Benjamin Barber: The Headstrong Democrat

Page 1

CriticalExchange

BenjaminBarberandthePractice ofPoliticalTheory

RichardBattistoni

ProvidenceCollege,Providence,RI02918,USA rickbatt@providence.edu

MarkB.Brown

CaliforniaStateUniversity,Sacramento,CA95819,USA mark.brown@csus.edu

JohnDedrick

TheKetteringFoundation,Dayton,OH45459,USA jdedrick@kettering.org

LisaDisch

UniversityofMichigan,AnnArbor,MI48109,USA ldisch@umich.edu

JennetKirkpatrick

ArizonaStateUniversity,Tempe,AZ85287,USA jennetk@asu.edu

JaneMansbridge

JohnF.KennedySchoolofGovernment,HarvardUniversity,Cambridge, MA02138,USA

Jane_Mansbridge@hks.harvard.edu

ContemporaryPoliticalTheory (2018) 17, 478–510.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296018-0226-3;publishedonline15May2018

2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914 ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 www.palgrave.com/journals

BenjaminR.Barber:TheHeadstrongDemocrat

OnequestionhascomeuprepeatedlyaboutmygraduatetrainingatRutgers University:howdidyoumanagetoworkwithBenBarber?Thewaythatquestion isaskedismeanttoimplythatBencouldbedifficult,whichistrue.Dissertation studentslikemewererequiredtoscheduleappointmentsweeksinadvanceandon themuch-anticipatedday,Benwouldoftenbedelayed,sometimesforhours.

Reschedulingwasnotanoptionandsowestudentsneededtoremainthere,outside ofhisoffices,attheready,becauseitwasneverclearwhenexactlyhewouldbe abletoseeus.SlumpinginthegraycorridorsofHickmanHall,wewaitedand waited,findingouteventuallythatthedelaywasbecauseBillBradley,Howard Dean,orPresidentBillClintonhadneededtotalktoBenimmediately.

InmeetingsBencouldbebrusque.Isupposesomepeoplemightsayhedidnot sufferfoolsgladly,butthetruthisBendemolishedfoolsgladly.Verbal argumentationwashisnaturalmediumandhewasadevastatinginterlocutor.

Bengraspedanargumentquickaslightningand,streakingthroughitsstructure, foundtheweakpoints,andstrainedthemuntiltheycollapsedfromtheirown internalfailures.Ifthewholeargumentwasknockedtothegroundasaresult,Ben

.
2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914 ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 489 CriticalExchange

didnotcare.Infact,hemayhavebeengladofit.Therewasnotoleranceonhispart forweakness,eitherinintellectualsorintheirarguments.Hewasunrelenting, exacting,andwithoutpitywhenitcametointellectualendeavors.

And,sothepersistentquestion:whyworkwithsuchaman?Ihavealreadygiven youpartoftheanswer:Benwasunrelenting,exacting,andwithoutpitywhenit cametointellectualendeavors.Ifyouwantedyourideasandargumentstogeta rigorousexamination,youneededtoworkwithBen.Forme,though,thegreatest giftthatBenofferedwashisfearlessintellectualnature.Hewasafreethinking socialcritic–adaringrisk-taker–whopositionedhimselfagainstconventional thinkingtimeandtimeagain.Benwouldfastenontoanorthodoxpoliticalview and,interrogatingitfully,showthatitwasnotastrueorasbeneficialasonefirst supposed.

Thinkwesternliberaldemocracyisagreatpoliticalsystem?Read Strong Democracy andthinkagain.Thisambitiousandpassionatebook,re-issuedby UniversityofCaliforniaPressonits20thanniversaryin2004,openswithsome preliminary,throat-clearingpraiseforitstarget.Liberaldemocracy,Barbernotes, isoneofthesturdiestpoliticalsystems,anditscapacitytostolidlyendurepolitical turmoil,especiallyinAmerica,hasmadeitthemodernmodelofdemocracy throughouttheworld.Whatmostreadersmightexpectatthispoint–apaeanto JamesMadison,thewisdomofFederalistNumber10,ortheprescienceofthe framersoftheUnitedStatesConstitution–neverarrives.Instead Strong Democracy insiststhatwefocusonthesourceofliberaldemocracy’sdependability.Wheredoesitcomefrom?Knowingaswedo,fromPolybiusforward,that politicalregimesarenaturallyunstableandcarrytheseedsoftheirowndestruction withinthem,itisnotobvioushowliberaldemocracyavoidsthisfate.Whathadto besacrificed–whathadtodie–inordertogiveliberaldemocracyitsenduring life?

Barber’sanswerwasthatstrongdemocracyitselfwassacrificed.Realselfgovernanceandanengaged,participatorycitizenryhadbeengivenovertocreatea fakeor‘‘thin’’kindofliberal,representativedemocracythatwasapallidand uninspiredsubstitute.Liberaldemocracyhadmanyundemocraticimpulses accordingtoBarber,buttheyallstemmedfromacentralproblemofprioritizing individuallibertyaboveallelse.Liberaldemocracycrownedanewsovereign,the individual,whoreignedsupremeoverherowndiscreteandsolitarysphere.Thus, thispoliticalsystem‘‘iscapableoffiercelyresistingeveryassaultontheindividual –hisprivacy,hisproperty,hisinterests,andhisrights–butitisfarlesseffectivein resistingassaultsoncommunityorjusticeorcitizenshiporparticipation’’(Barber, 1984,p.4).Heinsistedthatliberaldemocracy,withitsradicalindividualismandits stolid,boringsortofstability,neveroutweighedthebenefitsofgenuineselfgovernance,collectiveaction,andcivicparticipation. StrongDemocracy confrontedreaderswithanuncomfortabledemand:thenecessityofdethroning themselvesassovereignindividuals.Institutingstrongdemocracy,agenuinely

490 2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914 ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 CriticalExchange

participatoryformofself-governance,wouldrequireitsownkindofsacrifice.Each andeveryoneofusmustvoluntarilyabdicateindividualsovereignpowerandletgo ofthedreamofisolatedcontrolandself-reliance.

AsappealingasBarber’svisionofparticipatorydemocracywas(andremains), thebookraisedlegitimateconcernsthattheportrayalofstrongdemocracywastoo rosy,toooptimistic.AsAlanWolfe(1986,p.89)putit,the‘‘possibilitythatstrong democracymightunleashtheworstinmanaswellasthebesthastobe acknowledged.’’Thesesortsofconcerns–andothers–ledtothebookbeingread, re-read,praised,castigated,anddebated,asthemorethan8500citationsof Strong Democracy inscholarlybooksandarticleswellattest.

In Jihadvs.McWorld,publishedin 1995,Barberrespondedtoanewwaveof exultantpraiseforliberaldemocracypromptedbyFrancisFukuyama’s TheEndof HistoryandtheLastMan. Fukuyama,seeingthecollapseofstatecommunismasa monumentalhistoricalmoment,arguedthatliberaldemocracymarkedtheend pointofhumanity’sideologicalevolution,andthusitwasthefinalformofhuman government.WhileFukuyamaimaginedafutureofliberaldemocraticdominance andthepeacethatwouldlikelyflowfromit,Barbersawconflictandstrife.The contemporaryworld,heargued,wascaughtbetweentwoinversetrends:McWorld, theuniversalizingandhomogenizinginfluenceofglobaleconomicmarketsand popularculture,andJihad,theparochialandfragmentinginfluenceofracial, ethnic,andreligiousallegiances.Thesetwoforceswereantithetical;antipathy,for onefedandreinforcedtheother.Jihad(orelsewhereBabel)‘‘threatenedthe balkanizationofnation-statesinwhichcultureispittedagainstculture’’anditwas ‘‘againsttechnology,againstpopculture,againstintegratedmarkets;against modernityitselfaswellasthefutureinwhichmodernityissues’’(Barber, 1995a, p.4).Oneresultofthisdynamic,Barberargued,wasthattheplanetwasmelding togetherwhileattheverysamemomentitwaspullingapart.Thisepicconflict,bad enoughonitsown,wasmadeworsebecausebothtrendsunderminedthegenuine, participatorydemocracyofthesortoutlinedin StrongDemocracy.Eachtrend renouncedcivilsociety,subverteddemocraticcitizenship,andcompromisedcivil libertyanddemocraticinstitutions.Asonecriticpointedout,thetitleofthebook reallyshouldhavebeen Jihadvs.McWorldvs.DemocraticIdeals (Juergensmeyer, 1996,p.588).InoppositiontoFukuyama’stranscendentvisionofdemocracy, Barberargueddemocracywasunderthreatbythewarfarebetweenhomogenizing andfragmentingforces.Inhisview,historywasfarfromover.Indeed,itthreatened togobackwards‘‘inanatavisticreturntomedievalpoliticswherelocaltribesand ambitiousemperorstogetherruledtheworldentire’’anddemocracywasnowhere tobefound(Barber, 1995a,p.7).

Theuncannyprescienceof Jihadvs.McWorld wonitmanyadmirers.Itwasreissuedafter9/11withanewsubtitle,‘‘Terrorism’sChallengetoDemocracy,’’anda newintroduction,inwhichBarberconnectedtheargumentshemadein1996tothe eventsof9/11.Thebookvexedothers.Proponentsofliberal,free-market

2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914 ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 491 CriticalExchange

institutionsobjectedtothedenunciationofthecapitalisticglobaleconomy. Fukuyama(1995,p.117)dislikedthebook’s‘‘snobbishdistasteforcapitalism.’’ ReaderslikeMarkJuergensmeyerandFareedZakariaraisedareasonableconcern abouttheuseofjihad,atermwhichalsosignifiesasacredstrugglewithinadevout Muslim,tosymbolizeeverycentrifugal,tribal,andviolentforceintheworld (Juergensmeyer, 1996;Zakaria, 1996).Juergensmeyerrightlypointedoutthatsome ofthesecentrifugalmovementswerefoundedinthenameofdemocracy,notin oppositiontoit.Seeminglyimpervioustoattack,Barberdefendedhisargumentin unequivocalterms.Respondingtoacriticwhoofferedafull-throateddefenseof free-marketenterprise,henotedthathisopponent’s‘‘penchantforpinkbaiting assuresmethathistoryandideologicalconflictarenotreallyoverafterall’’(Brus, 1992).

Barber’scontrarianstreakispresentinsomeoftheearliestofhiswritings.In 1974,whenmuchfocuswasonthetumultsofAmericandemocracy,Barberlooked toSwitzerlandin TheDeathofCommunalLiberty,amonographthatbeganashis dissertation.Ifyouwanttounderstanddemocracy,heargued,donotlooktobig, brashAmerica,butrathertosomeoftheoldestandmostparticipatorycantonsin Switzerland.Questioningreceivedwisdomfromthestart,Barberpulledthe ultimateanti-Tocquevillianmove:heturnedtoEurope,notAmerica,tounderstand democracy.Alongtheway,henotedthe‘‘stunningparochialism’’ofmostofthe politicaltheoryoftheday,whichreliedtooheavilyontheAnglo-American tradition.Givingasenseofwhatwastocomeinthebookand,asitturnedout,in hiscareer,BarberchafedagainsttheconfinesofAnglo-Americanpolitical tradition,noting‘‘thatitisasinsularasitisfertile,asnarrowasitislong,as dogmaticasitisconvincing’’(Barber, 1974,p.3).Dislodgingthedominant theoreticalapproachalsorequiredexaminingactualpoliticalalternatives,theSwiss cantons,andunderstandingtheirhistoryandthedevelopmentoftheirpolitical institutions.ThiswaspreciselywhatBarber’sbook,whichreallyshouldhavethe Tocquevilliantitle‘‘DemocracyinSwitzerland,’’setouttodo.

BenjaminR.BarberwillberememberedforhismanycontributionstoAmerican intellectuallife,tointernationalorganizations,andtopoliticalscience.Hewrote eighteenbooksofpoliticaltheory.In CoolCities,publishedbyYaleUniversity Pressrightbeforehedied,Barberarguedthattheexistentialthreatofclimate changeandtheinabilityofnation-statestodealwithitdemandedanewsetof politicalinstitutionsandarrangements.Heurgedcitiestothefore.Cities,he argued,shouldforman interdependentglobalnetworkdesignedtoaddressthe commonproblemofclimatechangeandcitizensshouldexplicitlyempowerurban leadershiptospeakontheirbehalf.Rightuntiltheend,Barberwasproddingusto thinkaboutpressingproblemsdifferentlyandgoadingustobebetter,more engagedcitizens.

BenjaminR.Barberwillberememberedforeditingthejournal PoliticalTheory fortenyears.Hewillrightlybecommemorated,too,forhiswide-ranging

492
ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 CriticalExchange
2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914

intellectualinterestsinart,theater,dance,andfood,aswellasforauthoringplays andnovels,writingfortelevision,penningsonglyrics,andevencomposinga libretto.Hewillbeveneratedforalifetimeofawardsandhonors:hewasknighted bytheFrenchgovernment;hereceivedtheBerlinPrizefromtheAmerican Academy;andhewashonoredwiththeJohnDeweyAwardin2013.

Alongwiththesemanyaccomplishments,IwillrememberBenBarberasa lionhearted,evenfearlesscritic.Earlyoninwritingmydissertation,therewasone meetingwithBenthatIwasquitenervousandtenseabout.OnthisoccasionI dreadedtalkingwithBen,somuchsothatIwelcomedthewaitinHickmanHall becauseitdeferredwhatIexpectedtobeapainfulandembarrassingdiscussion.I hadbeentotheAmericanPoliticalScienceAssociation’sannualmeetingand presentedachapterofmydissertation.Thepanelistsandthediscussantwerefar moredistinguishedandlearnedthanI,and,notsurprisingly,theyfoundallsortsof flawswiththeargument.Iwasnotembarrassed–oratleastnottoomuch–about this.AsIhavesaid,Benreveredarmedintellectualbattlesand,thoughhelooked coldlyondefeat,healsounderstoodthatvictoriescamethroughpracticeand engagement.IwasnervousabouttellingBenthatthediscussant,thepanelists,and eventheaudienceseemedtogenuinelydisliketheargument.Mypaperarouseda greatdealofunaffectedantipathyandopposition,somuchsothatIwasconvinced thatthewholedissertationneededtoberethought.HowwouldIevergetajob? WhenthetimecametotalktoBen,Iexplainedthesituation.Tryingnottoletthe crashingwavesofdisappointmentinsidemeshow,Isuggestedthattheframing neededtochange.Thewholedissertationneededtoberethought.AfterIhadmade myspeech,Ibracedforhisreaction.Benwasecstatic.InsteadofthecriticismIwas expecting,therewasabarrageofpraise.Thework,Bensaid,wasforcingreadersto questiontheirassumptionsaboutdemocracy,anditwasgettingthemtothink withoutbanisters.Benassuredmetherewasnogreatersignthatthedissertation wasontherighttrack.Ishouldproceedwithouthesitation.

Tome,BenjaminR.BarberwasatrueheirofSocrates.Hewasagadflyonthe steedoforthodoxpoliticallifewhowasnotafraidtoarouseire.Henever bemoanedtheswatsthatcamehiswaybecauseheperceivedthesereactions differentlyfrommostofus.Heunderstoodthatswatsweregood;slingsandarrows wereevenbetter.Thesereactionstoldhimhewasontosomethingpromising.He wasdoingtheworkthathehadbeengiventodoasapoliticaltheorist.ThoughI wishthathewereherenowtocontinuehisworkasawhip-smartirritatorandpest, hehasleftittous:hisstudents,hiscolleagues,hisadmirers,hisfriends,thosewho knewhimpersonallyandthosewhoknewhimthroughhiswriting.We,whoare indebtedtoBenBarberforreasonstoomanytocount,owehimthis:acommitment tocontinuehisworkasanintellectualrisk-taker,afirebrand,andtheverybestkind ofpoliticalpest.

2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914 ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 493 CriticalExchange
JennetKirkpatrick

orbythestubbornnesswithwhichforeignscienceisspurned(1974, pp.200–201).

Thisquestionfiguresinto StrongDemocracy nowherethatIremember.Thatbook editsoutthisdarksideofAlpinedemocracytocarryforwardonlyitsbestfeatures. IdonotmeantosuggestthatBarberwillfullyrepressedtheonefeatureofhis archivethatbelieshislife’scommitments.Imean,rather,totakeupthegestureof hisinscription–toallowtheoryitsfictitiousaspectsandgrantfictionitstruths.

Notes

1SomeofwhatappearsinthisparagraphandthenexttwoistakenfromMansbridge(1987),reviewof StrongDemocracy;otherparagraphsinthisessaydrawfromMansbridgeandLatura(2017).

2InadetailthatBenundoubtedlyrefusedconsciouslytocropfromthephotograph,thecitizen’s hands,claspedbehindhisback,holdarosary.ThephotographistakenfromBichhler(1969), oppositep.265,withpermissionofthepublisher.Thephotographof‘‘RepresentativeGovernment’’ istakenfromTobler(1971,p.27),withpermissionofthepublisher.

3Foraparsingofthissentencethatcriticizesitsfocusoncommonality,seeBickford(1996).

References

AmericanHistoricalAssociation.(2017)StatementonConfederateMonuments,August20. https:// www.historians.org/news-and-advocacy/everything-has-a-history/historians-on-the-confederatemonument-debate

AmericanHistoricalAssociation.(2018)HistoriansontheConfederateMonumentsDebate. https:// www.historians.org/news-and-advocacy/everything-has-a-history/historians-on-the-confederatemonument-debate

Bachtiger,A.andHangartner,D.(2010)‘‘WhenDeliberativeTheoryMeetsEmpiricalPoliticalScience: TheoreticalandMethodologicalChallengesinPoliticalDeliberation.’’ PoliticalStudies 58(4): 609–629.

Bachtiger,A.Dryfus,J.Mansbridge,J.andWarren,M.(2018)Introduction.In: TheOxfordHandbookof DeliberativeDemocracy.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Barber,B.(1971) SupermanandCommonMen:Freedom,Anarchy,andtheRevolution. NewYork: Praeger.

Barber,B.(1974) TheDeathofCommunalLiberty:AHistoryofFreedominaSwissMountainCanton Princeton,N.J.:PrincetonUniversityPress.

Barber,B.(1981) MarriageVoices.NewYork:SummitBooks.

Barber,B.(1984) StrongDemocracy:ParticipatoryPoliticsforaNewAge.Berkeley,CA:Universityof CaliforniaPress.

Barber,B.(1988) TheConquestofPolitics:LiberalPhilosophyinDemocraticTimes. Princeton,NJ: PrincetonUniversityPress.

Barber,B.(1989)Thecivicmissionoftheuniversity. KetteringReview Fall:62–72. 2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914

ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 507 CriticalExchange

Barber,B.(1992) AnAristocracyofEveryone:ThePoliticsofEducationandtheFutureofAmerica NewYork:BallantineBooks.

Barber,B.(1995a) JihadVersusMcWorld. NewYork:TimesBooks.

Barber,B.(1995b)Publicspaceforacivilsocietyineclipse. KetteringReview FallEdition:22–30.

Barber,B.(1997)Afterword.In:Battistoni,R.andHudson,W.(eds.) ExperiencingCitizenship: ConceptsandModelsforService-LearninginPoliticalScience.Herndon:AAHE/StylusPublishing.

Barber,B.(1998a) APlaceforUs:HowtoMakeSocietyCivilandDemocracyStrong.NewYork:Hill andWang.

Barber,B.(1998b)FoundationalismandDemocracy.In APassionforDemocracy:AmericanEssays Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,pp.19–34.

Barber,B.(2001) TheTruthofPower:IntellectualAffairsintheClintonWhiteHouse.NewYork:W. W.Norton.

Barber,B.(2006)Thepoliticsofpoliticalscience:‘Value-free’theoryandtheWolin–Straussdust-upof 1963. TheAmericanPoliticalScienceReview 100(4):539–554.

Barber,B.(2011)OccupyWallStreet—‘WeAreWhatDemocracyLooksLike.’ HuffingtonPost. November7. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/benjamin-r-barber/occupy-wall-street—we-a_b_ 1079723.html.

Barber,B.(2013).IfMayorsRuledtheWorld:DysfunctionalNations,RisingCities.NewHaven:Yale UniversityPress.

Barber,B.(2017) CoolCities:UrbanSovereigntyandtheFixforGlobalWarming.NewHaven:Yale UniversityPress.

Barber,B.(mss.nd) AnAmericanCivicForum:Re-illuminatingPublicSpaceforaCivilSocietyin Eclipse

Barber,B.andBattistoni,R.(eds.).(2011) EducationforDemocracy,revisededn.Dubuque,IA: Kendall/HuntPublishingCompany.

Battistoni,R.(2002) CivicEngagementAcrosstheCurriculum:AResourceBookforService-Learning FacultyinAllDisciplines.ProvidenceRI:CampusCompact.

Bickford,S.(1996) TheDissonanceofDemocracy:Listening,Conflict,andCitizenship.Ithaca:Cornell UniversityPress.

Birchler,L.(1969) ViefaltderUrschweiz. Freiburg:Walter-Verlag.

Black,L,Thomas,N.andShaffer,T.(eds.).(2014)JournalofPublicDeliberationSpecialIssue:Stateof theField,Vol.10,Issue1. https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol10/iss1/B.

Boyte,H.(2004). EverydayPoliticsReconnectingCitizensandPublicLife.Philadelphia:Universityof PennsylvaniaPress.

Boyte,H.andBarber,B.(1994)Acallfornewcitizenship:AnewcitizenshipprojectoftheAmerican CivicForum.In: AnOccasionalPaperoftheKetteringFoundation,Dayton,OH.

BoyteH.and,Kari,N.(1996) BuildingAmerica:TheDemocraticPromiseofPublicWork.Philadelphia: TempleUniversityPress.

Boyte,H.etal.(2018) AwakingDemocracyThroughPublicWork. NashvilleTN:VanderbiltPress.

Brown,D.(ed.).(2004)Whatis‘public’aboutwhatacademicsdo?AnexchangewithRobertKingston andPeterLevine. HigherEducationExchange 17–29.

Brus,M.etal.(1992)JihadvsMcWorld(letterstotheeditor). TheAtlantic 269:8.

Clinton,W.(1993)RemarksonNationalServiceatRutgersUniversity. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ ws/?pid=46275

Cohen,J.(1989)Deliberationanddemocraticlegitimacy.In:A.HamlinandP.Pettit(eds.) TheGood Polity.Oxford:Blackwell.

DeliberativeDemocracyConsortium. http://deliberative-democracy.net/ EverydayDemocracy. https://www.everyday-democracy.org/.

Fisher,R.andUry,W.(1991). GettingtoYes:NegotiatingAgreementWithoutGivingIn.Boston: HoughtonMifflin. 508 2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914

Vol.17,4,478–510 CriticalExchange
ContemporaryPoliticalTheory

Follett,M.[1925](1942)Constructiveconflict.In:H.C.MetcalfandL.Urwick(eds.) Dynamic Administration:TheCollectedPapersofMaryParkerFollett.NewYork:Harper.

Fukuyama,F.(1995)Politicalandlegal—Jihadvs.McWorld:Howtheplanetisbothfallingapartand comingtogetherandwhatthismeansfordemocracybyBenjaminR.Barber. ForeignAffairs 74:116.

Gastil,J.andLevine,P.(eds.).(2005) TheDeliberativeDemocracyHandbook:StrategiesforEffective CivicEngagementinthe21stCentury.SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.

Gibson,C.(2006). CitizensattheCenter:ANewApproachtoCivicEngagement.Washington,DC:Case Foundation. http://casefoundation.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/11/CitizensAtTheCenter.pdf

GlobalParliamentofMayors. https://globalparliamentofmayors.org/.

Goodin,R.(2008) InnovatingDemocracy:DemocraticTheoryandPracticeaftertheDeliberativeTurn Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Habermas,J.[1962](1989) TheStructuralTransformationofthePublicSphere.Trans.T.BurgerandF. Lattimore.Cambridge,MA:MITPress.

Jacoby,R.(1987) TheLastIntellectuals:AmericanCultureintheAgeofAcademe. NewYork.Basic Books.

Jacoby,R.(2000)Intellectualsandtheirdiscontents. HedgehogReview fallissue:36–52. http://www. iascculture.org/THR/archives/University/2.3EJacoby.pdf

Jamieson,K.H.,Kahan,D.andScheufele,D.A.(eds.).(2017) TheOxfordHandbookoftheScienceof ScienceCommunication.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Juergensmeyer,M.(1996)Globalsociety. ContemporarySociology 25:588–589.

Kauffman,G.(2018) HowShouldWeConveytheHistoryofJacksonville?Monuments,Parksand People. IssuesForumsinJacksonvilleFL.JesseBallDuPontFund.

Kemmis,D.andMcKinney,M.(2011)Collaborationandtheecologyofdemocracy.In: AReportforthe KetteringFoundation,DaytonOH.

Leighninger,M.(2006) TheNextFormofDemocracy:HowExpertRuleisGivingWaytoShared GovernanceandWhyPoliticsWillNeverBetheSame.Nashville:VanderbiltUniversityPress2006.

Levine,P.(2013) WearetheOnesWeHaveBeenWaitingFor:ThePromiseofCivicRenewalin America. Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Lukensmeyer,C.(2013) BringingCitizensVoicestotheTable:AGuideforPublicManagers.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

London,S.(1992)Thepoliticsofeducation:AninterviewwithBenjaminR.Barber. http://www. scottlondon.com/interviews/barber.html.

Mansbridge,J.(1987)ReviewofBenjaminBarber. StrongDemocracy, AmericanPoliticalScience Review 81:1341–1342.

Mansbridge,J.andLatura,A.(2017)ThepolarizationcrisisintheUSandthefutureoflistening.In:T. Norris(ed.) StrongDemocracyinCrisis:PromiseorPeril? NewYork:LexingtonBooks.

Mansbridge,J.,Bohman,J.,Chambers,S.,Estlund,D.,Føllesdal,A.,Fung,A.,Lafont,C.,Manin,B.and Martı´,J.(2010)Theplaceofself-interestandtheroleofpowerindeliberativedemocracy. The JournalofPoliticalPhilosophy 18(1):64–100.

Mathews,D.(1994) PoliticsforPeople:FindingaResponsiblePublicVoice.Urbana:Universityof IllinoisPress.

Mathews,D.(2014) TheEcologyofDemocracy:FindingWaystoHaveaStrongerHandinShapingOur Future. Dayton,OH:KetteringFoundationPress.

McCartney,A.,Bennion,E.andSimpson,D.(eds.).(2013) TeachingCivicEngagement:FromStudent toActiveCitizen.Washington,DC:AmericanPoliticalScienceAssociation.

McCoy,M.andScully,P.(2002)Deliberativedialoguetoexpandcivicengagement:Whatkindoftalk doesdemocracyneed? NationalCivicReviewSummerIssue 91(2):117–135. http://ncdd.org/rc/wpcontent/uploads/2010/08/McCoy-DD_Expand_CE.pdf

Melville,K.,Willingham,T.andDedrick,J.(2005)Nationalissuesforums:Anetworkofcommunities promotingpublicdeliberation.In:J.GastilandM.Leighninger(eds.). DeliberativeDemocracy Handbook. SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass. 2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914

ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 509 CriticalExchange

Mitchell,E.(2017)WhathappenedtoAmerica’spublicintellectuals? SmithsonianMagazine July. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-happened-americas-public-intellectuals-180963668/ Morse,S.(2014) SmartCommunities:HowCitizensandLocalLeadersCanUseStrategicThinkingto BuildaBrighterFuture,Secondedn.SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.

BillMoyersJournal.(2007)InterviewwithBenjaminR.Barber.BenjaminR.BarberonCapitalismand Democracy.AiredDecember21. http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/12212007/transcript1.html. NationalCouncilforDialogueandDeliberation. http://ncdd.org/ NationalIssuesForumsInstitute. https://www.nifi.org/

Reagan,R.(1981)Inauguraladdress,January20. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=43130 Sanders,L.(1997)Againstdeliberation. PoliticalTheory 25(3):347–376.

Saunders,H.(2005) PoliticsIsAboutRelationship:AWorldviewfortheCitizens’Century. Revisededn. NewYork:PalgraveMcMillan.

Sirianni,C.andFriedland,L.(2001) CivicInnovationinAmerica:CommunityEmpowerment,Public PolicyandtheMovementforCivicRenewal.Berkley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress(see especiallysectiononNewCitizenshipproject249–254)

Sirianni,C.andFriedland,L.(2005) TheCivicRenewalMovement:CommunityBuildingand DemocracyintheUnitedStates.DaytonOH:KetteringFoundationPress.

Smith,A.(1759) TheTheoryofMoralSentiments.London:A.Millar.

StudentsforaDemocraticSociety.(1962) ThePortHuronStatement. NewYork:Mimeo. http://www. citizensource.com/History/20thCen/PHS.pdf

Sunstein,C.(1988)Beyondtherepublicanrevival. TheYaleLawJournal 97(8):1539–1590.

Thaler,R.andSunstein,C.(2009) Nudge:ImprovingDecisionsAboutHealth,WealthandHappiness. Revisededn.NewYork:PenguinBooks.

Tobler,J.(1971) DossierSchweiz:Demokratie. Zurich:Ringier-Bilderdienst. UnitedStatesNationalCommissiononExcellenceinEducation.DepartmentofEducation. (1983) A NationatRisk:TheImperativeforEducationalReform:AReporttotheNationandtheSecretaryof Education.Washington,DC:TheCommission[Supt.ofDocs.,U.S.G.P.O.distributor].

Veninga,J.andMcAfee,N.(eds.)(1997) StandingwiththePublic. Dayton,OH:KetteringFoundation Press.

WaltWhitmanCenterfortheCultureandPoliticsofDemocracy.(1997) MeasuringCitizenshipProject FinalReport.NewBrunswick,NJ:Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey.

Walton,R.andMcKersie,R.(1965) ABehavioralTheoryofLaborNegotiations:AnAnalysisofaSocial InteractionSystem. NewYork:McGraw-Hill.

Warren,M.andMansbridge,J.etal.(2016)Deliberativenegotiation.In: PoliticalNegotiation. Washington,DC:BrookingsInstitution.

Williams,B.(1969)Theideaofequality.In:W.T.Blackstone(ed.) TheConceptofEquality. Minneapolis:BurgessPublishingCompany.

Wolfe,A.(1986) StrongDemocracy:ParticipatoryPoliticsforaNewAge (BookReview).Society,23.

Young,I.(1996)CommunicationandtheOther:BeyondDeliberativeDemocracy.In:S.Benhabib(ed.) DemocracyandDifference.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.

Zakaria,F.(1996)ParisisBurning. NewRepublic,214:27–31. 510

ContemporaryPoliticalTheory Vol.17,4,478–510 CriticalExchange
2018MacmillanPublishersLtd.,partofSpringerNature.1470-8914

Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.