Woodbury University - 3rd Year Architecture - Portfolio - Justin Yap by Justin Yap

1b 6-19

gerard smulevich

louis molina & kari anderson

86-91



3a 

20-51

daniel rabin S

mark ericson

92-105

PEDESTRIAN CARS

Design Communication 2 52-67

alvaro zepeda

mark owen

106-113

Roof

Glass

Mullions

Design Communication 1 68-85

nicole acaron-toro B

heather scott peterson

100'

114-119

Delineation & Rendering (CCSF)

Materials & Methods of Construction 120-125

eric olsen

Professional Practice 1

Freehand Drawing (CCSF) ROOFING MATERIAL

O B a

5/8” PLYWOOD SHEET

2x12 R.R. @ 16” OC 5/8” PLYWOOD

giulio zavolta

2x12 STUD @24” O.C.

7/8” FINISH STUCCO

SS-3 5

SOFA

DBL. GLAZED ALUM WINDOW

126-133

5/8” PLYWOOD 2x4 STUD

7/8” INTERIOR SUCCO FINISH 5/8” PLYWOOD

SHIM CAULK SEALANT

DBL. GLAZED ALUM. KAWNEER 1.75”X4” CURTAIN WALL PROV. SHOP DRAWINGS & CALCS FOR WINDOWS

WOOD FRAMING

CONT. BACKER ROD AND CHALK SEALANT

ALUM. WINDOW

SHIM

7/8” PLYWOOD DBL. GLAZED WINDOW

STUCCO EXT. FINISH

CAULK SEALANT WINDOW GLAZING

SHIM

EXT. STUCCO WALL

Curtain Wall Section 34

Window Slab

DRIVEWAY

South East Elevation

DRIVEWAY

South West Elevation 4

STUCCO ROOFING MEMBRANE

CUSTOM STEEL FRAMMING

DRIVEWAY (OPEN BELOW)

150-159

simon udell

WOOD FRAMING

DOUBLE HEADER 7/8” EXTERIOR FINISH STUCCO

CONT. BACKER ROD AND CAULK SEALNT, TYP.

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

2 x 12 BEAM

GARAGE DOOR

FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION

Space for Ventilation

CKAJA HOUSE

SLAB

O B a Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

WOOD FRAMING

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

SS-3 13

CKAJA HOUSE

SS-1 5

SKYLIGHT IMPLEMENTED IN ROOF

Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE DOUBLE TOP PLATES

O B a

Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

CKAJA HOUSE

SS-1 13

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

SS-3 7

146-149

nestor regino

STUCCO

WOOD FRAME 5/8” PLYWOOD

SS-2 13

7/8” FINISH STUCCO

Exterior Wall System WOOD FRAMING

Floor Plan

Floor Framing Plan

STUCCO

4 WOOD FRAMING

SS-2 5

WOOD COLUMN

Wall Base

3:12 Slope

WOOD DOOR

2 x 10 R.R. @ 12” O.C. Stucco

Kraft Based Bat Insulation

14 Floor Finish

Documents and codes

01/24/12

Schematic Design

01/31/12

Design Development

02/14/12

Plans & Programming

02/28/12

North West Elevation 8

11568

North East Elevation

11568

2x4 WINDOW SILL

CONCRETE FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WALL

Splash Block

03 04 05

Documents and codes

01/24/12

Schematic Design

01/31/12

Design Development

02/14/12

Plans & Programming

02/28/12

Detail Drawings

02/28/12

Documents and codes

01/24/12

Schematic Design

01/31/12

Design Development

02/14/12

FINISHED GRADE

Natural Grade 2 x 12 F.J. @ 12” O.C.

Finished Grade CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM

NATURAL GRADE

INTERNAL WEEP

South West Section 4

SHIM

SEALANT & BR AT END DAM CONT CAULK AROUND END TO SEAL

Framing Elevations

WALL SECTIONS

Design Development

South East Section 4

A 2.0

Kitchen Wall Section 34

Curtain Wall Section 34

Garage Wall Section 34

Garage Door Section 34

http://homedesigninspiration.com/architecture/kowalewski-beach-house-design.jpg

http://www.hillcountrydoors.com/aluminumdoor_contemporaryhome.jpg

http://reyudesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/amazing-outdoor-furniture-and-pool-viewin-modern-dream-house.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRlbhg S6xJICfMtGNeS8stj37sBYLCnfKjZ83qBPpPFJxcrm4x2fw

Digital Painting ramon ramirez

http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_llq7ojKuof1qdo7c6o1_500.jpg

DD 1

Architectural Design 1 (CCSF) 134-137

160-165

jerry lum

LEGEND A

N X

22 21

LEVEL 5 FINISH FOR GYPSUM BOARD WALLS AND CEILINGS: REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 09 29 00, 3.7 FOR GYPSUM BOARD FINISH SCHEDULE

OWNER: STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 300 PASTEUR DRIVE, M/C 5871 STANFORD, CA 94304 TEL: 650.380.6858 FAX: 650.498.5833

Experimental Urban Drawing

Internship

UP DN

UPDN

4 1

138-145

CORRIDOR

VARIES (W14 X 233 STL. COL. SHOWN)

W12 X 96 STL. COL.

CORRIDOR

6.8

VARIES (W14 X 233 STL. COL. SHOWN)

RATED FIRESTOP

CORRIDOR

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

1' - 0"

10"

1' - 0"

1' - 3"

110

SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING. UL X790.

1" MIN. CLR. SP. TYP.

1' - 3"

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ CORRIDOR CORNER 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

LEVEL FOUR (LEVELS #5 - #7 SIMILAR) 1/32" = 1'-0"

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1' - 3" 1

1 A0460

N X

RATED FIRESTOP

CORRIDOR

TYP.

CORRIDOR

48"

18"

24"

24" LT.

60" X

18"

42"

1' - 0"

1' - 3"

1' - 2"

BACKCHECK #1

AS REQ'D

VARIES

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REVIEWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF T24, CCR

APPROVED

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE W/Z-CLIP @ INTERSECTING NON-RATED WALL 1 1/2" = 1'-0" RATED FIRESTOP

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

TYPICAL COLUMN ENCLOSURE AT FIRE RATED 2 HR CORRIDOR CORNER 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

10"

1' - 3"

1' - 1"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 1 A8107

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE W/Z-CLIP 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

1' - 0"

P Number:

B A

SPECIAL BATHING FACILITIES

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO OSHPD BACKCHECK COMMENT #A701 AND #P192

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL 631.004

GYPSUM BOARD FINISH LEVEL LOCATIONS

A.8 LEVEL ONE 1/32" = 1'-0"

A8105 SHEET NUMBER:

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS OSHPD # IS-081923-43

INCREMENT 4 OSHPD BACKCHECK #1

AUGUST 6, 2012 RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS & LEE BURKHART LIU

L J H G

10"

B A

IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 36in x 48in IT IS A REDUCED PRINT; REFER TO GRAPHIC SCALE

0 SCALE:

1' - 1"

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

P Name:

1' - 1"

P Number:

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

CORRIDOR

KEY PLAN AND NORTH SIGN

SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING. UL X790. 5/8" G.W.B.

TYP.

1' - 3"

VARIES (W12 X 230 STL. COL. SHOWN)

CL SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING. UL X790. 120

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

9 1/2" 8/3/2012 12:16:14 PM

3 A0460

1' - 3"

NOTE: FOR GROUND LEVEL COLUMN ENCLOSURES, USE 1'-6" IN LIOU OF 1'-3" TYP. U.O.N. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ STAIRS - 2HR

X 1/32" = 1'-0"

P Name:

1/32" = 1'-0"

ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD

TYP.

SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING 15/16" THK. UL X790

MECH. ROOM

TYP.

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

120

1 A0460

110

# 10 S.M.S. @12" O.C. TYP. 16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP BASE

1' - 3"

TYP. WIDE FLANGE COL. ENCLOSURE @ INTERSECTING NON-RATED WALL

VARIES (W12 X 72 STL. COL. SHOWN) RATED FIRESTOP

CL CORRIDOR

24 IN. X 24 IN. BOX STL. COL.

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP (SHOWN 2")

3X3X90, 16 GA. STL. L-ANGLE TYP.

9 A0460 262

110

0 SCALE:

LEVEL THREE

3X3X90, 16 GA. STL. L-ANGLE TYP.

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP TYP. (SHOWN 2")

SEE FLOOR PLAN

CL SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING. UL X790.

F E D

IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 36in x 48in IT IS A REDUCED PRINT; REFER TO GRAPHIC SCALE

SHEET TITLE:

A.8

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 1 A8107

NOTE: OMIT FURRING AT SHAFT CONDITIONS WHERE OCCURS. SEE FLOOR PLANS.

120

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP BASE TYP.

8 24 IN. X 24 IN . BOX STL. COL.

W12 X 230 STL. COLUMN

CORRIDOR

Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

STAIRWELL

G KEY PLAN AND NORTH SIGN

3 UP

IS-081923-43

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 11 A8107

1' - 0"

SHC REFERENCE PLAN - LEVEL TWO

L J H

DATE: _________________________________________

5/8" G.W.B.

16 GA. Z-CLIP BASE

W12X210 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 1 HR CORRIDOR CORNER

REV DATE

1' - 1"

W12X279 COL. ENCLOSURE AT CORRIDOR/STAIRS - 2HR

1 3/4" 16 GA. Z-CLIP

DN UP

01-29-2010 REV NO

IS-081923-43

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

TYP.

CORRIDOR

ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD

08-06-2012 04-29-2011 10-01-2010 05-28-2010

ISSUE NAME

INCREMENT NO.

1 A0460

ICE

08-06-2012 02-03-2012

100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

PHASE:

VARIES

1' - 3"

5 A0460

6.8

10"

1' - 3"

60"

GMP

50% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

OSHPD NO.

120

COLD FOOD PREP

TOPPINGS

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

110

2 HR RATED WALL. UL # U419

IS-081923-43 Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

HOST/ HOSTESS

SALAD BAR

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 6 A8107

CL TYP.

1' - 6"

APPROVED

DATE: _________________________________________

DN UP

1' - 0"

TYP. W12X230 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 1 HR CORRIDOR

120 2 HR, 1 HR SIM.

8/3/2012 12:14:58 PM

3 A0460

110

REVIEWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF T24, CCR

PICK-UP

120

5/8" G.W.B.

REV DATE

REF. (+35 F)

HOT FOOD PREP WATER FILTER FOR #276

STAIRS WELL

UPDN

SOUP

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

160

04-29-2011

01-29-2010 REV NO

IS-081923-43

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

E2 E1

DN DN

1" MIN. CLR. SP. TYP.

ROOM SIDE

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 6 A8107

1' - 1"

TYP. W14X370 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 1 HR CORRIDOR CORNER

02-03-2012

10-01-2010 05-28-2010

ISSUE NAME

INCREMENT NO.

HOT FOOD

W12 X 279 STL. COL.

08-06-2012

100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

OSHPD NO.

08-06-2012

BACKCHECK #1

50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

CORRIDOR

10"

SHC EXISTING HOSPITAL PATIENT BED TOWERS GMP 100% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 50% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

14 Y

166-171

NEW CONNECTION BRIDGE AT LEVEL TWO

24"

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ 1HR. CORRIDOR

48"

STAIRWELL

CORRIDOR

11"

UPDN

6.8 CL

11"

1' - 0"

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

CORRIDOR

100% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

2 HR. RATED SHAFT WALL UL. # U459

24"

11"

UP DN

1' - 3"

50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

UP DN

5/8" G.W.B.

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 11 A8107

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ 2 HR. CORRIDOR CORNER 2

TYP.

UP 1

1 1

1' - 3"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE AND 11 13 A8107 A8107

2 HR RATED WALL. UL # U419

120

# 10 S.M.S. @ 12" O.C. TYP.

5/8" G.W.B.

1' - 3"

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

RATED FIRESTOP

CORRIDOR

VARIES (W14 X 370 STL. COL. SHOWN)

3X3X90, 16 GA. STL. L-ANGLE TYP.

TYP.

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP W/16 GA. MTL. ANGLE STAGGERED @ 18" O.C. MAX.

L 1" MIN. CLR. SP. TYP.

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 21 A8107

1/32" = 1'-0"

16 Z-CLIP (2" SHOWN)

CORRIDOR

110

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP BASE

W14X211 COL. ENCLOSURE @ 1HR. CORRIDOR - LEVEL 2 ICU -1

CORRIDOR

LEVEL TWO

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

CL 16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP W/ 16 GA. MTL. ANGLE STAGGERED @ 18" O.C. MAX.

1 A0460

ROOM SIDE

TYP. W14X370 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 2 HR CORRIDOR CORNER

1 1H A0460

21"

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

W14 X 211 STL. COL. 3 A0460

CORRIDOR

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 21 A8107

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

1 LAYER 5/8" G.W.B.

A8107

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ 2HR. CORRIDOR

CL 1' - 0"

TYP.

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

PHASE:

21"

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 7

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 13 A8107

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE W/ 1 & 2HR. CORRIDOR CORNER

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

CORRIDOR

1' - 3"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE AND 11 13 A8107 A8107

GYP. BOARD

NON-RATED PTN INTERSECTING NON-RATED PARTITION IN ADJOINING WALLS

1' - 0"

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

1' - 1"

1' - 3"

CORRIDOR

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

W14X211 COL. ENCLOSURE @ 1HR. CORRIDOR - LEVEL 2 ICU -2

UP DN

Y CL

1' - 3"

TYP.

DO NOT CONTINUE GYP. BD. IN NONRATED ROOM CONDITIONS TYP.

10"

1' - 3"

CL 120

A.8

1' - 0"

RATED FIRESTOP

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 21 A8107

TYP. W14X233 COL. ENCLOSURE @ 1HR. CORRIDOR

CL 1' - 1"

MEDICAL PLANNER: LEE, BURKHART, LIU 13335 MAXELLA AVENUE MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.829.2249 FAX: 310.829.1673

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 3 A8107

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

DN UP

ARCHITECT: RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS PC 149 NEW MONTGOMERY, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 TEL: 415.671.4600 FAX: 415.671.4610

TYP.

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 6 A8107

11"

TYP. W12X96 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 1 HR CORRIDOR- LEVEL 2 ICU

OWNER: STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 300 PASTEUR DRIVE, M/C 5871 STANFORD, CA 94304 TEL: 650.380.6858 FAX: 650.498.5833

110

11"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE AND 11 13 A8107 A8107

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

TYP.

1' - 3"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 7 A8107

TYP. W14X233 COL. ENCLOSURE @ 2HR. CORRIDOR

1' - 10"

1' - 0"

TYP.

1' - 0"

110

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL

7 UP

rafael vinoly architects

1' - 3"

ramon ramirez

MEDICAL PLANNER: LEE, BURKHART, LIU 13335 MAXELLA AVENUE MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.829.2249 FAX: 310.829.1673

DNUP

B 2

ARCHITECT: RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS PC 149 NEW MONTGOMERY, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 TEL: 415.671.4600 FAX: 415.671.4610

6.8

14 Y

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL 631.004

COLUMN ENCLOSURE DETAILS

1' - 0" 1

120 1 TYPICAL COLUMN ENCLOSURE AT FIRE RATED 1 HR CORRIDOR CORNER 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

TYP. WIDE FLANGE COL. ENCLOSURE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

SHEET TITLE:

A8107 SHEET NUMBER:

o.b.s.e.r.v.e.

overheard boat and ecological reserve viewing emplacement

( in progress) b . r . i . d . g . e . border research institutes for demography, government, and the environment kimberly rodriguez justin yap

studio 3b gerard smulevich

o.b.s.e.r.v.e.

or the boat launch project, a viewing platform was designed that would provide a potential shading area for the launching area. In addition to the viewing platform, a place for judging and for bird watching had to be incorporated into the project. While providing shade for the viewing platforms, site aspects had to be taken into consideration: sun paths and rain protection. For such a structure, the design within an area could not obstruct any current working spaces: parking, boat launch, boat parking, and bike path. Working with quick 1/16 scale models; lighting, shading, walking, and form possibilities was discovered. From there, aspects from the previous scale was incorporated in 1/8 scale. Within the 1/8 scale model, structure was incorporated: steel beams, trusses, and columns. After the 1/8 scale model, Âź inch went into higher detail of structural framing by incorporating framing members for the roofing. Site: Ballona Creek Path Marina del Rey, CA

0 1

first attempt in hand drawing the structure in section with shading

process models discovering ways to create viewing platforms while providing shade for viewers and possibly for the boat launch platforms

building context on site B I R D WATC H I N G

boat launch platforms B OAT WATC H I N G

JUDGING

buildable area sunrise

sunset

sun path

o.b.s.e.r.v.e.

1/8th scale model

continuation of study models

1/4 scale model showing bird/viewing platfrom (top) and judging platform (bottom)

The final sectional drawing incorporated with shading to show light qualities, depth, and detail. (hand drawn) 0 1

b.r.i.d.g.e.

he objective for this project is to create a headquarters for two organizations (The Trans Border Institute & El Colegio de La Frontera Norte [COLEF]) to communicate with one another along the international border. Both institutions are working with another for problems along the border. In order to understand of what both institutions are doing, research was done between the United States and Mexico. Along with site research and analysis, the form of the building was to relate from the conclusion of our research. Our research was base off of three areas: environment, population, and economy. Through those three areas, we concluded that they all seem to have a chain reaction with one another. Form was created by using basswood and chipboard. The basswood would represent the steel structure, while chipboard would represent the faรงade of the building or the floor slabs. Team: Kimberly Rodriguez Justin Yap Competition: 2012-13 ACSA/AISC Steel Design Student Competition

site research photos

Site: International Border West of San Ysidro Border Area of Property: 430,390 ft2 Buildable Area: 30,576 ft2

main/residential streets diagram

natural vs. manmade diagram

building type diagram

density diagram

12p

sun diagram

b.r.i.d.g.e.

midterm model on site

study models from iteration to current (left to right)

detail view of midterm model on site

sectional study models of the building along the border.

224

Site model and building context is plotted while the detail and information is done by hand.

224

Two cross sections are drawn by hand. Program is called out to show the context within the building. Buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s elevation height is called out (on right) to keep track of height limits within site context. Elevation is drawn by hand. Program and height call outs are similar to cross section drawings.

128

scalar research jung mi kim justin yap

house and housing transit city housing

studio 3a daniel rabin

scalar research

or this project, a precedent was chosen to do a building and historical research â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Schneidman House by A. Quincy Jones. Partnering with Jung Mi Kim for the research, we looked at the historical context and found out that the house was part of the Mutual Housing Association in Crestwood Hills around the early to mid20th century. We had to understand the buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s form, program, and circulation in order to reiterate a scenario within the house. The reiteration of the scenario was done individually. In order to create a particular scenario, the use of collaging photographs with the floor plan was used to understand human scale and spatial context within the house.

Architect: A. Quincy Jones & Whitney R. Smith Engineer: Edgardo Contini Year: 1950

http://crestwoodla.com/

Site: Schneidman House 925 Stonehill Lane Los Angeles, CA 90049 Area of Property: 1938 ft2

http://crestwoodla.com/

Site research photo Photo taken by: Justin Yap

http://crestwoodla.com/



T  R E

PEDESTRIAN

CARS

PEDESTRIAN CARS

scalar research

Scale 1”=200’

Figure Ground

0 1

existing intervention

0 1

new intervention

house and housing

or this housing project, the site was located in Woodbury University School of Architecture - San Diego campus. A site location was determined and explored with site analysis. Through analysis of both sites, site B seemed to be an area of high interest because of the lack of lighting within the area. Therefore, light was a main deciding factor of programmatic spaces, window openings, and aperture sizes. Through the various window openings, program spaces were designed and layed out for a specific time depending on the unit owner. Two units were designed within the limited space with an addition of a cafĂŠ for both public and Woodbury students.

Site: Woodbury University School of Architecture San Diego - Area B Area of Property: 1292 ft2

Area of Focus: Light Units: Two One Bedroom Apt.

process model exploring units spatial qualities

interior cafe view showing light quality for early mornings.

model on site exploring areas of focus

program model exploring unit compositions

site light diagrams

house and housing

Diagrams showing light qualities, program layout, design, and program specifics for direct, indirect, and no light. The use of diagraming was used in the earlier process to formulate design and a realization of the spatial qualities. In addition, sun angles of the summer and winter solstice was kept in mind while designing apertures and placement of program.

transit city housing

he site was located across of Farmdale Station in Los Angeles, CA. Different housing typologies was explored to fit and respond to the current site conditions. In addition, diagramming site conditions and adjacencies was explored prior to any architectural move. Villas as a housing typology was chosen as the site seemed very calm during the day and that the surrounding areas seemed it was suitable. The villas design was based off of the modernist architecture as it was a compelling place to have something slightly different to the surrounding areas. Off of the site analysis, the villas units faced towards one another having its back against exposition, thus giving more privacy to the housing typology.

Site: Across of Farmdale Metro Station Area of Property: 33,734 ft2 Units: Five Studio Villas Four One-bedroom Villas Four Two-bedroom Villas Two Loft Villas

Area of Focus: Modern Architecture Parking: Eight indoor spaces Five outside (private)

study models exploring a variety of housing types within the site

diagram showing height limit

two family zoning one family zoning adult high school farmdale station

industrial zoning

diagram showing important adjacencies

transit city housing

study site model exploring mobile and pedestrian flow

Sunset

Sunrise 7 a.m.

4 p.m. 3 p.m.

noise diagram

metro and pedestrian flow diagram

2 p.m.

8 a.m. 1 p.m.

sun path diagram

12 noon

11 a.m.

10 a.m.

9 a.m.

traffic flow diagram

Two Bedroom Unit

One Bedroom Unit

bedroom

dining

bathroom

kitchen

dining

patio

kitchen

chesapeake ave.

farmdale ave.

SITE SECTION

1/16” = 1’-0”

patio one bedroom unit studio unit cafe two bedroom unit green space

exposition bl vd.

112

transit city housing

Unit type model on left is exploring spatial qualities, site conditions, human scale, and lighting conditions. The unit circulation model on right shows and explains the circulation within and around the site. In addition, it shows how it may be occupied by the public and private home owners.

transit city housing

studio farm

two bedroom

dale

a v e.

one bedroom

fountain

ex po si ti on bl vd .

UNIT TYPES

PARKING

ches

apea

v e. ke a

SEMI-PRIVATE

outside dining

VIEWS

CAFE

GREEN SPACE

Diagrams are exploring the villaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s conditions as it is placed on the site: views, semi-private areas, green space, and parking areas.

transit city housing

final ground floor plan

transit city housing

loft floor plan in relationship with site (top) and first floor plan (below) showing circulation and context

loft floor plan showing detail and section cut

loft axonometric showing interior and exterior view

transit city housing

detail shots of final model

transit city housing

LONG SECTION PERSPECTIVE

dissection site analysis bus terminal

studio 2b alvaro zepeda

dissection

uickly analyzing a precedentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s drawing by Mathur and Cunha (right), a reinterpretation and understanding of the drawing was made. Cutting bodies of water in two dimensional forms and reinterpreting it into a three dimensional form help create a clearer image of what the original author was showing. Through the analysis of the drawing, an assignment to do the same process was given at a given site: Los Angeles Zoo Parking Lot. In this practice, annotating different textures and mapping was done to create our own perspectival view of the site.

Site: Los Angeles Zoo Parking Lot Precedent: Sectional Drawings of Mumbai by Anuradha Mathur and Dilip da Cunha

textures gathered at LA Zooâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s parking lot. A process of tracing the various materiality through drawing.

Sectional drawings of Mumbai by Anuradha Mathur and Dilip da Cunha

Water Pond 1

Section Cut 1 - Water Pond 1

Section Cut 9 - Water Pond 2

Section Cut 2- Water Pond 1

Section Cut 10 - Water Pond 3

Section Cut 3 - Water Pond 1

Section Cut 11 - Water Pond 3

Section Cut 4 - Water Pond 1

Section Cut 12 - Water Pond 3

Section Cut 5 - Water Pond 2

Section Cut 13 - Water Pond 3

Water P ond 2

Section Cut 6 - Water Pond 2

Trench Alignment Line

Sectional Land

Section Cut 7- Water Pond 2

Water

Water Pond 3

Section Cut 8 - Water Pond 2

process reinterpretation of precedentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s drawing

dissection

TRENCHES T

An understanding of the precedentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s drawing without any prior research led to an reinterpretation of the drawing. 56

Drawing on left is a personal outtake on the LA Zoo parking lot with a plan and section view, which is referenced off of the precedent’s work.

Tree Bark

Parking Lot (Northern end)

Sign Post (K)

Leaf

“Do Not Enter” Sign Post

Concrete Curb (Painted)

Concrete Curb (Unpainted)

Metal Panel Cover

Parking Lot (Western End)

Small Tree Stump Sand

site analysis

site was given in downtown: Temple and Fremont. Site analysis and mapping was done in a physical model. Mapping of traffic was done on site model to get an understanding of the site and its surrounding area. It is between the 110 and 101 freeway. The site consists of three paid parking spots and adjacent to the site is a parking structure that is three stories tall. Standing next to the parking structure is a federal building that overpowers the surrounding area. Running perpendicular to the site is a building that contains a Gourmet Pizza Restaurant and Credit Union.

Site: W. Temple St. & N. Fremont Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90012

mapping exercises (separate from project)

detail view of site analysis model

top view of site model

site breakup study models exploring relationships and context

bus terminal

hrough the final project, even further mapping of the site was done on technical drawings and in a physical site: sewage, pedestrian flow, pipelines, traffic flow, streetlights, etc. From there, a bus terminal was designed based off of the analysis of the site. With the design of the bus terminal, mappings of car and bus turn radiusâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; was performed to figure out where to place parking and bus stops. Consideration of existing traffic had a big role because it determined exits and entrance within the site. The idea behind the design of the bus terminal was to use the topography that landed within the design program and manipulate it down back to the ground - a bus terminal that acted as if it somehow erupted from the ground and became a structure.

site sectional models showing traffic flow

bus terminal study model

program

collaboration

site

movement

224

bus terminal

structure

parti

REST

AURA

WAITING INTERIOR

R ETAI L

D I S PATC OFFICE /

TICKET BOOTH (B A G G A G E R O O M)

BATH R O O M S

DRIVER’S LOUNGE

bus terminal

detail sectional model

bus terminal

structure

parti

Short section drawing showing interior of bus terminal and the surrounding area. Shading within the bus terminal is to show light qualities happening within the space.

textile & garment research surface models/modules entry exhibit shed - MOCA precedent research boutique hotel

studio 2a nicole acar贸n-toro

textile & garment research

precedent was given to where analysis of the dress had to be analyzed through sewing structure, patterns, and symmetry. Through the various patterns and analysis of the dress, recreation of the sewing patterns was done through paper to get an understanding of how the methodology works. Through the precedent’s dress made out of wool and cashmere, pleats were used as a formal structure. It was used in such a way that the dress becomes seamless by folding, tucking, and layering.

Control “C” Collection dress by Sandra Buckland

box pleats in its folded form showing seam

box pleats in its rolled form

box pleats in its hidden seams (dashed)

detail connection of pleats with one another

dress is symmetrical down the center

dress showing seam connection

LONG

SHORT

LONG

rhythmic patterns along the dress

diagram of pleats rolled out - long, short, long

surface models/modules

Iterations of study paper models for pleat methodology using rolls as a technique to create a form. From there, modules were formed by using pleats. Diagrams on right shows how the paper was folded, creased, layered, and rolled. These were the different techniques used to get different forms for the modules.

CREASED LINE FOLDED LINE LAYERED

ROLLED CREASE

entry exhibit shed - moca Through the use of modules, it was used to create an exhibit shed for The Geffen Contemporary MOCA. The shed consists of two outdoor exhibition spaces and a ticket booth. The shed is to replace the exisiting canopy. The purpose of this project is to study the articulation of the material and how it can be used in different ways: inhabiting and viewing space.

Site: The Geffen Contemporary shed at MOCA Precedent: Control C dress by Sandra Buckland

Methodology: Pleats and Modules

final proposal for the MOCA shed

TICKET BOOTH EXHIBITION SPACE 1 EXHIBITION SPACE 2

structural connection diagram

porosity diagram

program diagram

site location of the shed

EX HIB ITIO N SPACE 1 EXHIBI TIO N SPACE 2

TICK ET BOOT H

A 0

A 21

precedent research/analysis

rom the precedent research, a new one was chosen for the next project â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Danish Pavilion by BIG. Precedent research of this building was analyzed through the form, structure, program, and methodology. From there, diagrams were created to explain the research understanding. Through the use of the research and diagrams, patents were formed by the understanding of the precedent. Since the Danish Pavilion dealt with circular curves and an infinite loop, the patent had the same characteristics. We then incorporated the site and program with the patent, which would then alternate its form. By adding the site and program, the boutique was formed. In addition, the module studies from the previous assignment determined the hotelâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s tectonic response. www.bid.dk MERMAID BAR

EXHIBITION SPACE

BIKE RAMP

SHOP

PICNIC AREA

FOUNTAIN

EXIT BIKES

www.bid.dk

www.archdaily.com

www.bid.dk

BIKE PARKING

EXIT PEDESTRIANS

SINGLE FLOW

Bicyclists Path Pedestrians Path Conjunction between two paths

CROWD FLOW

BRIGHT

DIM

DIM 0

www.bid.dk

MINS OF WALKING

www.bid.dk

MINS OF WALKING

precedent research/analysis

Patent research is shown on the left and the highlighted area is how the infinite loop occurs. From there, site and program model was implemented (right). Attempts to build vertical and study models were done, but ended up going with the horizontal model as it was more likely to be structural and ADA accessible.

boutique hotel

Site: Glendale Blvd. & Brier Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90039 Precedent: Denmark Pavilion by BIG

Through the site adaptation, modulation was implemented as well. However, trying to put such a curvilinear structure within the limited space was difficult, but not impossible.

The final model was difficult to build a curvilinear model while showing the modulation. In addition, keeping to the structure and scale was even more difficult. Therefore, a paper final model seemed like the only possible way to go through the process. Attempts to do a laser cut model was also unsuccessful as drawing a three dimensional curvilinear building was tough for one who had little experience with rhino.

boutique hotel

Reception Desk Concierge Desk Reception Offices Baggage Storage EL.

EL.

Bar

Suite 1

Lounge Seating

Suite 2

Kitchen EL.

Double Queen Rooms King Room Management Office Storage/Mechanical/Electrical Retail Lobby Seating Outdoor Pool

EL.

King Rooms

100'

open below

second floor plan relative to the site

100'

first floor plan

100'

ground floor plan

fire water

studio 1b louis molina & kari anderson

fire

he model is designed for daily naps and its intention is for recreational purposes. The methodology for constructing the design and the layout of the space is splaying as the element fire tends to spread and extend. Fernando Menis, the mentor that is used for this design, dealt with similar aspects of splaying as he designed a convention center located at Adeje Coast, Tenerife. In addition, he design a library for a house (which was never built) that dealt with splaying as the walls extended throughout the whole faรงade, which included light and ventilation. Throughout that concept, the method is continuously used throughout the site, both vertically and horizontally to include diffused light underground. The slow descending ramp is to manipulate the relaxation before a person takes a siesta.

process study models

water

he element used in this project is water and the methodology for constructing this model is lamination. The mentor Foreign Office Architects is undergoing a design located in Spain called Torre Masaveu Hotel. The exterior consists of a laminated layer over the structure giving both views and protection from the sun. With that idea, a place for napping was fromed. As a hiker or person explores the hill, a designated place is providing a person to nap. The exterior shell of the model deals with three different lighting techniques. Starting from the bottom, it is transparent and slowly transcends into opaque by using a variety of layers. With this, it allows the place for air circulation and providing an alarm system by having wind lifting up the layers and shake dramatically. This will remind the person to wake up and continue on their journey.

methodology for creating the project

process study sketches/models

animal movement site corruptor natural light faisal alzakari jose saldate justin yap

Studio 1A mark ericson

animal movement

personal decision was chosen for an animal to analyze by tracking its movement - goose. The analyzed movements were then used to construct study models. Through iterations, positive and negative spaces were used to iterate the next model. While constructing study models, drawing and mapping out movements of the goose was used to study for the next iteration - striation was then implemented. Through the final model, the words â&#x20AC;&#x153;gradual striationâ&#x20AC;? was introduced to the variety of spaces between the lines. The overlapping of the planes was used to describe the density in the drawing and to show how each part has a relationship to one another.

design iterations discovering structural patterns and deciphering the positive and negative spaces

design iterations for discovering striations

animal movement

projected section

site corruptor

n project one, we drew a section of our final model and constructed a hybrid collage. In addition, we were asked to research on a specific handshake: hand-onshoulder. Through the hybrid, the handshakeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s vocabulary of interlocking pieces was discovered. The varied scales of figure ground were used to translate how the handshake differed from one another. Diagramming also helped to create the final construct (site corruptor). The diagram helped to demonstrate certain aspects of the construct: relationship, receiving, communication, and shoulder. Through the given site (a hand railing), additional words were used to broaden the explorations: authority, space, and power. Authority and power is defined by the construct overwhelming the railing using tension to cantilever. The joinery within the hybrid is translated through relationship of wood to wood and wood to mason line.

strobo light movements were use to further discover the act of the handshake

section 1

section 2

section 3

Movements tracked by Miriam Jacobson and Justin Yap

site corruptor

diagram discovering striation and intersecting qualities

100

diagram discovering spatial qualities

101

natural tendencies

atural light was given as a tendency to study as a group. Our site was located at The Getty Center in Los Angeles, CA. Pictures of our tendency was taken to do further research of its abilities and how it reflects and refract on other materials. Drawings were then use to construct our study models and how light would travel through our project. Our goal was to direct a few and selected light rays that would travel from one end of the construct to the other. At the very end would be a box filled with glass, which would then light up an acrylic box. Study drawings of our ideas are seen on the right.

lightâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s reflective and refractive property with water and marble

102

study pictures of lightâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s capabilities - taken at The Getty Center

final drawing showing how light travels from one end to the other

study drawings that lead us to our final drawing

103

natural tendencies

104

exploded axonometric view of our final construct - hand drawing

Unfortunately the day after the final review, it rained and our construct started to break down. We were unable to take it back into studio the day of because of its size and the lack of space. In addition, we were unable to present a working light presentation on the final review because when we were constructing it at the time, our light source was a flash light. Trying to find the right angle and the specific light time for our construct to work was an extremely hard task to accomplish since our time frame to work and study was very limited.

final construct at our site - day after review

our first few initial light studies

the light presentation failed on review day

the aftermath of having it rain after review day

105

106

theatre agora

design communication two mark owen

107

theatre agora

heatre agora was given as a precedent to work with throughout the semester. Through the use tracing and making a computer 3d model, AutoCAD and Rhino was learned. In addition, rendering the building was done through 3ds Max. At the final presentation, a board layout was presented along with a physical model.

Roof

Glass

Mullions

Precedent: Theatre Agora Firm: UNStudio (in collaboration with B+M, Den Haag) Location: Lelystad, The Netherlands

108

Project year: 2005-2007 Programs: AutoCAD, Rhinoceros, & Autodesk 3ds Max

Theatre Area Cargo Area Lobby

109

theatre agora

THIRD FLOOR PLAN 0

110

112

BUILDING SECTION 0

112

ELEVATION 0

112

111

theatre agora

112

interior view of theatre agora

Exterior view of Theatre Agora. Etched floor plan done on matboard. Exterior was made with matboard and coated with white wood filler for the edges and seams.

113

114

piranesi prison villa savoye villa dallâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ava collage

design communication one heather peterson

115

piranesi prison

116

Hand drafted of Piranesi Prison. An interpretation of what the prison is shown on the right side of the drawing

villa savoye

Villa Savoye Le Corbusier Poissy, France 1929

Drawing of Villa Savoye done by hand and collaged with colored film strips.

117

villa dall'ava

Villa Dallâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ava Rem Koolhaas & OMA Paris, France 1991

118

Drawing of Villa Savoye done by hand and collaged with colored film strips.

collage

Collage 40” x 27.5”

119

120 120

glass studies joinery studies process work final construct majed alyabis joey potts adrianna saavedra brianna stafford justin yap

Materials & Methods of Construction eric olsen

121

Glass Studies

lass studies and research was performed of its materiality abilities. Our goal for the final was to create a construct using glass with other materials: concrete, metal, or masonry. Before developing the idea of the construct, glass studies and joinery connections was research throughout the semester.

study of glass index of refraction

122

glass connection through plaster

tension joinery: two washers, bolt, and a nut

welding glass with a blow torch

connection with wood using notch method

Joinery Studies

using our glass connection research with our material studies

glass study connection for window framing

glass study with wood bolts

pedro e inĂŞs bridge in coimbra, portugal architect: cecil balmond & arup associates

vertical folding movable glass walls http://www.movable-wall.com/

123

Mock Up Studies/Process Final

Through various glass studies and research, small scale mock ups were developed of what the construct may look like for the final using basswood, plaster, and straws (representation of acrylic tubes).

assembly of final construct

detail connection of washers meeting glass

detail framing of where glass meets metal framing

124

mock up study model

interior view of construct framing

(side view) detail of construct framing

(back view) detail of construct framing

Final Construct Our construct addresses how concrete, metal, and glass is sustainable by using other materials with one another. In order to have our concrete slab stable in the vertical direction, we would have to reinforce it with rebar in the center. The intent to use metal and glass as a cohesive framing technique would work, but would need a substance such as neoprene to prevent glass and metal thermalâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s expansion. In the end, our construct was never completely finished because of the schoolâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s metal shop hours and the limited supply of welding material. However, we had everything else ready for the final: concrete slabs, acrylic tubes, and glass cut to the appropriate dimensions that we wanted.

our attempt to finish our final construct

poured in concrete for base slab

added framing for vertical slab

making the concrete even within the framing

started to leak through the seams - oops!

125

126

schematic design design development construction document cecilia herrera kimberly rodriguez adrianna saavedra justin yap alejandra saldana

professional practice one giulio zavolta

127

schematic design

O B a

East Perspective

Detail Notes

West Perspective

Notes

Plan

South East Section

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

CKAJA HOUSE

Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

11568

Documents and codes

01/24/12

Schematic Design

01/31/12

Schematic Design

128

North East Elevation 8

North West Elevation 8

South West Elevation 8

South East Elevation 8

SD 1

design development

SKYLIGHT IMPLEMENTED IN ROOF

O B a Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

WOOD FRAMING

DRIVEWAY

South West Elevation 4

STUCCO ROOFING MEMBRANE

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

South East Elevation

CKAJA HOUSE

DRIVEWAY

STUCCO WOOD FRAME

WOOD FRAMING STUCCO WOOD FRAMING WOOD COLUMN WOOD DOOR

North East Elevation

North West Elevation 8

11568 Documents and codes

01/24/12

Schematic Design

01/31/12

Design Development

02/14/12

Design Development

http://homedesigninspiration.com/architecture/kowalewski-beach-house-design.jpg

http://www.hillcountrydoors.com/aluminumdoor_contemporaryhome.jpg

http://reyudesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/amazing-outdoor-furniture-and-pool-view-

https://encrypted-tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRlbhg

in-modern-dream-house.jpg

S6xJICfMtGNeS8stj37sBYLCnfKjZ83qBPpPFJxcrm4x2fw

http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_llq7ojKuof1qdo7c6o1_500.jpg

DD 1

129

W 5T 6.2 58 6.25 57

WOOD FN

W.I. FN

SET L & TAG 1.00' OUT

DRIVE

BEG W.I. FN 0.22'W

COR WALL 0.14'E

1.10'W

CONC N 13°17'15"E

573.6 10’-0”

5 57 84.7 4.7 5T 5 W

20’-0”

O B a

4TC

6.0

149.94'

Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

570.5 561.85

W 5T 8.2 59 8.25 57

582.5

COR WOOD FN 0.36'W

1.12'W

COR WOOD FN 0.19'W

576.1

578.5

5’-0”

586.50

587.00TW 583.50

GARAGE

END WALL 0.05'E

SET L & TAG IN TW

587.8

COR WOOD FN 0.16'W, 0.68'N

WOOD FN

construction document

565 565 .66TC .01 FL

8"OLIVE 582.5 20’-0”

569.5 SET BACK

16"OLIVE

25’-0”

CONC DRIVE

100.00' N 76°43'00"W

6 0' 3 0'

3 0'

559 .7

28"PINE

WALK

CONC CURB W/ 2'GUTTER

559.28

12"TREE 559.3

565

560

580

8"OLIVE 570.75

CONC

570

575

562.5 578.25

MERIDIAN

585

N 76°43'00"W

STREET

100.00'

5’-0”

LOT 14

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

PROPERTY LINE

40’-0”

576.25

CKAJA HOUSE

5’-0”

587.00TW 583.50

A-1

16"OLIVE

55 9.2 55 2TC 8.3 7FL

PARKWAY

16"OLIVE

TC .06 559 .41FL 558

559.26

568.5

562.8 CONC

SET L & TAG 1.00' OUT

149.94'

40' TO CORNER OF AVENUE 50

N 13°17'15"E

0.43'E

0.36'E

WIRE

575.5

WOOD SHED

COR CLFN 0.23'E, 0.03'S

582.50

SET CONC NAIL IN TW

C 56 OR 0 1.2 .6 4 8'E

583.50TW 580.00

END CLFN 0.10'W

566.5

SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

11568 Documents and codes

01/24/12

PLAN & SECTION

130

LEFT SECTION SCALE: 1/8” = 1’-0”

SS-3 7

SS-1 13

O B a Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

SLAB

2 x 12 BEAM

GARAGE DOOR

SS-3 5

SOFA

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

SS-3 13

CKAJA HOUSE

SS-1 5

DRIVEWAY (OPEN BELOW)

SS-2 13

Floor Plan

Floor Framing Plan 4

SS-2 5 3:12 Slope 2 x 10 R.R. @ 12” O.C. Stucco

11568 Documents and codes

01/24/12

Schematic Design

01/31/12

Design Development

02/14/12

Plans & Programming

02/28/12

Natural Grade 2 x 12 F.J. @ 12” O.C.

Finished Grade

NATURAL GRADE

Framing Elevations

South West Section 4

South East Section 4

A 2.0

131

construction document

ROOFING MATERIAL

O B a

5/8” PLYWOOD SHEET

2x12 R.R. @ 16” OC 5/8” PLYWOOD

Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE DOUBLE TOP PLATES 2x12 STUD @24” O.C.

7/8” FINISH STUCCO

FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION

Space for Ventilation

DBL. GLAZED ALUM WINDOW

2x4 STUD

7/8” INTERIOR SUCCO FINISH 5/8” PLYWOOD

SHIM CAULK SEALANT

CONT. BACKER ROD AND CHALK SEALANT

ALUM. WINDOW

SHIM

CONT. BACKER ROD AND CAULK SEALNT, TYP.

DBL. GLAZED ALUM. KAWNEER 1.75”X4” CURTAIN WALL PROV. SHOP DRAWINGS & CALCS FOR WINDOWS

7/8” PLYWOOD DBL. GLAZED WINDOW

STUCCO EXT. FINISH

CAULK SEALANT WINDOW GLAZING

SHIM

EXT. STUCCO WALL

Curtain Wall Section 34

Window Slab

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

5/8” PLYWOOD

CKAJA HOUSE

DOUBLE HEADER 7/8” EXTERIOR FINISH STUCCO

CUSTOM STEEL FRAMMING

5/8” PLYWOOD

7/8” FINISH STUCCO

Exterior Wall System

Wall Base

Kraft Based Bat Insulation

Floor Finish

11568 2x4 WINDOW SILL

CONCRETE FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WALL

Splash Block

Documents and codes

01/24/12

Schematic Design

01/31/12

Design Development

02/14/12

Plans & Programming

02/28/12

Detail Drawings

02/28/12

FINISHED GRADE

CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM

INTERNAL WEEP

SHIM

SEALANT & BR AT END DAM CONT CAULK AROUND END TO SEAL

132

Kitchen Wall Section 34

Curtain Wall Section 34

WALL SECTIONS

Garage Wall Section 34

Garage Door Section 34

O B a

1.2

1.3

SECTION INCLUDES A.

Glass skylites.

Roof system skylights.

RELATED SECTIONS A.

Section 07920 - Sealants: Products and installation provisions for perimeter sealant.

Section 08800 - Glass: Products and installation provisions for glass.

REFERENCES

1.5

Selection Samples: For each finish product specified, two complete sets of color chips representing manufacturer's full range of available colors and patterns.

Verification Samples: For each finish product specified, two samples, minimum size 6 inches (150 mm) square, representing actual product, color, and patterns.

Aluminum Association (AA): 1. AA M12C22A41 - Anodized Plus Finish. 2. AA M12C22A32/A34 - Color anodized: Class II, Color Anodic Finish.

Manufacturer Qualifications: 1. Skylight manufacturer shall have a minimum of ten years experience in design, fabrication and installation of custom aluminum skylight systems.

American Architectural Manufacturer's Association (AAMA): 1. AAMA 501.2 - Quality Assurance and Diagnostic Water Leakage Field Check of Installed Storefronts, Curtain Walls, and Sloped Glazing Systems. 2. AAMA 605.2 - Voluntary Specification for High Performance Organic Coatings. 3. AAMA 607.1 - Voluntary Guide Specifications and Inspection Methods for Clear Anodic Finishes for Architectural Aluminum. 4. AAMA 612 - Voluntary Specifications and Performance Requirements and Test Procedures for Combined Coatings of Anodic Oxide and Transparent Coatings on Architectural Aluminum, for Finishes such as Anodized Plus.

Installer Qualifications: 1. Installer shall be trained and approved by manufacturer. 2. Installer shall have five years experience with skylight type, size and complexity.

Mock-Up: Provide a mock-up for evaluation of surface preparation techniques and application workmanship. 1. Finish areas designated by Architect. 2. Do not proceed with remaining work until workmanship, color, and sheen are approved by Architect. 3. Refinish mock-up area as required to produce acceptable work.

ASTM International (ASTM): 1. ASTM B209 - Standard Specification for Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Sheet and Plate. 2. ASTM C1048 - Standard Specification for Heat-Treated Flat Glass Kind HS, Kind FT Coated and Uncoated Glass. 3. ASTM E331 - Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference. 4. ASTM E773 - Standard Test Method for Accelerated Weathering of Sealed Insulating Glass Units. 5. ASTM E774 - Standard Specification for the Classification of the Durability of Sealed Insulating Glass Units.

1.6

1.7

Store products in manufacturer's unopened packaging until ready for installation. Store and dispose of solvent-based materials, and materials used with solventbased materials, in accordance with requirements of local authorities having jurisdiction.

Manufacturer's data sheets on each product to be used, including: 1. Preparation instructions and recommendations.

Shop Drawings: Include plans, elevations, sections, and details, indicating dimensions, tolerances, profiles, anchorage, connections, fasteners, provisions for expansion and contraction, drainage, flashing, finish, glazing, and attachments to other Work. Design Data: 1. Submit manufacturer's structural calculations showing sizes of framing members and loads applied to supporting structure based on design loads. 2. Structural calculations shall be prepared in accordance with Aluminum Association Specifications for Aluminum Structures SAS30 by a professional engineer qualified in design of self-supporting, sloped glazed systems and curtainwall systems and licensed in state where skylights and wall systems are to be installed.

1.7

B. C.

Manufacturer Qualifications: Manufacturer to have minimum ten years documented experience in the fabrication of skylights and wall systems of the type required for this project and be capable of providing field service representation during installation. Installer Qualifications: Installer to have minimum five years documented experience in the work of this section who has specialized in the installation of work similar to that required for this project and is approved by the manufacturer.

Delivery: Deliver materials to site in manufacturer's original, unopened containers and packaging, with labels clearly identifying product name, manufacturer, and location of installation. Storage: Store products above the floor and under cover in a clean, dry area until ready for installation. Handling: Protect materials and finish from damage during handling and installation.

Acceptable Manufacturer: Major Industries Inc., which is located at: P. O. Box 306 ; Wausau, WI 54402-0306; Toll Free Tel: 888-759-2678; Tel: 715-842-4616; Email: request info (ads@majorskylights.com); Web: www.majorskylights.com

TRANSLUCENT SKYLIGHTS AND WALL SYSTEMS A.

6) B.

MANUFACTURERS

Translucent Wall Systems:

08950-2

Translucent Panel Units: 1. Construction: Translucent facings of ICC ES Listed architectural-grade fiberglass reinforced polymer sheets bonded under controlled heat and pressure to a mechanically-interlocked aluminum I-beam grid core framework to form double-faced, self-supporting, structural composite, sandwich panels. a. Thickness: 2-3/4 inches (699 mm). b. Overall Dimensions: 10 width x 5 length. 2. Physical Properties: a. Burning Brand, ASTM E 108: Class A rating. b. Aged Adhesive Bond Strength, ASTM D 1037: c. Water Penetration Through Fixed Panel System and Perimeter Framing, ASTM E 331: No leakage when water is applied to entire panel surface at rate of 5 gal/hr/sq ft for 15 minutes (8 inch per hour rainfall) at 15 psf air pressure (77 mph constant wind). 3. Adhesive: a. Laminate Adhesive: Waterproof resin for use in laminating polyester sheet to aluminum grid core. 4. Thermal Barriers: a. Perimeter Framing System: Cast-in-place rigid polyurethane, insulating U-Factor of 0.5. b. Screw-applied thermal barriers will not be acceptable. 5. Translucent Face Sheets a. Appearance of Face Sheets: 1) Uniform in color to prevent splotchy appearance. 2) Free of ridges and wrinkles that prevent proper surface contact for bonding to grid core. 3) Free of clusters of air bubbles and pinholes that collect moisture and dirt. 4) Protective Weathering Surface: a) Material: "State-of-the-art" surface protection. b) Application: Factory-applied. c) Minimum Thickness: 1.0 mil. d) Repairs: Fully field repairable.

08950-3

Glazing Gaskets and Sealants: Glazing to be separated from frame by a continuous extruded black Santoprene gasket.

Fasteners: Screws and fasteners used in the factory assembly process shall be stainless steel. Fasteners and screws used for securing skylight to structure shall be suitable for substrate.

a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i.

Extruded closed cell sponge neoprene hybrid, 9/16 inch wide. Factory installed in extruded dovetail slots. Compression Deflection, 25 Percent Deflection Limits, ASTM D 1056: 13 to 24 psi. Compression Set, 22 Hours at 158 Degrees F, Maximum Percent, ASTM D 395, Method B: 30 psi. Heat Aging, 70 Hours at 212 Degrees F, Change in Compression Values, ASTM D 865 and D 1056: 0 to 10 psi. Dimensional Stability, Change Maximum Percent After Heat Aging, 70 Hours at 212 Degrees F, 4 Psi: 11.4 percent. Ozone Resistance at 40 Percent Elongation, 100 Hours at 104 Degrees F, ASTM D 1149: 1) Type II, 3 Ppm Ozone: No cracks. Water Absorption, Percent of Weight: 1) Option I: 5.0 percent. Flame Propagation: 1) Option I, 4 Inch Maximum: 11.7 percent.

Expansion and Contraction: Design and install components with provisions for expansion and contraction due to a 100 degree F temperature variation.

Glazing Caps: 1. Extruded aluminum. 2. Attach glazing caps with glazing cap fasteners located at a maximum of 9 inches on center or as required to resist negative loading.

Fasteners: 1. Clips for Attachment of Rafter Bars: a. Aluminum. b. Attach using bolted fastening methods. Construction and Glazing Cap Fasteners: a. 18-8 stainless steel. b. Include gasketed sealing washers. 3. Field Anchors: Cadmium plated, unless otherwise specified. 4. Exposed Fasteners: Finish to match aluminum. 2.

3.2

Do not begin installation until substrates have been properly prepared. If substrate preparation is the responsibility of another installer, notify Architect of unsatisfactory preparation before proceeding.

3.2

1.1

SECTION INCLUDES

1.2

RELATED SECTIONS

Do not begin installation until substrates have been properly prepared.

Examine areas to receive translucent skylights and wall systems, with installer and manufacturer's representative present, including supporting structure and substrate for dimensions, tolerances, material conditions, and support. Notify Architect of conditions that would adversely affect installation or subsequent utilization of skylights and wall systems. Do not proceed with installation until unsatisfactory conditions are corrected.

PREPARATION A.

Clean surfaces thoroughly prior to installation.

Ensure supports to receive skylights and wall systems are clean, flat, level, plumb, and square.

08950-4

Section 05500 - Metal Fabrications: Fabricated steel framed opening. Section 07920 - Joint Sealants.

REFERENCES AAMA 605.2 - High Performance Organic Coatings on Architectural Aluminum Extrusions and Panels.

AAMA 1503.1 - Thermal Transmittance and Condensation Resistance of Windows, Doors and Glazed Wall Sections.

AAMA 2603 - Pigmented Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels.

AAMA 2605 - Superior Performing Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels.

INSTALLATION

ASTM C 297 - Tensile Strength of Flat Sandwich Constructions in Flatwise Plane.

Prepare surfaces using the methods recommended by the manufacturer for achieving the best result for the substrate under the project conditions.

Install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.

ASTM E 72 - Conducting Strength Tests of Panels for Building Construction.

CLEANING

ASTM E 84 - Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials.

ICC-ES Listed Translucent Wall, Skylight and Roof Panels (ICC-ES PFC 5620).

ICC ES Legacy Report for Translucent Wall, Skylight and Roof Panels (ICC ES Legacy Report PFC 5620).

B. 3.5

Section 05120 - Structural Steel: Structural support framing for system.

Clean surfaces thoroughly prior to installation.

Translucent wall systems.

PREPARATION

B. 3.3

General Cleaning: Installer shall remove all protective coverings from frames and domes and shall leave installation free from debris and sealant markings. Final Cleaning: Final cleaning in accordance with manufacturers recommendations. Cleaning instructions shall be located on manufacturer's label.

1.4

PROTECTION A.

Protect installed products until completion of project.

Touch-up, repair or replace damaged products before Substantial Completion.

DESIGN / PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A.

Performance Requirements: 1. Framing Members: Sufficient sizes as required to support design loads.

Expansion and Contraction: Design and install components with provisions for expansion and contraction due to a 100 degree F (56 degrees C) temperature variation.

END OF SECTION 1.5

SUBMITTALS A.

Submit under provisions of Section 01300.

Product Data: Manufacturer's data sheets on each product to be used, including:

08600-4

3.3

3.4

EXAMINATION

PART 1 GENERAL

1.3

PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1

OBa SECTION 08950 TRANSLUCENT WALL AND ROOF ASSEMBLIES

EXAMINATION

08600-3

Thickness: a) 0.060 inches (1.52 mm). Color: a) Crystal.

Framing Materials 1. Aluminum: a. Extruded Aluminum: ASTM B 221, Alloy 6063-T5/T6, 6061-T5/T6, or equivalent. b. Formed Aluminum Components and Flashing: ASTM B 209, Alloy 5005-H34 or equivalent. c. Minimum Thickness: 0.040 inch. d. Construct skylights of extruded aluminum shapes similar to sections indicated on the Drawings. 2. Interior Glazing Gaskets:

Curb and Curb Frame (self flashing): 1. Curb and curb frame shall be fabricated from 6063-T5/T6 aluminum extrusion. 2. Thermally broken and insulated curb and curb frame shall be fabricated from 6063-T5/T6 aluminum extrusion. 3. Insulated curb and frame shall be fabricated from 6063-T5/T6 aluminum extrusion.

Model: Guardian 275 Translucent Wall Panel Systems. Panel Height: a. 5 feet (1.52 m). Panel Width: 10 feet (3.048 m).

Maintain environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, and ventilation) within limits recommended by manufacturer for optimum results. Do not install products under environmental conditions outside manufacturer's absolute limits.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.2

3.1

3.4

Curb Mount: 1. Curb mount frame shall be fabricated from 6063-T5/T6 aluminum extrusion with a minimum thickness of .060 inch (1.5 mm). 2. Thermally broken curb mount frame shall be fabricated from 6063-T5/T6 aluminum extrusion. a. Thickness shall be minimum .060 inch (1.5 mm) with a polyurethane thermal break to reduce thermal transfer and reduce condensation on the interior of the frame. 3. All corners shall be welded using the heliarc process. 4. Aluminum Finish: a. High performance coating, custom color.

MATERIALS

PROJECT CONDITIONS A.

2.1

2.3

DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A.

1.8

1. 2. 3.

QUALITY ASSURANCE A.

Curb mount frame shall have an integral condensation gutter and weep holes for sufficient drainage to the exterior. All corners shall be welded using the heliarc process. Glazing track, mullions, rafters and tube rafters: Glazing track, mullions and rafters shall be fabricated from 6063-T5/T6 aluminum extrusion with a minimum thickness of .080 inch (2.0 mm). Mullions shall have an exterior compression mullion cap for air and water tight seal. Tube rafters (where required) shall have a minimum thickness of .110 inch (2.8 mm). Aluminum Finish: a. High performance coating, custom color.

PART 3 EXECUTION

Glass Thermal Break Self Flashing: Insulating glass unit skylights with 2 polyurethane thermal breaks and 1 inch (25 mm) fiberglass insulating 4 inches (102 mm) self flashing frame for installation on roof deck. Sizes as shown on drawings. 1. Model GTSF (fixed) as manufactured by American Skylites. 2. Model GTVSF (venting) as manufactured by American Skylites. a. Venting units shall have factory installed, single point gear mechanism (maximum 12 inch (305 mm) opening) with operator handle. Venting sash shall close onto continuous Santoprene compression gasket. b. Insect Screen: Venting units shall have aluminum frame screen with (gray or black) fiberglass screen material. 3. Insulating Glass: Construction shall be minimum overall thickness of 3/4 inch (19 mm) (3/16 inch glass1/2 inch air space3/16 inch glass) (4.8 mm glass13 mm air space4.8 mm glass). Insulating glass shall be factory dual sealed. 4. Glass: a. Laminated.

FABRICATI0N A.

Performance Warranty: Provide manufacturer's written warranty covering skylight work. Warranty shall cover defective materials, workmanship and performance. Warranty shall be limited to repair or replacement of work described in this section and shall not provide for repair or replacement of work by others. 1. 5 years.

Water Infiltration: 1. Acrylic and/or polycarbonate unit skylights shall meet the requirements of STM E547/E331 that allows for no water infiltration at a test pressure of 12 psf (571 Pa).

GLASS SKYLIGHTS A.

2.4

Load: 1. Deflection of framing members shall not exceed L/180 or 1 inch (25 mm) whichever is less.

08600-2

Preparation instructions and recommendations. Storage and handling requirements and recommendations. Installation methods. Maintenance instructions.

WARRANTY

08600-1

1.6

2.3

Acceptable Manufacturer: American Skylites, Inc., which is located at: 525 113th St. ; Arlington, TX 76011; Toll Free Tel: 800-772-7401; Tel: 817-633-4666; Email: sales@americanskylites.com; Web: www.americanskylites.com

SKYLIGHT PERFORMANCE

DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING

SUBMITTALS

1. 2. 3. 4.

2.2

MANUFACTURERS A.

QUALITY ASSURANCE

2.1

Indicate compliance with specified structural design criteria. 1. Submitted design calculations shall bear seal of a professional engineer licensed in the State in which the skylight is to be installed. 2. Certify that engineer has reviewed shop drawings.

1.4

Shop Drawings: 1. Indicate material types, gauges and finishes, fabrication details and installation details. Show glazing types, methods of attachment and thermal movement provisions.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

PART 1 GENERAL 1.1

Storage and handling requirements and recommendations. Indicate materials, finishes and installation procedures recommended by manufacturer. Indicate compliance with specified design criteria. Indicate compliance with performance requirements. Include product specific glazing details.

3.5

08950-1

Aluminum Protection: Apply a protective coating of bituminous paint or other neutral material to dissimilar materials coming in contact with aluminum or separate with a nonabsorbent isolator.

OBa SECTION 08360

INSTALLATION

SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOORS

Install translucent skylights and wall systems in accordance with manufacturer's instructions at locations indicated on the Drawings.

Install skylights and wall systems level, plumb, square, accurately aligned, correctly located, and without warp or rack.

Do not install skylight components with deficiencies or dimensional errors. Do not proceed with installation until unsatisfactory components are replaced.

Anchor skylights and wall systems securely in place to supports. Use attachment methods permitting adjustment for construction tolerances, irregularities, alignment, and expansion and contraction.

Install skylights and wall systems including flashings, fasteners, hardware, sealants, and glazing materials required for a complete, weatherproof installation.

Sheet Metal Flashing: Install sheet metal flashing at skylight and wall systems perimeter as specified in Section 07620.

Sealants: Install sealants at sill flashing and perimeter framing as required to prevent air and water intrusion as specified in Section 07920.

Repair damages to protective weathering surface of exterior face sheet in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and as approved by Architect.

PART 1 1.1

A. 1.2

1.3

Clean installed skylights and wall systems in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.

Clean skylights and wall systems inside and outside, including member connections and inside corners, immediately after installation and after sealants have cured.

Remove temporary protective coverings and strippable coatings from prefinished metal surfaces.

Remove labels and part number markings from components.

1.4

Protect installed products until completion of project.

Touch-up, repair or replace damaged products before Substantial Completion. END OF SECTION

08950-5

Commercial sectional doors.

RELATED SECTIONS A.

Section 08710 - Door Hardware: Hardware, locks, access panels.

Section 09900 - Painting: Field painting.

REFERENCES A.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A 653/A 653M - Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C 518 - Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 283 - Standard Test Method for Determining the Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors Under Specified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen.

11568

SUBMITTALS A.

Do not use harsh cleaning materials or methods that would damage metal finishes or glazing.

PROTECTION

GENERAL

SECTION INCLUDES

CLEANING A.

4954 E. Meridian Street Los Angeles, CA 90042

4. 5. 6.

SKYLIGHTS

CKAJA HOUSE

2. 3.

OBa SECTION 08600

Cecilia Herrera Kimberly Rodriguez Adrianna Saavedra Justin Yap Alejandra Saldana

Product Data: Manufacturer's data sheets on each product to be used, including: 1. Preparation instructions and recommendations. 2. Storage and handling requirements and recommendations. 3. Installation methods. Shop Drawings: 1. Provide drawings indicating track details, head and jamb conditions, spring shafts, anchorage, accessories, finish colors, patterns and textures, operator mounts and other related information. 2. Regulatory Requirements and Approvals: Provide shop drawings in compliance with local Authority having Jurisdiction (AHJ).

Certifications: 1. Submit manufacturer's certificate that products meet or exceed specified requirements. 2. Submit installer qualifications.

Selection Samples: For each finish product specified, two complete sets of color chips representing manufacturer's full range of available colors and patterns.

Verification Samples: For each finish product specified, two samples, minimum size 6 inches (150 mm) square, representing actual product, color, and patterns.

08360-1

Documents and codes

01/24/12

Schematic Design

01/31/12

Design Development

02/14/12

Plans & Programming

02/28/12

Detail Drawings

03/27/12

Door, Finish, & Wind. Sch. 04/17/12

Outline Specifications

04/17/12

OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS

OS 1

133

134

digital painting ramon ramirez

135

lantern

task was to create something digital and somehow bring it into a physical form (or vice versa). Area of focus was on the Bart routes in San Francisco Bay Area and how the system of public transportation is more reliable compared to other cities. Tracings of the routes was done and rotated to a 45 degree angle because back in the days when San Francisco was ruled by Spain, they had their urban cities at an angle rather than true North & South. After rotating the tracings, a form was discovered, trimmed, and laser cut into various pieces. Pieces of this form were then scaled into various sizes creating a lantern.

bart map route compilation

136

brainstorming sketches

www.bart.gov

blog.rhonafriberg.com

study model

final model 137

138

experimental urban drawing ramon ramirez

139

140

photograph

141

142

spray paint cardboard

143

144

spray paint cardboard

collage background printed from computer and stickers done by other artists were placed on top.

145

146

cake

delineation & rendering (ccsf) nestor regino

147

cake

148

The goal for this project was to collage letters with one another based off of a word: cake. From there, translate the drawing by hand. Through the act of drawing, relate the motion into a 3d physical model that captured characteristics of the drawing and the properties of cake.

149

150

free hand drawing (ccsf) simon udell

151

152

Interior of Batmale Hall at CCSF pencil drawing paper (80 lb) 9” x 12”

pencil drawing paper (80 lb) 9” x 12”

153

154

pencil drawing paper (80 lb) 6” x 8”

pencil drawing paper (80 lb) 9” x 12”

155

156

pencil drawing paper (80 lb) 9” x 12”

Leon Bakst (lithograph) by Pablo Picasso 1923 l-amour-a-trois.tumblr.com

Drawing purposely done upside down.

Leon Bakst Lithograph by Pablo Picasso (redrawn)

pencil drawing paper (80 lb) 9” x 12”

157

158

CCSF’s Rosenberg Library pencil drawing paper (80 lb) 9” x 12”

Robie House by Frank Lloyd Wright pencil drawing paper (80 lb) 9” x 12”

159

160

an experience: coit tower collage

architectural design one (ccsf) jerry lum

161

an experience: coit tower

A site was given to explore and take pictures: Coit Tower. While visiting the site, documenting the spatial experience was performed so that it can be later translated into drawings and through a model. Through the act of drawing and building, scale less models were explored.

162

163

an experience: coit tower

164

collage

165

166

new stanford hospital

internship rafael vi単oly architects

167

new stanford hospital 1

OWNER: STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 300 PASTEUR DRIVE, M/C 5871 STANFORD, CA 94304 TEL: 650.380.6858 FAX: 650.498.5833 ARCHITECT: RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS PC 149 NEW MONTGOMERY, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 TEL: 415.671.4600 FAX: 415.671.4610

MEDICAL PLANNER: LEE, BURKHART, LIU 13335 MAXELLA AVENUE MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.829.2249 FAX: 310.829.1673

OFFSET RATED PARTITION ABOVE IN PLAN VIEW WHERE OCCURS

RATED PARTITION AS SCHEDULED 2 HR-RATED HORIZONTAL SHELF TOP OF SHELF +9'-0" A.F.F.

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE AND 1 2 A8103

A8103

RATED SECTION SHELF AT LEVEL 3 LEDGE (PLAN SIM.) 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1 A8103

STORE FRONT WHERE OCCURS

1 A8103

FULL HEIGHT PARTITION AS SCHEDULED GMP

BACKCHECK #1

100% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PRIVATE DINING AT LEVEL 3 LEDGE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

08-06-2012 04-29-2011 10-01-2010

50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05-28-2010

100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

01-29-2010

ISSUE NAME

REV NO

OSHPD NO.

PHASE:

REV DATE

IS-081923-43

INCREMENT NO. RATED PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

08-06-2012 02-03-2012

50% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REVIEWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF T24, CCR

APPROVED TOP OF SHELF +9'-0" A.F.F. DATE: _________________________________________

IS-081923-43 Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 1 A8103

RATED SHELF AT LEVEL 3 LEDGE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

PAINT GYPSUM BOARD

ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD

LSA LIGHT FIXT. WHERE OCCURS, S.E.D. 'L' ANGLE 'J' MOLDING TOP OF PARTITION WALL + 9'-0" A.F.F.

FABRIC WALL COVERING

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 36in x 48in IT IS A REDUCED PRINT; REFER TO GRAPHIC SCALE

6" METAL STUD

0 SCALE:

5/8" GYPSUM BOARD FURRING

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

P Name: P Number:

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL 631.004

PARTITION DETAILS 8/3/2012 12:08:32 PM

168

KEY PLAN AND NORTH SIGN

BASE AS SCHEDULED

SHEET TITLE:

FURRED WALL AT LEVEL 3 LEDGE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

A8103 SHEET NUMBER:

LEGEND A

N X

22 21

LEVEL 5 FINISH FOR GYPSUM BOARD WALLS AND CEILINGS: REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 09 29 00, 3.7 FOR GYPSUM BOARD FINISH SCHEDULE

OWNER: STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 300 PASTEUR DRIVE, M/C 5871 STANFORD, CA 94304 TEL: 650.380.6858 FAX: 650.498.5833

UP DN

ARCHITECT: RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS PC 149 NEW MONTGOMERY, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 TEL: 415.671.4600 FAX: 415.671.4610

Y 13

MEDICAL PLANNER: LEE, BURKHART, LIU 13335 MAXELLA AVENUE MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.829.2249 FAX: 310.829.1673

DNUP UPDN

6.8

DN UP

A.8 LEVEL FOUR (LEVELS #5 - #7 SIMILAR) 1/32" = 1'-0"

LEVEL TWO 1/32" = 1'-0"

N X

UP DN

GMP

BACKCHECK #1

04-29-2011 10-01-2010

50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

05-28-2010

100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

APPROVED

UPDN

IS-081923-43

Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

UPDN

9 UP

DN UP DN

REVIEWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF T24, CCR

DATE: _________________________________________

9 UP

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

REV DATE

IS-081923-43

REV NO

OSHPD NO. INCREMENT NO.

01-29-2010

ISSUE NAME

08-06-2012 02-03-2012

50% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

PHASE: UP

08-06-2012

100% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

Y Z

UP DN

DN 48"

48"

18"

24"

6.8

LT.

24"

6.8

24"

48"

COLD FOOD PREP

60" X

60"

18"

REF. (+35 F)

42"

21"

PICK-UP

E2 E1

HOT FOOD PREP

ICE

WATER FILTER FOR #276

DN UP

ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD

HOST/ HOSTESS

SALAD BAR

SOUP

HOT FOOD

TOPPINGS

KEY PLAN AND NORTH SIGN

J H

IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 36in x 48in IT IS A REDUCED PRINT; REFER TO GRAPHIC SCALE

UP DN

DN UP

SCALE:

1/32" = 1'-0"

P Name: P Number:

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL 631.004

8/3/2012 12:14:58 PM

GYPSUM BOARD FINISH LEVEL LOCATIONS SHEET TITLE:

A.8

LEVEL THREE 1/32" = 1'-0"

A.8 LEVEL ONE 1/32" = 1'-0"

A8105 SHEET NUMBER:

169

new stanford hospital 1

4 1

CORRIDOR

VARIES (W14 X 233 STL. COL. SHOWN)

W12 X 96 STL. COL. RATED FIRESTOP

CORRIDOR

1' - 0"

CL 110

TYP. SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING. UL X790.

1' - 3"

TYP.

1' - 3"

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ CORRIDOR CORNER 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

ARCHITECT: RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS PC 149 NEW MONTGOMERY, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 TEL: 415.671.4600 FAX: 415.671.4610

110 TYP.

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 3 A8107

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 6 A8107

11"

TYP. W12X96 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 1 HR CORRIDOR- LEVEL 2 ICU 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

MEDICAL PLANNER: LEE, BURKHART, LIU 13335 MAXELLA AVENUE MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.829.2249 FAX: 310.829.1673

11"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE AND 11 13 A8107 A8107

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1" MIN. CLR. SP. TYP.

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 7 A8107

TYP. W14X233 COL. ENCLOSURE @ 2HR. CORRIDOR

1' - 10"

1' - 0"

110

OWNER: STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 300 PASTEUR DRIVE, M/C 5871 STANFORD, CA 94304 TEL: 650.380.6858 FAX: 650.498.5833

1' - 0"

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

10"

1' - 0"

1' - 3"

VARIES (W14 X 233 STL. COL. SHOWN)

CORRIDOR

TYP. W14X233 COL. ENCLOSURE @ 1HR. CORRIDOR 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1' - 1"

1' - 3" 1

1 A0460

RATED FIRESTOP

CORRIDOR

TYP.

CORRIDOR

RATED FIRESTOP

1' - 3"

120 TYP.

1' - 3"

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ 2HR. CORRIDOR 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

CL 16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP W/ 16 GA. MTL. ANGLE STAGGERED @ 18" O.C. MAX.

W14 X 211 STL. COL.

CL CL

1' - 3"

TYP.

5/8" G.W.B.

1' - 2"

11"

5/8" G.W.B.

1" MIN. CLR. SP. TYP.

1 CORRIDOR

1' - 3"

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP BASE NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 21 A8107 NON-RATED PTN INTERSECTING NON-RATED PARTITION IN ADJOINING WALLS 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP W/16 GA. MTL. ANGLE STAGGERED @ 18" O.C. MAX.

W14X211 COL. ENCLOSURE @ 1HR. CORRIDOR - LEVEL 2 ICU -1 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1' - 3"

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

CORRIDOR

11"

1' - 0"

ROOM SIDE

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 6 A8107

1' - 1"

1' - 0"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 6 A8107

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ 1HR. CORRIDOR 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

TYP. W14X370 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 1 HR CORRIDOR CORNER 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

TYP. W12X230 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 1 HR CORRIDOR 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

CL CL

3 A0460

TYP.

05-28-2010

AS REQ'D

VARIES

PHASE:

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

REVIEWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF T24, CCR

APPROVED CL DATE: _________________________________________

IS-081923-43

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE W/Z-CLIP @ INTERSECTING NON-RATED WALL 1 1/2" = 1'-0" RATED FIRESTOP

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1 A0460 PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

24 IN. X 24 IN. BOX STL. COL.

1' - 1" 110

9 A0460

MECH. ROOM

TYP.

8/3/2012 12:16:14 PM

1' - 0"

1' - 3"

CORRIDOR

NOTE: FOR GROUND LEVEL COLUMN ENCLOSURES, USE 1'-6" IN LIOU OF 1'-3" TYP. U.O.N.

W12X210 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 1 HR CORRIDOR CORNER 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ STAIRS - 2HR 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1' - 3"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 1 A8107

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE W/Z-CLIP 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

10"

C B

0 SCALE:

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

P Name:

1' - 1"

P Number:

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

CORRIDOR

F E

IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 36in x 48in IT IS A REDUCED PRINT; REFER TO GRAPHIC SCALE

5/8" G.W.B.

1' - 1"

10"

SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING. UL X790.

J H

KEY PLAN AND NORTH SIGN

SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING. UL X790.

120

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

1' - 3"

SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING 15/16" THK. UL X790

TYP. 262

110

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP BASE

# 10 S.M.S. @12" O.C. TYP.

3 A0460

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

CL SPRAY-APPLIED F.P.; 3-HR. FIRE RESISTIVE RATING. UL X790.

CORRIDOR

1' - 3"

TYP.

1' - 0"

SEE FLOOR PLAN

1' - 3"

9 1/2"

W12 X 230 STL. COLUMN

VARIES (W12 X 230 STL. COL. SHOWN)

10"

1' - 3"

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP (SHOWN 2")

2 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD

TYP.

3X3X90, 16 GA. STL. L-ANGLE TYP.

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

120

RATED FIRESTOP

16 GA. Z-CLIP BASE 16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP TYP. (SHOWN 2")

TYP. WIDE FLANGE COL. ENCLOSURE @ INTERSECTING NON-RATED WALL

VARIES (W12 X 72 STL. COL. SHOWN)

CORRIDOR

24 IN. X 24 IN . BOX STL. COL.

TYPICAL COLUMN ENCLOSURE AT FIRE RATED 2 HR CORRIDOR CORNER

3X3X90, 16 GA. STL. L-ANGLE TYP.

8 1 3/4" 16 GA. Z-CLIP

16 GA. STL. Z-CLIP BASE TYP.

STAIRWELL

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 1 A8107

NOTE: OMIT FURRING AT SHAFT CONDITIONS WHERE OCCURS. SEE FLOOR PLANS.

120

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 11 A8107

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

CORRIDOR

1 1

Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

5/8" G.W.B.

TYP.

1' - 1"

1' - 3"

5 A0460

1' - 6"

W12X279 COL. ENCLOSURE AT CORRIDOR/STAIRS - 2HR

1 A0460

5/8" G.W.B.

2 HR RATED WALL. UL # U419

1' - 3"

120

STAIRS WELL

REV DATE

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

110

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 21 A8107

01-29-2010 REV NO

IS-081923-43

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

160

170

50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

120

W12 X 279 STL. COL.

08-06-2012 04-29-2011

INCREMENT NO.

VARIES

STAIRWELL 2 HR. RATED SHAFT WALL UL. # U459

08-06-2012 02-03-2012

10-01-2010

OSHPD NO.

CORRIDOR

ISSUE NAME

120 2 HR, 1 HR SIM.

110

TYP.

BACKCHECK #1 50% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

120

GMP 100% CD - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE @ 2 HR. CORRIDOR CORNER 2

2 HR RATED WALL. UL # U419

1" MIN. CLR. SP. TYP.

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 11 A8107

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE AND 11 13 A8107 A8107

CORRIDOR

110

1' - 0"

RATED FIRESTOP

CORRIDOR

VARIES (W14 X 370 STL. COL. SHOWN)

10"

1' - 3" 11" PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

CORRIDOR

# 10 S.M.S. @ 12" O.C. TYP.

GYP. BOARD

DO NOT CONTINUE GYP. BD. IN NONRATED ROOM CONDITIONS TYP.

16 Z-CLIP (2" SHOWN)

3X3X90, 16 GA. STL. L-ANGLE TYP.

1 A0460

TYP.

TYP. W14X370 COL. ENCLOSURE AT 2 HR CORRIDOR CORNER

1 1H A0460

1' - 0"

3 A0460

CL 1' - 0"

TYP. BOX COL. ENCLOSURE W/ 1 & 2HR. CORRIDOR CORNER

ROOM SIDE

A8107

1' - 0"

1 1/2" = 1'-0"

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 7

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 13 A8107

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE AND 11 13 A8107 A8107

1 LAYER 5/8" G.W.B.

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

CORRIDOR

1' - 3"

W14X211 COL. ENCLOSURE @ 1HR. CORRIDOR - LEVEL 2 ICU -2

1' - 0"

1" MIN. CLR. TYP.

1' - 1"

CORRIDOR

NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DIMENSIONS, SEE 21 A8107

10"

1' - 3"

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL 631.004

COLUMN ENCLOSURE DETAILS

1' - 0" 1

120 1 TYPICAL COLUMN ENCLOSURE AT FIRE RATED 1 HR CORRIDOR CORNER 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

TYP. WIDE FLANGE COL. ENCLOSURE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

SHEET TITLE:

A8107 SHEET NUMBER:

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL

NEW CONNECTION BRIDGE AT LEVEL TWO SHC EXISTING HOSPITAL PATIENT BED TOWERS

SHC REFERENCE PLAN - LEVEL TWO SPECIAL BATHING FACILITIES

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO OSHPD BACKCHECK COMMENT #A701 AND #P192

NEW STANFORD HOSPITAL STANFORD HOSPITAL AND CLINICS OSHPD # IS-081923-43

INCREMENT 4 OSHPD BACKCHECK #1

AUGUST 6, 2012 RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS & LEE BURKHART LIU

171