Luís Lanfredi Belem 2013
Architect Urbanist Bachelor at Instituto Presbiteriano Mackenzie São Paulo, Brazil
LSAP - Laboratory for Sustainable Architectural Production Master Degree at Umeå School of Architecture Umeå , Sweden
Intentions
Luís Lanfredi Belem 04/2013
This Booklet contains a compilation of the material produced between 2010 and 2013. Some academic projects from the Master Program in Umeå. Two independent projects realized with groups of colleagues: an article written for the magazine “aha” and one designed and built project for the Festival Trästock Festival last year in Skellefteå. At the end, some of the work I have been doing as an architect in Stockholm. My personal background includes a 5 years Bachelor Program in São Paulo, Brazil, with simultaneous 2,5 years internship, and after graduated I have worked another 2,5 years as an architect. My work experience is based on project design and project development, from creation to detailing. Working from bigger to smaller offices I have had the opportunity to be in contact with both clients and engineers during most projects. My academic experience in Umeå took me to a further reflection on architectural concept and production, reinforcing the importance of analyzing and testing the complexities and realities we deal with. Further on I expect to work with projects where my working experience and my academic background can help creating more complete and conscious architectural production.
CV
Master in Sustainable Architectural Production Luís Lanfredi Belem 04/2013
Luís Rodolfo Lanfredi Belem da Silva born in São Paulo, Brazil. January 25th, 1984 Konradsbergsgatan 6F, Stockholm Iuislanfredi@gmail.com – 0723699123 Academic • Master in Sustainable Architectural Production, LSAP, Umeå School of Architecture (2012) • Bachelor in Architecture and Urbanism, Instituto Presbiteriano Mackenzie (2007) Professional • Currently Architect at Pupill Arkitektur (since January 2013) • Architect at Sic Arquitetura (2009 to 2010) • Architect at Aflalo e Gasperini Arquitetos (2008 to 2009) • Internship at Aflalo e Gasperini Arquitetos (2006 to 2008) • Internship at Alfredo del Bianco Arquitetura (2005 to 2006) • Internship at Amá Arquitetos (2005) Practical • Revit Architecture course, Cadritech (2008) • 3Ds Max course, Impacta (2005) • Productivity in Industrialized Wooden Materials, Liceu de Artes e Ofícios (2005) • AutoCAD and Photoshop courses, Instituto Presbiteriano Mackenzie (2004) Experience • Fluent English and Portuguese, intermediate Swedish level and basic Spanish. • Advanced AutoCAD and SketchUp. • Good ArchiCAD and Revit. • Advanced Photoshop and InDesign. • Good experience with physical models: hand krafted, 2D cutter and 3D printed.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Structural Efficiency
Structure and Materiais Prof. Walter Unterrainer LuĂs Lanfredi Belem 04/2011
In structural design group workshops, large size models were built to develop structural conscience and efficiency. In a stadium for 60 thousand people the concept was to built an external structure, keeping the elliptical interior space as pure and simple as possible reinforcing and focusing the attention on the field where the actual event happens. On the outside, the structure exposes and supports the circulation, technical and functional spaces. In the next page, the task was to design and built in one week time a 5 meter span wooden bridge to support the weight of a person. We were allowed to use only wood as construction material. Wood in three different forms was available, pins, stripes and rafters (max. 2,5m length). The use of screws, nails or even glue was forbidden.
Stadium The radius of the elliptical shape was adapted to receive seats on its lower half.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
Bridge Pair of double arched beams is kept in traction by shorter rafters on the lower portion. The geometry of the joints was defined after load and bending tests on the materials.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
The 5 meters bridge could have only wood in its composition, without using screws, nails or glue.
The longest available rafters had only 2,50 meters length, obliging us to have intermediate joints on the longer beams.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Light and Energy Simulations
Simulation Softwares Prof. Walter Unterrainer Luís Lanfredi Belem 2010-2012
luislanfredi@gmail.com
In technical workshops with architects and engineers computer simulations were performed in order to test and understand the impacts and results of architectural design. Studying both existing buildings and our own design, thermal performance, daylight studies and energy dynamics were tested and discussed. With the use of a thermal camera, critical points of our recently built Architecture School Building were discovered and afterwards the respective detailing was tested in simulations with the program Heat 3 to analyze the thermal bridges. Continuing studying the same building, simulations on the software VLux Daylight Visualizer show how the geometry of windows frame, different materials and positioning of the skylights could affect the quality of the light inside the studios. In a short exercise, structural wall system was developed and test according to its Lifecycle Assessments (LCA). Energy consumption, emissions levels and recycling potential was analyzed from Cradle to Grave. The energy efficiency of an unheated glazed courtyard was tested in Umeå climate conditions. Computer simulations were used to test and improve the efficiency of the design to allow maximum solar gains during the short winter days and prevent overheating during the summer.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
Thermal Performance Pictures from the thermal camera show the cold bridges on the window frames. The high quality of the glass is not a problem for the thermal performance of the facade, but with 455 windows the frames become a problem.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
The detailing of the facade was tested in simulations. The lack of insulating material around the frames causes the thermal bridges that explain the problems seen on the thermal camera.
With a thermal performance much lower than the rest of the materials used in the facade, the window frames causes great heat loss. The dark squares on the facades represent the equivalent uninsulated area on each facade.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
present situation without proposal
simulation with skywindow around the whole perimeter of the central block
simulation with skywindow around the whole perimeter of the central block and white floor and ceiling
simulation with skywindow around the whole perimeter of the central block, white walls and white angled window frames
1.2% daylight factor in the working areas
2.1% daylight factor in the working areas
poor light distribution
2.3% daylight factor in the working areas
double daylight factor and better light distribution
2.5% daylight factor in the working areas
small improvement compared with the fist simulation, the topografhy of the ceiling provides too little reflectance area
good improvement compared with the fist simulation, it would be a good technical solution, but it creates a very umconfortable space
Daylight From the left to the right, the actual situation to different positioning on the skylights, change of materials and modifications on the window frames
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Luís Lanfredi Belem
10 3 0Roockwool
11 4 0OSB Structure
0 kg 1,95
9.5.2 Building material disposal
0 kg 1,063
9.5.2 Building material disposal
0 kg 23
0 kg 3.4 Incineration of wooden particle board (including 14,88 credits)
0 kg 9.5.4 Incineration of household waste (including credit) 9,6 12 5 0Polycarbonate
Amount of the environmental impact of the end of life of the Building element (per m2)
0
6 0
0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 0 11 0 0 12 0
Amount of the environmental impact of the end of life of the Building element (per m2)
“Cradle to Grave”
23,5203
4
Äqu.] 0 0,01768 2,6E-050 0 00 1,4E-050 00 0 0,00030 0 00 5E-050 0 0 0,000280 0 0 0 0,00067 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
[MJ]
Primary energy Primary energy (renewable) (renewable)
[MJ]
Primary energy (renewable)
Primary energy (nonPrimary energy (nonPrimary energy (n renewable) renewable) renewable)
Eutrophication potential Eutrophication potential Eutrophication pot (EP) (EP) (EP)
Primary energy (non-energy (nonPrimary renewable) renewable)
Primary energy Primary energy (renewable)(renewable)
Primary energy (renewable)
Eutrophication potential (EP)
2
Äqu.] 0 0,1305 0,000160 0 00 8,8E-050 00 0 0,00190 0 00 0,012350 0 0 0,009640 0 0 0 0,02413 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Primary energy (nonrenewable)
Eutrophication potential potential Eutrophication (EP) (EP)
AcidificationAcidification potential (AP) potential (AP)
Photochemical Photochemical ozonecreation potential potential ozonecreation (POCP) (POCP) 2
Äqu.] 0 4,3E-06 3,2E-100 0 00 1,8E-100 00 0 3,8E-090 0 00 -3E-070 0 0 -1E-070 0 0 0 -4E-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acidification potential (AP)
Ozone depletion potential (ODP)
2
Photochemical ozonecreation potential (POCP)
Ozone depletion potential Ozone depletion potential (ODP) (ODP)
Global warming potential Global warming potential (GWP) (GWP)
Global warming potential (GWP)
unit
amount
unit
amount
unit
amount
Bonus / Emission
Layer nr.
92 0Gypsum board
Exchange quotient
Estimated service life Building element Bonus / Emission
Estimated service life Building
Layer nr.
Layer nr.
Polycarbonate external wall
9.5.2 Building material disposal
[kg PO4Äqu.]
Äqu.] 0 73,9867 0 0,03947 0 0 0 0 0,02151 00 0 0,465520 0 00 0 17,5086 0 0 0 5,48518 0 0 0 23,5203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polycarbonate external wall
Amount of the environmental impact due to the maintenance of the Building element (per m2)
[kg SO2Äqu.]
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Environmental impact end of life Building element:
81 0Painted plaster
[kg C2H4Äqu.]
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
unit
amount
unit
amount
Exchange quotient weight
Estimated service life density Building element
Estimated service life volume Building
Layer nr.
[kg R11Äqu.]
0,2686environmental 1,4E-08 3,4E-05 0,00036 impact per m2 3,9E-05 Building 4,13519 element 0,08823 0,21387 7,1E-09 2,9E-05 0,00032 8E-05 3,4925 0,13862 15,0826 6,4E-07 0,00453 0,08391 0,01053 208,913 7,5072 -21,267 4,6E-07 0,0061 0,03181 0,00546 116,72 365,093 68,5015 4,4E-06 0,0174 0,12086 0,01482 1348,24 21,0685 [kg CO2-0 [kg R11-0 [kg C2H4-0 [kg SO2-0 [kg PO4-0 0 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 [MJ] 0 [MJ] 0 0,2686 0 1,4E-08 0 3,4E-05 0 0,00036 0 3,9E-05 0 4,13519 0 0,08823 0 0,21387 8E-05 0 7,1E-09 0 2,9E-05 0 0,00032 0 0 3,4925 0 0,13862 0 15,0826 0 6,4E-07 0 0,00453 0 0,08391 0 0,01053 0 208,913 0 7,5072 0 0 4,6E-07 0 0,0061 0 0,03181 0 0,00546 0 116,72 0 365,093 0 -21,267 0 21,0685 0 68,5015 4,4E-06 [kg CO2-0 [kg C2H4-0 0,12086 [kg SO2-0 0,01482 [kg PO4-0 1348,24 R11-0 [kg0,0174 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 [MJ] 0 [MJ] 62,7998 5,5E-06 0,02808 0,23726 0,03093 1681,5 393,896 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0environmental 0 0 0 Building 0 element 0 0 impact per m2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 impact per m2 0environmental 0 0 0 Building 0 element 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62,7998 5,5E-06 0,02808 0,23726 0,03093 1681,5 393,896 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,48518 -1E-07 0,00028 0,00964 0,00155 -57,993 -0,5222 68,5015 4,4E-06 0,0174 0,12086 0,01482 1348,24 21,0685 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [kg CO2-0 [kg R11-0 [kg C2H4-0 [kg SO2-0 [kg PO4-0 0 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 [MJ] 0 [MJ] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [kg CO2- 0 [kg R11-0 [kg C2H4-0 [kg SO2-0 [kg PO4-0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 Äqu.] 0 [MJ] 0 [MJ] 0 0 0,02106 0 0,039470 3,2E-100 2,6E-050 0,000160 2,1E-050 0,31239 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,01148 0 0,021510 1,8E-100 1,4E-050 8,8E-050 1,1E-050 0,17021 0 -0,5222 0 5,48518 00 -1E-07 00 0,00028 00 0,00964 00 0,00155 00 -57,993 0 0 0 21,0685 0 68,5015 00 4,4E-06 00 0,0174 00 0,12086 00 0,01482 00 1348,24 0 0 0 0 0,00030 0,00190 0,000240 3,6846 0 0,2484 0 0,46552 73,9867 3,8E-09 4,3E-06 0,01768 0,1305 0,01637 1290,24 20,5464 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 impact per m2 00environmental 00 00 00 Building 00 element 0 0 0 -1,5912 0 17,50860 -3E-070 5E-050 0,012350 0,003240 -152,59 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 -0,5222 0 5,485180 -1E-070 0,000280 0,009640 0,001550 -57,993 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [kg CO -0 [kg R11-0 [kg C H -0 [kg SO -0 [kg PO -0 0 0
Environmental impact maintenance Building element: Polycarbonate external wall
Environmental impact end of life Building element:
Acidification potential (AP) Acidification potential Acidification (AP) potent
2
1,95 1,063 23 14,88 9,6 0 [kg] 0 1,95 0 1,063 0 23 0 0 14,88 0 9,6 0 50,49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Äqu.]
1,95 kg 1,063 kg 0,23 m3 0,024 m3 9,6 kg 0 0 1,95 0 kg 1,063 0 kg 0,23 0 m3 0 m3 0,024 0 kg 9,6 0 0 kg 1,95 0 kg 1,95 0 kg 1,063 0 kg 1,063 0 m3 0,23 0 0,23 m3 0,024 m3 50,49 0 0,024 m3 9,6 kg 1 9,6 kg 0 0 0 building material material group Material in database end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 7 0 50 0 production new Building element 0 0 end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 kg 1,95 1 plaster 50 50 0 8 Painted 0 production new Building element 0 kg 1.4.4Material Plaster (gypsum) 1kg 0 1,95 building material material group in database end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 kg 1,063 2 board 50 50 0 9 Gypsum 0 production new Building element 0 0 kg 1.3.13 Gypsumboard 1,063 end of life old Building elementsee page of life" 0 kg 0,23 m3 9.5.2 "end Building material disposal 1,95 3 Roockwool 50 50 0 10 0 production new Building element 0 0 m3 2.01 Rock wool (facade-Insulation) 0,23 1 Painted plaster end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 m3 0,024 4 0 OSB Structure 50 11 50 0 production new Building element 0 0 kg 3.2.49.5.2 OSB-board 0,024 m3 Building material disposal 1,063 end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 kg 9,6 25 Gypsum board Polycarbonate 25 1 12 0 50 0 production new Building element 0 kg 6.5.2 Transparent sheet PC 0 9,6 end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" Building material disposal 230 kg 6 Amount 0 50 0 of the environmental impact due to the maintenance9.5.2 of the Building element (per m2) production new Building element 0 0 3 Roockwool end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 Attributes of the Building element 7 0 50 0 production new Building element 3.4 Incineration of wooden 0 particle board (including 0 kg 14,88 credits) end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 48 OSB Structure 0 50 0 production new Building element 0 0 end of life old Building elementsee page of life" of household waste (including credit) 9.5.4 "end Incineration 9,60 kg 9 0 50 0 production new Building element 0 0 5 Polycarbonate end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 10 0 50 0 production new Building element 0 00 end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 6 00 11 50 0 production new Building element 0 0 end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 00 material material group Material in database 12 building 0 50 0 production new Building element 0 0 7 0
Layer nr.
1.4.4 Plaster (gypsum) 1kg 0,002 1300 2 Gypsum board 1.3.13 Gypsumboard 0,001 850 2.01 Rock wool (facade-Insulation) 0,23 100 3 Roockwool 4 OSB Structure 3.2.4 OSB-board 0,024 620 building material material group Material in database 5 Polycarbonate 6.5.2 Transparent sheet PC 0,008 1200 6 0 0 [m03] [kg/m 3] 7 0 1 1.4.4 Plaster (gypsum) 1kg 0,002 1300 8 Painted plaster 0 0 2 1.3.13 Gypsumboard 0,001 850 9 Gypsum board 0 0 3 Roockwool 2.01 Rock wool (facade-Insulation) 0,23 100 10 0 0 11 0 0 4 OSB Structure 3.2.4 OSB-board 0,024 620 building material material group Material in database 12 0 0 5 Polycarbonate 6.5.2 Transparent sheet PC 0,008 1200 6 0 0 Amount of the environmental impact of the production of the building element (per m2) 7 0 end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 1 Paintedof plaster 50 50 8 0 production new Building element 0 Attributes the Building element 1.4.4 Plaster (gypsum) 1kg 9 0 end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 2 Gypsum board 50 50 10 0 production new Building element 0 1.3.13 Gypsumboard 11 0 end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 0 3 Roockwool 50 50 12 0 0 Attributes of the Building element production new Building element 2.01 Rock wool (facade-Insulation) end of life of oldthe Building elementsee page "end ofelement life" of the environmental impact production of the building (per m2) 4 Amount OSB Structure 50 50 production new Building element 3.2.4 OSB-board end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 5 Polycarbonate 50 25 production new Building element 6.5.2 Transparent sheet PC end of life old Building elementsee page "end of life" 6 0 50 production new Building element 0
Photochemical Photochemical Photochemical ozonecreation potential ozonecreation potential ozonecreation pot (POCP) (POCP) (POCP)
environmental impact per m2 Building element
building material material group Material in database Environmental impact maintenance Building element: Polycarbonate external wall [kg CO 1 Paintedof plaster Attributes the Building element
Ozone depletion potential Ozone depletion potential Ozone depletion p (ODP) (ODP) (ODP)
[kg]
unit
weight
[kg/m 3]
amount
density
[m 3]
Global warming potential Global warming potential Global warming po (GWP) (GWP) (GWP)
Polycarbonate external wall
Attributes of the Building element volume
Layer nr.
Environmental impact production Building element:
4
Äqu.] 0 0,01637 2,1E-050 0 00 1,1E-050 00 0 0,000240 0 00 0,003240 0 0 0,001550 0 0 0 0,00506 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
[MJ] 0 1290,24 0,312390 0 00 0,170210 00 0 3,68460 0 00 -152,590 0 0 -57,9930 0 0 0 -206,41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
[MJ] 0 20,5464 0,021060 00 00 0,011480 00 00 0,24840 00 00 -1,59120 00 00 -0,52220 00 00 0 -1,8324 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-4E-07 0,00067 0,02413 0,00506 -206,41 -1,8324
Structural wall system was developed and test according to its Lifecycle Assessments (LCA). Energy consumption, emissions levels and recycling potential was analyzed from Cradle to Grave.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Livingroom_to_Outside_Winter
JANUARY 2nd week
JANUARY 2nd week
54
58 54
50
50
46
46
42
42
38
38
34
34
30
30
26
26
22
22
18
18
Temp
Load W/m2
Livi
(1) Q_heat
58
14
10
6
6
2
2
-2
-2
-6
-6
-10
-10
-14
-14
-18
-18
-22
-22 -26
-26 -30 13
14
15
16
17
18
Days
e_Winter
14
10
(1) Q_heat
Winter_to_Outside_Livingroo Minimum C:\Users\Masters\Desktop\L Zeitpunkt 20:22:53 Maximum 24.11.2011 Zeitpunkt Summe Mittelwert
58 54
19
20
-30 13
21
Livingroom_to_Outside_Winter
Q_heat W/m²
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
0 321 45.7943 359 3278.06 17.0732
50
14
15
Summer_to_Outside_Livingr Minimum C:\Users\Masters\Desktop\L Zeitpunkt 20:29:13 Maximum 24.11.2011 Zeitpunkt Summe Mittelwert
Tamb Tamb_m24h °C °C 7.31994 12.456 4708 4712 23.925 20.3619 4843 4848 3080.09 3025.6 16.0421 15.7583
16
Tground °C 16.8016 4657 17.313 4848 3277.11 17.0683
Tvent °C 7.319 47 23.9 48 3080. 16.04
46 42
Livingroom_to_Outside_Summer
38 30
50
26
46
22
46
42
18
42
20
21
58 54 50
14
38
34
10
30
6
30
26
2
26
22
-2
22
18
-6
18
14
-10
10
-14
6
-18
2
-22
2
-2
-26
-2
-6
-30 13
-10
1/1
11/24/11 20:35:35
Temp
Temp 19
JULY 2nd week
54
38 11/24/11 20:27:16
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
34
Temp
JULY 2nd week
58
14 10 6
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
-6
21
-10
Days
-14
-14
-18
-18
-22
-22
-26 -30 13
-26 14
15
16
17
18
19
Days
_Summer
34
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
Summer_to_Outside_Livingr Minimum C:\Users\Masters\Desktop\L Zeitpunkt 20:29:13 Maximum 24.11.2011 Zeitpunkt Summe Mittelwert
Tamb Tamb_m24h °C °C 7.31994 12.456 4708 4712 23.925 20.3619 4843 4848 3080.09 3025.6 16.0421 15.7583
58 54
Tground °C 16.8016 4657 17.313 4848 3277.11 17.0683
Tvent °C 7.31994 4708 23.925 4843 3080.09 16.0421
Tzone_luft °C 19.0985 4708 26.0638 4845 4252.41 22.1479
20
-30 13
21
Buffer_Summer
Tzone_op °C 19.484 4708 25.0466 4845 4271.14 22.2455
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
50
14
Summer_Buffer_zone.pr1 C:\Users\Masters\Desktop\L 19:12:54 24.11.2011
15
Minimum Zeitpunkt Maximum Zeitpunkt Summe Mittelwert
Tamb Tamb_m24h °C °C 7.31994 12.456 4708 4712 23.925 20.3619 4843 4848 3080.09 3025.6 16.0421 15.7583
16
Tground °C 16.8016 4657 17.313 4848 3277.11 17.0683
Tvent °C 7.319 47 23.9 48 3080. 16.04
46 42 38
20
21
JANUARY 2nd week
30
50
26
50
46
22
46
42
18
58 54
42
14
38
34
10
30
6
30
26
2
26
22
-2
22
18
-6
18
14
-10
10
-14
10
6
-18
6
2
-22
2
-2
-26
-2
-6
-30 13
-6
-10
1/1
11/24/11 19:21:25
Temp
Load W/m2 19
Liv
(1) Q_heat
54
38 11/24/11 20:35:35
Livingroom_to_Buffer_Winter
34
Temp
JANUARY 2nd week
58
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
-14
-18
-18
-22
-22 -26
-26 -30 13
14
15
16
17 Days
_Winter
(1) Q_heat
14
-10
Days
-14
34
Winter_to_Buffer_Livingroom Minimum C:\Users\Masters\Desktop\L Zeitpunkt 21:46:40 Maximum 24.11.2011 Zeitpunkt Summe Mittelwert
58 54 50
Q_heat W/m²
0 321 34.773 359 2684.25 13.9805
18
19
20
-30 13
21
Livingroom_to_Buffer_Winter
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
14
Winter_to_Buffer_Livingroom Minimum C:\Users\Masters\Desktop\L Zeitpunkt 21:39:48 Maximum 24.11.2011 Zeitpunkt Summe Mittelwert
46 42
luislanfredi@gmail.com
38 34 30 26 22
Luís Lanfredi Belem
15
Tamb Tamb_m24h °C °C -21.925 -20.4364 346 362 5.36389 -1.12734 494 504 -1599.24 -1771.27 -8.32939 -9.22537
16
Tground °C 2.60567 504 3.09197 313 544.833 2.83767
Tvent °C -21.9 3 21.13 4 215. 1.124
ingroom_to_Outside_Winter
994 708 925 843 .09 421
JANUARY 2nd week
54 50 46 42 38 34 30 26 22 Temp
18 14 10 6 2 -2 -6 -10 -14 -18 -22 -26
17
18
19
Days Tzone_luft °C 19.0985 4708 26.0638 4845 4252.41 22.1479
20
-30 13
21
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Days
Buffer_winter
Tzone_op °C 19.484 4708 25.0466 4845 4271.14 22.2455
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
Buffer_Summer
winter_Buffer_zone.pr1 C:\Users\Masters\Desktop\L 19:50:22 24.11.2011
Minimum Zeitpunkt Maximum Zeitpunkt Summe Mittelwert
Tamb Tamb_m24h °C °C -21.925 -20.4364 346 362 5.36389 -1.12734 494 504 -1599.24 -1771.27 -8.32939 -9.22537
Tground °C 2.60567 504 3.09197 313 544.833 2.83767
Tvent °C -13.0007 356 10.3946 494 -976.901 -5.08803
Tzone_luft °C -11.7434 362 11.2824 494 -867.076 -4.51602
Tzone_op °C -11.7201 362 11.3034 494 -864.383 -4.502
Livingroom_to_Buffer_Summer
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
JULY 2nd week
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
58 54 50 46 42 38
1/1
11/24/11 19:53:22
34
1/1
30 26 22 18 14 10 6 2 -2 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
-6
21
-10
Days
-14 -18 -22 -26
17
18
Days Tzone_luft °C 10.4703 4708 26.6251 4719 3680.72 19.1704
19
20
-30 13
21
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
15
Summer_to_Buffer_Livingroo Minimum C:\Users\Masters\Desktop\L Zeitpunkt 21:19:55 Maximum 24.11.2011 Zeitpunkt Summe Mittelwert
11/24/11 21:24:54
16
15
Tamb Tamb_m24h °C °C 7.31994 12.456 4708 4712 23.925 20.3619 4843 4848 3080.09 3025.6 16.0421 15.7583
16
Tground °C 16.8016 4657 17.313 4848 3277.11 17.0683
Tvent °C 7.31994 4708 23.925 4843 3080.09 16.0421
17
Tzone_luft °C 19.0327 4715 25.5384 4845 4072.75 21.2122
18
19
20
21
Tzone_op °C 19.4675 4715 24.4603 4845 4072 21.2083
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
1/1
14
14
Days
Livingroom_to_Buffer_Summer
Tzone_op °C 12.3511 4708 30.8466 4718 4029.16 20.9852
vingroom_to_Buffer_Winter
925 346 375 494 .88 437
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
58
Temp
994 708 925 843 .09 421
Buffer_winter
(1) Tamb (1) Tamb_m24h (1) Tground (1) Tzone_luft (1) Tzone_op (1) Tvent
17
18
19
20
1/1
21 Energy Efficiency
Days
17
18
19
20
Days Tzone_luft °C 20 347 24.0617 498 4199.41 21.8719
Tzone_op °C 19.4443 378 22.8014 498 4022.6 20.951
Luís Lanfredi Belem
21
The energy efficiency of an unheated glazed courtyard was tested in Umeå climate conditions.
Computer simulations were used to test and improve the efficiency of the design to allow maximum solar gains during the short winter days and prevent overheating during the summer.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Article on University Campus
Connecting with the City Luís Lanfredi Belem Soledad Larraín, Pavel Rueda 09/2011
In article the magazine Aha, it was proposed a possible intervention that would improve the communication between the city center and the two university campus existing in Umeå. The interventions would occur in three different scales. Small: Dynamic and flexible interventions that can adapt to different scenarios and events, that seek to create a language that spreads to all levels of urbanity. Small objects that encourages people to get involved, by a subconscious presence linking the whole system. Medium: Integrated urban equipment that blends in the everyday life of students and citizens. Incorporating to this familiar frame, information links that reinforces the idea of a network of interventions, that influence users to connect in other areas that the one at hand. Large: Though as a space made for urban encounter; where people meets and get connected with each other, not only in a physical way but also in a virtual and interactive one. Interconnected meeting places that would create an active network of information and participation.
University and the City Article published in November 2011 on Aha Magazine.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Luís Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
School in Holmsund
Open School Prof. Walter Unterrainer Luís Lanfredi Belem 05/2011
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Located in Umeå municipality, by the Baltic Sea, Holmsund is a dormitory village for central Umeå. Historically important docks for logging industry the area is now important by its natural features, supporting camping, hiking, fishing and bird watching. The proposal to build a new school connected with existing swimming and sport facilities became an opportunity to both improve the existing activities and provide new possibilities for the community. Reorganizing and improving the entrance and technical facilities of the swimming and sports hall, all the common areas of the school, studios, auditorium, cafeteria and library, can remain open after school time and during the summer independently from the classrooms.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
Site Reorganizing existing activities, the transversal position of the building connects small pond to forest area.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
Wings The different Wings can operate independently and are fiscally an visually by the central hall. Ramps provide accessibility and playful recreation areas.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
As well as the Cafeteria, the Auditorium can be open to external area to be used by the community during the summer.
The Library over the Main Hall provides quiet a space with a view over the pond.
Different types of classrooms and study rooms can be used according to pedagogical needs.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Malmö Hospital Masterplan
Healling Environment Prof. Walter Unterrainer Luís Lanfredi Belem 01/2012
Malmö is one of the fastest growing cities in Sweden, nevertheless its Hospital did not evolve proportionaly, as a matter of facts it has only become more complicated. The lack of long term planing resulted in a series of aditions and improvised solutions for serious problems. The group propousal was to improve the redability, functionality and overall capacity of the Hospital Complex by reorganizing acesses, open spaces, logistic and existing buildings. After analyzing and the buildings and defining actions for buildings individually, the potential free area gave us more options of interventions that would not necessarily disturb the existing green areas or make the relations between the existing buildings even more chaotic. To densify two big areas on opposite corners of the site into new treatment areas, allows possible growth and reorganization of the existing medical facilities.
Masterplan To improve the redability, functionality and overall capacity of the Hospital Complex by reorganizing acesses, open spaces, logistic and existing buildings
luislanfredi@gmail.com
A Connecting Axis links the different buildings of the complex, providing readable, weather protected and fast routes for patients, doctors and visitors.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
1Current Free area
2Demolish Misused spaces
4Potential Free area
3Recycle Historical buildings
The Free area visible in the first map relates mostly to the green areas of Malmö Hospital. Unfortunately most of the green spaces are Misused by some buildings built in temporary character. Some areas also present badly conserved, low density and spread buildings. Administrative functions are now dispersed trough the Hospital’s Historical buildings that are not suitable anymore for medical uses. Creating a more centralized and organized administrative centre would give the possibility to Recycle Historical buildings converting them into public and social areas that lack so much in Malmö Hospital.
Demolish
18 Telephone Centre 20 Porter 40 IT Medicine 40 Photography of Patients 78 Clinical Pathology 78B Chapel 78 Clinical Microbiology 79 Psychiatry Steering Group 83B Surgery Clinic pelvic surgery 92 Regional Service 94 Regional Service 94C Post 94G Blood Centre
Recycle
24 Department of Communication 24 Environment Unit 24 Hospital Management 26 Economy and Patient Unit 26D Lost and Found 26 Pay Office 26 Patient Administration 26 Cleaning administration 26 Transport 32 Recruitment Unit 32 Hospital Dentist 77 Addictive Centre detox 80 Infections Clinic reception 81 Workers Unions Care Union 81 Workers Unions Communal
After analysing and the buildings and defining actions for buildings individually, the Potential Free area on the new map gives us more options of interventions that won’t necessarily disturb the existing green areas or make the relations between the existing buildings even more chaotic. To Densify two big areas on opposite corners of the site into new treatment areas, allows possible growth and reorganization of the existing medical facilities. Some characteristics of the central part of the site make it suitable to Create Healing Environment. Most of the buildings in the central area of the Hospital do not have a very flexible structure and can hardly be transformed to receive modern treatment spaces, but they are very much suitable for receiving patient rooms. This location also gives the possibility to use the green area there as an important space in the patients recovery.
Flows As perimetral barriers, the roads isolate the pedestrian users of the Hospital and, at the same time, bring outside cars that uses the internal roads as shortcuts.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Public areas with “non medical” functions and reduced car traffic will connect to urban context, these public areas will provide open spaces that can support the density increase of the new built areas. Luís Lanfredi Belem
5Densify new T
Treatment areas
6Create Healing Environment
7Maintain Established areas Densify
59 Workers Unions SACO 59 Workers Unions SKTF 59 Urological Clinic 59B Urological Clinic reception 59A Eye Clinic wards 59 Vessel Centre Malmö-Lund 59 Auditorium 59 Conference Centre 59 Habilitation, Aid Equipment, Administration 59A Hand surgery 59B Hand surgery ward 80 Infections Clinic reception 86 Infections Clinic change of injection needle 90 Addictive Centre 90 Addictive Centre emergency 90 Addictive Centre screening 90 Addictive Centre wards
Transform
21 Orthopedic Clinic 21 Orthopedic Clinic wards 21 Orthopedic Clinic technical department 25 Orthopedic Clinic administration 25 Preparation and Security 25 Equipment Unit 25 Reumatism day treatments 29 Eye Clinic 31 Kidney Medicin and Transplants reception 33 Gastroenterologic screening ward 33 Clinical Research Unit 33 Clinical Research Unit 33 Local Health Care Unit 33 Geriatric Development ward 35 Gastroenterologic screening 35 Lung Clinic 35 Medicine Reception 35 Cardiology Clinic reception 35 Coagulation Unit 37 Clinical Chemistry sampling 71 Clinical Chemistry 71 Coagulation Unit 71 Cardiology Clinic administration 73 Haematologists 73 Blood Centre labs 73 Medicine Technology Department instruments 73 Skin Clinic 73 Skin Clinic administration 73 Skin Clinic treatment 75 Skin Clinic screening 75 Skin Clinic work and environment
To Maintain some areas of the Hospital is an economical and practice decision, once the activities in this areas are not disturbed during the construction phase. There is no need to interfere in some treatment and research areas of the Hospital where buildings are in good conditions and present technical installations compatible with most of the recent requirements. In the future some of those buildings can make use of the space in the new treatment areas for growing or reorganizing. As perimetral barriers, the roads isolate the pedestrian users of the Hospital and, at the same time, bring outside cars that uses the internal roads as shortcuts. Public areas with “non medical” functions and reduced car traffic will Connect to Urban Context, these public areas will provide open spaces that can support the density increase of the new built areas. Their placement near to public transport and park, in addition to pedestrian friendly measures on the crossings, will bring better accessibility and new qualities for the Hospital users and hopefully attract other people. According our perceptions from the visits to Malmö Hospital and from the idea of creating a Healing Environment Concept, the proposed Masterplan creates a clearly defined Central Patient Area surrounded by the necessary Treatment Areas. The Connection spaces provide social interaction and good clear access to the Hospital area. New treatment of existing streets will limit the internal car traffic, preserving the ground for the Hospital users as pedestrians.
8Connect to Urban Context
9Proposed Master Plan Treatment
36 Infections Clinic wards 36 Infections Clinic 38 Emergency 38 Emergency Centre administration 42 Pharmacy 42 Breast Screening 42 Dialysis 42 Intensive Care Clinic 42 Pain Unit 42 Sterilisation Unit 42 Transplants Administration 42 Kidney Medicin and Transplants 42 Kidney Medicin and Transplants wards/ dialysis 42 Vessel Centre Malmö-Lund laboratory 42 Vessel Centre Malmö-Lund ward 42 Emergency Centre 42 Emergency Centre emergency ward 42 Emergency Centre short term ward 42 Anestesia Clinic 42 Surgery Clinic breast surgery 42 Surgery Clinic wards 42 Urological Clinic wards 42 Medicine Department 44 Cardiology Clinic ward 44 Diagnostic Centre 44 Endoscopic Section 44 Clinical Physiology 44 Clinical Physiology 44 Mammography 44 Radiophysics Unit 44 X-ray 44 Clinical Pathology sampling 51 Stroke Centre 51 Endocrinological Clinic screening 51 Neurologic Clinic reception 51B Endocrinological Clinic 53 Endocrinological Clinic diabetic day care 53 Endocrinological Clinic ward 53 Neurologic Clinic wards 54 Psychiatry intensive care 56A Psychiatry emergencies 56B Psychiatry day treatment Psychosis 74 Womens Clinic 74 Womens Clinic emergencies 74 Womens Clinic childbirth 74 Womens Clinic wards 74 Neonatal Department 74 Reproduction Medicine 74 Children and Youth Centre neonatal ward 78 Clinical Pathology
Their placement near to public transport and park, in addition to pedestrian friendly measures on the crossings, will bring better accessibility and new qualities for the Hospital users.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Retrofitting of Hospital Building
Healling Environment Prof. Walter Unterrainer Luís Lanfredi Belem 01/2012
luislanfredi@gmail.com
As a continuation of Malmö Hospitals Masterplan, an individual project was developed focused on the creation of new patient wards. By enclosing left over spaces between three existing buildings, the project creates connecting courtyards that hosts the ward’s new social areas. Extracting all “non medical” areas from the interior of the buildings, these can now be filled only with patient rooms and their necessary support. The relatively short spans from the existing buildings are actually very much suitable for the standards of the single rooms that are needed. The covered courtyards marks a new intervention on the Hospital complex and highlights the different ages of the existing buildings, but not only as historical statement, also as an example of how the reuse of resources and existing structures can bring qualities that could never been achieved in a new project.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Connecting Courtyards Extracting all “non medical” areas from the interior of the buildings, these can now be filled only with patient rooms and their necessary support.
covered courtyards marks a new intervention on the Hospital complex and highlights the different ages of the existing buildings
direct radiation
translucent glass
Smoke extractor/ cooling “V” folded steel beams
water/snow colectors
transparent glass
difuse light
translucent glass extruded tube coluns
1:25
E
S W
N
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Luís Lanfredi Belem
Circulation Axis The circulation axis proposed in the group’s Masterplan shows as an important orientation element trough the courtyard and connecting the existing buildings
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Adaptive Mobility
Mobility to People Prof. Walter Unterrainer Luís Lanfredi Belem 05/2012
How to live in uncertainty? Will self-employment give people the freedom of coordinating their own life, or will it only transfer social responsibility to the shoulders of individuals? Although I believe more in transformation than in collapse, that is a common reality for more and more people, by choice or not. How can Architects design for uncertain? Imagine a Mobility Card. A card to pay for your housing expenses. Credentialed Hosts would accept it as payment and you would be able to top it as you please. Life without strings, no rent contracts, no internet, electricity or any extra bills, all included in the same fixed price payment. In well connected metropolitan areas the users would barely need a car, a useless expense when you can use the car pool once in a while. Got a job in a different place, to much traffic, you can move to a Host better connected to where you want. Provided with furniture, moving in our out to a individual or double flat is not a big struggle. To make sure there are always available units, Mobility Card would work similar to bank, using rotation money to finance new Hosts that are willing to join the network. The finance would have good rates once it is interest of both that the Hosts are successful, that could mean that smaller companies or even individuals could participate, improving income distribution. The benefits from this partnership would even go further in a more abstract way, a bigger diversity of Hosts would produce more diverse building than a single constructor, minimizing monotony. Moving could became a good experience. Try jobs in a different city, or self-employed, Hosts would also offer working spaces. Open offices are more and more common, you can rent a table or a studio, exchange information, unexpected contacts, the possibilities are many.
São Paulo Images show the project situated in a neighbourhood of São Paulo.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Luís Lanfredi Belem
The Project Granja Julieta
1:1000
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
flats circulation common commercial bicycle car pool
Critique and Proposal The idea is to create in our reality a housing model capable to promote and support the demand for mobility created by contemporary society.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
The different uses present in the project were defined in order to meet those demands.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Section On the local side of the project, facing the neighbourhood, the long site opens up in the end of a perpendicular street.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
The reduced car traffic in the street makes it a safe and inviting pedestrian access to the open area that converge the entrance to the flats, bike parking, restaurant and bar.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
Facade On the river side, a long facade sets a visual reference for who comes from Rio Pinheiros axis. Apartments on this side have their balconies with a very open view, even at a low height.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
The Ground The lack of collective spaces is a huge problem in the city of SĂŁo Paulo, it is not a coincidence that the city is known by its street life. Normally the collective spaces are really limited to the linearity of the streets.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
The open central space opens to pedestrians, bicycle and skateboards. Protected from Rio Pinheiros Marginal road by the long northwest facade and concentrating all functions, the space will have movement all day long.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
The Common In the common areas of this building once more diversity is the guideline. From the sunny Roof, to large terraced open offices and protected shaded balconies between floors.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Spaces designed for different types of people, weather, habits and so on. Here it shows the influence of social transformation and uncertainty versus freedom.
Open Offi ces provide also working spaces to host conferences, meetings, or simply “rent a desk” where you could do your daily work.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
The Flats Once the interior of the fl ats are extremely simple, the fully operable doors allow the elevated balconies to extend to the interior on wooden platforms that become seats and storage space when the doors are closed.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
Basically the flats are open plans with functional closets along one side. Each user habits will have influence on how the flat looks and performs.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Trästock Music Festival
Järv Arkitektur Self-constructed Luís Lanfredi Belem 07/2012
Trästock is an independent Music Festival in the city of Skellefteå, north of Sweden. The entrance is free of charge and the Festival is realized in Nordanå Park and Culture Center. With an naturally reduced budget provided by the free Festival, the objective of project was to design and built two entrance Portals and provide seats and tables for the open air Food Court. Except for a glued lam beam that was donated by the wood Industry Martinson’s, the project was entirely build using collected waste materials. For the main Entrance Portal, the concept created by the group was adapted and developed according to the available materials. For the Food Court and the Portal next to it, the main material used were 60 used doors that were about to be thrown away by a housing company in Umeå. The project was designed and built in smaller parts that are put together by bolts or simple geometric fittings. It can be easily assembled by reduced and untrained work force. All the parts were collected by the Festival to be used in the next years. The lights used in the project were own by the Festival, that in this project had its expenses reduced to the acquisition of screws and final transportation of the project parts.
Järv Arkitektur: Emili Norén, Johannes Sverlander, Krut Zetterlund, Luís Lanfredi Bem, Rebecka Örtegren, Sara Zetterlund.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Luís Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Shop’n go
Perspectives SketchUP+Maxwell Luís Lanfredi Belem 11/2012
The project was developed as initial concept for a fast food franchising. To be implanted in transport terminals and stations, the compact shop should be efficient and fast, and the food freshly made in the built in kitchen. The position and dimension of the equipments were crucial part of the design. Having products storage also as products display, the menu becomes almost “self explaining” and the shop more practical and space efficient. Repetition of modules allows constructive standardization even if different shops don’t have the same configuration.
Shop’n go The project was conceived using the program SketchUP and the images were rendered using the Maxwell plug-in.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Luís Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Cube house
Perspectives Revit Luís Lanfredi Belem 12/2012
luislanfredi@gmail.com
This Basic architectural project was developed using Autodesk Revit. Site modeling, family editing and management, component modeling and most architectural tools of the program were used on this “self-training” project. Creating and editing views and materials was necessary for achieving the desired quality of the images, as well as scene and environment setting and adjustment.
Luís Lanfredi Belem
Cube house Project and images produced using Revit Architecture.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Illustration
Pupill Arkitekter Archicad+Maxwell LuĂs Lanfredi Belem 2013
A part of the work Pupill Arkitekter is to organize and establish simple and efficient rendering methods. The Maxwell plug-in for Archicad is a simple program that can render good images along the project development. Creating templates and materials makes it easy to produce quality images to test and communicate aspects of the project, from fist sketches to detailing decisions.
Illustrations Initial sketches, existing buildings and interior images are used on the development of these projects.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
Constructive details
Pupill Arkitekter Archicad LuĂs Lanfredi Belem 2013
Most of my work for Pupill Arkitekter is has been focussed on the constructive details for the retrofitting of an office building from the 50s in Kungsholmen, Stockholm. These initial details are based on the feedback from the technical consultants and will serve as base for the final constructive drawings. At this phase, 3d modeling and rendering are also being used to visualize, develop and communicate our proposals for the parts of the project that are not yet defined.
Details Initial constructive drawings for some of the diverse parts of the project.
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
Conception
Construction
The development of a spatial solution for the platform that will serve as access the terrace and sitting place for the common areas at the top floor.
The constructive system proposed integrates lifting platform and air convectors. Specific combination of panels and insulation materials were thought to prevent vibrations and improve the acoustic performance.
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com
LuĂs Lanfredi Belem
luislanfredi@gmail.com http://issuu.com/luislanfredibelem/docs/portfolio contact:
+46 0723699123