International Baccalaureate Diploma Program Sri KDU Smart School
Extended Essay -Chemistry-
How will the period of fermentation and brewing temperature affect the amount of caffeine extracted from brewed Camellia Sinensis by solvent extraction technique using dichloromethane?
Word Count: 3992
By:
LEOW YUN JIN 002206 - 009
Â
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Abstract Camellia Sinensis contains polyphenolic flavonoids which have strong antioxidant properties that bring health benefits but at the same time contains caffeine, a stimulant. High caffeine consumption causes insomnia and constant consumption can be highly addictive. Caffeine should be taken in moderate dosage and thus factors affecting the amount of caffeine in brewed tea were investigated. Investigation on the period of fermentation was done by fermenting fresh tea leaves for 0, 40, 80 and 120min. Further investigation on the effect of brewing temperature was carried out at 25.0, 60.0, 80.0 and 100.0°C. Crude caffeine was extracted with dichloromethane, CH2Cl2 using liquid-liquid extraction technique. Selected samples were further purified through sublimation. The mass of crude and purified caffeine were calculated as the difference between the initial and final readings of boiling tubes and beakers respectively. The results showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between the period of fermentation and brewing temperature on the amount of caffeine. No significant increase in purified caffeine was found from 0-80min but there is a significant increase at 120min. Amount of crude caffeine increases as the temperature increases from 25.0–100.0°C and a line of linear regression graph was plotted (R2 = 0.9641) showing a positive correlation. The effect of period of fermentation and brewing temperature on the amount of caffeine are significant. As the period of fermentation and temperature increase, the amount of caffeine increases. In order to reap the health benefits of Camellia Sinensis but at the same time minimising caffeine intake, tea leaves should be processed at shorter period of fermentation and being brewed at a lower temperature. Tea leaves are suggested to undergo minimum fermentation for flavouring and brewed at an optimum temperature between 60.0–80.0°C. (283 words)
Page 1 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Table of Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................2 Acknowledgement.........................................................................................................................3 1.0 Introduction.....................................................................................................................4 2.0 Hypothesis........................................................................................................................7 2.1 How Period of Fermentation Affects the Amount of Caffeine.............................7 2.2 How Temperature Affects the Amount of Caffeine.............................................8 3.0 Methodology Used to Investigate How Period of Fermentation Affects the Amount of Caffeine........................................................................................................................................9 3.1 Devised Methods..............................................................................................................9 3.1.1 Collection of Samples..........................................................................................9 3.1.2 Tea Processing for Different Period of Fermentation...........................................9 3.1.3 Brewing Tea........................................................................................................11 3.1.4 Concentrating the Brewed Tea...........................................................................12 3.1.5 Extraction of Crude Caffeine.............................................................................12 4.0 Methodology Used to Investigate the Effects of Temperature on Amount of Caffeine......................................................................................................................................14 4.1 Devised Methods............................................................................................................14 4.1.1 Selection of Tea Leaves.....................................................................................14 4.1.2 Brewing Tea.......................................................................................................14 4.1.3 Concentrating the Brewed Tea and Extraction of Crude Caffeine..........................................................................................................................15 5.0 Purification of Crude Caffeine.....................................................................................16 6.0 Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Test....................................................................17 7.0 Data Collection.............................................................................................................18 7.1 Method of Data Collection.............................................................................................18 7.1.1 Calculating the mass of crude caffeine..............................................................18 7.1.2 Calculating the mass of purified caffeine...........................................................18 7.1.3 Identifying the purity of purified caffeine..........................................................18 7.2 Raw Data........................................................................................................................19 7.2.1 Amount of Crude and Purified Caffeine Extracted at Various Period of Fermentation...................................................................................................19 7.2.2 Amount of Crude Caffeine Extracted at Different Temperature.....................................................................................................................20 7.2.3 Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Test.............................................................21 7.3 Data Processing..............................................................................................................22 7.4 Statistical Analysis: ANOVA and Tukeyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s HSD test.......................................................25 7.5 Percentage of Caffeine Extracted by Liquid-liquid Extraction........................................28 8.0 Evaluation......................................................................................................................29 8.1 Significant of Studies.........................................................................................31 8.2 Limitations..........................................................................................................32 8.3 Ways of Improvements......................................................................................33 8.4 Unresolved Questions for Further Investigations................................................34 9.0 Conclusion......................................................................................................................35 10.0 Appendix........................................................................................................................36 11.0 Bibliography...................................................................................................................42 Page 2 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009 Acknowledgment Special thanks to: Lawrence Kok (Supervisor) Joel Micheal Lim Ju Anne Kalai Leow Wooi Hian
Page 3 of 42
Extended Essay 1.0
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Introduction
Figure 1: Molecular structure of caffeine
1,3,7â&#x20AC;&#x201C;trimethylxanthine (C8H10N4O2) or best known as caffeine is a naturally occurring alkaloid1 that belongs to the xanthine2 chemical group. Caffeine is known as a drug. It stimulates the cardiovascular and central nervous systems of the body. Caffeine consumed through foods and beverages is readily absorbed into the blood stream. It takes effects rapidly, about 15 minutes after consumption and its level peaks after an hour. It will stay in the body for several hours and to eliminate half the amount of caffeine will takes up to six hours3. In the human brain, a natural occurring xanthine called adenosine4 serves as a neurotransmitter. Adenosine is responsible for sleepiness as it will binds with its receptors in the brain cells causing the nerve cells activity to slow down. Caffeine is able to interfere with adenosine at various sites in the brain including the reticular formation by binding with adenosine receptors thus speeding up nerve cells. This results in decreased fatigue and
1
2
A class of naturally occurring compounds containing nitrogen and having the properties of an organic amine base
A purine base found in most body tissues, fluids and in other organisms. Caffeine has a half-life of 6 hours (http://www.psych.umn.edu/courses/spring05/dionisiod/psy3061/caffeine.htm) 4 An inhibitory neurotransmitter that plays a role in promoting sleep 3
Page 4 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
increased alertness thus allowing a person to stay awake. Besides that, caffeine has the ability to increase the heart rate, blood pressure and basal metabolic rate (BMR) for several hours. It also acts as a diuretic which increases urination. Caffeine, a plantâ&#x20AC;&#x201C;based alkaloid can be found in tea, coffee and Cocoa. Tea, a popular drink among all ages is rich in polyphenolic flavonoids5 which have strong antioxidants properties despites containing caffeine. Flavonoids play a role in preventing cancer by protecting cells from free radical damage. It also helps in keeping the heart healthy and research in Europe shows that drinking three or more cups of tea per day reduces the risk of heart diseases. [1] Despites all the goodness of drinking tea, the negative effects of caffeine cannot be ignored. Caffeine can cause insomnia, headache, nervousness and dizziness when consume in high doses. It also causes addiction and without it the addict will be unable to concentrate well and suffers depression. Thus, caffeine should be taken in moderate dosage.6 Due to these reasons, I choose to focus my research on tea. Tea is produced from the leaves and buds of the Camellia Sinensis plant through a series of processes. Tea leaves will start to oxidise after plucking and will take about one and the half hour to two hours to be fully fermented7. Tea leaves can be left unfermented or fermented as it will produce a range of teas from white tea to black tea.
5
Chemical substances that have antioxidant properties See appendix 1 7 Result from oxidation reaction but known as fermentation in the tea industry 6
Page 5 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Figure 2: Camellia Sinensis plant which is use to produce tea. Tea promotes health but at the same time it causes health problems due to its caffeine content. Thus, to be able to reap the benefits of tea but at the same time minimising the adverse effects of caffeine is by consuming the lowest possible amount of caffeine. There are several factors that affect the amount of caffeine in brewed tea. I will explore the possibility effects of period of fermentation and brewing temperature on the amount of caffeine in brewed tea. Processed tea leaves will be brewed using water and the caffeine will be extracted by liquid-liquid extraction using dichloromethane, CH2Cl28. Therefore, my research question is: How will the period of fermentation and brewing temperature affects the amount of caffeine extracted from brewed Camellia Sinensis by solvent extraction technique using dichloromethane?
8
An organic solvent used to extract caffeine
Page 6 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
2.0
Hypotheses
2.1
How Period of Fermentation Affects the Amount of Caffeine
Caffeine is an alkaloid known to bind with other compounds that can be found in tea such as theine9 and other polyphenols, to form insoluble complexes. The breaking of cell walls which is done by bruising the tea leaves causes the enzymes present in the tea leaves to mix with other chemical substances within the cells allowing fermentation. A series of complex chemical reactions begins, one of the most important reactions being the oxidation of polyphenols by the enzyme, polyphenoloxidase. In this reaction, an oxygen atom which is derived directly from the air is added into the polyphenol in the presence of polyphenoloxidase. The oxidised polyphenols will no longer be able to combine with caffeine to form insoluble complexes thus affecting the amount of extractable caffeine in tea leaves. The fermentation process can be stopped by subjecting the tea leaves to 100째C through heating. Polyphenoloxidase will be denatured causing the oxidation of polyphenols to stop as well. Thus, my hypothesis is that as the period of fermentation increases, more polyphenols are being oxidised by polyphenoloxidase causing less insoluble complexes to be formed with caffeine. This means that the amount of extractable caffeine through liquid-liquid extraction will increase as the period of fermentation increases. [2]
9
A type of polyphenol that exists in Camellia Sinensis
Page 7 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009 â&#x2020;&#x2018; Period of fermentation
â&#x2020;&#x2018; Polyphenols is oxidised by polyphenoloxidase â&#x2020;&#x201C; Polyphenols combine with caffeine to form insoluble complexes â&#x2020;&#x2018; Extractable caffeine Scheme 1: A summary on the effects of period of fermentation. 2.2
How Temperature Affects the Amount of Caffeine
Temperature of the water used during tea brewing will also affects the amount of caffeine extracted from the tea. My hypothesis is that as the temperature increases, the rate of diffusion of caffeine into the water increases as the caffeine particles gain more kinetic energy. The kinetic theory states that average Kinetic Energy, đ??¸đ??ž =
1 2
mv2 is directly
3
proportional to absolute temperature, T where đ??¸đ??ž = đ?&#x2018;&#x2DC;đ??ľ đ?&#x2018;&#x2021;. Thus, the average velocity, đ?&#x2018;Ł is 2
directly proportional to the T as the mass, m remains constant. The đ?&#x2018;Ł relates to the average velocity of caffeine molecules diffusing out from the tea leaves into the water. Therefore, as T increases, caffeine molecules gain more đ??¸đ??ž causing an increased in đ?&#x2018;Ł thus allowing a higher rate of diffusion. I strongly believed that as the brewing temperature increases, the amount of caffeine in brewed tea increases.
Page 8 of 42
Extended Essay 3.0
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Methodology Used to Investigate How Period of Fermentation Affects the
Amount of Caffeine. 3.1
Devised Methods
3.1.1
Collection of Samples
1. Fresh tea leaves were collected from BOH Plantation10 and were kept in air tight containers. Bulb Second Leaf First Leaf
Third Leaf Forth Leaf
Figure 3: The shoot of Camellia Sinesis plant which is use to produce tea. 3.1.2
Tea Processing for Different Period of Fermentation
1. Some sample of fresh tea leaves were heated in the oven at 100째C; 2. Tea leaves were mix at every 10minutes and once dried they were kept; 3. The remaining samples were being separated evenly into three portions;
10
http://www.boh.com.my/
Page 9 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
4. All three portions of the samples were bruised11 mechanically using hands and being spread out on a flat surface exposing them to air. 5. The three portions were heated under the same condition after being left at different time intervals of 40, 80 and 120minutes and were kept.
Figure 4: Tea leaves being heated in the oven at 100째C
Figure 5: Tea leaves being exposed to the air for fermentation. 11
The breaking of the cell walls to release the cell contents including enzyme for fermentation.
Page 10 of 42
Extended Essay 3.1.3
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Brewing Tea
1. Triplicate samples for different period of fermentation containing 3.000g of tea leaves each were weighed using electronic balance (¹0.001g); 2. 100cm3 of distilled water at room temperature, 27.0°C was added; 3. All samples were heated using Bunsen burner for 20minutes; 4. 5cm3 of sodium carbonate solution12 was being added into each beaker and the mixtures were stir for 15seconds; 5. Tea solution was filtered using sieve into conical flaks; 6. All samples were kept and being labelled.
Figure 6: Triplicate samples being brewed.
12
Used to neutralise the tannin acid from tea leaves
Page 11 of 42
Extended Essay 3.1.4
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Concentrating the Brewed Tea
1. Triplicate samples at four different period of fermentation were being heated using Bunsen burners; 2. Tea solutions were left to boil until 25cm3 was left. 3.1.5
Extraction of Crude Caffeine Using Dichloromethane
1. All boiling tubes were pre-weigh using the electronic balance (¹0.001g) and labelled; 2. The first set of triplicate samples were transferred into 50cm3 conical flasks and wash bottle was used to wash down all the tea solution; 3. 2cm3 of dichloromethane (DCM) was added into each conical flask using a calibrated glass pipette and conical flasks were being swirled slowly for a constant time period; 4. Mixtures were left tilted to settle the emulsion formed; 5. Glass pipette was used to draw the lower organic layer into its respective boiling tube. Then, another 2cm3 of DCM is added; 6. Caffeine was extracted three times from each sample; 7. Steps 3-6 were repeated for the other two samples and the organic layer was transferred into their respective boiling tubes; 8. Boiling tubes were placed in a water bath of 100°C to evaporate the DCM leaving behind the crude caffeine; 9. A small amount of DCM was then used to wash down all the crude caffeine13 to the bottom of the boiling tube and DCM was evaporated again; 10. Steps 2-9 were repeated for the other three sets of triplicate samples; 11. All boiling tubes were weighed.
13
Caffeine with the presence of other impurities such as chlorophyll
Page 12 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Aqueous Layer
Organic Layer
Figure 7: Liquid-liquid extraction using Dichloromethane (DCM).
Page 13 of 42
Extended Essay 4.0
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Methodology Used to Investigate the Effects of Temperature on Amount of
Caffeine 4.1
Devised Methods
4.1.1
Selection of Tea Leaves
1. BOH tea that can be purchase in the store will be used. This allows the research to be relevant to a bigger population. 4.1.2
Brewing Tea
1. Triplicate samples for four different temperatures containing 5.000g of tea leaves each were weighed using electronic balance (±0.001g); 2. 100cm3 of distilled water at room temperature, 27.0°C was added into the first set of triplicate and were stirred; 3. After 20minutes, 5cm3 of sodium carbonate solution was added into each beaker and were stir for 15seconds; 4. Tea solution was filtered using sieve into conical flaks; 5. Steps 2-4 were repeated for another three sets of triplicate samples using distilled water at 60.0°C, 80.0°C and 100.0°C which were left in water baths set at their respective temperatures. 7. All samples were kept in conical flasks.
Page 14 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Figure 8: Water baths set at temperature of 60째C, 80째C and 100째C. 4.1.3
Concentrating the Brewed Tea and Extraction of Crude Caffeine
Methods used to concentrate the brewed tea and crude caffeine extraction were the same as in 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 on page 12.
Page 15 of 42
Extended Essay 5.0
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Purification of Crude Caffeine14 1. 1cm3 of DCM was added into the boiling tube to dissolve the crude caffeine; 2. It is then transferred into a larger 25cm3 beaker and DCM was evaporated using water bath; 3. A pre-weighed smaller size 25cm3 beaker is place into the larger beaker. They are then heated using Bunsen burner; 4. The Bunsen burner is taken away from the beakers occasionally to keep the temperature below 200째C; 5. Heating is stopped after 20minutes. The smaller beaker is slowly taken out and left to cool, (Air was used to condense the caffeine instead of ice as water vapour will be formed on the outer wall of the smaller beaker thus affecting the amount of caffeine that sublimed on the surface); 6. The smaller beaker is then weighed by inverting it on the balance; 7. Steps 1-6 are repeated for the other samples.
14
Conducted for samples from different period of fermentation only
Page 16 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Smaller beaker Larger beaker Sublimed caffeine
Figure 9: Purifying the crude caffeine by sublimation. 6.0
Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Test 1. Samples of pure caffeine15, crude caffeine and purified caffeine were dissolved in DCM; 2. TLC plates were prepared and pure caffeine was spotted on the top left, crude caffeine at the centre while purified caffeine on the right of a TLC plate using a new capillary spotter each time; 3. TLC plate was place into a chromatogram prepared from ethyl acetate16 with a few drops of concentrated sulphuric acid, placing the spotted end into the mixture; 4. TLC plate was left to dry and then viewed under UV light; 5. Observations were noted.
15 16
Purchased from Sarget Welch, US A mobile phase used in this TLC test
Page 17 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
7.0
Data Collection
7.1
Method of data collection
7.1.1
Calculating the mass of crude caffeine
All the boiling tubes were weighed on the electronic balance (±0.001g) before the experiment. The boiling tubes containing crude caffeine were being weighed again. The mass of crude caffeine is the difference between the initial and final readings. 7.1.2
Calculating the mass of purified caffeine
The smaller beakers used for the sublimation process were weighed on the electronic balance (±0.001g) before the experiment. After the purification, the beaker with caffeine sublimed on its outer wall was being weighed again. The mass of purified caffeine is the difference between the initial and final readings. 7.1.3
Identifying the purity of purified caffeine
Spots viewed under the UV light were noted. The distance of the final spot from the starting point of the purified caffeine was compared to the pure caffeine’s.
Page 18 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
7.2
Raw Data
7.2.1
Amount of Crude and Purified Caffeine extracted at Various Period of Fermentation
Period of Fermentation / min
Before Purification Mass / g (±0.001g)
3 A B A B A A A B 0 40.097 0.018 39.684 0.015 38.195 38.179 40 39.860 0.012 39.966 0.016 39.004 38.991 80 42.666 0.016 41.770 0.018 43.035 43.020 120 37.687 0.018 43.030 0.020 43.179 43.158 After Purification Mass / g (±0.001g) 1 2 3 C-D C-D C D C D C D 0 22.839 22.834 0.005 22.843 22.834 0.009 22.842 22.834 40 36.874 36.864 0.010 36.870 36.864 0.006 36.871 36.864 80 48.442 48.432 0.010 48.440 48.432 0.008 48.439 48.432 120 34.139 34.126 0.013 34.142 34.126 0.016 34.140 34.126 Table 1: Amount of Crude and Purified Caffeine for Various Period of Fermentation a
1 B 40.079 39.848 42.650 37.669
2 B 39.669 39.950 41.752 43.010
Mean amount of crude caffeine extracted from 3.000g of tea leaves ±S.D. for triplicate samples Mean amount of crude caffeine per gram of tea leaves ±S.D. for triplicate samples c Mean amount of purified caffeine from 3.000g of tea leaves ±S.D. for triplicate samples d Mean amount of purified caffeine per gram of tea leaves ±S.D. for triplicate samples e S.D : Standard deviation b
(a)
A-B 0.016 0.013 0.015 0.021
Mean ± S.D / g for 3.000g
Mean ± S.D(e) / mg for 3.000g
0.0163 ± 0.0015 0.0137 ± 0.0021 0.0163 ± 0.0015 0.0197 ± 0.0015
C-D 0.008 0.007 0.007 0.014
0.0073 ± 0.0021 0.0077 ± 0.0021 0.0083 ± 0.0015 0.0143 ± 0.0007
Mean ± S.D / mg g-1
16.3 ± 1.5 13.7 ± 2.1 16.3 ± 1.5 19.7 ± 1.5 (c)
Mean ± S.D / g for 3.000g
(b)
Mean ± S.D / mg for 3.000g 7.3 ± 2.1 7.7 ± 2.1 8.3 ± 1.5 14.3 ± 0.7
5.4 ± 0.5 4.6 ± 0.7 5.4 ± 0.5 6.6 ± 0.5 (d)
Mean ± S.D / mg g-1 2.4 ± 0.7 2.6 ± 0.7 2.8 ± 0.5 4.8 ± 0.5
A: Mass of Boling Tube (Final) B: Mass of Boling Tube (Initial) B-A: Mass of Crude Caffeine C: Mass of Beaker (Final) D: Mass of Beaker (Initial) C-D: Mass of Purified Caffeine Page 19 of 42
Extended Essay 7.2.2
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Amount of Crude Caffeine Extracted at Different Temperature Mass / g (±0.001g)
Temperature / °C (±0.1°C)
1 A
B
25.0
42.397
42.387
60.0
40.547
80.0 100.0
2 A-B
A
B
0.010
42.37
42.358
40.531
0.016
39.514
39.174
39.147
0.027
38.437
38.412
0.025
3 A-B
A-B
Mean ± S.D / g for 5.000g
(a)
Mean ± S.D(c) / mg for 5.000g
(b)
Mean ± S.D / mg g-1
A
B
0.012
42.074
42.059
0.015
0.0123 ± 0.0025
12.3 ± 2.5
2.5 ± 0.5
39.495
0.019
43.206
43.184
0.022
0.0190 ± 0.0030
19.0 ± 3.0
3.8 ± 0.6
43.155
43.133
0.022
40.018
39.995
0.023
0.0240 ± 0.0026
24.0 ± 2.6
4.8 ± 0.5
39.095
39.071
0.024
42.756
42.726
0.030
0.0263 ± 0.0032
26.3 ± 3.2
5.3 ± 0.6
Table 2: Amount of Crude Caffeine Extracted at Various Temperature.
a
Mean amount of crude caffeine extracted from 5.000g of tea leaves ±S.D. for triplicate samples
A: Mass of Boling Tube (Final)
b
Mean amount of crude caffeine per gram of tea leaves ±S.D. for triplicate samples
B: Mass of Boling Tube (Initial)
c
S.D : Standard deviation
B-A: Mass of Crude Caffeine
Page 20 of 42
Extended Essay 7.2.3
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Test Solvent Front
Pure Caffeine
Impurities
Starting Point Pure Caffeine
Crude Caffeine
Purified Caffeine
Figure 10: TLC plate spotted with pure caffeine, crude caffeine and purified caffeine was viewed under UV light.
Page 21 of 42
Extended Essay 7.3
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Data Processing
Mean Amount of Crude and Purified Caffeine / mg g-1 against Period of Fermentation / min Mean Amount of Crude/Purified Caffeine /mg g -1
8.0 7.0 6.0
(c) 5.0 4.0 (a) Crude Caffeine 3.0
(b) Purified Caffeine
2.0 1.0 0.0 0
40
80
120
Period of Fermentation / min
Graph 1: Mean amount of crude caffeine and purified caffeine against period of fermentation. a
Mean amount of crude caffeine ±S.D. for triplicate samples Mean amount of purified caffeine ±S.D. for triplicate samples c Error bar denotes ±S.D. for triplicate samples b
Page 22 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Mean Amount of Crude Caffeine / mg g-1 against Temperature / °C 7.0
Mean Amount of Caffeine / mg g -1
6.0
5.0
(b) 4.0
3.0
(a) Crude Caffeine
2.0
1.0
0.0 25.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
Temperature / °C
Graph 2: Mean amount of crude caffeine against temperature. a b
Mean amount of crude caffeine ±S.D. for triplicate samples Error bar denotes ±S.D. for triplicate samples
Page 23 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Mean Amount of Crude Caffeine / mg g-1 against Temperature / °C 7.0
Mean Amount of Caffeine / mg g -1
6.0
5.0
(b) 4.0 y = 0.0385x + 1.5525 R² = 0.9907
3.0
Linear ((a) Crude Caffeine)
2.0
1.0
0.0 0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
Temperature / °C
Graph 3: Mean amount of crude caffeine against temperature. a b
Mean amount of crude caffeine ±S.D. for triplicate samples Error bar denotes ±S.D. for triplicate samples
Page 24 of 42
Extended Essay 7.4
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Statistical Analysis: ANOVA and Tukeyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s HSD test
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is conducted on the obtained data. ANOVA partitions the variance of all observations into variations between group and variation within each group. ANOVAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s result will show whether the manipulated variable (temperature and fermentation period) causes a significant difference in the amount of caffeine. Firstly, a null hypothesis, H0 is made: H0 = Îź1 = Îź2 = Îź3 = Îź4 (There is no difference between means of the four different groups). The statistic test will be carried out to find the:
F ratio =
đ?&#x2018;&#x161;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A; đ?&#x2018; đ?&#x2018;&#x17E;đ?&#x2018;˘đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;&#x;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019; đ?&#x2018;?đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;Ąđ?&#x2018;¤đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A; đ?&#x2018;&#x201D;đ?&#x2018;&#x;đ?&#x2018;&#x153;đ?&#x2018;˘đ?&#x2018;?đ?&#x2018; đ?&#x2018;&#x161;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A; đ?&#x2018; đ?&#x2018;&#x17E;đ?&#x2018;˘đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;&#x;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019; đ?&#x2018;¤đ?&#x2018;&#x2013;đ?&#x2018;Ą đ?&#x2018;&#x2022;đ?&#x2018;&#x2013;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A; đ?&#x2018;&#x201D;đ?&#x2018;&#x;đ?&#x2018;&#x153;đ?&#x2018;˘đ?&#x2018;?đ?&#x2018;
The null hypothesis will be rejected if the F-ratio is greater than the F-critical value at the significant level of 0.05 (Îą = 0.05) as there is a significant difference between one or more groups. [3] Microsoft Office Excel 2007 will be used to conduct the ANOVA. If there is a significant difference, a post hoc analysis, Tukeyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; HSD test is carried out. ANOVA does not indicate specifically which pairs have significant difference. Tukeyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s HSD test is a multiple comparison test by comparing to an overall significant level in order to test out the null hypothesis. A critical value, HSD will be calculated. There will be a significant difference between the pairs if the mean difference between groups is greater than HSD critical value. This test will be calculated manually.
Page 25 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
The results obtained are shown below: F - value17
F - critical18
Result
Crude Caffeine
6.39
4.07
Purified Caffeine
9.83
4.07
14.11
4.07
All the three F - value are greater than their respective F - critical value. This indicates that there is at least one significant difference between two groups in each of the variable.
Variable Period of Fermentation
Temperature
Table 3: The results obtained from ANOVA on the temperature and period of fermentation.
17 18
Refer to appendix 2 for further calculations Refer to appendix 2 for further calculations
Page 26 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Tukey’s HSD test19: Group Combination, min Mean HSD (Mean Amount of Crude Caffeine Difference, critical Extracted at Different Period of g value Fermentation) 0 40 0.80 1.46 0 80 0.00 1.46 0 120 1.20 1.46 40 80 0.80 1.46 40 120 2.00 1.46 80 120 1.20 1.46 Table 4: Results obtained from Tukey’s HSD test on mean amount different period of fermentation.
Group Combination, min (Mean Amount of Purified Caffeine at Different Period of Fermentation) 0 0 0 40 40 80 Table 5: Results obtained period of fermentation.
40 80 120 80 120 120 from Tukey’s HSD
Group Combination, °C (Mean Amount of Crude Caffeine Extracted at Different Temperature) 25 25 25 60 60 80 Table 6: Results obtained different temperature.
19
Mean Difference, g
HSD critical value
Implication no significant difference no significant difference no significant difference no significant difference significant difference no significant difference of crude caffeine extracted for
Implication
0.20 1.59 no significant difference 0.40 1.59 no significant difference 2.40 1.59 significant difference 0.20 1.59 no significant difference 2.20 1.59 significant difference 2.00 1.59 significant difference test on mean amount of purified caffeine for different
Mean Difference, g
HSD critical value
60 1.30 1.50 80 2.30 1.50 100 2.80 1.50 80 1.00 1.50 100 1.50 1.50 100 0.50 1.50 from Tukey’s HSD test on mean amount
Implication no significant difference significant difference significant difference no significant difference no significant difference no significant difference of crude caffeine extracted for
Refer to appendix 2 for further calculations
Page 27 of 42
Extended Essay 7.6
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Percentage of Caffeine Extracted by Liquid-liquid Extraction
Caffeine will distribute itself between water and DCM at a constant ratio according to the partition law20. Multiple extractions are better than a single extraction. Thus, three successive extractions were performed. 2cm3 of DCM is used to extract caffeine from 25cm3 of brewed tea for each extraction. Therefore, total amount of crude caffeine that can be extracted from 1 gram of tea leaves = 0.023g (23mg).21 From the calculation it shows: Percentage of extractable caffeine
=
23 30
x 100
= 76.6% ď&#x201A;ˇ
Using the amount of crude caffeine extracted for 120 min period of fermentation from table 1 (page 19), 6.6mg g-1 for calculation:
Percentage efficiency of extraction in this research =
6.6 23
x 100
= 28.7%
20 21
Refer to Appendix 3 Refer to Appendix 3 for further calculations
Page 28 of 42
Extended Essay 8.0
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Evaluation
TLC Results obtained from TLC test shows that sublimation process does not fully purify the crude caffeine as many spots can be seen. This result strongly suggests that other impurities such as chlorophylls are present. Furthermore, results show that there is a large decrease in mass of crude caffeine after purification indicating most of the impurities are removed. The values of purified caffeine will be more reliable for a fair comparative study. Nevertheless, for the investigation on the effects of temperature, the values of crude caffeine show an obvious trend thus they were not further purified. Percentage Efficiency of Extraction The percentage of extractable caffeine through liquid-liquid extraction using DCM is high, 76.6% but the percentage efficiency of extraction performed in this investigation is only 28.7%. This method was adopted because it is easy, inexpensive and DCM is available in the laboratory. Although the amount of crude caffeine extracted in this investigation is much lower than the extractable value, it does not affect the trend of the results obtained. The data are still valid as I will be comparing the relative difference of caffeine, not the total amount of caffeine. Period of Fermentation The mean purified caffeine extracted per gram tea leaves for period of fermentation of 0, 40 and 80min are 2.4±0.7, 2.6±0.7 and 2.8±0.5mg respectively. There should be zero crude caffeine found from the 0min as tea leaves are not bruise allowing no fermentation thus all caffeine forms insoluble complexes. The result obtained can be due to systematic error that occurs during sampling as tea leaves undergo minimum fermentation during the plucking Page 29 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
process. The samples were kept in an air tight container and the experiment was not performed immediately allowing some polyphenols to be oxidised. This means some caffeine does not form complexes enabling them to be extracted. Results showed no significant difference in the amount of purified caffeine over the period of 0-80min. The amount then increase to 4.8mg at 120min and records a 71.4% increased from 80 to 120min. According to statistical analysis, 120min shows significant difference (P < 0.05) with the other groups. According to graph 1, there is no significant increase at 0-80min but at 120min there is a significant increase. This can be due to time lag. The enzyme polyphenoloxidase lowers the activation energy, Ea for the oxidation of polyphenols. A series of complex reactions take place during fermentation, thus the release of polyphenoloxidase is time dependent whereby it is release through a cascade reaction. When the period of fermentation is short, only a small amount of polyphenoloxidase is available to oxidise the polyphenols thus allowing more polyphenols to form insoluble complexes with caffeine. The amount of polyphenoloxidase will increase exponentially overtime. Therefore, during shorter period of fermentation there will only be a slight increase in the caffeine but increases significantly at much longer period. Temperature As the temperature increases from 25.0-100.0째C, the mean amount of crude caffeine increases from 2.5, 3.8, 4.8 and 5.3mg respectively. It increased at a decreasing rate as the percentage increase drops from 52.0% to 26.3% and finally 5.3% as the temperature increases. Statistical analysis shows that there are significant differences (P < 0.05) in the amount of crude caffeine between 25.0째C with 80.0째C and 100.0째C while there is no significant difference for the other groups of temperatures. Graph 2 clearly shows that the amount of crude caffeine increases at a decreasing rate. The possible reason is that most of Page 30 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
the extractable caffeine has already diffused out from the tea leaves at 60.0°C. Thus, at 80.0 and 100.0°C only a small amount of caffeine diffuses out into the brewed tea. In graph 3, a linear regression line (R2 = 0.9179) drawn shows that there is a positive correlation between the amount of crude caffeine and temperature. The positive correlation can be explained by the kinetic theory: ď&#x201A;ˇ
Average Kinetic Energy, đ??¸đ??ž =
1 2
mv2 =
3 2
đ?&#x2018;&#x2DC;đ??ľ đ?&#x2018;&#x2021;
Average velocity, đ?&#x2018;Ł is directly proportional to absolute temperature, T. As T increases, đ?&#x2018;Ł which indicates the average velocity of caffeine diffusing out from the tea leaves into the water increases. Therefore, as the brewing temperature increases, the caffeine molecules gained higher Kinetic Energy which increases the rate of diffusion. Thus, more crude caffeine is extracted at higher temperature. 8.1
Significant of Studies
From the results obtained, we can conclude that the period of fermentation and brewing temperature do cause a significant difference in the amount of caffeine in brewed tea as indicated by the ANOVA in table 3. In order to reap the health benefits of Camellia Sinensis but at the same time reducing the intake of caffeine, I would suggest the following: 1. Fermentation is important as flavour compounds are formed
[2]
but tea producers can
minimise or optimise the period of fermentation to reduce the amount of caffeine in the tea brewed; 2. Consumers should brew tea at an optimum temperature that lies between 60.0°C and 80.0°C probably around 65.0°C in order to extract the beneficial substances such as flavonoids but minimising the amount of caffeine.
Page 31 of 42
Extended Essay 8.2
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Limitations 1. Ideally, pure caffeine should be used for comparative studies in this research. The amount of impurities in each samples obtained may vary thus affecting the trends of crude caffeine in relation with period of fermentation and temperature. 2. The extraction of crude caffeine is done using conical flask. A small amount of organic layer has to be left behind to prevent extracting the aqueous layer. The amount left behind for every extraction varies thus affecting the results. 3. The centrifuge machine found in the school can only centrifuge a maximum volume of 10cm3 while the volume of the mixtures of organic and aqueous layers are 27cm3. Emulsion forms when the mixture is swirl. Emulsion that contain caffeine is being left behind as the organic layer will be easily extracted together with it. 4. The mass of tea leaves used for brewing contains stem and it varies for every sample. The presence of stem will decrease the amount of crude caffeine extracted. 5. The sizes of tea leaves samples also vary and this affects the total surface area exposed during brewing. Larger total surface area will increase the rate of diffusion of caffeine into the water and vice versa. 6. The high variance (square of S.D.) of the results is due to the total sampling and measurement steps errors, đ?&#x2018; 02 = đ?&#x2018; đ?&#x2018; 2 + đ?&#x2018; đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;2 . [4] The experiments are very tedious and time consuming thus with the limited time, only triplicate samples are used thus increasing the S.D.
8.3
Ways of Improvement 1. Amount of caffeine in brewed tea can accurately measured using Reverse-Phase High Performance
Liquid
Chromatography
(HLPC)
Analysis
or
ultra-violet
spectrophotometry. Spectrophotometer is rather affordable while an HLPC may be Page 32 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
too expensive. Instead of that, the extraction technique may be further improved by using a separatory funnel instead of a conical flask which allows the mixtures to be well mixed. Only a negligible amount of organic layer will be left behind thus the amount of caffeine obtained will be more accurate; 2. Different organic solvents that can improve the percentage efficiency of liquid-liquid extraction should be explored. Organic solvent used should be non-toxic and can be easily available in the laboratory; 3. Fresh tea leaves are plucked with care in order to minimise the fermentation process and being stored in a vacuum container. Without oxygen, polyphenoloxidase will not be able to oxidise the polyphenols; 4. Tea leaves that will be used for brewing have to be sorted out to ensure that other parts such as stems are removed. Tea leaves that are still intact in large pieces have to be crushed to small pieces in order to ensure the total surface area exposed during brewing will be relatively constant for all samples; 5. The number of sample size used for each condition has to be increased in order to minimise the S.D. 8.4
Unresolved Questions for Further Investigations
Tea leaves can be divided into young (bulb, first and second leaf) and matured (third until the fifth leaf) ones. Their caffeine contents may differ thus the amount of caffeine in young and matured leaves under different period of fermentation and brewing temperatures can be investigated. The brewing temperatures investigated are only limited to 25.0, 60.0, 80.0 and 100.0°C. The optimum brewing temperature that should be used to extract out most of the beneficial substances but minimum amount of caffeine is believed to be between 60.0–80.0°C. Thus, Page 33 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
detailed investigation on different temperatures between this range can be carried out to determine the optimum brewing temperature in order to reap the maximum benefits of tea. Tea leaves used for this investigation were all grown in highlands and there is a possibility that the lowlands tea may have different caffeine content. Samples tea leaves from lowlands can be investigated for comparative studies with the highland tea. Camellia Sinensis can be divided into two varieties: [5] 1. Camellia sinensis var. Sinensis (small-leaved); 2. Camellia sinensis var. Assamica (large-leaved). The first variety was used in this investigation and further investigation should be conducted on the second variety to investigate whether different tea variety will have different amount of caffeine and how the period of fermentation and temperature will affects the amount of caffeine in its brewed tea. Investigation on how brewing temperature affects the rate of diffusion of beneficial substances that bring health benefits should be carried out in order to maximise the benefits of tea. 9.0
Conclusion
Results show the effects of period of fermentation and brewing temperature on the amount of caffeine are significant. As the period of fermentation and brewing temperature increase, the amount of caffeine increases. This research shows that in order to minimise the amount of caffeine in brewed tea, tea leaves should undergo minimum fermentation and be brewed at a lower temperature. Unfermented tea leaves may not provide any aroma and flavour thus tea leaves should be fermented at a short period of time. Brewing tea at 25.0째C shows that
Page 34 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
caffeine diffuses very slowly into the water and the same goes to other substances including beneficial ones. Thus it is best to brew tea within 60.0â&#x20AC;&#x201C;80.0°C. Therefore, it is concluded that under these suggested conditions, consumers will be able to enjoy the flavour and benefits of Camellia Sinensis but at the same time minimising caffeine intake.
Page 35 of 42
Extended Essay 10.0
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Appendix
Appendix 1
(http://kidshealth.org/teen/nutrition/general/caffeine.html#)
Moderation Is the Key Caffeine is usually thought to be safe in moderate amounts. Experts consider 200â&#x20AC;&#x201C;300 mg of caffeine a day to be a moderate amount for adults. Teens should try to limit caffeine consumption to no more than 100 mg of caffeine daily, and kids should get even less.
Page 36 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Appendix 2 ANOVA â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Analysis of Variance To perform ANOVA, three assumptions are made: 1. Observations are independent (the value of one observation is not correlated to the value of another); 2. Observations in each group are normally distributed; 3. Homogeneity of variances (variance of each group is equal to that of any other group). ANOVA table is summarised below: Source of Variation
Sum of Squares
df
Between Groups
SSb
k-1
Within Groups
SSw
N-k
Total
SSt
N-1
Mean Squares, S2 F - ratio P-value F - critical đ?&#x2018;&#x20AC;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;¤ Computer đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020; đ?&#x2018;&#x20AC;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;?2 = đ?&#x2018;? generated Fk-1, N-k đ?&#x2018;&#x20AC;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020; đ?&#x2018;? đ?&#x2018;&#x2DC;â&#x2C6;&#x2019;1 đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;¤ 2 đ?&#x2018;&#x20AC;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;¤ = đ?&#x2018; â&#x2C6;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x2DC;
Table 4: Summary of ANOVA table. All significances (Îą) for ANOVA will be at 5% or 0.05. Standard Notation SSb SSw SSt df k N đ?&#x2018;&#x20AC;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;?2 đ?&#x2018;&#x20AC;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;¤2
Meaning Sum of squares between groups Sum of squares within group Total sum of squares Degree of Freedom Total number of groups Total number of results Mean squares between groups Mean squares within group
Table 5: Legend for ANOVA table.
Page 37 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
HSD â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Tukeyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Honestly Significant Difference
HSD = q (Îą, k, N â&#x20AC;&#x201C; k)
đ?&#x2018;&#x20AC;đ?&#x2018;&#x2020;đ?&#x2018;¤2 đ?&#x2018;&#x203A;
Îą = represents the significant level (0.05) k = represents total number of groups N â&#x20AC;&#x201C; k = represents total number of results â&#x20AC;&#x201C; total number of groups q = the value based on (Îą, k, N â&#x20AC;&#x201C; k).
ANOVA calculations using Microsoft Office Excel 2007 and HSD values: Anova: Single factor SUMMARY Groups (Period of Fermentation, min) Column 1 (0) Column 2 (40) Column 3 (80) Column 4 (120)
ANOVA Source of Variation Between Groups Within Groups
Count 3 3 3 3
Sum 16.3 13.7 16.3 19.7
Average 5.44 4.56 5.44 6.56
Variance 0.26 0.48 0.26 0.26
SS 6.04 2.52
df 3 8
MS 2.01 0.31
F 6.39
P-value 1.61E-02
F crit 4.07
Total 8.56 11 Table 6: ANOVA for period of fermentation (mean amount of crude caffeine extracted).
HSD = 4.53
0.31 3
= 1.46
Page 38 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Anova: Single factor SUMMARY Group (Period of Fermentation, min) Column 1 (0) Column 2 (40) Column 3 (80) Column 4 (120)
Count 3 3 3 3
Sum 7.3 7.7 8.3 14.3
Average 2.44 2.56 2.78 4.78
Variance 0.48 0.48 0.26 0.26
ANOVA Source of Variation Between Groups Within Groups
SS 10.92 2.96
df 3 8
MS 3.64 0.37
F 9.83
P-value 4.65E-03
F crit 4.07
Total 13.88 11 Table 7: ANOVA for period of fermentation (mean amount of purified caffeine).
HSD = 4.53
0.37 3
= 1.59
Page 39 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Anova: Single factor SUMMARY Groups Column 1 (25째C) Column 2 (60째C) Column 3 (80째C) Column 4 (100째C)
Count 3 3 3 3
Sum 7.4 11.4 14.4 15.8
Average 2.47 3.80 4.80 5.27
Variance 0.25 0.36 0.28 0.41
ANOVA Source of Variation Between Groups Within Groups
SS 13.82 2.61
df 3 8
MS 4.61 0.33
F 14.11
P-value 1.47E-03
F crit 4.07
Total 16.44 11 Table 8: ANOVA table for temperature.
HSD = 4.53
0.33 3
= 1.50
Page 40 of 42
Extended Essay
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Appendix 3 Partition law states that at a constant temperature, a solute distributes itself between two immiscible liquids so that the ratio of its concentration in each solvent is constant, regardless of the amount of solute added. [6] đ??śđ?&#x2018;&#x153;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A;đ?&#x2018;?đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A;đ?&#x2018;Ąđ?&#x2018;&#x;đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;Ąđ?&#x2018;&#x2013;đ?&#x2018;&#x153;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A; đ?&#x2018;&#x153;đ?&#x2018;&#x201C; đ?&#x2018;?đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;&#x201C;đ?&#x2018;&#x201C;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x2013;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019; đ?&#x2018;&#x2013;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A; đ??ˇđ??śđ?&#x2018;&#x20AC; đ??śđ?&#x2018;&#x153;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A;đ?&#x2018;?đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A;đ?&#x2018;Ąđ?&#x2018;&#x;đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;Ąđ?&#x2018;&#x2013;đ?&#x2018;&#x153;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A; đ?&#x2018;&#x153;đ?&#x2018;&#x201C; đ?&#x2018;?đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;&#x201C;đ?&#x2018;&#x201C;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x2013;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A;đ?&#x2018;&#x2019; đ?&#x2018;&#x2013;đ?&#x2018;&#x203A; đ?&#x2018;¤đ?&#x2018;&#x17D;đ?&#x2018;Ąđ?&#x2018;&#x2019;đ?&#x2018;&#x;
= K (a constant)
Values used for calculation: ď&#x201A;ˇ
Percentage of caffeine by dry weight of tea leaves range from 1.4% to 4.5%. Thus, an average amount of 3.0% is used;
ď&#x201A;ˇ
Solubility of caffeine in water: 2.18g / 100cm3;
ď&#x201A;ˇ
Solubility of caffeine in DCM: 18.2g / 100cm3; 18.2
ď&#x201A;ˇ
Partition coefficient, k from caffeine in both solvent mixture is
100
2.18
= 8.35;
100
ď&#x201A;ˇ
Using the amount of crude caffeine extracted for 120 min period of fermentation from table 1 (page 19), 6.6mg g-1. đ?&#x2018;Ľ
First extraction:
8.35
=
2
0.03â&#x2C6;&#x2019; đ?&#x2018;Ľ 25
x
=
0.012g đ?&#x2018;Ľ
Second extraction:
8.35
=
2
0.018â&#x2C6;&#x2019; đ?&#x2018;Ľ 25
x
=
0.007g đ?&#x2018;Ľ
Third extraction:
8.35
=
2
0.011â&#x2C6;&#x2019; đ?&#x2018;Ľ 25
x
=
0.004g
Page 41 of 42
Extended Essay 11.0
LEOW YUN JIN 002206-009
Bibliography
1. Maria Fitzpatrick; Healthy drinking: Tea total (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/3356550/Healthy-drinking-Tea-total.html). 2. P. Sivapalan, S. Kulasegaram, A. Kathiravetpillai; Handbook On Tea; Tea Research Institute of Sri Lanka, Talawakele, Sri Lanka, 1986; Printed by Aitken Spence & Co. Ltd. 3. Jan W. Kuzma, Stephen E. Bohnenblust; Basic Statistics for the Health Sciences; Mayfield Publishing Company, 2001. 4. Gary D. Christian; Analytical Chemistry; Printed by Courier Westford, 2004. 5. Integrated Taxonomic Information System Report; Camellia Sinensis; Taxonomic Serial No. :506801 (http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value= 506801). 6. Yin Toon, Tan; Physical Chemistry for STPM; Published by Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd., 2003. Conrad Astill, Mark R. Birch, Clive Dacombe, Philip G. Humphrey, and Philip T. Martin; Factors Affecting the Caffeine and Polyphenol Contents of Black and Green Tea Infusions; J. Agric. Food Chem., 2001. Yung-Sheng Lin, Yao-Jen Tsai, Jyh-Shyan Tsay, and Jen-Kun Lin; Factors Affecting the Levels of Tea Polyphenols and Caffeine in Tea Leaves; J. Agric. Food Chem., 2003.
Page 42 of 42