1 minute read

CONCLUSIVE INFERENCES : GLOBAL AND LOCAL FOR INCREMENTAL HOUSING

From the perspective of EWS housing in SRA with a focus on incrementality, the case study analysis of Villa Verde Housing, Tila Housing, Quinta Monroy Housing, Weston Williamson Concept, and Incremental housing in India: Yerwada Pune reveals insightful information about the potency of these residential developments as long-term solutions for the problems encountered by economically weaker sections (EWS).

Overall, the case study shows how incremental housing initiatives can be implemented within a context that could benefit EWS populations. These tactics place a high priority on the progressive creation and enhancement of housing, enabling locals to take part in the construction process and modify their residences as their needs change over time. The projects generate a sense of responsibility and power among the inhabitants by including community involvement and self-built features, improving their standards of life.

Advertisement

The buildings under consideration have a variety of advantages when it comes to EWS housing issues. In order to ensure that EWS communities have access to essential services and infrastructure, Villa Verde Housing, Tila Housing, and Quinta Monroy Housing have been successful in offering cheap housing options to those populations. Novel solutions to incremental housing are presented by the Weston Williamson Concept, which incorporates sustainable elements and modular design concepts.

The study emphasizes the significance of context-specific approaches in the instance of Incremental housing in India: Yerwada Pune. As a result of the project's focus on cheap housing and locally driven development, living circumstances for EWS inhabitants have improved, and a feeling of community has been fostered.

The case study does, however, also highlight several drawbacks and difficulties. For progressive housing initiatives to be implemented successfully, the accessibility of capital and cooperation among both the private and public spheres are still essential. The ability to scale these programs and their long-term sustainability are also impacted by problems with land availability, regulatory obstacles, and the requirement for continual support and monitoring.

This article is from: