solution was to create a stepped down light well to bring light into an otherwise dark space. The light well was also used as gathering spaces and garden areas for the in architects home and the designers who worked with the architects. Since there was a lot of program in a tiny space, it was essential to be efficient in the way circulation connected spaces and what was next to each other. The main stairwell is center of the project next to the light well, which provides access to the home and the studio. A rooftop tea garden was created to create an outdoor room, which seems closed off but it is open up to the sky. In addition, there is a play of solid and void that is present in the project, which opens up space and condenses space giving a more definition of what is public and what is private. Overall, the building is a organized around light, program, and circulation, all which are dependent to solve the design problem.
28
4
5 8
9
10
1
11
12
7
6
2
3
20
13
14
17 18
15
19
16
1. Model Shop 2.Plotter Room 3. Studio A 4. Lobby/Presentation Space 5. Large Meeting Room 6. Studio B
21
7. Studio Garden 8. Studio Office A 9. Studio Office B 10. Resource Room 11. Secured Office A 12. Secured Office B
13. Living Space 14. Home Courtyard 15. Library 16. Temporary Sleeping Space 17. Courtyard for Employees 18. Kitchen/ Dining for Employees
19. Secondary Meeting Space 20. Tea Garden 21. Social Space
29
ESTCODE
ESTCODE
30
Monastero Del Santo Regno
31
Throughout Rome there are many sites noteworthy of redevelopment, the site here and the monastery that is being proposed, is one that ties back to history and fills in the urban void without compromising the essential character of the site. In 1930’s Rome, there was an initiative by Mussolini to excavate under streets and demolish buildings to have archeology teams map and know how ancient Rome was laid out and find artifacts. Some outcomes with this dig were, finding foundations of Portico of Octavia, Temple of Apollo, and Theatre of Marcellus. The Theatre is now converted into an apartment complex. The Temple and Portico is predominantly destroyed, with only a few walls, foundations, and columns. However, this gives an opportunity for future structure.
1930’s Rome
While in France and Italy, there were some essential ‘elements’ and configurations that were found and were consistent in architecture during the period of ancient to modern. Some include; the use of courtyards, light Vs. Heavy material or visual perception, blur of interior and exterior, separation of volume, impression of layers, and lifting of mass. These principles could be implemented in the project for variety of reasons. The church, and where it is located gives good opportunity to lift above the ruins as a piloti, and give a sense of lightness and not have major interference with the ancient foundations. The plan of the monastery gives visual tension between itself and the monastery, not only in terms of the different design style but how it is laid out to provide a corridor for pedestrian traffic from the old Roman Ghetto to Via del Foro Poscario to Via Del Teatro Marcello. The assembly logic of this monastery is one of interlocking programs, clustered together, and unified by an oblique façade system. Of course, there is an archaeological approach to the layout. By using existing lines in the ancient foundations and the surrounding buildings. The library, located at the ancient temple of Apollo, gives a poetic significance to the program, Apollo, the god of light and the sun, truth and prophecy, music, poetry, and intellectual pursuits, gives new meaning to the endeavor of religious truths. Similar to how after the Roman Empire fell, all locations of ancient temples were converted to churches; this one is converted to the pursuit of knowledge and storage thereof.
Via del Foro Poscario
32
The kind of atmosphere trying to be achieved here is one of visual abstraction and intimateness. This can be see as one enters the church through the main stair, turns right from the vestibule, then processes into the nave that opens up and has formal collisions of walls and repetition of sky lighting.
Studies from France
1748 Map
33 33
B
3
4
9 5
1
A
10
8
11
2
A 6 7
B
34
35
o Br
ai M n
. St
M
e
So
. St
er
h
ut
. St
p Up
. St
m
Li
This s ite for the micro public b athhouse w as chosen for its unique terrain, p roximity t o downtown l exington, and view onto the street. Lo cated between West High Street and West Vine Street it has the oppertu nity for a wide range of people; such as those leaving the gym, night out to relax, or socializing between friends.
Section
Section
. St
th
u So
n ai M
ne to es
st Ea
So
36
. St
in tV es W
h
ut
Li
N
t es W
. St
ills
. St
or
gh
u So
ne to es
m
th
Hi
th
t es W
Hang / Micro-bathhouse
ay w ad
South Brother Thermal Baths
based on the micro bathhouse done earlier in the studio. The hope was by freeing preconceived notions of scale and distorting the plan would allow a opportunity for it to manifest itself into a new volumetric model. In addition to aggregating, slicing, and subtracting, there was also the play of distortion. Physical models showed that these studies have the potential to be used in the large-scale public bathhouse and hotel on South Brother Island. where the bathhouse and hotel can potentially go. However, later in the design phase it was decided that different size cubes were more public and open for the bathhouse, Smaller cubes housed various other program and smaller baths that correspond to temperature. water and half way anchored on land. The hotel is in the center of this island and is the only 10 feet above sea level. Being surrounded by trees gives a sense that you are no longer in the city, even though New York City is all around the island. Even though bathhouses are not typically seen in the United States, this one gives a sense of a resort rather than just a place to bath.
37
Model Studies These models are based on the micro-bathhouse plans. They were
that w into ere figures affectedand b then y stretching, aggergaturned affected dby istortion, stretching,and distortion, and tion t o create n ew f orms and m anipulate them f or t he l argaggregation to create new forms and manipulate them for the larger er b athhouse and Brother h otel pIsland rojectinoNew n York South bathhouse at South City.Brother I sland.
Affected Figures
38
Figure Study in the Context of South Brother Island Bathhouse Hotel
Figure Problem
Scale Problem
Distortion
1 Person 4’ W 8’ H
10 People 10’ W 20’ H
100 People 40’ W 80’ H
1000 People 120’ W 240’ H
10000 People 300’ W 600’ H
Figure Problem Stretch
39
40
41
Br onx Br onx
North Brother Island
Hunts Point Hunts Point
South Brother Island
V T RI
EA S
ER
Randsall Island Randsall Island
Rickers Island
Surrounding Area of South Brother Island
42
NYC Waterways Overview
40-47’47.2”N 73-53’52.4”W 40.796437, -73.897894
Massing of Thermal Baths
3D Print Model of South Brother Island
43
Forest Retreat
44
West Elevation
South Elevation
North Elevation
East Elevation
Floor Plan
Section A
Section B
Roof Plan
Foundation Plan
JUSTIN WHITE 1316 Amherst Drive Lexington, KY 40515 502-727-3668 | jmwh228@gmail.com
45