Cl3 supreme court intervention in brexit by Andy Goodall

THE SUPREME COURT

R (MILLER) V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION BY MISS ANAL SHEIKH AN EX DEBITO JUSTICIAE APPLICATION FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF PROCEEDINGS A CLASS ACTION

CL 3 PART

DESCRIPTION

PAGE

LINKED APPLICATIONS AND APPEALS

2-3

DOCUMENTS

4-7

PRELIMINARY MATTERS

FOR SO LONG AS THE SUPREME COURT DELAYS ENDORSING UK11, CAN THE JUDICIAL ORGAN OF STATE BE SAID TO BE CONSPIRING WITH THE EXECUTIVE ORGAN OF STATE (THE LAW SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES) IN THE THEFT OF BONA VACANTIA FROM THE CROWN? WHAT ARE THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UK?

7-8

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WRITES THAT LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS (AND LORD PHILLIPS OF MATRAVERS ) SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE POLICE. IF THE CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT BELIEVES THAT THE JUDICIARY IS CORRUPT, WHAT ARE THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UK?

SHOULD THE BREXIT JUDGMENT BE SET ASIDE AND DECLARED VOID RATHER THAN APPEALED

GROUNDS

Re Pinochet House of Lords

Are there personal financial incentives behind all judicial decisions ?

Are judgments made for financial, economic and political reasons rather than to do justice between the parties?

Fundamental mistake about constitutional law and in the notion that Parliament is sovereign?

11-18

Fundamental mistake as to the supremacy of EU law

Is legislation being implemented with an ulterior purpose of eroding rights and freedoms . What is Blackstone Chambers’ role? Should Lord Pannick be recused ?

18-22

Is the Attorney General’s Office guilty of serious impropriety? Should Mr Wright MP be recused ?

Precedents relied on in the Brexit Judgment may be false instruments . The publication of instruments of theft on British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII).

The culture of fear in the UK.

The rule of law, separation of powers and judicial independence: do these constitutional principles exist in the UK only in the realms of constitutional theory?

9-10

Parliament in terror of the judiciary

UK’s academics and intellectuals in fear of the judiciary

UK’s media in fear of the judiciary

Does the sheer intellectual genius of judges enable them to steal from the Bench , commit human rights abuses and erode the principles of democracy so artfully no one can see what’s happening?

24-25

27-28

LINKED APPLICATIONS AND APPEALS

This application is one of nine linked applications and or appeals shown in the flowchart at PAGE 3 , some of which should be consolidated with the Brexit Appeal 2

DOCUMENTS

These submissions are based on following documents the contents of which should be treated as being incorporated herein. The definitions used are those previously used. 1)

CL1, a request made to Lord Justice Briggs and Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers (Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales (2005-2008) to appear before Parliament to account for their involvement in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud. It states that An application is made to Parliament and to Her Majesty the Queen to impeach1 Lord Briggs and Lord Phillips. An application is made to Her Majesty the Queen under the Judicial Committee Act 1833 s 4 to refer the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and the SRAâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc. (as defined) to the Privy Council. There is an online petition to the Minister of Justice requesting a public inquiry to investigate the use of fraudulent instruments in the courts. The petition can be accessed via the following link http://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-fraud-on-thecourt-in-the-uk The issues before the Members of the House and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council arising from these matters include the following: 1.

Should every court or tribunal proceedings over which Lord Justice Briggs has presided be set aside and declared ab initio void?

Should all civil and criminal court or tribunal proceedings in England and Wales since 30th September 2005 (the date Lord Phillips took up office as Lord Chief Justice ) be set aside and declared ab initio void ?

Alternatively, if the allegations of judicial corruption against Lord Phillips and Lord Justice Briggs are groundless, then the precedents they established by the instruments they created must be good law [PAGE 34 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; PAGE 39] Should all relevant findings and judgments in the UK (which are probably all findings and judgments ever made ) be set aside and

For the law see House of Commons Standard Note SN/PC/02666 by Oonagh Gay and Nerys Davies 1

declared ab initio void on the ground that they were wrong in law Should all pending civil and criminal court or tribunal proceedings in England and Wales be stayed while these issues are being determined

EC UN CORE - A core document , an index whereof is in Appendix 1 Part I consists of flowchart and diagrams to assist with understanding the underlying concepts , details the key allegations and sets out the purpose of the document Part II shows that there is no separation of powers in Britain but that ultimate unfettered power is vested the Lord Chief Justice and in the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State whom, it is argued, make legislation in order to steal from members of the public and from the State. Lord Phillips, Lord Chief Justice 2005-2008 , Lord Judge Lord Chief Justice 2008 -2013 and the Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Mr Kenneth Clarke MP QC were personally involved in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and they and their respective successors have suppressed it and their involvement in it. Part III discusses land appropriation and judicial corruption from a global perspective as well as the social and political phenomena associated with it such as State oppression, torture and slavery Part IV are the State’s responses. Part V lists the supporting documents. Part VI is a legal and forensic analysis of the four main frauds and the modus operandi of State sponsored fraud. In Part VII I argue that the Bar Standards Board and the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority are not regulators but are at the heart of the criminal network in the UK. In particular I discuss the connection, which I say is a criminal connection, between Baroness Ruth Deech, former Chair of the Bar Standards Board, Patricia Robertson QC, former Vice Chair, and Timothy Dutton QC, former Chair of the Bar Council. I also argue that there is no separation of powers. Part VIII details allegations against UK’s public officials of corruption, corruption in public office, theft, mortgage fraud. conspiracy to defraud, money laundering and land registration offences . The public officials include Mr Dominic Grieve QC MP, the Attorney General 2010 to 2014 , Lord Judge , Sir Nicholas Bratza and/or the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights, Mr Malcolm Dawson OBE former Chief Land Registrar Mr. Ed Lester, Chief Land Registrar, Mr. John Pownall, Head of Litigation at HM Land Registry. Mr. Edward Cousins , Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, Dr Vince Cable MP, Secretary of State for Business , Innovations and Skills, Mr Adam Sampson the Chief Ombudsman of 5

the Legal Ombudsman, Mrs Linda Costelloe- Baker CBE, the Independent Assessor of the Financial Ombudsman Service , Ms Natalie Ceeney CBE the Chief Executive and Chief Ombudsman Baroness Ruth Deech , Chair of the Bar Standards Board , the Presidents of the Law Society and Chair of the Bar Council Part IX deals with aspects of the Frauds where they concern the Crown and the Queen under the Judicial Committee Act 1833 s 4 Part X Racial hatred in the 21st century. The belief that black and ethnic minority individuals are corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and fundamentally unfit for the higher professions and for public office Part XI analyses UK’s torture techniques with reference to the lawyer’s regulator but it could just as well apply to the Victim who has been stripped of his land and property by a purported member of the judiciary and attempts to recover what he has lost through the courts which is an exercise in futility. The techniques are extracted from a random selection of official torture manuals such as Biderman (1956, 6-13), the "basic communist techniques of coercive interrogation" , KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation and LTC Jerald Phifer‘s memorandum to the Commander of Joint Task Force 170 (Guantánamo) C

PRELIMINARY COMMENT

Since the day the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud was committed, over 9 years ago, it has been suppressed by the judiciary. The SRA’s Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud Etc. has been suppressed by the judiciary for over 50 years. Applications, submissions, reports and complaints in relation to these frauds are never even acknowledged, let alone responded to or acted upon, so is little point in applying a great deal of time and effort in crafting these submissions. They are submitted in a summary fashion employing extracts From EC UN CORE to save time. If anything changes this document will be recrafted and resubmitted D

The Brexit Judgment describes the Crown’s powers In the SRA’s Bank Scam the Law Society has also stolen £55m by way of untraceable residual balances of which £11m is bona vacantia, In other words the SRA, in collusion with the Treasury, is stealing from the Crown. In the Matter of the interventions into the solicitors’ practices known as Ahmed & Co, Biebuyck, Dixon & Co and the practices 6

of Mr Zoi and In the Matter of Sections 35 and 36 and Schedules 1 and 2 of The Solicitors Act 1974 and In the Matter of the Law Society Compensation Fund Rules 1995 UK11 , is an application made ex debito justiciae in Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409 (Ch) Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2006] EWCA CIV 1577 Anal Sheikh v UK Government [2010] ECHR 649 (23 April 2010) 51144/07 and Ref 28863/11 EC UN CORE PAGE 46-51 The Supreme Court has failed or refused to endorsing UK11 for three years now which would end the SRA’s Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud Etc in a matter of minutes.[ CL 1 and references there] E

(If confirmation that the Red River Conveyancing Fraud is a fraud committed by Briggs and other members of the judiciary ) in 2010, the Solicitor General of the Labour administration, Vera Baird QC ,personally examined the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud ; she and the former Attorney General, Baroness Scotland, confirmed the fraud and what they termed ‘judicial corruption’ . They asked me ro refer Briggs, Mr Justice Henderson , Sir Andrew Morritt, Sir John Chadwick and the other Red River Conspirators to the police . Her successor , Dominic Grieve MP QC, has repeated the request. EC UN CORE PAGE 395-410 There is also in existence a twenty six paragraph report by the Serious Fraud Office which was disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Although they probably did not realize it at the time, the Solicitor General and the Attorney General were saying that Lord Philips of Matravers (Lord Chief Justice 3 October 2005 – 30 September 2008) and Lord Igor Judge (Lord Chief Justice 1 October 2008 – 30 September 2013) were also thieves. F

SHOULD THE BREXIT JUDGMENT TO BE SET ASIDE AND DECLARED VOID RATHER THAN APPEALED

In my submission the Brexit Judgment should not be appealed against but should be set aside and declared ab initio void

GROUNDS

The rule of law, separation of powers and judicial independence: do these constitutional principles exist in the UK only in the realms of constitutional theory?

See flowchart at PAGE 8- PAGE 9 2

Re Pinochet House of Lords

The High Court judgment should be set aside and declared void because of the facts and matters set out in CL1 and in EC UN CORE of which the Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls are very familiar The High Court judgment should be set aside and declared void because the judges were disqualified under Re Pinochet CODE

Indicates serious conflict

Indicates route for complaints or governance (HMLR was an MOJ agency at the material time) Indicates route to obtain a remedy, compensation or reparation

Theft of Bona Vacantia in SRA Scam

EXECUTIVE We’ve avoided paying the Victim compensation or reparation, kept them out of court and protected all of the barristers solicitors and judges as well as HMLR

LeO ‘ Go to court

HM Courts

LSB ‘ Go to the BSB

BSB ‘ Go to the police’

Victim’s own barrister

Victim’s own solicitor

Other barrister

Steal what you can from the Victim . Give me a 50% cut and I’ll protect all of you .

No money needed from Treasury as no payments made to Victim

MINISTER OF JUSTICE

We’ve protected the insurance companies and the Banks

Other solicitor

RED RIVER FRAUD

FCA

JICO ‘Go to court’

FSOM ‘Go to court’

Purported judge

SRA’S BANK SCAM COMPENSATION FUND FRAUD ETC

MARGARET GOMM

TREASURY

Treasury pays for court to commit fraud

THEFT OF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

HMLR

Complaints Commission er

BMIF ‘ You are not allowed to go to court

Banks

Anthony Townsend

THEFT OF MOUNTSIDE

Are there personal financial incentives behind all judicial decisions ?

Why should the public not assume that the High Court Judges have accepted financial incentives for the Brexit Judgment: after all

Lord Justice Briggs and the former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips of Matravers, committed the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud in which they made £64m in 10 minutes on the back of 4 sheets of paper.

There are an estimated 20 -30 judges directly involved in the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc. which has cost the UK economy £1.25bn

There are probably about 50 judges involved in the Bar Mutual Fraud [DOC 140]

In the Theft of Margaret Gomm’s Home and Three and a Half Acres of Land EC UN CORE PAGE 523-558, the judge stole the Victim’s land and home, while she was suffering from cancer. That was 26 years ago.

In the case of Grace Mekarska EC UN CORE PAGE 558- 565, the sheer irrationality in which Henderson J conducted himself suggests that he accepted a share of the sale proceeds of the Victim’s home. Henderson J was instrumental in the third stage of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

Burnett J refused to even look at a forged order which had been used to eject an elderly woman, Mrs Miller Fowles, from her home. She had been taken and dumped in a local park in the winter without a coat. His sheer irrationality suggests that he accepted a share of the sale proceeds of the Victim’s home.

The retired judges sitting on the Panels of the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Inns of Court in the Bar Council v Tariq Rehman had no constitutive jurisdiction . Can they be said to have accepted their remuneration unlawfully ? Can they be said to have committed theft? Are judgments made for financial, economic and political reasons rather than to do justice between the parties

See EC UN CORE PAGE 346-395

Fundamental mistake about constitutional law and in the notion that Parliament is sovereign

The Lord Chief Justice, the Master of the Rolls and Lord Justice Sales state It is common ground that the most fundamental rule of UK constitutional law is that the Crown in Parliament is sovereign and that legislation enacted by the Crown of both Houses of Parliament is Supreme. Parliament can by enactment of primary legislation, change the law of the land in any way it chooses. There is no superior form of law than primary legislation, save only where Parliament has itself made provision to allow that to happen. The ECA 1972 which confers precedence on EU law is the sole example of this

Unfortunately the judges are mistaken as to the law or have been misled as to the law. It is not the case that Parliament makes the law : the judiciary can 

disapply the existing law



amend the law



make new law

Parliament has enacted the Solicitors. Act 2974. The judiciary have disapplied the law in Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409 (Ch) Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2006] EWCA CIV 1577 Anal Sheikh v UK Government [2010] ECHR 649 (23 April 2010) 51144/07 and Ref 28863/11 and in all other so called intervention cases in the SRA Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud Etc. Parliament has enacted 40 or 50 statutory provisions which have been assimilated in the administrative process of conveyancing. In the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud, Lord Justice Briggs disapplied all 40 or 50 existing laws or broke the laws or made up his own law ; some 30 or 40 other judges, including the Lord Chief Justice, agree that what he did was lawful. Parliament enacted the Protection of Eviction Act 1977 , so that people could not arbitrarily thrown out of their homes and displaced. In the case of Grace Mekarska EC UN CORE PAGE 558-565, Henderson J disapplied the law and Mrs Merkarska’s 11

own barrister, Jonathan Allock of Maitland Chambers agreed that the judiciary could disapply the law. Mrs Mekarska spent the next two years living on the streets and on the goodwill of people. Parliament enacted the Legal Aid Act 1988. In the Theft of Margaret Gomm’s Home and Three and Half Acres of Land EC UN CORE PAGE 523-558, Marc Beaumont, Mrs Gomm’s purported barrister, consented, on Mrs Gomm’s behalf and without her knowledge, that the Legal Aid Act 1988 could be disapplied in her case and the judiciary agree that he is right. Parliament enacted the Legal Services Act 2007. In Tariq Rehman v The Bar Council, the judiciary have found that the Act can be disapplied in the case of Mr Rehman Parliament enacted legislation to enable parties to issue claims and applications in court. The judiciary disapply the law ; they picking and choosing who can issue claims and applications and who cannot. Parliament enacted legislation to enable parties to obtain judgments in default. The judiciary disapply the law ; they obstruct the claimant from entering judgment in default , the quantum of the which they split with the payer [DOC 140] Parliament enacted legislation to provide access to justice to every one in the UK . The judiciary disapply that legislation , barring parties not only from making applications in court for decades on end but barring them from entering the court premises itself Parliament enacted legislation to provide for an appellate procedure. The judiciary disapply that legislation . In the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud, Rimer LJ orchestrated the fraud in the High Court and was then appointed to the appeal in the Court of Appeal. Sir John Chadwick had retired from the Court of Appeal but notwithstanding dealt with the appeal and purported to dismiss it. The following is a summary of the law ,which is now good law in the UK Constitutional law 1)

In the UK, a) b) c)

judges can create new law judges can change existing law judges can disapply law which Parliament has created DOC 114

In the UK, one public official can injunct another public official from performing his statutory function, By the Order of 2nd one public official (Lord Justice Briggs ) whose functions derive from Parliament procured that another public official (the Chief Land Registrar) would not perform the function that Parliament has conferred upon him. Therefore a judge can 12

injunct the police from policing , or can injunct those Government Ministers who have statutory functions from discharging them. If the Ministry of Justice’s function are statutory, presumably a High Court judge could interfere with foreign policy and can injunct the UK from going to war or order the UK to go to war. 3)

In the UK , a person can consent that statutes will not apply to them (The SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Instrument , the Fabricated Order and Marc Beaumont’s Fraudulent Consent Order.)

In the UK, one person (whether a barrister or solicitor or other agent, or third party or anyone else whosoever) can deprive another person of their rights and obligations under statute law by entering into a consent order on behalf of that other person and without their knowledge agreeing that statute law should not apply to that other person (The SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Instrument, the Fabricated Order and Marc Beaumont’s Fraudulent Consent Order.)

There is no a separation of powers under the UK Constitution : power is vested in a single organ of State or is absolute and unfettered power vested in a single individual Criminal law

In the UK, a judge can commit criminal offences from the Bench, order that criminal offences be committed or procure that criminal offences are committed. This proposition is based on the fact that by the Order of 2nd land and conveyancing related criminal offences were committed including offences under s123 of the Land Registration Act 2002 (suppression of information), s124 of the Land Registration Act 2002 (improper alteration of register) Law of Property Act 1925 s 183 , Fraud Act 2006 s. 2 ( fraud by false representation ) s.3 ( failure to disclose information ) s4 ( fraud by abuse of position ) s 6 ( possession of articles for fraud ) s 7 (making of articles used for fraud ) ,Theft Act 1968 ,Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 . Briggs J personally committed a criminal offence under s 22 of the Solicitor’s Act 1974 by conveying land. It follows that a judge in the UK can order a bus full of people to be blown up, a judge in the UK can order the torture of child, a judge in the UK can order the rape of a woman, a judge in the UK can order a group of people to be murdered, judge in the UK can order the genocide of a nation. In fact a judge can do all of the aforegoing in the interim application’s list of the Chancery Division of the High Court during summer vacation when the courts are closed.

The SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Instrument, the Order of 2 nd and Marc Beaumont’s Fraudulent Consent Order establish a legal precedent that the victim of a crime can not only consent to a crime being committed against 13

him but that the victim’s barrister or any third party can consent to a crime being committed against him on his behalf and without his knowledge. Those convicted of murder, rape, burglary , assault and terrorism may not have been aware that they could have relied on the defence that their victims consented to being raped, burgled, assaulted , terrorised or killed , and even if their victims say they did not consent, those convicted should have been given the chance to procure consent orders from third parties consenting on behalf of the victims and without the victims’ knowledge to being raped, burgled, assaulted, terrorised or killed. Should all convicted criminals be released pending a new trial? Contract law 8)

In the UK a judge can create a contract which does not exist, find that it does exist, order parties who do not know he has created it to be bound to it, find that the parties have breached it and can make them liable for damages for the breach of the contract (Order of 2nd, Fabricated Order Marc Beaumont’s Fraudulent Consent Order)

In the UK anyone can create a contract which does not exist which can be treated as though it does exist , is binding upon parties who do not know it has been created between them and the parties can be treated as having breached the contract and be liable for damages for the breach of the contract created between them ( Order of 2nd, Fabricated Order, Marc Beaumont’s Fraudulent Consent Order) Mortgage law

10) In the UK, the concept of the mortgage which has been in existence since Anglo Saxon times has been redefined by the UK judiciary and the HMLR : a mortgage is not created when a borrower secures his property for a loan which he has received from his lender ; a mortgage is created by a land owner who does not receive a loan from anyone and who does not agree to securing his property to anyone DOC 202 Banking law 11) For the first time since the emergence of banking in 12,500 BC it is lawful for the Bank in the UK to freeze a customer’s bank account upon receipt by the Bank of written request from an unconnected third party and the funds held by the customer or the client can be transferred to that third party again without the customer’s or client’s knowledge and approval.

12) In the UK banking is justiciable2 which means that a judge can now fix interest rates, decide what services the bank will provide, decide when or if penalties should be charged to customers, fix bank opening hours, decide who can be given credit facilities and who cannot and so on. 13) In the UK, it is possible for an individual, an organisation or the SRA to control and transfer all of the UK’s Bank Deposits , if desired, to a Foreign Power or an International Terrorist Organization ? 14) Under UK law , it is possible for an individual, an organisation or the SRA to Whether the SRA could ultimately control every bank account in the world Banking law 15) All of Britain’s solicitors’ deposits held in all of Britain’s banks which certainly exceeds £1 bn which could potentially find its way into the SRA’S hands on a single day , in a matter of a few minutes – all it apparently requires is a letter faxed to their banks. What if they were all intervened upon on the same day? Trade 16) Conveyancing is based on principles of trade and exchange which have existed since trade began millennia ago. The Order of 2nd establishes a precedent that after a Customer has handed the Shopkeeper money for a loaf of bread, the Shopkeeper can make an application in the interim applications list to a High Court Judge without notifying the Customer and can obtain an order from the High Court Judge a)

ordering the Customer to hand back bread to the Shopkeeper and trust him to keep it in tact (viz. the Sheikh Charge)

enabling the Shopkeeper to retain the Customer’s money and use it if he wants (viz. the £1.2m secured by the Sheikh Charge)

enabling the Shopkeeper keep the receipt for the bread (viz. the Sheikh Charge in which a borrower acknowledges receipt )

providing if the High Court Judge got it all wrong the Customer could make a claim against the Shopkeeper

providing that if the Customer disobeys his order he will be committed to prison for contempt

See the response by the Financial Services Ombudsman and the Independent Assessor who agree 2

If the High Court Judge makes such an order , how does the customer avoid starving to death while he is litigating against the Shopkeeper ?

The Economy 19) Briggs J struck out a winding up petition at a secret hearing which did not exist in the Chancery Division’s interim applications list which does not have jurisdiction to hear winding up applications (a shipping case might just as well be heard in the Family Court). The winding up petition claimed an admitted debt. Lord Justice Briggs struck out the winding up petition within an hour of service in the creditor’s absence. If a judge can do that, can a judge control global corporations and hence the Global Economy ? 20) In the space of 10 minutes, Briggs J converted a Debtor indebted to his Secured Creditor for £1.2m into his Secured Creditor’s creditor indebted to him for £6m; and vice versa. If a judge can do that he can wipe out World Debt Qualification and Training 21) Conveyancing is a discipline which requires qualification and training. If in the UK Briggs J could do conveyancing from the Bench, a judge can also do open heart surgery in the interim applications list in the High Court, he can cook a Michelin starred meal or conduct the London Philharmonic. According to Dr, Vince Cable the aggrieved conveyancing client, heart patient , diner or audience has the right to appeal or apply for judicial review. Administration 22) The Land Register is a public record. The Order of 2nd establishes a precedent in the UK that a person (as well has his solicitor or any solicitor in the world whom he wishes to instruct) can be permanently injuncted by a High Court Judge at an interim application without notice from making any application whatsoever to HMLR . Therefore people can be permanently injuncted from appearing on          

The Register of Births, Deaths and Marriages Electoral registers Passport and Citizenship registers DVLC registers Registers entitlement people to receive Social Security Registers entitlement people to receive their pension Patent registers Company registers Shipping registers Professional registers 16

 

School registers Club memberships

Moreover they would never know it because they would never be notified that the judge had done that or served with any order Liability of legal representatives and clients’ conduct

their relatives

for the

23) The Order of 2nd establishes the precedent in the UK that the actions of a legal representative, the actions of his client and the actions of the legal representative’s mother or other relation are one and the same and they are all liable for the same thing in the same proceedings It follows that a)

In an application for ancillary relief the judge can order the Husband’s solicitor as well as the Husband to pay maintenance to the Wife

Ms Dinah Rose QC, who represented Mr Julian Assange in his extradition case should be extradited to Sweden to face charges of rape

Mr Alun Jones QC, who represented Mr Abu Hamza , should be extradited to the USA to face charges of terrorism

Mr Nicholas Bowen QC, who recently represented the Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe in his latest application to the High Court, should also be committed for the rest of his life in Broadmoor Hospital.

The mothers of divorce lawyers should also be ordered to pay maintenance to the spouses of their children’s divorce clients

Dinah Rose QC’s mother should also be extradited to Sweden to face charge of rape

Alun Jones QC’s mother should be extradited to the USA to face charges of terrorism

Nicholas Bowen QC’s mother, should also be committed for the rest of her life in Broadmoor Hospital.

Legal representation 24) A judge in the UK can permanently injunct every solicitor in the world from representing someone in the UK. 25) A judge in the UK can permanently injunct every solicitor in the world from representing all of their clients in the UK

Philosophical and Existential 26) If a judge in the UK can make up a contract which does not exist, find that a person is bound by the contract he has made up , find that a person is in breach of the contract he has made up to which he has bound that person , find that the person is liable to pay damages for the breach he has made up of the contract he has made up, to which he has bound that person, can extinguish the person’s actual interest in property by way of set off against damages for the breach he has made up of the contract he has made up (which is what Briggs J did by the Order of 2nd ) an asset which exists can be extinguished by a debt which does not exist. 27) The UK has the right to deprive citizens of the right to exist

Fundamental mistake as to EU law

The Brexit Judgment states the ECA 1972 which confers precedence on EU law is the sole example of when Parliament is not sovereign. The judges are mistaken as to the law: EU law only applies in the UK if the judiciary give permission for it to apply. EC UN CORE PAGE 908-909 In 2011, the conveyancing client in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud attempted to issue a claim under Francovich v Italy (1991) ECR 1 -5357 (1992) and Factorame & Ors R (on application of ) v SST [ 2002] EWCA CIV 932 (DOC 03). In further violation of European Community law , Sir Andrew Morritt, the former Chancellor of the Chancery Division and one of the Red River Conspirators circulated a letter that any claim had to be issued with the permission of Norris J , another Red River Conspirator; and if he did not want a claim to be issued, it would not be issued. DOC 201 PAGE 35 7

Is legislation being implemented with an ulterior purpose of eroding rights and freedoms . What is Blackstone Chambers’ role? Should Lord Pannick be recused?

Hugo Page QC ,of Blackstone, was instrumental in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud. Hugo Page QC and Jonathan Harvie QC, also of Blackstone were instrumental in the SRA’s Bank Scam ,Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

Charles Flint QC also of Blackstone is a Member of Bar Mutual. He has protected them by committing the Bar Mutual Fraud. David Hunt QC also of Blackstone is involved in prosecuting Tariq Rehman in the Disciplinary Tribunal on sham charges. Dinah Rose QC lost the Assange case in the Supreme Court David Pannick QC also of Blackstone is instructed in the Brexit Case. In EC UN CORE Blackstone is identified as a chambers operating as a criminal and as the State’s agents PAGE 317- 322, 670-, 676, 677-684 Lord Woolf is a Member of Blackstone Chambers. He was the driving force behind the Woolf Reforms which resulted in the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules . Is there any coincidence between the fact that Hugo Page QC and Jonathan Harvie QC were involved in the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud in which for decades the wrong procedure has been followed and that Hugo Page QC was involved in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud. These are the questions which should be considered: 1)

How it has come about that the Civil Procedure Rules permitted the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud to take place

How it has come about that the Civil Procedure Rules permitted the SRA Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud to take place

How it has come about that proceedings which do not legally exist (no claim form, no jurisdiction , impersonation of a judge etc) can take place under the Civil Procedure Rules

How it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules a member of the judiciary (Master Bard to name one) can refuse to give judgments in default for 5 years leaving him open to suspicion that he (and other judges to whom he is accountable (Lord Thomas, Lord Leveson, Lady Hallett, Lord Etherton) has pocketed the money which in the case in question is a sum of £8m- £64m

How it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules the court can remove judgments in default after they have been entered (Beaumont)

How it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules the court can pick and chose which cases it will issue or hear and which it will not

How it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules the court can assign every case concerning a certain individual or family to one judge at the very start of the case(s)

How it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules it is possible for the court to deprive members of the public from the right to use the court for years on end, on pain of the threat of imprisonment if they attempt it

How it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules it is possible for a (black) man to be arrested in the courtroom itself for disclosing documents to his own solicitor. In the case in question a black solicitor was imprisoned overnight for showing his solicitor a note from the SRA which in effect said ‘ Let’s get the black man and use the white man’s evidence against him’ The white man had committed money laundering offences

10) How it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules it is possible for a man to impersonate a judge in the Court of Appeal (Chadwick and Richards LJ) 11)

How it has come about that under the Civil Procedure Rules it is possible for the Court of Appeal to rewrite a High Court judgment making up a false set of facts (see Uk11)

12) How it has come about under the Civil Procedure Rules it is possible for the Court of Appeal to rewrite the High Court’s judgment making up a false set of facts when there is no issued appellant’s form referring to an order of the lower court against which an appeal can be lodged 14) Whether there is any truth in the allegation that ,unbeknown to its clients and to the world at large ,Blackstone represents the interests of the State as against the client's interests. The interrelation between the following parties and their witting or unwitting involvement in fraud is shown in the flowchart at PAGE 117 

The Westminister Legal Forum, Baroness Deech, Johnathan Djanogly MP, Dominic Grieve MP QC and Lord Lester



The Jewish Leadership Council, Baroness Deech, Lord Lester, Lord Woolf, Lord Pannick and Sir Michael Beloff



Blackstone Chambers, Lord Lester, Lord Woolf, Lord Pannick , Sir Michael Beloff , Hugo Page QC, Jonathan Harvie QC and the SRA’s Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud Etc



Blackstone Chambers, Lord Lester, Lord Woolf, Lord Pannick , Sir Michael Beloff , Hugo Page QC and the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud



Blackstone Chambers, Lord Lester, Lord Woolf, Lord Pannick Sir Michael Beloff , Hugo Page QC , Jonathan Harvie QC and the Bar Mutual Fraud 20



Blackstone Chambers, the Westminister Legal Forum, Baroness Deech, Johnathan Djanogly MP, Dominic Grieve MP QC Lord Lester Lord Woolf, Lord Pannick, Sir Michael Beloff , Anthony Peto QC , R v Crawley and others. [2014] EWCA Crim 1028 and the legal aid debate



Baroness Deech, John Deech , Blake Lapthorn and the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

See PAGE 541-542

For allegations of corruption against Dominic Grieve MP QC see PAGE 779790

The BSB has refused to consider

complaints against any barrister

John Deech’s firm Blake Lapthorn has a contract with the SRA to do regulatory work. The case of Anal Sheikh v the Law Society stopped all interventions . Baroness Deech’s family income depends on dismissing claims against barristers who further the SRA’s Bank Scam

Hugo Page QC of Blackstone Chambers was involved in the Red River fraud

Hugo Page QC was also involved in the SRA’s Bank Scam

Jonathan Harvie QC of Blackstone Chambers was involved in the SRA’s Bank Scam

Is the Attorney General’s Office guilty of serious impropriety? .Should Mr Wright MP be recused ?

Particulars are at EC UN CORE PAGE 460-470 ,PAGE 522-523. PAGE 779- PAGE 790 The Attorney General’s refusal to intervene in cases of land theft, bank fraud and other types of economic crime undertaken through the civil jurisdiction is inexplicable. The proceeds of crime and of money laundering in my and my mother’s cases alone amount to in excess of £300m ( £45m in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud, probably over £100 million if the 100 sales are completed, £45m in the Bar Mutual Fraud, £100m in the SRA’s Bank Scam , Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.) The quantum in all other cases is incalculable. The Attorney General’s costs of intervention in our cases would be less than few hundred pounds. As I have said all the Attorney General has to do attend in the interim application’s list tomorrow morning and ask for the Order of 2nd to set aside. He does not have to make an application or write to anyone. He just has to turn up and ask. The hearing should take 5- 10 minutes. The Attorney General doesn’t even need to attend court. He has to write the following words and everyone will cave in and consent to any provision he seeks: ‘It is the intention of the Attorney General to intervene’ These 10 words are worth £300m . Why doesn’t he write them? 9

Precedents referred to in the Brexit Judgment may be false instruments . The publication of instruments of theft on British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII).

The purported cases in Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud do not exist. They are works of fiction. Lord Justice Briggs simply made them up commit the fraud EC UN CORE PAGE 285-PAGE 307 The documents found on a conveyancing solicitor’s file are typically letters, drafts, completion statements, search results, and other administrative documents. You would not find judgments dealing with the transaction! If those ‘judgments’ are fraudulent instruments used as the vehicles of theft, how can anyone be sure that the judgments referred to in the Brexit Judgment are authentic and are not also fraudulent instruments ? 23

10 1)

The culture of fear in the UK. Parliament in terror of the judiciary

The judiciary is conventionally the weakest branch of Government. To borrow from Martin Loughlin, at its simplest, Parliament, the Legislature, make the rules; the courts, the Judiciary, interpret and vindicate them; and the Executive implements them, while also developing the policies that Parliament then considers and may transform into the rules. 4. We have an unwritten constitution, which some might think reflects Sam Goldwyn’s comment about an oral contract – not worth the paper it’s written on. More seriously, the absence of a formal constitution means that Parliament is supreme, save perhaps in extreme circumstances which are most unlikely to occur. The Judiciary comes second, as it holds the Executive to account – by ensuring that it acts within the law. And the Executive comes third. 5. But, although that is the position in principle, the Executive is far from being the weakest branch of the State. A thousand times the number of people work for the Executive as are in the Legislature and Judiciary combined. It has day-to-day control of government expenditure (now over 40% of GDP). Through prime ministerial patronage and party whips, it has a substantial role in Parliament, where in practice it controls much of the legislation. The weakest branch is the Judiciary which, as Alexander Hamilton famously remarked, has: ‘no influence over sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely Judgment.’ Lord David Neubeger 18 June 2013 Judges and Policy: a delicate balance. Institute for Government

The question is how the judiciary has been transformed from the weakest organ of State to the most powerful and the most feared. A well known and highly respected politician whom I chanced to meet and with whom I discussed the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and these other matters observed

Politicians are well aware of this problem but will not do anything because they know that the judges are too powerful . We are all terrified of them. The only way to deal with the problem is to get a gun, shoot a judge and then shoot yourself .

His meaning , of course, was not literal. He was referring to the growing trend of judge made law in Britain and of the age old constitutional conflict between judicial authority and Parliamentary Sovereignty. In May 2014, I circulated a summary of the submissions I had made to the House of Lords EU Subcommittee E to about 1000 Members of the House, 500 of which were sent in hard copy In that document I set out how ,in summer vacation when the courts are closed, empty courtrooms were used 9 times by purported judges (who may have included Lord Woolf, the then Lord Chief Justice) to interfere with a routine conveyancing process in order to steal the title to the Stoke Newington Site and by so doing violated over 50 statutes associated with the administrative process of conveyancing and land registration Not a single person responded . Does that signify

that not a single Member of the House understands that no one /no judge can make up a contract which does not exist and find that it does exist ?

that not a single Member of the House cares if a High Court Judge violates statutes ?

that not a single Member of the House cares if a High Court Judge(or the Lord Chief Justice) uses the Bench to steal from members of the public ?

that every single Member of the House is too frightened to do anything about it ? UKâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s academics and intellectuals in fear of the judiciary

I have sent these matters to over 3000 legal academics in almost every law faculty in the UK to invite them to intervene. Not a single response has been received. The history of the human race is a perennial struggle between rational and irrational forces; between knowledge and enlightenment, on the one hand, and stupidity, prejudice, lust for power and factionalism, on the other. Plato advocated government by philosopher-Kings, by intellectuals whose knowledge of what constitutes the good and the true and of how social and political life can be organised on the basis of justice entitles them to a position of pre-eminence. He wanted his statesmen to be men of supreme critical intelligence and of unimpeachable integrity, because such men alone, in his view, could eliminate through education the darker side of human nature, and guide men in the right direction. Those observations can be reframed in contemporary terms by modern intellectuals ,

‘With respect to the responsibility of intellectuals, there are still other, equally disturbing questions. Intellectuals are in a position to expose the lies of governments, to analyze actions according to their causes and motives and often hidden intentions. In the Western world, at least, they have the power that comes from political liberty, from access to information and freedom of expression. For a privileged minority, Western democracy provides the leisure, the facilities, and the training to seek the truth lying hidden behind the veil of distortion and misrepresentation, ideology and class interest, through which the events of current history are presented to us’ 3 ‘Intellectuals’ 4 by Paul Johnson ‘is a book by an intellectual who tells us not to listen to intellectuals. Aldous Huxley once defined an intellectual as someone who had found something more interesting than sex. Paul Johnson's definition is equally idiosyncratic: an intellectual is someone who wants to refashion the world, politically, in accordance with principles of his own devising. A dozen are given a chapter apiece: Rousseau, Shelley, Marx, Ibsen, Tolstoy, Hemingway, Brecht, Bertrand Russell, Sartre, Edmund Wilson, Victor Gollancz and Lillian Hellman. A final chapter lumps together George Orwell, Evelyn Waugh, Cyril Connolly, Norman Mailer, Kenneth Tynan, Rainer Werner Fassbinder, James Baldwin and Noam Chomsky. Lying is of particular relevance to Mr. Johnson's argument, since it implies that we should not believe what intellectuals say: One thing which emerges strongly from any case-by-case study of intellectuals is their scant regard for veracity. The lies range from self-serving deceits and conscious revisions of history to idle mythologizing, sexual boasting, self-deception and mere difference of opinion. The lives of those Johnson examines are simply ravaged by dysfunctionality, immorality, and egocentrism. Addictive lifestyles, sexual promiscuity that would make most sailors blush, greed, conflict with family, friends, and peers, anger, wastefulness of money leading to massive debt, and a general disinterest in the lives of anyone but themselves, were characteristic of each and every individual. People proposing to know what was best for humanity, for the common man, knew nothing of the common man’s life and showed almost no real concern for actual people’5 Baroness Ruth Deech, Mr. Kenneth Clarke MP QC , Mr. Dominic Grieve MP QC, Mr. Timothy Dutton QC, Mr. Gregory Treverton Jones QC are among the leading intellectuals of their generation . Their direct involvement in or their attempt to cover up State corruption is plain to see . The same can allegation can be made of the Lord Justices of the Court of Appeal ad the Justices of the Supreme Court.

The Responsibility of Intellectuals Noam Chomsky The New York Review of Books, February 23, 1967 4 May 2007 Harper Perennials 5 The Great Unwashed by Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty , is a member of the Committee on Social Thought and the Mircea Eliade Professor of the History of Religions at the University of Chicago. Published: March 12, 1989 3

UK’s media in fear of the judiciary

These matters have been put before a number of UK journalists, many of whom are lawyers. The only received has been from Joshua Rosenberg6 who wrote I am sorry I cannot help you He obviously did not understand that I was not asking him for help. I was asking him to report on judicial corruption. As a former solicitor, the implications of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud could not possibly have escaped him. 11

Does the sheer intellectual genius of judges enable them to steal from the Bench , commit human rights abuses and erode the principles of democracy so artfully no one can see what they are doing?

In the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud is a simple administrative function undertaken in a solicitor’s office at a cost of £25.00 has been transformed into what appears to be highly complex litigation. No one can apparently see it for the most preposterous of conveyancing frauds it is. Why is that ? The SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud is the most preposterous of bank frauds. Why is it is no one can apparently see the fraud for what it is? When in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud, Lord Justice Briggs in effect ‘injuncted’ the Chief Land Registrar from ever accepting any application from the legal mortgagee, the Judicial Organ of State injuncted a Government department from discharging its statutory function. How is that possible? The answer is that the frauds are committed with such genius it is impossible for ordinary people to see them for what they are EC UN CORE PAGE 224-233 Rozenberg began his career in journalism at the BBC in 1975 where he launched Law in Action on BBC Radio 4 in 1984.[2] At the BBC he worked across all media formats, providing 6

legal commentary on major cases and where legal affairs affected a headline story. In 2000 he joined the Daily Telegraph as Legal Affairs Editor,[3] where he remained until the end of 2008.[1][4] He also wrote a column for the Evening Standard. Now a freelance journalist, he writes regular columns for the Law Society Gazette, Law Business Review and Standpoint magazine. In May 2010 he started writing a weekly blog for The Guardian's online law page. On 8 June 2010, he returned to the BBC to present Law in Action, 25 years after starting the radio programme. Rozenberg holds an honorary doctorate in law from the University of Hertfordshire, is an honorary bencher of Gray's Inn, and is accredited as a mediator by the ADR group. He has won the Bar Council's Legal Reporting Award four times.

On the question of ‘What is the Rule of Law’ in the 6th Report of Session 2006–07: Relations between the executive, the judiciary and Parliament Lord Falconer said “the rule of law includes both national and international law as far as I am concerned, therefore if we remained in breach of the European Convention then we would be in breach of international law. I think the rule of law also goes beyond issues such as specific black letter law. I think there are certain constitutional principles which if Parliament sought to offend would be contrary to the rule of law as well. To take an extreme example simply to demonstrate the point, if Parliament sought to abolish all elections that would be so contrary to our constitutional principles that that would seem to me to be contrary to the rule of law. The rule of law goes beyond specific black letter law; it includes international law and it includes, in my view, settled constitutional principles (Para 25)

What is really happening in the Brexit Judgment? Is it the case that for the first time in the history of the Constitution , the judiciary are injuncting the electorate from voting? 15th November 2017 Miss Anal Sheikh

APPENDIX 1- EC UN CORE INDEX PREFACE A

INTRODUCTION

FLOWCHARTS, DIAGRAMS, GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIONS AND KEY EVIDENCE

40-42

The Law Society’s use of the SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Instrument to commit bank theft.

43-45

The implications of Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409 (Ch) and the financial, social , national and global consequences of setting aside the Law Society’s unlawful interventions into solicitors’ practices. UK11

46-51

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

The objective of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and who was behind it

52-53

What the modus operandi which was used in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud means for every buyer (or bank) in the UK

What should have happened on 5th October 2007

What the Red River Conspirators wanted to happen on 5th October 2007

The official certificates of search under the Land Registration Rules 2003 protecting the registration of the Sheikh Charge

57-63

The Lender’s solicitor applies to register his client’s legal mortgage following completion and during the priority period

Communcations from the Borrower’s conveyancing solicitor (Howard Richards of Isadore Goldman) showing that he is trying to complete the Sheikh Charge properly and from the Bank of Ireland’s solicitors (Steve Robinson of Burges Salmon ) showing he is trying to complete a fraudulent all monies mortgage before the Sheikh Charge

The attempt at the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud on 5th October 2007 scuppered by the Sheikh Registration Application

Lord Phillips of Matravers Worth , Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales (3 rd October 2005 – 30th September 2008 ) arranges for Lord Justice Briggs, Justice of the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice (20062013) to masquerade as a solicitor on 2nd October 2007 and 5th October 2007 to remove the Sheikh Registration Application and complete the fraud

69-76

10)

Lord Phillips and Lord Justice Briggs steal the Sheikh Charge

65-67

11)

The public, national and global implications of the Fraudulent Instrument of 2nd October 2007

12)

The consequences of setting aside the Fraudulent Instrument of 2nd October 2007 and declaring it ab initio void

13)

The Fraudulent Instrument of 2nd October 2007

80-83

14)

The Fabricated Order consenting to the Fraudulent Instrument of 2nd October 2007

84-85

The Bar Mutual Fraud

87-96

Internal emails showing the Chancellor, Sir Andrew Morrit CVO (the third most senior judge in the UK) conspiring with Mr Justice Henderson and Mr Justice Norris (two senior judges in the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice) to commit a property and mortgage fraud against two members of the public

97-101

Diagrams showing the theft of the Victim’s right in rem by ‘ converting’ it into a service complaint to a caseworker’s line manager. The creation of non existent rights

The SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

102-103

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

104

The Theft of Mrs. Margaret Gomm’s House and Three and A Half Acre of Land

105

The case of Mrs Grazyna Mekarska

106-107

The Bar Standards Board 1)

How the regulatory system is supposed to work

108-109

How the regulatory system in fact works

110-111

The role and function of Baroness Ruth Deech, the Chair of the Bar Standards Board (2009- 2014) in serious organised fraud in the UK.

112

Flowchart showing the involvement of Baroness Ruth Deech in the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud ; John Deech’s contract with the SRA to do their regulatory work

113-114

Flowchart showing the links between Baroness Ruth Deech and Lord Woolf, Lord Lester , Lord Beloff , Blackstone Chambers and others

114-117

Table showing members of the judiciary common to the Frauds

118

Flowchart showing the chronological synchronisation between the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc, the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and the Constitutional Reform Act 2005

119-121

Flowchart showing the absence of separation of powers in the UK. The connections and conflicts between the Minister of Justice and the Treasury The Class Action

122-126

14 C

127-129

SUMMARY OF THE FRAUDS 1

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

130-134

The SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

134-135

The Bar Mutual Fraud The theft of judgments in default (Art 1 Protocol 1 rights to property )

135-137

The theft of the judgment in default in Rabia Sheikh v Hugo Page QC (1) and Nigel Meares (2) The theft of the judgment in default in Anal 3) Sheikh v Gregory Treverton Jones QC (1) Paul Saffron (2) Hugo Page QC The theft of the judgment in default in Anal 4) Sheikh v Marc Beaumont The UK’s suppression of claims against the State made under Francovich v Italy (1991) ECR 1 -

138

1) 2)

139 140-141 141-143 31

5357 (1992) and Factorame & Ors R (on application of ) v SST [ 2002] EWCA CIV 932 D

A SIMPLE WAY TO UNDERSTAND THE FRAUDS

143-145

COMPLAINTS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND TO THE UNITED NATIONS

145-147

INTERVENTION IN DOMESTIC PROCEEDINGS 1

Grounds for intervention to set aside all High Court, Court of Appeal , House of Lords and Supreme Court decisions made since 2007 and to stay all current cases 1)

A society in which the observance of the law is 147-150 not assured, nor the separation of powers defined, has no constitution at all.” Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, Article 16,

If not a constitutional crisis, then endemic and widespread judicial corruption The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales guilty of criminal offences . Should he be prosecuted under the proposed Modern Slavery and Serious Crime Act ?

To apply the precedents established by the Order or Fabricated Instrument of 2nd and SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Instrument

150 151-152

152-157

Intervention to set aside cases in which judge is 158-175 implicated in the Red River Conveyancincg and Mortgage Fraud and or SRA’s Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud Etc and or the Bar Mutual Fraud

Intervention to make it publically known that it is lawful for a judge to commit criminal offences from the Bench 1)

Any UK judge or barrister can steal any property he wishes from any member of the public

176-178

If Briggs could commit theft and land 178-183 registration offences from the Bench, a UK judge can order one man to kill another, a 32

woman to be raped, a baby to be tortured to death, can order mass genocide or can order the invasion of France II

LORD PHILLIPS OF MATRAVERS WORTH, THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES (2005-2008) COMMITS THEFT FROM THE UK BENCH A

TWO OF THE MOST PROPOSTEROUS FRAUDS IN LEGAL HISTORY, INCAPABLE OF COMPREHENSION ARTICULATION OR CHALLENGE 1

Linguistic problems 1) 2)

The use of the terms ‘case’ ‘ proceedings’ ‘judge’ ‘hearing’ ‘court’

Existentialist problems

Do judges put on their judicial robes and masquerade as judges in the pretence they are exercising a judicial function ? Lord Igor Judge’s response shows that he is grossly incompetent or that he is corrupt

Conveyancing and banking

184-185 185-186 186 186-187 187-193

The Red River Conveyanancing and Mortgage Fraud 1)

A conveyancing fraud unprecedented in a country which has a land registration system and which recognizes solicitors

193-195

A High Court judge impersonates a conveyancing solicitor and Queens Counsel impersonate the Buyer and Seller in order to steal the title to the Stoke Newington Site

195

How conveyancing works

196-200

The importance of the Land Registration Act 2002 s 72 (Priority Protection)

200-201

The financial incentive behind the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud: a

201-203

100 unit development and £64 gross development profit

How Lord Justice Briggs, Hugo Page QC 203-206 Lexa Hilliard and others committed the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

The risk to the ordinary home buyer and 206-207 why land can never be transaction securely in the UK

Why every conveyancer would agree that the Order of 2nd means that the cost of a £300,000 house is now £9.35m

207-215

Why it is said that the Order of 2nd means any judge in the UK can steal any property in the UK at any time and make £64m in 10 minutes on the back of 4 sheets of paper.

215

10)

Why every conveyancer would agree that the Order of 2nd presents a risk to civilization ,whether theoretical or real, greater than any threat in the history of the world.

215-218

The SRA’s Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud Etc 1)

The Law Society of England and Wales: one of the world’s greatest confidence tricksters. The SRA’s Bank Scam: one of the world’s most stupid bank frauds

219-224

All of the Presidents of the Law Society of England and Wales and the Chief Executives of the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority could be arrested for bank fraud today

224-225

Why such preposterous frauds are so successful 1)

The legal genius of the frauds

225-228

The disbelief of the implausible

228-230

If a UK judge orders it , it cannot be a crime. Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority

230-233

The culture of fear in the UK a)

UK’s Governmental and Non Governmental Agencies in fear of the judiciary. Some judges in fear of others

234-236

UK’s Parliament in fear of the judiciary

236-237

UK’s Academics and intellectuals in fear of the judiciary

237-239

UK’s media in fear of the judiciary

239

WHY LORD PHILLIPS HAD TO BE THE PERSON BEHIND THE RED RIVER CONVEYANCING AND MORTGAGE FRAUD AND THE SRAS BANK SCAM, COMPENSATION FUND FRAUD ETC 1

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud 1)

September 2007. Lord Chief Justice, arranges for Briggs to use empty courtrooms in summer vacation to undertake the fraud

240-243

July 2008. Lord Chief Justice arranges for Sir John Chadwick to impersonate a UK Court of Appeal Judge and forge signature on the Court of Appeal’s purported refusal of permission to appeal against the Order of 2nd

244

December 2008. Lord Chief Justice arranges for Lord Justice Rimer to dismiss appeal against the Order of 2nd

244

August 2010. Lord Chief Justice arranges for Order of 2nd to be suppressed at the Supreme Court

244

Lord Chief Justice obstructs the issuing of applications, removes judgments in default, withdrawal of access to entire civil justice system by use of fraudulent civil restraint orders

245

6) 2

The Lord Chief Justice’s estimated share of the development profit

245-246

The SRA’s Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud 1)

The gang of judges and barristers retained by the Lord Chief Justice to maintain the fiction that the SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Instrument is a court order

246-254

April 2005-July 2005. Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409 (Ch) Sir Andrew Park’s final case at the Bench. An intervention which has never taken place under Part II of the Schedule to the Solicitor’s Act 1974 set aside.

254-256

September 2006. The Lord Chief Justice 256-271 arranges for Timothy Dutton QC and the High Profile Litigation Panel to fund an appeal against Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409 (Ch) Bribery Act 2010 offences, fraud offences and corruption

December 2005 – November 2006 Anal 272-274 Sheikh v The Law Society [2006] EWCA CIV 1577 Lord Chief Justice arranges for David Neuberger QC, John Dyson QC, Heather Hallett QC, John Chadwick QC, Martin Moore Bick QC and Simon Tuckey QC to masquerade as, or impersonate , Lord Justices of Appeal to further the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc in the Court of Appeal. Bribery Act 2010 offences, fraud offences and corruption

December 2007. Arrangements made for Blackstone Chambers to insinuate themselves into case

274-275

January 2007. Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2007 ] HL Lord Bingham, Lord Carswell and Lord Rodgers suppress the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc in the House of Lords. Bribery Act 2010 offences, fraud offences and corruption

275-278

February 2007- April 2009. Lord Chief Justice arranges for the Solicitors’

278-280 36

Disciplinary Tribunal to create a false and fraudulent judgment extinguishing Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409 (Ch) Bribery Act 2010 offences, fraud offences and corruption

April 2010. Lord Chief Justice (Lord Judge) arranges for Lord Justice Dyson, Lord Justice McCombe, Lord Justice Laws and Mr Justice Tughendat and Mr Justice King to obstruct the appeal against the purported decision by the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal. Bribery Act 2010 offences and judicial corruption.

280-281

April 2011. Lord Chief Justice arranges for Lady Justice Hallett, Lord Justice Morritt, and Lord Justice Wall to avoid discharging their judicial function in the Court of Appeal and for Nicholas Patten QC impersonate and or masquerade a Lord Justice of Appeal and appear in their stead

282

10)

April 2010. Lord Chief Justice (Lord Judge) arranges for the Second Fraudulent Intervention to be suppressed

283

11)

July 2011. Lord Chief Justice and Sir Nicholas Bratza , President of the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights conspire to suppress the SRA’s Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud Etc Anal Sheikh V United Kingdom 51144/07 [2010] ECHR 649 (23 April 2010) and the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud in the European Court of Human Rights

283-284

12)

16th Feb 2011. Lord Chief Justice protects SRA Conspirators and Bar Mutual from breach of duty and fraud claims.

284

13)

Lord Phillips of Matravers as President of the Supreme Court (2009-2012) suppresses UK11 in the Supreme Court

284-285

LORD CHIEF JUSTICE USES PUBLIC INFORMATION SITES, PUBLIC RECORDS AND PROPAGANDA TO COMMIT SERIOUS ORGANISED ECONOMIC FRAUD USING THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM 37

The publication of instruments of theft on British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII). 1)

About BAILII, its Trustees and Sponsors

BAILLI’s role in serious organised fraud and in money laundering : the publication and dissemination of fraudulent judgments

285-287

The publication of the fraudulent judgment as the vehicle of the fraud

287-288

Judgments which are never published because they are absurd or because they contradict other judgments

288-289

The money laundering aspects of the publication of fraudulent judgments : placement, layering and integration

289-290

The publication of fraudulent judgments in cases which do not exist

290

Interim judgments fraudulently published as substantive judgments.

290-292

Judgments published to reinforce the State’s false narrative and to smear the Victim’s name

292-293

Contradictory judgments on BAILLI

293-294

How BAILLI was used in the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc

294-299

How BAILLI was used in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

299-305

Legal textbooks used in serious organised fraud

305-306

The Daily Mail and The Sun used for propaganda

306-307

THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE USE OF SHAM LITIGATION AS A FORM OF TORTURE 1

The legal framework of torture and the Lord Chief Justice’s torture techniques

Guilt by association

308 308-309

3 E

Analysis of the Lord Chief Justice’s torture techniques

310-316

HAVE THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES 1998 AND THE SUPREME COURT RULES 2009 BEEN DRAFTED TO ENABLE THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE ,THE LORD CHANCELLOR, THE LAW SOCIETY AND THE BAR COUNCIL, BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS TO STEAL LAND AND PROPERTY FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC 1

The High Court and County Court used to steal from the Victim ; the Court of Appeal used to obstruct the Victim from challenging the theft

317-318

The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State , the Law Society and the Bar Council draft the Supreme Court Rules 2009 to keep the Victim away

318-320

The Civil Procedure Act 1997 : de facto control of drafting vested in the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor

The Rt Hon. the Lord Woolf. Lord Chief Justice 6 June 2000 -2005 , Barrister of Blackstone Chambers .The Woolf Reforms. Is it a coincidence that the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc have been committed by barristers at Blackstone Chambers ?

Were the Woolf Reforms designed so that the barristers of Lord Woolf’s Chambers, Blackstone , could steal land and property from their clients and to commit serious organized crime though the civil justice system? 1)

321

321-322

Hugo Page QC, Jonathan Harvie QC and the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc

322

Hugo Page QC and the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

322

Hugo Page QC Jonathan Harvie QC and the Bar Mutual Fraud

322

Mr. Kenneth Clarke MP QC, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice 12 May 2010 – 4 September 2012 personally involved in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

323-324

III

Lord Justice Richards Ex Officio Member of the Civil 324-327 Procedure Rule Committee. Lord Judge protects Lord Justice Richards from prosecution for charges of sexual depravity as a quid pro quo for Lord Justice Richard’s protection in the Court of Appeal of Briggs, Marc Beaumont and the Bar Mutual Fraud

THE INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE. THE THEFT OF LAND FROM HIGH NET WORTH INDIVIDUALS IN THE UK’; THEIR DISPLACEMENT; JUDICIAL CORRUPTION; TORTURE; SLAVERY; TERRORISM. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SANCTIONS OR RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AGAINST THE UK A B

THE GLOBAL PROBLEM INTERNATIONAL MEASURES AGAINST CORRUPTION AND THE LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK OF INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS 1

The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC)

333

Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter

333-335

UN Designation Criteria

335-336

The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Article 11 of the Treaty on European Union

336

Article 215 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU

336

OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions Adopted by the Negotiating Conference on 21 November 1997

337

Transparency International chapters to monitor EU sanctions of corrupt Ukrainian officials

337-338

WHAT THE UK SAYS PUBLICALLY AND ON THE INTERNATIONAL STAGE 1

The Inaugeration Speech of the Rt Hon, the Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury

338-339

The Prime Minister’s July 2015 Singapore Speech Against Corruption in UK’s Property Market

339-346

WHAT THE UK DOES BEHIND CLOSED DOORS The theft of land and property from members of the public and the use of the civil courts to commit serious organized fraud

346-352

How the UK steals land and property from its own people. The UK’s legal system compared with the worst legal system on earth: The People’s Republic of China

352-360

The use of the ab initio void instrument to appropriate rights in rem or convert them to chose in action or to mere rights to complain

360-374

The UK no longer has a reliable land registration system

The evolution of the land registration system from 1830 -2007

374-375

Since 2nd October 2007 the control of the Land Registry within the absolute and unfettered discretion of a corrupt judiciary

376-380

The global implications of the Order of 2nd

380-382

Is the real reason behind the proposed publication of data on the ownership of land and property titles in England and Wales by foreign companies so that UK judges can steal those titles ?

382-383

The UK’s theft from the public purse ; the use of the public purse to steal from members of the public

383-384

The deliberate impoverishment of the UK

384-385

The UK’s unlawful imprisonment of victims of land and property theft and of judicial corruption

385-387

The UK’s use torture contrary to the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 1984

387-389

The UK’s practice of slavery and bondage in the 21st century

389-391

World Bank Counsel’s Karen Hudes’ financial expose : Governments under the control of a ‘small group of corrupt, power-hungry figures’

391-394

Civil unrest - Anders Behring Breivik

394-395

THE TOTALITY OF UK’S RESPONSES TO THE AFOREGOING: EACH RESPONSE, A SINGLE PAGE IN LENGTH

DOCUMENTS A

THE UK CLAIM UNDER FRANCOVICH V ITALY (1991) ECR 1 -5357 (1992) AND FACTORAME & OTHERS R (ON APPLICATION OF) v SST [ 2002] EWCA CIV 932

DOCUMENTS REFERABLE TO JUDICIAL AND STATE CORRUPTION, THE ABSENCE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE RULE OF LAW

411

Letters to Parliamentary Committees and the responses received

411-416

Letters to the Lord Chief Justice and to the Supreme Court and response received

416-421

Letters to the Council of the Inns of Court and to the Bar Standards Board

421-422

Letters to the Global Law Summit 2015 attendees and academic institutions

423-424

CASE SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS 1

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

424-425

The Bar Mutual Fraud

The SRA’s Bank Scam Compensation Fund Fraud Etc

The Theft of Margaret Gomm’s Home and Three and a Half Acres of Land

427

The case of Grazyna Mekarska

427

425 425-426

THE FRAUDS IN DETAIL A

THE LAW SOCIETY’S BANK SCAM, COMPENSATION FUND FRAUD ETC, THE THEFT OF MOUNTSIDE (THE LAW SOCIETY’S EMAIL HACKING) 42

The implications of Anal Sheikh V The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409 (Ch

428-437

Mr. Timothy Dutton QC’s and Mr. Charles Plant conspire to deceive the High Profile Litigation Committee into funding an ‘appeal’ against Anal Sheikh v The Law Society [2005] EWHC 1409 (Ch Timothy Dutton’s Fraudulent Advice .

438-439

Does Timothy Dutton QC have the blood of solicitors who have committed suicide on his hands

439-440

The financial and race implications when the UK acknowledges that the SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Instrument is unlawful and void.

440-441

How the SRA’s Bank Scam works

441-442

Can the SRA steal all the banked money in the world with the SRA’s Fraudulent Vesting Instrument and, if so, how long would it take?

442-446

A mistake of monumental proportion in my case. How many similar mistakes have been made in other cases?

446-451

The Constitutional and money laundering implications of the Supreme Court’s failure or refusal to endorse UK11

451-259

For so long they do not endorse UK11, do the UK’s Supreme Court Law Lords also have blood on their hands ?

459-460

Will the Attorney General, Jeremy Wright QC, prosecute the past and present Presidents of the Law Society, Lady Paraskeva and Mr Antrony Townsend for the SRA’s Bank Scam ?

460-470

Will the Attorney General intervene in UK11 to correct the law?

470

THE RED RIVER CONVEYANCING AND MORTGAGE FRAUD

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud conveyed by a single concept illustrated on a single page The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud explained in conveyancing terms

471-478

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud explained by analogy

516

Why every conveyancer would agree that the Order of 2nd means that the cost of a £300,000 house is now £9.35m

517

Why every conveyancer would agree that the Order of 2nd presents a risk to civilization ,whether theoretical or real, greater than any threat in the history of the world.

518-520

Why it is said that the Order of 2nd means any judge in the UK can steal any property in the UK at any time and make £64m in 10 minutes on the back of 4 sheets of paper.

521

Why the Attorney General believes that Lord Nicholas Phillips of Matravers (Lord Chief Justice 30 September 2005 - 1 October 2008 ), Sir Igor Judge, (Lord Chief Justice 1 October 2008 - 30 September 2013) are thieves

522-523

478-516

THE THEFT OF MARGARET GOMM’S HOME AND THREE AND A HALF ACRES OF LAND 1

Relevant legal principles and law

523-526

Material facts

526-530

The State’s theft of Mrs Gomm’s right in rem

530-532

The State’s legislature provides for the security of ownership of property; the State’s judiciary steals it. The State maintains that the Victim consents to the theft

Evidence proving complaint

532-534

The conspiracy between the legal aid agency and the State to defraud members of the public

534-541

532

Her Majesty the Queen’s referral of Mrs Gomm’s case to the Minister of Justice

Jonathan Djanolgy MP, former Parliamentary Under Secretary of State - bribery , corruption in public office, conspiracy to commit insurance fraud

541-542

Request made of the Rt. Hon. Helen Grant MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Women and Equalities and Minister for Victims and the Courts to respond to questions and to pay reparation to Mrs Gomm

542-546

Baroness Ruth Deech is torturing Mrs Gomm to death

546-547

Mrs Gomm’s complaint to the Bar Standards Board

548-553

Allegations of corruption in public offices against Dr Ann Barker and Baroness Ruth Deech

554-557

Bribery and Corruption at the Bar Standards Board

557-558

THE CASE OF MRS GRAZYNA MEKARSKA

THE BAR MUTUAL FRAUD

541

558-565

The Bar Mutual’s control over the courts – the issuing of claims and the entering of judgments in default obstructed

The Bar Mutual’s control of the courts – refusal to enter judgment in default

568

The Bar Mutual’s control of the courts – fraudulent alteration of the court records by removal of judgments in default when entered. Anal Sheikh v Marc Beaumont

568

The Bar Mutual’s control of the courts – use of fraudulent civil restraint orders to threaten and menace litigants and keep them out of court 1)

Victims of State corruption in Britain who complain are secretly imprisoned by the judicial organ of State

566-568

568

The State’s use of the fraudulent civil restraint orders to imprison the Victim

Launcelot Henderson QC, purporting to be 571-572 Henderson J threatens the Sheikhs with a civil restraint order in April 2008 6 months after the Order of 2nd

Withers, Sebastian Prentice , Gray J and the 572-574 First Fraudulent Civil Restraint Order made ex parte and in secret. July 2009

Withers, Anthony Speaight QC , Burnett J and the Second Fraudulent Civil Restraint Order 2009 – 2011

574-575

Withers, Anthony Speaight QC, Richards LJ , Tughendhat J and the Third Fraudulent Civil Restraint Order 2011 – 2013

575-576

Withers, Anthony Speaight QC and the Fourth Fraudulent Civil Restraint Order 2013 – 2015

576

Henderson J and Fraudulent Civil Restraint Order Protecting Burges Salmon Anthony Speaight QC, Mr Hoffman and the Fraudulent Civil Restraint Order Obstructing a Judgment in Default for £3m in July 2010 in Rabia Sheikh v Hugo Page (1) and Nigel Meares (2)

575-576

10)

The SRA, Copley HHJ and the threat of imprisonment for contempt of court in the NRAM’s Repossession Proceedings for £30,000.00 in 2011.

578-579

11)

The SRA imprisons a black solicitor for disclosing their emails saying ‘ Let’s get the

579-580

The Supreme Court asked to injunct the High Court qua a public authority within the meaning of the s9 of the Human Rights Act 1988 which has violated Convention rights

580-582

568-571

577

black solicitor and use the white solicitor’s evidence against him’ 12)

THE BAR MUTUAL PROTECTS THE SRA CONSPIRATORS, THE RED RIVER CONSPIRATORS, THE GOMM CONSPIRATORS AND MARC BEAUMONT – THE POSITION TODAY 1

Bar Mutual spends £45m to cover up the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and split the money with the Red River Conspirators

582

Bar Mutual and Marc Beaumont conspire to fraudulently remove judgment in default for £900,000.00 entere in Anal Sheikh v Marc Beaumont and split the money between them

582-583

Bar Mutual , Deputy Master Nicholas Bard , Hugo Page QC , Nigel Meares, Philip Newman and Marc Beaumont split judgment in default of £8m -£20m between them in Rabia Sheikh v Hugo Page QC (1) and Nigel Meares (2) (ongoing hearing before Nicholas Bard since 28 April 2010)

584-585

Bar Mutual, Gregory Treverton Jones QC, Hugo Page QC, Jonathon Harvie QC , Philip Engelman , Marc Beaumont, Anesta Weekes QC split judgment in default of £15m (personal claim) -£1.65bn (class claim) in Anal Sheikh v Law Society and others , a class action (UK11) (ongoing hearing before Mann J since 2011)

585

The Bar Mutual Fraud shown graphically

585-638

THE STATE’S MODUS OPERANDI 1

The State extinguishes the Victim’s right in rem by reducing it into a service complaint to a caseworker’s line manager. The State creates rights in rem from non existent rights. 1)

The SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

639-646

The Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

647-649

The Theft of Mrs. Margaret Gomm’s House and Three and A Half Acre of Land

650-651

The Victim’s property is stolen by the State in a single moment in time, by a single sheet of paper, made at a secret hearing ; the Victim spends a lifetime trying to recover hisproperty

651

The State withholds a domestic remedy from the Victim and waits for him to die.

652-653

The State uses the intellectual and legal genius of barristers and judges to steal from the Victim; the State places the regulation of barristers and judges and the payment of reparation to the Victim in the hands of unqualified caseworkers.

653-659

Fundamental and Universal Absolutes are neither absolute nor universal for the Victim

659-660

The State uses its judicial organ for a financial and political agenda

660-661

The State’s legislature provides for the security of the ownership of property; the State’s judiciary steals it . The State maintains that the Victim consents to the theft.

662-663

The Victim is profiled, asset stripped and reduced to abject poverty by the State.

663-664

February 2005 – November 2006. The SRA uses Gregory Treverton Jones QC and Paul Saffron to financially strip me in the SRA’s Bank Scam , Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

664-665

January 2007. The SRA uses Hugo Page QC , Jonathan Harvie QC and Philip Englemen financially strip me in the SRA’s Bank Scam , Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

665

October 2007. The SRA uses Hugo Page QC and Nigel Meares used to financially strip me in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud.

665

August 2008. The SRA uses Marc Beaumont to financially strip me in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and in

665-666

SRA’s Bank Scam , Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

VII

August 2008 - April 2009 The SRA uses Philip Newman to financially strip me in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

667

December 2008 – April 2009. The SRA uses Anesta Weekes QC to financially strip me in SRA’s Bank Scam , Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

667-668

The State’s enslavement and torture of the Victim

668-670

Blackstone Chambers. Hugo Page QC , the Red River 670-676 Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and the SRA’s Bank Scam. Dinah Rose QC and Jeremy Assange. Lord Anthony Lester and the Human Rights Bill . Is Blackstone Chambers the State’s agent?

THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD, THE BAR COUNCIL, THE SOLICITORS’ REGULATION AUTHORITY AND THE LAW SOCIETY AT THE HEART OF UK’S CRIMINAL NETWORK A

HOW UK BARRISTERS’ CHAMBERS AND SOLICITORS’ FIRMS COMMIT SERIOUS ORGANISED FRAUD AND LAUNDER MONEY The network

All Law Society Presidents have committed the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc

Do Barristers Chambers operate like criminal cells ? 678-679 Do they purchase monopolies to commit crime

677

677-678

How the Victim’s barrister or solicitors conspires to 680-682 steal from him 682

The Government infiltrated by criminally dishonest barristers. Anthony Speaight QC and the Human Rights Bill

The Legislature infiltrated by criminally dishonest 683-684 barristers

UK BARRISTERS AND SOLICTORS : UNREGULATED AND UNACCOUNTABLE.

685

BARONESS RUTH DEECH (CHAIR OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD 2009- 2014) TIMOTHY DUTTON QC (CHAIRMAN OF THE BAR COUNCIL) AND PATRICIA ROBERTSON QC (VICE CHAIR OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD ) USE THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD AND SOLICITORS’ REGULATION AUTHORITY TO AUGMENT THEIR PERSONAL WEALTH 1

Baroness Ruth Deech protects barristers involved in the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud. John Deech has a contract with the SRA to do their regulatory work. Does Ruth Deech have blood on her hands?

Baroness Ruth Deech’s connection with Blackstone 687-689 Chambers

Baroness Ruth Deech protects barristers involved in 689-691 property frauds. Does she take a cut?

Timothy Dutton QC’s Fraudulent Advice to the Law Society’s High Profile Litigation Panel. Mr Dutton lies to a Panel which was never convened to secure his income for life.

Patricia Robertson QC mouths answers to the SRA’s 693-694 forensic account at a purported SDT hearing to tell him to lie.

Timothy Dutton QC and Patricia Robertson QC steal from the public to augment their personal income

BARONESS RUTH DEECH USE OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD AS AN INSTRUMENT OF TORTURE. THE CASE OF MRS MARGARET GOMM , AGED 80

BARONESS RUTH DEECH USE OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD TO SUPPRESS BARRISTERS’ SEXUAL IMPROPRIETIES . THE LINK WITH BBC AND THE SAVILE INQUIRY

685-686

693

694 695-696

Baroness Ruth Deech protects Marc Beaumont and Lord Justice Richards from prosecution on charges of sexual depravity

696-700

The link between Baroness Ruth Deech’s involvement in economic crime and the issues in the Savile Inquiry. The link between Kenneth Clarke and Jimmy Savile . Baroness Deech’s and

700-701

Kenneth Clarke’s involvement in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud F

THE WORKINGS OF THE REGULATORY SYSTEM 1

The Regulatory framework 1)

United Nations Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers (1990)

701-702

Primary legislation :e Legal Services Act 2007 702-703

Secondary legislation: The Tribunal Regulations 2014

The Rules . The BSB Handbook 2nd Edition 706-720 April 2015

Professional Conduct Committee Terms of Reference (Nov 13)

Guidance on the Rules The Committee 721-725 Handbook on the Procedure and Decisions and Committee Meetings 2014.

Disciplinary 704-705

720-721

The Bar Standards Board’s Professional Conduct Teams

726

Biographies of the Professional Conduct Committee Members

727-738

Flowchart showing what is meant to happen

739-740

Flowchart showing what in fact happens

741-742

The lawful procedure 1)

The Investigation

743

The Professional Conduct Committee Meeting’s function

Documents and formalities

745

Format of Meeting

745

Case Examiner present. Is that also a conflict?

746

743-745

Specific provision that the Investigation and Hearing Team should not be present at the Professional Conduct Committee Meeting

746

Disqualification

746

Directions to the PCC Members

746

After referral file passed to Investigations and Hearings team

747

The unlawful procedure. Separation of powers. Delegation of powers 1)

The initial assessment

747

Delegated powers

747-748

Separation of powers

748-749

THE ABSENCE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS 1

No separation of powers between the Bar Council and the Bar Standards Board

750

No separation of power between the Bar Council , the Bar Standards Board, the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Inns of Court and the Bar Mutual. Can some barristers can steal from anyone, including their own client, and enjoy complete immunity from criminal prosecution, regulation and civil liability ?

750-753

No separation powers and or conflicts of interest between the Inns of Court and the Bar Standards Board : TABLE 34 showing Members of the Inns of Court directly or indirectly involved in the Frauds

753-765

No separation powers and or conflicts of interest between the Bar Standards Board and the Minister of Justice

766

No separation powers and or conflicts of interest between the Council of the Inns of Court and the Minister of Justice. What are the implications if the Accused Barrister were to make an application to his Tribunal for legal aid, and David Hunt QC (Blackstone) was a Member of his Tribunal. Anthony

766

Peto QC (Blackstone) and R v Crawley and others. [2014] EWCA Crim 1028 ?

VIII

No separation of powers and or conflicts of interest between the Bar Mutual, the Bar Standards Board, the Council of the Inns of Court, the Financial Conduct Authority, the Treasury and the Minister of Justice

767

The Bar Standards Board responsible for making up, interpreting and enforcing the Code of Conduct. Baroness Ruth Deech a party to the Frauds and the person who approves the Barristers’ Code of Conduct

767-768

WHY ANAL SHEIKH V THE LAW SOCIETY [2005] EWHC 1409 (CH) ,(UK11) CAN DISMANTLE THE ENTIRE REGULATORY SYSTEM FOR LAWYERS IN THE UK 1

The regulatory system for lawyers

768-771

The regulatory system for doctors, accountants and judges

771-772

The State recruits the same Members to Committees and Panels to facilitate serious organized fraud

772

Dr Ann Barker, Bar Standards Board Commissioner, Panellist on General Medical Council Fitness to Practise Panels, the Mental Health Review Tribunal, and the appeal panel of the medical Royal Colleges

772

Lord Justice Burnett procures the appointment of Deputy Registrar Schaffer to the Association of Chartered Certified Accountant (‘ACCA’) to suppress and facilitate the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and the Bar Mutual Fraud

772-774

ALLEGATIONS AGAINST UK’S PUBLIC OFFICIALS, INTER ALIA , OF CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC OFFICE, THEFT, MORTGAGE FRAUD, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD, MONEY LAUNDERING, LAND REGISTRATION FRAUD, AND TRADING IN INFLUENCE

MR KENNETH CLARKE MP QC, LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE 12 MAY 2010 – 4 SEPTEMBER 2012

MR DOMINIC GRIEVE QC MP,ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR ENGLAND AND WALES MAY 2010 TO JULY 2014

775-779

The Attorney General’s role and responsibility generally

779-780

Mr. Dominic Grieve and the SRA’s Bank Scam, Compensation Fund Fraud Etc.

780-781

Mr. Dominic Grieve’s false statement to a black solicitor constituent

781

Mr. Dominic Grieve and the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

781-785

Mr. Dominic Grieve and the Bar Mutual Fraud

785-786

Mr. Dominic Grieve’s refusal to advise the Government in the UK Claim

786-787

Mr. Dominic Grieve and the late Mr. Lewis Nicholson

787-788

Mr. Dominic Grieve’s possible involvement in the suppression of a police investigation in the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud

788-789

Mr. Dominic Grieve’s possible involvement in corruption in the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights

789-790

Does the Attorney General ‘take a cut’ of the proceeds of serious organised crime undertaken through the civil jurisdiction ?

790

THE RT HON THE LORD PHILLIPS OF WORTH MATRAVERS PC PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OCTOBER 2009 – OCTOBER 2012, LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES 3 OCTOBER 2005 – 30 SEPTEMBER 2008

THE RT HON THE LORD JUDGE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES 2008 -2013

791

Lord Judge facilitates the second stage of the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud in April 2010.

791

Lord Judge facilitates the third stage of the Red River 791-798 Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud in 2013-2014

Lord Judge’s protection of Lord Justice Richards from prosecution on charges of sexual depravity as a quid pro quo for Lord Justice Richard’s protection of Briggs and the Bar Mutual Fraud

798-801

Other matters concerning Lord Judge

801-803

MALCOLM DAWSON OBE, FORMER CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR. ED LESTER, CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR, JOHN POWNALL, HEAD OF LITIGATION AT HM LAND REGISTRY, EDWARD COUSINS QC ADJUDICATOR TO HM LAND REGISTRY

DR VINCE CABLE MP, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND SKILLS

803-807

ADAM SAMPSON, CHIEF OMBUDSMAN OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN

807-808

LINDA COSTELLOE-BAKER CBE, THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR OF THE FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE (FSOM), NATALIE CEENEY CBE, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF OMBUDSMAN OF FSOM

808-810

BARONESS RUTH DEECH, CHAIR OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD MAURA MCGOVERN, CHAIR OF THE BAR COUNCIL

810

803

810-813

TREVOR PHILLIPS , FORMER CHAIR OF EQUALITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

813-815

TIMOTHY DUTTON QC, CHAIR OF THE BAR COUNCIL, CHARLES PLANT, CHAIR OF THE LAW SOCIETY’S HIGH PROFILE LITIGATION COMMITTEE AND PARTNER IN HERBERT SMITH, PATRICIA ROBERTSON QC , VICE CHAIR OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD, FORMER PRESIDENTS OF THE LAW SOCIETY, NICK FLUCK 2013–14. LUCY SCOTTMONCRIEF 2012–13 JOHN WOTTON 2011–12 LINDA HADFIELD LEE 2010–11 ROBERT HESLETT 2009–10 PAUL MARSH 2008–09 ANDREW HOLROYD 2007–08 FIONA WOOLF 2006–07 KEVIN MARTIN 2005–06 CHIEF

815-821

EXECUTIVES OF THE SRA, DAME JANET PARASKEVA ANTHONY TOWNSEND IX

MATTERS CONCERNING HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. APPLICATION UNDER THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE ACT 1833 S 4 TO REFER MATTERS TO THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL A

D X

DBE,

THE SRA’S BANK SCAM, COMPENSATION FUND FRAUD ETC 1

The Queen’s responsibility as Head of the Commonwealth Realms to solicitor victims.

822

In the Matter of the interventions into the solicitors’ practices known as Ahmed & Co, Biebuyck, Dixon & Co and the practices of Mr Zoi and In the Matter of Sections 35 and 36 and Schedules 1 and 2 of The Solicitors Act 1974 and In the Matter of the Law Society Compensation Fund Rules 1995 and the SRA’s theft of bona vacantia from the Crown

822-824

Should the Queen withdraw the Charter of the Society (1845)?

824

THE RED RIVER CONVEYANCING AND MORTGAGE FRAUD 1

Should the Queen exercise her powers of impeachment for the first time in modern history

824-825

Should Parliament and the Government be dissolved?

825-826

CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES 1 For so long as the Supreme Court does not grant UK11, there is constitutional crisis in the UK

826

For so long as the Supreme Court does not grant UK11, there is no civil court in the UK which is an independent and impartial tribunal

827

Is PSHO in breach of its statutory obligations as Agent to the Crown?

827

THE QUEEN’S SPEECH IN 2014

827-829

RACIAL HATRED IN 21ST CENTURY UK. THE BELIEF THAT BLACK AND ETHNIC MINORITY INDIVIDIUALS ARE CORRUPT,

DISHONEST, INCOMPETENT AND FUNDAMENTALLY UNFIT FOR THE HIGHER PROFESSIONS AND FOR PUBLIC OFFICE A

COMPARATORS 1

A black judge (Constance Briscoe) who makes a false statement in a speeding points case will be prosecuted by the police. Two white judges (Lord Justice Briggs and Mr Justice Henderson) who commit a conveyancing and mortgage fraud against two members of the public and theft and money laundering from the Bench, will not be prosecuted.

830-831

A black barrister (Constance Briscoe) who alters a witness statement in a speeding points case will be prosecuted. White barristers ( Hugo Page QC and Nigel Meares) who fabricate court orders in a land and mortgage fraud will not be prosecuted

831

A black barrister(Constance Briscoe) who makes 2 false statements will be prosecuted. A white barrister who makes 100 false statements or 50 white barristers (the SRA Conspirators and the Red River Conspirators) who make 1000 false statements will not be prosecuted.

831-832

A black HM Land Registry official (Surjeet Chana ) will be convicted and jailed for fraudulently altering a register of title. White Land Registrars ( John Pownell) a white Chief Land Registrar, a white Land Adjudicator (Edward Cousins QC) and High Court Judges (Briggs and Henderson ) can fraudulently alter a register of title without fear of prosecution.

832-833

A black Police Commander (Ali Dezaie) , is jailed for 4 ½ years for corruption in public office for using his position in a private dispute. Sum involved £600. Victim held unlawfully for 4 hours. A white QC (Briggs ) can use his position as a High Court Judge to steal a legal charge securing £1.2m from a black litigant without fear of being charged. Victim condemned to life of poverty

833-835

A black public prosecutor (Sarfraz Ibrahim,) who 835-838 accepts a bribe of £20,000.00 to drop a case is 57

convicted for corruption, misconduct in a public office and perverting the course of justice and jailed for 4 ½ years . A white High Court Deputy Master (Nicholas Bard) can accept a bribe of £3m for not entering judgment in default of defence worth £8m -£30m for black claimant

A black solicitor was struck off for ‘faking’ his legal qualifications. 50 white High Court , Court of Appeal judges , Supreme Court Judges and the Lord Chief Justice must have faked their legal qualifications because they believe that a judge can make up a contract which does not exist and find that it does exist, find that parties are bound by the contract he has created finds that they are in breach of the contract he has created finds that they must pay damages for the breach , can wipe out global debt and do all the other things Briggs did by the Order of 2nd

838

A black Attorney General (Baroness Scotland) is punished for turning a blind eye to her illegal immigrant housekeeper. A white Attorney General who turns a blind eye to theft, mortgage fraud and money laundering committed by a white High Court is not punished.

838-839

Black and ethnic minority solicitors Ranbir Dhaliwal, (forgery of a transfer ) Nazakat Ali (forgery of immigration visas) Osman Sadiq (forgery of immigration visas) jailed. White barristers Marc Beaumont (forgery of consent order,) Hugo Page QC (forgery of Tomlin Order), Nigel Mears (forgery of Fabricated Order ) free to forge whatever they want

840-842

Pakistanis in UK fuelling corruption, says law chief: Attorney General warns politicians to 'wake up' to the threat posed by minority communities

842-852

THE STATE’S TORTURE TECHNIQUES A

THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF TORTURE

GENERAL PROHIBITION AGAINST TORTURE

ANALYSIS OF TORTURE TECHNIQUES

853 853-854 855 58

Enforcing trivial and absurd demands

856

Humiliation and Degradation

857

Cultivation of Anxiety and Despair

858

Monopolization of Attention

859

Induced Debilitation and Exhaustion

860

Isolation, frustration and hopelessness

861

Being made to watch the suffering of others

862

Threats

863

Sensory Disorientation

863

Temporal Disorientation

864

Use of Prolonged Interrogations

865

Rapid Fire Questioning

866

Repetition Approach

866

Deception : File and Dossier

866

Deception: use of falsified documents

867

Demonstrating "Omnipotence" and "Omniscience"

867

Abuse of the victim simultaneously by multiple parties

868

Each abuser can rely on limited information and deny knowledge of incriminating material

869

Trust is engendered in the victim

869

The abusers can plan their attack upon the victim to cause maximum damage and so that one will know who is the real abuser

869

The abusers can attack the victim simultaneously to disorientate and paralyse the victim

869

Use of fiduciaries to attack the victim

869

Expropriation of property (Article 1 Protocol 1 rights ) used as a means of economic rape and torture

870

The Holocaust Syndrome and the Stockholm Syndrome

870

Modern day slavery

Physical Torture

872

STRATEGIES TO ACCOMMODATE, ACCEPT OR JUSTIFY TORTURE 1

XII

870-871

Torture legitimised by the State and formal orders

872-874

Abstraction and other Linguistic Transformations

874-875

“ They don’t count”

875-876

"They Deserve It Because of What They Have Done" 876-879

"We must have the information they have."

879-880

‘’This is no concern of mine."

880-881

"This is a lie, an exaggeration, or a mistake."

881-883

NO CRIMINAL LAW AGENCY IN THE UK FOR THE PROSECUTION OF ECONOMIC CRIME A

THE FAILURE OR REFUSAL OF THE BRITISH POLICE TO ACT. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST MR HOGAN HOWE, COMMISSIONER OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE AND MR ADRIAN LEPPARD , COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY OF LONDON POLICE, OF CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC OFFICE. COLLUSION WITH THE IPCC

THE UK’S POLICE CONSTABULARIES AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES CONTROLLED BY THE LAW SOCIETY AND THE SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY’S CONTROL 1

The connections. City of London Economic Crime Unit : ‘There’s no point in reporting the SRA to me. We share the same desk’

884-886

887-888

The Memorandum of Understanding between the Law Society and The Association of the Chief Police Officers of England and Wales

THE LORDS’ EU SUBCOMMITTEE E INQUIRY IN RELATION TO BRITAIN’S OPT OUT OF EU POLICE MEASURES

XIII

THE IMPEACHMENT OF LORD PHILLIPS OF MATRAVERS WORTH, LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS, MR JUSTICE HENDERSON , MR KENNETH CLARKE MP QC AND MR CHRIS GRAYLING

XIV

REPORT TO OLAF, EUROJUST AND GRECO. A

888-890

890-891 892

UK’S FRAUD AND MONEY LAUNDERING : THE COST AND CONSEQUENCES TO THE EU 1

The Order of 2nd and the SRA’s Fraudulent Instrument : the greatest threat to the stability of Europe ever known in its history.

893-896

The State’s appropriation of rights in rem

897-899

UK’s withdrawal of a land registration system

The UK’s obstruction of the Free Movement of Capital and Asset Freezing

899-901

No entitlement in the UK to judgments in default of defence

900-901

The UK’s money laundering and use of tax havens

901-902

Allegations of corruption against Sir Nicholas Bratza and/or the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Anal Sheikh v United Kingdom 51144/07 [2010] ECHR 649 (23 April 2010 , the Red River Conveyancing and Mortgage Fraud and related cases. Sir Nicholas’ connection with Serle Court Chambers and with Lord Justice Briggs. Did the UK Government influence the ECHR in the prisoner’s votes cases and in the terrorist cases?

902-907

Is the economic impoverishment of the UK and its increased dependency on EU handouts deliberate ?

908

The UK’s suppression of claims against the State 908-909 made under Francovich v Italy (1991) ECR 1 -5357

899

(1992) and Factorame & Ors R (on application of ) v SST [ 2002] EWCA CIV 932 XV

THE THREE MAIN OBJECTIVES IN THE UK 1

Holding the barristers at the lowest rung of the criminal ladder to account

910-911

Establishing a fully funded legal aid system

911-912

Bringing about the most fundamental change the legal profession will have seen for over one hundred and fifty years (since the days of Jinnah , Nehru and Gandhi)

912