Ryanpayneobjectto626trialdelay

Page 1

Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 1899 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender State Bar No. 11479 BRENDA WEKSLER State Bar No. 8124 Assistant Federal Public Defender RYAN NORWOOD Assistant Federal Public Defender 411 E. Bonneville Avenue, Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577/Phone (702) 388-6261/Fax Ryan_Norwood@fd.org

8 9

Attorneys for Ryan W. Payne

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12 13

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

14 15 16 17

Case No. 2:16-cr-046-GMN-PAL

v. RYAN W. PAYNE,

DEFENDANT RYAN W. PAYNE’S MOTION TO COMMENCE HIS TRIAL NO LATER THAN JUNE 26, 2017

Defendant.

18 19

Certification: This Motion is timely filed.

20

COMES NOW the defendant, Ryan W. Payne, by and through his counsel of record,

21

Ryan Norwood and Brenda Weksler, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, and hereby files this

22

Motion to Commence His Trial No Later than June 26, 2017.

23 24 25 26


Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 1899 Filed 04/25/17 Page 2 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

DATED this 25th day of April, 2017. RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender By: /s/ Brenda Weksler BRENDA WEKSLER Assistant Federal Public Defender By: /s/ Ryan Norwood RYAN NORWOOD Assistant Federal Public Defender

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2


Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 1899 Filed 04/25/17 Page 3 of 6

POINTS AND AUTHORTIES

1 2

Less than a week ago, and following a joint request by both the government and several

3

defendants including Ryan Payne, this Court set a trial date for the “Tier 1” defendants for June

4

26, 2017. 1 ECF 1872. A calendar call date was set for May 25, 2017. Id.

5

On Monday, April 24, 2017, the Court declared a mistrial in the “Tier 3 trial,” after the

6

jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on most of the counts, despite deliberating for

7

more than a week and being given an “Allen charge.” Immediately thereafter, the Court set a

8

retrial date for the Tier 3 defendants for June 26, 2017, and a calendar call date for May 25,

9

2017. ECF 1887. The Court has not vacated the date for the Tier 1 defendants. As such, there

10

are now two different groups of defendants with calendar calls and trials set for the same day.

11

Payne moves this Court to rule that Payne’s trial will commence no later June 26, 2017,

12

notwithstanding whatever may happen with other defendants in Tier 1 and 3.

13

government noted in its motion to set a trial date for the Tier 1 defendants (ECF 1837), a

14

definitive trial date is necessary for the parties’ planning, which includes complying with the

15

discovery schedule set by the Court and subpoenaing numerous witnesses. It would not be

16

reasonable to wait – for example – until calendar call on May 25, 2017, barely a month before

17

trial, to determine who will and will not be proceeding to trial in June. The Court should clarify

18

this matter immediately.

As the

19

Nor would it be reasonable to further delay Mr. Payne’s trial. As Payne has represented

20

throughout these proceedings, the delay in his trial up to this date is already unreasonable. This

21

Court had originally set this case for trial in February 2017, nearly a year after Payne’s

22

indictment, over his objection.

23

government’s belated request to sever the co-defendants into three groups, the Court ruled that

24

Tier 3 defendants would be tried first, and that Payne’s Tier 1 trial would commence 30 days

Just a few months before that date, and following the

25 26

1

Payne has joined Cliven Bundy’s objection to this date, in which he requests trial to be held no later than June 5, 2017, the date originally suggested by the government. 3


Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 1899 Filed 04/25/17 Page 4 of 6

1

after the conclusion of that trial. ECF 1098. In fact, the Court set a trial date out more than 60

2

days after that trial ended. ECF 1872. Payne has remained in custody the entire time. Payne

3

objects to any further delay, which he contends would violate his right to a speedy trial. Payne

4

would particularly object to having his trial date placed in “limbo” until the Tier 3 trial resolves

5

in a verdict. There is no reason why a second trial for that Tier would be any more likely to

6

result in a verdict than the first trial.

7

The Court has various means at its disposal to ensure Payne has a speedy trial. It could

8

consolidate Payne in a single trial with any defendants who wish to proceed to trial on June

9

26th. All of the defendants in Tier 1 and 3, of course, are charged in the same indictment, and

10

were originally joined for a single trial at the government’s insistence. It could prioritize

11

Payne’s trial based on his repeated and consistent invocation of his speedy trial rights. Or the

12

Court could direct that two trials take place simultaneously -- a procedure which would be

13

convenient for the numerous overlapping witnesses in this cases. At this point, Mr. Payne’s

14

right to a speedy trial must trump any inconvenience that any trial procedure would cause for

15

the Court and/or the government.

16 17 18 19 20 21

CONCLUSION Mr. Payne respectfully asks that this Court: (1) Confirm that his trial will commence no later than June 26, 2017, irrespective of what might happen with regard to any co-defendant (2) Hold a prompt status hearing to resolve the trial procedures for the two cases that are currently set to commence trial on June 26, 2017

22 23 24 25 26

4


Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 1899 Filed 04/25/17 Page 5 of 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

DATED this 25th day of April, 2017. Respectfully submitted, RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender By: /s/ Brenda Weksler BRENDA WEKSLER Assistant Federal Public Defender By: /s/ Ryan Norwood RYAN NORWOOD Assistant Federal Public Defender

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

5


Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 1899 Filed 04/25/17 Page 6 of 6

CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE

1 2

The undersigned hereby certifies that she is an employee of the Federal Public Defender

3

for the District of Nevada and is a person of such age and discretion as to be competent to serve

4

papers.

5

That on April 25, 2017, she served an electronic copy of the above and foregoing

6

DEFENDANT RYAN W. PAYNE’S MOTION TO COMMENCE HIS TRIAL NO

7

LATER THAN JUNE 26, 2017 by electronic service (ECF) to the persons named below:

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

STEVEN W. MYHRE Acting United States Attorney ERIN M. CREEGAN Assistant United States Attorney NADIA JANJUA AHMEN Assistant United States Attorney NICHOLAS DICKINSON Assistant United States Attorney 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89101 /s/ Lauren Pullen Employee of the Federal Public Defender

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

6


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.