NRPA Health Impact Evaluation Framework

Page 33

PHOTO COURTESY OF MONTROSE RECREATION DISTRICT

In Montrose, Colorado, community members participate in a nutrition education class.

Case Study: Mixed-Methods Approach Through Community Health Assessments Community: Bloomington, Indiana Bloomington is a suburban city in Indiana with an almost equal proportion of Black and white populations (46 percent versus 50 percent, respectively). The Bloomington Parks and Recreation Department manages the Banneker Community Center, which has a rich history in the Bloomington community, particularly for their African American community members, as Banneker was the first African American school in the city. Over the years, the center transformed as an avenue for community members to congregate for events, such as nutrition education, family dinners, physical activities and many others. To continue to improve this space and ensure it meets the needs of the community, staff at Banneker — in collaboration with partners at the Indiana University School of Public Health — created and implemented a Community Health Assessment. Questions in this assessment included both quantitative and qualitative questions, so that they can highlight the numerical significance of the community needs (i.e., percent of homes that are unable to access food) along with the story behind them (i.e., reasons behind the inability to access food, such as transportation). This assessment is ongoing as they maintain communication with their community members on their desire for the program and ensure their needs will be met through their plans for improvement.

Part D. Data Communication After learning about a variety of ways to collect and analyze data, it is important to consider how to interpret the results appropriately and effectively communicate them to key audiences. Resources – Further Reading Guide to Science Communication58 Qualitative Data Communication Tips59 Appropriately interpreting the results involves describing your study sample and being transparent about biases, limitations and challenges. Describing your sample will be based on the descriptive data from the quantitative analysis, particularly the demographic characteristics of the sample, which will help the audience understand how to interpret and apply the results. Audiences mainly will be interested in findings that are applicable to specific communities intended to participate in the NRPA’s Health Impact Evaluation Framework | 31


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Appendix II: Worksheet for Assessing Resources and Capacity

1min
page 45

Part C. Evaluation for Advocacy

3min
pages 42-43

Part E. Health Metrics

10min
pages 34-38

Part B. Dissemination

1min
page 41

Part C. Mixed-Methods Methodology

1min
page 32

Part B. Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis

4min
pages 30-31

Part D. Data Communication

1min
page 33

Part A. Focus Evaluation Design

4min
pages 22-23

Part C. Develop a Work Plan

1min
page 26

Section 4: Quantitative and Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis

0
page 27

Part C. Describe the Program

12min
pages 15-20

Part A. Quantitative Data Collection and Analysis

3min
pages 28-29

Part B. Assessing Resources and Capacity

3min
pages 24-25

Section 3: Designing an Evaluation Plan

0
page 21

Part B. Community Health Assessments

2min
page 14

Part A. What Is Health and Wellness?

2min
page 7

Part C. CDC Framework for Program Evaluation

3min
pages 9-10

Acknowledgements

1min
page 4

Section 2: Program Design

1min
page 11

Introduction

1min
page 5

Part A. Engage Stakeholders in Program Design

4min
pages 12-13

Part B. Importance of Evaluation

2min
page 8

Section 1: Importance of Evaluating Community-Based Health and Wellness Programs

0
page 6
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.