Mabel ho 559609 final journal

Page 1

AIR Journal Mabel Ho 559609 Tutor: Chen Canhui Semester 1-2014

1


ABOUT ME

My name is Mabel Ho. I am a third year student in the University of Melbourne, majoring in Architecture. Hailing from Singapore, I grew up under a milieu of constant change and diversification - the quintessential city life in an environment of neverending build possibilities. Yet having spent a number of my formative years in a high school in Canada, breathing in ocean breezes and wandering in forests during my spare hours, I have learnt to appreciate the combination between architecture and nature. I’m biophilic, though a visual geek at that. Visual complexity is often equated with beauty, such as a majestic landscape, or a city skyline, and is a reason why aesthetic of parametric abstractions holds such great attraction. However for me, it is always the simple things that nourish the human spirit. Such is the beauty of minimalistic aesthetics that inspire creativity. In this studio, I hope to achieve the responses of both by adding on to this journal with simplicity of my learning journey, as well as through elaborate experiments of parametric modelling abstractions.

2

At present, I have little prior experiences in Parametric modelling apart from the Virtual Communications subject I took in first year, in which we had to produce a paper lantern that is also wearable. Through that experience, I had gotten acquianted with the NURBS modelling in Rhino. The process of computing involved manipulating a series of vectors to form a curvilinear form (in which I represented the very condition of “fractal� design stipulated by the brief). Then, 2D and 3D panels were created out of that form and was further materialised in the card cutter - a subtractive method of fabrication where paper pieces were cut out in a lab. For the reason that we previously had to deal with tacky paper cut-outs, I am very excited at the prospect of this studio to not conform to this limitation and actually produce something cool from the 3D additive fabrication. I believe that having this knowledge in the forefront of technology would enable me to become a more equipped designer. :)


TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A A.1 DESIGN FUTURING

6

A.2 DESIGN COMPUTATION 12 A.3 COMPUTATION GENERATION 18 A.4 CONCLUSION 30 A.5 LEARNING OUTCOMES 31 PART B B.1 RESEARCH FIELD 34 B.2 CASE STUDY 1.0 36 B.3 CASE STUDY 2.0 46 B.4

TECHNIQUE: DEVELOPMENT

56

B.5 TECHNIQUE: PROTOTYPES 72 B.6 TECHNIQUE: PROPOSAL 84 B.7

LEARNING OBJECTIVES & OUTCOMES

92

PART C C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT 96 C.2 TECTONIC ELEMENTS 126 C.3 FINAL MODEL 138 C.4

ADDITIONAL LAGI BRIEF REQUIREMENTS

148

C.5 EXPANSION ON PROJECT 152 C.6 LEARNING OBJECTIVES 160 APPENDIX

3


4


PART A CONCEPTUALISATION

5


A.1 DESIGN FUTURING SUSTAINABILITY & THE DESIGN COMMUNITY: THE BRIEF

The topic of sustainability that is widely discussed of late, is situated in view of the pertinent crisis that we humans are facing. The argument by Fry (2008) informs that the design community requires a new paradigm on design theory to include concern for ecology besides that which is anthropocentric1. Traditionally, the development of design technologies that been focused on advancing existing technologies and to make them more democratic. This however, not only does not subtract from the wider material problem that humans are facing but also makes it worse. In light of excessive human consumption, climate changes and exponential global population growth, the future is uncertain. Fry (2008) promotes that since this is a material problem we are facing, there could also be material solutions - by design. That is fundamentally for designers to be educated in the ramifications of design input and outcomes and engage in sustainable choices. These motives are deemed as (1) Design Intelligence, and (2) Redirection2. Importance of Design intelligence is to think beyond economic and cultural positioning, meaning to view architecture beyond mere styles that pleases people. Knowledge of the agency of the material and immaterial, like how our social systems interact with the environment is crucial for understanding the problems we cause. Hence, it is important to be educated in ethical and sustainable choices through our practice and production in order to capture the potential for sustainable operation. As for Redirection, it is the commitment to participate in a common cause to act sustainably (not necessarily a political ideology that may be rife with paradoxes). This is conduct that complements knowledge. 6

The LAGI brief is interesting because it forges a direct link between designers and design that contributes to a more sustainable environment. Implications of the brief is that it harnesses what designers do best - aesthetic design, to rethink a new type of energy generation system that would engage the public. Considering the scale of the project and Denmark’s dedication to renewable energy, it is likely that the design will influence a discourse on the future of sustainable energy systems. Diving now into a few criterias of the design brief... The site located on a pier in the city of Copenhagen (Denmark), is formerly a shipyard. Its current state of its surroundings comprises of a multiplicity of purposes that mainly deals with water transport. This juxtaposition of activity with linear horizon lines has created calm scenic views to which the new design addition may explore and hopefully complement, along with its rich history. The installation requires a 3D sculptural form that is also a mind-stimulating piece that benefits the public. It is an energy generator on an energy grid that supplies to its vicinity. In other words, it must be able to capture energy from natural elements, store and transmit electricity3. The design should be pragmatic and constructable, and its height is constrained at 125m (in tall range for a wind turbine). Also it should not emit greenhouse gases that might cause pollution to its surrounding. At the same time, it is important to respect the significant history of the site and its geography4.


SITE

Fig 1:

Site plan

Fig 2:

The panoramic view from the location of the Little mermaid informs that the design will be a juxtaposition to the adjacent

industrial area located north of the site

7


A.1 DESIGN FUTURING COFFICE: SOLAR WIND BRIDGE

8

Fig 3:

Solar Wind Bridge design with specifications of the type and scale of wind turbines choices, the data management is an area

that may be optimised with parametric scripting


This project amongst other things, proposes the efficient reuse of highways by fitting wind turbines into the white spaces underneath5. Despite being a project that has yet been built, I particularly like this project because I feel that it examplifies the architectural possibility of design to collaborate harmoniously with technology. The notion of design futuring is very much evident in this project because it is opportunistic and problemsolving, not merely just a “lifestyle� sustainable architecture that most designs tend to idealize. Its main attraction lies in that white spaces under the bridge which would normally be a system of trusses has been intelligently replaces with circular modules fitted with wind turbines, able to generate precious renewable energy for up to to 15, 000 homes (along with solar cells on the roads above)6. Pretty impressive! Since bridges are generally

exposed to elements, the project has a great prospect of coming into reality not only for its intended original location, but in other highaltitude bridges as well. To me, this is sustainable design speaking for itself as a contemporary form, despite potential problems that are required to be solved. Such as how the design might affect birds in the vicinity - a problem that is commonly faced by windmill farms. Along with structural engineering, computer modelling wind impact is an important feature for this project to be considered viable, as undertaken by the architects to prove their design. As seen from the form of the design itself, parametric design is used to aid in the seamless integration of retrofitting geometries to the confinement of space. Specifically, a circle packing algorithm can be used for optimizing the allotment of wind turbines. 9


A.1 DESIGN FUTURING TOYO ITO: KOAHSIUNG STADIUM

Fig 4:

10

The seamless form of the stadium is accompanied by an intricately designed system of pipes under the solar panels


ROOF DETAIL

DIAGRAM OF HORIZONTAL PROFILES

solar panel array main trusses

concrete seat terraces lower terrace

This design by Toyo Ito fulfils the sole client’s brief to include solar panels by literally creating a form that is covered with them, yet no less sculptural. The design consists of 8,844 solar panels that is both a feat of architectural and engineering ingenuity since they were supported with a series of pipes7, showing the seamless integration of sustainable intent with digital architecture. Parametric modelling is clearly used here to define its structural/service system and also enhance the aesthetic composition. I chose this architecture because it shows a dissolution of boundaries, whether in emplying sustainable technology in architecture but also the concern with public to private spaces. As a public architecture, the architect has to ensure that favorable elements such as sunlight is adequately captured by the design, while unfavorable elements like excess sunlight or wind does not cause discomfort to its users. This is done with again with the use of computing

to determine the appropriate form for localised regions/profiles, at the same time still maintaining an expressive aesthetic. Despite the performance hype associated with this project, critiques have noted that at a cost of $150 million though reasonably priced for a stadium, efficiency of the solar panels are at question due to a general disregard for orientation8. As I bear these comments in mind for the exploration of my own type of sustainable architecture, I wonder if a solution might exist in the use of composite materials (besides solar panels) that are integrated through parametric modelling. Overall, the design itself is a revolution from tacky eco-architecture (solar) that since the 1970s has been a disparate element placed on roofs. Solar panels here are “cooked� into the very form of the building. With its 14,155m2 roof it could potentially generate 1.14 gigawatt hours of electricity every year, enough to power up to 80% of the surrounding neighbourhood9. 11


A.2 DESIGN COMPUTATION ALGORITHMIC THINKING COMPUTERIZATION VS. COMPUTATION The past few years have marked milestones after milestones in digital architecture, causing a reevaluation of the processes of architecture and its communication. Theories of the digital in architecture has shifted from the representation to logical and operative, and architectural designs are becoming not just concerned with form, but also the formations10. In effect, the use of computers extends beyond just the assistence in devising curvilinear surfaces and volume that is seemingly the characteristic of this new breed of architecture, a term dubbed “computerization�11. This is the basic form conceived by a computer, which may be lacking in data inputs by the human user. Contrasted against computerization, emerging technologies are enabling the morphogenesis and materiality in generative prccesses, creating a digital tectonic somewhat spontaneous but actually a result of calculated data - Algorithmic thinking thus becomes the intelligence to creatively explore fabrication ideas12. The skill of scripting or writing codes to define perimeters is known as computation, lends its way into the parametric design world.

INTEGRATION VS. REVERSAL The role of the architects that once merely exists as problem solvers in formal and linguistic modes of form representation, are evolved to also include puzzle making new constrains in a project to be better oriented to the social and environmental aspects13. In order words, architecture has the potential to become meaningful in our lives rather than just a stylistic shelter. As the dynamics of building has changed to become centred around software/IT, it is now possible for an integrated communication among the building makers. The agency of travelling information as orchestrated by architects allows prompt responsiveness on all front of disciplines involved, which serves up a more compelling design criteria14. 12


A L G O R I T H M I C T H I N K I N G P S P M

R O U A

O L

B V Z K

L I Z I

E N

M G

L N

E G

13


A.2 DESIGN COMPUTATION JURGEN MAYER H: METROPOL PARASOL

Fig 5:

Canopy/ parasol of the design appears to be aloft the adjacent buildings, yet did not appear to have their bulk

The Metropol Parasol located in Seville has a multifunctional program, mainly a market space, underground museum, cafe and plaza. Six parasols are interwoven into the surrounding city fabric. The stunning piece of architecture is a symbol of cultural progression that revalizes the old city of Seville, as well as a landmark for the future. The main challenges of creating the design (largest wood structure in the world) is its sinuous form and occuring loads15. Development of this design which is characteristically ambitious is decidedly magnificent because of its scale. Even for the 14


amount of materials that were used, it does not appear to be heavy as the waffle panel grid allows a smithering of light through to the urban space below, decreasing shawdow casts. Moreover, they were positioned at a height that is meant to be a dominant view, yet not an intimidating one. I chose this project not only because of its beauty, but also the rational that parametric design can support all these qualities in a form (scale, bulk) while playing with the interesting profiles of the structure. As we know, in order to capture wind/sun, scale and height positioning, in addition to practical orientation, are important. The visible structures, materials thicknesses vary according to simulations of their loading. Development and construction of the parasol required a complex iterative coordination. Using 3D architectural modeling, the stresses in the wood’s profiles could be determined, hence, all joints and structural profiles were optimized corresponding to test results16. An important aspect of the computation is each planar component (image to the right) make up the lattic existing in different forms - a level of complexity that is hard to match in traditional craftsmenship17. In addition to the parts that totally fit together, holes are also milled out to form joint connections. The design literally holds together like a puzzle, strengthened by bolt connections. To some degree, it translate to the durability of the structure held both in compression and tensile forces.

15


A.2 DESIGN COMPUTATION SHIGERU BAN: CENTRE POMPIDOU METZ

The building is remarkable for its roof structure, one of the largest and most complex built to date, which was inspired by a Chinese hat found in Paris by Shigeru Ban. The Centre Pompidou-Metz is a museum of modern and contemporary arts located in Metz, capital of Lorraine, France. The roof structure was assembled by weaving six beams into a hexagon, an innovative, benchmark concept in the construction world that is also used in other Shigeru Ban’s work18.

Fig 6:

An illuminated roof of the Centre Pompidou Metz, proudly displaying its “humble” roof structure that is derived from

traditional construction methods with modern technology

16


The building appear luminous as internal light lit up at night. This Japanese/ French hybrid shows the familiar roof aesthetic by Shiguru Ban, a weaving pattern that tessalates from wood, instilling a sense of lightness and permeability to the material. The sinous form, much like our previous precedent study is also evident here. The overhanging roof, up to 20 metres in places, protects the walls from the elements. The membrane is translucent, letting through 15% of the light to reveal the hexagonal roof structure at night when the building is lit from the inside19. In regards to the choice of material, wood is chosen for its lower embodied energy (and easy recycling) in comparison to other popular support materials like concrete and steel20. Every single beam of 18 kilometres of glue-laminated timber beams was CNC-machined to unique proportions. This enabled both the production of multidirectional curves and the perforations for the final assembly (node points, pins and braces).

Alongside, the texile membrane covering the whole building, protects the wooden frame from rain, sun and wind - the membrane is made of fibreglass and Teflon (PTFE, or polytetrafluoroethylene). It is light as well as selfcleansing. Addtionally use in combination with the organic form produces a landscape feature that is very suitable for its reputation as an inviting public space. Overall the building shows parametric design might be a rethinking of traditional building methods for production of forms that communicate expansive design and environmental intent. The application of material/form this design may be helpful for our explorations of since we require capturing the renewable energy source. One can also learn from the concept of creating an architectural object that is stimulating to our senses yet at the same time blends in with nature.

17


A.3 COMPOSITION GENERATION CONCEPT OF PARAMETRIC DESIGN Definition: PARAMETRIC MODEL: A model whereby part of the design relate and change as defined by the various parameters and dependencies stated by the designer21. (1) An algorithmn is produced by a series of perimeters/ dependencies- algorithmns, computers cannot produce new sets of instructions except for inputs by the human user22. (2) A recipe is used to define the direction of the design (not arbitrary) - therefore the process of making also exists in an analogue stage prior to a digital one. Perhaps this may explain the conditions of the model that matches with its meaningful context23. Within this definition, it can therefore give a sense that parametric design is as Daniel Davis calls it “associative geometry, scripting, flexible modelling, algorithmic design”24. The challenges of defining parametric design according to him is that the excessive focus on defining a parametric model itself (somewhat oxymoronic). To explain, many architects have the excessive focus on the model’s output, on the asthetics of a parametric model “style”, while neglecting that the process of constructing and associating relationships with the model throughout fabrication is the ultimate aim of parametric modelling. It is afterall, a technique. By focussing on appearance of a generative (an output of parametric modelling) model, the technique becomes repetitive, which is in fact hampering the potential of expanding on parametric design. 18


Here is how parametric design needs to be promoted: Generating an automated process eliminates tedious repetitive tasks, the need for complicated calculations on the fly, the possibility of human error, and generates huge shifts in the outcomes with slight variations of the original parameters25. Parametric thinking introduces the shift in the mindset between the search for an specific static and defined formal solution, and the design of the specific stages and factors used to achieve it. As this is a parametric design studio, so as to qualify the computational design as an integrated art form, the composition of the design may be thinking about how components can come together, but the generation stage may not be limited to mere transformations of energy in an operable sense. Hence, facade is key. The aesthetic should be as inviting and at the same time shows complex transformations. For the purpose of our experimentations, it is important to have a clear idea on design outcomes that physically represents maximised input data (which is essentially nonparametric considerations, e.g. mechanism, that grounds the design to be functional and not something completely organic). The understanding of the underlying logics of architecture is important and advantages of the design should preferably be traceable, expecially in this modern age whereby rapid feedback on performance is made easy through computer simulations26.

19


A.3 COMPOSITION GENERATION PRIMITIVES: ARANDA\ LASCH

Fig 7:

The different constructed foams made out of 3D-printing/ foam

The procedural design of Aranda lasch is recognised by the “Tooling” techniques they advocate, essentially a guide on “recipes” of pattern making27. In their series of installation in collaboration with fashion house Fendi - Primitives, invites people to participate in building blocks for disparate pieces of furniture. The installation offers an insight into construction technology and parametric design as users are encouraged to upload their designs on an app in which would be translated into actual built forms by the team28. 20


Fig 8:

A simplified diagram explains processes and inputs in layman’s term

From composition, the diagrams show that the language of scripting provided the architects the ability to use 4 different scaled objects to nestle into bundles, hence forming new shapes. Because the faces were subdivided, the differently scaled geometries were able to fit. A single face of a big form may be able to accommodate a few faces of the smaller forms. In this way, the final design would schematically be associable as a united object. Hence it is also a utilizable piece of furniture. This is done through the process

of fractal growth, using an octohedral unit to create highly-faceted geometries that have triangulated faces. Aside from that, the fractal growth was also represented as the geometries cluster together. The differently possibilities of the forms to be unique even coming from the same rudimental parts is attributed to specifications on the parametric modelling software.

21


Fig 9:

22

The design layout and different assemblies of an installation


Fig 10:

Different kinds of generated forms are shown here, all unique, yet from the same programming code

Through explorations of parametric scripting, they demonstatrated how a single unit can be used to generate multiple forms that may be interpretated differently. Scripting language allows the architects to develop a commonality with users whom have no prior

technological language because they are able to simply imput parameters into the app. This is an interesting aspect of the installation that showcases the functionality of parametric scripting from composition to generation. 23


A.3 COMPOSITION GENERATION UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART: ICD/ITKE RESEARCH PAVILION 2011

24

Fig 11:

The constructed pavilion, though temporarily in place, can in fact be reconstructed in another location because of the

construction logic behind it that uses bolts to join “cells” together


The premise of this project is an investigation into construction and material stability. This project is inspired by the bionic structure of a sand dollar (a type of sea urchin)29. Benefits of this structure include low shear forces and non-existant bending moments because of geometric arrangement of polygons and multiple layers. Given that the tessalation of the shell is reliant on elegant structural logic, material usage is low. Furthermore, the pavilion can be easily dismantled and reassembled, allowing for multiple usages30. The experiential design as a lit-up pavilion may also be attributed to the tessalated perforations in the inner shell.

CONCEPT OF MATERIAL SYSTEM31 / interstitial component in skeletal shell (mimicks biological system of organism) / hexagon pattern: 3 plate morphology meet together at one point / heterogeneity: cell-sizes are not constant (central cells are taller because of a lesser degree in curvature compared to cells located at the edges) / anisotrophy: cells stretch and orient themselves according to mechanical stresses / 2 levels of hierarchy: finger-joints form the connections at one level (mimicks calcium protusions of organism as well as associating with traditional carpentary joints) while screw connections form the connection for another level (for easy dismantle and reassembly)

25


Fig 12:

Illustration of the construction logic behind the easily deformable pavilion

Composition of the material system begins through using the geometry of hexagons to spread out throughout the structure. Following that, a series of analysis of both the self-weight and the wind loads of the structure was carried out to determine the optimal curvature. This process of form-finding is a demonstation that parametric design allows careful changes to the form of the design for optimization. The structure remains as a caternary surface existing in perfect compression because the software code allows it to be so. 26


Fig 13:

Structural analysis of the self-weight of the structure and its inherent stabelising properties

27


A.4 CONCLUSION RESEARCH ON RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

S O L A R Large scale requirement of renewable energy dictates that a sensible and abundant method should be used. Primarily energy from the sun is extremely available though varied across the daytime as well as through climate changes. Denmark has a typical coastal climate with mild, humid weather in winter and cool, changeable weather in summer, and mean temperatures do not vary greatly between the two seasons. However, the weather in Denmark is strongly influenced by the country’s proximity to both the sea and the European Continent. This means that the weather changes may be accounted by the prevailing wind direction. For instance with a predominantly Westerlies wind during the summer, coast boundaries may have a cover of very thin cloud forming - called stratocumulus - often forms at low altitude, blocking the sun32. Current common technologies range from light capturing panels such as photovoltiacs, photoelectrochemical cells, solar chimneys that sometimes are used in combination with mirrors and thermal energy. I do note that technology involving mirrors might be controversial for their impact on birds and may be highly uncomfortable for human users.

W A T E R As mentioned above, though water might be used with solar energy technologies, they usually involve heating to produce kinesthetic thermo energy. Other common forms of hydroelectricity technologies are such as geothermal (deals with water from the ground), or kinesthetic energy sources from tide/waves/currents. Even though our site is a port surrounded by water, unfortunately this trajectory might be less consequential as the surrounding area is highly urbanised and not as prone to dynamic energy conversion. Despite, other technologies like osmotic power/ salinity gradient power, or theories in regards to hydropower may be explored that might be interesting.This might explore a new dimension in relation to the brief to respect the site’s history as a port.

*** 28

All research here is taken from Ferry, Robert & Elizabeth Monoian, ‘A Field Guide to Renewable Energy Technologies’’ for the LAGI Competition 201436


W

I

N

D

An assortment of wind turbines (also windbelts) that are aeronautical engineered exists in a variety of heights on the current market. Although they are generally less than 100m33, well below the standards recommended by the brief. Wind technology is at present very popular in Denmark due to its preferable coastal location with high windflows. Despite, the city of Copenhagen is located in a zone with relatively lower winds compared to the rest of the country [arrow on image]34. This may be a factor to keep in mind though even windfarms are not common, there are viable windmills around the area -like Lynetten’s 7 windmills that claim to have a capacity factor about 20.5%. The wind speed is described to be in the medium range for Danish windpower. sites.

B I O

&

O T H E R

The implications of biomass/ biofuel that require a high level of post-processing may mean that a factory is involved, which is undesirable for the context of our brief. Other technologies such as kinethic energy harvesting from movements (may be possible for civic interaction) are still in their founding or theoretic stages. This notion of technology as the experiential is nonetheless very attractive to explore and maybe even synthesize. As I briefly refer to the need for energy storage, conventionally grids are used . Not only are they a blight to the sight, they have to exist overhead. This aspect can be a potential area for change in our project, to explore attractive transmission networks. Possibly the Kangaroo plug-in may be engaged to re-create a tensile structure that fulfils this need.

29


A.4 CONCLUSION PERSONAL REFLECTION The scramble for sustainable practices that have found its way into the 21 century has much to do with evolving systems that humans live in. Our requirements for resources are increasing just as our technology is advancing, which is a genuinely problematic. Hence the solution for this material problem has to be solved through deliberate methods and practices that aims to neutralise our negative carbon footprints. Within the architectural realm, we have shifted to a new paradigmn where we are working a lot with digital and factory fabrication. This typology has significant benifits, such as efficiency and ability for precise/careful consumption. The design approach this project is one that has to consider constructability, as well as practical usage of energy collection.Moreover, innovation (expressive architecture) is bound to benefit Copenhagen’s public, tourism sector and achieve its environmental goals.

30


A.5 LEARNING OUTCOME

As I approach the end of Part A for this studio, I have gained a deeper knowledge of the expectations of sustainable technologies and how it can have the potential to be a commonplace in our urban fabric through good design. Often sustainable technologies are viewed as inspiring. However, with the expression of parametric design, a new expression of sustainable technologies that are so pertinent to our lives may be created. This aesthetic that is used with algorithmic data to reflect actual data may in fact produce an architecture that is symbolic as well as intellectual.The key is to aim for a simple user experience with measurable returns. Sustainability as a feature has been a much talked about topic in the architectural world. A project of this scale encourages design with practical harvesting of energy and public interaction is indeed at the forefront of sustainability discussion. The important thing now is to think about carrying on with our design as a team with expansive technologies and material choices for such a unique typology and use them with parametric modelling variations.

31


32


PART B CRITERIA DESIGN

33


B.1 RESEARCH FIELD MATERIAL SYSTEMS: TESSALATION

Fig 1:

Volta Dom by Skylar Tibbits.

Material systems are commonly conceived as a form of architectural ornamentation. As Mousavi argues, “it is through ornament that material transmit affects”1. Not to include affection, which is the emotional and bodily reaction of the individual towards the object, but rather for architecture to have an affect - stimulate the mind through specific qualities of the form itself. It is non-personal and unmediated, allowing different kinds of sensory reaction to be generated. The architecture does not seek consensus, but rather allows for numerous subjectivity to be developed. It does not mean abandoning the formal and normative styles, but to include people’s interaction in the process of design in order to determine the aesthetics of a material system. In other words, material effects are not only visual effects; they are experiential effects2.

34

According to Mousavi, modern ornament also has to exist to serve a function or purpose, not purely decorative or symbolical3. This take on architectural ornamentation presents itself in many ways in today’s buildings whereby digital tectonic is a new element of ornament. Patterned environmental filters are woven into forms, spatial partitions set out in interesting compositions, etc. This view that ornament should be performance-driven is also conferred by leading architects Herzog and De Meuron, whom state “performance is the only consideration”4 in the use of computational tools. Despite, the architects note that using environmental performance to direct a design idea can be distracting as plenty of information may be irrelevent to how the building might actually function. Hence it is important for a distilled focus on architectural-environmental intent for performance to be measurable.


Fig 2:

Carpenter Puppet Theatre by Pierre Huyghe.

For our exercise, a range of taxonomy on “Material Systems” exist. Each one to do with structure, screen or surface has clearly to do with guiding the design process and objectively, different approaches to fabrication methods. (Recently there have been investigations of material adaptive/dynamic and mutable properties.) In particular, our group was interested in the “Tessalation” material system. In doing so, we will also cover topics of material performance and patterning, as they are related.

The creation of public spaces with the use of tessalation and computer design is largely focussed on facade aesthetics, as well as structural efficiency. For instance, the Volta Dom by Skylar Tibbits [Fig 1] is a doubly-curved vaulted structure is made by transforming complex curved vaults into developable strips using a digital modelling software5. This close the close relation between the use of patterning and tessalations (more to do with panelling) in enabling structural designs. Another example is the Carpenter Puppet Theatre, built with 500 unique white polycarbonate panels diamond shaped interlock to become a rigid structure6. The “cells” are simply bolted together, in order to be easily assembled and disassembled. Just like the previous example on material perforance, the concept on tessalation over here shows that it is related to efficient construction as well.

35


B.2 CASE STUDY 1.0 IWAMOTO SCOTT: VOUSSOIR CLOUD

36

Fig 3:

Voussoir Shell - sssembled panels with tabs from inner vaults.

Fig 4:

Aerial view of vaults shows that panels are connected in a single architectural fabric with no disunities.


Fig 5:

Form-finding and tessalation diagrams, along with material performance analysis.

Through tessalated surfaces, the whole is considered as a repetition of parts. Tessalation involves complex geometric organization, the systematic behavior of a material and its assembly7. Many of the patterning schemes can be 2D or 3D. Alongside, experimental building skins with dynamic, adaptive behaviors are also beginning to materialise, creating more opportunities for panelling to be responsive. In this case study, Iwamoto Scott created a vaulted installation of unconventional ultra-lightweight voussoirs, hence the name “Voussoir Cloud�. This design alludes to voussiors - traditionally are wedged shaped masonry blocks (made out of stone) assemblied in a vault. Through using the method of tessalation, vaults made out of caternary arches may exist in perfect compression due to the stiffness of the wood panels. The intent of this piece is to refute that logic to create both bulk and permeability, an effect

that is made because tessalation is used with manipulating the qualities of wood. According to Iwamoto, the installation explores the coupling of potentially conflicting constructional logics – the pure compression of a vault with an ultra-light weight material8. Despite the wooden panels being much lighter than traditional voussoirs, they act the same way structurally. This design that is a re-interpretation of a traditional building method is achievable because digital fabrication is used for precise assembly. Tessalation over here also uses heterogenous patterning for a more interesting skin. Such as petals with tri-angular shapes, each one having either 1 curve, 2 curves or 3 curves. In effect, tessalation is used for optimising material performances, and as a patterning tool.

37


B.2 CASE STUDY 1.0 MATRIX EXPLORATION

Panelling type | Point distribution

The form-finding process of Voussoir Cloud is created in the Kangaroo plug-in of physics simulation in Grasshopper. As the form requires a mesh for later panelling, the referenced geometry requires closed polylines, which in this case is made of voronoi cells (with an arranged seed number). Within Kangaroo, there is a component of unary force and rest length which created the “relaxed arches� between the cells of closed polylines. Over here, the main interest is in referencing different geometries as well as point distributions.

38


Panelling type | Point distribution

Referenced geometry: Circle

39


B.2 CASE STUDY 1.0 MATRIX EXPLORATION

Panelling type | Point distribution

Referenced geometry: Triangle/ Polygons

40


Panelling type | Point distribution

Referenced geometry: Quadrilaterals

41


B.2 CASE STUDY 1.0 DESIGN POSSIBILITIES

Fig 6:

Selected Iteration 1

This design is created first as a hexagonal grid, using a high rest legth and high unary force in the kangaroo engine to achieve the crown at the top. It is a rigid stucture made out of pipes on triangles - much like a truss system. Therefore, because the structure is strong and materially efficient, it would be suitable to nest heavy loads from above or under. This will be helpful if there is heavy equipment associated with energy collection. Furthermore, as a modular unit, replication on a grid may produce many of such structures. This would mean fabrication and economical efficiency. Challenges of this design include that while material is used efficiently, too many surfaces generated would be counter-productive as well as difficult to produce. Hence a smooth function is used on the curves to make the material more workable on Grasshopper.

42


Fig 7:

Selected Iteration 2

Similar to the last design, this design uses pipes. Regardless, it forms a relatively flat top that could be a better option for additional panelling (e.g. if solar panels are used). Since it has a round shape at the crown, it is better for facilitating a swirling motion as well (e.g. kinetic wind). As the roof of the design connects to a hole in the middle, it may also be good for rain water collection. As both designs are highly fractal, they mimic the formations in nature. It might also be possible to use them to create a more habitable space that is reminiscent of plant life which is missing in the Refshaleøen site. They could be designs that purify the air while creating clean energy.

43


B.2 CASE STUDY 1.0 DESIGN POSSIBILITIES

44

Fig 8:

Selected Iteration 1

Fig 9:

Selected Iteration 2


The voussoir forests are formed from a network of arches made out of hexagons. It is made so as to use each geometry as a part of a larger pattern, with the rectagular form like the area of the design site. As it uses hexagons, it is similar to Fig 1, except that panels were made with perforations. Implications of the design include that there is an element of randomness as well as order in the organisation of the trees. The design may be used for physical interactivity, like a maze, which would increase engagement with the public. 45


B.3 CASE STUDY 2.0 MATSYS: SHELLSTAR PAVILION

Fig 10:

46

The pavilion took 6 weeks to get from design to fabrication to assembly - a process made possible by parametric modelling.


The Shellstar Pavilion aims to provide maximum space using the smallest amount of materials. through parametic modelling, the process of design to fabrication to assembly, despite its complicated patterning, took only six weeks. Within the brief, the design team claims that “Using a custom Python script, each cell is optimized so as to eliminate any interior seams and make them as planar as possible, greatly simplifying fabrication. It is made out of 1500 panels, and because planarity of the panels were maintained as much as possible, fabrication was easy as panels were cut from a flat Coroplast sheet. This eliminates wastage and is thus better for the environment. As it is made out of caternary surfaces much like the Voussoir Cloud, the Kangaroo simulation is a point of interest in our exploration.

Fig 11: The process of designing includes not just digital modelling but also exploration into structural integrity and suitability of joints.

47


B.3 CASE STUDY 2.0 REVERSE ENGINEERING PROCESS

1

Within Rhino, create isosceles triangles.

2

Impose curves onto a triangular grid. Alternatively, use the Starling to create triangles within triangular curves.

3

48

Set anchor points on the resultant mesh. Reference into the Kangaroo simulation engine.


4

Reference geometry as the mesh. Set unary force to z-direction. Set connections to vertices of mesh faces. Run simulation.

5

Create planar panels from discontinuities of curves.

49


B.3 CASE STUDY 2.0 HAQUE D+R: BURBLE

Fig 12:

50

A floating Burble during night time is made out of helium balloons and anchored to the ground by the weight of the crowed.


Fig 13:

A tessalated grid of triangles form the underwirings in which the balloons nestled on.

Fig 14:

Conceptual diagram informs wiring of elements within the Burble, namely the form of the grid, positioning of balloons and handle bar.

As our previous exploration of the ShellStar Pavilion was lacking in a strong experiential design idea that adheres to the brief, our team decided on using a more fun, interactive project to compliment the technique we have learnt. The Burble is a kinetic design made out of balloons and a triangle grid. Through programming of LED lights within the balloons, the Burble is able to adapt to the whims of the people holding on to a handle bar. The architect Usman Haque had in mind for the public to participate in influencing a built form by creating an installation which is can be held on to yet visually impactful to the urban site surrounding it9 - precisely a concept that is striking in our project brief. As the quality of kinetic motion of the Burble floats with the wind, it is a design our project group would like to explore the potential of harvesting wind energy with a similar form-finding method. Kangaroo in combination with grasshopper, is

51


B.3 CASE STUDY 2.0 REVERSE ENGINEERING PROCESS

hexagon 1 Create grid on Grasshopper.

52

2

Use a patterning effect to cull negative spaces from grid.

3

Impose triangular lines into hexagon grid.


4

Reference curves into the Kangaroo simulation engine. Set anchor points and run unary force simulation.

5

Reference mesh spheres on mesh. Variate number. Set gradient.

6

Extend lines out from curves to spheres. Run wind simulation.

53


B.3 CASE STUDY 2.0 REVERSE ENGINEERING

Fig 15:

54

Diagrammatic process of Kinetic simulation of form in Kangaroo engine (2-sec intervals from right to left).


55


B.4 TECHNIQUE DEVELOPMENT EXPLORATION OF MATRIX

The method for forming our matrix involved using the Kangaroo engine to blow up curves into a vault. As seen, tessalations used in the patterns were made using a mixture of algorithmic calculations and culling. Anchor points provided the form with its distinctive relationship to space around. Whether it occupies space vertically or horizontally depended on the placement and manual movement of points during the simulation. Forces have a direct impact to the height of the structure and force levels give an indication of how stable the geometries of the pattern is. Finally, rest length shows how the form can be stretched or relaxed assuming that the joints stay in the same position).

56

Anchor Points: = Rest Length: Force:

9 1 200

Anchor Rest Le Force:

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

9 1 -200

Anchor Rest Le Force:

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

9 0.3 200

Anchor Rest Le Force:


Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

16 1 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

17 1 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

16 1 -150

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

17 1 -100

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

16 0.3 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

17 0.3 200

57


B.4 TECHNIQUE DEVELOPMENT EXPLORATION OF MATRIX

58

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

21 1 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

44 1 200

Anc Res For

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

21 1 -50

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

44 1 -50

Anc Res For

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

21 0.3 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

44 0.3 200

Anc Res For


Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

26 1 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

58 1 200

An Re Fo

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

26 1 50

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

58 1 100

An Re Fo

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

26 1.1 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

58 1.3 200

An Re Fo

59


B.4 TECHNIQUE DEVELOPMENT EXPLORATION OF MATRIX

60

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

45 1 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

45 1 150

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

45 1.5 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

16 1 200

16 1 200

16 1.7 200


Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

53 1 200

13 1 250

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

53 1 300

13 1.9 200

Anchor Points: Rest Length: Force:

53 2.1 200

13 1 200

61


B.4 TECHNIQUE DEVELOPMENT EXTRAPOLATION OF MATRIX

Defining parameters: For the extrapolation of our matrix, an algorithm was used for placement of balloons on the form. A wind simulation is then performed. Forces were found to be helpful in understanding structure, while rest length is ignored as we will not consider an elastic material for the curve lines. Grid density and different tessalations were used as generating patterns.

Fig 16:

Testing wind simulation on form with anchors around perimeter.

Defining the algorithmic code: For our first try-out with the wind simulation, input meshes were focussed on, instead of input curves in order to minimalise the complexity of the script when it comes to prototyping. This mesh would, from our knowledge, reference from a triangles/polygons since they are stable geometries that provide flexibility to a surface. With the use of plug-ins such as starling and weaverbird, we managed to utilize a few of our patterns for the extrapolation of matrix. In [Fig 16], a test on the algorithm. A star shaped grid is triangulated and put through the Kangaroo engine. Grasshopper is used to place spheres at the projected points of vertices on the mesh (analogue method).

Fig 17:

62

Testing out the algorithm on a triangulated grid.


63


B.4 TECHNIQUE DEVELOPMENT EXTRAPOLATION OF MATRIX

1a

1b

Force: Grid density (geometry): Balloon density (geometry): Balloon projection length:

64

180 1 0.5 3


2a

2b

Force: Grid density (geometry): Balloon density (geometry): Balloon projection length:

150 1 0.5 3

65


B.4 TECHNIQUE DEVELOPMENT EXTRAPOLATION OF MATRIX

3a

Force: Grid density (geometry): Balloon density (geometry): Balloon projection length:

66

150 1 0.6 4

3b


4a

Force: Grid density (geometry): Balloon density (geometry): Balloon projection length:

4b

150 1 0.5 3

67


B.4 TECHNIQUE DEVELOPMENT EXTRAPOLATION OF MATRIX

5a

5b

Force: Grid density (geometry): Balloon density (geometry): Balloon projection length:

68

150 1 0.5 3


6a

6b

Force: Grid density (geometry): Balloon density (geometry): Balloon projection length:

20 1 0.5 3

69


B.4 TECHNIQUE DEVELOPMENT EXTRAPOLATION OF MATRIX

7a

Force: Grid density (geometry): Balloon density (geometry): Balloon projection length:

70

20 1 0.6 4

7b


8a

Force: Grid density (geometry): Balloon density (geometry): Balloon projection length:

8b

150 1 0.5 3

71


B.5 TECHNIQUE: PROTOTYPES SKETCH WIND SIMULATIONS Wind, as a major factor into our design, is simulated with the control of an MD slider which inputs a vector for the force to be applied. It acts much like a point attractor which influences the vertices of the mesh, after extracting actual locations of points. There is also a function to multiply the vector transformation number, resulting in greater movements, which reflects wind strength. From referencing 3 different types of meshes, we were able to observe at a superficial level the behaviors of mesh to identical wind forces. To conclude the understanding of stresses within their respective structure would be too presumptuous as the movements are far too subtle to the naked eye. Indeed, it would be of greater use for colour-coding stress levels of the meshes to evaluate their scalar properties.

Nonetheless, a couple of empirical observations were made on the relationship between properties of meshes and magnitude of movements. 1. Denser grids may require little unary forces as they rise up very easily. Despite this gives a disadvantage in the Kangaroo engine since this accounts for both unary forces with wind forces. Thus, the motion of wind impact is less obvious [7]. 2. There are localised instability in meshes that uses a pattern with inconsistent geometries, coupled with an irregular shape of form. From [5], the narrower strands of the mesh look like they could disrupt the kangaroo engine.

[7] [5]

72


One important criticism of this wind simulation is that it performs based on the intrinsic quality of the mesh itself rather than on actual external applied forces. As the component treats the mesh as a collection of points, rather than actual surface area, basic science of wind reaction is negated. This means that openings in the mesh that would otherwise have allowed wind through are not considered. Real world considerations such as raw material usages to support the aesthetics of different grid density are not considered as well, meaning that the structure may be constructed and operated very differently.This brings to conclusion that although a basic understanding of mesh behaviors are necessary, there is still a great divide between virtual prototyping and a developed model which is to be supplanted by engineering tools.

[1]

https://vimeo.com/94838526

73


B.5 TECHNIQUE: PROTOTYPES VIDEO CAPTURES: GRASSHOPPER + KANGAROO TECHNIQUES

74

Fig 18:

Digital Prototype (Video Capture 1): Simulation of a strip (along with panelling, and positioning of spheres).

Fig 19:

Digital Prototype (Video Capture 2): Planarising a form (along with panelling, and positioning of spheres).


https://vimeo.com/94839372

https://vimeo.com/94839370

75


B.3 TECHNIQUE: PROTOTYPES PERSPECTIVE RENDERS

As a dense grid was used, this structure is easily deformable, meaning that it sways the most with the wind. It can be assumed that instead of a tensile structure forming the main upright force of the pavilion, the helium balloons are its primary levitating support. This design was chosen because it gives maximum number of balloons on the grid (though baloon sizes are small), and the balloon lines form an unintended moire effect. Therefore, giving it a more unique perspective to people on land. Despite, challenges of the design include that the structure might not be weight-bearing and may be too open, which gives no chance for a public-private space division.

76


Fig 20:

Prototype 1 (with design idea)

77


B.3 TECHNIQUE: PROTOTYPES PERSPECTIVE RENDERS

Fig 21:

Prototype 2

Within this design, openings are made within the mesh, allowing for multiple strands to be developed in the shell. Regardless, a central space is kept for shelter. This mesh is triangulated from hexagons, like the original Burble installation.

78


79


B.3 TECHNIQUE: PROTOTYPES PERSPECTIVE RENDERS

Fig 22:

80

Prototype 3


81


B.5 TECHNIQUE: PROTOTYPES VIDEO CAPTURE: FORM SIMULATION

Fig 23:

Digital Prototype (Video capture 3): Simulation of planarising form on-site perspective

This design is made with a pattern of hexagons with a delaney mesh applied to it. The height of the structure is contained at human scale and it is able to withstand higher forces than the other designs. As it is a stable form, this means more chances for the internal spaces to be converted into rooms for more function. 82


https://vimeo.com/94839373

83


B.6 TECHNIQUE: PROPOSAL PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT: ENERGY COLLECTION METHODOLOGIES LED lights programmed to perform when catch is triggered

Ball bearing in cell to capture wind energy Kinetic energy flywheels

3.0000

Cable to main power grid Inverter Safety grade access mesh

Fig 24 (Above): Fig 25 (Right):

84

Flexible photovoltaic panels on planarised roof surface

Concept of Energy Collection Mechanisms Wind Energy Diagram from Slelsmark (north of site) shows strongest winds to oriented our design to

Resin Cables for holding on to


Fig 26: Fig 27:

Precedent work: 99 Red Balloons (LAGI Competition 2012 4th place mention) Precedent work: Tree (LAGI Competition 2012 submission)

Since balloons are a significantly common product in our culture, it is no surprise that there are other designs influenced by them as well. In actual fact, from the very LAGI competition in 2012, 2 different designs involving balloons have had honorable mention - 99 Red Balloons10 and Blossom11. With precedents like these, we have taken a cue from them in their proposed energy collection methodologies, one being solar energy and the other with wind energy. Despite both designs proposing sustainable energy collection, research in actual technology behind the designs is very limited. Hence, our design still exists on a conceptual level. Regardless, we hope that the use of parametric tools (in which these designs are lacking in) may help to inform performance criterias which may be useful to assist in the creation of robotics in our design for the future. Understanding that the scale of our design has to make a big enough difference in the power grid, we propose 3 kinds of energy generation (combination of active and passive sources):

1. Kinetic energy from human users 2. Wind energy captured by balloons 3: Solar energy on panels (possibly flexible PV cells on balloons themselves) With concepts of energy generation, there are also design challenges. Foremost being how to maintain the massive amount of helium needed for the balloons to stay afloat. Kinetic energy, as explained earlier, is captured by human users through downward pressure on cables. It also comes from wind. Hence rotar (flywheels) that convert energy would have to be located on a roof, which is another big design challenge. (Can this be alleviated by the tensile resisting forces of the pavilion structure? Will helium in the balloons help?) Furthermore, photovoltaic panels on the roof structure might not be optimised, while flexible photovoltaic on the balloons will have to reconsider aesthetics. These are engineering problems that once again prove [Part A.1] that architecture in order tooperate sustainably, requires extensive design systems that architects alone may not be able to provide.

85


B.6 TECHNIQUE: PROPOSAL FABRICATION MOODBOARD: MATERIAL & HARDWARE

Fig 28:

ETFE used in a floating installation.

Fitting into the theme of a planarised pavilion fit for solar energy collection, the precedent project is the PURE Tension Pavilion created by Volvo as a portable unit to power an electronic car. Regardless, it is extremely lightweight (at 150lbs) engineered to allow minimal deformity while standing, making it an ideal precedent for our roof structure. The pavilion is an expression of the tensioned equilibrium between its elastic membrane skin and rigid perimeter frame12. Tessalation is used here to create rigidity with little materials, defined by the perimeter frame made out of 24 CNC bent carbon fibre pipes for structure. The internal material is tensile membrane skin is materialized as a vinyl encapsulated polyester mesh membrane. Through the form-finding process, the structure was by design made out of exactly 5 rational arches, for both material and cost efficiency. Even though the fabric material makes this pavilion easy for folding up, for our design, we would require a more waterproof and durable roofing material.

86

Ethylene Tetrafluoroethylene, also known as ETFE is a plastic material with distinctive properties and design versatality13. It is capable of resisting weathercorrosion, high temperatures and transmits light, making it an excellent choice for our design. Even more so that it can last for up to 50 years, it is only 1/100 the weight of glass and can cost 24-70% less to install. Hence, it is a sustainable material choice that fulfils the requirements of Copenhagen’s strive to decrease carbon impact. With its high elasticity and the ability to expand to 3 times its size, the challenges of having to constantly inflate ETFE may in fact be an advantage in our design, since we are creating a floating architecture. Given that it is a popular new material in the market, the fabrication process may be easier to undertake. the material itself may be used for the balloons and possibly even as a roofing material.


Fig 29:

Precedent work: Volva PURE Tension Pavilion - uses flexible photovoltaic panels on a stiffened frame.

87


B.6 TECHNIQUE: PROPOSAL FABRICATION MOODBOARD: MATERIAL & HARDWARE

Fig 30:

Precedent work: Connecting Lights by YesYesNo, consists of hundreds of LED lit balloons controled by radio devices. (Allows customisation by audiences in the form of messages sent to a website).

As a key consideration of our architectural design, the digital programming and electronic design are our main focal areas in researching hardware. Connecting Lights is a landscape art installation of LED lights scattered over London. The name ‘Connecting Lights’ refer to their visual designs of transforming messages that people write into coloured lights. It uses open-source hardware and software, with networks which the creators are willing to share as they “hope that others transform landscapes by constructing their own illuminated networks”14. Materials lists, plans, assembly instructions, and how-to guides can also be found in the Connecting Light blog. They provide technical consultations as well. This can be helpful to us in fulfilling the interactive component of our design if we consider lighting effects as an integral part of our study. Blog: http://198.101.217.72/devblog/

88


Fig 31:

Printed circuit boards and LED lights mechanised into lighting blocks for the balloons, assembled by YesYesNo.

Fig 32:

The code for transforming words into colour may also be used interchangeably with sounds. The potential is a music/ light show that may be created.

89


B.6 TECHNIQUE: PROPOSAL DESIGN IDEA

Fig 33:

Design idea perspective on the Refshaleøen site.

The main concept of our design is to create an architecture that is kinetic so as to foster interaction with its environment. Through the use of parametric design, we are able to create a pavilion that responds to the wind. Also through the use of the digital platform, lighting programming is possible to further engage users with our design. In our design idea, we hope to appeal to the Copenhagen public on issues of sustainability through architecture that very evidently captures energy, yet shows how energy may be used in our built environment. When a person under the pavilion holds on the an anchor bar, a jolt of energy is released, causing the balloons above to perform a lighting performance.Users are both a part of the energy source as well as the energy consumer. In this manner, there is a symbiotic relationship whereby we are forced to think about what drives the energy that we use. This is how we hope to educate the public. In addition to its local meaning, as this installation is flamboyant and fun, it could bring more global attention 90

to the methods of sustainability that is being adopted by Copenhagen. Since the design functions programmatically as a pavilion, it is open to multifunction to ensure the flow of people to our design (e.g, could be a museum, educational centre, etc). Refering back to the use of parametric design, tessalation is used to appropriate a form that is flexible yet stable and materially efficient (lightweight). Also as important is the planarisation and wind simulation which gives an indication into the viability of our structure. Despite it can be seen that the amount of movements in the structure are determined more by natural forces which are less predictable than an artificial replication that we have made, it is in fact a founding step into understanding the performance of kinetic design. As explored in Part A, it is extremely critical for architecture that has a specific environmental function to be analysed for its actual performance. This could in fact be in the next stages of our design exploration.


Fig 34:

Site Plan (The design is open to ferries from the coast, as well as the urbanised surrounding).

91


B.7 LEARNING OBJECTIVES & OUTCOMES FEEDBACK: SPATIAL IMPLICATIONS AND VISUAL TECTONICS

Fig 35:

92

Precedent work: Primal Source by Usman Haque


As a final note, it is evident that in our precedent, it seems to have little to do with parametric design tools (more of interactive design tools), yet we have identified the opportunity for the design to use digitarisation in a non-artificial manner by suggesting performance evaluations as the way forward. Yet, in creating the prototypes, often it can feel like virtual designs are made in an artificial setting. We have taken a largely interactive precedent and incorporated mechanical functionings to justify its permanence. For this reason, an exploration of patterning and form was commenced to determine spatial implications, or whether the form gives a sense of haptic or porosity. These spatial implications are crucial for us as it reflects the kind of function of the pavilion at large - if a porous and fleeting structure is interactive because of its representation to its landscape, much like the architect Usman Haques focus on mirage-like installations [Image to left], or a haptic and stable structure that allows activities to be held inside and around. Regardless, it is undisputable that the visual tectonics of this design is expressive its urban placement, an artwork so to refer back to the brief. For the mid-semester crit, we received both tecnical and qualitative feedback. The panel of the midsemester crit urges us to keep up with the idea of spatial implications by incorporating more site-specific responses to the design, such as its formal boundaries and vertical boundaries affected by kinetic movements. According to them, the final design should have a gateway that welcomes the public, as well as consider long-term engagement with its energy sources (people or environment). Hence it is critical that we define the space from both perspectives of inside and outside in our final design.

93


94


PART C DETAILED DESIGN

95


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT: SITE RESPONSE

As we progress through finding a suitable plan and layout of our design, it becomes increasingly important to look at the site context. This is a feedback from the panel that our design needs to have a better indication of scale and appropriate site conditions. From the most superficial level, it appears as though the site is enveloped by an industrial area. However, in probing into the purpose of the facilities around, the vibrancy of the site is revealed. From the creative production houses to the family-oriented entertainment facilities, it reaffirms the decision that the addition to the LAGI has to interact with the public in an active manner. Moreover, transport such as bus-stops and the water taxis guarantees a steady circulation towards the site.

The Littl

Kastellet (Military fortress & ramparts)

Now that we are confident that the program of our proposal would garner its intended users, we will have to consider another dimension of the design that is about extending it’s meaning beyond environmental impact and durability- can it stand the test of time culturally, what draws people to visit or return? A pavilion with high mobility will not only engage people to its cause, but will benefit the local economies and provide recognition to the aforementioned facilities as well, overall giving a new lease of life to the streetscape. From here, it is easy to pinpoint urban development and infrastructure as the cornerstone to the site’s openness to the public. Despite, there is a bigger question beyond a random variable of slow urban development that we are interested in- the test of durability. As breakthrough technologies are often associated with national identity (hence culturally significant), it is important to us that the design employs state-of-the-art technology that reflects a truly world-class architecture.

96

Fig 1:

Site context map


Industrial Area

le Mermaid

Dominant view

Copenhagen Paintball Arena Kobenhavn Yacht Service

Amass restaurant Royal Theatre’s Production House Bus-stop Superformlab (Royal Academy of Fine Arts) Bombay Production Aps Citybane Aps Water taxi terminal

Bus-stop

97


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT: AERONAUTICS

Previous water Previous water basin, basin, reclaimed reclaimed land

Landfill

Old building foundations

Sonder Hoved Refshaleøen Holding

Our design requires a low-density gas to keep the balloons bouyant, which could possibly be supplemented by a natural gas found on site - methane. Since part of the site is a landfill covered by a thin layer of grass, methane, though not an endless source, may be extracted through methane wells and provided to the balloons. Methane, despite having hard-to-control reactions which poses an engineering challenge, may be a good alternative to helium which is a non-renewable gas. This is a design opportunity that is pertinent to the site. Presently, ongoing research into extraction of methane gas (methane hydrates, found in its solid form) from the ocean floor seem to be favorable to our design as the site is located off a coast1. 98


Methane wells

Reused building materials

Landfill

Site cross-section

99


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT: WIND LOGIC

For our proposal development, we have decided to zero in on wind power as it is a reliable passive source of energy and also can be highly demonstrative in our design. The Wind Energy Diagram2 from Slelsmark (north of site) is taken from Technical Report 99-13, shows the average of wind patterns over an annual. The basic premise of the diagram tells that prevailing winds come from the west.

PREVAIL WINDS Fig 2:

100

Prevailing winds on site


LING

Site

101


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT: OPTIMISING MESH THROUGH PARAMETRIC

PREVAILING WINDS

https://vimeo.com/94838526 Deploying the logic derived from the prototyping in Part B... Dense grid = More flow Perforations = Increased altitude A tessalated mesh with variations in grid size was created specifically for the purpose of capturing the most wind power on site. Through orientation and angle of inclination, the form would ideally be able to have an increased surface area and that optimises wind capture from the west. Other notions that were guiding the creation of the form include the creation of varied openings (indentations in the mesh) towards the west side as the view is nicest there (with The Little Mermaid). Triangles in the Delaney mesh was chosen for their stable geometry.

102


Finer grid: Dense grid = More flow Perforations = Increased altitude

Coarser grid: Indentations for open views

103


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT TECHNIQUE ILLUSTRATION: BASIC MESH

To create the mesh, a grid was first made with curves and manipulated data lists. This grid that is modelled with curves can be parametrically changed to fit the curvature of the shape of the intended mesh, which is a merit. In doing this exercise, the concept of data list and simple equations were understood. Perimeters of the mesh, such as the refinement of the curves, division of space in between curves and approximating the position of the input geometry became the parametric conditions we had to consider within the context of the site/environment. The advantage of using this technique to create our mesh grid is that it is highly customisable. Hence, for our purpose of creating a roof with higher altitude at the east side is most apt. Following that we were able to retrieve points from the final grid to convert into a delaney mesh. Qualities of a delaney mesh is that it is made out of triangles, which has a suitable construction logic in making a lightweight and stable roof. Critique of this method is that since variant sizes of triangles are within the mesh, directly translates to variant sizes of panels required for manufacture. As shop drawings and fabrication is determined by specifications of each panel, this can mean that though assembly of the roof may be easy, manufacturing and logistics will have to be carefully planned and carried out. 104


1 2

3

4

Within Rhino, draw 2 sets of curves that are congruent (vertical set and horizontal set). Reference these sets seperately in Grasshopper.

For each set, shift lists (both up and down, eg. +1, -1). This ensures that the later points are interpolated between the top curve with the middle curve, and the middle curve with the bottom curve. Divide curves for each list to obtain the points on each curve.

Simultaneously create a range and set a vectors2points between the curves in each set. Multiply the vectors and move them along the path (which in this case is the link between the vectors that had to be grafted into sets of each move).

Use a nurb curve component to draw the curves in between the points. Obtain curve lengths.

105


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT TECHNIQUE ILLUSTRATION: BASIC MESH

106


5

Use list item to extract the first curve. Then, merge data streams with the curve lengths.

6

With the result, divide them up into segments and interpolate between segments. For our case, 10 segments were used.

7

In doing this, more even distribution of curve lengths are obtained for each set.

8

Using a curve/curve component, reference the vertical and horizontal set. Find out the intersecting points between each sets. The resulting grid of points will be the same grid that is used for the delaney mesh.

107


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT TECHNIQUE ILLUSTRATION: BASIC MESH

108


9

Create a surface for the form within Rhino (a mixture of nurb curves were used with the split tool).

10

Position the surface onto the grid of points created earlier. Reference within Grasshopper.

11 12

Within Grasshopper, get the interior curves. Divide the length of the curves (x number of lengths) to get the outer points on the outer edges of the form itself.

At the same time, use a surface/curve component to solve the intersection between the surface and the earlier grid of points. The resulting points will be the ones imposed onto the surface.

109


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT TECHNIQUE ILLUSTRATION: BASIC MESH

110


13

Combine the points from inside the surface and the interior curves.

14

Using these points, create a delaney mesh.

15

16

Clean up the form by either converting the mesh into brep and baking the geometry on rhino. Following that, explode and delete. Join the geometries and convert into a mesh again in Grasshopper. Alternatively from the original untrimmed mesh, dispatch and cull faces that are bigger than intended size.

The final mesh is ready for Kangaroo simulation. Technique of the simulation is the same as that of the experiments tried out in Part B.

111


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT ANALYSIS/SYNTHESIS OF INITIAL FORM

PREVAILING WINDS

By the time this form was created, a series of matrix was done. The purpose is creating a dynamic structure that weaves in and out from being a shelter or confined spaced that gradually opens up to and overarching canopy that sways with the wind. As seen from the simulation images, the surfaces that are widest are saturated in blue, showing the logic of the simulation that is connected to our purpose of anchoring the structure towards prevailing winds. This is most indicative that our created mesh was in fact optimised towards wind capture. A matrix was created by anchoring the form at different points and playing with heights. Despite the forms potentially serving their objectives, we found that there was a lack of diversity and furthermore, the user aspect of the pavilion could be rather strange, especially where the mesh transitions from a roof into a free-flowing form. 112


>250

0 180

0 Level datum (height from ground)

Profile section diagram (Wind-kissed faces in blue glow)

Matrix extrapolation (forms are facing prevailing winds) 113


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT RADICAL SHIFT IN FORM-FINDING

The radical shift in form-finding came because of a limitation we noticed from our earlier kangaroo technique of creating catenary surfaces - we simply did not require one. Since our structure was meant to be held up by the wind, the surface being held together in compression, as studied in the Voussoir Cloud precedent was actually obsolete. In reverse, it was crucial that the structure performed under tensile stresses. The difference of this technique in kangaroo from the previous one is that forces are applied not to “blow up� the single mesh into a catenary surface, but rather vectors are floated to either a negative or postive position. This provides a realistic representation of a dynamic mesh. Additionally, the extra mile was made in creating a simulation of the anchoring points which are the main wires that tether the structure to the ground. The parameters that we used were helpful with data visualisation, such as the control of height of the structure with wind behavior. The equation that manages the movement of the anchor points may be related the the language of wind velocity - spiralling/ swaying/ fading.

114


https://vimeo.com/96723164

PROCESS: FROM MESH TO SAIL

https://vimeo.com/97871551

THE EXPERIENCE

The first video shows the intricate details of the process in creating the design, much of which had to be presented graphically in video format due to the process being essentially focussed on simulation. While creating the design, structural logic was applied with physics, giving us an indication of how the pavilion might be erected in reality. In addition, we were able to identify the design challenges and change the parameters applied unto the mesh. It is a highly computerised process. As we have used parametric concepts to create an optimised mesh, the following steps were about generating kinetic movements while at the same time erecting a form.

The second video was created to demonstrate the kinetic movements of our final form. The video shows the structure moving with the wind, fulfilling the most basic requirement of the brief. It presents the experience of the design as a pavilion, both from the perspective of vantage point, and also a user nearby or within the structure.

115


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT TECHNIQUE ILLUSTRATION: FORM-FINDING

Simulation 1 - Projected kinetic lines from the ground that would form the basis of anchoring of the pavilion.

116


1 2 3 4

Using gumball, move mesh up the z direction so that it is levitating from the xy plane. From the mesh that we have, obtain curves from mesh boundary faces. Add anchor points within Rhino.

Within grasshopper, reference these points. Cull north. Project points. Then, use the draw line component between the projected points (on xy plane) and the points from cull north.

(a) Unary force 1: Extend the curves by using negative component on the list of lengths. The end points of the curves will be the points of the unary force for Simulation 1. Use an MD slider to control force.

(b) Unary force 2: Divide the extended curves and obtain points. List item and set as unary force for Simulation 1. Set positive value for unit z. 117


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT TECHNIQUE ILLUSTRATION: FORM-FINDING

Simulation 2 - The overhanging net that holds the balloons together. This simulation is directly related to the wind simulation explored earlier in Part B, with the additional input of the kinetic ground tethers that are set as anchor points. Hence, the movements located here are horozontal, from the mesh itself, and also vertical, from the ground cables.

118


5

(c) Unary force 3: From points of divided curves, cull index (reverse list and repeat). Set as Unary force for Simulation 1, along with negative value for unit z. Use a shatter curves component and set as geometry for Simulation 1.

6 7 8

Reference mesh in Grasshopper.

Obtain face boundaries. then get discontinuities and set them into wind component as point 1/2/3. Plug into Simulation 2. Use the same MD slider as Step 3 to control wind force.

From the Geometry output of Simulation 1, shift paths, list item and get the end points. Draw a vector (vector2points) between this result and the cull north points.

119


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT TECHNIQUE ILLUSTRATION: FORM-FINDING

120


9 10 11 12

Create a move component and add a multiplication unit. Use the geometry as anchor points for Simulation 2

Obtain face boundaries for the geometry output of the simulation. Explode curves and obtain the list of unique points.

Project the points onto the XY plane. Obtain the distance in between the points and the the point on the mesh after the simulation, multiply.

Using the multiplication as length, draw lines extending in the negative z-direction from the unique points. This will become the balloon lines that connect the roof panels with the balloons.

121


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT TECHNIQUE ILLUSTRATION: FORM-FINDING

Simulation 3 - The roof panels that depends on the movement of the balloons/mesh above. This logic is exemplified within our methodology of extending the roof from the mesh on ground which is influenced by the floating mesh in the design.

122


13

Move the projected points from Simulation 2 to the same negative translation in the previous step. Draw vectors between these points and the points from the most original mesh (face boundaries, explode).

14

Move the points and translate along the same multiplication unit as Step 11. Set this as anchor points for Simulation 3.

15

Start Simulation 3.

16

Add mesh balls to the output geometry of Simulation 2. Virtually, these are the balloons.

123


C.1 DESIGN CONCEPT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

Balloons

Balloons under-net

Vertical connection (wires)

Roof panels

Roof frame

Ground anchors

Fig 3:

124

Schematic layers of design


1

Anchor cable wires to the ground.

2

Hoist net of balloons up onto the ends of cable wires.

3

Attach secondary mesh to the roof-line.

4

Attach panel units unto secondary mesh.

Schematically, the design consists of 6 layers that are reliant on each other. The ground achors allow the height of the design to be controlled, and holds the upper layers together. The veritical connection is also particularly important as it ensures that the roof stays afloat and that no part of it will be too close to the human users due to the balloons in the air above. The balloon undernet is for keeping the balloons together so that they will not get tangled.

125


C.2 TECTONIC ELEMENTS CORE CONSTRUCTION ELEMENT

As the panels enable the kinetic function of the pavilion, they were considered our core construction element. These panels are constructed of high strength ETFE. balloons, receiving high temperatures directly from the micro-turbines, can be composed of ETFE coated with titanium dioxide and PTFE, which absorbs the CO2 from the exhaust. Furthermore, they have to be lightweight in order to stay up in the air. The major challenges of the panels is that because it is made up of an irregular grid, issues such as weatherproofing, and maintaining weather-tightness in joints may be challenging. The aesthetics of the panels also had to transmit light from the balloons above, as this would increase the level of interaction with the users whom can observe the lighting performance from below. Due to this reasons, we highly recommend ETFE for its durable properties, light weight and light-transmitting quality. Alternatively, we have researched into other materials and triangulated roof like the precedent - AIA Pavilion 2011 by Gernot Reither that uses a sustainable material called PETG3. This material, also called glycolmodified polyethylene terephthalate (PETG) is derived from either recycled plastic or the sugarcane plant. it suggests a negative carbon footprint, which is best for the environment. Another interesting aspect of this precedent is that it uses molds that cover the material, which is a concept we will also use in our design. Only within our design, we are more interested in using a “soft� material that is intrinsically flexible, such as rubber to allow bending in between the panels. 126


Fig 4

Precedent: AIA pavilion 2011 by Gernot Reither

127


C.2 TECTONIC ELEMENTS REFINEMENT & DOCUMENTATION

Fig 5:

128

Bending in roof within the simulation is created from a flat mesh


The form of our roof mesh is created as part of the simulation within Grasshopper. Since there are inevitably a lot of folds within the mesh, this forms a conflict with our unconventional concept of a floating roof. If the overall form it were to be used as a static structure in constructing. A hinch tells that the performance of the structure would be poor. We tried to show this by actually dividing the 3-dimensional mesh and unrolling the geometries. The fold of some panels were miniscule. After putting together, it seems like the movement of the form would be hampered, hence the wind may not have a strong impact on it, and may even end up breaking the roof sections. In contrast, letting the wind work its magic on manipulating a completely flat roof mesh (like the one originally referenced into the engine) would be a more sensible option. A little movement is fun to watch, but too much would be harmful to the shelter, and also instill a sense of menace to its users. Also as a roof, having little convolutions would actually be best for its longevity.

129


C.2 TECTONIC ELEMENTS REFINEMENT & DOCUMENTATION

Fig 6:

Testing out our fabricated model

Over here, a very basic flexible skin was fabricated to show the kinetic possibility of the delaney mesh. The panels were made out of 3mm boxboard that were laser cut. Wires were then used to tie the panels together. From the photos, we can already observe that the panel layout is extremely flexible, though it might not be so with the inclusion of the essential joints as in the previous exploration. Nonetheless, it brings us closer to proving the concept of our design idea of a kinetic pavilion. As an interesting side track, the lighting effect of the roof such as the shadows cast from the light of the balloons, viceversa, is shown. 130


131


C.2 TECTONIC ELEMENTS REFINEMENT & DOCUMENTATION

From this exploration, a few factors questioned our design idea that we had to accommodate. The first relates to the positioning of the connecting holes between panels of different sizes. The alignment of holes could barely be resolved mathematically as all the panels were of different lengths. Yet it was still required that the holes were of reasonable distance to the tip/edge of each panel to prevent differential stresses or weak links. We recommend that a method of creating molding, such an in our tectonic element diagram to be produced for more consistency between the connections, hence preventing potential failure. Secondly, material effectiveness is in question. Clearly through our multiple tries at getting the panels to float, shows that even material that can appear light such as ETFE might not actually work. A return to understanding what makes the panels float would point out that the amount (size of balloons), density and freshness of gas, are integral to the success of the design. Also the weight of the material itself, dead loads of equipments and live loads from the climate are all in need of a comprehensive amount of research. 132

To take our previous model further, another model was created that can be suitable observed at a human scale. The panels over here are made out of Persplex 2mm and laser cut. Initially, both black card 200gsm and polyproperlene 0.6mm (above images) were used. However, we found them to be too flimsy as well as heavy. Hereinafter, we reduced the frame to openings ratio by scaling the holes up. Balloons filled with high-float helium were obtained. Grasshopper was used to create the circles around discontinuities of the triangle curves, holes in between divisions of lengths, once again showing the flexibility of parametric designs having customisable capabilities.


Fig 7:

The panels maintain their flexibility in the fabricated model, even though bouyancy cannot be achieved

133


C.2 TECTONIC ELEMENTS EXPLANATION DIAGRAM

1 3 134

Connect panels through central node. Apply capping/flashing over in between panels.

2 4

Insert main balloon wire into node. Apply capping for central balloon wire.


Fig 8:

Top view of component parts

Even though our panels come in different sizes, there were conceived as a uniform system since they relatively similar components were used. This Is represented in the diagram. There can be both vertical movements (tip of each panel) and horizontal movements (between panels) because of the jointing placements and allowances (diagram above). 135


C.2 TECTONIC ELEMENTS REFINEMENT & DOCUMENTATION

Frame

Hook

136

Flashing

Catch (for flashing)


Fig 9:

Testing out fabricated model is only representational, not indicative of actual performance, unlike Fig 7

On the left, the concept of a double-hook panel, while on the right is the concept of a single-hook panel. While our concept of how construction panels might work sounds feasible, the fact is that as novice, there is a lack of knowledge and experience of technology on the market. Even so, we have decided to carry out a series of explorations based on intuition/ common sense. From the previous diagram, we have fabricated a series of parts to observe the movements as we claim. Despite, we are limited in understanding the movements of the connections within the wider grid as we could only fabricate a few parts. Even so, the relationship between the parts tells that while the molding have to be slim for to keep its light weight, the gap in between the joints have to be sufficient in order for movement to occur. Otherwise a “soft� joint or string-like joint may be used. Conversely, if our intention is for structural intactness within the panels, then we may have to consider other factors. Bending moments may be reduced if by creating rigid moment joints, while shear forces may be elevated with pinned joints.

Over here, we have tried to fabricate the different parts in the panel to show the connection between joints. Boxboard of 3mm were used. The basic concept, as explained in our tectonic elements diagram is that two panel frames are connected not to each other, but unto a wire. As our design requires a network of wires, it is a possibility that the moldings might be contained within each panel rather than joining multiple panels together. A catch with the flashing is then place on top of the wire to act as a weather seal. This principle is repeated for the tip of panel joints.

137


C.3 FINAL MODEL SITE RENDERS

Fig 10:

138

Perspective renders


139


C.3 FINAL MODEL PLANS & DIMENSIONS

N

Site plan

113

100

Dimensions: 113m x 100m

140


Elevation (West view)

120

5

Dimensions: Height from ground to roof Height from roof to balloons

= 5m = 120m

The height factor of the design is approximated since our concept is on a kinetic pavilion. Highest point where the balloons are are set a the limits stipulated within the design brief. This is because of the principle that the higher the generator is, the more advantage it has in capturing wind. This will be explained more in part C.4. While making the final model prototype, we note that the smallest panel length is 2.8mm while the widest panel length is 4.2mm. This means that the actual panels (since we manufactured at a scale of 1:350) would be estimated at about 1.12 to 1.47 metres.

141


C.3 FINAL MODEL PHYSICAL MODEL

Our design, as explained earlier comprises of a total of 6 layers - balloons, balloons under-net, vertical connections (wires), roof panels, roof frame and ground cables. This means that it is highly complicated and uses a combination of tectonic systems. None of these can be accurately represented in a rigid model, which explains the need for the graphic video representation that we had made. Because of the difficulting in fabricating the connecting parts on a small model, we have chosen just 3 things to make- the balloons, the roof and the ground wires. This gives an idea of massing of the pavilion.

142


Site model Scale 1 : 350

N

143


C.3 FINAL MODEL PHYSICAL MODEL

The final model, as observed from different perspective, is actually rather conservative in the context of the whole site. This is because the site itself is massive. We have managed with a form that fits on less than one-third of the site. This is in order to ensure that the oavilion still remains at human scale and that circulation is convenient for its human users. Even so, the scale of the pavilion may be comparable to a stadium.

144


N

Site model Scale 1 : 350

145


C.3 FINAL MODEL DOCUMENTATION

For our final model, we used a method of sectioning of the balloons and the method of laser cutting of 3mm boxboard. To do so, the balloons were deliberately made bigger until they are slightly touching so that there would be fewer tiny pieces on the card. They were joined with boolean union before passing though a Grasshopper script. Section plane were made. The intersecting curves with the mesh was plotted. In total, there were 28 layers, but we managed to fit them into 7 pieces of 900x600 boxboards. Even as this is a wasteful method of fabrication, since there was plenty of unused spaces in the boxboard, it was the cheaper alternative. Given the patterning geometries of our design, 3D printing would be extremely expensive to be done at a scale that matters, which in our case is 1:350. Following the creation of the laser cut balloons layer, we joined the roof mesh that was laser cut on ivory card with actual wires that represented cable wires. The model was spray painted white without the ivory card layer.

146


147


C.4 ADDITIONAL LAGI BRIEF REQUIREMENTS

D E S C R I P T I O N

This project was built upon the goal to stimulate and educate its users through an interactive structure that could directly engage them in the process of energy generation. The idea is to create a floating pavilion, lightweight that could be held up by balloons. The balloons cover the structure creating a network that generates energy obtained from high altitude wind power. They harness the kinetic energy from the wind through resin cables. At certain points of the structure users can also contribute in providing additional kinetic energy through pulling the resin cables. At certain places on the transparent roof, flexible solar panels on our roof covering may even provide much needed shade. Our aesthetic is a dynamic structure that ripples with the wind and creates a symbiotic relationship with its users with its form responding to their actions. At night this pulling motion causes LED lights in the balloons to react and light up, its colour determined by how much energy it has collected throughout the day. With these ideas combined we want to show that “Renewable Energy can be Beautiful”(LAGI) and tackle challenges of preconceived notions of sustainable design. The project celebrates Denmark’s success with wind power whereby 22% of Denmark’s total electricity consumption is produced by wind, the highest rate in the world. In addition to the local ties it seeks to create public friendly space for people from any age groups in the community that is iconic and fun in a bid to bring global attention to our purpose. The space functions as a pavilion but is flexible to multifunctional activity due to its open plan.

148


T E C H N O L O G Y

To deliver a state of art structure, our project relies on the sophisticated system of technological integration of its components. As mentioned before, the main idea of the project is based on a an airbourne wind generating system which collects energy through balloons interacting with wind. Having this condition, we understand that the mesh network the balloons connect to needs to be high enough to take advantage of steadier, more persistent and higher velocity winds at higher altitudes. The lower canopy mesh will be held up and partially supported by air balloons. The balloons will be connected to the mesh using resin cables, of which allow them to anchor to the land which fuel methane to the balloons collected in the existing landfill on site. The resin cables run through flywheels that are arrayed around the micro-turbines, under an earthen enclosure. These tethering cables are pulled by the balloons’ lift; their kinetic motions are converted by the turbines into energy. Piezoelectric panels and kinetic motors placed on the ground are systemised to connect to an external power grid to transfer energy generated for the use of the city. It also monitors the degree of energy captured by projecting an ambient glow in each balloon installed with LED lighting, glowing at night to provide visible feedback of energy that has been collected in the day. As our design is capped at a height of 125 metres as stipulated by the brief, we will follow the conservative estimation from energy generated by wind turbines around that height. There are many complicated calculations in regards to wind turbine generators; however some rough ideas can be achieved using primary mathematical formula or energy, whereas here involving aspects of Wind Velocity, Area, Air Density and a basic discriminant. By looking at the Copenhagen’s average wind velocity, wind energy that can be collected and converted into electricity will be around 5,487kWh, gained from the equation as follows:

E N E R G Y E S T I M A T I O N

Energy calculation5 Power=0.5 x Swept Area x Air Density x (Velocity)3 Air density = 1.23 Speed = 21 D=35 (exposed to wind panel) E = π x (d/2)² x 1.23 x (21)³ x 0.5 =5,476 kw/h

149


C.4 ADDITIONAL LAGI BRIEF REQUIREMENTS

D I M E N S I O N S

The balloons, approximately 3 metres in diameter each are composed of high strength ETFE - a fluorine based plastic. It is designed to have high corrosion resistance and strength over a wide temperature range. EFTE is recyclable and light (1% the weight of glass) making it ideal for our sustainable approach but it is also strong, capable of bearing up to 400 times its own weight. As it allows more light to be emitted through than glass it allows users to view the different layers of the structure and bask in sunlight during the day. At night the transparency of the material also helps to emphasize the intensity of the LED lighting. The skeleton of both the lower canopy mesh and balloon mesh that prevents entanglement of the balloons use carbon fibre rods. This is because of their strength and ability to bend, allowing for the dynamic movement our concept is based upon. Panels range from 1-1.5 metres in length and width and are also covered in some areas to provide shelter to the structure again using EFTE tensioned over the carbon fibre rods to cover.

150


E N V I R O N M E N T A L IMPACT STATEMENT In implementation of our design we also have to consider the possible impact it may have on the environment or surrounding area. Due to the scale of our design resources needed to sustain its functionality lie large in its materials. We have considered this in our proposal to use EFTE and methane in our design. The former is a material that is lightweight, meaning it is easy to transport and construct but that is also recyclable. In the event where maintenance is required to the panels, or balloons need to be replaced due to the high pressures they succumb to EFTE is a practical choice which also fulfils the functional needs of our structure. The production of ETFE involves the transformation of the monomer TFE in to the polymer ETFE using polymerisation; no solvents are used in this water based procedure, hence there is minimal carbon footprint. Additionally, ETFE can last from 50-100 years, depending on its application. We use methane sourced from the site’s own landfill taking advantage of the surrounding context instead of having to have a continuous supply of helium to the balloons which is quite unsustainable. In regards to the design first and foremost goal of generating energy, we have also reflected upon its sustainability in a functional sense. It must continuously be able to generate energy to justify the resources that have been invested into its construction. This is resolved in our interactive component of the design so that even when winds aren’t prevalent we can still harness the kinetic energy of the users, or even through the application of solar panels.

151


C.5 EXPANSION ON PROJECT RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY

Because of the constrains of time and the need to present our studio work as more of an aesthetic interpretation, we had to neglect the nitty gritty of performing actual environmental analysis on our model. This is a shame since as explained in Part B, we believe that environmental feedback has to compliment the parametric modelling process. Regardless, we had to sought out improvements for our conceptual design idea that relates to the form.

re

uv

no ma

on cti Tra rce fo

recoil

wind path

After the final crit, it is in our interest to check the validity of our project by consulting technologies that are similar to it. In particular, the products of airbourne wind turbines are promising. We tried to discover how they work, their opportunities and challenges, in order to understand implications of our design. The commonality between them is the use of rotational energy through blades. In particular, a concept, Kitegen is one that our design may most relate with since it uses vertical rotational energy on the ground through the traction (pulling) of kites in the wind, rather that blades that interact directly with the wind. Even so, aggressive movements with the wind is a trait of the design. Imagine kite surfing where a surfing is literally being transported around by wind, it has to have a volatile flight path., term subbed “list and drag�4. KiteGen also has to be floated high enough >800m to capture the two flow bands of high-altitude winds that envelope the earth’s surface, or crosswinds. Hence, we note that we could possibly be reinventing the wheel, but no doubt focussing on a more interactive version on the technology.

Fig 11:

152

Diagram showing physics behind energy capture of crosswind kites


Fig 12. KiteGen

Fig 13. Laddermill

Fig 14. Magenn

Fig 15. Sky Windpower

Fig 16. Makani Power

153


C.5 EXPANSION ON PROJECT RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY

Solar Power Average solar radiation in Central Europe - 115 W/m(sq) Fig 17:

Diagram showing difference in energy colllection of conventional versus high-altitude wind power

The current prospects of wind energy capture has taken high up into the sky. A few analysis of experts show that there is an effectively unlimited supply of power, with vastly more available as one moves up away from the ground6. High-altitude wind power (HAWP) is the harnessing of the power of winds high in the sky by use of airbourne wind turbines7. It is a solution to elevate the balloons and structure higher so as to capture wind power that is more stable, predictable and of a higher velocity. The diagram above shows the superiority of high altitude wind power in comparision to other common methods of energy generation such as solar power and conventional wind power. 154

Conventional wind power Average specific wind power over land 700 W/m(sq)


Conventional wind power Average specific wind power at 70m over the North Sea - 1,000 W/m(sq)

High altitude wind power Average specific wind power at 400m over the North Sea -1,000 W/m(sq)

Other benefits of high altitude wind power includes easy replacemen/maintenance of units (compared to a haptic structures such as wind turbines), rapid availability and shorter contruction phase of factory fabrication compared to the Herculean efforts to transport and set up a wind turbine on land8. Also, once main network supply is in place, design can be scaled to be more efficient over area size. Crucially, there would be no noise pollution, plus the design would subjectively be more visually appealing than wind turbines. As our design uses balloons, the issue of wind intermittency is negligable.

155


C.5 EXPANSION ON PROJECT RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY

Fig 18:

The balloon spectacle within the city

Cleaveland, circa 1986, in bid to achieve the world record for biggest simultaneous launch, they released 1.5 million balloons9. For a while, it was an incredible display. What the images show is a beautiful disaster about to happen. Due to inclemental bad weather, the explosions in the sky were likened to an “asteroid field�10. Worse to come, the debris clouded the air, shut down public facilities and left the city with an acute lot of garbage (even though the balloons were meant to be bio-degradable). This is a cautionary tale that informs the end of our project - scale matters. Additionally, it takes a ground research to actually determine the impact of a new design, in saying so, we are admittedly limited in resources to carry out experiments with actual materials in actual sizes, even a small sampling for it

156


Fig 19:

“Biodegradable� balloons in backdrop

. Despite, it is still a personal satisfaction to speculate on the possibilities that design can bring. Breakthrough designs and technology all start with a fantastic and fanatical idea. This should not exclude one that requires an extensive amount of environmental management and sagacity in general.

This is also the biggest issue that the panel have on the feasibility of our design. Existing airbourne technologies can be brought back to the ground and covered in case of weather changes. Can our design do the same? Can the kinetic roof withstand the harsh rotational forces that might be experienced in wind designs?

This example highlights a potential danger in our design, that it may be susceptible to bad weather. In concept, the higher the design goes, the more wind velocity it experiences, which is good for energy generation, but may not be ideal for a pavilion. This highlights the conflict within our design, along with higher wind velocity, higher temperatures have to be withstand over long periods. This is perhaps the biggest critique of airborne wind collection, even more so than its prohibition of airspace above.

In the same track, we propose that retractable balloons may be an option to explore. Furthermore, as our kinetic roof is made out of a maleable material such as ETFE, we may in fact conceive the roof more like a sail by keeping the tectonic elements as flexible and buoyant as possible. In effect, the hybrid kite-aerostat system,, may perhaps be more optimised to overcome these limitations.

157


C.5 EXPANSION ON PROJECT CHANGES TO FORM AFTER FEEDBACK

Within a hybrid kite/aerostat (balloons) system, the sail roof enhances the system of energy capture, instead of being a liability that weighs down on it. It is lifted by both winds and balloons at the same time, hereby also reducing the burden of the balloons’ low-density gas supply. The digital model as shown shows the design acting like a sail. In this model, we have also made the amendment of having fewer vertical connections/ balloon lines in response to the preference of the panel. Reducing the balloon lines would also enable more light to get to the solar panels on the sail.

158


Sail roof (with variable solar panels to provide shade)

159


C.6 LEARNING OBJECTIVES & OUTCOMES

O B J1. E C T I V E Objective

1

“interrogat[ing] a brief” by considering the process of brief formation in the age of optioneering enabled by digital technologies; In Part A, we were introduced to the concepts of sustainability, parametric modelling and the process of design. This has provided us with a solid framework in coming up with a design idea which techniques relates to environmetal/site conditions. Hereafter executing the design through a process of digital prototyping and parametric scripting.

O B J2. E C T I V E Objective

2

developing “an ability to generate a variety of design possibilities for a given situation” by introducing visual programming, algorithmic design and parametric modelling with their intrinsic capacities for extensive design-space exploration; In Part C, we have undertaken radical changes to our form to better suit the design idea and environment. This is done not without the rapid feedback abilities of scripting. The codes were not limited to changing parameters, we actually had to come up with new script components that decidedly form the basis for various functions. Notably, the changes in the script of the kangaroo simulation from creating a caternary form to a sail. Other components enabled by scripting components were the ground anchors, roof, balloon wires and balloon mesh. Also the variation of solar panels imprinted on the roof were made possible through a component of scripting. All these coding factors make up the essential foundation in creating a structure.

160

O B J3. E C T I V E Objective

3

developing “skills in various three-dimensional media” and specifically in computational geometry, parametric modelling, analytic diagramming and digital fabrication; Within the studio, we have used the 3D programming software of rhino to model basic NURB curves and render, Grasshopper and its plug-in Kangaroo were used for algorithmic coding. Additionally we have produced a few illustration diagrams with other graphic media such as Adoba Illustrator and Photoshop. We have fabricated our models through laser cutting, and card cutting, (both subtractive methods).

O B J4. E C T I V E Objective

4

developing “an understanding of relationships between architecture and air” through interrogation of design proposal as physical models in atmosphere; This objective is taken almost literally in our design concept since we have created a floating pavilion. Our design hopefully shows not just an object that the wind controls, but a piece of architecture, an inhabitable space that encourages people to visit.


O B J5. E C T I V E Objective

5

developing “the ability to make a case for proposals� by developing critical thinking and encouraging construction of rigorous and persuasive arguments informed by the contemporary architectural discourse. Though our design process is very pragmatic, it is centred on the premise of of sustainbility and parametric theories. Mainly how parametric design can compliment the intentions of a sustainbilityoriented designer by providing the capability of modelling environmental conditions, or factors to satisfy those conditions.

O B J6. E C T I V E Objective

6

develop capabilities for conceptual, technical and design analyses of contemporary architectural projects; This has been done not just in part A when they were a requirement, but also in part B and C as learning guides to refine on our design.

O B J7. E C T I V E Objective

7

develop foundational understandings of computational geometry, data structures and types of programming; This has been done through intuition, research, interacting with our tutor, and many practices.

O B J8. E C T I V E Objective

8

begin developing a personalised repertoire of computational techniques substantiated by the understanding of their advantages, disadvantages and areas of application. Advantages and disadvantages of computational techniques in our project is most evident in part B when we had to make prototypes (yet were unable to create environmental analysis). Advantages of scripting are plenty, such as it allows us to make parameter changes when necessary, contrive forms that cannot be drawn, and adheres to specific conditions such as environmental data and our own free design inputs. The biggest disadvantage is however that scripting is lengthy and can be complicated. It is difficult to pass the information from one team member to another for changes to be made. Scripting is used in our project to determine site plan (Elk), come up with design forms and facade.

161


162


APPENDIX

163


PART A BIBLIOGRAPHY 1-2. Fry, Tony , Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice (Oxford: Berg, 2008), pp. 1–16. 3-4. LAGI 2014 Competition brief <http://landartgenerator.org/competition2014.html>. 5-6. COFFICE - Solar Wind Bridge <http://www.coffice.biz/ 7-9. Toyo Ito - Koahsiung Stadium <http://www.toyo-ito.co.jp/ 10-12. Oxman, Rivka and Robert Oxman, Theories of the Digital in Architecture (London; New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 1–10. 13-14. Kalay, Yehuda E., Architecture’s New Media: Principles, Theories, and Methods of Computer Aided Design (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004), pp. 5-25. 15-17. ARUP - Metropol Parasol <http://www.arup.com/projects/metropol_parasol.aspx> 18-20. Shigeru Ban - Centre Pompidou Metz <www.shigerubanarchitects.com/> 21-23. Wilson, Robert A. and Frank C. Keil, Definition of ‘Algorithm’ in The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (London: MIT Press,1999), pp. 11,-12. 24. Daniel Davis, Thesis - Chapter 2: the Challenges of Parametric Modelling (2013) <http://www.danieldavis.com/thesis-ch2/> 25. Rethinking Architecture, What is Parametric Design? (2010) <http://www.rethinking-architecture.com/introduction-parametric-design,354/> 26. Peters, Brady, ‘‘Computation Works: The Building of Algorithmic Thought’ (Architectural Design 2013), 83, 2, pp. 08-15. 27-28. Aranda\ Lasch - Primitives < http://arandalasch.com/work/installation/> 29-31. University of Stuttgart - ICD/ITKE Research pavilion 2011 <http://icd.uni-stuttgart.de/?p=6553> 32-33. Danish Meteorological Institute, technical Report 99-13 (Ministry of Transport, 2013), pp. 5-12. 34. Energi- og Miljødata, Danish Wind Resource map, (2001), p. 3. 34-35. Energi- og Miljødata, Danish Wind Resource map, cover page

164

36. Ferry, Robert & Elizabeth Monoian, ‘A Field Guide to Renewable Energy Technologies’’, Land Art Generator Initiative, Copenhagen, 2014. pp 1 - 71


IMAGE REFERENCE LIST Fig 1.

Site plan < http://landartgenerator.org/competition2014.html>

Fig 2.

Panoramic view from The Little Mermaid <http://europevideoproductions.com/european-countries-travel-photos/little-mermaidstatue-copenhagen-denmark/>

Fig 3. COFFICE - Solar Wind Bridge <http://www.coffice.biz/ Fig 4. Toyo Ito - Koahsiung Stadium <http://www.toyo-ito.co.jp/ Fig 5. ARUP - Metropol Parasol <http://www.arup.com/projects/metropol_parasol.aspx> Fig 6. Shigeru Ban - Centre Pompidou Metz <www.shigerubanarchitects.com/> Fig 7-10. Aranda\ Lasch - Primitives <http://arandalasch.com/work/installation/> Fig 11-13. University of Stuttgart - ICD/ITKE Research pavilion 2011 <http://icd.uni-stuttgart.de/?p=6553>

165


PART B BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Moussavi, Fashid and Lopez, Daniel (2009). The Function of Form. (Barcelona, Actar, New York), p 8. 2. Kolarevic, Branko and Kevin R. Klinger, eds (2008). Manufacturing Material Effects: Rethinking Design and Making in Architecture (New York; London: Routledge), p 11. 3. Fashid Moussavi (2006). The Function of Ornament. Pg 8. 4. Peters, Brady (2013). ‘Realising the Architectural Intent: Computation at Herzog & De Meuron’. Architectural Design, 83, 2, p 60. 5. Volta Dom - Skylar Tibbits <http://www.sjet.us/MIT_VOLTADOM.html> 6. Puppet Theatre - Mos <http://thecreatorsproject.vice.com/mos-architects/puppet-theater> 7. Kolarevic, Branko and Kevin R. Klinger, eds (2008). Manufacturing Material Effects: Rethinking Design and Making in Architecture (New York; London: Routledge), p 6. 8. Iwamoto Scott - Voussoir Cloud <http://www.dezeen.com/2008/08/08/voussoir-cloud-by-iwamotoscott/> 9. Matsys - Shellstar Pavilion <http://matsysdesign.com/category/projects/shell-star-pavilion> 10. Haque d+r - Burble <http://www.haque.co.uk/openburble.php> 11. Scott Rosin, Meaghan Hunter, Danielle Loeb, Emeka Nnadi, Kara McDowell, Jocelyn Chorney, Indrajit Mitra, Narges Ayat, Denis Fleury - 99 Red balloons <http://landartgenerator.org/LAGI-2012/99009900/> 12. Yijie Dang, Tom Tang - Tree <http://landartgenerator.org/LAGI-2012/YJBLLJSL/> 13. Synthesis Design + Architecture, Buro Happold, and Fabric Images - Volvo PURE Tension Pavilion <http://synthesis-dna.com/pure-tension-volvo-v60-pavilion/> 14. ETFE installation <http://aboutetfeproducts.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/etfe-makes-strong-case-for-usability.html> 15. Connecting Lights - YesYesNo <http://198.101.217.72/devblog/> 16. Hoopsnake patterning <http://vimeo.com/59406203>

166


IMAGE REFERENCE LIST Fig 1. Volta Dom by Skylar Tibbits <http://www.sjet.us/MIT_VOLTADOM.html> Fig 2. Carpenter Puppet Theatre by Pierre Huyghe <http://spaceinvading.com/entry/project_id/Puppet_Theater200907021246598214> Fig 3. Voussoir Shell – Iwamoto Scott <http://www.iwamotoscott.com/VOUSSOIR-SHELL> Fig 4-5 Voussoir Cloud – Iwamoto Scott <http://www.iwamotoscott.com/VOUSSOIR-CLOUD> Fig 10-11. Matsys - Shellstar Pavilion <http://matsysdesign.com/category/projects/shell-star-pavilion> Fig 12-14. Haque d+r – Burble <http://www.haque.co.uk/burble.php> Fig 25. Wind Energy Diagram from Slelsmark < http://landartgenerator.org/competition2014.html> Fig 26. 99 Red Balloons - Scott Rosin, Meaghan Hunter, Danielle Loeb, Emeka Nnadi, Kara McDowell, Jocelyn Chorney, Indrajit Mitra, Narges Ayat, Denis Fleury <http://landartgenerator.org/LAGI-2012/99009900/> Fig 27. Tree - Yijie Dang, Tom Tang <http://landartgenerator.org/LAGI-2012/YJBLLJSL/> Fig 28: ETFE installation <http://aboutetfeproducts.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/etfe-makes-strong-case-for-usability.html> Fig 29: Volva PURE Tension Pavilion - Synthesis Design + Architecture, Buro Happold, and Fabric Images < http://synthesis-dna.com/pure-tension-volvo-v60-pavilion/> Fig 30-32. Connecting Lights – YesyesNo <http://198.101.217.72/devblog/> Fig 34. Aerial view of site < http://landartgenerator.org/competition2014.html> Fig 35. Primal Source - Usman Haque <http://www.haque.co.uk/primalsource.php>

167


PART C BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. World Ocean Review (n.d.). Energy: methane hydrates. From, <http://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-1/energy/methane-hydrates/> 2. Danish Meteorological Institute (2013). Technical Report 99-13, Wind Energy Diagram2 from Slelsmark (89-98). Pg 245. 3. Inhabitat (2011). Gernot Reither’s cocoon-like spherical enclosures made out of sugarcane win AIA award. From, < http://inhabitat.com/gernot-riethers-coccoon-like-spherical-enclosures-made-of-sugarcane win-aia-award/gernot-riether-aia-pavilion-new-orleans-5/> 4. Kitegen (2010). KiteGen research. From, < www.kitegen.com/en/> 5. Raeng (n.d.) Wind Turbine Power Calculations <http://www.raeng.org.uk/education/diploma/maths/pdf/exemplars_advanced/23_Wind_Turbine. pdf> 6. Dave Laviten (2012). High-Altitude Wind Energy: Huge Potential — And Hurdles. From, <http://e360.yale.edu/feature/high_altitude_wind_energy_huge_potential_and_hurdles/2576/> 7-8. Kitenergy (n.d.). High-altitude wind technology. From, <http://www.kitenergy.net/> 9-10. Gizmodo (2014). That Time Cleveland Released 1.5 Million Balloons and Chaos Ensued. From, < http://gizmodo.com/that-time-cleveland-released-1-5-million-balloons-and-c-1565731191?utm_ campaign=socialflow_gizmodo_facebook&utm_source=gizmodo_facebook&utm_ medium=socialflow>

168


IMAGE REFERENCE LIST Fig 4. Gernot Reither - AIA Pavilion < http://inhabitat.com/gernot-riethers-coccoon-like-spherical-enclosures-made-of-sugarcane win-aia-award/gernot-riether-aia-pavilion-new-orleans-5/> Fig 2. Diagram promoting high-altitude wind power < http://www.kitenergy.net/> Fig 11. NW Kite - Wind power generator < www.nwkite.com> Fig 12. KiteGen - KiteGen < www.kitegen.com/en/> Fig 13. TU Delft - Laddermill < www.lr.tudelft.nl/en/organisation/departments.../laddermill/> Fig 14. Magenn Power Inc - Magenn Power < www.linkedin.com/company/magenn-power-inc.> Fig 15. Sky Power - Sky Power < http://www.skywindpower.com/> Fig 16. Makani - Makani < www.google.com/makani/> Fig 17. Kitenergy (n.d.). High-altitude wind technology. From, <http://www.kitenergy.net/> Fig 18-19. Gizmodo (2014). That Time Cleveland Released 1.5 Million Balloons and Chaos Ensued. From, < http://gizmodo.com/that-time-cleveland-released-1-5-million-balloons-and-c 1565731191?utm_campaign=socialflow_gizmodo_facebook&utm_source=gizmodo_ facebook&utm_medium=socialflow>

169


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.