Architectural PORTFOLIO Selected Works 2017-19
Curriculum Vitae. Education :
Experiences :
Frank Anthony Public School, New Delhi / Bengaluru | till10thgrade
Vice President of Student Council, WCFA | 2018
AECS Maaruthi Magnolia Public School, Bengaluru | 11-12thgrade
ZoNASA Design-2 Head | 2018
Wadiyar Centre For Architecture, Mysuru | 1st- 8th (present sem.)
Layout Editor of Courtyard | Official College Newsletter Laurie Baker Centre Exposure Program | NASA Event
Rahul Kustagi “Kusthu” Phone No. : +91 9986311311 E-mail ID : kustagi.rahul@gmail.com Instagram : rahul_kustagi Address : Shanthiniketan Layout, Bengaluru, India D.O.B : 04 Sep.1998 English | Hindi | Kannada
Head of Photography Club | 2017
Competitions & Projects : Reviving Lost Heritage (The Drawing Board) | 2019 | Finalists* Sculpting The Pioneers of Architecture (Archdais) | 2018-19 | Top 25* The House (Archdais) | 2019 REschool Competition (Volzero) | 2018 The One Drawing Challenge (Architizer) | 2019* Parents’ Wadrobe | 2018
Skills :
Other Interests :
experience level
icon credits: noun project
Contents. THE SUSTAINABLE ARC. Nagpur | Maharashtra
Semester 7 | 4th Year | Campus Masterplanning Studio Guides : Prof. Manoj Ladhad Asst Prof. Shreyas Baindur
COGNITIVE SCHOOL. Bidar | Karnataka
Semester 6 | 4th Year | Campus Design Studio Guides : Prof. Prashanth G Pole Prof. Anand Prakash Asst. Prof. Shreyas Baindur Asst. Prof. Anjali Cheriyath
POROUS PORFORMANCE CENTRE. Mangalore | Karnataka
Semester 5 | 3rd Year | Public Building Studio Guides : Prof. Nelson Pais Asso. Prof. R Kiran Kumar Asst. Prof. Anjali Cheriyath
ADAPTIVE SENSE. Mangalore | Karnataka
Semester 5 | 3rd Year | Adaptive Reuse Studio Guides : Prof. Nelson Pais Prof. Girish Dariyav Karnawat Asst. Prof. R. Kiran Kumar Asst. Prof. Kavana Kumar
WORKING DRAWINGS. Semester 5,6 | 3rd Year | Housing Studio Guides : Prof. Ryan Thomas Prof. Sandeep Sen Asst. Prof. Indu S Panicker Asst. Prof. Kavana Kumar
DOCUMENTATION.
Semester 2| 1st Year | Measure Drawing Studio Guides : Prof. Kukke Subramanya Asst. Prof. Rishie Kurian Asst. Prof. Toshi Singh Asst. Prof. Nayantara Harindranath
TRACING IIMB.
Semester 6 | Contemporary Architecture Assignment | The One Drawing Challenge 2019 Subject Faculty: Asso. Prof. R Kiran Kumar
CENTRIPETAL. Mumbai | Maharashtra
The Drawing Board Competition 2019. Jury Members : Ar. Sanjay Mohe, Ar. Palinda Kannangara, Ar. Ernesto Bedma
SHUNYA. Pune | Maharashtra
Sculpting the Pioneers of Architecture. Jury Members : Sanjay Puri Architects
MANE.
The House Competition.
The Sustainable Arc Nagpur | Hot and Dry Climate | Campus Planning Semester 7 | Year 4
Studio Brief : The need of the hour are architects who are capable of understanding the intricacies of working in a world that is ever changing and also carrying through a larger discussion of sustainability. The intent of the studio is to introduce the students to the design of large Sustainable Institutional Campus and understand the impact of climate on such sustainability. The Site analysis of the parcel of land will include: the understanding of the terrain, water drainage patterns, vegetation patterns, soil conditions and soil substrata, climatic implications of wind and sun, seasonal changes on the site etc. Amalgamation: Developing on the inferences from the research and analysis, students will use designs done from their previous semesters to design a campus on the site selected, post appropriate change to the project to suit the selected site and climatic conditions;t namely: a. School of Architecture from semester 6 b. Performing Arts Centre from semester 5 c. Housing Design from semester 4 d. Community Centre from Semester 3 e. And smaller units as designed in semester 2 and 1. Along with the design of fresh designs done this semester which include: a.Hostels for boys, girls and third gendered individuals b. Independent Residences for the Dean and Director of the Institute c. A Dining facility for the campus d. Indoor Sports Complex e. Outdoor Sports facilities
Time Period : 2.5 months Type : Masterplanning Requirements : Planning and Building Design Site Area : 100 acres.
SITE ANALYSIS.
NW summer winds.
SW monsoon winds. Sunpath and Wind Direction.
Contour Patterns.
Ridges and Slopes
Existing Hydrology on site.
Existing Seasonal Vegetation.
Top Soil Depositions - Flat Zones
Pressure difference on site.
Potential Ecological Zones
Microclimatic Buildable Zone
Temperature, Humidity & Precipitation.
Summer temperatures reach upto 48o, with the onset of monsoon, the temperatures decrease. The climate becomes cool in December.
Nagpur recieves an annual rainfall of 1100 -1200, majority of the precipitation takes place in July and August.
Geology.
The soil available is hard and granular. A very thin blanket of silty soil is present in the sloping area towards the boundary. Topsoil is granular upto 2 to 3m followed by hard basalt rock, high bearing capacity.
Surrounding Contours
JUNE
DECEMBER
SEPTEMBER
160
0 80
400 240
MASTERPLAN IDEATION.
MASTERPLAN MORPHOLOGY (Design Process)
Shaded pathways running through landscape. Wide plinth to provide free pedestrian movement through the year.
Water creator of all beings. Has been the root cause of vegetation on land and the shade from the vegetation has lead one to be comfortable environment which we refer to as a microclimate and ecological zone.
Staggered planting pattern to allow diagonal movement and shaded paths.
To understanding sustainablity, it to be sensitive to the environment. Consuming the least and producing as less residue as possible. At the masterplan level, to create microclimate through minimal interference on the side to enhance the existing vegetative growth through all seasons. First step is towards sustenance is of creating water basins (collector) and swales (pathway) and create evergreen vegetation along these paths and basins. The strategies of creating ecological zones traveses through the vast scale of the site to the different building typologies and the unbuilt inbetween.
LANDSCAPE STRATEGIES
Water Edge Strategies NW - SE Major Spine
Exposed Surfaces to NW
Improvising Geometry
Public building rotation
PRINCIPLES TO PLANNING AND DESIGN ORIENTATION Longer faces north and south.
MUTUAL SHADING Use tall buildings to shade common spaces and other buildings.
FLOOR STACKING Reduce roof area by stacking buildings. This will also reduce footprint. HUMIDIFY AND COOLING Place water bodies strategically to cool functional and recreational spaces of the building.
NORTH LIGHT Considering Nagpur’s latitude, north light is comparitively soft. This light can be used for daylight of interior spaces. DEFLECTED LIGHT Use bounced light from light shelves. Clerestory can be used for daylighting as well as ventilation and are comparitively smaller to provide ambient lighting. COURTYARDS Use of courtyards allow light and ventilation and the openings to the exterior can be reduced.
Wall as a Landscape Feature N-S Major Spine
Shifting Ortho’ Axis
Basalt wall provides shaded spaces to walk and socialise. This wall breaks the orthoganality of the buildings with landscape.
SHADING DEVICE CONCEPTS Horizontal fins cut high angle sun and vertical fins cut low and wide angle sun. Depth of fin is decided depending on the daylight the space requires. THERMAL MASS Thick walls are prefered over thin walls. Basalt walls to reduce heat gain. Calculate thermal lag depening on type of occupancy.
Staggered Massing
Overlapped Layers 200
0 100
500 300
Shadow Analysis - Masterplan
June Shadows
Wind Analysis - Masterplan
September Shadows
December Shadows
Wind Strategies
Masterplan Zoning
Splitting the mass to allow the humidified air through the spaces. Stagger to cut dry dusty summer winds.
The Academic Block is equidistant from the housing and the hostel blocks, where as the circulation is diagonal through the landscape.
Porosity on the North West portion of the academic to redude wind shadows.
North West Wind - summer
The public buildings are placed at ends of the masterplan, which overlook waterbodies.
Checker Board pattern to break the wind and allow the winds to funnel through.
West Wind
HOSTEL BLOCKS Blocks allow west wind to pass. Only the humidified air is allowed ti the common in between spaces.
Water Management Stategies Catchment Area = 98.4 acres Average Annual Rainfall = 1200mm Runoff Coefficient = 0.1 Effective Volume of Catchment Water = 47,866cum Water Requirements: Per day = 99,150 / 1,00,000 lts Annually = 3,65,00,000 lts / 3,650 cum
South West Wind - monsoon
Water Requirement Table
Overlapped Shadows
SITE SECTIONS.
MASTERPLAN The campus is accessed fron the north west. The public road runs along the northern site boundary. This is a pedestrian friendly campus and vehicular access is terminated at the parking zones. Vegetation on site is planned along the swales that carry water to the reservoirs. The pedestrian arc is approximately 300m long from one end to the other. This arc is shaded through the day and renders a landscape character to the place. This arc is a social space with stepped water bodies and amphitheatres.
Legend
Built Circulation Water Bodies Vegetation Landscape Feature 50
0 25
125 75
HOSTELS.
Ideas
Double height units ventilation of the spaces. Stagggered landing overlooking common spaces in between the built.
Tight in between space for mutual shading.
East and West blank facades with north and south exposed to daylight and ventilation.
Suspended common spaces at mid landings to create interactions.
Ground floor used for common activities.
Key Plan
Roof Plan
Ground Floor
Second Floor
Section through common areas.
First Floor
Third Floor
Section through Hostel Block.
Daylight Analysis
Single and Double Occupancy June
September
December
Studio and Third Gender Type June
9am
9am
12pm
12pm
4pm
4pm
September
December
12
0 6
30 18
Unit Typology Plans
Single Occupancy
Views.
Double Occupancy
South Facade - Recession
1BHK Type
Third Gender/ Studio
Unit Typologies
Plan
Plan
Section
Section
Facade
Facade
Sections
North Facade - Projection
Triple Common Area
12
0 6
30 18
SPORTS COMPLEX.
Ideas Using the roof to facilitate indoor sport activities. Diffused lighting from the light to cut off glare.
DAYLIGHTING
VENTILATION
RAINWATER HARVEST
Key Plan
Roof Plan Envelope Strategies
B
Roof Detail
A
A B
Plan @ +2m
E and W Facade
South Facade
North facade Plan @ +6m 12
0 6
30 18
Sections
Section AA
Section BB
MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS. Roof and Wall Section
Envelope Overview
Daylight Analysis June 9am
12pm
4pm
September
December
LIBRARY & DINING : External Views
Section through the court.
MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS. Masterplan
,
Cognitive School Bidar | Hot and Dry Climate | School Semester 6 | Year 3
Studio Brief : To explore the possibilities of Space Making and Nature of Learning in two distinct climate zone (Hot and Dry / Hot and Humid) and focus on detailing to achieve the tangibles of crafting a building to its assembly and scale. The brief calls for an Institution project in the realm of the Urban envelope, under the constrains of limited land resource. The aim of the project will focus on transform the precinct into an urban nexus; respect and creatively engage with the climate; create a new creative and collaborative cultural landscape for the public to experience and create new types of spaces for learning. The direction of this studio is to gauge that the student is attuned to dealing with multiple issues, while retaining the design idea. This studio is not about trying to achieve objective score on “fitment” of requirement or designing an iconic building, but to achieve a design solution that combines simple logic, imagination and street smart pragmatism. It also combines the students travel based learning’s and the collaborative approach.
Time Period : 2 months Building Type : Institutional Building Building Requirements : Studios, Workshops, Staff Rooms, Library, Canteen, Basketball Court, etc. Site Area : 2 acres.
Site: 1:10 slope, West to East. Climate: Hot and Dry climate. Philosophy and Methodology: The method of the architecture school is of a research based method where the source is the library and the studios are discussion and study zones. The studios organise themselves around the library. The journey is between the studios and the library. This passage is between introspection and expression. The environment of the campus is a combination of introvert and extrovert spaces that support different levels of introspection and expression. IDEAS. Space within a Space. This is the idea of space within an existing space, further the spaces are contrasting with respect to what the function is. The variations of introvert and extrovert spaces within each other.
Synthesis as a whole. The studios follow a square plan and placed with spaces inbetween the studios as spill over and corridors.
Plan @ +2M
In-Between Inrospection and Expression. Corrridors haave a character that is not introvert nor extrovert. These are semi enclosed volumes that function climatically.
Climate Strategies:
Section AA Volumes of Spaces.
Section BB Double Height Volumes.
Climate Band and a datum.
0
10 5
25 15
Plan @ -3M
Plan @ -6.5M
Section CC
Section DD
Wall Section thro’ Studio Court. 0
10 5
25 15
Wall Section (Northlight opening) Arrangement of Studio
Roof Plan
VIEWS.
0
10 5
25 15
MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS.
East Elevation
South Elevation
North Elevation
West Elevation
,
Porous Performance Centre Bunder, Mangalore | Hot and Humid Climate | Performing Art Centre Semester 5 | Year 3
Studio Brief : The project and the requirements was determined by the students after a careful site study of Bunder (Old Port). Performing Art Centre was the program chosen to accomadate diverse culture of Mangalore. The site is picked from this region as the urban development authority proposes for a smart city riverfront in the near future. The studio questions if a public building could be a catalyst in a public realm of a city.
OLD MUNICIPAL BUILDING.
DOCKYARD
TOWARDS CITY
Time Period : 1.5 months Building Type : Public Building (A catalyst) Building Requirements : Auditorium, Gallery, Workshops, Food court, Shops, Ancillary and Administration office. Site Area : 3,203 sqm.
OLD PORT (proposed riverfront) SITE
GURUPURA RIVER
Climate and Context: Mangaluru is located around the confluence of Gurupura and Nethravati rivers. As they meet to flow as Arabian Sea. Mangaluru experiences hot humid climate throughout the year. The site is situated by the river Gurupura and in the age old locality of Bunder which was once used as a port. Towards the west is a riverfront that has been proposed for the urban development. The site is surrounded by roads on all sides and a street in between as well. A main road (18m) on the west and 9m roads around. Site Study: The urban fabric is permeable with space between two buildings. This allows the breeze to pass and pedestrian movement. Sections of a Permeable Street.
Porosity | Permeability | Pedestrian: The street that exists between the site is a pedestrian one, with pedestrian access to the building from the street. On a whole the idea is to connect the sites and the streets beyond. This street has the potential to host various public activities through the year.
Plan @ +3.3M
IDEAS . NOTIONS . CONCEPT To Fragment: To gain porosity throughthe built, in plan as weel as sections.
Connector Sketch: The sketch is losing lines but not losing its connections. A parallel orientation gives a sense of direction.
Section AA
Section BB
Section CC
Section DD
In betweens: In the scheme, the functions are fixed and the circulation is inbetween the functions. This a partially enclosed space. 2.
1.
3.
Sectional Idea : In reference to the book Manual of Sections. Shearing along all 3 axes and deducting. 4.
5.
0
10 5
25 15
MASSING PROCESS.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Plan @ +8.1M 7.
VIEWS.
Section EE
Section FF
Section GG
0
10 5
25 15
MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS.
Plan @ +10.2M
West Facade
East Facade
South Facade
North Facade 0
10 5
25 15
Plan @ -2M
Roof Plan
VIEWS.
Sectional Perspective
0
10 5
25 15
Frame work holds the precast modules in place. Roofing Material is Polycarbonate Sheet sitting on the framework.
West Facade Clerestory
Bridge connects the workshops on the 2nd floor, is a view point and an advertising board during events,
Breaking the Corner
Modules on 2nd floor accomadate functions such as workshops and toilets, these can be converted to gallery spaces. Louver Device to Shade.
Modules on 1st floor accomadate gallery spaces that overlook modules above and below.
Modules are interlocked to give varying volumes between corridor and modules itself.
Planter box to allow filtered light.
Plinth emphasizes the north-south movement across the street.
Balcony Module and Openings on North and South.
,
Adaptive Sense Bunder, Mangalore | Adaptive Reuse Semester 5 | Year 3 (minor task + vertical studio)
Studio Brief : Adaptive reuse of the old municipal office in Bunder was taken up as the minor project for the architectural design studio. The design task was conducted excercise between the 5th and 7th semester studio, based on the site observation and primary surveys conducted, an adaptive reuse proposal was to be formulated which enhanced the public charater of the building. The class was divided into 9 groups, who worked on various programs which manifested into spatial ideas so as to accelerate the urban regenaration of the heritage area of Bunder. SITE Time Period : 3 weeks Building Type : Public Building (A catalyst) Site Area : 2,180 sqm. Built Up : max. 1600 sqm. Team : Prabhanja Skanda, Ronak Darla, Sharvani S, Rahul H, Soundarya R, JK Sourav, Rahul Kustagi
OLD MUNICIPAL BUILDING.
DOCKYARD
OLD PORT (proposed riverfront)
GURUPURA RIVER
TOWARDS CITY
IDEATION & PROCESS : Bays / Walls : Extraction of lines from the existing and radiating a concept to cultivate an interactive space through vertical plan modulation.
ROOF: The roof tiles are retained and additional ste arepositioned to carry the truss.
Fractals: To break the bays and create a rythmic pattern of walls with decreasing heights to the open, hence an urban forum.
Key Plan D
Oblivion: The intent is to energise the municipal building, by breaking it open to the landscape and the riverfront, thereby rendering to the quality of the riverfront in the recent future. Keeping the facade intact as a memory of the building.
C
MEZZANINE: Smaller and less frequent activities can take p mezzanine which has a shallow volume.
B
A
A
D
Second Floor Plan Street | Square | Public: By principle, build as minimal as possible and also create a public activity through the diagonality of the site.
C
B
INTERMEADIATE FLOOR: A transition between the ground and the upp has balcony spaces that overlook towards to th the riverfront.
GROUND FLOOR: Open plans with walls to create partially shaded spaces. This space turns into a plaza and the MCC building acts as a backdop.
Rejuvination of Volumes: Refining the original building by modulating the floor planes, allowing a particular function to take place.
First Floor Plan
Multi-Utility: The design follows a strong program of no fixed use but a multifunctional space, which offers volumes for all sorts of indoor and some outdoor programs. The site holds prospects of a market, exhibition space, workshops and also a playground.
Ground Floor Plan
Exploded Axonometric View 3
0 1.5
7.5 4.5
eel supports
place in the
Section AA
per floors, it he street and
Section BB
Section CC
Section DD 3
0 1.5
7.5 4.5
MODEL PHOTOGRAPHS.
OUTDOOR VIEWS.
,
WD Brief : The aim is to make drawings that can communicate ideas and thoughts will allows one to execute a certain detail of work on site.
Semester 5 - Technical Drawings - plans, section, toilets,etc Semester 6 - Material and Detail Drawings - openings, lan Scale 1:200 wall sections, electrical layout, staircase facade cladding, etc.
Time Period : 5,6 Semester Requirements : Construction Drawings
B) Horizontal Louver Detail
Scale 1:10
(AR401- A) Wall Section 1
Scale 1:20
Working Drawings Mysore | Housing Semester 5,6 | Year 3
Ground Floor Plan @ +1.2m
First Floor Plan @ +4.5m GENERAL NOTES:
D2
D2
+6.0 LVL
+6.0 LVL HL
D3
D1
D3
PLAN KEY PLAN KEY Scale 1:500
+3.0 LVL
D3
-0.75 LVL
+0.0 LVL
+0.0 LVL
-0.90 LVL
2850
D3
D2
2850
D2
D2
3000
D2 +0.0 LVL
D2
STAIRCASE HORIZONTAL LOUVERS STR 1 PLAN Scale 1:500 HL -KEY 300 X 2800 , 600 X 2800
450
3000
D2
300
REVISIONS:
D
E
F
D
E
F
G
2830
NO. REVISIONS: 1 NO. 2
H
G
2
DATE
DESCRIPTION
14-09-18 DATE 01-11-18
DESCRIPTION
4
4
01-11-18
HOUSING
D2
1160
D2
450
1000
+6.0 LVL
Midlanding
+6.0 LVL
1050
450 2550
W1
+3.0 LVL
Midlanding
1160 DATE:
D2
Shear Wall (RCC) Handrail Grouve
1:50 SCALE:
+0.0 LVL
D2 500
500
Section YY
SECTION YY SECTION YY
SECTION YY SECTION YY
SCALE 1:50 SCALE 1:50
STRUC SERV CONSULT: CONSULT:
07-09-18
1:50
SERV
(AR301-A)AA SECTION AA CONSULT: (AR301-A) SECTION Scale 1:20
+0.0 LVL
3000 SHARMA MANJUNATH R AR. ANJALI
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
3200 1
+3M
+3M
+4.65M STR 1
20
1
10
10
20
2090 11
11
PROJECT:
Midlanding
1
10
20
11
A
SCA SCALE: 1:500, 1:40, 1:20,1:50 1:5
Kota Stone 24mm Tread and Riser
D
D
+1.65M PLAN of STR (AR301-B) (AR301-B) PLAN of STR 1 Scale 1:401
SIGNATURE:
(AR301-A) SECTION AA (AR301-A) Section AA
3000
Scale 1:20
DRAWN BY:
AR. BY: AR. SANDEEP SEN CHECKED BY: CHECKED AR. BY: AR. KAVANA KUMAR APPROVED BY:APPROVED
5
CONST COMP: CONST COMP: STRUC CONSULT:R MANJUN MANJUNATH STRUC CONSULT:
+1.65M
300
SIGNATURE:
5 E
5
E
DATE:
18/0 18/05/19 DRAWN BY: RAHUL KUSTAGIRAH 01 01NO: PROJECT NO: PROJECT REFERENCE NO: REFERENCE NO:
DATE:
6600
5
5
TITLE: AR301 Staircase AR301 Staircase
TITLE:
3880
6600
Staircase Tiling Detail
CLIENT:
CLIENT:
+3M
STR 1
PROJECT: HOUSINGHOUSING
LAKSHMIPURA LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
Ref. Nosing Detailing
A
3880
3880
A
A
200Th. RCC Shear Wall
+1.65M Folded Plate Stairs
3000
DATE DESCRIPTIO
Midlanding
Midlanding
A
STR 1
Shear Wall (RCC) Handrail Grouve
Kota Stone 24mm Tread and Riser
NO. DATE
+1.65M
Ref. Nosing Detailing
Ref. Nosing Detailing
2090
200Th. RCC Shear Wall
AR. ANJALI Scale 1:20 SHARMA
MYSURU
W1
200Th. RCC Shear Wall
Shear Wall (RCC) Handrail Grouve
REVISIONS:
+1.65M
Handrail incline at 25 degrees
DRAWN BY: RAHUL KUSTAGI DATE: 07-09-18 1050 01 Staircase Tiling PROJECT NO: Staircase Tiling Detail DRAWN BY: RAHUL KUSTAGI Detail 1160 REFERENCE NO:+3M Midlanding 01 PROJECT NO: AR. RYAN THOMAS CHECKED BY: REFERENCE NO:Folded Plate Stairs Folded Plate Stairs 1050 AR. INDU PANICKER APPROVED BY: Kota Stone 24mm AR. RYAN THOMAS CHECKED BY: 300 Tread and Riser 300 CONST COMP: AR. INDU PANICKER APPROVED BY: STRUC CONST COMP: MANJUNATH R CONSULT:
MYSURU
500
500
W1
W1
8490
AR103 SECTION XX MS Handrail AR104 SECTIONSCALE: YY Detailing
1350
W1
W1
W1
50
4
8490
TITLE:
150
1350
2550
+3.0 LVL W1
D1 +3.0 LVL
1350
D1 +3.0 LVL
A
MYSURU
1050
1000
W1
D2
+3M
+3M
+6.0 LVL
LAKSHMIPURAM, Handrail incline Skirting Detailing at 25 degrees
2090
Shear Wall (RCC) Handrail
8490
Handrail incline at 25 degrees
W1 D2
50
NO.
+4.65M
+4.65M
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
1000
HOUSING
HABITAT
1000
150
1050
150
1000
+9.0 LVL
1050
1000
1000
2550
1000
+9.0 LVL D4
HABITAT
PROJECT: CLIENT:
CLIENT: TITLE: AR103 SECTION XX AR104 SECTION YY
1000
2550
MS Handrail Detailing
MS Handrail Detailing
D4
PROJECT:
1000
Skirting Detailing
Skirting Detailing
+9.0 LVL
W1
Scale
E
4
1000
6640
150
3280
3910
1000
3300
1000
6620
Shear Wall (RCC) Handrail
Shear Wall (RCC)100 Handrail
1000
6640
4
4
1000
3280
150
3300
150
6620
6620
+9.0 LVL
+6.0 LVL W1
(AR301-E) Handrail Detail 2
Scale 1:5
REVISIONS:
3910
3910
+1.65M 6620
3300
+9.0 LVL
LEGENDS:
(AR301-E) Handrail Detail 2
D
14-09-18
1
100
100
H
3300
+9.0 LVL
LEGENDS:
Scale 1:5
E
E
3200
B
A
SCALE 1:50
(AR301-E) Handrail Detail Handrail Detail 2 Scale 1:5 2
(AR301- D) Handrail Detail 1
Scale 1:5
D
D
2830
B
A
SECTION XX
(AR301-D) Handrail Detail 1
Scale 1:5 (AR301-E)
HORIZONTAL LOUVERS HL - 300 X 2800 , 600 X 2800
2830
Section XX
SCALE 1:50
Handrail Grouve (Cast with smooth as shutter materia
50
-0.6 LVL
+0.0 LVL
SECTION XX
Handrail Detail (AR301- D)(AR301HandrailD) Detail 1 Scale 1:5 1
(AR301-C) Staircase Tiling Detail
-0.6 LVL -0.75 LVL -0.90 LVL
50 200 TH. Shear200 WallTH. Shear Wall
200 TH. Shear W Raw Concrete Scale 1:5 Finishing
(AR301-C) Staircase Tiling Detail
Scale 1:500
450
D2
D1
1500
+3.0 LVL
1500
HL
D2
80
20
6600
5
AR. ANJAL AR. CONSULT: ANJALI SHARMA SERV CONSULT:SERV
Scale 1:40
SIGNATURE:
D (AR301-B) PLAN of STR 1
E
(AR301-B) Plan of STR1
Scale 1:40
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
MYSURU
D2
320
SPECIFIC NOTES: MS Plate 5 mm TH. Handrail Grouve Handrail Grouve (bolted) Pour concretre carefully, concretre carefully, the concrete mixthe 50 (Castplywood with smoothPour plywood (Cast with smooth proportion shouldtobe manitain proportion should be manitained avoid as shutter material) uneven destribution of aggre as shutter material) uneven destribution of aggregates. Concrete Parapet
50 50
MYSURU
D2
300
SCHEDULE OF OPENINGS LEGENDS: DOORS D1 - 1100 X 2100 SCHEDULE OF OPENINGS D2 - 900 X 2100 Raw ConcreteRaw Concrete DOORS Finishing D3 - 750 X 2100 Finishing D1 - 1100 X 2100 D4 - 2700 X 2100 (SLIDING FOLDING DOOR) D2 - 900 X 2100 D3 - 750 X 2100 WINDOWS D4 - 2700 X 2100 (SLIDING FOLDING DOOR) W1 - 1500 X1500, SILL HEIGHT 500 FROM FLOOR. Staircase Detail WINDOWS (AR301-C) (AR301-C) Staircase Tiling DetailTiling Scale 1:5 W1 - 1500 X1500, SILL HEIGHT 500 FROM STAIRCASE FLOOR. STR 1
SPECIFIC NOTES:
50
50
D2
24mm Kota Tread Stone
200
2400
D2
80
20
Concrete Parapet Concrete Parapet
2400
1000
D2
300
24mm Kota Riser Stone 80
130
1000
1000 D2
320 20
320
LEGENDS:
150
1000
D4
Handrail MS Box Section 25x75 MS Pipe 10mm Dia. (welded)
50
150
150 D4
+9.0 LVL
75
180
24mm Kota 24mm Kota Tread Stone Tread Stone
SPECIFIC NOTES:
- ALL DIMENSIONS MM ARE IN - ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN 200
200
MS Pipe 10mm Dia. MS Pipe 10mm Dia. (welded) Cement Screed(welded) 15mm MS Plate 5 mm TH. MS Plate 5 mm TH. (bolted) (bolted)
50
SPECIFIC NOTES:
+9.0 LVL
24mm Kota Riser Stone
24mm Kota Riser Stone
Handrail Handrail MS25x75 Box Section 25x75 MS Box Section
50
5100
8110
6970
GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL NOTES:
75
75
Cement Screed Cement Screed 15mm 15mm
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
1
2400
5100
180
2
8110
3200
3
6970
1
180
4
- ALL DIMENSIONS GENERAL NOTES: ARE IN MM
2
130
3
130
4
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
SIGNATU
SECTION ACROSS HL
2
PLAN OF HL
SCALE : 1:10
2
SPECIFIC NOTES:
SCALE : 1:20
HL- Horizontal Louver
HABITAT HOUSING
PROJECT:
MS Bolt 10MM DiA
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
GENERAL NOTES:
30
CLIENT:
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
GENERAL NOTES:
TITLE: 3
Cement Board 50MM
AR300 PRIVACY DETAIL 3
50
Steel Flat Plate 10MM TH.
1
3
30
DRAWN BY:
MS Nut 10MM DIA with bush.
Cement Board 50MM
1
1:20,1:10,1:2 02-11-18 2 RAHUL KUSTAGI
2
1 PROJECT NO:
SPECIFIC NOTES: HL- Horizontal Louver
LEGENDS:
REFERENCE NO:
MS Angle 25x25
CHECKED BY:
SPECIFIC NOTES:
APPROVED BY:
2AR. RYAN THOMAS 2
SPECIFIC NOTES:
AR. INDU PANIKAR
HL- Horizontal Louver
CONST COMP:
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
JOINARY DETAIL
SCALE : 1:2
STRUC CONSULT:
MANJUNATH R
SERV CONSULT:
ANJALI SHARMA
LEGENDS:
SIGNATURE:
SCALE : 1:20
SPECIFIC NOTES:
LEGENDS:
MYSURU
ELEVATION OF HL
3
DATE:
25
1650
300
1
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
Elevation of HL
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
SCALE:
Key Plan
Key Plan
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
Scale 1:200
LEGENDS:
Key Plan
Scale 1:200
1650
LEGENDS:
HL REVISIONS:
Scale 1:200
DATE
NO.
2800
Key Plan
HL
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS: DATE
NO.
2800
+ 0.45M
+ 0.45M
REVISIONS: PROJECT:
HOUSING
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
H
REVISIONS:
Court Below
DATE
NO.
REVISIONS:
Court Below
DATE
NO.
CLIENT:
G
DESCRIPTION
6600
DESCRIPTION
6600
TITLE:
E
D
B
6600
AR 401 Wall Sections
A
6600
3300
SCALE: 1:20
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM +9.9 LVL
HABITAT HOUSING
LAKSHMIPURAM, PROJECT: MYSURU
MS Bolt 10MM DiA CLIENT:
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
(AR401-B) Horizontal Louver Detail
CLIENT:
TITLE:
AR. SANDEEP SEN
APPROVED BY:
AR. KAVANA KUMAR
SERV CONSULT:
(AR401-B) Horizontal Louver Detail
STRUC CONSULT:
MANJUNATH R ANJALI SHARMA
APPROVED BY:
Joinary Detail 200
100 H
6600
300 66006600
OUT
MYSURU
STRUC CONSULT:
(AR401- A) Wall Section 1
MANJUNATH R
(AR401-D) Horizontal Louver Detail ANJALI SHARMA (AR401-B) Horizontal Louver Detail
D
485
B
E
A
D
3300
6600
B
A
6600
Scale 1:100 900
1500
Teak frame 65x125 - Jamb
SIGNAT
485
1100
3
6600 (AR401- A) Wall Section 1
6600 Scale 1:20
SPECIFIC NOTES:
4
1500
Door Nob
CONST COMP:
200 Th. Masonry Wall
Polished Pine Wood 300 x 300
PVC Pipe 150 Dia.
MYSURU
Scale 1:100 Facade Detail
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
100
Scale 1:15
Facade Detail Polished Pine Wood 250mm
Steel Corrugated Sheet 5mm
200 Th.
150
OUT
65
HOUSING REFERENCE NO:
Timber and Corrugated Sheet Bolted
CHECKED BY:
AR. SANDEEP SEN
APPROVED BY:
AR. KAVANA KUMAR
4
DATE
DESCRIPTION 200
NO.
100
OUT
REVISIONS:
IN
200
Steel Angle 50x50 at Intervals
Steel Angle 50x50
15
12
100
MYSURU
1500
65
Peep Hole
RCC 100 MM Sill/ Bay seat. 400
300
MANJUNATH R
SERV CONSULT: AR. ANJALI SHARMA
Scale 1:15
SCALE: SIGNATURE: 1:100, 1:15
Elevation of W1 DATE:
Panel Shutter 30MM- 40MM
Door Nob
STRUC CONSULT: AR201 Elevation and Facade Cladding
685
1100
RCC Sunshade 100MM
CONST COMP:
TITLE:
ARCHITECTURE
Teak frame 65x125 - Jamb
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
CLIENT:
Masonry Wall (AR201-E) Intermediate Facade Detail
PVC Pipe 150 Dia.
900
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR
Shutter
RAHUL KUSTAGI 01
PROJECT NO:
ELEVATION OF W1
IN
800
800
200
200
(AR 201 -B) North Facade Facade Detail
SIGNATURE:
ANJALI SHARMA
6MM Glass
18/05/19
DRAWN BY:
SERV CONSULT: AR. ANJALI SHARMA
MANJUNATH R
AR201 Elevation and Facade Cladding
DATE:
(AR201-D) Bottom Bottom Facade Detail Scale 1:15 (AR201-C) Corner Facade Detail (AR 201-E) Intermeadiate (AR Corner (AR 201-D) (AR201-E) Intermediate Facade Detail Scale 1:15 201-C)
STRUC CONSULT:
SERV CONSULT:
SIGNATURE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
AR. RYAN THOMAS
window AR. INDU PANIKAR frame 65x125
OUT
DETAIL OF FRAME IN SCALE: 1:5
SCALE: 1:100, 1:15
300
Teak APPROVED BY:
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
Steel Angle 50x50
IN
CHECKED BY:
CONST COMP:
200 Th. Masonry Wall
250mm
REFERENCE NO:
Teak wood shutter 40x100
Window Shutter.
Teak Frame 65x125
Polished Pine Wood Polished Pine Wood
PROJECT NO:
1:10, 1:5 (AR201-E) In
02-11-18 RAHUL KUSTAGI
Drip Mould
DESCRIPTION HOUSING
485
Scale 1:15
STRUC CONSULT: OUTMANJUNATH R
+/- 0.0 LVL
PROJECT: DATE
TITLE:
180 300
10
SCALE: 1:10
1500
Steel Corrugated Sheet 5mm
LEGENDS:
Frame Rebate 15x40
DRAWN BY:
Teak wood frame 125x65
70
AR. KAVANA KUMAR
40
800
AR. SANDEEP SEN
APPROVED BY:
Champher 12x12
SCALE:
2099
Corrugated 60 BY: sheet CHECKED 200
100
OUT
Timber and Corrugated Sheet Bolted
Timber 01 and Corrugated Sheet Bolted
RCC 100MM Lintel/Chajja DATE:
Wall Plaster 12MM
1500
PLAN OF W1
NO.
SCALE: 1:10
OUT (AR201-D) Bottom Facade Detail
IN
RAHUL KUSTAGI
200
100 150
PROJECT NO: REFERENCE PinewoodNO: Frame
200
200
IN
Steel Angle SECTION OF W1 50x50 at Intervals
AR200 DOOR AND WINDOW JOINARY
70
DRAWN BY:
+3.3 LVL
Steel Corrugated Sheet 5mm
DATE:
Steel Corrugated 18/05/19 Sheet 5mm
REVISIONS:
125
OUT
Plan of W1
300
MYSURU
500
PVC Pipe 150 Dia.
+6.6 LVL
LAKSHMIPURAM,
Glass 12MM
700
HABITAT HOUSING
CLIENT:
DESCRIPTION
500
Polished Pine Wood
180
SCALE: 1:10 PROJECT:
800
200 Th. Masonry Wall
6600
ELEVATION OF W1
65 12
1500
200 Th. Masonry Wall
DATE
IN
Steel Corrugated Sheet 5mm
Pinewood Frame SPECIFIC NOTES:
SCALE: 1:100, 1:15
4
+0.5MREVISIONS: NO.
OUT
300
200
IN
400
500
AR201 Elevation and Facade Cladding
200 Th. Masonry Wall Steel Angle 50x50
1100
SCALE: 1:10
TITLE:
Steel Angle 50x50 at Intervals
RCC 100 MM Sill/ Bay seat.
Corrugated sheet
3
50
PLAN OF D1
SCALE: 1:10
1500
CLIENT:
TITLE:
+9.9 LVL
50
P 15
685
(AR 201-B) North Facade (AR 201 -B) North Facade Scale 1:100
4
6600
P 2
DESCRIPTION
15 1000
PLAN OF D2
SCALE: 1:10 MYSURU
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
IN
PVC Pipe 150 Dia. 6600
100
200
100
200
Scale 1:15
HOUSING 3
2
Scale 1:100
15 50
(AR201-C) Corner Facade Detail
PROJECT: 6600
OUT
IN
15
DATE
NO.
40
40
LEGENDS:
Teak window +/- 0.0 LVL frame 65x125
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
A
6600
OUT
300
GENERAL NOTES:
300
2
x 300 Scale 300 1:15
R 1
SCALE: 1:10 REVISIONS:
(AR201-C) Corner Facade Detail Polished Pine Wood Window Shutter.
ELEVATION OF D1
SCALE: 1:10
65
OUT
Drip Mould
Polished Pine Wood
(AR 201-A) East FacadeScale 1:100 (AR 201-A) East Facade
(AR201-D
HL - 300 X 2800 , 600 X 2800
Teak Threshold
Polished Pine Wood 300 x 300
+3.3 LVL
RCC 100MM 300 Lintel/Chajja
60
180
HORIZONTAL LOUVERS - HL
125
OUT
Polished Pine Wood 250mm
200
DESCRIPTION
Steel Corrugated Sheet 5mm
W1 - 1500 X1500
ELEVATION OF D2 LEGENDS:
Timber and Corrugated Sheet Bolted
IN
100
DATE
NO.
WINDOWS -W1
Timber and Corrugated Sheet Bolted
+6.6 LVL
SCALE: 1:10
S
60
PVC Pipe 150 Dia.
REVISIONS:
Steel Angle 50x50 at Intervals
IN Corrugated Sheet 5mm ELEVATION OF W1
6
200 Th. Masonry W
D3 - 750 X 2100 D4 - 2700 X 2100 (SLIDING FOLDING DOOR)
70
SPECIFIC NOTES: Steel Corrugated Sheet 5mm
685 PVC Pipe 150 Dia.Steel
200 Th. Masonry Wall
+6.6 LVL
1
T 6
DOORS -D1,D2,D3,D4
Pinewood Frame D1 - 1100 X 2100 Corrugated D2 sheet - 900 X 2100
RCC Sunshade 100MM
(AR201-D) Bottom Facade Detail Scale 1:15 6600
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
6600
Peep Hole
Panel Shutter 30MM- 40MM
SPECIFIC NOTES:
3300 Facade Connection Details :
AR. ANJA
LEGENDS:
200 Th. Masonry Wall
B
MANJU
STRUC CONSULT:
SERV CONSULT:
Shutter
+9.9 LVL
200 Th. +/- 0.0 LVL Masonry Wall
AR
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
2
6MM Glass
+9.9 LVL
IN
AR
APPROVED BY: CONST COMP:
Scale 1:20
(AR 401-B) Wall Section 2
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
1
3300
Scale 1:15
+3.3 LVL
CHECKED BY:
- ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM
(AR201-C) Corner Facade Detail
cade
GENERAL NOTES:
Teak Frame 65x125
RA
PROJECT NO:
01
GENERAL NOTES:
GENERAL NOTES:
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
6600
6600
Scale 1:20
1500
LEGENDS: G
(AR401-C) Wall Section 2
(AR 401-A) Wall Section 1 (AR 201-A) East Facade
Scale 1:10
SIGNATURE:
Polished Pine Wood 300 x 300
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
+/- 0.0 LVL
18/
DRAWN BY:
REFERENCE NO:
AR. ANJALI SHARMA
SERV CONSULT:
SIGNATURE:
SERV CONSULT:
SCALE : 1:2
E
G
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
MYSURU
60
Scale 1:10
AR. INDU PANIKAR
CONST COMP:
Timber and Corrugated Sheet Bolted
MANJUNATH R
STRUC CONSULT:
AR. RYAN THOMAS
CHECKED BY:
MYSURU
IN
JOINARY DETAIL
AR. KAVANA KUMAR
+3.3 LVL
SIGNATURE:
PVC Pipe 150 Dia.
AR. SANDEEP SEN
APPROVED BY: CONST COMP:
PROJECT NO:
SERV CONSULT:
DATE:
CHECKED BY:
02-11-18
REFERENCE NO:
Steel Corrugated Sheet 5mm
SC 1:2
2100
SCALE : 1:2
AR. INDU PANIKAR
01
RAHUL KUSTAGI
65
MS Angle 25x25
JOINARY DETAIL
APPROVED BY: CONST COMP:
RAHUL KUSTAGI
PROJECT NO:
70
200 Th. Masonry Wall
1:20,1:10,1:2
AR. RYAN THOMAS
DRAWN BY:
DRAWN BY:
REFERENCE NO:
1500
MS Nut 10MM DIA with bush.
Cement Board 50MM
Scale 1:20
SPECIFIC NOTES:
CHECKED BY:
AR 401 Wall Section
18/05/19
2099
25
30
PROJECT NO:
(AR401- A) Wall Section 1
SCALE:
RAHUL KUSTAGI
REFERENCE NO: DATE:
MS Angle 25x25
+6.6 LVL
DATE:
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
1500
25
50
30
Cement Board 50MM
AR300 PRIVACY DETAIL
1:20,1:10,1:2 02-11-18
DRAWN BY:
TITLE:
SCALE: 1:20
AR. ANJALI SHARMA SIGNATURE:
SCALE:
MYSURU
50 1650
1650
TITLE: DATE: MS Nut 10MM DIA with bush.
CLIENT: AR 401 Wall Sections
MANJUNATH R
STRUC CONSULT:
Scale 1:10
LAKSHMIPUR
CLIENT:
TITLE:
Cement Board 50MM
Cement Board 50MM
LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
CHECKED BY:
CONST COMP:
AR300 PRIVACY DETAIL
HOUSING
PROJECT:
HOUSING
PROJECT:
REFERENCE NO:
HABITAT HOUSING
PROJECT:
MS Bolt 10MM DiA
RAHUL KUSTAGI 01
MYSURU
SCALE : 1:20
SCALE : 1:20
PROJECT NO:
1500
PLAN OF HL
18/05/19
DRAWN BY:
65
Plan of HL
PLAN OF HL
A
DATE:
GENERAL NOTES:
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE
18/05/19
DRAWN BY:
RAHUL KUSTAGI
PROJECT NO:
01
Section ofOFW1 SECTION W1
Teak Threshold
SCALE: 1:10
ELEVATION OF D2
REFERENCE NO: RCC 100MM
SCALE: 1:10
ELEVATION OF D1
40
40
Lintel/Chajja
15
15
1
D3
01-11-18
D3
Geyser
Sink
01-11-18 1
Geyser
Geyser
Sink
PROJECT:
PROJECT: HABITAT HABITAT HOUSING HO Shower Head LAKSHMIPURAM, LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU
E2
WC
E4
E2 E1
E3
WC
CLIENT:
E4 E3
E1
Mirror
First Tile to lay
CLIENT:
Ventilator-Frosted glass Ventilator-Frosted glass louver window louver window
TITLE:
Mirror
TOI1TITLE: TOILET TOI1 DETAIL TOILET DETAIL
First Tile to lay
SCALE:
Shower
1:25
Sink
Shower
WC
WC Sink
Shower Gravel filling
SCALE:
DATE:
WC
DATE:
1:
10-08-18
10-08-18
DRAWN BY: DRAWN BY: RAHUL KUSTAGI RAHUL K
Sink
PROJECT NO:PROJECT NO:
Shower
REFERENCE NO: REFERENCE NO:
Gravel filling
Gravel filling Gravel filling
CHECKED BY:CHECKED BY: AR. RYAN THOMAS AR. RYA
Ventilator-Frosted glass Ventilator-Frosted glass louver window louver window
APPROVED BY: APPROVEDAR. BY:INDU PANIKAR AR. IND
(AR 501-A) Toilet Plan TOILET PLAN TOILET PLAN SCALE 1:25
SCALE 1:25
ELEVATION E3 CONST 1:25 COMP: COMP: (AR 501-C) ToiletCONST Elevation 2 SCALE
ELEVATION E2 1SCALE 1:25 (AR 501-B) Toilet Elevation SCALE 1:25 SCALE 1:25 ELEVATION ELEVATION E1 E1
STRUC CONSULT: STRUC CONSULT: MANJUNATH R MANJUNA
Unit Floor Plans - 3BHK
SERV CONSULT: SERV CONSULT: ANJALI SHARMA ANJALI SH
WADIYAR CENTRE FOR
WADIYAR ARCHITECTURE CENTRE FOR MYSURU
MYSURU
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
ARCHITECTURE
D3
G
Sink E2
WC
E4
Ventilator-Frosted glass louver window
E1
E3
First Tile to lay
Shower
Sho Gravel filling
Ventilator-Frosted glass louver window
TOILET PLAN
(AR 601-A) Floor Tiling Layout of 3BHK Unit
ELE
SCALE 1:25
(AR 601-B) Electrical Layout of 3BHK Unit
,
RSP Brief : The aim of the RSP is to study a place (Kiranagi) for its history, culture, climate, people and its architectural typology. This study expects students to enquire, research and analyse the place. The role of architecture is understood with respect to people and place.
Time Period : 2 weeks Type : Village Study Requirements : Measure Drawing and Analysis
Documentation - Related Study Program Kiranagi, Karnataka | Measure Drawing Semester 3 | Year 2 | Batch 2016
KIRANAGI RSP 2017 (from booklet)
,
Contemporary Architecture Assignment Brief : To explore an architect’s work by choosing a particular lens.
One Drawing Challenge 2019 Brief : Create one drawing that communicates a new architectural proposal or existing piece of architecture, and the experience of those that would inhabit it. It can be located anywhere in the world and be at any scale. It can take the form of a plan, section, elevation, perspective or sketch. As long as it portrays part or all of a building or group of buildings, it is eligible.
map credits: Giambattista Nolli
Tracing IIMB
Nolli’s Map is a two-dimensional plan used to understand the accessibility and flow of public space within a city.It is a figure-ground drawing, simply put, it shows contrast in relationships between positive and negative spaces, solids and voids, shadows and light.What happens when a technique that had been applied at an urban scale, is being applied at an Institutional scale? Does this reveal any character of the institution?In an educational institution, where can one meet, greet, fight, play, hide and what not? Could a monochromatic drawing give a glimpse into the culture that a design can manifest? Can it reveal how design can bring the spaces to life? Tracing, in a design process evolves from generating the ideas for a plan to analysing a building through the plan.This drawing is an attempt to give a hindsight to the thoughts of the Pritzker prize-winning architect of Indian Institute of Management Bangalore.
,
The Drawing Board Competition 2019 Brief : The competition aims to create a dialogue between the surrounding urban communities, citizens and the 140 year old heritage water tower which is a highly visible but an isolated segment of the urban fabric. A kowledge centre to create awareness on sustainability, importance and evolution of heritage landmarks , cafe restrooms and parking spaces.
Transit. You and I are always in-between, between past and future, thinking and doing, natural and artificial To learn from unlearning, not to loose identity in transition, on the threshold embracing the ‘in-betweenness’ For only the present can untangle the knots, of the future around the past.
In addition to this the participant is expected to study the bustling activities of the context.
Type : Urban Design - Competition Requirements : Ideation and Presentation
Centripetal.
Centripetal Pune | TDB | Reviving Lost Heritage Team : JK Sourav, Vismaya N, Rahul Kustagi
Have we ever paused our busy dynamic lives to admire the beauty that surrounds us? This heritage tower that lies amidst the highways and IT buildings constantly goes un-admired. Our intent is to bring back the focus and relevance of this structure by designing a catalyst, “transitional space” where one can take a break, read, eat, learn, unlearn, entertain and recreate. All these activities are the ones that happen ‘in-between’ our busy scheduled lives.
*competition sheets
,
STPA Brief : The aim is to design a sculpture that acts as a symbolic representation of the Architect’s work. The sculpture shall target aspects of design as referred and developed by the chosen architect. It shall be made accessible to the end users, explore stimuli, and various possibilities to be physically experienced by the end users. Key Words: sculpture: the art of making three-dimensional representative or abstract forms. symbolic representation: the depiction of someone or something in a work of art. physical: relating to things perceived through the physical senses; tangible or concrete. experience: feel (an emotion or sensation). Architects of Choice: Le Corbusier Charles Correa* Zaha Hadid Tadao Ando Frank Gehry
Type : Urban Design - Competition Site : Mumbai is India’s pulse point of rapid growth. It is Mumbai that witnessed numerous marvels of Correa’s work. It houses the film industry and its artists, to which Charles Correa shared another deep bond with. Navi Mumbai was Charles Correa’s dream. He described cities as ‘places of hope’ and spent his last days on his master plan for Navi Mumbai. 19°01’33.7”N 73°00’36.0”E Site Area : 3500 sqm. Built Up : 600 sqm. Submission : A1
Shunya Navi Mumbai | STPA | Charles Correa Team : Vismaya N, Rahul Kustagi
THE RITUALISTIC PATHWAY :
Key Section :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
,
The House Brief : The competition seeks to understand the idea of a house, in a context of the location you select. It encourages participants to rethink the basic fundamentals of a house and what their notions of a ‘home’ is in that respect. We urge architects to unwind back and think through their earlier projects and ask if the designs allow the above questions to be answered. Competition allows all types of projects constructed or conceptual. Jury Panel: Ar. Arpit Dutt Ar. Hiren Patel Ar. Chetan Raval Ar. Krima Shah
Type : House - Competition Site : Urban context. Row house with street in front. Submission : A1
Mane The House | Archdais Team : Vismaya N, Rahul Kustagi
,
‘‘Changes, small ones as well as big, are the sparks that feed fresh impulses to the motor of architecture and keep it ticking over.’’ - Herman Hertzberger
email id : kustagi.rahul@gmail.com phone no. : +91 9986311311