Matt Kreutzer 2015 Arch Portfolio v_2

Page 1

matthewKREUTZER

Architecture 2015



01

urbanBLOCKreMix

02

synergyPOD

03

urbanHEALTH tower

04

paraURBAN housing

05

changingPERMANENCE

Arch 310_Fall 2011

Arch 410_Fall 2012

Arch 411_Spring 2012

Arch 510_Fall 2013

Arch 613_Fall 2014/Spring 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS



2

COLUMNS

3

CORES

PARKING BAYS

12th Street

11th Street

4

10th Street

‘N’ Street

‘M’ Street EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC

[PARKING COMPONENTS]

Site Location

SITE CONTEXT PLAN

Site Plan

180’ - 0” 18’ - 0”

urbanBLOCKreMix 9’ - 0”

ARCH 310:Design Studio Fall 2011 - 8 week project 240’ - 0”

PARKING BAY

[CONTINUOUS SLOPING]

Massing Overview

Located in downtown Lincoln, this project focused on the redevelopment of two city blocks. The massing strategy was developed by a group made up Joe Johnson, Joey Laughlin, Sean O’ Brien and myself. We focused on the idea of creating an interior courtyard raised up a level. This created a public space for not only the building users, but also the general public. The raised level allowed for a level of parking on ground level as well as two levels beneath.

1:18’ SLOPE

ELEVATION [WEST BLOCK]

Parking Diagram

After the initial massing phase was complete, we individually developed separate buildings.


Egress Diagram

Beginning Massing Model

Final Massing Model

TERRACING CORE REDUCTION PLINTH MANIPULATION

Massing Manipulation


4

5

3

DN

6 UP UP

2

5

2

3

4

DN UP DN

5

UP

DN

UP

DN

UP

4

UP UP

UP

UP

7 2

3

1 6

UP UP

UP

6

1

UP

UP

UP

5 9

1

7

8

7

8

6

7 8

7

9 UP

UP

UP UP

UP

DN

UP

UP DN

UP

10

First Floor Plan

Second Floor Plan

1

5 8

Typical Business Floor Plan

urbanBLOCKreMix ARCH 310 Fall 2011 Street View

After the initial massing strategy, I developed the large wrap around building on the eastern block. I began by editing the large massing. Afterwards, I worked on developing the bottom six levels made up retail and business. The retail levels made up the bottom two-three levels and featured entrances not only on the street but also onto the interior courtyard. The business levels in the middle three levels featured areas for public space as well as exterior green spaces.

East Elevation



Axonometric Overview

synergyPOD ARCH 410:Tectonics Studio Fall 2012 - 3 week project The premise for the project was based off the idea of temporary housing either for emergency use or at large sporting events like the Olympics. We therefore designed a single prototypical pod able to be transported on a semi-trailer that would have uses such as sleeping, hygiene, a place to run a laptop, as well as a few other basic programmatic needs. I was fascinated with the use of the penrose pattern. By manipulating surface points I could create structure as well as other programmatic needs. Axonometric Detail


Handle Detail

Plan w/ Air Flow

Front Elevation

Isometric Detail

Back Elevation

Isometric Overview


Programmatic Diagram

synergyPOD ARCH 410 Fall 2012 By manipulating the pattern I was able to create doors, handles, windows, as well as structural components and vent openings for natural air circulation. By having the undulating exterior surface, I was able to reduce the amount of interior structure needed to support the pod. Programmatic I continued the use of the pattern to create a combination bed/desk as well as storage and a sink. I also included an adjustable solar panel on the roof in order to create electricity for each pod to use. 1/8� Section Model



14TH AND WASHINGTON ST. ST. LOUIS, MO

Final Site Plan

Site Location Map

urbanHEALTH tower I-70

ARCH 411:Urbanism Studio Spring 2013 - 8 week project Based in St. Louis, the studio project focused on how a specific health issue could be alleviated by urban form. At the start of the semester, I focused my health issue on lung issues. After doing some initial research, I was interested in how the built form could somehow alleviate the pollution in the environment caused by nearby coal plants.

edward jones dome fourtee nth st

washing ton ave

union station

scottrade center I-68

gateway arch

busch stadium

Main Roads and Metro Map

After visiting St. Louis, the studio located a site on the very edge of the downtown. We were then tasked with developing a master plan for five sites that were either undeveloped or underdeveloped at the time.


OPEN BELOW

OPEN BELOW OPEN BELOW

N

Building Massing Diagrams

OPEN BELOW

N

OPEN BELOW

OPEN BELOW

Second Floor Plan

OPEN BELOW

Balcony Level Floor Plan

Garden Level Floor Plan

N OPEN BELOW

OPEN BELOW

Thirteenth Floor Plan

N

Fourteenth Floor Plan

Roof Plan

Building Floor Diagram


PHASE 1.0 PROGRAM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE HEALTH RETAIL MULTI MODAL TRANSIT AREA PLAZA SPACE/GREEN ROOF

Site Massing Diagrams

urbanHEALTH tower ARCH 411 Spring 2013 We were given specific requirements for the amount of program required on the site and also had to respond to a proposed rail stop at the corner of our site. After developing initial massings for all five buildings, we were then asked to further develop a single 80’ section that cut across out proposed site. As part of the 80’ developed section, I focused on a large corner residential tower. To address my health concern of lung issues, I focused on creating large amounts of green space both within and around the building as well as investigated air circulation methods. Plaza Rendered View



EAR

925’

TH

WY

Mopac Future Extension

Mopac Bike Trail

0

I-8

HAVELOCK AVE

84TH ST

I-180

Final Site Plan CORNHUSKER HWY

ADAMS ST

Fleming Fields

Clinton Elementary P ELO NT

Trago Park

CA

PIT AL

Nebraska State Capitol

WAY

PK

W

Y

Woods Park

East High School

K ST

O ST

Antelope Valley Park

Piedmont Park

Site Location Analysis CA

PIT AL

A ST

A ST

PK

W

Y

VINE ST

VINE ST

O ST

O ST

I was interested in a type of housing called Small lot subdivision which typically involves taking a single lot and dividing into three separate smaller lots. From this initial investigation, I then created a larger development plan for three blocks in Lincoln. BLVD

9TH ST

10TH ST

L ST

N ANTELOPE DR

O ST

Downtown District

48TH ST

O ST

Culler Middle School

Hartley Neighborhood Park

27TH ST

16TH ST

Haymarket District

Univeristy of Nebraska - LIncoln

HOLDREGE ST

Bethany Park

VINE ST

COTN ER

R ED

Peter Pan Park

VINE ST

This project focused on creating a new housing type within the city of Lincoln. Currently the housing stock consists of typical suburban housing with 20 units per acre. Typical urban housing has a density of 80 units per acre so we focused on creating this mid condition. The project required research not only on different housing types, but also real world values for the Gateway Mall projects. HOLDREGE ST

Y ST

SITE #1

84TH ST

HOLDREGE ST

NA

CR

D

KR

EE

LT

SA

WY

ARCH 510:Research Studio Fall 2013 - 10 week project 70TH ST

Pentzr Park

COTNER BLVD

C

University of Nebraska - Lincoln East Campus

48TH ST

LT

SA

KR

E RE

27TH ST

Innovation CampusDWY

Oak Creek Park

ADAMS ST

paraURBAN housing

HUSKER HWY

A PARKS

70TH ST

WY

RH

KE

US

NH

R CO

TOUZAIN AVE

48TH ST

27TH ST

14TH ST

Mopac Bike Trail

N27TH ST.

LE H

WY

RH

KE

US

NH

R CO

27th Street Commercial vDistrict

70TH ST

56TH ST

27TH ST

14TH ST

4.75 Acres Assessed Value: $1,385,200 Current Tax Value: $27,967.19

250’

POSSIBLE SITE #1


1-2

1-1

Lot 1-3

1-5.2

Lot 1-4

Lot 1-5

1-5.1 Lot 1-5

2-1 Lot 1-6

1-5.3

2-2

1-5.4 2-3

RAILROAD LOT

Axonometric Overview


Lot 3-3

RAILROAD LOT

Lot 3-3

Lot 4-8

Lot 4-7

4-6

4-5

4-2

4-4

3-2

Lot 2-4

4-3

4-1

Lot 3-1

Lot 4-9

RAILROAD LOT

Lot 2-5

Lot 4-10

Lot 3-4

Lot Value Map

Lot Value Analysis Final Lots Lot 2-5 Lot 3-1 Lot 3-2 Lot 3-3 Lot 3-4 Lot 4-1 Lot 4-2 Lot 4-3 Lot 4-4 Lot 4-5 Lot 4-6

Address 945 N 23rd St 2301 Y St 1025 N 24th St 1014 N 23rd St 932 N 23rd St 2405 Y St 1020 N 24th St 2411 Y St 2415 Y St 2427 Y St 2435 Y St

Area 0.90 Acres 0.77 Acres 0.12 Acres 0.54 Acres 0.60 Acres 0.16 Acres 0.06 Acres 0.07 Acres 0.15 Acres 0.15 Acres 0.15 Acres

$Price $101,500 $308,300 $57,800 $64,500 $135,000 $25,000 $65,900 $51,100 $25,500 $25,500 $25,500

5.03 Acres

$481,600

$1,000/Acre $113 $400 $481 $119 $225 $156 $1,098 $730 $170 $170 $170

Lot 4-7 2449 Y St 0.15 Acres $17,800 $118 Lot 4-8 2545 Y St 1.08 Acres $129,800 $120 Lot 4-9 1012 N 25th St 1.35 Acres $590,000 $437 Lot 4-10 939 N 26th St 0.30 Acres $145,600 $485 Total 6.55 Acres $1,768,800 $270,050/Acre Vacated Railroad Lot

$95,750/Acre

Totals 11.58 Acres $2,250,400 $194,340/Acre

paraURBAN housing ARCH 510 Fall 2013 For the larger community plan, I focused on creating public spaces for all of the different units. I also focused on creating multiple types of units that would serve different types of units. While the preferred demographic I was looking at was young professionals who could work close by or at the university, I provided larger units that could support small families. My site location was directly adjacent to the Mopac Bike trail that runs east and west through Lincoln, so a large amenity for my site was the access the bike trail provided.


Interior Courtyard Render

West Elevation

South Elevation


BATHROOM

BEDROOM

B

A

B

A

B

A A

BEDROOM

A

MASTER BEDROOM

A

MASTER BEDROOM

BATHROOM

BATHROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

1st Floor Plan

2nd Floor Plan

BATHROOM

3rd Floor Plan

paraURBAN housing ARCH 510 Fall 2013 The final phase of the project included the development of three of the units within the larger community development. The first floor of the units for all of the units included a garage. The smaller unit then also included a kitchen and living room space on the first floor with two bedrooms up above. The larger units have space for a family room with the living and kitchen on the 2nd floor and the bedrooms located on the third floor.

Interior Render

For all of the units, focus was given on trying to enliven the public space in the courtyard and making that inviting as possible. However, the units still maintain privacy with the bedrooms all on upper floors as well as no shared walls between the units.



THESIS PROJECT Fall 2014 - Spring 2015 (IN PROGRESS)


Buildings change. Architects design them as if they shouldn’t. What if architects changed that?


Sk

in

(2

0

Ye

ar

STUFF

Can be influenced by the architect or interior designers but ultimately is decided by the tenants.

SPACE PLAN

Determined by collaborating between the architect and the tenant and will be constantly influenced later by the tenant

SERVICES

Determined by architect and engineers and are influenced by space plan

SKIN

Skin is placed on the structure and usually responds to the interior program

STRUCTURE

Architect determines the structure at the beginning and it effects everything else about the building

s)

Stuff (1-5 Years)

Space Plan (3-7 Years) Services (7-15 Years) Structure (30-300 Years)

SITE

SITE

Stewart Brand Six Layers of Buildings

Architect can only minimally affect the site

Stewart Brand Six Layers of Buildings

changingPERMANENCE ARCH 613-614 Fall 2014/Spring 2015

LEFT: ca. 1955 - The building was originally built as a garage and featured wide windows to provide natural lighting. RIGHT: ca. 1925 - The interior of the garage was wide and spacious allowing for maximum flexibility.

Architecture and buildings are looked at as “permanent” and “stable” objects within society, and yet almost everything about them change over their lifetime. All the individual pieces that make up a building are replaced, renovated, or upgraded as time goes on and still the building as the whole remains. This interesting dynamic of a static object containing a constantly changing system is something often overlooked within the design process. Thesis Statement: Create a resilient, dynamic and pre-adaptive building system designed to contain multiple changing programs over time.


Domino System

Domino System

Structure and Stairs Concrete slabs supported by minimal number of thin, reinforced concrete columns on edges. Stairs located on edges of space to allow for complete freedom in the plan. Interior Walls With the load supported by the concrete columns, the interior walls can be arranged in anyway as they are free from the loadbearing capacity.

Domino System Developed by Le Corbusier in 1914-15 that originally started as a platform for the mass production of housing.

Pre-Adaptive System

Facade Again freed from any sort of structural load, the facade was free to become whatever it wanted giving the architect more freedom.

Pre-Adaptive System

Structure and Stairs Structure is supported by load bearing columns. The stairs are moved into the interior to create an extended-point access system. This allows for greater flexibility in program across a floor. Interior Walls Interior walls are entirely flexible in their placement in order to support the different programmatic requirements. This allows for a greater customization of the individual tenant spaces.

Pre-Adaptive System In ways, it is similar to Domino System in terms of the structure though it is meant to do vastly different things.

Facade Still free from a structural component, the facades can reflect the interior program. As program changes over time, the exterior facade could also be changed out to reflect the new program.


UNIVERSITY DISTRICT

Building Evolution #1 Demand for Office space increases so building changes to fit those needs

DOWNTOWN

Seattle, WA

Building Evolution #2 Office and Retail is replaced by Residential

gradually

changingPERMANENCE ARCH 613-614 Fall 2014/Spring 2015 The majority of buildings today are made to suite the particular interests of the present with little thought given over to the needs of the future. This mentality has recently changed with the rise of sustainability and a continued interest in providing for the future.

Building Evolution #3 Uncontrolled by Owner, Tenant decides use after purchase/rent of certain amount of square footage

My investigation has looked at changing this way of thinking. I’ve investigated this not only through looking at past theory documents, but also by trying to implement my solutions in real world scenarios. Beginning in the spring, I’ve started to apply my initial thoughts to a site in Seattle, WA.


UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AREA OF FOCUS

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON


Scheme A Programmatic Massing

Site Map with Rail Stop Scheme B Programmatic Massing

changingPERMANENCE ARCH 613-614 Fall 2014/Spring 2015 Within Seattle, I located a site next to the university where a lot of growth is expected in the next five years. However, Seattle and planners are not sure what this growth might look like, so a pre-adaptive building that is capable of changing with minimum construction would work well in this area.

Scheme C Programmatic Massing

Within this area, I’ve identified a number of potential sites all located within a 10 minute walk to a proposed rail stop that is expected to be completed in 2020. I then began to do simple massings and investigating what programmatic changes might happen over time.



Building Typical Floor Plans

45th Street

changingPERMANENCE

University Way

ARCH 613-614 Fall 2014/Spring 2015 As part of my investigations, I’ve also been interesting in implementing a point-access core system as this increases the flexibility of the building over time. Other investigations include beginning facade studies as well as a diagrammatic render that displays the sort of complex activity might exist within this new type of building.

University Way

Brooklyn Avenue TO LINK STATION

12thAvenue 12th Avenue

11th Avenue 45th Street

47th Street Brooklyn Avenue TO FARMERS MARKET

47th Street 11th Avenue

47th Street

Facade Scheme Render

45th Street

Site Plan

This semester, I will continue to investigate this system through a fully designed building that investigates not only programmatic changes, but also mechanical and facade changes and how developers and architects might use this pre-adaptive building system to create longer lasting and more permanent buildings.



1944 SW 27th ST Apt 355 Lincoln NE 68528 mattkreutzr@gmail.com 1944 308SW 991 27th 5930

St Apt 355 Lincoln, NE 68522 mattkreutzr@gmail.com 308 991 5930

matthewKREUTZER

academicINFORMATION professional and educationGOALS

UNIVERSITY OFBachelor NEBRASKA - LINCOLN I earned my of Science in Design with Distinction from the University of Nebraska - Lincoln and will be completing Bachelor of Science in Design with Distinction - Graduated May 2013 motivated individual, Undergraduate GPA: 3.76/4.00 my Master’s of Architecture Degree this coming May. As a highly I have always strived to Master’s of Architecture Expected Graduation May 2015 Graduate GPA: 3.68/4.00 push myself and my designs to the highest standards. Looking towards my professional career, I look forward to becoming professional accredited as well as looking to gain LEED accreditation as well. As I continue in both my education and design career, I wish to expand on the idea that design is the way to improve the academicAWARDS human experience. Regents Scholaship Top Scholars Scholarship Architecture College Dean’s List University Honors Program Mary Roelf’s Scholarship H. Simpson Culpen Scholarship academicINFORMATION College of Architecture Faculty Achievement Award UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN Undergraduate GPA: 3.76/4.00 Bachelor of Science in Design with Distinction

jobEXPERIENCE

May 2013

Master’s of Architecture Expected Graduation 2015 CNTR. FOR SCI., MATH, & COMP.-ED. THE May CLARK ENERSEN PARTNERS Student Worker Architecture Intern 402 472 8965 402 477 6542 academicAWARDS 9/09 11/12 11/12 - Present Regents Scholaship Architecture College Dean’s List

Mary Roelf’s Scholarship softwareEXPERTISE

CollegePROGRAMS of Architecture Faculty Achievement DESIGN Rhinoceros 5.0 AwardRevit AutoCAD ADOBE PROGRAMS Illustrator InDesign Photoshop MICROSOFT PROGRAMS Word Excel PowerPoint organizations/ACTIVITIES

Graduate GPA: U. OF3.68/4.00 NEBRASKA - LINCOLN Graduate Teaching Asst. 402 472 9212 9/13 - Present Top Scholars Scholarship

University Honors Program H. Simpson Culpen Scholarship 3DS Max

Sketchup

College of Architecture Teaching Assistant for DSGN 123 Computers in Design

jobREFERENCES College of Architecture Student Advisory Board Member

Tau Sigma Delta Vice President JEFF CHADWICK, AIA, LEED® AP LINDSEY AUGUSTYN STEVE HARDY Co-Director of Freedom by Design as part of AIAS (American Institute of Architecture Students) Senior Principal Event Coordinator Associate Professor PastClark President andPartners Founding Member of Soap Carving Club Registered Student Organization) The Enersen Cntr. for (UNL Sci. Math, & Comp. Ed. Univ. of Nebraska - Lincoln 402 477 9291 402 472 8965 402 742 9235 jeff.chadwick@clakenersen.com laugustyn@unlnotes.unl.edu shardy4@unl.edu jobEXPERIENCE


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.