Emergencyc s

Page 1

ANATOMY OF FEMALE GENITAL ORGAN8

GROSS ANATOMY

The uterus is a thick walled hollow muscular-organ shaped like a pear, situated in the pelvis between the bladder in front and the rectum behind.

Position: Its normal position is one of the ante version and ante flexion. The uterus usually inclines to the right (dextrorotation) so that the cervix directed to the left (Laevorotation) and comes in close relation with the left ureter.

Measurements and Parts Its dimension vary but the nulliparous organ measures approximately 8 cm (3 1/4) overall length, 6 cm (21/2 inch) across it widest part 4 cm (1/2) from before backwards in the thickest part.

Its weight 45 to 55 gm. The wall is 1 to 2 cm thick, so the length of the normal uterine cavity, including the cervical canal, is not less than 7 cm and may be 7.5 to 8.0 cm. The uterus is made up of a body or corpus, isthmus and cervix. The part of the body situated above the level of insertion of the fallopian tubes is described as fondues, especially during pregnancy. The area of insertion of each fallopian tube is termed the cornu. The cavity of the uterus is triangular in shape when seen from the front, but is no more than a slit when seen from the


side. It communicates with the vagina through the cervical canal and with the lumen of the fallopian tube at cornu.

Structure The whole of the fondues, the anterior wall as low as isthmus, and the posterior wall as low as the attachment of the vagina to the cervix are covered with peritoneum which is so intimately connected with the underlying muscle that it can not be stripped away.

The side of the uterus between the attachment of the two leaves of the broad ligament, the lower anterior uterine wall, and the whole of the cervix except for the posterior aspect of its supra vaginal part, are devoid of peritoneum.

The main mass of the uterine wall is composed of involuntary muscie fibres which for the most part run obliquely in a crisscross spiral fashion. The more superficial fibers, however, are arranged longitudinally and are continuous with those forming the outer coats of the elastic tissues are mixed with the muscle in varying amounts. Internal to the muscle layers, there is a mucous membrane which is directly applied to the muscle without an intervening sub mucosa, so its glands often dip into the fibro muscular tissue.

Isthmus The isthmus is an annular zone, no more than 0.1-0.5 cm from top to bottom in the nonpregnant uterus, which lies between the cervix and the corpus. The obvious constriction between the uterine cavity and the cervical canal is the anatomical internal OS and the isthmus is below this. The junction between the isthmus and the cervical canal proper, which is recognized microscopically, is the internal OS. The mucous membrane of the isthmus is intermediate in structure and function between that of the corpus and that of the cervix.

The importance of the isthmus is that it is the area which during late pregnancy and labour 2


becomes the lower uterine segment.

Cervix8 The cervix is barrel-shaped, measuring 2.5 to 3, 5 cm from above downwards. Half of it projects into his vagina (vaginal cervix or portio virginal's) while half is above the vaginal attachment (supravaginal cervix).

The vaginal part is covered with squamous epithelium continuous with that of the vagina. The supravaginal part is surrounded by pelvic fascia except on its posterior aspect where it is covered with the peritoneum of the pouch of Douglas. A spindle shaped canal, disposed centrally, connects the uterine cavity with vagina. The upper part of the cervix is composed mainly of involuntary muscle, many of the fibres being continuous with those in the corpus. The lower half has a thin peripheral layer of muscle (the external cervical muscle) but is otherwise entirely composed of fibrous and collage nous tissue. The mucous membrane lining the canal (end cervix) is thrown into folds which consist of anterior and posterior columns from which radiate circumferential fold to give the appearance of tree trunk and branches, hence the name arbor vitae.

Vascular Connection8 Arterial Supply. •

Uterine Artery

•

Ovarian Artery

Venous


Pam inform plexus in the broad ligament

Uterine vein

Ovarian vein

Vaginal plexus

Vertebral plexus

Lymphatic Cervix •

Paracervical Plexus

Obturator nodes

External iliac and internal iliac

Sacral nodes

Corpus8

The same as the cervix.

Also the aortic nodes via lymphatic accompanying the ovarian vessels.

Superficial inguinal nodes via lymphatic in the round ligament.

Nerves8 The nerve supply of the uterus is derived principally from the sympathetic system and part by from the parasympathetic system.

Sympathetic components are from segments T 5 and T6 in the case of motor nerves, and from segments T 10 to L1 in the case of sensory nerves. The somatic distribution of uterine pain is that of the abdomen supplied by T 10 to L-i Spinal Segment (sensory). The somatic distribution of uterine pain is that area of the abdomen supplied by T 10 to L1. The parasympathetic system is represented on either side by the pelvic nerve which consists of both motor and sensory fibers S2, S3, S4 and ends in the ganglia of Frankenhauser. The cervix is insensitive to touch, heat and also when it is grasped by any instrument.

4


The uterus too, is insensitive to handling and even to incision over its wall.

RELATION8

Anterior

The upper part of the uterus has the uterovesical pouch and either intestine or bladder in front of it. The lower part is closely associated with the base of the bladder from which it is separated only by loose connective tissue.

Posterior: Posterior lies the pouch of Douglas (uterorectal pouch) with coils of intestine. The vagina! cervix also has the posterior fornix behind it.

Laterally: Laterally are the broad ligament and its contents, especially the uterine artery which runs up by the side of the uterus, giving branches at different levels. Attachment of the Mackenrodt's ligament extends from the internal OS down to the supravaginal cervix and lateral vaginal wall.

As the ureter pass forwards to reach the base of the bladder the ureter lies only 1-2cm to the side of the supravaginal cervix. The uterine artery crosses the ureter almost at right angle to the ureter at the level of the internal OS. Here it gives off a descending branch to supply the


lower cervix, and a circular branch the circular artery of the cervix, from which arise the anterior and posterior azygos arteries to the vagina.

CAESAREAN SECTION 9-12 A caesarean section refers to the delivery of a fetus, placenta and membranes through an abdominal and uterine incision. The first documented caesarean section on a living person was performed in 1610. The patient died 25 days after since the time, numerous Advances have made a safe procedure, in order for the practitioner to perform this common operation safely, he or she must be aware of the indications, risk, operative technique and potential complications of the procedure.

Indication Caesarean section is used in cases where original vaginal delivers either is not feasible or would impose undue risk to the mother or baby. Some of the indications for caesarean section are clear and straightforward, whereas others are relatives in some cases, fine Judgments is necessary to determine whether caesarean section or vaginal delivery would be better. It is not practical to list all possible indication. However, hardly any obstetric complication has not been dealt with by caesarean section. The fallwing indications are currently common.

EMERGENCY CAESAREAN SECTION When the operation is performed due to unforeseen complication arising either during pregnancy or during labour without wasting time following the decision, it is said to be 'emergency'.

Indication 6


1) Cord prolapsed with the child still alive and cervix not dilated 2) Severe preeclampsia 3) Failed induction of labour 4) Fetal distress in the first stage of labour 5) Failed trial of labour 6) Failed trial of forceps 7) Malpresentation during labour 8) Obstructed labour 9) Prolong labour. 10) Ante partum hemorrhage

ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTION

When the operation is done at a prearranged time during pregnancy to ensure best surgical conditions, it is said to be 'elective'.

Indications 

Cephalopelvic disproportion

Previous two Caesarean sections

Successful repair of vesicovaginal fistula

Placenta praevia posterior type II, III and IV

Proven intrauterine growth retardation

Persistent malpresentation

Cervical stenosis


Vaginal stenosis

Patient with bad obstetric history

Elderly primigravida with breech presentation

Ovarian tumour complicating pregnancy at term if it cannot be pushed up from the front of the presenting part

Cases of fibroid which occupy the pelvis persists in advance to the presenting part

Many cases of diabetes mellitus

TYPES OF CAESAREAN SECTION

The types of Caesarean sections in modern use are: 1)

Lower segment Caesarean section

2)

Classical Caesarean section

1)

Lower segment Caesarean section

In this operation, the extraction of the baby is done through an incision made in the lower segment through a transperitoneal approach. It is the only method practiced in present day obstetrics and unless specified, Caesarean section means lower segment operation.

Advantage

a)

8

The myometrial incision is positioned entirely in the thin lower segment


b) c)

The incisional site is less vascular than the upper segment A tower segment incision is easier to close than an upper segment wound

d)

There is lower likelihood of postoperative ileus

e)

Complications and risk of rupture/dehiscence in vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC) trials are less

Potential complications a)

The length of the incision is limited is limited by the width of the lower uterine segment

b)

Problem with premature deliveries

c)

Problem with abnormal presentations

d)

Risk of vessel injury

e)

The angles may be difficult to suture, exposure may be limited and extension or vessels injury are common

f)

Haemorrhage and haematoma may form at the wound angles

g)

Extension of the wound into the vagina, bladder or broad ligament

h)

Ureteric injury is possible


2)

Classical Caesarean section

In this operation, the baby is extracted through an incision made in the upper segment of the uterus. Its indications in present day obstetrics are very much limited, and the operation is only done under forced. Circumstances, such as: a)

Preterm delivery with poorly formed lower segment

b)

Placenta praevia with large vessels in lower segment

c) d)

Premature rupture of membranes, poor lower segment and transverse lie Transverse lie with back inferior

e)

Large cervical fibroid

f)

Severe adhesions in lower segment reducing accessibility

g)

Postmortem Caesarean section

Advantages a)

There is no limitation in uterine incision length

b)

Entry is rapid as neither cervix nor bladder dissection is required

c)

Access to the transverse lie is excellent

Potential complications

a)

Closing of the incision may be difficult

b)

There is greater blood loss with this technique than with a transverse incision

10


c) d)

Poor uterine closure/healing is impossible Adhesion of bowel to wound incision and/or postoperative ileus is more likely than with transverse incisions

e)

There is an increased risk of scar rupture/dehiscence with a VBAC trial

Extra peritoneal Caesarean section This procedure, designed for use in infected or potentially infected patient, was introduced before the modern era of antibacterial agents and blood transfusion. The procedure is timeconsuming and may not be effective in preventing spillage into the peritoneal cavity, because the peritoneum often is perforated even by the expert. Although the operation was virtually discarded more than 20 years ago, the question has recently been raised whether it might not be applicable for the potentially infected patient, At present, most obstetricians perform caesarean hysterectomy if the uterus is frankly infected; if it is only potentially infected, they perform lower cervical Caesarean section with prophylactic antibiotic coverage.

ANAESTHESIA USED DURING CAESAREAN SECTION12-15 Whatever might be the choice of anaesthesia, it is important for the obstetric surgeon to review in advance the circumstances of the projected operation with the anesthesiologist. In instances of patients with preexisting medical problems, a preoperative anaesthesia consultation is best obtained at a time when the patient is remote from term, and not in labour. Such preliminary visits are strongly indicated for individuals with congenital or acquired cardiac disease, serious medical complications (e.g. advanced diabetes mellitus), hereditary disorders likely to result in complications (e.g. Marfan's or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome), and patients receiving anticoagulants of antihypertensive, those with prior back


surgery or prior anaesthesia complications and for other complicated or unusual cases.

Anaesthesia for Caesarean section

1)

Regional anesthesia a)

Epidural

b)

Spinal

2)

General anaesthesia

3)

Local anaesthesia and analgesia

For the safety of the patient, epidural or spinal anaesthesia is usually best for caesarean delivery if the clinical circumstance permit. The patient "remains awake, members of the family may be present, and the potentially dangerous issues of intubation and airway management are avoided. Unfortunately, epidural anaesthesia is neither always available nor indicated if frank fetal distress, severe maternal hemorrhage or other-problems develop.

1)

Regional anesthesia

Regional anaesthesia is generally considered to be the technique of choice. It allows the parturient to be awake and the father to be present, reduces blood loss, is associated with less maternal risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents or hypoxia from failed

12


endotracheal intubation, and reduces neonatal drug effects. The major hazard of the regional analgesic technique is blockade of sympathetic fibres and a decrease in vascular resistance, venous pooling and hypertension. However, this can be greatly alleviated by elevation of the patient's right hip to avoid compression of the vena cava by the gravid uterus when the patient is lying on the operating table. In addition, the anaethesiologist may rotate the operating table 15-20 degrees to the left to rotate the uterus away from the vena cava, and the patient is given a rapid infusion of Ringer's lactated solution. One may utilize 5-10 mg ephedrine intravenously for a mild vasopressin effect.

a)

Lumbar epidural block

Lumbar epidural blockade may be utilized for Caesarean section analgesia and for providing adequate analgesia for operative delivery.

Advantages

a)

Hypotension is less likely to occur

b)

Anaesthesia is more controllable if an epidural catheter is placed because additional anesthetic doses can be given if necessary

c)

Headache does not occur postoperatively because the Duran is not punctured

Disadvantages a) b)

It is not easy to perform It is not indicated in cases of acute urgency or fetal distress or severe maternal

hemorrhage


c)

Spinal anaesthesia

Advantages

a) b)

Simpler technique to perform Immediate onset of analgesia so that there is no waiting for the block to become

effective

Disadvantages a)

A more profound and rapid onset of hypotension

b)

More frequent nausea and vomiting

c)

Spinal headache occurs more frequently

d)

Spinal anaesthesia is contraindicated in anaemia, shock and severe hemorrhage.

2)

General anaesthesia

General techniques

anaesthesia is indicated cannot

be

used

for Caesarean section delivery when regional

because

of

coagulopathy, hypovolaemia, or urgency.

Some prefer to be 'put-to-sleep' and refuse regional techniques.

Advantages

14


a)

Greater cardiovascular stability (i.e. hypotension from sympathetic blockade)

b)

It is speedy in its action

c)

Simple to perform

d) The patient has no unpleasant memories of the procedure

e)

It is used suitable in case of titanic uterine contraction and constriction ring

Disadvantages

a)

During induction, vomiting from full stomach results in dangerous Aspiration

b)

If anesthesiologist is not skilled at passing endotracheal tube, it results in maternal asphyxia which is dangerous to the baby and mother

c)

Many drugs cross the placenta barrier. So, use of anaesthetic drugs, analgesic or hypnotics may affect the fetus either directly crossing the placenta or indirectly.

3)

Local anaesthesia

Local anaesthesia still has a useful place in situations where general anesthetic service is inadequate.

Advantages Shock is reduced to a minimum and pulmonary complication is very rare. Again, the liver


and kidneys suffer no toxic damage and cardiac muscle is not, in any way, affected. Uterine tone is good throughout, and this also diminishes hemorrhage. Cases of heart disease are regarded as usually suitable.

Disadvantages It takes time to secure adequate anaesthesia and often fails to achieve it completely so that the patient, already frightened, finds that she has to suffer, also a certain amount of pain. But, now local anaesthesia during Caesarean section is not practiced.

PREPARATION FOR CAESAREAN SECTION12-14, 16-18 GENERAL PREPARATION Before doing operation, written permission for operation under general or spinal anesthesia must be sought from patient's guardian. Blood is sent for grouping and cross-matching. If facilities are available, hemoglobin percentage (Hb %) is to be done. When patient is anaemic and where blood loss prior to operation has been acute, blood should be transfused before operation. A supply of compatible blood should be assured. Intravenous Ringer's lactate solution be started. Abdominal wall and vulva are shaved. Stomach should be empty. In case of elective operation, patient is given nothing-by-mouth eight hours prior to operation to relieve the full stomach. Patient transferred to operating theatre must be in the left lateral position with a wedge under the right buttock. Premedication with antacid is standard. In theatre, the operating table must also be kept in left lateral tilt position until after delivery,

16


SKIN INCISION

After the anesthesiologist has indicated that the patient is ready, fetal heart sound is checked, abdomen and thigh are painted with antiseptics. The patient is now draped for operation. The surgeon's attention is then directed to the abdomen for the initial skin incision. A number of types of skin incision are possible. indication,

necessity for a classical

The choice depends on gestational age,

section and the presence of previous scars.

A low

transverse incision is preferred for its cosmetic appeal and a lesser chance of wound dehiscence and hernia. If other operative procedures have to be combined, a lower vertical incision is preferred for better exposure. A minimum length of 15 cm is needed. Excision of a previous scar is essential for better healing and cosmetic results.

If a classical Caesarean

section is contemplated, a midline or paramedian incision that can be extended above the umbilicus if needed should be used.

PROCEDURE FOR LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION

Position of the patient during operation should be dorsal with a left lateral tilt of 10-15 degrees. General or spinal anaesthesia may be given according to the case. A transverse Pfannenstiel incision is given two-finger breadth above the symphysis pubis. Incision should be 15 cm in length.

The choice of incision is based upon the urgency of the operation. Pfannenstiel incision is preferred;

For elective procedure,

it is given for cosmetic purpose.

During emergency procedure, sub umbilical right par median and midline incision is to be given.

After sharp dissection of rectus sheath, splitting of rectus muscle peritoneum is

reached. The peritoneum is now picked up and incised in the upper-third of the peritoneum. Now, abdominal cavity is entered. A Doyne's retractor is introduced. The


anterior surface of uterus is now in view. It should be noted whether there is any dextrorotation. If present, dextrorotation is corrected. The loose peritoneum over the lower uterine segment is lifted up and incised transversely. By means of finger dissection through loose arcolar tissue the bladder is separated from the anterior surface of the uterus inferior for a distance of 3-5 cm. The bladder is held away by retractor. The lower segment is exposed, and a short incision made through it, down to the fetal membrane. The incision in the lower segment can be made large by finder traction with very little bleeding. The membranes are ruptured if intact. The Doyne's retractor is removed. The head is delivered by hooking the hand with until the palm is placed below the head. As the head is drawn to the incision line, the assistant applies pressure on the fundus. As soon as the shoulders are delivered, an intravenous infusion containing about 20 units of oxytocin per litre is allowed to flow at a brisk rate of 10 mlmin until the uterus contracts are satisfactory, after which the rate can be reduced. Bolus doses of 5 to 10 units are avoided due to associated hypotension. The rest of the body is delivered slowly. The cord is cut ir between two clamps and baby is handed over to the nurse. The uterine incision is observed for any vigorously bleeding sites. These should be promptly clamped with sponge-holding forceps, or similar instruments. Most surgeons recommend that the placenta be removed promptly manually, unless it is separating spontaneously. Fundal massage begun as soon as the fetus is delivered reduces bleeding and hastens delivery of the placenta. Repair of the uterus After delivery of the placenta, the uterus may be lifted through the incision into the draped abdominal wall, and the fundus covered with a moistened laparotomy pack. Although some clinicians prefer to avoid this latter step. Uterine that outweigh

exteriorization often has advantages

any disadvantages. The relaxed, atonic uterus can be recognized quickly

and massage applied. The incision and bleeding points are visualized more easily and repaired; especially if there have been extensions laterally. Adnexal exposure is superior, and thus, tubal sterilization is easier.

The principal disadvantages are from discomfort and vomiting caused by faction in the 18


woman given spinal or epidural analgesia. Neither febrile morbidity nor blood appears to be increased in woman undergoing uterine exteriorization prior to repair. Immediately after delivery and inspection of the placenta, the uterine cavity is inspected and wiped out with a gauze pack to remove avulsed membranes, verminx, clots or other debris. The upper and lower cut edges and each angle of the uterine incision are examined carefully for bleeding vessels. The uterine incision is closed with one or two layers of continuous 0 or #1 absorbable suture. Traditionally, chromic suture is used.

Abdominal closure: All packs are removed, and the gutters and cul-de-sac are emptied of blood and amniotic fluid by gentle suction. After the sponge and instrument counts are found to be correct, the abdominal incision is closed. Many omit peritoneal edge approximation. Now-a-days, both the visceral and parietal peritoneum is left open because it reduces operating time and postoperative adhesion. The rectus muscles are allowed to fall into place, and the subfascial space is meticulously checked for homeostasis. The overlying rectus fascia is closed wither with interrupted nonabsorbable sutures that are placed lateral to the fascial edges and no more than 1 cm apart, or by continuous, nonlocking suture of a long-lasting absorbable or permanent type. The subcutaneous tissue usually need not be closed separately. The skin is closed with vertical mattress sutures of 3-0 or 4-0 silk or equivalent suture or skin clips.

POSTOPERATIVE CARE First 24 hours a)

The patient is observed meticulously for at least 6 to 8 hours; periodic check-up of pulse, blood pressure, amount of vaginal bleeding and behaviour of the uterus are mandatory

b)

Patient .is given nothing-by-mouth until bowel sound appears

c)

Intravenous fluid, 5% dextrose or Ringer's lactate drip, is continued until at least 2 to 2.5 litres of the solution has been infused


d)

Oral feeding in the form of plain water or coconut water or clear soup may be given after 6 hours, if condition permits

e).

Blood transfusion is helpful in anaemic mothers for a speedy postoperative recovery; blood transfusion is required if the blood loss is more than average during the operation and also if the Caesarean section is done in anemic patient or with history of antepartum hemorrhage

f)

Prophylactic

parenteral

antibiotic

injection,

cephradine

500

mg

intravenous , 6-hourly, along with or without injection metronidazole 500 mg intravenous, 8-hourly for 24 hours and then oral antibiotics for another 5 days g)

Injection pethidine hydrochloride 75 mg is administered when patient comes round and may have to be repeated if patient feels pain; diclofenac sodium suppository may be used

h)

i)

j)

Injection oxytocin 5-10 unit intravenous drip may be given slowly through separate channel for 24 hours to prevent postpartum hemorrhage Ambulation: The patient can sit on the bed; she is encouraged to move her legs and ankles and to breathe deeply to minimize leg vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The baby is put to the breast as early as possible

From second day a)

Antibiotics are given in oral form

b)

Analgesics are given either in oral or in suppository form

c)

Diet from liquid to semisolid or even solid food may be given as patient's preference

d)

Catheter is removed, and patient is encouraged to drink plenty of water or liquid diet

20


by mouth and get out of bed to evacuate the bladder

On sixth or seventh day The abdominal skin stitches are to be removed on the sixth (in transverse) or seventh day (in longitudinal)

DISCHARGE The patient is discharged on the day following removal of the stitches.

Advice on discharge a)

To avoid heavy lifting for six weeks

b)

To return for postnatal check-up after six weeks

c)

To take contraceptive measures

d) To avoid pregnancy for two years e) To come for regular antenatal check up in her next pregnancy; she must be admitted into hospital two weeks before her expected date of delivery for observation.

COMPLICATIONS OF CAESAREAN SECTION10-14 MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS

Immediate complications a)

Hemorrhage:

Primary hemorrhage is related either to the operations. It is


mostly related to uterine atony.

The average loss which may be one liter is too

much for the patient, especially with preexisting anaemia.

b)

c)

Shock: When Caesarean section with hemorrhage.

Anesthetic hazards:

Mostly occur during emergency operation. The hazards are

cardiac arrest, aspiration gastric contain. The result may be aspiration atelectasis or aspiration pneumonitis (Mendelson’s. Syndrome).

d)

Sepsis: Still remains one of the commonest complications, especially with emergency Caesarean section, prolonged rupture of membrane, obstructed labour and frequent internal examination.

e)

Thrombosis: Leg vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are likely to occur following Caesarean section.

f)

Wound complications: Abdominal wound sepsis is quite common, The complications detected on removing skin stitches are:

g)

Sanguineous or frank pus

Haematoma

Dehiscence (peritoneal coat intact)

Burst abdomen involving the peritoneal coat

Intestinal obstruction:

The obstruction may be mechanical due to adhesions or

bands, or paralytic ileus following peritonitis. 22


h)

Secondary postpartum hemorrhage.

Remote complications 1)

Gynecological a)

Menstrual irregularities

b)

Chronic pelvic pain

c) Backache

2)

General surgical complications

3)

a)

Incisional hernia

b)

Intestinal obstruction due to bands and adhesion

Future pregnancy a)

Risk of rupture scar

b)

Scar endometriosis

FETAL COMPLICATIONS

a)

Iatrogenic prematurity is common

b)

Increased risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)

Objectives of the present study General: Is to analyze the indication of emergency caesarean section of the patients admitted in Dhaka Medical College Hospital.


Specific: 1.

To detect the indication of emergency caesarean section cases,

2.

To find out the complication in the emergency caesarean section cases.

3.

To know the outcomes of mother and fetus in emergency caesarean section.

4.

To determine the proportion of emergency caesarean section among all caesarean section cases.

METHODOLOGY: Type of study-

Cross sectional

Place of study -

Dept. of Gynae & Obs in Dhaka Medical College Hospital.

Period of Study-

The study will be conducted over a period of 6 months. From 1 st

January 2009 to 1st July 2009.

STUDY POPULATION: All the emergency caesarean section cases admitted at Dhaka Medical College Hospital during the period of study.

SAMPLE SIZE 415 cases were selected for the study. Which was calculated by this formula-? Sample size (n)

z2 × p × q d2 =

Here, z= 1.95 (95% confidence limit where value of ‘t’ is 1.95) p = .47 (the prevalence rate of disease) q = .53 (1-p, proportion of persons not affected by the disease) d = .05 (Acceptable standard error, which range from 5 (0.05) to 25 (0.25) 24


(1.95) 2 × .47 × .53 (.05) 2 Sample size (n) = =378.88 Additional 10% of 378.88 =37.88 ∴ So sample size for study will be (378+37) = 415

SAMPLING TECHNIQUE Purposive

DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT Prepared questionnaire.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATION The patient will be informed about purpose and nature of the study and potential benefit or risk of it. Before collection of data it will be ensured to maintain the confidentiality of her data and informed consent will be taken from the patient or her legal guardian. Before starting the study permission will be taken from the ethical committee of the institute.

DATA COLLECTION METHOD Data will be collected by investigator herself. The case will be diagnosed by history, examination findings, and investigation. After admission name, age, address, occupation, socioeconomic condition of the patient will be recorded. Details menstrual history, past obstetrical history like para, history of any abortion will be taken. At the time of admission patient’s condition like anaemia, temperature, pulse, blood pressure, edema, jaundice, condition of heart, condition of lungs


will be recorded. Prr-abdominal examination and pervaginal examination will be done.

Indication of operation, Intra-operative, postoperative complications and fetal

outcome

will be noted. All information will be recorded in the predesigned questionnaire.

Procedure of data analysis After collection of required information data will be checked, processed and edited by computer and statistical analysis will be done using appropriate formula.

RESULTS

Table-I Type of Caesarean section (n-415)

Caesarean section

no.

(%)

Elective

42

(10.12%)

Emergency

373

(89.87%)

26


Table-I shows that out of 415 pregnant women, 42 (10.12%) underwent elective Caesarean section and 373 (89.87%) emergency. Table-II. Age of the Caesarean section subjects Age (years)

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

No.

(%)

No.

(%)

Up to 20

8

(19.04)

70

(18.76)

21-30

27

(64.28)

287

(76.94)

>30

7

(16.66)

16

(4.28)

Mean + SD

25.13 + 5.64

24.31+3.94

Range

18.0-39.0

18.0-36.0

Age distribution of elective and emergency Caesarean section women shows that 8 (19.04%) and 70 (18.76%) were in age group < 20 years, 27 (64.28%) and 287 (76.94%) in age group 21-30 years and rest 7 (66.66%) and 16 (4.28%) were in age group >30 years. Respectively. In both the groups, maximum number of women belonged to age group 21-30 years, followed by <20 years and 24.31+3.94 years. Respectively (Table-II)

Table -III. Educational status of the study subjects

Education

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)


No.

(%)

No.

(%)

Primary

8

(19.04)

12

(3.21)

Secondary

20

(47.61)

112

(30.0)

SSC

14

(33.33)

179

(47.98)

HSC

0

48

(12.86)

Graduate and above 0

14

(3.75)

Illiterate

8

(2.14)

0

Table-III shows educational status of the study women of electively and emergency Caesarean section. In elective group, maximum number of women had secondary (47.61%) level of education and in emergency group SSC (47.98%). Table-IV. Residence of the study subjects Residence

Urban Semi urban (slum) Rural

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

No. 30 8 4

No. (%) 317 (84.98) 44 (11.70 12 (3.21)

(%) (71.42) (19.04) (9.52)

Table-IV shows residential status of elective and emergency Caesarean section women. Thirty (71.12%) and 317 (84.98%) were from urban areas, 8 (19.04%) and 44 (11.79%) from semi urban (slum) and 4 (9.52%) and 12 (3.21%) from rural areas, respectively. Table-V. Occupation of the study subjects 28


Occupation

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

Housewife Daylabourer

No. (%) 40 (95.23) 2 (4.76)

No. (%) 346 (92.76) 12 (3.21)

Serviceholde

0

15

(4.02)

Table-V shows that 40 (95.23%) women of elective group were housewives, 2 (4.76%) day labourer and none service holder. In the emergency group, 346 (92.76)

were

housewives,

12

(3.2%)

daylabourers

and

15

(4.02%) serviceholders. Table-VI. Socioeconomic status of the study subjects Socioeconomic status

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

Poor

No. (%) 3 (7.14)

No. (%) 0

(<Tk.3,000/month) Low middle

30 (71.72)

171 (45.84)

8 (19.04)

193 (51.74)

1 (2.38)

9 (2.41)

(Tk.3,000-6,000/ month) Mobile (Tk6,001-10,000/ month) Rich (>Tk. 10,000/month) Table-VI shows that most of the women of elective group were from low


middle class income (71.42%) and in emergency group from middle income (51.74%) Table VII. Built and nutritional status of the study subjects Parameters

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

No. (%)

No. (%)

Built and nutrition Poor Average

3 36

(7.14) (85.71)

11 283

(2.94) (75.87)

Obese

3

(7.14)

79

(21.17)

Height (cm) <130 130-150

3 27

(7.14) (64.28)

0 242

(64.87)

>150

13

(28.57)

131

(35.12)

Weight (kg) Mean+SD

58.00+8.11

61.69+10.53

Range

45.0-70.0

38.0-83.0

Table VII shows that built and nutritional status was poor in 3 (7.14%) and 11 (2.94%) average in 36 (85.7%) and 283 (75.87%) and obese in 3 (7.14%) and 79 (21.17%) women of elective and emergency groups, respectively. Height was <130 cm in 3 (7.14%) and 0, 130-150 cm in 27 (64.28%) and 242 (64.87%) and > 150 cm in 12 (28.57%) and 131 (35.12%) respectively. Mean (+ SD) weight was 58.00+8. 11 and 61. 69+ 10.53 kg, respectively. Table VIII. Gravidity of the study subjects Gravida 30

Elective

Emergency


Primi 2nd 3rd 4th or more

(n=42)

(n=373)

No. (%) 20 (47.61) 14 (33.33) 8 (19.04) 0

No. (%) 138 (36.99) 171 (45.84) 41 (10.99) 23 (6.16)

Table- VIII shows that 20 (47.61%) women of elective group and 138 (36.99%) of emergency group were primigravida, the rest 22 (52.38%) women of elective and 235 (63.00%) of emergency group were multigravidae. Table-IX. Gestational age and status of ANC Parameters

Gestational age (weeks) Mean+SD Range Antenatal care Once Twice Thrice More than thrice

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

No. (%)

No. (%)

39.40+1.33 37.042.0

39.12+1.23 35.0-41.0

3 11 13 15

7 33 93 240

(7.14) (26.19) (30.95) (35.71)

(1.87) (8.84) (24.84) (64.34)

Table – IX shows that mean (± SD) gestational age of elective and emergency groups were almost equal, i.e. 39. 40 ± 1.33 and 39. 12 ± 1.23 weeks, respectively. Antenatal care shows significant variation between the two study groups. Table X. Past history of any disease


History

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

No. (%)

No. (%)

Present

0

19

(5.09)

Absent

42

(100.0)

364

(97.58)

Hypertension

13

(68.42)

Operative treatment

3

(15.78)

Bronchial asthma

3

(15.78)

Past history

(on medication)

Table-X shows that none of the women of elective group had any history of any disease or operation. In emergency group, out of 19 women, 13 (68.42%) were suffering from hypertension and were on medication, 3 (15.74%) had operative treatment and 3 (15.78%) was suffering from bronchial asthma. Table XI. Obstetric history History Abortion One Two None MR One Two None IUD One None 32

Elective (n=42) No. (%)

Emergency (n=373) No. (%)

6 0 36

(4.02)

(85.71)

15 0 358

0 3 39

(7.14) (92.85)

15 0 358

(4.02) (1.07) (94.97)

3 39

(7.14) (92.85)

4 369

(1.07) (98.92)

(14.28)

(95.97)


Neonatal death One None Caesarean section Yes No Number of Caesareansection One Two

0 42

(100.0)

15 358

(4.03) (95.97)

9 33

(21.42) (78.57)

160 213

(42.89) (57.10)

6 3

(66.66) (33.33)

142 18

(88.75) (11.25)

Table-XI shows that 6 (14.28%) women of elective group compared to 19 (5.09%) women of emergency group had history of abortion. History of MR was present in 3 (7.14%) of elective group compared to 15 (4.02%) in emergency group. History of IUD was present in 3 (7.14%) of elective and 4 (1.07%) of emergency group. History of neonatal death was absent in elective group compared to 15 (4.02%) in emergency group. Significantly more women had history of Caesarean section, i.e. 9 (21.42%) in elective group and 160 (42.89%) in emergency group. Out of 9 women of elective group with history of Caesarean section, 6 (66.66%) had one and 3 (33.33%) two Caesarean sections, and out of 160 women of emergency group, 142 (88.75%) had one and 18 (11.25%) two Caesarean sections. Table XII. Presenting complaints

Complaints

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

Pain Per vaginal

No. (%) 11 (26.19) 0

No. (%) 112 (30.02) 15 (4.02)

watery discharge Less fetal movement Others

0 0

7 (1.8) 4 (1.07)


None

31 (73.80)

235 (63.00)

Pain was the main presenting complains in both elective (26.7%) and emergency (30.02%) group. Other complaints in emergency group was 15 (4.02%) per vaginal watery discharge, 7 (1.8%) less fetal movement and 4 (1.07%) others. In elective group, other than pain, there were no other complaints.

Table-XIII: Indications for caesarean section Indications

Elective (N=42) No. Emergency (N=373) No. (%) (%)

Fetal distress

0

130 (34.85)

Eclampsia with complications

0

45 (12.02)

Obstructed labour

0

30 (2.04)

Premature rupture of membrane

0

30 (8.04)

Prolonged labour

0

10 (2.68)

Friled induction

0

52 (13.94)

Transverse lie

5 (11.90)

1 (0.26)

Bad obstetric history

9 (21.42)

7 (1.87)

Contracted pelvis

4 (9.52)

1 (0.26)

Placenta praevia

10 (23.80)

1 (0.26)

Elderly primi

3 (7.14)

1 (0.26)

Twin pregnacy with high blood pressure

8 (19.3)

7 (1.87)

Unfavourable cervix

0

7 (1.87)

Oligohydramnios

0

12 (3.21)

Breech Presentation

2 (4.76)

12 (3.21)

34


Twin pregnancy with breech presentation

0

5 (1.34)

Antipartum haemorrhage

0

17 (4.55)

History of 2 previous c/s

4 (9.51)

5 (1.34)

Table-XIV Neonatal weight and Apgar score Parameters

Elective

Emergency

(N=42)

(n=385)

No (%)

No. (%)

Mean + SD

2.5-4.02.0-4.0

0.95+0.42

Range

2.97+ 0.40

Birth Weight Normal

42 (100.0)

373 (96.88)

Low (<2.5 kg) Apgar score (5-mnute)

0

12 (3.11)

Mean+ SD Range

9.73+0.69 8.0-10.0

9.72+0.69 8.0-10.0

Birth weight (kg)

(2.5-4.0kg)

In this study, 12 women of emergency caesarean section had twin pregnancies. One baby of each twin pregnancy were low birth weight (<2.5kg) babies. Mean (+SD) birth weight of elective (n=42) and emergency (n=385) groups were (2.97+0.40 and 2.95+0.42kg, and Apgar score (5-minute) were 9.73+0.69 and 9.72+0.69, respectively (Table XIV) Table XV. Hospital

Hospital

Elective (n=42)

Emergency

Stay (days)

No. (%)

(n=373)

Mean +SD

5.33+0.88

No. (%) 5.87+1.00

Range

5.0-8.0

5.0-7.0


Table-XV shows that mean (+SD) hospital stay of elective and emergency groups were almost equal, i.e. 5.33+0.88 and 5.87+1.00 days, respectively.

Maternal Condition during Puerperium Condition

Normal Pyrexia Urinary tract infection Post partum Hemorrhage Wound infection Others

Elective

Emergency

(n=42)

(n=373)

No. (%) 40 (95.23) 1 (2.38) 1 (2.38) 0 0 0

No. (%) 333 (89.27) 18 (4.82) 8 (2.14) 4 (1.07) 4 (1.07) 6 (1.60)

of the 42 women of elective group 40 (95.23%) and 333 (89.27%) experienced no complication during puerperium, 1 (2.38%) women of elective and 18 (4.82%) of emergency group had pyrexia, 1 (2.38%) women of elective and 8 (2.14%) of emergency group had urinary tract infection in emergency group post partum Hemorrhage 4 (1.07%), wound infection 4 (1.07%) and 6 (1.60%) others. In elective group, other than pyrexia and urinary tract infection, there was no other complication.

DISCUSSION

Caesarean section has become widely practiced and liberalized owing to the recent advancement in anaesthesia, surgical technique, strict aseptic precaution and blood transfusion facilities20. In modern practice, with the object of 'safe motherhood' and 'mother-baby package’ programmer, the aims of the obstetricians is to achieve a healthy mother and a healthy baby by proper management of obstetrical problems. To achieve this goal Caesarean section plays a vital role21.

The incidence of Caesarean section is gradually increasing in developing and also developed 36


countries. The should be 7 percent in developed countries and less than 10 percent in developing countries, as recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) 22. Minimum acceptable level as recommended in the guideline for monitoring progress in the reduction of maternal mortality, Caesarean section as percentage of all births is not less than 5 percent not more than 15 percent23. 1 This study shows that the rate of emergency Caesarean section was 89.87% percent among all the Caesarean section operations.

This finding is higher than the finding of Deeba

(69.3%) 24 and Chowdhury ET al.25. Age distribution of elective and emergency Caesarean section women showed that 8 (19.4%) 70 (18.76%) were in age group < years, 27 (64.28%) 287 (76.94%) were in age group >30 years, respectively. In both the groups, maximum number of women belonged to age group 21-30 years, followed by < 20 years and > 30 years. Mean (+SD) age was 25.13+5.64 and 24.31+3.94 years, respectively. In this study most of the emergency Caesarean section cases belonged to age group 21-30 years, which is almost similar to the findings by Deeba 24, Petru ET al17. And Joll ET al18.

In elective group, maximum number of women (47.61%) has secondary level of education and in emergency group SSC (47.98%)

Thirty (71.42%) and 317 (84.98%) were from urban areas, 8 (19.04%) 44 (11.70%) from semiurban (slum) and 4 (9.52%) and 12 (3.21%) areas in elective and emergency groups, respectively.

Forty (95.23%) women of elective group were housewives, 2 (4.76%) daylabourer and none


serviceholder. In the emergency group 346 (92.76%) were housewives, 12 (3.21%) daylabourers and 15 (4.02%) service holders.

Most of the women of elective group were from low middle income (71.42%) and in emergency group from middle income (51.74%). A recent showed that 54.9 percent women belonged to law socioeconomic status. This shows that the emergency Caesarean section rate is higher among women from lower socioeconomic status. Build and nutritional status was poor in 3 (7.14%) and 11 (2.94%), average in 36 (85.71%) and 283 (75.87%) and obese in 3 (7.14%) and 79 (21.17%) women of elective and emergency groups, respectively. Height was < 130cm in 3 (7.14%) and 0,130-150 cm in 27 (64.28%) and 242 (64.87%) and > 150 cm in 12 (28.57%) and 131 (35.12%), respectively. Mean (+SD) weight was 58.00+ 8.11 and 61.69+ 10.53kg, respectively.

Twenty (47.61%) women of elective group and 138 (36.99%) of emergency group were primigravida, the rest 22 (52.38) women of elective and 235 (63%) of emergency group were multigravidae. A recent study observed that increasing number of gravida raised the rate of emergency Caesarean section (primi: 18%, multi: 72%) 24. Similar findings were noted by Lewis and Shorten 27, and by Tadesse ET al28.

Mean (+ SD) gestational age of elective and emergency groups were almost equal, i.e. 39.40+ 1.33 and 39.12+1.23 weeks, respectively. Antenatal care shows significant variation between the two study groups.

38


None of the women of elective group had any history of any disease or operation. In emergency group, out of 19 women, 13 (68.42%) were suffering from hypertension and were on medication, 3 (15.78%) had operative treatment and 3 (15.78%) was suffering from bronchial asthma.

Six (14.28%) Women of elective group compared to 19 (5.09%) women of emergency group had history of abortion. History of MR was present in 3 (7.14%) of elective group compared to 15(4.21) in emergency group. History of IUD was present in 3 (7.14%) of elective and 4 (1.07% ) of emergency group. History of neonatal death was absent in elective group Compared to 15 (4.02%) in emergency group. Significantly more women had history of Caesarean section, i.e. 9 (21.42 %) in elective group and 160 (42.89%) in emergency group. Out of 9 Women of elective group with history of Caesarean section, 6 (66.66%) had one and 3 (33.33%) Caesarean sections, and out of 160 women of emergency group, 142 (88.75%) had one and 18 (11.25%) two Caesarean sections. Pain was the main presenting complains in both elective (26.19%) emergency (30.02%) group. Other complaints in emergency group was 15 (4.02%) per vaginal watery discharge, 7(1.8%) less fetal movement and 4 (1.07%) others. In elective group, other than pain there were no other complaints.

In this study, 12 women of emergency Caesarean section had twin pregnancies. One baby of each twin pregnancy was a low birth weight (<2.5 kg) baby. Mean (+_ SD) birth weight of elective (n-42) and emergency (n-385) groups were 2.97 + 0.40 and 2.95+ 0.42 kg, and Apgar score (5-minute) were 9.73 + 0.69 and 9.72 + 0.69, respectively.


In this study 34.85% of caesarian sections were performed for foetal distress in Dhaka medical College Hospital. Another study abroad shows 14.28% cases of caesarian sections were performed for fetal distress in USA in 2002, which is less than that of this study 29.

In this study caesarian section performed for obstructed labour constitute a leading indication, which is about (8.04%), this incidence has got similarity with Mymensingh Medical College Hospital. From study of Khan. In his study at Mymensingh Medical College Hospital in 2007, he showed 6.2% caesarian section was performed for obstructed labour 30.

In this study 45 cases i.e.12.02% caesarian section were performed for eclampsia in Dhaka Medical College Hospital, in MMCH 2007 in a study it was observed 10.2% caesarian section was performed for eclampsia which is similar to this study 30.

To reduce perinatal mortality caesarian section has been considered as standard method of management for mal presentation. In these study 13 cases i.e. (3.59%) emergency operation performs for mal presentation. In a study in MMCH in 2004 it was observed that 3.2% caesarian operation was performed for mal presentation 30. Which has got similarity with this study? In this study caesarian section was done on 10 i.e. (2.68%) due to fail progress of labour. This findings is lower than the finding of khan (7.4%) 30 .

Summary

40


The incidence of caesarean section in this study in Dhaka medical College Hospital during the period form January 2009 to July 2009 was 2181 and per vaginal delivery was 2334 and (Percentage of caesarean section was 48.30% and vaginal delivery was 51.7%. Analyzing the delivery incidence in the present series it was observed that out of 415 women number of emergency caesarean section was 373 i.e 89.87%and elective caesarean section 42 i.e. 10.12% .

Age distribution of elective and emergency caesarean section women showed that 8 (19.04%) and 70 (18.76%) were in age group< 20 Years, 27 (64.28%) and 287(76.94%) in age group 21-30 years and the rest 7(16.66%) and 16 (4.28%) were in age group 30 years, respectively. In both the groups’ Maximum number of women belonged to age group 21-30 years, followed by < 20 years and < 30 years. In elective group, Maximum number women (47.61) had secondary level of education and in emergency group SSC (47.98%) .

Most of the patient underwent section were housewives 40 (95.23%) and 346 (92.76%) in elective and emergency group respectively. Twenty (47.61%) of emergency group were primigravida the rest 22 (52.38%) women of elective and 235 (63%) of emergency group were multigravida. So most of the women of caesarean section were multigravida. In this study 34.5% of caesarian section was performed for fetal distress. Other indications for emergency caesarean section were obstructed labour 8.04% eclampsia 10.2% Malpresentation 3.59%.

CONCLUSION


The Caesarean section rate continues to increase. Caesarean section into two categories:

Now it is important to divide

electively and emergency.

the

Because the

emergency Caesarean section always carries a higher risk of complication than the elective procedure, this distinction seems valid concerning maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. However, morbidity and mortality rates have could be significantly reduced due to proper antenatal care, immunization new surgical techniques, improved anaesthesia, use of antibiotics and post delivery care, However, to reduce cost and risk, every effort should be taken to reduce emergency Caesarean section deliveries. In this regard, further long-term studies with larger sample siztfshould are undertaken.

BIBLIOGRAPITY 1.

Arulkumaran S. Malpresentation, Malpostion, Cephalopelvic disproportion and

obstetric procedure. In: Edmond’s DK (Ed) Dew hurt’s obstetrics and gynecology. Oxford: Blackwell science, 2007, 24 : 223

2.

Nielsen TN, Hokgard KH. Comparison of indications for caesarean section. Ginekol

pol, 2004. 75 (21): 926-31.

3.

Bhuiyan SN, Parveen R, Begum R. Caesarean section. In: clinical guide to obsteric

and gynecology. 3rd edition, 1999; 509.

4.

Hacke NF, Moore JG. Delivery, Vacuum extraction and Caesarean section. In

essentials of obstetrics and gynecology WB saunders, 1998: 352-360.

42


5.

Ratnum SS, Rao KB and Arulkumaran S. obstetrics and gynecology for

postgraduates, 2nd edition, orient long man, Hyderabad, India : 1992; vol-1:10-14.

6.

Azim AKMA, Salauddin AKM, Bari MA. A study of MCH service among the slum

dweller of Dhaka city. Bangladesh J obsted gynaecol 2000; 15:10-14.

7.

Holland and Brews. Obstetric operation. in: Robert Percival. Holland and Brews

manual obstetrics. Fourth Edition. The English language book society of churchill living stone. London. 1980; 680.

8.

Norman Jeffcoate. Anatomy. In: Neerja Bhatla. Jeffcoate’s principles of gynaelogy

sixth edition. Arnold. London, 2001;38

9.

DeCherhey AH, Nathan L. Operative Delivery. In: current obstetrics and gynecologic

diagnosis and treatment. 10th edition. New York: McGraw Hill companies, 2007: 469.

10.

Donald IAN. Practical obstetric problems 5 th edition. New Delhi: BI publications PVt

Ltd. 1998.825-61.

11.

Bhuiyan SN, Parveen R, Begum R. Caesarean section. In: clinical obstetrics and

gynecology. 3rd edition, 1999:509-10.

12.

Dutta DC. Operative Gynecology. In: textbook of gynecology including gerontology

and contraception. 5th edition. Calcutta : New Central book Agency (P) Ltd. 2001: 553-7, 633-41

13.

Nielsen TF, Hokgard KH. Postoperative caesarean section morbidity. AMJ obstet


Gynecol 1983; 146: 911-5

14.

Grady JPO, Veronikis Dk, cheruenak F,A Mccullough LB, Kannan CM, Tileon JL.

Caesarean delivery.

In: Grady JPO< Gimovsky ML, Mcihargie CJ, editors. Operative

obstetrics . 10th edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1998: 239-84.

15.

Cowan RK, Kinch RA, Ellis B, and Enderson R. Trial of Labour following caesarean

delivery. obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 933-6

16.

Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liuy W, Tsadika G. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus

trial of labour: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 927-32. Petro S, Kuppex E, Vause S, Marsh M. Clinical Provider and Sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits. In England and wales. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 1123-4. 17.

18.

Jolly M, sebire N, Harris J, Robinson S, and Regan L, The risks associalted with

pregnancy in women aged 35 years or older. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2433-7.

19.

Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agrossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M. Caesarean section

using the Misgave ladach method int J Gyhecol obstet 1997; 57: 273-9

20.

Kores N, Mayekai R, Ambiye VR. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section J obstet

Gynaecol India 1996; 45: 328-30.

21.

Maternal health and safe Motherhood program. Annex -2. Division of Family

planning. WHo/FHE/MSM/94, 1994;11: 95

22.

Boiyaji H, Muhan FP. Post Caesarean delivery. Eur J obstet Gynaecol Rreprod Biol

1993; 51: 181-92. 44


23.

A review of the emergency obstetric are functions of sedated facilities in

Bangladesh UNICEF; 1993: 10-2.

24.

Deeba F. A Study on factors and outcome of emergency caesarean section among

the patients admitted in Rajshahi medical college Hospital (Dissertation) Bangladesh College of physicians and surgeon, 2004.

25.

Chowdhury SB, Newaz R, Begum A, Dewan F. Indications and complications of

caesarean section: A study of 1083 cases. Bangladesh J obstetric Gynaecol 1994; 9 9:1-7.

26.

Kitschke HJ, Misselaritz B, Lieb E. Caesarean section in Hesse: what is the ideal rate

of caesarean section? Gynaecol 2001;34:99-101

27.

Shorten A, Lewis DE, Shorten B. Trial of Labour versus elective repeat caesarean

section: a cost effectiveness analysis. Aust health wealth rev 1998; 1: 8-28

28.

Tadesse E, Adane M, Abiyoum. Caesarean section deliveries at Tikur Anbessa

teaching Hospital, Ethiopia. East AFR med J 1999; 73: 619:22.

29.

Birth 31:2 June 2004, increase caesarean section rates: Exploring the role of culture

in an Australian community. Ruth walker, BA (Hon’s) PhD Deborah, B.A (Hon’s). M. Psych (clin) PhD and chiris wilkinson , MB, FRANCOG, MPH

30.

Khan AKMMR. Indication of caesarean section in Mymensingh medical college

Hospital (Dissertation) Bangladesh college of Physicians and Surgeon’s 2007


Data Collection Sheet Topic-Critical analysis of the indication of emergency caesarean section of the patient admitted in Dhaka Medical College Hospital. General information of the patient:

1.

Name

2.

Age -

3.

Registration No.

4.

Address

5.

Educational level a) Primary

Years

b) secondary c) S.S.C d) H.S.C e) Degree and above.

6. Residence – a) Rural b) Slum c) Urban d) Affluent 7. Occupationa) House wife, b) Day labour c) service holder d) others 8. Monthly income of the familya) <3,000/- month

46

b) 3,000-6,000/ month


c) 6,000-10,000/ month d) > 10.000/ month. 9. Date of time of admission. 10. Who advice you for admission in hospital? a) Doctor & other health personal b) Husband c) Relative d) Patient herself Others. 11. Build and Nutrition – a) Poor, b) Average c) Obesc 12. Height of the patient –a) <150cm, b) 150-160 cm. c) >160 cm 13. Blood group & Rh factor 14. T.T. immunization –a) Yes b) No. 15. Gravida –a) Primi b) 2nd c) 3rd d) > 3rd L.M.P. E.D.D. Age of last child 16. Do you receive Antenatal care? Yes, a) One b) Two c) Three d) More than three No.

e)


17. From whom you receive Antenatal care? a) Health personal others than MBBS b) MBBS c) Specialist in respective subject d) others. 18. Had any complain? Yes, a) Pain b) per vaginal bleeding c) per vaginal watery discharge d) Less fetal movement c) Others No. 19. Had any disease? Yes –a) Hypertension  Mild

 Severe

b) Diabetes mellitus  controlled  Diet / Insulin  Both c)

Others

 uncontrolled

Renal disease d) Heart disease –Grade I, Grade II, Grade III, Grade IV, Any Medication Operative treatment / Not No.

Regarding post obstetrical history 48


20. History of infertility 21. History of Abortion 22. History of Still birth 23. History of Neonatal death 24. History of previous caesarean section. 25. History of Operative treatment

Caesarean section Hysterotomy

Myomectomy Repair of Rupture uterus.

Regarding Diagnosis of the patient 26.

How patient was diagnosed?

History CTG

Examination

Others.

General Examination during admission. Appearance Pulse

Ultrasonography


Anaemia

B.P.

Jaundice

Heart

Oedema

Lungs

Obstetrical examination during admission : Height of uterus : ................ wks Uterine contraction Lie

Vaginal

: present /absent

: Longitudinal / others

Presentation

: Cephalic/ others

FHR

: ................. / Min

examination before C/S : Cervix Consistency : Soft/firm Position Dilatation

: Ant/ post : Cm/ Full dilated

Presenting part

: Cephalic / other

Station

: .................. /o/+

Membrane

: Ruptured /no.

Liquor

: Normal/ stained

Pelvis

: Adequate/ inadequate

Regarding operation : 27.

Date & time operation

28.

Duration of pregnancy at the time of operation

29.

Indication of emergency caesarean section.

30.

Anastasia- a) General b) Spinal c) Epidural

31.

Maternal and Fetal outcome in C/S Maternal outcome

50


Normal/ associated medical and obstetric/ complications improved /need blood transfusion / developed complications. i.

Sex

ii.

Alive / asphyxiated /Still birth

iii.

Weight

iv.

Apart score

32.

Regarding complication : During operations:

1. Hemorrhage : Average / Severe 2. Anaesmetic hazards: occur/not occur

Post Operative: 1. PPH

: Occur/not

2. Pyrexia

: Present/absent

3. Peritonitis

: Present / absent

4. UTI

: Present / absent

5. Wound infection

: Present / absent

6. Burst at abdomen

: Present / absent

33.

Condition of the baby during discharge

1.

Weight in kg............ kg.

2.

Length in (cm)........... cm

3.

Reflex behavior- Well /poor

4.

Condition of skin –pink /pallor /icterus /erythematic toxicum


52

5.

Condition of umbilicus –Dry / any discharge

6.

Neonatal Jaundice – present / absent

7.

Any congenital malformation- present /absent

8.

Method of feeding -Breast feeding/ Artificial

9.

Drugs used (if arty ) :

34.

Date & time of discharge

35.

Duration of stay in Hospital.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.