979.450.6705 | KELLYHEYER@GMAIL.COM
Bennett Partners 5/2022 - 10/2022 Fort Worth, TX ASA Architects 7/2018 - 5/2022 Las Cruces, NM El Paso, TX
12 YEARS EXPERIENCE
Associate / Senior Project Manager
Responsible for business development as well as management and coordination regarding all aspects of project efforts. Served as the primary client and general contractor contact. Managed client budgets, schedules, and oversees internal team. Estimated fees, determined scopes of work and authored proposals and contracts. Served as internal LEED expert. Project types included: Municipal | Higher Education
Senior Project Architect
Responsible for business development as well as management and coordination regarding all aspects of project efforts. Served as the primary client and general contractor contact. Managed client budgets, schedules, and oversees internal team. Estimated fees, determined scopes of work and authored proposals and contracts. Served as internal LEED expert. Project types included: Municipal (Aquatic Center & Animal Services Center) | K-12 Education | Public Safety (Detention Center).
Peter Vincent Architects 6/2016 - 6/2018 Honolulu, HI
Bennett Benner Partners 2/2013 - 11/2015 Fort Worth, TX
Project Architect
Responsible for management and coordination regarding all aspects of multiple luxury custom residential buildings. Responsible for project conceptual design; drawing documentation; writing specifications; selecting finish materials and fixtures; and managing consultant coordination. Served as the primary client and general contractor contact for all aspects of projects. Managed client budgets, schedules, and internal team. Project types included: Luxury Custom Residential.
Project Coordinator
Responsible for management and coordination regarding all aspects of multiple small and midsize buildings at all phases. Served as the primary client and general contractor contact. Managed client budgets, schedules, and internal project team as well as estimated fees, and determined scopes of work. Served as head LEED expert & Instated company’s AIA 2030 Commitment. Project types included: Mixed-Use Multi-building Development | Higher Education | Commercial & Retail TI.
Square Feet Studio 6/2012 - 12/2012 Atlanta, GA
IBI Bay Architects 07/2009 - 07/2010 Houston, TX
5G Studio_collaborative 12/2008 - 06/2009 Dallas, TX
Architectural Intern
Responsible for preparing presentation and technical documentation for multiple small and midsize projects. Project types included: K-12 Education | Restaurant Interior.
Architectural Intern
Responsible for preparing presentation and technical documentation for multiple midsize projects. Project types included: K-12 Education.
Architectural Intern
Responsible for preparing presentation and technical documentation for multiple midsize projects. Project types included: Restaurant | Hospitality | Higher Education.
EDUCATION | AWARDS EXTRA CURRICULAR
Georgia Institute of Technology Masters of Architecture 2012 - 2012 | Atlanta, GA
Faculty Award of Merit - Best Thesis Project | Marthame Sanders Fellowship | Portman Prize Winner, Third Place | Wood & Metal Shop Coop Assistant & Architecture Library Librarian
University of Texas at Arlington Bachelors of Science in Architecture 2005 - 2009 | Arlington, TX
University Scholar | USGBC Kristen Kirkley Scholarship | Dean’s List Finland Design Summer Studio Competition Winner
Leadership Las Cruces Alumni
USGBC Hawaii | Education Board Member
Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture Neuroscience for Architecture Certification
SALK Institute, San Diego, CA. A comprehensive background in neuroscience as it relates to architecture and the built environment with emphasis on environmental psychology, neuroanatomy, and neurophysiology.
Association for Community Design | Board Treasurer
AutoDesk AutoCad | AutoDesk Revit | Graphisoft Archicad | Adobe Creative Suite | Newforma | BlueBeam
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Shape Grammars Thesis Part I Courthouse Thesis Part II
Promenade Building Portman Prize Landscape Building
Urban Infill Building
Roof Garden Congo Street Green Initiative Shell-ter
1 23 37 53 61 71 77 85
Shape Grammars Thesis Part I
Courthouse Thesis Part II
Promenade Building Portman Prize Landscape Building
Urban Infill Building Roof Garden Congo Street Green Initiative Shell-ter
Rule 12
Thesis Abstract:
Shape Grammars Neural & Computational Processes of Shapes
“Like art, designed and mass-produced objects are bearers of meaning. The idea that visual cues communicate specific messages has a distinguishing ancestry.” Using thirty different parts of the brain to see, we are able to recognize and understand the visual environment. How do shapes and forms influence our understanding and perception of the space and the built environment? Stanislas Deheane explains how the visual processes of reading are not inherent in the brain but are learned with growth. Although, he also states that the brain is not exactly a “blank slate,” that “alphabet of shapes” (like the T shape of a face) influences the way we see other formal compositions. “These themes are not just intellectual constructs but echoes of actual material objects and spatialized patterns: abbreviated universal ‘grammars’ of line and color...” The imbedded language of shapes suggests that forms evoke a grammar or defined behavior and “how the objects make the mind” (proving that all humans have synesthesia to a small degree.)
Additionally, a process of formal design exploration using visual computation entitled shape grammars, explores the visual computations of primitive shapes (like Froeble blocks) to create dynamic spatial relationships and formal compositions solely based on the mathematics and symmetries of the shape. In contrast to symbolic computational processes where codes and language are representative of shapes and functions, visual computation allows for more authorship and intentionality. Mitchell Stiny describes, “shape grammar formalism allows for algorithms to be defined directly in terms of labeled shapes and parameterized labeled shapes. Each such algorithm defines a language of shapes.”
How do the visual computational process and the neurological process of understanding shapes influence and inform inspirations for design, specifically for architecture? How and why does our brain organization determine our understanding of shapes and forms and in turn possibly our understanding of architectural formations? How do these two processes of seeing, cataloguing, perceiving form influence how we design and experience architecture?
Bibliography
Stafford, Barbara Maria, ed. A Field Guide to a New Meta Field: Bridging the Humanities-Neuroscience Divide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. Print. _ Stafford, Barbara Maria. Echo Objects: The Cognitive Work of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007. Print. _ Deheane, Stanislas, Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention. New York: Viking, 2009. Print. Hauser, Marc. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: Ecco, 2006. Print _ Knight T, 1994. Transformations in Design: a Formal Approach to Stylistic Change an Innovation in the Visual Arts Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England Stiny G and J. Gips, 1978. Algorithmic Aesthetics, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA _ Stiny G, 1976, “Two exercises in formal composition”, Environment and Planning B 187 – 210 Stiny G, 1980, “Introduction to shape and shape grammars” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 7 343-351 Stiny G, 1980, “Kindergarten grammars: designing with Froebel’s building gifts” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 7 409-462 _ Stiny G, 1977, “Ice-ray: a note on Chinese lattice designs” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 4 89-98 _ Stiny G, Mitchell W J, 1978, “The Palladian Grammar” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 5 5-18 _ Stiny G, Mitchell W J, 1980, “The Grammar of paradise: on the generation of Mughal gardens” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 7 209-226 _ Knight T W, 1990, “Mughal gardens revisited” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 17 73-84 Koning H, Eizenberg J, 1981, “The language of the Prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright’s Prairie houses Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 8 295-323 _ Duarte J P, 2005, “Towards the mass customization of housing: the grammar of Siza’s houses at Malagueira” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32(3) 347-380 _ Flemming U, 1987, “The role of shape grammars in the analysis and creation of designs” in Kalay Y E (ed.) Computability of Designs (New York: John Wiley amp; Sons) 245-272 (AE) Dye D S, [1937], 1974, A Grammar of Chinese Lattice, Vols. 1, 2 (Dover Publications, New York) _ Emmer M, 1993 Ed, The Visual Mind: Art and Mathematics (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts) _ Grünbaum B, Shephard G, 1987, Tilings and Patterns (Freeman Press, San Francisco) Haeckel E, 1974, Art Forms in Nature (Dover Publications Inc, New York) Sullivan L H, [1924], 1967, A System of Architectural Ornament According with a Philosophy of Man’s Powers (A L Huxtable, New York) _ Thomson D W, [1917], 1992, On Growth and Form (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
1 23 37 53 61 71
Shape Grammars Thesis Part I
Courthouse Thesis Part II
Promenade Building Portman Prize Landscape Building Urban Infill Building Roof Garden Congo Street Green Initiative Shell-ter
DOWNTOWN MOBILE, ALABAMA NEW FEDERAL COURTHOUSE SITE PLAN SCALE 1” = 500’
Contemporary U.S. Courthouses pose unique design challenges. They have complex functional requirements and vary widely in their size, volume, configuration, form, program, and style. The courthouse design itself has received much attention in recent years under the GSA Design Excellence Program. The proposed design of a new federal courthouse is Mobile, Alabama, a state fraught with race discrimination. The most significant and identifiable characteristics of federal courthouses are the divisions in three distinct, independent zones that all terminate at the courtrooms. The three zones are: 1) the general public zone intended for includes attorneys, clients, witnesses and jurors; 2) the restricted zone intended for judges, court clerks, court employees and jurors; and 3) the secure zone intended for defendants in custody. The circulation between the three zones can not cross or interact at anytime making the building circulation and programmatic building designs quite complex. Utilizing the Shape Grammar design processes, the distinct zones can be applied in a systematic way that is influenced by both programmatic constraints as well as the neurological development and interpretation of the design methodology.
COURTHOUSE GRAMMAR COURTROOM GRAMMAR
COURTHOUSE GRAMMAR COURTROOM GRAMMAR
1 23 37 53 61 71 77 85
Shape Grammars Thesis Part I
Courthouse Thesis Part II
Promenade Building Portman Prize Landscape Building Urban Infill Building Roof Garden Congo Street Green Initiative Shell-ter