8 minute read
Identified shortcomings adversely impact safe chemical management
"A rule of government is never look into anything you don't have to, never start an enquiry unless you know what its findings will be" Sir Humphrey Appleby
Advertisement
The latest independent review into WorkSafe NZ’s ability to carry out its regulatory responsibilities for an increasingly diverse range of workplace health and safety issues finds a growing gap between public expectations and WorkSafe outcomes.
Responding to WorkSafe NZ seeking additional funding to carry out its role, the just released 2021 WorkSafe Strategic Baseline Review commissioned by MBIE concluded the organisation will never have the resources to effectively undertake the everwidening range of duties relating to ensuring safe and healthy workplaces.
The report commended WorkSafe for progress achieved since its inception following the Pike River Mine tragedy but found problems in the organisation’s ability to undertake its regulatory role, beginning with not having a clear strategy for achieving it.
The report found the organisation cannot clearly describe what it does, nor assess the effectiveness of its many interventions. There is no clear promulgation of WorkSafe’s core responsibilities to secure buy-in from key stakeholders.
Of particular interest to the chemical industry was the recommendation that WorkSafe would be more effective by involving industry sector stakeholders.
WorkSafe diverts already scarce resources to meet ever-changing Ministerial priorities and increasingly diverse ‘wellbeing’
demands.
Engaging with proactive industry associations to help develop and implement effective workplace health and safety strategies and practices, reducing demand for WorkSafe involvement, would allow limited capability and funding to be better applied.
A timely example highlighted in the review is the finding that WorkSafe is struggling with the regulatory responsibility to develop and maintain codes of practice and guidance material.
The former NZ Chemical Industry Council (now Responsible Care NZ) was one of three ‘midwives’ at the birth of the much-loved Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) legislation.
A key industry contribution was the suite of enforceable Approved HSNO Codes of Practice (ACoPs) which comprehensively answered the “Just tell me what to do and how to do it” requirements of chemical suppliers, their customers, the regulators and the enforcement agencies.
Chemical industry RCNZ ACoPs, developed with the rigour required of international Standards, provide the industry best practice performance standards required for training, compliance and enforcement.
Our HSNO Code Committees included representation from every user group, particularly the relevant regulatory bodies, validated by extensive consultation with stakeholders.
WorkSafe NZ publications intended to provide ‘good practice’ compliance solutions include ‘Quick
Guides’, technical guidelines, good practice guides and even the allimportant ‘approved codes’.
While reflecting the best practice intentions and even the content of our HSNO ACoPs, none of the present WorkSafe chemical-related
guidance material has been developed in collaboration with Responsible Care NZ.
Routinely declining RCNZ offers to help improve national chemical safety by contributing our collective and increasingly unique expertise, frustrates our members who are grappling with complex and often controversial compliance requirements. These range from clarifying compliance options to obtaining authoritative advice from risk-averse officials.
Responsible Care NZ continues to seek a mutually beneficial partnership with each of the nine government agencies
involved in safe chemical management, most of which continue to work in isolation from an industry sector they serve.
Returning to proven, international best practice, whereby industry sectors produce and maintain user-
friendly, performance-based codes of practice developed in conjunction with, and accepted by, the authorities, enables PCBUs, their workers, contractors and customers to successfully achieve their conflicting compliance obligations.
Importantly, endorsement and acceptance of industry codes of practice enables the training of industry certifiers and enforcement agencies, delivering common understanding and interpretation. Acknowledging the benefit of this proven yet abandoned approach, would relieve pressure on WorkSafe resources.
The government is proposing to implement an Infringement Offence scheme to incentivise compliance with increasingly confounding regulations.
It is always disappointing when threats and penalties are the government’s first response when attempting to improve workplace health and safety performance, especially when industry has solutions to offer.
Business operators’ needs for safely managing the chemicals present in every workplace are simple and bear repeating: “Just tell me what I have to do and how to do it and I will do it.”
Accepting user-friendly, performance-based codes, produced by industry for industry and accepted by the authorities, is a pragmatic solution to at least part of WorkSafe NZ’s woes. With apologies the the Bard “A code, an approved code – my kingdom for an industry approved code!”
“Never set up an enquiry unless you know in advance what the findings will be.” -Sir Humphrey Appleby.
“A code, an approved code – my kingdom for an industry approved code!” -With apologies to the Bard
Responsible Care New Zealand (RCNZ)
Barry Dyer is the Chief Executive of Responsible Care New Zealand (formerly the NZ Chemical Industry Council). One of 65 chemical associations worldwide implementing the UN endorsed Responsible Care® Safety, Health and Environmental Protection initiative, RCNZ provides a comprehensive range of unique products and services to encourage, enable and verify the safe management of hazardous substances and dangerous goods.
Email: info@responsiblecarenz.com Website: www.responsiblecarenz.com Phone: 04 499 4311
sUMMeR 2022
Advertisers & Supporters
Rapid Facility Services PH7 ATG AMAAS
totalenergies.co.nz
Responsible Care NZ
Safety Nets NZ Optimum Training
Quest Cancer Society
Telarc TotalEnergies
Core Logic
JLL New Zealand Site Safe REINZ AUTODESK
Guaranteed Performance
N E W G E N E R AT I O N
Expol InEight APS Equipment Bastion
Content Partners
SLAB 200 The Evolution of
EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BOARD HIGH PERFORMANCE 200kPa RATED SHARING INSULATION FOR CONCRETE SLABSKNOWLEDGEPhilip Cryer, CEO, Telarc Barry Dyer, Chief Executive, Responsible Care NZ EN388:2016 Certified
Safety Gloves
Andy Cunningham, Autodesk Senior Regional Director Australia & NZ
Adrienne Miller, General Manager NZ, Infrastructure Sustainability Council
Window and Glass Association NZ Civil Contractors New Zealand
SLABX200 is EXPOL’s new generation high performance Expanded Polystyrene Board specifically designed to deliver high compressive strength and Daily news improve insulation under concrete slabs. It delivers an uncompromised compressive strength of updates 200kPa @ 10% deformation and exceptional Insulation Values. Specifically engineered for residential and commercial projects, online its high performance gives engineers and specifiers peace of mind while increasing the thermal performance of a building. SLABX200’s durable nature means it will not degrade over time, keeping its integrity for the life of the structure.
Superior Hand 3.0 R-VALUE Protection
200kPa @100mm Please contact our experienced team for specialist product advice. Get our FREE newsletter emailed to you each week
Contents
2 No better investment than chemical safety training 4 Identified shortcomings adversely impact safe chemical management 8 What employers need to know about Fair Pay Agreements 12 Pay cuts and redundancies – how a company lost $280k 13 Battery fire in underground storage 14 The explosive risks working with heat-pumps, aircons & fridges 16 The great unlearning 18 Hydraulics that bump in the night 20 Ensuring adequate respiratory protection 22 Business fined after modified machine kills worker 23 Another fine for unsafe machinery injury 24 Company prosecuted for subcontractor’s death 25 Sentencing sends a message to installers 26 Chemical safety relies on meaningful cooperation
28 Avoidable workplace death results in enforceable undertaking 30 The perfect combination of quality assurance, high stock levels and expertise 33 Safer, faster, multi-purpose telehandlers 35 Review proposes significant changes to local councils 36 Mayors propose simpler Three Waters alternative 39 Three Waters debate drowning out the real issue 40 Skills shortage to worsen by 38% in just six years 42 How the cloud can help fill job shortages 43 What is ‘quiet quitting’ and how do employers navigate it? 44 Recruiting and retaining the skills we need 45 Immigration policy changes welcomed by infrastructure sector 46 Compromises with little benefit at COP27 48 Sustainability rating tool gains traction 54 Future of inter-regional train travel in New Zealand 56 Fuel tax cut a wasted opportunity 60 Keeping your worksite safe this flu season 62 Repeating past mistakes of RMA 64 How BIM Will Impact Your Future Infrastructure Projects 66 Higher mortgages create hesitant housing market 70 ‘One bright light’ amidst housing market downturn
72 Commercial property market snapshot Q4 2022
75 Kiwi innovation leading the way in concrete slab insulation
76 New building code requirements come into effect
78 Hard work gets results
80 Third of homeowners not confident they are adequately insured
82 Health and Safety pre-qualification – where to next
Editor Michael Curreen +64 21 029 20234
michael@infrastructurebuild.com
Publisher Mike Bishara +64 27 564 7779
mike@infrastructurebuild.com
Graphic Designer Rachel Loo
rachel@infrastructurebuild.com
Published by Media Solutions Ltd PO Box 503, Whangaparaoa Auckland 0943 09 428 7456
Administration Manager Anita Feria +64 27 444 1573
anita@infrastructurebuild.com
Sales Manager Margie Lindsay +64 22 317 8170
margie@infrastructurebuild.com
Original material published online and in this magazine is copyright, but may be reproduced providing permission is obtained from the editor and acknowledgement given to Media Solutions. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and may not necessarily be those of Media Solutions Ltd.
