+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
KALY MANSON 2015 PORTFOLIO
CONTENTS WHERE TO ROAM
1
ROOM TO ROAM
15
TRI - FORT YORK!
23
INTERACTIONS & INTERVENTIONS
31
DUFFERIN SMALL
33
LESLIE ST SPIT
39
MOTION
41
A SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR RAVINE PLANNING NATURALIZING THE LOWER DON RIVER BRINGING PEDESTRIANS INTO THE FOREFRONT EXPLORING TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION PERMEABILITY AND SMALL-SCALE DESIGN GRADING PLAN
GENERATING MOVEMENT, STRENGTH AND RANGE
KALY MANSON
100 Wellesley Street East, Toronto, ON, M4Y 1H5 T: (905) 726-5762 E: kalymanson@gmail.com Portfolio: http://issuu.com/kmanson/docs/2015_manson_kaly_portfolio
SKILLS SUMMARY • • • • • •
Creative, innovative and energetic individual with broad technical and design skills Solid working knowledge of software programs such as Microsoft Suite, Adobe Creative Suite, AutoCAD and ArcGIS Strong report writing, communication, research and analytical skills Ability to effectively work in a team environment with excellent interpersonal skills Ability to manage multiple priorities while meeting tight deadlines using effective management skills Proven aptitude to learn quickly, strong work ethic, attention to detail
EDUCATION University of Toronto Master of Landscape Architecture (MLA)
September/2012 - April/2015
University of Waterloo Bachelor of Environmental Studies (BES), Honours Planning, Co-op Program
September/2007 - April/2012
Oxford Brookes University School of the Built Environment
April - May/2011
WORK EXPERIENCE Parks, Forestry & Recreation, City of Toronto Summer Student, Policy & Systems Planning
May - August/2014 & 2015
The Regional Municipality of York Planning Assistant, Long Range & Strategic Planning
January/2010 - April/2012 *three 4-month terms
Town of East Gwillimbury Planning Assistant, Development Services
May - August/2011
City of St. Catharines Student Planner, Planning and Development Services
May - August/2009
ACADEMIC INVOLVEMENT Urban Design Guest Critic, University of Waterloo - School of Planning
December/2014
MLA1 Representative, Graduate Architecture Landscape Design Student Union (GALDSU)
September/2012 - August/2013
University of Toronto MLA1 Student Ambassador - CSLA
September/2012 - August/2013
Urban Design Chair, Waterloo Students Planning Advisory (WSPA) Urban Design Teaching Assistant, University of Waterloo
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Ontario Association of Landscape Architects - Student Member Ontario Professional Planners Institute - Former Student Member
September - December/2011 January - April/2011
April 2015
38 ACRES
WHERE TO ROAM
OF PARKING LOT AVERAGE LOT 3 ACRES (12,100 SQ.M)
A SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR RAVINE PLANNING Thesis Research and Design Toronto, ON
Toronto has a remarkable natural ravine system that was formed by the Ice Age over 12,000 years ago. This ravine system has the greatest terrestrial value within the city for a diverse range of species.
KILOMETReS
Over the past number of decades, the Black Creek Subwatershed has experienced massive pressure from urban development, which has led to a dramatic increase in non-permeable surfaces and a severely fragmented ravine network. These conditions, combined with the consequences of climate change and outdated urban infrastructure, have resulted in more frequent and severe flood events, and unhealthy urban ecologies and vegetative communities.
OF RESIDENTIAL STREETS
Where to Roam questions current practices used to keep Toronto’s ravine system healthy and resilient. In order to ensure there is a strong ravine network in Toronto, it is imperative that landscape architects develop multivalent strategies of reclamation, reuse and adaptation.
220 ACRES OF PARKLAND AVERAGE PARK 27 ACRES (109,000 SQ.M)
(right) Three open space typologies make up the majority of conditions within and adjacent to the Black Creek Ravine; parking lots, residential streets, and parkland. One possible design technique is explored for each typology. 1
PARKING LOT PHASE 1 Existing surface parking lot conditions greatly contribute to urban heat island effect and high salinity in Black Creek
INDICATOR SPECIES: BEFORE Eastern Chipmunk
PHASE 2 Excavate a series of trenches to convey and clean runoff before entering the creek channel; stores water during storm events and alleviates pressure on storm sewers
PHASE 3 Plant fast-growing, urban and salt tolerant species to increase natural cover and filter water runoff
PHASE 4 Plant urban and salt tolerant species including shrubs, grasses and groundcover
INDICATOR SPECIES: AFTER Eastern Chipmunk
American Toad
Green Frog
American Toad
Green Frog
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Savannah Sparrow
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Savannah Sparrow
American Woodcock
Eastern Meadowlark
American Woodcock
Eastern Meadowlark
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
Snow Clearing
S
O
N
D
Flood Season
Planting
Monitoring
Lawn Mowing
Natural Cover
0 YEARS
5 YEARS
10 YEARS
15 YEARS
Water Storage Water Quality Human Activity
RESIDENTIAL STREET PHASE 1 Excavate bioswale along residential boulevard to infiltrate water and alleviate storm sewer pressure
INDICATOR SPECIES: BEFORE Eastern Chipmunk
PHASE 2 Foster community stewardship; local residents to plant pioneer and successional species to increase natural cover along streets
PHASE 3 Foster community stewardship; local residents to plant and learn about low-maintenance grasses, shrubs and groundcover
PHASE 4 New wildscape system grows in neighbourhood, creating a new community vibrancy
INDICATOR SPECIES: AFTER Eastern Chipmunk
American Toad
Green Frog
American Toad
Green Frog
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Savannah Sparrow
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Savannah Sparrow
American Woodcock
Eastern Meadowlark
American Woodcock
Eastern Meadowlark
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
Snow Clearing
A
S
O
N
D
Flood Season
Planting
Monitoring
Lawn Mowing
Natural Cover
0 YEARS
5 YEARS
10 YEARS
15 YEARS
Water Storage Water Quality Human Activity
PARKLAND INDICATOR SPECIES: BEFORE
PHASE 1 Excavate periphery to create bowl-like edge condition for water storage during storm events, particularly flash flooding
Eastern Chipmunk
PHASE 2 Use fill to create refuge landforms for pedestrians during precipitation events, and also educate people about water levels during floods
PHASE 3 Foster community stewardship; local residents and volunteers to plant pioneer and successional species to increase natural cover where recreational programming does not take place
PHASE 4 Daily use of recreation and leisure continues in the park as usual
INDICATOR SPECIES: AFTER Eastern Chipmunk
American Toad
Green Frog
American Toad
Green Frog
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Savannah Sparrow
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Savannah Sparrow
American Woodcock
Eastern Meadowlark
American Woodcock
Eastern Meadowlark
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
Snow Clearing
A
S
O
N
D
Flood Season
Planting
Monitoring
Lawn Mowing
Natural Cover
0 YEARS
5 YEARS
10 YEARS
15 YEARS
Water Storage Water Quality Human Activity
WHERE TO ROAM: A Systems Approach for Ravine Planning
2
NATURAL COVER 2002 2012 12%
BLACK CREEK
8%
LOWER HUMBER
15%
13%
WEST HUMBER
17%
39%
EAST HUMBER
36%
47%
MAIN HUMBER
46%
3
56%
1953
DRAINAGE AREA:
2015
66 SQ. M. NATURAL COVER (2002-2012):
12% to 8%
(above) Humber Watershed, highlighting the Black Creek Subwatershed which has the lowest natural coverage when comparing all five subwatersheds. ArchGIS was used to collect and compile this data.
(left) After Hurricane Hazel hit in 1954, the TRCA was formed and within ten years approximately five kilometres of Black Creek was channelized. Tracing historic maps was the technique used to compile this data. WHERE TO ROAM: A Systems Approach for Ravine Planning
4
600 1895
1915
1935
1955
1975
1995
YEAR
TORONTO ANNUAL PRECIPITATION
EXTREME PRECIPITATION EVENTS (CANADA) EXTREME PRECIPITATION EVENTS (CANADA)
TORONTO ANNUAL SINGLE DAY RAINFALL EXTREMES TORONTO PRECIPITATION 1400
90
2090
85
2050
80
1985
75 70 65
PRECIPITATION (MM)
SIZE OF EVENT (MM)
95
1200
1000
800
60 55 50
600 10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1895
80
1915
1935
1955
1975
YEAR
EVENT RECURRENCE TIME (YEARS)
1995
Hurricane Hazel 1h
While annual precipitation in Toronto is occurring at similar rates over time, extreme precipitation events are on the rise and projected to increase drastically.
EXTREME PRECIPITATION EVENTS (CANADA)
95
PERMEABILITY SIZE OF EVENT (MM)
90
HABITAT
2090
85
2050
80
1985
75 70 65 60 55 50
10
20
30
40
50
60
EVENT RECURRENCE TIME (YEARS)
50m
5
50m
70
80
TORONTO STORM EVENTS 300
JULY 8, 2013
150 100
JULY 26, 2009
200
AUGUST 10, 2005
MAXIMUM RAINFALL IN A DAY
OCTOBER 15, 1954 HURRICANE HAZEL
TOTAL RAINFALL
250
PRECIPITATION (MM)
TORONTO AVERAGE MONTHLY PRECIPITATION
PRECIPITATION
50
EXTREME DAILY
0 JAN
REB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG
SEPT
OCT
NOV
DEC
MONTH
Based on the July 2013 flood, current practices are not enough. Black Creek is continually hit hard with flooding because the existing green system cannot absorb or store the water. 74 Avg Rainfall
EXTREMES
122 m August 19, 20
FLOWS
REGIONAL FLOOD
126 m July 8, 20
Hurricane Hazel 1h
50m
July 8/13 1h
285 m Hurricane Ha
July 8/13 Maximum recorded rise in water level (Black Creek)
50m
WHERE TO ROAM: A Systems Approach for Ravine Planning
6
BLACK CREEK RAVINE The site consists of approximately 12km of the Black Creek Ravine from Sheridan Mall located at Jane St and Wilson Ave (slightly north of Highway 401) to its confluence with Humber River.
N RD
WILSO
SHERIDAN MALL PARKING LOT 21 ACRES 1
AY 40 HIGHW
Three test sites demonstrate one possible intervention for three different open space typologies: Sheridan Mall (parking lot), Rustin Neighbourhood (residential streets), and Keelesdale Park South (parkland).
RUSTIN NEIGHBOURHOOD RESIDENTIAL STREET 2 ACRES
BL
AC K
ENCE
EE
KD
R
AVE W KEELE
LAWR
CR
These possible techniques for each typology can then be deployed in a similar manner throughout the entire 12km site to create a larger united system.
ST
JANE ST
TRETHEWEY DR
WE
STO N
RD
VE W TON A
EGLIN
KEELESDALE PARK PARKLAND 30 ACRES
SCA
EW
RLE
IR AV
TT R
ST CLA
D
WATER STORAGE & NATURAL COVER Existing PARKING LOT
EXISTING STORAGE
REQUIRED STORAGE
0 m3
1350 m3
7
EXISTING COVER
0%
RESIDENTIAL STREET
EXISTING STORAGE
REQUIRED STORAGE
0 m3
140 m3
EXISTING COVER
15%
PARKLAND
EXISTING STORAGE
REQUIRED STORAGE
200,000 m3
200,000 m3
EXISTING COVER
50%
MASTERPLAN The masterplan demonstrates what the possibilities are for the Black Creek Ravine system to expand the existing green network into the urban grid, connecting key parks and amplifying the tail end of the subwatershed.
N RD
WILSO
1
AY 40 HIGHW
These new connections would have a very significant influence on the overall ecological network for flora, fauna, and stormwater management. This proposal will provide important linkages for wildlife and create a new robust wildscape in space that are currently impervious and mundane.
BL
AC K
ENCE
EE
KD
R
AVE W KEELE
LAWR
CR
ST
JANE ST
TRETHEWEY DR
WE
STO N
RD
VE W TON A
EGLIN
SCA
EW
RLE
IR AV
TT R
ST CLA
D
WATER STORAGE & NATURAL COVER PROPOSED PARKING LOT
REQUIRED STORAGE
PROPOSED STORAGE
1350 m3
2020 m3
PROPOSED COVER
25%
RESIDENTIAL STREET
REQUIRED STORAGE
140 m3
PROPOSED STORAGE
1000 m3
PROPOSED COVER
40%
PARKLAND
REQUIRED STORAGE
PROPOSED STORAGE
200,000 m3
240,000 m3
WHERE TO ROAM: A Systems Approach for Ravine Planning
PROPOSED COVER
60%
8
PARKING LOT PHASING
Phase 0: Sheridan Mall; area chosen for intervention
Phase 1: Creation of a network of ecological trenches and perimeter vegetated patches to store, convey and clean runoff
Natural Cover
0 to 25% Phase 2: Ecological trenches planted with highly salt tolerant pioneer species such as birch, aspen and dogwood
Phase 3: Perimeter patches planted with moderately salt tolerant pioneer species for the second phase in cleaning process
TRENCH DIVERSITY ECO-CUT (1.0M)
ECO-TROUGH (1.5M)
ECO-TRENCH (2.5M)
SHADE TOLERANT
PART SUN TOLERANT
FULL SUN TOLERANT
BIG BLUESTEM
9
WILLOW, BIRCH, ASPEN
SMOOTH SERVICEBERRY
1.5 M
1.5 M
1M
CONNECTION UNDER ROADS
1.5 M
1.5 M
2.5 M
DRAINAGE TRENCH
HIGH SALT TOLERANCE
MODERATE SALT TOLERANCE
SERIES OF TRENCHES
HIGH SALT TOLERANCE
GRASSES Andropogon gerardii (Big Bluestem) Schizachyrium scoparium (Little Bluestem) Molinia caerulea ssp. ‘Karl Foerster’ (Purple Moor Grass)
SHRUBS Cornus sericea (Red Osier Dogwood) Symphoricarpus (Snowberry) Rhus typhina (Staghorn Sumac)
TREES Salix amygdaloides Anderson (Peachleaf Willow) Salix nigra (Black Willow) Populus balsamifera (Balsam Poplar) Populus deltoides (Eastern Cottonwood) Populus tremuloides (Largetooth Aspen) Betula alleghaniensis (Yellow Birch)
MODERATE SALT TOLERANCE
GRASS / SHRUBS Panicum virgatum (Switch Grass) Bouteloua gracilis (Blue Grama) Cornus racemosa (Gray Dogwood) Cornus alternifolia (Alternate-Leaf Dogwood)
TREES Amelanchier canadensis (Oblong Leaf Serviceberry) Amelanchier laevis (Smooth Serviceberry) Salix bebbiana Sarg (Bebb Willow) Populus tremuloides (Trembling Aspen) Betula papyrifera (Paper Birch)
(below) Example of parking lot with trenches implemented containing pioneer species that are highly salt tolerant.
WHERE TO ROAM: A Systems Approach for Ravine Planning
10
RESIDENTIAL STREET PHASING
IC RD
RUST
ST STELLA
VE OOK A SEABR
Phase 0: One possible area of intervention; Rustin Neighbourhood
Phase 1: Right-of-way and boulevard conditions that allow for intervention of new streetscape typology
Natural Cover
15 to 40% Phase 2:
Creation of a network of bioswales planted with a variety of , salt tolerant, and low-maintenance species
Phase 3: Distribution of urban champion tree species
This new system of grasses and trees will strengthen linkages between the urban grid and ravine system, while treating and storing storm water runoff from residential streets.
11
RUSTIC RD
STELLA ST
GRASSES Panicum virgatum (Switch Grass) Andropogon gerardii (Big Bluestem) Schizachyrium scoparium (Little Bluestem) Bouteloua gracilis (Blue Grama) Molinia caerulea ssp. ‘Karl Foerster’ (Purple Moor Grass)
SHRUBS Cornus sericea (Red Osier Dogwood) Symphoricarpus (Snowberry) Cornus racemosa (Gray Dogwood) Cornus alternifolia (Alternate-Leaf Dogwood)
TREES Populus grandidentala (Largetooth Aspen) Betula alleghaniensis (Yellow Birch) Populus Deltoides (Eastern Cottonwood) Celtis occidentalis (Hackberry) Acer saccharinum (Silver Maple) Picea glauca (White Spruce) Thuja occidentalis (Eastern White Cedar)
(below) Example of bioswale network along suburban residential street.
WHERE TO ROAM: A Systems Approach for Ravine Planning
12
PARKLAND PHASING This new system allows the park to function as it currently does day-to-day, while increasing natural cover, and slowing and treating runoff before entering Black Creek. It will also store excess water during storm events. Phase 0: Keelesdale Park South, one possible area of intervention Phase 1: The park perimeter is graded to intensify the bowllike physical form in order to store water during flood events; particularly flash storm events
Phase 2: Excess fill is used to form a refuge mound creating a didactic landscape that will communicate water levels and facilitate some public access during storm events Phase 3: Distribution of a diverse range of fast- and slowgrowing tree species, tolerant of wet-dry conditions are planted in areas not used for recreation
Natural Cover
50 to 60%
13
EAST-WEST
NORTH-SOUTH
TREES Prunus pensylvanica (Pin Cherry) - uncommon Prunus virginiana (Choke Cherry) - uncommon Liriodendron tulipifera (Tulip Tree) - uncommon Morus rubra (Red Mulberry) - endangered Ostrya virginiana (Ironwood) - introduce
Salix bebbiana Sarg (Bebb Willow) - introduce Populus deltoides (Eastern Cottonwood) Juglans cinerea (Butternut) - endangered Carya ovata (Shagbark Hickory) - uncommon Quercus rubra (Red Oak)
Quercus macrocarpa (Bur Oak) Acer nigrum (Black Maple) Tsuga canadensis (Eastern Hemlock) - introduce Picea glauca (White Spruce) Thuja occidentalis (Eastern White Cedar)
(below) Refuge Landform The park periphery is graded to embrace and store water during flash flood events. The fill from that process is then used to create mounds that communicate water levels and permit some public access during these events.
WHERE TO ROAM: A Systems Approach for Ravine Planning
14
April 2014
ROOM TO ROAM NATURALIZING THE LOWER DON RIVER with Rob McIntosh Toronto, ON Room to Roam forms the missing link in the natural heritage system of the Lower Don, while creating space for the river to move naturally and creating new places for people along Toronto’s most iconic valley. The Lower Don River has experienced significant urban development encroachment which has severely degraded riparian habitat. Through rigorous site analysis and research about the natural evolution and habitat of rivers, a sound design solution is proposed that provides the necessary space to allow the Don River to naturally evolve in a selfdetermined path and alleviate flooding both on-site and downstream.
MEANDERING A RIVER PLACES FOR PEOPLE
STAGE 1: ALTERNATING BARS
STAGE 2: INCIPENT POOLS AND RIFFLES
ROOM FOR THE RIVER
STAGE 3: DEVELOPED POOLS AND RIFFLES
STAGE 4: MEANDERING BEGINS
NATURAL HERITAGE CONNECTION STAGE 5: BRAIDED (ANASTOMOSING) RIVER
ROOM TO ROAM
15
MOVE FROM THIS...
TO THIS...
PROJECTED RIVER MORPHOLOGY
NT
SE
E PR
R1
A YE
5
R2
A YE
0+
R5
A YE
ROAM TO ROAM: Naturalizing the Lower Don River
16
TECHNICAL SECTION CONDITIONS THAT ALLOW A SELF-DETERMINED PATH
Landscape Strategy existing CONDITIONS Urban development
Road (8 m)
Row (8
PROPOSED CONDITIONS Urban development
17
Urban park (approx. 40 m)
Woodlot (approx. 40 m)
Ri
8 m)
Constructed river materials palette TOP SOIL
GLACIAL TILL
STRUCTURAL ROCK BASE
GEOTEXTILE EROSION MAT
(above) Technical section of the intended erosion area where the river will meander and change course over time in a self-determined path. (below) Landscape strategy comparing the existing conditions to the proposed ecozones.
Rail (15 m)
iparian zone (15 m)
Trail (12 m)
River channel (14 m)
River channel (35 m)
Riparian zone (15 m)
Buffer (1 m)
Buffer (10 m)
Rail (15 m)
dvp (30 m)
dvp (30 m)
ROAM TO ROAM: Naturalizing the Lower Don River
18
PROPOSED FLOOD CONDITIONS
NO FLOOD
NO FLOOD
100-YEAR STORM
REGIONAL STORM
19
100-YEAR STORM
REGIONAL STORM
LOWER DON RIVER TRAIL
BOARDWALK TRAIL EXTENSION
ROAM TO ROAM: Naturalizing the Lower Don River
20
Species & planting matrix Tree species
Growing conditions
growth rate
steep
Eastern White Pine Pinus strobus
Eastern Hemlock Tsuga canadensis
Balsam Fir
Abies balsamea
Tamarack
Larix laricina
Eastern White Cedar Thuja occidentalis
White Spruce Picea glauca
Sugar Maple
Acer saccharum
White Birch
Betula papyrifera
American Beech Fagus grandifolia
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
White Oak
Quercus alba
White Elm
Ulmus americana
21
moderate
dry
shallow
wet
fast
medium
slow
Woodlot implementation
Stabilize with Geotextile Fabric
50 YEARS
Grade Slope
Community Tree Planting Coniferous Deciduous
RESILIENCY OVER TIME System Resiliency
Human Activity / Engagement
40
50 YEARS
Urban Parks - Active / passive Use
Woodlot - Plantings / Recreation
Wetland views / paths
Water Storage
Water Quality
10
20
Natural Heritage
20
30
Overall Human Activity
30
40
10
0
0
ROAM TO ROAM: Naturalizing the Lower Don River
22
December 2014
TRI - FORT YORK! BRINGING PEDESTRIANS INTO THE FOREFRONT Individual Studio Project Toronto, ON Upon visiting the site for the first time, it was intriguing to see the abundance of people moving in and around the site, while also alarming that the majority of these people were not spending time in the public spaces. As the area around Fort York has developed, infrastructure for rail and automobile have taken priority, leaving pedestrians in the shadows. It is time to bring pedestrians back into the forefront of the designed landscape, while respecting the historic significance and ecological processes that exist today.
ENUE
23
1. The health activity track 2. The everyday loop; and 3. The ecological perimeter trail
V HAN A STRAC
(left) Site plan for Fort York and Garrison Common. Data was brought into AutoCAD with basic rendering completed in Illustrator and final rendering in Photoshop.
To improve access, provide alternative routes, and maximize the use of the site for pedestrians, the design strategy involves the creation of three pedestrian circuits:
FLEET STREET
STANLEY PARK CAROLINIAN ECOZONE
STANLEY PARK EXTENSION
MIXED MEADOW
ROCKY CREEK
NEW GATEWAY
FORT YORK AMPHITHEATER
MAPLE MARSH PLAZA
EVENT SPACE BIRCH GROVE
GARRISON COMMON
JUNE CALLWOOD THE GORE
D CANA
C ACIFI IAN P
AY RAILW
URST BATH T STREE
GARDINER EXPRESSWAY
FORT YORK BOULEVARD
TRI - FORT YORK: Bringing Pedestrians into the Forefront
24
ANALYSIS: SITE USERS On-site data collection method involved recording people participating in stationary activity, and also following over 80 people around the Fort York area. For each person or group of people followed, their chosen route, age, gender, duration of walk, and any unique moments that occurred were recorded. These walks were documented spatially and visually through mapping and photograph. Routes most travelled, points of entry and exit into the site, and spaces that were being used or not used for pedestrian activity were analyzed.
ALL USERS
CLASSIFYING USERS LEISURE WALKS
Wednesday 11:30AM to 1:30PM 1. Guy with morning coffee 2. Young girl reading 3. Midday walk to the waterfront 4. Physically disabled (electric wheelchair)
2 1
Sunday 3:30PM to 5:30PM
6
5. Stroll through Garrison Common 6. Wandering man 7. Couple walking to Front Street Monday 5:30PM to 7:30PM
3 7
4
8. Couple new to the area 9. Two friends walking through park 10. Family playing with street art
9
5 10
8
VISITORS + EVENTS
Wednesday 11:30AM to 1:30PM 1. Tour group of six 2. Man reading information boards 3. School girl with purple backpack Sunday 3:30PM to 5:30PM “GET FORTIFIED� EVENT
1
4. Family from parking lot to event 5. Indecisive woman 6. Men leaving event 7. Large family tour 8. Three boys at canons 9. Interesting characters with butterfly sign 10. Young male arriving to event
9
8 2 10
3 6
7
5
Monday 5:30PM to 7:30PM The Fort York site was closed
4
DOG WALKERS
Wednesday 11:30AM to 1:30PM
4
1. Girl with dog heading to CityPlace 2. Walking Border Collie back to condo 3. Fetching stick in Garrison Common
6 5
Sunday 3:30PM to 5:30PM 4. Couple walking dog with Home Sense bags Monday 5:30PM to 7:30PM 5. Girl walking pug slowly 6. Stanley Park dog off-leash area 7. Family walking dog 8. Girl walking Chihuahua 9. Dog fetching ball in Garrison Common 10. Victoria Park with dog & stroller
10
3 1 2
9
8
7
2
PURPOSE WALKS
Wednesday 11:30AM to 1:30PM
14
7
15
1. Girl with red bag 2. Guy walking to police station 3. Man walking to Liberty Village 4. Woman leaving Liberty Village
2
6
10
Sunday 3:30PM to 5:30PM 5. Girls after yoga class 6. Man with stroller going to TFC game
3
1
4
11
9
12
13 8 5
25
Monday 5:30PM to 7:30PM 7. Two private school girls walking home 8. Brisk walker 9. Businessman walking home 10. Older woman with groceries 11. Stratchan Street couple shopping 12. Grocery route through Garrison Common 13. Parents with stroller and Lamborghini box 14. Couple heading home to CityPlace 15. Couple out for dinner
EXPERIENTIAL SEQUENCE
DATA COLLECTION METHOD 1 2 3 4
Find a pedestrian(s) to follow Estimate and record the pedestrian(s) gender and age Record the time you began to stalk Take photographs every 60 to 75 meters off-site; and every 15 to 20 meters on-site
5 6
7
Record the pedestrian(s) chosen route on a map Stop following when the pedestrian(s) stops walking, arrives at destination or has gone too far out of geographic location Record any unique moments of pause Age 0-5
FINDINGS Age 60+
84
53%
total
male
17%
6%
10% 11%
47%
female
Age 6-14 Age 15-24
57% Age 25-59
MOMENTS OF PAUSE ECOLOGICAL
CULTURAL
PEDESTRIAN USE HISTORICAL
ACTIVITY
DESIRE
UNDERUTILIZED AREAS
HIERARCHY OF ROUTES underutilized
future mouth of the creek park
underutilized
ACCESSIBILITY
fort york boulevard maple grove
underutilized
ZONES OF USE fort york boulevard
fort york berm
underutilized
fort york parking
COMPOSITE
garrison common
underutilized
garrison road
garrison common
underutilized
stairs to stratchan ave
TRI - FORT YORK: Bringing Pedestrians into the Forefront
26
HEALTH ACTIVITY TRACK CONCEPT: UNIFY PARK NETWORK WITH HEALTH IN MIND
STANLEY PARK STANLEY PARK EXTENSION
GARRISON COMMON FORT YORK
JUNE CALLWOOD THE GORE
SLOPED TERRAIN
The sloped lawn provides a new entrance into the site and maximizes sun exposure for activities such as sunbathing
EXTRA TRACK LOOP
The series of small track loops off the main circuit add another layer of intensity for runners by lengthening the distance and increasing elevation
ADULT EQUIPMENT
A series of different exercise equipment is located along the track to encourage strength training along with cardio
HEALTH ACTIVITY TRACK
The circuit has separated lanes for multiple speeds of activity including cyclists, runners and walkers
KIDS OBSTACLE COURSE
Inspired by the armoury, a obstacle course will provide an fun and active opportunity for children
POTENTIAL NEW USE
The existing armoury has potential to be converted into a school or community centre which could use the roof for additional fitness opportunities
(above) Section cut came from Rhinoceros and then rendered in Photoshop
GARRISON COMMONS LARGE LOOP 27
EVERYDAY LOOP CONCEPT: UNIFY HEALTH & ECOLOGICAL CIRCUITS
AMPHITHEATER
PLAZA
MIXED MEADOW
This open lawn within the health activity track allows for spontaneous and flexible activity
HEALTH ACTIVITY TRACK
The circuit has separated lanes for multiple speeds of activity including cyclists, runners and walkers
NEW GATEWAY
EVENT SPACE
PLAZA
The plaza located next to the Visitors Centre provides resting places for users and an area for smaller events
VEGETATED SLOPE
The tall grasses infiltrate water and reduce runoff from high ground while providing visual interest
PARKING LOTS
Parking lots are located in strategic areas throughout the site to provide easy access to the site They also double as space for event overspill
(above) Section cut came from Rhinoceros and then rendered in Photoshop
VISITOR CENTRE EVENT SPACE TRI - FORT YORK: Bringing Pedestrians into the Forefront
28
ECOLOGICAL PERIMETER TRAIL CONCEPT: ALTERNATIVE CIRCUIT WITH VEGETATIVE ZONES CAROLINIAN ECOZONE
ROCKY CREEK
MIXED MEADOW
MAPLE MARSH
BIRCH GROVE
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY
Dense vegetation along the north perimeter of the site acts as a noise buffer from the CNR
BOARDWALK
An boardwalk varying in elevation runs along the north edge of the site
CAROLINIAN ECOZONE
Dense vegetation of native Carolinian species provide a unique experience for pedestrians, provides new views of Fort York
FORT BERM
The large berm around Fort York has historical reference and also provides shelter from wind for people and community gardens along the north edge
WILLOW TREE
The large existing willow is an important beacon for visitors
(above) Section cut created in Rhinoceros and then rendered in Photoshop
BIRCH GROVE TEMPORAL WET ZONE 29
PLANTING STRATEGY
PATH NETWORK
HARDSCAPE
VEGETATIVE ZONES
OPEN SPACE NETWORK
TRI - FORT YORK: Bringing Pedestrians into the Forefront
30
April 2013
INTERACTIONS & INTERVENTIONS EXPLORING TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION with Rob McIntosh and Matt Perotto Published in Representing Landscapes: Digital, edited by Nadia Amoroso This physical model explores the topography and vegetation in the Don Valley. A black and white aerial image with a green filter was used to emphasize the tree canopy and hatching was used to etch all manmade characteristics such as roads, railways, trails and buildings. A light table beneath the model was used to emphasize the contrasting relationship between the natural and built properties of the site, When the light is on, the natural features come alive and when the light is off, the etched build forms become the emphasis.
31
Technique: Fabrication of a physical model using a numerically controlled process of laser beam cutting and assembly. Materials: Plexi glass and mylar aerial GoogleEarth image.
INTERACTIONS & INTERVENTIONS: Exploring Topography and Vegetation
32
December 2013
DUFFERIN SMALL PERMEABILITY AND SMALL-SCALE DESIGN Individual Studio Project Toronto, ON The existing site is the heart of the Dufferin Grove Neighbourhood that is home to two key community amenities; Dufferin Grove Park and Dufferin Mall. The intent is to preserve or enhance these amenities while creating a more pedestrian-oriented neighbourhood that ties into the surrounding urban fabric. Permeability and small-scale design are at the forefront of this strategy. VISION: To unite Dufferin Grove Park with its surrounding neighbourhoods by creating a permeable urban fabric and integrated open space network. The general strategy for this project was to begin by overlaying a typical Toronto street grid on the site. After identifying areas of preservation, a block structure was formed within the new grid. Next, an open space strategy was overlayed and the block structure was altered to accommodate this.
GENERAL STRATEGY
Dufferin Grove Park
EXISTING CONDITIONS 33
NEW STREET GRID
PRESERVATION
AXIOMS
OPEN SPACE TYPOLOGIES UNITING TWO SPACES SURROUNDED BY STREETS
STREET PERMEABILITY
ADJACENT BUILDING
BUILDING PERMEABILITY
DOUBLE ENCLOSURE OPEN SPACE CONNECTIVITY
MODIFIED COURTYARD
BLOCK STRUCTURE
INSERT OPEN SPACE NETWORK
BLOCK PERMEABILITY DUFFERIN SMALL: Permeability and Small-Scale Design
34
STREET TYPOLOGIES
DUFFERIN STREET EXISTING (NORTH OF PARK)
SERVICE / LANEWAY
DUFFERIN STREET PROPOSED (ADJACENT TO PARK)
MARKET STREET “TYPICAL STREET”
PEDESTRIAN CENTRAL PROMENADE EAST-WEST STREET
(above) Cross sections describing the different street types and their specifications.
MAIN RETAIL NORTH-SOUTH STREET 35
(right) Perspective rendered to show the pedestrian central promenade east-west street.
KEY MAP: STREET TYPE LOCATIONS EET W
R STR
BLOO
MAIN
ISTING RIN EX DUFFE
BLOOR STREET EXISTING
RETAIL
OSED
WOONERF “LIVING STREET”
PROP
ERF
WOON
ERF
WOON
ERF
WOON
ERIN
CEN
DUFF
E
ENAD
ROM TRAL P
DUFFERIN SMALL: Permeability and Small-Scale Design
36
LAND USE PROGRAM
metrics LAND USE TYPES
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL [1%] industrial commercial office industrial industrial parking commercial commercial residential
COMMERCIAL [15%] OFFICE [8%] LIGHT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL [1%][1%]
PARKING [19%] COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL [15%] [15%] OFFICE OFFICE [8%][8%]
office office civic parking parking recreation residential residential
open space civiccivic recreation recreation open open space space
COMMERCIAL [17%]
PARKING [15%] COMMERCIAL [25%] COMMERCIAL [25%]
PARKING PARKING [19%] [19%]
COMMUNITY [8%] RECREATIONAL [8%] RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL [41%] [41%] COMMUNITY COMMUNITY [8%][8%]
PRIVATE VS RECREATIONAL PUBLIC RECREATIONAL [8%][8%]
PARKING [11%]
OFFICE [11%]
OFFICE [11%] OFFICE [11%]
RESIDENTIAL [41%]
OFFICE [7%]
COMMERCIAL [25%]
PARKING PARKING [15%] [15%] RESIDENTIAL [35%]
COMMUNITY [7%]
RECREATIONAL [7%]
COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL [17%] [17%] OFFICE OFFICE [7%][7%] PARKING PARKING [11%] [11%] RESIDENTIAL [36%]
COMMUNITY [19%] RECREATIONAL [10%] RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL [36%] [36%]
Project Site Area
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL [35%] [35%] COMMUNITY COMMUNITY [7%][7%]
TYPES OF PUBLIC SPACE
PARK [25%] [7%][7%] RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL PUBLIC [7%]
276,200m2
Total Site Gross Floor Area 242,900m2
COMMUNITY COMMUNITY [19%] [19%]
CALCULATIONS FAR
0.88m2
RECREATIONAL RECREATIONAL [10%] [10%]
Total 134600m2 Project Project SiteResidential Site AreaArea GFA 276,200m2 276,200m2 Assume Average Unit Size242,900m2 75m2 Gross Floor Area TotalTotal Site Site Gross Floor Area 242,900m2
park
PARK [25%] PARK [25%] PUBLIC PUBLIC [7%][7%]
public street parkpark
PUBLIC, OPEN [74%]
STREET [40%] SEMI-PUBLIC [7%]
semi-publ public public private street street
PUBLIC, OPEN [74%] PUBLIC, OPEN [74%] PRIVATE [26%]
STREET [40%] STREET [40%] PRIVATE [26%] SEMI-PUBLIC [7%][7%] SEMI-PUBLIC
semi-publ semi-publ private private
37
0.88m2 FARFAR 0.88m2 Assume 60% One-Bedroom and 40% Two-Bedroom Residential 134600m2 TotalTotal Residential GFAGFA 134600m2 Assume One Person per Bedroom Assume Average 75m2 Assume Average UnitUnit SizeSize 75m2 1795 Units Assume One-Bedroom Assume 60%60% One-Bedroom Where 1077 One-Bedroom; Two-Bedroom and and 40% Two-Bedroom 71840% Two-Bedroom Assume Person Bedroom Assume OneOne Person per per Bedroom Total Population 2513 Units 17951795 Units Where One-Bedroom; Where 10771077 One-Bedroom; Two-Bedroom 718 718 Two-Bedroom Population TotalTotal Population 25132513
PRIVATE PRIVATE [26%] [26%]
PRIVATE [26%] PRIVATE [26%]
(right) Rendered site plan showing the final proposal for Dufferin Mall and Dufferin Grove Park. (left) Axonometric plan of the proposed land use with supporting graphs describing the specifications for land use as well as private and public space. Comparisons are provided for minimum and maximum requirements and where the project proposal falls within these requirements. The 3D model was created in Rhinoceros.
SITE PLAN
DUFFERIN SMALL: Permeability and Small-Scale Design
38
April 2013
LESLIE ST SPIT GRADING PLAN Individual Studio Project Toronto, ON This project called for the design of a gateway to the Leslie Street Spit. In addition to meeting program requirements, topographic form and composition is explored as a sequence of experiences. The grading plan shows the proposed topographical changes and respective elevations. Shifts in topography is the fundamental change to create three distinct transects and support a wide variety of diverse ecological communities. This grading plan was produced in AutoCAD.
39
(below) Perspective render depicting the forested area located on the highest elevations of the site, east of the discovery centre. The base is from Rhinoceros and then rendered in Photoshop.
77.50
78.25
78.50
78.75
.00
78.10
+
+
5
77.25
78
77.2
0
77.75
78.50
79.35
77.5
+
78.25
79.20
78.00
79.25
5
78.2
+
78.50
+
78.75
78.35 78.25
+
5
79.30
78.7
+ +
78.50
+ 78.20
5 .2 00 . 5 80 9.7.50 5 7 79 .2 00 7979. .75 78
79.00
+ 79.00
+ 78.75
5
78.2
+
78.75
0
78.0
+
78.50
78.25
78.00
77.75
77.50
77 .50
77 .75
+
78.80
+
79.10
78.35
+
+
+
78.15
79.80
+
75
0 1
2.5
78.40
77.15
78.85
+
+
+
77.55
+ +
78.10
10
76.80
+
+
North
25
77.55
76.15
77.20
77.55
+ 77.80
76.35
75.60
76.30
78.30
80.05
.0
0
LESLIE ST SPIT: Grading Plan
40
77.0
76.75 76.50 76.25 76.00 75.7 5 75.5 0 75.2 5 75.00
77 .25
78.2 78.0 77.7 77.5
April 2013
MOTION GENERATING MOVEMENT, STRENGTH AND RANGE Individual Studio Project Toronto, ON VISION: To transform Riverdale Park into a destination that encourages healthy lifestyles while supporting ecological healthy by focusing on enhancing movement, strength and range.
STRATEGY: The conceptual framework for increasing human and ecological health focuses on three key components:
ECOLOGICAL HEALTH NETWORK
HUMAN HEALTH NETWORK
41
1. Movement (aerobic activity and water management) 2. Strength (anaerobic activity and biomass); and 3. Range (flexibility and biodiversity)
Key Health Drivers
HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS
strategy diagrams aerobic existing
aerobic proposed
water management existing
water management proposed
biomass existing
biomass proposed
biodiversity existing
biodiversity proposed
MOVEMENT
anaerobic existing
anaerobic proposed
STRENGTH
flexibility existing
flexibility proposed
RANGE
human
+
ecology MOTION: Generating Movement, Strength and Range
42
CONCEPT PLAN
43
PLANTING PLAN FORM
PLANTING SCHEDULE
MOTION: Generating Movement, Strength and Range
44
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +