April2008 2008 April
John Janik
President & CEO
Amy Gardner
Vice President Finance & Administration
John Norwood
Vice President Business Development
Cutting Edge Business Models: Subsea Maritime Software Shipbuilding
Designing a World of Power
Exclusive Interviews:
USCG ADM Thad Allen MARAD Chief Sean Connaughton
executive achievement
the maritime executive
1
GREEN SAILING
contents 04.08
ePD Photos by tim Fulton
case Study : ePD Designing a World of Power
24
Deepwater and rOv technology
8
BY JOSEPH KEEFE
BY tONY muNOZ
executive interview
executive achievement
30
John Janik, President and ceO, ePD, inc. BY tONY muNOZ
Washington insider Washington’s energy agenda awaits a New President
real talk: Oil With Dr. michael economides
20
BY MAREX STAFF
12
Nautical Nodes
16
imOS
BY BarrY ParKer
34
BY LarrY KierN
maraD’s New Focus utility, credibility and Partnership BY JOSePh KeeFe
integrating Data to create Sound maritime Business Strategy
38
BY marex StaFF
editorial
6
Looking Forward
Benchmarking the marex reader: Who are You?
thad allen also honors the past
BY JOSePh KeeFe
BY JOSePh KeeFe
NeW Feature crossword Puzzle-by myles mellor
56
upgrades & Downgrades Buy Low, Sell high BY JacK O’cONNeLL
17
42
BOurBON Goes Down under the Subsea market Beckons BY JOSePh KeeFe
18
44
managing “risky Business”
Kommer Damen Sits on top of the Global Small vessel Shipyard market BY JOSePh KeeFe
the maritime executive
3
editorial staff
editor in chief Tony Munoz tonymunoz@maritime-executive.com managing editor Joseph A. Keefe jkeefe@maritime-executive.com senior copy editor John J. O’Connell, Jr. harvardjo@maritime-executive.com senior vice president sales & marketing Brett Keil bkeil@maritime-executive.com sales & marketing executive Irena Ortlani irena@maritime-executive.com art director - partner Daniel Bastien dbastien@maritime-executive.com art director - partner Evan Naylor enaylor@maritime-executive.com internet services manager Matthew Miller matt@maritime-executive.com sales associate - Germanic Europe Hansjorg Brans jbrans@maritime-executive.com sales associate - Eastern Europe Maciej Wedzinski maciej@maritime-executive.com published by TM Marketing Group, LLC The Maritime Executive, LLC (ISSN 1096-2751) 3200 S. Andrews Avenue, Ste. 100 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Telephone: (866) 884-9034 Fax: (954) 848-9948 www.maritime-executive.com For subscriptions please visit www.maritime-executive.com.
4 the maritime executive
editorial Benchmarking the MarEx Reader: Who Are You?
Y
ou’ve just opened up the maritime industry’s premier business journal. That’s a good start, but it barely scratches the surface of where I want to go with this edition’s lead editorial. That’s because I’m far more interested in why you read THE MARITIME EXECUTIVE than I am in securing your business, your print advertising or anything else even remotely related to all of that. This is your business journal. The fact that we are still around, cranking out quality articles designed to help you better run your business and deal with the regulatory climate that impinges on those efforts, is ample testimony to that claim. Over the past twelve months, and as I travel around the country to conduct interviews and attend trade shows, I constantly get asked the same question, over and over again: “I love the magazine, but – um – how are you guys doing?” We are doing fine, thank you very much for asking. And, if you are at this moment reading someone else’s copy of MarEx, then I invite you to visit our Web site and buy a subscription. While that’s about as far as you’ll ever see me cross the line from editorial into sales, I’m also aware that, without readers and subscribers, I’ll someday have to adjust my stock answer above. I take a lot of soundings on a weekly basis from all phases of the maritime markets and the commonly held perception out there – erroneous, as it turns out – is that our primary competitors consist of a handful of other well-established trade magazines. You may remember that I mentioned this twice in the first paragraph, but in case you missed it then, I’ll say it again: This is a business journal. As you turn the pages of this or any other back issue of MarEx, there is one thing that you just won’t find, and that’s a press release. There’s a place for corporate news releases and we have one, too. It’s not in this magazine. Instead, we have a uniquely designed space on our weekly e-newsletter and, when you click on this highly visible “flash graphic,” you can read all about the latest and greatest in products and services designed specifically for the maritime and shipping industries. If you haven’t yet signed up for that free vehicle, then I encourage you to do so as soon as possible. Bringing your attention back to this print edition of MarEx, however, you’ll find no fewer than five case studies that detail various products and businesses. Some of those companies advertise in THE MARITIME EXECUTIVE; some do not. All of those articles have compelling stories to tell and go to the heart of how to successfully run a business in the toughest business climate that I can think of: maritime. But that’s why you are here, isn’t it? Defining our competition isn’t necessarily an apples-to-apples exercise. Certainly, I know who we compete with for print advertising. But when you place an ad in this publication (I’m dangerously close to that sales firewall again, I know) I would also hope that your motivation for doing so is to reach a far different audience. Enough said. And you’ve got work to do, in any event. Waiting for you and starting on page 16 of this edition of MarEx are exclusive interviews – conducted within 24 hours of one another – with the two men who, between them, largely control the maritime regulatory climate in America today. Regardless of what you think of MARAD Chief Sean Connaughton or Coast Guard Commandant ADM Thad Allen, you will surely agree that some of what they have to say is interesting. I’m certain that a good portion of it will someday, maybe sooner rather than later, impact your bottom line. Thanks for picking up this edition of MarEx and tuning in. I’m going to go out on the proverbial limb and predict that it won’t disappoint you. I should clarify one more thing, however: “How we are doing,” down the road, depends largely on you. And no one has ever been denied the opportunity to have their voice heard in MarEx. Don’t hesitate to let me know your thoughts on anything in this magazine or, for that matter, our e-newsletter. The issues and subjects that we touch upon online and within these pages in the future should revolve around you and your business. And they always will.
JOSEPH KEEFE
Managing Editor
MANAGING EDITOR JOSEPH KEEFE
can be contacted at jkeefe@ maritime-executive.com with comments, input and questions on this editorial or any other piece in this magazine. The Maritime Executive welcomes your participation in our editorial content.
MarEx
Distribution of The Maritime Executive:
Naval architects, lawyers, consultants, and insurers
16% Shipbuilders and repairers
59%
6%
Other
Other West Coast
28%
38%
5% 2%
Government
Domestic Circulation:
Canada
Ship owners, operators, managers, charterers, and brokers Western Europe & Mediterranean
12%
Marine equipment manufacturers
6 the maritime executive
International Circulation:
Markets Served:
29% 20%
1% 2% 3%
28%
8%
Other South & (Africa, Central America Australia, Misc. Island Nations)
East Coast
26%
Scandinavia
Asia & Middle East Eastern Europe
2%
Gulf Coast
15% Midwest
executive achievement
Proven Performance with Safety & Efficiency.
With our ultra-large towing vessels and deepwater offshore supply vessels, we provide offshore rig moving services and support to jack-up and semisubmersible drilling rigs for every major Drilling Contractor and Oil Company, as well as rendering tug and barge transportation services for cargo movements, platform rig installations and ocean towing services. VESSEL NAME / TYPE Offshore Towing Vessels Harvey Commander Harvey Gladiator Harvey Invader Harvey Viking Harvey Warrior Harvey Trojan Harvey Titan - DP Harvey Intruder Harvey Thunder Harvey War Horse Harvey War Horse II - DP* Dive Support Vessel Harvey Discovery DP 2 Cert. Offshore Supply Vessels Harvey Provider DP 2 Cert. Harvey Explorer DP 2 Cert. Harvey Spirit DP 2 Cert. Harvey Supplier DP 2 Cert. Harvey Carrier DP 2 Cert.**
SIZE L x B x D 115’ x 32’ x 14’ 115’ x 32’ x 14’ 115’ x 32’ x 14’ 115’ x 32’ x 17’ 115’ x 32’ x 17’ 126’ x 37’ x 17’ 135’ x 36’ x 16’ 135’ x 36’ x 16’ 135’ x 36’ x 16’ 150’ x 45’ x 18’ 150’ x 45’ x 20’ SIZE 265’ x 58’ x 18.5’ SIZE 240’ x 56’ x 18.5’ 240’ x 56’ x 18.5’ 280’ x 60’ x 19.5’ 280’ x 60’ x 19.5’ 295’ x 60’ x 24.0’
HORSE POWER CLASS 9000 9000 10000 10500 10500 13500 13500 13500 13500 16500 16500 CLEAR DECK 180’ x 50’ CLEAR DECK 175’ x 50’ 175’ x 50’ 202’ x 52’ 202’ x 52’ 245’ x 55’
KORT NOZZLES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES LIQUID MUD 8,000 BBLS LIQUID MUD 7,000 BBLS 7,000 BBLS 11,000 BBLS 11,000 BBLS 17,500 BBLS
BOW THRUSTERS N/A N/A YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES DRY BULK 8,000 CU. FT. DRY BULK 9,600 CU. FT. 9,600 CU. FT. 12,000 CU. FT. 12,000 CU. FT. 14,000 CU. FT.
SHARK JAWS
All Towing Vessels ABS Bollard Pull Certified under new guidelines in 2003. *Harvey War Horse II - DELIVERY DATE 02-15-08 **Harvey Carrier - DELIVERY DATE 06-15-09
N/A N/A 200 TONS 200 TONS 200 TONS 200 TONS 200 TONS 200 TONS 200 TONS 350 TONS 350 TONS CRANE 65 TON METHANOL 1,100 BBLS 1,100 BBLS 1,500 BBLS 1,500 BBLS 2,500 BBLS
HARVEY GULF INTERNATIONAL MARINE, INC. 1901 Manhattan Blvd. Building H, Suite 200 Harvey, Louisiana 70058 t 504-348-2466 f 504-348-8060 info@harveygulf.com www.harveygulf.com the maritime executive
7
executive executiveachievement achievement
By Joseph Keefe Deepwater and ROV Technology: Business Models That Work
triton Group Goes Deep by Building From – and for – the core
In the middle 1980s, and with the oil boom long since gone, the city of Houston literally emptied out as thousands of offshore workers lost their jobs, their homes and, perhaps more importantly, the business of offshore oil development lost its core of skilled labor. Most would never return. At the time, crude oil prices dropped to as low as $17 per barrel in an atmosphere where most business models said that a minimum price of $25 per barrel was needed in order to make offshore exploration and production anywhere close to being a profitable venture. In recent weeks, the price of a barrel of crude oil has exceeded and settled out, at the close of several trading sessions, at more than $110 per barrel. Although that number includes a healthy allowance for a quarter century of inflation, there is little argument that the business of offshore, deepwater oil exploration will enjoy a period of sustained, robust growth. Hand-in-hand with that metric is the reality that anyone capable of designing, building and supporting a wide range of technologies and systems for remote intervention operations and applications will be wellpositioned to experience not only substantial revenues, but also real growth. One such company that appears to be ideally ready to 8 the maritime executive
meet the coming deepwater challenge head-on is the Aberdeen-based Triton Group Holdings (Triton). This did not happen by accident.
Martin Anderson: More Than an Idea Man Martin Anderson is the Chief Executive Officer of Triton, appointed CEO in February 2007 when Triton Group was established following the acquisition of Perry Slingsby Systems. Before that, he was Managing Director and CEO of Perry Slingsby, a position he had held since 2003. But Martin has worked in the oil and gas industry since 1984, mostly in the subsea construction project management and contracting sectors. And while his undergraduate degree in Offshore Mechanical Engineering and his MBA make him a nominally good choice to run this sort of outfit, it is ultimately his vision for what is to come and how the Triton Group will fit into it that is the cornerstone of the Triton “buy-and-build” strategy. What that strategy entails makes a great deal of sense.
Triton Group Holdings: Narrow Focus, Big Ideas… Triton is an international group of businesses offering a range of control system-
based products and complementary services. Products include the widest range of market-leading electric and hydraulic ROVs for inspection, survey and light intervention applications, and deepwater heavy construction applications. The Group also offers a comprehensive range of ancillary remote intervention products and tooling systems as well as operational services such as training programs, offshore personnel recruitment, equipment rentals, management and servicing. Today, Triton martin anderson, ceO, triton Group
executive achievement
consists of six highly complementary companies, each acquired within the last 14 months. Those firms include Cynergetix, GEMS, Perry Slingsby, Subco, UKPS and Sub-Atlantic Ltd. All of them revolve, in some shape or form, around subsea activities, deepwater markets and the business of ROVs.
The Triton Business Model – And a Case Study Comparison Anderson calls the Triton business model, “Buy-and-build.” What that means is that he and Triton have set out on a course to build a suite of complementary companies that can benefit each of the other components while driving interior, organic growth of the individual parts. A casual observer might conclude that Anderson could de clare “game over” or “mission accomplished,” especially after examining the already impressive suite of companies that he has already – and rather quickly – amassed. But Anderson is anything but done. The Triton Group is a 100-percent privately held firm, with the private equity firm of SCF Partners as the primary shareholder. There are, of course, any number of venture capital and private equity investment firms out there that buy, sell and ultimately hope to profit from that cycle of capital investment. Sometimes a venture capital firm will buy a company with a set formula, unique to its particular investment strategy, with the ultimate intention of shedding that particular component after building value in the business. Still others buy a company with the intention of doing nothing more than breaking up its individual product lines and selling the parts for more than it paid for the whole. The Triton philosophy is nowhere to be found in either of these business models. J.F. Lehman & Company, run notably by its namesake and former Secretary of the U.S. Navy, buys companies within its core areas of interest: typically aerospace, maritime and military applications. With the intent of making those companies better, stronger and often increasing employee headcount, it has
been enormously successful at the strategy. Built into all of that, however, is the knowledge that the firm will someday shed that particular asset once the corporate financial goal has been realized. At the Triton Group, Martin Anderson has made it a point to accomplish the same JFLinspired goals with each of his six firms, with one notable exception. He insists, “Unless there is a reason to sell, then we will keep all of our assets. Ultimately, what is right for Triton is right for business.” That having been said, Anderson also states, “We are keeping all of our options open.” In the meantime, the Triton suite of highly technical companies creates economies of scale not previously possible, eliminating the middle man in certain transactions and combining infrastructure to provide more efficient delivery of products and services.
Group Growth – Not Investments: Carefully Chosen Components Staying true to the Triton goal of ensuring that each acquired component provides value to the core goals of the Group, Martin Anderson has assembled a logical and sequential line-up with which to move forward. Starting in February 2007, Triton Group Holdings acquired Perry Slingsby Systems Ltd. and Perry Slingsby Systems Inc. (PSS) from Technip. At the time, Triton Group Holdings was a new entity, established specifically for this transaction with the principal shareholder being the Houston-based SCF Partners. As an immediate signal to industry of the nature and intent of the Triton Group, the management team of PSS became investors in Triton Group Holdings along with SCF. Thus, with the acquisition of PSS, the strategy of developing an international group capable of designing, building and supporting a wide range of remote intervention products and technologies was born. This move was quickly followed by five others, starting with the purchase of Sub-Atlantic Ltd. in April 2007.
Also based in Aberdeen, Sub-Atlantic designs and manufactures small to mediumsize electric ROV systems and components. In addition, its hydraulic thrusters are supplied to the vast majority of work-class ROV builds. Sub-Atlantic’s core business of small video ROVs immediately plugged what Martin Anderson characterizes as “a product gap” in the Perry Slingsby portfolio. In fact, Perry Slingsby was already a customer of Sub-Atlantic at the time of the purchase. The two firms are expected to provide good synergy between their product lines as electric technology evolves in response to the need for deepwater construction vehicles to provide improved maneuverability via lighter vehicles. The Sub-Atlantic purchase was followed by a flurry of “buy-and-build” activity by the Triton Group in August 2007. The addition of UK Project Support Limited (UKPS) to the Triton fold gave Triton a new and immediate dimension to offer to industry. Supplying ROV and technical personnel to the subsea oil and gas construction industry worldwide since 1985, UKPS has also developed, along the way, one of the biggest databases of ROV, survey and other technical personnel disciplines available to the subsea sector. Its technical expertise in the use of ROV and subsea equipment has the potential to help any of the other Triton companies as they improve what they manufacture; market what they sell, and contribute to a myriad of other technical specialties. The acquisition of Subco, also in August 2007, brought a new arrow to the Triton quiver of subsea/ROV services. Subco, while a relatively small company to begin with, is notably a specialist in the rental of ROV equipment. Triton’s ability to enhance its ROV sales and delivery schemes was an immediate byproduct of the Subco purchase. Now, Triton was uniquely positioned to provide a temporary replacement to a client (who might have lost an asset through damage or in a repair period), while providing an extended building time for one of its manufacturing arms. And, of course, in this way a Subco lease would the maritime executive
9
executive achievement offer the potential buyer a chance to “test drive” a particular model prior to purchase. Culminating an extremely busy August for the fledgling Group, Singapore-based Cynergetix was acquired for the primary purpose of providing a bigger presence for Triton in the region. Cynergetix services the offshore oil and gas industry, in particular the inspection, diving subsea engineering, survey, maintenance and Remote Operated Vehicle (ROV) sectors of the wider Asia Pacific region. Already a PSS-registered service agent at the time of the purchase, Cynergetix now operates as the Triton Group’s “support center,” further cementing its global footprint. Rounding out the current Triton portfolio, and perhaps signaling to the rest of the business sector that it was anything but done, the acquisition of GEMS provides Triton with an important business advantage that it had not previously had the capacity to deliver. Martin Anderson adds, “We now offer equipment to market with complementary engineering and analytical data service.” With the deal completed only in January of this year, Houstonbased GEMS (Geoscience Earth & Marine Services) is a geophysical and geotechnical engineering consulting group providing services to a wide range of industries, includ-
ing oil and gas. GEMS has been involved in deepwater projects in the Gulf of Mexico and numerous projects worldwide. Its services include 2-D/3-D high-resolution geophysical assessments, geotechnical engineering/consultation, and integrated engineering sciences. Its U.S. Gulf Coast location provides ample warning to competitors that Triton is moving rapidly into the expanding offshore, deepwater markets.
A Different Slant on Combining Assets to Create Economies of Scale Martin Anderson didn’t invent the concept of combining complementary assets to create better internal efficiencies. At Triton, however, he goes about it with a slightly different take on how that will work. Anderson adds, “By buying complementary businesses that already have good cash flow, good people and good market share, we create an atmosphere and infrastructure where we can generate organic growth from the sum of all the individual parts.” Another less visible part of the Triton strategy is to keep the individual brands of the firm’s six components in place. This accomplishes many things, but in general
the Group’s philosophy is that the employees tend to be loyal to the brand and, in turn, the brand is loyal to the employees. Beyond this, Triton maintains a firewall of sorts between the various brands, satisfying external legal requirements as well as driving internal growth of the individual parts. In the end, though, Anderson says, “This is very much about Group growth as opposed to just investing. We invest in companies that are already interested in growth and exhibit an entrepreneurial spirit.” Martin Anderson declined to be more specific about what could come next for this interesting and exciting company. And while he refused to rule out the possibility of another layer of private equity or perhaps even an IPO down the road, it seems apparent that he and the entire Triton management team are intent on building a world-class business with global reach. With more than 100 years of combined experience contained within the expanded business portfolio – as well as the prospect of a rapidly burgeoning and robust deepwater building program – there may be little incentive to do anything more than continue on down the path that he has already begun to blaze. And who could blame him if he did? MarEx
When a Plain Gray Box Won’t Cut It. Turn to Point Eight Power, the leading manufacturer of custom designed electrical control and distribution systems and buildings. Let our consultative manufacturing process lead you where you need to go.
*Camouflage paint available on request 10 the maritime executive
PointEightPower.com
800.284.1522
executive achievement
DMW Marine is your North American Distributor of Palfinger Marine Cranes and DMW Marine heavy lift cranes
DMW Marine LLC 1123 St. Matthews Road • Chester Springs, PA 19425 phone 610.827.2032• fax 610.827.1199
www.dmwmarine.com
the maritime executive
11
washington insider
washington insider
Washington’s energy agenda awaits a New President
By Larry Kiern, Winston & Strawn LLP
Presidential Primaries Signal New Presidential Leadership on Energy Policy The Republican and Democratic party primaries have established that whichever party prevails in November, the election of the next President of the United States will mark a material departure from the Bush Administration’s pro-development fossil fuel energy agenda. For the past eight years, former Texas oil men President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney proved reliable allies of the domestic oil and gas industry. However, in an important development, it is now clear that, absent intervening events or remarkable flip-flops by the remaining candidates, the next President will not advocate expanding domestic development of America’s enormous fossil fuel energy reserves. Additionally, the next President will likely depart from other key aspects of the Bush Administration’s energy policy. As highlighted in this column in October 2007, oil and gas reserves in the United States remain immense, yet largely untapped. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that there are in excess of 100 billion barrels of oil and 1,000 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the United States. Importantly, these estimates do not even include the newly discovered reaches of Alaska’s continental shelf exposed by the receding Arctic ice cap. Yet these enormous reserves remain locked-up, firmly off limits to development. That means, of course, that these reserves remain wholly unavailable to help the United States cope with $110-plus per barrel oil and recurring foreign threats to cut off oil supplies to the United States. The policy decisions that led to this lock-up resulted from decades-old environmental decisions borne of the fears of 12 the maritime executive
environmental harm from development that no longer presents a serious risk. Therefore, our next President will not likely push for development of either the enormous oil and gas reserves of Alaska or our nation’s coastal zone. The primary election results might also be interpreted as reflecting a national preference for a different energy strategy. Beyond their shared opposition to the development of domestic oil and gas reserves, the likely party nominees for President also share remarkably similar positions on other key energy policies. The opposition of the likely Democratic nominees to development of domestic oil and gas reserves has been manifest from before the start of the campaign. No matter which Democratic candidate garners the party’s nomination, Senators Clinton and Obama have largely mirrored each other’s positions on energy policy. Importantly, they firmly opposed proposals to expand domestic fossil fuel exploration and production. Instead, they have both favored reducing America’s dependence on foreign energy resources by promoting the development of domestic renewable sources, e.g., biofuels, solar, and wind. They both have also called for an 80 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions and enactment of a domestic cap-and-trade system to encourage businesses to reduce these emissions. While they both have declined to rule out expansion of nuclear energy development, they have expressed reservations about the persistent obstacles to expansion of that energy source presented by nuclear waste storage and economics. Now that it is clear that Senator John McCain will be the Republican presidential
nominee, it is also clear that the domestic fossil fuel development agenda of the Bush Administration has sustained a severe setback. Like his Democratic opponents, Senator McCain has a consistent record of opposition to opening the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for development. He has also opposed other proposals to provide energy companies incentives to develop domestic fossil fuel resources. Additionally, even if he proves amenable to opening offshore exploration, experience shows that this is very difficult to accomplish. Coastal state senators from both parties have proven formidable obstacles to such initiatives, which floundered during the Bush Administration even with the support of the President. Likewise, Senator McCain shares remarkably similar positions with his Democratic opponents on other key energy issues. Like Senators Obama and Clinton, Senator McCain supports a sharp cut in carbon dioxide emissions and enactment of a cap-andtrade system. He also supports government incentives for the development of alternative fuels. Like his opponents, he has decided to emphasize renewable energy sources as the solution. His election-year conversion to the wisdom of ethanol subsidies illustrates his preference for renewable fuels. His support for nuclear energy seems more straightforward and is not encumbered by his Democratic opponents’ reservations. In summary, when compared to his former competitors for the Republican nomination, Senator McCain’s positions on energy policy set him apart from the Republican orthodoxy, and he seems to have truly earned his reputation as
washington insider a maverick whose positions are more in line with the Democrats than his own party. Therefore, the next President is likely to steer the ship of state on a new course on energy policy, away from an emphasis on domestic oil and gas development. And, barring unforeseen events or remarkable changes of heart, it will be left to others to unlock the enormous untapped oil and gas capacity of the United States.
Stalemate Likely in the Interim Against this election-year backdrop, it seems highly unlikely that President Bush and the Democratic-led Congress will accomplish much that is new in the field of energy legislation this year. With the enactment of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which President Bush signed into law on December 19, 2007, it appears that the current leadership of the legislative and the executive branches has occupied what common ground they find politically achievable for now. That legislation heavily emphasized conservation measures and the development of renewable fuels. It did not open America’s fossil fuel reserves for new development despite President Bush’s call for “open access to domestic energy sources.” So far this year the House of Representatives has passed a tax bill that shifts tax benefits from the oil and gas industry to stimulate renewable energy sources, and the Bush Administration has issued a veto threat. For its part, the Administration has not yet signaled achievable compromises on the key issues that separate the parties. And it is unlikely that the Democratic leadership of the Congress will engage in further serious negotiation with the Bush Administration over major energy policy matters in what remains of the 110th Congress. The Democratic-led House will more likely enact provisions that will invite further Presidential veto threats and have little chance of passage by the Senate. Instead, Democratic Congressional leaders will likely resolve to await the outcome of the November elections. Hungry for a return to a real governing majority, as compared to their current technical majority, Democratic Congressional leaders are hoping for sub-
stantial victories in both the Presidential and Congressional elections. They have been repeatedly stung by the defeats President Bush scored with his veto pen that have frustrated key planks of the Democratic majority’s legislative program. With a growing exodus from Congress of Republican incumbents and more Republicans than Democrats apparently vulnerable in Senate contests, the Democratic Congressional leadership will likely foresee a more favorable political climate for its agenda on these key energy issues next year after the November election when they hope to have both a Democratic President and an expanded Democratic Congressional majority.
had approved the project following an environmental review, found itself the target of environmental critics who challenged the agency’s thoroughness. Defending the agency, the Committee’s Ranking Member, James Sensenbrenner, said that the polar bear had become a “political tool” to block the project. But questions about the polar bear are not isolated because similar concerns have also been raised about the walrus, suggesting that the Endangered Species Act may yet prove the ultimate environmental obstacle to ongoing development of warming Arctic waters. Thus, even those remaining areas of Alaska that are not subject to the ANWR moratorium continue to face formidable challenges from those adamantly opposed to domestic development. Additionally, Alaskan officials have not succeeded in assembling the partnership necessary to construct the massive Alaska gas pipeline project as provided by the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA). This project aims to bring to market in the lower 48 states billions of cubic feet of natural gas from Alaska’s North Slope that is not subject to the ANWR moratorium. Differences continue to separate the major gas producers and the State of Alaska about how this project should be accomplished, and major gas producers have not supported the AGIA framework. For example, ConocoPhillips recently announced that it was proceeding with its own plans for a pipeline, and BP expressed the view that over time the major producers and the state would see merit in other approaches.
the opposition of the likely Democratic nominees to development of domestic oil and gas reserves has been manifest from before the start of the campaign…Likewise, Senator mccain shares remarkably similar positions with his Democratic opponents on other key energy issues Current Alaska Development Faces New Challenges Notwithstanding the Congressional bar to future development of ANWR, other oil and gas-rich regions of Alaska not covered by the Congressional moratorium are still being developed under careful government regulation by the Department of Interior. Yet developers face lawsuits in federal courts over permits granted by the Minerals Management Service (MMS). Environmental opponents of exploration and development have repeatedly charged that environmental safeguards approved by the federal government remain insufficient. Additionally, in mid-January 2008, Chairman Ed Markey of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming raised a new objection to oil and gas development in Alaska’s Chukchi Sea. He pointed to the recent proposal of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the polar bear as a threatened species because of global warming, which has reduced the bear’s Arctic ice cap habitat. According to Chairman Markey, “We shouldn’t sell the drilling rights in this important polar bear habitat before deciding how we are going to protect them.” Once again, the MMS, which
Environmental Protection Has Become the New Energy Policy Truth is often stranger than fiction, and such is the case with the emerging state of our nation’s energy policy. Notwithstanding the imperative for increased development of fossil fuel resources to keep the world economy functioning and despite the importance to the United States of adequate oil supplies for its national security and economic vitality, the political trendline has shifted decisively against development of oil and gas reserves in the United States. So when Exxon recently announced that it would spend $125 billion the maritime executive
13
washington insider ing their own proposals. Even the Bush Administration has reluctantly acknowledged the problem. Likewise, in the maritime world there is no longer any serious debate about curbing air emissions from vessels. The current debate focuses on how to speed further dramatic reductions in sulfur emissions. Remarkably, one of the maritime industry’s leading trade groups, Intertanko, has advocated a controversial proposal to convert marine fuels from residuals to distillates. Such a proposal would have seemed folly to many in the industry just a few years ago. But reports from the recent deliberations of delegates to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in London suggest that this is now the leading proposal to address the problem of sulfur emissions from vessels. The Intertanko proposal is directly attributable to the growing environmental concerns being expressed in many nations about the public health harms caused by vessel emissions, and some industry leaders realize that the maritime industry can ill afford differing individual national laws that render the global world of shipping a patchwork quilt of varying fuel regulations that become unworkable. Therefore, industry leaders appear to have recognized the collective wisdom of getting ahead of this political trend by proposing a dramatic reduction of sulfur emissions in return for maintaining a largely uniform and workable system for operating vessels in international trade. To be sure, there will be a commensurate increase in fuel costs, which will have to be passed along to shippers and charterers and ultimately to the consumers who are demanding cleaner air. Another important change has occurred that was completely unintended and has profoundly affected energy policy in the United States. Because of the war in Iraq, which caused the loss of Iraq’s oil supplies from the world market, and increasing growth in world oil We are the standard in Industrial Dehumidification. consumption, we have witnessed since 2003 oil prices skyrocket from $25 a barrel to $110 a barrel. That is, in a relatively short period of time the Telephone (757) 873-6800 price of oil has more Facsimile (757) 873-3632 than quadrupled. www.ebacusa.com; email: sales@ebacusa.com In effect, America 700 Thimble Shoals Blvd. Ste 109 • Newport News, VA 23606-2575 today unintention-
over the next five years for exploration and development of new production capacity, it should be understood that neither Exxon’s massive investment nor that of other oil majors will be made in the reserves America has put off limits. The political impetus for change, as manifested in the policy positions of the remaining Presidential candidates, has moved decidedly toward protecting the environment by developing renewable energy sources. Remarkably, it appears that America’s emerging energy policy is first and foremost an environmental protection policy. Even when the most recent conservative resurgence in America reached its political high-water mark from 2003 to 2007, when the Bush Administration enjoyed a Republican-controlled Congress, the nation was at war, and threats to America’s oil supplies were palpable, conservative leaders still could not muster the votes for Congress to open either ANWR or the coastal continental United States for oil and gas development. And the pro-development tide that was part of that conservative high-water mark now appears on the ebb. Since then, a heightened sense of environmental concern arising from increased sensitivity to global warming appears to have overtaken much of the American electorate. A growing consensus of scientists worldwide has concluded that mankind is responsible for the warming of the planet and that the consequences could be very serious over the coming decades. In the popular culture, former Vice President Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth, captured the imagination of millions of Americans by expressing the scientific consensus in a powerful form of mass entertainment. Now the remaining candidates for President all endorse the need for strong action to confront global warming, and Congress and many states are develop-
14 the maritime executive
ally pays a de facto oil tax it refused to levy upon itself intentionally. The consequences of this remarkable de facto tax on oil include the transfer thus far of approximately $124 billion from American consumers to foreign oil-producing countries. Simultaneously, this enormous outflow of American wealth abroad has contributed to the dramatic decline in the value of the dollar, which imposes on Americans an additional de facto tax in the form of increased prices Americans must pay for imported goods, upon which we now are so dependent in a global economy. These economic burdens present a doublewhammy to Americans pocketbooks. In terms of national energy policy, they likely have the unintended and felicitous consequences of causing more Americans to conserve energy while simultaneously spurring the investments to develop alternatives to imported oil and gas. However, the economic viability of the new alternative energy sources, which the Presidential candidates endorse, remains unclear. And if energy costs continue to soar, voters may find cause to reconsider the decisions to lock up America’s oil and gas.
Conclusion No matter which of the major political parties prevails in November, America’s new President appears poised to break dramatically with the pro-domestic oil and gas development policy of the Bush Administration. The immediate future promises a new energy policy grounded principally in environmental protection. Whether this policy will prove practical remains to be seen. The harsh reality is that even with costly government subsidies, renewable energy sources will provide only a small percentage of our nation’s energy needs for the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, we remain particularly vulnerable to foreign oil and gas suppliers. MarEx
Larry Kiern is a partner at Winston & Strawn LLP, an international law firm of 900 lawyers. His practice concentrates on maritime issues, including legislative, regulatory, and litigation matters. Before joining Winston & Strawn, he was a Captain and law specialist in the U.S. Coast Guard who served as the Legislative Counsel and Deputy Chief of the Coast Guard’s Congressional Affairs Office.
GMATS
GLOBAL MARITIME AND TRANSPORTATION SCHOOL
KEEP YOUR CAREER MOVING The United States Merchant Marine Academy (USMMA) is one of five federal service academies in the United States. In addition to the undergraduate program, the USMMA operates the Global Maritime and Transportation School (GMATS), which is the professional development division of the USMMA. The primary mission of GMATS is to prepare private-sector, government, and military professionals to be global leaders and innovators in maritime operations, intermodal systems and transportation security.
A World Leader in Maritime Training in: Nautical Science Engineering Systems Security and Transportation Research and Special Projects Call to REGISTER NOW! Phone: 516-726-6100
E-Mail: gmats@usmma.edu
Web: http://gmats.usmma.edu
By Joseph Keefe
china
feeding the dragon
MARAD’s New Focus: Utility, Credibility and Partnership Sean connaughton enters the Final Year of his tenure by Steering the u.S. maritime administration in the right Direction
In February, and less than one year until the end of his tenure as Maritime Administrator, MarEx caught up with Sean Connaughton in Washington. On that frosty winter day, it was clear that MARAD’s Chief Executive was not about to coast through his final months of service. Like the Coast Guard, MARAD has over the years taken more than its share of heat for being a less-than-effective advocate for the maritime industry it is supposed to serve. But 2007 was anything but business as usual for the Transportation Department’s least visible, and probably least understood, component. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters should be thankful for that. Read more to see why. MARINER RETENTION AND RECRUITMENT Job One for MARAD in 2007 was to attack the most serious problem facing the American and worldwide shipping game: Getting mariners trained and back onto ships where they are desperately needed. In response, Connaughton used new laws that incentivize hopeful LNG terminal operators to put Americans on their foreign tonnage and helped engineer numerous pacts with ship operators in all modes of ocean transport. This produced new cadet berths and could pave the way for U.S. mariners to eventually serve in some of the most lucrative billets afloat. Connaughton says, “The Merchant Marine Academy depends entirely on commercial berths, and we were having difficulty getting berths for these students. So we simply had to get more berths. On the state school side of the equation, right now, demand for gradu16 the maritime executive
ates is also very strong. The question is, then, how do we get more cadets coming through the system?” In the end, it was not a hard sell to get the companies to sign on, and Connaughton promised more agreements to come. In February, the protocol to determine how to best allocate the berths had not yet been finalized. The goal is to be fair to all the schools, and Connaughton envisions a self-regulating program for the schools themselves. He added, “We are in the process of rewriting our relationships with the state schools as well as King’s Point.” The MARAD effort to expand the mariner base does not end at the academies. Work is progressing on a model curriculum for towboat operators on small vessels, and there is real interest in maritime high schools. Connaughton concedes that some of the existing programs are maritime in name only. He aims to change that metric.
HANDICAPPING MARAD’S FY ’09 BUDGET The latest MARAD budget request, within the overall DOT budget, is roughly equivalent to last year’s numbers – assuming it all gets funded. Connaughton says that the numbers are deceiving and insists, “Our budget is dramatically higher than the numbers that were announced because, like all of our RRF (Ready Reserve Force) activities, these are on a reimbursable basis. We get around $300 million for that, and we also get around $300 million for our ocean freight differential – that’s the cargo preference side. We also have some other accounts so our overall budget is around $1 billion, of which $300,000 is discretionary.” Those numbers do not tell the full story. Where MARAD saw real funding progress was is in the Maritime Security Program. This is the year, by law, that MARAD was authorized to increase the MSP payments by $300,000 per vessel. That bumped up the budget by $18 million. It was no surprise, of course, that the Administration has decided not to support Title XI, the governmentsponsored ship loan program. In the end, all that’s left in that budget are funds to administer the current accounts. The requested funds for ship disposal were down a little from the previous year, but Connaughton counters, “We’re actually breaking even, if not making a little bit of money on some of these disposals. That money goes right back into the revolving account, so we don’t need as much money as we did in the past.” Finally, the proposed General Provision to the Student Incentive Program (SIP) actually doubled, from $4,000 to $8,000 per academic year. continued on page 46
china
feeding the dragon
U.S. Coast Guard Commandant ADM Thad Allen has pledged to modernize a Coast Guard that, in his own words, “has not kept pace” with the demands placed upon it in the post-9/11 regulatory world. Selling that message to Congress will be the linchpin of how successful his effort will be. The full amount of the President’s FY ’09 Coast Guard budget request hangs in the balance. Allen has done a lot of selling in the past six months. More accessible to industry and on the move more often than any of his predecessors, he also spends a large amount of his time on Capitol Hill. Because he constantly meets with industry stakeholders, getting him to slow down long enough to take his temperature on the full range of his responsibilities is usually next to impossible. In mid-February, Managing Editor Joseph Keefe was privileged to get two hours of Allen’s undivided attention as he flew to Houston for an industry function. The details of this exclusive interview, providing direct and unvarnished dialogue that Allen willingly delivers, cannot be read or seen anywhere else. Follow along as ADM Thad Allen explains what he means by “Honoring the past, not operating in it.”
JUSTIFYING THE COAST GUARD AND “DOING MORE WITH LESS” There is little that irritates Thad Allen more than casual discussion over whether or not a Coast Guard is needed. The inferred motto of “Doing more with less” is clearly one of those things. Nevertheless, the concept of restructuring certain parts of the Coast Guard is a discussion he can embrace, and he starts by expand-
ing upon that idea for MarEx readers: ALLEN: The Coast Guard has evolved over the past 200 years into an organization that operates in an all-threats, all-conditions environment. So I don’t think the question ought to be, “What do we do with all these missions?” It should be “How do we optimize the Coast Guard to do the missions they have?” There’s a reason we have all these missions. Everywhere I go in the world, I visit other coast guards and there is no other coast guard like ours. Nobody in the world does what we do in one organization. I go back to what Secretary Ridge said after he had been Secretary for about a year. He said, “If you didn’t have a coast guard, you’d have to invent one.” I gather that you are done doing more with less? ALLEN: That’s correct. Not on my watch, anymore. And until somebody tells me to stop saying that, I’ll keep doing it. Beyond this, every time we need to go and get a new class of cutter, it becomes a referendum on whether or not we need the Coast Guard. That’s a tough environment to live in. We have multi-missioned cutters and multi-missioned people – you put these in place and we can do five or six different things. We can’t do five or six different things at once. We are an organization that is very adaptable. So what I’ve
By Joseph Keefe
ADM Thad Allen Honors the Past but Concentrates on Positioning the Coast Guard for the Future
tried to do is create the right organizational structure so we are effective in doing all these things. The question shouldn’t be, “What can we take away from the Coast Guard?” And by the way, I’ve heard no one say that except in the context of marine safety. The question ought to be, “How do we optimally organize it?” Back in 1998 – before Katrina and 9/11 – we decided that we should merge all of our commands in one port and have one face to deal with the public. That actually spawned four or five activities around the country that we set up as prototypes. Fortunately, New York was one of those places. I cannot imagine how we would’ve managed the events of 9/11 had we not had a single command there to manage all facets of marine, port functions and law enforcement. Mission Execution - Thad Allen’s way: ALLEN: Now we focus on “mission execution.” Quite frankly, we’ve tended to be organized around programs – aids to navigation, search and rescue, and so on. We haven’t looked at the fact that these are product lines that we deliver to the same entity. The notion is to merge the product lines so when you are dealing on the port level, you’ve achieved one-stop shopping. And the customers should be able to expect service levels that are adequate for them to do their jobs. What that means is that we have to run and deliver that product line correctly. Allen on full transparency, responsibility: ALLEN: I’ve got no problem with the issues that have been raised. I doubt there are very many entities in government who would’ve sent Jim Card out to collect that information and make it public. As I’ve said to Chairman Oberstar on more than one occasion, if you tell me what your issues are, I will be responcontinued on page 49 the maritime executive
17
upgrades downgrades
Upgrades & Downgrades By Jack O’Connell
Buy Low, Sell High In an age when the art of investing has become a Ph.D.’s game, complete with complex algorithms and sophisticated spreadsheet models, the time-honored adage to “buy low, sell high” seems all but forgotten. Yet these simple words form the basis of all investing success. Especially in times of market turmoil and uncertainty, such as we are experiencing now, there is no better guide to follow. And yet most investors do just the opposite. They sell in times of trouble, and they buy when the market is booming. In other words, they “buy high and sell low,” thereby missing out on both ends. Why is this?
BUY LOW
more than 50%. An ideal buying opportunity. Now the BDI has changed direction and, as of early March, was up over 8000 and climbing. But it is not too late to buy these stocks, which have been slow to recover and continue to show lots of upside potential as prices for iron ore, coal, wheat and almost every type of commodity keep rising. The same holds true for tanker stocks and oilfield service stocks which, despite oil prices setting new all-time highs, have been beaten down by the twin fears of recession and a consequent falloff in the demand for crude oil and its byproducts. Many carry a “Sell” or “Hold” rating and are 20% to 50% below their 52-week highs. Some of these companies – General Maritime (NYSE: GMR) and Frontline (NYSE: FRO), for example – pay handsome dividends approaching or above 10%. In addition, the world’s major energy companies have all budgeted significant increases in their exploration and development budgets for 2008. What’s not to like?
Let’s start with the “buy” side of the equation. Common sense tells us to buy when stocks are cheap. Well, stocks are cheap right now. Most companies in the S&P 500 are down 20-50% from last October’s highs, and shipping stocks are no exception. This is the ideal time to buy. Yet most people are selling. Why? For one thing, the analysts who follow the market and track individual stocks are all telling us to sell or, at best, hold. But the smart Baltic Dry index (courtesy: capital Link) money is doing just the Yet investors remain reluctant to buy when opposite. It’s buying. This is what is known these stocks may never again be so cheap. as a “buying opportunity,” and there are lots What’s going on here? Why are we so of buying opportunities in a market that is afraid to buy when stocks are going down? approaching bear status. For one thing, we’re afraid of losing more Take, for example, dry bulk companies. money. We think the stock will keep going Beginning late last year many investors began down. And maybe it will – for a time, at shorting these stocks as the Baltic Dry Index, least. This is the so-called “fear factor,” the which measures freight rates on 40 or so fear of additional losses. It is fear that motiof the most heavily traveled shipping lanes, vates investors to sell perfectly good stocks began falling. It fell all the way from a high when their prices start to fall. They are afraid of over 11000 in November to below 6000 of losing more money if they don’t act fast in January. And companies like DryShips (“better get out now before this stock falls fur(Nasdaq: DRYS), Euroseas (Nasdaq: ESEA), ther”). If enough people do this (the “herd Genco (NYSE: GNK) and others dropped mentality”), then the stock will keep falling accordingly, down anywhere from 25% to 18 the maritime executive
and smart investors will have an even better buying opportunity. The fear of incurring additional losses – actually, of losing all one’s money – is at the heart of almost every bad investment decision. Another inhibiting factor is lack of cash, and this is certainly a legitimate constraint. We never seem to have any excess cash lying around when we need it most. Usually when the market starts falling, we are fully invested. Why? Because up to that point everything had been doing well, so there was no sense in having any cash salted away in a money market fund earning a measly 3% or 4% when it could be put in a high-flying stock that could double or even triple inside a year. As a result, when the market starts falling, we are forced to sell stocks on the downside or at a loss in order to raise the cash to buy stocks that are now cheap. So we’re caught in a vicious circle. To avoid this particular trap, the smart investor keeps a minimum of 5% up to a maximum of 20% of his portfolio in cash, in good times and bad. There are other excuses as well. “Have we really hit bottom? Maybe I should wait a few more days (weeks) and get XYZ stock at a real bargain.” By then, of course, it’s often too late. XYZ has already started going back up.
SELL HIGH The other side of the equation is to sell high. Why is it so hard to do this? When is the right time to sell? And how high is “high”? Is it a 20% gain? 30%? 50%? Wait till you double or triple your money? These are the questions that plague investors and keep them awake at night. Too often it is plain old greed that prevents us from selling. Just as the fear factor encourages us to sell when we should be buying, the greed factor encourages us to buy or stay put when we should be selling: “This stock could go much higher. Why should I sell now? I’ll miss out on future gains.” This is a particular
upgrades downgrades danger in the case of “momentum” stocks, which are driven by so-called momentum investors who keep buying and pushing the price of a stock up. This can go on for weeks and months, and when the “mo” shifts, and the momentum buyers disappear, the stock collapses, and collapses fast. Ordinary investors are caught holding the bag. We need look no further than DryShips or Aegean Marine Petroleum Network (NYSE: ANW) for examples of this. From a high of over 130 last fall, DryShips fell to below 60 in early 2008 as investors abandoned ship. Aegean was approaching 50 when the bottom fell out, and it trades today at about 30. A screaming buy? You tell me. Another factor that prevents us from selling is emotional attachment. We grow too attached to a stock that has done well. It proved how smart we were to buy it in the first place. We feel a personal commitment to it, a perverse sense of loyalty. We’re reluctant to part with it, and we wind up holding it too long and selling only after a substantial decline. One way to avoid this is to sell part of your position in a stock after a predetermined gain – say 30% or 50%. Hold onto the rest and see what happens. If it keeps going up, fine – you’ve already locked in a substantial gain and there’s more coming. If it goes down, you look even smarter: You’ve got your gain and you have the opportunity to buy back in at a lower price whenever the spirit moves you. Here’s another excuse: “What do I do with the money after I’ve sold a winner? What other winner can I buy? I know of no better place to put my money, so I’ll just leave it where it is.” These are legitimate questions, which each investor must answer for himself. No one can
predict the “top” of a market or the “top” of a stock. Better to sell before the top and find something else that’s undervalued and has greater upside potential. It all depends on your perspective (a week? a month? a year? five years? 25 years?), and your goals. The wise investor sets goals and sticks to them. When a stock reaches a particular price, he sells. If it falls below a certain price, he starts buying again. For some, a 30% gain is sufficient. Others want to double or triple their investment. Some have a long-term perspective; others are in for the quick kill. But no matter what your goals or perspective, the important point is to be disciplined in your approach and stick to your guns.
COMMON SENSE Nothing, of course, is as simple or easy as it seems. Common sense tells us to buy low and sell high. But our instincts tell us to do just the opposite – to buy when stocks are going up and sell when stocks are going down. The great irony in all this is that, if everyone starts selling at the same time, we have a real panic and everyone loses. There is a general loss of confidence, and markets collapse. Investing depends on confidence – confidence in the future, in the economy, in the currency, in earnings growth and so on. Conversely, if everyone starts buying at the same time and keeps buying, prices skyrocket and eventually create a bubble, as we have seen in the dot.com, real estate and now mortgage credit markets. Eventually the bubble bursts and prices collapse. Study after study has shown (and I won’t bore you with the statistics) that the best course of action in times of market turmoil, such as we are experiencing today, is to do
nothing. The market has a built-in, selfcorrecting mechanism. When stocks get low enough, people start buying again as valuations become overwhelmingly compelling. When stocks get too high, people start selling to take profits and put their money elsewhere. In the long run, patience and a long-term perspective win the day. Jeremy Siegel proved this in his classic Stocks for the Long Run. Investors who try to time the market almost always fail. Those who stay the course prosper. The choice is yours.
FOLLOW-UP In our previous column (February issue of MarEx), we discussed the performance of shipping stocks and stated that “Barring a major recession in the U.S., which the Fed seems determined to prevent, shipping stocks seem poised for another good year, though perhaps not as spectacular as 2007.” So far we would seem to be right on course, although it is much too early to tell. Nonetheless, after a precipitous fall in January and into February, drybulk companies are climbing back up as freight rates rebound, while tanker stocks have generally held their own – not gaining much, not losing much. Ditto for oil service stocks, which have held up well as the price of oil remains stubbornly high. In a difficult market environment, you could do a lot worse than owning these stocks. MarEx
Jack O’Connell, the senior copy editor of this magazine and a former maritime executive, is a private investor who may own shares in some of the companies mentioned in his columns. The views expressed in this column are his and his alone and are not in any way to be construed as investment advice.
the maritime executive
19
realtalk:oil economides
Real Talk: Oil
With Dr. michael economides
By MarEx Staff higher prices regardless of the consequences michaeL J. ecONOmiDeS Peak Oil to the world economy, Economides said. The Web site lifeaftertheoilcrash.net greets is a Professor at the cul“In that group is Chavez, Putin and Iranian its visitors with, “Civilization as we know it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. At $100 coming to an end soon. This is not the wacky len college of engineering, proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse President per barrel they are the 1,000-pound gorillas. At $50 per barrel they are monkeys. These bible prophecy sect, or conspiracy theory university of houston; the militants hardly have functioning real econosociety. Rather, it is the scientific concluchairman of the Board of mies whose workings would be adversely sion of the best paid, most widely-respected affected by a recession.” geologists, physicists, bankers, and investors Paleon Oil and Gas, and in the world. These are rational, professional, the managing Partner of a conservative individuals who are absolutely Russia by a phenomenon known as global On Russia, Economides says the recent petroleum engineering and terrified �Peak Oil’.” elections that installed Dmitry Medvedev, “Peak Oil is today’s myth,” says Dr. Putin’s handpicked successor, may impact strategy consulting firm. he Michael J. Economides. “It might happen, but Americans even more than the U.S. elections is also the editor-in-chief of not before 2050.” Many doomsayers are not in the fall. “While Medvedev promises social petroleum experts, he points out. In fact, benefits and improved living conditions for the energy tribune. Publica- even “Peak Oil is a figment of the imagination of ordinary Russians, these statements are easy born-again, pessimist geologists.” to make with oil at $100 per barrel. But in a tions include authoring or Instead, Economides predicts that world where health care is abysmal, male co-authoring 14 profession- oil may not run out for at least two hundred country mortality rates have dropped to age 55 and the rate of corruption ranks Russia between al texts and books, among years. With that said, he also believes that even if significant reserves were found, they Nigeria and Indonesia, progress is a feeble them the color Of Oil and would not play a major part in meeting our feeling,” he said. demands because natural gas is becoming the A reduction in oil and gas revenues will the forthcoming From fuel of choice throughout the world, and this put a hold on Russia’s social progress, which will lessen the demand for crude oil. is financed by those commodities. “The U.S. Soviet to Putin and Back, While many conclude Peak Oil has either and the rest of the world showed over the and more than 200 journal already taken place or is in the near future, last few years that they can bear higher oil these forecasts generally consider oil supply but they cannot live with supply interpapers and articles. he also independently of demand and point to sup- prices, ruptions. Therein lies the potential disaster,” appears regularly as a guest ply shortfalls. “Currently, Saudi Arabia pro- Economides said. “Economic problems are about 10 million barrels of oil per day,” never good for any country, especially one and expert commentator on duces says Economides. “But it could easily produce like Russia that is surrounded by hostile ex20 million barrels of oil per day.” satellite states, still owns tens of thousands national and international What is emerging is the “axis of energy of nuclear weapons, and feels its place in the television programs. militants,” national leaders who want everworld has been diminished.” 20 the maritime executive
realtalk:oil economides Later this year Economides will release his new book, From Soviet to Putin and Back. “He’s (Putin) not just taking Russia back to Brezhnev. He’s taking it back to Khrushchev. He’s taking Russia back 50 years-you have to go back 50 years to see what you see going on in Russia now.” Economides thinks the takeover and sale of Yukos’ assets was the “theft of the century,” and notes the emergence of Russian giant Gazprom as a world-scale force. “Gazprom is such a gargantuan company—six times the size of Shell, for comparison—it’s a state within a state. It’s a question whether Russia owns Gazprom or Gazprom owns Russia,” he notes.
Iran “The fact of the matter is, Iran is hurting badly,” Economides says. “During the time of the Shah, Iran was producing six million barrels a day. Now they are barely meeting their OPEC quota. Even worse, Iran has become a net importer of natural gas and uses about half its oil production to generate electricity. Nuclear power generation is very rational for them. That would free oil for external sale.” In February, Iran opened the Iranian Oil Bourse—the first-ever Islamic oil, gas and
petrochemical exchange. There was concern that the bourse would start trading in euros, but initially it will only use the Iranian rial. The dollar, of course, is the only currency accepted by OPEC. When the Iranian Oil Bourse was originally scheduled to open in 2006, it planned to use the euro for transactions. But that idea was plagued with problems and never got off the ground. Economides says he doesn’t believe that OPEC will change its reliance on the dollar and, if it did move to the euro, it would have little impact on the U.S. economy. But from all accounts by other experts, the move to the euro would signal a true geo-economic earthquake. The fact is, major world economies not having to buy and hold dollars to secure payment for oil would be devastating to the U.S. The Iranian Oil Bourse may be the first step in destroying the underpinning of the American economy.
China China is the third largest oil-consuming nation in the world, using about five million barrels per day. It has already passed Russia and is poised to pass Japan. There has never been a country in history to increase its oil
consumption by 20 percent in a single year until China. “China has experienced explosive growth in oil consumption of 110% over the last decade, almost all of it met by imports, and much of that from the Middle East. This cre-
Gazprom is such a gargantuan company—six times the size of Shell, for comparison—it’s a state within a state. It’s a question whether Russia owns Gazprom or Gazprom owns Russia. ates a significant geopolitical vulnerability for China,” say Economides. “Aggravating the situation is China’s lack of domestic resources of the magnitude and type they need.” Rarely has the world witnessed the breathtaking economic developments taking place in China’s emergence as a world-class economy. In an almost ironic reversal of recent his-
the maritime executive
21
realtalk:oil economides tory, Russia, with its newfound status as a major exporter of oil and a counterbalance to OPEC, may actually benefit from Middle East strife and the certain increase in oil prices. China is truly worried, and future Chinese imports will feature Russia prominently as a far more stable source of supply than the Middle East. “It is natural gas that will dominate China’s future. Currently, it represents a meager two percent of the country’s energy mix when compared with a worldwide market share of about 23 percent,” says Economides. “Recent announcements of massive natural gas finds in Xinjiang Province will make it a domestic superpower in energy. Even so, China will need far more gas than can possibly be produced domestically. China’s energy future is likely to emerge as the most serious geopolitical and economic event of the coming decade.”
United States “The biggest problem the U.S. faces is supply disruption—the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR) is estimated to have 30-40 billion barrels. Added to the activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, America could have an additional four million barrels per day, which would greatly reduce imports and bring down costs,” Economides says. “The U.S. is committing economic suicide by not developing domestic resources.”
venezuela is another huge problem for the u.S. hugo chavez is a much bigger threat to america’s energy security than Saddam hussein ever was—chavez is really the poster boy for what’s wrong with OPec today. The United States cannot get too comfortable with any of the world’s major oil producers. “Saudi Arabia, which maintains friendly relations with the U.S., also birthed Osama bin Laden and 15 of the 19 September 11th hijackers,” said Economides. “In order to attack foreign dependence, the U.S. must attack transportation—there are no two ways about it. Currently, the U.S. uses 99.6 percent of oilbased fuels in all forms of transportation.” “Venezuela is another huge problem for the U.S.,” says Economides. “Hugo Chavez is a much bigger threat to America’s energy security than Saddam Hussein ever was—Chavez is really the poster boy for what’s wrong with OPEC today.” Regarding alternative fuels and bio-fuels, Economides says there are no realistic alternatives to hydrocarbon energy in the foreseeable future. If Americans used all the soybeans in the country, it would only account for four percent of total diesel fuel consumption. Nor will other forms of alternative energy make a big impact on consumption. “Solar and wind are never going to account for more than half a percent, so just get that out of your mind,” he said. As far as natural gas being used for transportation, designed to decrease the country’s dependence on gasoline, “The U.S. does not and cannot produce enough natural gas to meet future demand as it is,” he said. “I don’t care how many wells you drill. The U.S. will be forced to import natural gas from foreign sources.” MarEx 22 the maritime executive
Seabulk Towing: Providing Service Excellence Through Safety
Celebrating its 50th Anniversary, Seabulk Towing is an established leader in harbor ship assist operations and offshore towing services. Seabulk Towing’s high standards of customer service are founded on the basic principles of safety and service excellence. Headquartered in Port Everglades, Florida, Seabulk Towing assists petroleum and chemical product tankers, barges, container ships, and other cargo vessels in docking and undocking and provides a variety of offshore towing services along the Gulf Coast and the Southeastern Seaboard.
Ship Assist & Towing Operations
www.seabulktowing.com | (954) 523-2200
case study : port everglades case study: electronic power design
ELECTRONIC POWER DESIGN, INC.
Designing a World of Power lectronic Power Design, Inc. (EPD) first came to the attention of MarEx when our staff was developing the Rigdon Marine edition in November 2006. EPD’s cutting-edge power and control systems’ design for next-generation platform support vessels has been acclaimed as a major breakthrough for the offshore industry. However, the company also engineers and manufactures automated electrical power systems for many different industries. EPD’s growth and worldwide expansion are what The Maritime Executive is all about—benchmarking excellence for others to measure. EPD is a fascinating case study in engineering and marketing. The firm built its reputation on the skills, experience and innovative knowledge of John Janik, its founder and President. Today, EPD Inc. (Houston) and EPD Asia Group (China) are considered among the top design/engineering and manufacturing companies in the world for automated electrical power systems. The company is also recognized for its work in harmonic solutions for a wide range of power systems, either utility feed or generated. After graduating from Texas A&M with a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering, Janik was hired by General Dynamics (GD) to work on the military’s F-16 Fighter Jet Program. In 1983, GD had discovered that when the F-16’s inverter came online it produced excessive harmonics, which created AC power system disturbances. It was a “phantom” problem and a mysterious issue that could bring these technologically-advanced planes down. The young Janik had the good fortune to work alongside some of the greatest avionic minds in the world to solve disruptive-power-harmonics problems. At the time, the science of harmonics in power-drive systems was a completely neophyte discipline, and there was simply no scientific experience with the switching algorithms that were burning up power supplies. General Dynamics formed a new engineering group
24 the maritime executive
By Tony Munoz
called Power Systems and Controls, which became responsible for all the plane’s power supplies and complete generator-power systems. Janik was responsible for learning every nuance and function of the 10-KVA generator and its constant frequency output PWN inverter box. The experience of fixing harmonics in planes put Janik at the center of the next generation of applied sciences for any type of generator power system.
Founding Electronic Power Design, Inc. In 1985, defense budgets were severely cut by the U.S. government, and GD began laying off workers. Janik was asked to return to work as an engineer for an electrical company that he had worked for as a teenager. Although his education was based on AC drives, Janik was soon designing DC drive controls and printed circuit boards with Op Amps, resistors, transistors and other discrete components. In 1986, after the oil industry crash, Janik’s main industry focus was dredging and designing diesel electric power systems for the dredging industry. Knowing that he was an excellent engineer with the drive to succeed, the 25-year-old Janik decided to take the risk of forming his own company to service these dredging customers. This was the beginning of Electronic Power Design. Janik’s reputation as a talented field service engineer with a few advanced designs began to spread. Soon he was busy commissioning and servicing more and more equipment for the dredging industry. This quickly led to EPD’s becoming an electrical power and controls system manufacturing company. In 1986, John Norwood, currently Vice President of Business Development for EPD, was at the University of Texas. He began assembling circuit boards for Janik to earn extra money for school. Norwood decided to leave college in 1988 and started working for EPD in printed circuit board design, controls wiring and whatever else EPD needed
case study : port everglades case study: electronic power design
All photography in this article courtesy of Tim Fulton.
at any given time. From there he moved to CAD drafting, purchasing and then eventually to sales. These skills, plus his previous work with AC/DC motors, transformers, switchgear and DC drives, made for a good “hands-on, real world” education that he uses in his capacity at EPD today.
Reputation + Opportunity = Success In 1990, EPD was growing from a small electronics company to designing and commissioning diesel electric power systems and variable speed drives for operators in the dredging markets. At the same time, gambling laws were changing throughout the U.S., and gambling boats became all the rage. These boats were required to float and have a certain amount of propulsion power. They were also required to be built to marine classification society standards. As the dredging business slowed, EPD began working on casino boats in Indiana, along the Mississippi River, and on the Gulf Coast. The company was soon in a much larger facility and began hiring more employees. During the early �90s, the oil field market began picking up as well because of new technology that allowed drilling at deeper and deeper depths. While EPD had little experience with offshore support vessels, drilling rigs or production platforms, Janik and Norwood began finding projects in the oil field. It was a natural step moving from dredges and casino boats to propulsion systems for platform support vessels (PSVs) and drilling systems for the offshore oil market. “The common theme about all of the marine applications we worked on was the classification requirements,” said Norwood. “Whether the design and commissioning were for a casino boat, a suction dredge, a cutter type dredge, a platform support vessel, or if we were working on a generator power system for a drilling rig, every generated power system required a class society’s approval.” Norwood also stated that “the other commonality was limited space. All marine installations are limited on space, especially when it comes to electrical equipment, which in the past was always an afterthought.”
Soon another sea change began taking shape throughout the world. During this time, analog systems drove industrial power; but digital microprocessors were coming on the scene in industrial applications, and EPD clearly understood it was the future. Furthermore, as the oil and gas industry and the marine industry were being legislated to become more environmentally responsible, EPD began designing digital power systems with microprocessor controls, variable speed drives and fiber-optically connected, PLC-based control systems, which allowed these industries to modernize with diesel electric systems and meet the environmental standards that society and governments demanded from them. This is also the time EPD allied itself with Siemens Energy and Automation. Siemens offered a wide range of modern “off-the–shelf” products that EPD could use and apply to a specific industry or application. EPD began working with Global Marine Drilling and Sonat (now Transocean) on their semi-submersible and drillship drilling rigs. The first was a retrofit of an old 1970s’ German system, and the other was the installation and commissioning of a completely new system. Then companies such as Transocean, R&B Falcon, Global Marine Drilling, Diamond Offshore, Atwood Oceanic and Noble Drilling, which worked for Shell, BP, ExxonMobil and the rest of Big Oil, began calling the company. EPD became the “go-to” guys for moving from analog to digital systems for power generation and controls for the drilling industry worldwide.
Reputation + Success = Global Expansion EPD’s reputation for innovation began opening many doors of opportunity for the company and, with Houston being the center of the world’s oil and gas industry, working on equipment around the world was not uncommon. Global Marine Drilling decided to upgrade its drilling capacity and bought a famous ship called the Glomar Explorer, which was involved in retrieving a Russian nuclear submarine off the coast of Hawaii in
the maritime maritime executive executive the
25
case study : port everglades case study: electronic power design “Instead of the finger-pointing that happens when too many are involved, somebody needs to take responsibility for commissioning the vessel. EPD’s electric plant integration is that commitment. It allows vessel owners to get the integrated electrical power system they want while maintaining an easy separation between owner-furnished and shipyard-furnished equipment.” the mid-�70s. Global decided to turn the ship into a drilling rig, and EPD was awarded the retrofit for the propulsion and drilling systems. The company added approximately 50,000 horsepower of Siemens variable speed drives with switchgear and automation to the rig. In addition to the Glomar Explorer, EPD also worked on the Glomar Celtic Sea, a semi-submersible floating hotel converted to an anchored, semi-submersible drilling rig. The very first offshore contract EPD was awarded was the DC drilling system retrofit of an old Sonat rig named the Offshore Amirante. EPD used Siemens digital technology to modernize this 1970s’ vintage drilling rig. Known for designing, building and commissioning quality drilling systems, EPD soon began doing field work on other Siemens products in the Gulf Coast region. In terms of drilling rigs, EPD has provided equipment on numerous projects for drilling companies worldwide. It has provided digital power systems and/or controls for the drilling, propulsion, anchor windlass, BOP transport, compressor and pipe racker systems on these rigs. As the company worked more and more in the drilling industry, Janik and Norwood met many new people. It was around this time that EPD was introduced to Tidewater, one of the largest offshore support companies in the world. Janik and Norwood began meeting with Larry Rigdon, a senior executive at the company at the time. Tidewater was interested in building some new, state-of-the-art, DP-2 class diesel-electric platform supply and large anchor handling vessels, and EPD was brought in as part of the design team. EPD designed and specified the integrated electrical power systems for both vessel types. It soon became evident to Rigdon that EPD was a sophisticated design and manufacturing company with innovative designs for power generation and, specifically, diesel-electric propulsion. Additionally, part of the arrangement was that EPD could create the designs for the integrated power systems and would not be precluded from bidding on the manufacturing of the equipment. Consequently, the EPD staff spent many months working with Tidewater executives in New Orleans and with the builder in Norway. In all, EPD assisted with the building and delivery of 12 new vessels for Tidewater.
Forward Thinking + Knowledge = A Sea Change for an Industry “The drilling industry has used diesel-electric power generation on oil rig platforms for many years,” Norwood said. “And this technology was nothing new to EPD. When Larry Rigdon started his own offshore support company, he wanted to build a smaller support vessel, which could transport more cargo than larger vessels that demand similar day rates and be faster in the water with less fuel burn. He asked EPD to join the process.” Rigdon hired Guido Perla and Associates (GPA), a naval architectural firm in Seattle, to design the GPA-640 class of PSV, which later was renamed the Rigdon 5000 class. EPD was brought in to design the integrated electrical power system for the new diesel-electric boats. GPA and EPD had collaborated on a number of high-profile casino boats during the �90s, and there was a high level of synergy. Rigdon had over 30 years of experience in the offshore support
26 the maritime executive
industry, and he understood what type of vessel was needed in the offshore markets. He also knew GPA had designed a number of vessels with advanced hull configurations, which provided speed and comfort and burned less fuel. Added to this, he knew that EPD was an innovative designer of integrated electrical power systems. The assembled teams began working on a vessel that would revolutionize the offshore industry. The GPA 640 would use dynamic-positioning (DP-2 systems) and a diesel-electric power generation system in an advanced hull design. By removing the traditional shafts that ran the length of a conventional diesel vessel and replacing them with diesel-electric power, which ran cables down the sides of the hull, the new, smaller vessel could transport more payload cargoes in the tank farm system. The team collaboration completely changed the dynamics of the offshore support industry and brought forth the first modern design in over 20 years. After Rigdon built the GPA-640s he began working with EPD and Guido Perla on a new GPA-654 PSV design. Rigdon’s strength lay in the way he built the boats. First, he wanted to build boats in a series, and he contracted with a shipyard to build 10 identical vessels, one after the other. As a savvy veteran of the marine industry who was familiar with shipyards, Rigdon wanted the ships built quickly and inexpensively. While the yards are good at cutting steel, welding and construction, they often have problems commissioning the power systems. Rigdon was aware of this problem and hired EPD to design the GPA-645 with a containerized house for the integrated electrical power system components. This house became the vessel’s Engine Control Room (ECR). With this new design Rigdon could owner-furnish an integrated electrical power system installed and tested in the vessel’s ECR. The shipyard had only to remove various panels on the outside of the ECR and hook up the power and control cables. EPD would then verify the shipyard’s connections, unlock the ECR and begin powering up the various systems. “Piecing together electronics and components of an electric power system is not a good idea,” John Janik said. “Instead of the finger-pointing that happens when too many are involved, somebody needs to take responsibility for commissioning the vessel. EPD’s electric plant integration is that commitment. It allows vessel owners to get the integrated electrical power system they want while maintaining an easy separation between owner-furnished and shipyardfurnished equipment.” John Norwood admits there is a little more cost on the front end to purchase a totally integrated ECR; but with the ship being assembled quickly and the commissioning process greatly reduced, it is less costly in the long run. The faster a vessel gets delivered, the faster it can go on hire to earn income. In the past, the shipyards built and wired the control rooms, which usually delayed vessel deliveries and upset vessel owners. This approach helps reduce this time/cost. Today, Rigdon and the French offshore giant BOURBON are still building modern diesel-electric, dynamically positioned offshore support vessels. EPD has been contracted to provide the integrated ECR electrical power systems for almost one hundred offshore support
case study : port everglades case study: electronic power design vessels for these two companies. They consist of DP-2 class PSVs, Anchor Handlers and DP-3 class IMR vessels, all of which are complete ECR-designed as part of the vessel’s hull and sent to the yard for welding into the ship. If the yard can not get inside the container, it cannot be responsible for any problems within the ECR during commissioning. With this method the yard gets a few motors, an ECR and a few consoles, which they have to connect. EPD has additionally found ways to greatly reduce the need for huge tonnages of air conditioning traditionally required to cool the ECR and its equipment, without water cooling. Another unique process being implemented for these Rigdon and BOURBON vessels is no-load testing of the integrated electrical power system with the vessel’s actual engine/generator sets, which are supplied by Cummins MidSouth for the Rigdon vessels as well as for the BOURBON vessels. Cummins sent a shipset of engine/generator sets to EPD’s plants in Houston and China to be connected and used during factory testing. Testing the generators offsite at EPD greatly reduces dockside testing and commission. This is another innovative way to get the vessel working faster and is very cost-effective on a multi-vessel order. Rigdon and BOURBON have been on prolific building programs since 2002. Rigdon is about to finish building 20 new vessels, and BOURBON is nearly finished building approximately 125 new offshore vessels. EPD has provided or is providing the integrated ECR power systems for most of these vessels. EPD’s first experience with diesel-electric systems came while working on casino boats and dredging vessels. In the past, Europeans built a number of diesel-electric vessels utilizing AC variable speed drives and motors, and when EPD first started powering vessels there were not many companies working with DC variable speed in diesel-electric systems. The U.S. drilling markets were used to DC variable speed, which is commonly used on over 85% of the world’s drilling systems today. Because of this, these new diesel-electric integrated ECR systems are using DC variable speed technology. EPD also offers and supplies AC variable speed systems as customers or applications require. In the past, few shipyards or owners were willing to pay for a total integrated electrical system. Consequently, EPD sold numerous AC and DC drives and motors for bow-thrusters as well as other power system components. It was not until Rigdon Marine and BOURBON wanted to build vessels fast and economically that EPD had the opportunity to design and build an entire electrical power system house in the ECR for marine applications.
EPD Engineers
EPD Accounting and Human Resources
Bringing Clean Power to the World The offshore industry has offered EPD the growth and opportunity it needed to become a major player in designing, building and commissioning electrical power systems. The company now has a vast wealth of experience and applications knowledge from working in many different industries. Being strategically located in the world’s energy capital,
EPD Marketing and Administration
the maritime maritime executive executive the
27
case study : port everglades case study: electronic power design John Norwood joined the company a couple of years after John Janik founded it, and Amy Gardner joined the company in 2005... Amy brings with her 20 years of banking/finance experience. Together, these three have an eye for bringing in talented engineers to further the growth of the EPD companies. “Growth is good, but it has to be measured,” said Janik. “We have been fortunate to find the impressive talent needed to build a global company.” EPD has developed systems in the petrochemical industry and in the product manufacturing industries. Whether it has been developing control systems for the cement industry or for the extruded plastics industry, EPD creates and manages raw electrical power so that businesses can function profitably and efficiently. Furthermore, John Janik is regarded as a bit of a genius when it comes to harmonics and harmonic mitigation. While there is seldom a right or wrong answer in dealing with harmonics, or even a published science book to guide an engineer, Janik understands the complexity of harmonic interference in power systems. No matter if it’s a manufacturing plant, refinery, or vessel, harmonics is often an issue. EPD is now working on developing systems for the mining industry in South America. From digging for gold to mining other minerals, they all must use electric power and control systems. EPD has recently hired a marketing executive to manage business development in a wide range of industries throughout Latin America. EPD has also done work in wind generation and completed test stands for a large California company that was developing wind farms. The company sees wind generation in South America as a rapidly growing industry. EPD has been able to penetrate a number of industries because of its applications knowledge. No matter how good the equipment is,
PSI
if the application of supplying electrical power is not appropriately managed then the equipment will not function to capacity. Whether it be pumps, cranes, winches, drilling applications, plastic extrusions, kilns, fans and every power application conceivable, Norwood says moving into any industry is easily done. A propulsion unit for a vessel is simply a pump, and the dynamics are the same: A fan moves air and a propeller moves water. From industry to industry, the need to maximize the performance of equipment is the driving factor for systems applications rendered by EPD. EPD is a “Siemens Solution Partner.” It predominantly utilizes Siemens products and services Siemens products in the marketplace. EPD does, however, offer and utilize other major manufacturers’ components to achieve a cost-effective solution for its customers.
EPD Team-Building Over time, EPD has built a team of engineers and designers recruited from Texas A&M and other universities around the South. By virtue of the need for qualified talent, the recruitment of young minds allows the company to send these new recruits into the field with qualified and licensed engineers to learn through on-the-job training. During the ‘70s, power systems were analog, which means they
Explore Opportunities in the Indian Port & Ship Industry
October 23-25, 2008 Bombay Exhibition Centre Goregaon, Mumbai
Organized by:
Port & Ship International India
2008
Certified by:
U.S. Department of Commerce 28 the maritime executive
For more information, please contact Alexi Bustillo at 301-493-5500 or bustillo@ejkrause.com
www.portshipinternational.com
case study : port everglades case study: electronic power design were not computer-controlled. Today, with the proliferation of computer-control technology, the engineering and design of electrical power systems have become a young person’s endeavor. As microprocessor controllers have taken over the electric power systems industry, most systems have moved from simple relay logic to advanced automation. Young engineers tend to be in front of this type of learning curve. Being a leader in the digital age, EPD’s young talent pool tends to be computer-savvy people fresh from major universities who undergo intense field and classroom training while at EPD. Because of EPD’s global expansion and work on projects around the world, the company’s staff and senior management have grown three-fold. John Norwood joined the company a couple of years after John Janik founded it, and Amy Gardner joined the company in 2005 as part of the expansion of EPD to serve as the Vice President of Finance and Administration. Amy brings with her 20 years of banking/finance experience. Together, these three have an eye for bringing in talented engineers to further the growth of the EPD companies. Meeting with their staff in China and Houston, MarEx found that the company is thriving on the energy and enthusiasm of its employees. “Growth is good, but it has to be measured,” said Janik. “We have been fortunate to find the impressive talent needed to build a global company. Everyone has a sense of success, and it is witnessed in their work ethic and commitment to move the company to the next level.” MarEx
is recognized as one of
North America’s leading suppliers of wire rope, fiber rope, related hardware, anchor chain and A.L. Don pilot/debarkation ladders. For 55 years, we have been in the forefront of supplying high performance products incorporating the latest technological advances. Atlantic Cordage is the exclusive distributor of Katradis 8 Strand/ 12 Strand Nikasteel, Improved Nikasteel Mooring Lines, Mooring Wires and Forerunners, in addition to “Defiance®“ brand wire ropes, fiber ropes and heavy marine towing hardware. One call gets you quick delivery from our warehouses in the New York and Houston port areas. Visit us at the
Katradis Booth #574 POSIDONIA 2008
To view our complete catalogue of products, go to www.atlantic-group.com
Atlantic Cordage Corp.
35 Mileed Way, Avenel, New Jersey 07001 Phone: 732-574-0700 • Fax: 732-574-9191 E-mail: sales@atlantic-group.com
the maritime maritime executive executive the
29
executive
interview
Executive
Interview with
MarEx: When did the company begin, and what type of project were you involved with at first? Janik: I started EPD in 1986 as a one man company providing field engineering services. I was also the principle designer/engineer for the generator controls, electric propulsion system, and the dredging power system and controls for a 14,000 horsepower hopper dredge named the “Atlantic-American’ owned by Atlantic Trailing Company. MarEx: EPD is a recognized worldwide leader in electronic power systems. Explain some of the unique systems designed over the years. Janik: At Texas A&M, part of my curriculum as an Electrical Engineering student was to study inverters and converters as well as courses in electric utility design and power systems. I was hired by General Dynamics (GD) right out of school and became part of its F-16 Fighter Jet Power Systems & Controls team. I was fortunate to work on ‘harmonic simulators’ as well as the ‘Stand-by Inverter’ design for the jet’s back-up power system. The F-16 was having issues with its inverter and harmonics at the time, and these problems 30 the maritime executive
were within my scope of studies and knowledge. At the time there had not been much published in the field of ‘Harmonic Analysis,’ and my work at GD put me years ahead of my peers. I even helped review (unofficially) IEEE-519 before it was published regarding Harmonic Problems, Interactions and Propagation for General Dynamics in Fort Worth, Texas. MarEx: Did you ever consider pursuing a career in harmonics? Janik: In a way I did. After leaving GD, I founded Electronic Power Design Inc. (EPD), and got involved in a number of diverse projects that included issues with harmonic environments. The first product I designed was the “EPD-100 Synchronizing Filter Board.” Our printed circuit board allowed many large and world-known companies’ drive systems work in a harmonic rich environment and, in many cases, where they had not worked before. EPD manufactured and sold these printed circuit boards and serviced these power systems all over the world. As a result, we earned a reputation of solving problems for drive systems, even when the actual man-
ufacturer could not solve the problems within their own equipment. MarEx: So, EPD was a problem solver for after market applications? Janik: In the days before digital Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) were available, EPD designed Analog Printed Circuit Boards for specialized applications, such as our “Constant Tension Winch Controls,” which are still in use by DuPont in titanium mines around the world. I believe it was our understanding of how systems applications worked. It’s really been the key to our success. Lots of companies can cut and paste “canned” software application modules from PLC libraries. But, if they don’t have the experience or knowledge to understand the nuances of what and why things need to be done, then unforeseen problems can arise later. We have used this background as a spring board to design: electric ship’s propulsion systems; drilling systems; pipe rackers and riser rackers for large drillships; harmonic filterslarge and small; crane controls; winch power systems and controls; transformers; plastic applications, including mixers and extruders;
All photos this article courtesy of Tim Fulton.
President and CEO, EPD, Inc. and EPD Asia Group
executive
interview
I was fortunate to work on ‘harmonic simulators’ as well as the ‘Stand-by Inverter’ design for the jet’s back-up power system. The F-16 was having issues with its inverter and harmonics at the time, and these problems were within my scope of studies and knowledge. At the time there had not been much published in the field of ‘Harmonic Analysis,’ and my work at GD put me years ahead of my peers. I even helped review (unofficially) IEEE-519 before it was published regarding Harmonic Problems, Interactions and Propagation for General Dynamics in Fort Worth, Texas.
cement kiln drives and ball mill drive systems; dredging power systems and controls; and mining power systems and controls, and more. MarEx: Today, the company is well-known for designing, building, and commissioning integrated power systems. What were some of the issues you had to overcome to compete in the global markets? Janik: First, thing that comes to mind is earning the respect of the multi-national companies. When EPD was a smaller company, it was always an uphill battle. Today, our global reputation serves us well, and our field engineers are working around the world. MarEx: Can you list some of the countries the company has work in? Janik: It’s a very long list. But, I can best answer that by saying, we have worked
it was just easier to put the components anywhere they would fit. And, while it was easier for the ship designers to work that way, it caused lot of big issues during construction. By spreading the equipment out all over the ship, this made the inter-connections of the electrical circuits an extensive and expensive job. Additionally, the many fragile electronic systems were exposed to the welders, grinders,
Marine, BOURBON Offshore, and Guido Perla and Associates. MarEx: EPD works in alternative energy markets such as wind power turbines. Explain the growth of those markets, especially in Texas, which is known as the wind turbine capital of the world. How can your integrated applications be useful? Janik: While, this is a very complex issue
everywhere except Antarctica. And, you never know? MarEx: When did the company begin working with the offshore energy industry? Janik: Actually, much longer than most folks realize. During the mid-90s, EPD was hired to do a retrofit on a large semi-submersible drilling platform. We were tasked to change old, outdated drilling drives for a more modern system. We also built new winch controls, new driller’s console and controls, new mud pump consoles and controls, and a new SCR drive line-up, and more. It was a retrofit that included fiber optics, which was new on drilling rigs. MarEx: EPD designed a new way of constructing electronic power systems in offshore support vessels. Please explain some of the issues that were confronting the owners of these vessels and the approach taken to solve their problems? Janik: It has been our experience that naval architects design a vessel based on the owners’ desired tonnage size, projected cargo capacities, and projected speed requirements. The ship would be designed and the major components were shoved in wherever they would fit. As you can imagine, this approach has serious problems. From our perspective, as the electrical power company, the electrical systems were scattered throughout the vessel, because
painters, pipe workers and other tradesmen while building the ship and a lot of damage was sustained by sensitive components. Obviously, when it came time to commission the power on the ship, invariably some important component was damaged. A lot of finger pointing took place and nobody wanted to pay for the damaged equipment. This type of situation does nothing more than create problems between the shipyard and the vendors as well as between the shipyard and the owners, and nobody wins this kind of battle. As you can imagine, the commissioning process took a very long time with expenses running up over budget, including the lost time and revenues for the ship’s owner. EPD lobbied to be a part of the initial design of the vessel. By working on the initial design, we knew we could solve problems by designing solutions for the electronic controls and power systems. On the Rigdon and BOURBON vessels, our company designed a containerized module that housed the electrical equipment. The equipment was precommissioned and, most importantly, protected from the working environment. Once, the validity of this approach was accepted and it was evident that the construction process had been greatly expedited; we realized that we had been an integral part of a shipbuilding revolution that included Rigdon
to discuss in this venue. Primarily, because it involves power system stability and control and the prevention of undesirable power system interactions with windmills and other alternate energy systems, which are not available to produce power 100 percent of the time. Alternative energy issues have caused utility companies fits. Historically they have stayed away from these types of power sources because the power cannot be controlled in a consistent and reliable manner. With energy costs rising and global warming on everyone’s mind, these same utility companies are now forced to deal with these complex issues. The number of companies with a core competence in this area is rather small, which strategically puts EPD in a very good position to participate in these markets. MarEx: Recently, EPD Asia opened in China. Explain some of the reasons for the investment and what future growth China might offer EPD? Janik: The impetus for our investment in China was a large contract we obtained to build and ship equipment from Houston. Logistically, it just made sense to be closer to the customer. Being across an ocean and outside a time-zone just wasn’t the way I wanted to do business. There were some other benefits as well. the maritime executive
31
executive
interview
Since, our new plant was inside an Export Processing Zone near Shanghai, we were able to mitigate the Import/Export taxes that we would otherwise have to deal with. Additionally, this location also enables EPD in Houston to effectively support the Chinese organization in several different ways. One important factor is that between EPD Houston and EPD Asia Group, we are able to be working for our clients on a normal work schedule 24 hours a day. This allows us to support customers around the world more effectively. Furthermore, from a purely business point of view, by operating our businesses in different economies and on different continents, we can hopefully remove the peaks and valleys from our operations and financials. Currently, we send employees back and forth from China to Houston. Since, the companies are integrated; staff and support can easily be shifted where it’s most needed. MarEx: Today, China has the world’s attention as a major player in the world economy. Tell us about the experience of working with the Chinese, in terms of doing business in the country, and about the quality of the workers. Janik: I must say that this is the most sur-
prising thing of all. Just about every negative thing that Americans think about China is not true, and there are also some positive things that are not true either. All in all though, life in China is not that much different than in the U.S., after one gets used to being there for a while. Our experience in Yangzhou, which is about a 3.5 hour drive from Shanghai, is that the government is very cooperative and helpful, more so than what I have ever experienced in the states. The people are hard working and follow directions exceptionally well. They want very much to succeed. They have a great work ethic and a positive attitude, which is something that easily makes up for their lack of experience. If a company has a good management team in place, the quality of work in China is every bit as good as it is in America. MarEx: Recently, you have partnered with Derek Foster a well known designer of drytype transformers and inductors. In what way does Foster Magnetics compliment EPD’s business? Janik: I have known Derek for many years. Quite frankly, he is the only person I have been able to call and discuss some unusual
project, which is usually followed by, “Can you build that?” Not only has he always said ‘yes,’ but he’s also been able to design a superior system 100 percent of the time. When, I discovered that he might be available to join our company, he and I decided to create a new company to design products pursuant to his knowledge, skills and experience. And since we use these components in our products, it was an easy decision to bring transformers in-house. Derek and I have very high expectations for ‘Foster Magnetics.’ Recently, we secured a new project for a special, very high current, 24,000 Amp, Water Cooled Inductor for the new Magnetics Research Laboratory at Florida State University. MarEx: EPD is a success story in the evolution of today’s power systems for industry. What are your future goals for the company? Janik: Currently, we are researching an expansion program that might include Switzerland, Brazil, Vietnam and Singapore. I am also working to turning EPD into a more vertical market oriented company. But, while staying focused on the energy industry, a sector that I have been committed to for over 22 years. MarEx
Unique Hydra Maritime Services (Pty) Ltd has been established as a separate specialist Marine Electronic, sales and service division following Hydra Marine (Pty) Ltd becoming part of The Unique Maritime Group FZC. South African based Unique Hydra Maritime Services (UHMS) are now the authorized sales and service support centre for Kongsberg Maritime products in South Africa. The operations of UHMS now extend to the entire maritime market throughout the African continent. The Unique Maritime Group has thus expanded the extensive range of specialist marine engineering, sales, service and support solutions available to the Middle East, Asian and US Oil and Natural Gas markets, to include the African continent. The following Maritime products are thus sold, with service support available by UHMS. s $YNAMIC 0OSITIONING 2EFERENCE 3YSTEMS s 6ESSEL #ONTROLS -ONITORING s #ARGO #ONTROLS 3ENSORS s )NTEGRATED "RIDGE 3YSTEMS s &03/ 2IG !UTOMATION Kongsberg Waldo Fourie /PERATIONS $IRECTOR Unique Hydra Maritime Services (A Unique Maritime Group Company) Tel +27 21 534 3600 Fax +27 21 534 3610 Mobile +27 (0)83 585 7393 Service E-mail kmservice@hydra.co.za Website http://www.hydra.co.za Group Website http://www.uniquegroup.com
32 the maritime executive
HOW DO YOU BUILD A TOP-PERFORMING TUGBOAT WHILE REDUCING EMISSIONS AND IMPROVING AIR QUALITY?
ASK FOSS.
INTRODUCING THE WORLD’S FIRST HYBRID TUG. With its efficient combination of batteries, generators and main engines, the hybrid’s power management system will allow this first-of-a-kind tug—that will look and perform like her sister Dolphin-class tugs —to be both powerful and green. This adds up to unbeatable service along with less pollution and noise. To make it happen, it took all of us. Foss Maritime thanks the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach for their generous support. To learn more about Foss, contact us at (206)-281-3864 or visit www.foss.com.
NORTH AMERICA • THE PACIFIC RIM • EUROPE • SOUTH AMERICA AND AROUND THE GLOBE
nautical nodes offices afloat
By Barry Parker
Nautical Nodes for Offices Afloat
In the early 1970s, a group of forward-looking and influential U.S. shipping executives began thinking about a satellite network for the global maritime industry. They hired an engineering team from Comsat to detail a vision for such a system. This work led to Marisat, a 1976 U.S. endeavor, and preceded the 1979 founding of Inmarsat, originally under the auspices of the United Nations. The advances in maritime communications, no longer futuristic, have brought Internet capabilities to ships at sea. Shortwave has been largely superseded by satellite communications. This article gives an overview for the busy maritime executive of the leading providers of satellite communications services and some of their more exciting maritime offerings. The Dawn of a New Age Crew retention and the desire to keep morale high aboard vessels is a central problem confronting maritime companies throughout the world. Often, this category includes keeping crews connected with their families, sometimes half a world away, through email and telephone calls. But other morale boosters could be television and video feeds. Michiel Meijer, Maritime Market Manager for Stratos Global, said, “One of today’s most effective ways to improve shipboard life for seafarers is to provide advanced voice, private emails and SMS communications systems that are powerful, economical, easy to use, and available away from the bridge.” The next level in crew communications – providing crewmembers with Internet access – is expected to become the norm in the coming years, according to Meijer and other providers interviewed by MarEx. The business side, now fueling the growing uptake of high-speed service at sea, might include the time-sensitive transmission of electronic chart updates. Globe Wireless, an industry leader, reports that remote engine monitoring is driving its clients’ uptake of higher speed, “always on” communications. Stratos’ Meijer, in describing a host of new applications, also cited the burgeoning area of remote IT support, telling MarEx, “Vessels are complex systems, with fewer people aboard than in previous years. They may need remote access to get support from specialists ashore.” Investors have increasingly demonstrated their confidence in the business of maritime satellite communications, which has been driven by dual trends – privatization and 34 the maritime executive
consolidation. Inmarsat morphed from a quasi-UN organization to a financial stock market offering (with the intermediate step of privatization followed by investment from Apax Partners and Permira). Private equity firm BC Partners recently took control of Intelsat – another satellite network with its origins in the 1970s. Globe Wireless and Broadpoint, both owned by private investors, have built their businesses serving seafarers, with the burgeoning offshore oil business playing an important role. Both have expanded internationally. Providers have ramped up through mergers and acquisitions to better serve customers. Stratos, owned by a Canadian investor group since late 2007, has grown through horizontal mergers. It is a distributor of Inmarsat services, but it is also a sales channel for Intelsat (with more than 50 “birds” deployed in high orbits) and Iridium, a system in “Low Earth Orbit” (LEO). In the U.S Gulf oil patch, Broadpoint, a provider of voice and data services to the offshore industry, has also chosen the merger route as three smaller companies have combined to help it pursue its international expansion. In mid-2007, Globe Wireless’s acquisitions of Seawave (an onboard, least-cost voice and data message router) and Rydex (a maritime email provider) cemented what Globe President Frank Coles had called Globe’s “ability to provide airtime over a wide variety of communications pipes.”
Inmarsat’s “FleetBroadband” Service The big buzz in the marketplace centers around Inmarsat’s formal introduction of
its much-heralded “FleetBroadband” highspeed data and voice service. Inmarsat’s Piers Cunningham, who oversees its maritime business, tells MarEx that “FleetBroadband will be the new standard for high-speed maritime Internet communications. It’s different from VSAT. It operates on a different band with much smaller antennas. It’s based on the Broadband Global Area Network (BGAN) platform that has operated successfully for land-based users since the rollout in late 2005.” Cunningham added, “FleetBroadband will supersede a family of Fleet maritime products that were rolled out beginning in 2002. For us, it’s a natural evolution of our maritime portfolio. We expect the uptake to occur over the next 18 to 24 months.” FleetBroadband (operating in the “L” Band of the satellite spectrum, which enables smaller antennas than those required for V-SAT’s “C” and “Ku” bands) offers data speeds of up to 492 kb/sec. Once the third of Inmarsat’s Fourth Generation satellites is operational, later in 2008, the new system will offer nearworldwide coverage. Stratos, as the world ‘s largest distributor of Inmarsat services, is offering FleetBroadband to shipping customers, and Michiel Meijer stressed that “As FleetBroadband antennas are small (35cm/60cm), the installation process is rapid. Ships won’t be delayed. They can maintain their commercial trade schedules. It’s a standard IP service that can be seamlessly integrated with the head-office network.” MarEx asked Meijer, in the process of still finalizing the pricing on the new offering, why a shipowner would choose FleetBroadband instead of a service such as
nautical nodes offices afloat
“The industry is increasingly regulated. There is heavier demand for data exchange. The tanker segment is trailblazing now. It is trying many new applications…”
OceanVSAT, provided by Intelsat. He explained that “Both pipes are similar. They both support similar throughput speeds. It really depends on the expected usage of the channels. VSAT pricing is fixed irrespective of usage, so it’s a better deal for a heavy user, while FleetBroadband customers pay according to their usage.” In describing FleetBroadband, Inmarsat’s Cunningham told MarEx, “We know that many parts of the maritime industry want increased bandwidth. FleetBroadband comes in two flavors. Both support 4kbps voice, Group 3 fax and standard 3G SMS functionality.” Cunningham further explained that, “Our FB500 package offers standard IP connectivity of up to 432kbps, with guaranteed or ‘streaming’ IP data rates up to 256kbps. It also supports 64kbps ISDN connectivity for legacy applications. The above-deck dome diameter is around 57cm, and weighs about 18kg. The FB250 configuration offers 284kbps, with streaming IP available at up to 128kbps. The dome is smaller, about 25cm diameter, and lighter, at around 2.5kg ” Both Cunningham and Meijer talked about a world of video-based applications and customers who were exploring new ways of working to enhance operational efficiency. Through Meijer’s extensive customer contact, he sees customer demand increasing for communications tied to applications that reduce fuel consumption, either directly through engine performance monitoring or indirectly through more efficient weather routing aided by frequent chart and weather map downloads. Cunningham stressed that “The indus-
try is increasingly regulated. There is heavier demand for data exchange. The tanker segment is trailblazing now. It is trying many new applications – for example, in remotely looking at emissions. The freight market has been good in tankers, and other sectors, including IT and communications, have supported new applications.” Another exciting application is Frontline Communicator, a wireless node allowing video transmissions to be uploaded from the vessel. Meijer described a recent onboard product demonstration where shore-side engineers could see what their colleague aboard the vessel, with a helmet-mounted camera, was seeing as he examined a malfunctioning diesel engine. Cunningham explained that Frontline Communicator, running through a Fleet 77, was used to provide Internet video feeds of onboard conditions in sailing’s Volvo Ocean Race.
Sea Tel: Antenna King One member of the original Comsat team, Bob Matthews, the recently retired founder of leading stabilized antenna provider Sea Tel, has never looked back since its founding in 1978. Sea Tel holds patents on the familiar marine satellite antenna housed inside a radome. Today, Sea Tel offers stabilized antennas for voice and data communications and for satellite TV (a big attraction for merchant crews and for yachting customers). Intelsat has now announced that Sea Tel’s “9707” C Band antenna will be supporting enhanced service on Intelsat’s new C Band service. According to Peter Broadhurst, Sea Tel’s Vice President for Sales, “We have 25,000 successful installations. We were the first to
bring VSAT, Direct-TV, L-Band and X-Band to maritime satellite communications.”
Broadpoint: Provider to the Oil Patch
Broadpoint is “new” in name only, the result of rebranding that occurred after the merger in 2007 of three stalwarts in the oil patch: Petrocom, Coastel Communications and SOLA Communications. “The individual businesses go back more than 25 years,” says Broadpoint CEO Ken Wright, who cut his teeth engineering communications networks for far-flung mining operations. Wright explained that the business combination and financial infusion will support Broadpoint’s move “…toward industry leadership. We need a wide range of offerings to serve our customers. We now have the base, a critical mass, to move to a much higher level.” He described a strategy of “following the customers and their assets abroad – to offshore Africa, India, the Middle East, and the Pacific Rim. We’ve been in the Gulf of Campeche for ten years.” In elaborating on Broadpoint’s strategy, Wright told MarEx: “The new company is far more than the ‘sum of the parts’ of the three business that we’ve put together.” The Broadpoint business builds on Petrocom’s pioneering cell phone network in the Gulf of Mexico, serving users exploring for and producing oil and gas, and myriad of others supporting them. “We have a large GSM network – the Petrocom legacy – and we have roaming partners all over North America. Our users are installing WiMax networks aboard vessels,” Wright said. He described the company’s mantra as “moving the enterprise communications environment to the offshore sector.” These days, that environment includes capabilities such as remote engine or process monitoring, and also leveraging the capabilities of experts on shore. Wright, like Cunningham and Meijer, told MarEx that video applications have been a big driver for broadband applications. In Broadpoint’s case, a number of customer executives have been motivated by forensic applications, where recordings are available for insurance or investigative purposes (after an accident). “Through VSAT,” he said, citing another important application, “an engineer in the office can watch the view from a ROV in real time – for example, in well intermediation or in an underwater pipeline repair.” the maritime executive
35
nautical nodes offices afloat Stratos’ OceanVSAT Brand
“Deck space is valuable on vessels in the U.S. Gulf. The smaller footprint of the new antennas greatly expands the marketplace. Mid-tier companies and outfits with smaller boats can now consider VSAT.”
Stratos is a distribution partner for both Inmarsat’s FleetBroadband and Intelsat’s C Band Network Broadband Global Maritime Service, which Stratos markets under its OceanVSAT brand. Stratos’ Meijer told MarEx that “Stratos is the largest supplier of mobile satellite services to the maritime industry. OceanVSAT offers global, always-on broadband access for a fixed monthly fee. We also offer customer network management, application support and installation, and maintenance of terminals on vessels. Customers choose us because of our extensive portfolio of value-added services.” An example of those value-added services is Stratos’ AmosConnect Crew service, which combines private email, text messaging and international calling. In talking further about OceanVSAT, Meijer mentioned two additional features that meet fleet managers’ demands, “It offers an Automatic Beam Switching system, which seamlessly transfers service between Intelsat’s satellites, eliminating any manual interference. The second feature, Intelsat’s Global Network Monitoring System, lets a fleet manager monitor all remote locations from a single monitoring site, probably the head office.”
Globe Wireless – “A Network of Networks” Globe Wireless, describing itself as “A Network of Networks,” is vertically integrated, with its satellite communications distribution
capabilities augmented by its own digital highfrequency radio network. Frank Coles said, “As an independent company, we work with customers to recommend satellite communications systems to suit their requirements.” In response to demand for high-speed connectivity from its customers, numbering some 500 ship operators, Globe announced two important distribution agreements. Iridium, a constellation of 66 low-earth-orbiting satellites, has appointed Globe Wireless as a Charter Distribution Partner for its new OpenPort service, which will offer a Broadband internet protocol (IP) data plus voice lines. With speeds up to 128 kbps, the cost will be lower than higher-speed services and “allow us to continue to meet our customers’ increasing requirements for bandwidth while maintaining cost control,” said Coles. Globe Wireless has also been selected by Intelsat to be a distributor for its Network Global C Band service (where speeds can reach as high as 2 mbps), and is a Virtual Network Operator (VNO) for the service. “We can build and manage fleet-wide networks for our customers,” said Globe Wireless’ Shane Rossbacher. The IT manager at a new Globe customer, Rederiet Stenersen in Bergen, Norway, commented, “Globe Wireless’ VSAT services will allow us to offer better services to our crew for browsing, email and voice calling, while at the same time improving communications between ships and our offices.” Stenersen’s fleet includes 13 chemical/product tankers on the water now, and six newbuilds.
Small and Powerful The evolving antenna technology and smaller footprint have also con36 the maritime executive
tributed to the growth in satellite communications. Broadpoint’s Ken Wright underscored this point, saying, “Deck space is valuable on vessels in the U.S. Gulf. The smaller footprint of the new antennas greatly expands the marketplace. Mid-tier companies and outfits with smaller boats can now consider VSAT.” Sea Tel’s Broadhurst tells MarEx, “With the increasing popularity of VSATs and the higherpower satellites, Sea Tel was able to manufacture smaller VSAT antennas in the 1m size. We have now moved to the 60cm size with our Model 2406. This allows smaller vessels to take advantage of the fixed pricing of VSAT services. Smaller vessels are all now trialing the 2406 and the options and applications it brings.” Though technology drives the communications business, the personal touch still counts. Broadpoint’s Wright told MarEx, “We are relatively small compared to giants in the business, but we use that to our customers’ advantage. Small means nimble with quicker decisions. It’s actually a core strength.” MarEx GLOSSARY - C Band (3400 to 4800 mHz), Ku Band (10700 to 12750 mHz), Ka Band (19000 to 22000 mHz), L Band (800 to 2000 mHz), X Band (7000 to 9000 mHz)
The Independent Provider of Maritime Communications & IT Solutions
Broadband Broadband Communications Communications
Other Communications Communications HF HF Iridium Iridium Inmarsat Inmarsat GSM/GPRS GSM/GPRS Fleet Fleet Broadband Broadband
Iridium Iridium OpenPort OpenPort VSAT VSAT -- Regional Regional Ku Ku VSAT VSAT -- Global Global C-Band C-Band
Messaging Messaging & & Data Data
ShipShape ShipShape Applications Applications Forms Forms Archive Archive Fleet Fleet Tracking Tracking Virus Virus Protection Protection IT System IT System Support Support
Globe Globe i4 i4 GlobeRydex GlobeRydex Globe Globe Wireless Wireless GCC GCC
www.globewireless.com
Phone +1 (321) 308-0112
Sales@globewireless.com
one step ahead veson
IMOS: Integrating Data to Create Sound Maritime Business Strategy
veson Nautical Offers a user-Friendly and Flexible Platform that allows customers to Stay One Step ahead in the ever-changing Global Shipping markets John veson
By MarEx Staff
If asked, any shipyard executive will tell you tell you that the last fifty years of the twentieth century brought change to seagoing vessels primarily in terms of size. The introduction of ULCC tank vessels and 12,000-TEU container ships was most often regarded as the most visible bellwether of change at any shipyard. Most notably within the past decade, the advent of technology on board any marine vessel has eventually taken the place of size as the primary change and improvement in ocean commerce. In the business of running these very same vessels, it could be argued that the processing – and efficient analysis – of information has run along similar lines. Although the Master of a tramp steamer no longer runs the business of his ship or decides where to go next, the input of his data into a flexible, standardized software platform will potentially have everything to do with whether or not he has a job on the following voyage. Some things never change: The noon position and bunker consumption reports still go from the ship to the office every day. What happens to that information once it arrives ashore is another story. And that’s where Veson Nautical comes in.
coMpUteRS And oceAn coMMeRce: gRowing Up togetheR The PC arrived on board ocean carriers of all types more than two decades ago. That grimy box sitting in the ship’s office or cargo control room performed a myriad of tasks ranging from the calculation of stability and trim characteristics for a particular vessel to planning cargo stowage, keeping track of a ship’s payroll accounts and, later, developing into a touch-screen device that controlled critical ship’s engine and cargo systems. Those customized, typically one-dimensional programs have grown up, replaced and/or augmented by shore-based technical software that helps to manage maintenance cycles and 38 the maritime executive
even monitor the temperature of a critical turbine bearing via broadband connection to an office 9,000 miles away. Slower to follow was the trend of more sophisticated technology on the operations side of the equation. Today, the utilization of software to streamline data analysis and provide more cogent decision-making in the boardroom is now becoming all but standard practice in most companies. One company that has quickly moved its focus from producing customized software solutions to providing a standardized platform for marine business is Veson Nautical, based in Boston. Long a player in the marine software game, Veson traces its roots back in 1979 to devising distance tables and voyage-estimating software.
MARitiMe RootS + cUtting edge technology = MeASURAble iMpRoveMentS After company founder Michael Veson pioneered the automation of port-to-port distance tables for use in early voyageestimating software, he turned his attention to meeting the individual needs of countless worldwide maritime clients. In 2003, Veson’s son, John, took over the firm and, leveraging
its maritime legacy, he took that focus in a new direction. Veson’s Integrated Maritime Operations System (IMOS) is the most visible manifestation of that effort. At the close of 2007, over 70 companies worldwide had chosen IMOS as their primary tool with which to manage and organize their business. IMOS consists of three core modules: Chartering, Operations and Accounting. A fourth module, OnBoard, can be used to build complete solutions for bulk carrier, tanker, container and barge companies. John Veson touts his IMOS platform as the most technically advanced and complete chartering and operations system on the market today. The most recent release employs a Microsoft.net framework to enhance functionality, user-friendliness, system stability and graphical presentation. Because of this, he says, experienced office personnel can hit the ground running, using known data sets from multiple sources and producing definitive analyses of complex shipping problems. The real value of IMOS rests somewhere between the efficient integration of multiple streams of data and the accurate forecasting that can drive the decision process. Rather than replace an existing accounting system,
one step ahead veson
however, IMOS fully interfaces with and takes data from financial systems such as SAP or Oracle and then integrates that data with information streams from other sources. IMOS users therefore enjoy the functionality of being able to engage any number of variables into their decision-making rather than dealing with multiple spreadsheets in a standalone environment.
Specific Applications: Managing Physical Risk and Financial Pitfalls From the standpoint of voyage accounting alone, the IMOS platform is probably worth its weight in gold. From a twenty-twenty hindsight position, the IMOS “true cost” determination uses transferred data, integrates it into company-generated information and provides a bottom-line analysis of a particular voyage charter. Showing budgeted assumptions versus actual data, the platform provides what John Veson characterizes as “packaged consulting.” In real time, IMOS provides built-in “views and warnings,” turning the conceptual (potential) voyage into something “actual.” Veson says that his clients have come back to him with tales of the voyage charter that they didn’t fix because IMOS showed them in advance what the business would cost. Charterers are the fastest growing part of Veson Nautical’s client base. Focused on the commercial side of the business, IMOS naturally assists charterers in booking their fixtures. There is also a vetting component, which pulls information from SIRE, Fairplay and other sources to help manage the vetting process. But unlike other systems, which merely crank out data for assessment, the Veson vetting module can provide an instantaneous approval or rejection of a charter choice, based on preset rules determined by the charterer and dependent on their particular threshold of risk. Veson recognized
early on that vetting IS part of the business decision and, because of it, customers can now balance their commercial decisions against the risk presented by an unsafe ship or operator. Even the best financial deal will be a failure if it is founded on the use of an unsafe or otherwise commercially undesirable (non-performing) vessel. The right software platform can mean the difference between accurate forecasting and mere data collection. And while John Veson dislikes the use of the term “plug-and-play,” the IMOS is billed as the superior out-of-thebox trading module to assess risk and exposure to market conditions. The IMOS add-on feature, says Veson, can help charterers lock in freight rates – limiting downside exposure – by using Forward Freight Agreements (FFA). In simple terms, the operating performance of a particular tanker company’s spot tanker segment can be measured in net revenues per revenue day, or time-charter equivalent (TCE), and includes the effect of forward freight agreements (FFAs), which may be entered into as hedges against a portion of the company’s exposure to spot market rates. Predicting exposure and performing “what if” scenarios, John Veson says, “IMOS let’s you look at the overall freight position and see if you can hedge your exposure to freight markets. In simpler terms, IMOS is a planning tool for determining which tonnage to use to move a particular cargo.” Because FFAs are an integral part of many ocean-shipping company’s business activities, the IMOS Trading Module enables users to have a unified picture of all physical and paper trades. IMOS can be used in many other ways as well. Interfacing with AIS systems, the platform can verify the statement of facts, manage “time-bars,” and create a standardized demurrage solution by generating a freight statement. Additionally, IMOS, partnering with third party information, can be used to manage bunker fuel purchasing by maintain
ing a constantly updated database for pricing at individual ports while also tracking on board consumption.
IMOS Onboard: Up and Running In November 2007, European oil refiner and marketer Neste Oil Corporation became fully operational on Veson’s IMOS platform for the purpose of better managing its fleet of 30 tankers. Veson’s IMOS now enables Neste’s Shipping Division to operate its large tanker fleet more efficiently and profitably, from the onset of the voyage to the financial tie-out. “The greatest benefit we have experienced is having an integrated system that handles chartering, operations and accounting,” explains Joakim Kärkkäinen, Vice President of Neste Oil Corporation’s Shipping, Finance and IT Department. The independent northern European oil-refining and marketing company regularly moves refined product from its two Finland-based refineries. With a total refining capacity of approximately 250,000 bpd, Neste also employs about 4,500 people. On the other side of the equation, Broström Tankers AB, headquartered in Göteborg, Sweden, was one of the first users of what would eventually become Veson Nautical’s full-fledged Integrated Marine Operations System (IMOS). The company has been leveraging IMOS for its chartering and operations activities for more than a decade. In 1993, Börje Forss, Chartering Manager at Broström Tankers AB, and Michael Veson, founder of the predecessor of today’s Veson Nautical, began working together to create a tailor-made solution for Broström’s chartering calculation needs. Börje Forss explains, “Originally we had a DOS-based calculation program, but it did not have the functionality or power we needed. Michael Veson approached us with the beginnings of a solution and we started working together. Michael is a technology expert who understands the the maritime executive
39
one step ahead veson needs of the shipping business.” As a respected logistics company, Broström serves the oil and chemical industry and its needs for marine transport solutions. The company runs approximately 35 vessels – owned, partly owned and some on commercial management – operating mainly within Europe. Today, Broström vessels make as many as 2,000 voyages per year, transporting cargo for major oil companies such as BP, Chevron Texaco, Exxon Mobil and Shell, among others. The long relationship enjoyed between Veson and Broström is, perhaps, ample proof that Veson software provides a competitive edge. “With IMOS, we can always evaluate which cargo is the best for each vessel. In addition, the ability to combine voyages is both significant and unique,” remarks Forss. “I’m sure we make better decisions because when you have a good calculation tool and you can combine voyages, it’s truly a benefit.”
chASing the bottoM line: the StAndARdiZed AppRoAch to Shipping Perhaps the number-one reason to consider an integrated maritime operating
of technology solutions, IMOS will certainly be among the products being vetted for managing the business of maritime commerce. It is far too early to say that Veson’s IMOS platform will eventually become the benchmark for integrated management tools, but the
system – IMOS, for example – is to catch the errors that might be made through the use of stand-alone or less interactive management systems. In fact, says John Veson, “Many clients initially run our system in parallel with their previous systems. This
John Veson dislikes the use of the term “plugand-play,” the IMOS is billed as the superior out-of-the-box trading module to assess risk and exposure to market conditions practice helps them to catch errors and see where they might have been saving money in the past, had they been on board with IMOS from the start.” With more users coming online as the value of its software becomes more widely known, Veson is gearing up to meet the expanded challenge. Already with a strong European and U.S. presence, its Singapore office has been up and running since September 2007. Veson now has 27 employees and is looking to expand even further. As industry continues to evaluate the adoption
early vision of Michael Veson certainly set the stage for what was to come next. The same integrated sophistication considered standard on the technical side of the shipping equation is now available for maritime players who want to run those physical assets in a more efficient and productive manner. It’s not too late to climb on board, but as they say in the shipping business, “the Captain is singling up the lines now.” Not to worry: John Veson will hold the gangway a little longer for you. MarEx
HSEQ MANAGER - ABERDEEN International Ship Management Company has an immediate requirement for an HSEQ Manager based in its Aberdeen office. Focus will be to drive safety, environmental, legislative compliance forward and achieve industry-leading HSEQ performance. Successful candidate must have strong background, expert knowledge, practical experience and certification in ISO14000 & OSHAS 18000 auditing; proven HSEQ track record in shipping industry with special focus on tankers/offshore PSV’s preferred. Must have Master’s license (tankers & offshore vsls, preferred); experience/ability to carry out inspections, incident investigation, training, root-cause analyses and ability to liaise with Oil Majors & Charterers at the senior level. Familiarity with Aberdeen area a plus. Exc. Salary and benefits pkg. offered.
RISE™ Cable & Pipe Penetration System ™
Save space, time, money & lives
Applicants must have immediate right to live and work in the EU.
Tested to worse-case conditions and approved by ABS, BV, DNV, Lloyds, NAVSEA, USCG & TC
Qualified candidates, E-mail Resumes to Ravenship@gmail.com
Naval Architects & Owners: Demand the best - specify RISE™
JNR. SUPERINTENDENT/OFFICE ASSISTANT Aberdeen
Office Assistant required to assist Tech. Superintendent monitoring a fleet of PSV’s out of our UK office based in Aberdeen. Role will include assisting in technical, purchasing, operations and administrative matters of the fleet. Min. req’d: OOW (STCW95) Certificate of Competency pref., Shipboard exp on Offshore vsls, knowledge of offshore ops in North Sea (deck or engine); competent with MS Office. Salary based on experience. E-mail Resume to: Ravenship@gmail.com. 40 the maritime executive
Contact us for a copy of our free booklet:
Everything you should know about cable and pipe penetrations to ensure a safe vessel.
Quality Integrity Safety CSD Sealing Systems, LLC 21 Meadowbrook Lane Gilford, NH 03249 Tel. 603-293-0100 info@csdsealingsystems.com www.csdsealingsystems.com
400 Years of Combined Legal Experience in the Offshore Oil Industry FOWLER RODRIGUEZ VALDES-FAULI
The Energy Partners
George J. Fowler, III 32 Years - New Orleans
Alanson T. Chenault Professional Mariner
Antonio J. Rodriguez Professional Mariner 34 Years - New Orleans
Mat M. Gray, III
Norman C. Sullivan, Jr.
41 Years - New Orleans
37 Years - New Orleans
T.C.W. Ellis Of Counsel
Robert R. Johnston
57 Years - New Orleans
14 Years - New Orleans
Delos E. Flint, Jr.
Jon W. Wise
James K. Carroll
Daniel Lichtl
Edward F. LeBreton, III
16 Years - New Orleans
26 Years - New Orleans
24 Years - New Orleans
33 Years - New Orleans
8 Years - New Orleans
32 Years - New Orleans
Stephanie Skinner
Timothy W. Strickland
Luis Enrique Cuervo
George Gaïtas
Justin Renshaw
Wayne Pickering
17 Years - New Orleans
15 Years - Houston
20 Years - Houston
30 Years - Houston
8 Years - Houston
17 Years - Houston
Houston 713.654.1560
Miami 786.364.8400
New Orleans 504.523.2600
Mobile 251.344.4721
Bogotá 011.571.313.4488
www.FRVF-Law.com fowler_drill.indd 1
3/10/08 10:19:44 AM
china
feeding the dragon
BOURBON Goes Down Under: The Subsea Market Beckons
after Divesting Non-core assets in Order to concentrate on its maritime Business, BOurBON ceO Jacques de chateauvieux Now turns his attention to the Subsea and rOv markets
By Joseph Keefe
The transformation of Groupe Bourbon into a pure, maritime-oriented company has been a careful and well-planned journey. The same company that evolved from a small sugar cane refining firm based in the Indian Ocean after World War II, and later pioneered the retail and modern shopping mall industry in Vietnam, is now entirely focused on operating a fleet of modern marine vessels. A major player in the offshore industry also providing bulk transport, the firm has once again begun to look outwards for ways to maintain its position as one of the world’s largest marine employers. BOURBON continues to grow by leaps and bounds, with 2007 revenues exceeding 2006 results by more than 25 percent. And while some CEOs might be content to continue to drive down the same road in 2008, BOURBON has, instead, put new attention on its Inspection, Maintenance and Repair (IMR) Activity. This Activity, created in part by the December 2007 purchase of DNT Offshore, signals BOURBON’s intention to more fully enter the deepwater offshore subsea markets. DNT is an Italian company specializing in continental or deepwater offshore inspection (up to 4,000 meters) with fully electrical Cougar and Falcon-type ROVs. Created in 2002, the company posted a 24 percent increase in revenues in 2007. The firm had a total of 44 employees before being acquired by BOURBON. Although the DNT Offshore group is widely recognized for the qualifications of its team and the quality of its fleet of remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), BOURBON’s position in this market is still relatively modest. That looks to change, and quickly. Specifically, and in order to keep pace with the strong growth in this sector of the offshore marine 42 the maritime executive
business, BOURBON will augment its existing fleet of 11 vessels with orders already placed for 19 additional units, including the latest order for a series of 10 GPA 696 IMR vessels for 450 million euros, whose design is specifically adapted to this type of operation. BOURBON’s Horizon 2012 plan also calls for increasing the number of ROVs in its fleet from seven to 21 units by 2012. The total investment, which will be in the hundreds of millions of dollars, includes orders for at least 16 new ROV units. BOURBON’s new Subsea Services Activity will include installation engineering and a definition of work procedures, design and supply of specific equipment or supervision and execution of offshore installation work, feedback management and updating of trends in subsea structures and project management. As always, the hallmark of any BOURBON business plan calls for the latest generation of IMR vessels, adapted to the specific demands and needs required by deepwater inspection, maintenance and repair interventions. The new focus comes out of the gate leveraging the expertise of DNT Offshore, BOURBON’s latest subsidiary, which has six years of experience and a fleet of seven ROVs to conduct a wide variety of inspection, maintenance and repair operations on subsea structures. BOURBON is not new to the subsea markets, but CEO Jacques de Chateauvieux naturally sees additional, promising prospects opening up in this booming market. And the demand for subsea services and ROV technology won’t go away any time soon. With crude oil prices now firmly north of $100 per barrel, multinational oil companies are now looking at reinvigorating old wells that, while not deemed profitable to run when oil was worth half of what it is now, could now
produce more than satisfactory revenues. Beyond this, the move to deepwater for the purposes of exploration is also ramping up the requirements for subsea support. And, of course, all of the offshore equipment installed in the previous ten years will need inspection and maintenance support as well. Certainly, the flush cash position of many oil companies is making the decision to explore deeper and farther offshore that much easier. As always, BOURBON enters a particular market by first ensuring that its employees are well trained for the task at hand. As such, a new Italy-based ROV simulator will come on line in mid-2008 to join the other anchor-handling simulators already run by BOURBON. Hence, the BOURBON model for success and growth is intact within its newest effort to expand into this rapidly growing sector of the maritime markets. The focus on the subsea side of the maritime equation will, according to Jacques de Chateauvieux, be built using the same timehonored business strategy that has already produced a global operator of more than 236 vessels. In the short term, and while day rates may have plateaued, BOURBON’s position is further solidified by the fact that about 85 percent of its fleet is engaged in long-term charters of at least six months, with a good portion of that tonnage engaged on time charter for two to three years. BOURBON’s CEO calls this strategy, “One of moderation, but also one that creates stability.” In other words, by agreeing to a more moderate – but still profitable – long-term day rate, BOURBON usually avoids and mitigates the risks associated with a more appealing spot rate. The strategy, based on their most recent financial disclosures, is serving them well. MarEx
DISCOVER
Discover a better bottom line
Look to the horizon, to an abundance of black ink. Telemar will help get you there. Telemar maintenance contracts aid your bottom line. They protect your communication and navigation systems, to keep revenue flowing. They also control cost, so operations overhead is no longer a guessing game. Ultimately, Telemar gives you the time and money to advance your business — to discover a new financial world.
,IMIT RISK #ONTROL COST "E FREE s s WWW TELEMARUSA COM
Telemar USA
LLC
managing
risky business
Damen Shipyards: Uniquely Managing “Risky Business”
By Joseph Keefe
Kommer Damen Sits on Top of the Global Small Vessel Shipyard Market From the American side of the big pond, the discussion over shipbuilding techniques and economics will always and inevitably turn to the high price of domestic steel, unfair subsidies enjoyed by foreign-based shipyards, the vertical integration of the Korean yards and a myriad of other factors. These and other variables, say many industry observers, prevent U.S. yards from effectively competing in the global marketplace. Today, shrinking domestic capacity creates backlogs that may look good on order books but do not necessarily bode well for the coming downturn from the most robust U.S. shipbuilding market in half a century. One international company may hold the key for shipyards everywhere to not only survive the next downturn but also profit immensely under those conditions. This time-tested business concept isn’t rocket science and certainly wouldn’t be difficult to initiate. On the downside, however, embarking on the road first traveled by Damen Shipyards almost 40 years ago would not be without risk. Properly managed risk can and does bring substantial rewards. That’s where Kommer Damen comes in.
RISKY BUSINESS: EARLY VISION Kommer Damen is not the shipbuilding pioneer in his family. Not by a long shot. From a modest start based out of just one shipyard in 1927, the Damen Shipyards Group has grown to a global force consisting of 30 shipyards and related companies. But the great majority of that growth came after today’s Damen Shipyard Group’s CEO arrived in 1967, fresh out of college. Damen showed an aptitude and a genuine affection for the 44 the maritime executive
shipbuilding business, and he quickly became an important part of the Damen family management team. He also began to formulate ideas about which direction the business should take, how that could be accomplished, and why. At the time, many of those ideas were not well received. By 1969, Kommer Damen had enough faith in his standard design concept for boatbuilding that he proposed the idea to his father. In a nutshell, the younger Damen wanted to build and stockpile standard hull forms for various types of vessels. The rationale for this effort would be to offer potential clients (a) shorter lead time for delivery, (b) a more standard vessel design that could easily be serviced in an economical fashion and (c) a lower overall cost. In the end, lacking the confidence of his father and other management team members, Damen bought the shipyard and heavily leveraged himself in the process. The rest of the story, as they often say, is history. The footnotes and details, though, are fascinating.
DEFINING THE DAMEN STANDARDIZED APPROACH The shipyard business model championed by Kommer Damen is a simple one: Maintain a high stock of standardized hull forms; consistently use the same propulsion equipment and technology over the broad reach of any number of newbuildings; educate customers as to the advantages of purchasing tonnage from a “series,” and promise them shorter lead times for delivery. The risks of such a practice, as pointed out to him by many others, exposed his business to failure if orders slowed down. In that case, he would be left
with a sizable inventory and no one to deliver it to. That metric, however, never developed. The Damen approach extended far beyond the simple stockpiling of hull forms.
GLOBAL REACH: SIZE DOES MATTER, AFTER ALL… By 1973, Damen had already begun to grow his global sales network. His system of delivering a prompt and reliable product had begun to pay off. Eventually, the Damen Shipyard Group would expand to a global presence of over 30 shipyards and related companies. Damen-built boats could now be serviced all over the globe, using his standardized inventory and equipment process. The Damen Marine Services group devel-
managing
oped a model for providing technical service in places not very well developed. Partly as a result, Tidewater Marine Service, a wellknown offshore supply and services company, has become a big customer. With at least 12 of its 34 operating companies located abroad, the Damen Group now averages about 130 deliveries annually, with sales last year that reached $2 billion. Those vessels are exported to 117 countries and, predictably, series production accounts for 75 percent of those deliveries. Since 1969, Damen Shipyards has delivered more than 4,000 vessels using a global workforce that has expanded to almost 10,000 employees. With those kinds of numbers Kommer Damen has the luxury of continuing to operate and provide service in places where others might hesitate. But the practice also creates brand recognition and brand loyalty across a broad range of small to mid-size vessels, including tugs, workboats, high-speed craft and ferries, dredging equipment, cargo vessels, fishing vessels, short sea and inland vessels, naval and patrol boats, mega-yachts and a host of other platforms. In any given year, output for military or law enforcement use can amount to as much as thirty percent of Damen’s volume. That Damen can deliver more than two-thirds of those craft, year after year, in series production is remarkable.
NOT YOUR AVERAGE “USED CAR” LOT AND OTHER FORMS OF REAL INNOVATION The Damen way of doing business has many other, perhaps less visible, downstream
benefits for its many clients. As he perfected the series production of countless types of vessels from a predictable supply of stockpiled hull forms and standardized equipment, Kommer also embarked on developing a focused program of providing planned replacement boats for the previous-generation ships. Damen ships, that is. Through and with other subsidiary companies such as Damen Trading & Chartering and Damen Marine Services, Damen actually will buy back certain vessels from a client as well as allow that client to lease and charter Damen newbuildings. The leasing of a Damen newbuilding allows a potential buyer to take a Damen prototype vessel out for a test spin, so to speak. And the secondhand vessel taken back by Damen usually turns out to be an easy one to refurbish and refit, using his standardized inventory and propulsion systems. The end result is that the value of a used Damen vessel can often fetch a premium in the aftermarket. Last year alone, Damen built and delivered more than 160 vessels and, remarkably, took in 30 to 40 trade-ins as part of that business. Typically, Damen’s trading and chartering arm will have five or six used vessels in stock. Because a Damen ship is often sold with “a buyback guarantee,” this aspect of the total Damen business structure is likely to remain in place. Loyal customers continually come back to purchase, lease or trade-in for what they know will be a standard and reliable product down the line. For the buyer who wants all the bells and whistles, “standard” does not have to be synonymous with “plain vanilla.” Indeed, says Kommer Damen, “We are building X-bow vessels and tractor tugs using one of our standard hull forms, providing high-output engine performance and low vibration.”
BETTER SERVICE IN GOOD TIMES; SURVIVAL IN THE DOWNCYCLE When business falls off – and ultimately it will – Damen stands ready to deliver vessels to prospective buyers in a much shorter time frame. Unlike shipyards elsewhere that live for today and continually suffer through the cycles of “boom and bust,” the Damen Shipyard Group believes in continuing to build even in the lean times, at least to the point where it can perhaps halve the delivery time for a buyer, eliminating costly waiting time for component delivery. After all, the Damen approach allows for innovative design within set parameters of standard equipment choices. And as Caterpillar’s biggest worldwide customer, the standard equipment pack-
risky business
age on a Damen-series vessel is anything but second-best. The Damen business model takes the practice of preparing to survive, as opposed to failing to prepare, to a higher level. Even in the good times, Kommer Damen says, “We try to keep a few shipyard slots open for our best customers.” He readily admits that it isn’t always possible, but with a global network of shipyards he is arguably better positioned to make the concept work than anyone else. Finally, when the crunch does come, it only makes sense that the firm with the best inventory of pre-positioned parts and hull forms will be able to produce the least expensive vessel in the shortest amount of time. Just imagine a U.S. shipyard trying to compete with the Damen machine in the early 1980s!
LESSONS LEARNED: COULD U.S. FIRMS FOLLOW SUIT? Even with the terribly weakened dollar and a robust backlog at most U.S. yards, the American shipbuilding machine probably has only a remote chance of duplicating the unique Damen business model. In the past, series-built vessels in the United States were the exception rather than the rule. When this did occur, the practice was usually limited to a few vessels, after which the Jones Act appetite for new tonnage would weaken. Ten years later, a new design would have to be put together from the ground up. The Japanese and the Koreans have long known that real economy of scale is created by producing dozens of vessels in the same fashion, quickly and to a high standard. For a generation of international deck officers, walking into the control room of a Japanesebuilt VLCC meant revisiting a cargo control system that he had seen time and time again on many other vessels. In today’s (still) red hot domestic shipbuilding market, some vessel series are being produced again. Notably, Aker Shipyard in Philadelphia is producing a standardized product tanker for coastwise use, and it’s already delivered a number of these into service. And at General Butch King’s VT Halter yards, a series of back-to-back barges for ATBs are being cranked out. Kommer Damen even says that he has partnered with more than one U.S. shipyard on design packages, one of which is constructing a vessel for the United States Coast Guard. Nevertheless, it is doubtful that anyone in the domestic U.S. shipbuilding business is building hull forms for vessels that have not yet been ordered. Still the maritime executive
45
managing
risky business
less likely is the prospect of anyone offering to buy back what they’ve already sold. Perhaps it is time for them to start. 2012 will be here before you know it.
THE DAMEN STANDARD: ANYTHING BUT BUSINESS AS USUAL When the next down market arrives, Kommer Damen will promote the use of Damen Shipyards as a way to get quicker delivery of a lower-cost vessel, backed by various guarantees unheard of elsewhere. That vessel, once delivered, can operate in most places and know that a Damen shop of some kind is virtually right around the corner. Hence, the term “downturn” may actually have no place in the Damen Shipyard nomenclature. Although Kommer Damen told MarEx in March that he had no spectacular plans for acquisitions or business moves in the works, he did say, “We are slowly and incrementally increasing our capacity in the Far East.” This potentially lays the groundwork for Damen to beat the Japanese and Koreans not only at their own game but also in their own backyard. Which led us to our last question: What about expanding the Damen standard-design
concept to larger vessels, such as VLCCs and 10,000-TEU container ships? Kommer Damen didn’t need to think very long before answering, “Absolutely not. We are already the big boys in the small boat markets. There we have a better survival strategy and business scenario.” Enough said. The biggest hull ever produced in a Damen yard measures about 220 meters in length by 32 meters breadth, with a deadweight capacity of about 13,000 tonnes. That’s how it is likely to stay as long as
Kommer Damen is in charge. The largest volume global supplier of small vessels in the world already enjoys an enviable market share, supported by a very simple business plan. Why more yards haven’t moved to duplicate at least part of what he has assembled is a mystery. But to be fair, even his father would be astounded at the position enjoyed by his son’s business empire less than 50 years after the inception of a single modest yard in the Netherlands. MarEx
Are Your Costs Under Control? SPAR offers specialized products and services for shipyards, government and ship design agents: Independent cost estimating Shipyard planning/scheduling & project management support PERCEPTION® software for shipyards (new construction, repair and plant maintenance) integrates cost estimating, planning, purchasing, inventory, manpower, and project performance tracking & forecasting.
927 West Street, Annapolis, MD 21401 Tel: 410 263 8593, Fax: 410 267 0503
www.sparusa.com 46 the maritime executive
NORDIC S H I P C O N S U LTA N T S I N C .
We are a marine consulting company established in 1980 and operated by Merchant Mariners with extensive operational experience with the ocean-towing industry world-wide. We have a long track record of success. Our services include sales & purchasing of tugs, barges, offshore/AHTS vessels, G/C vessels, ferries, cruiseships, etc. Traffic and projects analysis with management services for existing or start-up businesses. We manage donations of commercial vessels with maximum tax credit benefits for U.S. owners.
www.nordicship.com
954 524 0025
PMI
MITAGS
The Leaders in Simulation Training “Of all the initiatives I got involved with in Bermuda, the MITAGS (simulator) database and relationship has to be the most satisfying.” Barry Coupland, Former Director of Bermuda Marine and Port Services
Lot C
2
Lot B
1 RES IDE
NC E
Lot A
CE ER EN CO NF ER CE NT
Lot D
A MIT AC AD
EM
GS
IL IC BU
DI NG
S
3
4 MITAGS Linthicum, MD
PMI Seattle, WA
MITAGS 692 Maritime Boulevard Linthicum Heights, MD 21090 Toll Free: (866) 656-5568 www.mitags.org
PMI 1729 Alaskan Way South Seattle, WA 98134 Toll Free: (888) 893-7829 www.mates.org
prevention, MARAD’s New Focus: not reaction utility, credibility and partnership continued from page 16
Assistance to Small Shipyards In 2008, $10 million was appropriated for a new loan program providing assistance to small shipyards, but the 2009 budget includes no funding for continuing this initiative. The funds, which only arrived in December, nevertheless have the potential to do some real good, especially in places that sustained significant damage during the hurricanes of 2005. Connaughton told MarEx in February, “We have published a Federal Register notice about its availability. We are taking applications until the end of this month and making the awards
Today’s MSP fleet is modern with a good vessel mix. Age limitations create a regular change in tonnage with newer vessels replacing older models. Working closely with the U.S. Transportation Command, MARAD tries to accommodate them by bringing in more roll-on/roll-off and multi-purpose vessels. Connaughton adds, “We’ve been able to work with the operators and make that mix a reality.” The good news for MARAD is that there is a waiting list. The program has a statutory limit of 60 vessels, and the incentives to participate are clearly significant. Beyond the payments to the operators, participation opens the door for bidding on U.S.
On MSP: “This is a great opportunity for us to partner with industry. And the $2.9 million allows these operators to defray some of those uniquely American costs – taxes and labor, for example.” in April. The authorizing language defines it as a shipyard of 600 employees or less.”
MSP Program: Going Forward for the Right Reasons The Maritime Security Act of 2003 authorized 60 ships for the Maritime Security Program (MSP) and a $2.9 million payment per ship for 2009. The increased numbers are good news for MSP participants. Connaughton cautions, “Obviously, there is a difference between authorization and appropriation. At this point, we are authorized to spend up to $2.6 million per vessel. So this was a big deal for us to get the Administration’s support – no recision – and ask for a $2.9 million per vessel appropriation.”
Government cargoes. Connaughton remains bullish on both the concept and the benefits to the participants. “This is a great opportunity for us to partner with industry. And the $2.9 million allows these operators to defray some of those uniquely American costs – taxes and labor, for example.”
Student Incentive Program (SIP)
Getting more cadets on board commercial vessels is only one part of the equation. MARAD’s real drive has been to increase the number of mariners being produced. One way to do that, says Connaughton, is to ensure that the cadets on these commercial vessels are SIP students. He adds, “The SIP Program is there for a reason. It is not a student loan program per se. Quite simply, the program ensures that students Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestures take the license track and become reserve www.maritimemad.com officers. When they Are you ready to sell your business or are you ready to graduate, they will sail expand your business through a merger or acquisition? on their licenses.” This year’s proWe focus on the maritime industry worldwide. posed increase from $4,000 to $8,000 per Contact: Capt. Johan Schild, M.Mar./MBA Phone 251-626-0713 student is intended 7226 Bridgewood Lane Cell 504-650-5000 primarily to stop the Spanish Fort, Fax 251-447-0423 bleeding from the AL 36526 USA E-mail info@maritimemad.com license track programs
MARITIME M.A.D, Inc.
48 the maritime executive
at the state academies. Although the number of license track cadets has remained constant, the number of SIP students is actually decreasing. Connaughton is adamant: “The need is OUR need, not their need. If we can demonstrate that we are attracting more cadets because of it, then we will pursue more money. Right now, there is no cap on the SIP program in terms of numbers of cadets. And until recently, we’ve been turning money back into the Treasury because we haven’t spent it all. Those SIP numbers are going down – we’re trying to change that.” Connaughton has also laid down the gauntlet for those who would casually take the money and then fail to carry through with their responsibilities. He told MarEx flatly, “We are taking action against King’s Point graduates, and we’re also evaluating the possibility of going after state school graduates. In fact, we just received our first $120,000 check from a King’s Pointer and we’ve been able to cut active duty orders for Iraq for another King’s Pointer so as to force him to fulfill his obligations. We are working with the Navy and the Department of Justice on this.”
Ship Disposal: Obsolete RRF Fleet Vessels Probably no task on MARAD’s plate is more difficult than the mandate to safely dispose of the obsolete RRF vessels in the three MARAD fleets. New rules imposed by the Coast Guard to clean the hulls (of organic growth) before the vessels depart for their final disposal have made the job even more onerous. Although MARAD has been able to work very closely with Texas and Virginia, no such cooperation exists with California. Connaughton explains, “We’ve had a very difficult time coming to any sort of collaborative effort in California. They were concerned about paint and other materials coming off the hull during the cleaning process.” Nevertheless, Texas and Virginia signed off on new procedures developed to address these fears. Today, there is a moratorium on ship disposal in California. Connaughton adds, “We’ve been sued by the National Resources Defense Council over the Suisan Bay fleet, suing us to remove the ships but getting an injunction to prevent us from removing them.” He adds, “California’s loss has been Texas and Virginia’s gain. We took out 23 ships last year, one of the highest removal rates we’ve ever had.” Not satisfied with the status quo, Connaughton is implementing new procedures and guidelines to streamline the dis-
prevention, MARAD’s New Focus: not reaction utility, credibility and partnership
the maritime executive
49
prevention, MARAD’s New Focus: not reaction utility, credibility and partnership posal process in the future: “In the end, we have an overarching environmental excellence initiative, which we began when all of these problems started. Essentially, we looked at all our fleet operations to figure what we’re doing right and what we’re doing wrong. That process is now nearing completion.” The goal is to develop a cross-government protocol for ship-disposal procedures, using the MARAD environmental study as a guide.
So Many Things to Do, So Little Time Connaughton is not one to wax nostalgic, but with January 2009 on the near horizon he was willing to reflect for a moment: “If I look back at what we’ve done, I think we’ve been able to refocus MARAD to address the things that are most important to industry. When you do that, opportunities naturally end up presenting themselves. Probably one of the most important things we’ve done is to restore some credibility to the agency – throughout government and with the industry that it serves.” In the next ten months, Connaughton’s labor of love will be a national port strategy. Looking at the land side and water side of the equation – pipelines, rail, the entire intermodal
system – he hopes to effect real improvements at not only the ports but the entire system of moving cargo in and out of the ports: “We want to identify the bottlenecks. We also anticipate MARAD taking a greater role in port development, in streamlining and shortening the time period to get all the regulatory permits in place, and I point to our efforts in Anchorage, AK as a good example of this.” As MarEx went to press, MARAD was also undertaking port improvement projects in Honolulu and had been approached to do port improvements in Guam. Adds Connaughton, “We have other ports coming to us to talk about one-stop-shopping – getting the federal and private stakeholders together to try and shorten the regulatory process to four or five years instead of ten.” The revival of the short sea shipping concept was a bright spot for MARAD in 2007. Connaughton and his boss, Mary Peters, are bullish on the concept. He says, “We are now thinking about the marine highway – not generically – but working closely with states and local governments. We are very close to two or three projects that are about to happen.” And that, if it happens, would eventually take traffic off the highways. One way to
Why Spend Too Much for Your AB to Mate Program When You Can Get ALL of the USCG Approved Classes and Assessments for Much Less in Sunny South Florida!
get there is to repeal the Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT) as it applies to the short sea component. Most observers say that the tax acts as a disincentive to short sea shipping and has a minimum impact on the U.S. budget. With industry and MARAD support, a repeal of the short sea HMT could happen this year. If it does, it would certainly be another feather in Connaughton’s cap. With time winding down on Connaughton’s tenure, the New Year also kicked off with MARAD trying to get an MOU signed with the Transportation Command and DOD in an effort to enable the use of RRF assets for civil emergencies. The program is to a point where MARAD can offer FEMA and local governments the use of vessels for contingency plans. Given what happened with Katrina, the idea makes a lot of sense.
January 21, 2009 Connaughton was noncommittal about his next move in a post-MARAD world. “I am one of those people who have gotten to where I am by not worrying about the next job. I do the best job I can with my current job and opportunities do present themselves.” Look for that trend to continue. MarEx
patented
Listing# E212282
MARINE SANITATION DEVICE
SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM USCG CERTIFIED; LLOYDS REGISTER APPROVED TO IMO STANDARDS FOR WORLD WIDE ACCEPTANCE NO CHEMICALS REQUIRED PATENTED CROSS-FLOW SEPARATION TECHNIQUE LOW MAINTENANCE QUIET, ODOR FREE PERFORMANCE EASY & AUTOMATIC OPERATION WITH PROGRAMMABLE FEATURES
Custom Biological Systyms Availible
Touch Screen Control Panel
CONSTRUCTED OF TOUGH, CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIALS SMALL FOOTPRINT & LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN CAPACITIES UP TO 190,000 LITERS PER DAY PLC WITH COLOR TOUCH SCREEN DISPLAYS AND AUTOMATES ALL VESSEL WASTE TANKS INTO MSD
MARITIME PROFESSIONAL TRAINING 1915 S. ANDREWS AVE., FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 +1.954.525.1014 • www.MPTusa.com • info@MPTusa.com
Financial Aid Available!
50 the maritime executive
Approved For Veteran’s Training
TIDALWAVE HMX Marine Sanitation Devices provide advanced wastewater processing. By utilizing chemical oxidation, hydro-maceration and patented cross flow separation techniques, a sterile, dechlorinated effluent is achieved. An electrocatalytic system generates sodium hypochlorite from seawater to eliminate consumables. PLC automation permits the treatment technique to be customized after installation to treat varying hydraulic or organic loads, and meet future performance standards. From marine sanitation’s global leader in marine aluminum or steel construction with a flexible, ceramic-loaded epoxy coating.
WWW.HEADHUNTERINC.COM 3380 SW 11th Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33315 Phone: 954-581-6996 Fax: 954-587-0403
zero ADM Thad Allen: discharge positioning for the future continued from page 17 sive to them – because that’s my job as the Commandant. If I am not responsive, then you can hold me accountable.
Soundings Admiral Allen’s four-year term expires in May 2010. With twenty-one months of service already behind him, we asked ADM Allen to outline just a couple of initiatives that would best exemplify the Coast Guard’s transforming itself to meet the heightened expectations of industry and the general public. Here’s what he had to say: ALLEN: Last July, we stood up to our new acquisition organization and started to assume the role of lead system integrator for Deepwater. We’ve stabilized the National Security Cutter technical baseline, and we’re poised to take on the responsibilities that we need to and redefine our relationship with Integrated Coast Guard Systems (ICGS). Secondly, last year we commissioned our “deployable operations group” that takes our echelon of deployable special forces under one command in order to adapt a force package equal to whatever incident you are talking about – hurricanes, heightened security situations, etc. We’re talking about port security units, environmental HAZMAT strike teams, maritime safety and security teams – all of them. Under one command, we can now pick and choose the force package to match the threat. Two huge successes. What could you have done better? ALLEN: Fixing and upgrading the Unified General Ledger – I probably should have put more people on that sooner. As recently as 1986, if we wanted to produce a combined financial statement, we had each of the districts mail in a disk and we’d combine them all at headquarters. So, in response to that, we centralized finance in two MLCs and, within a year, we knew we’d made a mistake. That resulted in the creation of a single Coast Guard finance center in 1988 or 1989. But even then we didn’t get it right, because certain Coast Guard centers remained as standalone finance centers that dealt directly with the Treasury. So we had a uniform financial system but no unified general ledger. We still don’t today, and that’s why we can’t pass an audit. We won’t be there until 2010. The Coast Guard has taken considerable heat for not keeping pace with the demands put upon it by present and past administrations and current events in general. We asked Allen if
he felt these “failures” were more of an internal issue or simply the long-term consequence of inadequate funding and resources. Here’s what he had to say: ALLEN: All of the above. There are internal issues and there have been external funding issues. There have been external policy and legislative decisions. We’re always going to have surge operations. If you are a multimissioned organization, with five defined missions per vessel, it also means that you can’t do five missions at once. Any surge we did with Katrina was a temporary surge – not a fundamental realignment of our resources. 9/11, on the other hand, changed the way we think about port security and maritime security. There may have been some migration at the sector level to accommodate the local commands. But we had holes in the marine safety department before 9/11. So 9/11, while it didn’t exacerbate those holes, it did for a while make them absolutely invisible. So I think we just kind of let it (marine safety) sit for five years. The real holes in marine safety were made in the mid-1990s when we also put a hole in the Coast Guard. As the streamlining of government took place, we took a huge hit, losing 4,000 people. Just a little while ago, we finally got back up to the strength we had in the mid-1990s. We actually spent about two years of doing not much else except figuring out how you operate while you are taking $400 million and 4,000 people out of the Coast Guard.
Deepwater/Acquisitions/ICGS Allen talks freely about Deepwater issues and the way forward in reorganizing the Coast Guard so that it can stand up and manage a competent acquisition program: ALLEN: I talk to (Navy) Secretary Winter a lot – and he helps me a great deal. It is important to note that there’s no Secretary of the Coast Guard that does acquisition for us. The Coast Guard also does not have a systems command like NAVSEA or NAVAIR. In the mid-1990s, we were constrained in our capacity and we were told that we could expect no more than $500 million per year for the life of the project. We had a fleet of vessels that were approaching block obsolescence. Well, the decision that we made at the time – rightly or wrongly – was to hire a systems integrator and tell them, “Here’s what we have to replace, with $500 million per year. Give me a portfolio of how we can acquire new assets and extend the life of the old assets.” At the time, there was no other way that we could
recapitalize the Coast Guard. We had to outsource to the lead integrator a lot of the functionality defined in NAVSEA. I told my people: If you are going to sign a contract to deal with Integrated Coast Guard Systems, you’ve got have an integrated Coast Guard. We did not. We did not take our engineering staff – which is a great engineering staff – and integrate them with the program office. So we tried to execute this procurement with ICGS with some disenfranchised technical authority. They said, “We’ve designed cutters for you in the past. We’re the people that used to do this for you. We haven’t been involved in the procurement and, when we have an issue with it, we can’t get it raised out of the integrated product teams.” You have two issues: the growing fear within the Coast Guard that we’re leaving key decisions to the contractor, and the wedge being driven between our technical people and the program shop and contractor. Allen speaks to refute some of the press coverage that occurred when the Deepwater “story” broke: ALLEN: When the news broke in the press in January of 2007, somehow it was like people were hearing it for the first time. We weren’t rebutting the fact that issues were being reworked – I knew that myself and had been working on it for five or six months. There was no recognition of that whatsoever. We were basically shouted down. There were significant organizational, cultural, funding and policy issues that resulted in how we got to where we were. But as I told everybody when I got down to Katrina, “That was then, this is now.” Today, ICGS is in a position where it has to demonstrate that it adds value or we do something else. The best example of that is that we ultimately took back and completed the fast-response cutter. We’re doing that ourselves. There were vessels out there in the price range that could perform the way we wanted them to, and there was no premium to having ICGS as the middle man.
At Home in Homeland Security With a history of being housed under more than one department over the years, Thad Allen is clear about the Coast Guard’s proper place – and internal structure – within the federal government: ALLEN: We’ve found the right home. If you were to draw a diagram encompassing all of our missions and responsibilities and those of DHS, that diagram has never been more approaching concentric than now. It’s not the maritime executive
51
zero ADM Thad Allen: discharge positioning for the future perfect, but it’s never going to be with us. The early construct of the revenue cutter service was the first Department of Homeland Security. Alexander Hamilton once wrote something to the effect that “Vessels stationed at the entrances of our bays and rivers would at very small expense be useful symbols of the laws.” That is our organizational DNA. So we have always been homeland security – they haven’t called it that at times, but we’re maritime border security. In the late 1790s, we were the only maritime force the country had, with the dual character of providing law enforcement but also being an armed force. I’ve said we were never structured right
marine safety community itself. The rest of the Coast Guard should’ve taken a cue from NMC to centralize our delivery of national service through service centers. So not only should we be looking at our business models to unify our backroom functions; we ought to be looking at how to unify the service we give to the public. We do have some lack of integration out there.
Selling the MeSSAge Allen’s management style is to have his people manage “up” as well as they manage “down.” Allen himself knows that he must “manage up” better (to Congress/DHS Secretary/the
…every time we need to go and get a new class of cutter, it becomes a referendum on whether or not we need the coast guard. that’s a tough environment to live in. to begin with – there are two parts to that. Before 1986, every Coast Guard district had an engineering staff, a finance staff, and everything was done regionally. This evolved from the early days of the Coast Guard and the revenue cutter service and the U.S. lightsaving service. Back in those days, because of the way communications were, these geographically-based districts were self-sufficient. One of my predecessors, ADM Paul Yost, for reasons of economy, felt that we needed to centralize support functions. And so he established a working group in 1986, on which I served, to move the support and engineering functions out of the districts so they could focus on operations – much in the same way a corporation would. But at the time, and because of Flag politics, quite frankly, we sub-optimized that by creating two regional maintenance and logistics commands on each coast under the area commanders. Every time one of these things comes around, we seem to know the right thing to do but we don’t quite get it 100-percent executed. Over the years, then, we have sub-optimized responses to external drivers. What about NMC (National Maritime Center) – did you centralize this for the same reasons? ALLEN: No. That decision was taken separately from the finance discussions. That’s a service or a product line. The idea to centralize there was actually spawned inside the 52 the maritime executive
Administration) when trying to sell budget requests, legislative programs and the general organizational agenda: ALLEN: First of all, I’ve pushed the decision process down in the Coast Guard, to free me up to work more outside the building. In the past, we’ve never had a close relationship with CNO or any of the other secretaries. Today, however, I get a lot of great mentoring by interacting with Air Force Secretary Wynne. He’s a great person to bounce things off, and he has a great acquisition background. Today, when the Joint Chiefs are meeting with the President, I’m in the room. I’m invited to go to any session I want. That wasn’t always the case, was it? ALLEN: It kind of comes and goes, depending on the Secretary of Defense. Secretary Gates has been an extraordinary leader. I can call the SecDef any time I want if I have a problem. And Secretary Chertoff, if I need to get to him at any time, I can get to him. I’ve also started a series of meetings with people that we are strategically aligned with, where our areas of concern overlap from time to time: NOAA, the head of the EPA, the Secretary of Transportation, etc. I call them up and I go see them. What about Congress? ALLEN: I spend a lot of time up there. My legislative affairs staff will tell you I’ve probably been up there as many times as any Commandant in history. The other thing that we do is invite, on a regular basis, a member
of Congress to come over at 0745 hours. We start in my office with a light breakfast and have a “one-on-one” executive session about what’s going on, and we roll down to the eight o’clock ops briefing and sit through that. Then we have the overnight Intel briefing. Most of the time, recently, that brief has been about drug interdiction and some of the challenges we’ve been having. We can also customize a briefing as to what that particular member’s concerns are. They’re out of there before the Congressional day starts. We are averaging about one of those a week. They like it – they are effective – and we’re gong to keep doing it. DHS has held a number of national and regional summits to address the issue of “the small boat threat.” A myriad of special interests want “exemptions” from any AIS (Automatic Identification System) solution. Allen has couched the solution first in terms of safety. As port security goes, he says that one size does not fit all, but there’s much more to the solution than that: ALLEN: Well, as Jim Loy would say, “If you’ve seen one port, you’ve seen one port.” (Laughter) But seriously, I can understand if people in America don’t want this “invasion of privacy,” but what I don’t understand is not wanting to have the discussion. Because in five years, after I’m gone and a fastboat comes out of the Bahamas and cuts through the hull of a cruise ship coming out of Miami, I don’t want that to have occurred because ADM Allen had a lack of imagination. I feel that it is incumbent upon me to bring the debate. Before the Motorboat Safety Act of 1971, we were up around 1,700 deaths per year. We’ve plateaued in the last five years at 600 to 700 per year, but we’ve always thought there was an issue with boating safety, even before 9/11. There is no uniform competency standard, and that’s why you see 14-year-olds dying in jet ski accidents. That’s why we’ve always pushed for a national standard, to reduce the number of boating deaths. Now the real reason for tying in safety with security is that they are interlocking. Any improvements you make in safety ultimately benefit security and vice-versa. The biggest issue we have with marine security right now is that we do not have an existing national infrastructure upon which we can build a maritime security regime. The aviation system that grew up in the twentieth century has an air traffic system because the prospect for an air disaster is so large. We have dramatically reduced aviation accidents in this country by having ubiquitous
Yantai Raffles wins OTC Spotlight on new Technology Award 2008 Visit us at OTC 2008 booth no. 5969
‘TAISUN’
RESHAPING THE FUTURE OF SHIPBUILDING PROCESSES Yantai Raffles 20,000 MT gantry crane - The ‘Taisun” - is a state-of-the-art equipment specially Engineered to facilitate the building of rigs and other super-sized offshore vessels such as semi-Submersibles and FPSOs. Now operational, Yantai Raffles is ready to take on bigger and more complex offshore marine projects. Key advantages of the ‘Taisun’ in the shipbulding process include: s 5SE OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY s 3IGNIlCANT TIME SAVINGS s )NCREASED SAFETY LEVELS s 3UBSTANTIALLY IMPROVING QUALITY AND PRODUCTION CAPACITY With proven engineering capabilities, cutting-edge yard facilities and a highly skilled work force, Yantai Raffles is geared up to be the world’s Yard of Choice.
For further information, please visit www.yantai-raffles.com
zero ADM Thad Allen: discharge positioning for the future coverage, persistent radar surveillance. That also produces a security premium. We’re not trying to take away anyone’s civil liberties. Someone came up to me recently and said, “Driving is a privilege; boating is a right.” So I pretty much know who I’m dealing with here. And there is a case for competency standards for recreational boats. There’s only so much benefit you can derive from the electronic solution. But the technology is there. Still, it would be hard for us to make a case to drive down AIS requirements significantly further unless we have the capacity and the capability to understand and process that information. Right now, our
understand that the Straits of Hormuz, Straits of Malacca, Gibraltar and the English Channel present unique challenges to shipping. If we’re talking potential passages in the Bering Straits, then we ought to be talking to Russia right now about traffic separation schemes and navigation systems. The current policy statement for the Arctic is imbedded in a document formulated in 1994. It doesn’t take into account the more open waters up there, the modern technologies for oil and gas exploration, and the fact that we operate the world’s largest zinc mine north of the Arctic Circle. That also has to come out of there by boat. It is time for that document to be refreshed.
we don’t have the luxury to train everybody to be an expert at everything, but we can bring someone into our “centers of excellence,” train and then send them on… mandate through the Maritime Security Act is to drive AIS requirements down to all vessels 65 feet and above. That’s law. It’s backlogged, so you may not see it on my watch. Reacting to outside circumstances has become business as usual for the Coast Guard. Allen points to one example of where today’s Coast Guard has looked internally and made the necessary changes before a “crisis” precipitated it: ALLEN: Operations in the Arctic. I’ve had no direction from the top on this one. I am seeking it now. We have to start looking at environmental response, search and rescue, and patrolling in an area that didn’t have water. We’re going to be sending some units up there to test their capabilities at high latitudes next summer because there’s water there and we have responsibilities. If you understand at all what is going on in the world, then you
M7DJ;: # :;7: EH 7B?L; HEBB;H JH79A =H7L?JO :7L?J JH7?D?D= FKHFEI;I EDBO#I;7JJB; 7H;7 9EDJ79J0 @KB?; A;?C @KB?; QWjS 9ECF7II9EKHI;I$9EC .--#I;7#8KEO -)(#(.,/
54 the maritime executive
MARine SAfety: eARning bAck the tRUSt Allen finishes up by talking about the plan to enhance the Marine Safety Program by splitting it into three general areas: (a) improving capacity and performance, (b) enhancing delivery of service to mariners and industry, and (c) expanding outreach and advisory mechanisms for industry and communities: ALLEN: We need to bring people on board, put them in place and train them. It is going to take a while to ramp that up. “Outreach” is where we’ve moved right away because I’ve got to have credibility with the marine community. I’ve told Chairman Oberstar that I’m responsible and that involves senior leaders talking to senior leaders. I’ve recently started a senior leadership forum where we’ve had ten major executives in from every phase of the maritime industry – including labor. Nobody’s been more engaged with industry than me. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been to Houston. We have some ports where we have a fairly homogenous fleet and the work is not very complicated. In a fishing port you can get pretty good,
pretty quick. Then you have ports that have high concentrations of crude, LNG and/or container ships. And we’re working closer with the offshore industry than we ever have before. So we’re going to create “centers of excellence” around those product lines in those ports. We don’t have the luxury to train everybody to be an expert at everything, but we can bring someone into our “centers of excellence,” train him or her and then send them on to the port where they can best use those skills. When I was in Miami, we started a one-week course on cruise ships – sort of a precursor to today’s centers of excellence. But that’s how these centers will eventually evolve. The President’s FY ’09 budget includes an additional 276 new Marine Inspector positions and other program enhancements intended to improve service and restore balance in the Marine Safety Program. Allen expends on where they will come from and how many will be needed: ALLEN: We’ll be recruiting and looking across the broad spectrum of everything maritime. We’ll be looking at the federal and state maritime academy graduates – we have a particularly good relationship with California Maritime right now. We need to look at places like Webb Institute and MIT and take people with degrees and put them through OCS. We have to look at how we’re training these people. What headcount is good enough? ALLEN: We have to look at the gaps in each product line, what is the total gap and what’s the highest priority gap to fill first – based on risk. But we’re talking thousands, not hundreds here. Look at the Arctic: We have emerging threats there. We’d like to attack them before they hit us (for once). National AIS is coming too. And let’s face it, in comparison to the other armed services – and we are nowhere as big as they are – it doesn’t take much of an increase in force to give us a huge surge in capacity. We’ve got some training issues, but most of the problems we’ve had since 9/11 have been related to capacity. The challenge with marine inspection is that it involves almost totally human resources. So many of our other missions are platform-based; we can track those missions by the hour and calculate costs. Marine inspection is quite different. Ultimately, we need to understand the cost of an inspector’s time and what he is doing with his time. We also want to send the right people to the right ports where their expertise is best placed. MarEx
PG-MACS £
- a new agenda has been set for Offshore Supply Vessels Features; -
No dedicated dry-bulk pressure vessels! Drill Cuttings & Haz Rig Slops transported below deck Extremely flexible tank-configuration! Block coefficient dramatically improved Discharge of dry bulk down to batches of 4m3 enabled! 100% continuous dry-bulk discharge! ORO NOFO 2005+ conform!
-
Integrated MACS-tanks = yard supply – special tanks avoided!
-
All Dry- & Liquid Cargo handling over one LCC, fully IAS-integrated!
Østensjø Rederi - ST 216 MACS PSV
Bourbon Offshore - PX 105 MACS PSV
2 vessels for 2007 & 2008 delivery 8 x PG-MACS tanks dedicated for Drill Cuttings
4+4 vessels for 2009 & 2010 delivery 8 x PG-MACS full flexibility tanks full
Farstad Shipping - UT 751 MACS PSV
Harms Offshore PSV 1400 MACS
1+1 vessels for 2009 & 2010 delivery 4 x PG-MACS full flexibility tanks
2+2+2 vessel for 2009 & 2010 delivery 14 x PG-MACS full flexibility tanks
PG Marine Group - Ing Per Gjerdrum AS Tlph.: +47 66 77 56 00 Tfax.: +47 66 77 56 01 E-mail: pg-pumps@pergjerdrum.no Home-page : www.pg-marinegroup.com
marex crossword puzzle 1
2
3
4
5
11
6
7
8
12
9
10
13
14
15
16
17 18
19
20
24
21
25
28
22
26
23
27
29
30
31 32
34
35
36
37
38
41
39
42 45
46
47
48
33
40 43
A L L I S I O N
44 49
D R Y S C
M S A A N F E R A W N C F I S A C O S K Y C
C D O E S C I O B U A S N A N E I O I L O
O M P L T A I L N H M E S U S B S D O C T M N C E S H R I F T O N I A M A R P A E R N E
I A N C S H H O A R K E T O R F O L A I G
N C E O S H A R T E S E R T E H R S E A H O D S E N U E N E T M Z A I M R N A H A X I D
Solution to previous edition’s puzzle 50
51
52
55
56 58
60
53
54 57 59
61
Crossword by Myles Mellor Across 1. Freight rate measurement (3 words) 11. Mined metal 12. Executive position, abbr. 13. A very long time 14. The “buy-and-build” holding company ready to meet the deepwater challenge 15. Backwards, at sea 18. Iranian __ Bourse 20. Maritime environment 21. Tonnage 24. Roth or Trad? 27. Solution from ash percolation 28. Captain’s record 29. Type of miles 32. “Monster-in-Law” star 34. Alternative energy source to oil (2 words) 40. Hull member 41. Inside, prefix 42. Opposite of aweather 44. Such in Spanish 45. Small vessel shipyard giants, Kommer ____ 48. Former 49. Cycle or miran? 51. Maine to the US 52. Reputation 54. Overnight stay place 55. Standardized specialty of 45 across 56 the maritime executive
56. Gives a makeover to a boat 58. Merchant Seaman Protection and Relief Act 59. Be in debt to 60. Risk 61. Using the latest technology Down 1. Critical business focus for any maritime company (2 words) 2. Airport abbreviation 3. Garland 4. Maritime industry software from Veson 5. Lobbying arena 6. Pull on oars 7. Hello! 8. Northern Europe oil-refining using Veson’s software as an integrated system handling chartering, operations and accounting 9. Pixel component 10. Power supply 16. Profit 17. Fill up the tank again 19. ____ intervention applications 22. Not in good physical shape 23. Gentleman 25. Area in the US which has an estimated 30-40 billion barrels of oil supply (abbr.) 26. Sea motion related
30. Full page or classified 31. Company constructing a vessel for the US Coast Guard 32. Reduce load 33. Acquire knowledge 35. Plus 36. German city on the River Danube 37. Superior (2 words) 38. Russia’s state within a state 39. Observe 43. Type of tax 46. See 50 down 47. Befall 50. Coast Guard Commandant (goes with 46 down) 53. Nevada city 57. Interest rate watchers (abbr.)
Crossword solution to be published in a future online edition of the MarEx e-newsletter. The first five persons who submit a correct, completed puzzle will receive a one-year subscription to The Maritime Executive.