Revitalizing the American Hostel by kellyplatko

revitalizing the american hostel Kelly Platko/FLorida State university/2013

contents research and programming

problem statement client profile initial location design considerations from literature - hostel precedent studies - hostel precedent studies comparison charts - hostel square footages - hostel adjacency matrix and uses - hostel bubble flow and circulation - hostel furniture needs - hostel code considerations - hostel design considerations from literature - shared rooms precedent studies - shared rooms precedent study comparison chart - shared rooms design considerations from literature - private rooms precedent studies - private rooms precedent study comparison chart - private rooms design considerations from literature - restaurant and bar precedent studies - restaurant and bar precedent study comparison chart - restaurant and bar design considerations from literature - gathering space precedent studies - gathering space precedent study comparison chart - gathering space research paper

design process major changes location site images site plans code considerations inspiration concept design checkpoint preliminary spatial studies

design solution major changes about the project basement level level one level two level three haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery specifications

referenceS

RESEARCH AND PROGRAMMING

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Once you have traveled, the voyage never ends, but is played out over and over again in the quietest chambers. The mind can never break off from the journey.â&#x20AC;? - Pat Conroy

problem statement Hostels in America are viewed negatively by society as a way of traveling and must be revitalized in order to make this a desirable lodging alternative. Not only are hostels a budgetfriendly accommodation for all ages, but they promote a sense of community with strangers and provide an overall greater travel experience.

client profile Client: Hostelling International USA

user: Millennial Travellers

mission: â&#x20AC;&#x153;To promote the education of all young people of all nations, but especially young people of limited means, by encouraging in them a greater knowledge, love and care of the countryside and an appreciation of the cultural values of towns and cities in all parts of the world, and as ancillary thereto to provide hostels or other accommodation in which there shall be no distinction of race, nationality, colour, religion, sex, class, or political opinions and thereby to develop a better understanding of their fellow men, both at home and abroad.â&#x20AC;?

initial location

Location summary: • Located in Big Sur, California • 2 Buildings Total • 10,154 Square Feet • 1.28 Acres

design considerations from literature Hostel 1. ABILITY TO FEEL CONNECTED

2. ENCOURAGES SOCIAL INTERACTION

“By adding amenities, addressing high-tech needs, and providing ‘mixeduse’ facilities for both flashpackers and other backpackers, a business could maximize the perceived value to their customers, not alienate flashpackers, and differentiate themselves from the competition.” (Paris 2012)

“To combat the problem of being impersonal, larger hostel design might incorporate several smaller communal areas, instead of one or two large ones, to encourage smaller informal groups to form within the larger whole.” (Murphy 2001)

“Such travelers have been viewed as people pursuing experiences of local life styles, wanting to meet local people, and being distinct anti-tourists (Maoz, 2007). O’Reilly (2006) maintains that backpacking still is viewed by many as containing a “certain degree of … mystique and prestige” (p. 1014), which immanently brings a sense of elitism with it.” (Brun, Larson & Øgaard 2011)

“Hostelers want the sense of community. They might meet someone and go to Grand Canyon with them. You’d never do that with someone you’d meet in a hotel or motel.”(Miller 201)

3. PROVIDES A SENSE OF PRIVACY AND SECURITY “Though hostels have always had the big shared dormitory-style rooms, we are now seeing more demand among travelers for double or single en suite rooms,” Mr. Kruger said, adding that hostels had grown even more popular in the midst of the recession.” (Conlin 2009) “Indeed, hostels are particularly safe, with doors locked after a certain hour at night and staff members at the reception desk 24 hours. ‘’You don’t feel so alone when you stay in a hostel,’’ Ms. Rose from Chicago said of her stay at the Circus hostel in Berlin.” (Conlin 2009)

4. CLEAN AND COMFORTABLE

5. SMALL SCALE

“Clean and comfortable hostels also helped to create an atmosphere that was more conducive to social interaction.” (Murphy 2001)

“With respect to hostel design, it is evident that smaller properties are often associated with friendlier, more relaxed atmospheres.” (Murphy 2001)

“This current research shows that the respondents do value creature comforts, such as clean rooms and private bathroom facilities, suggesting a high level of demand from this target market than has previously been documented.” (Hannam & Ateljevic 2008)

“The document concluded that an increase in room size would be likely to stimulate the provision of illegal hostels.” (Hannam & Ateljevic 2008)

6. HOME AWAY FROM HOME ATMOSPHERE “Extras, such as pool tables, outdoor entertainment areas, and “touches of home’’ (such as duvets) can all help to eliminate a sterile impersonal feeling and create a more welcoming atmosphere.” (Murphy 2001) “‘At a hostel you don’t have to worry that your child is going to knock over an ornamental lamp in the lobby,’ Mr. Simpson said. ‘The whole atmosphere is more casual.’” (Conlin 2009)

precedent studies Hostel 1. costanoa lodge

2001 Rossi Rd. , Pescadero, CA 94060

Description:

Mission:

Design Criteria:

Costanoa is an eco-adventure resort designed to encourage guests to explore the beauty of the California coastline.

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Costanoa is an eco-adventure resort where our guests can simply retreat from the chaos of everyday life and discover the pace of nature. We are committed to providing genuine service, unique accommodations,

1. Does have the ability to feel connected both to nature and to the outside world with access to wifi. 2. Does not encourages social interaction outside of group. 3. Does provides a sense of privacy and security. 4. Overall sense of comfort and cleanliness in furnishings. 5. Is not small in scale. 6. Does not have home away from home atmosphere.

California coastal cuisine, as well as a variety of spa and adventure activities using sustainable methods to create a quality experience for our guests in a natural environment. Through sustainable wealth, we foster joy and wellness while sharing our unique resort.â&#x20AC;?

precedent studies Hostel 2. the hostel in the forest 3901 U.S. 82, Brunswick, GA 31523

Description:

Mission:

Design Criteria:

Budget accommodations in a sustainable environment on 105 acres of forest with hiking trails, a lake, and organic gardens.

â&#x20AC;&#x153;The Hostel in the Forest, a 501ÂŠ(3) Non-Profit located in Brunswick, Georgia, USA, is a center which promotes and teaches environmental sustainability, while also serving as a spiritual retreat, and hostel for

1. Does have the ability to feel connected nature but not to the outside world. 2. Does encourages social interaction outside of group. 3. Does not provides a sense of

international and domestic travelers. It teaches a hands-on approach to a sustainable lifestyle through activities such as alternative building and organic gardening while complementing the processes of nature. While the Hostel is not dedicated to any particular religion or denomination, its educational programs and services are designed to integrate the ecological, social, spiritual, economic and emotional aspects of the human condition.â&#x20AC;?

privacy and security. 4. Overall sense of comfort but not cleanliness in furnishings. 5. Is small in scale. 6. Does have home away from home atmosphere.

precedent studies Hostel 3. living lounge hostel

Rua do Crucifixo, 116 - 2nd floor 1100 Lisbon, Portugal

Description:

Mission:

Design Criteria:

Living Lounge Hostel is a design hostel in an urban location providing both private and shared rooms for their guests and fostering a sense of community in the common rooms.

â&#x20AC;&#x153;To provide our guests with supreme comfort, security and style during their stay.â&#x20AC;?

1. Does have the ability to feel connected outside world but not to nature. 2. Does encourages social interaction outside of group. 3. Does provide a sense of privacy and security. 4. Overall sense of comfort and cleanliness in furnishings. 5. Is small in scale. 6. Does have home away from home atmosphere.

precedent studies Hostel 4. mosaic House

Odboru 4 120 00 Prague, Czech Republic

Description:

Mission:

Design Criteria:

Mosaic House is a hostel offering modern, eco-friendly, and centrally located accommodations.

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Provide comfortable, eco-conscious and cool-designed spaces which foster authentic interactions and awesome experiences for our travelling guests.â&#x20AC;?

1. Does have the ability to feel connected nature and the outside world. 2. Does encourages social interaction outside of group. 3. Does provide a sense of privacy and security. 4. Overall sense of comfort and cleanliness in furnishings. 5. Is not small in scale. 6. Does not have home away from home atmosphere.

precedent studies Hostel 5. island lodge

AB Bergholmen 18 592 Vaxholm Sweden

Description:

Mission:

Design Criteria:

“Island Lodge offers corporate & leisure groups a highly exclusive archipelago experience, a concept designed to be in harmony with the surrounding environment, a mix of genuine ”hardship” but still benefitting from a luxurious and comfortable habitat. We offer you a high quality, sustainable, all-inclusive concept based on an outdoor tented accommodation - leaving ”green footprints” and memories for a lifetime.”

“To pioneer a new genuine sustainable and exclusive outdoor experience with focus on Gastronomy, Scandinavian Design and Personal Service.”

1. Does have the ability to feel connected nature and to the outside world with access to wifi. 2. Does encourages social interaction outside of group. 3. Does provides a sense of privacy and security. 4. Overall sense of comfort and cleanliness in furnishings. 5. Is small in scale. 6. Does have home away from home atmosphere.

precedent studies comparison charts Hostel Precedent Study 1

Precedent Study 2

Precedent Study 3

Precedent Study 4

Precedent Study 5

Name

Costanoa Lodge

Hostel in the Forest

Living Lounge Hostel

Mosaic House

Island Lodge

Location

Pescadero, CA

Brunswick, GA

Lisbon, Portugal

Prague, Czech Republic

Vaxholm, Sweden

Function

Eco-Adventure resort

Hostel

Hotel and Hostel

Tented Lodge

and campsite

Lighting

Layered and useful

Minimal

Layered and useful

Minimal

Color Scheme

Neutrals

Neutrals with pops of

Warm bright colors with rich neutral accents

Neutrals

Eclectic and trendy

Comfortable and luxurious

Scandinavian

Medium, 23 rooms

Large, 94 rooms

Small, 7 tents

color

Furniture

Comfortable and

Comfortable, eclectic

rustic

but not easily cleanable

Size of Facility

Large, 52 rooms plus tent bungalows and campsites

Small, 9 tree houses

SPACE

Precedent Study 1

Precedent Study 2

Precedent Study 3

Precedent Study 4

Precedent Study 5

General Store

Yes

20%

Restaurant

Yes

40%

Spa

Yes

20%

Bar

Yes

60%

Private Rooms

Yes

100%

Shared Rooms

Yes

60%

Gathering Space

Yes

100%

Shared Kitchen /Dining

Yes

60%

Shared Bathroom

Yes

100%

Private Bathroom

Yes

40%

Garden

Yes

40%

Luggage Storage

Yes

40%

Reception

N/A

Yes

N/A

60%

Internet Lounge

Yes

40%

Public Laundry

Yes

60%

square footages Hostel Major spaces Shared Rooms - 1000 sq. ft. Private Rooms - 600 sq. ft. Restaurant and Bar - 2000 sq. ft. Gathering Space - 1000 sq. ft.

minor spaces Reception - 100 sq. ft. Shared Kitchen - 100 sq. ft. Shared Dining - 100 sq. ft. Shared Bathrooms - 250 sq. ft. Private Bathrooms - 300 sq. ft. Internet Lounge - 170 sq. ft. Garden - 500 sq. ft. Laundry Facilities - 100 sq. ft. Staff Rooms - 550 sq. ft. Storage - 30 sq. ft. Circulation - 4000 sq. ft.

High Importance Low Importance Not Desirable

Adjacency matrix and uses

Shared Rooms Private Rooms Restaurant Bar Gathering Space Reception Shared Kitchen Shared Dining Shared Bathrooms private bathrooms internet lounge garden laundry facilities staff rooms storage

storage

staff rooms

laundry facilities

garden

internet lounge

private bathrooms

Shared Bathrooms

Shared Dining

Shared Kitchen

Reception

Gathering Space

Bar

Restaurant

Private Rooms

SPACE

Shared Rooms

Hostel

adjacency matrix and uses

Private Rooms

Restaurant

NR M

Commercial kitchen equipment

Bar

NR L

Commercial kitchen equipment

Gathering Space

NR H

Reception

Shared Kitchen & Dining

NR M

Commercial kitchen equipment

Shared Bathroom

NR M

Lavatory, toilet & shower

Internet Lounge

Computers & printer

Garden

NR H

Laundry Facilities

NR NR L

Washer & dryer

Staff Rooms

Lavatory, toilet & shower

Storage

NR L

H - High importance

M - medium importance

l - low importance

Adjacencies

Noise Control

Daylight / View

Special Equipment

Shared Rooms

SPACE

Privacy

Plumbing

Hostel

Notes

nr - not required

y- yes

n - no

bubble flow and circulation Hostel Staff Rooms Shared Bathroom Shared Rooms

Storage Restaurant

Reception

Shared Kitchen & Dining

Gathering Space Bar

Internet Laundry

Private Rooms

Garden

Major Spaces Minor Spaces Major Traffic Flow Minor Traffic Flow

furniture needs Hostel SHARED ROOMS Users - Guests Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - No Furniture Needed - 10 Beds, 10 Nightstand, 10 Lockers

private ROOMS Users - Guests Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - Yes Furniture Needed - Bed, Nightstand, Entertainment Center, Desk, Chair, Toilet, Lavatory, Mirror, Shower, Wardrobe

Restaurant and bar Users - Guests and Staff Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration -7:00 am - 1:00 am Technology - No

Furniture Needed - 10 Tables, 40 Chairs, 10 Banquettes, Oven, Stove, 2 Sinks, Refrigerator, Dishwasher, 10 Stools, Bar Storage Display, 2 Lavatories, 2 Toilets, 2 Mirrors

Gathering Space Users - Guests Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - Yes Furniture Needed - 8 Sofas, 4 Occasional Tables, 4 Side Tables, Entertainment Center

Reception Users - Guests and Staff Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - Yes Furniture Needed - Desk, Chair

Shared Kitchen and Dining

Garden

Users - Guests Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - No Furniture Needed - Oven, Stove, Sink, Refrigerator, Table, 10 Chairs

Users - Guests and Staff Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - No Furniture Needed - Bench

Shared bathroom

Users - Guests and Staff Days of the Week - 7

Users - Guests

Laundry Facilities

Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - No Furniture Needed - 8 Lavatories, 8 Toilets, 8 Showers

Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - No Furniture Needed - 4 Washing Machines, 2 Dryers

Internet lounge

Users - Staff Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - No Furniture Needed - 5 Beds, 5 Lockers, 5 Nightstands, 5 Desks, 5 Chairs

Users - Guests Days of the Week - 7 Time of Day - Morning, Afternoon, Evening Duration - 24 hours Technology - Yes Furniture Needed - 5 Computer Stations, 5 Chairs, 2 Sofas

Staff Rooms

code considerations Hostel • Construction type: R-1 (hostel rooms)

• Minimum door opening width: 32”

• Number of Stories: 1

• Dead end corridor max. length: 20’

• Unsprinklered

• No object protrudes from vertical planes

• 10,154 sq. ft.

between 27” and 80”

• Circulation sq. ft.: 4,064

• Wheelchair turning radius: 60”

• Gross sq. ft. available after circulation:

• Major corridor width: 44”

6,090

• Secondary corridor width: 36”

• Total occupants: 174

• Elevators min. dimensions: 80” w x 51” d

• Number of exits: 2

• Wheelchair turning radius: 60”

• Minimum distance apart for two exits: 50’

• Major corridor width: 44”

• Minimum corridor width: 34.8”

• Secondary corridor width: 36”

• Minimum corridor width to be used: 44”

• Elevators min. dimensions: 80” w x 51” d

• Max. exit access travel distance: 175’

• Min. ramp width: 36”

• Minimum corridor width for 2 passing

• Slope & rise: 1:12

• Min. landing: 60” • Landing at direction change: 60”x60” • Handrails necessary on both sides if ramp has 6” rise • Handrails must extend 12” past stair or ramp • Handrails between 34” and 38” • Minimum riser: 4” • Maximum riser: 7” • Minimum tread depth: 11” • Restaurant needs 2 M & 2 F water closets, 1 M & 1 F lavatory, 1 water fountain, & 1 service sink

• Hostel needs 5 water closets, 5 lavatories, & 1 service sink • Plumbing walls: 10” • Water fountains conform to figure 602 for approach and height • Existing columns are retained • 2 phones located near assembly areas for use by the public

Design Considerations from literature shared rooms 1. ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY “Guests will expect hotels to be sustainable and for operations to run with environmental principles at the core, without compromising on comforts and luxury.” (Dykins 2011)

2. PROVIDES A SENSE OF PRIVACY AND SECURITY “Though hostels have always had the big shared dormitory-style rooms, we are now seeing more demand among travelers for double or single en suite rooms,” Mr. Kruger said, adding that hostels had grown even more popular in the midst of the recession.” (Conlin 2009) “Indeed, hostels are particularly safe, with doors locked after a certain hour at night and staff members at the reception desk 24 hours. ‘’You don’t feel so alone when you stay in a hostel,’’ Ms. Rose from Chicago said of her stay at the Circus hostel in Berlin.” (Conlin 2009)

3. CLEAN AND COMFORTABLE “Clean and comfortable hostels also helped to create an atmosphere that was more conducive to social interaction.” (Murphy 2001) “This current research shows that the respondents do value creature comforts, such as clean rooms and private bathroom facilities, suggesting a high level of demand from this target market than has previously been documented.” (Hannam & Ateljevic 2008)

precedent studies shared rooms 1. maverick hostel

1051 Hungary, Budapest, Ferenciek tere 2, 2nd floor/16.apt.

Description: â&#x20AC;&#x153;The Maverick Hostel is located in the heart of the city, in a royal mansion built by the Habsburg dynasty.â&#x20AC;?

Design Criteria: 1. Has environmentally friendly features 2. Does not provide a sense of privacy and security 3. Is clean and comfortable

2. Gilchrist hall

702 University Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306

Description: Gilchrist Hall is a residence hall at Florida State University. It houses 229 students in suite-style living.

Design Criteria: 1. Does not have environmentally friendly features 2. Does not provide a sense of privacy and security 3. Is clean and comfortable

3. Earthrise retreat center 101 San Antonio Rd., Petaluma, CA 94952

Description: “EarthRise is a beautiful, semi-rural retreat center for multi-day group retreats providing sleeping accommodations for up to one hundred and twenty people in a mix of single, double, and couple rooming options.”

4. Chicago getaway Hostel 616 W Arlington Pl., Chicago, IL 60614

Description:

1. Has environmentally friendly features 2. Does not provide a sense of privacy and security 3. Is clean and comfortable

“The Chicago Getaway Hostel is a fun backpackers hostel located in Lincoln Park, Chicago, near pubs, restaurants, cafes, and the beach. Lincoln Park is a university area surrounded by bars and nightlife.”

Design Criteria:

1. Does not have environmentally friendly features 2. Does not provide a sense of privacy and security 3. Is clean, but not comfortable

Precedent Study comparison chart shared rooms

Name

Precedent Study 1

Precedent Study 2

Precedent Study 3

Precedent Study 4

Maverick Hostel

Gilchrist Hall

Earthrise Retreat

Chicago Getaway Hostel

Center

Location

Budapest, Hungary

Tallahassee, FL

Peraluma, CA

Chicago, IL

Function

Hostel

Residence Hall

Retreat Center

Hostel

Lighting

Ambient and task

Ambient and

Ambient and task

Ambient

Monochromatic with

Neutrals with pops of color

institutional

Color Scheme

Monochromatic with

Neutral

wood accents

Furniture

Minimal

Institutional

Contemporary

Size of Facility

Large, 10 beds

Small, 2 beds

Large, 8 beds

Design Considerations from literature private rooms 1. ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY “Guests will expect hotels to be sustainable and for operations to run with environmental principles at the core, without compromising on comforts and luxury.” (Dykins 2011)

precedent studies Private Rooms 1. The pod hotel

230 E 51st St., New york, NY 10022

Description: “The Pod Hotels offer hip, convenient and personalized accommodations for the stylish and spend thrifty traveler.”

Design Criteria: 1. Has environmentally friendly features 2. Does provide a sense of privacy and security 3. Is clean and comfortable

2. the circus hostel Weinbergsweg 1a 10119 Berlin

Description: “The Circus Hostel houses dorms, private rooms and studio apartments, a street-level cafe and basement bar.”

Design Criteria: 1. Has environmentally friendly features 2. Does provide a sense of privacy and security 3. Is clean, but not comfortable

3. Point Montara lighthouse hostel 16th Street and Highway 1, Montara, CA 94037

Description: “Just 25 miles south of San Francisco, our hostel is both an idyllic retreat and a convenient base for exploring nearby Half Moon Bay. “

4. hotel teatro

1100 Fourteenth Street, Denver, CO 80202

Design Criteria:

Description:

1. Does not have environmentally friendly features 2. Does provide a sense of privacy and security 3. Is clean, but not comfortable

“Located in downtown Denver Colorado, across from the Denver Center for Performing Arts, Denver’s luxury boutique hotel offers exquisite lodging accommodations for the business traveler or for perfect romantic weekend getaways.”

Design Criteria: 1. Has environmentally friendly features 2. Does provide a sense of privacy and security 3. Is clean and comfortable

Precedent Study comparison chart PRIVATE ROOMS

Name

Precedent Study 1

Precedent Study 2

Precedent Study 3

Precedent Study 4

The Pod Hotel

The Circus Hostel

Point Montara

Hotel Teatro

Lighthouse Hostel

Location

New York, NY

Berlin, Germany

Montara, CA

Denver, CO

Function

Budget Hotel

Hostel

Luxury Hotel

Lighting

Layered and useful

Ambient and

Layered and useful

institutional

Cool color scheme

Neutral with cool

Color Scheme

Primary colors

Neutral

accents

Furniture

Comfortable and

Eclectic and minimal

Eclectic and nautical

Comfortable and classic

Medium

Small

Large

contemporary

Size of Facility

Large

Design Considerations from literature Restaurant and Bar 1. APPROPRIATE AND ADEQUATE DÉCOR “Décor is not the same for all restaurants and it is a commonly neglected area where significant value can be offered to customers.”(Rahman 2009) “To satisfy customers, restaurateurs should pay attention to the operation of the physical environment (e.g., attractive interior design and décor, comfortable seats, high quality of furniture, professional appearance of employee, and pleasant music, lighting, color) in quick-casual restaurants.”(Robson 1999)

2. COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT A customer’s satisfaction and likelihood to return is affected by the physical comfort in the waiting areas. (Sulek & Hensley, 2004) “Spending in booths is significantly higher than at other kinds of tables, and in at least two restaurants we’ve examined, seating a party of two at a four top resulted in a slightly higher average check.” (Robson 2009)

3. VARIETY OF SEATING

4. SENSE OF Perceived CONTROL

“A variety of seating creates individual, intimate dining experiences. Using low walls and booths to break up the space also creates small ‘rooms’.” (Ryan 2006)

“Booths let users have more control over their experiences and whatever stress they may be feeling, either consciously or unconsciously.” (Robson 2009) By specifying the right kind of seating in appropriate areas, guests’ personal space will not feel invaded. (Robson 2009)

precedent studies restaurant and bar 1. SÆMUNDUR Í SPARIFÖTUNUM

Skúlagata 101 Reykjavik, Iceland

Description: Sæmundur í Sparifötunum is gastropub located in KEX hostel.

the

Design Criteria: 1. Does have appropriate and adequate décor 2. Provides a comfortable environment 3. Incorporates a variety of seating 4. Lacks a sense of perceived control

2. harvest on the main

576 East Main Street, Blue ridge, GA 30513

Description: Harvest on the Main is a farm-to-table restaurant with a globally influenced menu.

Design Criteria: 1. Does have appropriate and adequate décor 2. Provides a comfortable environment 3. Incorporates a variety of seating 4. Lacks a sense of perceived control

3. shula’s 347 grill

415 n monroe st., tallahassee, fl 32301

Description: “The atmosphere is casual and full of energy, and includes a high impact bar, dark woods and a stunning video system. “

4. dogmatic

26 east 17th street, new york, NY 10003

Design Criteria:

Description:

1. Does have appropriate and adequate décor 2. Provides a comfortable environment 3. Incorporates a variety of seating 4. Has a sense of perceived control

Dogmatic serves fast food that is sustainably and nutritional responsible. It began as a food cart, but then transformed into a permanent location in NYC.

Design Criteria: 1. Does have appropriate and adequate décor 2. Provides a comfortable environment 3. Does not incorporate a variety of seating 4. Lacks a sense of perceived control

Precedent Study comparison chart restaurant and bar

Name

Precedent Study 1

Precedent Study 2

Precedent Study 3

Precedent Study 4

Sæmundur Í

Harvest on the Main

Shula’s 347 Grill

Dogmatic

Sparifötunum

Location

Reykjavik, Iceland

Blue Ridge, GA

Tallahassee, FL

New York, NY

Function

Hostel Restaurant

Restaurant

Hotel Restaurant and

Fast Food Restaurant

Bar

Lighting

Layered and useful

Layered

Layered and useful,

Layered

lots of accent lighting

Color Scheme

Neutrals with pops of

Neutrals

Rich neutrals

color

Furniture Size of Facility

Scandinavian

Medium

Neutrals with pops of color

Comfortable and

Classic and

rustic

comfortable

Medium

Large

Contemporary

Small

Design Considerations from literature Gathering space 1. MIXES WORK, RELAXATION AND PLAY

2. SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND BELONGING

Guests want a communal area that eliminates formal boundaries while combining work and play. (Kridler 2006)

We found that people wanted that sense of community and belonging, and that sense of connection while they are traveling. (Kridler 2006) Hostelers want the sense of community. They might meet someone and go to Grand Canyon with them. Youâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;d never do that with someone youâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;d meet in a hotel or motel.(Miller 2001)

3. ENCOURAGES SOCIAL INTERACTION To combat the problem of being impersonal, larger hostel design might incorporate several smaller communal areas, instead of one or two large ones, to encourage smaller informal groups to form within the larger whole. (Murphy 2001)

4. HOME AWAY FROM HOME ATMOSPHERE Extras, such as pool tables, outdoor entertainment areas, and “touches of home’’ (such as duvets) can all help to eliminate a sterile impersonal feeling and create a more welcoming atmosphere. (Murphy 2001) “At a hostel you don’t have to worry that your child is going to knock over an ornamental lamp in the lobby,” Mr. Simpson said. “The whole atmosphere is more casual.” (Conlin 2009)

precedent studies gathering space 1. clink78

78 King’s Cross Road, London WC1X 9QG, UK

Description: “Clink78 is a fun, friendly and stylish London youth hostel with great facilities, set in a beautiful 200 year-old courthouse building which mixes bold interior design and elegant Victorian architecture.”

Design Criteria: 1. Does mix work, relaxation and play 2. Provides a sense of community and belonging 3. Does encourages social interaction 4. Does provide a home away from home atmosphere

2. Ace Hotel

20 West 29th st., New york, ny 10001

Description: “Ace Hotel New York is a 12 story hotel in the heart of Midtown Manhattan. The unique new boutique hotel has 269 rooms and is located near the Theater District.“

Design Criteria: 1. Does mix work, relaxation and play 2. Provides a sense of community and belonging 3. Does encourages social interaction 4. Does provide a home away from home atmosphere

3. general assembly

902 broadway, 4th floor, new york, ny 10010

Description: “General assembly is a global network of campuses for technology, business, and design.”

Design Criteria:

4. MAGGIE’S CENTRE CHELTENHAM Cheltenham General Hospital, College Baths Road, Cheltenham, GL53 7QB

Description:

2. Provides a sense of community and belonging 3. Does encourages social interaction 4. Does provide a home away from home atmosphere

“Maggie’s is about empowering people to live with, through and beyond cancer by bringing together professional help, communities of support and building design to create exceptional centres for cancer care.”

Design Criteria:

1. Does mix work, relaxation and play

1. Does mix work, relaxation and play 2. Provides a sense of community and belonging 3. Does encourages social interaction 4. Does provide a home away from home atmosphere

Precedent Study comparison chart Gathering space

Precedent Study 1

Precedent Study 2

Precedent Study 3

Precedent Study 4

Name

Clink78

Ace Hotel

General Assembly

Maggieâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Centre Cheltenham

Location

London, UK

New York, NY

Cheltenham, UK

Function

Hostel Movie Lounge

Hotel Lobby

Collaborative Office

Cancer Center Lounge

Space

Lighting

Ambient and natural

Layered and

Layered and useful

Ambient and natural

dynamic

Color Scheme

Primary colors

Neutrals

Warm neutrals

Neutrals with pops of color

Furniture

Comfortable

Comfortable and

Contemporary and

Contemporary

eclectic

comfortable

Medium

Large

Size of Facility

Small

Research paper The Millennial Traveller Abstract Tourism is a leading industry in North America. These days the Millennial Generation has found itself at the core of this tourism industry. There is a significant amount of this generation that considers travelling a priority, yet the United States fails to provide an affordable, yet desirable solution for millennials. By reevaluating the American hostel, the tourism industry would be better able to meet the needs of the Millennial Generation, and consequently be able to provide a stronger sense of community for this generation while travelling.

THE MILLENNIAL TRAVELLER: EVALUATING THE NEED FOR a SENSE OF COMMUNITY IN HOSTELS Tourism has always been a driving force in North America. It is one of the largest industries within the United States, generating $1.8 trillion in economic impact (U.S. Travel Association, 2010). These days the Millennial Generation, otherwise know as Generation Y, has found itself at the center of this industry. A substantial amount of this population considers travelling a priority, yet the United States fails to deliver an affordable and desirable means of travelling (McCrindle, 2009, p. 4). By reevaluating the

American hostel, the tourism industry would be better able to meet the needs of millennials, and consequently be able to provide a stronger sense of community for this generation while travelling. As a whole, hostels are commonly misunderstood as a way of traveling in North America. In order to better understand the current status of the hostels in America, it is vital to first understand the meaning of a hostel and components that derive from it. Hostel Management (2013) defines hostels as the following: A hostel is a budget-oriented, shared-room (“dormitory”) accommodation that accepts individual travelers (typically backpackers) or groups for short-term stays, and that provides common areas and communal facilities. To be considered a hostel, the property must provide short-term, shared (dormitory-style) accommodation for individual travelers, though many hostels also provide private rooms. The word “dormitory” refers to a room where travelers independently book individual beds in a shared room as opposed to booking entire rooms like in a hotel or guesthouse.

It is much more than just a place to rest your head, but rather provides its guests with an overall travel experience, unlike a hotel, which is focused more on the individual and less on the community as whole. Hostelling International (2012), the leading corporation within the industry, further explains what a hostel typically involves stating: Hostels provide friendly, inexpensive overnight accommodations for travelers. Hostelling International hostels assure travelers the utmost in quality standards including cleanliness, security and service. Hostels offer dormitory-style rooms with separate quarters for men and women. Some hostels also have private family and couples rooms. All hostels provide a blanket and pillow. Linens are often included in the price, or available for rental. Most hostels offer fully equipped selfservice kitchens or cafeterias, dining areas, secure storage and common rooms for relaxing and socializing with other travelers. Some hostels have laundry facilities, travel libraries and concierge service. There are a few that even have hot tubs, swimming pools, barbecues and an ocean at its front door. Most urban hostels have secure 24-hour

access and are handicapped accessible. In order to better understand how the hostel became what it is it today in America, it is vital to look at its origins and analyze how the industry has grown over the past 100 years. Once this has been established, the spirit of the hostel must be explored to gain an unbiased perception of this environment. Without this knowledge, it is difficult to objectively presume the needs of the millennial traveler and how a sense of community can enhance the travelling experience. The notion of the youth hostel began in Germany during 1909 by Richard Shirmann (Hostelling International, 2012). During this time Shirmann, an elementary school teacher, was astonished by the negative impact that the industrial revolution had on his students (Hostelling International, 2012). He coined the term â&#x20AC;&#x153;wandering school,â&#x20AC;? reintroducing his students to nature in a time where the machine ruled society, attempting to educate them outside of the classroom during the weekends (Hostelling International, 2012). This idea gave way to the concept of a youth hostel. More and more permanent hostels were established throughout Germany that were funded by local supporters and activists of the outdoors

Research paper The Millennial TRaveller (Hostelling International, 2012). Shortly after the movement became popular in Germany, many countries such as Switzerland, Poland, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, the British Isles, Ireland, France and Belgium followed in their lead (Hostelling International, 2012). 1932 marked the first international meeting, forming the International Youth Hostel Federation (IYHF), with over 2500 hostels in Europe at this time (Hostelling International, 2012). Isabel and Monroe Smith attended this meeting the following year and subsequently decided to open the first American hostel in Northfield, Massachusetts in 1934 (Hostelling International, 2012). This marked the formation of the American Youth Hostels (AYH) (Hostelling International, 2012). A year later this movement gained support from the president of the United States and grew throughout the New England area, producing nearly 30 new American hostels (Hostelling International, 2012). Around this time, World War II began, ultimately putting a standstill on the movement (Hostelling International, 2012). Once the tragic war came to an end, youth everywhere tried to pick up the pieces that were only just beginning in the hostel world. The fifties became a time to escape modernity through nature

Hostelling International, 2012). Towards the end of the decade, transportation was transforming, making commercial airlines more popular and affordable than ever before (Hostelling International, 2012). The 1960s and 1970s were crucial and influential times for the hostel industry. Americans were gaining a strengthened sense of global awareness that was not present in previous eras. With the assistance of a growing economy both fiscally and technologically, international travel was at its peak (Hostelling International, 2012). Hostel believers started to see that this way of travelling could flourish in urban areas as well. Since the hostel was founded in rural areas, there was no certainty that the previous model would be applicable to metropolitan areas. However, by 1969 the first urban hostel was opened in Washington D.C. and proved to be unexpectedly successful, becoming the model for succeeding hostels (Hostelling International, 2012). During the 1980s and 1990s hostels were popping up in metropolitan areas like San Francisco, Boston, Miami, Chicago and New York (Hostelling International, 2012). The International Youth Hostel Federation and American Youth Hostels decided to merge in order to produce a more unified vision for the

hostel industry, forming Hostelling International-American Youth Hostels (HI-AYH) (Hostelling International, 2012). September 11th, 2001 greatly impacted all of the tourism industry resulting in a substantial decrease in travelling (Hostelling International, 2012). HI-AYH responded to the tragedy by incorporating the motto “Opening Doors, Opening Minds” into their mission in 2002 (Hostelling International, 2012). This mission wholeheartedly attempted to unify cultures while creating an understanding and appreciation for cultural differences through experiences and opportunities (Hostelling International, 2012). The following year HI-AYH transformed into Hostelling International USA (HI-USA) in an attempt to broaden their range of guests by no longer accommodating just the youth of the world (Hostelling International, 2012). By 2006, the hostelling industry began to see an increase in travelers that has continued to grow. According to Hostelling International (2012), “today in the U.S., there is a network of 60 hostels hosting nearly 1 million overnights annually. Worldwide, there about 4000 hostels recording over 33 million overnights in more than 80 countries.” Now that the logistics of the hostel have been

clarified, it is important to grasp spirit of the hostel to gain a greater understanding of the millennial travelers who visit. Byron (1818) could not have captured the spirit of the hostel better in his Pilgrimage of Childe Harold where he stated the following (p. 85-86): There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, The is society, where none intrudes, By the deep Sea, and music in its roar; I love no Man the less, but Nature more, From these our interviews, in which I steal From all I may be, or have been before, To mingle with the Universe, and feel What I can ne’er express, yet cannot all conceal. Hostelling is not only a way of travelling, but a lifestyle that embraces self-discovery, global awareness and a connection between man and mother nature (McNair, 1957). It is not just a means of lodging, but provides an overall experience, which shapes the visitor in hopes to produce growth and understanding of humanity. Many people who choose to stay in hostels are in a transitional period of their life, whether it be finishing college, in between jobs, or even a mid-life crisis. These people

Research paper The Millennial TRaveller are on an extended journey that is about more than just sightseeing, embracing and seeking out the adventure of the unknown. As seen by Sharon Wall (2009, p. 251-257) in The Nuture of Nature, those living in urban environment desire a back to nature experience in a modern culture. By adopting simplicity into travelling, the luxurious factor often associated with vacationing is removed creating a minimal lifestyle that promotes appreciation and reflection. While hostels were originally created for youth, this is no longer the case. Many people who are looking for a more social travelling experience will opt to stay in a hostel. A significant portion of those staying in hostels are typically categorized as either backpackers or flashpackers. Although backpackers have recognized within the tourism industry since the 1970s (Cohen, 1973), little has been researched about this social group within academia. Consequently, the term backpacker remains ambiguous, with little consistency in its definition throughout the world. One of the more accepted and well-known definitions of backpackers classifies them as typically younger, with 75% under the age of 30, who travel for longer durations and rely on informal communication (Buchanan & Rossetto, 1997). Additionally, backpackers also have

different ethical expectations when compared to other tourists. Ross (1992) found that backpackers find value in “company, friendships and relationships with other travelers and local people” (as cited in Ryan & Mohsin, 2001, p. 71). A backpacker, however, embodies much more than the person and their values. As stated by Doorne and Ateljevic (2005), “Over the last decade, backpacker travel has appeared as representative of a travel lifestyle, an expression of consumer identity, as well as a coherent cultural form and industrial complex” (p.176). From these various notions of a backpacker it can be concluded that this means of travelling is also a lifestyle that embodies a multi-faceted approach to experiencing the world. It is also worth noting that although backpackers are the majority in the hostel world, there has been a rise in the new concept of flashpacking that has begun to shape the future of this division of the tourism industry. As defined by Schwietert (2008), a flashpacker is, “someone usually in their mid 20s to early 30s, who travels like a backpacker but has more disposable income, as well as electronics such as a camera, Ipod, or laptop. Flashpackers also expect better accommodation and amenities.” All hostelers, including both backpackers and flashpackers,

share personal characteristics of friendliness, helpfulness, willingness to do one’s part, and unselfish cooperation according to McNair (1957, p. 12). These concepts of travelling have shaped how hostels approach their business, looking at the particular needs of these groups, specifically millennials, and translating them into qualities within the hostel. Now that the social groups that are present within the hostel environment has been defined, it is important to understand the generation that the industry is attempting to cater to, otherwise know as the Millennial Generation. Though most agree that millennials are born between the late 1970s and the early 2000s, this generation is arguably the most difficult to homogenize (Brandau, 2012). If the previously mentioned dates are used, as of today, the age range of this generation is somewhere between the ages of 13 and 35. While millennials do share certain values and characteristics, it is important to note that they are not comprehensively uniform since there is a significant range in age. However, for the purpose of this paper, only the similarities within this generation will be analyzed. To better grasp the context from which Generation Y was born, it is essential to understand a brief history of

the prior generation. Preceding the Millennial Generation, Generation X, which includes those born between the early 1960s and late 1970s (Jorgensen, 2003; Tulgan & Martin, 2001), plays a vital role in shaping who the Generation Y becomes. This generation is responsible for the beginning of a major shift, where as a society independence is greatly valued, which can be seen even more strongly in Generation Y. Generation X generally possesses the following characteristics (DiGiacinto, 2010): • Skeptical • Independent • Defy Authority • Reality Driven • Technology Competent Overall, Generation X is considered a pessimistic generation due to the significant amount of failures they watched American society experience and life became a matter of survival, generating many of the key characteristics listed above (Huntley, 2006, p.8). Following this generation, Generation Y makes up a significant portion of the world’s population, with approximately 88 million people (Hobart, 2012). Millennials derive its values and characteristics from reactions to

Research paper The Millennial TRaveller Generation X’s mood and failings (Huntley, 2006, p. 5). As a whole, Generation Y children were planned, leaving them to feel special and wanted (Huntley, 2006, p. 11). Furthering this idea, Howe & Strauss (2000) go as far as to call the Millennial Generation the “healthiest and most cared-for child generation in history” (p. 76). However, perhaps one of the greatest influencers springs from the economic status of the nation at this time. Although most have grown up comfortably, there is a struggle in the transition period from child to adult. It is becoming more common for Generation Y to be denied entry into societal markers of adulthood, whether it be through means of work, marriage, children, or purchasing a home (Wierenga, 2002). Despite this uncertainty, Generation Y chooses to view this as an optimistic freedom (Mackay, 1997, p.138). Overall, the Millennial Generation’s key characteristics include (Huntley, 2006, p.14-16): • Optimistic • Idealistic • Empowered • Ambitious • Confident • Committed

• Passionate • Highly Mobile Additionally, Generation Y feels the need to be doing, achieving, socializing, travelling, buying new stuff, changing and learning (Huntley, 2006, p. 171). Generation Y is also “the first generation to grow up thinking of itself as global” (Howe & Strauss, 2000, p.16). A large factor of this generation’s mindset originates from expected technology. Millennials grew up in the Internet era, fostering this sense of globalization. Another event that contributed to this mind frame was the terrorist attack of September 11th. Unlike previous generations who had experience many tragedies, both nationally and internationally, this was the first dramatic global disaster for Gen Y (Huntley, 2006, p. 2). It assisted in the transformation between the generations’ key qualities and values. Furthermore, the Millennial Generation is also known as the Paradoxical Generation (Huntley, 2006, p. 10). Hodge (2004) describes this generational group as “the kindly selfish, the bingeing purgers and the ambitious procrastinators.” Generation Y considers themselves individualists, but simultaneously has the desire to belong to communities (Brillet, Hulin, Leroy, & Bourliataux-Lajoinie,,

2011). This paradoxical world in which millennials live suggests that providing environments that fulfill the various needs of the generation will foster a greater connection and sense of community within the built environment. Since providing a sense of community within the Millennial Generation helps to achieve success in the built environment, it is important to first understand and dissect this theory. To begin, a sense of community is defined as a “feeling an individual has about belonging to a group and involves the strength of the attachment people feel for their communities or group” (Halamova, 2001, p. 137). McMillan (1996), the original theorist who proposed this notion of a sense of community, embodies it with four different elements, which include (p. 315): • Spirit • Trust • Trade • Art The first element, spirit, manifests itself in a spark of friendship; it becomes the basis on which connections are created (McMillan, 1996, p. 315). These connections are vital to expressing the individuality, which is an important value to the Millennial Generation. This opportunity to see

oneself reflected in others within a community allows one to feel more attached to the environment (McMillian, 1996). The second element, trust, is defined by McMillan (1996) as “a person’s statement about his or her own internal experience” (p. 316). It relies heavily on intimacy as a source of trust, that without it a sense of community would be impossible. A sense of truth provides honesty and emotional safety using boundaries as an approach to community (McMillian, 1996, p. 316). Although establishing authority is important, the exchange between the member and the leader, and the leader and the member possess equal importance (McMillian, 1996, p. 319). Furthermore, expectations must be clear to create order to attain social, emotional, and political potential (McMillian, 1996, p. 319). The next element, trade, occurs when “members discover ways that they can benefit one another and the community” (McMillian, 1996, p. 320). Communities begin by on a basis of similarities and upon further development start to discover differences (McMillian, 1996, p. 320321). This idea is important in a hostel because as soon as differences are embraced, the realization of different needs occurs and trade becomes valuable. Likewise, this exchange, whether it be goods or skills, supports Hodge’s

Research paper The Millennial TRaveller (2004) notion of Generation Y as “the kindly selfish,” where something is given and received in a cyclically manner. The final of the four elements, art, is defined by McMillan and Chavis (1986) as a “shared emotional connection in time and space.” In its purist form, art is to experience, and to experience is to have contact (McMillan, 1996, p.322). This contact must be meaningful enough that the experience is shared and felt within the community, which then translates into the community’s values (McMillan, 1996, p.322). Art becomes the final element in the sense of community, which as a result creates this “self-reinforcing circle,” known as a sense of community (McMillan, 1996, p.323). In closing, the reevaluation of the American hostel could serve as a catalyst for meeting the needs of the millennial traveler. By creating a sense of community within the hostel, Generation Y would be more prone to take advantage of this means of travelling. It is important to note that in a hostel, where affordability is important, a sense of community “will be higher in communities which have to invest considerable energies and resources just to survive,” (Lounsbury & DeNeui, 1995, p. 271) which can be seen in environments, like hostels, where cost is a

key deciding factor. Furthermore, this sense of community within hostels cannot be ignored; if America wants to meet the needs of these millennial travelers it is vital to consider implicating a sense of community in order to be successful.

major changes location site images site plans code considerations inspiration concept design checkpoint preliminary spatial studies

design process

“For my part, I travel not to go anywhere, but to go. I travel for travel’s sake. The great affair is to move.” -Robert Louis Stevenson

Major changes • Site change to 801 West Sixth Street, Cincinnati, OH 45203 • Garden space eliminated • Gathering space and internet lounge integrated into lobby

location former hudepohl brewery 801 west sixth street cincinnatti, oh 45203

• Cincinnati is a tourist destination for the arts, sports, cuisine, and architecture • Historically rich and relative structure that was established in 1885 by German immigrant, Ludwig Hudepohl II • Located in the Queensgate neighborhood, which has plans to revitalize the industrial area into a lively pedestrian mixed-use development • One of the few Cincinnati breweries to remain open during the prohibition • Easily accessible from the highway • Corner lot has greater visibility • Potential for green space in between brewery buildings • View of Cincinnati skyline from eastern windows

site images

site plans

Code considerations General building information Number of Stories Sprinkler Presence Basement Square Footage Level 1 Square Footage Level 2 Square Footage Level 3 Square Footage Total Square Feet Circulation Square Footage Square Feet Gross Area Available After Circulation

4 No 2,367 SF 8,167 SF 5,857 SF 5,857 SF 22,248 SF 8,899 SF 13,349 SF

occupancy Space Type Shared Guest Rooms

Occupancy Category (302.1) R-4

Estimated Square Feet 3,500 SF

Load Factor (Table Max. # of Occupants 1004.1.1) 200 gross 17

Private Guest Rooms

R-1

3,500 SF

200 gross

Restaurant

A-2

2,000 SF

15 net

133

Commercial Kitchen

A-2

2,000 SF

200 gross

Bar

A-2

2,000 SF

15 net

133

Gathering Space

A-3

1,000 SF

15 net

Reception

200 SF

100 gross

Shared Kitchen/Dining

R-4

1,000 SF

200 gross

Internet Lounge

500 SF

100 gross

Laundry

500 SF

100 gross

Staff Rooms

R-1

1,000 SF

200 gross

Storage

300 SF

300 gross

egress

3’

-3

”

’-7

”

Exit Locations (1004.1.4)

Basement Min. Distance: 35’-10”

Level One Min. Distance:66’-8”

Code considerations ” ’-3 99

’-3

”

egress continued

Level Two Min. Distance: 49’-8”

Level Three Min. Distance: 49’-8”

Egress Width (1005.1) Total Occupancy Load Corridors Stairs

Width Factor 400 400

Minimum Width .2” .3”

80” 120”

Exit Access Travel Distance (Table 1016.1) Occupancy R A B S • • • • • • • • •

Distance (ft) 100 200 300 400

The minimum corridor width will be 60” to accomodate 2 passing wheelchairs. (ADA 403.5.3) All doors must have a 32” minimum door opening width. (ADA 404.2.3) No object will protrude from a vertical plane between 27” and 80”. (ADA 307.2) Ramps will be 36” minimum with a slope and rise ratio of 1:12. (ADA 405.5 & 405.2) Landings will be 60” clear at the top and bottom. (ADA 405.7.3) Landings are a minimum of 60”x60” at a direction change. (ADA 405.7.4) If the ramp’s rise is longer than 6” handrails are required on both sides. (ADA 405.8) Handrails must extend 12” beyond stairs or ramp end. (ADA 405.9.1) Handrails will be between 34” and 38” AFF. (ADA 505.4)

• Stairs risers will be between 4” and 7” and have a minimum of 11” treads. (ADA 504.2)

Code considerations egress continued Door Clearances (Figure 404.2.4.1)

Plumbing (403.1) Space

Occupancy Category R-4

Maximum Occupancy 17

Water Closets 2

Urinals

Lavatories

Water Fountains Other

<50%

R-1

1/unit

N/A

1/unit

N/A

Restaurant

A-2

133

<67%

A-2

133

Gathering Space

A-3

Reception Shared Kitchen/ Dining Internet Lounge Laundry Staff Rooms

B R-4

2 5

B B R-1

5 5 5

1M 1F 2M 2F 1M 1F 1 1M 1F 1 1 1/unit

Bar

2M 2F 4M 4F 1M 1F 1 1M 1F 1 1 1/unit

Shared Guest Rooms Private Guest Rooms

<67% <67% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

1 1 1 1 1 1 N/A

3 Showers, 1 Service Sink 1 Shower and 1 Service Sink 1 Service Sink 1 Service Sink 1 Service Sink 1 Service Sink

1 Shower and 1 Service Sink

Inspiration

concept

SMOOTH

Warm

Mystery

adventure Jewel tones EXCITEMENT

reveal

Hidden Darkness

depth risk

Rich Colors

URBAN

JAZZ

CONTRAST

twenties

socialization and therefore improves the overall hostel experience.

SPEAKEASY Elegant

The hostel derives its concept from the speakeasies of the prohibition era. This notion is reflected in the space plan, which provides an increase in privacy as the levels ascend, mimicking the mysterious element of the speakeasy. Additionally, the hostel integrates materials that are rich in texture producing a dynamic and industrial atmosphere. Volume and light are manipulated within the space, creating a refined environment. Holistically, these aspects assist in promoting a space which fosters

shadow

CONCEPT STATEMENT

design checkpoint process diagrams and sketches

pin-up

preliminary spatial studies reception

Lounge

preliminary spatial studies restaurant

bar

preliminary spatial studies shared room

private room

major changes about the project basement level level one level two level three haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery specifications

design solution

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness.â&#x20AC;? -Mark Twain

Major changes • Patio added to bar • Additional exterior entry added to bar • Increase in private rooms • Decrease in shared rooms

HAUS 18 and

The Blind Pig

about the project Basement Level Bar Patio Restrooms

Level one Reception Luggage Storage Lobby Computer Area Shared Kitchen Restaurant Restrooms Directorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Room Staff Room Staff Restrooms

Level Two Lounge 3 Shared Rooms Restrooms Laundry

Level Three 11 Private Rooms

HAUS 18

derives its name from the German word for house in combination with the 18th amendment, which established the prohibition of alcohol in the United States.

The Blind piG

is named after establishments during the prohiibition which illegally sold alcoholic beverages. At these “blind pigs”, guests were charged to see an attraction, likely an animal, and then given a “complimentary” alcoholic beverage.

basement level floor plan elevator

Emergency stairs

patio

Bar

Menâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s restroom

woMenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s restroom

N 0

50 Feet

Jan.

reflected ceiling plan 5’-10”

5’-10”

OPEN TO ABOVE ALL BEAMS 10’-0” 5’-10”

OPEN TO ABOVE

5’-10”

11’-0”

10’-6”

5’-10”

OPEN TO ABOVE

5’-10”

Legend 4” recessed can vanity sconce

5’-10”

outdoor wall sconce 5’-10”

gold pendant

2’x4’ troffer 5’-10”

7’-0”

6’-0”

6’-6”

5’-10”

6’-0” 7’-0”

exit sign emergency wall light

6’-0”

*all heights above finished floor

6’-0”

N 0

50 Feet

level one floor plan elevator

restaurant reception

EMERGENCY Stairs up

luggage storage women’s restroom Kitchen

food storage men’s restroom

lobby

Shared kitchen

EMERGENCY Stairs

staff room

staff restroom

Director’s room

computer

50 Feet

reflected ceiling plan All beams at 12’-6”

7’-6”

OPEN TO ABOVE

7’-6”

8’-6”

OPEN TO ABOVE

15’-8”

7’-6”

Legend

7’-6”

4” recessed can floor recessed uplight 11’-8”

2’x4’ TRoffer

2’x4’ wall-mounted troffer

6’-0” 6’-0”

8’-0”

vanity light

7’-0”

chandelier OPEN TO ABOVE

7’-0”

black medium pendant

8’-0”

schoolhouse pendant

7’-0”

exit sign emergency wall light *all heights above finished floor 10’-0” 10’-0”

6’-10”

50 Feet

6’-10”

level two floor plan elevator shared room 3

down

open to below men’s restroom

open to below

women’s restroom

lounge

Laundry

shared room 1

shared room 2

EMERGENCY Stairs

N 0

50 Feet

reflected ceiling plan All beams At 13’-0”

10’-0”

OPEN TO ABOVE

7’-0”

OPEN TO ABOVE

7’-0” 15’-9”

9’-0”

Legend

7’-0”

4” Recessed can black small pendant black medium pendant black large pendant

7’-0” 7’-0” 15’-9”

9’-0”

vanity light

7’-0” 8’-6”

2’x4’ wall troffer

7’-0”

6’-5” 7’-4” 7’-4”

7’-4” 13’-9”

13’-9”

7’-4”

15’-9” 13’-9”

7’-4”

schoolhouse pendant

6’-10”

exit sign

15’-9”

15’-9” 13’-9”

15’-9”

emergency wall light *all heights above finished floor

7’-0”

10’-0”

OPEN TO ABOVE

7’-0”

10’-0”

7’-0”

50 Feet

level three floor plan Private room 1

elevator

restrooM

down

Private room 2 open to below

open to below

Private room 3

restrooM

Private room 4 Private room 11

restrooM Private room 6 restrooM Private room 7

restrooM

Private room 5

Private room 10 Private room 8

restrooM

EMERGENCY Stairs

Private room 9

down

50 Feet

reflected ceiling plan 8’-0” 10’-0”

8’-0”

6’-0”

10’-0”

Legend Ranging from 26’-11” to 14’-4”

4” Recessed can

8’-0” 10’-0”

stainless steel pendant 3 pendant rail

8’-0”

10’-0”

schoolhouse pendant 8’-0”

2’x4’ wall troffer

8’-0” 8’-0” 10’-0”

10’-0”

beer bottle pendants

8’-0”

exit sign

10’-0” 8’-0”

emergency wall light *all heights above finished floor 8’-0”

10’-0” 8’-0”

10’-0”

N 0

50 Feet

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery exterior facade

exterior entry

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery reception

lobby

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery computer area

shared kitchen

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery restaurant entrance

restaurant

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery restaurant

restaurant

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery restaurant day

restaurant night

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery bar

bar

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery bar

bar patio

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery lounge

laundry

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery shared room

private room

haus 18 at the hudepohl brewery staff room

directorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s room

specifications

The products and materials specificied all contribute to the overall atmosphere of Haus 18. By using mainly neutrals with accents of brighter colors, the furniture and fixtures complement the architecture. The selections combine a sense of playfulness and classic design to create dynamism within the hostel.

staff and directorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s room seating

staff room rug

bar seating

lobby seating

wallcovering used to indicate room identity

bar seating

lounge seating

bar pendant light

references

references A Brief History of Hostelling International. Retrieved from http://www.hihostels.com/hostel/2011/05/brief-history-of-hostelling/ Ace Hotel. Retrieved from http://www.acehotel.com/newyork Ateljevic, I. & Hannam, K. (2007, December 15). Backpacker Tourism: Concepts and Profiles. Tonawanda, NY: Channel View Publications. Brandau, M. (2012). Millennials. Nation’s Restaurant News, 46(9), 32. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1197689980?accountid=4840 Brillet, F., Hulin, A., Leroy, J., & Bourliataux-Lajoinie, S. (2011). E-generation, What’s New. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 2011, 1-15. doi:10.5171/2011.784128 Buchanan, I. & Rossetto, A. (1997). With My Swag upon my Shoulder: A Comprehensive Study of International Backpackers to Australia. Bureau of Tourism Research, Occasional Paper No. 24, Canberra: Bureau of Tourism Research, Commonwealth of Australia. Byron, G.G. (1818). Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage. New York, NY: New York-Kirk and Mercein. Chicago Getaway Hostel. Retrieved from http://www.getawayhostel.com/about Clink 78. Retrieved from http://www.clinkhostels.com/london/backpacker-hostels/clink78/facilities Cohen, E. (1973). Nomads from Affluence: Notes on the Phenomenon of Drifter Tourism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 14(1-2), 89-103. Conlin, J. (2009, April 16). In Europe, Hostels Grow Up. Retrieved from http://travel.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/travel/19hostelsht ml?pagewanted=all Costanoa Lodge. Retrieved from http://www.costanoa.com/ DiGiacinto, D. (2010). The Dynamics of a Multigenerational Classroom and Clinical Environment. Retreived from http://www.ouhsc.edu/egr/documents/GenerationCharacteristic_000.pdf Dogmatic. Retrieved from http://eatdogmatic.com/ Doorne, S., & Ateljevic, I. (2005). Tourism Performance as Metaphor: Enacting Backpacker Travel in the Fiji Islands. Jaworski & A. Pritchard (Eds.), Discourse, Communication, and Tourism (pp.173-198). London: Channelview. Dykins, R. (2011). Changing rooms: Rose Dykins finds out what influences hotel design and takes a sneak peek at the room of the future. Business Traveller Middle East, 38. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?action=interpret&id= GALE%7CA276517418&v=2.1&u=tall85761&it=r&p=ITOF&sw=w&authCount=1

Halamova, J. (2001). Psychological Sense of Community: Examining McMillan’s, Chavis’ and Peck’s Concepts. Studia Psychologica, 43(2), 137–148. Harvest on the Main. Retrieved from http://harvestonmain.com/about.php Hobart, B. (2012). Understanding Generation Y: What You Need to Know About Millennials [White Paper]. Retrieved from http://www.princetonone.com/news/PrincetonOne%20White%20Paper2.pdf Hodge, A. (2004). Generation Next Rides Wave of Optimism. Retrieved from http://www.news.com.au/national-news/generation-next-rides-wave-of-optimism/story-e6frfkvr-1111112107948 Hostel in the Forest. Retrieved from http://www.foresthostel.com/mission-statement Hostelling International. (2012). History of Hostelling. Retrieved from http://www.hiusa.org/about_us/history Hostel Management. (2013). Definition of a Hostel. Retrieved from http://www.hostelmanagement.com/glossary/hostel.html Hotel Teatro. Retrieved from http://www.hotelteatro.com/ Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Books. Huntley, R. (2006). The World According to Y: Inside the New Adult Generation. Crows Nest, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin. General Assembly. Retrieved from http://generalassemb.ly/ Gilchrist Hall. Retrieved from http://www.housing.fsu.edu/Quicklinks/Our-Facilities/Building-Styles/Floor-Plans/Gilchrist-Hall Island Lodge. Retrieved from http://www.islandlodge.se/Island_Lodge/ACCOMMODATION.html Kridler, K. (2006, Feb. 3). Hotels tearing down walls, creating communal space. The Daily Record. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/389960857 Jorgensen, B. (2003). Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y. Foresight, 5(4), 41-49 doi:10.1108/14636680310494753 Larsen S., Ogaard T., & Brun W. (2011). Backpackers and mainstreamers: Realities and Myths. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(2), 690-707. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.003 Living Lounge Hostel. Retrieved from http://www.livingloungehostel.com/about_ us.html Lounsbury, J., & DeNeui, D. (1995). Psychological Sense of Community on Campus. College Student Journal, 29, 270–277. Mackay, H. (1997). Generations: Baby Boomers, Their Parents and Their Children. Sydney: Pan Macmillan. Maggie’s Centre Cheltenham. Retrieved from http://www.maggiescentres.org/about/what_is_maggies.html Maverick Hostel. Retrieved from http://www.maverickhostel.com/eng/index.php

references McCrindle, M. (2009). Generation Y: The Casuals, the Downagers, and the Boomerang Kids [White Paper]. Retrieved from http://www.mccrindle.com.au/snapshots/GENY-BOOMERANG-SNAPSHOT-MCCRINDLE-RESEARCH.pdf McMillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of Community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 315-325. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199610)24:4<315::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-T McMillan, D. W., & Chavis D. M. (1986). Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23. McNair, J.B. (1957). American Youth Hostels: Aid to Education. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 301915084) Miller, V. (2011, March 7). Hostel Makeover. Retrieved from http://www.lvbusinesspress.com/articles/2011/03/07/news/ iq_41878047.txt Mosaic House. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/MosaicHousePrague/page_map Murphy, L. (2001). Exploring Social Interactions of Backpackers. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(1), 50-67. doi: 10.1016 S0160-7383(00)00003-7 O’Reilly, C.C. (2006). From Drifter to Gap Year Tourist. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(4), 1014. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2006.04.002 Overview of EarthRise at IONS. Retrieved from http://noetic.org/earthrise/about/overview/ Paris, C.M. (2012). Flashpackers: An Emerging Sub-Culture? Annals of Tourism Research, 39, 1094–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.12.001 Pointe Montara Lighthouse Hostel. Retrieved from http://norcalhostels.org/montara Rahman, N. (2001). Toward A Theory Of Restaurant Décor: An Empirical Examination Of Italian Restaurants In Manhattan. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 34(3), 330-340. doi:10.1177/1096348009350635 Robson, S. (1999). Turning the Tables: The Psychology of Design for High-Volume Restaurants. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly.40, 56-63. doi: 10.1177/001088049904000320 Robson, S. (2009). Build for Comfort and Speed: Designing Your Dining Room for Maximum Performance. Restaurant Startup & Growth, January 2009, 28-33. Retrieved from http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/specialized/ restaurantgrowth_20100708_sysco2/index.php?startid=12

Ross, G.F. (1992). Tourist Motivation Among Backpacker Visitors to the Wet Tropics of Northern Australia. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 1(3), 43-60. Ryan, A. (2006). Subject to Taste. The Daily Journal of Commerce. Retrieved from http://djcoregon.com/news/2006/04/28/subject-to-taste/ Ryan, C., & Mohsin, A. (2001). Backpackers. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 10(1), 69-92. doi:10.1300/J073v10n01_05 Sæmundur í Sparifötunum. Retrieved from http://www.kexhostel.is/saemundur Schwietert, J. Bye-bye Backpacker, Hello Flashpacker. Retrieved from http://matadornetwork.com/pulse/bye-bye-backpacker-hello-flashpacker/ Shula’s 347 Grill. Retrieved from http://hotelduval.com/portfolio/shulas-347-grill/ Sulek, J.M. and Hensley, R. L.. (2004). The Relative Importance of Food, Atmosphere, and Fairness of Wait. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 45, 235-247. doi: 10.1177/0010880404265345 The Circus Hostel. Retrieved from http://www.circus-berlin.de/ The Pod Hotel. Retrieved from http://www.thepodhotel.com/about/ Tulgan, B., & Martin, C. (2001), Managing Generation Y Global Citizens Born in the Late 70s and Early 80s. Amherst, MA: HRD Press. U.S. Travel Association. (2010). Economic Impact of Travel & Tourism. Retrieved from http://www.ustravel.org/government-affairs/travel-industry-economic-impact Wall, S. (2009). The Nuture of Nature. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. Wieranga, A. (2002). Findings and Losing the Plot: Storying and the Value of Listening to Young People. Scottish Journal of Youth Issues, 4, 9-30.