2015년 국제개발협력 주요문서 강독 자료집(20151022)수정 by KoFID

2015년 국제개발협력 주요문서 강독세미나 & UN총회 아웃리치 결과보고

｜주최｜｜주관｜｜협력｜｜일시｜ 2015년 10월 22일(목) 16:00~18:00 ｜장소｜ KCOC교육센터

2015 국제개발협력 주요문서 강독세미나 & UN총회 아웃리치 결과보고

목차 UN 문서----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 1.

UN 총회 의장 기조연설

UN 총회 사무총장 연설문

UN 총회 박근혜 대통령 연설문

UN 총회 프란치스코 교황 연설문

UN 총회 한국정부 의견서

시민사회 관련문서------------------------------------------------------------------ 27 6. ‘NO SDGs without LDCs’ 7. THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT & THE CPDE’s RECOMMENDATIONS (1) 8.

THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT & THE CPDE’s RECOMMENDATIONS (2)

9. Is the UN fit for the ambitious new Sustainable Development agenda? 10. Public SDGs or Private GGs? 11. Women's major group-Concern regarding images to present 2030 Agenda and SDGs to the world 12. NEW YORK DECLARATION: Mobilising Against Inequalities Making "Leave No One Behind" A Reality 13. SDGs Images(UN) and SDGs Images(CSO)

UN총회 아웃리치 결과보고-------------------------------------------------------- 51 1. 각 국가별 차원의 SDGs 이행 전략 2. 글로벌 차원의 시민사회 SDGs 이행 전략 3. 새마을운동 고위급 회담

UN 관련문서

Opening speech of President of the 70th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, Mogens Lykketoft 15 September 2015, 15:00 Excellencies, distinguished delegates, Mr Secretary General, Ladies and Gentlemen, it is my great honour to open this, the 70th session of the General Assembly of the United Nations. A session which I hope will be truly historic. A session, not just of ground-breaking decisions, but one of much needed concerted action for people and planet. Let me begin by once again thanking you, the member states, for entrusting me to lead the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s most representative multilateral body. Your endorsement of me is also an endorsement of the role which Denmark has played at the UN over the past 70 years. I will do my utmost to represent each of your countries in a fair and open manner. As I do so, I will build on the solid foundations laid by my predecessor, H.E. Sam Kutesa. I congratulate him, in particular, on shepherding the Post-2015 negotiations to a successful conclusion, well in advance of the Summit. And I thank him and his Office for their close cooperation and support in recent months. Let me also take this opportunity to recognise the crucial role played by you, Mr Secretary General, in your tenure thus far, not least in supporting the emergence of a truly ambitious 2030 Agenda. Over the coming year, I very much look forward to working closely and collaboratively with you. [] Excellencies, in less than 10 days time, our leaders will gather in this hall to adopt the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A seminal, in fact, revolutionary universal agreement befitting this anniversary year. And a welcome gift to a world beset by war and humanitarian crises, sectarianism and violent extremism, by poverty and inequalities, by climate change and environmental degradation. In signing up to the 2030 Agenda, governments will voluntarily commit to take action for the dignity, security, prosperity and human rights of our shared humanity, for gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls for the sound management and fair distribution of the earthâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s finite resources, and for the health and vitality of our planet. It raises high hopes of the United Nations being fit for purpose and committed to action. The challenge now, and a major priority for my Presidency, is to ensure that all actors move swiftly to deliver on the promises being made.

-3-

[] The Summit, of course, marks only the beginning. There is an urgent need for action right across the three pillars of the UN and ample opportunities to do so during this session. Not long after the Summit and General Debate, our leaders will come together in Paris for the COP 21. An ambitious and universal climate agreement is an absolute must and the first real test of the world community’s ability to deliver the necessary policy tools for Sustainable Development. But there will be no sustainable development without peace and security and respect for human rights. The UN and its member states have a strong obligation to work together to end the catastrophic wars and conflicts – in and around Syria, the broader Middle East, Africa and even Europe. And we will have to act here and now to address the huge and explosive refugee crises resulting from ongoing conflicts – and to protect the human rights of all refugees. With the conclusion of the Review of the UN Peace-building Architecture, the release of the Global Study on Women, Peace and Security, the forthcoming Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism, the review of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism strategy, and the recently published Report from the Secretary General on Peace Operations, there is significant scope to demonstrate our commitment to action across the broad area of Peace and Security during this session. Among other important issues, I will also preside over the high level meeting in December on the World Summit on the Information Society. I will hold a special session of the General Assembly in the spring of 2016 on the World Drug Problem as well as a High Level Meeting on HIV&ampampAIDS. And, in May, the Secretary General will convene a World Humanitarian Summit – an incredibly timely and crucial initiative. In addition, ladies and gentlemen, we must continue our efforts to revitalise the work of this Assembly. Responding to the continued interest among many member states in both the reform of the Security Council and in creating more transparency and openness when selecting the next Secretary-General, I will continue the work mandated by you on both of these issues. We must also ensure constructive negotiations relating to the UN budget and I will consult widely in the coming months to ensure their timely conclusion. Finally, during this session, there will be events to commemorate the 70th anniversary including, on October 1st and 2nd, a High Level event on Peace and Security on October 23rd, an event on the entry into force of the Charter and on January 11th 2016, an event to mark the 70th anniversary of the first session of the General Assembly. [] Excellencies, with such a busy schedule ahead of us, I am keenly aware of the pressures which all missions to the United Nations will face. The three high-level thematic debates which I will

-4-

hold in my capacity as President, therefore, will aim to complement on-going activities, and to take stock of each of the three pillars of the UN. The Summit and the General Debate will be the starting points for these discussions, with their focus respectively on sustainable development and the road ahead for peace and security, and for human rights. The first high-level thematic debate will be dedicated to the implementation of commitments relating to sustainable development, climate change, and financing. This will take place in April. In this way I will endeavor to mobilize and catalyze individual, collective, multilateral and multistakeholder action to support early progress on realizing our global goals. The second high-level thematic debate will take place in May. It will focus on strengthening the UNâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s role and performance in the area of peace and security. It will serve as a platform for an open and frank exchange of views and could span the full spectrum of threats to global security. One of the key deliverables from this debate will be to draw out synergies from the three major peace and security related reviews now at various stages of advancement â&#x20AC;&#x201C; the peace operations review, the review of peace-building, and the global study on women, peace and security. The third high-level thematic debate will be organized next July and will revolve around human rights. Here, the focus will be on the UNâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s role in the field of human rights including in relation to governance, the rule of law, gender equality and institution building. Taking into account the unprecedented scale of global humanitarian challenges, particular focus will be placed on addressing the needs of the hundreds of millions of men, women and children affected by conflicts and disasters. It is my hope that these events can help us to identify pragmatic and action-oriented outcomes in each area. To that end, I will consider holding support meetings to explore particular issues or elements that warrant additional focus or preparation. I will conduct all activities in as transparent, inclusive and open a manner as possible. Where it is relevant I will also engage with and involve civil society representatives and others, such that a multi-stakeholder approach becomes a hallmark of my presidency. I will also work closely with committee chairs and continue the tradition of coordinating with the Secretary General, as well as the Presidents of ECOSOC and the Security Council to ensure smooth and timely conduct of business. With your cooperation, I am confident that we can make substantial and meaningful progress across this broad agenda. []

-5-

Excellencies, it is, in some respects, hard to believe that this great organisation has already been in existence for seventy years. For, despite its significant evolution and achievements since 1945, the UN has more to learn, much more to give and much much more to do to fulfill its mandate under the Charter and to bring about the world envisaged by the 2030 Agenda. Let this be a year, where we, the Assembly of the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s nations help each other and this Organisation to move towards that vision, through a spirit of global solidarity and with a renewed Commitment to Action. I thank you for your attention.

-6-

Opening remarks at press conference Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, UN Headquarters, 16 September 2015 Good afternoon, Ladies and Gentlemen. It is a great pleasure to see you. This yearâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s session of the General Assembly opens at a time of turmoil and hope. Turmoil -- because conflicts have deepened in so many places, and civilians are paying the price. Hope -- because a historic number of world leaders will gather here at the United Nations to forge solutions and adopt an inspiring new development agenda. It will start with His Holiness Pope Francis, who I look forward to welcoming here on September 25th. His call for climate action and a global ethical mobilization has resounded across the world, among people of all faiths. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development embodies the yearnings of people everywhere for lives of dignity on a healthy planet. It shows what Member States can achieve when they work together in solidarity. The Addis Ababa Action Agenda adopted in July of this year provides a financing framework to implement the new agenda. Now we look to Paris in December for a universal agreement on climate change. I am encouraged by the phenomenal changes that are under way. New investments in renewable energy, and major commitments to reduce harmful greenhouse emissions, are putting wind in the sails of climate action. I am concerned, however, that not enough is being done to keep temperature rise under the 2degree Celsius threshold. I urge world leaders to raise ambition â&#x20AC;&#x201C; and then match ambition with action With political will and resources, we can transform our future and do more to prevent the kinds of crises we see in far too many places. In Syria, the combatants are defying all norms of humanity. My Special Envoy continues his efforts. But responsibility for ending this horror rests on the parties, and on the neighbours and external forces that are fuelling the fighting.

-7-

In Yemen, the escalating conflict and especially the aerial attacks are devastating the civilian population. I urge the Yemeni parties to immediately rejoin the political process under the facilitation of my Special Envoy, and in accordance with relevant Security Council resolutions, including Resolution 2216. There is no military solution to this conflict. In Libya, recent weeks have seen progress, and my Special Representative continues to press the parties to form a Government of National Accord. A political framework is also critical for urgently putting in place sustainable security arrangements. In South Sudan, more than 200,000 displaced people are now sheltering at UN peacekeeping bases. Thousands more are in need of urgent humanitarian assistance. All efforts must now focus on implementing the new peace agreement. I urge the two leaders to uphold the recent commitments they made to end this brutal conflict. Around the world, 100 million people â&#x20AC;&#x201C; about one of every seventy people on earth -- need lifesaving support. Yet all our humanitarian appeals are chronically under-funded. Brutal conflicts, breakdowns in basic governance, economic despair and other factors have generated displacements of people not seen since the Second World War. Sixty million people have fled their homes. Men, women and children fleeing war and persecution deserve real support, including asylum. I ask those standing in the way of the rights of refugees to stand in their shoes. People facing barrel bombs and brutality in their country will continue to seek life in another. People with few prospects at home will continue to seek opportunity elsewhere. This is natural. It is what any of us would do for ourselves and for our children. I commend those countries that are admirably doing all they can for people in need. Lebanon is hosting Syrian refugees equal in number to 25 per cent of its population. Jordan is also a major per capita host, providing shelter to Syrians equal to almost 10 per cent of its population. And nearly 10 per cent of Syriaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s pre-war population -- some 2 million people -- today live in Turkey.

-8-

I salute leaders and citizens in many other countries, including Germany, Sweden and Austria, for opening doors and showing solidarity. I am also grateful for the financial generosity of many countries in addressing the humanitarian consequences, in particular the United Kingdom and Kuwait. On September 30th, I will convene a high-level meeting to mobilize a humane, effective and rights-based response to the refugee crisis. I urge all states to shoulder their responsibilities and live up to their legal obligations. Ladies and Gentlemen, Todayâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s crises highlight the failures of long-established peace and security and development responses. My concern led me to establish a high-level panel, which reported to me earlier this year. Last Friday I issued my own assessment of the future of United Nations peace operations. My report sets out the actions I believe we must take to maximize our impact today while putting in place the foundations for more long-term transformation. I am calling for three key changes: 1/ an urgent emphasis on conflict prevention and mediation; 2/ steps to improve the speed and agility of UN peacekeeping and political missions; and 3/ deeper partnerships with regional organizations, in particular the African Union. We do not have many opportunities to reform UN peace operations in such a comprehensive way. It is essential that we act urgently and collectively. I am moving ahead with what can be done under my own executive authority. Much depends on the General Assembly and the Security Council, and I urge Member States to give this effort their full support. The future of UN peace operations also depends on concerted action to rid UN peace operations of sexual exploitation and abuse. It is shameful when UN and other personnel sent to protect people compound the suffering and become part of the problem. I have set out a number of new measures, and doing everything within my authority to stamp out this unacceptable behaviour. I have stressed to all my special representatives the need for their vigilance and leadership. Member States must also do more to train their personnel and hold them accountable. Tomorrow, I will meet with troop and police contributing countries to emphasize this point. Despite many challenges on [many] fronts, the forthcoming session of the General Assembly â&#x20AC;&#x201C; my

-9-

ninth as Secretary-General -- is filled with possibility. I am determined to press ahead as we serve â&#x20AC;&#x153;we the peoplesâ&#x20AC;? in our 70th year. Thank you very much. I will be happy to answer some of your questions.

- 10 -

- 11 -

- 12 -

- 13 -

- 14 -

- 15 -

Official translation of Pope Francisâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; speech to the United Nations General Assembly on Friday (Sept. 25) in New York. Mr President, Ladies and Gentlemen, Thank you for your kind words. Once again, following a tradition by which I feel honored, the Secretary General of the United Nations has invited the Pope to address this distinguished assembly of nations. In my own name, and that of the entire Catholic community, I wish to express to you, Mr Ban Ki-moon, my heartfelt gratitude. I greet the Heads of State and Heads of Government present, as well as the ambassadors, diplomats and political and technical officials accompanying them, the personnel of the United Nations engaged in this 70th Session of the General Assembly, the personnel of the various programs and agencies of the United Nations family, and all those who, in one way or another, take part in this meeting. Through you, I also greet the citizens of all the nations represented in this hall. I thank you, each and all, for your efforts in the service of mankind. This is the fifth time that a Pope has visited the United Nations. I follow in the footsteps of my predecessors Paul VI, in1965, John Paul II, in 1979 and 1995, and my most recent predecessor, now Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, in 2008. All of them expressed their great esteem for the Organization, which they considered the appropriate juridical and political response to this present moment of history, marked by our technical ability to overcome distances and frontiers and, apparently, to overcome all natural limits to the exercise of power. An essential response, inasmuch as technological power, in the hands of nationalistic or falsely universalist ideologies, is capable of perpetrating tremendous atrocities. I can only reiterate the appreciation expressed by my predecessors, in reaffirming the importance which the Catholic Church attaches to this Institution and the hope which she places in its activities. The United Nations is presently celebrating its seventieth anniversary. The history of this organized community of states is one of important common achievements over a period of unusually fastpaced changes. Without claiming to be exhaustive, we can mention the codification and development of international law, the establishment of international norms regarding human rights, advances in humanitarian law, the resolution of numerous conflicts, operations of peacekeeping and reconciliation, and any number of other accomplishments in every area of international activity and endeavour. All these achievements are lights which help to dispel the darkness of the disorder caused by unrestrained ambitions and collective forms of selfishness. Certainly, many grave problems remain to be resolved, yet it is clear that, without all those interventions on the international level, mankind would not have been able to survive the unchecked use of its own possibilities. Every one of these political, juridical and technical

- 17 -

advances is a path towards attaining the ideal of human fraternity and a means for its greater realization. For this reason I pay homage to all those men and women whose loyalty and self-sacrifice have benefitted humanity as a whole in these past seventy years. In particular, I would recall today those who gave their lives for peace and reconciliation among peoples, from Dag Hammarskjöld to the many United Nations officials at every level who have been killed in the course of humanitarian missions, and missions of peace and reconciliation. Beyond these achievements, the experience of the past seventy years has made it clear that reform and adaptation to the times is always necessary in the pursuit of the ultimate goal of granting all countries, without exception, a share in, and a genuine and equitable influence on, decision-making processes. The need for greater equity is especially true in the case of those bodies with effective executive capability, such as the Security Council, the Financial Agencies and the groups or mechanisms specifically created to deal with economic crises. This will help limit every kind of abuse or usury, especially where developing countries are concerned. The International Financial Agencies are should care for the sustainable development of countries and should ensure that they are not subjected to oppressive lending systems which, far from promoting progress, subject people to mechanisms which generate greater poverty, exclusion and dependence. The work of the United Nations, according to the principles set forth in the Preamble and the first Articles of its founding Charter, can be seen as the development and promotion of the rule of law, based on the realization that justice is an essential condition for achieving the ideal of universal fraternity. In this context, it is helpful to recall that the limitation of power is an idea implicit in the concept of law itself. To give to each his own, to cite the classic definition of justice, means that no human individual or group can consider itself absolute, permitted to bypass the dignity and the rights of other individuals or their social groupings. The effective distribution of power (political, economic, defense-related, technological, etc.) among a plurality of subjects, and the creation of a juridical system for regulating claims and interests, are one concrete way of limiting power. Yet today’s world presents us with many false rights and – at the same time – broad sectors which are vulnerable, victims of power badly exercised: for example, the natural environment and the vast ranks of the excluded. These sectors are closely interconnected and made increasingly fragile by dominant political and economic relationships. That is why their rights must be forcefully affirmed, by working to protect the environment and by putting an end to exclusion.

- 18 -

First, it must be stated that a true “right of the environment” does exist, for two reasons. First, because we human beings are part of the environment. We live in communion with it, since the environment itself entails ethical limits which human activity must acknowledge and respect. Man, for all his remarkable gifts, which “are signs of a uniqueness which transcends the spheres of physics and biology” (Laudato Si’, 81), is at the same time a part of these spheres. He possesses a body shaped by physical, chemical and biological elements, and can only survive and develop if the ecological environment is favourable. Any harm done to the environment, therefore, is harm done to humanity. Second, because every creature, particularly a living creature, has an intrinsic value, in its existence, its life, its beauty and its interdependence with other creatures. We Christians, together with the other monotheistic religions, believe that the universe is the fruit of a loving decision by the Creator, who permits man respectfully to use creation for the good of his fellow men and for the glory of the Creator; he is not authorized to abuse it, much less to destroy it. In all religions, the environment is a fundamental good (cf. ibid.). The misuse and destruction of the environment are also accompanied by a relentless process of exclusion. In effect, a selfish and boundless thirst for power and material prosperity leads both to the misuse of available natural resources and to the exclusion of the weak and disadvantaged, either because they are differently abled (handicapped), or because they lack adequate information and technical expertise, or are incapable of decisive political action. Economic and social exclusion is a complete denial of human fraternity and a grave offense against human rights and the environment. The poorest are those who suffer most from such offenses, for three serious reasons: they are cast off by society, forced to live off what is discarded and suffer unjustly from the abuse of the environment. They are part of today’s widespread and quietly growing “culture of waste”. The dramatic reality this whole situation of exclusion and inequality, with its evident effects, has led me, in union with the entire Christian people and many others, to take stock of my grave responsibility in this regard and to speak out, together with all those who are seeking urgentlyneeded and effective solutions. The adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development at the World Summit, which opens today, is an important sign of hope. I am similarly confident that the Paris Conference on Climatic Change will secure fundamental and effective agreements. Solemn commitments, however, are not enough, even though they are a necessary step toward solutions. The classic definition of justice which I mentioned earlier contains as one of its essential elements a constant and perpetual will: Iustitia est constans et perpetua voluntas ius sum cuique tribuendi. Our world demands of all government leaders a will which is effective,

- 19 -

practical and constant, concrete steps and immediate measures for preserving and improving the natural environment and thus putting an end as quickly as possible to the phenomenon of social and economic exclusion, with its baneful consequences: human trafficking, the marketing of human organs and tissues, the sexual exploitation of boys and girls, slave labour, including prostitution, the drug and weapons trade, terrorism and international organized crime. Such is the magnitude of these situations and their toll in innocent lives, that we must avoid every temptation to fall into a declarationist nominalism which would assuage our consciences. We need to ensure that our institutions are truly effective in the struggle against all these scourges. The number and complexity of the problems require that we possess technical instruments of verification. But this involves two risks. We can rest content with the bureaucratic exercise of drawing up long lists of good proposals – goals, objectives and statistical indicators – or we can think that a single theoretical and aprioristic solution will provide an answer to all the challenges. It must never be forgotten that political and economic activity is only effective when it is understood as a prudential activity, guided by a perennial concept of justice and constantly conscious of the fact that, above and beyond our plans and programmes, we are dealing with real men and women who live, struggle and suffer, and are often forced to live in great poverty, deprived of all rights. To enable these real men and women to escape from extreme poverty, we must allow them to be dignified agents of their own destiny. Integral human development and the full exercise of human dignity cannot be imposed. They must be built up and allowed to unfold for each individual, for every family, in communion with others, and in a right relationship with all those areas in which human social life develops – friends, communities, towns and cities, schools, businesses and unions, provinces, nations, etc. This presupposes and requires the right to education – also for girls (excluded in certain places) – which is ensured first and foremost by respecting and reinforcing the primary right of the family to educate its children, as well as the right of churches and social groups to support and assist families in the education of their children. Education conceived in this way is the basis for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and for reclaiming the environment. At the same time, government leaders must do everything possible to ensure that all can have the minimum spiritual and material means needed to live in dignity and to create and support a family, which is the primary cell of any social development. In practical terms, this absolute minimum has three names: lodging, labour, and land; and one spiritual name: spiritual freedom, which includes religious freedom, the right to education and other civil rights.

- 20 -

For all this, the simplest and best measure and indicator of the implementation of the new Agenda for development will be effective, practical and immediate access, on the part of all, to essential material and spiritual goods: housing, dignified and properly remunerated employment, adequate food and drinking water; religious freedom and, more generally, spiritual freedom and education. These pillars of integral human development have a common foundation, which is the right to life and, more generally, what we could call the right to existence of human nature itself. The ecological crisis, and the large-scale destruction of biodiversity, can threaten the very existence of the human species. The baneful consequences of an irresponsible mismanagement of the global economy, guided only by ambition for wealth and power, must serve as a summons to a forthright reflection on man: “man is not only a freedom which he creates for himself. Man does not create himself. He is spirit and will, but also nature” (BENEDICT XVI, Address to the Bundestag, 22 September 2011, cited in Laudato Si’, 6). Creation is compromised “where we ourselves have the final word… The misuse of creation begins when we no longer recognize any instance above ourselves, when we see nothing else but ourselves” (ID. Address to the Clergy of the Diocese of Bolzano-Bressanone, 6 August 2008, cited ibid.). Consequently, the defence of the environment and the fight against exclusion demand that we recognize a moral law written into human nature itself, one which includes the natural difference between man and woman (cf. Laudato Si’, 155), and absolute respect for life in all its stages and dimensions (cf. ibid., 123, 136). Without the recognition of certain incontestable natural ethical limits and without the immediate implementation of those pillars of integral human development, the ideal of “saving succeeding generations from the scourge of war” (Charter of the United Nations, Preamble), and “promoting social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom” (ibid.), risks becoming an unattainable illusion, or, even worse, idle chatter which serves as a cover for all kinds of abuse and corruption, or for carrying out an ideological colonization by the imposition of anomalous models and lifestyles which are alien to people’s identity and, in the end, irresponsible. War is the negation of all rights and a dramatic assault on the environment. If we want true integral human development for all, we must work tirelessly to avoid war between nations and between peoples. To this end, there is a need to ensure the uncontested rule of law and tireless recourse to negotiation, mediation and arbitration, as proposed by the Charter of the United Nations, which constitutes truly a fundamental juridical norm. The experience of these seventy years since the founding of the United Nations in general, and in particular the experience of these first fifteen years of the third millennium, reveal both the effectiveness of the full application of international norms and the ineffectiveness of their lack of enforcement. When the Charter of the United

- 21 -

Nations is respected and applied with transparency and sincerity, and without ulterior motives, as an obligatory reference point of justice and not as a means of masking spurious intentions, peaceful results will be obtained. When, on the other hand, the norm is considered simply as an instrument to be used whenever it proves favourable, and to be avoided when it is not, a true Pandora’s box is opened, releasing uncontrollable forces which gravely harm defenseless populations, the cultural milieu and even the biological environment. The Preamble and the first Article of the Charter of the United Nations set forth the foundations of the international juridical framework: peace, the pacific solution of disputes and the development of friendly relations between the nations. Strongly opposed to such statements, and in practice denying them, is the constant tendency to the proliferation of arms, especially weapons of mass distraction, such as nuclear weapons. An ethics and a law based on the threat of mutual destruction – and possibly the destruction of all mankind – are self-contradictory and an affront to the entire framework of the United Nations, which would end up as “nations united by fear and distrust”. There is urgent need to work for a world free of nuclear weapons, in full application of the non-proliferation Treaty, in letter and spirit, with the goal of a complete prohibition of these weapons. The recent agreement reached on the nuclear question in a sensitive region of Asia and the Middle East is proof of the potential of political good will and of law, exercised with sincerity, patience and constancy. I express my hope that this agreement will be lasting and efficacious, and bring forth the desired fruits with the cooperation of all the parties involved. In this sense, hard evidence is not lacking of the negative effects of military and political interventions which are not coordinated between members of the international community. For this reason, while regretting to have to do so, I must renew my repeated appeals regarding to the painful situation of the entire Middle East, North Africa and other African countries, where Christians, together with other cultural or ethnic groups, and even members of the majority religion who have no desire to be caught up in hatred and folly, have been forced to witness the destruction of their places of worship, their cultural and religious heritage, their houses and property, and have faced the alternative either of fleeing or of paying for their adhesion to good and to peace by their own lives, or by enslavement. These realities should serve as a grave summons to an examination of conscience on the part of those charged with the conduct of international affairs. Not only in cases of religious or cultural persecution, but in every situation of conflict, as in Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, Libya, South Sudan and the Great Lakes region, real human beings take precedence over partisan interests, however legitimate the latter may be. In wars and conflicts there are individual persons, our brothers and sisters, men and women, young and old, boys and girls who weep, suffer and die. Human beings

- 22 -

who are easily discarded when our only response is to draw up lists of problems, strategies and disagreements. As I wrote in my letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations on 9 August 2014, “the most basic understanding of human dignity compels the international community, particularly through the norms and mechanisms of international law, to do all that it can to stop and to prevent further systematic violence against ethnic and religious minorities” and to protect innocent peoples. Along the same lines I would mention another kind of conflict which is not always so open, yet is silently killing millions of people. Another kind of war experienced by many of our societies as a result of the narcotics trade. A war which is taken for granted and poorly fought. Drug trafficking is by its very nature accompanied by trafficking in persons, money laundering, the arms trade, child exploitation and other forms of corruption. A corruption which has penetrated to different levels of social, political, military, artistic and religious life, and, in many cases, has given rise to a parallel structure which threatens the credibility of our institutions. I began this speech recalling the visits of my predecessors. I would hope that my words will be taken above all as a continuation of the final words of the address of Pope Paul VI; although spoken almost exactly fifty years ago, they remain ever timely. “The hour has come when a pause, a moment of recollection, reflection, even of prayer, is absolutely needed so that we may think back over our common origin, our history, our common destiny. The appeal to the moral conscience of man has never been as necessary as it is today… For the danger comes neither from progress nor from science; if these are used well, they can help to solve a great number of the serious problems besetting mankind (Address to the United Nations Organization, 4 October 1965). Among other things, human genius, well applied, will surely help to meet the grave challenges of ecological deterioration and of exclusion. As Paul VI said: “The real danger comes from man, who has at his disposal ever more powerful instruments that are as well fitted to bring about ruin as they are to achieve lofty conquests” (ibid.). The common home of all men and women must continue to rise on the foundations of a right understanding of universal fraternity and respect for the sacredness of every human life, of every man and every woman, the poor, the elderly, children, the infirm, the unborn, the unemployed, the abandoned, those considered disposable because they are only considered as part of a statistic. This common home of all men and women must also be built on the understanding of a certain sacredness of created nature.

- 23 -

Such understanding and respect call for a higher degree of wisdom, one which accepts transcendence, rejects the creation of an all-powerful élite, and recognizes that the full meaning of individual and collective life is found in selfless service to others and in the sage and respectful use of creation for the common good. To repeat the words of Paul VI, “the edifice of modern civilization has to be built on spiritual principles, for they are the only ones capable not only of supporting it, but of shedding light on it” (ibid.). El Gaucho Martín Fierro, a classic of literature in my native land, says: “Brothers should stand by each other, because this is the first law; keep a true bond between you always, at every time – because if you fight among yourselves, you’ll be devoured by those outside”. The contemporary world, so apparently connected, is experiencing a growing and steady social fragmentation, which places at risk “the foundations of social life” and consequently leads to “battles over conflicting interests” (Laudato Si’, 229). The present time invites us to give priority to actions which generate new processes in society, so as to bear fruit in significant and positive historical events (cf. Evangelii Gaudium, 223). We cannot permit ourselves to postpone “certain agendas” for the future. The future demands of us critical and global decisions in the face of world-wide conflicts which increase the number of the excluded and those in need. The praiseworthy international juridical framework of the United Nations Organization and of all its activities, like any other human endeavour, can be improved, yet it remains necessary; at the same time it can be the pledge of a secure and happy future for future generations. And so it will, if the representatives of the States can set aside partisan and ideological interests, and sincerely strive to serve the common good. I pray to Almighty God that this will be the case, and I assure you of my support and my prayers, and the support and prayers of all the faithful of the Catholic Church, that this Institution, all its member States, and each of its officials, will always render an effective service to mankind, a service respectful of diversity and capable of bringing out, for sake of the common good, the best in each people and in every individual. Upon all of you, and the peoples you represent, I invoke the blessing of the Most High, and all peace and prosperity. Thank you.

- 24 -

- 25 -

- 26 -

국제 시민사회 입장 문서

24 September 2015 ‘NO SDGs without LDCs’ 1) As UN member states, our government leaders convene at a high-level meeting of the General Assembly in New York on 25-27 September 2015 to adopt the post-2015 development agenda comprising a set of 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs); we express serious concerns over the outcome document “Transforming Our World – the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”. 2) LDC Watch has actively engaged in the post-2015 process with our campaign call ‘No SDGs without LDCs’, following on ‘No MDGs without LDCs’ given that the UN-defined 48 least developed countries (LDCs) represent the most vulnerable populations of the international community. 3) The UN member states have committed repeatedly since the last four and a half decades, to provide special development attention to these countries in special situations. LDCs are not only challenged by geographical and environmental constraints but also by violence, war, conflict and political instability symptomatic of poverty, inequalities and social injustices. We have constantly called for a coherent alignment of the post-2015 development agenda with the current Istanbul Programme of Action for the LDCs for the Decade 2011-2020 (IPoA) which focuses on the graduation of at least half of the LDCs. We, however, are gravely concerned about the less ambitious “Means of Implementation and the Global Partnership for Development”. 4) Official Development Assistance (ODA) of 0.15-0.20% of GNI committed to LDCs since the last decade and a half still remains a distant dream. The IPoA states the ODA should be reviewed and enhanced in 2015. Besides increase in quantity, we call for quality of aid without any conditionalities to enable development effectiveness. 5) External debt cancellation of LDCs has been called upon in various UN General Assembly resolutions including by A/RES/68/224 on Follow-up to the Fourth UN Conference on LDCs (LDC-IV) which adopted the IPoA. It however is not included in the outcome document. We call for full cancellation of LDC debt as integral to means of implementation and global partnership for development. The resources thus mobilised can be directed to the realisation of social protection of LDC peoples. 6) We are concerned about investment promotion regimes in LDCs, rich in natural resources and plundered by extractivism. We urge LDC governments to use their sovereign rights and powers to regulate the entry, terms of conditions and operations of foreign investment.

- 29 -

7) We call for technology transfer free from intellectual property rights (IPRs). After 20 years of the TRIPS Agreement, the TRIPS Council records show that there is no meaningful technology transfer from developed countries to LDCs. In this context, we welcome the commitment to fully operationalising the technology bank and science, technology and innovation capacity-building mechanism for LDCs by 2017. We also call for technology assessment to be integrated into the structure and the workplan of the Technology Bank to ensure adoption of appropriate technologies, duly considering socio-economic, cultural, health and environmental implications. 8) Duty-free-quota-free market access, simple and transparent preferential rules of origin are long-standing commitments by development partners and part of the Bali package for LDCs which still contains a non-binding language on their responsibility and commitment. The Bali package for LDCs must be binding and immediately implemented and therefore, a decision to this effect must be adopted at the 10 th WTO Ministerial Conference in Nairobi in December 2015. 9) We welcome the acknowledgement of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as the primary, intergovernmental forum responsible for global response to climate change. We reiterate that climate finance must be immediate, new and additional grants to address mitigation, adaptation and loss and damage. We call for Climate Justice for LDCs who are least responsible but most affected by the climate crisis. 10) We are gravely concerned about the undue leverage given to publicprivate-partnerships in the form of multi-stakeholder partnerships for the implementation of the post-2015 development agenda. The corporate capture of the UN is increasingly diluting the developmental role of the state as well as global partnership for development based on historical responsibility and North-South cooperation. We call upon member states to provide leadership in reclaiming the UN for the peoples and not for profits. 11) We reiterate that the post-2015 development agenda must be anchored on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) which encompasses the duality of both universality and differentiation. Indeed, we can then translate the rhetoric of equity, justice, democratic governance and global partnership into achieving a truly transformative sustainable development agenda. 12) We will continue with our engagements and interventions towards ensuring development justice and a world free of LDCs!

Mr. Gauri Pradhan International Co-ordinator

Mr. Demba Dembele President

- 30 -

THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT & THE CPDE’s RECOMMENDATIONS As Heads of States and Governments gather in the United Nations (UN) Headquarters in New York City, the CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness reiterates its key asks in relation to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that Member States are formally adopting this September 25-27, 2015. Rights-Based Approach (HRBA) to Development for Ensure the right to participation of the implementation of the SDGs. people by institutionalizing the participation of CSOs in the policy formulation, implementation, review and monitoring of SDGs. Recognize CSOs as States should integrate “Inclusive independent and rightful actors in the 2030 Agenda. Development” as a key guiding principle of the The role of CSOs in the SDGs, as independent implementation of SDGs. While numerous aspects development actors, is not clearly defined in the 2030 of the principle have been affirmed, Inclusive Agenda especially in contrast with the Private Sector. Development is not cited as a guiding principle. References to civil society, although extensive, strictly limit our role only on the review processes. It does Establish clear accountability and not recognize a need for institutionalized and formal regulatory mechanisms to hold the private space for CSOs in policy arenas. There is no mention sector and corporate bodies accountable of CSOs’ right to initiative in development programs. in all their involvement in SDGS implementation and financing thereof. The 2030 Agenda affirms Fully adhere to and implement existing its commitment to fostering a “dynamic and wellcommitments on Aid and Development functioning business sector while protecting labour Effectiveness. Many existing aid and development rights and environmental and health standards”. effectiveness commitments of governments are However, it has inadequate consideration of binding ignored in the 2030 Agenda as evident in: regulatory and accountability frameworks to ensure • regression to quantitative ODA targeting, that private sector involvement is predicated on • acknowledgement of country ownership but not social and environmental accountability and aligned democratic ownership, with international standards on business and human • transparency and accountability was only rights, ILO and UN conventions. mentioned in relation to specific initiatives on public-private cooperation and follow-up and Ensure an equitable partnership among review processes, and, all development actors, with due recognition • ommission of aid additionality as a necessary of their rights and roles, in all processes of policy criterion in climate finance. formulation, implementation, review and monitoring of SDGs at the local, national, regional and global Ensure the full recognition and adoption levels. It is evident that although partnerships are of the Human Rights Based Approach to emphasized in the Outcome Document, a meaningful Development as fundamental guiding principle and equal participation amongst its stakeholders for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Human is absent. CSOs are only evident in the Technology Rights have indeed been recognised and continuously Facilitation Mechanism (TFM) and the review process reaffirmed in numerous parts of the text of the 2030 while the Private Sector through the Addis Ababa Agenda. However, it does not advance Human Rights Action Agenda (AAAA) has been given a much more through the operational framework of the Human prominent role.

Contact Person: Jiten Yumnam, CPDE Post-MDG Working Group | Email: jitnyumnam@yahoo.com.in

- 31 -

Contact Person: Jiten Yumnam, CPDE Post-MDG Working Group | Email: jitnyumnam@yahoo.com.in

- 32 -

Is the UN fit for the ambitious new Sustainable Development Agenda? New study highlights private funding and corporate influence in the United Nations New York City, 22 September 2015. More than a hundred Heads of State and Government will gather in New York this week to adopt the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This agenda is intended to make the UN ‘fit for purpose’, but it is important to ask, ‘whose purpose will it be fit for’? A new study from Global Policy Forum warns that the United Nations is embarking on a new era of selective multilateralism, shaped by intergovernmental policy impasses and a growing reliance on corporate-led solutions to global problems. Download full report here (PDF, 2,5 MB): https://www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/images/pdfs/Fit_for_w hose_purpose_online.pdf The changing funding patterns of the UN and its funds, programmes and specialized agencies reflect these alarming trends. Key features are the growing gap between the scale of global problems and the (financial) capacity of the UN to solve them; the growing share of non-core contributions and earmarked trust funds in UN finance; increased reliance on the corporate sector; and the outsourcing of funding and decisionmaking to exclusive global partnerships. “Funding of all UN system-wide activities is around US$40 billion per year. While this may seem to be a substantial sum, - 33 -

in reality it is smaller than the budget of New York City, less than a quarter of the budget of the European Union, and only 2.3 per cent of the world’s military expenditures,” said Jens Martens, co-author of the study. He added: “As the World Bank calls on the global community to move from ‘Billions’ to ‘Trillions’ to meet the investment needs of the Sustainable Development Goals, the United Nations still has to calculate in terms of ‘Millions’.” Barbara Adams, co-author of the study said: “Member States have failed to provide reliable funding to the UN system at a level sufficient to enable it to fulfill the mandates they have given it. Many Member States, particularly the large donors, pursue a dual approach of calling for greater coherence in UN development activities while at the same time increasing their use of earmarked funding, which furthers fragmentation.” She added: “This pick- and- choose dynamic, together with ongoing financial constraints, has opened the space for corporate sector engagement. Increasingly the UN is promoting market-based approaches and multi-stakeholder partnerships as the business model for solving global problems. Driven by a belief that engaging the more economically powerful is essential to maintaining the relevance of the UN, this practice has harmful consequences for democratic governance and general public support, as it aligns more with power centres and away from the less powerful.” Fit for Whose Purpose? Private Funding and Corporate Influence in the United Nations, released today, gives a comprehensive overview of current UN funding trends and ends with a summary of findings and policy recommendations to counter the new ‘business model’ of global governance and to make the United Nations really ‘fit for purpose’, fit for the purpose of a democratic and inclusive global governance. Detailed and specific, the demands range from adopting measures to limit earmarked funding as a percentage of total funding, to - 34 -

strengthening the rules and tools governing engagement with the business sector, and to establishing an intergovernmental framework for partnership accountability.

Fit for whose purpose? Private funding and corporate influence in the United Nations Published by: Global Policy Forum Authors: Barbara Adams and Jens Martens Bonn/New York, September 2015 Download full report here (PDF, 2,5 MB) For single chapters, please see here. ISBN 978-3-943126-20-4

- 35 -

Public SDGs or Private GGs? By Barbara Adams versión en español The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) negotiated painstakingly over two years by all UN Member States with thousands of public interest organizations providing their commitment and expertise have been copyrighted. And by whom? The UN you would think? But no. They have been re-branded as Global Goals (GGs) and the copyrighted by Project Everyone, a private company incorporated and registered in London. On its own website (www.globalgoals.org), Project Everyone claims ownership of the 17 icons that it is popularizing, with active help from celebrities and the UN Secretariat itself, representing each of the 17 Goals that the heads of State and Government are endorsing this week as common objectives of humanity from here to the year 2030. A political declaration by all UN Member States should be a global public good, available for everyone to use. But the small print of the Project Everyone website says that “all Content included on Our Site and the copyright and other intellectual property rights subsisting in that Content, unless specifically labelled otherwise, belongs to or has been licensed by Us”. That copyright protection clearly includes both the icons and the summary titles given to each of the goals. The Global Goals website identifies Aviva, Getty Images, Pearson, Sawa, Standard Chartered and Unilever as “Founding Partners”. Some 60 other corporations and media are identified as “delivery partners” while 22 institutions are listed as NGOs and foundations. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UN Foundation are the only foundations in that list, - 37 -

which includes many well known international NGOs (such as Oxfam, Amnesty and Save the Children) along with prominent UN agencies (e.g., UNDP, UNICEF, UN Women, UNESCO, UN Department of Public Information) that it curiously lists as NGOs. From a media point of view, the strategy seems successful. The international press is already talking about the “Global Goals Summit” at the UN and the Global Goals (GGs) are treated as just a short and easier nickname for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which is their title in the official UN documents. In shortening the titles, the concept of “sustainable development” is completely lost. But more is lost. In what seems justified as necessary simplification for communication purposes, some concepts key to achieve universal consensus are also lost: Goal 12 on “sustainable consumption and production patterns” is translated as “responsible consumption and production”. Goal 16, designed to “promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels” is transformed into “Peace and Justice, strong institutions”. Yes, UN jargon is tortuous sometimes, but if the word ‘inclusive’ was mentioned twice in the title, why replace it with ‘strong’? Does a call for ‘strong institutions’ ring the same bells as a call for ‘inclusive governance’? Also, the much debated Goal 17, which deals with means of implementation and calls for revitalizing “the global partnership for sustainable development”, a partnership among rich and poor governments towards the common objective, is transformed into “Partnerships for the goals”, dropping mention of ‘means of implementation’ and making ‘partnership’ plural, so that now includes a variety of uneven and loosely accountable associations with the private sector and ‘stakeholders’. - 38 -

Of course any communicator is free to take a complex document and â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;translateâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; it in ways that are understandable by their constituency. But this simplification is a misrepresentation of the SDGs themselves. UN senior officials not only allowed this to happen, but actively promoted it, using UN resources to network the icons and the UNâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s official communication office is encouraging their use. Do Member States know that they could be supporting a campaign that is not owned by the UN if they refer to the Global Goals instead of to the SDGs? Are the many NGOs and celebrities that are supporting and sponsoring the Global Goals and related activities aware that this is a private initiative not a global public good? To be sure, it is important that everyone knows about the SDGs. A huge campaign with private sector support could be a realistic way of communicating the 17 goals to everyone. But these goals belong to the public and the UN should safeguard their use. And to over-simplify global challenges is not the purpose of the UN and misrepresents the delicate and politically complex balance that went into crafting the new Agenda for 2030 that the governments are approving today. Much more than one letter is at stake in the choice between the SDGs or GGs.

- 39 -

Women’s Major Group To attention of USGs Ms Amina Mohammed and Mr Thomas Gass Copied: Co-‐Facilitators Kamau and Donoghue, Member States, UN agencies Re: Concern regarding Images to present 2030 Agenda and SDGs to the world 22 September 2015, New York Honourable USGs Ms Amina Mohammed and Mr Thomas Gass, The Women’s Major Group, bringing together over 600 national and international women’s CSOs, continues to be actively engaged in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We want to contribute to the success of the 2030 Agenda, and the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in all countries, and help ensure that real transformative change towards gender equality, human rights, and responsible and equitable stewardship of the earth’s climate and natural resources. As always, please accept our proposals below in that sense of a constructive contribution by the women’s organisations. Overall concern: Although it is good that many different people have become engaged in spreading the word about the 2030 Agenda and the 17 SDGs, we call on leadership from the UN to avoid trivialization and simplification in the main messages to the public. We need to maintain integrity and forward momentum of the SDGs in substance and scope in all messages coming from the UN. Concern 1: Do not drop “sustainable development” The latest proposals for the outreach of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals now speak only of “the Global Goals”. Although we appreciate the effort on melody and alliteration, we entirely disapprove of dropping “Sustainable Development”. It has been a key achievement of the negotiations of the last 5 years from Rio+20 to the Post-‐2015 summit that all governments have finally agreed that development cannot be achieved when people and the planet continue to be exploited, which is why only a balanced “sustainable development” should be the aim of the new 2030 Agenda. By suddenly dropping the SD from SDGs, the United Nations is giving an entirely wrong message to the world. ! We call on you to consistently speak of “SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS” and not just ‘the global goals’. If needed, add in small letters (as now used for Sustainable Development) ‘global’ at the beginning.

Yes !

The Global

The Global Goals - 41 -

No !

Concern 2) Over-‐simplification and misrepresentation of the SDGs

These icons are too much of a simplification and wrongly re-‐interpret the titles of the SDGs. We object to the use of these icons, i.e. for the following reasons. ! ‘Family’ icon can be misunderstood as regression The icon used to present goal 1 could easily be misunderstood as a regression to the "husband, wife, child" icon used for decades to promote population control. Unfortunately the icon does not reflect the UN agreements since 1994 that all forms of family be supported and that adolescents' needs and rights be explicitly recognized as well. A better reflection of these commitments in the goal 1 icon would be at least three different heights of people, in a mixture that is not symmetrical. ! All goal ‘titles’ are too simplified and do not reflect the delicate negotiated balance The goal 5 icon and title are too reductive. Since women and girls were dropped from the title, the image should be of strong and empowered women and girls. For goal 12 Why is the word sustainable being deleted everywhere? This goal is about sustainable and consumption and production therefore the image should reflect this instead of only focusing on consumption. Goal 14 called ‘Life under water’ completely ignores the food sovereignty, sustainable livelihood and economic importance of oceans for millions small fishers and women and men processing fish in coastal communities, whose livelihoods are under threat from i.e. unsustainable industrial fishing, seabed mining, oil industries and mass-‐tourism. Worst is the short title of goal 17 “partnerships”, which completely invisibilises hard won language of 'means of implementation', and specifically recognition of financial and investment regulation, debt restructuring and trade policy changes needed to achieve the SDGs. Concern 3) Private ownership of UN messages? Privatising of public goods? Finally, we are very concerned that that the ‘Global Goals’ and the ‘icons’ are a private initiative of “Project Everyone”, which has the license for use and holds the domain name. It is inconceivable that the UN should give away like this, the results of member state and CSO commitment and expertise. This seems to be entirely against the spirit of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which aims at including all people in contributing to the SDG implementation. We wonder about the process of this, and why member states have not been consulted on such an important issue as the UN giving a licence for use to a group which has mis-‐represented and over-‐simplified the results of 3 years of intergovernmental negotiations.

- 42 -

We call on the UN to correct the wrong impression, and provide images for the SDGs that use the full titles and ensuring free use for all of these images. The WMG will be happy to work with you in promoting the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with all its ambition and in all its diversity, and would be glad to meet with you on this matter during the coming days before and after the post-‐2015 summit! Sincerely yours, Undersigned representatives of the Women’s Major Group: WECF International CoopeSoliDar International Women's Health Coalition Women for Women’s Human Rights South Asia Women's Network (SWAN) GESTOS Brazil DAWN Development Alternatives with Women for a new Era ?? Echoes of Women in Africa Initiative Nigeria Centre for Human Rights and Climate Change Research Nigeria Congregation of Our Lady of Charity of the Good Shepherd Red de Educacion Popular entre Mujeres A. Latina y el Caribe , REPEM Jamaica Community of Positive Women FEIM; Fundacion para estuio e Investigacion de la Mujer, Argentina Diverse Voices and Action for Equality Pacific Partnerships on Gender, Climate Change and Sustainable Development (PPGCCSD) World YWCA AFRIHEALTH OPTONET ASSOCIATION, NIGERIA ….

- 43 -

CommuniquĂŠ of the GCAP Global Assembly 2015

NEW YORK DECLARATION Mobilising Against Inequalities Making "Leave No One Behind" A Reality New York, 28 September 2015

A Fresh Mandate after 2015 1. An unsustainable development model - obsessed with the market and economic growth - is driving rising and untenable inequalities, man-made climate change and the further exclusion of socially and economically marginalised communities. The concentration of wealth and political power in fewer hands is detrimental to society, as is the discrimination and unequal treatment that mostly affects women, girls and minority communities. Across the globe, billions of people are suffering. 2. We, the representatives of the Global Call to Action Against Poverty (GCAP) - a global civil society movement that challenges the institutions and processes that perpetuate poverty and inequalities - meeting in New York in the Global Assembly from 27-28 September with inputs from coalitions and constituents across the globe, agree to renew and affirm our mandate to fight inequalities and poverty, to ensure that the human rights and dignity of every person is realised and that the planet's boundaries are respected. 3. We hereby declare that we will work together in a new form after 2015 for justice and to eradicate inequalities and poverty. 4. GCAP was launched in 2005 at the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, Brazil, as an open and ambitious call to civil society â&#x20AC;&#x201C; including feminist and women's organisations, human rights groups, marginalised and socially-excluded communities, national and international NGOs, trade unions, youth and faith-based groups, among others. GCAP adopted and popularised the whiteband as an international symbol to end poverty and inequalities. GCAP national coalitions and constituency groups, including the Feminist Task Force and the Socially Excluded Task Force, have mobilised hundreds of millions of women, men, children and youth, including socially excluded groups, to put pressure on governments to deliver on their promises. GCAP constituents have monitored the successes and failures of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as well as national and regional development commitments and the actions of international institutions

- 45 -

and groupings, such as the G20 and UNFCCC. Since 2010, GCAP constituents have also worked to shape the Post-2015 development agenda. Since the start of GCAP's 'Call to Action' ten years ago, we have influenced national and regional policies and helped shape the global discourse on poverty and inequalities, including successfully campaigning for a standalone Sustainable Development Goal (SDG #10) "Reduce Inequality Within and Among Countries."

Inequalities and the SDGs 5. Given the context of obscene inequalities in todayâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s world, we, the Global Assembly of GCAP, declare that we will fight inequalities with a focus on gender inequalities and socially excluded people, including women, indigenous communities, Dalits, people living in conflict areas, children, aging people, communities affected by climate change, climate and other migrants and persons with disabilities. We shall ensure that the slogan "No One Left Behind" - which originated with civil society and later adopted by the United Nations - becomes a reality. This is the basis for a strong political positioning by GCAP as a Global Call with a Southern perspective in which the majority of the leadership comes from the Global South. 6. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) go far beyond the MDGs and offer the hope of a future where people live in harmony on a safe, sustainable planet. Unlike the MDGs, the SDGs include goals on inequalities, peace, decent work, justice and transparency while also vowing to end violence against women and children, human trafficking and dangerous climate change. While we welcome the adoption of the SDGs, we are disturbed by the weakness of the discussion on the structural and root causes of inequalities and poverty. In addition, there is no critical assessment of the role of the private sector, which is only portrayed as part of the solution, even though businesses often exacerbate inequalities, including gender inequality, poverty and climate change. The SDGs are just one framework for engagement. GCAP will continue to challenge the structural aspects and causes of inequalities and poverty. We will hold all actors to account - including governments, private sector and international institutions, including the UN. To achieve the SDGs, policies that promote equality such as tax justice, decent work, distributive measures, social protection and gender equality are crucial.

Bottom-up Mobilisation 7. GCAP will work at local, national, regional and global levels to monitor the implementation of the SDGs in order to ensure that countries achieve the goals and meet and exceed the targets for all groups. GCAP will focus on a bottom-up approach to engage people and governments. Our strategy of engagement with this framework is captured by the expression, "Localising SDGs - Supporting Local Communities Fighting

- 46 -

for Justice." This includes working with coalitions, constituencies and partners at national, regional and global levels based on local mobilisations. GCAP's core strengths include community mobilization, evidence-based monitoring and advocacy at local, regional, national and international levels with clear demands. GCAP's work is based on peoplesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; voices and, as such, GCAP supports developing the awareness and capacity of local leaders to participate in international processes and frameworks. 8. GCAP will work to end land, water and forest grabs as well as violations of human rights by mega-mines and other extractive sites. We seek an end to the extractives development model. We will work to transform unjust and impoverishing aspects of the global economic and financial architecture as well as the root causes of violent conflicts. As legal systems have often failed to protect peopleâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s rights to natural resources, GCAP will work with local communities to ensure that democratic decisions at all levels are implemented by governments. 9. Governments continue to relegate civil society and peopleâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s voices to the margins. Governments have enacted restrictive legislation and intimidated activists, aid workers, journalists and the media. GCAP campaigners have been unjustly imprisoned while mobilizing constituents for greater accountability, gender justice and climate action. GCAP will stand up for meaningful civil society participation and support civil society organisations and activists that are harassed by their governments. 10. We plan to connect with millions of global citizens and ensure that their demands for justice are heard. We recognize that advocacy and mobilisation are two sides of the same strategy. Since its creation in 2005, mobilizing the people of the planet is in the DNA of GCAP. Mobilisation is based at local and national levels. Global campaigns support these national campaigns.

The New Start 11. Creating a just, sustainable world for all people - particularly in the face of entrenched interests that benefit from the status quo - is a formidable challenge that requires reenergizing our network and building new partnerships and alliances. We plan to work collaboratively with social movements, civil society networks, grassroots groups and others with common values and objectives, at the regional and global levels, to build a strong initiative and to work in broad civil society alliances. 12. Marking GCAP's 10th anniversary has been a celebratory event; reigniting our passion to continue with a fresh start, GCAP will have a transitional period to develop a new governance structure, name, logo and other elements. We will re-launch at the beginning of 2016. We invite constituents, strategic partners and allies to work with us to develop this future strategy. END

- 47 -

- 49 -

Sustainable Development Goals

End poverty for all

Sustainable consumption and production

Sustainable energy for all

Action on climate change

Freedom from hunger

Clean water and sanitation

Health and wellbeing

Decent work and economic development

Quality education

Innovation and infrastructure

Healthy oceans

Gender equality

Reducing inequalities

Sustainable ecosystems - 50 -

Sustainable cities and communities

Peace and justice

Global partnerships

UN총회 아웃리치 결과보고

각 국가별 차원의 SDGs 이행전략 2015.10.22

신 재 은

목차 1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의 2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견 3. 불평등 이슈에 대한 시민사회 의견 4. SDGs 달성의 핵심 주제

- 53 -

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의 인식 확대 인식확대 u

대중인지 확대

모니 터링 모니터링

실행 실행 u

거버넌스 및 조직체계

참여 주요주제

u u u u u u u

책무성(accountability) 국회의 기능 시민사회 참여 기업 참여 참여 데이터 지표화 정보 공개

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

인도네시아(정부)

H.E Mr Desra Percaya, Permanent Representative, Permanent Missions of The Republic of Indonesia to the UN, New York Yanuar Nugroho, Deputy Chief of Staff to the President of The Republic of Indonesia H.E. Yanuar Nugroho, Deputy of Priority Program Management, Presidential Staff Office, Indonesia

Nila Moeloek, Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia RADEN SILIWANTI, Director for State Apparatus, Ministry Of National Development Planning/The National Development Planning Agency

구분

세부내용

인식확대

대중참여

실행

SDGs 문서는 국가이행을 위한 주요 문서임. 국가개발계획에 불평등 과제가 포함된 것이 처음임. 대통령실에서 개입 중. 개발기획부: 국내 sDGs 이행 주류화 위해 정책, 법적 프레임워크 필요. 제도적 프레임워크 필요: 공공참여를 보장할 수 있는 제도 및 언론, 학계, 기업, 시민사회 모두가 참여할 수 있는 제도. 실행을 위해 다양한 이해관계자 참여 필수: 재원마련, 실행 및 모니터링 주요주제: 불평등, 16번 국가 차원의 제도 프레임워크 마련 16번 파일럿 프로젝트: ①인니 민주주의 워킹그룹 구성: 다양한 이해관계자 참여 ②기획, 실행, 평가과정에 국민 협의

모니터링

- 책무성, 모니터링, 보고 메커니즘 중요 - 16번 파일럿 프로젝트: ③다양한 이해관계자 연계 및 정부, 시민사회, UN기 구, 학계, 기업, 지역사회 구성원이 정책형성과정에 참여

*불평등: 자원 접근의 불평등 ex) 물, 도로, 화장실, 인터넷 등 따라서 불평등 해결은 모든 시민들에게 기본 인프라 제공하는 것.

- 54 -

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

탄자니아(정부) H. E. Dr. Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete, President of United Republic of Tanzania

구분

세부내용

인식확대 실행

5개년 계획에 SDGs 통합, 이행 강조

모니터링

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

콜롬비아(정부) H. E. Simon Gaviria, Director General, National Planning Department of Colombia

구분

세부내용

인식확대 실행

모니터링

왜 SDGs가 필요한지, 어떻게 construct 할지에 대해 논의중. 121 targets에 대한 예산 확보. 24개는 측정 방법론이 아직 갖춰지지 않았 음. 시민사회와 협력하여 다양한 소셜 이노베이션 추구. 이주, 자유무역 등 다양한 이슈 대응. UN의 역할 중요 국가 및 지자체의 역할 중요 SDGs 복잡하나, 예산, 규제, 조세 등 다양한 방식으로 이행

오픈데이터, 빅데이터를 통해 보완 예정. 고위급 위원회 설치를 통해 투명성 강화 시민사회 피드백 적극 반영

- 55 -

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

케냐(정부) H. E. G. M Mailu, Director Enablers Department, Ministry of Planning in Kenya

구분

세부내용

인식확대

현지주민들의 인지제고 노력 필요

실행

SDGs 주류화를 위한 노력 이미 시작. 이행을 위한 재원마련 필요 시민사회의 역할 및 연계 중요: ex) 8개 시민사회에게 지역사회를 맡긴 후 현지 주민들과 협력 가능하게 됨

모니터링

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

스웨덴(정부) H. E. Kajsa B. Olofsgård, Ambassador for the Post-2015 Development Agenda, Sweden

구분

세부내용

인식확대 실행

ODA 증액, 정책일관성, SDGs 주류화 각 부처: SDGs 통합 과제 부여 공공행정부처: 지자체와 지역공동체 레벨의 이행 조정 외교부, 개발부: 조정 역할 미래기획부: OWG 결과를 전략, 정책변화 기획, 국가위원회 구성 정부와 시민사회 협력 시민사회: 전통적 시민사회, 학계, 기업, 노조 등 포함

모니터링

- 56 -

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

한국(정부) Ambassador Hahn Choong-hee, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Republic of Korea to the UN in New York

구분 인식확대

세부내용 - SDGs DAY, 세계시민교육

실행 모니터링

데이터 시스템 강화 리뷰 매커니즘에 CSO, 기업, 다른 스테이크홀더 참여

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

인도(시민사회) Amitabh Behar, Wada Na Todo Abhiyan

구분

세부내용

인식확대

SDGs 힌디어 번역본 부재 (로컬 오너십 부재)

실행

사회정의를 위한 플랫폼이 되어야 함.

모니터링

- 기업 참여에 대한 우려 - 책무성 프레임워크 부재 - CSO 감시: 재원, 실행

- 57 -

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

러시아(시민사회) Oleg Kucheryavenko, GCAP Russia

구분

세부내용

인식확대 실행 당면과제

• • • •

보건시스템의 문제 기업이 보건산업을 통제하고 사람들의 권리를 거부 중산층에 집중 특허 보호를 받지 않는 의약품 제공 안함. 의약품의 부정적 영향 연구결과 감춤.

1. 국가별 SDGs 이행 논의

브라질(시민사회) Gonzalo Berron, REBRIP(브라질 인민네트워크)

구분 당면과제

세부내용 -

높은 이자율로 인해 사람들이 보건과 교육을 위한 재원마련 어려움 기업은 보건과 교육으로 이윤추구함. 다양한 이해관계자 연계 및 파트너십이 기업의 이윤추구 통로가 되어서는 안됨

실행

주요이슈: 인권 강조, 기술 접근성 우선 과제, 시민파워 회복

모니터링

정보공개: 굿거버넌스와 평등의 열쇠

인식확대

- 58 -

2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견 - PIANGO (피지 NGO협의체) • 제도적 조정과정에 여성, 청년, 노인, 선주민, 청년, 장애 인 등 소외계층이 참여 보장 • 결사의 자유 및 언론의 자유 보장 • 글로벌 지표가 지역별, 국가별 맥락에 맞게 고려 • 태평양 도서국가의 시민들에 대한 고려 촉구. 지구온도 2도 씨 이하에 대한 합의 필요. • 핵심의제: 인권, 성평등, 생태적 지속가능성

2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견

• • • • • • • •

Civil Society Partnership for Development Effectiveness 3년간 노력, 환영하기 어려운 부분도 있음. 거대 자본이 공공 이익을 위협하는 문제. 기업의 권리보다 사람의 권리를 강조, EE 강조. 정책 일관성 시민사회 권리와 역할을 분명히 인식 정부의 이행 의지 중요 지역주민의 현실에 근접해야 함. 정부와 기업이 협상중인 new free trade deals에 경각심.

• 로컬레벨 리더십 중요.

- 59 -

2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견

• • • • • • • •

PLAN International 공동의 노력, 글로벌 노력 필요. 국가전략 마련 시 일부만 선정하지 않도록 주의 부유한 국가에서 leave no one behind의 의미는 equality 증진하는 것임. 경제성장은 progress를 의미하지 않음. 환경에도 악영향. 성장을 계속할 수는 없음. 라이프스타일 변화 필요. 인권실현 빈곤과 불평등 연계하여 접근 power relations 개혁 필요.

2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견

• • • •

Campaign for People's Goals for Sustainable Development 이주문제. leave no one behind 정책과 태도 변화 필요. 이민자와 난민, 국내실향민은 언제나 left behind에 속함. Migrant 에 대한 세부목표 불충분함. decent work 보장되는 목표 필요. • 이주는 mal development의 결과로 나타나는 현상임.

- 60 -

2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견

- Catholic Agency For Overseas Development (CAFOD) • SDGs 책자 및 그래픽 이미지 제작 • UN에서 민간기구와 함께 만든 17개 이미지에 대해 시민사회 의 문제 제기 • 시민사회 자체적으로 만든 이미지

2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견

- Catholic Agency For Overseas Development (CAFOD) • SDGs 책자

- 61 -

2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견

- Catholic Agency For Overseas Development (CAFOD) • SDGs 이미지

2. SDGs 이행에 대한 시민사회 의견

- Justice Development and Peace Commission • SDGs에 대한 정치적 리더들의 진정성 • 정치적 의지와 선택이 중요. 정치적 용기 필요

- Beyond 2015 • 주민들이 정부 주도로 이행되기 전까지 기다리지 않고 대응. • 시민사회는 이 절차로부터 레슨을 얻고 power shift 일어나지 않도록. • 북반구와 남반구 협력 증진하고, 진정한 파트너십 구축해야 함 • 일관성과 우선순위 • 정부의 commitment 필요 • 다자간 이해관계자 접근

- 62 -

3. 불평등 이슈에 대한 시민사회 의견 - Oxfam+12+CSOs • 브라질, 러시아, 중국, 인도네시아 등에서 불평등 해결하기 위해 노력.

• • • •

Initiative for equality 불평등 완화를 위해 국가간 무역 및 투자 규제 필요. 강력한 기업규제 필요 건강하지 않은 외국인직접투자(FDI) 요소 제외 시민들에 의한 책무성 논의 및 SDGs 모니터링 필요

3. 불평등 이슈에 대한 시민사회 의견

• • • • • •

Amnesty International EU의 설탕회사 무역투자 문제 책무성은 SDGs의 통합적인 부분 HLPF가 책무성 점검 조직이 되어야 함. 인권의 UPR제도 벤치마크 필요 모든 이해관계자에게 모니터링 과정의 공개 SDGs 보고와 다른 보고의 연계

• • •

SOS Children’s Village 가장 소외된 아이들은 통계에서 누락됨 데이터 세분화 중요. 청소년(Youth) 참여 중요

- 63 -

3. 불평등 이슈에 대한 시민사회 의견

• • • • • • •

Global Partnership on Sustainable Development Data 불평등과 16번 목표 연계 시민 참여 다양한 이해관계자 참여 시민사회를 위한 자리 마련 데이터의 질 데이터 레볼루션으로 불평등이 드러나도록. 정보 공개 및 접근 가능

• • •

Global Financial Integrity 불법재원이 불평등 심화 불법재원의 소스는 인신매매, 마약, 부패, 세금 정부가 불법재원 해결에 집중해야 함.

4. SDGs 달성의 핵심 주제 – 불평등 – 기업규제 – 책무성 – 국회 – 캠페인 – 시민사회 참여, shadow report – HLPF 책무성 시스템 – OGP 활용

- 64 -

감사합니다.

- 65 -

- 66 -

2015 유엔총회 아웃리치 결과보고

글로벌 차원의 시민사회 SDGs 이행전략 - What happens after September 2015?

2015.10.21 국제개발협력시민사회포럼(KoFID) 문도운 간사

“What happens after September 2015?” 소개 •

유엔총회 기간 중 Beyond2015, action/2015, CIVICUS, GCAP, CAN 등의 시민사회 공동 부대행사

•

2015년 9월 28일 9시-12시, 뉴욕 Open Society Foundation

•

향후 15년간의 SDGs 이행에 있어 시민사회 의 공동 협력 메커니즘을 논의하기 위한 부 대행사 개최

•

SDGs에 대한 인지제고와 캠페인, 정책 애드 보커시를 위한 글로벌 시민사회의 협력방안 논의

- 67 -

지난 시민사회 활동의 교훈 •

애드보커시와 시민캠페인에 함께 연대함으로써 정책결정과정에 더 강한 영 향력을 행사할 수 있었음

•

메시지를 만들어내고 협의를 거치는 것이 쉽지 않음

•

포용을 증진하기 위한 특별한 접근이 필요

•

새로운 SDGs 주체들을 포섭하려는 의지가 필요

•

캠페인과 캠페인 목적에 대한 고위급 지지가 중요

•

활동을 유지할 수 있는 기초적 기능을 확보하는 것이 중요: 모금, 소통, 커뮤 니티·국가·지역·글로벌 차원 활동 간의 조정, 아웃리치

Coming Soon? 새로운 글로벌 연대체의 등장 •

글로벌 연대체의 “Transition Group” 구성 2015년 3월부터 새로운 글로벌 연대체의 목 표와 구조를 논의 2015년 6월 뉴욕에서 60여명이 참여하여 회 의, 7월 아디스아바바에서 80여명이 참여하 여 의견 수렴 폭넓게 논의 내용을 공유하고 웨비나 개최 첫 킥오프 미팅을 뉴욕에서 9월 28일 진행

- 68 -

Coming Soon? 새로운 글로벌 연대체의 등장 •

비전 모든 사람들의 전적인, 동등한, 포용적인 참여를 바탕으로 하여 Agenda2030이 전파되는 세상, 그리고 사람들이 공약 달성에 대한 정치적 지도자들의 책무를 요구할 만큼 역량을 갖춘 세상

•

목적 이행과 책무성 보장 참여와 포용 증진 새로운 글로벌 이니셔티브 수립

•

주요 활동 인지제고와 캠페인 공동 애드보커시 모니터링과 책무성 제고 역량강화와 정보 공유

앞으로 어떻게 함께 일해야 할까? Leo williams, Beyond2015 •

글로벌 차원의 활동을 이끌 수 있는 리더십을 확보하는 한편 폭넓은 주체의 참여를 증진하는 것이 과제

•

정책 애드보커시와 캠페인의 구조에 대한 결정을 분명히 내리고 실행하는 것 중요함

•

시민사회의 활동, 논의 내용을 활발히 공유하고 국회와 정부를 연계해서 정 치적 의지를 제고

•

자본이 정책을 좌우하지 않도록 중심 잡기

•

글로벌 활동의 리더십 구조를 분명히 정해야 할 것

- 69 -

앞으로 어떻게 함께 일해야 할까? Marie L'Hostis, action2015 •

150개국 2000개의 멤버가 참여. 지역사회부터 글로벌 레벨까지 연결하는 캠페인을 진행하였으며 기후변화, 환경, 인권, 개발을 중심적으로 다루었음. 가장 닿기 어렵고 소외된 집단의 참여를 독려하였음.

•

참여 증진, 가볍고 쉬운 내용으로 접근, 정보의 폭넓은 공유를 캠페인 원칙으 로 삼았음.

•

성과는? 3000회의 캠페인. 탈중앙화에 성공, 오픈 소스 공유가 성공의 핵심 요소였음.

앞으로 어떻게 함께 일해야 할까? John Patrick, Nigerian Justice and Peace Commission •

Beyond2015에서 정책 애드보커시를 지원하기 위한 기금을 지원받았던 것이 가장 값진 원조였 음! 글로벌 정책 형성 과정에 직접 참여할 수 있었던 의미 있는 경험

•

SDGs 시대에서는 누가 누구에게 무엇이 가장 옳다고 가르치는 실수를 반복하지 않기를 바람. 역 사적으로 개발의 이름으로 아프리카를 해하는 사례가 많았음. 일방적 개발이 아닌 전환을 가져오 는 의제가 되었으면 함.

•

우리는 모두 개발도상국임. SDGs는 빈곤층만을 대상으로 하는 의제가 아님.

•

ODA/GNI 0.7% 달성보다 진짜 우리에게 필요한 것은 정책을 변화시킬 수 있는 힘. 접근법을 바 꾸면 세상의 많은 부분에 변화를 가져올 수 있을 것임. SDGs가 모든 나라에 적용할 수 있는 보편 적 의제인만큼 우리 모두의 마음가짐이 달라져야 함.

- 70 -

앞으로 어떻게 함께 일해야 할까? Alessandra Nilo, GESTOS •

Business as usual이 되지 않도록 마음가짐을 새롭게 하는 것이 중요.

•

SDGs가 이행과정에 물타기되는 것을 막기 위해서는 시민사회가 이행과정이 옳은 방향으로 갈 수 있게 중요한 역할을 해야 함.

•

브라질에서는 지역 주민들이 글로벌 논의가 어떻게 자신의 삶에 어떻게 영향 을 미칠 것인지에 대해 인지할 수 있도록 노력하였음. 정부간 협상에 정부대 표단으로서 참여하였음.

•

가장 취약한 계층에 다가가는 것이 가장 큰 과제 중 하나.

•

민간기업부문과의 파트너십 형성하여 긍정적 효과 가져오는 한편 부정적 영 향 최소화하는 역할을 해야 함.

앞으로 어떻게 함께 일해야 할까? Danny, CIVICUS •

SDGs에 대한 자축의 분위기, 축하해도 좋을까? 치열하게 참여하여 시민사회가 싸워왔던 의제 중 많은 부분이 반영되었지만 그 동안 들인 시간과 노력만큼의 가치가 있을까?

•

시민사회가 앞으로 무엇을 할 수 있을 것인가? 진짜 people's goals라고 한다면 시민사회 가 지역 주민에게 다가갈 중요한 역할을 담당. 캠페인 차원을 넘는 아주 정교한 전환 전략을 세워야 함. 사회 통합과 leave no one behind를 어떻게 실현할 것인가?

•

SDGs 이후 시민사회는 더 특별한 책임을 부여 받음. 모니터링, 정보를 둘러싼 권력관계를 전환하는 것.

•

시민사회에게는 새로운 시민사회 네트워크, 메커니즘, 연대체를 구성할 수 있는 기회. INGO, grassroots, 비공식적 시민활동들이 한데 역량을 합칠 수 있는 기회.

•

보편적 의제의 예제화가 필요. 행동의 변화 가져오기 위해 어떻게 시민사회를 동원할 것인 가? 우리가 일하는 방식을 새롭게 정할 수 있는 기회임.

- 71 -

어떤 전략이 필요할까? 그룹토의 결과 •

regional 애드보커시 전략 regional 레벨에서 더 큰 시너지 발휘할 수 있는 목표들이 많음 Sub-regional 차원의 전략도 활용

•

UN 애드보커시 한 기구가 gate keeper가 되서는 안 됨. HLPF, 유엔인권기구, COP21 협약 등 다양한 차원에서 함께 대응

•

모니터링과 책무성 시민사회의 협력, 플랫폼을 구성하여 구조적인 문제에 대해 감시하는 것이 중요함 감시를 위한 역량강화가 필요. SDGs 피로 유발하지 않도록 주의해야.

•

국가별 애드보커시 전략 여러 이해관계자, 새로운 파트너와 함께 일해야 함. 국제적 캠페인과 연대가 국가레벨에 어떻게 기여할 수 있을 것인가? 인지도 제고와 소통 증진 방안이 필요함. (언론 동원 전략)

어떤 전략이 필요할까? 그룹토의 결과 •

더 넓은 시민사회에게 다가가기 위한 전략 기존에 활동하던 환경단체와 종교단체 등 여러 주체가 참여하는 것이 중요 - 기존의 actor들이 사용하고 있던 언어를 차용하여 소통, 개발NGO와 국내단체를 함께 패널로 구성한 워크샵, 토론회 조직 지역사회에서 국제 논의를 알고 논의의 오너십을 가질 수 있도록 tool 개발, 지자체의 역량 강화 북반구 나라들에서는 “개발”의 정의를 확장하여 보편적 의제 실행해야 하는 문제 – 어떻게 SDGs를 이행 할 것인가 전에 왜? 무엇을? 이라는 질문에 대해 설득해야 함 시민의 일상에 다가갈 수 있는 전략 - 허핑턴포스트에 기획 연재, 학교 교과과정에 SDGs 이행을 제도화 언어가 분명하고 소통하기 쉬워야 함 - 아이콘과 문구 단순화에 대한 우려가 있지만 시민들과 소통하기 위해서는 단순화 작업을 두려워해서는 안 됨. 소통할 때 모든 복잡한 논의를 다 전달하는 것은 불가능 민간기업영역에도 outreach 해야 함. UN 의제이지만 UN-led agenda가 되지 않도록 시민사회 간의 연대를 강화 <끝>

- 72 -

UNGA 새마을운동 고위급회담 이현아간사 (지구촌빈곤퇴치시민네트워크)

1. 행사개요 • 행사명: 새마을 운동 영감을 받은 새로운 지역개발패러다임과 포용적이 고 지속가능한 새로운 지역사회 모델 (A new rural development paradigm and the inclusive and sustainable new communities model inspired by the saemaul undong) • 주관:UNDP, OECD, 대한민국 외교부 • 일시: 2015년 9월 26일 15:00-18:00

- 73 -

2. 행사프로그램 전문가 세션: UNDP 사무차장보 Magdy Martinex-Soliman, OECD 개발센터 국장 Mario Pezzini 환영사: 한국아동인구환경의원연맹 이주영 국회의원 개회사: Magdy Martinex-Soliman UNDP 사무차장보 Mario Pezzini OECD 개발센터 국장

발표: - Simona Marinescu (Chief Development Impact Group, UNDP) 볼리비아, 라오스, 미얀마, 르완다, 우간다, 베트남에서 포용적이고 지속가능한 새로운 지역사회 15:00 글로벌 프로그램(Inclusive and Sustainable New Communities: ISNC). ISNC에대한 UNDP이행 가 이드 런칭. ~ 16:30 - Carl Dahlman, Head of Thematic Division, OECD 새로운 지역 패러다임 프레임 워크 소개. OECD의 새로운 지역 개발 패러다임 발표. 질의응답

- KOICA 김인 전략기획실이사 새마을운동 비디오 발표 및 KOICA 개회사 - 김은미 이화여자대학교 국제대학원 교수, Jeffry Sachs 콜럼비아대학교 교수 KOICA 발표 폐회사: 김영목 KOICA 이사장

2.행사프로그램 고위급 세션 (진행: Helen Clark UNDP 수장) 환영사 및 발표: Helen Clark UNDP 수장 - ISNC 글로벌프로그램에 대한 비디오 개회사: 박근혜 대한민국 대통령 환영사: 반기문 UN 사무총장

소개사: Angel Gurria OECD 사무총장 17:00 초청 정상들의 특별사 - Paul Kagame 르완다 대통령 ~ 18:00 - Chummaly Sayasone 라오스 대통령 - Truong Tan Sang 베트남대통령 - Ollanta Moises humala Tasso 페루 대통령 특별사 - Mahmoud Mohieldin 세계은행그룹 정상 특사 폐회사: 박근혜 대한민국 대통령 맺음말: Angel Gurria OECD 사무총장 Helen Clark UNDP 수장

- 74 -

3. 고위급회담 대통령 언급 • 새마을운동 - 新농촌개발 패러다임으로 - 새마을운동을 인류 공동의 자산으로 - 대한민국 발전을 이끈 개발 정책이자, 국민적 의식 개혁 운동 - 가난을 이겨내기 위해 근면, 자조, 협동 - 선순환 구조를 구축

3. 고위급회담 대통령 언급 • 성공요인 - 첫 번째 요인은 인센티브와 경쟁 - 두 번째 요인은 신뢰에 기반을 둔 국가 지도자의 리더십 - 세 번째 요인은 자발적이고 적극적인 국민의 참여

- 75 -

3. 고위급회담 대통령 언급 • 새로운 새마을운동 -각기 다른 국가들의 현실에 맞춰서 새마을운동의 성공 요인을 보편적 원칙과 행동으로 재구성할 필요 -빈곤 퇴치와 지속가능한 개발이라는 공동의 목표 달성에 기여하도록 새마을운동의 내용과 실천 방식도 현대화해야 -OECD와 UNDP가 새마을 운동을 기초로 ｢新농촌개발 패러다임｣과 ｢ 포용적이고 지속가능한 새마을모델｣을 구축해 가고 있는 것을 환영

4. 향후 새마을 운동 국제개발협력 전망 • OECD는 외교부와 새마을운동 연구협력 진행 중 (2014년 부터) • UNDP는 포용적이고 지속가능한 새로운 지역사회 이행 가이드를 런칭하 면서 새마을 운동과 협력 • KOICA 새마을 운동 글로벌화 전략 수립 • OECD와 UNDP의 지역개발사업, KOICA의 적극적인 홍보 및 프로그램 에 따라 새마을운동 개발사업이 더욱 확장될 것으로 예상

- 76 -

5. 시민사회역할 • 주민자발적인 참여 유도 • 민주주의 가치 강조 • 외적성장 치중 보다 정치, 경제, 사회, 문화 등의 중장기적 효과에 고려

고맙습니다.

- 77 -

- 78 -