Notes

BREAKING IT DOWN

If you don ’t have a curbside green bin program, a countertop composter could be just the ticket. We test drove five models; here ’ s how they stacked up

EVERY YEAR, Canadians throw away nearly 2.2 million tonnes of food. Not only is this incredibly wasteful, but it’s also awful for the environment. When buried in a landfill, food waste generates methane, a potent greenhouse gas. In fact, landfills are responsible for nearly one-quarter of Canada’s methane emissions.

“Methane contributes to global warming, and its concentration is increasing in the atmosphere, ” explains Mario Tenuta, a professor of applied soil ecology at the University of Manitoba. “One of the ways to decrease the environmental impact of landfills is to divert materials from going to them. That’s where composting comes in. ”

When composted, food breaks down to produce nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, and returns carbon to the soil instead of releasing it into the atmosphere. Many Canadian cities operate a green bin program for food waste, but if yours doesn’t have one, consider the countertop composter. There are a variety of models on the market; most yield either true compost, or a dehydrated byproduct that can be used as fertilizer. Chatelaine staffers put five options to the test in our kitchens.

— Natalie Michie

WE TRIED IT: COUNTERTOP COMPOSTER EDITION

REENCLE, $873, reencleus.com After being primed by a four-week carb and protein diet, Reencle ’ s patented microbes break down select types of food waste into compost in three to five hours. Pros Odourless; quiet motor; processes food quickly; no need to replace microbes if instructions are followed well; creates actual compost as opposed to dehydrated food waste Cons Very expensive; bulky; can ’t process many common waste types (such as eggshells, onion skins and root vegetables) TERO, $595, teroinnovation.ca The brainchild of two Laval University students turned entrepreneurs, Tero grinds and dehydrates many types of food waste into fertilizer that can be used indoors or out. A cycle takes from four to eight hours. Pros Sleek design; odourless; very easy to operate; no additives required to process waste; Canadian; female-founded Cons Expensive; need to replace activated charcoal in filter at regular intervals; doesn ’t accept paper products

URBALIVE BOKASHI KITCHEN COMPOSTER,

$150, wormbox.ca Bokashi is a Japanese method of fermenting food waste with layers of microbe-laden bran. After three weeks, it yields a “ pre-compost” that can be buried or added to an outdoor composter, as well as a liquid that can be used as fertilizer. Pros Less expensive; odourless; no electricity required; accepts a wide variety of food waste; made from recycled plastic; Canadian Cons Cannot be opened during fermentation process; waste needs to be chopped well; need to repurchase bran and paper filters at regular intervals; the pre-compost can ’t be used directly on plants

LOMI, $624, pela.earth/lomi Lomi grinds and dehydrates many types of food waste—as well as yard waste, compostable paper and Lomi-approved bioplastics—into compost that can be used indoors or out. A cycle can take from three to 20 hours (the latter results in mature compost); a LomiPod tablet, which contains microbes, is recommended for most cycles to facilitate decomposition. Pros Sleek design; odourless; accepts a wide variety of waste; creates actual compost Cons Expensive; need to repurchase LomiPods and replace activated charcoal at regular intervals; our tester found the motor somewhat loud

VITAMIX FOODCYCLER,

$500, vitamix.com This “food recycler ” grinds and dehydrates many types of food waste—including dairy and small bones—within eight hours. The end product can be used as a plant fertilizer indoors or out (though the brand doesn ’t recommend it if you ’ re processing meat waste). Pros Odourless; quiet motor; processes food quickly; no additives required to process waste Cons Expensive; bulky; need to replace activated charcoal in filter at regular intervals