Análisis de COVID | Fuentes consultadas y temas recurrentes
Kwon, D. (07 de mayo 2020). How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research. Nature, 581, 130-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01394-6 Lariviere, V., Shu, F., y Cassydy, S. (5 de marzo 2020). The Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak highlights serious deficiencies in scholarly communication. Blogs. London School of Economics, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/03/05/the-coronaviruscovid-19-outbreak-highlights-serious-deficiencies-in-scholarly-communication/ Ledford, H. (06 de agosto de 2020). US trust in scientists is now on par with the military. Nature News, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02389-8 Letras Libres (S/F). Quiénes somos. Consultado el 25 de abril de 2021 en https://www. letraslibres.com/equipo Lew, L. (16 de marzo 2020). Will the coronavirus kill off the ‘dinosaur’ world of academic publishing? South China Morning Post, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/ article/3075431/will-coronavirus-kill-dinosaur-world-academic-publishing Martínez-Rodríguez, A. (2009). Comunicación científica: de su necesidad a las redes y comunidades. Bibliotecas. Anales de investigación, 5, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/ articulo?codigo=5721651 Merkley, E. (2020) Are Experts (News) Worthy? Balance, Conflict, and Mass Media Coverage of Expert Consensus, Political Communication, 37(4), 530-549. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2020.1713269 Nielsen, P., y Davison, R.M. (2020). Predatory journals: A sign of an unhealthy publish or perish game? Information Systems Journal, 30(4), 635-638. DOI: 10.1111/isj.12289 Ordway, D. M. (2 de abril 2020). Covering biomedical research preprints amid the coronavirus: 6 things to know. Journalist’s Resource - Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center and the Carnegie-Knight Initiative, https://journalistsresource.org/tip-sheets/research/ medical-research-preprints-coronavirus/ Pérez-Dasilva, J. A., Meso-Ayerdi, K., Mendiguren-Galdospín, T. (2020). Fake news y coronavirus: detección de los principales actores y tendencias a través del análisis de las conversaciones en Twitter. El profesional de la información, 29(3), e290308. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.08 Rödder, S. (2020). Organisation matters: towards an organisational sociology of science communication, Journal of Communication Management, 24(3), 169-188. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-06-2019-0093 Rosen, C. (02 de septiembre 2019). México y Brasil valoran a la ciencia pero escepticismo crece. Sci Dev Net, https://www.scidev.net/america-latina/comunicacion/noticias/mexico-ybrasil-valoran-a-la-ciencia-pero-escepticismo-crece.html?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=4c688d d4fcd62b2b21d781aae024cd490e618da1-1589228559-0-AcT9kqfK9KP3SBMKtdEB8Cd tFhn0JtvsNdbmUgWe_AkSE7R7zCd0ub6nUFHV6yETWc9rmfywdlWzfvWxa4Gpev_ RLza8OKFpeNo48eYZsZ1ZuHa4AI78WujU1ZgV-qUsTw2EzPz30aaglDYOIUdXlvNn_ RvlGLmvuq_uJ5P5B5wGP-_3A5qsBY1qREhKx91qQ0rKsOsdKdnIlBEk_1KTh q9sEBCBUsmevOVv4DP0u0Vhk7z4vq2GTTx3Ca1msDrEpRzgHoMK7CGlT0BQ70nOvh-fZcGGe0ioIAxwA1xsFlIAuCOmlxHUG66t7iyPA7sYS6FmoSZR1UUU_ d4XYWgRMBFIXy42JYJXESH_sGRZRRA4Ii2ZmfRonNGhB3MduFG11US5vxkh3Mz 0tDbyWYByheK3ViqFT7cyBT1GvmG-fFp
49
