symbioGENESIS
A Mutualistic Interaction of Nature and Architecture Monteverde Research Center for Biomimetic Building Technology Marco Barboza // ARCH 799 - Thesis II // Prof. Hsu-Jen Huang // Summer 2015
Symbiogenesis: A Mutualistic Interaction of Nature and Architecture Monteverde Research Center for Biomimetic Building Technology
A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Architecture Department in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Architecture at Savannah College of Art and Design Marco Barboza Savannah, GA © August 2015
Hsu-Jen Huang, Committee Chair Scott G. Dietz, Committee Member Steven J. Wagner, Committee Member
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Special thanks go to my professors Judith Reno, Scott Dietz, Hsu-Jen Huang, and Huy Ngo for the vast amounts of knowledge they have nested in me. To professors Steven Wagner and Regina Rowland, for guiding me with their extensive biological knowledge; To my colleagues Justin Kruemmel and Sionnis Pierre for sharing the same passions and contributing to my research; To all my friends and family that have helped and supported me throughout this journey of discovery. Finally, to my birth land, Costa Rica, for inspiring and teaching me the infinite wisdom lying in nature.
TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 1 THESIS ABSTRACT
11
Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION
12
Chapter 2 - THEORETICAL CONTEXT
25
Chapter 3 - CONTEXT ANALYSIS
61
Chapter 4 - SITE ANALYSIS
75
Chapter 5 - PROGRAM ANALYSIS
99
Chapter 6 - SCHEMATIC DESIGN
113
Chapter 7 - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
153
Chapter 8 - THESIS CONCLUSION
191
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
197
LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 1 Fig. 1.1: http://www.wallpaperhi.com/thumbnails/detail/20120306/green%20nature%20leaves%20grass%20plants%20
water%20drops%20macro%20depth%20of%20field%202560x1600%20wallpaper_www.wallpaperhi.com_23.jpg -
Image edited by Author // pg. 13
Fig. 1.2: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/Centranthus_Ruber_Plant_(Macro).jpeg // pg. 15 Fig. 1.3: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/La_station_art_nouveau_de_la_porte_Dauphine_(Hector_ Guimard)_(2590158427).jpg // pg. 17 Fig. 1.4: http://www.visitbelgium.com/images/ceilinghortamuseumbrussels.jpg // pg. 17 Fig. 1.5: http://runawaytrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/IMG_0164.jpg // pg. 18 Fig. 1.6: http://m.flikie.com/ImageData/WallPapers/4e11a51e5fdb11dfa153000b2f3ed30f.jpg // pg. 19 Fig. 1.7: http://www.sustainableideas.it/2013/02/ego-vs-eco-2/ // pg. 20 Fig. 1.8: http://www.mimoa.eu/images/15353_l.jpg // pg. 21 Fig. 1.9: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/77/Water_Crystals_on_Mercury_20Feb2010_CU1.jpg // pg. 22 Fig. 1.10: Image created by Author // pg. 23
Chapter 2 Fig. 2.1: http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/102/3/8/cellular_structure_by_tagirocks-d4vvy2f.jpg // pg. 25 Fig. 2.2: http://www.greenbiz.com/sites/default/files/styles/panopoly_image_full/public/images/articles/featured/ vandusenvisitorcentreniclehoux.jpeg?itok=sxKNIgnp // pg. 29 Fig. 2.3: http://biomimicry.net - Image provided by Biomimicry 3.8 Institute // pg. 29 Fig. 2.4: http://biomimicry.net - Image provided by Biomimicry 3.8 Institute // pg. 30 Fig. 2.5: http://www.arch2o.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/shi-ling-bridge_09.jpg // pg. 31 Fig. 2.6: http://biomimicry.net - Image provided by Biomimicry 3.8 Institute // pg. 33 Fig. 2.7: http://biomimicrykth.blogspot.com/2012/05/biomimicry-in-architecture-and-start-of.html // pg. 34 Fig. 2.8: http://www.n-camera.net/archi/imgs/springtecture/103.jpg // pg. 35 Fig. 2.9: http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large/3-bird-bone-tissue-sem-steve-gschmeissner.jpg // pg. 35 Fig. 2.10: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/48/53/e1/4853e1a4a7f95337530c8dc5feb91018.jpg // pg.35
1
Fig. 2.11: http://www.canadianarchitect.com/asf/principles_of_enclosure/enclosure_typologies/images/munich_olympstad.
jpg // pg. 36
Fig. 2.12: http://wp.hallenbau.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/drucklufthalle.jpg // pg. 37 Fig. 2.13.1: http://mlab.cca.edu/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/02studioproject-500x275.jpg // pg. 39 Fig. 2.13.2: http://www.vub.ac.be/ARCH/interactive-geometry/images/SHMS-1.jpg // pg. 39 Fig. 2.14: http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/640xn/p023r74v.jpg // pg. 40 Fig. 2.15: http://www.architecturetoday.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Paw-1.jpg // pg. 41 Fig. 2.16: Image created by Author // pg. 41 Fig. 2.17: http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/medium/media/2009/11/namib_beetle_
jpg_31143.jpg // pg. 42
Fig. 2.18: http://www.seawatergreenhouse.com/images/SGdiagram.jpg // pg. 43 Fig. 2.19: http://saharaforestproject.com/uploads/pics/The_SFP_vision_01.jpg // pg. 44 Fig. 2.20: Image created by Author // pg. 45 Fig. 2.21: http://www.architectureoflife.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/EKODesign-2011-Konferansini-Geride-
Birakirken-6.jpeg // pg. 46
Fig. 2.22: http://machinedesign.com/site-files/machinedesign.com/files/uploads/2013/04/11343_LF_Metal_Foam1.jpg //
pg. 47
Fig. 2.23: Image created by Author // pg. 50 Fig. 2.24: http://www.metafysica.nl/ontology/pelvis_1.jpg // pg. 50 Fig. 2.25: http://www.jspbiz.co.uk/blog/blog.php // pg. 52 Fig. 2.26: http://inhabitat.com/biomimicry-3-8-founder-janine-benyus-says-biomimicry-is-the-key-to-a-green-3d-printing-
revolution // pg. 53
Fig. 2.27: Image created by Author // pg. 54 Fig. 2.28: http://soft-matter.seas.harvard.edu/images/9/99/Soapfilm4.jpg // pg. 54 Fig. 2.29: http://www.lochnesswatergardens.com/pondblog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/dragonfly-wing-closeup.jpg //
pg. 55
Fig. 2.30: Image created by Author // pg. 55 Fig. 2.31: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/eps-gif/Fractal1_1000.gif // pg. 56 Fig. 2.32: http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/wiredscience/2010/09/fractal_10.jpg // pg. 56
2
Chapter 3 Fig. 3.1: http://mommaandmax.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/mg_4019-4.jpg // pg. 62 Fig. 3.2: Image created by Author // pg. 64 Fig. 3.3: Image created by Author // pg. 65 Fig. 3.4: Image created by Author // pg. 68 Fig. 3.5: Image created by Author // pg. 69 Fig. 3.6: http://www.ecomapcostarica.com/ref/plants.shtml // pg. 70 Fig. 3.7: http://costarica.com/images/travel-guide/attractions.jpg // pg. 71 Fig. 3.8: http://www.elzota.org // pg. 72 Fig. 3.9: http://www.fincabellavista.com // pg. 72 Fig. 3.10: http://www.parklandscostarica.com/uploads/5/1/5/9/5159662/7743449_orig.jpg // pg. 71 Fig. 3.11: http://www.play-costa-rica.com/images/pic-tour/scenery/monteverde-cloud-forest-bridge.jpg // pg. 74 Fig. 3.12: http://urbanfragment.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/hanging-bridge-in-the-canopy-monteverde-costa-rica-photo-
clifton-beard-2009.jpg // pg. 74
Fig. 3.13: http://dam.vacationscostarica.com/crvacations/tours/monteverde/sky-trek-in-monteverde/images/CRV_Main_
SkyTrekin_Monteverde.jpg // pg. 74
Fig. 3.14: http://www.monteverdeinfo.com/canopy/sky-trek-monteverde/sky_trek_monteverde_3.jpg // pg. 74 Fig. 3.15: http://www.nacion.com/sucesos/represa-Pirris-altura-verano-ARCHIVO_LNCIMA20120214_0076_1.jpg // pg. 74 Fig. 3.16: http://www.crhoy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/phoca_thumb_l_proyecto-eolico-7.jpg // pg. 74
Chapter 4 Fig. 4.1: Google Earth. Image edited by Author // pg. 76 Fig. 4.2: http://www.monteverdetours.com/assets/templates/html5/slideshow/images/monteverdeImage01.jpg // pg. 78 Fig. 4.3: Image created by Author // pg. 79 Fig. 4.4: Image created by Author // pg. 79 Fig. 4.5: Image created by Author // pg. 79 Fig. 4.6: Image created by Author // pg. 80 Fig. 4.7: Image created by Author // pg. 80 Fig. 4.8: Image created by Author // pg. 79 Fig. 4.9: Image created by Author // pg. 79
3
Fig. 4.10: Image created by Author // pg. 80 Fig. 4.11: Image created by Author // pg. 80 Fig. 4.12: Image created by Author // pg. 79 Fig. 4.13: http://www.costaricantimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Monteverde-Cloud-Forest.jpg // pg. 81 Fig. 4.14: Image created by Author // pg. 82 Fig. 4.15: Google Earth. Image edited by Author // pg. 83 Fig. 4.16: http://lifeiswanderful.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/IMG_1259.jpg // pg. 84 Fig. 4.17: http://www.travelcostaricaonline.com/image-files/monteverde-costa-rica-1.jpg // pg. 84 Fig. 4.18: http://www.gummibunny.com/images/UGAcostarica.jpg // pg. 84 Fig. 4.19: http://uga.edu/gm/ee/images/support_photos/adams-costarica-21001-038.jpg // pg. 85 Fig. 4.20: http://www.externalaffairs.uga.edu/images/sized/costa_rica/uploads/general/JoeDrawing2(1)-500x307.JPG //
pg. 85
Fig. 4.21: http://www.externalaffairs.uga.edu/costa_rica/cr_gallery/var/albums/UGA-Costa-Rica-Campus/library.
jpg?m=1286554492 // pg. 86
Fig. 4.22: http://cdn1.360cities.net/pano/isaac-martinez/00338907_UGAMonteverdeCostaRicaStudentUnionatNight.jpg/
cube/front/5.jpg // pg. 86
Fig. 4.23: http://multimedia.uga.edu/media/images/UGA_Costa_Rica_2.jpg // pg. 86 Fig. 4.24: Image created by Author // pg. 87 Fig. 4.25: Image created by Author // pg. 88 Fig. 4.26: Image created by Author // pg. 89 Fig. 4.27: http://www.bagheera.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/golden_toad_2011.jpg // pg. 89 Fig. 4.28: Image created by Author // pg. 91 Fig. 4.29: Image created by Author // pg. 94 Fig. 4.30: Google Earth. Image edited by Author // pg. 95 Fig. 4.31: Image created by Author // pg. 96 Fig. 4.32: Image created by Author // pg. 95 Fig. 4.33: Image created by Author // pg. 96 Fig. 4.34: Image created by Author // pg. 96 Fig. 4.35: Image created by Author // pg. 97
4
Chapter 5 Fig. 5.1: Image created by Author // pg. 102 Fig. 5.2: http://www.utexas.edu/features/graphics/2011/architecture_tanzania/architecture_tanzania1.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 103 Fig. 5.3: http://www.bls.gov/ooh/images/1987.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 103 Fig. 5.4: http://rossengineers.com/wp-content/themes/rosseng/img/j0439299.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 103 Fig. 5.5: Image created by Author // pg. 104 Fig. 5.6: http://cdn.archinect.net/images/514x/9q/9qc100pa9b7xl97w.jpg // pg. 105 Fig. 5.7: http://grimshaw-architects.com/media/cache/bb/bc/bbbca46a6365b41190ebb5f543b46c40.jpg // pg. 106 Fig. 5.8: http://www.archello.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/media_image/Ecorium08.jpg // pg. 106 Fig. 5.9: http://www.archello.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/media_image/EcoriumLevel1.jpg // pg. 106 Fig. 5.10: http://www.hok.com/about/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/RiMED640.jpg // pg. 107 Fig. 5.11: http://www.hok.com/about/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/RiMED3.jpg // pg. 108 Fig. 5.12: http://www.hok.com/about/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/RiMED4.jpg // pg. 108 Fig. 5.13: http://assets.inhabitat.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/11/Ri.MED-Biomedical-Research-and-
Biotechnology-Center-BRBC-HOK-Architects-5.jpg // pg. 108
Fig. 5.14: Image created by Author // pg. 111
Chapter 6 Fig. 6.1: http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large/3-close-up-of-bubbles-henrik-sorensen.jpg - Image
edited by Author // pg. 113
Fig. 6.2: http://www.e-architect.co.uk/images/jpgs/barcelona/media_ict_w210911_2.jpg // pg. 115 Fig. 6.3: http://www.evolo.us/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Cloud9-3.jpg // pg. 116 Fig. 6.4: https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8512/8472148500_90db822247_b.jpg // pg. 116 Fig. 6.5: https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-GmrrtvNW1wk/Tt9XtpTKmuI/AAAAAAAAATg/4x0l74rtG8Q/s0/33Media-ICT_ cloud9.jpg // pg. 116 Fig. 6.6: http://www.bustler.net/images/news2/world_architecture_festival_awards_2011_grand_prize_winners_06.jpg //
pg. 116
Fig. 6.7: http://farm8.static.flickr.com/7225/7240534112_c8f71ac9f5.jpg // pg. 117 Fig. 6.8: http://photoeverywhere.co.uk/britain/cornwall/eden_project_dome.jpg // pg. 118
5
Fig. 6.9: http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/671/cache/eden-project- england_67153_990x742.jpg // pg. 118 Fig. 6.10: https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6027/5916035749_587b100514_b.jpg // pg. 118 Fig. 6.11: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Eden_Project_geodesic_domes_panorama.jpg // pg. 119 Fig. 6.12: http://tonkinliu.smartdesigns.sk/projects/island-of-light/ // pg. 121 Fig. 6.13: http://tonkinliu.smartdesigns.sk/projects/island-of-light/ // pg. 122 Fig. 6.14: http://tonkinliu.smartdesigns.sk/projects/island-of-light/ // pg. 122 Fig. 6.15: http://tonkinliu.smartdesigns.sk/projects/island-of-light/ // pg. 122 Fig. 6.16: http://acdn.architizer.com/thumbnails-PRODUCTION/c2/29/c2297f4fda5379b6ba474f111d1f2150.jpg // pg. 123 Fig. 6.17: http://static.natgeotraveler.nl/thumbnails/GenjArticleBundle/Article/fileUpload/detail/00/01/46/ondergronds-park-
primeur-in-new-york-146.jpg // pg. 124
Fig. 6.18: http://www.fastcoexist.com/multisite_files/coexist/lowline-main.jpg // pg. 124 Fig. 6.19: http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17z3gbb7zcin6jpg/original.jpg // pg. 124 Fig. 6.20: http://www.conscienciaampla.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/warka_2.jpg // pg. 125 Fig. 6.21: http://discoverytrip.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Warka-Water14.jpg // pg. 126 Fig. 6.22: http://15kpfc487cpb33j2xa3omwzvf9e.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/warka-12.jpg //
pg. 126
Fig. 6.23: http://zebrea.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/WarkaTower21.jpg // pg. 126 Fig. 6.24: http://kathyadamsclark.zenfolio.com/img/s5/v121/p104118300-3.jpg - Image edited by Author// pg. 127 Fig. 6.25: http://www.asknature.org/uploads/strategy/
e61f1d7787150df465d03fa3894c225d/6ac791b4e939d4dc4104c64b1b0a68ea.jpg - Image edited by Author //
pg. 127
Fig. 6.26: http://www.asknature.org/uploads/strategy/58655598a1dddbbfe02492060ab103c7/rainforest_
interwoventrees12.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 128
Fig. 6.27: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2731/4196672361_9962aa3a96_b.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 128 Fig. 6.28: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-QKPOuwi9mIw/TndYwDNft1I/AAAAAAAAAtQ/_V5ry33flmk/s1600/IMG_2342.JPG -
Image edited by Author // pg. 129
Fig. 6.29: http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/02/4a/2c/80/a-walking-stick.jpg - Image edited by Author //
pg. 129
Fig. 6.30: https://s3.amazonaws.com/suite101.com.prod/article_images/large/2617787_com_elodeacell.jpg - Image edited
by Author // pg. 130
6
Fig. 6.31: http://botany.thismia.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/plant_cell_plasmolysis.jpg - Image edited by Author //
pg. 130
Fig. 6.32: http://m3.i.pbase.com/u40/jonrankin/upload/26404993.PBASEUP030BROMELIADMONTEVERDE.JPG - Image
edited by Author // pg. 131
Fig. 6.33: http://www.asknature.org/images/uploads/strategy/5c3f3f250731561714d60f47585eba0e/bromeliad.jpg - Image
edited by Author // pg. 131
Fig. 6.34: http://www.tropicflore.com/grande/29486_1676/tillandsia_punctulata.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 132 Fig. 6.35: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/29/Tillandsia_oaxacana1.jpg - Image edited by Author //
pg. 132
Fig. 6.36: http://www.varmaphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/cloud-forest-panama-920x613.jpg - Image edited by
Author // pg. 133
Fig. 6.37: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sO5q8cj3i5U/T2euu9M5yDI/AAAAAAAACXM/7iL3FfkpV7Y/s1600/Humboldt_current.
jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 133
Fig. 6.38: https://ibexinc.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/bullet_ant.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 134 Fig. 6.39: https://vashtiqvega.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/56878_the-bullet-ant_
u4otpkuoohegc34cxym6cgqbe3ncurxrbvj6lwuht2ya6mzmafma_610x457.jpg?w=300&h=225 - Image edited by
Author // pg. 134
Fig. 6.40: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rosendahl/3196331940 - Image edited by Author // pg. 135 Fig. 6.41: http://il7.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/1118323/thumb/1.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 135 Fig. 6.42: http://www.filin.vn.ua/images/filin_images/amphibia/b_robusta.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 136 Fig. 6.43: http://www.asknature.org/uploads/strategy/
a9a48000a7eadb955b2cf778dda9537d/66037b43399f10925a5ea4e2ada02033.jpg - Image edited by Author //
pg. 136
Fig. 6.44: Image created by Author // pg. 138 Fig. 6.45: Image created by Author // pg. 139 Fig. 6.46: Image created by Author // pg. 140 Fig. 6.47: Image created by Author // pg. 140 Fig. 6.48: Image created by Author // pg. 141 Fig. 6.49: Image created by Author // pg. 142 Fig. 6.50: Image created by Author // pg. 143 Fig. 6.51: Image created by Author // pg. 144 Fig. 6.52: Image created by Author // pg. 143
7
Fig. 6.53: Image created by Author // pg. 146 Fig. 6.54: Image created by Author // pg. 147 Fig. 6.55: Image created by Author // pg. 148 Fig. 6.56: Image created by Author // pg. 148 Fig. 6.57: http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/12306080.jpg // pg. 149 Fig. 6.58: https://worldtradepoint.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/biome-pillows-construction.jpg?w=821&h=422 // pg. 149 Fig. 6.59: http://www.peterson-co.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/image027.jpg // pg. 149 Fig. 6.60: Image created by Author // pg. 150 Fig. 6.61: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/14/d5/c6/14d5c6c147ee4f1b44b101511dc64327.jpg // pg. 150 Fig. 6.62: http://www.aaschool.ac.uk//images/mainPics/visitingschool/297/width640/1410450242.jpg // pg. 150 Fig. 6.63: http://feel-planet.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Eden_Project2.jpg // pg. 150 Fig. 6.64: Image created by Author // pg. 151 Fig. 6.65: Image created by Author // pg. 152
Chapter 7 Fig. 7.1: http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large/closeup-of-pores-on-tube-mouth-of-bolete-mushroom- tylopilus-felleus-ed-reschke.jpg // pg. 153 Fig. 7.2: Image created by Author // pg. 156 Fig. 7.3: Image created by Author // pg. 157 Fig. 7.4: Image created by Author // pg. 160 Fig. 7.5: http://www.asknature.org/uploads/strategy/f097cff84f4731c409ac223e2a88e125/
d3e1f2126d44d1fad5d481a9a2578c2e.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 162
Fig. 7.6: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/14/d5/c6/14d5c6c147ee4f1b44b101511dc64327.jpg - Image
edited by Author // pg. 162
Fig. 7.7: https://tomaszjaniak.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/169_lisc_l.jpg - Image edited by Author // pg. 162 Fig. 7.8: http://4hdwallpapers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Soap-Bubble-Close-Up.jpg - Image edited by Author //
pg. 162
Fig. 7.9: https://d27v8envyltg3v.cloudfront.net/mio/30133080/14019843750359/large.jpg // pg. 162 Fig. 7.10: Image created by Author // pg. 163 Fig. 7.11: Image created by Author // pg. 165 Fig. 7.12: Image created by Author // pg. 167
8
Fig. 7.13: Image created by Author // pg. 167 Fig. 7.14: Image created by Author // pg. 169 Fig. 7.15: Image created by Author // pg. 171 Fig. 7.16: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/ac/5c/1a/ac5c1a5cc4c5686420d56cd4491c29b4.jpg - Image
edited by Author // pg. 173
Fig. 7.17: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_WcYoqiwezjw/SYSn8MI-siI/AAAAAAAAAEE/6Rl5ldHSgtQ/s400/0807edit_11.jpg //
pg. 173
Fig. 7.18: https://www.guardian.com/cs/groups/guardianasiapacific/documents/web_content/stg_033599.jpg // pg. 173 Fig. 7.19: http://kerekinfo.kz/uploads/images/topic/2013/07/17/88b854ddc6_1000.jpg // pg. 173 Fig. 7.20: https://kierahintze.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/constructed-reef1.jpg // pg. 173 Fig. 7.21: Image created by Author // pg. 174 Fig. 7.22: Image created by Author // pg. 175 Fig. 7.23: Image created by Author // pg. 176 Fig. 7.24: Image created by Author // pg. 176 Fig. 7.25: Image created by Author // pg. 177 Fig. 7.26: Image created by Author // pg. 177 Fig. 7.27: Image created by Author // pg. 178 Fig. 7.28: Image created by Author // pg. 178 Fig. 7.29: Image created by Author // pg. 179 Fig. 7.30: Image created by Author // pg. 180 Fig. 7.31: Image created by Author // pg. 181 Fig. 7.32: Image created by Author // pg. 181 Fig. 7.33: Image created by Author // pg. 182 Fig. 7.34: Image created by Author // pg. 183 Fig. 7.35: Image created by Author // pg. 185 Fig. 7.36: Image created by Author // pg. 187 Fig. 7.37: Image created by Author // pg. 189 Fig. 7.38: Image created by Author // pg. 190
9
Chapter 8 Fig. 8.1: Image created by Author // pg. 191 Fig. 8.2: Image created by Author // pg. 193 Fig. 8.3: http://sun-surfer.com/photos/2012/07/Costa-Rica-Monte-Verde-Cloud-Forrest.jpg // pg. 195
10
THESIS ABSTRACT Symbiogenesis: A Mutualistic Interaction of Nature and Architecture Monteverde Research Center for Biomimetic Building Technology
Marco Barboza © August 2015
The intent of this thesis is to propose a research
facility dedicated to the study of Biomimicry, taking advantage
of design and analysis, biomimetics, morphogenesis, and
of Costa Rica as one of the most biodiverse territories in the
bio-mathematics, this thesis seeks to re-establish the
world; while at the same time employing biological principles,
Human-Nature connection, and reduce human impact on the
design strategies, systems, and functional, performative
environment at a physical, spatial, and systematic level, thus
qualities regarding structure, energy, and environment, similar
creating an architecture that enhances the environment and
to those found in Nature and its organisms.
creates a more harmonious ecotone. What can be learned
from biology and the natural realm?
The argument arises from the realization that human
beings have lost the essential connection with Nature and
their surroundings, resulting in building systems, architectural
to promote education and innovation through the collaboration
technologies, methods, and models of development not
of professionals from numerous fields – ranging from biology
suitable for the planet to sustain. Thus, altering the natural
to engineering – focusing on the common goal of developing
rhythms and order that govern its inhabitants.
new architectural technologies and materials that will aid in the
conception of new design methodologies and holistic models
This exploration reaches out to technology as
one of the main design drivers due that it is a tool with the potential and capability of delivering solutions to complex
11
problems. Through the exploration of computational strategies
Due to its interdisciplinary nature, the project seeks
for a more sustainable world.
BIOLOGY // BIOMIMICRY // COLLABORATION // ENVIRONMENT // GENERATIVE DESIGN // MATHEMATICS // NATURE // SUSTAINABILITY // TECHNOLOGY // SYSTEMS THEORY
12
Fig. 1.1
INTRODUCTION 13
1
14
“
I don’t understand why when we destroy something created by man we call it vandalism, but when we destroy something created by nature we call it progress. - Ed Begley Jr.
”
1. Michael Pawlyn, Biomimicry in Architecture (London, UK: Riba Publishing, 2011).
Fig. 1.2
15
1.1 - WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES, PROBLEMS, AND ISSUES?
“When Julius Caesar arrived in North Africa, what
greeted him was a wooded landscape of cedar and cypress trees. The Roman writer, Pliny, marveled at the abundance of fruits in the forests and the variety of animals. Caesar’s armies set about clearing the land to establish farms, and for the next 200 years North Africa supplied the Roman Empire with half a million tons of grain a year, but, over the years, deforestation, salinization and over-exploitation of the land took its toll. Productivity dropped and the climate changed. It was a highly extractive model of land use, which in many ways became the dominant paradigm for the next two millennia.” 1
Even though mankind has managed to gather vast
amounts of knowledge and developed technologies to an unimaginable limit, nature still fills our heart and mind with a sense of awe and admiration. For millennia, humanity has looked to nature in order to find inspiration in its ever-lasting quest for enlightenment; from structural arches echoing coastal rock formations to velcro emulating burdock burrs (seed-hairs). It appears nature has always seemed to be one step or two ahead of man. The undeniable truth is, it has been ahead for billions of years through an arduous process of trial-and-error that demonstrated from time to time the magic of its simplicity and elegance (Fig. 1.2). The simple yet intricate systems, structures and processes by which nature rules itself by hold great mysteries which human beings fail to
16
There has been a number of efforts in the past in
order to restore this Human-Nature connection or relationship. One of those was the Art Nouveau movement, from 1890 to 1910. Art and architecture were inspired by natural forms, structures, and systems. The ‘unruly’ aspects of the natural world heightened a sense of beauty categorized by the name of ‘organic’ architecture. Organic meaning inspiration in nature through the literal sense of form through the use of Fig. 1.3 - Subway entrance in Paris by Hector Guimard.
new construction design, materials, and technologies recently available at the time. For distinguished architects, Hector Guimard (Fig. 1.3), Antoni Gaudi, and Victor Horta (Fig. 1.4), their work is evidence of such effort. Even the celebrated American architect, author of “Falling Water”, Frank Lloyd Wright (Fig. 1.5), also shared some wisdom collected during the latter part of his life:
”So here I stand before you preaching organic architecture: Fig. 1.4 - Interior by Victor Horta. understand, mainly because their fast-paced industrial lives have inhibited their ability to listen, observe, and experience. Nature’s perfect complexity has incessantly daunted man; in frustration, he tries to control nature by enforcing order on it under his own terms. As a result, he has distanced, alienated himself from the earth and its ecosystem. Even though his own survival is merely dependent on its very existence. Because
declaring organic architecture to be the modern ideal and the teaching so much needed if we are to see the whole of life, and to now serve the whole of life, holding no traditions essential to the great tradition. Nor cherishing any preconceived form fixing upon us either past, present or future, but instead exalting the simple laws of common sense or of super-sense if you prefer determining form by way of the nature of materials...”2 - Frank Lloyd Wright, written in 1954.
man tried to dominate and control nature, he has found an obstacle to understand and appreciate it.
17
At some point in history, man relied on his
technological advancement and turned his back on nature; thus ceasing to be humanity’s great mentor and source of inspiration. But, no matter how advanced man becomes, he continues to face many challenges. For example, the energy crisis. In order to solve complex problems, man should respect and learn from nature. Only then, will man be part of the whole natural system.
Technology nowadays is more developed than ever
before and man is able to approach problems in countless ways. He is also able to examine the environment surrounding him to whole new scopes ranging from the macro scale all the way to the micro and molecular scales. An entire new world of opportunities and experience has opened up for him. Nature has proved countless times to solve problems in the most unthinkable of ways. Man needs to respect, understand, learn, and engage with nature in a balanced approach. At the end of the day, who is man to doubt, when after 3.8 billion years of evolution, nature has learned: What works. What is
Fig. 1.5 - Johnson Wax building by Frank Lloyd Wright.
appropriate. What lasts.3
This thesis attempts to demonstrate the need
for architecture to look back at nature, where it will find the answers to numerous complex issues regarding techniques for energy and water harvesting, thermal control, structural and material efficiency, building systems, and technologies that make a direct impact on the environment.
2. Frank Lloyd Wright and Donald D. Walker, The Natural House (New York: Horizon Press, 1954), 3. 3. Janine M. Benyus, Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature (New York: Morrow, 1997), 0.
18
“
The evolution of human mentality has put us all in vitro now, behind the glass wall of our own ingenuity. - John Fowles
4. Benyus, 1-2.
Fig. 1.6
19
”
“We must draw our standards from the natural world. We must honor with the humility of the wise the bounds of that natural world and mystery which lies beyond them, admitting that there is something in the order of being which evidently exceeds all our competence.” – Vaclav Havel, President of the Czech Republic
1.2 - WHY ADDRESS SUCH
EGO
CHALLENGES, PROBLEMS, AND ISSUES?
“Chaos and complexity tell us that a system that is
far from stable is a system that is ripe for change.” Today man has looked back and witnessed the detrimental path he has left on his way to global dominance and economic grandeur. He has taken a look at himself and at the various other species that he is bringing down along with him. Wherever man creates, he destroys everything in his path, forgetting that he needs to live harmoniously with nature and its other inhabitants. He is a guest, not a tenant (Fig. 1.7). His ‘Homo industrialis’ approach to management of resources and systems has translated to his built environment, where cities nowadays have become places for machines and industrial optimization as opposed to places for people.4 He has been building extensions of himself. They are reflections of the altered state of his natural rhythms. Cities have evolved into concrete jungles alienated from all natural experience. Man’s impulsive practices can eventually lead to his demise. Unless,
ECO
Fig. 1.7
of course, he changes the way he has been approaching his interactions with Nature, revealing a need for a paradigm shift in man’s mentality.
This thesis seeks to satisfy the need to re-establish
the Human-Nature connection and understanding the totality of living in the natural environment by re-evaluating how we go about designing our built environment. Thus, blurring the at times, literal edge between humans and everything else that surrounds them. In doing so, man will find his balance with the
20
world he lives in.
1.3 - HOW CAN ARCHITECTURE FACILITATE TO ADDRESS SUCH CHALLENGES, PROBLEMS, AND ISSUES?
Architecture will be able to facilitate a new phase of
adaptation in which humanity adapts to the Earth instead of the other way around. Through Biomimicry [from the Greek bios, life, and mimesis, imitation]: innovation by making use of the subtle systems and solutions in nature having evolved within millions of years5; architecture can begin to establish harmony between man and his surroundings by means of an increase in resource efficiency, forms, systems, and processes that can now be applied thanks to technology. The recent developments in Biomimicry, computational design innovations, the increasingly cheap ability to measure energy and material flows, and breakthroughs in green building techniques are key elements today that conceive the possibility of buildings which are vastly sustainable. Thus, the architecture will contribute as a mediator in the conversation between man and his natural surroundings by utilizing technology to work with nature rather than against it (Fig. 1.8).
The concepts of Emergence, and bio-mathematics
are vehicles that will aid in the understanding of such complex systems. It is an explanation of how natural systems have Fig. 1.8
21
evolved and maintained themselves. Everything seems
to produce an effect on something else, a connection; a linkage between its surroundings; a relation to the Whole. The economist Jeffrey Goldstein gives it this definition, “The arising of novel and coherent structures, patterns and properties during the process of self-organization in complex systems”. An example of an emergent natural process can be witnessed in the inherent symmetrical and radial qualities of water crystals (Fig. 1.9), formed due to an existence of optimal conditions in temperature and humidity. The potential of the
Fig. 1.9 - Emergent structures in snowflakes.
mathematics of Emergence that underlie the complex systems of nature for the production of complex architectural forms and effects, in advanced manufacturing of ‘smart’ materials and processes, and in the innovative designs of active structures and responsive environments, will aid in the conception of a building that reacts to the environment with the sensitivity of a natural organism; a building that acts a little more like it is a part of Nature rather than a complete separate organism from the environment that surrounds it. The building ecology is a conceptual framework for understanding architecture and the built environment as the interface between the dynamically symbiotic elements of buildings, their occupants, and the larger environment; a living building of community.
5. Ibid.
22
1.4 - ARCHITECTURAL STATEMENT OF DESIGN INTENT
Through the implementation of an arsenal of
biomimetic sustainable strategies and building adaptations, the reduction in human impact on the environment at a physical, spatial, and systematic level can be achieved in order to create an architecture that enhances the environment, reestablishes the human-nature connection, and creates a more harmonious ecotone (Fig. 1.10).
Mentee
Mentor
Fig. 1.10 - Cycle of Mutualism
23
Outcome
“
It has become clear that a new type of architecture and landscape must emerge that is ecologically sound, socially just and designed for both utility and beauty, if we are to successfully deal with the challenges ahead of us. Success requires a level of integration and holistic thinking still uncommon in the design world. - David R. Macaulay
”
24
Fig. 2.1
THEORETICAL CONTEXT 25
2
26
2.1 - HISTORICAL, SOCIAL, & PHYSICAL
pro life? How do we make a transition from the comfort zone
CONTEXT
in which we as a society have deliberately bunkered ourselves
in?
Society and the environment suffered a paradigm
shift when the Industrial Revolution arrived and ‘The Fossil Fuel Age’ began. The world’s entire economic model of
2.2 - HUMAN ATTRACTION FOR NATURE
production went from handcrafted and unique, to mass
produced and generic. The raw material of choice to stimulate
dedicated to supplying architectural flooring products such
the machine industry was fossil fuels. Buried deep down into
as carpet tiles, accustomed to open his speeches by asking
the earth, the pervasiveness and convenience of fossil fuels
the audience to close their eyes and imagine a place of
has allowed excessive inefficiency to develop, and achieved
exorbitant beauty and tranquility. He then asked them to raise
to efficiently wreck resourcefulness. Since then, humanity has
their hands if the place they imagined was outside. When the
achieved considerable leaps in technology, though paying a
audience opened their eyes and scanned around the room,
high cost.6
they discovered that nearly everyone in it also had their hand
The emission of long-stored carbon reserves into
raised. The majority of people instinctively picture a prairie,
the atmosphere and other geophysical bodies has become
mountains, a forest, a stream, or other examples of natural
notable through the drastic changes in the conditions of our
landscape.8
surrounding environment. Climate is fluctuating, sea levels are
rising, pollution is increasing, and our resources are depleting.
have an engrained appeal for nature yet fail to recognize it.
Humanity has become too comfortable with the technological
Nature is an inherent characteristic of man’s built environment;
advancement efforts done to date and economical models that
not only due to the evident fact that the built environment is
feed on an infinite growth agenda. These models are suited
placed on a nature-surrounded environment but also because
for a short-term notion of prosperity; one that our planet fails to
nature is an essential component employed to embellish it.
sustain.7
Trees, plants, shrubs, flowers, grass, water, are all elements
27
So what alternatives are out there to move
Ray Anderson, chairman of Interface, a company
It is undeniable that human beings benefit from and
that are present in our everyday lives. They serve as tools with
away from an industrially driven fossil-fuel economy that
a known high value of providing pleasure and satisfaction. The
has numbed our senses and survival instincts, to a more
value of nature to people can be observed in the willingness to
sustainable one that enhances our resource sensitivity and is
spend considerable amounts of capital in exclusive, dramatic
“
The way we steward water, energy, and land in integrated ways over the course of the 21st century will have a major bearing on the extent to which our civilization fails or succeeds. - Michael Pawlyn
6. Pawlyn, 2. 7. Ibid., 4. 8. Ibid., 5. 9. James Harris, Fractal Architecture Organic Design Philosophy in Theory and Practice (Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press, 2012), 26. 10. Harris, 30.
”
views of a scenic landscape, high real estate prices in relation
are proliferating worldwide as they have proved to be of
to the proximity of coastlines, and time invested visiting
great physical, psychological and spiritual benefits to the
naturally abundant environments such as the Iguazu Falls in
human condition. Some of the benefits that arise include:
Brazil/Argentina, Yellowstone in California , the Great Coral
relaxation, restorative qualities from illness, contemplation,
Reef Barrier in Australia, the Galapagos Islands in Ecuador,
self-reflection, spiritual renewal, cognitive awareness, and
and the Alps in Switzerland to name a few. As a result,
memory. It has been proven that nature has also the power to
Ecotourism has become one of the fastest growing industries
prevent depression, boredom, loneliness, anxiety, and stress
in international travel.9
within humans. Thus, increasing a person’s quality of life
significantly.10
Public parks, protected areas, and gardens
28
The popularity of natural settings is usually
this case, being the human awareness of and capability to
attributed to their aesthetic qualities. The experience of
recognize and derive the symmetry, order, and organization
natural beauty results in adaptive intellectual benefits such
of natural forms, is specifically fundamental for the generation
as curiosity, creativity, increased exploratory drive, increased
of aesthetically pleasing architectural forms (Fig. 2.2).
problem-solving capacity, as well as the effortless recognition
Therefore, when nature’s characteristics and structures are
of symmetry and harmony.11 According to Environmental
translated into an object such as architecture, because of the
Psychologists, Rachael and Stephen Kaplan, the physical and
geometry’s close relationship to the underlying organizational
mental benefits endowed by nature arise from four factors:
and structural systems of those in nature, unconscious positive
coherence, complexity, legibility, and mystery. Coherence in
associations are transmitted.12
2.3 - BIOMIMICRY
The term ‘biomimicry ’ was first employed in scientific
literature in 1962. It could also be referred to as ‘biomimetics’ or ‘bionics’. Recently, it has captured the attention of people such as biological-sciences writer Janine Benyus, Steven Vogel, Professor of Biology, and Julian Vincent, Professor of Biomimetics, who have all written their observations and Fig. 2.2 - Biophilic Architecture
opinions in the subject. Benyus describes it as “the conscious emulation of nature’s genius” and Vincent describes it as “the abstraction of good design from nature” (Fig. 2.3). For simplicity, it will be defined as the implementation of natural principles in order to provide functional design solutions for universal or man-made problems (Fig. 2.4); for example, closed-loop models for waste management. Biomimicry employs strategies based on the standards set by a diligent 3.8 billion-year old process of natural selection, meaning
Fig. 2.3 - Biomimicry Thinking
29
survival of the genetically fit, called evolution.13
Fig. 2.4 - Biomimicry Life’s Principles
It is important to make clear terms such as ‘bio-
utilization’ and ‘biophilia’ in order to avoid confusion and state their functions. Bio-utilization can be defined as the direct use of nature for beneficial purposes; for example, planting in and around buildings in order to produce evaporative cooling. Biophilia is the hypothesis that there is an instinctive bond between human beings and nature.14
Another distinction that would be significant to make
is that between ‘biomimicry’ and ‘biomorphism’. The latter
11. 12. 13. 14.
Ibid., 32. Ibid. Pawlyn, 5. Ibid.
30
Fig. 2.5
31
seeks nature as a sourcebook for exotic forms and symbolic
learning from nature as the same laws and variables govern
associations.15 This can be witnessed through famous works,
us after all. Besides the scientific approach biomimicry offers,
like the TWA terminal by Eero Saarinen, which achieves
architecture should also be spiritual, emotional, and embracive
to capture the poetry of flight through its gestural form.
of the Zeitgeist (spirit of the time), which can be compromised
Frank Lloyd Wright’s Johnson Wax building also employs
if approached from a purely scientific point of view to design.
biomorphism through its celebrated hypostyle resembling the
leaves of lilies. However, they do not serve any functional
technologies similar to those created by human beings and
purpose close to what lilies deliver in nature. Finally, Le
solve the same problems with a far greater economy of
Corbusier was one of the greatest associative symbolists at
means. We need buildings that stop being static consumers
the time where he translated natural shapes to plans and
and become net producers of useful resources. Ultimately,
other elements. The reason it is important to distinguish
the intention is to transcend the mimicking of natural forms,
between them both, biomimicry and biomorphism, is because
and understand principles behind those forms and systems
biomimicry, not biomorphism, will aid in delivering the solutions
in order to create a more holistic architecture that enhances
we desperately need. How to distinguish between the two?
and behaves more like nature. Most importantly, this begins
One needs to answer the question: Does the design employ
to re-establish a human-nature dialogue where synergistic
the function delivered by a particular natural adaptation? If not,
relationships between the two can collaborate in order to
it is biomorphic (Fig. 2.5).16
ensure long-term prosperity.17
Bottom line, if closely observed, organisms embody
The pressures of survival have directed organisms’
evolution into incredibly specific niches and developed adaptations to resource-constrained environments. Beetles that harvest fresh water from air humidity in deserts, a reptile that drinks with its feet, beetles that detect forest fires ten kilometers away, and many more. These are some of the problems society currently faces: producing clean energy, finding fresh water, and manufacturing benign materials, among others. Nature addresses them in a variety of ways.
New alternatives and horizons can be achieved by
15. Ibid. 6. 16. Ibid. 17. Ibid. 7.
32
2.4 - BIOMIMETIC PATTERNS IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
Biomimicry lies in the identification of patterns in
the way problems are solved in nature through recognition, solution, and elimination of problems (Fig. 2.6). The goal is to produce an architecture that possesses attributes of biological systems, and adaptation characteristics of plants/ animals stemming from the need to adapt to certain given conditions. Some of these adaptations are: low energy usage, easy recycling, ventilation, heating and cooling, day lighting, structural efficiency, circulation, water collection, extreme durability, and versatility from few readily available starting materials, among others.18
There is a major difference on how biology and
technology, human intellect, approach problems in the physical realm. The classification of main design problems, according to the University of Bath’s CBNT (Centre for Biomimetic and Natural Technologies), is outlined by factors such as: Substance, Structure, Energy, Space, Time, and Information. These factors give way to the idea that ‘in biology, material is expensive but shape is cheap.’ 19
The TRIZ System (Theory of Inventive Problem
Solving, from its Russian acronym) is a holistic way of thinking. This method blurs the boundaries between disciplines, which in turn enables to see the ‘unknown knowns’ (things you didn’t know you knew) not recognized because they seem irrelevant Fig. 2.6 - Biomimicry Design Process
33
or astray to the problem at hand.20
The potential of biomimetics for man-made problem solving is made clearer. New ways of thought and observation can be derived at all scales ranging from the microscopic to the macro, which aids in framing nature as measure and model. Looking at nature from a different point of view can also give way to new discoveries. The analytical comparison between nature and technology is also of great importance because it exposes the need of a shift to a more systematic mentality.21 Fig. 2.7 - Structural Efficiency
2.5 - BIOMIMETIC STRUCTURAL
needs to be, in this way achieving equal results with only a
EFFICIENCY
fraction of the building units (Fig. 2.7).23
Nature is proficient at creating exceptionally
There are a number of examples in nature
effective structures with a greater economy of material in
that demonstrate this structural principle such as: hollow
comparison to man-made structures. This is usually achieved
bones, plant stems, bamboo, and feather quills. There is a
through evolved adaptations in form.22 Nature employs
proliferation of material wherever there is a concentration of
techniques such as folding, vaulting, ribs, inflation, among
stresses; where there are none, there is usually a void. There
others in order to reduce the amount of material needed for
are also cases, like D’Arcy Thompson’s documentation of the
an effective response against a set of evolutionary conditions
vulture’s metacarpal, where selective pressure is utilized to
like thermoregulation, avoiding predation, mating, finding sustenance, and genetic mutations, among others. Throughout the extensive period of evolution on earth, nature has developed the ability to refine its structures through the ‘less material – more design’ paradigm, thus, keeping the ‘minimum input for maximum output’ principle integral. As a result, it is possible for nature to create equally stiff structural elements with varying degrees of efficiency through the manipulation of shape and putting the greater density of material where it
18. Julian Vincent, “Biomimetic Patterns In Architectural Design.” Architectural Design 6, no. 79 (2009): 74-81. Accessed October 7, 2013. Google Scholar. 19. Ibid. 20. Ibid. 21. Ibid. 22. Pawlyn, 9. 23. Ibid.
34
achieve maximum strength with minimal weight.24 The result is similar to that of a Warren truss using struts and ties that connect in between top and bottom chords. Planar Surface Transformations
In order to increase photosynthetic surface for
maximum sun exposure, plants have had to grow bigger leaves. But growing size by increasing thickness has significant structural impediments. Therefore, plants have Fig. 2.8 - ‘Springtecture’ by Shuhei Endo
incorporated combinations of curves, ribs, and folds, in order to create much more rigid elements with extremely thin, flexible material (Fig. 2.8). In rainforests, sunlight at the floor level tends to be limited, reason why a variety of plants have adapted by employing large leaves in radial fan forms.25 Skeletons
As mentioned before, birds are wonderful examples
of clever adaptations to selective pressures. Birds, such as crows and sparrows, require strength in exchange of weight Fig. 2.9 - Bone Tissue Matrix
in order to comply with the laws of aerodynamics. Their skulls achieve minimal weight by increasing the effective thickness in which multiple surfaces are connected by a matrix of fibrous bone tissue (Fig. 2.9). Thus, combining shell action with space-frame technology in an ingenious manner.26 The economy of material is the beauty in nature and its designs – the absence of the superfluous.
Skeletons and their principles are an aspect
of nature that can lead to breakthrough innovations in Fig. 2.10 - Buttressing Tree
35
engineering. Claus Mattheck, follows a principle in biology
that he calls ‘the axiom of uniform stress’: Material is built up in locations of stress concentration until there is enough to evenly distribute the forces; on the other hand, in areas of no stress, there is no material.27 Trees
Trees are experts at utilizing optimized junction
geometries that avoid stress concentrations and adapt to changes over time. In conventional engineering, it is common for all the elements to be designed to resist the most arduous stress conditions that can take place in only a couple of locations. This leads to the entirety of the structure to be oversized and not economical. The tree will adapt over the course of its life, as the loads acting on it will forever change.
Trees can be great examples to inspire new
approaches to building foundations. In rainforests, where soils can be shallow, trees have evolved prominent buttresses (Fig. 2.10), which offer prevention to overturning.28 Webs / Tensile Structures
Fig. 2.11 - Olympic Stadium Munich by Frei Otto.
Webs and spiders are evident when it comes to the
inspiration of tensile structures. Man has turned to them in an attempt to widen the spectrum for lightweight long-span structures. The German architect and engineer, Frei Otto, pioneered cable-net buildings, such as the West German Pavilion at Expo 1967 and the Munich Olympic Stadium in Munich, Germany (Fig. 2.11). The difference between spiders and humans is that if there is a damage in the structure, the spider will happily ingest and recycle the web in order to fix the
24. 25. 26. 27. 28.
Ibid., 11. Ibid. Ibid., 20. Ibid., 23. Ibid.
36
Fig. 2.12
37
damaged silk in a constant maintenance regime; humans not
employ this technique in order to acquire structural integrity:
quite so.29 The greatest lesson that can be learned from this
Cells. These micro structures make up plants and animals
extraordinary insects is the way in which they manufacture and
alike with some internal variations between them. Cells
recycle their material in a completely sustainable cycle as well
use fluid from their interior ecosystem in order to maintain
as the secret to its disproportional strength.
their exterior structural membrane under compression thus
Pneumatic Structures
achieving rigidity. However, when it comes to the human
scale, employing this type of technique presents a variety of
Pneumatic structures can be widely found in nature.
They are present in every organic life form in the planet.
structural challenges. In this case, filling up a structure with a
Some of the smallest microscopic structures known to man
readily available liquid, such as water, would make the overall
29. Ibid., 24. 30. Ibid., 27.
structure too heavy and prone to failure. Nevertheless, if the same concept is grasped and executed with a much lighter resource, such as air, the same structural properties and benefits can be achieved (Fig. 2.12).30 Due to their extremely light weight and ease of construction, inflatable structures present an enormous amount of potential for innovation within the architectural realm.
38
2.6 - BIODYNAMICS: STRUCTURES AND MODELS
The study of Biodynamics offers models for dynamic
material systems and for adaptations found in nature. It explores nature’s capacity to provide versatile models for design. Through natural dynamic systems, material behaviors and adaptation, one can extract concepts and apply them in Fig. 2.13.1
the fields of architecture and engineering.
The idea of environmentally responsive systems
for buildings has been around for a while, a 19th century idea to be specific. They exist as a collection of individual gadgets that respond to the command of a central artificially intelligent computer system through a variety of sensors. The difference between this and nature is that in nature, most sensing, decision-making and reactions are entirely local. The global behavior observed is the product of local actions Fig. 2.13.2 - Biodynamic Structures
within individual components. All these structures, or materials, involve movement, locally and globally, to achieve advanced levels of adaptation and responsiveness. They utilize the concept of “movement without muscle”.31 It is stated that geometry and material hierarchies produce dynamics. To be more specific, biodynamics, are achieved by a system of pretensioning and the variation of turgor pressure in differentiated
31. Michael Hensel, Achim Menges, and Michael Weinstock. Emergence: Morphogenetic Design Strategies. (Chichester: Wiley-Academy, 2004). 32. Ibid. 33. Ibid. 34. Ibid.
39
geometrical arrangements to produce a variety of different types of movements (Fig. 2.13.1 & Fig. 2.13.2).32
A variety of biodynamic structures can be found in
nature. One of them is the hydrostatic structure, where the prestressing of fibers in tension is balanced by compression in a fluid, which can be found in plants at a cellular level (Fig. 2.14). It also outlines fibrous composite structures which nature employs to carry nearly all loads. The success of such structures lies not on what they are but on the way they are put together. Nature produces a large number of patterns of load-bearing fibre systems where each one is a specific answer to a specific set of mechanical and environmental
Fig. 2.14 - Hydrostatic Plant Cells
conditions and requirements.33
its ecosystems.34 Applications of these concepts can be seen
in:
Probably one of the most valuable lessons from
biodynamics is the fact that movement and force are
•
Variable-Stiffness structures: structures or structural
generated by a unique interaction of structures, materials,
elements that could be reassembled for a change of load
energy sources and sensors. Different variables within these
or condition.
networks establish the reaction, even the direction, for each
•
specific condition. These can range from the sizes and
Portable structures: soft for mobilization, rigid for deployment, and flexible for relocation.
orientations to the pressures and magnitudes of external forces. Evolutionary adaptive qualities such as these ones
2.7 - BIOMIMETIC CYCLICAL WASTE
occur in nature at the species level, in response to a set
SYSTEMS
of inputs on the emergent organism. These evolutionary
adaptive models can be useful in defining design strategies
and educational tool for mankind when it comes to solving
that aid in the development of architecture types, populations,
environmental, manufacturing, and economic problems.
and series. New opportunities to architecturally articulate
Ecosystems are configured in a closed-loop system manner,
concepts such as thigmomorphogenesis, the change in shape,
such as the Carbon Cycle, which is driven by photosynthesis
structure, and material properties in response to changes in
and solar energy. This closed-loop system model can be
environmental conditions, and tropism, movement in response
further translated into human waste, manufacturing, and
to environment, arise in methodical observation of nature and
business models. The Cardboard to Caviar Project (Fig.
Natural systems prove to be a useful mentoring
40
to the restaurants and shops where the boxes were first collected and the cycle is repeated all over again. This
closed-loop system model, unlike its inherently wasteful linear counterpart, creates more productivity output with a greater economy of means, as well as employment opportunities and diminished environmental impact from import logistics.35 The most important remark to be made is that all of the elements composing the system are found and kept within it thus,
Fig. 2.15 - Cardboard To Caviar Project
making it dependent of itself and ensuring the longevity of the
2.15) in Huddersfield, UK is a wonderful example of how
cycle.
a linear, wasteful model of production can be transformed
into a resourceful closed-loop system with zero waste and
system model observed in nature can take form as a zero
a higher productivity output. Basically, it demonstrates how waste cardboard packaging from local restaurants and shops, previously destined to end up at a landfill, can alternatively be shredded to produce horse bedding. The bedding can
waste system within a building or city. Human, as well as animal, ‘waste’ is to be seen as a valuable resource. Energy can be harvested from it in the form of biomass. Also, it can
later be composted by worms, which are then fed to farmed
be broken down and composted by microorganisms in order
sturgeon. Finally, the sturgeon produces the caviar sold
to be used as fertilizer for produce. The same applies to rain
TAKE MAKE
Fig. 2.16
41
An architectural translation of the closed-loop
WASTE
REDUCE
vs RECYCLE
REUSE
and grey water collection, which can be reused and recycled
new ways of water collection other than digging hundreds of
through natural filtering processes for irrigation and the
meters into the ground and extracting millennial waters from
various building water needs. As long as we strive to think in
the underground aquifers, which only degrade the land to a
a closed-loop manner regarding systems, this will ensure we
greater extent.
are taking maximum advantage of our finite natural resources
and operate more as an ecological entity within nature’s
is scarce, organisms have developed ingenious adaptations
cycles. The goal here is to make a paradigm shift between the
in order to harvest it. The Namibian fog-basking beetle, for
current linear model of “Take | Make | Waste” and adapt
example, harvests fresh water by climbing up to the top of a
a sustainable closed-loop model of “Reduce | Reuse |
sand dune during periods of high humidity, either during the
In harsh environments such as deserts where water
Recycle”. (Fig. 2.16)
2.8 - BIOMIMETIC WATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS
With the warming up of the atmosphere, a
consequence of unregulated greenhouse emissions, intensive droughts are hitting the world’s agricultural centers. Poor agricultural practices, increasing population and livestock pressures on marginal lands have accelerated desertification
Fig. 2.17 - Namibian Fog-Basking Beetle
at an alarming rate. What was once lush forests are now barren deserts. Every year 12 million hectares (that’s 23 hectares/minute) of land are lost to drought and desertification where 20 million tons of grain could have been grown. About 1.5 billion people are affected globally.36 Water sources are drying and human settlements and ecosystems are feeling the consequences. Fragile ecosystems, like cloud forests, usually pay the highest price with the extinction of key species who play major roles within the system. Such reality calls for finding
35. Pawlyn, 64. 36. “Desertification, desert, drought, arid, climate change, drylands, poverty, ecosystem, biodiversity”, UNCCD, Retrieved October 22, 2013, http://www.un.org/en/events/ desertificationday/background.shtml
42
Fig. 2.18 - Seawater Greenhouse section night or early mornings when temperatures are cooler. The
The surplus water captured inside was then distributed to the
beetle radiates body heat to the night sky in order to cool down
surrounding arid landscape. This in turn created a humid micro
its matt-black surface below the ambient temperature thus,
climate around the greenhouse which began to presence the
becoming cooler than its surroundings. This allows for water
growth of vegetation all around it.38 This project shows how in
droplets to form on the beetles water-attracting surface bumps
exploring new sources of water collection, usually overlooked,
when a moist breeze blows in off the sea. The beetle will then
we can bump into opportunities to replenish and even
tilt its body and the spherical droplets run easily into its mouth
enhance the existing ecosystem without exhausting its natural
(Fig. 2.17).37 This technique allows the Namibian fog-basking
resources.
beetle to harvest water out of thin air taking advantage of
43
condensation.
2.9 - BIOMIMETIC ENERGY HARVESTING
Innovative adaptations like this one have inspired
Modern day buildings are massive consumers of
architects and engineers to find new solutions. The Seawater
energy. Just in the United States, buildings account for 39%
Greenhouse concept (Fig. 2.18), designed by Charlie Paton,
of primary energy consumption and 72% of all electricity
was a direct result from the desire to explore new possibilities
consumed domestically. This exposes architecture as one
to harvest water from unusual sources inspired by nature.
of the major protagonists in the energy crisis. With human
The Seawater Greenhouse uses onshore breeze in order to
populations rising exponentially by the year, so will our energy
capture moisture condensation and create a cool, humid dry
demands in order to keep our society running. Therefore, we
interior environment which improved crop growth drastically.
must design our buildings in a way where the least amount
of energy is required to operate them. The problem lies in the
our future and that of our fellow species.40
fact that we live in a fossil fuel driven economy, but such fuels
are limited and will deplete in the near future. Society needs
just that. This ambitious project will try to harvest massive
to transition to a more reliable, cleaner source of energy if it
amounts of solar energy through a technique known as CSP
wants to prosper in the long term: solar energy.39
(Concentrated Solar Power). Basically, utilizes mirrors or
parabolic lenses in order to concentrate a large amount of
Nature functions and satisfies its energy needs
The Sahara Forest Project (Fig. 2.19) aims to do
purely on solar energy from the sun. Plants live off of
solar thermal energy onto a small area. In this case, a steam
photosynthesis, the process in which solar energy is converted
turbine in said area will be connected to a power generator.
into chemical energy through a series of internal chemical
Other techniques out there such as CPV (Concentrated
processes within the plant’s cells, while at the same time
Photovoltaics) have started to gain traction around the world
contributing the ecosystem’s functions with its ‘waste’ oxygen.
as well.41
Man should look at plants and try to emulate such highly
desirable behavior. The sun is also a perpetual source of
square kilometers) of land area is required to power the
energy and will keep burning for at least a few more billion
world with solar panels. This is roughly about the same
years unlike fossil fuels. For as long as we keep burning fossil
area of Spain. It might sound like a lot, but it makes more
fuels into the atmosphere, every single ecosystem in the
sense if put in perspective. Let’s also not forget that there
planet, from rainforests to tundras, will be in peril. The faster
is a garbage patch the size of Texas 268,820 square miles
we make this transition, the higher the possibility of securing
(696,241 square kilometers) floating around the Pacific Ocean.
Fig. 2.19 - Sahara Forest Project
It is estimated that 191,817 square miles (496,805
37. 38. 39. 40. 41.
Pawlyn, 172. Ibid. 174. Ibid. 186. Ibid. Ibid. 188.
44
The Saharan Desert is 3,500,000 square miles (9,064,958
complex set of interacting metabolic chemical reactions.
square kilometers), or 18 times the total required area to
From the simplest unicellular organisms to the most complex
fuel the entire world. It is also a colossal uninhabited patch
plants and animals, internal processes coordinate efforts
of land with an abundant flow of sunlight, which makes it a
to keep internal conditions within tight margins to allow
strong candidate.42 However, building all this solar power
these reactions to take place. Homeostasis, the property
infrastructure would come with a high financial cost, but it
of a system in which variables are closely regulated so that
sounds pretty reasonable considering how much capital we
internal conditions can remain stable and constant, is a natural
spend on producing cellphones and cars every year.
process that maintains the body’s internal environment stability in response to changes in external conditions. Homeostatic
2.10 - BIOMIMETIC THERMAL CONTROL
processes can be witnessed at a cellular, tissue, and organ
level, as well as in the organism as a whole. All homeostatic
With the already exorbitant energy demands human
lifestyle requires these days, our buildings are powerhouses
control mechanisms possess at least three interdependent
built with complex energy-consuming heating and cooling air
components for the variable being regulated: a receptor, a
conditioning systems that just add to the problem at hand.
control center, and an effector (Fig. 2.20). The ‘receptor’ is the
Unlike humankind, nature makes use of form and design as
sensing component that monitors and responds to changes
well as precise, synchronized responsive mechanisms in order
in the external environment. When the receptor senses a
to regulate thermal loads.
stimulus, it communicates to a ‘control center’, which is in
charge of setting the range at which a variable is maintained.
All living organisms depend on maintaining a
ENVIRONMENT
RECEPTOR
HOMEOSTASIS EFFECTOR Fig. 2.20
45
CONTROL CENTER
The control center then determines an appropriate response to such stimulus. It then sends signals to an ‘effector’, such as muscles, organs, or other structures that receive these signals and take action accordingly. Once the signal reaches the effector, it then triggers a response to correct the deviation by depressing it with negative feedback. Negative feedback mechanisms, such as temperature control, consist of reducing the output or activity of any organ or system, back to its normal functioning range. The hypothalamus, a gland located in the brain which monitors body temperature, is capable of determining even the slightest variation of normal body temperature. A response to such variation can be observed in the stimulation of glands that activate a transpiration mechanism in order to reduce the temperature. It can also signal muscles to shiver in order to increase body temperature.43 These observations of inner body functions can serve as a metaphor and inspiration for how we go about regulating temperature inside our interior spaces.
Fig. 2.21 - Termite Mound Thermal Control
In nature, various organisms build structures out of
organic materials while regulating temperatures without the need of energy-consuming heating and cooling air conditioning systems. Termites in Zimbabwe build colossal mounds inside of which they farm a fungus, which is their primary food source. The fungus must be kept at exactly 87 degrees Fahrenheit, while the temperatures outside range from 35 degrees Fahrenheit at night to 104 degrees Fahrenheit during the day. The termites achieve this remarkable feature by
42. “Total Surface Area Required to Fuel the World With Solar.”, Retrieved October 24, 2013, http://landartgenerator.org/blagi/ archives/127. 43. Elaine Nicpon Marieb. Essentials of Human Anatomy & Physiology. 8th ed. (San Francisco: Pearson/ Benjamin Cummings), 2006.
46
constantly opening and closing a series of heating and cooling vents throughout the mound over the course of the day (Fig. 2.21). With a system of carefully adjusted convection currents, air is sucked in at the lower part of the mound, down into enclosures with muddy walls, and up through a channel to the peak of the termite mound. The industrious termites constantly dig new vents and plug up old ones in order to regulate the temperature.44 Fig. 2.22 - Cellular Metal Foam Microstructure
47
2.11 - BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL
amount needed. Therefore, this approach leads to monolithic
MANUFACTURING
shapes and members with excessive density and weight. A
much cleaner, energy efficient, smarter way to manufacture
The way human society manufactures materials can
be described, like Janine Benyus likes to refer to, as a ‘Heat,
building materials needs to be adopted.
Beat, Treat’ method of production. In order to achieve high
strength materials, we have adopted environmentally harmful
intricate interior structure of biological materials is an
methods of chemical mixing along with extreme temperature
evolutionary response. Cellular materials are common at many
and pressure exertion that end up creating large amounts of
scales in the natural world, such as in the structure of tiny sea
toxic waste.45 Nature takes a different approach, one that uses
creatures, in wood, and in bones. They all possess an internal
only five percent of energy and ninety-five percent structural
structure of ‘cells’, voids, or spaces filled with air or fluids, each
information that has already been coded by nature’s DNA.
of which has edges and faces of liquid or solid material (Fig.
It also produces everything with only energy from the sun
2.22).46
and room temperature unlike human technology which uses
seventy percent energy to manufacture the product and thirty
polymers are useful for films and surfaces with multiple layers.
percent is used for solving structural information problems
Manufactured by mimicking and adapting the self-organizing
that could have been solved in the manufacturing process.
behavior and complex functions of natural polymers, very
Human materials are also manufactured in bulk, not taking
strong transparent or translucent films can be produced with a
into account the amount of prime material extracted versus the
water-repellent and self-cleaning surface for facade systems.
Natural materials develop under load, and the
Materials such as complex and cellulose-based
“Self-organizing materials, such as liquid crystals,
are found. Emergent structures are present everywhere in
natural polymers, and copolymers have found their
nature, from brain neurons to bird flocks. The concept evolves
applications in biotechnology, sensor development, and
from the direct observation of unusual behaviors in nature.
smart medical surfaces, and more recently in maritime,
Behaviors such as the perfectly synchronized movements
automotive, and aerospace applications, but they have the
of schools of fish, ant colonies, insect clouds, even people
potential to produce new structures and systems for advanced
circulating through the city, are examples of emergent
architectural engineering[…] There has been a new interest
patterns. They move and act as if controlled by a greater
lately within the material sciences industry in incorporating
consciousness; but at the same time, they are unaware of it.
ceramics as a structural material. Ceramics are very light, but
What defines the end result or behavior however, is the initial
their compressive strength matches, or even exceeds, that
state or rules through which the components are placed. The
of metals. They are hard and durable, resistant to abrasion,
emergent behaviors and patterns arise from the actions that
and noncorroding as they are chemically inert. Ceramics are
are controlled by the rules. This is an order that we should
good insulators (both electric and thermal) and can resist high
not expect to see easily, also referred to as complexity from
temperatures[…] Cellular ceramics are porous and can now be
simplicity or order from chaos.48
manufactured in various morphologies and topologies, ranging
from honeycombs and foams to structures woven from fibers,
automation of processes in living systems. These systems are
rods, and hollow spheres.”47
composed of a lot of parts or components. What gives them
Emergence could also be considered as the natural
2.12 - EMERGENCE: SPONTANEOUS STRUCTURES AND PATTERNS IN NATURE
Emergence is an integral rule or law present in
nature and its complex systems. It can be defined as the existence of individual interdependent systems or parts that converge and interact to stimulate the function of a greater, invisible whole, which spontaneously create complex structures depending on the given conditions in which they
44. Pawlyn, 105. 45. Ibid. 82. 46. Michael Weinstock, “SelfOrganization and Material Constructions”, In Fabricating Architecture Selected Readings in Digital Design and Manufacturing, edited by Robert Corser, 140151 (New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press, 2010). 47. Ibid. 48. Peter A. Corning, “The ReEmergence of Emergence.”, Synergy, Cybernetics, and the Bioeconomics of Evolution Holistic Darwinism 7, no. 6 (2002): 18-30.
48
An [ecosystem] is a biological
49. Ibid. 50. Ibid.
community of a variety of interacting organisms and their physical environment. The organisms vary greatly in their functions and designs. Though each is important individually, they fit together in a blended fashion that enables them to support one another and the ecosystem as a whole.
their unique characteristics is the programming of rules that inform the next moves in a strategic manner. One component’s
“There is no independence in nature. The whole of
action is able to trigger thousands of other actions in
nature is a unified system of interdependent variables; each a
supplemental components, just like the human nervous
cause and a reaction. Existing only as a concentrated whole”.49
system.
The concept of emergence owes its relevance to
the fact that it is a crucial piece in understanding the puzzle of
[Rules] + [Actions] = [Behaviors] OR
[Principles/Equations] + [Patterns] = [Shapes/Geometry]
49
nature and its complex systems. The notion that humanity is separated as intelligent beings from the rest of the animal and plant kingdoms, and the geophysical elements in the universe
BIOSPHERE ECOSYSTEM COMMUNITY POPULATION ORGANISM
2.13 - FORM AND FUNCTION IN NATURE
D’Arcy Thompson, considered one of the pioneers
in bio-mathematics and allometry, observed that differential growth rates of the parts of a living organism’s body affected the relationship of body size to shape, anatomy, physiology, and finally behavior (Fig. 2.24). Specific variables, such as temperature, latitude, resource availability, among others,
Fig. 2.23 - Ecological Levels of Organization
affect the genome which determines the formal and behavioral
is an erroneous misconception as the entire human race
outcome. Depending on where an organism is located and
depends on them for survival. Take one away and the entire
in what type of habitat it prospers, certain body attributes
system will collapse (Fig. 2.23).
are developed: wings, fins, fur, etc. Teeth, in this case,
determine what kind of animal it is: What will it look like?
The law of cause and effect can also be found within
the principles of emergence; the natural law that states that for
Carnivore or herbivore? What will be its behavioral patterns?
every action, there is an equal opposite reaction.50 Humanity
This can also be observed in the factors that determine the
needs to understand that life is not a human experience but a
variables of a bird’s shape, the beak’s shape, the length of
total one. Success, as defined by nature, depends on how well
the neck, the shape of the wing, etc. The type of flight the
we relate to everything around us. The world is a community.
bird will perform is affected in relation to its wing size and
The universe is a community. Thus, architecture must embrace such natural concept.
Another aspect that can be learned from Emergence
is the potential to articulate the concept physically through mathematics. Mathematics is the abstraction of our physical world. It is the language of nature. Everything that surrounds us can be represented through numbers. If you graph these numbers, or abstract representations of reality, then patterns will begin to emerge.
Fig. 2.24 - Allometric Transformations by D’Arcy Thompson
50
body shape. This is witnessed in the short-wing typology of maneuvering birds versus the larger wing typology of soaring
interaction or transition.53 •
birds. Form is the expression of embedded forces. It is the result of an interaction of interactions, or system driven by
rhythms. •
system. Therefore, form follows function. In nature, form is not accidental but consequential; created with a specific purpose
Le Corbusier strongly believed that these natural
Positive Space: Wholeness in the space between its components.
•
to ensure efficient survival.51
Alternating Repetition: Distinct sequence and alternate
Good Shape: Derived by recursive aggregation of elemental geometric shapes; usually curvilinear.
•
Local Symmetries: Natural generative forces controlled
forces generated forms based on fitness of purpose
by the principles of minimum energy and least action.
according to laws of economy. He considered this belief a
Existence of a local layered organization; sub-symmetries
universal principle that gave way to the flawless qualities of
within sub-symmetries within symmetries.
harmony, order, and balance that are so present in nature.
•
Peep Interlock & Ambiguity: Interrelating connections.
As a consequence, he also believed that by utilizing these
A subsystem can belong to either of two perceptually
forces in architecture, man would be able to achieve a
overlapping systems.
grander connection with the universals and order that govern
•
existence.52
Contrast: Positioning of opposites provides mutual reinforcement.54
•
2.14 - PROPERTIES OF NATURAL ORDER
Gradients: Strengthen precedent and antecedent condition.
There are a number of prevalent traits and patterns
•
Roughness: Perceptual irregularity.
found in natural systems and forms. These properties can be
•
Echoes: Characteristic angles and proportions resonate
seen from the micro to the macro scale in organisms and their
throughout the whole.55
integral structures. If attention is paid, these characteristics are
51
easily spotted:
2.15 - NATURE IN NUMBERS
•
Levels of Scale: Clear hierarchy at multiple levels of
scale.
witnessed all around. It lies in the pinecones, sunflowers,
•
Strong Centers: Radially generated.
cauliflowers, turtles, shells, fireflies; literally everywhere.
•
Boundaries: Spatial proximity form boundaries. Zones of
Nature has a language and it is that of numbers. Everything in
When one looks to nature, mathematics can be
it is beautifully proportioned, arranged, and measured through mathematical principles that create systems; systems of proportion; systems of growth; systems of movement. These proportional systems are controlled by a set of rules or laws, which usually manifest in the form of equations and principles. These rules then create iterative actions, which can also be identified as patterns. The patterns, following the Law of Entropy and cause-and-effect, later create reactions or results, which can manifest themselves as shapes and geometry. Thus, connecting the worlds of abstract numbers and theories with the physical and tangible. “Math is about patterns … patterns are what life is about.” – K. Devlin. One of the most prominent mathematical concepts present in nature is the Fibonacci sequence. By definition, the first two numbers in the Fibonacci sequence are 0 and 1, and each subsequent number is the sum of the previous two: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144…. This sequence can be used to derive proportional systems
Fig. 2.25 - Fibonacci Phyllotaxis in Nature
such as the Golden Ratio. Its presence in nature can usually be found in spirals, more specifically logarithmic spirals, conforming the shape and geometry of organisms in nature. They can be found in flowers, pinecones, artichokes, shells, and pineapples, among others (Fig. 2.25). The number of spirals in these objects usually sum up to a number belonging to the Fibonacci sequence.
But, conditions will not always favor Fibonacci
numbers and ‘imperfections’ might arise. These imperfections
51. 52. 53. 54. 55.
Harris, 56. Ibid. Ibid. 64. Ibid. 65. Ibid. 66.
52
can take the form of Lucas numbers. The Fibonacci and Lucas numbers are closely related and both are intimately related to the Golden Ratio as well. Similar to the Fibonacci numbers, each Lucas number is defined to be the sum of its two immediate previous terms:
2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123…
The first two Lucas numbers are 2 and 1 as opposed to the first two Fibonacci numbers 0 and 1. Though closely related Fig. 2.26 - Sunflower Seed Spiral
in definition, Lucas and Fibonacci numbers exhibit distinct properties however. Like all Fibonacci-like integer sequences, the ratio between two consecutive Lucas numbers converges to the Golden Ratio.
The Golden Ratio can be explained when the
ratio of two quantities is the same as the ratio of their sum to their maximum. It is present in shells and the number can be depicted as: 1.618. An angle can be derived from it that is proved to control the distribution and rotation of elements in nature such as the growth of leaves in a branch or the sunflower seed spiral (Fig. 2.26). That angle is 137.5° and just like the Fibonacci sequence, it is present all over nature. The angle 100° would be the equivalent for the Lucas numbers. These mathematical principles are a tool to derive proportional systems and identify patterns for design and architecture 56. William Meeks, and A. Ros, The Global Theory of Minimal Surfaces in Flat Spaces: Lectures given at the 2nd Session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (C.I.M.E.) Held in Martina Franca, Italy, June 7-14, 1999. (Berlin: Springer, 2002).
53
with instructions from nature. Due that mathematics are the abstraction of the physical world; they serve as a vehicle in the articulation of all previous concepts into an architectural solution.
2.16 - MINIMAL SURFACES & SOAP FILMS
The connections between bio-mathematics and
architecture are unequivocal. There is a contagious fascination in architectural theory nowadays with employing mathematical models as inspiration for architecture, more now with the use of new digital technologies. It is not so much about understanding the complete architecture of the underlying mathematical formulae, but the key lies in possessing the imagination to translate these concepts effectively into
Fig. 2.27 - Minimal Surface
architectural models.
A compelling characteristic of soap bubble structures
is that they always strive to minimize their surface areas. That is why a free floating soap bubble will always be spherical in form, because the bubble minimizes its surface area while aiming to maximize its volume with the amount of material membrane at hand. A minimal surface can be defined as a surface characterized by having a total mean curvature equal to zero in every point. Simply put, for all points on the surface, if the surface is curving with a certain amount in one direction, at the same point the surface will also have to curve with minus the same amount in the normal direction (Fig. 2.27). A minimal construct’s surface area is minimized given a set of specific constraints. For example, the constraints could be the shape of its rig/supporting edge or the volume of air trapped inside the soap film. The soap film is unable to change the initial constraints, but it can change its surface shape and curvature (Fig. 2.28).56
Fig. 2.28 - Soap Film
There is great architectural and sustainable potential
in learning from the concept of minimum surface area and maximum volume. By employing a minimal surface approach we can expect to reduce the amount of material utilized to create our spaces, thus reducing the amount of energy used to manufacture such materials. Also, it presents an opportunity to mitigate man’s spatial impact on the environment by taking only the necessary volume of space for the built construct out of the environment.
54
Voronoi
are equidistant to the nearest two, or more, source points In nature, the Voronoi diagram or tessellation,
(Fig. 2.30). This strategy can aid plant cells in determining the
named after Russian-Ukrainian mathematician Georgy
most efficient arrangement in order to keep as much contact
Voronoy, can be found in the arrangement of plant cells and
as possible with adjacent neighboring cells and facilitate the
microstructure organization of insects (Fig. 2.29), among
exchange of nutrients throughout the leaves. In architectural
others. Its practical application lies in taking pairs of points
terms, this technique can be employed in the arrangement of
that are close together and drawing a line that is equidistant
program components to ensure maximum interaction among
between them and perpendicular to the line connecting them.
its users and function systems. Also, the triangulation of
In other words, all points on the lines or edges in the diagram
structural elements in three dimensional space can create more compact buildings and distribute load forces more efficiently while saving up on material.
2.17 - FRACTAL GEOMETRY
Fractal geometry surged from the quest for
a possible key to understanding the natural world. The fundamental processes underlying a category of fractals, known as iterated function systems, are startlingly simple Fig. 2.29 - Voronoi Structure in Dragonfly WIng
yet produce a vast number of complex and effective forms in nature. The iterated repetition of these simple rules of formation gives birth to an immeasurable array of complex structures and behaviors (Fig. 2.31). These systems of rules govern themselves by the adage that ‘simplicity equals complexity’.57
The fractal forms found in nature (Fig. 2.32) exhibit
essential qualities that make them unique and of high human interest. These qualities are interwoven, reinforcing, and Fig. 2.30 - Voronoi Diagram
55
supporting of each other, some of which are:
•
Self-Similarity
•
Holism
•
Structure
•
Generative Quality
•
Dimension
•
Organizational Depth
•
Recursive / Nested Quality
•
Geometric Diagram Fig. 2.31 - Fractal Geometries
2.18 - BEHAVIORS OF NATURAL SYSTEMS
The recognition of basic theories and models
that describe the behavior and evolution of living systems allows for a comprehensive approach towards a biomimetic architecture. This set of principles will all strive to work and interact with each other in order to create a place of contemplation, education, knowledge, experience, and scientific research. •
Fig. 2.32 - Fractal Recursion in Nature
Complexity: The complexity of living matter results from the presence of emergent properties, not reducible to the properties of the underlying components. As an example, consciousness or memory cannot be understood by looking at individual neurons; nor is the behavior of an ant colony the result of a group of individual ants.58
•
Evolution: The generative process of biological complexity, operating at multiple scales. It accounts for all sorts of changes and adaptations in different situations,
57. Harris, 14. 58. Christa Sommerer, and Laurent Mignonneau, Living Systems (Barcelona: Actar, 2011), 10.
56
•
•
•
from the emergence of new viruses to human language. It
present patterns of connection that are neither purely
can be either fast or very slow.59
regular nor random.65
Interaction: Process through which individuals and
Emergence: Appearance of novel properties, such as life
groups act, identify, communicate and react in relation to
or consciousness, often resulting from a sudden change
each other and to the environment.60
in the communication pattern among existing entities.66
Iteration: Procedure for generating structures or series
•
Autonomous System: A system able to sustain itself
by means of sequential repetition of a set of simple
and adapt to a given environment and its changes. This
operations, which can lead to unpredictable behavior.61
can be achieved through adaptive strategies to perform
Cooperation: Process of working or acting together,
given functions, cooperation with other systems or even
which can be accomplished by both intentional and
language development.67
non-intentional agents. In its more complicated forms, it
•
•
•
Fractal: Geometric structure characterized by the
can involve something as complex as a bee community,
presence of self-similarity: parts of the system appear to
the inner workings of a human being or even the social
look like the whole. The term was coined by Mandelbrot
patterns of a whole country.62
in 1975 and was derived from the Latin ‘fractus’ meaning
Self-Organization: Process whereby a structure appears
‘broken’ or ‘fractured’.68
in a system without a central authority or external
•
•
57
element. This global pattern appears from the local
2.19 - COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS AND
interaction of the elements that make up the system, thus
NATURE
the organization is achieved in a way that is parallel and
distributed, that is without a coordinator.63
the behavior we witness in nature are in some way similarly
Open Systems: Systems continuously interacting with
responsible for the behavior of simple programs. By studying
their environment through an exchange of information,
the nature of simple programs, we can obtain insight into
energy and/or matter.64
the behavior of systems in nature and understand what
Network: Interconnected set of nodes representing
mechanism in nature causes the complex forms in vegetation,
living organisms, individuals or agents. Linked nodes are
animals, and phenomena. Nature’s rules of growth can
those that keep any kind of relationship, interaction, or
be viewed as a program and the resulting behavior as a
exchange. Social, biological, and technological networks
computation. The fundamental categories of repetition,
The fundamental mechanisms responsible for
nesting, and randomness with localized structures appear to
possibilities take over the design decisions and are applied
represent the dominant behavior in many natural systems.69
without critical reflection. Therefore, a strong conceptual framework for the design is needed to develop coherent
2.20 - COMPUTATIONAL GENERATIVE
architectural designs. A great potential lies in the combination
DESIGN
of intuitive ideas and vague formal explorations in combination
with mathematically defined relationships and rule-based
With the increasing integration of digital
computational design and science research, new design
interdependencies. Mathematics can play a role in both parts,
processes that integrate self-organizational processes of
as overall conceptual inspiration for the generation of ideas
biology and other life sciences have appeared throughout the
and as a tool for the geometrical relationships of elements.”71
last few years. These processes are frequently based on the use of an algorithm, which is a sequence of instructions for completing a task or computation. Algorithms are utilized in the design process by providing a framework for articulating and defining both the input data and procedures. Computational systems aid us in computing complex processes in a fraction of a second, which otherwise would take us a long time to decode.70
Through the advancement of digital design
methodologies in architecture, not only new tools have become available, but a new understanding of the design process is emerging as well. With it, new definitions and an understanding of form and matter are coming. “The current transformation process has the potential to unite the use of computational techniques in architecture which are applied for discrete parts of the design and construction process at present… The constantly evolving new computational design possibilities come along with the difficulty that software
59. Sommerer and Mignonneau, 10. 60. Ibid., 18. 61. Ibid., 20. 62. Ibid., 26. 63. Ibid., 30. 64. Ibid., 32. 65. Ibid., 34. 66. Ibid., 36. 67. Ibid., 38. 68. Ibid., 40. 69. Harris, 240-244. 70. Ibid., 249. 71. Michele Emmer. “Minimal Surfaces and Architecture: New Forms” Nexus Network Journal. Accessed August 2013, Volume 15, Issue 2. 227-239.
58
2.21 - SYNTHESIS
resources.
Human presence and intervention on the
environment causes alterations in ecosystem balance
practices? The extraction of water from underground sources
leading to the extinction of endemic species populations and
and aquifers at such rate has been turning water saline as
physical change in landscapes. Unsustainable development
they become recharged with seawater and draining lands
models and practices, pollution, natural resource depletion,
from a vital resource that is essential to their survival. This has
deforestation, and habitat destruction, are some of the
also created a considerable drawdown of the water tables as
problems human society brings upon the environment.
well as a reduction in rainfall and increase in temperatures
worldwide. These biomimetic strategies also pose great
Life on Earth is interconnected and interdependent.
There are a series of principles and strategies within natural
potential to help restore the fertility of our soils; vital to feed our
systems, structures, and processes that represent the
ever increasing population.
overarching patterns found amongst species surviving and
thriving on Earth. Nature integrates and optimizes these
our built environment? Energy expenditures to cool / heat
strategies to create conditions conducive to life. If we zoom
buildings are massive and contribute to climatic change which
in on nature, it can teach us a variety of strategies that can
directly affects fragile ecosystems, such as cloud forests.
be employed in order to adopt a paradigm shift in the way
This creates the opportunity to conceive buildings that are
we go about utilizing our natural resources, manufacturing
extended organisms where function and structure meld and
our building blocks, designing our infrastructure, cities,
are controlled by the overriding demands of homeostasis.
and ultimately designing our buildings. The answers to our problems have always been there, we just need to pay attention to them.
Why do we need more efficient biomimetic structures
and materials? With the creation of more efficient, frugal, smart, and elegantly designed structures and materials we will be able to counteract the current inefficient architectural building techniques and systems that employ environmentally harmful processes and deplete the world’s finite natural
59
Why do we need biomimetic water harvesting
Why do we need biomimetic thermal control in
ECOTONE: /‘eko,tōn/ A transition area between two biological communities or biomes. It may be narrow or wide, and it may be local (the zone between a field and forest) or regional (the transition between forest and grassland ecosystems).
60
CONTEXT ANALYSIS 61
Fig. 3.1
3
62
INTRODUCTION
The project requires a place with natural
abundance and biodiversity. If the goal is to develop new technologies and methods from natural models, there needs to be a rich presence of raw material (nature) readily available.
So what is biodiversity? Biodiversity
(or biological diversity) is a term employed in reference to the totality and variety of life on Earth. Biodiversity includes genetic diversity within species, the variety among species, and the range of ecosystems within which life or organisms exist and interact.
63
BIOMES in Costa Rica Polar Ice Taiga / Coniferous Forest Tundra Temperate Forest Tropical Rainforest Temperate Grassland Savannah / Tropical Grassland Desert Chaparral / Mediterranean Mountains Oceanic
Fig. 3.2 - Costa Rican Biomes
64
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Americas
Central America Fig. 3.3
65
0.03% o f
t h e
w o r l d ’ s
L A N D M A S S [ 1 9 , 7 3 0 m i . 2]
Costa Rica
66
70% of the world’s
BIODIVERSITY
Australia
is found within these countries 3.1 - BIODIVERSITY
Costa Rica is a small territory of 19,730 sq. mi.
[51,100 sq. km.] located in Central America. Due to its Colombia
neotropical climate and wide variety of habitats, it houses a vast number of flora and fauna; nowhere else in the world are so many types of habitats or ‘biomes’ squeezed into such a small area. Tropical rainforests, deciduous forests, Atlantic and Pacific coastline, cloud forests, and Mangrove forests are some of the ecosystems found within the country. Costa Rica
67
Indonesia
is home to more than 500,000 species, which represents a 4%
of the estimated species estimated to exist worldwide.72 The
countries that contain the majority of the world’s species (Fig.
country is located in between the North and South American
3.4). It is estimated that 70% of the world’s total biodiversity is
continents; characteristic that is attributed to the biodiversity
found in just twelve of these countries: Australia, Brazil, China,
of wildlife residing in it. Together with Panama, it forms a
Colombia, Costa Rica, the Democratic Republic of Congo,
type of land ‘bridge’ that allows for the intermixing of species
Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mexico and Peru.75
from both hemispheres.73 Therefore, doubling the number of
These are habitually found in the Southern Hemisphere where
concentrated species per 10,000 sq. km. to an impressive 615;
the density of species is the greatest. Tropical regions account
the highest density of biodiversity worldwide. 74
for the support of two-thirds of the estimated 250,000 plant
Costa Rica forms part of a selected number of
Brazil
Ecuador
China
4% Democratic Republic of Congo
Mexico
Costa Rica
Peru
India
Madagascar
Fig. 3.4 - Worldwide Biodiversity
species and overall, are thought to contain about 50-90% of the species in the planet. 76
72. “Biodiversity in Costa Rica”, Inbio, http://www2.inbio.ac.cr 73. Stiles, Gary Slater and Alexander F. Skutch, A Guide to the Birds of Costa Rica (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1989). 74. Obando, V. “Biodiversidad en Costa Rica”. INBio-Sinac. INBio-Sinac. 75. UNEP/Global Environment Outlook 3 (2003). http://www.unep.org/geo/geo3. asp 76. World Resources Institute, Earth Trends. http://www.wri.org/our-work/ project/earthtrends-environmentalinformation
68
COSTA RICA LIFE ZONES Elevation
Forest Type
Tree Features
Canopy Height
Epiphytes or Vines
Shrub Layer
Ground Layer
Other Features
1000m
Tropical Dry Forest
Compound leaves, stout trunks, flattopped crowns.
20-30m
Occasional
Dense and thorny
Sparse/bare
Rubiaceae common in understory
Tropical Moist Forest
Wide crowns, light-colored bark.
40-50m
Abundant
Palms
Bare, some ferns
Many lianas, long drip tips on leaves
Tropical Wet Forest
Buttressed trunks, light-colored bark.
45-55m
Relatively rare
Palms and giant herbs
Sparse, some ferns
Most species-rich life zone in Costa Rica
Tropical Premontane Moist Forest
Umbrella crowns, flaky / rough bark
25m
Rare
Woody, spiny plants
Sparse
Many trees crooked
Tropical Premontane Wet Forest
Bark brown or gray, fissured, leaves on twig ends.
30-40m
Present, many vines
Dense and thorny
Bare, some ferns
Most trees covered by moss
Tropical Premontane Rain Forest
Round to conical crown, thin bark
30-40m
Abundant
Dense
Completely covered in ferns
Moss and epiphytes everywhere
Tropical Lower Montane Moist Forest
Rough bark, gnarled 30-35m branches
Uncommon
Dense, large-leaved plants
Open, grassy
Most of the trees are oaks
2000m
3000m
4000m
4500m
Tropical Lower Mon- Thick flaky bark tane Wet Forest
20-25m
Orchids, bromeliads
Dense, few palms
Ferns, vines, rotting leaves
Large coiled lianas common
Tropical Lower Mon- Thick bark, compact tane Rain Forest crown
25-30m
Orchids, bromeliads
Dense
Ferns, sedges, moss
Large-leaved vines
Tropical Montane Wet Forest
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Bamboo
Unknown
Restricted to the southwest slopes of Volcano Irazu, little data
Tropical Montane Rain Forest
Short with rough bark
25-30m
Orchids, bromeliads
Bamboo
Open
Woody vines with fleshy leaves
Tropical Subalpine Rain Paramo
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mostly tree-like flowers
Mosses dominate
Bogs are present
Fig. 3.5 EcoMap Costa Rica. (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2014, from http://www. ecomapcostarica.com/ref/plants.shtml
69
Fig. 3.6
Holdridge Zones
National Parks / Protected Areas
Main Roads & Highways
Peaks & Volcanoes
Hydrography
70
clear-cutting on their land and create tree plantations instead,78 making it one of the first countries to pioneer payment for ecosystem services to conserve forests and maintain freshwater resources.
Other efforts of conservation can be witnessed
in the creation of a number of educational institutions and conservational organizations that foment the public’s awareness in the importance of the environment. InBio Fig. 3.7 - Rio Celeste
Parque, El Zota: Field Station (Fig. 3.8), Finca BellaVista: A
3.2 - WILDLIFE CONSERVATION &
Sustainable Treehouse Community (Fig. 3.9), and EARTH
PROTECTION
University, are some of these facilities, to name a few.
The country takes great pride in its natural
exuberance, commitment to conservation, and the sustainable development of its economy. Over 27% percent of the country’s territory has been designated a protected status of national parks, wildlife refuges, forest preserves, among others (Fig. 3.7).77 The government executes a 5% tax on gasoline to generate revenue in order to pay landowners to desist from
Fig. 3.10
71
3.3 - ECO-TOURISM
The Costa Rican economy has been benefited to a
great extent thanks to its biodiversity. The practice of Ecotourism brings about $1.92 billion dollars in revenue for the country every year.79 The eco-tourism industry here thoroughly promotes the protection and preservation of natural resources
77. Karen Holl, Gretchen Daily, Paul Ehrlich. “Knowledge and Perceptions in Costa Rica Regarding Environment, Population, and Biodiversity Issues”. Conservation Biology 9 (6): (December 1995). 1548–1558. www.jstor.org. Retrieved 5 November 2013. 78. John Burnett, “Costa Rica Aims to Be a Carbon-Neutral Nation”, National Public Radio, Retrieved 5 November 2013, www.npr.org. 79. Wesley Rose, “Costa Rica: Unequaled Tradition Of Political, Social and Economic Stability”. Inside Costa Rica.
Fig. 3.8 - El Zota Biological Station
Fig. 3.9 - Finca Bellavista Treehouse Community
72
rather than consuming them. Millions come every year to visit
with the amount that it captures or offsets by, for example, by
its exuberant national parks and natural reserves (Fig. 3.11 &
planting trees.
3.12). Due to this, Costa Rica has been able to position itself
among one of the leaders and pioneers in this industry.
Dobles, stated that his plans to achieve this ambitious goal
included using budgeting, laws, and incentives, as well as
In past decades, growth of tourism in Central
The Environment and Energy Minister, Roberto
America was stagnant due to armed conflicts and civil wars
measures to promote biofuels, hybrid vehicles, and clean
taking place among some countries in the region. As peace
energy. A new ‘C-Neutral’ system was proposed where tourists
developed throughout the neighboring countries, Costa Rica
and businesses will be charged a voluntary ‘tax’ to offset their
witnessed a significant increase in tourism which only rose
carbon emissions, with one ton of carbon valued at $10. The
during the next two decades.80 In 1988, the number of visitors
money collected from the system will then be invested to fund
rose to 329,000, to 1.03 million in 1999, all the way to an
conservation, reforestation, and research in protected areas.
impressive record of 2.34 million tourists in 2012 (Fig. 3.13 &
Thus, Costa Rica is taking a lead role globally in regards to
3.14).81
reducing our carbon footprint, as about 80% of the country’s
This success can also be correlated to Costa Rica’s
geographical proximity to the United States, as 20% of the
energy is already generated from renewable sources, such as wind and water (Fig. 3.15 & 3.16).
world’s tourism is comprised of American travelers. American visitors make up 49% of Costa Rica’s total tourism rates, while 9% is comprised of visitors from Canada and Mexico.82
3.4 - COSTA RICA STRIVES TO BECOME CARBON NEUTRAL BY 2020
Recently, at a 2013 United Nations climate
conference talk held in Monaco, of 154 nations, Costa Rica was one of five other countries, Iceland, Monaco, New Zealand, and Norway, which committed to achieve carbon neutrality. Carbon neutrality seeks to balance the amount of carbon dioxide a country releases by burning fossil fuels
73
80. Weaver, D.B. (1996) [1998]. Ecotourism in the Less Developed World. London: Cab International. 52. 81. Departamento de Estadísticas ICT (2009). “Anuário Estadístico 2008” (PDF) (in Spanish). Instituto Costarricense de Turismo. Retrieved 2013-07-19. 82. Dasenbrock, Julie (2002-02-01). “The Pros and Cons of Ecotourism in Costa Rica”. TED Case Study Template. Retrieved 2013-11-12.
Fig. 3.11 - Monteverde Sky Walk Suspension Bridges
Fig. 3.12 - Monteverde Sky Walk Suspension Bridges
Fig. 3.13 - Arenal Sky Tram
Fig. 3.14 - Monteverde Sky Trek Zipline
Fig. 3.15 - Pirris Dam
Fig. 3.16 - Proyecto Eolico Valle Central de Santa Ana
74
SITE ANALYSIS
75
10˚18’37” N 84˚48’55” W
Fig. 4.1
4
76
SITE JUSTIFICATION WHY Monteverde? Monteverde qualifies as a vulnerable ecosystem (cloudforest) which has been affected by our current unsustainable practices, leading to ecosystem imbalances. Human intervention in the landscape has lead to the extinction of endemic species such as the Golden Toad, and keeps witnessing a great deal of physical change due to the construction of hotels in the area and deforestation for cattle. It is also a unique and rare ecosystem that nurtures life, which can be studied for signs of biomimetic adaptations and conditions that could help mankind achieve such ecological equilibrium within its built environment.
Fig. 4.2
77
78
Fig. 4.3
Fig. 4.8
Fig. 4.12 - Project Site
SITE 79
Fig. 4.4
Fig. 4.5
Fig. 4.9
Fig. 4.6
Fig. 4.10
Fig. 4.7
Fig. 4.11
This patch of land in Monteverde was once covered in lush cloudforest but due to the high demand for lumber and cattle at the time, it was deforested. A site ravaged by human activity becomes an opportunity to restore it. It is also bordered by rainforests, creating a clear edge and an invitation to its inhabitants could be extended. The site is located in a main road, close to the UGA Costa Rica campus and it also poses the opportunity to draw tourists and the community into learning more about biomimetic practices due to easy visibility.
80
Fig. 4.13
MONTEVERDE
81
Location: 140 miles (225 km) northwest of the capital city of
numerous other reserves. This attracts in turn a considerable
San José (generally, this takes about 3.5 hours by car and 5
numbers of tourists and naturalist enthusiasts.
hours by bus).
was mainly populated by Creole people who worked at the
Monteverde, Costa Rica is a small town in
In the early decades of the 20th century, the area
Puntarenas, Costa Rica, located in the Cordillera de Tilarán.
nearby Guacimal gold mines. Decades later, the town was
It is considered a major ecotourism destination in Costa Rica.
then founded by a group of Quakers, originally from Alabama,
The area is host to the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve and
United States, who defied the Korean War American draft
SAN JOSE
SANTA ELENA
MONTEVERDE
Fig. 4.14 back in the 1950s. They settled due to its cool climate and
of insect species, 1,200 species of amphibians and reptiles,
dedicated themselves to dairy farming. That land was later set
more than 3,200 species of plants including 500 species of
apart for conservation.
orchids and 700 species of trees, living within its bounds. It’s
one of the few remaining habitats that support all six species
The Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve was
established in 1972 and initially covered some 810 acres (328
of the cat family – jaguars, ocelots, pumas, oncillas, margays,
ha) of forested land. Nowadays, its protective reach extends
and jaguarundis – as well as the endangered three-wattled
over 35,089 acres (14,200 ha) and encompasses eight life
bellbird and resplendent quetzal. Over 8 miles (13 km) of
zones atop the Continental Divide. Monteverde is home to 100
trails are available for visitors to explore on their own or with a
species of mammals, 400 species of birds, tens of thousands
guide.
82
Monteverde Monteverde Cloud Forest Biological Reserve
Santa Elena i
m 8 .
ALTITUDE = 4460 ft
i
m
0
0
Fig. 4.15
83
.6
1.8mi
mi 7 . 1
1mi
Site
UGA Costa Rica Campus
Road 620
Main Road 606
San Luis
Fig. 4.16 - Santa Elena
Fig. 4.17 - Monteverde Cloud Forest Biological Reserve
Fig. 4.18 - UGA Costa Rica Campus
84
UGA CR CAMPUS
Fig. 4.19 - UGA Costa Rica Classroom
UGA Costa Rica is used as a site for research, study
abroad, symposia, and ecotourism. Located at the foot of the Monteverde Cloud Forest, is primarily a site for the University of Georgia’s study abroad programs, though dozens of other American universities utilize the campus for study abroad as well. Currently UGA Costa Rica offers 23 annual programs held during the fall, spring, Maymester, and summer terms as designated by the University of Georgia. The scope of Fig. 4.20 - UGA Students
85
each program differs greatly as UGA Costa Rica works with
over 50 UGA faculty members in 28 academic disciplines.
Launched in January 2008, the Carbon Offset Program
is a unique component of UGA Costa Rica’s study abroad experience. In addition to offsetting carbon emissions related to the participant’s international travel and the efforts to restore critical lost habitats where tropical rain forests once stood, UGA Costa Rica’s Carbon Offset Program seeks to establish longterm research forests where scientists from the University of Georgia and elsewhere can study the effects of climate change;
Fig. 4.21 - UGA Costa Rica Library
forest, soils, and wildlife ecology; sustainable silviculture and soils management techniques; and even sociological issues.
The UGA Costa Rica campus sits at the head
of the San Luis Valley adjacent to the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve. Though 155 acres in size, only about 10% of the property contains built structures of any kind, leaving the majority of the campus situated in a web of federally protected but privately owned natural forests.
Altogether
the
campus
comprises
36,000
Fig. 4.22 - UGA Costa Rica Common Area
square feet (3,300 m2) of built space, which was designed almost exclusively by the University of Georgia’s College of Environment & Design. The complex houses a student union space, natural science wet laboratory,
classrooms,
a student recreation center, residential facilities, cabinas, student bungalows, resident faculty house, among others.
Fig. 4.23 - Student studying insect
86
POPULATION = 6750
Santa Elena
Site
Monteverde
N
500’
1500’
Fig. 4.24 - Figure Ground
87
Institutional Commercial Hospitality Residential
Fig. 4.25 - Land Use / Zoning
88
Biodiversity Monteverde is home to:
3%
of world’s known species of Birds, Mammals, Reptiles, Amphibians, Insects, Plants
Without a niche to dwell in, shade and a variety of plants and animals as food sources, many organisms struggle to survive in deforested areas and man-impacted landscapes.
Fig. 4.26 - Biodiversity Diagram
Extinct Endemic Species: GOLDEN TOAD
Fig. 4.27 - Golden Toad
89
100 MAMMALS: Howler and Capuchin monkeys, Puma, Ocelot, Deer, Tapir, Sloths, Marsupials, Muskrats, Edentates, Squirrels, Paca, Agouti, Porcupine, Ground Hog, Wild Pig
400 BIRDS: Hummingbirds, Quetzals
3,200 PLANTS / TREES: Epiphytes, Orchids
+10,000 INSECTS/ARTHROPODS: Butterflies, Ants, Centipedes, Spiders, Moths
1,200 REPTILES/AMPHIBIANS: Snakes, Tree Frogs, Toads, Salamanders
90
LOCAL FAUNA
Fig. 4.28 - Fauna Sketches
Bat
Bullet Ant
Salamander
Iguana
91
Sunflower
Scorpion
Tree Frog
Raven
92
Emergent Layer The tallest trees of the rainforest can be as tall as skyscrapers. They poke through the canopy to form the Emergent Layer. The sun is so bright and the wind so strong here that only trees with thick leaves and strong trunks can survive in this layer.
Canopy Layer This layer stretches out like an umbrella of leaves and branches over the forest below. This is the thickest layer and much of the rain is stopped by the thick foliage. Most trees in the forest grow to this height. There are plants that grow in the canopy layer whose roots don’t reach the ground. These are called air plants.
Understory Not much sun reaches the understory, so small plants climb the tree trunks reaching for more light. Animals such as jaguars, tree frogs, and insects find homes in the nooks and crannies of tree trunks.
Forest Floor It is very dim on the rainforest floor. Even on the sunniest days, very little sunlight makes its way through thick vegetation and tree branches soaring above the rainforest floor.
Subsurface The subsurface provides the necessary nutrients for the rainforest to thrive. It absorbs moisture and provides the “infrastructure“ for the ecosystem to function.
93
Fig. 4.29
Cloud Forest Structure
94
CLIMATE Site Area 375,750 sq. ft. Jun 21
66˚
294˚
Mar 21/ 271˚ Sep 21
Dec 21
90˚
114˚
246˚
Fig. 4.30
Fig. 4.32 Resting roughly at 4,600 ft above sea level, Monteverde is misty, humid, and windy, with a mean annual temperature of 18 °C (64 °F) (Nadkarni 2000: 17). Annual rainfall averages
Dry Season: December to March
16
14
14
12
12
13 11
10
FOG DAYS
8 6
4
4 2
1
0
1
2
0 Jan
Feb
Mar
Total = 102 days
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
It is foggy 28.3% of the year
95
17
10
around 3,000 millimetres (118 in). Humidity oscillates between 74% and 97%.
17
18
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
WIND
Fig. 4.31
MAX.
36
44
68
46
58
46
46
36
58
51
46
12
AVG. (mph)
15
15
13
11
8
7
8
8
6
6
8
45
61%
62%
65%
79%
83%
79%
81%
86%
86%
80%
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
104 100 96 92 88 84 80 76
TEMPERATURE (°F)
72 68 64 60 56 52 48 44 40 36 32
64% JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
NOV
DEC
Fig. 4.34
RAIN DAYS
PRECIPITATION (mm / in)
Fig. 4.33
OCT
71% R.H.
Total = 198 days
Total = 3000 mm. // 118 in.
It rains 54.2% of the year
96
Optimum Tilt of Solar Panels by Month * in degrees from vertical
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
64˚
72˚
80˚
88˚
96˚
104˚
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
96˚
88˚
80˚
72˚
64˚
56˚
Fig. 4.35
97
Mar 21/ Sep 21
On December 21st, the sun will rise 87° east of due south and
Dec 21
set 87° west of due south.
Jun 21 On March 21st/ September 21st, the sun will rise 91° east of due south and set 91° west of due south.
On June 21st, the sun will rise 95° east of due south and set
95˚ 91˚ 87˚
95° west of due south.
Sunrise: 5:30 AM. Sunset: 5:30 PM. Daylength oscillates between 11 hrs 30 min to 12 hrs throughout the year.
98
PROGRAM ANALYSIS 99
5
100
PROGRAM GOALS The purpose of this building is to create an architecture that foments an environment of exploration, education, collaboration, and innovation for the development of
Architects & Engineers
new biomimetic building technologies. The concept of interdisciplinary collaboration dwells at the heart of this project and is what has the capability of ensuring its success. The center will house research and educational components as well as some hospitality units for researchers in residence and students.
The facility will provide spaces for the research and development of building technologies in the areas of:
SUBSYSTEMS [USERS]
• BUILDING STRUCTURES • MATERIAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING • ENERGY & LIGHTING
Students
• AIR QUALITY CONTROL • PROTOTYPE FABRICATION • INTEGRATED SYSTEMS Fig. 5.1
101
PROGRAM SYSTEM HIERARCHY Technicians
Biologists
RESEARCH SYSTEM [PROGRAM] SUPERSYSTEM [BUILDING]
HOSPITALITY
MONTEVERDE RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOMIMETIC BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
EDUCATIONAL
Entrepreneurs Tourists 102
USER PROFILES
Fig. 5.2
103
Fig. 5.3
Fig. 5.4
College Students
Biologists
Engineers & Architects
With the proximity of the UGA (University of Georgia) Costa Rica campus, the facility can be an opportunity for foreign or local students to immerse themselves in the biomimetic environment. Students can even contribute new ideas through design studio programs while receiving feedback from professionals currently in the field.
Monteverde has always been a ‘mecca’ for eager biologists looking to experience the rich flora and fauna the cloud forest region has to offer. The facility will serve as a support for the Monteverde Biological Station. Here, biological scientists and researchers will be able to collaborate with architects and engineers in order to develop new biomimetic building technologies and educate students, tourists, and the community about what nature’s genius is able to offer us.
These professionals play a key role in the new paradigm shift. Making it tangible, applicable, and functional is their niche in the facility’s ‘ecosystem’. Structural, mechanical, material, environmental, engineers and architects will all collaborate with biologists and among themselves in order to give birth to the new advances in biomimetic building technology.
Biologists Technicians Architects / Engineers
Discover
Learn
the rainforest in search of new specimens
species with functional adaptations
organism dynamics and adaptations
Observe
Discover
Learn
Educate
Collaborate
specimens and their adaptations
technical adaptations by detailed analysis
the physical principles of adaptations
other disciplines on new discoveries
in design to ensure proper application
Discover
Learn
Educate
Collaborate
Apply
collegues and other disciplines on new technologies
to develop proper understanding of methods
new biomimetic methodologies developed
Students
Entrepreneurs
biological applicable biomimetic methods principles and systems
Collaborate
other disciplines on in design to ensure learned observations principles are present
Discover
Learn
Educate
Collaborate
Apply
biological principles and new possibilities
biomimetic methods and approaches
collegues and other disciplines
to spread biomimetic technologies in the building industry
new biomimetic models of production and manufacturing
Observe
Discover
Learn
Educate
Apply
peers, friends and communities on biomimicry
learned biomimetic principles and methods to work
Educate
Apply
family, friends and communities on biomimicry
learned principles and methods to future projects
new biomimetic methods and technologies
Observe
Eco-Tourists
Educate
Explore
new biomimetic methods and technologies
new possibilities and principles and ways of looking at methods inspired by sustainability nature
Discover
Learn
new ways of looking principles and at nature methods inspired by nature
Fig. 5.5
104
ECORIUM PROJECT CASE STUDY
Fig. 5.6
105
Architects: Grimshaw Architects Engineer: Samoo Architects & Engineers Location: Seocheon-gun, South Korea Area: 356,177 sq. ft. Building Type: Museum / Educational Construction: 2013
The Ecorium is an environmental visitor attraction at the National Ecology Center. It showcases the world’s diverse ecosystems as immersive teaching exhibits and was planned with the ultimate goal of educating the population about ecology and sustainability. The visitors are guided through five biomes, experiencing the flora and fauna of the tropical rainforest, cloud forest, dry tropics, cool temperate, and Antarctic regions.
Fig. 5.7
The project also showcases various susainable strategies. For example, the alignment and orientation of the numerous greenhouses were simulated to create an ideal environment depending on the climate zone the greenhouse would represent. The sloped curtain-wall enclosing each climate zone will gather rain-water for cooling & watering plants. These and other techniques employed are set to have reduced energy consumption by approximately 10%.83 83. Ecorium. Grimshaw. Retrieved January 21, 2014, from http://www. http://grimshaw-architects.com/project/ ecorium/
Fig. 5.8
Fig. 5.9
106
RI. MED BRBC
(BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH & BIOTECHNOLOGY CENTER) CASE STUDY
Fig. 5.10
107
Architects: HOK Engineers: Buro Happold Location: Palermo, Sicily, Italy Area: 334,000 sq. ft. Building Type: Museum / Educational Construction: est. 2016
The Ri. Med Biomedical Research and Biotechnology Center is set to be a global hub for biomedical research and development. The design promotes communication by organizing the research facility as a small, compact village integrated into the landscape. At the heart of the village, a pedestrian street connects all of the buildings and offers spectacular views of the Tyrrhenian Sea to the north and the mountains to the south. The flexible laboratory space is divided into four wings on three floors. A modular design allows each laboratory neighborhood to be easily subdivided. Floor-to-ceiling glass between laboratory and documentation areas maximizes visibility between teams and provides ample natural light. A mix of formal and informal workspaces encourages collaboration. At the heart of the laboratory space is a central conference center with an auditorium. A central commons building provides additional conference facilities, a small faculty club café and other amenities. A patient trial clinic and incubator labs are located nearby for easy patient access.87
Fig. 5.11
Fig. 5.12
This research center is expected to employ more than 600 scientists and other staff. Future plans for an additional hospital and medical school have also been made. The research center is an example which promotes dialogue and collaboration between various disciplines in order to achieve a common goal.
84. Furuto, Alison. “New Global Hub for Biomedical Research / HOK” 30 Nov 2012. ArchDaily. Retrieved 21 January, 2014, from http://www.archdaily. com/?p=300385
Fig. 5.13
108
QUANTITATIVE PROGRAM Preliminary Program
Research Laboratories Thermal Test Lab Energy Systems Integration Lab Biodynamic Structures Lab Materials Lab Technological Platforms Prototype Building & Testing Bioterium Greenhouse
Size
Use
4
2,200 sq ft
B-2
1 1 1 1
B F-1 U U
Education Classrooms Collaboration Design Studios Lecture Hall Conference Room Exhibition Gallery Lounge
400 sq ft 1,600 sq ft 400 sq ft 1,600 sq ft Total: 6,200 sq ft
3 4 1 2 1 5
B B A-3 B A-3 B
Administration Offices Lobby / Reception
1,600 sq ft 1,600 sq ft 580 sq ft 520 sq ft 1,500 sq ft 200 sq ft Total: 6,000 sq ft
2 1
B A-3
Hospitality Living Quarters Cafeteria (Indoor / Outdoor)
800 sq ft 1,200 sq ft Total: 2,000 sq ft
10 1
5,000 sq ft 1,600 sq ft Total: 6,600 sq ft
R-1 A-2
2 2
400 sq ft 400 sq ft 3,200 sq ft 3,600 sq ft Total: 7,600 sq ft
S-1
Services / Support Mechanical Restrooms Circulation (13%) Storage
109
Quantity
Preliminary Occupancy 4 4 4 4 2 8 1 4 15 20 20 6 20 2
IBC Code Research
Total Exits Required = (173 Occupants x 0.2 = 34.6”/36” door) = 2 Maximum Travel Distance = 250’ w/ building sprinklers Allowable Building Height = 65’ (building height based on max. wind pressure in accordance to the Association of Carribean States Building Code for Wind Loads)
4 20 20 15 TOTAL LOAD: 173
TOTAL GROSS: 28,400 sq ft 110
Lecture Hall
Administrative Offices
Prototype & Fabrication Lab
Bioterium
Reception / Lobby
Exhibition Galleries
Reception / Lobby
ADJACENCY MATRIX
1
2
2
4
4
1
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
Exhibition Galleries Lecture Hall Administrative Offices
1
Prototype & Fabrication Lab Bioterium Greenhouse Research & Development Design Studios Conference Rooms Technological Platforms Dining Kitchen Lounge Dormitories Restrooms Technical / Mech Vertical Access / Egress 1 2 3 4 Fig. 5.14
111
Most Important
Least Important
Greenhouse
Research & Development
Design Studios
Conference Rooms
Technological Platforms
Dining
Kitchen
Lounge
Dormitories
Restrooms
Technical / Mech
Vertical Access / Egress
4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 1
4 4 2 2 4 2 4 4 4 2 2 1
4 4 3 3 4 1 3 2 4 1 1 1
3 1 2 1 2 4 4 1 4 2 4 2
1 1 1 3 1 4 4 4 4 3 1 1
1 1 1 4 2 4 4 3 4 4 2 3
1 1 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 3 4
1 1 1 2 4 3 4 2 1 2
2 4 2 4 1 3 1 3 2
4 2 3 3 4 1 4 1
4 4 3 4 2 1 3
1 3 3 1 2 1
3 4 3 1 1
2 2 4 3
1 2 1
1 4
2
112
Fig. 6.1
SCHEMATIC DESIGN 113
6
114
MEDIA-TIC BUILDING CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.2
115
Architects: Enric Ruiz-Geli, Cloud 9 Location: Barcelona, Spain Area: 150,695 sq. ft. Building Type: Control Center / Office Construction: 2010
Designed to be a communications hub and meeting point for businesses and institutions in the world of information and communication technologies (ICTs). It is creating a new model of intellectual space that will promote collaboration and synergies between the University, Technology and Business, with the aim of encouraging the development of an innovative culture and fresh talent.The building seeks to be a vehicle for the dissemination of new technologies, while being designed as a socially open civic space.
Fig. 6.3
It is cube-shaped and covered in a plastic coating of inflatable bubbles, as a way of regulating light and temperature, primarily preventing 114 tons of CO2 a year from escaping from the building, and offering a 20% saving on climate control. The ETFE skin is activated using pneumatic mechanisms thanks to “luxometer” sensors that automatically and independently activate the chamber inflation and deflation devices according to how much solar energy the panels are receiving. Fig. 6.4
Fig. 6.5
Fig. 6.6
116
THE EDEN PROJECT CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.7
117
Architects: Nicholas Grimshaw Engineer: Anthony Hunt & Associates Location: St. Blazey, Cornwall, UK Area: ~ 5.5 acres Building Type: Museum / Educational Construction: 2000
The Eden Project was conceived in response to the need of further educating the local population about the dependence of life as we know it with the environment; that thin crust of dirt and air around the globe that nurtures the growth and survival of all living organisms in this planet. The site is a wide old china-clay pit about 1,000 feet deep, with very unstable terrain in certain places. The project is shaped as a connected chain of varying-diameter bubbles that form two colossal geodesic dome structures or ‘biomes’. Each one of these biomes encloses specific microclimatic conditions and vegetation.85 The first, ‘Rainforest Biome’, covers about 3.9 acres and stretches 180 feet high, 328 feet wide and 656 feet long. It is dedicated to humid tropical plants, such as banana trees, cocoa, rubber, nuts and species. Therefore it is kept under a tropical temperature and moisture level. The ‘Mediterranean Biome’, covers about 1.6 acres and stretches 115 feet high, 213 feet wide and 443 feet long. It is the home to warm temperate and arid plants such as olives and grape vines.86
Fig. 6.8
Fig. 6.9
The covered ‘biomes’ were constructed from tubular steel with hexagonal and pentagonal external cladding panels made from a high-strength polymer called Ethylene Tetraflouroethylene (ETFE). These were sealed around their perimeter and inflated in order to create a large ‘cushions’. In this way, the ‘cushions’ act as a thermal blanket for the structure. The structure is an entirely self-supported geodesic dome, with no internal supports. In order to achieve the lightest structure possible, the architects studied examples in nature closely, such as carbon molecules to single-celled organisms to pollen grains, which drove them to the conclusion that a spherical structure comprised of hexagons and pentagons was the optimal. Focus was directed toward maximizing the hexagon sizes so that the
Fig. 6.10
118
amount of natural light penetration could be increased. Glass was discarded as an option as it posed serious constraints due to unit sizes and weight. The use of ETFE translated to a 1% of the weight of glass (a factor – 100 saving) and much larger ‘cushions’ could be created in comparison to the biggest sheets of safety glass available.3 This design breakthrough catalyzed other efficiency gains throughout the design. Larger hexagons meant less steel, which meant more light admitted, which reduced the amount of heating that would have to be done in the colder months of the year. This implementation of biomimicry resulted in a design that utilized only a fraction of the resources used in an otherwise conventional approach and cost a third only a third in comparison to a glasshouse’s average rate. Considered a success such that the weight of the Rainforest Biome superstructure is less than that of the air contained inside of it.
Fig. 6.11
119
85. Pawlyn, M. (2011). How can we build more efficient structures?. Biomimicry in architecture (pp. 18-19). London, UK: Riba Publishing. 86. Eden Project. (n.d.). Top eco visitor attraction. Retrieved October 24, 2013, from http://www.edenproject.com/
120
ISLAND OF LIGHT CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.12
121
Architects: Tonkin Liu Engineer: Arup Location: Kaohsiung, Taiwan Area: 785,765 sq. ft. Building Type: Port & Cruise Service Center Construction: 2010 Competition Submission
The design is based on clear and rational principles of providing comfortable conditions for the building users in a low-energy fashion. Rather than trying to condition all the spaces, those requiring more stable conditions are contained in the base so that the benefits of thermal mass can be exploited, similarly to the way animals exploit the steady temperatures of the ground. Seawater is used as a locally available source for cooling during the warmer times of the year through the use of high-efficiency heat exchangers. The characteristic canopy of tree structures is created using the shell lace system of perforated steel sheet. The forestlike structure is draped with a covering of ETFE pillows that provide shelter from the wind, sun, and rain. It also facilitates natural ventilation through the use of rooftop wind-catchers and vents coupled with low-level vents in order to take advantage of the wind and stack-effect forces within the building. Additionally, the canopy controls the admission of light into the building as well as the harvest of rainwater to provide for the building’s water needs. The design employs a series of biomimetic techniques and strategies that seeks to optimize its interaction with the environment.87
Fig. 6.13
Fig. 6.14
87. Pawlyn, M. (2011). Synthesis. Biomimicry in architecture (pp. 110-111). London, UK: Riba Publishing.
Fig. 6.15
122
THE LOWLINE CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.16
123
Architects: RAAD Studio Engineer: James Ramsey Location: Manhattan, New York City, NY Area: 1,650,000 sq. ft. Building Type: Public Park / Solar System Construction: est. 2018
The Lowline is an ongoing project promoting the use of new innovative solar technology to illuminate a historic trolley terminal on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. The project proposes an underground park and a cultural attraction in one of the world’s most dense and exciting urban environments. It will be located in the former Williamsburg Bridge Trolley Terminal below Delancey Street. The proposed solar technology, designed by James Ramsey of Raad Studio, involves the creation of a “remote skylight.” Sunlight passes through a glass shield above the parabolic collector, and then reflected and gathered at one focal point, where it is directed underground through a series of fiberoptic cables. Then, sunlight is transmitted onto a reflective surface on the distributor dish underground, which transmits the collected sunlight into the space underneath. This technology would transmit the necessary wavelengths of light to support photosynthesis, enabling plants and trees to grow. During periods of sunlight, electricity would not be necessary to light the space. In September 2012, the Lowline team built a full scale prototype of the technology. This attracted thousands of visitors, where it ultimately served as a proof of the concept.88
Fig. 6.17
Fig. 6.18
This new sustainable technology offers a great opportunity to enhance the environment and to fill our built spaces with organic life.
88. The Lowline. (n.d.). Top eco visitor attraction. Retrieved February 2, 2014, from http://www.thelowline.org/
Fig. 6.19
124
WARKAWATER TOWERS CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.20
125
Architects: Arturo Vittori Engineer: N/A Location: Ethiopia Area: N/A Building Type: Water Collection System Construction: est. 2015
The WarkaWater Towers are a revoluntionary new way to collect clean drinking water in Ethiopia and other parts that dwell under the arid African climate, where water collection is often a dangerous and incredibly time-consuming procedure. They were inspired by the local Warka tree, a large fig tree native to Ethiopia that is commonly used as a community gathering space. The towers take advantage of condensation, utilizing the environment’s humidity. They were designed in order to ensure long-term environmental, financial and social sustainability, and to provide a more reliable, efficient and sustainable method of water harvesting for local women and their families. Each of the towers cost approximately $550 and can be built in under a week with a four person team and locally available materials. The 30 foot, 88 pound structures are made out of juncus stalks or bamboo woven together to form the tower’s vaselike frame. Inside, a plastic mesh material made of nylon and polypropylene fibers act as micro tunnels for daily condensation. As droplets form, they flow along the mesh pattern into the basin at the base of the towers. By harvesting atmospheric water vapor in this way, it’s estimated that at least 25 gallons of potable water can be sustainably and hygienically collected by the towers every day.89
Fig. 6.21
Fig. 6.22
This project proves an incredible opportunity to exploit and obtain useful resources from readily available sources, such as humidity in the air, in a sustainable manner.
89. Inhabitat. Jewell, N. Brilliant warkawater towers collect drinking water from thin air in ethiopia. Retrieved February 2, 2014, from http://inhabitat. com/nature-inspired-warkawatertowers-use-condensation-to-collectdrinking-water-in-ethiopia/
Fig. 6.23
126
MEXICAN HAIRY PORCUPINE
Coendou mexicanus BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.24
Function: Maintain physical integrity and prevent structural failure from buckling.
Strategy: Spines are made of a dense outer shell surrounding an elastic, honeycomb-like core.
Mechanism: An outer shell of almost fully dense material supported by a low density, cellular core. In nature, all are loaded in some combination of axial compression and bending: failure is typically by buckling. Biomimicking of natural cylindrical shell structures may offer the potential to increase the mechanical efficiency of engineering structures. Fig. 6.25
127
TROPICAL TREES BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.26
Function: Maintain physical integrity and prevent structural failure from compression.
Strategy: Trees gain support by growing together in an upward spiral.
Mechanism: Thin trunks join into bundles, supporting each other and forming an upward winding spiral.
Fig. 6.27
128
WALKING STICK Leptynia hispanica BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.28
Function: Structural efficiency
Strategy: Nature achieves high flexural and torsional stiffness in support structures, with minimum material use, by using hollow cylinders as struts and beams.
Mechanism: Hollow cylindrical tubes. Nature uses them in diverse places, bamboo stems; vertebrate long bones; insect, spider, and crustacean appendages; the wing veins of insects; and the feather shafts of birds. Hydrostatic systems and hollow cylindrical beams.
Fig. 6.29
129
PLANT CELLS
Ocotea monteverdensis BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.30
Function: Structural; Resist gravitational loading
Strategy: The broad leaf of a tree resists gravitational loading through its internal anisotropic structure: liquid-filled cells along the bottom resist compression, and, along the top, long cells with lengthwise fibers resist tension.
Mechanism: Uses thick-walled, liquid-filled cells along its bottom, which resist compression well, and long cells with lengthwise fibers along the top, which act as ropy tension resistors. Internal structure--anisotropy at various levels-matters at least as much as overall cross section in efficiently dealing with gravity. (Vogel 2003:375-376) Fig. 6.31
130
BROMELIADS Bromeliaceae BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.32
Function: Water storage
Strategy: Leaves capture water and nutrients in a storage tank via hydrophobic leaf surfaces.
Mechanism: Leaves are coated in small surface cells raised like bumps.“Bumpy” cells have tiny hairs that catch water as it drops. The hairs are several millimeters higher than the outer surface of the leaf and thus, hold the water above the leaf itself. Below the tiny hairs are small, hydrophobic wax crystals. This causes it to roll off until they can collect on the hairs. The shape of the leaves bends in a convex shape such that water rolling across the wax crystals either drips off the outside of the plant or is funneled down to a pool in its center. Fig. 6.33
131
TINA Tillandsia punctulata BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.34
Function: Water harvesting
Strategy: Leaves of rosette-forming plants capture fog by having a narrow form.
Mechanism: Some first-principles from physics predict that narrow leaves, together with other ancillary traits (large number and high flexibility of leaves, caudices, and/or epiphytism) which constitute the ‘‘narrow-leaf syndrome’’ should increase fog interception efficiency. Interception efficiency is maximized by large numbers of narrow leaves.
Fig. 6.35
132
CLOUD FOREST
Biome BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.36
Function: Water harvesting
Strategy: Trees of cloud forests contribute to water yield by precipitating water from clouds onto needles, a process known as ‘fog drip.’
Mechanism: Water condensing on the needles and dripping to the ground can increase precipitation enormously. Trees can sometimes scavenge more moisture from the clouds than the clouds yield directly as rainfall.
Fig. 6.37
133
BULLET ANTS
Paraponera clavata BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.38
Function: Cooling and ventilation
Strategy: Air scoops on the sides of ants cool them through evaporation.
Mechanism: When these ants backs enter the sunny, hot lawn, little airscoops on its side automatically switch on. A mist of cooling water vapor puffs upward from them. This keeps the ant’s temperature down.
Fig. 6.39
134
LEAFCUTTER ANTS Atta vollenweideri BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.40
Function: Natural ventilation
Strategy: Nests self-ventilate thanks to two different types of turrets taking advantage of wind.
Mechanism:
Fig. 6.41
135
Surface wind, drawing air from the central tunnels of the nest mound, is thought to be the main driving force for nest ventilation. According to predominant airflow direction, two functionally distinct tunnel groups were identified: outflow tunnels in the upper, central region, and inflow tunnels in the lower, peripheral region of the nest mound. Outflow of air through the central tunnels is followed by a delayed inflow through the peripheral tunnels. Openings are designed on top of the nest with turrets which may reinforce wind-induced nest ventilation.” (Kleineidam et al. 2001:301)
RING-TAILED SALAMANDER Bolitoglossa robusta BIO CASE STUDY
Fig. 6.42
Function: Energy harvesting
Strategy: Algae encapsulated in cells of spotted salamander may provide photosynthetic products (oxygen and carbohydrates) by internal symbiosis.
Mechanism: Algae are located inside cells all over the salamander’s body. Because vertebrate cells have what is known as an adaptive immune system, which destroys biological material not considered ‘self’, the salamander cells have either turned their internal immune system off, or the algae have somehow bypassed it.” (Petherick 2010:1)
Fig. 6.43
136
DESIGN DRIVERS These are design drivers or concepts that are present in nature and can be translated into architectural design language or ordering principles. Some more present than others, but at one point, they were all part of the design thinking process.
137
Community
Interwoven
Fractal
Phyllotaxis
Interaction
Responsive
Landscape Sensitive
Adaptive
Gradient Fig. 6.44
138
MITIGATING MAN’S IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT 1
MINIMAL SURFACE & VOLUME Architectural volume encloses space. It carves away space which is also part of the existing ecosystem and reclaims it. Space that serves a purpose for its surroundings in providing a place to dwell in. By minimizing the surface area and optimizing the volume of the built construct, to take away only the necessary, this spatial impact is therefore reduced. Also, along with a minimal surface area, comes a reduction in material resource usage as well.
3
POINT OF CONTACT
EXTRACTIVE VS. DISTRIBUTIVE
Our current way of building occupies an excessive amount of land area that serves as a niche for many organisms. Raising a building up from the ground minimizes the amount of land impacted by the architecture as well as the invasion of the existing ecological system and whatever is dependent of it.
When architecture is built, the local biological system’s energy flow is disturbed. Solar energy, in order to fuel photosynthesis, is blocked; wind patterns are modified; migratory and feeding routes are interrupted; organisms are deprived of water sources; the list can go on indefinitely. But what architecture can do in order to avoid falling in a parasitic behavior is employ an arsenal of sustainable strategies aiming to cooperate and give back what it has taken away.
1
Fig. 6.45
139
2
2
Fig. 6.46
3
Fig. 6.47
140
PROCESS SKETCHES These sketches portray the main train of thought that took place throughout the design process. Ecological thinking, along with form and materiality worked together in order to arrive to a cohesive design solution.
Fig. 6.48
141
Fig. 6.49
142
CELLULAR MORPHOGENESIS Morphogenesis or “beginning of the shape” is the biological process by which an organism develops its form and shape. Highly dependent on cellular growth patterns, either by differentiation or integration. It arises from the interaction of cells within the tissues. Through a process known as cell sorting, cells are able to sort themselves into clusters that maximize contact between cells of the same type.90 This technique is applied in the conception of the design’s floor plans as the goal is to optimize interaction between the program’s components and foment collaboration between the disciplines. This cellular close-packed and voronoi spatial arrangement also saves up space and distance, therefore saving energy within the system.
Fig. 6.52
Fig. 6.50 - Program Distribution Sketch
90. Gilbert, Scott F. (2000). “Morphogenesis and Cell Adhesion”. Developmental biology (6th ed.). Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates.
CLOSE PACKING
PROGRAM PLACEMENT
Fig. 6.52
143
SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN
Fig. 6.51
VORONOI PLAN
CELLULAR GROWTH
144
145
Fig. 6.53 - Perspective
146
Fig. 6.54 - Rain Runoff
147
Fig. 6.55
EAST ELEVATION
Fig. 6.56
SOUTH ELEVATION 148
CONCEPTS & MATERIALITY
Fig. 6.57 - Minimal Surface Structure
Fig. 6.58 - ETFE Panels
Fig. 6.59 - Metal Mesh Pathways 149
Fig. 6.61 - Bone Tissue Matrix
Fig. 6.62 - Bone-inspired Floor Concept
Fig. 6.60 - Schematic Epiphytic Unit
Fig. 6.63 - Hanging Platform 150
Primary Structure
Structural Tensile Cables
Elevated Pathways
Hanging Platform System
Fig. 6.64 - Schematic Exploded Axonometric
151
Fig. 6.65
152
Fig. 7.1
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 153
7
154
155
Nature as Mentor.
Fig. 7.2 - Research Gardens
156
Nature as Measure.
Fig. 7.3 - Approach from Santa Elena
157
158
159
Nature as Model.
Fig. 7.4 - Main Entrance
160
BIOMIMETIC DESIGN DRIVERS
161
BROMELIADS (EPIPHYTES) Fig. 7.5
Funnel form and hydrophobic leaves aid in storing rain and condensation in center storage tank.
BONE TISSUE Fig. 7.6
Economizes material by only densifying it where the major loads and forces are acting. Areas lacking pressure are left as voids.
PLANT CELLS Fig. 7.7
Grow and organize in a voronoi sequence, use sunlight as their primary fuel, and possess an inflatable hydrostatic behavior.
SOAP FILMS & CRYSTALS Fig. 7.8
Close pack together saving space and distance in order to economize energy and material.
CLOUDFOREST ECOSYSTEM Fig. 7.9
Complex interconnected networks where each individual’s function benefits the greater whole.
162
SITE PLAN
Fig. 7.10
163
164
SOUTH ELEVATION
165
Fig. 7.11
166
EAST ELEVATION
Fig. 7.13
167
Fig. 7.12
WEST ELEVATION
168
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND 1st Level
EDUCATIONAL CLUSTER
2nd Sub-Level 3rd Sub-Level 1) Reception 2) Prototype & Fabrication Lab 3) Office 4) Storage 5) Exhibition 6) Lecture Hall 7) Dining 8) Kitchen 9) Design Studio 10) Research & Development 11) Bioterium 12) Tech Platforms 13) Greenhouse 14) Conference Room 15) Lounge 16) Dormitories 17) Restroom 18) Mech
0
169
20
60
120
RESEARCH CLUSTER
A-1
Fig. 7.14
170
L1 S2 S3
A-1
171
REACTIVE INSULATION
SOLAR COLLECTION & DISTRIBUTION
Plant cells retain water depending on the surrounding environmental conditions. The warmer the environment, the more water they hold on to in order to avoid dehydration. This was used as a metaphor as water would be too heavy to insulate the building. Instead, another valuable and free resource was employed: Air. Reactive inflatable pressurized panels respond to the exterior conditions by filling up with air which in turn acts as light and non-toxic insulation; a means to maintain homeostasis without energy-consuming HVAC systems.
Just like plant cells satisfy their energy needs through photosynthesis, free solar energy is collected through BIPV (Building-Integrated Photovoltaics) along the building canopy. This energy is then used to fuel the various systems throughout the building. A fiber optic technology system installed in the canopy channels natural sunlight down and projects it into the landscape below in order to provide it with the essential resource.
RAIN COLLECTION & DISTRIBUTION Like Monteverde’s endemic epiphytes in the forest canopy, the roof structure is shaped to “funnel” rain water down to storage cisterns; the water is then distributed to the various spaces. Sprinklers under the floor system also utilize this water to spray the landscape underneath, thus providing it with the necessary moisture levels to allow life to flourish on the structure while creating “research pockets” where organisms can dwell for future research.
Fig. 7.15
NATURAL VENTILATION
FOG / DEW COLLECTION
Organisms utilize homeostasis, or the ability to self regulate internal temperatures, in order to achieve thermal balance and economize on valuable energy. Mechanisms such as transpiration are used to allow excess heat to leave their bodies. An environmentally responsive floor system acts as “pores” allowing the necessary ventilation from below in order to regulate interior temperatures without energy-consuming HVAC systems. The facility contains several voids in order to let air through the spaces. The canopy also creates a semioutdoor space with natural ventilation.
In the natural world, water is a valuable resource. Organisms evolve and adapt in order to acquire it. Bromeliads (epiphytes) are able to harvest water from mist in the cloud forest. This presents another opportunity to harvest water from an unusual source instead of extracting from aquifers and other sources that can cause ecosystem imbalances. The facility makes use of fog harvesting meshes around its envelope and in between its floor system in order to catch condensation from the changing temperatures between nightfall and daybreak.
172
PERFORATED METAL PLATE Manufactured using 100% renewable energy, a high percentage of recycled content and recyclable properties.
Fig. 7.16
1
CELLULOSE-BASED ETFE PANELS High melting temperature, excellent chemical, electrical and high energy radiation resistance properties with acceptable environmental degradation.
Fig. 7.17
2
HYDROPHOBIC GLASS LOUVERS
Fig. 7.18
3
Surface-treated glass that self-cleans by activation of UV rays. A surface coating is applied to glass that by the photocatalytic effect continuously breaks down organic dirt to negate the need to clean the pane. Activated by UV rays, the TiO² based coating also has a hydrophobic effect, causing water to sheet rather than spot so that a clearer surface remains when the surface becomes wet.
FOG HARVESTING FABRIC Fig. 7.19
4
Balance between hydrophilic materials that attract water droplets, and hydrophobic materials that then send them down into a collection container. Fog harvesters have captured one liter of water (roughly a quart) per one square meter of mesh, per day.
D-SHAPE 3D PRINT New building technology which enables full-size sandstone buildings to be made without human intervention, using a stereolithography 3-D printing process that requires only sand and a special organic binder to operate.
Fig. 7.20
5
173
EPIPHYTIC UNIT SECTION REACTIVE INFLATABLE ETFE PANELS
2
3
4 1
5
REACTIVE POROUS FLOOR
Fig. 7.21
174
REACTIVE POROUS FLOOR SYSTEM
Perforated Metal Plate
Teflon Fabric + Fog Harvesting Fabric = Porous Mechanism
Utility Piping
D-Shape Hexagonal Close Packed Frame
Perforated Metal Plate
Fig. 7.22
175
OPEN FLOOR PORES
Profile
Top
Perspective
CLOSED FLOOR PORES
Fig. 7.23
GRASSHOPPER DEFINITION
Fig. 7.24
176
REACTIVE INFLATABLE ETFE PANELS Fig. 7.25
Fig. 7.26
GRASSHOPPER DEFINITION
177
INFLATED ETFE PANELS
(unresponsive to external radiant pressures)
(responsive to external radiant pressures)
Thermal Analysis Profile
Thermal Analysis Top
DEFLATED ETFE PANELS
Fig. 7.27
Fig. 7.28
178
HIGH-LEVEL STRUCTURAL HIERARCHY
Fig. 7.29 - Cellular Multi-Level Structural Member
179
Multiple layers of structure from macro, the overall structure, to micro, the individual structural members, aid in economizing material by increasing density only where it is needed. Therefore, increasing the structural hierarchy levels such as those found in nature’s structures.
GRASSHOPPER DEFINITION
Fig. 7.30
180
Fig. 7.31 - Research & Development
Fig. 7.32 - Prototype & Digital Fabrication Lab 181
BIPV Panels
ETFE Panel Skin
3D Printed Structure
Frosted & Clear Glass Envelope + Fog Meshes
Floor Plates + Circulation
Fig. 7.33 - Exploded Axonometric 182
Fig. 7.34
183
SYMBIOGENESIS FINAL GRASSHOPPER DEFINITION
184
Fig. 7.35
FINAL PRESENTATION BOARDS 185
186
Fig. 7.36
187
THAT’S A WRAP! 188
SITE MODEL
189
Fig. 7.38
Fig. 7.37
190
Fig. 8.1 - Final Boards
THESIS CONCLUSION 191
8
192
BIOMIMICRY LIFE PRINCIPLES DESIGN EVALUATION MATRIX gC
in ang
h
Fully Aligned WITH BIOMIMICRY All components present within the principle are clearly visible in the design; Fit to evolve.
oC t t p
a
Ad
ons
iti ond
ate por
D
or
Inc
ity
rs ive
in inta
Ma
ity
gr ntre
I
gh
u thro
y bod
Em
Re
Partially Aligned WITH BIOMIMICRY Three components within the life principle are present in the design; Apparent biological behavior. Bio-Innovative Two components within the life principle are present in the design; Life-friendly. Biologically Aware At least one component within the life principle is present in the design; Moving towards a greener approach. Man-Made The components making up the life principle are fully ignored; None present in the design.
R Be
e
rc sou Us
e
e
ici E ff
ent
E Low
n
y erg Us
Pr
ss oce
eM
-F ulti
es
u
ion nct
al
si De Re
gn
cyc
ll le A
M
r ate
ials
Fit
F
Be
t orm
a Loc
o
lly
ct Fun un Att
ion
e
R d+
Le U
193
es
si pon
ag ver
R se
ve
eC
ea
ic ycl
A dily
P
vai
h
Re
lfSe
Va ce,
ed
sh Re
n atio
rm
fo e In
uffl
y+
ac und
R on,
i riat
n
lie esi
e e th
rat
eg Intr
nt
ce De
ted
ec exp
Un
e to
v
l Evo
ive
rv Su
e cat
i
pl Re
ork W t a
th ies
eg
at Str
rate
g Inte
nt me
lop
ve De
ine
b
m Co
h wit
ts
th
w Gro lar
du Mo
om
C ted
s
e +N
ild Bu
en pon
he mt
fro
m otto
B
ze
ni rga
lf-O
Se
Up
Adaptability Efficiency
Pr
il
l
a new
tion
za rali
ss oce
eM abl
es
a
ial ter
s+
er En Us C
gy
eF
ba eed
e vat i t l u
Co
c
oo kL
ra ope
ps
tiv
e eR
a Bre
lati
Us
e
o kD
hi ons
Life wn B
ps
Fri
ly end
d Pro
uc
S uild
C
n ts i
c ele
is hem
e to B
tive
try
nig
it ly w
o nC
ha
n
Sm
ue stit
S all
nts
ub
of t e s
E
e lem
Do
C
nts
is hem
try
ate W n i
r
Fig. 8.2
194
Fig. 8.3
195
symbioGENESIS A Mutualistic Interaction of Nature and Architecture Monteverde Research Center for Biomimetic Building Technology
This thesis began with the existential observation
and interacts with it as one of its organisms. The building integrates itself into the natural cycles and seeks to enhance the environment in order to further foment its subsistence. The exploration of Biomimicry opened my eyes to a whole new
that man, as a species, is not of much contribution to the
world of innovative possibilities by refining my sensibility to the
planet’s overall ecosystem unlike the rest of the species
vast catalog of countless adaptations and techniques offered
which he inhabits it with. Our humble progress dating back to
by nature such as homeostasis.
around 10,000 B.C. have dramatically changed throughout the
millennia and it shows no signs of halting. Human progress
of looking at sustainability in my mind. For me, sustainability
can be measured by its technological advances. When
does not only mean that a material is less toxic for the
technology progresses, humanity takes a leap forward into
environment or possesses less embodied energy. True
the future, or so we think. Lately, during the past centuries,
sustainability is an ecological way of thinking. It is a systematic
technological innovations have caused more damage
way of thinking about cause and effect. It is the realization of
than good in all aspects, social, economic, political, and
interconnectedness between human activity and environment.
environmental. The environment has witnessed the impact
The realization that we are one. It is thinking about how our
of such ‘progress’ through global climate change, resource
actions and creations are going to impact the world around
depletion, and extinction at an accelerated rate. Humanity has
us. But more importantly, it is asking the question of how our
taken an antagonistic position in the environment’s future lead
practices benefit the environment and can even enhance it as
by technology. But technological advancement and economic
we connect to nature once again.
Finally, this exploration formed an entire new way
prosperity does not have to equal unregulated extraction of resources and ecosystem destruction.
It is time to realize that technology, and building
technology specifically, can be a major player in the much needed paradigm shift. My design attempts to unite both technology and nature through architecture. Through the mimicking of natural forms, processes, and systems, I created an architecture that speaks of coexistence with nature
196
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Aguilar, Javier. Bio-architecture. Oxford: Architectural Press, 2003. Benyus, Janine M. Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. New York: Morrow, 1997. Brockman, John. This Explains Everything: Deep, Beautiful, and Elegant Theories of How the World Works. New York:
Harper Perennial, 2013.
Burnett, John. “Costa Rica Aims to Be a Carbon-Neutral Nation”. National Public Radio. Retrieved 5 November 2013. www.npr.org. Charleson, Andrew. Structure as Architecture: A Source Book for Architects and Structural Engineers. Oxford: Elsevier/
Architectural Press, 2005.
Contemporary Art and the Mathematical Instinct. Duluth, MN: Tweed Museum of Art, 2004 Corning, Peter A. “The Re-Emergence of Emergence.” Synergy, Cybernetics, and the Bioeconomics of Evolution Holistic
Darwinism 7, no. 6 (2002): 18-30.
Crowe, Norman. Nature and the Idea of a Man-made World: An Investigation into the Evolutionary Roots of Form and
Order in the Built Environment. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.
Dawkins, Richard. The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Doczi, Gyo. The Power of Limits: Proportional Harmonies in Nature, Art, and Architecture. Boulder, Colo.: Shambhala
Publications, 1981.
Emmer, Michele. “Minimal Surfaces and Architecture: New Forms” Nexus Network Journal. Accessed August 2013,
Volume 15, Issue 2. 227-239.
Emmer, Michele. The Visual Mind: Art and Mathematics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993. Gans, Deborah, and Zehra Kuz. The Organic Approach to Architecture. Chichester, England: Wiley-Academy, 2003. Harris, James. Fractal Architecture Organic Design Philosophy in Theory and Practice. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of
New Mexico Press, 2012.
Hensel, Michael, Achim Menges, and Michael Weinstock. Emergence: Morphogenetic Design Strategies. Chichester:
197
Wiley-Academy, 2004.
Holl, Karen, Gretchen Daily, Paul Ehrlich. “Knowledge and Perceptions in Costa Rica Regarding Environment, Population,
and Biodiversity Issues”. Conservation Biology 9 (6): 1995. 1548–1558. www.jstor.org. Retrieved 5
November 2013.
Kellert, Stephen R., Judith Heerwagen, and Martin Mador. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing
Buildings to Life. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2008.
Landa, Manuel. A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History. New York: Zone Books, 1997. Legendre, George. Mathematics of Space. London: Wiley, 2011. Marieb, Elaine Nicpon. Essentials of Human Anatomy & Physiology. 8th ed. San Francisco: Pearson/Benjamin Cummings, 2006. Meeks, William, and A. Ros. The Global Theory of Minimal Surfaces in Flat Spaces: Lectures given at the 2nd Session of
the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (C.I.M.E.) Held in Martina Franca, Italy, June 7-14, 1999.
Berlin: Springer, 2002.
National Biodiversity Institute (INBio). “Biodiversity in Costa Rica”. Accessed October 27, 2013. http://www2.inbio.ac.cr Obando, V. “Biodiversidad en Costa Rica”. INBio-Sinac. http://www.inbio.ac.cr/en/12-inbio/conservacion.html Passino, Kevin M. Biomimicry for Optimization, Control, and Automation. London: Springer, 2004. Pawlyn, Michael. Biomimicry in Architecture. London, UK: Riba Publishing, 2011. Portoghesi, Paolo. Nature and Architecture. Milano: Skira, 2000. Prusinkiewicz, Przemyslaw, and Aristid Lindenmayer. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990. Rose, Wesley. “Costa Rica: Unequaled Tradition Of Political, Social and Economic Stability”. Inside Costa Rica. Sommerer, Christa, and Laurent Mignonneau. Living Systems. Barcelona: Actar, 2011. Stiles, Gary Slater and Alexander F. Skutch. A Guide to the Birds of Costa Rica. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University
Press, 1989.
Thompson, D’Arcy. On Growth and Form. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1942. “Total Surface Area Required to Fuel the World With Solar.”. Retrieved October 24, 2013. http://landartgenerator.org/blagi/ archives/127. UNCCD. “Desertification, desert, drought, arid, climate change, drylands, poverty, ecosystem, biodiversity”. Retrieved
October 22, 2013. http://www.un.org/en/events/desertificationday/background.shtml
198
UNEP/Global Environment Outlook 3 (2003). http://www.unep.org/geo/geo3.asp Vincent, Julian. “Biomimetic Patterns In Architectural Design.” Architectural Design 6, no. 79 (2009): 74-81. Accessed
October 7, 2013. Google Scholar.
Weinstock, Michael. “Self-Organization and Material Constructions.” In Fabricating Architecture Selected Readings in
Digital Design and Manufacturing, edited by Robert Corser, 140-151. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural
Press, 2010.
Weinstock, Michael. The Architecture of Emergence: The Evolution of Form in Nature and Civilisation. Chichester, U.K.:
Wiley, 2010.
World Resources Institute, Earth Trends. Accessed November 1, 2013. http://www.wri.org/our-work/project/earthtrends- environmental-information Wright, Frank Lloyd, and Donald D. Walker. The Natural House. New York: Horizon Press, 1954.
199
200
Marco Barboza // ARCH 799 - Thesis II // Prof. Hsu-Jen Huang // Summer 2015