How Will an Increased Focus on ESG by the SEC and Investors Impact Transactions?

ESg overview and Use in Investments

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) has become a hot topic for investors in recent years. For those not familiar, ESG proposes a set of nontraditional factors to identify risks and opportunities related to a given business. Each of the three main categories includes numerous subcategories, so any given company must tailor its focus to the ESG factors most relevant to its business. Environmental considerations range from physical risks from rising sea levels to carbon emissions. Social factors can mean anything from diversity and inclusion to the ethical sourcing of materials. The governance factors look to how ethically a company operates and how it incorporates environmental and social considerations into the business. ESG advocates argue that boards incorporating ESG into business decisions and investors using ESG to evaluate potential investments increase financial returns and reduce liabilities.1 For example, a company with robust anti-harassment practices is less likely to encounter costly litigation. On the environmental side, an investment fund considering the physical risks of its assets is likely to suffer fewer costly damages from hurricanes or flooding.

Consequently, ESG-related funds and a focus on ESG have proliferated in the M&A world.2 According to one study, 65% of M&A executives say their companies’ focus on ESG will increase over the next three years.3 Incorporating ESG into due diligence involves broadening traditional diligence considerations that are already geared toward evaluating potential litigation risks or future financial performance. In fact, many ESG factors, like safety and diversity, are already accounted for in EEOC and OSHA reporting requirements. Buyers are asking more ESG questions in the due diligence process, and sellers need to be prepared.

As investors seek ESG investments, companies are reviewing their internal ESG metrics and seeking to provide reports to their shareholders and potential investors. However, the U.S. currently lacks an overarching ESG reporting standard. Companies attempting to incorporate ESG have wide latitude to choose a reporting standard (or not) in compiling any investor reports or public relations materials. The most used reporting standards include the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

Even after selecting a given framework, companies have further discretion on how to use the framework. For example, SASB includes 77 identified industries, each with different standards for evaluation.4 Thus, a company must select the most applicable industry (or combination) prior to evaluating its ESG metrics. Similarly, the TCFD includes 11 different categories of disclosure. For the fiscal year 2021, only 4% of companies using TCFD disclosed according to all 11 recommended disclosures and only 40% included at least five of 11 disclosures.5 While ESG reporting may provide investors and shareholders with more information, the lack of standardization makes it difficult to draw comparisons between companies, or even develop a full understanding of any individual company or fund. ESG reports may even be misleading given the lack of scrutiny of climaterelated methodologies.

SEC takes an Interest in ESg Companies are increasing their ESG reporting, and regulators are taking note. To rectify some of the issues associated with this new plethora of ESG reports, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched a Climate and ESG Task Force in March of 2021.6 The Task Force is working to identify material gaps or misleading statements in issuers’ reports.7 As summarized below, the SEC is stepping up enforcement related to ESG reporting and is proposing new rules related to that reporting.

Investment Company Act “Names Rule”

In 2022, the SEC proposed changes to the Names Rule, including changes designed to reduce greenwashing in investment funds. Greenwashing refers to exaggerated claims made regarding ESG, especially for sustainability.8 The current rule requires investments with names suggesting a focus on a particular type of investment to have 80% of the assets invested in accordance with the suggestion of the name. The proposed rule extends this 80% requirement to funds with names suggesting a focus on investments with “particular characteristics.” The SEC did not define the term “particular characteristics,” but used ESG as an example of a term that would trigger the new requirement. Funds with names such as “ESG” or “sustainable” need to consistently invest in appropriate assets or risk being found materially deceptive or misleading under the new requirements.

Climate-Related Risk Rule

In March 2022, the SEC published a proposed rule requiring that publicly traded companies report on climate-related risks.9 While many people agree that a broad need for standardization exists, there has been considerable discussion and commentary surrounding the proposed rule. It has been hotly contested and drew more than 15,000 comments. The rule would require registrants to include climate-related disclosures in their registration statements and periodic reports. In particular, companies would be required to disclose climate-related risks that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on the company’s business, operations results, or financial condition. The proposed rule requires companies to analyze the climate-related costs and risks for each item of their financial statements and report costs that are 1% or higher of a given line item. It was ex- pected that the rule would be finalized in April 2023, but as of the writing of this article, the rule has not been finalized. Given the broad reach of the proposed rule, legal challenges are sure to follow.

SEC Enforcement

While the SEC continues to increase regulations around ESG, current regulations give the SEC power to prosecute issuers who make misleading statements in their reports. In the past few years, the SEC has been cracking down on issuers’ and investors’ statements regarding ESG.10 In 2022, the SEC charged BNY Mellon Investment Advisor, Inc. (BNY) for misstatements and omissions about ESG considerations in making investment decisions for certain mutual funds that it managed.11 The SEC’s order found that for three years, BNY had failed to use the ESG criteria as promised in evaluating investments and that numerous investments held by BNY did not have ESG quality review scores at the time of the investment. BNY agreed to settle the charges with a $1.5 million penalty. Adam S. Aderton, co-chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit and a member of the Climate and ESG Task Force, stated, “[a]s this action illustrates, the Commission will hold investment advisers accountable when they do not accurately describe their incorporation of ESG factors into their investment selection process.” While this is just one example of SEC enforcement, as ESG reporting and related regulations increase, we expect similar enforcement actions to increase in tandem.

going Forward

As investors become increasingly focused on ESG, they will demand more accurate and reliable information from companies. The SEC’s proposed rules point to a significant shift toward standardization and accountability in ESG reporting. SEC enforcement poses a serious potential liability, so buyers of public companies will need to closely review past reporting for potential greenwashing. There has been, and will likely continue to be, some ESG pushback, as well. Still, it seems fair to say that the overall emphasis on ESG will continue, with a corresponding increase in ESG due diligence in connection with investment decisions and acquisitions.

Madison Guerinot is an environmental associate in Phelps Dunbar’s Houston office. She combines her experience in engineering and law to help companies in heavily regulated industries stay current on evolving regulations and other macroenvironmental factors that may impact their bottom lines. Complimenting her environmental practice, Madison is a frequent author on topics related to ESG policies, trends, best practices, and regulations.

Endnotes

1. Tim Koller, Robin Nuttall, and Witold Henisz, Five Ways that ESG Creates Value, Nov. 14, 2019, https://www.mckinsey. com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/ our-insights/five-ways-that-esg-creates-value.

2. ESG-focused Institutional Investment seen Soaring 84% to US $33.9 trillion in 2026, making up 21.5% of Assets under Management: PwC Report, Oct. 10, 2022, https://www.pwc.com/ gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2022/awm-revolution2022-report.html.

3. Jean-Charles van den Branden, Axel Seemann, and Marc Lino, The ESG Imperative in M&A, Feb. 8, 2022, https://www. bain.com/insights/esg-imperative-m-and-a-report-2022/, and Martin Vezér and Doug Morrow, ESG Compatibility: A Hidden Success Factor in M&A Transactions, Jun. 29, 2017, https://connect.sustainalytics.com/esg-compatibility-a-hidden-success-factor-in-ma-transactions.

4. SASB Standards, Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, https://sasb.org/standards/download/.

5. Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosures (2017) and Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, 2022 Status Report, Oct. 2022.

6. SEC Announces Enforcement Task Force Focused on Climate and ESG Issues, RELEASE 2021-42 (Mar. 4, 2021).

7. Spotlight on Enforcement Task Force Focused on Climate and ESG Issues, U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (Apr. 10, 2023), https://www.sec.gov/securities-topic/ enforcement-task-force-focused-climate-esg-issues.

8. SEC Proposes Rule Changes to Prevent Misleading or Deceptive Fund Names, RELEASE 2022-91, May 25, 2022, https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-91.

9. SEC Proposes Rules to Enhance and Standardize ClimateRelated Disclosures for Investors. RELEASE 2022-46, Mar. 21, 2022, https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-46.

10. See Enforcement Task Force Focused on Climate and ESG Issues, https://www.sec.gov/securities-topics/enforcementtask-force-focused-climate-esg-issues.

11. SEC Charges BNY Mellon Investment Advisor for Misstatements and Omissions Concerning ESG Considerations, Release 2022-86, May 23, 2022, https://www.sec.gov/news/ press-release/2022-86.

Hallettsville Rare Find! Running Springs!! Cattle Dream Place!!!

1007± Acres Lavaca County - Just 7 miles to downtown Hallettsville, in the same family for many years, no pesticides/chemicals ever used, great all-around cattle/horse recreational ranch, small cabin, two old barns, cattle pens, dove hunting, spring-fed pond, running springs, great location!

Texas Best Water! Medina River, Creek, 2 Lakes, Minutes to Bandera!

374± Acres Bandera County - Minutes to Medina/ Camp Verde. 4BR/4BA ranch home w/pool, guest house, cabin, nice barn, equipment shed, airstrip, hangar, paved roads, electric gate, large & small lake, both sides of cypress-lined creek & Medina River!

Rare Opportunity – Bandera Texas Giant Lake!

60± Acres Bandera County - Minutes to historic Bandera, 3BR/3BA lake-side home, wrap-around porches, 1BR/1BA guest cabin, barn w/workshop, paddocks, boat ramp, floating dock, 3 pastures, water well, paved access, gated entry, more!

Texas Best Deal! Motivated Seller!!

1 Hour to Horseshoe Bay!!!

2,556± Acres San Saba County! - 5,500± s.f. 3BR/3.5.5BA hilltop home, gourmet kitchen, magnificent porches, giant patio w/pool, outdoor cook area, 10 ponds, community water, 4,000± s.f. pole barn, 3,000± s.f. shop, 20± years game managed, great wildlife, gated entry.