1 minute read

Figure 29: Illustration depicting Movement of mind, soul and body in the various planes of architecture and space (pg

The result shows that in some buildings, the movement of natural elements can play a prominent role in the whole system of the construction. This can be related to the existence of more types of movements other than circulatory and optical; such as the flow of natural elements, sense of time passage, association, and the impact of water and wind.

In this essay, the term “Movement in Architecture” was redefined and taxonomy was presented regarding not only the movement of body and eye but also of mind, soul, pictorial representation and natural factors, as well as the movement of architecture itself. The collocation was developed based on the relationships among form, space, and expirencee (or observer). Three types of relationships were defined in this regard: • Movement concerning the built form and space • Movement of the observer with the built form • Movement of the expirencee about the built space.

Advertisement

The overall goal to create a new ordination was achieved in the form of a table of observations (Table 1) depicting the interconnections among different types, factors, and architectural elements of movement. The generated table is a framework for the qualitative-quantitative assessment of “Movement in Architecture” in any building, whether employing a scale through a questionnaire or a descriptive report.

The author hopes the conclusion of this research can act as guidance for the practical construction of museum architecture.

This article is from: