COLLABORATION
To learn how KLMK Group can assist in making your capital project a success: 804-343-0161 or solutions@klmkgroup.com
Richmond, VA
•
Birmingham, AL
•
Atlanta, GA
www.klmkgroup.com
•
Houston, TX
•
Looking For A More Effective Way To Deliver Your Capital Facility Project?
Dallas, TX
INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY
Comparison of Project Delivery Approaches
Why Integrated Project Delivery? At KLMK, we are committed to ensuring that your capital facility project is launched, managed and transitioned
Characteristics
Pros
Cons
on time and within budget. Our services support your project from concept to completion. For 25 years, we Design-Bid-Award
have been assisting clients in navigating the Capital Project Delivery Process and during that • • • •
Dedication and Commitment.
Utilizing Lean Principles, IPD engages the entire team to participate in the design and development of the new facility. This process, built on trust and team work, eliminates waste, improves efficiencies, and enhances communication. IPD provides an earlier and more confident definition of scope,
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
INDUSTRY Better Working Relationships Collaboration / Teamwork Desire for Greater Transparency Risk Shifting
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD).
• • • •
At the forefront of innovation is
PROJECT GOALS • Renewed Scrutiny on Cost & Schedule • Integrated Process Planning • Inefficiencies in Project Delivery Process
Trust, Innovation, Collaboration,
TECHNOLOGY / PROCESS • Building information Modeling (BIM) • Lean Principles Applied to Operations, Design & Construction • Consensus Project Management Software
schedule and budget which can minimize surprises during the construction phase. Delivering a
Trends Driving Owners Toward IPD
project without all the frustration typically experienced, is the real
Design-Build
it takes to make a project successful:
• Low First Cost
• Presents Highest Risk • Stimulates Adversarial
& Contractor)
Relationships
• Best Understood
• Encourages Change Orders
• Linear Sequence of Work (Longest
• Contractor Has Minimal Input
Delivery)
in Design
• Single Contract / Responsibility
• Sole Source of Accountability
• Faster Delivery
• Increases Potential for Early
• Changes Traditional Roles and
Completion
Relationships Between Owner,
• Less Adversarial
Contractor and Designer
• Earlier Knowledge of Firm Price
• Minimum Innovative Design Potential • Owner Less Involved in Design Decisions • Owner Pushed for Earlier Decisions • Not “Open Book” on Pricing & Level of Quality
Construction Manager (CM At Risk)
time, we have learned exactly what
MARKET DEMANDS Improved Performance Reimbursement Changes Capital Constrains Continued Margin Compression
• Two Main Contracts (Design Team
• Two Main Contracts (Design Team and Contractor) • Linear Sequence of Work but Accommodates Fast Track Delivery • CM is Selected on Qualifications, Not Price • CM Selected Early in Delivery Process
• Fosters More Collaborative Environment • Allows for Tight Control of Pricing and Schedule • Allows for Phased Construction • Full Disclosure of Cost and Sched-
• Perception That Price Competition is Limited • Design Team May Not Take Input From CM During Design • Still Can Foster “Finger Pointing” Behavior
ule Throughout Delivery Process • Reduces Owner Risk
name of the game.
Our Integrated Project Delivery services include the following: IPD Fit Test
IPD Launch
• Review IPD Process and Standards
• Define Project Scope
• Assess Organizational Culture to Determine Fit
• Facilitate Interactive Team Selection • Lead Integrated Process Planning
IPD Maintenance
• Negotiate Integrated Form of Agreement (IFOA)
• Facilitate Pull Scheduling Sessions
• Develop Project Implementation Plan
• Assess Team Dynamic & Relationships
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
• One Integrated Form of Agreement • Mutual Respect and Trust • Mutual Benefit and Reward • Early Involvement of All Key Delivery Team Members • Early Goal Definition
• Owner, Architect and Contractor Act As One • Owner Can Tailor the Best Aspects of Design-Build and CM-At-Risk
• Perception That Cost Competitiveness is Limited • Can Be Complex to Administer • Can Require Major Culture
• Shared Risk and Rewards
Change on Part of Owner,
• Allows for Reduction of Costs by
CM and Design Team
Eliminating Redundant Efforts • Delivery Relationships Changes From Adversarial to Collaborative • Increase Ability to Deliver Project Within Budget and Schedule • Increases Ability to Deliver a More Operationally Efficient Facility
Comparison of Project Delivery Approaches
Why Integrated Project Delivery? At KLMK, we are committed to ensuring that your capital facility project is launched, managed and transitioned
Characteristics
Pros
Cons
on time and within budget. Our services support your project from concept to completion. For 25 years, we Design-Bid-Award
have been assisting clients in navigating the Capital Project Delivery Process and during that • • • •
Dedication and Commitment.
Utilizing Lean Principles, IPD engages the entire team to participate in the design and development of the new facility. This process, built on trust and team work, eliminates waste, improves efficiencies, and enhances communication. IPD provides an earlier and more confident definition of scope,
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
INDUSTRY Better Working Relationships Collaboration / Teamwork Desire for Greater Transparency Risk Shifting
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD).
• • • •
At the forefront of innovation is
PROJECT GOALS • Renewed Scrutiny on Cost & Schedule • Integrated Process Planning • Inefficiencies in Project Delivery Process
Trust, Innovation, Collaboration,
TECHNOLOGY / PROCESS • Building information Modeling (BIM) • Lean Principles Applied to Operations, Design & Construction • Consensus Project Management Software
schedule and budget which can minimize surprises during the construction phase. Delivering a
Trends Driving Owners Toward IPD
project without all the frustration typically experienced, is the real
Design-Build
it takes to make a project successful:
• Low First Cost
• Presents Highest Risk • Stimulates Adversarial
& Contractor)
Relationships
• Best Understood
• Encourages Change Orders
• Linear Sequence of Work (Longest
• Contractor Has Minimal Input
Delivery)
in Design
• Single Contract / Responsibility
• Sole Source of Accountability
• Faster Delivery
• Increases Potential for Early
• Changes Traditional Roles and
Completion
Relationships Between Owner,
• Less Adversarial
Contractor and Designer
• Earlier Knowledge of Firm Price
• Minimum Innovative Design Potential • Owner Less Involved in Design Decisions • Owner Pushed for Earlier Decisions • Not “Open Book” on Pricing & Level of Quality
Construction Manager (CM At Risk)
time, we have learned exactly what
MARKET DEMANDS Improved Performance Reimbursement Changes Capital Constrains Continued Margin Compression
• Two Main Contracts (Design Team
• Two Main Contracts (Design Team and Contractor) • Linear Sequence of Work but Accommodates Fast Track Delivery • CM is Selected on Qualifications, Not Price • CM Selected Early in Delivery Process
• Fosters More Collaborative Environment • Allows for Tight Control of Pricing and Schedule • Allows for Phased Construction • Full Disclosure of Cost and Sched-
• Perception That Price Competition is Limited • Design Team May Not Take Input From CM During Design • Still Can Foster “Finger Pointing” Behavior
ule Throughout Delivery Process • Reduces Owner Risk
name of the game.
Our Integrated Project Delivery services include the following: IPD Fit Test
IPD Launch
• Review IPD Process and Standards
• Define Project Scope
• Assess Organizational Culture to Determine Fit
• Facilitate Interactive Team Selection • Lead Integrated Process Planning
IPD Maintenance
• Negotiate Integrated Form of Agreement (IFOA)
• Facilitate Pull Scheduling Sessions
• Develop Project Implementation Plan
• Assess Team Dynamic & Relationships
Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
• One Integrated Form of Agreement • Mutual Respect and Trust • Mutual Benefit and Reward • Early Involvement of All Key Delivery Team Members • Early Goal Definition
• Owner, Architect and Contractor Act As One • Owner Can Tailor the Best Aspects of Design-Build and CM-At-Risk
• Perception That Cost Competitiveness is Limited • Can Be Complex to Administer • Can Require Major Culture
• Shared Risk and Rewards
Change on Part of Owner,
• Allows for Reduction of Costs by
CM and Design Team
Eliminating Redundant Efforts • Delivery Relationships Changes From Adversarial to Collaborative • Increase Ability to Deliver Project Within Budget and Schedule • Increases Ability to Deliver a More Operationally Efficient Facility
COLLABORATION
To learn how KLMK Group can assist in making your capital project a success: 804-343-0161 or solutions@klmkgroup.com
Richmond, VA
•
Birmingham, AL
•
Atlanta, GA
www.klmkgroup.com
•
Houston, TX
•
Looking For A More Effective Way To Deliver Your Capital Facility Project?
Dallas, TX
INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY