Actual prosecutions very unlikely

kidnapping, specifically the section on bringing someone into the state against their will.

Newsom also made noise last year when requesting the federal government investigate the previous flights, but so far, the U.S. Department of Justice has not made public any such investigation.

Immigrant advocates said on Monday that the human consequences of federal inaction last year are arriving tired and hungry in Sacramento this week.

“I think it was a mistake to dismiss these flights as a stunt in September,” said immigration and border consultant Chris Rickerd.

“It was a mistake not to stop the escalation then.”

A spokesperson for California Attorney General Rob Bonta told The Associated Press that the migrants were transported through a program run by Florida’s Division of Emergency Management and carried out by the same contractor paid by the state of Florida to fly migrants from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard in September.

“While we continue to collect evidence, I want to say this very clearly: Statesanctioned kidnapping is not a public policy choice, it is immoral and disgusting,” Bonta said in a statement.

Brian Hofer, an attorney and executive director of the Oakland-based nonprofit Secure Justice, which advocates against what the organization deems to be state and corporate overreach, said the legal ground is “messy” for determining charges, much less where to file them.

“You took people from one state, on flights which are funded by another state, dropped them off in a third state, and you’re going to say they were coerced or taken under threat of force?” Hofer said.

“What court do you bring that in?

“It’s just a mess. The legal ground is certainly messy.”

Mark Meuser, a San Francisco-based constitutional and election law attorney, disputed Newsom’s legal reasoning in a tweet on Monday.

“Can you please cite one Florida law that prohibits the transportation of individuals who are in this country illegally to a sanctuary state?” wrote Meuser, a Republican who ran against U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla in last November’s election.

Justice Department?

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre called the flights “dangerous and unacceptable” on Monday, but the Biden administration’s response to previous migrant flights has been, at the very least, out of public view.

Newsom in September asked the U.S. Justice Department to investigate whether the flights could be considered kidnapping under state laws. If they could, he wrote, then the U.S. Justice Department should get involved because they could be considered violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

In September, Rachael Rollins, former U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, pledged to “look long and hard” at potential charges. But Rollins has since resigned, and it’s unclear where that investigation led. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Massachusetts did not return calls from CalMatters on Monday.

DeSantis’s office also didn’t return calls and emails from CalMatters.

Florida’s Republican-controlled legislature has set aside $12 million for the migrant flights.

Bonta, as California’s attorney general, also didn’t file state charges related to those September flights, and it’s unclear what would be different this time. Bonta did not respond to requests for comment from CalMatters.

Newsom’s office released a statement late Monday that expressed support for Bonta’s investigation into the flights.

“As to specific charges and laws that may have been violated, that will ultimately be determined by the attorney general’s office,” Newsom spokesperson Daniel Lopez wrote.

It’s one thing to know the planes came from Florida and another to connect those flights directly to DeSantis. But at least one investigation into that connection is continuing, as the sheriff in Bexar County, Texas, has turned over the results of a criminal investigation into DeSantis for his alleged role in transporting 49 migrants from San Antonio to Martha’s Vineyard last year.

The Texas Tribune reports that the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office recently filed several counts of unlawful restraint, both misdemeanors and felonies as a result of the investigation, but didn’t name individual suspects. The investigation has been turned over to the Bexar County District Attorney.

Sacramento surprised California was caught unaware by the latest arrivals, who were diverted to a small airport in the city and met by local outreach groups and law enforcement.

Sacramento County spokesperson Kim Nava said the migrants left from Texas and changed planes in tiny Deming, N.M., before arriving in California.

“The county did not know the flight was coming in,” she said. “We don’t have communication (with the state of Texas) at this time.”

Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg said the migrants were being used as “political pawns.” He said he’s focused on “making sure the people who landed here are cared for, and that’s our job.”

Steinberg, a Democrat who is considering a run for attorney general, said he supported a review of whether criminal charges should be filed.

“I mean, I think we ought to, you know, await the result of an investigation, but certainly, an investigation into potential criminal culpability is warranted,” he said.

Each of the migrants carried a clear plastic bag, inside of which were papers directing them to immigration courts, some as far away as Chicago, according to an advocacy group that has been supporting them. Landing in California could make it more difficult for those individuals to reach their court appearances.

“So they’re not even trying to get them closer to families or closer to their court,” said Lydia Guzman, national immigration chair for The League of United Latin American Citizens. “This is all politics.”

Guzman said the organization also demanded action from the federal government in September.

“We inquired with the (U.S.) Department of Justice, we wanted them to look at who was behind all of this,” Guzman said. “We never heard back from DOJ on this issue.” of Special Assistant to Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken.

“While serving in county government during the pandemic, I saw how Yolo County can come together to take care of one another and prioritize the most vulnerable – if we have the political will to do so,” De Loera-Brust. “But right now, it seems that some in our town are worse off than ever. Pandemic-era programs are expiring. Hunger is growing. Evictions are rising. Whole populations in our community feel excluded or unheard. Too many families are being priced out of their own American Dreams.”

In his federal government career he has worked on the second impeachment of President Trump in the aftermath of January 6th, on bipartisan immigration reform legislation and investigations into abuses of migrant children in Border Patrol custody, and on multiple foreign policy crises including the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

He also has experience serving in Yolo County government, serving as an emergency hire Latino Outreach Specialist for Yolo County’s Covid Response Operations Center (CROC) from March 2020 through April 2021. During this time he helped advocate for, plan, and implement Yolo County’s successful farmworker vaccination campaign which saw over 80% of Yolo County farmworkers vaccinated by April of 2021. He currently works for the United Farm Workers labor union and is involved in several ongoing farmworker unionization campaigns.

If elected Supervisor for District 4, he would be the youngest County Supervisor in Yolo County history as well as the first Latino elected in this district.

De Loera-Brust identifies his top priorities as strengthening and expanding Yolo County’s social safety net, increasing the availability and affordability of housing, and making county government more attentive and responsive, especially to underserved and marginalized communities.

“Yolo County needs to change course,” he said. “I believe in smart growth, a strong social safety net, and in diverse and inclusive government. Above all, I promise to fight my heart out for workers, immigrants, families, and the most vulnerable among us — on every issue, every day, every time.

“From the high cost of housing, to the persistent and entrenched hunger and poverty, to the looming impacts of the climate crisis, Yolo County has big challenges. But I also believe there is nothing wrong with Yolo County that can't be addressed with what's good in Yolo County — our people, our values, our resources, and our belief in the power of government to make life better. Together, we can build a Yolo County in which nobody is left behind.”

The election will be to replace the retiring Jim Provenza, who announced in late April that after 45 years in public service; he will not seek re-election. Sheila Allen, Provenza’s current deputy, is also running for the District 4 position.

The district includes Davis east of F Street, the area north of Covell Boulevard and east of Highway 113, El Macero, and the unincorporated areas to the south and east of town.