Kate Shepherd Portfolio by Kate Shepherd

ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO 2019 KATE SHEPHERD REGISTERED ARCHITECT, AUSTRALIA

SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL WORK COMPLETED IN PRACTICE BETWEEN 2011 2019, COMPETITION ENTRIES AND STUDIO PROJECTS COMPLETED DURING MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE COURSE 2012-2013, UNIVERSITY OF OULU, FINLAND & UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA

PORTFOLIO OF WORKS - PROFESSIONAL

PROJECT 622 - NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH FACILITY OXFORD UK, FJMT

AZURE APARTMENTS KINGSTON ACT, STEWART ARCHITECTURE

RED HILL AND STUART FLATS MASTER PLANS RED HILL AND GRIFFITH ACT, STEWARTARCHITECTURE

LINQ PRECINT BELCONNEN ACT, STEWART ARCHITECTURE

STELLAR HEALTH CLUB PHILLIP ACT, CLARKE KELLER

BOUTIQUE HOTEL FORREST ACT, STEWART ARCHIETCTURE

CAMPOSAZ 7:7 CANAL SAN BOVO, ITALY

tion

2.2 Reference to the Trust’s Masterplan

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH FACILITY

he new neuroscience research art of the John Radcliffe Hospital d off Headley Way in Headington. ear of the hospital grounds behind the Site slopes from south-east nd north-east to south-west.

nd west, views of the Site are r Hospital buildings. To the north the Old Headington Cemetery, ed by a tall hedge row, and the e Old Headington Conservation

The Trust has yet to publish a Masterplan for the hospital site, although its 2016/17 Business Plan acknowledges that “developing a vision for a Masterplan for the future development of and investment in our estate is essential to ensure we have the facilities and infrastructure in place to deliver our clinical strategy.” It is the Trust’s intention to work with Academic Health Science Centre partners (including both Universities) so that a joint approach can be taken across all of the Headington hospital sites.

Old Headington Conservation Area

UNDER CONSTRUCTION Until a Masterplan is published,

gton Conservation Area contains de I and Grade II listed buildings l different character areas. Within modern residential properties and Dunstan Road).

site context is that of the John ital Campus which contains are varied in mass, scale and use of white and grey modulated e buildings, which is highly visible and longer distance views, is a re of the John Radcliffe Hospital enables the various buildings to r as a precinct.

individual proposals for development within the John Radcliffe Hospital Site are to be determined in accordance with Oxford City Council’s Development Plan, in particular with Policy SP23 of the Council’s Sites and Housing Plan 20112026. However, the design team has worked in careful collaboration with the Trust throughout the pre-application stage to ensure that the objectives of any future Masterplan would not be jeopardised by the development of this site.

OXFORD, UK

Refer to further detail in Planning Statement and Community Engagement Statement by JPPC

urrently occupied by contractors’ spital late-starter staff parking. te by public transport is provided closest stop at Car Park A to the spital site and a bus stop south isitors or staff will then follow a hill adjacent to the West Wing of ospital, cross the road just before entry to arrive at the proposed site connections areSeminar outlined room on Clinical research stations his document.

Imaging analysis rooms

The neuroscience reserach facility was a new building for the Oxford University on the existing Aerial map of the Site John Radcliffe Hospital site. There were a number of complexities within the client group and the large number of end users contributing to the design discussions. The design comprises of a three storey building, with a simple staggered rectangular form. The functional requirements of the proposed new neuroscience research facility were a mixture of clinical research stations, imaging analysis rooms, seminar rooms, research assessment rooms and cat. 2 wet and dry research laboratories.

is no direct access to the Site ng Main Hospital and FMRIB n across Carpark 1 as described

Level 2 layout plan

Seminar room

studio architecture interiors urban landscape community

CPSD

Staff area

Meeting rooms

WIN

Clinical research stations

Imaging analysis rooms

Clinical research stations

Imaging analysis rooms

Secondary entry

Level 1 layout plan

Offices and imaging analysis rooms CPSD

Main reception

Clinical research stations

Main entry Interview rooms

Research assessment rooms

WIN

Wet lab

Archive room Dry labs

Ground floor layout plan

CPSD

Main reception

My responsibilities on this project were in the capacity of Project Architect to produced documentation up to and inclusive of tender stage as well as all RIBA Stage reports submitted on behalf of the Oxford University.I assembled project presentations that were given to the various University building management and design and access statement design proposal

client groups as well as attended regular client and user group meeting, community consultations, Oxford Design Review Panel (ODRP) presentaions and consultant co-ordination meetings. I worked directly with the Project Manager to produce a building that was on budget and met the aesthetic and functional requirements of the clent. Through design, we were able to convince the local residence that a new modern building fit within the heritage context of Oxford without any objections during public consultation.

new neuroscience research building oxford

SHEET NO PROJECT CODE

1:25, 1:17.0087, 1:1 @ A1

19/10/17 DATE

100mm precast slab to SE details

3,100

3,035

nom. 100mm structural topping to SE details

FAC-03

Plasterboard lining nom. 200mm Rainspan panel

OXFORD Level 1, 8 St. Aldates Oxford OX1 1BS United Kingdom T +44 1865 520 420 E fjmt@fjmt.co.uk W www.fjmtstudio.com

STAGE 4

8,175

Raised access floor as specified.

FAC-03

REGISTERTED ARCHITECT: RICHARD FRANCIS-JONES REG. NO. 078103G

metal stud with INS1 insulation

FAC-02a

ARCHITECT

FAC-01

3,100

FAC-02a

FAC-01

FAC-02a

3,995

2,935

Terracotta rainscreen system FAC-01

ARCHITECT

OXFORD Level 1, 8 St. Aldates Oxford OX1 1BS United Kingdom T +44 1865 520 420 E fjmt@fjmt.co.uk W www.fjmtstudio.com

EQ EQ EQ

515

105.400

+105.700 2 LEVEL 2

3117

105.490

PROJECT

105.530

Fire Stop Beam with welded bottom plate to SE details

500

FAC-06

125

FAC-06

EQ EQ 125

FAC-06

FAC-04

Flush glazed curtain wall window system

STAGE 4

Secondary steel to SE details

REGISTERTED ARCHITECT: RICHARD FRANCIS-JONES REG. NO. 078103G

raised access floor as specified

Powder coated metal flashing sill detail

+105.700 2 LEVEL 2

New neuroscience research facility John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford, OX3 9DU University of Oxford

3,085

4,055

TITLE

Flush glazed curtain wall window system

SCALE

PROJECT CODE

100mm precast slab to SE details

FAC-01

TITLE

FAC-02a

FAC-04

Beam with welded bottom plate to SE details

Wall Sections Wall Section 5

FAC-01

+109.300 3 ROOF

Secondary steel to SE details 108.785

New neuroscience research facility John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford, OX3 9DU University of Oxford

FAC-02a

Wall Sections Wall Section 4

FAC-01

Composite timber cladding

1:25, 1:10, 1:17.0087, 1:1 @ A1

EQ EQ EQ

nom. 100mm structural topping to SE details

1,456

FAC-05

100

Aluminium roof trim. Finish and colour to match composite metal cladding

109.000

19/10/17

109.090 109.000

DATE

INS5 Insulation to roof fall to specialists details Shadow box glazing spandrel with INS2 insulation

INS5 Insulation to roof fall to specialists details Aluminium parapet capping

SCALE

EQ EQ

Secondary steel to SE details +109.300 3 ROOF

1,422

Handrail. membrane roofing

109.710

PROJECT

100

109.692 109.600

100

270

180

UOXJRRB 4-A-62005

700

610

Aluminium parapet capping

1 150

3117

350

SHEET NO

Membrane roofing

FAC-06

700

REVISION

D Handrail.

UOXJRRB 4-A-62004

430

EX5 Slot light

FAC-02b

Flush glazed curtain wall window system

3,100

Dim Varies

1,477

FAC-04

Aluminium corner trim. Finish and colour to match composite metal cladding

Channel drain to SE detail

ELEVATION WALL SECTION 4 1:25

Waterproofing membrane

+98.500 0 GROUND FLOOR

Issued for Approval

LV-03

External Proprietary aluminium extruded louvre screen system with concealed carrier frame. Butt jointed to appear continuous in front of framing.

LV-04

External aluminium extruded louvre screen system butted up to aluminium carrier frame segmenting louvres.

Please note construction/manufacture will not proceed without signed approval

Acou

stic

400

Baffl

e Dept

h 105 Dam Dept per h

CHK REV 28/03/2017

DATE

DRW

CHD

DESCRIPTION

Unit 1 Smiths Forge Industrial Estate, North End Road, Yatton, Bristol, BS49 4AU T. +44 (0) 1934 835900 sales@pricetwa.co.uk

100 250 Louvre Neck

Original For Comment/Approval

REV

PROJECT:

G30Z-P2 EXTERNAL LOUVRE c/w INSECT MESH POLYESTER POWDER COATED to RAL COLOUR TBC

286

250

Sleev

e Widt h Louv Flang re Widt e h

Exte rnal Over

150 Sleev Dept e h

e Widt h Sleev re Widt Louv e nal InterOver Flang

250

286

622 Oxford

TITLE: Acoustic Through Wall Vent c/w Thermally Tight Shut Off Damper

G30Z-P2 INTERNAL LOUVRE c/w INSECT MESH POLYESTER POWDER COATED to RAL COLOUR TBC

SCALE: DWG:

1:5@A2 A-TWU-01

REV:

P01

KEY Core A - 70mm stud Core B - 70mm stud with INS1 insulation Core C - 70mm stud with INS2 insulation Core D - 2x48mm stud with INS2 insulation Core E - 140mm Blockwork Core F - 100mm Blockwork to Plant room, 20mm cavity 50mm stud with INS2 Insulation Core G - 200mm In situ Concrete wall with 8mm Membrane, 12mm air gap, 75mm Stud with insulation. Core H - 200mm Rainspan with INS1 insulation and top hat. Core J - 200mm In situ Concrete wall with 8mm Membrane, 157mm air gap, 75mm Stud with insulation. Core K - 200mm In situ Concrete wall with 8mm Membrane, 42mm air gap, 75mm Stud with insulation. Core L - 75mm Stud with INS1 insulation. Core M - 200mm Rainspan, 75mm Stud with INS1 Insulation

Note:

and INS1 35mm INS1 INS1

CEILING FINISHES

FLOOR FINISHES

EC1 series EXPOSED for DoorCONCRETE schedule SOFFIT WITH PAINT Refer to 4-A-96000 FINISH Refer to 4-A-97000 series for Curtain Wall schedule EC2 series EXPOSED SOFFIT WITH Refer to 4-A-61000 for WallCONCRETE types ANTIMICROBACTERIAL PAINT for FINISH Refer to 4-A-67000 series and Fixed Joinery Schedule Furniture TC TIMBER CEILING MFC1 MINERAL FIBRE ACOUSTIC TILES - Acoustic treatedNOM. mechanical louvre SUPPORTED BY SEMI300 X 1200mm CONCEALED GRID RWP Rain water pipe MFC2 MINERAL FIBRE ACOUSTIC TILES SM Sprinkler main NOM. 300 X 1500mm SUPPORTED BY SEMIRAD Radiator CONCEALED GRID MFC3 MINERAL FIBRE ACOUSTIC TILES NOM. 300 X 1800mm SUPPORTED BY SEMICONCEALED GRID MFC4 HUMIDITY RESISTANT MINERAL TILES NOM. 600 X 600mm SUPPORTED BY SEMICONCEALED GRID PB PLASTERBOARD AC SUSPENDED ACOUSTIC CEILING BAFFLE MC1 METAL CLADDING FC1 FIBRE CEMENT CLADDING

CF CA CT2 CT3 VIN1 VIN2 VIN3 ST1 ST2 MAT

EXPOSED CONCRETE WITH PAINT FINISH CARPET TILE ON ACCESS FLOOR CERAMIC TILES ON ACCESS FLOOR CERAMIC TILES ON ACCESS FLOOR VINYL ON ACCESS FLOOR VINYL ON HEAVY DUTY ACCESS FLOOR VINYL ON SLAB STONE TILES ON RAISED ACCESS FLOOR STONE TILES ON SLAB BARRIER MATTING

3101 02

20 COVERED BICYCLE PARKS

J-1-19

J-1-06

WL2

PT6

RWP

D-W.01.06-01 ST2

DE-W.01.18-01

WL7

J-1-14

J-1-20

TAP

CW-W.01.07-02

D-W.01.10-01

W.01.07 LOUNGE 13.55 m2

PT2

W.01.08 1P OFFICE 10.40 m2

RAD

6 UNCOVERED BICYCLE PARKS

J-1-19 CA CA MAT

CW-W.01.07-01

RAD

CW-W.01.08-01

CW-W.01.09-04

RAD

CW-W.01.09-05

CW-W.01.10-02

CW-W.01.09-03

CW-W.01.09-02

RAD

+102.000

ST1

+102.100

CW-W.01.08-02

WL2

RAD

CW-W.01.09-01

CW-W.01.11-04

+102.110

WL3

D-W.01.07-01

WL2

J-1-17

RAD

CW-W.01.10-01

CW-C.01.07-01

CW-C.01.07-02

CW-W.01.11-02

WL2

CW-W.01.11-03

WL2 RAD

RAD

CW-W.01.11-01

CW-C.01.08-01

RAD

CW-C.01.08-02

CW-C.01.09-01

WL2

RAD

CW-C.01.09-02

CW-C.01.10-07

CW-C.01.10-05

WL2

RAD

CW-C.01.10-06

CW-C.01.10-03

62009

CW-C.01.10-04

CW-C.01.10-02

CW-C.01.10-01

WL2

RAD

CW-C.01.11-04

RAD

CW-C.01.11-03

CW-C.01.11-01

RAD

CW-C.01.11-02

CW-C.01.12-06

WL2

CW-C.01.12-07

CW-C.01.12-05

WL3

30 COVERED BICYCLE PARKS

DE-W.01.07-01

WL3

+102.100

EC1

01 62005

01 62007

WL7

W.01.09 15P WORKSTATION 40.96 m2 CA

PT7

CW-W.01.06-01

PT2

WL2 RAD W-C.01.17-01 RAD

PT2

W.01.18 STAIR 2 19.12 m2

W-C.01.17-02

W.01.21 CIRCULATION

WIN TOTAL 311.73 m2

W.01.10 1P OFFICE 10.24 m2

J-1-19

CW-W.01.06-02

CW-W.01.04-02

CW-W.01.06-03

CW-W.01.05-02

CW-W.01.05-01

CW-W.01.04-01 D-W.01.18-01

RWP

WL2

PT2

PT8

PT6

CT3 W.01.15 SHW/ CHG J-1-12

3.15 m2

WL2

J-1-19

2 3102

6 COVERED BICYCLE PARKS

J-1-18

PT2

D-W.01.08-01

RWP

W.01.17 MEETING 9.55 m2

PT7

J-1-05

W.01.11 3P OFFICE 21.03 m2

D-W.01.05-01

D-W.01.03-01 WL2 PT2

D-W.01.15-01

PT4

D-S.01.02-02

D-W.01.11-01

D-C.01.07-01

WL2 R.01.03 RISER 1.52 m2

WL1

PT2 PT4

D-S.01.02-03 WL2

WL6

WL10

PT2 J-1-19

PT2

J-1-19

PT4

D-W.01.17-01

D-W.01.02-01

CA W.01.13 PT5 WC CT2 D-W.01.13-01

2.34 m2

RWP

C.01.07 1P OFFICE 10.21 m2

PT7

J-1-19

PT7

D-C.01.08-01

PT2

C.01.08 1P OFFICE 10.23 m2

PT6

PT3

WL5

PT2

LIFT 3.87 m2

CT2

PT2

J-1-06

PT7

D-C.01.11-01

D-C.01.09-01 PT7

J-1-19

J-1-06

J-1-19

J-1-15

PT8

PT7

D-W.01.01-01

D-C.01.06-01

D-C.01.05-01

D-C.01.04-01

D-C.01.02-01

D-C.01.13-01

PT9

D-R.01.01-01 WL1

CW-C.01.12-01

CW-C.01.12-02

CW-C.01.12-03

8.35 m2

D-C.01.18-01

CA D-S.01.02-01 S.01.02 SHARED LOBBY 6.63 m2

PT2

C.01.09 1P OFFICE 10.21 m2

PT4

D-W.01.14-01 W.01.12 CT3 W.01.20 AMBULANT   W.01.14 CIRCULATION WC SHW/ CHG CT2 2.36 m2 3.11 m2 J-1-11 PT5 D-W.01.12-01

D-W.01.18-02

CT2 D-C.01.17-01

J-1-05

S.01.01 ACC   WC 3.82 m2

WL2

PT1

PT4

D-R.01.19-01 D-R.01.19-02

RWP

PT7

PT5

C.01.17 WC 2.68 m2 PT4

J-1-08

PT2

RAD

WL2

W.01.06 2P OFFICE 12.49 m2

WL6

WL1

PT7

RAD

WL2

W.01.05 1P OFFICE 10.22 m2 CA

J-1-17 CA

W-W.02.13-01

D-R.01.03-01

3,450

RAD

WL2

W.01.04 15P WORKSTATION 40.90 m2 W.01.19 CIRCULATION

PT9

6,090

CW-W.01.04-04 RAD

W.01.03 1P OFFICE CA 10.21 m2

WL5

C.01.21 CIRCULATION C.01.10 21P WORKSTATION 57.86 m2

J-1-17

J-1-19 CA

J-1-19

W.01.16 PRINT/ COPY 2.23 m2 WL2

W-C.01.15-02

J-1-06

WL2

PT2

C.01.11 3P OFFICE 20.98 m2

J-1-19

CW-W.01.04-03

CW-W.01.04-05 RAD

WL2

W.01.02 1P OFFICE CA 10.28 m2

PT1

W-C.01.14-02

CPSD TOTAL 380.94 m2 J-1-19

CT2

J-1-19

PT2

C.01.18 PRINT/ COPY/   STORE CA

PT1

CA RAD

W.01.01 1P OFFICE CA 10.21 m2

PT7

RWP

WL PT1 J-1-01 C.01.12 LOUNGE 33.37 m2

CW-C.01.12-04

C.01.06 1P OFFICE 10.21 m2 CA

D-S.01.01-01

J-1-02 RWP

J-1-02

RAD

12 UNCOVERED BICYCLE PARKS 02 4101

D-C.01.15-01

WL3 WL3

1 3102

J-1-04 R.01.01 RISER PT4 2.23 m2 C.01.16 AMBULANT   WC CT2 C.01.20 CIRCULATION 2.67 m2 D-C.01.16-01 PT3

D-C.01.13-02

PT7

CA WL7

C.01.15 MEETING 9.85 m2

J-1-19

PT2

WL2

ST2

CW-C.G.13-01

+98.750

C.01.14 MEETING 9.69 m2

RWP

C.01.05 1P OFFICE 10.22 m2 CA

D-C.01.19-03

PT7

TAP

C.01.13 STAIR 1 18.95 m2

J-1-19

PT2

W-C.01.15-01

D-C.01.14-01

PT2

W-C.01.14-01

PT7

D-C.01.01-01

5,850

C.01.03 15P WORKSTATION 41.25 m2

B 01 4101

C.01.04 1P OFFICE 10.21 m2 CA

J-1-17

WL6

J-1-16

PT7

PT2

C.01.19 CIRCULATION

WL7

WL2

RAD

WL2

CW-W.01.03-01

CW-W.01.03-02

CW-C.01.06-02

CW-W.01.02-01

CW-W.01.02-02 RAD

WL2

PT7

C.01.02 1P OFFICE CA 10.22 m2

PT7

J-1-19

PT7

PT2 CW-C.01.01-03

PT7

J-1-19

PT7

J-1-19

RAD

WL2

CW-W.01.01-01

CW-C.01.05-01 RAD

PT7

C.01.01 1P OFFICE CA 10.22 m2

J-1-19

02 62006

WL3

WL2

CW-C.01.06-01

RAD

WL2

CW-C.01.05-02

CW-C.01.03-01 RAD

WL2

CW-C.01.04-01

CW-C.01.03-02

CW-C.01.03-03 RAD

CW-C.01.04-02

CW-C.01.03-05

CW-C.01.03-04

CW-C.01.02-01

16 3102

WL2

CW-W.01.01-02

RAD

WL2

CW-C.01.02-02

CW-C.01.01-01

CW-C.01.01-02

+99.900

+101.650 +102.080

+101.660

02 62003 1,550

7,200

1,200

03 4102

02 62010 6,000

02 62001

02 62002

7,200

01 3101 7,200

02 62004

04 4102 7,200

7,200

+102.170

01 62008 7,200

FOR COORDINATION REV A

DATE 04.08.17

DESCRIPTION

CORE WALLS RE-ALIGNED

20.09.17

ISSUE FOR REVIEW

17.10.17

ISSUE FOR CONTRACTOR

CHK

KS KS AC

REV

DATE

DESCRIPTION

CHK

Do not scale. Use figured dimensions only. All dimensions to be checked on site. All drawings to be read in conjunction with the Engineers’ drawings. Any discrepancies between consultants drawings to be reported to the Architect before any work commences. The Contractor’s attention is drawn to the Health & Safety matters identified in the Health & Safety plan as being potentially hazardous. These items should not be considered as a complete and final list. The work Package Contractor’s normal Health & Safety obligations still apply when undertaking constructional operations both on and off site.

ARCHITECT

PROJECT

OXFORD Level 1, 8 St. Aldates Oxford OX1 1BS United Kingdom T +44 1865 520 420 E fjmt@fjmt.co.uk W www.fjmtstudio.com REGISTERTED ARCHITECT: RICHARD FRANCIS-JONES REG. NO. 078103G

New neuroscience research facility John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford, OX3 9DU University of Oxford

STAGE 4

Sectional perspective of the proposed building showing the natural ventilation strategy

TITLE

General Arrangement Plans Level 1 Plan

SCALE

1:100 @ A1

DATE

11/8/17

PROJECT CODE

SHEET NO

UOXJRRB 4-A-2002

REVISION

francis-jones morehen thorp

CHK DESCRIPTION P01

Thermally Tight Shutoff Damper c/w Actuator TBC 105

12.10.17

1536 External Louvre Height Over Flange 400 Sleeve Depth

250 Acoustic Baffle Depth

Powder coated metal profiled flashing to shadow gap details, sills and parapet capping

Composite metal panel to window returns and soffits

FAC-06

ISSUE FOR CONTRACTOR

FAC-05

286 Louvre Over Flange

FRANCIS-JONES MOREHEN THORP LTD 2017 COMPANY NO. 7384142. REGISTERED ARCHITECT: RICHARD FRANCIS-JONES REG. NO. 078103G

Signature:

Date:

150

Tick

Client: Name: Position:

NOTES

100

SCALE WITH CAUTION

Status

A. No further comments, issue for construction/manufacture B. Construction/manufacture may proceed subject to compliance with comments C. Review/incorporate comments re-submit drawings

Sleev

DATE

250

e Dept

350

Acoustic Baffle

DESCRIPTION

Internal Proprietary aluminium extruded louvre screen system with concealed carrier frame. Butt jointed to appear continuous in front of framing.

DATE

FAC-05

LV-02

FAC-02b

CHK BY

DESCRIPTION

ISSUE FOR CONTRACTOR

External louvre with mechanically operated insulated dampers and acoustic splitters where applicable.

REV

SECTION 3D

12.10.17

FAC-06

Pre-finished external timber cladding panel system with concealed fixings

LV-01

FAC-03 FAC-04

The louvre system will be operated locally by manual open/ close switches and not connected to the BMS.

The windows are simple fixed glazing that provides security and allows daylight into the building, an important consideration for the comfort of the occupants. The variation The louvre design has been developed to incorporate both in the positioning of these windows articulates the façade. the natural ventilation and acoustic requirements for external openings. The integrated acoustic baffles are made of a self- Stage 3 design change: Louvres width from 350mm to 250mm following the result of the thermal modelling. extinguishing material to prevent fire borne security3Drisks. VIEW

FAC-05

Flushed Glazed two sided capture curtain wall system with silicone vertical joints, horizontal extruded aluminium framing and secondary steel

FAC-04

1500 Sleeve Height

FAC-05 FAC-04 FAC-05

CHK DATE REV

External aluminium extruded louvre screen system butted up to aluminium carrier frame segmenting louvres.

DATE

FAC-06 FAC-01

Natural ventilation is provided through vertical ventilation louvres that are incorporated into the window design. This ventilation also provides an effective night purge system which Composite metal panel to window returns and soffits is integral to the sustainability strategy for naturally heating Powder coated metal profiled flashing to shadow gap details, sills and parapet capping and cooling of the building.

FAC-05

Natural ventilation strategy

External Proprietary aluminium extruded louvre screen system with concealed carrier frame. Butt jointed to appear continuous in front of framing.

LV-03

Glazing system to the north and south elevation (except the area enclosing the boardroom and CPSD lounge) with glazed spandrel panel with concealed fixing to conceal floor junction (steel mullion for stair glazing)

-02c

FAC-03

250 Louvre Neck

Internal Proprietary aluminium extruded louvre screen system with concealed carrier frame. Butt jointed to appear continuous in front of framing.

Proprietary terracotta/ceramic extruded rain-screen system with concealed carrier frame. Flush structural silicone double glazed curtain wall system with extruded aluminium framing. All visible aluminium to have anodised finish. Typically recessed and adjacent to FAC01 Ground level facade glazing with east and west following the rake of the ground and with a higher U-value for the glass.

-02a -02b

FAC-03

LV-02

FAC-01

FAC-04

External louvre with mechanically operated insulated dampers and acoustic splitters where applicable.

FRANCIS-JONES MOREHEN THORP LTD 2017 COMPANY NO. 7384142. REGISTERED ARCHITECT: RICHARD FRANCIS-JONES REG. NO. 078103G

Pre-finished external timber cladding panel system with concealed fixings

LV-01

DESCRIPTION

FAC-04

FAC-01

FAC-02a

FAC-06

Flushed Glazed two sided capture curtain wall system with silicone vertical joints, horizontal extruded aluminium framing and secondary steel

EXTERNAL FINISHES KEY

FAC-02

REV

FAC-02a

FAC-01

-02c

FAC-03

FAC-02b

FRANCIS-JONES MOREHEN THORP LTD 2017 COMPANY NO. 7384142. REGISTERED ARCHITECT: RICHARD FRANCIS-JONES REG. NO. 078103G C

-02a -02b

LV-04

SECTION WALL SECTION 5 1:25

FAC-02

LV-01

FAC-05

FAC-01

1536 Internal Louvre Height Over Flange

EXTERNAL FINISHES KEY

ELEVATION WALL SECTION 5 1:25

1500 Sleeve Height

SECTION WALL SECTION 4 1:25

FAC-05

FAC-06

Foundations to SE detail

286 Louvre Over Flange

Structural slab to SE detail

350 Sleeve Depth

+98.500 0 GROUND FLOOR

300

The Contractor’s attention is drawn to the Health & Safety matters identified in the Health & Safety plan as being potentially hazardous. These items should not be considered as a complete and final list. The work Package Contractor’s normal Health & Safety obligations still apply when undertaking constructional operations both on and off site.

RL Varies

FAC-02b

+102.100 1 LEVEL 1

101.535

All drawings to be read in conjunction with the Engineers’ drawings. Any discrepancies between consultants drawings to be reported to the Architect before any work commences.

Flush glazed curtain wall window system

Do not scale. Use figured dimensions only. All dimensions to be checked on site.

Powder coated metal flashing soffit detail

Secondary steel to SE details 101.800

100

101.535

515

101.800

500

101.890

Fire Stop

All drawings to be read in conjunction with the Engineers’ drawings. Any discrepancies between consultants drawings to be reported to the Architect before any work commences.

+102.100 1 LEVEL 1

150

Do not scale. Use figured dimensions only. All dimensions to be checked on site.

102.480

AZURE APARTMENTS COMPLETED 2016

KINGSTON, AUSTRALIA

Azure apartments are a multi-residential development comprising of 75 units located on the prestigious Kingston Foreshore, Canberra. I was appointed as Project Lead for this building, being responsible for preparing the majority of drawings and documentation for the project from preliminary sketch planning through to construction documentation. During the design phase, I was able to demonstrate to the client the benefits of providing a communal roof top garden, enabling access to the views of mount Ainslie and Black Mountain over Lake Burley Griffin to all residents, not just the penthouse apartments. I produced a full set of architectural documentation for these stages and met with the local planning authorities to acquire building approval. Stewart Architects were engaged for full coordination of documents including coordination of building services, certification

principles and statutory planning requirements. I managed the coordination of all consultant input including civil, hydraulic, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire, energy ratings, wind, acoustics, landscape and building certification and arranged team meetings with all consultants. I was the first point of contact for the consultants and coordinated all consultant documentation, including sizing and location of service risers, louvre openings, horizontal and vertical service penetrations, lift shafts, beams, columns, load bearing walls, fire walls and setdowns. I liaised with the consultants regarding errors and service clashes, working with them to produce the best alternative outcome. The final built project is consistant with the Kingston Foreshore master plan and contributes to the urban realm.

GROUND TO LEVEL 3 LEVELS 4 & 5 ROOFTOP ELEMENTS EXISTING SPOT LEVELS FINISHED CONTOURS W D U P

WALL MOUNTED LIGHTS DOWNLIGHTS TO SOFFITS RECESSED UPLIGHTS POST TOP LUMINARES

REFER CIVIL & LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION FOR VERGE WORKS ALL EXTERNAL LIGHTING TO COMPLY WITH CPTED GENERAL CODE AND AS1158 & AS4282

PROJECT

KINGSTON FORESHORE BLOCK 2 SECTION 66

20m

PROJECT N0.

1252

REV

DESCRIPTION

DATE

ISSUE FOR 50% DA

28.03.14

ISSUE FOR 75% DA

07.0514

ISSUE FOR DA

12.05.14

ISSUE FOR FURTHER INFO

14.11.14

DRAWING SCALE DATE DWG NUMBER

PLAN: SITE 1:200 (A1) 2014 DA 001

36 mildura street fyshwick 2609 po box 3469 manuka act 2603 p 02 6228 1200 f 02 6295 6943

MASTER PLANNING

B1 S25, B1 S26, B49 S31, B1 S40 Red Hill

RED HILL & GRIFFITH, AUSTRALIA

03 Stuart Flats Master Plan

Red Hill Housing Master Plan

The Red Hill Flats and Stuart Flats Master Plans formed part of the ACT Government’s Public Housing Renewal Omnibus Draft Territory Plan Variation DV334 Red Hill. I put together a number of feasibility options with varying development yields and building heights. The design included a comprehensive public consultation process which lead to the refining of the Master Plan options.

there to instruct on what implications the Territory Plan and the design principles had on allowing or disallowing these changes. The consultation process facilitated discussions between the residents, the ACT Government and the consultants which enabled an outcome that everyone was happy with.

I prepared all the documentation for the consultations which included a set of design principles outlining the design goals of the Master Plan. I presented the design on behalf of the office on the consultation evenings which also included a series of group design sessions where the residents were encouraged to present their ideal outcomes. In these situations I was

After the consultation and the final Master Plan document was prepared I liaised with ACT Government representatives to produce ‘Design Guidelines’ that meant that the allowable development that fell within the Draft Variation area was consistent with the Master Plan, the community’s contributions and heritage reports.

colin stewart architects

The Stuart Flats are surrounded by some “unusual” neighbours as shown. Also the relatively steep topography tends to isolate the site from the surounding neighbours.

Existing Park Areas:

Proposed Park Areas:

1400m²

2000m²

2500m²

3000m²

1400m²

2000m²

1450m²

Total:

1:2000 @ A3 Rev: A

6750m²

Total:

The ‘green’ spaces are enhanced by improving permeability and higher density of surrounding development for safety and use.

1000m² 8000m²

Existing Road Areas:

Proposed Road Areas:

Total:

2090m²

The proposed Master Plan maintains and remodels key ‘green’ spaces including remnant native trees.

2280m²

Job number: 1263 Date: 2015

colin stewart architects

The Stuart Flats site should be better connected to Canberra Avenue, Manuka and the surrounding neighbourhood. This diagram shows a number of desirable and potential linkages and pathways that will improve connection and permeability.

1:2000 @ A3 Rev: A

Job number: 1263 Date: 2015

colin stewart architects

Red Hill Primary

The proposed Master Plan provides improved pedestrian connection through the site, to the local shops and primary school. Views through the site to the shops are framed by the development.

Red Hill Shops

- The axial plan is retained and enhanced. - An additional crescent shaped street is implemented. - The central park is reshaped to provide increased address frontage to residents. - An original, smaller semi-private open space is redesigned as a public space with vehicle access.

St. Pauls Church

2 Storey Roof Pods

Existing “Coles” Building

- New pathways are added to improve permeability and connectivity.

4 Storeys + Parking

6 Storeys + Parking

- Higher density development is located to the local centre and the central park. - Small scale developable areas to provide improved range of housing types. - Improved permeability through the site for pedestrians. - Connection with shops is improved.

4 Storeys + Parking

- Improved amenity and density. - Role of green space areas is retained and better integrated with development. - Retention of mature trees as much as possible.

Captain Cook Crescent

Stuart Flats Site

Light Street

Existing Park

TYPICAL EAST WEST SECTION

4 Storeys + Parking 2 Storeys + Parking

Existing Residences

LEGEND

Stuart Flats Site

Light Street

Existing Park

LOWER DENSITY

Evans Crescent

MEDIUM DENSITY HIGHER DENSITY

TYPICAL EAST WEST SECTION CONTINUED

OPEN SPACE 1:500 @ A3 Rev:

colin stewart architects

Job number: 1263 Date: 2015

LINQ PRECINCT

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

BELCONNEN, AUSTRALIA

04 Linq Apartments are a multi-residential development comprising of over 200 apartments. Linq Apartment interiors are designed to provide the residents with an extremely practical, relaxed and liveable apartment by drawing on the delineation and clear division of space to satisfy basic needs ,whilst opening up interiors to capture natural light, ventilation and views to the predominantly landscaped setting. The amenity of each apartment is complimented by the amenity of the wider â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Eastern Valleyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; attractions including; The University of Canberra, the Canberra International Sports & Aquatic Centre, Lake Ginninderra and other elements and public/private destinations. This is a high

energy but extremely relaxed and peaceful place to reside, enjoying quality apartments inside and outside. For Linq Stage one I supported Project Architect, Robbie Speight to produce a set of tender drawings. Stewart Architecture are engaged to complete Stage 2 and now the master plan of the whole precinct in Stage 3. I was Project Architect for he initial design phase of Stage 2 and am currently working in collaboration with Felicity Stewart on the Stage 3 development plan.

LINQ PRECINCT

CONCEPT PRECINCT PLAN

LEVEL 12

The Linq Precinct comprises blocks 14,15 and 16 within Section 45. Block 15 has already been transformed with the LINQ residential development. The HTI Precinct is comprised entirely on block 12.

Notes:

HTI PRECINCT

1: 3,000 01-Apr-2019

LINQ PRECINCT

Page 1 of 1

Source: ACTmapi

DISCLAIMER The map is a user generated static output mapping site 0 from30an Internet 75 and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on map may12or may 1 this 0 - VIEW 3 - LEVEL not be accurate, current or otherwise

150m

1: 1000 @ A3

reliable. UNCONTROLLED ISSUE

SE CTION 45 BE LCONNE N URBAN DE SIGN STUDY

PLANNING FRAMEWORK

PEDESTRIAN NETWORK

Section 45 falls within the CZ2 Business Zone of Belconnen and considered part of the Belconnen Town Centre.

The Belconnen Town Centre Master Plan September 2016 (Page 96) includes a Proposed Pedestrian Network diagram as below. The network includes potential linkages through Section 45 in both a north-south and east-west direction. This approach

SCALE

@ A1

POTENTIAL TOWNHOUSES

PA G E 3 09/04/19

S45 MASTERPLAN

PROJECT NO. 1911

SECTION 45 BELCONNEN

PSP 013 2019 REV

SEC T I O N 4 5 B EL C O N N EN UR B A N DESI G N ST UDY

PA G E 1 1 09/04/19

BUILDING HEIGHTS

is strongly supported given the dimensions of this site as a city block of approximately 220 x 180m. Commonly held urban design rule of thumb allows paths of pedestrian travel every 100m through a town centre.

Section 45 includes controls for 3 building height controls over varying portions of the site. The Linq Stage 1 has a height limit of 10 storeys, Stage 2 (B14) and Stage 3 (B16) have a 27 storey height limit and the western portion of the urban block has a 12 storey

height limit. HTI B1 has a height limit of 27 storeys and HTI B2 has a height limit of 12 storeys.

The map below indicates the heights as taken from the Territory Plan Precinct Maps and Codes. Indicating three varying height zones across the section.

Figure 2 ‘a2’: the Building b) for area lesser of 25heights storeys and 80m SECTION 45

e) for area ‘d’: the lesser of 18 storeys and 60m f)Rules for area ‘e’: the lesser of 12 storeys and 42m

SECTION 45

SECTION 45 PRECINCT URBAN DESIGN PRINCIPLES

Source: 10.1 Suburb Precinct Maps and Codes There is no applicable rule. Belconnen Precinct Map and Code Effective: 1 March 2019

LINQ PRECINCT SE CTION 45 BE LCONNE N URBAN DE SIGN STUDY

PA G E 4 09/04/19

Criteria C12 This criterion applies to development in the area indicated by an asterisk shown in figure 2, at the corner of Benjamin Way and Belconnen Way. One higher building element up to the lesser of 16 storeys and 55m may be permitted where development suitably addresses the adjoining

LINQ STAGE 3

BUILDING 1 HTI (27 STOREYS)

LINQ STAGE 2

REPUBLIC BUILDING 2B GEOCON

NI2008-27

and Belconnen Way intersection. REPUBLICBenjamin Way REPUBLIC WAYFARER BUILDING 1B BUILDING 1B GROCON B EL C O N N EN GEOCONSEC T I O N 4 5 GEOCON UR B A N DESI G N ST UDY

10.1 Suburb Precinct Maps and Codes Belconnen Precinct Map and Code

PA G E 5 09/04/19

page 11

Effective: 1 March 2019 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au

LAKE GINNINDERRA

ACCESS + PERMEABILITY

STREET EDGE DEFINITION / BUILD TO STREET

RESIDENT + PUBLIC OPEN SPACE

AY YW

BUILT FORM + SOLAR ACCESS

VEHICULAR ACCESS

SE CTION 45 BE LCONNE N URBAN DE SIGN STUDY

AL NV

TALL BUILDING SEPARATION

PA G E 9 09/04/19

SEC T I O N 4 5 B EL C O N N EN UR B A N DESI G N ST UDY

PA G E 7 09/04/19

STELLAR HEALTH CLUB COMPLETED 2017

PHILLIP, AUSTRALIA

05 This project was a new health and wellness centre for the Canberra Southern Cross Club, incorporating a childcare centre, pool facilities, gym and allied health and community partner spaces. The building is on five levels, nestled on the prominent corner of Yamba and Launceston Street in Woden. The building form incorporates an articulated curved faรงade with glazing and precast elements. Connection to community was imperitive for the success of the design, and the facilities incorporate and active frontage on the ground floor to support the future development of the olf pitch and putt site. I was the project architect during the initial design phase of the project. I prepared drawings and coordinated with consultants and government bodies for concept design, preliminary sketch planning, development application and building

approval. These included wall type details, wet area details and concrete setout drawings. I produced marketing renders for press release and community consultation. I also conducted project meetings with project managers, clients and consulting engineers. Stewart Architecture was awarded the master plan for the overall site, of which I was part of the design team. The development will incorporate housing, aging in place, the retaining of part of the original golf course and a new commercial centre supported by the next stage of the Canberra light rail.

BOUTIQUE HOTEL

Manuka Oval Colin’s Park

Canb

erra

FORREST, AUSTRALIA

Aven u

Sectin 7 Forrest Block 23 SectionBlock 7 23Forrest Blandfordia 5 Heritage Housing Precinct Blandfordia 5 Heritage Housing Precinct

W ay

06 NTS July 2014

The Boutique Hotel in Forrest was proposed as an alterations and additions project of an existing building within the heritage Blandfordia precinct in Canberra’s Inner South. A new contemporary two-storey building element was designed to the rear of the block to provide additional guest rooms. These additions are set behind the existing façade lines to maintain the prominence of the original dwelling. The additions complement rather than mimic the original Spanish Mission style architecture. The existing building is known as both ‘The Pines’ and ‘Fraser House’. Although it is not heritage listed, the building has an interesting history and is well known due to its prominent location opposite the Manuka Group Centre. The building was designed by Kenneth Oliphant for Canberra dentist Dr. Rolland Fraser. The building functioned as both surgery and residence for Dr. Fraser and was constructed in 1930.

001 Site Plan Block 23 Section 7 Forrest

colin stewart architects

I was Project Lead for this development and liaised with all planning authorities in order to acquire a development application approval. There had been a number of attempts to receive approval previously, however due to stringent heritage requirements none had been successful. I produced a series of diagrams to explain our intention for the development and how it would achieve a desirable outcome both in terms of retaining the heritage quality of the site and creating a modern boutique hotel that would be profitable for the client.

addition

1 - single circulation window 3 - double paired windows 2 - single paired windows 2 2 2

addition

1.5 1 1.5 replication of existing circulation

original

2 - single paired windows original 2

Figure 1. Design : Original and Addition

Figure 2. Circulation : Original and Addition

3 - double paired windows 1 - single circulation window 2

Figure 3. Articulation : Adopting Rythm Old and New

original

existingcentral north facing courtyard

continuous facade

external pathway conection from original to adition

Figure 4. Connection : Ground Floor

Figure 5. Connection : Physical and Visual

Figure 6. Connection : Retaining Visual Characteristics - Single Detached Dwelling

NTS July 2014

003 Design Analysis Block 23 Section 7 Forrest

2.7

201

301

colin stewart architects

REAR ZONE

2.7

2.5

U U 58

2.7

BOUNDA

PRIMARY

RY 71°1

6'20''

REAR ZONE

EXISTING BOUNDARY FENCES TO BE RETAINED

BUILDING

ZONE

2.7

19000

FRONT

4527

ZONE

2.5

2.2

14b

2.2

RL 582.355

12a

50 58

2.0

1b T

ROOM 2

11715

ROOM 6

ROOM 7

ROOM 5

ROOM 4

ROOM 3

9a U

U 2

301

1.7

1715

LINE OF GLAZED THRESHOLD OVER

RL 582.355

FFL 582.405

RL 582.3550

LOGGIA

2 201 LINE OF GLAZED AWNING OVER

STORE

1200

14b U

12b

LED

T FFL 582.530

LED

RECEPTION

1.7

1.5

U ROOM 1

1880

1.2

2710

7540

9 U

12a

3110

15240 NEIGHBOURING DOUBLE STOREY CAR PARK

NEIGHBOURING SINGLE STOREY DWELLING

BLOCK 6 SECTION 23

REE

582.750

6'20'

RY 71°1

NDA

BOU

581.750

582.750 NEIGHBOURING SINGLE STOREY DWELLING

RZ1 SETBACK LINE

582.750

EXISTING 2 STOREY BUILDING LFL 582.530 UFL 585.660

PROPOSED 2 STOREY ADDITION LFL 582.030 UFL 585.030

TREE PROTECTION ZONE

BAC

EXISTING MAILBOXES

SEWER

582.000

°45

'45

SET

328

R ZON

582.250

3000

I/O

COM

581.500

SMH

EXISTING PATH TO BE RETAINED

581.750

TEL

BAC

DING

BUIL

0 SET

ARY

NDA

SUM

581.500 1130

PRIM

'40''

°23

246

BOU

ZON

581.500

NEIGHBOURING SINGLE STOREY DWELLING

HERITAGE SETBACK LINE

582.500

REA

SIGN

BLOCK 29 SECTION 1

EXISTING VERGE RETAINED

NEIGHBOURING MANUKA GROUP CENTRE

581.250

FRO

BLOCK 8 SECTION 23

ZON

STUCCO APPLIED TO BRICK WALLS WITH EXAGGERATED TEXTURE (BR-1) TEXTURED PRECAST (CO-1) HALF ROUND SPANISH OR ROMAN TILES (AT LEAST IN PROMINENT LOCATIONS) (RF-1) GABLED CHIMNEY TOP TILE CAPPING (RF-1) STUCCO FINISHED UP TO UNDERSIDE OF TILES (BR-1) DECORATIVE PARAPET (RF-1) SHAPED CORBEL GROUP ARCHED OPENINGS LEDGED AND BOARDED WINDOW SHUTTERS (WF-1) LOGGIA TWISTED OR CHEVRON-DECORATED COLUMN ORNAMENTAL METALWORK, PAINTED BLACK (WF-1) (HR-1) ORNAMENTAL METALWORK (WF-2) (SC-1) CONCENTRATION OF ORNAMENT CONTRASTED WITH PLAIN SURFACES. COLOURFUL CERAMIC TILE ORNAMENT IN ORANGE AND EMERALD GREEN. COLOURFUL GLASS ORNAMENT IN SHADES OF ORANGE AND EMERALD GREEN (WF-2) EXPLOITATION OF SUNLIGHT AND SHADOW

SIGN SMH

IDENTIFIED SPANISH MISSION STYLE CHARACTERISTICS AND MODERN INTERPRETATIONS: 1a. 1b. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12a. 12b. 13. 14a. 14b. 15.

581

1.5

BLOCK 6 SECTION 24

SV WM

582.75

ZONE

REAR

EXISTING CAR PARK STRUCTURE

E ST

1.5

BAC

HERITAGE CONSIDERATIONS

582.750

SET

246°23'40''

582.250

582.500 4600

BOUNDARY

VILL

582.000

RY BUILDI

PRIMA

ALL EXTERNAL LIGHTING TO COMPLY WITH CPTED GENERAL CODE AND AS1158 & AS4282

ZONE

AIN

FRONT NG ZONE

LED

1.2

LED

NEIGHBOURING SINGLE STOREY DWELLING

STABLIZED GRASS SHORT STAY DROP-OFF PARKING ZONE

LED 58

°57

RL 581.920

RL 581.250

147

TRUNK MOUNTED CANOPY UP-LIGHTING

REFER CIVIL & LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION FOR VERGE WORKS

LED UP-LIGHTING RECESSED UP-LIGHTS

FRONT ZONE

FINISHED CONTOURS LED

LOUNGE

4590

RL 582.090

BOUNDARY 147°57'

PRIMARY BUILDING ZONE

4 301

202

2.0

BOUNDARY 328°45'45''

8800

ELP

EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE UPGRADED

EAUX

BLOCK 9 SECTION 23

301

202

STRE

FURN

BLOCK 1 SECTION 2

BLOCK 36 SECTION 2

LEGEND LFL SETBACK NEIGHBOURING DOUBLE STOREY DEVELOPMENT

UFL SETBACK HERITAGE SETBACK

UNCONTROLLED ISSUE REV A B

DESCRIPTION

ISSUE FOR 75 % DA ISSUE FOR DA

DATE 31.10.14 17.11.14

PROJECT 36 MILDURA STREET FYSHWICK 2609 PO BOX 3469 MANUKA ACT 2603 OFFICE@STEWARTARCHITECTURE.COM.AU

21 FURNEAUX STREET BLOCK 7 & SECTION 23 FORREST

PROJECT No.

1268

NEIGHBOURING DOUBLE STOREY DWELLING

DRAWING No. DA 101 DRAWING TITLE PLAN: LFL SCALE 1:100 DATE 2014

REV A B

DESCRIPTION

ISSUE FOR 75% DA ISSUE FOR DA

PROJECT

DATE 31.10.14 17.11.14

36 MILDURA STREET FYSHWICK 2609 PO BOX 3469 MANUKA ACT 2603 OFFICE@STEWARTARCHITECTURE.COM.AU

This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Stewart Architecture. This drawings is for development application purposes and not for construction.

21 FURNEAUX STREET BLOCK 7 & SECTION 23 FORREST

PROJECT No.

1268

This drawing is copyright and remains the property of Stewart Architecture. This drawings is for development application purposes and not for construction.

DRAWING No. DA 002 DRAWING TITLE PLAN: SITE PLAN SCALE 1:200 DATE 2014

CAMPOSAZ 7:7

CANAL SAN BOVO, ITALY

07 The aim of the workshop was to design and construct architectural objects out of timber to enhance the landscape, contributing to the quality and use of public spaces in the retirement house of the village. We achieved this by designing and constructing new outdoor furniture, that encouraged residents to stop and rest in the garden, and a new panoramic terrace that was built over an existing unused outdoor area.

PORTFOLIO OF WORKS - COMPETITIONS

CANBERRA LIGHT RAIL IDEAS COMPETITION RE:LAYERED

120 HOURS EUROPEAN STUDENT COMPETITION STRATIFICATION

PLACED 2ND TEAM: BENOIT BOURD

GRIANGERFJORD, NORWAY TEAM: SARAH LEBNER

CANBERRA, AUSTRLIA

NEW EXPERIMENTAL ARCHITECTURAL TYPOLOGIES COMPETITIONS 24°° x 56°° CANBERRA, AUSTRLIA

PORTFOLIO OF WORKS - STUDIO PROJECTS

GRADUATION 2014 STUDIO LEAD: GEVORK HARTOONIAN CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA

SEMESTER 1 2013 STUDIO LEAD: ANN CLEARY CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA

SEMESTER 1 2014 STUDIO LEAD: REINER MAHLAMÄKI OULU, FINLAND

SEMESTER 2 2014 STUDIO LEAD: ANN CLEARY CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA

URBAN ACUPUNCTURE

STUDENT HOUSE

WATER CITY SEMESTER 2 2013 STUDIO LEAD: HENNU KJISIK OULU, FINLAND

SPATIAL RESONANCE

SPATIAL RESONANCE PT.2

RE:LAYERED CANBERRA LIGHT RAIL IDEAS COMPETITION PLACED 2ND TEAM: SARAH HERBERT

CANBERRA, AUST.

CANBERRA DESIGNED

1911

Population

Era

Date

site for Canberra selected

1,7

Dickson transport hub will be a paradigm shift in Canberra’s trajectory, acting as a catalyst for a new era of development in the nation’s capital.

1908

griffin & mahony design wins

construction begins

1911

1913

griffin resigns 1920

1930

9,0

1945

Our city has reached a stage where a selection of urban nodes aregentrifying, and our population has reached the critical level needed to stimulate redevelopment. Meanwhile, Canberra is criticised for its lack of character, human scale, surface activity, and ‘layers’.

,00

population grows 50% every 5 years 1955

CANBERRA BUILT

1957 1960

1966

1971

1976

1983

1988

National Capital Development Commission formed

,00

1957

,00

lake burley girffin completed

Instead of defaulting to soulless knockdown rebuild development, Dickson transport hub presents a tangible opportunity to repurpose existing iconic building stock. Ironically, these buildings provide ideal spaces for the various transport services, including a light rail station coupled with mix-use development, a Dickson bus interchange, and central open space providing an urban living room.

1964

,00

6,0

3,0

5,0

0,0

gungahlin sprawl begins 1990 2000

Existing buildings will be stripped back to bold historical

1,0

canberra city gentrification begins 2006

CANBERRA RE:LAYERED

2014

2035

4,2

design of dickson transport hub 2014

9,7

bones, providing a stage for the choreography of temporary container developments. An open-ended architecture will exist, bridging static forms from the past with a dynamic vision for the future. This project will be much more than just a symbolic gateway to the city. Dickson transport hub will be the landmark project for a new era of relayering development in Canberra. It will challenge the Canberra stigma, and stimulate an internationally exemplar precinct. We present ‘RE:LAYERED’ to Australia and the world as an alternative future of development in which transient forms and fluctuating individual business ventures knit together to provide a responsive, spontaneous and sustainable urban condition.

Tram Station

Bus Station

24°° x 56°° NEW EXPERIMENTAL ARCHITECTURAL TYPOLOGIES COMPETITION CANBERRA, AUST.

Infilled Site Potential Site

12,400m2 425 car parks project site area

The design of Multi-Residential apartments throughout the A.C.T. is already dictated by the dimensions of a single car park through structural grids and the number of potential dwellings on the site driven by out dated car park generations. 2400 x 5600 proposes to develop the 140+ existing surface car park sites identified here in Town Centres across the A.C.T. turning them in to strategically located affordable housing precincts inserted in to areas that are already serviced by established infrastructure: Commercial, Retail, Public Transport, Schools, Sporting and Entertainment Facilities etc. The re-development of these sites eliminates the added expense of supplementary infrastructure, noting that a large proportion of office and retail spaces in these areas are currently vacant, beginning to action the urgent need for re-invigoration and gentrification of the city’s forgotten Urban Nodes. 2400 x 5600 provides an alternative to Canberra’s current model relying on Urban Sprawl to accommodate the influx of new residents, putting

100 House Modules 400 Apartments Increased density drives improvement to the public realm

the focus back on densification to create a modern walkable city. Following successful international examples of ‘Half-Finished’ affordable housing typologies and building on the 9” x 18” scale and siting ideals, the proposal for 2400 x 5600 aims to provide and construct the necessary living requirements for residents that allows individual growth and adaptation of each dwelling. In the simplest terms, the project would deliver a basic semi enclosed framework, accommodating cooking and cleaning provisions, leaving the division of living spaces, bedrooms and outdoor areas up to the end user, at a time they can afford. This creates a new organically formed dynamic identity for the affordable housing typology. Not only does this approach to building bring down costs, but avoids adding to the monotonous overscaled multi-housing typology that we see constructed today.

7500 Car Park Grid

Single Dwelling

Unbuilt Framework

Enclosed Provisions

Gungahlin 610,000m2 2300 apartments

Belconnen 1700,000m2 6500 apartments

Dickson 1400,000m2 5300 apartments

City 2700,000m2 10000 apartments

Kingston 135,000m2 500 apartments

Weston Creek 645,000m2 2500 apartments Woden 725,000m2 2700 apartments

Tuggeranong 960,000m2 3600 apartments

Town Centres Number of Car Parks (Potential Sites) Total Site Areas Number of Apartments =Total Area/80m² (65m² Apartment + 15m² Common Areas) x 4 (Number of Storeys)

STRATIFICATION 120 HOURS TEAM: BENOIT BOURD

GEIRANGERFJORD, NORWAY

newest layer oldest layer

adaptable and permanent and fixed functions

compression of plates

uplift of mounconnection to water

connection to land

The site around Geirangerfjord is made up of siltstone and slates which were created under intense pressure over hundreds of millions of years. Through extreme movement within the earths plates, the surface uplifted in a mountain building event lasting millions of years. The concept for a cruise liner terminal in Geiranger aims to capture the tension between the sites dramatic formation and the serene environment that now exists. Whilst drawing from the juxtaposition between the overwhelming verticality and coarse texture of the mountains and the seemingly calm, smooth horizontality of the fjords water the project plays on

the notion of extruding the stratification of the rock to inform the design. As a whole, the scheme aims to create a congenial composition, although formed by the manipulation and exploitation of these points of tension.

eco power

storage

tradition

swim + cafe

terminal

skate park

tourism

skating

structure

cladding

snow sport

URBAN ACUPUNCTURE GRADUATION 2014 STUDIO LEAD: GEVORK HARTOONIAN CANBERRA, AUST.

This strategy views cities as living, breathing organisms and pinpoints areas in need of repair. Sustainable projects, then, serve as needles that revitalize the whole by healing the parts. By perceiving the city as a living creature, thoroughly intertwined, “urban acupuncture” promotes communitarian machinery and sets localized nucleus similar to the human body’s meridians. Satellite technology, networks and

“

The urban environmentalism theory of Urban Acupuncture combines urban design with the traditional Chinese medical theory of acupuncture. This process uses small-scale interventions to transform the larger urban context. Sites are selected through an aggregate analysis of social, economic, and ecological factors, and developed through a dialogue between designers and the community. Acupuncture relieves stress in the body, urban acupuncture relieves stress in the environment. Urban acupuncture produces small-scale but socially catalytic interventions into the urban fabric.

collective intelligence theories, all used to surgically and selectively intervene on the nodes that have the biggest potential to regenerate. -Urban Acupuncture, Marco Casagrande

The project for Graduation Studio asks “in what location could a Mega-Form intervention be placed within the Canberra city context, where its placement could relieve the greatest amount of urban tension, and what type of program does this scale of project require to transform the urban fabric?”

s h axi ar y thr oug g ond sec tin uin con

not

tran spor t hub e ntrance accomo dation pr imar ily underg round above make paved ope n area for market s

cul

tur

spi

1. Griffin Plan

2. Current Plan

3. Overlaid Plan

5. Griffin Residential

edu

13. Griffin Commercial

cat

orm gaf s me of y axi r ne ma pri

ion

Fig. 09. Conceptual Plan Development

Fig. 10. Conceptual Plan Proposal

Fig. 11. Transitional Space

Fig. 12. Green Space

Fig. 13. Pause Space

Fig. 14. Proposal Programme

14. Current Commercial

15. Overlaid Commercial

4. Regulating Lines

The conception of the Mega-Form accepts that there is no definitive ‘Capital City’ and no localised density to indicate a ‘City Centre’ of Canberra. The city is dispersed in such a way that vehicular transport is a necessity of daily life.

vary, depending on the elemental level, from close interaction, with little in common at the un-selected neighbourhood level, to the more distant relationships with selected, like minded colleagues within the city dialogue.

As abstracted from Alison and Peter Smithson’s structuralist city diagrams, a liveable city can be broken down in to four main elements:

At a city level, the defining elements of interaction can be broken down in to transport, business, accommodation and gathering. These levels of city interaction can be further simplified to the transition from moving, working, living and being.

The City, The District - or Suburb, The Street and The House. The levels of social interaction also

6. Current Residential

8. Green Space Being Community Plaza Apartments Bar

7. Overlaid Residential

9. Griffin Government

12. Pause

16. Transition

Living Apartments Hotel Conference Rooms Working Cinema Gym Exhibition Hall Amphitheatre

10. Current Government 20. Combined Density Moving Tram Station Bus Terminal Train Station Bicycle Paths Pedestrian 11. Overlaid Government 24. Acupuncture

The Mega-Form has been located in the central nodal point of the capital, City Hill, and aims to integrate the elements of moving, working, living and being in one homogenous intervention, connecting to the broader city through the implementation of a new transport hub. This new hub will consist of a bus interchange, tram stop and train station, closing the distance and decreasing the dependence of cars, and the concrete sprawl of car parks within the city. The Mega-Form becomes a project of transition.

Connection Integrating with the existing city situation, funnelling vehicular traffic and public transport in to the Mega-Form at ground level, and giving all other levels to pedestrians.

Transport Linking multiple modes of public and private transport - underground city parking, train station, connecting Canberra with Sydney and Melbourne, Tram stop, connecting with satellite cities and bus interchange.

The project outlines a conceptual structuring process that should not be seen as a concrete proposal or fixed arrangement. However, the idea is that the Mega-Form provides a structural framework that can grow and densify with the influx of residents and transitory needs as required. The proposal of the Mega-Form builds on the original 1911 Griffin plan for Canberra, and can be seen as a social comment on how that plan has been changed and adapted for the change in modern living requirements.

Public Interface Creating large expanses of ‘Public Plazas’, activated by the retail and commercial frontages.

As per Griffin’s original proposal, the Mega-Form is planned from public transport up, linking everything (commercial and residential positioning) back to layout of the basement train station. Connection Implementing ‘mixed-use’ on a super scale, the Mega-Form creates a city within a city, Affording all residents with the amenities they require, and encouraging external users in the open plan plaza’s.

STUDENT HOUSE SEMESTER 1 2014 STUDIO LEAD: REINER MAHLAMÄKI OULU, FINLAND

Forest

Tectonic

Harvest

Tactile

Material

Refined

The Student House in Oulu was completed during my third semester of Masters at the University of Oulu in Finland.

sympathetic to the natural Finnish setting and iconic Scandinavian design, without being too ‘kitsch’.

The project combined programs of a main city theatre and gallery space for the students of the architecture school to exhibit their work to be open to the public, a restaurant and library to be used by the students as well as office space, meeting rooms, an auditorium and, of course, a Sauna. I tried to keep the idea of the building

The main concept for the design of the student house in Oulu is to create a structure in keeping with the park on which the building is sited. The building forms an “urban forest” within the city centre, combing the different tactile qualities of timber.

Event

Creating a sculptural beacon to the main access side of the street. Creating an identity for the school within the city.

Screen & Connect

Addressing the immediate context with a vertical screen that answers to the street and fits in with its surrounds.

Filter

Rear facade is open and vibrant forming a filter between the urban context of the city and the park.

Form

Combining these elements with the programme to create composition.

Enclosure

Enclosing the space within a transparent skin.

13 14 10

7 5 4 3

1 2

Plan 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Pool Sauna Theatre Atrium Gallery Ravintola Lobby Theatre Foyer

9 Library 10 Breakout Space 11 Meeting Suites 12 Auditorium 13 Office 14 Hub Space 15 Machine Room

Circulation

Space Division

Composition

Series of intersecting bridges and stair cases connecting to circulation cores forming the â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;canopyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; above.

Division of public to private space is created through height separation. The most public spaces being on the ground floor and private spaces at the top.

Composition is created through a Program is organised through the series of cubes isolated according combination of circulation, public and private space division and to program and function. schematic composition.

Program

WATER CITY SEMESTER 2 2013 STUDIO LEAD: HENNU KJISIK OULU, FINLAND

03 Master Plan

Team: Benoit Bourd (France) Mert Gonül (Turkey) Noora Laadhepenra (Finland) Lauri Salo (Finland) In 2035 the sea level in oulu will rise 6m, covering a large proportion of the current city centre. Oulu requires the re-planning of the coastal strip of the city centre. The plan will aim to; 1 Be efficient 2 Create urban density 3 Be car free 4 Improve public transport infrastructure 5 Improve accessibility and movement 6 Be both an ecologically and socially sustainable urban entity 7 Enhance housing 8 Create a vibrant urban structure 9 Form a diverse urban environment

A new green connection ‘central park’ will be implemented to bridge the relationship between the old city and the new, enabling the opportunity to link the old city via a new hybrid green belt - transportation connection.

centre, and maintain the car free notion of the new centre, a main tram line runs through the green belt connection, linking the current train station and the city to the university and the airport.

To create the new urban entity, the old cities urban context is replicated the rising water phenomenon breaks the contexts of the old city to create the new fragmented city plan.

Maintaining the link to the new cities main functions and creating a walkable city centre. Each tram stop is a maximum of 500m or 5 minute walk from any point in the new city.

The old city is linked to the new city via the green belt connection. Retaining the current main pedestrian routes from the centre to the market square.

Perspective views are obtained from all public buildings to the sea as well as all central park blocks to the sea to maintain the cities visual connection to the water.

To improve public transport in the city

Oulu 2050!

Green Connection

Copy the Context

2 1 3 5

Break the Context

Connect to the City

Public Spaces

TO UNIVERSITY

3 1

4 2

5 1 TO AIRPORT

Tram way Connection

Connection to the Water

Steel frame with gravel infill and 300mm top soil Hollow steel frame mechanically fixed to mulch, mechanically fixed to ground with masonry ground with masonry anchors. Timber play anchors. Timber seating and grass covered planes. ground/climbing frame and stone covered/ skateboarding planes with incorporated seating.

Steel frame with gravel infill and 500mm min. Top soil mulch, mechanically fixed to ground with masonry anchors. Summer flower garden and urban farming vegetable garden planes.

SPATIAL RESONANCE SEMESTER 1 2013 STUDIO LEAD: ANN CLEARY CANBERRA, AUST.

04 The sculptural Canberra School of Music is internally oriented towards Llewellyn Hall at its core, protectively wrapping the figure of the hall in fragmented public and service spaces. It’s bold external mass articulates light internally throughout the manipulation of form and carved interstitial spaces.

concept aims to connect the ANU with the city, breaking down the physical barrier between them and opening up the school of music to the development of New Acton and the new surrounding office buildings. The site will respond to the plan of the School of Music, where private space is grouped together to the north, opening the south to the public. The piano museum will flank the south in turn creating an enclosure for Llewellyn Hall’s exposed unprotected facade.

The concept for the piano museum will turn this plan inside out synthesising external and internal experiences through the use of ‘pop out’ sky lights. Capturing light as phenomenon that creates the notion of movement and directionality as the program of the school of music successfully Mirroring the large interstitial void that achieves. creates the School’s circulation ‘street’ an external street will be created in the void Historically, schools were seen to have an formed by the tight relationship between institutional presence standing alone as a the placement of the museum to the school. monumental fortress. Today, schools want The School of Music building connects to engage with the community, bringing pubic space by pulling back the floor plates, the public into the school allowing them connecting the spaces both visually and to interact with the infrastructure. The site through sound, subtly defining the public

from private spaces. The museum will employ this idea linking spaces through both horizontal and vertical voids. Piano’s are items that were never intended to be exhibited or ‘viewed’, but played, and seeing these instruments out of this context as objects can be seen to be a strange concept. The scheme for the piano museum aims to display the pianos in an environment in which they were intended to exist, displaying them in intimated ‘performance’ rooms, in which the instruments can be played to an audience and enjoyed acoustically but also visually.

“

the school’s boldness of form is due to a desire to produce an assertive cubist arrangement whose parts explore landscape and figurative metaphors, to create architectural presence -Daryl Jackson

”

Circulation

Articulation of Light

Structure

Composition

a 7

Plan 1

Theatre

Digital Auditorium

Gallery

Intimate Performance Displays

Practice Rooms/Workshops

Theatre Entrance

Museum Entrance

Reading Room

Digital Display

2 13 5

10 Manuscripts Library 11 Mezzanine Bar 12 Roof Top Terrace 13 Bathrooms 14 Storage

d 14

4 8

10 3

SPATIAL RESONANCE

PT 2.

SEMESTER 2 2014 STUDIO LEAD: ANN CLEARY CANBERRA, AUST.

05 Music and architecture in classical times were frequently linked together; at least in the mind of composers, seeking interpretation in the builtcivilising world of the European city/church/court era of patronage. Connections between architecture and music are generally based upon theories of classical harmony, based upon numbers for music, and for architecture proportioning systems of geometry emanating from Pythagoras. At least this is how the mysteries are explained, handed on from mimetic, aesthetic and rhythmic constructs, where compositions or both disciplines:architecture and music are conveyed throughout history by a combination of cultural precepts, driven by human intelligence. Today it is different: composers are somewhat freed by explorations beyond the material forms; where imaginations extend to universal ideals, related to infinite space and

existential concepts. All forms of art are empowered by the brain and expressed through the senses. These can be correlated and structured by consciousness of sounds inside the brain at one layer of encounter, say via neural networks, and by spatial experience of place, at another. The School’s boldness of form is due to (these) factors as well as a desire to produce an assertive cubist arrangement whose parts explore landscape and figurative metaphors, to create architectural presence. Here in Canberra, the musical brief emanated from Ernest Llewellyn, working in collaboration with his acoustic architect Gerald Riley. Mr Riley provided the dimensions of height, width and length of the interior volume, all given to creating a “long reverberation time where the orchestra could dwell”. Moving sounding boards on the ceiling and stage sound wall vary the criteria for a variety of performances. There

were no computers, and the Llewellyn/Riley partnership prevailed as a touch and feel duet. As the architect I responded to their dictates and saw the Hall as a metaphor; a form of architectural instrument. The audience gain the impression of being inside a large, resonating bass fiddle. At least this is how I imagined it to be; and that the audience might experience a representative musical space that once again was a music maker where the basic laws of sound as Performance related to the new interior sound shell being an instrument in itself; a metaphor where total immersion, and an indivisibility about “being there” make the connection for both music makers and the audience to embrace the programmes, and to find meaning. As Patrick McCaughey writes in the

foreword to Drawings an

“Here on a p capital, via a architecture became pos

The building skyline and Its sculptura first readings and horizont and towers, storey was a language tha density...the

within itse at one mo another.”

o Daryl Jackson Architecture nd Photographs:

prominent site in the nationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s an important commission, an e of form and feeling suddenly ssible.

g needed to be lifted up in to the to be a self contained form... al quality dominates on all the s. The dialogue between vertical tal elements, massive cylinders , and heavy cantilevered upper articulated in a solid, volumetric at delighted in weight, mass and

e building was felt to move elf, thrust itself forward oment and draw reath at