Fig. 28: Number of fruits at setting and harvest at different treatments

from Rit LbhÍ nr 45

by Landbúnaðarháskóli_Íslands

Fig. 27: Average weight of tomatoes (1. class fruits) at different treatments

Fig. 28: Number of fruits at setting and harvest at different treatments.

4.3.3 Outer quality of yield

Marketable yield was about 81-86 %. Marketable yield was lowest with the highest light intensity and top density due to a high amount of flawed and cracked fruits and with Diamantino due to a high amount of flawed and not well shaped fruits. Diamantino had more 1. class fruits compared to the other treatments, while Encore had a high proportion of 2. class fruits (Tab. 4).

Fig. 28: Number of fruits at setting and harvest at different treatments

Next Article

Fig. 27: Average weight of tomatoes (1. class fruits) at different treatments

Fig. 28: Number of fruits at setting and harvest at different treatments.

4.3.3 Outer quality of yield

More articles from this publication:

Fig. 27: Average weight of tomatoes (1. class fruits) at different treatments

Tab. 5: Lighting hours, power and energy in the cabinets

Tab. 8: Profit margin of tomatoes at different treatments (urban area, VA210

Fig. 30: Sweetness, flavour and juiciness of fruits at different treatments

Fig. 39: Profit margin in relation to tariff and treatment

Fig. 36: Revenues at different treatments

Fig. 33: Dry matter yield of stripped leaves at different treatments

Fig. 41: Profit margin in relation to treatment – calculation scenarios urban area, VA210

Fig. 40: Profit margin in relation to yield – calculation scenarios (urban area, VA210

This article is from:

Rit LbhÍ nr 45