6 minute read

Where is housing most affordable in New Zealand?

The figure is up sharply from the 7.4 times recorded just three months ago and 6.6 times of 12 months ago. The longterm average is for property values to be 5.8 times the average annual household income.

Property values in Aotearoa rose 15% during the first six months of 2021, well ahead of the increase in gross average household income which rose 1.0%, illustrating the acute affordability challenges we face, CoreLogic NZ Chief Property Economist Kelvin Davidson says.

“Since our last Housing Affordability Report in late February, the New Zealand economy and property market have generally remained very buoyant.

“Even though mortgage rates have remained very low, albeit they’re now starting to rise, housing affordability has simply become worse, and that’s from an already stretched position.

“Those higher mortgage rates themselves will exacerbate the situation in

Where is housing most affordable?

The average property value in New Zealand is a record 7.9 times the average annual household income according to the latest CoreLogic Housing Affordability Report, though there is wide variation across the country

the coming months, albeit they should eventually aid affordability by dampening house prices.”

However Davidson says it’ll still plausibly take at least five years for housing affordability to adjust back to some kind of normality. Indeed, the Reserve Bank recently estimated that an adjustment phase could take as many as eight years.

The report also found it currently takes more than a decade to save a house deposit (10.6 years), beating the previous record high of 9.9 years, which was set in Q1 2021. It takes almost three years longer to save for a house deposit than the long-term average of 7.8 years.

On average, households who take out a new home loan spend 38% of their income on their mortgage repayments, compared to tenants, whose rental payments absorb 21% of household income. Despite historically low interest rates, average mortgage payments as a proportion of household income have increased from 32% a year ago.

“However, this is not to say that renting is easy either – indeed, that figure of 21% is also above average,” Davidson points out.

“It’s also worth noting that the typical income for a renting household may well be lower than the overall average, which would imply a much higher figure than 21% of their income being spent on accommodation costs.

Mortgage repayments are now back to levels not seen since early 2018, when typical fixed mortgage rates were much higher, above 5%.

These patterns of declining housing affordability have been seen right across the country, from the main centres down to the smaller rural areas. Of 66 main authorities, 49 currently have a value to income ratio at its highest recorded level, going back to 2004.

Looking at the mortgage

affordability measure, 43 of 66 areas are currently above average, despite low interest rates.

Affordability in New Zealand’s main centres

Tauranga and Auckland are New Zealand’s least affordable main centres, requiring 49% and 43% of gross household income 2 respectively, to service an average mortgage with an 80% loan to value ratio.

Despite ultra-low mortgage rates in the past three to six months, Hamilton households require 38% of their income to make payments, the highest level since just prior to the GFC in Q2 2008.

Similarly mortgage holders in Wellington spend 36% of their income on mortgage repayments and Dunedin households spend 39%.

Christchurch’s figure is comparatively low, albeit rising, at 28%.

Affordability outside New Zealand’s main centres

In each of the main urban areas of New Zealand (outside the main centres), the value to income ratio has deteriorated in recent years, and in fact for 11 of the 12 areas, it was at a record high in Q2 2021. In other words, affordability was the worst it’s been since at least 2004.

Only Queenstown bucked that trend, but not by much. Kapiti Coast (from 8.7 in Q1 2021 to 9.6) and Palmerston North (6.8 to 7.6) saw particularly large changes in Q2.

Even though property values have soared right across the country in the past year or so, some still have mortgage repayments as a % of gross household income that are below past norms – e.g. Queenstown and Whangarei, while New Plymouth (29%) is bang on its average.

However, Palmerston North, Napier, Whanganui, and Nelson all have mortgage servicing figures that are 8-9% points above normal – even though mortgage rates are low.

On the years to save a deposit measure, the figures across the main urban areas range from 6.8 in Invercargill up to 13.2 in Queenstown. However, each area is above its own average (i.e. affordability is worse than normal), especially again in Palmerston North and Kapiti.

Renting is still more affordable in Queenstown than normal (presumably reflecting the reduction in the hospitality workforce and reduced rental demand), but much more stretched in areas such as Nelson, Whanganui, and Napier. However, it’s also important to note that rental affordability has declined recently across all the main urban areas.

The Thames-Coromandel District is the least affordable area in the country, where houses are worth 15.3 times the average household income there.

Value to income ratio12 Auckland’s latest value to income reading was 9.1, which is high by national standards and also up sharply from 7.8 a year ago, but still a bit below the previous peak of 9.3 in Q4 2016. Once again, Christchurch has 1210 the lowest reading amongst the main centres (5.7), and is also a bit below the previous peak of 5.9 in Q2 2007 –but even there, affordability has still declined (a year ago Christchurch’s reading was only 4.8). On average, servicing a mortgage costs 74% of that income and saving for a deposit would take 20.4 years. Rent costs 30% of the average household income, second only to the Kaipara District at 33%. Westland stands as the most affordable area in the country in all regards. It has a value-to-income ratio of just 3.2. Saving for a deposit takes an average of 4.3 years and servicing a mortgage costs 16% of household income, on average. Renting costs only 14% of average household income. South Waikato and the Grey District aren’t too far behind in affordability either.

Hamilton

Affordability Outlook

Davidson says it’s conceivable that house prices have further to rise before

8 10 6 8 4 6 4 0 2 2004 2006 2008 2010 More affordable2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 0 2004 2006 4 Share of income required for payments 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Share of income required for payments flattening out, which could 80% see affordability metrics decline further in the next 70% 80% three to six months, particularly with the added threat 60% 70% of continued interest rate 50% 60% rises (which will serve to push up mortgage repay40% 50% ments in the near term before they eventually help 40% affordability by restraining 30% house prices). 30% “However, towards the 20% middle and later stages of 0% 10% 2004 2006 2008 0% 10% 20% 2004 2010 2006 2008 More affordable 2012 2014 2010 2016 2012 2018 2014 2020 2022 slower house price growth should allow for some improvement in affordability, especially as rising incomes in a squeezed 2016 2018 2020 labour market should help 11 11 those first home buyers trying to cobble together the deposit. “That said, even with housing supply expanding, a return to ‘normal’ for most affordability measures looks likely to be a long grind.”

Kelvin Davidson

Senior Research Analyst CoreLogic 027 355 3813 kelvin.davidson@corelogic.co.nz corelogic.co.nz

More affordable Auckland Hamilton Tauranga Wellington Christchurch Dunedin

More affordable

Tauranga Wellington Value to income ratio Christchurch Dunedin 12 10 8 6 2 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Share of income required for payments 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

11

More affordable Auckland Hamilton Tauranga Wellington Christchurch Dunedin

More affordable Auckland Hamilton Tauranga Wellington Christchurch Dunedin

This article is from: