M. ARCH 1 2GB SHA, LIU
CONTENT M. ARCH 1 2013-2014 INSTRUCTORS. 2GA DS. DEVYN WEISER 2GB DS. RAMIRO DIAZGRANADOS VS. FLORENCIA PITA ANDREW ZAGO AS. ILARIA MAZZOLENI& JEFFREY LANDRETH HERWIG BAUMGARTNER& SCOTT URIU& MATTHEW MELNYK CS. DORA EPSTEIN JONES PETER ZELLNER
02 2GB DS HOUSING DESIGN 14 2GA DS EMBASSY DESIGN
24 VS 1.0 BLOW FISH 35 VS 2.0 FROM NEW FORMS
40 AS 1.0 ENVIRONMENT SYSTEM 44 AS 2.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
46 CS 2.0 URBAN STUDIES
Birdview Axonometric
4
DS Housing Design 01. 14 - 04.14 Barcelona
Courtyard Perspective Instructor:
Ramiro Diaz-Granados
Site:
A traditional Cerda block located in southwesten area in Barcelona
Address:
Carrer de Cristobal de Moura, 191 08019 Barcelona, Spain
Design:
Liu Sha & Eiko Tsushiya 5
Overall Arrangement
Floorplates
Typical Cerda Block Analysis FAR:
3.4
Height:
120’
Volume Ratio: 0.48
6
Roof Deviation
120‘ 90‘ 60‘ 51‘ 39‘ 0‘
Horizontal Arrangement
Lighting Facilities
7
Core 1 3 Volumes
Core 2 2 Volumes
Secondary Core
Massing Parti Diagrams
8
Core 3 3 Volumes
Core 4 4 Volumes
3D Subdivision
Core 5 4 Volumes
In order to bring the project back to the urban conversation, the massing was applied 7 different types of fenestration systems based on a 3D subdivision.
9
The voxel system, one of the seven fenestration systems, in a scale of 4’*4’*4”, so that each three of them match to one floor. The fluctuating sectional surface of this system creates windows and terraces.
West Perspective
Unfolded Elevation
10
11
Ground Plan
As the massing is consisted of a series of bars, some of them stay at the ground and some fly into the sky, which generates an open yet conservative courtyard, in the meaning of that the public can see through the courtyard but cannot walk.
12
Typical Floor Plan_8th Floor
By inspired from the concept of Tetris, the overall arrangement of the units is based on a module system. Each unit is consists of serveral blocks in 10’*10’*10’. There are 6 different types of units in this project, micro appartments, studios, one-bedroom appartments, two-bedroom appartments, penhouses, and live-works. 13
14
Each type of fenestration system has different affects to the units: various of ways to operate windows, different interior space and etc. However, no matter how weird they are, all the systems are matching to the interior floor and spaces.
15
1. Embassy Entrance 2. Security 3. Reception 4. Core A 5. Embassy Office 6. Kitchen 7. Conference Room 8. Escalator
9. Egress Stairs 10. Lounge 11. Core B 12. Theatre 13. Food Court 14. Auditorium 15. Stage 16. Black Room
17. Parking 18. Exhibition 19. Gallary 20. Sculpture Garden
1
4
2
3 8 5 7 6
Site Plan
16
DS U.S. Embassy Design 09. 13 - 12.13 Rio de Janeiro
SLS model in context Instructor:
Devyn Weiser
Site:
Located beside the Copacabana Palace facing to the Copacabana Beach
Address:
Avenida Nossa Senhora de Copacabana, 335 - Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Design:
Liu Sha 17
Object Massing Studies
5 18
SLS model in context
12
19
South Perspective
5 20
1. Embassy Entrance 2. Security 3. Reception 4. Core A 5. Embassy Office 6. Kitchen 7. Conference Room 8. Escalator
9. Egress Stairs 10. Lounge 11. Core B 12. Theatre 13. Food Court 14. Auditorium 15. Stage 16. Black Room
17. Parking 18. Exhibition 19. Gallary 20. Sculpture Garden
20
12
Parti Diagrams
17 21
1. Embassy Entrance 2. Security 3. Reception 4. Core A 5. Embassy Office 6. Kitchen 7. Conference Room 8. Escalator
9. Egress Stairs 10. Lounge 11. Core B 12. Theatre 13. Food Court 14. Auditorium 15. Stage 16. Black Room
17. Parking 18. Exhibition 19. Gallary 20. Sculpture Garden
Embassy Office Plan
4
7
10
5
5
8
9
One thing needs to be mention is that the egress stairs are located around the courtyard in stead of the usual place like in cores, thereby avoiding dead ends in the building. Protected by the double-layer glass curtain walls(which also provides the day light for the office space), the egress circulation guarenteed enough time for people escape the fire.
22
7
1. Embassy Entrance 2. Security 3. Reception 4. Core A 5. Embassy Office 6. Kitchen 7. Conference Room 8. Escalator
9. Egress Stairs 10. Lounge 11. Core B 12. Theatre 13. Food Court 14. Auditorium 15. Stage 16. Black Room
17. Parking 18. Exhibition 19. Gallary 20. Sculpture Garden
Theatre Plan
20 4 16
9
15
13 14 10 12
9
23
1. Embassy Entrance 2. Security 3. Reception 4. Core A 5. Embassy Office 6. Kitchen 7. Conference Room 8. Escalator
9. Egress Stairs 10. Lounge 11. Core B 12. Theatre 13. Food Court 14. Auditorium 15. Stage 16. Black Room
4
17. Parking 18. Exhibition 19. Gallary 20. Sculpture Garden
14 15
18 19 5
17 Long Section
24
11
20
SLS model in context
25
26
VS Blow Fish
09. 13 - 12.13
Instructor:
Florencia Pita
Design:
Liu Sha & Javier Ruiz
27
Composition 1
By using blowfish as reference, we have booleaned six spiky objects to create one single nested component to which two different scaled colour texture was applied. The first one is applied onto the exterior shell consisting in a gradient spike formation. We changed it depending on the curvature of the shell. The second one is applied into the interior shell as a detailed bump following the arrangement of colour.
28
Composition 2
Composition 3
Composition 4
29
Composition 5
30
Composition 6
31
Midterm Model Render
32
Render of chosen segment
Render of chosen segment
33
Render of chosen segment
34
Composition 7
35
36
VS From New Form 01. 14 - 04.14
Instructor:
Andrew Zago
Design:
Liu Sha
37
38
39
40
41
This is an US embassy building which is located at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, facing to the famous Copacabana Beach. It contains one theater area sitting on the top of the office space.This theater is consisted of two floors having seats for 384 people. The total area is 3470 square feet.
42
AS Environmental System2 09. 13 - 12.13
10’x12’x36’ Air Handling Unit
10’x12’x36’ Air Handling Unit
Shaft
Shaft
Shaft
Shaft
40”x24” louver return
40”x24” louver return
sha
ft 74’
’ 32
’ 32
’ 32
74’
10’x12’x36’ Air Handling Unit
Plan 1
Instructor:
Ilaria Mazzoleni & Jeffrey Landreth
Design:
Liu, Sha & Shao Wen, Tou
Liu Sha/ Shao-wen Tou
ft
ft
ft
74’
10’x12’x36’ Air Handling Unit
Plan 1
sha
sha
sha
’ 32
74’
Plan 2
Plan 2 Legend Supply Air Return Air Air Handling Unit Supply Duct Return Duct
Environmental System 2 IlariaEnvironmental Mazzoleni/ Jeffrey Landreth 2013 12/05 System 2 IlariaFall Mazzoleni/ Jeffr
43
HVAC SYSTEM SIZING AND LAYOUT - AIRSIDE SYSTEM
4. DETERMINE AIR HANDLER QUANTITY, SIZE, CLEARANCES, ROOM SIZE, AND LOCATION.
1. PRIMARY COOLING AIR FLOW CALCULATIONS 1) Option 1: Typical Spaces
Total Conditioned Floor Area: 3470 sf Cooling Load Density: 400 sf/tons Total Cooling Load: 8.7 tons Air Flow Factor: 400 cfm/ton Total Cooling Air Flow: 6000 cfm
1) Using your total required air flow values, determine the size required for the air handling unit. [A] [B, Typically 200-800 sf/ton] [C = A/B] [D, Typically 400 cfm/ton] [E = C x D]
[A, ACH = Air Changes per Hour, Typically 4-12 ACH] [B] [C = B x A / 60]
Choose the largest of the two options as your total required airflow: 8,675 cfm Multiply this factor by 1.25 for displacement ventilation system. Final Required Air Flow: 10,844 cfm
2. VENTILATION AIR FLOW CALCULATIONS Total Building Area Requiring Ventilation: 3470 sf People Density: 9 sf/person Total Number of People: 384 people Ventilation Rate: 0.15 cfm/sf (Area) OR 15 cfm/person (People) Total Ventilation Air Flow (Area): 520 cfm Total Ventilation Air Flow (People): 5760 cfm Final Ventilation Air Flow Requirement: 5760 cfm Percent Outside Air: 5760/10,844 = 53 %
[A] [B] [C = A / B] [D, Typically 0.15 cfm/sf ] [E, Typically 15 cfm/person] [F = A x D] [G = C x E] [Largest of F or G] [Total Ventilation Air Flow / Total Cooling Air Flow]
3. DETERMINE DIFFUSER SIZES, QUANTITIES AND LAYOUTS. 1) Select a supply diffuser from a manufacturer's website. DF1R In Wall Diffuser 2) Determine the maximum air flow per diffuser given the requirements for maximum noise criteria and/or outlet velocity. Max Noise Criteria: 20-25 NC Max Outlet Velocity: 50-100 fpm Air Flow Per Diffuser: 100 cfm Required number of diffusers: 10,844 / 100 = 108 diffusers
3) Locate diffusers in space in order to maximize ventilation effectiveness. Identify locations and strategies for return air.
44
2) Determine required clearances per reference table. 30’ X 42’
2) Option 2: Large Volume Spaces Design Air Change Rate: 6 ACH Total Space Volume: 86,750 cf Total Cooling Air Flow: 8,675 cfm
Final Required Air Flow: 10,844 cfm Divide into symmetrical rooms on either side of auditorium. Length: 28 ft Width: 9 ft Height: 8.5ft
3) Determine size of main supply and return air ducts. Total Airflow: 10,844 cfm Design Velocity: 500 fpm Required Duct Area: 22 sf Duct Dimensions: 5 ft x 5 ft
[A] [B] [C = A / B]
4) Determine ventilation/exhaust air duct and louver sizes. (384 seat theater) Total Ventilation Airflow: 5760 cfm Design Velocity: 500 fpm Required Duct Area: 11.5 sf Duct Dimensions: 4 ft x 4 ft Louver Free Area: 50 % Louver Area: 23 sf Louver Dimensions: 8 ft x 3 ft
[A] [B] [C = A / B] [D] [E = C / D]
5) Determine room dimensions. Using air handler size, required clearances, and required duct sizes, determine the required room dimensions. Length: 34 ft Width: 21 ft Height: 12 ft
6) Finally, locate the air handling room in your building. 5. AIR DISTRIBUTION ROUTING AND DUCT SIZING. 1) Develop a schematic (single-line) layout of the supply and return ductwork. 2) Size ductwork based on design velocities.
Supply Duct Design Velocity: 500 fpm Return Duct Design Velocity: 500 fpm Duct Size = Air Flow (cfm ) / Design Velocity (fpm) = required duct area (sf ) Area of round duct = radius ^2 * 3.14 Area of rectangular duct = length x width 1 ft = 12 inches, 1 sf = 144 sq inches
HOMEWORK: HVAC SYSTEM SIZING AND LAYOUT - COOLING AND HEATING PLANTS
1. PERFORM LOAD CALCULATIONS TO DETERMINE REQUIRED HEATING AND COOLING CAPACITIES. 1) Total Cooling Loads
Total Cooling Load Density: 8.8 w/ft Total Area Cooled: 3470 sf Total Cooling Load: 30598 watts Total Cooling Load: 8.7 tons
1) Using your total required cooling load, determine the size required for the chillers. [A] [B] [C = A x B] [D = C x 3.412 / (12,000)]
2) Total Air Flow (entire building) Design Air Change Rate: 6 ACH Total Space Volume: 86,750 cf Total Cooling Air Flow: 8,675 cfm Total Cooling Load: 21.7 tons
[A] [B] [C = B x A / 60] [D = C /400 cfm/ton]
3) Total Heating Loads Total Heating Load Density: 5.0 w/sf Total Area Heated: 3470 sf Total Heating Load: 17,350 watts Total Heating Load: 59.2 kBtu/h
3. DETERMINE THE REQUIRED CHILLER PLANT SIZE AND AREA REQUIREMENTS. Total Cooling Load: 21.7 tons Chiller Capacity (each): 250 tons Length: 25 ft Width: 20 ft Height: 10 ft
2) Assuming chilled and condenser water pumps footprints of 3ft x 4ft and required clearances of 3ft around each side of the pumps, layout the pumps and chillers in a space. (One chilled water pump and one condenser water pump for each chiller.) 3) Provide an additional 20% of area for the chiller plant and determine the final room dimensions.
[A] [B] [C = A x B] [D = C x 3.412/(1,000)]
2. DETERMINE THE REQUIRED BOILER PLANT SIZE AND AREA REQUIREMENTS. 1) Using your total required heating load, determine the size required for the boilers. Total Heating Load: 59.2 kBtu/h Boiler Capacity (each): 350 kBtuh Length: 6 ft Width: 5ft Height: 10 ft
2) Assuming heating hot water pump footprints of 3ft x 4ft and required clearances of 3ft around each side of the pumps, layout the pumps and boilers in a space. (One hot water pump for each boiler.) 3) Provide an additional 20% of area for the boiler plant and determine the final room dimensions.
Total Plant Area: 2,301 sf Length: 59 ft Width: 39 ft Height: 13 ft
4. DETERMINE THE REQUIRED COOLING TOWER SIZE AND AREA REQUIREMENTS. 1) Using your total required cooling load, determine the size required for the cooling towers. Total Cooling Load: 21.7 tons Cooling Tower Capacity (each): 275 tons Length: 18 ft Width: 9ft Height: 18 ft
2) Assuming required clearance on each side of the cooling towers to be equal to the height of the tower, layout the total required area for the cooling tower. Length: 42 ft Width: 19 ft Height: 18 ft
Total Plant Area: 336 sf Length: 16 ft Width: 21 ft Height: 13 ft
45
46
AS Design Development
01. 14 - 04.14
Instructor:
Herwig Baumgartner & Scott Uriu
Consultant:
Matthew Melnyk & Jeffrey Landreth
Team:
Liu Sha , Sierra Helvey, Yen-Po Chen, Kirrill Ryadchenko, Matt Grossman 47
48
CS Urban Urban Culture: History, Theory, and Criticism 01. 14 - 04.14
The increasing number of Chinese large architectural projects
This paper will diagrammatically compare those two delir-
inevitably let people concern about the future of its cities. As
ium happened in both Eastern and Western cities by using
some people’s saying, “China is becoming the laboratory for
Shenzhen and New York as examples, thereby explaining the
foreign architects”. As Koolhaas demonstrated in Great Leap
distinction between these two urbanism and two distinguish-
Forward, there has been an unprecedented torrent of relentless
ing urbanism conceiving came out of different social ideology.
construction flooding Asia. This fanaticism is ruining the current condition in everywhere as well as the completing new urban substance. At the moment when urbanism is apotheosized, cities cannot be understood.1 In Delirious New York, Koolhaas described another delirium of Manhattan, “a mythical island where the invention and testing of a metropollitan lifestyle and its attendant archite ture could be pursued as a collective experiment in which the entire city became a factory of manmade experience, where the real and the natural ceased to exist.”2 1 Rem Koolhaas, Introduction of Great Leap Forward: City of Excerbated Difference, Harvard Design School, P27 2 Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New York, The Monacelli Press, P9-10
Instructor:
Peter Zellner
49
The Greatest Grid, Manhattan, NY
The grid has been applied regardless of any nature condition.
50
Central Park, Manhattan, NY
“a taxidermic preservation of nature that exhibits forever the drama of culture outdistancing nature.� --Rem Koolhaas
51
The linear city In the initial master plan 1982, Shenzhen was designed to be a rough grid consisted of 3 east-west avernue and 12 north-south streets. The entire plan expressed in a linear layout which was considered as the Modernism and Utopia.
Three Paths and One Leveling
The city was divided into 8 blocks in order to be efficiently controled in terms of the market deregulation.
Eight Blocks
Subway Blocks
The city was eventually shrunk to three blocks, the west zone, the middel zone and the east zone.
Three Blocks 52
53
Since the equivalence generated by the grid, Manhattan’s blocks can easily fall under architecture control. “ It develops a maximum unit of urbanistic Ego”
54
Conversly, to Shenzhen SEZ’s planners, differences between site to site seem to be invisible. Architecture here is replicated extrusion sharing the same plan. However, due to the exploded population and the sudden economic growth, what Shenzhen needed was simply the happening of massive construction. We hope not only Shenzhen but many other Chinese cities could have a leap forward in terms of architecture and urbanism.
55
Refernce Rem Koolhaas, Introduction of Great Leap Forward: City of Excerbated Difference, Harvard Design School Rem Koolhaas, Delirious New York, The Monacelli Press Image refernce http://www.mappery.com/Sanitary-and-Topographical-Map-of-City-and-Island-of-New-York http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a8/1870_Vaux_and_Olmstead_Map_of_Central_ Park%2C_New_York_City_-_Geographicus_-_CentralPark-knapp-1870.jpg
56