PhD LO2 Conception of research Development of appropriate research plan
Originality of Research
Understanding of quantitative and statistical techniques Understanding of analytical techniques and procedures
4 Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines. Specific position ( thesis/hypothesis) is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position (thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged. Others' points of view are synthesized within position (thesis/hypothesis). Provides accurate explanations of information presented in mathematical forms. Makes appropriate inferences based on that information. All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
3 Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed however more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
2 Begins to demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with evidence of most relevant contextual Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed or unfocused.
1 Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement or related contextual factors. Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
Specific position (thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others' points of view are acknowledged within position (thesis/hypothesis).
Specific position (thesis/hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of an issue.
Specific position (thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious.
Provides accurate explanations of information presented in mathematical forms.
Provides somewhat accurate explanations of information presented in mathematical forms, but occasionally makes minor errors related to computations or units. Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed or unfocused.
Attempts to explain information presented in mathematical forms, but draws incorrect conclusions about what the information means.
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed however more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
PhD LO3 Understanding in the subject area
Critical thinking Ability to Conduct Research
Originality of Research
Application of quantitative and statistical techniques Application of analytical techniques and procedures
4 Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others' assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. Synthesizes in depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches. Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant yet previously lessexplored aspects of the topic. Specific position ( thesis/hypothesis) is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position ( thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged. Others' points of view are synthesized within position ( thesis/hypothesis). Provides accurate explanations of information presented in mathematical forms. Makes appropriate inferences based on that information. All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
3 Identifies own and others' assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position.
2 Questions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others' assumptions than one's own (or vice versa).
Presents in depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches. Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic. Specific position ( thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others' points of view are acknowledged within position ( thesis/hypothesis).
Presents information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches. Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic. Specific position ( thesis/hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of an issue.
Provides accurate explanations of information presented in mathematical forms.
Provides somewhat accurate explanations of information presented in mathematical forms, but occasionally makes minor errors related to computations or units. Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed or unfocused.
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed however more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
1 Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position. Presents information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches. Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable. Specific position ( thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious.
Attempts to explain information presented in mathematical forms, but draws incorrect conclusions about what the information means. Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
PhD LO4 Written Communication Content Development
Disciplinary conventions
Sources and evidence
Control of syntax and mechanics
Spoken Communication Organization
Language
Delivery
Central Message
4 Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer's understanding, and shaping the whole work. Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task (s) including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices Demonstrates skillful use of high quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually errorfree.
3 Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work
2 Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work.
1 Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work.
Demonstrates consistent use of important conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s), including organization, content, presentation, and stylistic choices
Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) for basic organization, content, and presentation
Attempts to use a consistent system for basic organization and presentation
Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing. Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the portfolio has few errors.
Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors.
Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing.
4 Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is clearly and consistently observable and is skillful and makes the content of the presentation cohesive. Language choices are imaginative, memorable and compelling and enhance the effectiveness of the presentation. Language in presentation is appropriate to audience. Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation compelling, and speaker appears polished and confident.
3 Organizational pattern (specific introductionand conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is clearly and consistently observable within the presentation.
2 Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is intermittently observable within the presentation.
1 Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is not observable within the presentation.
Language choices are thoughtful and generally support the effectiveness of the presentation. Language in presentation is appropriate to audience.
Language choices are mundane and commonplace and partially support the effectiveness of the presentation. Language in presentation is appropriate to audience. Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation understandable, and speaker appears tentative.
Language choices are unclear and minimally support the effectiveness of the presentation. Language in presentation is not appropriate to audience.
Central message is compelling (precisely stated, appropriately repeated, memorable, and strongly supported.)
Central message is clear and consistent with the supporting material.
Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation interesting, and speaker appears comfortable.
Central message is basically understandable but is not often repeated and is not memorable.
Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage
Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) detract from the understandability of the presentation, and speaker appears uncomfortable. Central message can be deduced, but is not explicitly stated in the presentation.