Round Hill Council Weighs Utility Rate Hike Options

BY NORMAN K. STYER nstyer@loudounnow.com

The Round Hill Town Council is preparing for larger-than-expected utility rate hikes this year, but just how high they’ll go isn’t clear yet.

During the March 15 meeting, Mayor Scott Ramsey presented the first part of his updated rate study, with more detailed recommendations expected at the council’s April 5 meeting.

Since the last rate study was conducted in 2021, the town has seen the buildout of most of the permissible development in its service area, meaning the availability fees charged to new homes will no longer be a significant revenue stream to support the system’s capital needs. Also, the town has seen higher construction and operations costs. Increasing expenses and the need to use more operating funds to meet debt service obligations will require rates to increase—probably substantially, according to Ramsey’s presentation.

The town boasts the lowest utility rates among Loudoun’s towns, at an average of about $85 per month. That’s the in-town rate. Out-of-town residents, who make up the vast majority of the utility system’s customer base, pay about $127; that’s slightly higher than Leesburg’s out-of-town bills, but lower than out-of-town rates charged in Hamilton, Lovettsville, Purcellville, and Middleburg.

Capital projects look to be the main driver in the upcoming rate debate. The town’s proposed five-year Capital Improvements Plan calls for $13.4 million in new spending. Even if the council pares that down to the $12 million range, the town faces a new round of borrowing—followed by significantly higher annual debt service payments.

The town has about $3.75 million in outstanding utility debt, at a cost of about $400,000 a year. If the town borrows another $8 million, the annual payments could be up to $700,000 higher, according to the study. Unlike past years when rapid construction brought availability fees—$7 million over the past 10 years—to help cover debt service costs, few are expected over the next 10 years. The operations side—user rates—will pick up the deficit. In one scenario outlined by Ramsey, rates would have to increase 12% just to cover increased debt service.

The mayor is working with the town staff to finalize the construction plan, interest rate projections and inflation assumptions. n

Hankins

continued from page 18 myself from that representation.”

Milan responded, “interesting,” and Hankins stated it was not, before pressing him on what he thought was interesting.

“I’m just talking about the totality of everything,” he said.

“I don’t know what you’re implying, but I have not done anything,” Hankins said to which Milan responded that he was not implying anything.

“I think you are,” Hankins said.

“I’m going to try one more time and say it differently … I am recusing myself because, under the code of ethics, I have already taken a position that the court has in front of it,” she said. “And in order to represent the body I would have to take the exact opposite position in front of the same court. And I won’t be doing that.”

She also stated that the town’s insurance company had declined to provide legal support to defend against the lawsuit because the council failed to follow legal advice.

“They are interpreting this as a willful action against the law,” she said.

The council has held three closed session meetings in the past month citing legal and personnel issues with attorney John F. Cafferky, from the Fairfax law firm Blankenship & Keith, providing legal advice.

Following a March 9 closed meeting, the council voted unanimously to “support the steps outlined by the interim town manager and counsel in the closed session.” Hankins has not participated in council or planning commission meetings since that vote. Loudoun Now has requested clarification on that motion from Interim Town Manager John Anzivino and received no response.

Hankins has been the town attorney since 2012. n