King's College London newsletter SPECIAL EDITION
Revising the Academic Plan This special edition of Comment has been issued in order co pr07Jide all members of staffwith the text of the paper that was presented to Heads of Department at che briefing meeting on Monday 4 N07Jember. The main paper was prepared by Professor Archur Lucas, Vice-Principal with responsibility for academic planning. This paper contains six sections: 1. Reasons for revision 2. The College planning process
3. Policy underlying planning 4. Producing the options 5. Summary of options 6. Consultation with UFC
and is supported by the following appendices: A. Academic Policy Group: Guiding Principles B. Academic Policy Group: Criteria for constructing Academic Plans C. Preliminary Options (Distribution of numbers of academic staff and of student numbers)
the merger, and its being able to generate small surpluses to reduce the inherited accumulated deficits, the College is no longer fmancially viable. The change in financial outlook has a number of causes: i) The UFC response to our original plan was piecemea~ partly as a reflection of the general decisions neither to expand numbers in London nor to increase national postgraduate research student numbers. We were given part of our requested increase in funded humanities numbers, but funded for fewer than our previous funded numbers in the sciences, particularly postgraduate research students. (It seems that nationally postgraduate research students were distributed broadly in terms of research ratings, most funded research student places going to departments assessed as being strong in research.) The original King's plan was thus distorted in such a way that it produced a deficit budget. The UFC 'safety net' has not compensated for all the loss incurred, and at best is temporary support.
1. Reasons for revision
a) Financial
ii) Government policy to impose a 1.5% 'efficiency gain' per annum, and the expectation that government policy of under-funding nationally agreed salary awards will continue, together impose further pressure. The combined effect of these two pressures is an accumulated 'cut' of roughly 10% in real terms from 1989/90 to 1994/95.
Despite the very good housekeeping that has resulted in King's College having a balanced annual budget for most years since
iii) The transfer of funding for research from the UFC to the Research Councils to take effect in 1991/92 will
one of us wished to be engaged in this exercise so soon after the academic planning exercise of 1989/90. There are two major reasons why a revision is necessary now: financial pressures and changes in the context of higher education.
reduce our research-related general income. The transfer, while neutral in national terms., will increase selectivity of research funding quite dramatically. It will be done by paying an 'overhead' on research council funding, so that only active research council projects will attract money from this source. We have made some substantial improvements in research council income recently, (48.9% bener in 1990/91 than in 1989/ 90 in the non medical area). However, because there are few Research Council grants available in the humanities areas where our highest rated departments are concentrated we expect to lose about ÂŁ1 million per annum in the short term. The combined effect of these national and local factors means that the College must take action if it is not rapidly to fall into insolvency. b) The changing context of higher education The changes required for the financial reasons outlined above must take place in a new, and rapidly changing, educational policy environment. The recent White Paper foreshadows major changes in structure, with the erasure of the 'binary line' leading to polytechnics and universities being funded on the same basis, with separate decisions for research and for teaching. The research element in universities funding, currently about 35% of total income, is expected to be awarded selectively, based on research selectivity exercises which in 1992 will be extended to polytechnics that wish to enter costs centres for assessment and subsequent funding.
The effect of these clunges is clear. Since there is to be no overall increase in research funding for the system as a whole, and since some existing polytechnic departments will be rated more highly than some existing university departments, there will be a nett loss to the university sector. More importantly, the changed basis of providing funds based on selectivity ratings will increase the relative importance of achieving grade 4 or 5. ote that given fmite funds, if the average level of research rises, which it should if the national policy has had any effect, then those cost centres which maintain a 5 rating would get less money after the next round unless there is a change in the allocation formula. That change is about to be made, by the deletion of research funding from J-rated departments, so that a 5-rated department will attract twice the funding of a 3-rated department. The details for the funding of teaching are not yet clear, but there is little doubt that academic staff will need to teach more students. There will be a move to separate accountability for the teaching and research elements of funding, so that even highly rated research departments will need to increase in 'teaching efficiency' if research activity is to be maintained. There is also a national consultation currently under way on the nature of undergraduate medical education. The General Medical Council proposals, which so far have had general suppOrt, would change the nature of the medical curriculum by eliminating the pre-clinical phase, with clinical and basic science components taught throughout the course. This has implications for the relationship between parts of the College, especially as it may involve a very close teaching relationship between the present pre-c1inical basic medical sciences staff and clinicians, as well as adapting to change in the aims of medical education.
2. The college planning process a) The framework The College Council has prime responsibility for deciding any change in the academic plan. The Council is required to receive advice from the Academic Board.,
but it need not accept tlut advice. The Council requires any academic plan(s) sub mined to it for consideration to be financially viable. The Academic Policy Group (APG) has prime responsibility for recommending proposals to the Academic Board and to the Planning and Resources Committee. The APG consists of the Principal, the Vice Principal having responsibility for academic planning, and the Heads of the Schools. It is attended by the senior college officers, and may seek advice from others. b) Timetable Council has set a deadline for decision on the required new plan of 17 December, its last scheduled meeting for this calendar year. The APG has been meeting as often as possible, consistent with allowing time for the College officers to prepare papers for consideration. Two meetings of the Academic Board have been scheduled (using two of the following dates depending on the availability of suitable rooms: 27 November, 4 December, 11 December). The first will be for a presentation of the issues and a general discussion, the second to make formal recommendations to Council. Heads of DepartmentlDivision are also being met, on 4 November, for a preliminary briefing, and on 8 November, for discussion. At the second meeting College officers will be present to provide answers to technical questions that Heads may have after their consideration of these papers and the briefing. The College has arranged a meeting with UFC officers in mid-November.
3. Policy underlying planning Given the need to position ourselves to the best advantage in the emerging national policy environment, and given our favourable position in having most of our current departments at or above the national average research rating for their group, the APG has had as its objective to produce a
College in which nearly all departments will be rated as 4 or 5 , at least by the research selectivity exercise after next. Thus the APG has selectively supported our 4- and 5-rated departments (so that they maintain or improve their rating) and those other departments ior which there is strong evidence of a high probability of achieving a 4-rating in the June 1992 exercise. It has also anempted to ensure a research base for those activities where there is evidence to predict marked improvement within four or five years. The APG has required evidence, preferably by comparison with national trends, of continued high quality of the activities rated 4 or 5, and has required similar evidence for the claimed strength of other activities. To inform its judgement, the APG has used data on research activity drawn from the cvcr and UFC University Management Statistics and Performance Indicators in the UK, including the J991 edition which reported on the 1989/90 year, and internal college statistics up to the 1990/91 year, as well as data on student recruitment, and sub-areas of research activity. Appendix A is the document produced for the APG as a summary of its policy discussions. All staff were invited in July to make comments to the Chairman of the APG on the broad issues at stake, and meetings with heads of department are being held prior to the meetings of the Academic Board. Council members are also being briefed in the same way so that they have the opportunity to ask for data and the clarification of the implications of various options before the meeting at which they have to take their decision on the plan. The APG has produced more than one solution within its policy guidelines, so that the final decision can be made on the basis of consultation and discussion of choices between financially viable options, each with different academic costs and benefits.
4. Producing the options Translating the policy decisions into plans has involved the steps outlined in Appendix B, which is also a working document of the APG.
In summary the steps were to a) identify the departments that meet the research performance criteria. taking into account recent performance; b) consider proposals for the introduction of new initiatives, within departments and as completely new additions to the College c) based on advice from Schools, assign staffing levels that are the minimum judged to be consistent with a) and b). d) assign student numbers within the parameters set by the total funded number from the UFC in the March settlement, 1990/91 overseas (non-EEC) recruitment, and application and recruitment patterns. Higher than present student:staff ratios for most areas were expected. (For undergraduate medical and dentistry numbers, there is no recruitment flexibility in any category of student.)
internal structure somewhat different than that which presently exists, and for that reason in the options in Appendix C the label' environmental sciences' is used to signal this new emphasis, but without commitment to that name. It is also impOrtant to recognise that no decisions have been taken about grouping of activities in that School prior to the decisions on the overall academic profile of the College, although the APG is aware of debate on a re-grouping initiated within the School. If closer association with UMDS results from present discussions, it may also be necessary again to reconsider internal structures.
5. Summary of Options
Options A The basic set, Management, Mechanical Engineering, Computing, Environmental Sciences B
The basic set, but with an extended Humanities (to allow for new areas of staff expertise in Geography, History, Spanish and English, associated with new Pan-American and Mediterranean Rim foci), Management, Environmental Sciences
C The basic set, extended Humanities, Management, Mechanical Engineering D The basic set, extended Humanities, Management, Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Sciences
The basic set The process produced a number of options; all with Clinical Medicine, Clinical Dentistry, the minimal set of departments/ divisions identified by the research criteria. and all also containing the Management Centre, without which adequate recruitment for some departments in the list identified by the research criteria would be impossible. A target student population of 7300 has been set, to which must be added Junior Year Abroad and other non-award students when assessing the total load on facilities. These additional numbers amount to the equivalent of about 200 people. The options for consideration are listed in Appendix C. A provisional financial assessment is being made of each option. The APG is yet to examine the plausibility of each assumption built into the financial assessment, subject group by subject group. A confirmed frnancial assessment will be issued as soon as possible. The case of Divisions within Life, Health and Basic Medical Sciences requires comment. The list of activities chosen on research grounds does not include the Biosphere Division. Some of the constituent activities in that Division are judged to be of higher quality than this decision would indicate. However, to unravel the Division produced distortions of different kinds. The APG decided that to produce informed choices it was important to preserve the integrity of a division, grouped on an
The options so far considered, which are presented in more detail in Appendix C, all include Clinical Medicine and Clinical Dentistry, plus departments satisfying the APG's research rating criteria (staff and student numbers associated with the preclinical areas are incorporated in Life, Basic Medical and Health Sciences):
Humanities Byz'and Modern Greek
English*Geography History'
Classics French, Gerrtl2D'c", .Music'
Portuguese
Philo$oprry$-
Theology . War Studies: "Incorporating Paleography
Spanish,
"Incorporating HPS
Laws Ed=ation
Life, Basic MediCal and Health Sciences Anatomy Biophysics
Biochemistry Pharmacology
Physiology
Gerontology Nutrition
Nl11sing Pharmacy (Radiography)
(Physiotherapy)
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemistry Electrical Engineering路 Mathematics Physics
E The basic set, extended Humanities, Management, Computing, Environmental Sciences.
6. Consultation with UFC It will be obvious to all that none of these plans can be implemented without the concurrence of the UFC. Informal discussions have been held at officer level, and the Principal has met with the Chief Executive Officer of the UFC. No commitments can yet be asked for nor given. However, it is clear that the UFC policy is not closely to 'steer' individual institutions, and the UFC requires us to put our proposals before it. Nevertheless, a meeting has been arranged for midNovember where our preferred options will described in more detail and the advice of the UFC sought.
Appendix A Academic Policy Group: GUiding Principles
The UFC has called upon universities to submit their Institutional Plans for the period 1991-1995. The submissions will inform the UFC about the shape and future direction of individual universities and the system as a whole, as well as having some bearing on resource distributions in the longer term. The core of the Institutional Plan will be a persuasive and justifiable statement of academic intention. The Academic Policy Group has been charged by the Standing Committee (on behalf of the Academic Board) and the Planning and Resources Committee with the task of formulating an academic plan for consideration ultimately by the Academic Board and the Council.
ii) Academic robustness will be jud ed in terms of excellence in research and teaching; where there is conflict, excellence in research will ta e precedence over that in teaching in the short term. iii) Excellence in research will be judged by reference to the present research ratings and current research performance as evidenced by stringently applied measures of research achievement. iv) The scale of each academic activity will be influenced by considerations pertaining to the preservation of excellence, by evidence of the buoyancy of recruitment of undergraduate and postgraduate students, by considerations of academic coherence and interdependence, and by considerations of fmancial viability.
2. List minimum staffing levels required to enhance the rating for all those departments that are at a rating of 3, unless that is a below the national median. 3. List minimum staffing levels required to enhance the rating for departments where the APG is very confident that there will be a 3 rating, if necessary in order of likelihood of achieving that rating. 4. Consider the effects on the Departments identified in steps 1 to 3 of removing each of the Departments not included by those steps.
v) Academic diversity will be promoted to the extent that the preservation of academic excellence and considerations of financial viability will allow.
5. Identify the candidate departments for closure so that the total number of staff Lost exceeds the number required to be lost to generate the investment needed in academic infra-structure, including Library and IT services for teaching and learning, and new academic developments.
AppendiX 8 Academic Policy Group: Criteria for the construction of Academic Plan(s)
6. Decide whether any staff posts can be allocated to proposed new academic developments. (If there is more than one set of possibilities for closure that will generate an academically coherent College, the remaining steps need to be done for each resultant modeL.)
It is a requirement of the Council that the accumulated deficit of £4.6m shall not be exceeded by the end of the planning period. the most recent internal financial forecast prepared in the light of the funded student numbers allocated to the College and the accompanying grant settlement for 1991/92 announced in March 1991 shows that the College's present expenditure commitments will exceed projected income by approximately £3million in 1992/93, £4milLion in 1993/94 and £5milLion in 1994/ 95. In other words, unless remedied, the projected accumulated deficit at the end of the planning period will have risen by £12miLlion to £ 16.6million. These figures assume that the UFC 'safety net' of £1.3milLion, which offsets a deficit of Like amount for the year 1991/92, will be maintained in real terms. There is no guarantee of this.
The final model has to be based predominantly on research quality criteria, because that is the best guarantee of being able to survive the financial effects of the removal of the binary line. We must minimise the risk of having to undergo an exercise like this again in two or three years tune.
The task of the Academic Policy Group is therefore quite formidable and without doubt carries an imperative for radical change from the status quo.
After testing the data available to us, we use it to build models which are based on staffing, by proceeding in the following sequence:
In addressing its remit, the Academic Policy Group has adopted the following guiding principles:
1. List staffing levels consistent with the maintenance of the quality of all departments confidently expected to achieve a 4 or a 5 rating at the next round. (That is all those currently at those levels, and then those where stringent application of
i) The academic plan must be both academically and financially robust.
jud ement su ests that this will be achieved for the next round.)
The broad criteria agreed by the Academic Policy Group have been converted to the following operational procedures.
7. Estimate the number of UFC funded, fees-only, and high fee students that will be required to produce financially viable departments, taking into account plausible cases made for the possibility of covering core funded staff by Continuing Education activities, Contract Research Overheads, fees-only students etc.
8. Assess the probability of recruiting these students, at a sufficiently higt. -luality at entry.
9. Assess the financial viability of the plan(s). 10. Fine tune, distribute student load, and prepare a consultation report for the College committees, informal consultation with Council and KCLSU. 11. Other things being equal, identify and recommend a plan that has the minimum restructuring costs.
APPEN DIX 'C'
A Core departments, Management, Mechanical Engineering. Computing. Environmental Sciences
1994/95 Planned Numbers Total
Departments HUMANITIES Bvz.& Mod.Greek Classics English French German History Music Philosophy Portuguese Geography Spanish Theoloov War Studies HUMANITIES :==11
25 109 192 145 84 157 97 127 32 153 104 200 58 148311
9 30 43 67 20 55 17 45 13 80 19 43 77 51811
0 3 20 5 5 8 14 9 1 6 3 22 33 12911
34 142 255 217 109 220 128 181 46 239 126 265 168 213011
29 115 214148 90 165 114 141 ..... 37 167 110 232 95 165711
36 141 255 217 112 220 128 175 46 244 126 265 168 213311
1I
LAWS
11
32511
26511
20011
79011
56311
11
EDUCATION
I[
33411
011
3011
36411
214211
78311
35911
r
I[ARTS-BASED
11
O'seas
1994/95 1991/92 Planned EstimatedI1994/9511991/92 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Load Staff Staff Total
6
5
7 4 13
20
6 11
Departments HUMANITIES 6 Byz.& Mod.Greek 8 Classics 12- Enalish 13 French 12 German 11 Historv 14 Music 8 .... Philosophy 9 Portuouese 15 Geography 13 Spanish 11 Theolol:lY 12 War Studies HUMANITIES 1111
5 14 1811 8 15 8 17 ..... 4 12 9 20 8 14711
8 13 16 16 16 16 14 13 12 16 16 13 14 1411
75011
481C==W1
1611
1511
LAWS
11
30511
36411
2711
341L==rID1
911
EDUCATION
11
328411
252511
324711
22311
21811
99 215 76 171
99 220 79 171
184 248 95 203
15 20
17 23 14 16
Nb. 'The Red Book' is the KCL Budget Manual 1991/92 produced by the Finance Department SSR is the Student Staff Ratio
5 11 16 14 7 14 9 13 4 15 8 20 12 14811
1994/9511991/92 Planned Red Book SSR SSR
9 15
1511
12I1ARTS-BASED
I
11
A Core departments, Management, Mechanical Engineering, Computing, Environmental Sciences
-- ..... - ..
IN THIS SPA
__ .,.---
1994/95 Bd Student Numbers
~dl
Departments LIFE, BASIC MEDICAL & H [Environmental Scn, [[ Green Gerontology Nursing Nutrition Pharmacy Physiotherapy· • Radiography· • Health Scionces LIFE SCIENCES
(16_8) (48)
J[
le-
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & ENGIN Chemistry Computing lec'l Eng'n'ng Mechanical Engineering Management Mathematics Physics IpHYS'L SCNS.& ENG'G
~SCIENCE-BASED
preclinicOI Dentistry Clinical Modicine [ .Clinical Dentistry [MEDICINE & DENTISTRY
[
COLLEGE TOTAL
16 18 15 5
o . _
432]L~ 1312]C-=RING 220 162 208 103
-
-
o
:l
143T
""1
23!!.Q]L:
293Jl
-
-
1 5 23 85 10 2
17 20 95 33 75 27 16
-
-
::IDJC 4881e
237 193 323
23 33 165 151 131 90 300 256 15 20+1125\ 11 6451 1503Jl
3 13 7 20 19\
4 16 8 23 11
232 262 457*
23 14 23 8 9 24
24 22 36*
1~
135 282 196 150jJC
106 261 191 150IDI
271 196 326 100 171 360 185 16091C=
31iDC 30ffiC- 3~1I
.?2,
__
wC
1994/95 Planned SSR
1991/92 Red Book SSR
11 12
5 10 13 11 6
1~
13 116\
Departments
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & ENGINEERING 12 11 Chemistry 14 12 Computing 14 12* Elec'l EnQ'n'n! 13 Mechanical En! 11 19 17 ManaQement 30 15 9 Mathematics 30 9 6Pi1vsi~ 1 5 ] l L - l~L ~Cf..HYS'L SCN S.& EN G 'G
2711C· 3'@C=
l]]L
101[SCiENCE-BASED
]
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY .'_
207~._ 88
J
358 188 84!J[
0t ~ o 6 4 33 9 23
rnl
~C
215 94 395 220
9?J]1
1089]C----g}"JJL 737]]1
- Includes Palaeography Includes History and Philosophy Science * Includes Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering combined .* Bracketed figures represent NHS funded students A
1991/92 1994/95 1991/92 Planned Estimated 1994/95 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Staff Total Load Staff
33 171 108 - 295 20 . o _ 2 62jJI 71]C-:- l]IDC 150][ _ ~L 166]J1
_
205 180 l078r_
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY preCllncal Medlcln
O'seas
'1-
'~
150 67 195 5
I
Fee. Onlv
1994/95 Planned Number. Total
215 94 395 211 9151L 645211
0 0 395 246 64111 736111
0 0 61 50
N/A N/A
N/A N/A -
llllL
66 54 11911
6 5 611
60511
68]]1
1211
Preclincal Medicine Preclinical Dentistr 6 Clinical Medicine 4 Clinical Dentistr 51lM@ICINE & DENTISTRY 1011
COLLEGE TOTAL
11
11
B Core departments but with an extended Humanities, Management, Environmental Sciences
Departments HUMANITIES Byz.& Mod.Greek Classics English French German History Music Philosophy Portuguese ...Q.eog.raphv Spanish Theol09LWar Studies [ =HUMANITIEยงj [
r==
LAWS EDUCATION
~RTS-BASED
O'seas
-_ _ ,==
25 101 189 169 79 167 82 117 32 180 106 179 89
~C~I
1994/95 Planned Numbers Total
1994/95 1991/92 Planned Esti mated11994/95 1991/9211994/9511991/92 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Planned Red Book Load Staff Staff SSR SSR Total
9 27 60 49 21 53 20 40 8 50 27 49 36 44911
0 3 20 5 2 8 14 9 1 10 3 22 33 13011
34 131 269 223 102 228 116 166 41 240 136 250 158 209411
29 115 214148 90 165 114 141 37 167 110 232 95 1657]
36 130 269 223 105 228 116 160 41 245 136 250 158 2097J
5 11 20 14 8 18 9 13 4 18 10 20 13 16311
5 14 1811 8 15 8 17'" 4 12 9 20 8 14711
8 12 13 16 13 13 13 12 10 14 14 13 12 1311
Ao
Departments HUMANITIES 6 Bvz.& Mod.Greek 8 Classics 12- English 13 French 12 German 11 History 14 Music 8 .... Philosophv 9 PortuQuese 15 Geography 13 Spanish 11 TheoloQV 12 War Studies HUMANITIES 1111
=::J
~I
37111
21911
20011
79011
563]1
75011
4811
3711
1611
1511
LAWS
11
~I
33311
011
3011
364![
30511
36411
2711
3411
1311
911
EDUCATION
11
6@L
36011
324811
252511
321111
23811
21811
1411
o
5 20 6 11
99 215 76 171
99 220 79 171
184 248 95 203
15 20 9 15
17 23 14 16
~~I
o o
o
121IARTS-BASED
11
B Core departments but with an extended Humanities, Management, Environmental Sciences IN THIS SPREADSHEET ALL FIGURES ARE ROUNDED 1994/95 _ 'Planne d Student Numbers UF ~ [ Onl O'seas Departments Fund ed LIFE, BASIC MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES continued Environmental Scn. 36~ Q. ~ Green 365]L_ 01L"
f
Numbers Total
1991/92 1994/95 Planned Estimated 1994/95 1991/92 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Staff Total load Staff
1994/95 Planned SSR
1991/92 Red Book SSR
Departments
I lL
l1=
3
166 85 210
.-
(16~+10
(48)
Jl
][
_
QJ[
503][ 152IIL
2~H
1
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY Predlncal Medicine Predlnrcal Dentrstry Clinical Medidne Clinical Dentistry IMEDICINE & DENTISTRY
---= -
COLLEGE TOTAL
~
88 ~ll~ 358
le-
8411c-
~C
188
.
01 :
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & ENGINEERING Chemistry lec'l Eng'n'ng 219 Management 0 MathematiCs 205 Physics 180 ][[PIlYS'L SCNS.& ENG'G 8241C-= rSCIENCE - BASED lL 235..!JL=
[[
1994/95 Planned
_
5412]C
·fi -
50 0. _ 110][ : 11.Q][ :
~l
---
-
131C:'" 7911[
=
- Indudes Palaeography '" Indudes History and Philosophy of Science • Indudes Mechanical and Electrical Engineering combined ... Bracketed figures represent NHS funded students.
1 5 23 85 10 2 126][ 2071
17 95 75 27 16 2301 4371
8 6133 23 70r 861J[
-
-
-
-
-
33 33 23 151 171 165 - 90 131 108 295 300 256 20+ 125) 20 15 · 11 2+127 2 629JC=- 64~L 173f1L= 150~L "-
-
-
-
-
237 232 274 · 457 299 314 · 106 135 171 - 340 261 282 191 185 196 n63JC:= 124ZJC 1£6l!]1 28981C-= 2750]L 320mL
21§"f94 395 220
-
215 94 395 211
_ _
= ~9151C·7.Q1IDL
0 0 395 246 6illl
619JfJL::tQ@1
3 13 7 20 (9)
-
231 22 9 23 20 9]JC 2~C
0 _ 0 61 501111C
'~
23 11
11 12 13 13 (16)
-
5 10 13 11 6
24 36 11 30
N/A N/A
_ 66 6 54 5 l@L==::ID1
601lC6g]c==m1
N/A N/A
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY _ Predincal Medicine I Predlnical Dentist 6 Clinical Medidne ~ .Cllnic.al Dentistry 5[MEDICINE&DENTISTRy4 lolC==cOllEGE TOTAL
11
C Core departments, extended Humanities, Management, MechanicsJ Engineering iN THIS SPREADSHEET All FIGURES ARE ROUNDED 1994/95 Planned Student Numbers UFC Funded
Departments HUMANITIES -=--Byz.& Mod.Greek Classics English French
I
I
Fees Only
O'seas
1994/95 Planned Numbers Total
Theology War Studies HUMANITIES ~ I
31 120 226 202 94 201 98 140 37 214 125 212 109 180911
3 8 23 16 6 19 4 17 3 16 8 16 16 15511
0 3 20 5 2 8 14 9 1 10 3 22 33 1301[
LAWS
11
43511
15511
EDUCATION
11
33411
==:11
257811
~erman
History Music
~o~ Portuquese Geo9~hL-
~anish
L I1
t .
~TS-BASED
LIFE, BASIC MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES 94 195 70 160 I
;
1991/92 1994/95 1991/92 Planned Estimated 1994/95 1991/92 1994/95 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Planned Red Book SSR load Staff Staff SSR Total
34 131 269 223 102 228 116 166 41 240 136 250 158 209411
29 115 214148 90 165 114 141 " 37 167 110 232 95 165711
36 130 269 223 105 228 116 160 41 245 136 250 158 209711
5 11 20 14 8 18 9 13 4 18 10 20 13 16311
5 14 1811 8 15 8 17" 4 12 9 20 8 14711
20011
79011
56311
75011
4811
3711
161L
1511
LAWS
11
011
3011
36411
30511
36411
2711
3411
13[
YJI
EDUCATION
11
31011
36011
324811
252511
321111
23811
21811
1411
121IARTS-BASED
5 20 6 11
99 215 76 171
99 220 79 171
184 243 91 203
15 20 9 15
17 23 14 16
o o o o
8 12 13 16 13 13 13 12 10 14 14 13 12 1311
Departments HUMANITIES 6 Byz.& Mod.Greek 8 Classics 12- English 13 French 12 German 11 History 14 Music 8- Philosophy 9 Portuguese 15 Geography 13 Spanish 11 Theology 12 War Studies HUMANITIES 1111
I
11
C COfe departments, extended Humanities, Management, Mechanical Engineering IN THIS SPREADSHEET ALL FIGURES ARE ROUNDED 1994/95 lann ad Student Numbers UF Fees O'seas Departments Fund Onlv LIFE, BASIC MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES continued
r,
if
1994/95 Planned Numbers Total
I
~d I
Gerontol09L 32 ..Q NurSing _ _ _ __ 166 _-.2. ,Nutrilion 85 0 -210 _ Q Pharmacy Physiotherapy •• . _ 10+ (1..68 _ 0 Radiography'· . (48) _Q._ I Health Sciences . J[ 503lL LIFE SCIENCES Jf 11621L=
1 5 23 85
r
SCIENCE
BASED
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY Preclincal Medicine Preclinical Dentistry Clinical Medicine Clinical Denlistry MEDICINE & DENTISTRY [
COLLEGE TOTAL
-']
Jl ...JC
RING 220 208 103
o
o
1.g -2
9S
2
~
60 50
237
17 -
20
75'
33 23 165 151 131 90 300 256 15 20+(125 - ~ 11 2,+ (27 2 6291C 6 § ) L @I 1337'~ 136§JL )54011 33 171 108 295
-o:JC 126] OJC 17§JL
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & ENGIN Chemistry E1ec'l Eng'n'ng Mechanical Engineelng Management t Mathematics t PhysIcs IPHYS'L SCNS.& ENG'G ]
1991/92 1994/95 1994/95 1991/92 Planned Estimated 1994/95 1991/92 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book PLanned Red Book Load Staff SSR SSR Total Staff
-
27+-
~
135 282 196
-
205 180 916j[
132][
1§t-: 263]J -~L
207811
1321
438J
2648d,
0 0 4 9
8 6 33 23 70]
215 94 - 395 --220 9241C
201 _ 88 358 188
o
841lC~_' ~r 549ijC:
455Je- _
- Incl udes Palaeography '" Incl udes History and Philosophy of Science • Includes Mechanical and Electrical Engineering combined •• Bracketed figures represenl NHS funded students.
86!11
11 12 13 13 (16
4 16 8 23 11
5 10 13 11 6
Gerontology Nursing Nutrition Pharmacy Physiotherapy Radiograflhv 10 I[ Health Sciences 11]LLlFE SCIENCES
(6
(5
1211 1211
431L:::::..- 6:t]1 1251C 158]1
I I
268 326 100 106 171 360 261 191 - 1 8 5 1231]1 141011
23 23 8 9 24 20 107L :-
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & ENGINEERING 11 Chemistry 12 14 12" Elec'l Eng'n'nq Mechanical Engineering 13 17 Management 11 19 30 15 9 Mathematics ~ PllYsics 30 9 13JJ1=-----vJC- lQjIpHYS-'L SCNS,& ENG'G I
261~L
~I
2321C
289
232 457"
323
3 13 7 20 (9
Departments
215 94 395 211 9-®1
6820lL 605]]1
0 0 395 246 64111 680211
-
0 0 61 50
-
24 36"
1
-
llllC
66 54 '-19]
58111
626]1
131r==
m~CIENCE-BASED
::::=JI
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY
N/~r-preclincal Medicine N/A Preclinical Dentistry
N/A N/A
6 6 reJinical Medicine 5 ~ c9iDical Denlistry 6IC=~@EDICINE& DENTISTRO 1211
101C=c·OLLEGE TOTAL
11
D Core departments, extended Humanities, Mechanical Engineering, Management, Environmental Sciences
IN THIS SPREADSHEET ALL FIGURES ARE ROUNDED 1994/95 Planned Student Numbers UFC Funded
Departments r=-----,---O.H,-,=U,...;.;M A N ITIE S I Byz.& Mod. 3reek Classics English French German Histor Music Philosophy
-_.-
~-
-- -
--
--
§£anish Iheology War Studies HU MANITIES ~
C~_
c _--
LAWS EDUCATION
[ARTS-BASED
-
I
Fees Only
28 110 204 183 86 180 89 I-126 34 212 114 192 97 16551C
---
Portu~se
Geo~.b.
I
-lC
6 18 45 35 14 40 13 - f31 6 18 19 36
28 309}1
:::=J.C~C::=-2051 ~L ~c::::.
oIL
~ ~ C 5-14l[
LIFE, BASIC MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES Anatomy 88 Biochemistry 166 Biophysics 66 147 Pharmacology Physiology 123 C Biom edical ]I 61211
6 7 4 13 17 4711
O'seas
.-
0 3 20 5 2 8 14 9 1 10 3 22 33
1994/95 Planned Numbers Total 34 131 269 223 102 228 116 166 41 240 136 250 156
=~~091J1 200 I~ l@1
-~C:::= 3S4J[ ~I
324811
5 20 6 11 7 4911
99 215 76 171 147 70811
1991/92 1994/95 Planned Estimated 1994/95 1991/92 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Total Load Staff Staff 29 36 115 130 214269 148 223 90 105 165 228 114 116 141 ..160 37 41 167 245 110 136 232 250 95 156 16571L 20@1 5631[ 3051C 25251L
99 220 79 171 152 72111
-
5 11 20 14 8 18 9 13 4 16 10 20 13 1631C
1994/95 Planned SSR
5 14 1811 8 15 8 17'" 4 12 9 20 6
147][:=
1991/92 Red Book SSR
8 12 13 16 13 13 13 12 10 14 14 13 12 1I!C
J50][
4811
371C= 3611
~I
2711
341c:::::::::..=
32111[
23811
21811
164 248 95 203 267 9971[
15 20 9 15 23 8211
17 23 14 16 26 9611
~T 14JI
Departments HUMANITIES 6 Byz.& Mod.Greek 8 Classics 12- Enqlish 13 French 12 German 11 History 14 Music 8'" Philosophv 9 Portuguese 15 Geography 13 Spanish 11 Theology 12 War Studies HUMANITIES 11C::: 151C-:= 91c.=
LAWS
-
I
=:J]
EDUCATION]
121[A[TS-I3ASED
==:11
LIFE. BASIC MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES 12 Anatomy 12 12 13 Biochemistry 7 Biophysics 11 14 14 Pharmacology 12 11 Phvsiologv Biomedical 1211 1211 1
o Core departments,
extended Humanities, Mechanics! Engineering, Management, Environments! Sciences
IN THIS SPREADSHEET ALL FIGURES ARE ROUNDED 1994/95 Planned Student Numbers
--
UFC Funded ..
.
I _.
Fees Only
I
O'seas
17 15 1 Qerontol09Y 150 16 NursinlL 5 - .Nutrition 67 18 23 195 15 Pharmac 85 - - (168) +5 Ph}'siotheraeY •• 5 10 . Radiography •• 0 2 (4m Health Scien :es--1 432]~71)[ 12611 LIFE SCIENC Es~c--r3m.L ~L~I
23 165 131 300 15 11 64511 150311
17 33 95 75 27 16 26311
237 138 323 135 282 196 131111
232
282]1
46811
207 88 358 188 84111
0 0 4 9 1311
544311
80911
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & ENGINEERING .Chemistry -- 2 200 Mechanical Engin eerin~_ 103 2 208 Elec'l En9'n'ng 20 !v1anagemenl 0 60 Mathematics 205 50 Physics 180 0 '('pHYS'L SCNS.& ENG'GJL .9}6lC=@1
-
:J
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY Precllncal Medicine - fPreclinical DentTstr Clinical MediclM 91inlcal Dentisl.')' 1MEDICINE & DENTISTR 0 1 [
CO[(J=GtrOIA~[
1991/92 1994/95 Planned Estimated 1994/95 1991/92 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Total Load Staff Staff
33 171 108 295 20 2 62911 166711
22281C
- Includes Palaeography A Includes History and Philosophy of Science • Includes Mechanical and Electrical Engineering combined •• Bracketed figures represent NHS funded students.
1994/95 Planned SSR
1991/92 Red Book SSR
Departments
33 151 90 256 20+(125 2+(27 55211 186411
3 13 7 20 (9 (5 4311 15011
457* 106 261 191 124711
274 100 326 171 360 185 141611
23 8 22 9 23 20 10511
36 11 30 30 13111
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & ENGINEERING 11 Chemistry 12 13 Mechanical Engineering 15 12 Elec'l Eng'n'ng 19 17 Management 16 9 Mathematics 6 Physics 9 101lpHYS'L SCNS.& ENG'G 1311 I
297811
275011
328011
25511
32511
1311
8 6 33 23 701[
215 94 395 220 92411
215 94 395 211 915[1
0 0 395 246 64111
0 0 61 50 11111
66 54 11911
6 5 611
89811
715011
619011
713211
60411
66311
1211
--
lSCIENCE- BASED
1994/95 Planned Numbers Total
4 16 8 23 11 6211 19411
11 12 13 13 (16 (6 1211 1211
24
N/A N/A
5 10 13 11 6
Gerontology Nursinq Nutrition Pharmacy Physiotherapy Radioqraphv Health Sciences 1011 LIFE SCIENCES 1111
101IsCIENCE-BASED
N/A N/A
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY Preclincal Medicine Preclinical Dentistry 6 Clinical Medicine 4 Clinical Dentistrv 511 MEDICINE & DENTISTRY 1011
COLLEGE TOTAL
I I
11
I 11
E Core departments, extended Humanities, Management. Computing. Environmental Sciences
Departments HUMANITIES Byz.& Mod.Greek Classics English French German History Music Philosophy Portuguese Geography Spanish
O'seas
11
Ir==
11
43511
15511
20011
79011
56311
75011
4811
3711
1611
1511
LAWS
11
c=~UCATION ~I
33411
011
3011
36411
30511
36411
2711
3411
1311
911
EDUCATION
11
2560lC=illJI
36011
324811
252511
321111
23811
21811
1411
5 20 6 11
99 215 76 171
99 220 79 171
184 248 95 203
15 20
17 23 14 16
LAWS
~RTS-BASED
11
1731C=~1
6 7 4 13
34 131 269 223 102 228 116 166 41 240 136 250 158 209411
29 115 214148 90 165 114 141 " 37 167 110 232 95 165711
36 130 269 223 105 228 116 160 41 245 136 250 158 209711
5 11 20 14 8 18 9 13 4 18 10 20 13 16311
5 14 1811 8 15 8 17" 4 12 9 20 8 14711
8 12 13 16 13 13 13 12 10 14 14 13 12 1311
Departments HUMANITIES 6 Byz.& Mod.Greek 8 Classics 12- English 13 French 12 German 11 History 14 Music 8" Philosophy 9 Portuguese 15 Geographv 13 Spanish 11 Theology 12 War Studies HUMANITIES 11 11
J:;!ar Studies HUMANITIES
=C
0 3 20 5 2 8 14 9 1 10 3 22 33
1994/95 1991/92 Planned Esti m ated11994/95 1991/9211994/9511991/92 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Planned Red Book Total Load Staff Staff SSR SSR
30 118 220 198 92 197 97 136 37 230 123 208 105 179111
Theol~
4 10 29 20 8 23 5 21 3 0 10 20 20
1994/95 Planned Numbers Total
9 15
121IARTS-BASED
I
11
Core department., extended Humanitie., Management. Computing. Environmental Science. IN THIS SPREADSHEET ALL FIGURES ARE ROUNDED 1994/95 Planned Student Numbers UFC Funded
~orontol09Y Nur~lng
Nutrition Pharmacy f.hy'sloth era.EY...::.. Radiography" Health Sciences LIFE SCIENCES
/1681
I
15 150 67 195 5
NGINEERING 220 I 162 ~ompuling -----+1 219 Elec'l Eng'n'ng j 0 ~ana9oment ---205 Mathomatlcs 180 Physics PHYS'L SCNS.& ENG'G C=9wL
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & Chomlst0'
Fees] Only
O'seas
1994/95 Planned Numbers Total
1991/92 1994/95 Planned Estimated 1994/95 1991/92 Numbers Planned Ac&Ac/Re Red Book Staff Total Load Staff
17 16 18 15 5
1 5 23 85 10
33 171 108 295 20
23 165 131 300 15
0I 11 0 60 50 0 1h11
171 20 95 75 27 16 25011
2371 193 314 135 282 196 135711
2321 262 457* 106 261 191 150911
33 151 90 256 20+/1251
1994/95 Planned SSR
11 12 13 13 /161
271 I 196 299 171 340 185 146211
231 14 22 9 23 20 11111
241 22 36* 11 30 30 15311
PHYSICAL SCIENCES & ENGINEERING 121 11 I Chemistr 14 12 Compulin 14 12" Elec'l Eng'n'n 19 17 ManaQement 15 9 Mathematics 9 6 PhYsics 1311 101IpHYS'LSCNS.&ENG'G I
34811
1311
27111
45511
302411
301211
334811
26111
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY Precllncal Modlcine Praclinlcal DontlstrL Clinical Medicine Clinical Dontlsti}' __ MEDICINE & DENTISTRv:J1
207 88 358 188 84111
0 0 4 9 1311
8 6 33 23 7011
215 94 395 220 92411
215 94 395 211 91511
0 0 395 246 64111
0 0 61 50 11111
66 54 11911
6 5 611
COLLEGE TOTAL::11
569911
61211
88511
719611
645211
717811
61011
68511
1211
Includos Palaeography Includes History and Philosophy of Science Includes Mechanical and Electrical Engineering combined Bracketed figures represent NHS funded students
5 10 13 11 6
4 16 8 23 11
229811
'" " ..
Departments
3 13 7 20 /91
-:JI
SCIENCE-BASED
1991/92 Red Book SSR
101IsCIENCE-BASED
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
MEDICINE & DENTISTRY Preclincal Medicine Preclinical Dentistr 6 Clinical Medicine 4 Clinical Dentistr~ 511MEDICINE & DENTISTRY 6211
COLLEGE TOTAL
11
11 11