A Perpetual Pride Luke Whitaker
Writtle School of Design Landscape Architecture BSc Design Dissertation
May 2013
luke. Landscape architecture
luke.
Landscape architecture www.allaboutluke.co.uk
A Perpetual Pride Luke Whitaker
Writtle School of Design Landscape Architecture BSc Design Dissertation
May 2013
l_j_whitaker@hotmail.com 07890553570 Honeysuckle Cottage Middle Duntisbourne Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 7AR United Kingdom
A Perpetual Pride A Contemporary Rethinking of Soho Square
Site Context
By Luke Whitaker Dedicated to Freya For putting up with her absent boyfriend
Soho
Student Number: Course: Project: Lecturers: Date:
98075879 Landscape Architecture Comprehensive Design Project Steve Terry, Tim Waterman 18.05.2013
Camden
Westminster
Th a
m
es
Southwark
Project Introduction
Social Context United Kingdom
strategy for the reconfiguration of historical urban squares in
(2007) the needs of communities affiliated with Soho through
response to a changing social context. The project argues that the
residency, commerce and culture are addressed. The underpinning
philosophies and principles guiding the design of many historic
philosophy of the document calls for collective respect and
urban landscapes are non-resonant with the idiosyncrasies of
cooperation between interrelating and coexisting community groups
modern popular culture and the contemporary needs of society.
as ‘One Soho’ seeks to retain and enhance the uniqueness that defines
Taking a conceptual approach, this project aims to utilise the
it. A continual strand that emanates through a document that
surrounding cultural and social context to drive a design that
umbrella’s cultural subdivisions including opportunity, order,
unpacks and re-configures a historic urban square to complement
enterprise and renewal is the need to support and augment the
the people who use it. The selected site is Soho Square, City of
vibrant Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community.
Westminster, London. Applying a contemporary treatment to a
LGBT community needs are made explicit within the Soho Action Plan
historic landscape will inherently prompt practical and functional
centred on broad support to action a report examining the feasibility
enquiries into, and the development of, strategies that may
for a London community centre for the LGBT Community, a
succesfuly marry the old with the new. Whilst these strategies will
fundamental LGBT support facility identified by Kairos in Soho (KiS)
form a framework within which the design can be formed, it is the
(Westminster City Council, 2007). Despite the significant LGBT
social context which will need to be addressed and understood in
presence in Soho, it is recognised that positive, public images and
order to produce a public landscape that champions the
expressions of the LGBT community are rare, suggesting a rationale to
contemporary needs of the people who use it. This has advanced a
encourage LGBT community led public art and the requirement for a
further enquiry into the social context of Soho Square.
public exhibition space (Westminster City Council, 2007).
Central London Soho Soho Square Tottenham Court Road
treet Oxford S
Road
Within the Soho Action Plan prepared by Westminster City Council
g Cross Charrin
This comprehensive design project will provide an alternative design
af Sh
0
bu tes
100m
r
e nu e v yA
200m
N
Soho Gay Village
Commercial Retail Cafes
Soho Square
Oxford Street
Independant Retail
Tottenham Court Road
Offices
1
Commercial Retail Cafes Independant Retail Restaurants
3
2 Wardour Street
4
Cafes
Charring Cross Road
Restaurants
Entertainment
5
Night Clubs
1. The Edge 2. Candy Bar
Offices
Restaurants
6
3. The Gay Hussar
Old Compton Street
4. Centrepoint Greek Street 5. The Pillars of Hercules
Entertainment
Residential
7
6. G-A-Y
8 10
12 14
13
7. Ku Bar 8. The Admiral Duncan
9
11
9. Comptons of Soho 10. Freedom Bar Soho 11. The Village 12. Escape Bar 13. The Yard
LGBT Entertainment Venues
0
100m
200m
N
14. The Enclave
A Perpetual Pride Making the Visible, Visible Soho is considered to be one of London’s most culturally and
Many of the Pride parades are fivilous, satrical and humourous in
Geographically Public Space
‘Pride Parades’
socially diverse districts. A recognised component advancing this
nature, helping them serve as an event for both homo- and
Temporary LGBT Public Space
cultural richness is the vibrant LGBT community (Westminster City
heterosexual consumption (Enguix, 2009). They do however fail to
Assumed Heterosexual Space
Council, 2006). It is however acccepted that even within urban
challende the heterosexual omnipresence of public space of a
villages appropriated by the LGBT community globally, public
permanent basis. Considering this and remembering the invisibility
expressions reflecting and celebrating there presence are rare
of LGBT expressions with the ‘gay village’ it can be understood that
(Enguix, 2009; Westminster City Council, 2006). This has advanced a
a current public space doens’t evenly represent the sexualities of
conceptual exploration into the dynamics of public space and the
the people who occupy it. This project will create design that
LGBT community.
suggests a public space that firslty celebrates the LGBT community
‘Gay Village’
LGBT and Heterosexual
Politically Private LGBT Space
Convergence
and
secondly
permanently
challenges
the
heterosexual
assumption of the public realm.
As Pride Parades serve to promote civil rights and popularise public oppinion towards the LGBT community, their temporary occupation of public space serevs as a paridigm of the relationship
Through the omnipresence of heterosexuality it can be assumed
between the LGBT community and the public realm (Brickell, 2000).
that heterosexuals will use the public space within gay villages. This
It is widely accepted that for Pride Parades to succesfully challenge
ostensive heterosexual invasion of socio-politically private LGBT
the Heterosexual assumption of public space they must occupy
space could however be positive. Through heirachial spatial design
space outside of the ‘gay village’ (Brickell, 2000; Johnston, 2005;
and LGBT imagery, representation, symbology and program a
Enguix, 2009). This suggests that, whilst acknowledging the terms
geographically public space, politically de-privatised by inviting a
‘public’ and ‘private’ are socio-political constructs, regardless of a
heterosexual presence, could provide a socio-politically public
geographically public location ‘gay villages’ are politically private
space which permanently and pleasantly challenges the
space (Brickell, 2000; Enguix, 2009).
heterosexual assumption of the public realm.
Permanent LGBT Public Space
Tottenham Court Road
Heterosexual
Soho Square
treet S d r o f x O
g Charrin
LGBT Socio-politically Private Space
‘People grow only by the processes of encountering the unknown’
LGBT
Cross
Sennett, 1986 cited by Shaftoe, 2006
Soho Gay District
A Concept Contextualised With an estimated residential LGBT population of 7-10 % and a regional, national and international LGBT visitor base, Soho is home to a thriving gay community (Westminster City Council, 2006). Soho
Leicester Square Av en ue
Square stands as the LGBT communities primary geographic public
Sh af t es bu ry
space. With its proximity to the new Crossrail development at Tottenham Court Road and Oxford Street it is well placed to form the visible and public centre of the LGBT community. Tottenham Court Road
treet Oxford S
Trafalgar Square
g Charrin
Cross 100m
N
0
100m
200m
N
LG GBT Socio-politically Public Space
LGBT Socio-politically Private Space
Leicester Square
Nationally Political Space
Soho Square
Corporate Entertainment
Cultural Diversity
Soho Gay District Corporate Space
LGBT Socio-p polittically Publiic Space
0
Trafalgar Square
*Elevation Not to Scale*
A Perpetual Pride Soho Square: The Site The lawn serves as a popular relaxation spot for visitors, especially on sunny days. It also provides a year-round ‘green’ space within a heavily urban context
12 large mature Platanus x hispanica exist within the central garden area of Soho Square. They add aesthetic character and ecological benifit and must be retained within the reconfiguration.
Several Statues and scultures exist within the Soho Square central garden. The staute of Charles II is listed and must remain with a potential relocation. The sculptural presence should be celebrated within the new design
The 1970’s plaza area to the south of the central garden area is dated in both form and material quality. Maintain the plaza concept but considered relocating and re-forming
Listed mock Tudor hut used as tool shed and a defining feature of Soho Square. Currently acts as focal point and centre piece of the Square. Must be retained and potentially relocated.
56 benches are located contained within the peremeter railings at the periphery of the central garden and on the southern plaza. This provides a large seating capacity but makes the square ‘inward’ facing, reducing the connection between the garden and the street.
1 2
The majority of surrounding buildings are Offices suggesting evening and weekend noise levels won’t be problematic
3
N
A complex one way traffic system encompasses the Square with key larger free flowing traffic on the bordering roads of Oxford Street, Chaarring Cross Road, Shaftesbury Avenue and Regent Street. Any treatment to the traffic flow will have to be well considered.
There are three listed buildings adding historical merit to Soho Square which must be celebrated: 1. The Manor House. Built in 1840 2. House of St Barnabas. Built in 1746 3. Roman Catholic Church of St Patrick. Built 1893
The Tottenham Court Road Cross Rail development running directly beneath Soho Square is estimated to increase daily passengers from150’000 to 350’000. This suggests a heavier pedestrian traffic using the site and a rationale to explore pedestrianisation
Site Issues
‘Fine Grained’ connecting streets are cluttered and uninviting with limited opportunity for medium - large vegetation
The surrounding buildings and mature large London Plain canopy limits available sunlight creating spaces of heavy shade
The 1932 London Squares Preservation Act outlines a requirement for tyhe design to include lawn and iron railings on a granite plinth
Conflict zones exist between pedestrian and vehicular circulation with the surounding road serving as a spatial barrier to the square.
Cultural Development Multi-culturalism
1660
Oxford Street
International Cuisine
Soho Square
Live Entertainment
Thriving LGBT community
Greek Street
Old Compton Street
*Elevation Not to Scale*
2013
A Perpetual Pride A Strategic Framework
Spatially celebrate buildings with historic merit
Merge the boundaries between ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ the square
Make entrances to central garden wider and more inviting
Visiblise LGBT imagery and symbollogy ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ the square
Respect and maintain historic central garden footprint
Activate the edges and central garden area
Retain historic design principles including four lawns divided by central pathways
Introduce contemporary uses for historic structures
Strategic Foundations
Strong conceptual and functional foundations underpin the design and balances the practical needs of the site with artistic expression. The concept is largely informed by theoretical discourses on the nature the LGBT community and public space during Pride Parades. Making a distinction between geographically public space and politically public space, ‘A Perpetual Pride’ provides a public space capable of reproducing the positive social and political impacts of Pride Parades 365 days of the year. Located within Soho’s gay village the project assumes Soho Square as a politically private space (Johnston, 2005; Enguix, 2009). Conceptually, the social requirement to provide a public space that provides a permanent challenge to the heterosexual assumption of public space requires occupants
A Destination and Gateway
of the space to read and experience the symbology and metaphor imprinted upon it. It has also been established that conviviality, humour, symbology, encounters with the unknown and the removal of barriers between homo- and heterosexual identities serve as the most successful methods for achieving this challenge (Johnston, 2005; Enguix, 2009). It therfore is fundamental to the design’s success that ‘conviviality’ is achieved. The prioritisation
of the pedestrian has been identified as a strategy for achieving this. Shaftoe (2008) claims that the removal of vehicles provides for a more convivial, people friendly atmosphere. Shaftoe (2008) continues to state that whilst form, facades and vegetation serve to allure people to a place, the biggest attraction is other people. It is then self-evident that reducing the number of vehicles the street could catalyse an increase in occupants at a pedestrian scale. This would also allow occupants to read the symbology and interact with ‘the unknown’. IFP (2013) place the ideal travelling speed to process sensory impressions at 5kph, claiming that the human sensory apparatus is programed for a pedestrian pace.
Designing For Conviviality 0m
facial features and expressions can be seen (Shaftoe, 2008)
Provide shelter and protection
Celebrate the theatrical
Pedestrian Movement
0 30m
Maximise seating potential
200m
N
100m
Human movement can be interpreted (Shaftoe, 2008)
Opportunities for people watching
100m
Areas of relaxation
Prioritise the pedestrian *Elevation Not to Scale*
A Perpetual Pride Finding the Form
The Development Process
1.
Exclusively Heterosexual
“It is a characteristic of the human mind that tries to dichotomize in its classification of phenomena….Sexual behavior is either normal or abnormal, socially acceptable or unacceptable, heterosexual or homosexual; and many persons do not want to believe that there are gradations in these matters from one to the other extreme.”
Exclusively Homosexual
The design process centred around recreating the spatial condition of both an individuals sexual awakening and the ‘coming out’ process. The concept of public and private space was made tangiable by applying varrying degrees of enclosure throughout the site. To spatially create the spation condition of being ‘out’ and ‘in’ the Kinsey Scale was used. The kinsey scale provides a model of sexuality which argues that few individuals sit within the commonly accepted heterosexual and homosexual subdivisions of sexuality but exist on a continuum of vary bisexual responses (The Kinsey Institute, 2013) . This continuum suggested a spectrum of sexxual identy that, whilst providing metophor for diversity, provided a spatial platform to guide the design process.
The Kinsey Scale
Varying Bisexual Responses
(Kinsey, 1953, cited by The Kinsey Institute, 2013)
Private
2.
Public
3.
Colour
Spectrum Rainbow
Ideas developing degrees of enclosure commenced the design process.
Distinctions between Heterosexualy assumed public space and LGBT private space were made.
Sexuality
Exploration of the spatial condition of being ‘in’ and ‘out’ of the closet.
Identity
Diversity
4.
6. Desirable circulation coupled with the applied spectrum created a central plaza space
Exploration of circulaation and degrees of enclosure were made, using the Kinsey ‘spectrum’ to dictate form
5.
Indentations to the four lawn areas were made. These exploraations investigated the idea of having both politically private and public spaces within the squaare
The Process Simplified
Public
Private
Enlarge the central garden.
Apply the public / private distinction.
Apply the ‘Spectrum’ of sexuality.
Insert the desired pedestrian circulation.
Spatially celebrate historic buildings and create ‘Public Plaza’.
Insert continuous seating.
Blur the boundaries between ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ the central garden.
Apply LGBT symbology inside and outside the central garden.
A Perpetual Pride A Design Proposal The Masterplan
reet Oxford St
A Gateway to Soho
TCR
Soho Square
in Charr
‘A Perpetual Pride’ is designed for and inspired by Soho’s vibrant Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community. Through metaphor, symbology and programme this project
ss Roa g Cro
produces a public landscape that champions the contemporary needs of the people who use it. Prompted by LGBT requirements outlined with the Soho Action Plan (Westminster City Council, 2006), ‘A Perpetual Pride’ presents London‘s alternative public space, celebrating not only the LGBT
d
community, but the richness of cultural difference. Soho is recognised as one of London’s most culturally and socially diverse districts (Westminster City Council, 2006). Coupled with the ongoing Crossrail developments at the neigbouring Tottenham Court Road Station this proposal provides Soho Square with a much needed contemporary landscape redesign. Concieved through the belief that the original design philosophies and principles of many historic squares no longer resonate with the idiosyncrasies of modern popular culture (Ward Thompson,1998; Edensor, 2002), this proposal also provides practical strategies that successfully marry the old with the new.
St ho eet Soford Str
Ox
0m
100m
Running Rill
Continuous ‘Lounger’ Seating
Functionally the Rill increases the desirablity of the narrow roads, conceptual it symbolises public visablity gravitating towards the square. delineates Soho Street
wd o R oa
n tR r u o utt m Co
Sottenha alk
The Central Plaza Loading Bay
Loungers provide further seating capacity with the central garden
The Public Plaza The public plaza spatially celebrates The three listed buildings in the square whilst providing a metophorically political space
The Tudor Cafe The Tudor Hut will be given a contemporary use, retrofitted to serve as a cafe on non-event days
Continuous Back to Back Seating
The Tudor Cafe
Continuous benches increase the seating capacity of the square whilst delineating the central pathways
Sliding gates gate the square during closure hours and provide the potential to restrict access for ticketed events.
T in W 1M
Detailed Area
The proposal removes existing parking to enhance the pedestrian experience of the square. The loading Bay’s provide essential service points for the buildings
Sliding Gates
N
200m
The Queer Plinth The ‘Queer Plinth’ provides the LGBT community a platform to public sculpture and imagery
Th
eR
ain
bo
t S le
w
s i l r a
The Rainbow
C
A large Arch provides an easily interpreted LGBT expression whilst offer an over head plane for lighting during events
ek Gre
S ton mp Co alk Old in W 2M
The Poetic Divisions
Sttreet
Wooden divisions inscribed with LGBT poetry spatially the lawns segment the lawns
The Central Plaza The central Plaza is a multifunctional, hard wearing space which provides the potential to hold large events
Taxi Rank Moped Parking
Site Functionality
Primary Circulation Secondary Circulation Central Circulation
t et h S Stre
ton mp Co lk Old in Wa 2M
Frit
A designated area for Taxi collection and drop off retains vehicular accessability to the square
0
25m
50m
N
An area for Moped parking, provides further accessability to the square
Primary Circulation
Lounger Seating
Loading Bay
Back to Back Seating
Taxi Rank
Single Bench Seating
Moped Parking
A Perpetual Pride A Celebration of Sexual Diversity Championing the LGBT Community Through programme and functionality the design provides a convivial space that invites in and pleasantly challenges the heterosexual omnipresence of public space. With visible LGBT symbology imprinted upon the landscape at its least ‘A Perpetual Pride’ is an important celebration of the LGBT community and at its most, provides a perminant challenge to the heterosexual assumption of the public realm. Symbollogy imprinted within Soho Square ensures that the LGBT commnity, a key ingredient to the richness of Soho’s cultural fabric, are reprsented and celebrated. The Rainbow provides a piece of easy to interpret symbology whilst providing a protective spatial barrier over London’s most diverse square. The ‘Queer Plinth’, named to draw a whimsical parrallel with Trafalgar Square’s Fourth Plinth, provides a platform for members of the LGBT community, and members of Soho’s minority groups, to project imagery of emerging indentities to the public. A
Private Space
The Tudor Cafe
A
Public Space
The Rainbow
The Queer Plinth
Multifunctional Central Plaza
Soho’s Gay Garden
LGBT Imagery
The Public Plaza The Public Plaza serves as an important element of the
Multifunctional Central Plaza
design proposal on a functional and conceptual level. Functionally, it provides a spatial celebration of Soho Square’s rich historic fabric, plithing St Patrick’s Church, the House of St Barnabas and the Manor House. It also provides
The Public Plaza
a spatial prompt, forging a direct connection with Greek Street, the most direct thourough fare to Old Compton Street, Soho’s LGBT cultural centre.
The Queer Plinth
Conceptually it provides a politically public platform and a space that challenges the Heterosexual omnipresnce of public space. Housing the ‘Queer Plinth’ the Public Plaza addresses the apparent invisibility of LGBT imagery within the ‘Gay Village’ identified by Enguix (2009).
As a
programmatical and physical solution, the Queer Plinth allows LGBT identities the freedom of artistic expression whilst cementing the presence of LGBT community into Soho’s urban fabric.
Scale: 1:200
0
100m
200m
N
A Perpetual Pride Detailing the Design Planting Strategy A
9.850
The planting strategy is both conceptually and functionally informed. Whilst micro climates, site location and site conditions dictate the planting palette, the concept has informed the choice of plant sizes, textures and growing habits.
10.0
Detailed Area
Conceptually, the design proposal celebrates cultural and social diversity, setting the site up as the
Planting Plan
threshold between cultural conformity and cultural expression. This concept has led to the inclusion of more wild plants set against a backdrop of vegetative formality. The central garden planting, designed to blur the boundaries between 'inside' and 'outside' the square, is afforded structure and seasonal interest by the central common beech hedge (Fagus sylvatica). The woodland planting adjacent to the beech hedge provides wild, naturalistic forms. The sweet box (Sarcococca confusa) adds further evergreen structure to the planting whilst the
A
shield ferns (Polystichum setiferum) bring a semi-evergreen, course textured drama to the scheme (RHS, 2013b). Contrasting fine textured plants are added to the planting palette with the selection of great woodrush (Luzula sylvatica 'Marginata') and fringe cups (Tellima grandiflora), both plants that are semi evergreen and, with a breeze, bring movement to the scheme (Gardiner's World,
9.750
2013). This luscious and shade tolerant scheme is further complimented by the introduction of colour with bleeding hearts (Lamprocapnos spectabilis), a hardy, herbaceous plant with heart
9.720
shaped rose red and white flowers in the spring and summer (RHS, 2013b).
B
10.280 9.800
A
The Planting Plan 10.690
B
Tellima grandiflora Polystichum setiferum
Luzula sylvatica 'Marginata'
Lamprocapnos spectabilis
Buxus sempervirons
Fagus sylvatica
AA
Tree Retention
Hard Landscaping
BB Sliding gates at the four entrance have both concpeptual and functional foundations. Serving as an obvious reference to degrees of enclosure they will allow for ticketed events
800mm x 200mm light granite paving provides a directional, hard wearing surface.
100mm x 200mm granite pavers connect the landscape with the architecture through scale and colour.
600 x 600 york stone flags contrast the direction paving and define nodal gathering points.
to be managed and held in the central garden. 11 of the 14 London Plane (Platinus x hispanica) will be retained. 3 trees have been strategic identified for removal. The removeal of the selected trees will increase available sunlight to the square. The removal also allows for a hard wearing treatment to be applied on the pedestrian paths and central plaza.
A. The public Plaza and ‘Queer Plinth’ provides a politically public space that challenges the heterosexual assumption of public space
London Plane (Platinus x hispanica) to be removed
A Perpetual Pride Realising the Space
A
C
B
A. The Home of Gay Pride
C. Somewhere Under the Rainbow
The Sexual Spectrum
A. Soho’s Cultural Centre
The Tudor Cafe
A Perpetual Pride A Place for Entertainment
A Dynamic Space for a Dynamic Public A Flexible Public Space
A perpetual Pride provides Soho with a trully flexible public space. In reponse to Soho’s cultural and social diversity the design proposal provides a multifunctional space that allows for the expression of all of Soho’s cultural richness. A space that can accommodate Soho’s thriving international cuisine industry on one day and stage a jazz festival the next, a Perpetual Pride is a public space design for both the people and the place. Designed using recognised strategies for conviviality identified by Shaftoe (2008) a Perpetual Pride embraces the vibrant culture and liberal attitudes of Soho. With increased back to back seating surrounding the central area spatial refrences are made to
AA
The central plaza accomodates temporary structures and seating which provides for a programme of events 356 days of the year. With the potential for a temporary bar around the Tudor Hut the square can host a range of festivities.
Soho’s theatrical inclinations whilst providing a platform to encourage people watching. Varying degrees of enclosure divide the space providing a spatial spectrum which offers the occupants the choice of exhibition or retreat. Vehicular access around the site has been reduced without impeading architectural services. The reduction in cars will stimulate a larger pedestrian permeation of the site which will stimulate a snow ball
The Village Green
effect. People attract people (Shaftoe, 2008). Embraced by the Rainbow Arch, the square will be able to grow with an ever evolving public and provide a continued and permanent reference and celebration of the LGBT comunity. Dedicated to diversity, a Perpetual Pride is London’s alternative public space.
A
A
With the recognition of Soho as an ‘Urban Village’ (Westminster City Council, 2006) the central space provides an ‘Urban Village Green’ which will centre the community and allow for a spectrum of cultural expressions.
AA
An Evening Programme
A
AA
The Rainbow Arch provides a functional elegant structure which houses lighting equipment facilitating an even programme. The central; plaza can bring Soho’s famous entertainment industry into the public realm.
The Rainbow
The Queer Plinth
References Brickell, C. (2000). ‘Heroes and Invaders: gay and lesbian pride parades and the public/private distinction in New Zealand media accounts’, Gender, Place and Culture, 7, (2), 163-178. Enguix, B. (2009). ‘Identities, Sexualities and Commemorations: Pride Parades, Public Space and Sexual Dissidence’, Anthropological Notebooks, 15, (2), 15-33. Gardeners World (2013). Plant Search [www.document] http://www.gardenersworld.com/plants/tellima-grandiflora/2965.html (Accessed 10 May 2013).v Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Johnston, L. (2005). Queering Tourism. Paradoxical Performances of Gay Pride Parades. London: ¬¬¬-Routledge. Kinsey Institute (2013). Kinsey’s Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale [www.document]. http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html (Accessed 20 April 2013). Royal Horticultural Society (2013). Plant Selector [www.document]. http://apps.rhs.org.uk/plantselector/ (Accessed 10 May 2013). Shaftoe, H. (2008) Convivial Urban Spaces; Creating Effective Public Spaces. Earthscan: London. Westminster City Council (2006). Soho Action Plan. London: City of Westminster.
luke. Landscape architecture
Thank you for Reading
Luke Whitaker Writtle School of Design Landscape Architecture BSc Portfolio of Works
2010-2013 l_j_whitaker@hotmail.com 07890553570 Honeysuckle Cottage Middle Duntisbourne Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 7AR United Kingdom