REFORMING ROWS in Historic East Baltimore
A thesis completed by Kelly Elizabeth Ball in fulfillment of the requirements for Bachelor of Architecture at Cornell University August 2009
table of contents
site
03
precedent
17
form
25
program
31
design proposal bibliography
43 63
thesis statement “Between the dream’s row of successive images and a series of recollections there is as much difference as that between a pile of rough-hewn material with superimposed parts heaped one upon the other, only accidentally achieving equilibrium, and the walls of an edifice maintained by a whole armature, supported and reinforced by neighboring edifices…our recollections depend on those of our fellows, and on the great frameworks of the memory of society” Maurice Halbwachs “The architecture of the city summarizes the city’s form and from this form we can consider the city’s problems.” Aldo Rossi
The thesis approaches the rowhousing typology as a critical component of the physical fabric, collective memory and urban identity of Baltimore- a city in which the population has been dropping and the popularity of the rowhouse has been dwindling. In Historic East Baltimore, partially abandoned blocks are being leveled and redeveloped into “new-urbanism” housing and conventional commercial buildings. If it is to maintain its viablity as a housing type and perpetuate an urban indentity in East Baltimore, the rowhouse must adapt to better support community needs and provide amenities offered by new urban and suburban development. Through formal analysis of the housing typology and introduction of community based programming, the transformation of a rowhouse block will take place. The particular block under examination is comprised of 52 row house lots between 1,000 sf and 1,500 sf in size. Public program- library, grocery, laundromat- will be introduced without destroying the structural system, the inherent architectural logic or iconic facade of the rowhouse block. However, reprogramming the block will demand a rethinking of the existing formal elements. The thesis will thus reform the individual rowhouse, the block and the neighborhood in order to stimulate the area and perpetuate an urban collective memory. Such a transformation will inform how redevelopment in American cities can reuse existing urban constructs rather than replace existing blocks.
01
02
site
03
site
The thesis problem begins with site, Historic East Baltimore, a neighborhood in transition. Between 2000 and 2006, the population of Baltimore city dropped by nearly 20,000, continuing patterns begun in 1950. Resultant housing abandonment in Baltimore has led to the deterioration of the city’s physical and social fabric, distinctly noticeable in this aerial view. Vacancy manifests itself through rows of empty and neglected housing, and has led to the demolition of units and entire blocks. The city has begun to give up on the rowhousing typology.
04
aerial map of Historic East Baltimore, site is highlighted
site
The immediate site is an abandoned residential block in a neighborhood in East Baltimore. The site is a gateway block into the neighborhood, adjacent to both a major boulevard to the West, and a developing residential zone to the East. It is a viable site for community, residenital and commercial programming, that could help revive the larger area. Adjacent housing units are aligned to face the street on three sides of the block. The alley is meant to provide an internal street with back access to units. While arrangement of rows, types and groupings of units varies block to block, the pattern and organizational logic is consistent throughout Baltimore.
existing conditions of block
05
N Broadway
site
A proposal developed by East Baltimore Development Inc. illustrates the areas of new construction, rehabilitation and proposed buildings, both commercial and residential. The thesis site, outlined, is situated east of Broadway and west of new housing construction that introduces smaller streets and open green space into the community. The continuously expanding Johns Hopkins Medical campus and Hospital is directly south of the residenital and commercial zone, providing hundreds of jobs and world-class medical amenites to the city. Along with residenital and commercial development, construction on the medical campus for new facilities is underway.
E Preston St.
E Biddle St.
E Chase St.
E Eager St.
Ashland Ave.
Madison St.
06
EBDI Neighborhood Plan
site Johns Hopkins Medical Campus Map
07
site
1042
1040
1024
1022
Key Plan
N Broadway
1044 1042 1040 1038 1036 1034 1032 1030 1028 1026 1024 1022 1020 1018 1016 1014 1012 1010 1008 1006 1004
McDonogh St
E Chase St
E Eager St
08
McDonogh Street back elevations (looking East)
1038
1036
1020
1034
1018
site 1034
1030
1012
1028
1010
1024
1026
1008
1006
1004
09
site
1001
1019
1003
1021
1005
1023
1007
1025
1009
1027
1029
1047
1049
1031
Key Plan
N Broadway
1044 1042 1040 1038 1036 1034 1032 1030 1028 1026 1024 1022 1020 1018 1016 1014 1012 1010 1008 1006 1004
McDonogh St
E Chase St
E Eager St
10
Broadway back elevations (looking West)
1045
1051
site 1009
1033
1011
1035
1013
1037
1039
1015
1041
1017
1043
11
site
1703
1705
1707
1709
1711
Key Plan
N Broadway
1044 1042 1040 1038 1036 1034 1032 1030 1028 1026 1024 1022 1020 1018 1016 1014 1012 1010 1008 1006 1004
E Eager St
12
McDonogh St
E Chase St
1711
1709
East Chase Street back and front elevations (looking South and North)
1707
1705
1703
site 1004
1006
1008
1010
1012
1014
1016
1018
1020
1022
1024
1026
1028
1030
1032
1034
1036
1038
1040
1042
McDonogh Elevation (looking West)
1053
1051
1049
1047
1045
1043
1041
1039
1037 1035
1033
1031
1029
1027
1025
1023
1021
1019
1017
1015
1013
1011
1009
1007
1005
1001
Broadway Elevation (looking East)
Front Elevations
13
site 1
Looking North on Broadway
3
Looking Northwest on Chase
2
Looking Northeast on Chase
3
Looking Northeast on Chase
1 E Chase St
3
McDonogh St
4
N Broadway
2
4
E Eager St
Key Plan 1/256”=1’-0”
14
Panoramas
Looking Northwest on Broadway
site photos around site depicting abandoned and derelict conditions
15
16
precedent
17
precedent
Only 11 to 12 feet wide and 25-30 feet deep, typical 19th century alley rowhouse Kennington Road terrace row, London built 1780 1609 Lanvale St 203 Amity Street built in 1830, the original residence of Edgar Allen Poe
Typical Georgian rowhouse, Engligh prototype for Baltimore construction
Early 1800s through the 1830s, Federal style two-bay-two-and-ahalf story rowhouse
1780 1800 Baltimore Rowhouse: variations on the typology
18
time line of the Baltimore rowhouse
Two-story-and-attic house typical to housing built for the growing working class in the 1840s and early 1850s
1840
Three-story, three-bay rowhouse at 1412 Park Ave, built 1857, is typical of elegant rows built 1850s-1880s. The plan is elongated, the double parlor becomes a long single parlor and an open passage is provided from the front to the back of the house.
1860
The 200 block of N Castle exhibits both old and refurbished versions of the two-story-two-bay rowhouse
Row at E 33rd st at Alameda built by Edward J. Gallagher 1917
The modest two-story Italianate rowhouses constructed in Baltimore’s factory neighborhoods around the waterfront in the 1870s and 1880s include a vestibule and formal parlor.
Rowhouse design between 1880 and 1915 reflected improved styling and technology. The interior opened up to allow for a more formal stair/reception hall, but also created windowless center rooms.
Daylight rowhouses began to be built in Baltimore around 1915, characterized by two-room deep, two-room-wide floor plans that allowed sunlight to enter every room.
1870
1880
1915
precedent
Original two story Italianate rowhouses , built late 19th century
19
precedent
The conversion of an abandoned glass factory in Sau Paulo, Brazil into a community arts and recreation complex revitalizes its surrounding neighborhood. An internal pathway, formally alike to the alley of a rowhouse block, is revitalized as an active pedestrian street. Open structure of the warehouse typology allows flexible architectural intervention not permitted by the small-scale rigid construct of a residential rowhouse block. However, the project’s success as a community center provides inspiration for the thesis.
Existing building New construction Programmatic divisions
Plan of complex
Section through converted warehouse
20
Lina Bo Bardi, SESC Pompeia Factory, Sau Paulo
programmatic insertion
precedent
By reoccupying the existing rowhouse shell, the project is analogous to a hermit crab, whereby the organism inhabits an abandoned snail shell. Once the shell is reoccupied, new life processes take place. An analogous ecological reuse should take place in architecture.
21
precedent Ragflats by Onion Flats readapts a warehouse site into a viable apartment complex and rethinks typical rowhouse design. Unexpected cladding materials, cantilevered extensions to block housing, the prominence of green space, both shared and private, and the subdivision of the block into smaller blocks all provide formal precedents for the thesis.
22
Onion Flats, Rag Flats, Philadelphia
1
3'-4 1/2"
A10
IAWN3735
13x18 ceramic floor & wall tile in running bond pattern over 1/2" 'Durock' & transition per Product Selection Sheet
2'-2"
IAWN3735 over ICA 3763
eq.
eq.
ICA 2535 over ICA 2563
5'-6"
"Mini" pellet stove to exhaust out rear wall using Simpson Duravent parts: Pipe - 3012B Pipe Adapter - 3079B Horizontal Cap - 3085S Wall Thimble - 3043; fresh air intake shall be 2" diameter steel w/ exterior elbow
R 1 A5
2 A10
living room
1 A6
exist. low CMU wall to remain
concrete & CMU base & walls to be parged per Product Selection Sheet
ICA2535
4"
DS
full round downspout; color per Product Selection Sheet; extend rain leader to parking pad above grade
1 A4
CATV
DS
fin. clg. ht. 11'-1" a.f.f.
prime & paint exist. CMU wall per Product Selection Sheet
2x6 clg. joists @ 24" o.c.
concrete & CMU wall & base to be parged per Product Selection Sheet 1'-6" exposed brick
ICA 3763
ICA 2563
KITCHEN This rowhouse conversion project in Baltimore replaces the dividing wall between two neighboring units with strategically placed columns to double the floor area. The methodology suggests the potential for flexible spatial and programmatic conditions within the rowhouse block.
1 A7 open to below
R UP
+/- 10'-3" 4
gas cooktop
A11
1 A11
1
kitchen
full tile
R
ref
R 1'-2" typ.
fin. clg. ht. 9'-0" a.f.f. eq.
eq.
4
2 A11
dw
R elec. wall oven
powder rm. fin. clg. ht. 7'-6" a.f.f.
A11
7'-10"
7'-6 1/2"
HVAC: 6" exhaust for hood to vent through roof bulkhead per section 4/A11
RCATV
bulkhead per section 4/A11
R
3 eq.
stair opening above
3'-1"
28" full-lite w/ frosted glass; spring hinges
A11
R3
3'-0"
24" full-lite w/ frosted glass; spring hinges eq. eq.
3'-6 1/2"
3'-6"
glu-lam beam to be sealed, stained, & polyurethaned per Product Selection Sheet
2'-2"
eq.
2'-2"
1'-2"
1'-6" exposed brick
R 6"
9'-0"
eq
pedestal sink w/ mirror above 12x18 ceramic tile in running bond pattern over 1/2" 'Durock' & transition per Product Selection Sheet
bulkhead fin. clg. ht. 8'-4" a.f.f.
+/-8'-2" exposed brick
4'-0"
3'-0"
dining room
2x4 bulkhead w/ (2)4'x10' veneer plywood finish per Section 1/A4
entry bulkhead fin. clg. ht. 8'-4" a.f.f.
plywood joint 6" typ. eq.
eq.
STAIRWELL
eq
9'-0"
1
wood dbl. hung
2
6'-7"
R
2'-11"
R
36" w steel stair w/ (9) 8" risers & (8) steel rough treads ; solid wood tread to be 10" (9" nose to nose); stain & polyurethane per Product Selection Sheet
9'-7"
fin. clg. ht. 9'-0" a.f.f.
3'-0" exposed brick
R
sitting room
CATV
3/4" solid wood pre-finished flooring throughout 1st floor (incl. living room)U.O.N. per Product Selection Sheet; fasten flooring in living rm. w/ 1 3/4" fasteners
R
9'-5"
see trim schedule for solid wood handrail; typ.
DN
3'-2"
+/- 9'-5"
36" w steel stair w/ (4) 8" risers & (3) steel rough treads ; solid wood tread to be 10" (9" nose to nose); stain & polyurehtane per Product Selection Sheet
Hose Bib
6"
R
10'-2"
2x4 wall infill to cseal gap between houses; recess 2"
IAWN3735 over +/-36" full-lite
addition above; see section 1/A6 for soffit information
+/- 8'-2" exposed brick
HVAC: return air on wall; center below sill
R
precedent
First Floor Notes 1. All windows and doors to be replaced shall be in original masonry openings in new bullnose frame unless otherwise noted. Construction Dept. to determine if new bullnose is needed. 2. All windows shall receive casing, jamb extension, & solid wood stools w. aprons 3. F + I solid wood blocking per General Notes where cabinets and kitchen shelves are shown. 4. Expose interior brick where noted per general notes. Mortar color to be 12B-verify color w/ Construction Supervisor. 5. F + I Tear Away L Bead where drywall meets brick, typ. (Trim-Tex model #(9012). 6. F + I shoe mold only (per Product Selection Sheet) where exposed brick meets wood flooring. 7. All interior doors shall be smooth finish solid core Masonite Doors. Styles as noted on drawings. 8. prime & paint all low wall sills & aprons per Product Selection Sheet.
fixed full lite
2-pnl. door; transom w/ insul. glass
wood dbl. hung Hose Bib
38"wx12" d steel window box per elevation 12/A12 1x3 casing & apron
partition schedule
1x4 base
5/4 solid 5/4 solid stair wood; 3/8" wood(2 "w); opening bullnose; 3/8" apron; stools, sills, bullnose; WM-249 open shelves railing
low 2 x 4 partition full height 2 x 4 partition full height insulated 2 x 4 partition full height 2x4 "on edge" partition 1/4" laminated drywall exposed brick
metal rail over new brick stair per section 1/A4
12 A12
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY: T C
CHECKED BY:
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED ALL WORK IS TO BE COMPLETED PER GENERAL NOTES, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON DWGS.
first floor plan
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
9 north port street PATTERSON PARK CDC
2900 EAST BALTIMORE STREET BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21224
05.10.06 BID SET revised 8.22.06
3
A 2 7 of 18
EAST ELEVATION
Trace Architects, 9 North Port Street, Baltimore
23
24
form
25
form 26
formal diagrams: existing condition NTS
Existing Block
Existing Elements
Party Walls
Walls to Street
Plug-In Building
Tunnel
Zipper formal diagrams: tactics for transformation of existing elements NTS
form
Plug-In Lot
27
Orthogonal Structure of Block
Existing Buildings Existing Property Lines Maximum Lot Coverage
form
Party Wall Projected Property Line
Lot Coverage
Existing Built= 19,035 sf
Existing Buildings Proposed Coverage Total Area on Block=37590 sf Maximum Permitted Lot Coverage Total Area on Block=42,786 sf
Maxiumum Permitted Lot Coverage= 25,903 sf
Total Lot Area= 39,851 sf Total Lot Area= 20,398 sf
Existing Built Area= 3,578.5 sf Maxiumum Permitted Lot Coverage= 3,624 sf Total Lot Area= 5,576 sf
Maxiumum Permitted Lot Coverage= 13,259 sf
Existing Built Area= 11,078 sf
28
formal diagrams 1/64”=1’0”
Existing Buildings
form
The formal operative stratgey for the proposal was generated from existing lot coverage laws and the orthogonal logic of the existing block. Through using the inetrnal block as a single zone for intervention, the area in which adhoc additions have been constructed is replaced by a lateral zone across which divided units connect.
Buildings to Demolish New Lateral Zone of Intervention Party Wall New Building
29
30
program 31
program
Existing Traditional Program: HOUSING
LIBRARY
32
program components
GROCERY
GREENHOUSE
DAYCARE
LAUNDRY
Daycare Greenhouse Library Reprogramming by Lot
Laundromat Existing Buildings
Programmatic Overlap and Interaction
programmatic diagrams: street level plan 1/64”=1’0”
program
Grocery/Retail
33
1,900 sf_laundromat component
4
11
5,400 sf_daycare component
19
8,170 sf_greenhouse component
15,400 sf_grocery component
program
17,500 sf_library component
40
74
31,300 sf_housing component total
34
36
program size analysis 1/64”=1’0”
430 sf_one floor of existing rowhouse 560 sf_1 BR subsidized apt
2
1500 sf_3 BR on site townhome
4
740 sf_2 BR subsidized apt
2
790 sf_1 BR on site market rate apt
1500 sf_minimum laundromat 5
2500 sf_maximum laundromat
1040 sf_2 BR on site market rate apt
2
4
5
2000 sf_main street retailer
2000 sf_3 BR on site townhome
2
5
2200 sf_3 BR on site townhome
6
7
3000 sf_minimum daycare
12,000 sf_maximum daycare
28
program
30
13,000 sf_chain drugstore
41
17,500 sf_library
98
40,000 sf_average supermarket
program size proposal1/64”=1’0”
35
NO RT HB RO
AD W
AY
1. basic configuration of program distribution among units
EA ST
CH AS
TR EE
T
2. retail to high traffic corner, greenhouse to light and air
NO RT HB RO AD WA Y
program
ES
EA ST
36
program massing diagrams
CH AS ES
TR EE
T
NO RT HB RO
AD WA Y
3. greenhouse to South, library to inside street
CH AS
ES
TR EE
T
NO RT HB RO
AD W
AY
4. grocery to high traffic corner, greenhouse to south
program
EA ST
EA ST
CH AS
ES
TR EE
T
37
1004
1006 1008
1010 1012
1014
1016
program
Existing Elevation NTS
Existing Longitudinal Section NTS
38
sections through housing component NTS
single family home
2 BR apartment market rate or subsidized
3 BR townhome market rate
1 BR apartment market rate or subsidized
1018
1020
1022
1024
1026
1028
1030
1032
1034
1036
1038
1040
1042
39
program
Daycare Greenhouse Library Grocery/Retail Laundromat Housing
program
Isometric Diagram
1
2
3
4
5
6
28
7
29
8
30
31
9
10
11
32
33
34
12
35
13
36
14
37
15
38
16
39
40
17
18
41
42
19
43
20
44
21
45
22
46
23
47
24
25
26
27
48
49
50
51
52
Ground Floor Plan Diagram 40
programmatic proposal NTS
2
3
4
5
6
28
7
29
8
30
31
9
10
11
32
33
34
12
35
13
36
14
37
15
38
16
39
40
17
18
41
42
19
43
20
44
21
45
22
46
23
47
24
25
26
27
48
49
50
program
1
51
52
programmatic proposal NTS
41
42
design proposal 43
N N Broadway
Existing Buildings Property Lines
McDonogh St
Proposed Block Renewal Strategy (thesis)
St
Ellsworth St
y Ga
E Preston St
N
Proposed Construction (Johns Hopkins Hospital and East Baltimore Development Inc.)
E Biddle St
E Chase St
N Chapel St
proposal
N Chapel St
N Patterson Park Ave
44
site plan NTS
E Chase St
proposal
McDonogh St
N Broadway
site plan 1/128”=1’0”
45
46 isometric diagram
proposal
GROUND LEVEL MANIPULATION
GREEN ROOF AND PROGRAMMATIC INSERTION
EXISTING FACADES AND PARTY WALLS
proposal 47
Parking Level Plan 1/32”=1’0”
proposal Green Roof Level Plan 1/32”=1’0”
48
C
B
A
proposal
A
C 49
Housing Level Plan 1/32”=1’0”
B
SECTION BB
proposal
SECTION BB 1/16”=1’0”
SECTION CC 1/16”=1’0” Sections
50
Cross sections were taken sequentially, every 4’, through the block to illustrate the changing formal and programmatic conditions as one travels through the site. The following sections describe the way in which the model, at left, was made.
proposal
The model describes the stratified condition of the block and emphasizes passage between existing rowhousing (frosted) and new construction (clear). While the model diagrams formal conditions, the following sections diagram the new programmatic condition of the block.
sectional model
51
2 10 13 16 20 25
2
40 44
3
63
4
proposal
67
5 86 89 6
108 KEY PLAN 52
sectional series 1/64”=1’0”
7
Daycare
Library
Laundromat
Greenhouse
Grocery/Retail
Housing
15
9
16
10
17
11
18
12
19
13
20
14
21
proposal
8
53
proposal 54
22
29
23
30
24
31
25
32
26
33
27
34
28
35
sectional series 1/64”=1’0”
43
37
44
38
45
39
46
40
47
41
48
42
49
proposal
36
55
proposal 56
64
71
65
72
66
73
67
74
68
75
69
76
70
77
sectional series 1/64”=1’0”
71
65
72
66
73
67
74
68
75
69
76
70
77
proposal
64
57
proposal 58
78
85
79
86
80
87
81
88
82
89
83
90
84
91
sectional series 1/64”=1’0”
99
93
100
94
101
95
102
96
103
97
104
98
105
proposal
92
59
proposal 60
sectional model
proposal
SECTION AA NTS
CHASE STREET ELEVATION 1/16”=1’0” Sections
61
St h g no o D Mc
y proposal
a dw a Bro
Removal of units along Broadway and McDonogh allow for pedestrian pathways to cross through the block and connect with the residential development to the East of McDonogh. While most of the original hosuing units stay in tact, the porosity of block is altered dramatically. Site Model
62
proposal
before
63
Site Model
after
Cohen, Charles. “Destroying a Housing Project, to Save It.” The New York Times 21 Aug. 1995. Halbwachs, Maurice. On Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago P, 1992. Hayden, Dolores. “What Would a Non-Sexist City Be Like? Speculations on Housing, Urban Design, and Human Work.” Signs 5 (1980): S170-187. Hayward, Mary Ellen, and Charles Belfoure. The Baltimore Rowhouse. New York: Princeton Architectural P, 2001. Julie, Gabrielli, and Schaefer Kim. “Green Rowhouse Renovation Template.” Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Apr. 2001. TerraLogos Eco Architecture. Oct. 2008 <http://www.dnr.state.md.us/ed/casestudies/baltimorerowhouses.pdf>. Miller, Mark B. Baltimore Transitions : Views of an American City in Flux. New York: Johns Hopkins UP, 2000. Moneo, Jose Rafael. “On Typology.” Oppositions 07.13 (1978): 23-45. Muthesius, Stefan. English Terraced House. New Haven: Yale UP, 1982. Rossi, Aldo. The Architecture of the City. New York, NY: The MIT P, 1982. Rozhon, Tracie. “Old Baltimore Row Houses Fall Before Wrecking Ball.” The New York Times 13 June 1999. Shivers, Natalie W. Those Old Placid Rows: The Aesthetic and Development of the Baltimore Rowhouse. Baltimore: Maclay & Associates, 1981.
bibliography 64