Design & Fine Art Portfolio 2022

Page 1

KAT FORGET Design & Fine Art Portfolio 2022



OTHER

ACADEMIC

PROFESSIONAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

P1

P2

P3

P4

Canyon Residence

Alvarado Residence

‘LightMASS’ Solar House

McEwen Graduate School of Business

2

6

10

14

A2

A3

A4

18

26

28

O1

O2

O3

A1 Riverdale

Townhomes

‘Disneyfication’ of Paris

‘Baba Yaga’ Marionette Theatre

Selected Technical Drawings

Selected Hand Drawings & Fine Art

Selected Photography

34

38

40

Cartography Centre

32


P1

CANYON RESIDENCE Type: Employer: Client: Location: Year:

Architectural, Custom Residential Project Koch Architects Private, Single-Family Lafayette, California, USA 2019

Nestled in the hills of a suburb located in the San Francisco Bay Area, this MidCentury home was originally designed by architects Fred and Lois Langhorst who apprenticed with Frank Lloyd Wright before launching their own firm. The original design was representative of the signature modern architectural style characteristic of Northern California during the post-war era. As demonstrated in the following pages, the house underwent a number of major renovations and stylistic changes, passing through the hands of various homeowners over several decades. Unfortunately, these transformations obscured much of the structure’s original architectural language and integrity.

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

Shortly after our clients became the new homeowners, they expressed interest in restoring and bringing back to life the essence of the original design. This in turn led to a comprehensive house remodel as well as the addition of a new guest house, both of which showcase distant views of Mount Diablo.

2

Via careful deconstruction and thoughtful design analysis, we identified and developed architectural and structural opportunities in the house that had not previously been explored. We also provided the clients with state-of-the-art amenities, finishes and design touches that addressed their family’s current and future needs, all the while ensuring that the design decisions were keeping in concert with the Langhorsts’ original architectural vision. The resulting product is a well-crafted home that meets the demands of today’s environment and of our clients’ lifestyle while also nodding to its unique past.

My Role:

Project Manager / Lead Architectural Designer (Reported directly to Principal)

My Focus: Drawings (AutoCAD and Sketchup), Construction Administration, Detailing, Interior Design, Consultant Coordination


1'-8"

3"

4'-0"

3'-7"

8 1/4"

2'-8"

CL

CL

1'-0"

2'-10"

6"

CL

BELOW Interior Elevation & Photos: Master Vanity OPPOSITE BELOW Site Plan

3


+9'-0" FIN. CEILING 1980’s

1'-6 3/4"

2 EQ.

1'-3"

2019

PAINTED GWB CEILING, SEE FINISH SCHED

1" SCRIBE

3/4" TYP.

1'-8 1/4"

10 3/4"

2'-0"

1'-3"

1'-0"

ADJUSTABLE 3/4” MAPLE PLYWOOD SHELVING

OPEN

PAINTED WOOD CABINETS

DW

TILE BACKSPLASH OVER THINSET & BACKERBOARD; SEE ELEVATION

3/4"

1 1/2"

FIXED PANEL

FINISHED WOOD PANEL TO MATCH CABINET FIN.

3/4” QUARTZ COUNTERTOP, MITERED EDGE & NOSE

+3'-0" T.O. COUNTER

4"

1'-1"

3'-0"

MICRO. DRWR.

RECESSED UNDER-CABINET LED LIGHT

1'-8"

6"

1'-8"

PANELED REF.

5'-9 3/4" MIN. CLR.

1" FLUSH SCRIBE

1990’s

2'-6"

1950’s (Original)

2'-0"

1'-6 3/4"

1'-9"

1'-6"

1'-10" MIN. CLR.

4"

DRAWERS, HEAVY DUTY FULL EXTENSION BLUM TANDEM GLIDES, SOFT CLOSING; SEE ELEV FOR CONFIGURATION

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

3"

4

+0'-0" FIN. FLOOR


4

3 1

5

2

1 2 3 4 5

RESTROOM FLEX SPACE KITCHENETTE PATH TO HOUSE CONCRETE PATIO N

ABOVE Guest House Floor Plan BELOW Exterior South Elevation OPPOSITE ABOVE Evolution of Exterior Front Facade OPPOSITE Guest House Kitchen Elevation & Cross-Section

5


P2

ALVARADO RESIDENCE Type: Employer: Client: Location: Year:

Architectural, Custom Residential Project Koch Architects Private, Single-Family Berkeley + Oakland, California, USA 2019

This project is situated at a high elevation in the East Bay hills, immediately straddling the Berkeley-Oakland border, while overlooking sweeping views of the East Bay Bridge and San Francisco skyline. The site was once home to a property that was destroyed by the 1991 Oakland fires. Since that time, like many of its surrounding neighbours, the site saw the development of newly and quickly rebuilt structures that were unfortunately not subject to rigorous seismic design practices nor state-of-the-art architectural solutions. This site in particular was also subject to a previous consolidation of three lots which continue to be overseen by two different jurisdictions.

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

The clients who purchased the properties were interested in hiring a design architect in order to help them translate their vision of a single, beautifullycrafted and integrated home into reality. Working with some of the home’s existing structural “bones”, our team spent a great deal of time getting to know and understand how the clients operated in their daily activities and how best to design a home suited to their uniquely personal needs.

6

The resulting design saw major tranformations in the overall configuration of interior and exterior spaces, the relocation of primary vertical circulation including the conception of a new curved feature stair, as well as an entirely new carport and newly-excavated entry drive from the adjacent laneway. New window and door openings were conceived in careful coordination with the newly designed interior spaces. In an effort to exceed the most up-to-date environmental standards, all openings received insulated, double-glazed and thermally-broken aluminum custom windows and doors.

My Role:

Construction Phase: Project Manager / Architectural Designer (Reported directly to Principal)

My Focus: Drawings (AutoCAD and Sketchup), Construction Administration, Detailing, Interior Design, Consultant Coordination Spanning two levels and a steeply undulating geological terrain, the house invites both visitors and residents alike to experience its various spaces from the interior and exterior simultaneously. Entries from the exterior are located throughout, connected by paths and thoughtful landscaping, while wrapping the home and providing moments of pause at varying planes of elevation. Finishes and colour palettes can be felt extending from the outside and continuing through to the interiors. Custom cabinetry, hardware and lighting were employed extensively throughout the home, unifying the various rooms and spaces while also providing ample opportunity for crafting design features that respond to the precise functional needs of each space. Working with a team of highly skilled strucural engineers, landscape architects and civil engineers, Koch Architects were able to provide the clients with a strong unified architectural scheme capable of weathering the elements and withstanding the natural forces of the region. Photos courtesy of Koch Architects.


ABOVE Custom Kitchen Cabinetry, Hardware & Windows OPPOSITE Exterior View From Carport

7


1

2

3

5

7

8

9

11

12

14

15

5

3

1

1/4" 1 1/2"

2 1/8"

4"

3/16" 2"

1 1/2"

4

BACKSET

2 3/4"

4 1/2"

10

6

19

1

(4) 1/2” DIA. X 6” HEX. HEAD BOLTS, EMBED AT 18” O.C., TYP. (GRADE A325 & HOT DIP GALV. STEEL)

7

1/4” THCK DOOR STOP BOLTED TO STEEL CHANNEL AT BASE OF JAMB; COL/FIN: (US10B) OIL-RUBBED BRZ.

2

3/4” PVC CONDUIT ROUTED IN CONCRETE WALL

8

3

2 1/2” X 1 1/2” X 1/4” STEEL CHANNEL BOLTED TO CONC., WELDED TO STEEL PLATES & HOT DIP GALV.

BRASS LEVERS & ROSETTES; COL/FIN: (US10B) OILRUBBED BRONZE (ONLY INSIDE LEVER OPERABLE)

9

4

ELECTRIFIED STRIKE MOUNTED IN STEEL CHANNEL; COORD. W/ TONGUE & SPRING DEADLATCH HARDWARE MOUNTED IN GATE LEAF

3 3/4” LONG, 15/16” DIA. LATCH, SUITABLE FOR 2 3/4” BACKSET

5

(4) PIECES NON-CONTINUOUS 1/4” THICK STL PLATE, WELDED TO STL CHANNEL & HOT DIP GALV.; DRILL & TEP PLATE FOR EQ. SPACED MOUNTING SCREWS FOR ALUM PLATE & ELEC STRIKE

6

10 (2) 5/16” DIA. ADJUSTABLE LENGTH SPINDLES 11 1 X 6 ALL CLEAR, SEALED ‘IPE’ WOOD, EACH SIDE, TYP. 12 1 X 1 X 3/16” STL ANGLE FRAME, POWDER COATED

POWDER-COATED ALUM. PLATE INSTALLED OVER 1/4” STEEL CHANNEL; COL/FIN: (US10B) OIL-RUBBED BRONZE

13 3 STANDARD BRASS BUTT HINGES W/ REMOVABLE PINS, BOLTED TO STEEL CHANNEL; COL/FIN: (US10B)

8"

3/8"

T.O. WALL/GATE 17 18 19

11 12

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

14

8

EQ.

EQ.

CL

13

CL

3/4" 1 1/2" 3/4"

4"

3"

2 1/2"

3/4" 2"

16

6

14 2 X 1 1/2 X 3/16” STL ANGLE FRAME, POWDER COATED 15 3 PIECES NON-CONTINUOUS 4 X 3/16” HOT DIP GALV STL PLATE WELDED TO STL ANGLE, DRILLED & TAPPED TO RECEIVED MOUNTING SCREWS FOR HINGES; POWDER 16 NOTCH BOARDS AT HINGE BARRELS 17 3” WIDE X 1/4” THICK POWDER-COATED STL FLAT BAR WELDED TO ANGLE; COL/FIN: (US10B) OIL-RUBBED BRZ. 18 STEEL ROD WELDED TO EXT. ANGLE FOR SECURING INT. ANGLE; DRILL HOLES AT INT. ANGLE 19 TYP: STL SELF-DRILLING/SELF-TAPPING SCREWS W/ PLATE WASHER FOR CONCEAL-FASTENING IPE BOARDS


CL

EQ.

EQ.

CL

EQ.

EQ.

CL

EQ.

ABOVE Exterior Hardscaping & Landscaping BELOW Photo & Framing Elevation of Exterior Gate OPPOSITE ABOVE Detail Plan Section: Exterior Gate OPPOSITE BELOW Detail Cross-Section: Exterior Gate

9


P3

‘LIGHTMASS’ SOLAR HOUSE Type: Employer: Client: Location: Year:

Architectural, Custom Residential Project Baird Sampson Neuert Architects Private, Single-Family Oak Ridges Moraines, Canada 2017

LightMASS is an experimental house carefully set within its 11-acre site to respond to the unique geomorphology of rolling hills and circular kettle ponds characteristic of the Oak Ridges Moraines. It is designed to take advantage of exposure to sun and wind and use the combined mass of earth and structure to create a convivial domestic realm for the owners that minimizes negative impacts on the land and the need for external energy sources.

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

The clients for the house envisioned a simple and practical country house that would be energy efficient, responsive to the site’s natural beauty, and a support for small scale farming. At the project outset, they expressed a strong preference for the robustness of concrete over wood construction and the design was conceived to take advantage of the material’s “stereotomic” qualities of plasticity and cast surface, as well as the potential environmental performance contribution inherent in its durability and energy-absorbing mass.

10

The house is sited to meet local conservation requirements, avoiding interference with ground water systems and minimizing disturbance of related plant ecologies. Dug into the side of a knoll and maximizing solar exposure, it is designed to face the sun and enjoy views to a nearby kettle pond and heavily treed water course. Its green roofs will return their surfaces to the living landscape of the site, as well as aid cooling in summer and heating in winter using its geothermal exchange system. Two long, tilted walls with bent tops organize movement within the simple linear organization of the house and give it a unique identity when approached

My Role:

Junior PM for Construction Administration (CA) (Reported directly to Principal)

My Focus: Drawings (Revit), Passive ‘Net-Zero’ Systems, Concrete Construction, Submissions to Competitions from the entry drive. The scoop form of the concrete walls gathers daylight into the length of the house and creates a continuous solar chimney utilizing sun energy absorbed into its mass to help drive passive ventilation and heating. Solar thermal panels for heating domestic hot water are integrated into the clerestorey alongside vents for stack ventilation. The walls break open to form the house entry and separate the children and guest wing circulation from that of the main wing . Their long, convex back sides are heavily insulated and close the house to northern winds, as well as views from the neighbours. Clad with ribbed stainless steel, their form alludes to the purposeful elegance of agrarian buildings and their evanescent surfaces will reflect changes in the sky. Designed to provide summer shading, the cantilevered edges of the main roof are thermally broken from climate controlled space so that their cast ceiling surface can visually extend from inside to outside, emphasizing the house’s openness to the landscape while maintaining the lightness of its space and mass. ABOVE Rendered View of Front Entry

OPPOSITE LEFT Site Plan at Ground Floor Level OPPOSITE RIGHT Floor Plans


1

2

!

!

!

3

4

. .

11 10

9

8 6

7

11

5

12

5 13

5

GROUND LEVEL

12

15

14

0 ft

20 ft

0 ft

20 ft

11

9

LOWER LEVEL

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

CHICKEN COOP GARDEN STORAGE WORKSHOP GARAGE BEDROOM OFFICE DINING KITCHEN

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

LIVING MASTER BEDROOM BATHROOM PATIO FISH POND WORK ROOM LAUNDRY

11


10

1

2

3

6 7

7

5

1 4

3

2

9

3

8 4

SUMMER PASSIVE STRATEGIES: 1 Green / ‘Cool’ roof reduces heat island effect and heat load on building. 2 Solar chimney induces stack effect to enhance natural ventilation. 3 High mass construction / ground source heating / infloor radiant systems are integrated to moderate cooling demands and temper interior space. 4 Partial earth berming reinforces the thermal mass and insulation properties.

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

5 Roof projections and retractable awning systems block summer sun and enhance interior daylighting.

12

5

6

WINTER PASSIVE STRATEGIES: 6 Automated vents and operable windows respond to prevailing winds and local microclimate opportunities related to the nearby pond. 7 Stack effect benefits extend across both floor levels using low level ventilation inlets and stair openings to interconnect spaces. 8 Prevailing winds from operable windows near walk-out basement on west facade. 9 Concrete cistern integrated into patio foundation design.* 10 Vacuum tube solar hot water collectors.*

1 Roof projections and retractable awning systems enable winter sun penetration / solar gain and enhance interior daylighting. 2 High mass construction serves to store passive solar heat gain. 3 Thermal energy generated by the solar chimney is recovered and recirculated as part of the hybrid environmental strategy.

6 Geothermal infloor heating system combined with high mass construction enables heat storage and “charging” during “offpeak” hours for electricity. 7 Thermal stratification within lower spaces vents to upper level solar chimney for heat recovery using open stairway / interconnected spaces.

4 Strategic positioning of the fireplace optimizes its radiant heat contribution. 5 Floor level inlets and perforated fireplace design enhances convective heating contribution and distribution from fireplace.

*Strategies are employed year-round.


ABOVE / LEFT Perspective & Elevation Sketches OPPOSITE BELOW Construction Photographs OPPOSITE ABOVE Sections of Summer & Winter Passive Strategies

13


P4

McEWEN GRADUATE STUDY & RESEARCH BUILDING Type: Employer: Client: Location: Year:

Architectural, Institutional Project Baird Sampson Neuert Architects York University Toronto, Canada 2019

Business schools tend to be architecturally conservative. By contrast, the McEwen Graduate Study & Research Building is rooted in creative, climate-responsive design which makes manifest its commitment to sustainability. The project provides facilities for graduate programs, research activities, and office and support space. Its mandate is to achieve a sociable environment conducive to formal and informal interchange for learning and research, and to serve as an exemplar of the school’s sustainable values. To this end, the design employs many environmental strategies which are unusual for Canadian academic buildings. For example, the environmental control system is a hybrid of active mechanical systems and passive natural ventilation, driven by a solar chimney.

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

Central to the design is a social hub/event space which also serves as air transfer for the solar chimney. All building windows are operable and triple glazed. Most window frames are fibreglass, which has a higher thermal transfer resistance than typical aluminum frames. The durable, heavy concrete construction’s insulated thermal mass is employed for radiant cooling and heating. The envelope minimizes cold bridging.

14

The building’s projected energy intensity is 98 eKWh/m2. Compared to reference buildings in Canada’s Model National Energy Code, this is a 71.4% energy savings, representing a 67.4% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Minimizing unnecessary interior finishes, using fast-growing woods, green roofs, and a solarready design contribute to sustainability. The performance of people within the building is of primary concern. Daylighting of occupied spaces enhances wellbeing, and natural ventilation controls create a learning synergy between the building, its

My Role:

Junior PM / Consultant Coordinator for Construction Drawings (Reported directly to Principal & Project Architect)

My Focus: Construction Drawings (Revit), Interior Design, Landcsape Design Awards: 2020 OAA Design Excellence Award, CaGBC Green Building Award occupants and operators. Flexible spaces, such as clustered, flat floor classrooms and reconfigurable research pods, ensure longterm adaptability. Extensive lounge areas support private relaxation and study, and promote informal interaction between students, faculty and visiting members of the business community. The Hub’s flexible furnishings and infrastructure can support major outreach events. Located on the main campus entry boulevard, the landmark building provides a dynamic identity for the School. Solar orientation has been optimized for daylighting and shading control, passive energy harvesting, and the solar chimney symbolizes the centrality of sustainability to the curriculum. On the south side, a sunlit courtyard with shade trees provides outdoor amenity. Along the north façade, a continuous colonnade improves pedestrian comfort. The full height glazing of the Hub allows views right through the building to the courtyard, and a bridge lounge at the top of the Hub provides dramatic views out to the campus. Extensive green roofs augment natural cooling through plant transpiration and enhance the natural habitat of the campus. ABOVE Rendered View of Front Elevation

OPPOSITE ABOVE Site Plan at Ground Floor Level OPPOSITE BELOW Photos of Completed Build (BSN / T. Arban)


Y

LE BOU ORK

VA R D

1

UP

11 UP UP DN

UP

4

4

4

4

2 6

5

5

5

5

M

3

9

5 5

3

7

8

WA

3

TTC

10

BUS

5

Y

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

FRONT ENTRY SOCIAL HUB (ATRIUM) LECTURE ROOMS SEMINAR ROOMS BREAKOUT ROOMS CAFE STUDENT OFFICE LOADING & SERVICE LINK TO ‘SSB’ COURTYARD COVERED COLONNADE

R9 00 0

MB

E

SHRUBS EXISTING

E S TONE 38 S P AC AIR 27 INS ULATION 1 00 - UP AC K K B B L OC

1 90

E S TONE S P AC 38 AIR 27 INS ULATION 1 00

15


F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

ABOVE Exterior View of Solar Chimney & Courtyard

16

OPPOSITE ABOVE Perspective Cross Section Illustrating Environmental Design Features OPPOSITE BELOW View of Social Hub (Atrium) from Second Floor


1

4

2

3

5

1

SOLAR CHIIMNEY RACK AND PINION AWNINGS FOR PREHEAT INTAKE AND NATURAL VENTILATION EXHAUST

2

SOLAR CHIMNEY RACK AND PINION SKYLIGHT DAMPER

3

SOLAR CHIMNEY MASS WALL WITH INTAKE DAMPERS TO “DOAS” SYSTEM

4

MECHANICAL SPACE WITH DEDICATED OUTDOOR AIR SYSTEM (“DOAS”)

5

RADIANT ACOUSTICAL CEILING PANELS AND BAFFLES

6

ACTIVE SLAB RADIANT HEATING AND COOLING

7

CURTAIN WALL AND INLINE FIBERGLASS WINDOWS WITH TRIPLE GLAZED INSULATED GLASS AND OPERABLE VENTS CONTROLLED BY BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM

8

SOUTH ELEVATION EXTERIOR SOLAR SHADING DEVICES

6 7

7

6 8

6

17


A1

RIVERDALE TOWNHOMES Type: Description: Instructor: Location: Date:

Architecture Residential Mixed-Use Studio Project Honorata Pienkowska Ottawa, Canada Fall 2013 / Spring 2014

The Riverdale Townhomes are part of a mixed-use residential development proposed for the site at Bank Street and Riverdale Avenue in Old Ottawa South. The development looks towards existing amenities and ‘neighbourhood favourites’ for its primary sources of inspiration. It has reinvented a space for the area’s pre-existing local food grocer, Cedar’s, and has further incorporated a local goods marketplace within its very center. Both residents of the development and the public are invited to shop, play and eat locally within the first high-density, affordable housing project envisioned for Old Ottawa South.

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

Two primary housing typologies - flats and towns - are linked via a shared exterior space. The townhomes, located along Riverdale Avenue, are oriented according to the city’s primary street grid in contrast to the buildings immediately across them. This maneuver perpetuates the idea that residents may look beyond the buildings opposite the street in order to connect with the Rideau River situated mere minutes from their doorstep. The undulating presence of the towns along the street, in combination with the formalistic “push and pull” strategy used both in elevation and plan, give these townhouses a unique character. Such moments are further emphasized through the use of contrasting materials and playful punctures amidst the façades.

18

Awards / Publications:

Building 22 Student Publication (2014, Carleton University) Finalist Nominee, Teron Scholarship (2014)

1 Property lines and zoning regulations for the site are the first factors to inform the volumetric

potential of the development. Mid-rise and mixed-use developments are permitted along Bank Street, while lower-rise residential proposals are permitted along Riverdale Avenue.

2 Residential units are oriented in such a way as to correspond to the existing city’s street grid. Retail units at grade maintain their orientation toward Bank Street, serving as the primary threshold linking the development to the Traditional Mainstreet.

3 Residential units are pushed back from the street and divided into three clusters along

both streets abutting the development. This allows for natural lighting opportunities and for the creation of exterior space for residents. The opportunity for a local marketplace is also introduced within the central exterior portion of the whole.

4 Along Bank Street, a rise in height is introduced as the development progresses

northward, culminating in a mid-rise tower. This helps to greatly reduce shadows cast within the development, while providing density to the whole. Along Riverdale Avenue, the residential units begin to take the form of stacked townhomes, as they increase in height toward the ‘peak’ of the development. The marketplace takes form at the core of the development’s central exterior space.

5 The stacked townhomes along Riverdale Avenue are further defined into a series of

vertical volumes which respond toward their immediate surroundings. The mid-rise tower to the north of the development is paired with an attached point-access tower. Landcape features such as hills and rainwater collection pools are introduced within the exterior courtyard, complimenting the marketplace’s form and program.


200 m 500 ft

parking parking parking green space playgrounds playgrounds playgrounds PARKING PLAYGROUNDS

GREENERY

green space green space

200 m 500 ft

1

2

4

5

3

ABOVE Transit, Amenities + Figure Ground Plan BELOW Massing Methodology + Site Analysis OPPOSITE Exterior View of Townhomes from Riverdale Ave.

19


7 12

11 5 1

9

8

2

4

6

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

10

20

1

THE SUPERMARKET

7

MID-RISE TOWER

2

THE ‘HEARTH’

8

STACKED TOWNHOMES

3

GREENHOUSE LOOKOUT

9

RAINWATER COLLECTION POOLS & HILLS

4

RETAIL AT GRADE

10 KITCHENETTE & LOUNGE

5

CEDAR’S GROCER (LOCAL FOODS)

11 UNDERGROUND PARKING ACCESS

6

STEPPED FLATS

12 BICYCLE PARKING

3

ABOVE Site Plan OPPOSITE ABOVE Exploded Axon. of Stacked Units OPPOSITE BELOW Floor Plans of Segment ‘B’ / Bird’s Eye Axon.


E. E A V AL RD VE RI

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 3

B

21


F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

1

22 2 3

1

2

3


UP

UP

DN DN

3 BEDROOMS + STUDY

2 BEDROOMS + STUDY

ABOVE Selected Unit Plans BELOW View of Unit Interior OPPOSITE Axonometric Detailed Section

23


318 13

76

64

16

RETAIL

A

152 10

101

13 W1

100

F1

TOP OF GROUND FLOOR SLAB

40

100.00

BACKFILL 60 x 914 x 1219 RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSUL. BOARD, RSI=0.76 (R=4.3) 64 x 610 x 1219 RIGID MINERAL FIBRE THERMAL INSUL., RSI=0.76 (R=4.3) 3 ELASTOMERIC AIR AND VAPOUR BARRIER MEMBRANE 250 POURED CONCRETE, RSI=0.014 (R=0.08)

• • • •

• • •

13 GLASS FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE PANEL, RSI=0.06 (R=0.34) 76 AIR SPACE, RSI=0.12 (R=0.68) 18 GA 64 x 100 Z-BAR VERTICAL AT 610 O.C. 64 x 610 x 1219, WATER REPELLANT RIGID MINERAL FIBER INSUL. BOARD, RSI=1.9 (R=0.36) 1 MICROPOROUS LAMINATE SELF-ADHERED VAPOUR PERMEABLE WATER RESISTIVE AIR BARRIER MEMBRANE 16 WATER RESISTANT EXTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING, RSI=0.18 (R=1.0) 51 x 152 x 3658 20 GA STRUCTURAL–AXIAL LOAD-BEARING & WINDBEARING COLD-FORMED STEEL C STUDS 16 O.C. 152 x 413 x 1219 SEMI-RIGID BATT STONE WOOL INSULATION, RSI=3.96 (R=22) 10 x 1200 x 1370 NATURAL COTTON RADIANT/VAPOUR BARRIER, RSI=0.69 (R=4) 13 x 1220 x 2743 INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD, RSI=0.23 (R=1.3) 1 COAT WATER BASED INTERIOR ACRYLIC PRIMER/SEALER 2 COATS INTERIOR EGGSHELL FINISH 100% ACRYLIC PAINT

• • • • •

13 LIGHTWEIGHT SPRAY PLASTER FINISH 2 REINFORCING FIBREGLASS MESH 150 SEMI-RIGID MINERAL WOOL INSULATION BOARD, RSI=1.4 (R=8) 200 POURED CONCRETE, RSI=0.014 (R=0.08) 40 LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE WITH POLISHED FINISH, RSI=0.014 (R=0.08)

• • • •

80 X 260 X 260 PERMEABLE CONCRETE PAVER 50 BEDDING COURSE TYPICAL GRANULAR A STONE DUST 200 COMPACTED GRANULAR A CRUSHED STONE BACKFILL

200

• • •

150

• FN2 G1

100

5% SLOPE

PARKING

50

80

99.61 GRADE

64

001

250

200

60

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

FN1

24

FN1 - TYP. BELOW GRADE FOUNDATION WALL

• • • • •

W1 - TYP. EXT WALL

F1 - TYP. GROUND FLOOR

G1 - TYP. EXTERIOR GRADE


A

B

C

ABOVE Front Exterior Elevation BELOW 1:100 Card Model of Segment ‘B’ OPPOSITE Construction Detail Section

25


2 km

RER TRANSIT STOPS

MAJOR HIGHWAY

PARIS, ÎLE-DE-FRANCE

5 km

VAL D’EUROPE, ÎLE-DE-FRANCE

A2

THE ‘DISNEYFICATION’ OF PARIS Type: Description: Instructor: Location: Date:

Urban Planning Critical Thinking, Dissertation Brent Patterson / Michael Herrman Paris, France Spring 2012

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

During the spring 2012 semester in Paris a collaboration took place between Columbia University’s New York/Paris program and the École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture Paris-Malaquais. The two student bodies met over the course of the semester, in seminar format, to ignite a multicultural discussion and consider the development of Paris from a distinctively international point of view (Columbia), in comparison to the native perspective (Malaquais). The essays produced by a group of third year students at the ÉNSA Paris-Malaquais discussed and researched various themes related to representations of the city. The end result of this collaboration is a rich collection of insights into how the city is perceived, questioned, represented, and the challenge it raises for architecture and urban planning. This publication contains a selection of the best student work produced during this collaboration as selected by Michael Herrman and Brent Patterson. -written by M. Herrman

26

“The Val d’Europe of Disney: An ‘Authentic’ Simulation of Paris” How do recent developments in Greater Paris, such as Val d’Europe in Marnela-Vallée, look to adopt traditional aspects of Paris’ architecture and urbanism, and what strategies are used to do so? Val d’Europe, whose construction is largely overseen by the Walt Disney Company, is a major urban centre situated approximately 35 kilometers east of Paris. It is a highly unique project in France which attempts to unite private developments with commercial and touristic industries. The movement of New Urbanism or “Nouvel urbanisme”, as communicated by planners such a Léon Krier and François Spoerry, is also examined in the text.

Publications & Awards: Mediating Memory (2012, Columbia University Press)

New Urbanism, which first began in Europe and is now linked to various popular American developments, consists of new approaches to urban planning said to be morphological, pedestrian-friendly and smaller in scale. These features in addition to the movement’s tendency to adopt a pastiche of traditional elements, has garnered criticism for its character of nostalgia and exclusion. The text examines the ways in which newer construction and planning strategies at Val d’Europe imitate various traditional and Haussmannian styles of architecture that were used throughout the history of Paris’ evolution, as well as the consequences that arise from such actions. The research also critically reflects on the issue of authenticity in regards to particular components and methods of construction used throughout the development, demonstrating an evident American leverage on the project’s progression, in respect to both New Urbanism conventions and ‘Disneyfication’ (the superficial simplification of entities, inclusing those associated to architecture). ABOVE Context Map of Paris and Val d’Europe OPPOSITE ABOVE Architectural Language in Paris vs.Val d’Europe OPPOSITE BELOW ‘Mediating Memory’ Publication


PARIS, FR POPULATION:

2, 240, 621 DENSITY:

21, 258 p / km2 AREA:

105.40 km2

VAL D’EUROPE, FR POPULATION:

30, 132 DENSITY:

586 p / km2 AREA:

51.41 km2

27


A3

‘BABA YAGA’ MARIONETTE THEATRE Type: Description: Instructor: Location: Date:

Set Design Design-Build Theatre Set Stephen Fai Ottawa, Canada Fall 2011

Part of the third year undergraduate architectural design studio, the marionette theatre ‘design-build’ project was undertaken as groupwork with the primary aim of utilizing all constructed components - including set, props, marionnettes and audience seating - in a performance taking place at the univeristy following the end of the term.

In collaboration with: L. Boyd, A. Chiney, D. Farid & T. Nguyen

via Baba Yaga herself, the marionette of the young girl invoked a sense of clarity and good. Not only was this achieved through her delicate material and form, but also in her consistent and predictable pendulum movements. This is what ultimately set her apart from the rest of the scene, and successfully related the classic tale involving the demise of crudeness and prevailing of grace.

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

The design conception of this theatre demonstrates what the group collectively established as the underlying meaning shared between the faculty-assigned ‘artifact’ (or prop) and the Russian folklore story of Baba Yaga. Both pieces maintain a juxtaposition of the beautiful and the grotesque, the loved and the unloveable. Both communicate a simultaneous representation of the group’s most fundamental desires and repulsions. This dichotomy invokes an emotional response in itself: one that is particularly alluring, a testament to the inevitable prevailing of good over evil.

28

The stage environment was envisioned as a skin used to cover what is traditionally hidden, otherwise understood as the ‘innards’. However, through thoughtfulness, precision and form, the creation of a humble yet dramatic aesthetic was achieved. The marionettes of the two primary characters in the story further brought this to life by personifying this almost confusing state. Baba Yaga, jaggedly clad, much like her harsh surroundings, was meant to produce a strange mixture of fear and humour. Her abrupt and violent movements were countered and challenged by her bizarre bodily proportions and oddly humanlike features. In contrast to these angular motifs strung throughout the theatre and

ABOVE Marionnette Theatre & Seating OPPOSITE ABOVE Detail Images, ‘D1’ Section & Axon. OPPOSITE BELOW Theatre Plan (Legend on p.14)


231

135

69

313 403

1

69

190 293

610

2

404

97

4

542

828

617

610

610

610

2

610

822

1525

7

1

610

4 6

3050 610

350

D-2

3

1

2

2441

1911

5

A-A

D-1

313 3306

587

29


313

4

1525

2 D-1

5

D-2

542

1

828

1

610 (W) x 2438 (L) 12MM OSB SHEATHING FLOOR PANELS OVER 38x38 SPRUCE FRAMING

2 3

617

610

610

610

610

822

3

610

4

7

FASTEN END PIECES OF OSB PARTICLE BOARD TO FRAMING W/ 75MM FINISH NAILS

2438 (L) x 610 (H) 12MM OSB SHEATHING WALL PANELS OVER 38x38 SPRUCE FRAMING (VARYING DEPTHS)

CONTINUOUS GALVANIZED 25MM STEEL SQUARE HOLLOW SECTION, FASTENED TO REAR OF WALL W/ 90MM STFFL BOLT

5

8

100MM DIA. RECESSED SPEAKERS

BENCH CLADDING: 12MM OSB SHEATHING PANELS OVER 38x38 SPRUCE FRAMING

38x38 SPRUCE FRAMING, PARTIALLY EXPOSED THROUGH FLOOR PANELS

6

1219 (W) X 2438 (H) 3MM MDF SHEET, CUT TO SIZE

9

SHAPED 38x38 SPRUCE FRAMING MEMBERS

3050

30

2441

1911

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

350

610


794

794

775

914

914

762

57 100

794

794

775

914

914

762

57

5

616

1

100

616

152

152 330

337

1765 2438

152

152 330

337

1765 2438

1 8 9

5

ABOVE ‘D-2’ Media Panel, Plan & Axon. Details OPPOSITE ABOVE ‘A-A’ Longitudinal Section OPPOSITE BELOW Marionettes / Performance Photos

31


A4

CARTOGRAPHY CENTRE Type: Description: Instructor: Location: Date:

Architecture Institutional Studio Project Eric Archambault Ottawa, Canada Spring 2011

The Cartography Centre is an exercise in responsive infill design within the downtown Ottawa fabric. The program constitutes a library and archive for the purposes of housing maps and other cartographic material concerning the city, as well as a bookstore. The specific site for the project is the historic Byward Market, a neighbourhood whose morphology over the course of the last century was studied to help inform the design of the proposed structure. The project’s inspiration draws from experimentation with both vertical and horizontal circulation, influenced by Adolf Loos’ research surrounding the concept of the “Raumplan”, something which has been translated through the use of section and plan drawings.

ABOVE North Exterior Elevation

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

BELOW Parti Diagram and Perspective

32

OPPOSITE ABOVE Floor Plans and Longitudinal Section ‘B-B’ OPPOSITE BELOW 1:100 Card Model


33


O1

SELECTED TECHNICAL DRAWINGS Type: Client: Location: Date:

Hand Drafting, CAD Drawings & Diagrams, Sketches Various or N/A Ottawa and Toronto, Canada 2009 - 2017

On these spreads are excerpts of technical drawings, details and diagrams which I have produced over the course of the preceding ten years as both a student and practicing designer. Here, I have included examples of hand drafted drawings in axonometric, plan, section and elevation views. Furthermore, the comprehensive detailed hand-drafted axonometric section aids in demonstrating an understanding of construction techniques and materials.

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

In the following pages, I have included technical CAD and Revit drawings produced for BSN Architects while I worked there on a custom-designed cottage located in Haliburton Highlands, Ontario.

34

ABOVE / RIGHT Hand-Drafted Detailed Axonometric Wall Section Case Study : The Gae House OPPOSITE Hand-Drafted Cross-Section and Floor Plans Case Study : The Gae House


35


13

11

12 1

10

3

LOFT LEVEL

0 ft

2

10 ft

6

4

2 5 7

9

MAIN LEVEL

8

1

2 3 2

6 7

LOWER LEVEL

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

36

SCREENED PORCH BEDROOM LIVING DINING KITCHEN BATHROOM ENTRY

8 9 10 11 12 13

WALKOUT PATIO BRIDGE DOUBLE SKIN LIVING SPACE SLEEPING LOFT CLOSET GREEN ROOF


OPPOSITE ABOVE Floor Plans OPPOSITE BELOW Perspectival Cross Section View of Living Space ABOVE Exploded Axonometric Drawing of Structural + Architectural Systems

37


O2

SELECTED HAND DRAWINGS + FINE ART Type: Client: Location: Date:

Graphite on Paper, Ink on Paper, Acrylic on Canvas N/A (Academic and Independent) Ottawa and Toronto, Canada / Berkeley, USA 2009 - 2017

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

On these spreads are selected hand drawings, sketches and paintings which I have opted to include in order to showcase artistic ability, creativity as well as an understanding of perspective drawing techniques.

38


ABOVE ‘Untitled’, Acrylic Paint on Canvas OPPOSITE RIGHT ‘Hands’, Graphite on Paper OPPOSITE ABOVE Conceptual Axonometric Sketch, Graphite on Paper OPPOSITE BELOW Life Drawing, Charcoal on Paper

39


O3

SELECTED PHOTOGRAPHY Type: Client: Locations: Date:

Digital, Film N/A, Various California, Bristish Columbia, Ontario 2018 - 2020

On these spreads are selected examples of fine art and landscape photography I have captured in recent years. Many of these belong to larger themed bodies of work which I am currently in the process of editing and compiling into a series of photo books.

ABOVE ‘Hourglass’, 2018

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

RIGHT ‘Rodeo Slug’, 2019

40

OPPOSITE ABOVE ‘Off Duty’, 2018 OPPOSITE BELOW ‘Untitled’, 2020


ABOVE Conceptual Hand Sketch of Cross-Section RIGHT Hand-Drafted Detailed Axonometric Wall Section Case Study : The Gae House

41


42

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1


ABOVE ‘Sheets’, 2018

43


44

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1


ABOVE ‘Hunter Gatherers’, 2018 OPPOSITE ‘Highway US-101’, 2018

45


46

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1


ABOVE ‘Givré’, 2019 BELOW ‘PM’, 2018 OPPOSITE ‘Lazy Nol I’, 2019

47


F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

48

ABOVE ‘Weeds’, 2018 OPPOSITE ‘Fissures’, 2018


49


50

F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1


51


F O R G E T // 2 0 2 1

52

PREVIOUS LEFT ‘Glen Hall Pool’, 2020 PREVIOUS RIGHT ‘Cutlery, Table and Schoolchairs’, 2018



KAT FORGET

TEL EMAIL

+1 604 442 1325 kat.forget@gmail.com

IN

linkedin.com/in/katforget issuu.com/katforget

PORTFOLIO


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.