Fatah Al-Islam organization – The political Committee: The Syrian revolution and the deception of the Arab Protocol
Alhamdulillah for the grace of Islam and this grace is enough and the peace and blessings of Allah be upon the divine leader and political thinker who made the Moslem Ummah a nation of leadership and guidance and taught her good review and thinking in all the events and blessings be upon his family, companions and those who took their path to the day of judgment, then: (Nay, but We hurl the true against the false, and it doth break its head and lo! it vanisheth) 18 Surah Al-Anbiya The viewer to the situation of the revolution in Syria is well aware that this revolution which they are trying to assassinate continuously whether the Arab Protocol succeeded or failed, since this protocol isn’t the official spokesman of the revolution so that the signing of the regime to it is considered a victory to the revolution, the Arabs don’t need to visit Syria to discover the lying of the regime that there isn’t any revolution, especially that hundreds of images are broadcasted daily from the heart of the events either of deaths and wounded or for the demonstrations, except if these demonstrations were in Venezuela that don’t speak Arabic and we don’t know that, and the revolutionaries don’t need for the regime to sign this protocol to stop their revolution, because the regime considers this war with the revolution a war of existence, while the revolution consider it a war of salvation from an era of black injustice, and the question here who is the Arab League fooling when it gives the Syrian regime few hours to sign it’s protocols then it gives it days and gives it time to think? Is the blunder of the Arab regimes due to their fear that the revolutionary tide reaches them or from the misguidance of America and the panic of the Zionists from what happens in the region or what might happen in case of the fall of the treachery regime in Syria? The Arab League proved to the Arab revolutionaries that it’s a puppet in the hands of the West; it’s with the West in supporting or not supporting the revolutions. In the revolution of Tunisia the League tried to save the regime of Ben Ali who had an advanced partnership with the West when it called for to holding of an urgent Arab summit to rectify the situation, but the acceleration of events prevented the possibility of aiding the Tunisian regime and efforts of Qaddafi didn’t succeed to alleviate the pressure on the Ben Ali regime when he opened the Libyan borders for the Tunisian labor with an Arab Western encouragement. And in the Egyptian revolution the
League aided the wisdom and called for it fearing chaos that threaten the security of the ally of the West the Zionist entity. And in Libya it was forced to ride the wave of the revolution because the revolutionaries took arms and marched towards Tripoli, and who said that the disputes between the leaders of the Arab regimes and the dispute of Qaddafi with the West is what made the West and the League stand against the Qaddafi regime is in delusion because the revolutionaries revealed documents that state that the West headed by America provided Qaddafi with many advices to get out of the crisis and suppressing the revolution but the dissenting of the army and the situation getting out of control pushed them to play the role of the ally of the revolution to eat as much as possible from the Libyan cake. And in Yemen the League continues to ensuring on the peacefulness of the revolution of this armed nation and invents solutions after solutions to get Saleh out from his crisis even on the bodies of the Yemenis, to eventually handing over the management of the solution in Yemen to the Gulf Corporative Council in a way that the states of the council keep themselves safe from the revolutionary and Jihadi tide from Yemen. And in Syria the League seeks to keep the revolution peaceful despite of the dissention of a large number from the soldiers of the Syrian army, we repeat the question here, to whose interest is the peacefulness of the revolution in Syria that is bloody with the killing of its sons? Is it for the interest of the murderous regime or for the interest of the murdered people? Why doesn’t the League support the Free Army to overthrow the regime? Or is the story of the regime about the presence of the armed gangs true in the eyes of the League. The Syrian people revolted and created groups to defend itself either by dissenting of the elements of the army, or by ordinary people, and whatever the League invents from initiatives and protocols to give the regime more time to suppress the revolution will make you no good and will be a foregone conclusion, because the people took his choice and sentenced on this protocol with death and to be laid in the cemetery of dreams. Yes the dream of the League and behind it the zio-crusaders (the secret hand that moves the League) is to save the regime have dissipated. Therefore, the give and take by the League and the Baathist regime serve as playing in the lost time. When Al-Muallem threatens and asks and the League answers him with intimidation and threats publicly this is only a lie exposed by the hidden messages between the two sides under the table. How do you explain the League calling the Syrian revolution “crisis” and what is the secret of the it continuing its contact with the regime which didn’t give it or its decisions any considerations? The answer in brief maintaining the security of the region (Zionist entity) even if all the Syrian people were killed. The Arab League and Syrian regime know each other well, each one of them completes
the other, the goal is to kill the revolution for the people to mourn it and the League to pray on it and the method is playing with the card of time. On the other side of the face of the League it is not a secret to anyone that the West under the leadership of America is playing politics. America withdrew its forces from Iraq to devote itself for what is coming, and to save them from a war that they might be its victims either it was an Iranian – Zionist or sectarian war, since it doesn’t want to be forced to fight a losing war in the light of its financial crisis, but rather it wants to control the situation from a distance. It is sharing roles with its allies regarding the revolutions. It claims its support to the Syrian revolution, while it’s two righteous “sons” in the region Al-Maliki and his regime and the Zionist entity stand with the stay of the regime fearing on themselves. The so called Arab leaders who surround Syria or away from it have lost their trust in the ability of America in preserving their chairs since they are now in a state of blunder, do they support a revolution to be dragged to them or stand against it so that their stance be a fuse for their people explosion against them (the rule that says America keeps and America removes fell due to the revolutions) and the so called reform and pleasing the peoples became their only option and they are incapable of this option be they already aren’t used to it. Those leaders and behind them the West which overthrow full entities and governments with their armies stand helpless before solving the Syrian code despite that the Syrian regime is staggering. It’s clear that the reason of this helplessness isn’t the power of the regime, but rather lack of a secure alternative. Since Syria is the joint of the region and holds several cards that it can play with it with the security of the vicinity and causing a chaos that the West and the regimes that are allied to it doesn’t wish because if the revolution extended to beyond than Syria the West will lose much of the riches that that it plunders and therefore will deepen it’s financial crisis. The Syrian regime proved that it’s the champion and master of treachery which the colonial world doesn’t want to lose since he is worthily resembles James Bond of the regimes, and plays successfully the role of the spinal cord for the regimes of the region, and it proved to all the world that it does the work of the white germ that preserves for the West it’s black cells of petrol. The Zio-crusaders presenting the idea of the New Middle East wasn’t vainly but it was due to scenarios that were realized by those compilers of the Zio-crusader ideology early. The new concept of splitting the region or the so called “change” depends on the death of the largest possible number from the rulers of the totalitarian regimes who are old and exceeded 80 years with some chaos that will drag the change to the young rulers. The Zio-crusaders have realized that Islam is coming, if we go back a little, we find that Zio-crusaders sought to export the so called “moderate
Islam” that is resembled in the deliquescent Fiqh of Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood), and was eager to strike the Jihadi Islam that is resembled in Salafi Jihadism. When Obama refused to address the Islamic World from Cairo with the absence of the Muslim Brotherhood, the secretary of State Hillary Clinton confirmed that Al-Qaeda resembles a danger that is bigger than Iran, and before that one of the members of the Zionists Knesset gave tidings to the former Egyptian president that he won’t bequeathhis rule and his rule reign will end, and the American administration expressed its concern from the status of the royal family in Saudi Arabia because the lack of young leadership, and at the same time also one of the Zionist officials gave tidings to the Abdullah II that the demise of his reign is near and that he is the last kings of the Hashemite dynasty and three years ago Netanyahu said to Assad: “You are the last president of the family in Syria”. Yes the wind of change that they expected swept but it came with controversy to what their ships and themselves want. The change came through unexpected revolutions, and thus their swindle of ripping returned to their throat, especially that the Islam of Tawhid that resembles to them their only opponent will replace the regimes allied to them, and the rise of the Ekwani stream in this stage is only a summer cloud that will pass quickly to give space before the leadership of the mujahidin of the Ummah Insha’Allah, and the recent statements of the American officials reflect the blunder of their administration and it realizes that since that Clinton after the fall of Mubarak said: “The American administration has no objection for the establishment of an Islamic government in Egypt” and when the security council held its session to discuss the Syrian revolution Susan Elizabeth Rice expressed the stance of its administration by saying: “This nation – meaning the Moslem Ummah – which nations stands with it”, it used the concept of “nations” and didn’t say that the American people is standing with Arab or Moslem people. The West uses the League to draw the a return line for the region from the door of oppositions and the transitional councils, since he blackmails the oppositions to gain the as much as possible from concessions and keeps its influence in the region. So he stands with the revolutions in the name of allies, because he needs to change its image from a colonizer to a savior and from a searcher for his interest to a friend and ally, with maintaining the guarantee of security of Zionist entity which the American people recently revolted against its financial companies in New York and Washington. Despite of this we find that the Zionist entity have enslaved America the leader of the West by installation of its president and ministers and people by strangling it with depts. And America enslaved the so called Arab leaders, and the Arab leaders enslaved the Arab League, so this enslavement begot the Arab Protocol to kill some revolutions and especially the Syrian revolution that it believes that it will tear the Fiqh of enslavement in the region.
In short: The Syrian people have realized the parentage of the Arab Protocol. It’s Protocol son of League son of ruler son of colonizer, and thus the conspiracy of the protocol no matter how it was colored won’t pass over this heroic people. The souls of the heroes of Daraa, Damascus, Homs, Hamah, Aleppo, Latakia, Deir Al-Zour and the rest of the Syrian cities won’t go in vain or keep silent about it as soon as the regime signing of the alleged protocol which the League claims that it is s step on the path of achieving freedom of Syrian people. The Syrian regime won’t continue even if it signs it, because the Syrian revolution and the Western Arab League that supports the regime that tries to mock from the experienced and play with politics are walking in two parallel paths that cannot meet. There is great difference between a revolution that wants to overthrow the regime and execute its president and a League that seeks to save the regime and calls the revolution a crisis. No matter what the League protocol contains from conditions and orders against the regime and with the revolution but the final goal of the two sides is different and thus the protocol will die and the revolution will continue and the regime will fall Insha’Allah, wa As-Sal mu `Alaykum wa Rahmatu l-l hi wa Barak tuh. The political Committee of Fatah Al-Islam organization 28 Muharam 1433 A.H. corresponding 23 December 2011