WELD SOP

Page 1

WELD SOP

Figure 1 Brickpit Ring, SOP (Author, 2020)

Design Research Report for

Landscape WSUD Of Brickpit Site In Sydney Olympic Park LAND7313- Studio 6 Capstone Part 2 September, 2020 by Lei Zheng z5236279


- “Acknowledgement to the Wann-gal as the traditional custodians of the land on which Sydney Olympic Park is located. I also pay my respect to Elders past and present and appreciate their contribution to this landscape — its land, waters and skies.” (SOPA) Figure 2 Western Entry of Brickpit, SOP (Author,2020)


CONTENTS 01 FOREWORD - Research Journey and timeline

04

02 INTRODUCTION - Overview,Topic challenge, personal mission and goals & the subject site

07

03 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS AND ASSUMPTIONS - The mission, design theories and research methods

14

04 SITE ANALYSIS - Site analysis, opportunity and constraints & projections

18

05 METHODS AND TECHNIQUES - The overview of proposed design methods and its precedents

29

06 DESIGN TESTING - Testing the design methods at the subject site - Brickpit SOP

33

07 DESIGN RESEARCH FINDINGS - Synthesis and findings

47

REFERENCE LIST

54


01 FOREWORD Research Journey and timeline

4

Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Foreword Water, it is considered as a most important nature resource that involves in the daily requirement of human. As the rapid urbanisation, increased human population and shortage on the potable water, these factors have facilitated the humankind to rethink of their way in the creation of future built form and urban planning. In order to sustain the human civilisation and future generation, save the water resource becoming a big challenge in the built environment design industry. Water Sensitive Urban Design, a design approach that has been proposed to mitigate the urban stormwater runoff, simulating the water cycle in the landscape setting and treat the stormwater to improve the quality before it flows back to the natural environment. With the increased demand on high quality outdoor open spaces, it is crucial to rethink how to enhance the spatial quality and experience of a WSUD project in relation to its users. This Design Research Proposal will review the relevant landscape WSUD design theories to put forward a theoretical framework for the implementation of future WSUD. A series of design methods and techniques will be utilised to test this framework in the selected subject site at Sydney Olympic Park. The framework will be optimised during the process and come up with the appropriate final theoretical framework, design principles and strategies for the future WSUD projects.

November 2020

Finalise and amend the proposed design based on the outcome of the design testing. Summarise the finding of this design research project

October 2020 Proposed design to subject site is based on the theoritical framework and use the design research methods to test the proposed design.

September 2020

Site visit, a series of detailed site analsys of Brickpit.

August 2002 Investigate the existing WRAMS system on site, site section changed to Brickpit .

July 2020

Exploring experiential landscape approach for informing the future design

June 2020 Investigate (Woo-la-ra) site potential in relation to WSUD theory

May 2020

Establish the theoretical framework and preliminary site selection - Woo-la-ra

April 2020 Literature review, Revealed the theories

Critical inquiry: WSUD, social experience and environmental benefit

March 2020

Research interest: WSUD. Case study investigation on Sydney Park

February 2020

Research project time-line - Key points

Figure 3: Project timeline 5

Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Proposed Project Program- time line Term Break - Weeks

Stages Further Case Study Investigation

1

2

3

4

Term 3 - Weeks 5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Local precedent study (Sydney Park) quantitative & qualitative analysis environmental and social benefits, the outcome will be the reflection of the design measure were put in place. This can contribute to determine whether some of the design measure could be replicated in SOP. Site visit and on-site observation and social media analysis Visual and spatial analysis: mapping, photographing etc.

Site analysis, On-site Data collection

Land form analysis: topography, elevation & levels Existing accessibility, footpath connection mapping analysis Existing WSUD/WRAMS key elements design max capacity Existing water feature in SOP, view points,vegetation Existing stormwater catchment, water outlets,GPT analysis Estimate rainfall and total additional water volume/yr in catchment Opportunity and constraints analysis based on Site Analysis Draft the base context map for design Draft the 3D base model Review design research methods and techniques and precedents Propose sketch concept options to test the theoretical frameworks Refinement to preferred design option based on the received feedback Producting 3d model and perspectives for testing the theories.

Design concept/ resolution

Developing moodboards, materials and planting palette. Detailed spatial design based on experiential landscape key elements Develop detail design for landscape structure and art installation Producing illustrative landscape master plan Producing illustrative landscape detail plans (zoom-in plans) Producing Illustrative landscape sections and elevations Refining 3d model and bird view perspectives. Physical models if required Boards layouts and presentation preparation Figure 4: Project program to 27 Nov,2020

6

Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


02 INTRODUCTION Overview,Topic challenge, personal mission and goals & the subject site

7

Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Research project overview

The purpose of this design research project is to demonstrate the research design strategy, process and goals of Author for the final design project by utilising multiple research design methods to test the proposed design theoritical frameworks. The "Research Throught Design" process was begun with the “Design as research” critical inquiry to discover the answer to specific research question regarding a landscape architecture design topic in the contemporary world. It follows by “Research for Design” to review the definition of the focused design topic; then review the relevant precedent projects and to translate into design strategies as a reflection of “Research on Design”. Finally, the design theory and strategies were revealed need to be applied to the specific project. The following section will reveal the research question, discuss the challenge, mission and goals from a personal perspective to the topic area as a reflective practitioner. The author will explore the mission, potential landscape design theory and the design research methods in relation to the subject site and its contexturalised conditions in the Sydney OIympic Park; the following section will conduct a detailed site analysis of the subject site to explore the opportunities and constraints for contributing to the concept design in the next stage. Last but not the least, explore and test the proposed design based the theoritical frameworks at the subject site, to saught out whether the proposed theoritical frameworks has achieve the initial design intention and possibility for future implementation.

8

Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 5 Brickpit Ring, SOP (Goolge map images)

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


9

Topic challenge

Personal mission

In the recent years, the rapid development of urban spaces and the booming population become concerns to the humankind. It is believed that climate change as the result of the above mentioned issues has impacts on our vulnerable environment. The impacts are widely acknowledged by people as Urban Heat Island Effect, potable water shortfall and irregular rainfall patterns in difference areas etc. The acronym “WSUD� stands for Water Sensitive Urban Design; it is an urban planning adaptive design approach to the urban stormwater treatment solution. The idea of this approach is to provide a system in the landscape to capture/treat the stormwater runoff and reduce the water pollution in contemporary landscape architectural projects. It is observed that most of the stormwater management systems were designed in engineered concrete pipes and channels to treat the stormwater run-off, which is considered not appealing and well-integrated within the landscape in early days. I was always wondering, is there a better way to design the stormwater system so that it can well situate in the appealling landscape and also connect with the human activities? How to diversify the use of space? How can these spaces become evocative and attract people to come in and willing to spend the time with the nature environment? What if landscape can be vertical? how will that change people's perception of the space and also the landscape?

As a landscape architect, I am always interested in how to create well-thoughout, sustained and appealing landscape spaces to the public. My mission is to learn desgin theories for human experience and produce appropriate design for creating connections between natural environment and humankind, and also bring in potentional social, environmental and economic beneftis to the community in WSUD project.This is also useful for informing design of similar WSUD projects in my future career. In my opinion, landscape architects play an important role to integrate and recede the engineered stormwater system and spaces in order to make the spatial configuration become more usable and aesthetically attractive to the public. Therefore, it is critical for landscape architect to appreciate how the design approach of WSUD system works and then able to use the landscape design strategies to enhance the water treatment process as well as provide better experience to users while using the space. It is critical to balance between the functions, spatial configurations and human connections in the landscape design for WSUD projects.

Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Personal goals My goal is to develope my design knowledge in relation to landscape WSUD project and use the gained design strategies to test and infrom the final design as a Research Intepreter.This is in order to produce landscape design which should not only just deliver the stormwater management system, but also be integrated with human activities and given the respect to the history of site. While considering the environment,the design should also provide educational design elements in the landscape such as educational signage, public art installations in order to inform people with educational knowledge of making positive impact on the natural environment in different ways. The desired outcome is to redesign the ourdoor spaces and recreational parks to become a destination to public and its local community. As an attraction to leading people into the spaces and interact with the natural environment, the water, the planting and of course the animals.

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


The geographical context of Sydney Olympic Park Sydney Olympic Park, a 6 Green Star rating world class precinct which is located around 17 kilometers west to the Sydney CBD area, refer below Figure 6. It is famous for its legacy history of hosting the Olympic “Green Games� in the year 2000. The planning and design idea of environmental sustainability in Sydney Olympic Park have been established since 20 years ago for the success of the Games. Since the finish of the Games, the NSW government and Sydney Olympic Park Authority have carried on with the sustainability design ideas in order to achieve a more liveable place for its current and future community (Park, 2018). The Sydney Olympic Park is also falling under the Parramatta River and Humebush Bay Catchment, refer figure 10. Therefore, Sydney Olympic Park is an appropriate place whhich has great opportunity to establish the WSUD design for the purpose of this research project.

Parrama

tta River

Parramatta River

Woo-La-ra Newington Reserve

The primary site selection to test the proposed theoretical frameworks and design strategies is the brickpit, a former brick making site and the secondary site selections are the future Central and Parkview Precinct, refer Figure 7. The reason for this site selection will be unpacked in the following section.

Wentworth Point Development Rhodes Homebush Bay

Bay Marker

Brickpit Ring

Ha s

lam

sC

ree

Sydney Olympic Park

k

Wentworth Common

Sydney Olympic Park

Badu Mangroves

Old businese park

Pa

rra

ma

tta

Ro

ad

17 km

Legend

Pa

rra

N

ma

tta

SOP Boundary

Ro

ad

Primary Site Secondary Site

Figure 6: Sydney Olympic Park in Greater Sydney context 10 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 7: Sydney Olympic Park context map(basemap Mapbox, 2020) Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Residential

Future demography and Built Form analysis

Commercial

Brickpit : E2 zone environmental conservation

Public Open Space Sports/Event

In the long-term development of Sydney Olympic Park, the State Government identified the need to upgrade this Olympic game legacy place to accommodate predictable booming population. The aim is to redesign the SOP to become a more active and vibrant town centre within the Greater Sydney Metropolitan. The target is to accommodate a total projected daily population of 82,500 people by 2030 and total 31,574 residence to 2042, From the predicted growth of population and on-going redevelopment of the site, there will be an increasing demand on the potable water at SOP by 2030. Therefore, the social groups of Workers, visitors, residents and students will be the major focused social groups of this design research project.

Education Hotel and serviced Apartment Community Mixed-use, event Commercial Key

Based on the future demography and built form analysis, the development will face the shortage of portable water and flooding issues as the increasing of population, as well as the creation of the hardstand surfaces. It is critical to plan for additional stormwater runoff catchment and WSUD system to mitigate the foreseeable water issues in this area to achieve a sustainable future for the development.

Transport/ Parking

Mixed Commercial & Residential

Future Central and Parkview Precinct Land Use (FLOMS, 2020)

Brickpit

Existing Built Form in the Old Business Park (Future Central and Parkview Precinct) Projected daily population 2030

TOWER ZONE

Brickpit

40-49 storeys 30-39 storeys 20-29 storeys 11-19 storeys 7-10 storeys

Key

4-6 storeys

Figure 8: SOP Population growth trend (Park, 2018) 11 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

1-3 storeys

Expected Future Built Form in Central and Parkview Precinct Figure 9: Land use and built form Source from Development Control Plan (Park, 2018)

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Stormwater runoff at Parramatta river catchment

BAULKHAM HILLS

Sydney Olympic Park Parramatta River Homebush Bay

BLACKTOWN

PARRAMATTA

RYDE

HOLROYD HUNTERS HILL

CANADA BAY

AUBURN STRATHFIELD

LEICCHARDT

BURWOOD

FAIRFIELD

Legend

ASHFIELD

SOP Boundary

BANKSTOWN

N

CANTERBURY

Parramatta catchment Homebush Bay Catchment

Figure 10: Parramatta River Catchment map (AECOM,2010) 12 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Rainfall and Sea Level Rise analysis

Sydney Olympic Park Monthly Average Rainfall from 1961 - 1982 120 100 Rainfall,mm

80 60 40 20 0 Rainfall,mm

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

99

101

112

104

100

104

93

68

60

70

72

84

(Homebush Bay Catchment Stormwater Management Plan ,2020)

Sydney Olympic Park Monthly Average Rainfall from 2001 - 2020

Figure 12: Sea level rise 2100 (Coastal risk &FLOMS, 2020)

140

There are two critical water issues currently at Sydney Olympic Park based on the analysis. Firstly, from the data comparison of Sydney Olympic Park monthly average rainfall Figure 11, from 1961-1982 (Homebush Bay Catchment Stormwater Management Plans, 1999) and from 2001 - 2020, it is believed that the rainfall average in the recent 20 years becomes even more uneven throughout the years. This implies that as the developing of climate change, the monthly rainfall pattern will be keep developing in irregular amount. This consideration need to be taken in the design process how to maintain the water level through the draught period of time. The current existing recycled water demand is 2,640 KL/D and predicted future recycled water demand will be 6,983 KL/D by 2030 based on the residential development projections: 26,000 dwellings. (Listowski, 2014)

Rainfall, mm

120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Rainfall, mm

Jan

Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Jul

Aug Sep

Oct Nov Dec

85

133 104

48

49

64

88

62

113

50

82

75

Figure 11: SOP Monthly Average Rainfall in 20 years period (BOM,2020)

13 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

The sea level rise, as the result of climate change and global warming, it is another key issue that Sydney Olympic Park will face in the short coming future. Refer Figure 12.As the time evolving, not only the environmental issues and challenges has become different from what people were facing twenty years ago, but also the WSUD design approaches and sustainable design strategies have also evolved overtime. Therefore, the current challenge is how are we able to apply the evolved landscape WSUD design approaches and strategies to mitigate the current environmental challenge, such as population growth, sea level rise, flooding and potable water shortage at Sydney Olympic park.

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


03 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS AND ASSUMPTIONS The mission, design theories and research methods

14 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Project mission

Key landscape design theory

Design research methods

The mission of this design research project is to seek a better way to design the landscape WSUD project and stormwater management system in the contemporary world. The end goal is to integrate the engineered system with the beautiful and evocative landscape that connects to human movement. The research process is deliberate to reveal the answer and further queries to research question of how can landscape design strategies be applied to enhance positive social experience a nd e nvironme nta l benef it s in Wat er Sensitive Urban Design project? The aim of this proposal is to find out the appropriate landscape design theoretical frameworks and design approaches to improve the social experience and provide environmental function in mitigating flooding issue and potable water shortage in Brickpit and its surrounding site at Sydney Olympic Park, ultimately to use the proposed theoretical framework as a reference to design the future landscape WSUD projects.

The this design research project, the key landscape design theories will be implemented are "Cues to care" in Messy Ecosystem, Orderly Frames by Joan Nassauer (Nassauer, 1995) refer Figure 17; "Spatial Practice" and "System Logic" in Landscape Theory in Design by Susan Herrington (Herrington, 2017) refer Figure 16.There is an identified gap in the literature review which is lacking of supportive design theory in social experience, the future research reveal the Experiential Landscape design approach developed by Ian Simkins and Kevin Thwaites in the book “Experiential landscape: An Approach to People, Place and Space” (Simkins, 2007) can fill the gap. It covers two design components which are spatial dimension and experiential dimension to help define and enhance the social experience in the design process. Within each dimension, there are a numbers of design terminologies, spatial dimension including Centre, Direction, Transition and Area; the experiential dimension: attachment of significance, orientation and awareness of the home ground. Refer Figure 16. The above mentioned landscape design theories were put forward by canonical landscape architects who worked in this field for many years and the theories have influenced and inspired lots of landscape architectural students. The System Logic theory will be the primary theory to lead the project as the stormwater system works holistically with its surrounding landscape area. After the foundation of the project is determined, the Space practice and “Cues to Care” theories will guide the design process and determine the design strategies to create appealling spatial and sensory experience to the space users.

In order to deliver the desired design outcome, the designer need to investigate and understand how is the stormwater system working in the landscape context and how does it associate with human activities, and then review the relevant design theory and precedent case studies: Sydney Park, Qiaoyuan Wetland Park and Weiliu Wetland Park to generate appropriate design strategies (Francis, 2001). This way can provide existing precedents of the appropriate landscape WSUD design that creates positive impact on social experience. The detail site context and perception analysis can also assist to interpret the needs of redesign, a few useful analysis in relation to focused topic will also be undertaken to assist the design process, such as social groups analysis, topography and hydrology analysis, existing WRAMS system mapping, existing stormwater cathcments in SOP, accessibility and circulation analysis etc. The outcome of the relevant site analysis will contribute to answering the preliminary design questions. Such as Where does the water come from and which direction it flows to; how does the users think of the existing site and what can be enhanced; what type of stormwater management system is existing and how to best utilise for my research project; How does people access to the site and from where; what design element can contribute to creates spatial and sensory experience; what about the frogs and birds etc. In the design testing section, the "Experiential Landscape approach (Simkins, 2007) as the design testing approach in order to assess whether the proposede design has carefully provide appropriate design outcome in relation to the focused topic and research questions.

Figure 13: Design vision

15 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Conceptual thoughts and research process

Figure 14: Thought process (Zheng, 2020)

16 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 15: Research process (Zheng, 2020)

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Theoretical frameworks and assumptions

Neatness WSUD System Logic

Ornamental lawns, tree in rows, Plants, clean and neat , maintained, no weed etc.

System theory, Cybernetics and Infrastructure

Cues to Care

Constructed wetland,

regenerative landscape, landscape urbanism,Instrumentalism,soil remediation

Stewardship Good conservation, terraces, no erosion, wind break, Pasture etc.

Social experience

Naturalness Apparent naturalness, habitat,development blends in, native vegetation, wildlife etc.

Environmental benefits

Figure 17: Cues to care – Design strategies for appealing landscape (Nassauer, 1995)

Spatial Practice

Cues to care Neat, Stewardship and Natural of landscape

Spatial Constructs,Phenomenology and Memory & space

Spatial Dimension Centre, Direction, Transition and Area

Cues to care native vegetation, animal habitat, soil remediation

Experiential Dimension Attachment of Significance, Orientation and awareness of the home ground.

Figure 16: Theoretical frameworks diagram. (Herrington, 2017b, McHarg and History, 1969, Nassauer, 1995, Herrington, 2017a, Simkins, 2007) 17 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design with Nature Curbless street, Drainage with open surface, wellretained softscape

Figure 18: Other potential dimensions will impact on social experience

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


04 SITE ANALYSIS

Site analysis, opportunity and constraints & projections

18 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


History and Cultural analysis

Re-habitation

1992 - 2004

Brick production

1982

2005 Brickpit ring

Wann-gal

1912

1992

Discovery frogs

Brick production

The traditional lands of the Wann-gal (Canada Bay Council, 2020)

Figure 19: Brickpit Re-habitation process (Park, 2018 Review, Zheng, 2020) The traditional land of custodian in Sydney Olympic Park is the Wann-gal people prior to all the industrial history that happened afterwards. The State Government commenced brickmaking at the State Brickworks in 1911 and the operation ceased 1988. The residual of brick pit was redeveloped to become the freshwater wetlands and also an adopted habitat for the discovered endangered frog species - Green and Golden Bell Frog. The freshwater wetland at Brickpit was also included as part of The Water Reclamation and Management Scheme for stormwater storage which was built in 2000. The constructed Brick pit Ring walk was opened in 2005. The Brickpit site acts as a stormwater storage reservoir and also treated sewage to provide additional supply for final treatment when there is high water demand. The reservoir contains up to 300 million litres which can be pumped into the Water Treatment Plant for final treatment. (Authority, 2020)

19 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Stormwater Catchment and existing outlets in SOP

er

Riv

tta

Parrama

att

am arr

er

iv aR

P

Homebush Bay

Homebush Bay

Haslams Creek

Haslams Creek

ree

k

Stormwater harvesting catchment

sC

Brickpit water storage

Ha

sla m

Powells Creek

Legend

Non- Stormwater harvesting catchment

Stormwater Outlets GPT Location

Powells Creek

Drainage system Stormwater Drainage

Figure 20: Sydney Olympic Park SW Catchment (AECOM,2010)

20 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 21: Sydney Olympic Park SW Outlets map (AECOM,2010)

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Secondary effluent

Exsiting WRAMS system analysis in SOP

Stormwater Br

ic

e ag

w Se

5

1

Site selection The rational of the site selection is because the brick pit is a part of the existing WRAMS and WSUD system network, which will have consistent water levels through the year, refer Figure 22 & 23. In addition, this area and its adjacent future Central & Parkview Precinct do not form part of the stormwater harvesting catchment in Sydney Olympic Park, refer Figure 20 & 21. Based on the stormwater catchment analysis and the existing WRAMS system analysis. It is mentioned by David Martin from SOP that currently SOP is reviewing the possibility to harvest more stormwater from non-stormwater harvesting catchment in order to increase the water volume for solving the high water demand within the development. Potentially design resolutions could be tested and applied in this area for capturing the stormwater and connect it back into the existing WRAMS/WSUD system, or proposed extension of water system if required. Regarding the social experience and environmental benefits, the potential design solution should be focus on the place-making and how to integrate the existing water landscape with human activities and enhance the spatial experience and environmental benefits.

kp

it

wa

te

r

Recycle water Secondary effluent

4

6

3 3

7

1 N

4 1 7

6 2

Figure 22: Existing WRAMS system process (H.Chapman, 2005) 21 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

5 Legend

1

Existing pipeline

2

Proposed new pipeline

3

Proposed bridge pipeline

4

Water treatment plant

5

Brickpit - water storage

6

Water reclamation plant

7

Recycle water delivery system

Figure 23: Existing WRAMS system mapping Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Topography and stormwater runoff analysis From the topography analysis, the unique existing spatial configuration and level different will provide opportunity for the different dimension of view and spatial experience. Considerredirecting the stormwater runoff from Parkview Precinct due to level difference

n

so ack

J

rie

rjo Ma

y

Pkw

Brickpit Water storage site

ue

ven nA

alia

str

Au

Figure 24: Brickpit topography with future built form

w

Da

Hillshade

Slope

Terrain

Consider to redirect the untreated stormwater to brickpit Central and Parkview Precinct Water capture

pic

ym

Ol

Contour

ser

ra nf

ue

n ave

rd

va

ule

Bo

Figure 25: Brickpit topography analysis (GIS DATA FROM FLOMS, 2020) 22 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 26: Stormwater runoff pattern in Brickpit and its surrounding site

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Accessibility analysis

Existing water features mapping

Limited accessibility to existing site is a great opportunity to reconsider the access into the Brickpit.

The Figure 28 indicates the water features in current SOP and potential opportunity to integrate the proposed water feature into the existing water narrative.

Connect to Wentworth common Access to public

rie

rjo Ma

on

ks Jac

ay Pkw

Carpark

1

10 9

3

Australian Avenue

7 5

6

kway

2

long P

Access to

4

Benne

1

2

Inaccess to public

8

Northern water feature Recycled water landmark

Brickpit

2

Water play Au lian

stra

Water narrative of using recycled water

5

Brickpit

ue

n Ave

1

N

Carpark rray

Mu

e Ros

Ave

nue

Inaccess to Murray Rose Avenue

3

3 Olympic Cauldron

4

Legend Accessible pathway

Future Central and Parkview Precinct

Inaccessible route

N

Maintenance path

4 Figure 27: accessibility analysis mapping

23 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Bicentennial Park Water Feature

Figure 28: SOP existing water feature analysis (Google map images) Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Social media analysis Student Resident Worker

Enhancing the visual experience of water clarity

Potential for a better walking trail for worker during lunch break.

Potential Educational observation directly to groundplain and frogs

Reinforcing the history and water narrative in the design at Brickpit. Echoing the elevated structure as part of the design at Brickpit.

Additional elevated structure at different levels, s o that people can visit the ground plain of the Brickpit

Figure 29: Key words exacted from 157 Google visitor’s review of Brickpit (Google, 2020)

24 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Precedent case studies analysis

Sydne

y Park

Road

Contaminated fill Clean fill cap layer Wetland 2

Existing level

1 nce s

Brownfield

Pri

41.6 ha

Circuit path

Secondary path

3

sto

Clean fill cap layer

Eu

Circuit path

4

Flooding

Ca

m

Typical Cut & Fill section 02 NTS

(Turf Design Studio,2020)

Public Art & viewing platform

Public Art & Animal habitat

Circulation path & Water experience

ell

Sydney Park Site Plan - NTS

Photo by Ethan Rohloff

Figure 30: Sydney Park - Key characteristic and spatial experience diagram. (Turf Design Studio, 2020, Zheng, 2020)

25 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

pb

Biodiversity and accessibility

Integration of water system and human activities

(Turf Design Studio,2020)

n

Barwon Park

Typical Cut & Fill section 01 NTS Contaminated fill

Repaid urbanisation + Climate change

2

5

Constructed wetland Pathway network Munni Channel Bioretention & native species GPT Water flows Water reuse Extent of works

To enhance the social experience in Sydney Park, the amenity of park is designed to become more attractive and appeal to its user from a multi-dimension perspective, such as promoting native vegetation, terraced landscape, variation in spatial design, educational art installation and well-maintenance as the design elements etc. The flows, sounds and smells of the water create a sensory experience to the visitors. This has strongly emphasis and expresses the water story and themes throughout the park. A circulation hierarchy pathway network and a series of open spaces were designed to provide user with water experience during secondary contact and social interaction opportunities. The design of Sydney Park wetlands has provide a great example of using adaptation WSUD design approach to manage the stormwater onsite and integrate with human activities. The above mentioned design elements and strategies are worth considering in the proposed desing for Brickpit.

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Avenue Weiguo Suitable planting

PH 6-8

2 5

Brownfield Saline-alkali soil

8

Polluted

Let nature work

Provide nice aesthetic place to users

(Turenscape,2009)

16

13 14

15

18 21 (Turenscape, 2009)

Adaptive vegetation in wetlands Design concepts

The play & observation space

The wetland & observation space

20

12

17

19

9

Sponge City

Community

Viewing and rest platform

d orth Roa

Repaid urbanisation + Climate

10

1

3 7

6

11

Kunlun N

Typical long section NTS

4

oad han R Tians

22 ha

PH 4-9 PH 6-8 PH 5.5-7 PH 6.5-8 PH 6-8 PH 5.5-6 PH 7.5-8.5 PH 6.5-7.5 PH 7.5-8.5

Pan

ad

Ro

Lookout platform Water flows

Qiaoyuan Wetland Park Site Plan - NTS

Circulation boardwalk

Social gathering space

n sha

Constructed wetland Pathway network Social interaction

Photo by Turenscape

Extent of works

Under the design concept of “let nature work” (Turenscape, 2009),the implementation of ‘Cut and fill’ strategy for creating constructed wetlands in order to capture and filtered the acid stormwater runoff, simulating the nature process of the stormwater life circle,as well as providing the sustainable education purpose to park users. Some of the twenty-one constructed wetlands are completely dry and planted with native vegetation; some of the wetlands contain water and use native vegetation to enhance the water quality. A series of outdoor recreational spaces with varies materials (red asphalt, timber deck, concrete paving etc.) and accessible footpath, boardwalk and viewing platforms; A continues neat pedestrian boardwalk has been designed to connect each of the wetlands for providing access. These enclosure and defined spaces generate varies spatial experience to park users from different dimensions. The design strategies of Qiaoyuan have revealed the design frameworks of “Cues to care”(Nassauer, 1995) and “Spatial Practice” (Herrington, 2017a) in many ways. The regenerative landscape and educational signs in the park helps to accomplish the environmental benefits, which are considered a great design element to be implemented into the Brickpit design.

Figure 31: Qiaoyuan Wetland Park - Key characteristic and spatial experience diagram. (Turenscape, 2009, Zheng, 2020)

26 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Ecological degradation

125 ha

Recreational urban park with educational value for water & social interaction

Floodable park/ Flooding adaptive Varies of planting species Constructed wetlands

Repaid urbanisation + Climate change

Flooding Polluted water

iver

Constructed wetland to collect/cleaning/ reuse stormwater runoff and waste water

R Wei

Loss of rural landscape

Biodiversity Restoration

Integrated green infrastructure

(Landezine,2019)

(Landezine,2019)

Viewing and rest platform

The water play space

The wetlands & Social gathering

Native bird habitats

Circulation boardwalk

Photo by Yueyan JIN, Bo LUAN, Fang LI

The design has reserved the rural landscape spatial experience in order to differentiate the natural riparian area to the urban space. This design strategy is not only to retain the genius loci of this place, but also reserve the existing ecosystem and environmental characteristic of existing site. A numbers of gathering spaces have been constructed for social interaction and activities. The treated waste water goes through the wetlands enable the water play for children to explore and embrace the natural environment. The native bird habitat and circulation boardwalk are considered great opportunity to implement into the Brickpit design.

Figure 32: Weiliu Wetland Park - Key characteristic and spatial experience diagram. (Landezine, 2019, Zheng, 2020)

27 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Opportunities and constraints analysis Extend of works

er

m

m Su

Opportunity Sun path

er

t in W

orie

Marj

son Jack

y

Pkw

Potential for additional accessible entry Potential for accessible elevated spaces Potential for public access ground level spaces Potential for water movement

Au

Potential for bioretention areas

ue

Bennelong Pkwy

ven nA

alia

str

Potential for additional wetlands for storage

Potential for regenerative landscape Potential for additional water harvesting catchment Potential for water features as focal point Potential for educational public art installation

ue

os

yR

rra

Mu

Increasing of population

ven eA

Constraints Unstable geographical character Irregular rainfall pattern Frogs habitat Strong wind

y

kw

P ng

lo

ne

n Be

The Opportunity and constranits map is produced based on the outcome summary of previous site analysis. This provide the critical guidence on what potential design opportunity and strateties could be implemented based on the theoretical frameworks and the proposed design will get tested in the design testing stage to determine whether the design has achieve the design goals. N

Figure 33: Opportunity and constraints at Brickpit map 28 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

The aim is to sought out the appropriate and suitable design solutions to brickpit and its surrounding area in order to achieving collect/treat/store/reuse more stormwater runoff, as well as enhencing the social experience and environmental benefits in this design project.

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


05 METHODS AND TECHNIQUES

The overview of proposed design methods and its precedents

29 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Methods and techniques.

The proposed design methods to test the proposed design concept are plan mapping, landscape sections and photo montages. The aim of this testing is to use these methods to analyse the proposed design and determine whether it will enhance the social experience and environmental benefits to the subject site or it will need to be amended to achieve the desired outcome.

Experiential Landscape Frameworks Social imageability

Centre

Social interaction

Why do I need three methods to test the proposed concept at Brickpit?

Restorative benefit

Firstly, the key components of the design will be stormwater management system, social experience and it’s following environmental benefits. In order to design the stormwater system, it is very important to understand how water flows and what direction it flows so that the designed landscape can capture and treat the stormwater runoff efficiently. Section is a useful technique to test the water levels and landform changes in this case to test how the water flows, as well as to understand some of the landscape design elements in relation to its surrounding environment;

Movement

The design is also about enhancing the social experience at Brickpit, the experiential landscape approach is a great method to test the proposed design by using mapping experiential landscape vocabulary on the plan and it has been undertaken previously to analyse landscape project by the researchers; As the human experience can be multi-dimensional and the complexity level changes at Brickpit, the photo montages are considering useful techniques for designer to understand the spatial design and how the human experience will be after the proposed design get constructed. After this step, the analysis will be undertaken to assess whether the design need to be amended to achieve the desired outcome .

30 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Direction Centre

Direction

View Threshold

Transition

Corridor Segment Ephemeral

Area

Topic continuity Sound

Sensory Transition

Area

Figure 34: Experiential Dimension terminologies (Simkins, 2007)

Smell

Touch/feel

Figure 35: Experiential landscape framework (Simkins, 2007) Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Precedent project 1

Research project: Experiential Landscape as a Tool to Enhance Behavioral Response of users in Urban Parks Case Study of Al-Azhar Park In this precedent, the researcher has utilised the Experiential landscape as tool to examine human experience at an urban park to inform whether the design can be enhance to achieve better user experience of this park. The technique that was used is the experiential vocabulary and plan mapping, refer Figure 32 (Nassar, 2010). The reason being the experiential landscape approach is often being used in the design to provide positive spatial experience in a landscape project, the researcher has reversed the process and use it as a tool to examine the space in order to inform the design changes. It is crucial way to advise the design based on relevant design approach and/or theoriesas academic support. Therefore, this method is considered useful for testing the proposed design at Brickpit.

Figure 36: Experiential landscape analysis precedents 1 (Nassar, 2010) 31 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Precedent project 2 Copenhagen Strategic Flood Masterplan- Ramboll Studio Dreiseitl The precedent project has the similarity in stormwater management in relation to the scope of works at the Brickpit. The designer has utilised sections, section elevations, photo montages and bird views to demonstrate the level changes in landform and the methods to manage stormwater runoff in the flooding event. Refer Figure 33 (Dreiseitl, 2015). The reason being that the before and after montages express clearly how the floodable landscape will change in varies weather scenarios; the sections demonstrate the water and landform changes efficiently. As the flooding event may not apply to the Brickpit at SOP, therefore, photo montages and sections testing techniques from this precedents are considered relevant for testing the proposed design at Brickpit and assess whether the design as achieve the stormwater management intention and enhance the social experience.

Figure 37: Experiential landscape analysis precedents 2 (Dreiseitl, 2015) 32 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


06 DESIGN TESTING

Testing the design methods at the subject site - Brickpit SOP

33 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Design Principles Design Principle 1:

Design Principle 2:

Design Principle 3:

Provide addtional wetlands and bioretention stormwater management system in the brickpit to capture, treat and store the harvested stormwater runoff. Continue the reuse of water narrative at

Integrate the proposed addtional stormwater management system into the exisitng WRAMS system to best utilise the pre-existing system and

Provide multi-dimensional spatial and sensory design to enhance the social experience in the Brickpit.

increase the efficiency of the stormwater treatment.

the Brickpit.

Student

Cues to care

Spatial constructs WELD

Visitor

Sensory Resident

Existing WRAMS system Worker Spatial Practice

Access

Figure 40: Experiential landscape design intent Room for water

Design Principle 4: Provide habitats for birds and protect existing frog habitat to enhance the environmental benefits in the Brickpit. Birds

Proposed addtional system

For

Room for bioretention

34 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 39: Integration of water system design intent

Provide

Additional Habitat For

Figure 38: Wetlands and bioretention design intent

Integration to achieve better outcome

Protect

For

Terraced wetlands

Existing Habitat

Frogs

Frogs

Figure 41: Habitat protection and creation Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Secondary effluent

Design process and ideas

r arjo

M

Water treatment bioretention and wetland

Water capture through new street system Recycle water

ay

kw nP

kso

storage

treated

Water treatment plant

ac ie J

Diverted

Re-direct

Stormwater

e

g wa

ne Ben

Se

at

Br

ic

5

1

kp

Treated recycled water

long

it

m

wa

en

t

te

r

Secondary effluent

a Pkw

t Aus an

y

rali

Brickpit

Tr e

Ave

3

ue

GPT

ay urr

ven eA

s

Ro

M

7

N

1

Street

Aus tral

1 7

ian Ave N

Stormwater overflow capture

6

Street

Proposed additional water system area Refer Figure X on the same page

Legend Captured Stormwater runoff Proposed pipeline

Water outlets GPT

Figure 42: System Logic - Proposed WSUD network 35 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Legend

4

Street

Street

4

3

6

2

Proposed works (Integrate)

5 Increase Stormwater storage and treatment Redirect Stormwater overflow

Existing works

1

Existing pipeline

2

Proposed new pipeline

3

Proposed bridge pipeline

4

Water treatment plant

5

Brickpit - water storage

6

Water reclamation plant

7

Recycle water delivery system

Figure 43: Existing WRAMS system mapping Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Landform and wetlands

Existing landform

Proposed landform

“Direction”

Water fall

“Transition”

Pipe line

1

2

Water Fall

3

Bioretentions

Teired water features

4

5

Wetlands

Wetlands

Cascade

Wetlands

Semi-dry wetland Section A

Section A “Direction”

Ben

Water fall

nelo

Pipe line

ng P

Exising

“Transition” Cascade

Wetlands

Wetlands

y

kwa

water storage

Section B

Section B “Direction”

stra

Au

Water fall Pipe line

lian ue

n Ave

3 1

A D

B

5

2

2

2

2

“Transition”

Cascade

Wetlands

Wetlands

5

4

Section C

Section C

2

2

2

3 1

3

1 N

C

Section D - existing

Carpark ue

rray

Mu

Ro

ven se A

Water fall Pipe line

Water flow direction Proposed water body

Figure 44: Proposed Wetland networks - Spatial constructs 36 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

“Direction”

Legend

“Transition” Wetlands

Cascade Wetlands

“Transition”

“Transition”

Teired water flow

Teired water flow

Wetlands

Wetlands

Section D - proposed

Figure 45: Proposed landform and defined wetlands typologie Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Planting strategies - Spatial, Instrumental and sensory

ie

rjor

Ma

n kso

Jac

y

Pkw

ne Ben long

Casuarina glauca

Cyperus alternifolius

Lepironia articulata

Ficinia nodosa

y Pkw

2

1 Wetland species - permanentaly inundation Function : Water cleansing and spatial construct

Schoenoplectus lacustris

Bioretention planting species Function : Water filtering and spatial construct

Crinum pedunculatum

lian

stra

Au ue

n Ave

Carpark

Baeckea virgata

Lavender dentata

Imperata cylindrica

Stachys byzantina

ue

rray

Mu

ven eA Ros

3 Function : water cleansing and spatial construct

Figure 46: Proposed Planting Typologies - “Area� 37 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

4

Semi-dry wetland species - Semi inundation

Ornamental and Sensory planting species Juncus usitatus

Function : Good visual and sensory experience

Westringia fruticosa

Figure 47: Proposed Planting Typologies & species Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Environmental benefit- Creation of birds and frog habitats

bioretention

bioretention

nelo

Ben

Typical wetlands and bioretention - frog habitat “Area” in the Brickpit 2 metres nominal in width

y

lian

stra

Au 5 metres nominal in height

ue

n Ave

3

2 1

3 metres nominal in height

kwa

ng P 2.5 metres nominal in width

3 metres nominal in width

2

Birds shelter art installation 02 3 metres nominal in height

Galvanised Steel to match existing ring structure Function : Habitat for birds (Area and centre) Human observation point, Educational purpose for student

ue

y urra

M

ven eA Ros

1

Birds shelter art installation 01 Galvanised Steel to match existing ring structure Function : Habitat and food for birds (Area and centre) Human observation point, Educational purpose for student

Figure 48: Proposed Habitat location - “Area” and “Centre” 38 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

3

Birds shelter art installation 03 Galvanised Steel to match existing ring structure Function : Habitat for birds (Area and centre) Human observation point, Educational purpose

Figure 49: Proposed Habitats typologies - “Area” and “Centre” Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Boardwalk structure

M

ack

ie J

r arjo

y

kwa

P son

Pathway

Viewing deck

View

View

ay

kw

gP

lon nne Be

View

View

Exising water storage

Connect to ground plane footpath

1

2

Elevated path structure - Transition

Elevated pathway with viewing deck -Transition and Area

stra

Au lian

View

ue

n Ave

View

N

Highest viewpoint Access to Australian Avenue and carpark

View

View

View

View

Legend

Viewing boardwalk

- Workers

Carpark

Exploration boardwalk e enu

y

rra Mu

v eA Ros

-Student, residents and visitors

Existing structure Proposed viewing deck Highest viewing deck

3

Elevated path structure with glass surface - Transition and Direction

Figure 50: Proposed Elevated Boardwalk - “ Transition and direction� 39 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

4

Elevated path structure with arbour structure - Transition and Direction

Figure 51: Proposed Boardwalk Typologies Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Experiential landscape mapping testing on proposed design Experiential Landscape Legend Experiential place

Type

Symbol

Social imageability Centre Social interaction Restorative benefit

Direction

Movement

View Threshold Transition

Corridor Segment Ephemeral

Area

Topic continuity Sound

Sensory

Smell Touch/feel

Figure 52: Experiential landscape Legend (Simkins, 2007 & Nassar, 2010) 40 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 53: Experiential landscape mapping testing - Centre

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Figure 54: Experiential landscape mapping testing - Transition

41 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 55: Experiential landscape mapping testing - Direction

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


The purpose of the experiential landscape test mapping method is to use mapping technique based on the experiential landscape terminology to test the proposed design. The result of this mapping analysis can determine whether the proposed design has achieved enhancing the social experience or it will require further amendment in order to meet the objective. From the below Figure 53,54,55,56 and 57, it is clearly demonstrated that the proposed landscape design elements has enhanced the social experience to some extent; the four experiential landscape terminologies and their sub categories can all be identified throughout the proposed concept at the Brickpit.

Figure 56: Experiential landscape mapping testing - Area 42 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Figure 57: Experiential landscape mapping testing - Sensory Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Illustrative Landscape photomontage

View

Key Map

Area

Centre

Area

Centre

Direction Area

Area

on

cti

re

Di

Centre

Transition Figure 58: Experiential landscape Photomontage 1 testing 43 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


View

Key Map

Direction

Direction

Area

Area

Centre

on

Area

Di

re cti

Area

Transition

From the photomontage Figure 58 and 59, it is clearly shown that the proposed spatial configuration is well engaged with the human activities and exploration. The proposed variation in planting species creates the sense of spatial constructs and forms the edge of the space; the proposed movement of the water fall expresses the water narrative of the brickpit to the users as well as creating the sensory experience; the proposed elevated boardwalk structure provide the transition and direction functions to the users and walk them through the site with dynamic experience; the upper boardwalk with shorter distance provide great opportunity for the workers from the business park to take a walk during lunch break and restored the busy mind. The proposed water features and public art installation are echoing the existing elements in the Sydney Olympic Park, such as existing ring structure and other water features. They are not only acting as instrumental habitats, but also becomes the centres and destination area in the brickpit, which attracts the people willing to travel to the park and enjoy the educational walkthrough experience. All the above creates a sense of place and experiential memories to the visitor.

Figure 59: Experiential landscape Photomontage 2 testing 44 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Illustrative Landscape Sections

Area Sensory Area

Direction Transition

Area

A

Direction Transition

B

Area Wa te

rd

ire

cti

Key Map

on

Figure 60: Experiential landscape section A testing - 1:500 @ A3

Area Sensory Area

Direction Transition

Area Direction Transition

Wa te

rd

Area

ire

cti

on

In order to enhance the water circulation in the brickpit area, the section Figure 60, 61 and 62 are provided to test how the water features situates in the brickpit in relation to its surrounding landscape elements. The landscape section testing shows the positive outcome of the water direction, movement and offered sensory experience to the user; the proposed boardwalk will be situated over varies of ground surfaces to create dynamic spatial experience; the regenerative landscape buffer and terraced wetlands also create a sense of area and centre to its user. With the existing landscape elements sits in the background of each sections, it is convinced that the proposed landscape elements are welded into the existing context at the brickpit. From the typical sections Figure 63 and 64, the typical street treatment of capturing of the stormwater runoff from the street are feasible and it should be considered and included in the testing stage as part of the proposed extended stormwater treatment system. It is clearly communicated how the grade of carriageway is falling for water to flow to low point and captured by the proposed raingarden and planting median within the road reserve. After that, the water should either follow the natural falls of the ground surface to the proposed GPT at brickpit or captured by a pipeline system to get pumped back to the brickpit. As the result of design testing advised that the proposed design achieved enhancing social experience objective. The following section will reveal the proposed design in illustrative master plan, sections, renders and bird views to gain further spatial experience.

Figure 61: Experiential landscape section B testing - 1:500 @ A3

45 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Area Sensory Area

Wa te

r di

Direction Transition Area

Direction Transition

rec

tion

C

Area

Key Map

Figure 62: Experiential landscape section C testing - 1:500 @ A3

Water runoff direction

Raingarden -Typical street stormwater runoff collection In Central and Parkview Precinct

Water runoff direction

Water runoff direction

Street median & raingarden -Typical Boulevarde stormwater runoff collection In Central and Parkview Precinct

Figure 63: Water street capture typologies

46 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


07 Design Research Findings Synthesis and findings

47 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Wentworth Common

Illustrative Landscape Master plan

rie

rjo Ma

ay

kw nP

so

k Jac

gP lon nne Be

12

ay

11

kw

14

Badu Mangrove

13

1:1500 @ A1

stra

Au

5

14

6

lian n Ave

4

ue

Sydney Showground

1:3000 @ A3

2

1

1

6 2

5

5

D

4

7

14

1

3

7

1

Legend

3

6

7 5

3

6

1 4

14

5

3

6

1

3

2

9

4

4

8 10

ue

ven eA

os yR

rra

Mu

Parkview Precinct 48 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

N

1

Wetlands

2

Viewing boardwalk

3

Viewing deck

4

Water fall

5

Large shade tree

6

Instrumental planting

7

Habitat art installation

8

Carpark access

9

Businese park access

10

Shaded carpark

11

Existing ring structure

12 13 14

Existing water storage Connect existing path Regenerative vegetation

Figure 64: Illustrative Landscape Master Plan Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Figure 65: Experiential landscape section D - 1:1000 @ A3

49 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Illustrative Landscape renders

View

Key Map

Figure 66: Proposed landscape render 1

50 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


View

Key Map

(Authority, 2020)

Figure 67: Proposed landscape render 2

51 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Bird views As mentioned previously, the key focuses of this research design project are promoting the landscape design strategies that can enhance social experience and environmental benefits in the Water Sensitive Urban Design projects. Based on the proposed theoretical frameworks and the site analysis, the proposed landscape design principles and strategies have been implemented in the design stage in order to achieve the positive outcome of the required three aspects. For the stormwater management, 1).proposed enlarged stormwater catchment to including future Central and Parkview Precinct for capturing additional water for treatment; 2). Direct and/or redirect the stormwater back to Brickpit for water cleansing; 3). Proposed additional water fall features to function during wet season, terraced wetland networks and vegetated bioretentions as part of existing WRAMS system to enhance the water circulation and filtering process at the Brickpit and store the water in the existing Brickpit water storage. For enhancing social experience at the Brickpit, 1). Proposed different planting typologies in the design in order to create vary spatial configurations and/or sensory experience, as well as an instrumental function for water cleansing purpose; 2). Proposed a series of elevated boardwalk, viewing decking and lookout point to provide both accessibility and visualisation experience to the Brickpit; 3). Proposed the animal habitat art installations as focal points an acting as destinations for people to approach in between the exploration journey. For the Environmental benefits, ideally the proposed wetland networks and vegetated bioretention is to enhance the water quality of the Brickpit and also provide additional habitat to water birds and frogs; 2).The proposed art installations provide habitat to birds and also create educational value to human being.

(Merton, 2012)

Figure 68: Proposed brickpit bird view 52 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Findings and future implementation

In conclusion, it is believed that the design strategies based on the theoretical frameworks has achieved the intended design outcome for enhancing the social experience at the Brickpit during the design testing section. Regarding both environmental benefits and stormwater treatment, it is convinced that these design measure can potential achieve the design intention, however these only can be tested during different stages of the project. For the stormwater management system, there is some uncertainty around how much water volume could be captured form the extended stormwater catchment each year and how much water will be treated through the proposed wetland system. This process will require further investigation by water engineer to provide professional opinion from their professional perspective. For the environmental benefits, this is also relying on the post occupancy evaluation of the landscape performance in order to determine whether the proposed environmental design elements have achieved certain environmental benefits.

Experiential Landscape Frameworks WSUD System Logic

Social imageability

Centre

Social interaction Restorative benefit

System theory, Cybernetics and Infrastructure Constructed wetland,

Movement

regenerative landscape, landscape urbanism,Instrumentalism,soil remediation

For the future implementation, it is believed that the proposed theoretical frameworks and experiential landscape frameworks can enhance the positive social experience during the design stage in a landscape water sensitive urban design project. They could be potentially implemented into future WUSD and/or other landscape projects to guide the landscape designs process and evolve the design to enhance the positive social experience.

Direction

View Threshold

Social experience

Environmental benefits

Transition

Corridor Segment Ephemeral

Spatial Practice

Cues to care Neat, Stewardship and Natural of landscape

Spatial Constructs,Phenomenology and Memory & space

Cues to care native vegetation, animal habitat, soil remediation

Design with Nature Curbless street, Drainage with open surface, wellretained softscape

Topic continuity

Area

Sound

Spatial Dimension Centre, Direction, Transition and Area

Experiential Dimension Attachment of Significance, Orientation and awareness of the home ground.

Proposed Theoretical frameworks diagram. (Herrington, 2017b, McHarg and History, 1969, Nassauer, 1995, Herrington, 2017a, Simkins, 2007)

53 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Sensory

Smell

Touch/feel

Proposed Experiential landscape frameworks (Simkins, 2007)

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


REFERENCE LIST AECOM, 2010. Parramatta River Estuary Processes Study. AUTHORITY, M. D. B. 2016. The triple bottom line framework. In: GOVERNMENT, A. (ed.). Murray‒Darling Basin Authority. AUTHORITY, S. O. P. Water Catchment [Online]. Sydney. Available: https://www.sopa.nsw.gov.au/environment/water-and-catchments [Accessed 01.08.20 2020]. AUTHORITY, S. O. P. 2006. Urban Water Reuse & integrated water management. In: AUTHORITY, S. O. P. (ed.). Sydney. AUTHORITY, S. O. P. 2020. Sydney Olympic Park Education Standard Teacher Resource Kit 2020. In: AUTHORITY, S. O. P. (ed.). Sydney. AUTHORITY, S. O. P. 2020. Things to do - Wetlands and Woodlands [Online]. Available: https://www.sydneyolympicpark.com.au/things-to-do/learning-and-discovery/wetlands-and-woodlands [Accessed 31.10.20 2020]. BUYS, K. O. D. F. C. L. 2015. Renewable energy distribution in public space: analysing the case of Ballast Point Park in Sydney. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 10, 18-31. C.RADCLIFFE, J. 2019. History of Water Sensitive Urban Design/Low Impact Development Adoption in Australia and Internationally. Approaches to Water Sensitive Urban Design. COASTAL RISK. 2020. Sydney Olympic Park Flooding risk [Online]. Coastal risk. Available: http://coastalrisk.com.au/viewer [Accessed 08, march 2020]. CULLEN, G. 1961. Townscape, New York, Reinhold Pub. Corp. DREISEITL, R. S. 2015. Copenhagen Strategic Flood Masterplan. Landezine. GHD 1999. Homebush Bay Catchment Stormwater Management Plan. FRANCIS, M. 2001. A case study method for landscape architecture. Landscape Journal. FLOMS, 2020. Term 1 2020 Landscape Studio 5 group work. H.CHAPMAN 2005. WRAMS, sustainable water recycling. Elsevier. HERRINGTON, S. 2017a. Spatial Practice. Landscape Theory in Design. New York: New York, NY : Routledge. HERRINGTON, S. 2017b. System Logic. Landscape Theory in Design. New York: New York, NY : Routledge. LANDEZINE 2019. Weiliu Wetland Park by Yifang Ecoscape. Landezine. LISTOWSKI, A. 2014. Innovative Recycles Water Scheme – Challenges and Opportunities [Online]. Available: https://www.awa.asn.au/documents/Innovative%20Recycles%20Water%20Scheme%20 %E2%80%93%20Challenges%20and%20Opportunities.pdf [Accessed 01.08.20 2020]. MCHARG, I. L. & HISTORY, A. M. O. N. 1969. Design with nature, American Museum of Natural History New York. METEOROLOGY, A. G. B. O. 2020. Monthly rainfall Sydney Olympic Park. MERTON, M. 2012. An aerial photo of Sydney Olympic Park at Homebush Bay [Online]. Available: https://www.sydneyimages.com.au/media/4bee34b6-d6d5-11e1-bdd5-07058bc0ef88-brick-pit-ring-walk [Accessed 15.10.20 2020]. NASSAR, U. A. 2010. Experiential Landscape as a Tool to Enhance Behavioral Response of users in Urban Parks - Case Study of Al-Azhar Park. ResearchGate, 15. NASSAUER, J. I. 1995. Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames. Landscape Journal, 14, 161-170. PARK, S. O. 2018 Review. Sydney Olympic Park Master Plan 2030. In: AUTHORITY, S. O. P. (ed.). Sydney. POLICY, S. O. P. A. 2016. Stormwater Management and Water Sensitive Urban Design. In: AUTHORITY, S. O. P. (ed.). Sydney. SIMKINS, K. T. I. 2007. Experiential Landscape: An approach to people, place and space, New York, Routledge. TURENSCAPE. 2009. Tianjin Qiaoyuan Wetland Park [Online]. Available: https://www.turenscape.com/en/project/detail/339.html [Accessed 23.03.20 2020]. TURF DESIGN STUDIO. 2020. Sydney Park Water Re-use Project [Online]. Available: http://turfdesign.com/sydney-park-water-re-use-project/ [Accessed 23.03.20 2020]. ZHENG, L. 2020. Illustrated Design Research Proposal.

54 Landscape WSUD at Brickpit, SOP

Design Research Report by Lei Zheng


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.